chandu_69

No. It is very simple.

Jesus said "though shalt not kill".

 

 

Like prabhupada harekrishnas repeat the same error.Obviously prabhupada's knowledge of other religions is superficial.

"though shalt not kill" is one of the ten commandments of Old testament.

In The original hebrew bible(torah) it actually translates as

"though shalt not murder".

Anybody can do a Google search and find out.

Hitler's guru was a woman.

 

 

http://books.google.com/books?id=m6-5YC-pBk4C&pg=PA1&lpg=PA1&dq=Hitler%27s+guru&source=bl&ots=STi-g5mV_c&sig=vY5EwotdIA3XlTn3sTL_3TfItHM&hl=en&ei=svDxSbXkCMbJtgeSjcWyDw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1#PPP1,M1

savitri devi was not a Hindu guru.

Any fool can do a google search like the saying "any fool can pull a trigger".

Hitler recd. a lot of 'secret' teaching from hindu gurus, that's how he became powerful. But I am not sure if BSM was one of them.

What are those secret teachings? Can you provide references.

They might, if they have the power. Since they don't, they're forced to be nice and humble;

They had power and there is nothing in their scriptures to encourage or advocate what you are claiming.

prince goutham personality

 

understanding my questions-nil

intelligence quotient=corrupted

able to answer simple yes or know=nil

talking off topic=100%

how do expect him to engage in a debate?. his only purpose is to spam.

How effortlessly Sambya is changing his position in the same thread.

Page-1 he is condemning prabhupada for saying that the above religions are imperfect.

now he is against prabhupada for inferring the opposite.

Sambya for a change comeout with your real islamic identity.

009.029 : FIGHT those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.

Adding to Smiley's post(in this page) with regards to jealous and vindictiveness on account of nonworship or competetive worship.

004.048

: Allah forgiveth not that partners should be set up with Him; but He forgiveth anything else, to whom He pleaseth; to set up partners with Allah is to devise a sin Most heinous indeed.

004.116

: Allah forgiveth not (The sin of) joining other gods with Him; but He forgiveth whom He pleaseth other sins than this: one who joins other gods with Allah, Hath strayed far, far away (from the right).

025.068 : Those who invoke not, with Allah, any other god, nor slay such life as Allah has made sacred except for just cause, nor commit fornication; - and any that does this (not only) meets punishment.

continuation of 68

025.069 : (But) the Penalty on the Day of Judgment will be doubled to him, and he will dwell therein in ignominy,-

<b>When people speak of essential unity of all religions, such as: "we are all worshipping the same one God", "all religions are good" etc. this can be seen as political correctnes.</b>

 

<b>It is political correctness - because you do not want to offend others by showing inferiority of their religion</b>

.

Excellent explanation.I am guilty of not expanding on my assertion.

:smash::smash::smash:

Kulapavana,

Prabhupada is known to be politically correct, sometimes.

Btw, Buddha never said he is god.

Prabhupada is actually being polite here.

The god depicted in islamic and christian books is a jealous and vengefull one.

<b>Krishna is not a jealous god.

In my book a jealous and vengeful god is no god</b>.

Speculation is spiritual and

factual information is karmic...

my ..my .. my ...

Incorrigible.

Suchandra, i know you have a difficulty in reading what you wrote and the response of others.

Just look at what you wrote in the other thread i mentioned.

If the Indian government goes against Pakistan it should be clear that the Indian government itself is part of the conspiracy. Pakistan's president Asif Ali Zardari clearly says, these are terrorists which have to eliminated. Manmohan Singh, India's president says, no, this is an attack originating from Pakistan's government. In other words, like Bush, he uses terrorism to start a war.

Just read it.

Well, I have explained giving evidence here at this thread

http://www.indiadivine.org/audarya/world-review/450173-chopra-attack-prompts-tough-questions.html

suchandra made some funny and wild observations saying manmohan singh wants to be another bush.

That indian finacial institutions want war.

Little he knows India is not US and war is bad for everybody's business.There is no military industrial complex of any significance and whatever small defence suppliers that india have an unhappy prospect of payments getting delayed in the event of war.

Pakistani bloggers have written a zillion pages that kasab (the lone terrorist) caught in mumbai attacks is an indian.But all that stopped after nawaz sharif and sherry rehman (pakistan minister) accepted the fact of kasab being a pakisthani citizen.

I have explained patiently (in the thread mentioned above) the evidences gathered and i painstakingly gave information from pakistan news agencies.

Now, he is back with same theories.Had he discussed those evidences i would have patiently explained again without blowing the lid.

The problem with him is he is unable to distinguish between opinions and facts.If he keeps his fanciful theories to himself nobody should have any objection.

The worm shows its teeth. Well that's your sentimental belief, you simply present your biased opinion. Therefore if you like it or not you have to accept that others do the same.

Sentimental beleif??. i am not way off the mark when i said you are an imbecile cause you dont know difference between

facts, opinions and beleifs.What a moron.

The worm shows its teeth. Well that's your sentimental belief, you simply present your biased opinion. Therefore if you like it or not you have to accept that others do the same.

Just use google, Mumbai terror inside job, why blame me for getting ideas?

Yeah google and u get ideas on why earth is flat.

Suchandra is back to stupid theories.what a waste of life.And there is enough fodder on the net from islamic publicity machine to feed imbeciles like him.

Info for your stupid mind;

Ajmal kasab caught in the attack is a pakistani.Admitted by pakistan minister to a pakisthani news channel.

http://www.geo.tv/1-7-2009/32168.htm

The terrorists were conversing with their pakistani handlers

by sat phones.

and more at http://specials.rediff.com/news/2009/mar/17sld1-book-extract-of-mumbai-attacked.htm

"..All Beings are in Me,But I am NOT in them."

 

You seemed to have missed this.

 

 

MANY PEOPLE MISS THIS

chandu,why ARE you being so obnoxious. ??

 

MASALA ???

Do you have any idea what manifestation of Mahabhava means ??

 

This mahabhava is yearned by Shankara ever so earnestly and constantly.

 

You are so out of your league here,you don't even know what your dealing with.

 

..snipped irrelent nonsense...

 

***

 

Over ZEALOUS.

Mahabhava= highest level of god(krishna in this case) consciousness.

Did Caitanya mahaprabhu say he is an avatar of krishna?

I was merely objecting to the sectarians view on this.I am in no way casting any aspersions on caitanya mahaprabhu..

and chandu keep your fanatic views against muslims to yourself

This is an irrelevent and malicious talk.

Sambya a she her girly talks and posts which ful of smileys and lols reflect that and shes not a muslim because i read a post of her defending krisna against someoNe

That is just a tactic to fool new guys like you and some gullibles.I recommend you to check his older posts.He was talking nonsense that krishna is not vishnu and that harekrishnas and vaishnavas are stupid to think that krishna is brahman.

And my posts showing evidence where he comes from.

Nonsense you r disgrace girl shes not a muslim mate but a liar

It is not a she..liar, yes.

See how he is stonewalling.He used content before(exact copy paste) from muslim sites who abuse hinduism.

I have identified a similar fellow who went by the id arj.Gullible hindus dismissed me initially.

I debated with lots of muslims. So, i recognise one when i see one.

on a serious note dont drag in parents here . its not keeping with the desired etiquettes .

Not at all.I said in the remote chance that you dont know this.That is just for your info only.No need to share with us what u learn from that query.