Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Sonic Yogi

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content Count

    1,093

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Sonic Yogi

  1. Posted · Report reply

     

    please which is yoni and wwhich is nature and wgat are the specificdifference. please donot answer if you think but answer what do the scripyures say. thak you

     

    Cologne Digital Sanskrit Lexicon: Search Results

     

    <!-- SQL query: select buch,st,en from tamil where buch=1 and (st regexp '[[:<:]]daitya[[:>:]]') order by st --> <table cellspacing="3"><tbody><tr><td align="right" valign="top">1</td> <td valign="top"> daitya</td> <td valign="top">m. a son of Diti , a demon Mn. MBh. &c. ; mf(%{A})n. belonging to the Daityas MBh. R. ; (%{A}) f. N. of plants (= %{caNDau9hadhi} and %{murA}) L. ; spirituous liquor L.</td></tr></tbody></table>

    <table cellspacing="3"><tbody><tr><td align="right" valign="top">1</td> <td valign="top"> rAkSasa</td> <td valign="top">mf(%{i})n. (fr. %{rakSas}) belonging to or like a Rakshas , demoniacal , infested by demons AitBr. &c. &c. (with %{vivAha} , or %{dharma} or %{vidhi} m. `" one of the 8 forms of marriage "' , the violent seizure or rape of a girl after the defeat or destruction of her relatives see Mn. iii , 33) ; m. a Rakshas or demon in general , an evil or malignant demon (the Ra1kshasas are sometimes regarded as produced from Brahma1's foot , sometimes with Ra1van2a as descendants of Pulastya , elsewhere they are styled children of Khasa1 or Su-rasa ; according to some they are distinguishable into 3 classes , one being of a semi-divine benevolent nature and ranking with Yakshas &c. ; another corresponding to Titans or relentless enemies of the gods ; and a third answering more to nocturnal demons , imps , fiends , goblins , going about at night , haunting cemeteries , disturbing sacrifices and even devouring human beings ; this last class is the one most commonly mentioned ; their chief place of abode was Lan3ka1 in Ceylon ; in R. v , 10 , 17 &c. they are fully described ; cf. also IW. 310 RTL. 237) Kaus3. Up. &c. ; a king of the Rakshas g. %{parzv-Adi} ; (with Jainas) one of the 8 classes of Vyantaras L. ; N. of the 30th Muhu1rta L. ; of one of the astronomical Yogas. Col. ; of a minister of Nanda Mudr. ; of a poet Cat. (cf. below) ; m. n. the 49th year in the Jupiter cycle of 6o years VarBr2S. ; (%{I}) f. a Ra1kshasi1 or female demon MBh. Ka1v. Katha1s. ; the island of the Ra1kshasas i.e. Lan3ka1 or Ceylon Buddh. ; N. of a malignant spirit supposed to haunt the four corners of a house VarBr2S. ; of a Yogini1 Hcat. ; night L. ; a kind of plant (= %{caNDA}) L. ; a large tooth , tusk L.</td></tr></tbody></table>

    <table cellspacing="3"><tbody><tr><td align="right" valign="top">1</td> <td valign="top"> asura</td> <td valign="top">mfn. (2. %{as} Un2.) , spiritual , incorporeal , divine RV. AV. VS. ; m. a spirit , good spirit , supreme spirit (said of Varun2a) RV. VS. ; the chief of the evil spirits RV. ii , 30 , 4 and vii , 99 , 5 ; an evil spirit , demon , ghost , opponent of the gods RV. viii , 96 , 9 ; x AV. &c. [these Asuras are often regarded as the children of Diti by Kas3yapa see %{daitya} ; as such they are demons of the first order in perpetual hostility with the gods , and must not be confounded with the Ra1kshasas or imps who animate dead bodies and disturb sacrifices] ; a N. of Ra1hu VarBr2S. &c. ; the sun L. ; a cloud Naigh. (cf. RV. v , 83 , 6) ; (%{As}) m. pl.N. of a warrior-tribe , (g. %{parzv-Adi} , q.v.) ; of a Vedic school ; (%{A}) f. night L. ; a zodiacal sign L. ; (%{I}) f. a female demon , the wife of an Asura , KaushBr. (cf. %{AsurI} and %{mahA7surI}) ; the plant Sinapis Ramosa Roxb. L. [in later Sanskr2it %{sura} has been formed from %{asura} , as %{sita} from %{asita} q.v.]</td></tr></tbody></table>

  2. Posted · Report reply

     

    PART AND PARCEL SHOULD BE USED IF YOU FOLLOW GAUDIYA.

    BY THE WAY CAN ANYONE EXPLAIN THE TERM PART AND PARCEL

     

    part and parcel

     

    <form name="entry" method="post" action="/dictionary"> One entry found.

    <input name="book" value="Dictionary" type="hidden"> <input name="quer" value="part and parcel" type="hidden"> <input name="jump" type="hidden"> <input name="list" value="va:1,0,0,0|part and parcel=115274785" type="hidden">

    </form> http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/part%20and%20parcel

    <dl><dt class="hwrd">Main Entry:</dt><dd class="hwrd"> part and parcel </dd><dt class="func">Function:</dt><dd class="func">noun </dd><dt class="date">Date:</dt><dd class="date">15th century</dd></dl> : an essential or integral component ........>

  3. Posted · Report reply

     

    Yes on brahmas night whole material worlds is destroyed

    Actually, only the planets up to the Svargaloka or the heavens are destroyed after the day of Brahma is over.

    Above the heavens are Tapa, Jana and Satyaloka.

    So, they survive.

    But, on the Tapaloka planets the heat is too much so they transfer to Janaloka to wait out the destruction and then return after it's over.

     

    But, all the planets up to Indraloka are destroyed.

    Beyond the heavens are the planets of the great yogis and jnanis.

    Those planets are only destroyed at the time when the whole universe is withdrawn back into the body of MahaVishnu at the end of Brahma's lifetime.

  8. Posted · Report reply

     

    Yes I know, Sonic Yogi. That Srila Vyasadeva was the scribe who wrote the story. But still we have yet to hear in full what these great souls(mahajanas) have to say about the science of Krsnah consciousness They are Lord Siva, Narada Muni, Dhruva, Kapila, the Kumaras, Bhisma, Yamaraja, Sukadeva Goswami, etc. In fact, Touchstone Narada has summarized it ( the bits and pieces) in his Narada-pancaratra:That Vedic knowledge, rituals and mantras can all be summed up into just 8 words, " Hare Krsnah Hare Krsnah Krsnah Krsnah Hare Hare."

     

    There are no bits and pieces Melvin.

    Krishna is the Supreme Absolute Truth.

    That is not a bit or a piece, it is the complete truth.

  9. Posted · Report reply

     

    This knowledge( science of Krsnah consciousness) was instructed to Ishvaku then to Manu, so and so forth. Along the way, however, this transfer of knowledge was broken. Now, we are picking up the bits and pieces. Try to analyze the Dhruva story and what was he really looking for, a piece of land, a piece of broken glass, or was it a piece of broken information or data?

     

    There are no bits and pieces Melvin.

    Lord Krishna taught the same thing again to Arjuna and it is all in the Bhagavad-gita.

     

    What he taught to the Sun god millions of years ago and lost was again revived on the battlefield of Kurukshetra and Arjuna was the recipient.

     

    You can get the same benefit that Arjuna received if you just study the Bhagavad-gita as it comes down in the disciplic succession from Lord Krishna.

  10. Posted · Report reply

     

    Is your web site able to explain the origin of the swine flu virus?

    --------------------------------

    It's not my web site.

    It is there because the BBT has authorized it.

    It has some errors, typos and mistakes so sometimes I have to turn to the books if something doesn't sound right.

    I have found quite a few errors, mainly missing sentences and sometimes missing paragraphs.

    But, for convenience it is ok.

  11. Posted · Report reply

     

    How Gaudiya teachings evolved was because the scribes who authored these teachings were open to other ideas. If an idea connects or is directly or indirectly related to Krsnah then it`s absorbed say, into the system.

     

    Well........... no......... you are quite wrong.

    In fact the Gaudiya sampradaya is very strict about not taking theories and ideas from outside.

    What you have said cannot be supported by any evidence such as the written teachings of any Gaudiya acharya.

    In fact it is mental speculation, a fabrication.

    Sorry, but your statement is incorrect.

  13. Posted · Report reply

     

    Super-ego is the faculty that seeks to police what it deems unacceptable desires. It represents all moral restrictions and is the advocate of striving towards perfection.

     

    What is ego? (http://deoxy.org/egofalse.htm)

     

    " Only a person who has no ego is for the first time a master; he is no longer a slave. That the real center(not ego) is the soul, the self, the god, the truth, or whatsoever you want to call it. It is nameless, so all names are good. You can give it any name of your liking."

    FROM Beyond the Frontier of the Mind by Osho

     

    That is not from the teachings of Srila Prabhupada or the Gaudiya tradition.

    If you want to go outside the Gaudiya teachings and pull up something to support your point, you should not expect that the Krishna devotees will accept it.

  15. Posted · Report reply

     

    Can you describe to me what`s Id and Super ego?

     

    If Krsna also possesses a super ego, the latter must be greater than the former.

     

    -----

     

    No. I have never heard of those terms in the books of Srila Prabhupada.

    Ego is one's conception of oneself.

    False ego is the conception that the living entity is the material body and mind.

    When the living entity becomes situated in proper spiritual life of devotional service then he becomes freed from false ego and he is established in his real ego of being a part and parcel of the Supreme Absolute as an integrated component.

     

    I have never heard Srila Prabhupada refer to any thing as you say the "super-ego".

    There is false ago of material identification and there is real ego of realizing oneself as an eternal part and parcel of Krishna, the supreme absolute.

     

    There is no "superego".

    There is false ego and real ego.

     

    Krishna's ego is that he is a cowherd boy the lover of Srimati Radharani.

     

    Real ego is all a part of the spiritual character of the liberated souls and devotees.

     

    Some are parents of Krishna, some are friends, lovers etc.

    Ego is the spiritual identity of the soul as an eternal devotee of Krishna in one rasa or another.

     

    False ego is some illusory self-conception of being something other than a servant of Krishna.

     

    That is an illusion.

    That is false ego.

  18. Posted · Report reply

     

    Krsna is transcendental or inconceivable. It means He can`t be understood. To describe Krsna as the God of God only makes it more confusing to realize who really is Krsna. We should consult Srimad Bhagavatam first to know what chapter or verse in the book that says Krsna is the God of God.

     

    deva-deva — O Lord of all demigods; BG 10.15

    deva-deva — O Lord of all demigods; BG 10.15

    deva-īśa — O Lord of all lords; BG 11.25

    deva-īśa — O God of the gods; BG 11.37

    deva-īśa — O Lord of lords; BG 11.45

    deva-deva — O Lord of lords; SB 1.7.26

    deva-deva — O Lord of lords; SB 1.7.26

    deva-deva — the worshipable of the worshiped; SB 1.8.9

    deva-deva — the worshipable of the worshiped; SB 1.8.9

    deva-devaḥ — the Supreme Lord of the lords; SB 1.9.24

    deva-deva — O god of the demigods; SB 3.15.4

    deva-deva — O god of the demigods; SB 3.15.4

     

     

    It goes on an on.

    If you don't understand this, there is nothing more I have to say.

  19. Posted · Report reply

     

    Krsna is transcendental or inconceivable. It means He can`t be understood. Form what chapter or verse in Srimad Bhagavatam did you get that description which says Krsna has a spiritual ego.

     

    Obviously, you seem to have some idea that ego in itself is a derogatory term.

    It is not. It is Latin for "I" and also means "self".

     

    Don't get ego confused with false ego.

    False ego is the illusory conception that the body is the self or that the mind or intelligence is the self.

    Real ego is to know oneself as spirit soul - part and parcel of Krishna.

     

    If Krishna didn't have an ego he would not exist as the ego is the self.

     

    Look at the dictionary definition and try to understand, then you won't be asking for some shastric proof that Krishna has an ego.

    If you can just understand the meaning of the word it will all be clear to you.

     

     

    <input name="book" value="Dictionary" type="hidden"> <input name="quer" value="ego" type="hidden"> <input name="jump" type="hidden"> <input name="list" value="va:5,0,0,0|ego=50850053|alter ego=2004552251|ego ideal=2050858547|ego trip=2050876802|et in Arcadia ego=2184812024" type="hidden">

    <dl><dt class="hwrd">Main Entry:</dt><dd class="hwrd">ego audio.gif</dd><dt class="pron">Pronunciation:</dt><dd class="pron"> \ˈē-(ˌ)gō also ˈe-\ </dd><dt class="func">Function:</dt><dd class="func">noun </dd><dt class="inf">Inflected Form(s):</dt><dd class="inf">plural egos</dd><dt class="ety">Etymology:</dt><dd class="ety">New Latin, from Latin, I — more at i</dd><dt class="date">Date:</dt><dd class="date">1789</dd></dl> 1: the self especially as contrasted with another self or the world

     

    It is so elementary that the idea of requiring shastric proof that Krishna has an ego is ridiculous.

  20. Posted · Report reply

     

    So, brahman is the all pervading conscious - and spiritual nature or substrate of God, but brahman is not God. Krishna is the supreme personality of God (beyond God); equal to our general religious concept of a personal God (the God of God). Humans are not Krishna or God, but part of Krishna (and God)..

     

    Well, for example, God in the Bible is the creator.

    In Vedic lore the creator is Brahma who is a guna avatar of Vishnu.

    Creation of this particular universe in terms of engineering the planetary systems and life forms is the work of Brahma.

     

    So, Vishnu is the plenary portion of the plenary portion of Krishna.

    Not only is Krishna the Lord of Brahma, but even Vishnu or Narayana considers himself the servant of Govinda.

     

    So, Krishna is the God of millions of Gods.

     

    Krishna is even the God of Narayana.

    Even Lord Balaram, the first expansion of Krishna considers himself a servant of Krishna and all the Vishnu expansions come from him.

     

    Lord Balaram is the original Vishnu and partakes of the nature of a servant of Krishna.

     

    According to expert opinion, Balarāma, as the chief of the original quadruple forms, is also the original Sańkarṣaṇa. Balarāma, the first expansion of Kṛṣṇa, expands Himself in five forms: (1) Mahā-sańkarṣaṇa, (2) Kāraṇābdhiśāyī, (3) Garbhodakaśāyī, (4) Kṣīrodakaśāyī, and (5) Śeṣa. These five plenary portions are responsible for both the spiritual and material cosmic manifestations. In these five forms Lord Balarāma assists Lord Kṛṣṇa in His activities. The first four of these forms are responsible for the cosmic manifestations, whereas Śeṣa is responsible for personal service to the Lord. Śeṣa is called Ananta, or unlimited, because He assists the Personality of Godhead in His unlimited expansions by performing an unlimited variety of services. Śrī Balarāma is the servitor Godhead who serves Lord Kṛṣṇa in all affairs of existence and knowledge. Lord Nityānanda Prabhu, who is the same servitor Godhead, Balarāma, performs the same service to Lord Gaurāńga by constant association.

     

    So, Krishna is even the God of Balarama who is the Supreme Personality of Godhead.

  22. Posted · Report reply

     

    Can u explain the last line sonic

     

    First, we must understand the name because the diacritics are missing.

    Vasudeva and Vaasudeva can be easily confused.

    Vasudeva is Krishna's father.

    Vasudeva is also Krishna.

    Vasudeva as Krishna's father has a soft (a) and is pronounced like the u in but.

    Vasudeva as Krishna has a long (a) and is pronounced as Vaasudeva.

     

    So, Vaasudeva is Krishna in his all pervasive feature as the indwelling spirit of all souls.

    Krishna of Bhagavad-gita is Vasudeva because he is not worshiped with his shakti Radha as in Radha-Krishna.

    In the beginning we worship Krishna of Bhagavad-gita on the battlefield of Kurukshetra. There he is not with his shakti Radha.

     

    In Vrindavan, Krishna is worshiped along with his shakti Radha.

    This is the Gaudiya Vaishnava worship.

    Gaudiyas worship Radha-Krishna.

    In the Gaudiya temples you always find Krishna being worshiped along with the deity of Radha.

     

    The idea of worshiping Krishna without worshiping his shakti Radha is actually Vasudeva worship.

     

    Gaudiyas do not worship Krishna without simultaneously worshiping Radharani.

    So, that is why Gaudiyas are known as suddha-shakta because the worship of Radha is the pure form of shakti worship.

  23. Posted · Report reply

     

    Is krsnah an ego?

    -----------------

    Krishna has an ego - a spiritual ego.

    There are two kinds of ego; real and false.

    In illusion we all have false ego.

    In Krishna consciousness we have our real ego as servants of Krishna.

     

    We have ego because Krishna has ego, but that ego must be purified for it to be spiritual.

×
×
  • Create New...