Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

mahak

Members
  • Content Count

    1,615
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by mahak

  1. It doesnt matter if humans caused this problem or if it is a natural cycle. The absurdity is the denial by mostly fat (really fat obese unhealthy disgusting) amerikkkans that there is even a problem. Fact is, stupid folks wonder why so many homes are now burning when before, not so many homes were lost. It is because homes were built in areas where fires always occurred. But smog in LA basin was there when Junipero Serra was the travelling wilbury of california. Mt Pinatubo blew and deposited more greenhouse gasses in two weeks than those caused by every factory and car ever built. The world always changes, and intelligent folk change with it. Only disgusting fat folks with no mercy, no austerity, no cleanliness, no honesty, these are those who deny real science. These demons are quite pleased that the middle class families can no longer afford to take their campers out of their driveways and crowd up the sites and share showers with thier fat disgusting obese kids. Its not global warming, its global fat. The fatter amerikkans become, the bones of the toothpick people of the world become more pronounced. aloha pumehana, have a good doomsday, mad mahax the vulcan. Hey gHari, hope all is well with you
  2. World war began and never ended, and has been going on since the very beginning of time, when the human species lost their immortality. War is as natural as earthquakes and heart attacks. The idea of "World War" is a puffed up invention of amerikkka. I mean, ask anyone when world war two began, and most likely the response will be 12-7-41, when the Japanese attacked pearl harbor. But in fact, world war two began the second the truce of world war one went into effect. All the problems that will be cited as the reasons for WWIII have been brewing since the dawn of the industrial revolution, the late 1700s. Nixon said WWIII began with the 1978 Arab oil embargo. But War was involuntarily created by Lord Brahma, who was going to destroy his creation because they were overpopulating this planet. Lord Siva advised him to have mercy on humans, so He did, but when he did, a being named Martyadevi was created, and she was told to kill them all. Because she steadfastly refused to do this and walked away, her refusal made war, famine, disease, and all the things we think are responsible for death. Since that time, the intelligent know this place as Martyaloka, the place where everyone dies, and only fools cry over that fact. Hare Krsna, ys, mahaksadasa
  3. Nice try, theist, but kali yuga remains as a world of chaos, quarrel, and confusion. These three things are present especially in religious circles, so we have staunch disciples of Prabhupada who hate each other, and even if they like each other, their sub-gurus hate other sub-gurus, and it all goes to waste. As far as the aparadha trip goes, I have always been amazed when a neophyte calls another neophyte an offender. Duuuuhhhh!!! The definition of the kanistha adhikari stage of bhakti is "the offensive stage". I have never seen Vaisnava aparadha on these forums, never. All Ive seen is inquisitiveness mixed with arrogance of party spirit, defensiveness towards ones particular temporary philosophical fixation (say that three times fast). Just like the guy crying about how devotees continually decry sai baba, advaita, et al. Of course, we all decry everyone but who we want to impress, with what? I dont know. I cant be guru krpas boy unless I offend siddha. If I think rtvik is a crock of man-made, prabhupada cut and paste out of context run on sentences, the rtviks put me on the list of unfavorables, If I become rocana dasa's friend, the gurus of ISKCON will never accept me (whew, that was close, thanks for your friendship, rocana). Aparadha means one who is fixed up in Krsna Consciousness (madhyama adhikari) takes a very disturbing turn and suicidally gives up all common sense. Other than a few of us like Sri Paramadwaiti Swami and a few other rare commenters on these forums, this is a place for kanistha adhikaris. We are all, by design, offenders, but aparadha means falling down from an exalted platform, which we have never existed on. Srila (AC Bhaktivedanta Swami) Prabhupada was quite clear in his example. If he was fanatic about the Aparadha (like those who use the word as an end of debate weapon), he would have maybe three or four disciples. But he had thousands, so this means that he initiated offenders to the Holy Name by most foolish definitions used on the net. But Srila Prabhupada has faith (sraddha) in sadhana bhakti, knowing that sick folks, when taking medicine, gradually get better. Cure? Mauna, silence. Bettah yet, Harinama Samkirtana. Infection? Endless casting pearls before swine, preaching to the faithless, trying to get a member of leary's Brotherhood of Eternal Light to mellow out and chant, only to get their typical response "Naming it is gaming is brother". haribol, ys, mahaksadasa
  4. Yeah, cow pies are not filthy places. Shrooms arent really that good, anyway. Even magic ones make the user barf usually, so the body is trying to tell us something, just like the first hit of smack or the first drag off a tobacco cigarette. What is miserable at first but then becomes good, this is the mode of goodness. What is good at first, but then is miserable is the mode of passion. That which is miserable from the start to the finish is tamasic. I put shrooms in that catagory, especially the health food nuts' favorite gross drink, kambucha. Kim chee, boca burgers, all that stuuff is not palateable, i wouldnt offer it to my dog let alone god. Ketchup, this is the best thing to offer a dog. put it on his pile, no more pile, but never let them lick ya, never know where that tongue lashed last. mahak
  5. I was going to publish a picture of an old indian to show contrast of bodies and how the form doesnt have anything to do with anything, so to see the old indian, scroll down
  6. there is no Vaisnavism without the scribe, Lord Ganesha. Without philosophy, one just has sentiment, flakey nonsense easily disturbed by a reefer or other such diversions. Lord Vyasadeva used the talent of the One who removes all obstacles and impediments to spiritual life to produce the Veda. It is not only absurd to deny Lord Siva, Ganesha, Gangamayi, and suicidal to one attempting to be a so called devotee of Krsna, it demonstrates the number one flaw in spiritual life as described by Srila Bhaktivinode Thakur, party spirit sectarianism and the abhorent religiosity demanded to be abandoned by Lord Krsna Himself. Krsna worships Siva. Not that one is superior to the other, rather they have a relationship of transcendence, which is what is worshippable. This is why christianity is not valid as it stands as a religion, because Jesus is worshipped instead of the Father under the false doctrine that they are one and the same. Thus, vaisnavism cannot be seen without the key element of that which is worshippable, devotional service, bhakti yoga. The christian religionist neglects the existance of the sweet relationship between Father and son, thus rejects both the father and the son. Same goes for the neophyte who thinks they follow some directive against worshipping demigods by always vilifying Lord Shiva, Sri, Ganesha, etc. Such folks have completely misunderstood the teaching, as the relationship between ganesha, siva, ganga with the various incarnations and fountainhead of Visnutattwa is never duplicitous, never immersed in materialism that the decree against worshipping demigods is specifiaclly designed for. For those who need a clue, demigod worship is only forbidden because of motive. In that sense, Krsna worship is also forbidden, as so many teachings of Lord Chaitanya decry such false krsna worship with equal vehemense (i.e. smarta brahmanism, et al). The motive of the worshipper is always at play. A vaisnava can worship Ganesha, in fact, must worship ganesha. Ganesha is the first, without Ganesha, there is no entry into devotional service, no veda, no mahabharata, no Ramayana, no vedic culture whatsoever. All glories to the gatekeeper, Lord Ganesha, whose only mistake ever was not not recognize his Father, Lord Siva. Hare Krsna, ys, mahaksadasa
  7. I like the biker funeral, where the survivors go to the bar and have a shot, and have a shotglass upside down for their dearly departed. or the airforce, who do the missing jet formation. Or the surfers, who bring out the board for the final ride. My words are "Your life is in sound, therefore, you never leave". All those whose life was in sound have never left me, so funerals are not an issue. mahak
  8. innocence of youth is not enough to be called guru. Come back to him when hes 20, then we will see. Guru is never what you see, but what you hear, what is imparted. A body is a body is a body. mahak
  9. pigs on the wing every dog needs a bone http://youtube.com/watch?v=P5kMkr6JxpA and if I didnt care, sheep Animals, very good album by the floyd. But the best song is, with a bit of velakovski, talk about staying power, I hear more floyd now than I did when they were di yout. haribol, mahaksadasa
  10. BTW, this cartoon is quite awesome, I wish Srimati Jayaradhe dd were still around for this recommendation. Cartoonists are a rare breed these days. The wallace and grommett movie, the curse of the were-bunny, is billed as the first vegetarian horror flick. mahak
  11. but Im sure glad he doesnt see what Im doing. A true disciple makes no distinction between disappearance or disappearance, but phony ones dont want him around at all. I still remember the sense of relief on some faces of the gundas with dandas whenever he was safely on the plane going thopusands of miles away from them and their ever-present misrepresentation. The true disciple has no plane taking him away, no tomb making him non-existant. Only true disciples REALIZE his instructions about vapu/vani, knowing that both are simultaneously existing. The true disciple prepares the vyasasana of the heart to give him a seat and the food and water of devotion. There is no difference to the true disciple between 11-13-77 and 11-15-77, no difference between 1966 and 2008. Disciple means to follow the discipline, to establish personal, intimate, confidential relationship that only exists one to one, disciple to guru, with no one else really involved at all.. is he dead? or alive? The guru cannot answer, No one other than disciple can solve this transcendence question. My answer is not for you, only for me and my guru maharaja. haribol, ys, mahaksadasa PS Oneness? Difference? How bout both?
  12. I have two casios, a farfisa, and an awesome yamaha. But I will only donate an old whirlitzer.
  13. and this is taking way too long.
  14. really awesome live performance here:
  15. Haribol, Babhru, hope all is well witcha. Nice explanation of surrender. I may add that one cannot even think of surrender while wi8nning the war. Arjuna SURRENDERED and accepted a more FORMAL Krsna that the best friend and companion that their normal relationship (which we cannot even begin to understand, because it is nityasiddha). This formal surrender happened as arjuna was so defeated that he could no longer hold the gandiva not pull a shaft from his quiver. I like the story of the guru who held his disciples head under water for a long time, let him have a breath, then held him down again. Finally, when releasing him, he said "When you desire Krsna as much as you desire that breath of air you just took, then you have experianced surrender". Prabhupada describes surrender as a child calling for mother, helpless, yet knowing that the cries will be heard. This is how Srila Prabhupada wants us to feel when we chant, and this is clearly noted on his introductorey lecture recording upon his establishment of the Samkirtana Movement in the west. Another point about diksa is recognition by the spiritual master of the disciple. No many revisionists will claim that surely prabhupada did not know everyone he offered the sacred thread to. But this is simply not true. When my friend Sudama Swami recommended me for initiation, he was drilled by Srila Prabhupada as to why I should be initiated. It was only after Sudama offered compelling info that was pleasing to Prabhupada that he agreed to convey just first (harinama) initiation. As mentioned, I did not take the brahmana thread, and this, too, was explained to Prabhupada, and this also pleased him, and I personally accept this pleasure in the same way I would have accepted second initiation. Diksa initiation may be discredited as just a formality, but it is not. To think so is very offensive, because this is a very serious precept of sadhana bhakti. Sure, we can hit the search engine to glean quotes from the folio, but this kind of study is very lame and not scientific at all, and really shows the kali-yuga tendency of laziness and proneness to misguiding. Accepting diksa is, of course, secondary to his initial instruction to the whole world, but then again, so is following regulative principles, associating with devotees, living in a holy place, etc. The primary instruction is to chant hare krsna, and this is said to be the ONLY method of deliverance in this age. But when one accepts a formal diksa recognition by Srila Prabhupada and enters into the intimacy such reciprocal guru-disciple relationship that is entailed, this is not unlike the successive things described by Krsna as being very dear to him. To be a vegetarian is very pleasing to Krsna, but to be a vegetarian person who chants is more pleasing. And if one then decides to quiot intoxicating himself, even bettah, and then to hang with only devotees, to work on behalf of guru, even bettah. Best is to become Parampara. One cannot claim to be in the disciplic succession if one does not accept the discipline of ones guru. To think otherwise is ludicrous. As silly as me trying to explain to US office of personnell management that my partner is my wife even though their is no formal connection. I am a fraud if I try, and those who think they can claim to be diksa disciples of Prabhupada without surrendering to his discipline, just on the strength of thinking that some magic can make him accept and recognize the relationship thirty years after he has disappeared, well, what can I say (that I havent already, many times)? And if one thinks that none of his disciples are qualified, then they are just as offensive because they are really saying that he was not a spiritual master at all, that he failed in his mission, that no one benefittede from his missionary work. Anyway, definition. I like Babhrus ideas on surrender, I like my ideas of reciprocal relationship not unlike a formal marriage (in other words, SERIOUS, as opposed to convenient, temporary, a fad to be replaced by another fad when following the ol guy gets in the way of progress). hare krsna, ys, mahaksadasa
  16. It doesnt matter what we think when we die, most of us will be thinking, "Oh s---". What matters is what krsna is thinking when we die. George Harrison was very pleasing to Srila Prabhupada. All the speculation about his smoking, his drug use, his SRF and TM leanings, none of this has anything to do with anything. Krsna was thinking of george harrison as he passed away. Shastra confirms my statement here. Krsna thwarted Yama in the jurisdictional question in the ajamila matter. Yama confirms that George is not in his jurisdiction, because he was initiated by Chaitagurudeva. haribol, ys, mahak
  17. Because the US government is a funny type of democracy, knee jerk at best, satisfied by ten second sound bites and blasts of armageddon from pulpits. Politicians make laws that they think will get them votes, not because they are moral or immoral. Why do liberals support abortion? Liberal means that we are supposed to be compassionate and advocate for those who have no power. So liberals advocate for bugs, ferns, frogs, but there is no advocacy for human beings. The liberals are a fraud and not liberal at all if they support abortion as a means of birth control, support the abortion industry that loves unwanted pregnancy so they can get the goop for scientific research to keep their own useless forms alive. So you cant see why the right wing cant tolerate gay marriage? Weell, maybe you dont understand how the West works. Bush dont care if fags get married, but Crl Rove loves the controversy because it gets the fanatics to the polls where they will vote for the dry drunk while they do their duty as descr5ibed by the pedophile leader of their congregation, thats why. Bush could care less if a black teen on crack opts to kill her offspring, in fact, he hopes they do, but carl rove gets big turnout for this knee jerk reaction to the meaningless word "abortion". You dont get it? Maybe you are still quite young, naive, optomistic, idealistic, etc. Not bad things, but a blast of reality aint a bad thing, either. Gay marriage is not even an issue, but if opposition to such a thing gives power to those who want to wipe out 3/4 of the worlds population by active genocide, against arabs, against blacks, against latinos, against HINDUS (yes, all you vaisnava bush supporters should remember the Sikhs who were slaughtered in Arizona shortly after 911 by fools who dont even know that binladen is a long-time family friend of the nazi-bush clan (or should I say Klan), well abortion and gay marriage are very good things to those who perpetuate the age of chaos, quarrel, and confusion. mahak
  18. Ok l will spell it out. Formal diksa is not required by anybody to follow the process of bhakti under the instructions of a bona fide spiritual master. How can I make it any more clear? The quotes by Prabhupada speak for themselves. - cbrahma mahak- Does anyone see the flaw in this statement? If the instructions of the spiritual master includes to take initiation, to approach a bonafide spiritual master and humbly serve with rapt attention, which are the instructions as well as the program of Srila Prabhupada, how can one, in the same sentence, say that formal diksa initiation has no value nor is required? It is like saying one can have conjugal relationship without undergoing marriage and its the same thing. Formal initiation by diksa guru is not required to follow process, and advancement is ensured by dilligently doing ones best in that regard, but to enter a transcendental relationship with ones spiritual master is necessary in order to achieve the highest goal as described by the Guru. Haridas Thakur never went thru any formal diksa initiation process, and there may be many others as well, but these are exceptions rather than rules. Haridas Thakur is nitya siddha playing a role in his eternal service to Krsna, bhakta joe is not a nitya siddha, but rather a kanistha adhikary, prone to cheap imitation. The sadhana bhakti process is the science that elevates one from offensive beginner to a spontaneous lover of the supreme lord, and diksa initiation is part of this process. I do not disrespect kanistha adhikarys here, Srila Prabhupada includes them as vaisnavas, who are all pure devotees guaranteed success. Of every 10,000 folks living, there may be one kanistha adhikary. But to surrender to this third class vaisnava stage is like the born again christians who refuse to grow up, refuse to continue to always wipe their bloody sins on Lord Jesus Christ. Maturity means one has a desire to love Krsna spontaneously, so diksa initiation, rendering service to one more advanced, these are not threats to be feared. However, as taught by Srila Prabhupada, specifically in second chapter of his Science of Self Realization, work is to be done by disciple. Convenience and esteem are terrible reasons to agree to accept a formal relationship with Guru. Prabhupada calls this cheap act fanaticism. So, I am a formal harinama initiate of Srila Prabhupada. Apparently, I have not received diksa initiation, as I begged him to not give me brahmanical standard because I was not fully following his desire regarding getting high. He was very pleased, and this was a second initiation for me, because my goal was to please him. Had I taken the thread and done the spliff, I could say I was a diksa initiate, but I pleased him with my decision to skip that process, and pleasing him is everything, while getting status in his society is dry without rendering such pleasure, so I have no regrets. I have many spiritual masters, the chief being my humble godbrother Srila BA Paramadvaiti Swami. I have never met him, Im kinda afraid of presenting myself to him, but I am content knowing that Srila Prabhupadas rteachings are being continued. I dont use adjectives for guru, so paramadwaiti swami is accepted as guru. Maybe someday I will get off my peninsula and go see him, even volunteer to work for him, and maybe ask to be his formal disciple. But in the meantime, I will try to be pleasing to him by doing my best to follow our spiritual master. Guru is one, Chaita guru, and he is the director of guru tattwa, no other can do this. To accept diksa because one takes advice of other kanistha adhikaris may simply be fanaticism. But to be pleasing to the spiritual master makes Lord Nityananda see the sincerity level and direct the self to one who just may allow a formal relationship, based on love and reciprocation, not fear and coercion, with a diksa guru. No one else can point they way, as confirmed by both Srila Prabhupada as well as Lord Jesus' Instructions to his disciples. Hare Krsna, ys, mahaksadasa
  19. PLASTIC, GLASS, METAL, AND SPARKS by mahaksadasa The world. We say we move it, we always find ways of control. Our history, a conspired story to mislead, is full of theories that the past was pagan, barbarian, and ignorant. Ignoring all facts of history, we take shelter of this story and relinquish all control to plastic, glass, metal and sparks. This combination of matter releases images and data to mesmerize us while propagandizing that we have entered into a vast "information age". But we must break this spell long enough to ask the question, "Who's information?" Technology is fiction producing. Ku Klux Klan can mask themselves as humble callers of the Name of Yahweh. IBM can run for public office with promise to serve the people. Profits can be read as failure, and slaves can be paid what is called "livable wages". Advancement of society translates into the ability to convince the masses that all answers lie in plastic, glass, metal and sparks and the new age of composite inorganic materials presently being worked on. All this, while the world breathes it's last gasps. As a living being, birth, growth, adaptation, dwindling, and demise all take take place on a planetary scale. Life is set, and we can only speculate at which stage Mother Earth is presently existing. The sciences of astronomy and geology are very difficult for the new technology to hide, therefore, are very helpful in our quest for knowledge of reality. The dry surfaces of the planet are, in fact, produced by molten magma's contact with atmosphere. Only a thin layer of skin, 40 miles thick, floats upon this ball of liquid fire. At any time, this skin can shed, shift, and even be blown into space. Evidence abounds that this has happened on grand scales periodically, and such events will leave no verifiable historical record. Cataclysm will never be casually printed in tomorrow's edition of the New York Times. Do we still believe that white slaves built the pyramids? Let us try to analyze such an effort that will never be duplicated by todays fund of knowledge and capabilities. Take six 1976 Chrysler New Yorkers and weld them all together into one mass, without any wheels. How many human beings (as we understand such beings) would it take to push such dead weight over a mile up a thirty degree grade? This effort symbolizes the undertaking to place the smallest of blocks on the Great Pyramid at Giza near the top. The ramp itself used for such a job would be a wonder of the world by itself, yet the story goes that the ramp was disassembled and deposited in an unyet discovered location. So-called Egyptologists ask the world to submit to such absurd faith without question, and the pyramid builders are given the status of stipulated fact. Modern scientists have no understanding of how the phrase "I do not know" could actual add quite a bit of credence to their field, and enhance the commoners natural inquisitiveness. However, these pyramids very well could be simple and plain architecture to the actual builders. Egyptologists must preserve the notion that they are 4,000 year old structures. Yet, geologic analysis recently performed has opened a vast array of possibilities. Evidence abounds that they were built in a rain forest, like their counterparts of Mexico and other Central American sites. They may be more than 30,000 years old. The survivors of cataclysm were few, and their offspring were mutated by the dark, desolate planet that remained. Tiny in strength and intelligence, all they could do was draw pictures on the wall to try to depict the sketchy history told around the cave-fires. This dark age of mutation continues to this day, the darkness of war, famine, chaos, superstition, ignorance, and fear continues to affect the populace. Few may wonder in the spirit of adventure in real history quest, but plastic, glass, metal, and sparks will not produce wonders to survive the coming cataclysm, not will such matter give any indication on the reality of our bygone ancestry. One may charge speculation in these writings, and the author concedes. But the pyramids, both of desert and rain forest, and the sciences of astronomy and geology, the way of the ancients, the roots and culture, all survive to form a preponderance of evidence that reality is yet to be discovered. peace love, and joy for Jah RasTafari, haribol, mahaksadasa
  20. mahak

    oh, Bama

    Hey, BB, Im sure it will be quite tough for obama. I had political aspirations at one time, but one must be squeaky clean, and my relationship with Sondra Bacon back in the day would have been rough, especially after she blew up the US Senate building. And all that hash oil, and my relationship with john cippolina and the Owsley bunch. But, ya know, its quite entertaining, doncha think? I can wait for the photos of lil bama with his malcolm X hat, or michelles secret friendship with betty shabazz. At least the entertainment wont be a re-run, and I find that refreshing. We can say good riddence to bubba and his library, his pardons, vince foster, et all. But The riots wont be in denver, and mccain wont be prez. US Code title 50 will take effect, perhaps well before denver. And america will be begging for straightjackets because the streets will be inhabitable. You live in a great place. That whole corner is actually redneck/progressive, my kinda folk. Of all the places for a reggae star to play, Ras Michael always did the reggae fest in Pend Oreille. Montana, too, real thinkers there, a whole bunch of pro-life yet very liberal folks (meaning those who appreciate freedom, not the definition of the foxed up linbaugh (who would be just as obnoxious as a liberal if thats where the radio money was). Im okay here, too, except for the riffraff from bangor who moved over when braindead island got too spendy for their double GS 11 status. Good show, hold out, billary, ya never know. Kennedy had to take johnson, but I think youd be better off to be a supreme court judge. As veep, billy boy has too many rooms to sneak around in, and you aint his cup a tea. mahak
  21. coconuts and pakalolo. waves. truely a good birth, but they die there, too, which is always the problem, eh?
  22. IU dont have a right to prevent two people from any relationship they want. However, I do have exclusive and absolute right to do whatever is necessary to stop anyone else from inflicting their trips upon me. As I clearly explained in the other topic, sexual harassment is a crime, and I am a champion of preventing this crime at all times. Any ACTION of a sexual nature that is unwanted, yet forced upon me, is a crime by definition, of harassment. I would be just as adamant against the sexual harassment inflicted by a heterosexual couple who insisted on laying their trips off on me, unwanted yet forced discussion of their sexual proclivities. But this is not an issue, because hetero couples accept each other. Now you may counter that to deny gays the same deal if they kept it private is not consistant with what I say here, but first you have to produce a gay couple who refuse to explain their sexual proclivities, thus sexually harassing me, a third party. Because you cannot produce such a couple, then your argument is moot. The reason gays demand these rights to sexually harass others is not because they want a peaceful life of love with each other. No, their issue is that they want permission to openly recruit, to turn confused pimply teens who cannot find a gal. They want gays to be okay in schools and churches, they want sexual promiscuity to be accepted as normal human behavior. My spiritual master has made it quite clear that the issue is not gay or straight, it is the issue of unrestricted sense gratification., Such activity destroys cleanliness, a pillar of spiritual life. One cannot allow the mind to act like a billygoat and be accepted as a human being. Human means control of senses, not unrestricted activity of rats, dogs, pigeons, and goats. Without sense control, there is no spiritual progress, just as elephants do not clean themselves in the water if they roll in the dirt afterwards. Therefore, shastra affirms the allowed sex life. In fact, such life is said to be Krsna Himself, that sex life done per spiritual code. Procreation, and sanctity of marriage is there in shastra, and there are issues that the gay movement has actually given a devotee some room to think. As mentioned, Im not hompophobic, I support their right to equal protection under the law. They should be able to unite under secular law, secular contract. I even support the marriage to the extent that straight folks fully compliant to scriptural injunction and performing actual devotional service by procreating Krsna consciousw offspring are often denied rights they should have, such as in the case where devotees accept each other yet are not recognized by priests, judges or licensing officials. But, again, I cannot allow my liberalism to cloud my vision of reality. If I wasnt sexually harassed everytime i hear some gay right activist speak, I may favor his position. But I favor no one who is committing a crime against me. This is where me and Random are truely one, you break my law, I break yo face. Haribol, ys, mahaksadasa
  23. Has nothing to do with hate, everything to do with expert politics. By this initiative appearing on the ballot, this ensures McCain to carry California, just as Bush won key states in '04 because similar initiatives were on those state ballots. In fact, Carl Rove specifically has Bush call for the ill-fated constitutional amendment to preserve marriage. Everyone knew this measure would fail miserably, because the Federal civil rights act prevents discrimination due to sexual preferance, but success of the amendment was never the issue with Rove. States have individual rights, and swing states that had the sanctity of marriage issues on the '04 ballot had the usually non-voting churchians go to the polls by church-busload, armed with fire and brimstone, and while they were there, the also punched Bush in, not because they like him or think that he is qualified to run the country, but because he was passionately with them on this single issue. Carl Rove knows how to manipulate the uneducated who get all their information from their preacher. Again, hats off to my enemy, well done, from the act of approving the gay marriage in California to the subsequent outrage. Always remember Orwell's 1984, where thwe opposition to big brother was none other than big brother himself. And always remember, as my friend BB obviously does, that this is simply a show to witness, and to fail to see we are all just temporarily acting in roles and not really participants in the action and reaction that birth in this world of death (Martyaloka), this is where the madness lies. Rove isnt a crazy man, neither is bush or obama or billary, they are actors. If our identification with the movie makes us think any of them make reality, well, see ya at the next star trek convention. Nanu nanu, as mork the ork would say. BB would say, haribol. Mahak would say, "Are you surprised? Im surprised you are surprised, you should know better." Theist would say, "Oh well, from Che to Cheney? So, what, me worry?" Aloha pumehana and haribol, out and about, while breathing is still protected by the constitution. mahaksadasa
  24. dependent. No one other than Krsna. It is really quite simple, and the first instruction by Srila Prabhupada to his disciples, followers, favorable well-wishers, etc, is to chant hare krsna and ones life will be sublime. No other instructions are as important, or even applicable minus following the first instruction. So we cry, like helpless children, calling for mother, and krsna picks us up, he hears his name. nice one, as usual, theist, hare krsna, ys, mahaksadasa
×
×
  • Create New...