sant

I Mean Brahman Only But There Are Many People Worshpping As Shiva The Formless Parmatma Take An Example Read Ab\out Brahmakumaris - Very Big Organisation Take The Example Of Baba Avdhoot Shivanand See His Website Or Watch Him On Tv Shivling Says That Parmatma Is Formless And I Think They Refer To The Breahman Of Krsihna Which Is Atributeless And So You Can Call Him By Any Name

Quote: <TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=6 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR><TD style="BORDER-RIGHT: #666666 1px solid; PADDING-RIGHT: 3ex; BORDER-TOP: #666666 1px solid; PADDING-LEFT: 3ex; BORDER-LEFT: #666666 1px solid; BORDER-BOTTOM: #666666 1px solid" bgColor=#e0e0e0>There are many mantras connected with healing general ailments and also specific diseases. Atharva Veda is the source of many of this mantras. They are part of Ayur Veda which is also part of Atharva Veda. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ayurveda You may contact one of the older traditional Ayur Vedic Practitioners. Kerala is the state where there are many. <!-- / message --><!-- sig --> </TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE> I THANK YOU Quote: <TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=6 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR><TD style="BORDER-RIGHT: #666666 1px solid; PADDING-RIGHT: 3ex; BORDER-TOP: #666666 1px solid; PADDING-LEFT: 3ex; BORDER-LEFT: #666666 1px solid; BORDER-BOTTOM: #666666 1px solid" bgColor=#e0e0e0> <HR style="COLOR: #ffffff" SIZE=1> <!-- / icon and title --><!-- message --> http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/sbe42/index.htm You should ask a Brahmin priest if there are any restrictions. It is consonant with Sanatana Dharma to consult them in any matters relating to the Vedas. </TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE> I THANK YOU

thank you

hey you tall about sadhana all the time so i said sometimes your English is too bad,sometime fluent,why to hide imotions Sant? cant get u here on this one what do u say

ok i dont know much but japninja i think kali upasakji has a point take this link /message/8484

Beside i am talking from shastras and great acharyas not merely through emotions

I agree but Hindustani god is not my own but everybodys and i am not such a high sadhak like u act like

Wel its a form to represent the formles nature of god. have you heard about brahmakumaris they are rajayog folowers they believe in this and they are a big example they dont worship bhole baba in particular but the formles shiva

Yes I Think These Pisaach Sadhaks Can Tell About Past Present And Future Thats All This Sadhana Is About

whos calling tantra wrong kali upasakji but im saying this pisaach sadhana is tantrik thats all

post edited

Oh Yes Narasingh Thank You Great Post Lotusflower

RIGHT TRHOUGH KRISHNAS GRACE MAYBE ONE CAN DEFEAT KAMA DEVA

It Is The Nature Of Maya To Delude And Durga Is Krishna Deluding Mahamaya And Though She Provides Moksh This Devi Bhagwatam Is Not Fully Correct And Is Illusionary And Such Mayavadi

devi bhgwatam does mention krishna as supreme in many skands. refer to earlier posts like 48 though in the start it challenges vishnus position. THIS MAY BE BECAUSE AS KRISHNA IS GOD AND HE IS UNDER RADHARANIS CONTROL AS GOD IS CONTROL UNDER HIS DEVOTEES BY HER LOVE.(PLEASE CORRECT ME ABOUT THIS) DEVI BEING CONTROLLER OF VISHNU CAN BE INTEPRETATED TOWARDS THIS CONCLUSION VERY EASILY. EVEN JAGAD GURU KRIPALU MAHARAJ DESCRIBES KRISHNA AS GOD AND DEVI BHAGWATAM IS MENTIONED IN ONE OF HIS WEBSITES. SO THIS DEVI BHAGWAT CAN BE SOMEWHAT ILLUSIONARY AS I HAVE POSTED IN OTHER DEVI BHAGWAT FORUM <!-- / message -->

repeat my point but i want to say that god is only impersonal brahman according to shakt and shaiv texts EXAMPLE: shivling is attributeless and nirguna form of god as written in shiva puraan. he is known as shiv/sadahshiv and is not rudradev rudra dev is only a part of him as according to the puraan even devi bhagwat says about god being formless atrribute less they just call her shakti AND MAA kali is a small form of that shakti just like lakshmi and vaishnav philosophy says that krishna is basis of that brahman aint i right? krishna is not subservient to that brahman so their is a big difference

tell professor m sivasurya that plants also have life

im sorry sambhya will not be rude to you by using such words i have edited this post

hey dont tell me ask any intelligent tantric yourself what im talking

Sambya a she her girly talks and posts which ful of smileys and lols reflect that and shes not a muslim because i read a post of her defending krisna against someoNe

Nonsense you r disgrace girl shes not a muslim mate but a liar

Sory kulpvana ji i apologise for my coment but she has declared swadharm to be faulty from the start

No she a tantrik ive given proofs but whatever he or she is, she is not very truthful

U see her posts asking relevance of truthfulness in sadhana she herself IS SHOWING HOW UNTRUTHFUL SHE IS ARE YOU UNDERSTANDING

Sambya is lying and im not joking chandu