ARJ

Thank you for posting your query, one of the technical analysts form Hare Krishna Pvt. Ltd. will be with you shortly.

Lord Vishnu's statue at Kwanshinji temple, Japan, does anyone have any more information on this temple ? Thank you

A man who just died is delivered to a local mortuary wearing an expensive, expertly tailored black suit. The female blonde mortician asks the deceased's wife how she would like the body dressed. She points out that the man does look good in the black suit he is already wearing. The widow, however, says that she always thought her husband looked his best in blue, and that she wants him in a blue suit. She gives the Blonde mortician a blank check and says, 'I don't care what it costs, but please have my husband in a blue suit for the viewing.' The woman returns the next day for the wake. To her delight, she finds her husband dressed in a gorgeous blue suit with a subtle chalk stripe; the suit fits him perfectly. She says to the mortician, 'Whatever this cost, I'm very satisfied. You did an excellent job and I' m very grateful. How much did you spend?' To her astonishment, the blonde mortician presents her with the blank check. 'There's no charge.' she says. 'No, really, I must compensate you for the cost of that exquisite blue suit!' she says. 'Honestly, ma'am,' the blonde says, 'it cost nothing. You see, a deceased gentleman of about your husband's size was brought in shortly after you left yesterday, and he was wearing an attractive blue suit. I asked his wife if she minded him going to his grave wearing a black suit instead, and she said it made no difference as long as he looked nice, so I just..... > > > > > > > > > > 'switched the heads!'

yes, the 'VAISHNAVISED' version of Vedas

now that's a pathetic attempt to justify or shift the blame

budding jehadists

a must watch video </param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src=" " type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

Can you prove it ? Christians, Mohammedians they all claim what's written in their books is the only truth.

you can make anyone as Kalki avatara, all you have to do is add a few words in the bhagavata purana.

Ten-year-old Deep Shah can mentally multiply 999 by 2,300 within seconds, but he insists he's no child prodigy, just a good student of Vedic maths. Vedic maths, derived from ancient Hindu scriptures called the Vedas, claims to enable students to calculate complex sums faster and in a much simpler way, a skill thousands of students are clamouring for in India's highly competitive school system. Unlike traditional mathematics, Vedic maths offers several options to work out a calculation and cuts the number of steps required to find a solution. "I like Vedic maths because I can do the calculation more easily and faster, just like a calculator," said the beaming Shah, who lives in Mumbai. He said he can easily multiply any four-digit number by 999 within seconds. Vedic maths is based on a set of 16 key formulae and some subsidiary formulae given in word form. These formulae, compiled between 1911 and 1918, help calculate the way the mind naturally functions, experts say. Students are now taking up these formulae to gain an edge over others in India's highly competitive, exam-geared school system and dozens of colleges and schools have introduced supplementary Vedic maths lessons to help students. "A few years ago no one heard of Vedic maths," said author Kenneth Williams, who teaches the subject on the Internet and has run courses at the Oxford University. "It is certainly better than the maths currently taught and the recognition it is now receiving throughout the world proves its effectiveness," he said. The growing popularity of Vedic maths in India has prompted teacher Deep Kapadia to set up 13 centres across the country and enter tie-ups with seven colleges in Mumbai. Plans are also underway to open a centre in Muscat and Chicago by the end of the year, said Kapadia, who teaches 1,000 students a year now compared with only 100 a few years ago. "Anyone who hates maths will start to love it. You can solve a problem in two or three ways," said Nirmal Doshi, 42, a textile engineer who has been studying Vedic maths for the last eight years. source

JAI GANESH

I love audarya

what i meant is K.C. is not as flexible as Buddhism. The no. of whites proves nothing, rope in a couple of idiots from Hollywood & the rest will dance to your tune.

Because they are Indians they are populating ISKCON temples, but Buddhism is more popular worldwide than K.C.

this should do it

Don't strain your brain, 'sok

Werner Heisenberg developed the uncertainty principle which tells us that we (the observer) can never exactly know both the position and momentum of a particle. As every observation requires an energy exchange (photon) to create the observed 'data', some energy (wave) state of the observed object has to be altered. Thus the observation has a discrete effect on what we measure, limiting how precisely we can determine both the position and momentum of the particle. Max Born (1928) was the first to discover (by chance and with no theoretical foundation) that the square of the quantum wave equations (which is actually the wave-density) could be used to predict the probability of where the particle would be found. Since it was impossible for both the waves and the particles to be real entities, it became customary to regard the waves as unreal 'probability waves' and to maintain the belief in the 'real' particle. Unfortunately this maintained the belief in the particle/wave duality, in a new form where the 'quantum' scalar waves had become 'probability waves' for the 'real' particle. Albert Einstein agreed with this probability wave interpretation, as he believed in continuous force fields (not in waves or particles) thus to him it was sensible that the waves were not real, and were mere descriptions of probabilities. It seems to be clear, therefore, that Born's statistical interpretation of quantum physics is the only possible one. The wave function does not in any way describe a state which could be that of a single system; it relates rather to many systems, to an 'ensemble of systems' in the sense of statistical mechanics. (Albert Einstein, On Quantum Physics, 1954) Albert Einstein was correct to realise that matter is not a discrete 'particle' but is spherically spatially extended. His error was to represent matter as a continuous spherical force field rather than a Spherical Standing Wave (a subtle but profound difference). Thus it is true that matter is intimately interconnected to all the other matter in the universe (by the spherical In and Out-waves). It is this lack of knowledge of the system as a whole that is the ultimate cause of the uncertainty and resultant probability inherent in Quantum Physics. http://www.spaceandmotion.com/Physics-Erwin-Schrodinger.htm

Maya Reloaded <embed src="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Dq454iFp2c&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" height="300" width="375">

An excerpt from John Dobson's book Advaita Vedanta & Modern Science "We can understand the attraction between the proton and the electron as the undividedness seen in the duality, just as we can understand the gravitational attraction of the protons for each other as the undividedness seen in the plurality. As a member of the duality, the proton sees itself (if we may use such language) as separated from the electron. As a member of the plurality, it sees itself as separated from the rest of the universe. But in either case it sees itself as small, and we can understand the self- repulsion of like charge as simply the infinitude seen in the apparent smallness. The gravitational energy of the primordial hydrogen can be understood as priya, the undivided seen in the apparently divided. The electrical energy of the primordial hydrogen can be understood as bhati, the infinite seen in the apparently finite. Bhati and Priya drive the change in which the changeless is seen as Asti, inertia. In the great-space, this is our primordial hydrogen. It arises through apparition, through the appearance of pairs of opposites, space against time, mass against energy, gravity against electricity, plus against minus and spin-up against spin-down, without any change in the changeless. We have seen how, through relativity theory, modern science has been driven to the conclusion of the Advaita Vedantins that the first cause must be apparitional. The screen through which we see the reality must be the screen of apparitional causation, what the Vedantins call Maya. We have also seen how, through relativity theory, modern science has been driven to the conclusion that the nature of the reality which underlies the multifarious diversity in the world of our perceptions must be changeless, infinite and undivided. Finally, and this is the important point, we have seen that, through a careful analysis of apparitional causation we are able, at last, to understand why we see a universe of hydrogen and not something else." the book can be downloaded from here

hmmmm....... Advaita in the garb of Buddhism definitely Buddha must be rolling in his samadhi

Dear Buddha, we need someONE to experience this Shunyata.

Get enlightened here & now, fools <embed src=" " type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" height="244" width="300"> Swami Dayananda, 1976 (Swami Chinmayananda's disciple)