Tarun

nA'sato'dRSTatvAt

not, of unreal, of destroyed object no longer existing; because it's not perceived

199) Of that disintegrated, there can't b persistence in cognition, for it's nowhere seen.

Should first a be A or a?

Similar 2 2nd chptr Gita verse... which one?

anusmRtez ca

from remembrance also

Memory & recollection both prove things r not momentary.

majjnaz ca pariNAmena, yadi zukraM pravartate |

sarva-deha-gataM zukraM, pravadanti manISiNaH |

tahA'sthi madhya majjnaz ca, zukraM bhavati dehinAm ||59||

[caraka : cikitsA 15:22-26]

'tis stated zukra's produced by majjA's transformation.

According to scholars, zukra pervades entire body whereas majjA is located only within bone.

Then how is it possible zukra comes from majjA?

40x100 - who's that on the seesaw? sattva-guN & rajoguN?

akAzE cAvizeSAt

in space case, ether example and from no specific difference

196) Sky's absolute non-existence tenet also untenable because no difference in this case too.

zlaxNAbhyAM mAMsa medobhyAM, kharatvaM katham asthiSu |

khareSvastiSu majjA ca, kena snigdho mRdus tathA ||58||

How is medas, liquid in nature, produced from solid mAMsa?

Asthi is rough natured. How is it produced from mAMsa & medas, both smooth-natured?

How is majjA, unctuous & soft, produced within rough bone?

Providence has forced a situation wherein i must go. There's no other remedy.

ubhayathA ca doSAt

in either case, and from objections, imbalances

In both cases, there r substantial arguments, hence release idea is unestablishable.

antidisestablishmentarianism?

"U can't have one, u can't have 1, u can't have nor not the other."

athaupadhenavAt, cikitsA sAra sangrahAt

rasAd raktaM visadRzAt, kathaM dehe'bhijAyate |

rasasya ca na rAgo'sti, sa kathaM yAti raktatAm ||56||

According to Aupadhenava tantra & CikitsA sAra sangrha:

Rakta looks different from rasa.

How former is produced from latter in body?

THere is no color in rasa.

=============

dravAd raktAt sthiraM mAMsaM, kathaM taj jayate nRNAm |

drava dhAtoH sthirAn mAMsAn, medasaH saMbhavaH katham ||57||

Hos does it become red?

Rakta is liquid in nature.Hos is mAMsa, solid in nature, produced from this rakta?

How is medas, liquid in nature, produced from solid mAMsa?

or weekends, otherwise call 718-591-3231 anytime

Stop in the Name of Prem... b4 u break His Heart.. think it over! Think it over!

Srila Bhaktipramoda Puri Gosai published "Heart of KRSNa = Avoiding Vaisnav-aparAdha"

prati-sankhyAprati-sankhyA nirodhAprAptir avicchedAt

(destruction) depending upon conscious entity's volition; destruction) not depending upon any voluntary agent

nirodhaH = cessation, breakdown aprapti = non-establishment; avicchedAt = no complete interruption

195) Nor can one establish 2 destruction sorts, volitional & non-volitional, for there's never any total extinction.

=======

I heard all 8,400,000 species exist at all times on one planet or another.

athaupadhenavAt, cikitsA sAra sangrahAt

rasAd raktaM visadRzAt, kathaM dehe'bhijAyate |

rasasya ca na rAgo'sti, sa kathaM yAti raktatAm ||56||

According to Aupadhenava tantra & CikitsA sAra sangrha:

Rakta looks different from rasa.

How former is produced from latter in body?

THere is no color in rasa.

9th offense is covered/avoided by Beatle's only non-musical recording:

"Take this brother, may it serve u well! Number 9, Number 9, Number 9"

I did not agree with PrabhupAd's 1972 'by hook or crook' letter. I still don't.

I explained my position/opinion in one VNN article.

I hope none of u agree with me.

Please don't. Pretty please. With cream on top.

Sans HarinAm, book distribution... doesn't rock... or roll... or jive for jeev.

Now r we further distinguishing betwixt 'P' & book sales?

asati pratijnoparodho yauga-padyam anyathA

non-being, pratijnA = stated fact; uparodhaH = contradiction; stepping together; were it not so

194) If cause ceases existence when effect begins, then admitted principle that Skandhas cause universe contradicts.

Otherwise cause & effect arise simultaneously.

Is there anybody going to listen to my story all about the house in Central Queens?

Rubber Soul 1966, problem unsolved 2005

Where? amidst it all.

khala-tirna bhavet strINAM, yasmAt tal likhyate' dhunA |

atyantasu kumArANAM, rajo duSTaM sravanti ca ||54||

avyAyAm aratAH yasmAt, tasmAn na khalati striyaH |

vAyuH pittam zamaM yAti, vyAyAm aparivarjanAt |

rajah sravaty ataH zuddir, jAyate sA na jAyate ||55||

No we shall write reasons y ladies don't bald.

They r very tender; waste products exit via menstrual secretion.

They don't indulge in exercise. (unlike today)

Ergo they suffer not from baldness.

Exercise avoidance alleviates vAyu & pitta.

From menses their body becomes clean.

Ergo they don't bald.

ps - Perhaps those who do do so due to imitating men.

uttarotpAde ca pUrvanirodhAt

in next, subsequent; at origin, production; and preceding stoppage, cessation

193) No causal relation may exist betwixt avidyA + rest, for when next manifests, former dissolves.

tato hInA smRtA yoSA, hIna-kUrcA matA budhaiH ||53||

According to Videha SaMhitA:

In ladies, hair number is less than stated above.

Ergo, they r called hInAkUrcA = having less hair

His impression of Carnival games:

"Hit the dog & win a puppy!"

Is this related to your calf/cow milking proposal?

Silverstein admitted on tape he wanted & ordered all WTC demolished in order to collect his cool $7 bil.

U guys r so far off base. Unbelievable.

still u could never fully count all the Supreme Lord's transcendental glories.

=============

agnivezAt

romNAM koTyas tu pancAzac, catasraH koTya eva ca |

tapta SaSthis tathA laxAH, sArdha-koTyas tathaiva ca ||51||

sankhyAta ity arthaH ||52||

trayolaxAs tu vijneyAH, zmazru-kezAH zarIriNAm |

According to Agniveza:

RomAs (small hairs) total 54.5 crores + 67 lakhs

Beard hairs total 3 lakhs

itaretara pratyayatvAd iti - cenotpattimAtra nimittatvAt

Washington Mutual = one another; from one causing other; thus if; merely of origin, production; from there being efficient cause only

192) If it b said material world is caused by Avidya's mutual causality, ZrIla Baladev VidyAbhUSaNa says no; they r only efficient causes of immediate subsequent links.