sant

Kulpavana what r saying krisna has mentione swadharm r u denying the gita

The tamo gun of teling a huge lie, to deceive others only murder does not come in tamo gun

I dont know about kartabhajas and al but this point does not aply here tantra consists of al these sadhanas and so this is apart of tantra a vaishnav is of bhakti

U cal yourself a vaishnav even more disgusting

See ure lying urd a low natured tamo gun is shown by u and ur post

Krisna is beyond knowledge as said in gita so we cannot know him by speculation as said by acharyas

I also was suffering some of the points especialy 3 do pranayam as it has helped also leave meditation and japa for sometime or do more pranayaam as some mantra can causes heat in the body.best is u ask a guru if u have one i think faith in god will help u more as this kundalini is under his will

Lying u are

Karnapisachini sadhana is inside tantra only im sure

Nonsense the orthodox brahmins were right when they did not let shoodra women translate ved as we can see the result with u. The smriti mention of low nature of women

I agree but on shruti being higher as i have also read about that but you cannot ignore the importance of puranas

Nonsense puraans were written 5000 yrs ago along with vedas

If you can call upanishad vedas then the puranas can also be vedas

Quote: <TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=6 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR><TD style="BORDER-RIGHT: #666666 1px solid; PADDING-RIGHT: 3ex; BORDER-TOP: #666666 1px solid; PADDING-LEFT: 3ex; BORDER-LEFT: #666666 1px solid; BORDER-BOTTOM: #666666 1px solid" bgColor=#e0e0e0>how do you know i follow tantra ? is it merely because i have a pic of kali as my avatar ? </TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE> most shakts are tantric i guess you live in calcutta all t he more the chances Quote: <TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=6 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR><TD style="BORDER-RIGHT: #666666 1px solid; PADDING-RIGHT: 3ex; BORDER-TOP: #666666 1px solid; PADDING-LEFT: 3ex; BORDER-LEFT: #666666 1px solid; BORDER-BOTTOM: #666666 1px solid" bgColor=#e0e0e0> ha ha !! even your vaishnav doctrines would agree that everything except god is temporary and relative . what are you speaking of ? 91 </TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>your hah Quote: <TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=6 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR><TD style="BORDER-RIGHT: #666666 1px solid; PADDING-RIGHT: 3ex; BORDER-TOP: #666666 1px solid; PADDING-LEFT: 3ex; BORDER-LEFT: #666666 1px solid; BORDER-BOTTOM: #666666 1px solid" bgColor=#e0e0e0> no ! im neither he nor she nor nothing . im not body neither the soul , im not buddhi , nor ego nor existence . CHIDANANDARUPAM SHIVOHAM SHIVOHAM !!! ha ha ha !!!!95 </TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>weird answers pr sense of humor Quote: <TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=6 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR><TD style="BORDER-RIGHT: #666666 1px solid; PADDING-RIGHT: 3ex; BORDER-TOP: #666666 1px solid; PADDING-LEFT: 3ex; BORDER-LEFT: #666666 1px solid; BORDER-BOTTOM: #666666 1px solid" bgColor=#e0e0e0>BTW , shakta texts never talk of vishnu as not being the supreme . tantra always respects the supremacy of vishnu . this is so because the supremacy of any male god can never undermine the importance of devi . sh is the inner potential of all male gods . she is laxmi and durga also . and she is the only existing female prin 96 </TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>tantra you talk yourself

sambya you yourself foollow tantra dont try to hide it

Quote: <TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=6 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR><TD style="BORDER-RIGHT: #666666 1px solid; PADDING-RIGHT: 3ex; BORDER-TOP: #666666 1px solid; PADDING-LEFT: 3ex; BORDER-LEFT: #666666 1px solid; BORDER-BOTTOM: #666666 1px solid" bgColor=#e0e0e0>is the concept of swadharma a flawed one right from its begining ? </TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE> here you did Quote: <TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=6 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR><TD style="BORDER-RIGHT: #666666 1px solid; PADDING-RIGHT: 3ex; BORDER-TOP: #666666 1px solid; PADDING-LEFT: 3ex; BORDER-LEFT: #666666 1px solid; BORDER-BOTTOM: #666666 1px solid" bgColor=#e0e0e0>chances of mistake in the shrutis is low as there is an extreme concern in all hinduism to pronounce the words correctly in order to get the full results of the rituals . but smritis might not be as accurate simply because they are written from rememberence . </TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE> you mean to say that puraans are not vedas

use amla in your self control procees it is helpful too

Quote: <TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=6 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR><TD style="BORDER-RIGHT: #666666 1px solid; PADDING-RIGHT: 3ex; BORDER-TOP: #666666 1px solid; PADDING-LEFT: 3ex; BORDER-LEFT: #666666 1px solid; BORDER-BOTTOM: #666666 1px solid" bgColor=#e0e0e0>is the concept of swadharma a flawed one right from its begining ? in order to solve this we must understand the very nature or shruti and smritis . shruti literally means that which is heard and reffers to the vedas upanishads and vedanta which was transmitted through hearing for centuries </TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE> Quote: <TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=6 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR><TD style="BORDER-RIGHT: #666666 1px solid; PADDING-RIGHT: 3ex; BORDER-TOP: #666666 1px solid; PADDING-LEFT: 3ex; BORDER-LEFT: #666666 1px solid; BORDER-BOTTOM: #666666 1px solid" bgColor=#e0e0e0>chances of mistake in the shrutis is low as there is an extreme concern in all hinduism to pronounce the words correctly in order to get the full results of the rituals . but smritis might not be as accurate simply because they are written from rememberence . and as swadharma is a smriti concept we might conclude that there are misinterpretations in the texts . later day corruption and misinterpretations might have caused such texts to have been added to the otherwise broad and universal sanatana dharma . </TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE> bhagwat gita is also considered a shruti and krishna mentions varnashram dharam now is that also flawed? or do you just want to critisize the vedas why dont u start finding faults witht antric methods that you follow is that smriti or shruti

no only 3

are you ok now

oh yes good post

how is puraan a smriti please explain as they herad and not remembered

i dont think varn ashram is wrong because even in bhagwad gita krishna talks about it and im shore he didnt mean what is happening here as history taught us about the injustice done to shudras and the corrupt brahmins and that is why i think new religions came here in the kaliyugu . women and shudras do not read ved and misintepret them that is why they were not allowed.but that is happening now i think. om is the most difficult to realise so may be that is why women and shudras were not allowed. and what was not allowed for brahmins was allowed for shudras such as eating anything. in puraan a great rishi says that in kaliyuga women and shudras are the best. women can reach higher planet by serving their husband but yes taking it as a supremacy point as it was taken and misused is wrong. varn ashram is only for duty. but the work of a soldier is higher than that of a vaishya. and for shudras methods such as tantra is already there for religion.

excellent

only 3 r there Finished Files are the result of years of scientific study combined with the experience of Years.