I_love_krishna_

As a matter of fact, surveys are very unreliable, due to the fact that the surveys are dependent upon who you ask the question... for example, if you ask 20 dumb females and 20 smart males from the population, then the outcome would be simple...males are smarter than females.. If you conduct the survey with 20 dumb males and 20 smart females then the outcome would be that females are smarter than males. To conduct the experiments or surveys according to the strict interpretation of the scientific method however, would prove to be impossible because human brain is so complex that it is impossible to say one group is intelligent over another unless, one group contains bunch of einsteins and the other contains bunch of hillibillies. In truth, By the researchers at the international society of neuroscience, it is said that Intelligence is an entertained notion, because, there is intelligence dependent upon many factors. however, they do agree that overall, there are two types of intelligences: one based on spatial memory, which also deals with mathematics as well as distance, and another type of intelligence called verbal intelligence, which is facility in dealing with words. ________ According to the anatomy of the human brain, the male and female brains function differently. The male brain is much more intelligent than a female brain when it comes to mathematics and spatial differentiation(takes place in hippocampus of the brain). The female brain however, is much more complex when it deals with verbal skills or the communication skills of the brain, which are parts of the limbic system as well as the anterior prefrontal cortex. They are said to be more enhanced in females, thus making the females much more intelligent when it deals with verbal skills. So! we can conclude that the survey conducted by fox is an attraction to attract more viewers... /images/graemlins/grin.gif The same survey would be a joke for the people who work in the SFn or the society of neuroscience. www.sfn.org thank you /images/graemlins/smile.gif For vbprasad: Itilanti loyallalo manamu padavaddhandi! avanni thappule!!

Even in the 21st century! oh my god!, there are still racists like that! In the first half of the 20th century (1900-1965),most of the souls who wear white bodies were being racists... In the second part of the century and beyond, most souls who are non-white are being racists... Aren't they going into further ignorance with these racist thought formations forming in their heads... They should start cleaning! /images/graemlins/smile.gif

Omg! are you serious? did the guy really have such accusations against him?

The people who are trying to make fool of us when they say "westerners cannot do this or that" are literally making fool of themselves in reality. They are going against all the teachings of most of the scriptures (that i have some idea about) talk about. ..

But take the dynasties, for instance. Did the British falsify hundreds of thousands of handwritten manuscripts just to undermine Hindu civilization? I think not. __________ well you see, British wanted to control India, so it is very logical fact that if you destroy the manuscripts and various other documents, you cripple people's beliefs etc. However, British did not really destroy India, but they saved it from the wreckage it was going through by the Moghul Empire. They did the same thing with China... The boxer rebellion in china led to the british control thus decreasing the ridiculous propaganda of the empress and also by increasing free will in the people. They later fight for democracy under Sun-Yat-Sen but that doesn't go well does it... The british saved many places from ruin and also gave the gift of democracy to the world. They are the people who truly made democracy possible all over the world, not us(Americans). Even though we are the present guardians of democracy. ...depends on what you take bush to be... Alcopone or the next Jesus Christ.

But take the dynasties, for instance. Did the British falsify hundreds of thousands of handwritten manuscripts just to undermine Hindu civilization? I think not. __________ well you see, British wanted to control India, so it is very logical fact that if you destroy the manuscripts and various other documents, you cripple people's beliefs etc. However, British did not really destroy India, but they saved it from the wreckage it was going through by the Moghul Empire. They did the same thing with China... The boxer rebellion in china led to the british control thus decreasing the ridiculous propaganda of the empress and also by increasing free will in the people. They later fight for democracy under Sun-Yat-Sen but that doesn't go well does it... The british saved many places from ruin and also gave the gift of democracy to the world. They are the people who truly made democracy possible all over the world, not us(Americans). Even though we are the present guardians of democracy. ...depends on what you take bush to be... Alcopone or the next Jesus Christ.

But the picture gets big when I try to make it my background, Can some one tell me where you got this from, so that I can resolve this issue... If you give me the name of the website, I would greatly appreciate it! thanks! /images/graemlins/grin.gif

May be they should try to make those dolls a bit pleasing to look at... lol Once, one of my dad's friend's dad... (I know it sounds kind a childish but I don't know any other way of explaining it) went to one of his big conferences with some friends in India, he was actually discussing problems he has at work or something in his car when they were all going to his conference. when he went to the conference, Sai baba called him by literally calling by his name and said the exact words that he spoke off in the car and told him the solution to his problem too. My dad's friend's dad was shocked. Another instance, (this is before Atal Bihari vatchpay was elected as prime minister). A couple of years ago, my grandfather in India was invited to some of Sai baba's conferences ( He is a famous journalist). Anyway, Sai baba called Vatchpay and basically told him that he was going to be the prime minister of India and will bring India away from danger... then he literally materialized a diamond year ring in front of every one and then gave it to vatchpay saying that it is for luck!. It may not be true that he is not God, but He is a Great Great Yogi and a Great man. He does alot of social service, He has numerous hospitals, I think in India and they tend to take care of the sick for free and it is said that those hospitals are really well kept and they do selfless service. I hope he finds krishna's grace upon him, because he is a great man who is detached from materialistic ideals even when he gets alot of money. He donates it to various institutions and takes care of the sick for free... He has a selfless life. __________ I wouldn't literally believe the things that people say about him, but when you hear the same miracles from close friends and family members then it is very hard not to believe it.

Because when man divided Jerusalem; it became into such of an improper use. And is brought into such of a worse condition (By other Gods). The son of God is rejected by all who support dividing Jerusalem. _________ what is the symbolic meaning here of Jerusalem? The splitting of Jerusalem here has an uncanny similarity with the splitting of hastinapur... One more thing! /images/graemlins/grin.gif , The other Gods here, They seem similar to demigods in Hinduism.

Is there a significance to the new moon in karthika... Just curious

But I kind a understood by the examples... thanks /images/graemlins/grin.gif

Thank you for clearing that up Ghari

I think they are trying to convert us, however there is no need of conversion here, because we do agree with them as we agree with krishna... he is everything. krishna consciousness is like orange juice and Christianity is plain water... we would obviously want orange juice.. it tastes better /images/graemlins/smile.gif So please gospeldefense, learn about our religion, but don't try to convert people here, because such efforts will prove to be futile.

To my understanding, the guy here clearly says curved space is impossible: ______ Curved Space: The concept of a 'curved space', which is essential for present cosmological models, is logically flawed because space can only be defined by the distance between two objects, which is however by definition always given by a straight line. Mathematicians frequently try to illustrate the properties of 'curved space' through the example of a spherical (or otherwise curved) surface and the associated geometrical relationships. However, a surface is only a mathematical abstraction within the actual (3-dimensional) space and one can in fact connect any two points on the surface of a physical object through a straight line by drilling through it. Strictly speaking, one can not assign any properties at all to space (or time) as these are the outer forms of existence and it makes as much sense to speak of a 'curved space' as of a 'blue space'. Any such properties must be restricted to objects existing within space and time. The concept of a distorted space around massive physical objects for instance, as promoted by General Relativity, is therefore also inconsistent and should be replaced by appropriate physical theories describing the trajectories of particles and/or light near these objects. __________ /images/graemlins/smile.gif I want to read more about bashing physics but I don't want to get my self confused during exam periods. /images/graemlins/crazy.gif so if you clear this myth up i would greatly appreciate it Avinashji /images/graemlins/smile.gif I go to a school in Long Island , New York. They provide college and advanced courses for "enthusiastic" students. We learn stuff in college board's AP physics and work with real scientists , like the guy I mentioned about the Ion collider before. He explained to me about it, he is a scientist in brookhaven labs. I am going to get him for a mentor.

But such things will never happen to me cuz i have krishna! This would seem kind of delusional but for me, who has been saved like 4 times... I don't think its luck!

First of all, who is lazarus... Second of all, why the heck do you believe being ressurected is great? In my view, being in this material world is the worst kind of a thing anybody would hope for, but you can't get out of it unless you realize, in your words"God" or in my words"krishna" .

Honest questions... ___ We shall offer such help to those who, after having faith in God for several births, have begun service to God. We should feed and clothe the needy and do them other benefits in order to make them serve Hari; otherwise, what is the need of nourishing a snake with milk and bananas? ____ How the heck do we know if the person we are trying to serve is really a soul who after several births has taken abode of hari? which brings me to my next question... Aren't all living entities the property of krishna, then if they are why do we have to ponder about who to serve and who to not serve? these are honest questions really... If love is unconditional, then aren't we tainting it by conditionality if we are limiting the service to an only few?

huh? Simpler words please? or elaboration ?

The guest who posted after you is not me . it is some one else. In order to decrease the amount of confusion that has been in this forum, I am going to login from this time onward./images/graemlins/grin.gif _____ anyway, This guy who ever it is goes against my physics books my teachers' teachings... kind a .. I do remember my teacher saying that the doppler effect is seen everywhere. And he explains how the doppler effect is used to see if a certain object is moving away or moving toward. If it is moving away, then the color should be red. If it is moving closer the color should be different. _______________ " he says thats not the case here. Big Bang cosmologists conclude that more distant galaxies move faster because they assume the redshift to be caused by the Doppler effect as more distant galaxies show a higher redshift. However, no one has actually observed yet that the distance between galaxies increases with time (obviously, one could tell this only after billions of years). In fact, the 'Hubble Law' is not at all an exact linear relationship but only an average tendency with quite a significant spread. It is even known that there are spectral lines from the same object (!) that show differences in the redshift by up to 10%. This does of course completely invalidate the interpretation of the redshift as a Doppler effect. I have consequently suggested an alternative explanation for the galactic redshift as being due to the electric microfields in the intergalactic plasma (i.e. the redshift would essentially be distance related not velocity related) (see my website http://www.plasmafacts.de (under Cosmological Redshifts) for more details). There are of course also problems of a general conceptual nature if one assumes the universe is expanding (more). In addition, there have been crucial flaws in the analysis of observational data that apparently confirm the Big-Bang theory (see the page regards the WMAP Data Analysis). (see also Olbers Paradox, Curved Space, General Relativity). " /images/graemlins/smile.gif thanks ! -enlightened.

History: Bible has been proven to be very accurate when it deals with various places in the middle east and europe. However, It does not deal with the other asian parts such as India, China and Japan. Thus proving that it has been written by mortals. The bible also has told about prophesies that deal with Isreal going back to Isrealites etc. Such have been said to be proven to be true, which they have been, but it could be just the human will of making such things true. before we even deal with the authenticity , we have to take into account that history is filled with propaganda and most of the world was controlled by european "christian" nations who were conquering lands for the three Gs. Three Gs: Gold, God, Glory. So over all, the authenticity of the bible could be just another propaganda, but most people , being christians take it to be the truth.

If he is a fake, now I know.

Could be just a rumour , but thats where the society is going today. Talking about it here though is not going to do much, We need to take action and do what we can.

Everything first is just computations, but when you see it in reality when it actually happens it is said to be true. but how do you suggest we acheive the truth with out having it figured out theoretically? Great mathematicians like Newton and descartes have first figured out it in computations first. You don't expect people come up with equations like G= k(m1+m2)/d*d through sitting under the tree watching apples and feathers fall do you? /images/graemlins/smile.gif

But its tainted with imperfection, which is why he is not attracted to it . /images/graemlins/crazy.gif

when Krishna allows you to possess Him. ______________ what do you mean when you say when a devotee possesses krishna? how do we possess krishna?