chandu_69

Ask your parents.

So , you are accepting that you are a muslim. A muslim wont swear on god and say lies.I know that.

Sambya is a muslim many times i made it clear with evidence. He will avoid this question.I asked him to swear on god and say he is not a muslim. If he swears on god and say he is not a muslim i will apologize and remove all my posts on him.

Muslim following tantra?? Not many i know of. Btw, Sambya you havent answered my question who is your god.Swear on god and answer it.

Said perfectly.He accomplished his mission of increasing krishna consciousness.The rest is all masala of overjealous sectarians.

Not exactly the word munivadAmisaam was brocken up in to two words (wrongly) as munivada and Amisaam. Also it is redundant to mention about meat seperately if when it is already mentioned living off on roots fruits and honey.No cooked food.That is the stress

Lol@ xochitl, I dont need either caitanya or Srimati Radharani to know the message of krishna.But, i dont need to object either..lol here is the signature of theist ""If a devotee accepts Lord Sri Caitanya Mahaprabhu as the <i>universal guru</i> and Lord Jagannatha as the Supreme Personality of Godhead Krsna, he is benefited by the combined mercy of Krsna and guru." - Madhya 13.18 purport"

I agree with this completely.

Sant, I am not telling you in particular. Cleaning up based on the principle “Let noble thoughts come to us from everywhere.” and sattvik aspects.I am sure there will be more. And absolute junk like "DADEECHI" story.

There is lot of cleaning up to do in the hindu texts.Any tom dick and harry(or it is golu,lolu and lallu) can write any nonsense and pass it of as scripture. A good starting point could be what kyros wrote quoting from bhagavadgita.

This is nothing but masala .What is the necessity to glorify Chaitanya Mahaprabhu?. Are u people bored of discussing krishna and his leelas?

Ok, i didnt quite get the picture at the first glance.Sant, please be brief and post your views clearly.

SANT are u on a troll mode.what rubbish you are posting?

This question was answered way back in 2001 at http://www.indiadivine.org/audarya/spiritual-discussions/28150-did-rama-eat-meat-2.html

It is not Amishaam(आमिषम् ) in the in 2-20-29 it is munivadaamiSham(ascetics= munis).."Like munis"... This question was answered in 2001 in this same forum http://www.indiadivine.org/audarya/spiritual-discussions/28150-did-rama-eat-meat-2.html

No problem I didnt get it.Let the harekrishnas think that they can dominate the world.i see no problem with that.How does that make u compare them with Tamar lane? Desire exactly the same??.I think you are smarter than that.What is the comparison between dreaming that the whole world become harekrishna and making a slaughter in the land(of the timur lane variety) Again the comparison is atrocious.Dont u Like the whole world become advaitan. Ofcourse they will never think of Murder as a means for "world domination". Ohh man, The world of islam is much bigger than the few individuals you know of. Why do you think the muslim guy with mnc( india) was actively helping the bomb blasters?I am sure u agree many such people are roaming freely.Take a look at what Zia-ur Rehman said after he was caught(http://indiatoday.intoday.in/index.php?option=com_content&Itemid=1&task=view&id=16662&sectionid=30&issueid=74&page=archieve) I noticed that and i responded in some threads and made bhaktajan not to talk that way wrt God Shiva. But i dont think u should have any problem with denigration of hinduism.In your latest post you compared rama and krishna to the charlatan saibaba. Lol., i countered them in the threads i am aware of.But again, that should be the least of ur problems.Ur utter contempt for hinduism(except ur version of the advaitan kind) is evident from all ur posts.Am i wrong?

Melvin i have no idea.Bathala doesnt appear to be related neither to allah nor to govinda.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bathala

Then why dont you spend your time educating people who beleived in killer cults rather than harassing the hareskrishnas and poor hindus. cheers(i mean it)

Ahh logic.Well, let me give some logic about divinity. Here goes my logic .. 1)A jealous god cannot be a god 2)A god who promises to punish in hell for nonworship is no god. 3) A god who says kill people who dont worship me is no god.. Do u have any objections to these criteria... And krishna doesnt give a damn That is the way god behaves.

This question pops up with predictabile reasons. Many posters have made it clear several times since this old thread at http://indiadivine.org/audarya/hinduism/23145-lord-vishnu-supreme-also-worship-lord-brahma.html

Not true.Please dont copy paste things which you have no idea. In arabic ilah=god Allah=name They say "no ilah but Allah". This question is directed at sambya.Let him answer this.

How do you know this?.Do u have name(s).How about Allah.

I know religion(s) have war as an important method to establish itself.Also the same religion(s) give "spoils of war"-booty as a reward "for the good work". Go figure.It is stupid to think that all religions are equal. One particular religion i know of has a chapter exclusively devoted to "spoils of war"-booty.. hint:"spoils of war" chapter 8

Ohh yeah; nothing new.It seems the blood spilled during partition riots is not enough for the grandson .The terrorists dont give a damn what mk gandhi or his progeny says.

Ohh yeah; nothing new.It seems the blood spilled during partition riots is not enough for the grandson .The terrorists dont give a damn what mk gandhi or his progeny says.