Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

mahak

Members
  • Content Count

    1,615
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by mahak

  1. no option. life has always been. why we come to play in di muck and di of babylon is a good question. Oh oh, here come some lyrics, must be sunday <CENTER>OH! JAYA RADHA JAYA RAMANA -c-1994-mahaksadasa For no apparent reason, Prabhupada comes to deliver. This Prophet of Gopala, the great gift giver. From the mud and mire of Babylon we can rise above. For the gift of His Love, we must give Him love. Oh! Jaya Radha Jaya Ramana. To the voice of the mind: "Sing Radha Ramana!" To the one always singing the song of Harinama. To the one who gives us life, living in Sri Vrndavana. To the one showing freedom from the chains of Babylon. Oh! Jaya Radha Jaya Ramana. To the thunder in the night, the flame within my heart. To the wrinkles on the head, the signal for the time to start. To the life of the Sun so we nevah stay in the dark. To the Great Blazing Fiyeh from which we are but a spark. Oh! Jaya Radha Jaya Ramana. To the one who grants us peace, what we are all looking for. To the one who holds the key to lock out all the world of War. To the one who is so obvious, always knocking at my door. To the One I need to ask, always kindly giving more. Oh! Jaya Radha Jaya Ramana For no apparent reason, Prabhupada comes to deliver. </CENTER>
  2. Maybe cbrahma is a bit burned out. Anyone who would deride the 1973 vyasapuja address, Srila Prabhupadas wonderful and emotional discussion of his relationship with his guru maharaja, call it advertizement for some phony religion, well, hes not hearing. The contributors to this thread are spreading nectar, but sweet is bitter to the jaundiced.
  3. Guruvani gave me music to cry over, so here is one for frustration that destroys faith. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mdvic9cRsFM
  4. sounds like a song is due, murali
  5. paul is dead, didnt ya hear. Its george who is alive, Now "inner light", theres a song. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YhHm-5lKkZ0 and for those who want an unreal all-star show, checvk this out. Imagine such a show, clapton, young, petty, dylan, totally unreal. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4bUch5dveX0&feature=related and from the best movie ever made http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4TwKWxKOw2Q&feature=related and you azre all forgiven http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oamahR97xpA&feature=related
  6. Because its nice to have music while we type. http://www.esnips.com/doc/d295d61e-baf9-4c35-ae2a-2f2ff5e296ce/06
  7. because when one is nitya siddha, loosely translated eternal perfection, there is no time in which he was nitya baddha (even if he was.) Little boy loses mom, this is miserable condition, so little boy associates with bhaktivedantas, and misery turns to wisdom, and presto, nitya siddha. One must understand the way of touch stone. Gurudeva is like touchstone, and Can and does turn nitya baddha into nitya siddha. Some may contradict because they do not accept transcendence other than gopis. But there are innumerable beings that are eternally liberated who have distinct relationships, nitya siddha relationships, meaning eternally perfect, with the supreme Lord. Can we knock at Lord Narayanas door? Can we observe the household activities of Krsna with his wives? Narada can, thus his eternaql perfection is that he comes and goes as he pleases, both in this material world, the vaikunthas, including goloka.
  8. hes sitting on the fenced, but seems to be lookin the other way, south. "hey blood, Mo mattah for me mudder, brodder".
  9. from http://www.esnips.com/doc/8b434cb4-1a6c-4f2c-82cc-1925b44ebfa0/02 lyrics are missing, so here they are <CENTER>Mercy Ship c.1993, mahaksadasa You came into my life from oh so far, Riding through my mind in Subhadra's car, Without a single purpose but to save the world. Your Song has mor power than all the missles they have hurled. All the holy men came to show the way. Many people listened to what they had to say. Some of them insane, some just went to other things, Not knowing the difference between soldiers and Kings. They wanted to steal my mind, take away my land, A trade for a philosophy no one can understand. They prey on people' greed, take advantage of their fear. They say anything the people want to hear. Tricks, treachery, cheap words, and smiling nods, Are needed to convince the ignorant they are gods. Crime, poverty, death, gods exposed as fools, Tossed around like ants into giant whirlpools. But You did not come to advertize Your name. You had no pressing needs to strive for selfish fame. You have what you are given, and to me You bring, Matchless Gifts, if I would only dance and sing. You have gone back to Vrndavana, left me all alone, On these streets of Armageddon, weary to the bone. Yet You leave Your loving Lifeline, waiting for my grip. Through these dreadful waters, You guide the Mercy Ship.</CENTER>
  10. Half heaven, half heartache? Or maybe you were thinking the more gangbanger friendly "man who shot liberty valance". :eek: And, yeah, Ive heard my stuff on the radio, others gittin good bucks lie dat. Ever go to a songwriters showcase, big ones in nice clubs that has awesome recording engineers there to give yall a chance a stardom? Well, need I say more, they have really good tunes and lyrics without any mention of names on those recordings so their sponsors may even float them some new piece of computerized equipment if they would cut em a CD of that lady livin down by the river. Sad, but I knew the one doing this criminal activity. But his competitor lifted a few of my lyrics before. Getting back to topic, the rolling stones did a song when Brian Jones was there, before jagger had him offed:eek: , titled, "sitting on a fence." Great song, like all the brian jones era, they were once a good band. Lilith leaning, but thats okay. The point is, that was my song. I called this song, tatashta shakti. There is gods throne, and there is his feet, which do I grab. While Im pondering this decision, Im stuck (like tar mixed with burning lava) thinking water, earth, air, fire, and ether are my substance, and that the intelligence from my mind gives me the idea that I AM THE ONE. Im not matter, but Ive magnetically attracted all this ooze, like the old lady in the excellent flick "Labyrinth". Even the demigods think Im matter because of all the layers of much sticking to me. But burning in my heart is another reality, hidden but there (I dare not say sleeping but stirring:eek: ) I guess we have to grasp multidimensional physics, theory of simultaneous reality, to get it. "Im just sitting on the fence, you can say Ive got no sense, trying to make up my mind, feeling spirit all the time, so Im sitting on the fence." Good song I wrote, eh. Dem bastards, I oughtta sue. hare krsna, ys, mahaksadasa
  11. Certainly there is sharing. No one would accept that someone who is temple president would not relay Srila Prabhupadas instructions to those whom he has accepted responsibility for, as direct service to srila prabhupada. But are we to believe that Srila Prabhupadas additional instructions in that letter, such as how to keep the overbearing sanyassi sneakin into a TPs domaine in line, or a personal commentary to help a particular devotee with a particular anartha to overstep, are we to believe that they be shared by everyone at the Sunday Feast? Bad analogy? No way, it is spot on. Im quite advanced at 24, I have independently accepteed vegetarianism at age 15 when no one did that at the time (1965). Ive been chanting since 67, investigating, having unreal association from the likes of a whos who in late sixties hare krsnas. Now Im initiated, in 74. A member in good standuing in ISKCON, some would say a rising star. Do I really think that a letter Srila Prabhupada has written to Goursundar das, TP of Hawaii, personal caretaker of Srila Prabhupada for many years, do I have the arrogance to think that this letter is to be shared word for word? Absolutely not, I will wait for later, when Goursundara gives us the message. It is arrognace, these letter freaks. I mean, I get nectar from them, I admit. After all, it is Prabhupada who is the author, equal to all, seeing us all in our very best light eternally. But is there no confidentiality? If I remember right, "Confidential" is a common word used in Prabhupadas teachings. Dioes not srila prabhupada, as a spiritual master to a particular disciple, have the right to instruct personally his disciple specifically to meet his needs? (Spot on GV, we agree on a few thiongs, eh?) I have even gone so far as to tell these letter freaks that they are guilty of international human rights violations, and federal felonies per US Statute. (Again, I hope folks see the distinction to what Im speaking of and the stuff me and theist were submitting earlier this AM) This is why, when I read a letter specifically published to embarass a particular godbrother of mine, I read the same letter and see that this disciple is getting awesome instruction personally that we do not get because we are not yet qualified to hear. They say he was patronizing him, I read the same letter and I say he was empowering him. Haribol, everyone is correct here, there is no one who is acting like the "letter freaks" I refer to. ys, mahaksadasa
  12. But guru tattwa is working well, making you observe the fraud and inability to surrender to such. Not accepting a guru suddenly is a teaching of Srila Prabhupada, and in doing o (or refraining from doing so), taking your time, these are his orders. Fanatics use force, guru has no use for one who has no need for a guru. Next time you get fanaticized on the diksa issue, say you already got one. When they ask you who, tell them that they must be shown the same way you were, and if they refuse, that it has something to do with their lack of sincerity.
  13. namin it is gamin it. gangbanger talk. sleepervadi is nowhere in shastra, and is used by those who think they grasp the reality of origins. I know you was joshin, so was I. When assumin the gangsta role, our jokes are dry and cynicall, and usually a challenge (even to ones own motha) Again, my spiritual master teaches,"somehow or other, we have forgotton, and the yuga dharma is what revives us to consciousness. We call madhyama adhikari a clearing stage of bhakti, where clarity replaces the fog of kanistha adhikari. We can discuss without namecalling. Sleepervadi is not a word of good intent and well wishes, it is a battle word, a word used to belittle ones opponant . Vaisnava ettiquette has always dictated refraining from such calling out of ones philosophical opponant. So, its all a joke. But it was a good thread, and theist made a great point in confiding personal realization, and others have nicely done the same. hare krsna, the not so funny mad dog stare gangsta rappa mad mahax
  14. Im actually referring to letters that are obviously personal to the recipient, concerning specific duties, discrepancies, etc. These are highly personal guru disciple things that we may be interfering in, and pas through our imperfect judgements. If we glean nectar we can use, this is certainly responsible. But I clearly refer to those who have made internet careers demeaning other devotees and disciples based on PERCEIVED undertones of displeasure of the spiritual master. Never do they consider the fortune of the chastized disciple, but they impeach the disciple, showing thay have no qualifications to speak on even the rudimentary aspects of the science of Bhakti Yoga. There are certainly letters addressed to temple presidents that are specifrically meant to be broadcast, and these are truely lectures unto themselves. Each person will have to decide how to interpret the intent of the letter, which must at least be considered, because time and place considerations are always brought up by the revisionists who preach letters over books. Books dont have as much option for one to even consider "what does he mean by that?" haribol
  15. ya know, I read in his books very little about fire sacrifices. Has anyone else? Usually in conjunction of some outdated and passe brahmana ritual calling Indra down so they can deliver a curse upon him. There is horse sacrifices. Brahmanas always had fires burning somewhere, smokin up the place. But I dont remember ritual between Iswara Puri and Madhavendra Puri, Vidura-Maitreya, Narada-Brahma, Vyasa-Narada, Sukadeva-Pariksit. Now his son, Janamejaya, he had a fire sacrifice goin that was called off because the reptilians had demigod clout. But guru-disciple relationship has nothing to do with official ritual. Only shadow quasi religions are into that stuff. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=scPNtdAayNA&NR=1 mahaksadasa
  16. O scare me. Lightweight. If you have no realization, then you call people names. 3rd grade (or should I say class).
  17. thanks, beggar, where would I be without the veda base of audarya fellowship, hare krsna.
  18. No one has ever commented on this proposal. That no letter from prabhupada to a disciple is allowed unless we see the letter the disciple wrote to him. This is not a jerk proposal, it is a wise one, because Bhagavatam does not have Maitreya Rsi spouting off. Maitreya is HEARING Questions from Sri Vidura. Yes, we want answers by citing the Lords Version, but the questions MUST be included. These letters are a profound vehicle for creating false doctrine, and have been used consistantly for just that specific reason. Just as ridiculous if we never heard from King Pariksit, Sri Vidura, even Lord Chaitanya. What good are the answers by ramananda raya without the questioning of Lord Chaitanya. But you all wont answer here either. What I want to see in order to consider the 1975 letter concerning guru tattwa to tusta krsna das without having access to the letter tusta wrote him, prior and subsequent written communication, confidentiality of the relationship between the guru and the disciple communicated with, the whole thing. Otherwise, there is just those damn books he wrote. mahaksadasa.
  19. Yawn. You rang? Whats with the jiv jago, already? Oh, the truth is the void, eh? prior to the beginningless beginning, none of us had the seed of existance. It dont compute, sorry. G'night. mahaksadasa
  20. This can be the nectar we all hope for, what we crave. Theist has a great new topic going, sharing his realizations, krsna has a new guru tattwa thread begun, and they have started off well. What do the disciples and followers of the vaisnava acaryas have to offer? Even if imperfectly composed, dont thoroughly honest folk wanna hear, and then chant? Haribol, ys, mahaksadasa
  21. Even though we get headaches speaking on this subject, it is most important. The importance is right up there with "who am I? What is my eternal function?" There are many discussions about folks realizations concerning guru tattwa, many studies with drawn conclusions about the definition of initiation, etc. But first, we must come to realize Guru. Guru is the deep voice within that, when we are afflicted with the four reasons to approach the idea of the Supreme Being, takes the helm of the chariot of our successful return to sanity. This voice becomes leadership, and places one in contact of whom the Inner Self, the Inner Light as bro george sings in the most excellent beatles composiotion, and presto, there is a devoteespeaking on behalf of Sri Sri Guru and Gauranga. This is no accident, this first contact. And that person fits all definition of guru, specifically inspired to give what he has himself received. (Now comes the letdown, I have forgotten the adjective for this form of Lord Nityananda as the introduction guru.) SIKSA GURU Then naturally, the invitee to the feast wants more, so he sits down with a particular devotee and hears from him (her) with rapt attention, and performs service in return (takes the beads, and begins the sadhana bhakti process). DIKSA GURU Then the craving begins, one decides to make a commitment, the inquisitiveness, need, and utter poverty dwindles into SOPHIA (my word for Krsnas Personally sent wisdom.) The wisdom gives one vision to see the vaisnava, to decide beyond doubt, that this person is a valid link to Krsna who is guiding me from within, according to my sincerity. That person is one I must ask to enter into intimate world of Krsna Lila, to become a member of Lord Chaitanya's travelling samkirtana party. And that person may or may not agree to the proposal, not unlike a goddess who has the right to refuse the marriage proposal of a prospective suitor. When the marriage takes place, the two are acting as one, and that ultimate ONE is Srila Vyasadedva, the owner of the Vyasasana, who is the ultimate decider of authorization. I dont remember anything about joining a church, declaring allegiance, acting all religious, lie dat. Everything mentiond above seems quite natural, surfing. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Zx0O2p-wAM&feature=related BTW, The above link is what I mean about comedy relief. Guru tattwa. Discussion, anyone. No fighting, just realizations allowed. hare krsna, ys, mahaksadasa
  22. YouTube - Yellowman Reggae Sunsplash 1982........ height="350" width="425"> <embed src="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ko46_aXW_94" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" height="350" width="425"></object> <!-- / message --><!-- controls -->
  23. Or, as waters says, "there is no dark side of the moon. Its all dark." Or as dylan says, "theres no reason to get excited". I take your words as valid as well as theistic. hare krsna, ys, mahak
  24. another song is brewin, murali. A thousand years ago, when I had an echoplex and Gibson Birdland, I did the ol "Sunrise" song, very electric. "Sunrise, he bring in di morning, sunrise, he leave in di evening, spreadin all the light all around". I think Chief Joseph of the Nez Perce Band wrote that un. Hes a cool god, eh? Then, there is the great sunrise revelation at the great sunsplash, by the great yellowman himself. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ko46_aXW_94
  25. I see your point, theist. Im a bit jaded about the arrangement of these letters rather than the content. My objection is where the time of the letters is disregarded by the ones using them for their purposes and not necessarily his. (I.e. some say that letters written in 1969 are invalid because of letters written in 1974, yet when I countered by producing a 1975 letter that defeated their 1972 letter, they backtracked and even had the gall to say that he was patronizing the recipient of the letter). I guess I could say I like the letters, but hardly ever understand the points trying to be made by the users of these letters. The letters are pure nectar in and of themselves, sorry I seemed to say something different previously.
×
×
  • Create New...