Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org
Sign in to follow this  
Gauracandra

Aryan Mummies

Rate this topic

Recommended Posts

There is some debate on whether or not Aryans invaded India. There is no concrete proof that they did, and as has been pointed out, no scriptures in India speak of such an invasion. However, there is evidence of movements of white Nordic peoples across Asia (if not India). Here is a link on China’s desert mummies:

 

http://www.discovery.com/stories/history/desertmummies/desertmummies.html

 

Posted Image

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The link is one among the many books and articles for and against the Aryan Invasion Theaory. Whether Aryans came as nomads or as conquerers, there is no evidence. But the Aryans came and there existed a pre-aryan civilization should be correct. History is the storynof such settlements, conquests and re-settlements. The article says:

"This hypothesis was apparently based upon references in the Vedas that point to a conflict between the light-skinned Aryans and the dark-skinned Dasyus. 2 This theory was strengthened by the archeological discoveries in the Indus Valley of the charred skeletal remains that we have mentioned above"

 

There are more than enough references in the Rk Veda. References like the blacks(krishna varnam), the Dasyus, the Assurs and the Panis(Assyrians and Phoenicians).

 

Further, the auther states that ‘The hypothesis that of racial hatred between the Aryans and the dark-skinned Dasyus has no sastric foundation’. History is not founded

on vedas and sastras. The linguistic and anthropological evidence, alongwith ancinet customs and manners of the sudroids, the 'panchamas' and the adivasis points to the fact that pre-aryans of India were related to the Negrito race. Genetic evidences also substantiates this fact.

 

And to the question that whether South India was unoccupied(unpopulated)prior to the Aryan invasion, the answer is 'not'. Ethiopia/Eritrea(ancient civilizations) was nearer to Southern India by the sea route than to the North. When merchandise were bought and sold from far away Greece, Mesopotamia and Babylonia, the Africans could come here more easily. They might have settled here earlier.

 

And no mummies are needed, living examples are there. Sometimes we would not be able to distinguish between an Indian Adivasi and a Negro.

Races have liberally intermingled, and purity of race is hard to find.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

given that it was the aryans who wrote the scriptures why would they speak from the perspective of Dravidians about their own arrival. Aryans are the source of Hinduism and i think more than a few people need to wake up to that fact and stop denying the truth becvause its not Pc enough for them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You make the point that why would a group who has conquered another mention them in their writing. It seems to me the exact opposite - that the victor writes the history. If you just conquered a group of people, you would write that down for posterity about your great battles and success. Every other civilization has done this. But not the Aryans? Doesn't make sense.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

aryan is not a race, period.

 

if we know what arya is from our vedic letureature,

then that should be enough for us.

why discuss something that is not true or we do not believe.

 

many have invaded india.

even columbus wanted to invade india but landed in america.

 

so what?

 

any one who accept teh authority of the vedas

and lives by it is an arya.

 

so this thread needs to end,

else it would make some think there was aryan race's invasion in india who created the vedic culture.

 

the reality is the veeic culture grew in india

and once was spread almost all over the world.

 

islam, . and buddhism curtailed it now to india only.

 

prabhupada made some hippies and westerners aryans (krishna devotees.).

 

an aryan can be found in any color and race.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

But did exist. It only exists now in various diluted forms. But fairly obviously research into it has been suppressed since Hitler as has all public research and debate into racial science or history.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

The Aryan race for sure exists in India in its purity. The language of the Aryans, Sanskrit is as pure as it is in Rigveda. All of India and Central Asia was the ancient Aryavarta.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

These people are probably of Indian origin. I am told they spoke Sanskrit.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

I agree the original home of Aryans is Bharatvarsh. Most Indians happen to be pure Aryans. Indias must be referred to as Aryans, not Whites or Brown. Remember we have Brown people like the Latin people but also more than 300 million people who are amongst the Whitest people on this globe.

 

Also Sanskrit is the fountain of Indo-European languages. though the Slavic languages are Indo-European too, Sanskrit is very close to ancient Persian and Latin.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Only two nations India and Iran can claim to be the original home of the Aryan Race. The first use of the word Arya is in the Indian epic Rigveda. Also amongst the purest Aryan Race in the worid live today in India or Aryavarta as is refferred to in ancient times.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Truly the Aryan race originated in India. The sign Swastik though found in many cultures is only referred to as Swastik in India, Iran and some European countries. It is a Sanskrit word.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

 

All races are our brothers but Aryan means a race of people living in India and Iran in ancient and present times.

Man Singh

Gwalior

 

Some people who are jealous are trying to fake the history of India. This is an attack on Aryavarta and Aryadharma:

 

HHAGWAD GEETA: Adnixture of blood damns the destroyers of the race as well as the race itself. Deprived of the offerings of race and water the manes of their also fall. BHAGWAD GEETA VERSE $@.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

 

All races are our brothers but Aryan means a race of people living in India and Iran in ancient and present times.

Man Singh

Gwalior

 

Some people who are jealous are trying to fake the history of India. This is an attack on Aryavarta and Aryadharma:

 

HHAGWAD GEETA: Adnixture of blood damns the destroyers of the race as well as the race itself. Deprived of the offerings of race and water the manes of their also fall. BHAGWAD GEETA VERSE 42.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

The Aryan Race has its origins in Aryavarta, India. All political games are being played by foreigners to change this but these people are fool no one can change the history of India.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Now money is being paid to some corrupt Indians to make the Dropkas (who are purely Indian) into Greeks. The truth is the Aryan Race came from India.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

It has been often mentioned that Bhagwad Geeta is matchless read below-

Age-long family traditions disappear with the destruction of the family: and virtue having been lost, vice takes hold of the entire race.

 

With the preponderance of vice, Krsna, the women of the family become corrupt; and with the corruption of women, O descendent of Vrsni, there ensures an intermixture of castes.

 

Admixture of blood damns the destroyers of the race as well as the race itself.

 

Bhagwad Geeta Text 39-42: 40-42.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

 

The real thought behind "ayran race" is indo-european not

the indians of india. The actual tribe that people refer to the Ayran was only called ayran because not much is known about them only that they were white and had blonde,red, or other light coloured hair. There would be no trace of them left because the indians and other non-european interbreed with them until the dna of the tribe was gone.

The caste system is close to Nordic wisdom and differs in the respect that Nordic peoples did not use the evolutionary gauge to oppress people by keeping them poor. The truth is your culture is connected to White culture not asian. Without the ancient european incursions into asia Indian culture would not be as it is today. To prove this study Nordic mythology and you will see that. Only a fool would deny the truth when it is looking at him in the face. So which are you the Ubermensch or the untermensch? The real reason the term ayran is used is because people believe that it means noble and in that context it is more fitting to the european race which invented science and the concepts of freedon and it's own form of democracy. So the true homeland would not be india because The true home is most likely Atantis. Though there is no prove. The stories about that is they were tall and light skinned and had blue or grey eyes.

We use this term to encompas all europeans regardless of what sub-group they are and Indian is included in the indo-european chart because of sanskrit being close to other

native ancient languages of the european peoples.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...