chandu_69

Sambya also copied and pasted(from muslim sites) VI) Yama wards off his sister Yami, saying marriage between brother and sister is forbidden [R.V.X.10][Apte 11] FYI there is no such thing with the number mentioned http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/rigveda/rv05010.htm There are only 7 aptes in book 5 hymn 10

Sambya copied and pasted the material from muslim sites without going in to the original texts and he claims to be a 23 year old brahmin() Answering one by one let me start with Agni is the son of his father and his sister [Rg Ved.I.91.7] Sambya who claimed to be a brahmin(i dont have any idea if some muslims call themselves as brahmins) didnt even check it. The actual hymn is (http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/rigveda/rv01091.htm) 7) To him who keeps the law, both old and young, thou givest happiness, And energy that he may live. There is no mention of any birth here, leave alone agni or surya next Rg Ved X.3.3][Apte 11](http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/rigveda/rv10003.htm) 3 Attendant on the Blessed Dame the Blessed hath come: the Lover followeth his Sister.Agni, far-spreading with conspicuous lustre, hath compassed Night with whitelyshining garments. Agni compassed night...There is no clarity in this verse if NIGHT referred to as sister. And about pushan and aswins.([Rg Ved VI.55.4][Apte 11],RV I.116.19 Asvins, sons of Pusan are pre-dawn and Usas his sister is dawn; There is no god or shakti representing dawn(before arrival of sun) or predawn, it is one of those elusive references in vedas Referring to his another one IV) The Ashvisns married Surya and Savitri who is their sister [RV I.116.19]. The actual hymn is (http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/rigveda/rv01116.htm) 19 Ye, bringing wealth with rule, and life with offspring, life rich in noble heroes; O Nāsatyas,Accordant came with strength to Jahnu's children who offered you thrice every day your portion. It refers to nasatyas the aswins (the heralders of the dawn) The so called marriages are referring to Heralders of dawn to predawn and dawn. They are no marriages because there doesnt exist any devas called usas(Dawn and predawn).These hymns are one of those undecipherable things in rigveda

Too much of a coincidence...lol i saw muslims quoting this verse to say that Allah is the only god.

Sambya, Did u read the relevent portion of Badshahnama??. It may be also of interest to you to go through this article http://www.frontpagemag.com/articles/Printable.aspx?GUID=401C6222-3668-4E4B-9824-D85A9D2B4B6A The article also quotes from "The Story of Civilization, by historian Will Durant "

You may have lot of tolerance but abrahamic faiths especially islamic faith condemns people like u with ferocity.As per them polytheists(they define u that way) has no reason to live You should read mughal history written by mughals themselfes, Not written by leftist hindu hating historians. Fatehpur sikri was built after making Pyramid of hindu skulls(This was actual happening recorded ) Take a look at the book " A History of the Great Moghuls By Pringle Kennedy" at http://books.google.com/books?id=X43K1xXI-3IC&pg=PA264&lpg=PA264&dq=Pyramid++skulls+Fatehpur+sikri&source=web&ots=xyJ59iDsbY&sig=LD_uNzY_WJOBn-GaFYP_yuQrBCk&hl=en&sa=X&oi=book_result&resnum=2&ct=result#PPA265,M1 Now tell me what is bogus in the book " The True Story of the Taj Mahal" I have answered the points raised by you.

He(p.n. Oak) is not alive to make such a claim.But why does it bother you ??? The ferocity with which you are rubbishing Mr oak without reading the article tells me something. Are u a muslim??

Sure, You dont have any patience whatsover .Since you now, with great patience read and raised the points in Sri Oak's article let us examine them one by one Is it inconceivable for you to think that the trident was removed and Moon symbol was placed??? Now you are speculating without reading the article and not doing any research. Her name was "Mumtaz-ul Zamani" as recorded in Badshahnama(Take a look at home.freeuk.net/tajmahal/4badshah.htm for the scan copy obtained from archives of Government of India) 4 . archaeological survey of india will not be taking any risks without government approval.Dont u know that? 5 . One of the important proofs is Badshanama .Pls go through the link i gave above. 6 . Do you know of any muslim mausoleum built with so called "indo islamic art". Did you read any points he raised about the architecture.. "western building which is claimed to be a mosque has no minarets" 7 . Badshahnama did survive and it has description about Mumtaz burial What Glory??? Glory of claiming other's work as their own?? Destruction of hindu temples and using the idols as steps??? What islamic glory you are talking about??

. If you don't have the patience to read you should not be commenting on it in the first place

.A well researched article is at http://stephen-knapp.com/true_story_of_the_taj_mahal.htm Tej-o-Mahalaya:

Scientists, in most of the cases set out to FIND something.And science is ever evolving.And Scientitsts go wrong many times , but spiritual minded people need not jump in everytime and comment on something which they dont understand. Let the scientists create life out of chemicals and then we will comment.Why do u want to rob them of their right to speculate??

What exactly is your objection?.They are called scientists for a good reason.They do what they set out to do.

Interesting news. Thanks

Dating of Bhagavadgita invariably ties up with dating of mahabharat war.There is no clinching evidence for the dating of mahabharat war. The dating is as difficult as dating the disappearence of Saraswati river which was considered mythical by the western scholars (until it's evidence found from satellite imagery)- gisdevelopment.net/application/archaeology/site/archs0001a.htm gisdevelopment.net/application/archaeology/site/archs0001pf.htm I would take with a pinch of salt any dating of mahabharat war(and hence Gita) since many details are missing in the subsequent history.

Oh yes, Einstein actually was a advaitan.Einstein actually devised Theory of relativity from advaitan concepts :idea:

Many do care. It makes sense to many who are still happy with their lives, here on earth. But there is no compulsion that one has to work towards avoiding rebirth.There is No punishment for not working towards salvation(mukthi) If we remember our past lives it is going to be one hell of a life.Is it not.The idea is to live life as it is.

How god decides / arrange to decide the fruits of karma is not the botheration of humans.Why it makes u angry that KARMA has a role to play??? Is it because of the arrogant mayavadi assertion that u are no different from god ??

This is discussed extensively in many threads.Why dont u go through them instead of spamming the forums with same question??? U already opened a thread at indiadivine.org/audarya/spiritual-discussions/449748-kalki-purana.html I already informed u at that thread opened by you to go through indiadivine.org/audarya/spiritual-discussions/445621-kalki-avatar-2.html.

Yeah, vaishnavism is a threat all hindus beware :rolleyes:

Sarcasm is welcome...Not when it is the only argument.lol

This doesnt belong here.. Wow srikanth, ranjeet didnt reply to u.Why so much of anger????.

Yes,Advaita is a complete hoax.I agree

You dont have to accept him as ur spiritual teacher.

The weapons described in mahabharat dont have ANY resemblence to Nuclear weapons.So this news even if it is true has no correlation to Asthras of those times.

Why not just ban these silly fellows like Hindustani and ARJ. they are not here for spiritual discussions. ARJ is a confirmed missionary and hindustani certainly is no hindu.