Amlesh

Back to square one.

No use of arguing with you. But that does not mean I said yes to your thoughts. Anyways, I'm happy that you are a devotee of Vishnu [The only thing I can agree with you is that he is the Supreme.]

It's me to be blamed. Krishna is the basis of Vaisnavism, so how can he be a myth. And it's not that what we want to convey.

Janmane Jayante Sudra (Purana). By birth everyone is a Sudra. We get our identity according to our nature.

So he is.

The other day you spoke about roses smell sweet. But Dark is also like a Flower but a CauliFlower, he is odorless, he has only 1 angle of vision.

He might be with the Lord or explaining the others about the Father. Or since he is the Son of God, He is waiting for you to become his brother. It's a statement that will activate Dark with his missiles, where is my shield;).

Yes, you are right. The reason behind my attachment is Hari only. "For you to become my disciple you'll need to hate your [material] father " - Christ.

When truth is placed as the basis of your task. Then everything is in order. The show must go on.... Thanks Bhaktajan.

The day you meet a real Vaishnava you tell me. The way you perceive Itihaas and Puranas are your way, mine is different from you. Furthermore, it's a proof with these ideas that you have, you'll be unwilling to help any other entities with the exceptions of those who think like you. Don't ask me mine, I see them as the sons of God only, even the worst of their Kind.

Yep... I know.

1. It's your interpretation about Parasara Muni. 2. Vaishnavism gives the missing links between the different school of thoughts. That's why I say He is the Son of God [Hari].

All these are nice ingredients for self relisation. Instead to going to Maa Luxmi for wealth, ask Maa to introduce you to her Husband.

He said explicitly, I'm the son of God. Is there 10 gods? Of course there is only one, it's Hari.

I know, he also said, after coming to his realm he'll explain the rest. But even for the Christians, his realm is not easily attainable.

I don't follow their path, but I respect what Jesus did for them, though there are things lacking in his teaching, which even Jesus confirmed about it.

I'm not sarcastic but may be illogical. I admit about what you've said about Veda, but it's not a text to be decoded so easily. From time to time sages come to explain those texts according to time and circumstances and in a limited way. It happens because not everybody can understand the Vedas perfectly in this material world. True, but that does not mean we should despise them and force them to learn something which is not to their calibre. It will be detrimental for them. True again, but in some way or the other they are praying to those ones who are dear to God only. For e.g., Shiva is very dear to Hari, Buddha is an incarnation to Hari and so on. I know that what you would expect from a Vaishnav is far much higher than than of a Christian and Shaivate. But that's the rule in the material world you can never get real followers of Hari at one go in this material world. It is a settled rule, confirmed by Hari himself. Jesus did what he can, I can never blame him for that. Infact i respect Him for that. I know for the followers of Jesus, it's mighty long and winding road but it's like that. As concerning me, I know that I'm not a Vaishnava. I'm always in search of one. That's why I would certainly not mind to see Yamraj one day after my death, but the only thing I'll ask Krishna is let me remember who I'm actually facing, one of His Dearest. And for sure I never mix Vaishnava with Christianity. Vaishnavism is the Universal set and Christianity is an element of it.

Ramanuja Acharya and Vedanta Deshikar, am I right Dark?

Dark is very compassionate, he wants each and everyone on this earth to attain Moksha at one go, which is my wish also, but we are not in Alice in wonderland. What you've said is true Dark, but the other routes if properly followed will lead some day or the other to Vishnu. It's a matter of the level of consiousness of every individual.

But I'm really attached to Bharatvarsh, though born in Mauritius.

Dark seems to be a patriotic Vaishnava.

In these issues, he has a lot of ammunitions.

:confused:???????Where is Dark Warrior????????:confused:

Perfectly said Bhaktajan, you deserve your title name. I agree with whatever you've said, but for the accomplishment of it, the group or organisation must be healthy in every aspect. If the other way round, instead of doing good for mankind, it will deteriorate things, which is not the trade mark of Vaishnavism. The reason why I say that is because I know many people who don't want hear about Hari because of the behaviour of some so-called Bhaktas, not really depicting the true values of Vaishnavism. It's sad because many are there who judge the deity by his so-called Bhaktas, which is often the case for Jesus. Many don't like Jesus, because of some his Bhaktas. No one will be willing to hear Gita, if his present devotees don't show the beauty of Gita. It leads to prejudice. I know it's not easy but it is my greatest wish to see things as they should be, like Srila Prabhupad wanted.

Yep, one day. But it is really interesting. And I would like to hear yours, I know, it would be even more interesting. I wonder how it would be for Theist and cBrahma??????????