Bishadi

after reading through all that it reminded me of a preacher in a chrsitian church. the first item that came to mind was the flower. the beauty, the peddles, the aroma; kind to the sense; all for to procreate. even the beauty of the birds, dancing, singing for to earn the right to procreate each for the purpose of good......'life to continue' such is the same in all aspects of human interrelation. in that if neither of our parents had compassion, intent and we all hope a little bit of Love; not a one of us would be here. Then we think of all the humble contributors to our knowledge and existence and may wonder; could you imagine if each had a child to convey the knowledge and life-times commitment to the unabused eyes of their own child; could more compassion have conveyed to the observance of knowledge? Just a perspective with a little food; or maybe 'the nectar of the lotus flower' ... perhaps?

go advice

don't say much; just subject judgment kind of neat, to be

Perhaps that's what all the corrections are for? When does equality make a presence?

Prabhupada: He's a rascal, and he was given in charge. Another rascal,

The post was to share 2 items; one that knowledge is collective and two; that additional development has come from this interaction. (website) Perhaps both are of quality; good?

Fear yourself. Isn't that what the suffering is all about; self examination?

Does that mean you are ill or that you have knowledge to share from the experience? That is one of the 'nasties' that unfolds when knowledge someone believes as true is found incorrect. Such that all over the world many religions beliefs and faiths have people even willing to die for what they are being taught as absolute; when we each have areas that are still unanswered by the religion themselves. Now imagine when the truth unfolds pure. Not only will there be no need of faith ever again but then all them folk out there who will use that knowledge of being decieved and rebel; such that even the teacher may bare the wrath from the student. 'Knowing' as in 'enlightenment' is comprehending the experience; proof is when the experience can be conveyed to words.

Honesty!

Most of your post is quite abusive and should be corrected with a little compassion. Seems comprehension may not be your greatest gift; all that scholar and still has to return to breaking 'faithful' rules just to get a point across. There is word that defines this type of choice .... hypo...... the pursuit of truth must be absolute; the returning to faithful beliefs to represent or discredit knowledge of truth; is where ignorance and the choice of self represents itself quite purely. Meaning; it would not matter if we went all the way back to Thoth or the sumarian tablets; be compassionate in the underlying message and retain not the attachment of 'who' is suggested of writting as all of it is from or within the period of existence (God). we must maintain this absolute integrity; honor each as if God was at hand himself but keep focus on the intent and compassion within without regression to phenomenon! Vishnu/Braham never fibs; men do! and to retain an underlying theme that all words from God shall emit compassion, understanding, knowledge and enlightenment; then enjoy all of the knowledge prepared throughout existence; just be honest in the experience and remove the self. again food for thought

an educated response No gambling, No drug, No kill, no Il sex ...... did that cover 'sense of human-rights, justice and civility' or is there more to include? and please.... in these last few weeks this 'i' has contributed over 100 hrs of studying the many forms of dharma within the 'degeneration phenomenon' of the Hindu branches. moving on.... and since, this 'i' has no need of faith but to experience and observe knowledge, then find a piece that is interesting and enlightening. Mark 10-17 And as he is going forth into the way, one having run and having kneeled to him, was questioning him, `Good teacher, what may I do, that life age-during I may inherit? 18 And Jesus said to him, `Why me dost thou call good? no one [is] good except One -- God; 19the commands thou hast known: Thou mayest not commit adultery, Thou mayest do no murder, Thou mayest not steal, Thou mayest not bear false witness, Thou mayest not defraud, Honour thy father and mother. In which God is not HE in this rendition as he 'said', nor any of the first 4 commandments that promote humility to an unknown; rather to be responsible in each action of associations; compassion as rule ONE. Just food for thought from a simple 'i'

You mean 'evolution'..... as the term is like an oposition to... Such that entropy degenerates a system as in contrast evolution is a system 'changes' based on the environment. the term phenomenon is soon to be over. Like the philosophies of the Upanishads? They are contributors by choice. Honor as many as possible; they offer an understanding of the term godhead; they give with no need of self. How do you think we have the term 'evolution' in articulations; the time was correct and a contributor gave of his life for others. I disagree; did Srila Prab use enjoyment as his intent? So then you contradict the opening line; 'it's called the natural phenomenon of degeneration' when in reality; the intent of the Krshna consious is to pursue the truth It is our duty to tomorrow; the children; life; existence; Vishnu/Brahman and even Krshna.

Helplessness in reduced material knowledge than today! To suggest that a person has walked yesterday; that could have the words of today, returns to the understanding of prophecy (which does occur) but they cannot define what they saw; see the doomsday mare.

Gita Govinda?

I agree.... compassion, kindness, humility.... And in this pride and selfish preservation is the cause or defensive reactions versus comprehensive dialogue; see the middle east. and why logic and the equality of the human experience is the setting of conveyance; to honor the acheivements and combining similarities As if a new vaccine to cure; knowledge honored as the gift is like a cure. and without question integrity and honesty is the number one 'right action' as it is one we each can be responsible for. Not neccessarily, as compassion between people can move mountains. And since all of existence is the only pure divinity, as flesh and blood maintains the experience of choice; then divinity is bound to the individuals experience and integrity of representations. As what one may do in surrendering to God (divine) may be interpretted as ill regard to another; see the variety of cultures. And that is what religions try and do; assimilate. Just as the migration from india to the west in 1966; an evangelical movement. i.e...... if every person was to remain focused on the complacent teaching of a faith; and each was to conform; then what would ever be accomplished but a 'boring' existence with no ability to evolve with knowledge. It is usually the rebel that commits (divine devotion) for to learn and represent knowledge; as the progression lives.

Lot's of principles and examples represented on many of Khajuraho's temples. For the self. Pre-Radha combining 2 into one. Copied from another's website...... the rest is like you 'an opinion.' .. Don't bet on one sect having it all. Just as any predetermination. Living in a pretty picture rather than experience Now, 'as she represents herself' What could any contradiction offer in present company? then why drink? Taste? Social pressure? Take the edge off when confounded in the responsibilities of the material world? Ah..... makes sense. Seems a cup of hot cocoa is a drug to some. Yet to identify consumptions of anything identified as 'altering' as bad, simply because many atrocities can be linked to irresponsibility is such the same as requiring a burqa. Yet, some of the greatest wails of happiness come from some pretty wild parties and it is not so much the possibilities of errors to eliminate but that much good comes from just living and observing in social experience. Just thoughts... It seems like we know all cars cause detriments to the earth but we tolerate them. Will vehicles ever be removed from the earth? No much stock in that bet; likewise drugs, liquors and the such should be of responsibility; the same as each choice in life. Imagine if life was not so filled in the pursuit of things, then enjoyment will increase in the compassionate associations of community.

Do you like to read? There is more even when some conflict with logic, find the wisdom and grow with the intent to learn; only a teacher of absolute truth is pure; none had walked with the full scope but each contributed just the same Much of this is quite true yet one stands out; detachment; freedom from entanglement with children. In this if you have children, any can ship them to the other side of the earth but physically 'you stay entangled' as they are a portion of you physical being (life) and your whole lineage from the beginning of time. Then back to the top note the item; 'the perception of the evil of birth' seems no one could be reading or experiencing if they were not born. And then how can we honor life within existence and offer another chance for life to continue, if we do not observe 'birth of life' as pure good? Such the same to stay within and not to associate; what is compassion for? Perception must be relative to the attachment; physiological or mentally responsible. Each carry weight. food for thought

perhaps representing Love for the total of existence shares a constant intent to seed 'good' much more to learn than just what one sect suggests as final and to lighten it up yet remain politically correct there's more than one way to peal the husk from corn.

Born of Mary. Rather than Devaki; in an emaculate similarity. Still men who walked and still live in the words and hearts of today; because they conveyed the compassion evolved to 'their' time; by choice! Ask them, 'duty was to fight for, and protect, the righteous people, not to prevent the war' Then what is there to teach in words, math, philosophy, medicine and Love? Let's be intelligent with logic to convey; rather than stiff with pride to retain a position. Nor Jesus, Moses, Mohammed or even Buddha; each contributors not God's, only one completeness to all existence; the total; Vishnu/Braham/God..... not an old guy with a beard, that was Zeus. Perhaps Krsna was said of birth I believe it was closer to 5000 years ago, so Jesus was not even a twinkle of hope at the name given, per writings. And most do not know the name Quexalcoatl either. Perhaps Vishnu has more to unfold? Maybe a new name; nameste ?

Perhaps knowledge had not evolved; such the same can be noted in the progression of India's religions with Hinduism and the varieties born thereof. and since equality is the combining idea in presenting knowledge; then what is the single language that is pretty uniform in all the world's societies? Mathematics. The pure name will be in Math!

As to comprehend the life upon the body presents: knowing the field; what you are! Knowledge is the combining of Krsna; that is my opinion!

At night and in the early hours of the morning he would write and translate, and during the day he would guide his students in devotional service. He lived and ate simply and slept only a few hours a night. Continuous extention of knowledge!

<CENTER>Lord Krishna, Source of Immortal Wisdom</CENTER> <HR> Who are we? What is the purpose of our living through one lifetime after another? What is freedom all about, and how can we achieve it?

He was nearly penniless and had no friends or relatives in America. But, depending on Krishna, he chanted Hare Krishna in a public park and taught classes in a small store. Soon people took interest in what he had to say. Srila Prabhupada's mission was to present Krishna's teachings as they are, without watering them down or compromising to suit popular fashion. His message might become popular or not, but he was determined to give the genuine thing. Did Srila Prabhupada think himself God? Never. He worked as a humble servant of God. Men who claim to be God, he said, are dogs. Srila Prabhupada taught how to serve Krishna by his words and by the example of his life. At night and in the early hours of the morning he would write and translate, and during the day he would guide his students in devotional service. He lived and ate simply and slept only a few hours a night.

Then why the diversion from Hindu? What caused the change of thousands of years of historical observance?