RadheyRadhey108

I'm sure your guru is wonderful if a devout soul like you is his disciple

Surely you've met at least one heterosexual person! Right?

I agree. Homosexuals shouldn't be allowed to form romantic relationships in the military just as heterosexual men and women aren't allowed to form romantic relationships in the military. What they do outside of it is fine w/ me... but I don't think they should be able to do so inside (since that's the going rule).

I think they give a better sense of equilibrium to the signature, myself.

How true... why should we except Satan without her housewife?

Sorry... I thought you were talking about the gay community in general... not just some homosexuals who wish to display their sexual preference to the world and make what they do with their genitalia everybody's business. Those types also bother me. And, it's not an anti-gay thing... I'd be just as upset with a 'straight parade' or a holiday for straight people to celebrate being straight.

Why can't he adopt?

Where is the shastra that says that all homosexuals are selfish, lack compassion, and are perverted without an ounce of self-control?

I was just kidding around Bhaktajan... sry if I offended your sentiments. I respect the men and women who serve our country. I'm sorry if I was a bit disrespectful.

Congratulations Random, you are now a prema bhakta. 3/5 qualifies you for graduation.

Prabhupada's commentary on shastra isn't shastra... at least not for me. And... what about the ladies? Got any verses/commentary for them? So far, everything people are quoting is applying only to male homosexuality... what about lesbians? Is it okay to be a gay girl but not a gay guy? If so, why?

What're we going to do if Her mom didn't pack Her lunch?! I'm sure She'll be devastated when She comes to the picnic and there's no grilled cheese left over!

I'm scared! Well... at least when Bhaktajan becomes commander-in-chief, all of our dead soldiers will have worn Tulasi beads and chanted "Hare Krishna".

Hey... if she claimed to be Sri Dhumavati Mahavidya or another goddess with a similar appearance, I wouldn't quibble over her appearance. But, she claims to be Srimati Radharani, and Srimati Radharani is described as having a certain form and characteristics by which we can recognize Her, one of them being unsurpassed beauty (both physically and inwardly). Not to say that Dhumavati Mahavidya is any less a form of divinity, but She is described as being ancient and emaciated (kind of like Vasantha Sai), while Radharani is described as having a moon-like face, skin like gold, eyes like lotus petals, lips like bilva fruits, and beautiful limbs (unlike Vasantha Sai). So, maybe she should claim to be another form of divinity that isn't described as being unsurpassingly beautiful... then I won't quibble over her appearance.

Hmmm... I'm thinking that if Radha-Krishna were currently manifesting in a body, They'd be a bit more attractive than this dynamic duo.

LOL... Agreed. I think I made a mistake. But, honestly, what is she thinking? Does she really think she can even compare with Radharani? Talk about a severe Chandravali-complex.

Probably not the best method of contraception... but... hey... it might've worked back in the day... LOL

We are all trapped in Samsara, and without loving and understanding both our brothers and sisters and God, we'll never leave it. What a good point... I'd never thought of it that way before.

Thank you for this lovely verse, Bija Prabhu. I think many people could take a lesson from it.

How so?! It says the rakshasas wanted to attack Brahma Dev and then have sex with him... that'd classify as rape in my book. I'm sorry that I don't interpret a verse talking about homosexual rape at the beginning of a world age as an attack on all homosexuality (since I know it's the only verse you guys have from shastra to back up your anti-homosexual bias).

Thank you! She's rather lovely She actually looks a lot like my Ishta-Devi, Srimati Radharani, in Her deity form. Not surprisng, though. To me, all the Devis are incarnations of Srimati Radharani

Yes, it is. And people are so held back by their prejudices that they don't care.

I've pointed this out before, but the verse is clearly talking about homosexual RAPE, not consensual homosexual acts between two consenting adults. There's a huge difference.

I know, Indulekha Ji. I'm guessing Vasantha thinks rather highly of herself if she thinks her beauty can even hold a candle to the beauty of Srimati Radharani. She's such a fool, leading people from chanting the names of Sri Sri Radha-Krishna to chanting her name and the name of her magician guru.

I guess you don't have many gay friends, since I can assure you that there are many people who are friendly toward me, both male and female, who are homosexual and would never even hurt a fly. Don't paint all homosexuals with one brush. You're a follower of ISKCON... you know how wrong the media can be about a group and you know how hurtful it can be. Maybe you need to think before you type. Oh... and, by the way, you didn't answer the question as to why a secular government (as we have in the U.S.) should have to listen to nosy people's religious views when it comes to two consensual adults getting married.