talasiga

If you are the former Animesh, how come you are only a "junior" member ? What happened ? Are you trying to confuse the FBI ? Hah ! But you can't fool this Fiji Born Indian. But seriously, Avinash I think you will find that, if indeed the US FBI are investigating South Asians - it is the prospect of a Muslim terrorist element that is instigating it. BTW have you ever seen a walrus with only one tusk ? Ekadantiyum Atlanticum !

Ahhhh ! The humour of the wise and diplomatic .....

This is quite bizarre reasoning. In ancient India, Sanskrit was the predominant scriptural vehicle of Hinduism and Pali was the predominant scriptural vehicle of Buddhism. 1.There is no need to speculate that the absence of <u>ancient</u> Buddhist texts in Tamil means the absence of Buddhism in <u>ancient</u> Tamil Nadu. Nor is there a need to speculate that the the absence of <u>ancient</u> Hindu texts in Tamil means the absence of Hinduism in <u>ancient</u> Tamil Nadu. (In the ancient period under consideration here I know of no significant Hindu texts in Tamil.) 2. Buddhism had its peak of royal patronage under the Mauryan emperor Ashoka (c268 BC - 233 BC). Ashoka's reign represented the peak of the Mauryan Empire and even during his reign <u>Kerala and Tamil Nadu were not included</u> in the empire. [This message has been edited by talasiga (edited 12-11-2001).]

A most tempting question But we have no desire to answer it ..... Talasiga & Co. [This message has been edited by talasiga (edited 12-11-2001).]

Perhaps it was a shower of blessings. . . . [This message has been edited by talasiga (edited 12-11-2001).]

Hey ! Am I in the past or is it in your presence those days do last and last ? Here is my well meant pranaam:- "I greet the highest in you. Your goodness walks in front of me. Your gentleness bids me good day. Your laughter raises me to joyfulness. Your quietness leads me away." - A Ute Prayer for Friendship from War Cry on a Prayer Feather: Prose and Poetry of the Ute [Red]Indians by Nancy Wood, (Doubleday & Co, New York ISBN 0-385-12885-1 ) . . . [This message has been edited by talasiga (edited 12-11-2001).] [This message has been edited by talasiga (edited 01-07-2002).]

Sometimes I feel like a demolition in progress

The greatest loneliness is known in close company

It happens to many . It is all part of His plan To keep our relationship A secret cherish . . . . [This message has been edited by talasiga (edited 12-10-2001).]

Do you enjoy analysing droppings ? Me too !

new readers may also be interested in this older thread "Loneliness Vesus Alone" commenced by Bhaktavasya:- http://www.indiadivine.com/ubb/Forum1/HTML/000562.html

Ahhhh ! the diplomacy of the wise and loving ..... [This message has been edited by talasiga (edited 12-09-2001).]

Let me see now ...... let me see..... Learn how to put Des cartes before Des ass and still pull the world along ?

Hmmmm...... Neela Kant Mahadeva ! Jay Jay Shambho !

Knowledge without wisdom is like a college with no dean

If you see a body with a sleeping mind You will notice it is mourning

Black and Gold ? How sweet - Krishna and Radha .....

Wait a minute ! First KICK the mirror hard to see it really exists .....

Hey ! Where do YOU put your head at night ?

Well, I don't understand you. Are you a woman or Am I a beast ?

Yep, right again ! Try kicking a bad habit .....

Yes you're right ! Each has his/her very own God .....

( Oh dear - she is trying to beat me with my own stick.............) Nevertheless all the elements in the mistake are real and its result too...... and you "have no idea how [it] happened" and when you do work it out you may no longer be confused but the mistake won't disappear and even if you fix it while it existed the mistake will have existed as a real thing......... [This message has been edited by talasiga (edited 12-07-2001).]

Oh ! So now you have introduced <u>notional</u> temptation ? It appears that you are suggesting that Self generated Desire for Object is due to the Choosing a Notion for superimposition. Thus T[emptation] is a <u>context</u> where S[elf] with Desire has option of C[hoice] of N[otion]. This is a precise summation of what you just said - generically no different to the earlier summation encapsulating O. [This message has been edited by talasiga (edited 12-06-2001).]

(Perhaps not unlike Temptation) ! Please take responsibility (which you rightly promote) and fix it up. The Law of Copyright requires accuracy of representation. If you wish to insert something not in the original utterance editorial convention requires your insertion to be in square brackets or some separate notation admitting the change. Shvu is very knowledgeable and might be able to help you with the underlining. Otherwise, you should go back to where you quoted me and in square brackets put a note like: [underlining by Suryaz]. [This message has been edited by talasiga (edited 12-06-2001).]