Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

talasiga

Members
  • Content Count

    654
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by talasiga


  1. Originally posted by Avinash:

    Avinash (formerly Animesh)

    If you are the former Animesh,

    how come you are only a "junior" member ?

    What happened ?

     

    Are you trying to confuse the FBI ?

    Posted Image

     

     

    Hah !

    But you can't fool

    this Fiji Born Indian.

    Posted Image

     

    But seriously, Avinash

    I think you will find that, if indeed

    the US FBI are investigating South Asians -

    it is the prospect of a Muslim terrorist element

    that is instigating it.

     

    BTW

    have you ever seen a walrus with only one tusk ?

    Ekadantiyum Atlanticum !

     

     


  2. Originally posted by karthik_v:

    There is absolutely no reason to believe that Buddhism was ever a popular religion of the masses in India. If that were the case, there should have been many literature to support such a claim. But, even in an ancient language like Tamil, we can just come across a couple of Buddhist literature.

     

     

    This is quite bizarre reasoning.

    In ancient India, Sanskrit was the predominant scriptural vehicle

    of Hinduism

    and

    Pali was the predominant scriptural vehicle

    of Buddhism.

     

    1.There is no need to speculate

    that the absence of <u>ancient</u> Buddhist texts

    in Tamil means the absence of Buddhism in <u>ancient</u> Tamil Nadu.

    Nor is there a need to speculate

    that the the absence of <u>ancient</u> Hindu texts in Tamil means the absence of Hinduism in <u>ancient</u> Tamil Nadu.

     

    (In the ancient period under consideration here

    I know of no significant Hindu texts in Tamil.)

     

    2. Buddhism had its peak of royal patronage

    under the Mauryan emperor Ashoka (c268 BC - 233 BC). Ashoka's reign represented the peak of the Mauryan Empire and even during his reign <u>Kerala and Tamil Nadu were not included</u> in the empire.

     

    [This message has been edited by talasiga (edited 12-11-2001).]


  3. Originally posted by JRdd:

    This mood is so far removed from the days when devotees appreciated each other so much, and genuinely felt humbled in each other's presence, and meant the obeisances and pranams that were constantly offered.

    Hey !

    Am I in the past

    or is it in your presence

    those days do last and last ?

     

     

    Here is my well meant pranaam:-

    "I greet the highest in you.

    Your goodness walks in front of me.

    Your gentleness bids me good day.

    Your laughter raises me to joyfulness.

    Your quietness leads me away."

     

    - A Ute Prayer for Friendship from

    War Cry on a Prayer Feather: Prose and Poetry of the Ute [Red]Indians

    by Nancy Wood,

    (Doubleday & Co, New York

    ISBN 0-385-12885-1 )

     

    .

    .

    .

     

    [This message has been edited by talasiga (edited 12-11-2001).]

     

    Posted Image

     

    [This message has been edited by talasiga (edited 01-07-2002).]


  4. Originally posted by Krsnacandra dasa:

     

    For some reason, the media really does not want

    to talk about him being a devotee of [Krishna].

    It happens to many .

     

    It is all part of His plan

    To keep our relationship

    A secret cherish .

     

    .

    .

    .

     

     

     

    [This message has been edited by talasiga (edited 12-10-2001).]


  5. Originally posted by gHari:

    Excerpt of letter to Syamasundara das, April 12, 1970:

     

    I think George does not require to become my formal

    disciple because he is already more than my disciple.

     

    Ahhhh !

    the diplomacy of the wise and loving .....

     

     

     

    [This message has been edited by talasiga (edited 12-09-2001).]


  6. Originally posted by suryaz:

    YES! YES! YES! Right On Talasiga Posted Image YES - A mistake, surrounded by confusion.

    ( Posted Image Oh dear - she is trying to beat

    me with my own stick.............)

     

    Nevertheless all the elements

    in the mistake are real

    and its result too......

    and

    you "have no idea how [it] happened"

    and when you do work it out

    you may no longer be confused

    but the mistake won't disappear

    and even if you fix it

    while it existed the mistake

    will have existed

    as a real thing.........

     

     

     

     

    [This message has been edited by talasiga (edited 12-07-2001).]


  7. Originally posted by suryaz:

    The object only has appealing value when I superimpose my notions about that onto it. ........bye for now

     

    Oh ! So now you have introduced

    <u>notional</u> temptation ?

    It appears that you are suggesting that

    Self generated Desire for Object

    is due to the Choosing a Notion for superimposition.

     

    Thus

    T[emptation] is a <u>context</u> where S[elf] with Desire

    has option of C[hoice] of N[otion].

     

    This is a precise summation of what you just said - generically no different to the earlier summation encapsulating O.

     

     

     

     

    [This message has been edited by talasiga (edited 12-06-2001).]


  8. Originally posted by suryaz:

    I have no idea how the underlining bit happened Posted Image

     

     

    (Perhaps not unlike Temptation) !

    Posted Image

     

     

    Please take responsibility (which you rightly promote)

    and fix it up.

    The Law of Copyright

    requires accuracy of representation.

    If you wish to insert something not in the original utterance

    editorial convention requires your insertion to be in square brackets

    or some separate notation admitting

    the change.

     

    Shvu is very knowledgeable and might

    be able to help you with the underlining.

    Otherwise, you should go back to where you quoted me

    and in square brackets put a note like: [underlining by Suryaz].

     

     

     

    [This message has been edited by talasiga (edited 12-06-2001).]

×
×
  • Create New...