Is Mercury to be considered as Combust ?

[Guest guest]

Dear friends,

 

On combustion of Mercury there are diversant views. One sect considers

that Mercury is normally so close to the Sun, so one must not consider

it as Combust (Just as Retro rahu and ketu are considered as Direct,

since they are retro always), while the other sect considers it as

combust.

 

1) What do you consider ?

 

2) Does Mercury combust produce " mand buddhis " ?

 

3) What could be the effect of a combust and retro Mercury ?

 

Anybody care to answer ?

 

Please note that we must not get afraid that we may be wrong, for none

is perfect in astrology and every day of Life even at age of 90, in

astrology is a learning day. Unless one participates one cannot enjoy

the pain and pleasure both. We must always participate in discussions so

that others can learn , if not we. We may look stupid at asking

questions or answering them, but this should not change our mission of

developing astrology to great heights and a learning experience to all

who are silent witnesses and members of this Forum. We have to look at

horizons beyond and move out of our individual images. You can consider

me as a example of this. I have never considered or cared for my image

or any sort of image building. I talk nonsense many times, on women,

etc, and enjoy cheap thrills too at cost of looking stupid or

-un-astrologer like. But who cares? As long as I know how to cut hair, I

will be known as a barber. I know I am skilled at my work. Thats what

matters. Is it not ? So one must shed all fears of images, temporary

fleeting reputations, and pretensions of looking good, and not speaking

out of fear of writing something wrong. Do not do this.

 

Bhool sabhi se hoti aayi. kaun hai jisne na thokar khaayi.

 

Bhoolon se seekhe joh, manzil usne paayi.

 

best wishes/bhaskar.

[Guest guest]

Dear Bhaskar ji,//What could be the effect of a combust and retro Mercury?////Anybody care to answer?//Padhe likhe ko faarsi kya! I am sure, by now our members have well understood the effects of a combust-retro mercury!

Does anyone need to answer? :-)RegardsNeelam2009/12/5 Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear friends,

 

On combustion of Mercury there are diversant views. One sect considers

that Mercury is normally so close to the Sun, so one must not consider

it as Combust (Just as Retro rahu and ketu are considered as Direct,

since they are retro always), while the other sect considers it as

combust.

 

1) What do you consider ?

 

2) Does Mercury combust produce " mand buddhis " ?

 

3) What could be the effect of a combust and retro Mercury ?

 

Anybody care to answer ?

 

Please note that we must not get afraid that we may be wrong, for none

is perfect in astrology and every day of Life even at age of 90, in

astrology is a learning day. Unless one participates one cannot enjoy

the pain and pleasure both. We must always participate in discussions so

that others can learn , if not we. We may look stupid at asking

questions or answering them, but this should not change our mission of

developing astrology to great heights and a learning experience to all

who are silent witnesses and members of this Forum. We have to look at

horizons beyond and move out of our individual images. You can consider

me as a example of this. I have never considered or cared for my image

or any sort of image building. I talk nonsense many times, on women,

etc, and enjoy cheap thrills too at cost of looking stupid or

-un-astrologer like. But who cares? As long as I know how to cut hair, I

will be known as a barber. I know I am skilled at my work. Thats what

matters. Is it not ? So one must shed all fears of images, temporary

fleeting reputations, and pretensions of looking good, and not speaking

out of fear of writing something wrong. Do not do this.

 

Bhool sabhi se hoti aayi. kaun hai jisne na thokar khaayi.

 

Bhoolon se seekhe joh, manzil usne paayi.

 

best wishes/bhaskar.

[Guest guest]

Dear Mr.Bhaskar jee,I am new to forum.Your advice in the last paragraph made me to attempt it.Mercury and Sun placed in one house as close as 1 degree apart - then it combust.I am not aware that how many minimum degree that will not make combust.It is not mercury, any planet with Sun with closer degree, that combust.The Jagannath Hora software can tell about if the planet is combust or not.Please correct if am wrong with proper support classics.warm regardsS.GovindRajanOn Sat, 05 Dec 2009 23:46:40 +0530 wrote>

 

>Dear friends,>>On combustion of Mercury there are diversant views. One sect considers>that Mercury is normally so close to the Sun, so one must not consider>it as Combust (Just as Retro rahu and ketu are considered as Direct,>since they are retro always), while the other sect considers it as>combust.>>1) What do you consider ?>>2) Does Mercury combust produce "mand buddhis" ?>>3) What could be the effect of a combust and retro Mercury ?>>Anybody care to answer ?>>Please note that we must not get afraid that we may be wrong, for none>is perfect in astrology and every day of Life even at age of 90, in>astrology is a learning day. Unless one participates one cannot enjoy>the pain and pleasure both. We must always participate in discussions so>that others can learn , if not we. We may look stupid at asking>questions or answering them, but this should not change our mission of>developing astrology to great heights and a learning experience to all>who are silent witnesses and members of this Forum. We have to look at>horizons beyond and move out of our individual images. You can consider>me as a example of this. I have never considered or cared for my image>or any sort of image building. I talk nonsense many times, on women,>etc, and enjoy cheap thrills too at cost of looking stupid or>-un-astrologer like. But who cares? As long as I know how to cut hair, I>will be known as a barber. I know I am skilled at my work. Thats what>matters. Is it not ? So one must shed all fears of images, temporary>fleeting reputations, and pretensions of looking good, and not speaking>out of fear of writing something wrong. Do not do this.>>Bhool sabhi se hoti aayi. kaun hai jisne na thokar khaayi.>>Bhoolon se seekhe joh, manzil usne paayi.>>best wishes/bhaskar.>>

[Guest guest]

Dear Neelam Ji,I'd like to mention here that combust & retro mercury is good for LEO Ascendant Natives, atleast :-)Best Regards,Deepak Sharmaneelam gupta <neelamgupta07 Sent: Sun, December 6, 2009 12:02:50 AMRe:

Is Mercury to be considered as Combust ?

 

 

Dear Bhaskar ji,//What could be the effect of a combust and retro Mercury?////Anybody care to answer?//Padhe likhe ko faarsi kya! I am sure, by now our members have well understood the effects of a combust-retro mercury!

Does anyone need to answer? :-)RegardsNeelam2009/12/5 Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish@ .co. in>

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear friends,

 

On combustion of Mercury there are diversant views. One sect considers

that Mercury is normally so close to the Sun, so one must not consider

it as Combust (Just as Retro rahu and ketu are considered as Direct,

since they are retro always), while the other sect considers it as

combust.

 

1) What do you consider ?

 

2) Does Mercury combust produce "mand buddhis" ?

 

3) What could be the effect of a combust and retro Mercury ?

 

Anybody care to answer ?

 

Please note that we must not get afraid that we may be wrong, for none

is perfect in astrology and every day of Life even at age of 90, in

astrology is a learning day. Unless one participates one cannot enjoy

the pain and pleasure both. We must always participate in discussions so

that others can learn , if not we. We may look stupid at asking

questions or answering them, but this should not change our mission of

developing astrology to great heights and a learning experience to all

who are silent witnesses and members of this Forum. We have to look at

horizons beyond and move out of our individual images. You can consider

me as a example of this. I have never considered or cared for my image

or any sort of image building. I talk nonsense many times, on women,

etc, and enjoy cheap thrills too at cost of looking stupid or

-un-astrologer like. But who cares? As long as I know how to cut hair, I

will be known as a barber. I know I am skilled at my work. Thats what

matters. Is it not ? So one must shed all fears of images, temporary

fleeting reputations, and pretensions of looking good, and not speaking

out of fear of writing something wrong. Do not do this.

 

Bhool sabhi se hoti aayi. kaun hai jisne na thokar khaayi.

 

Bhoolon se seekhe joh, manzil usne paayi.

 

best wishes/bhaskar.

[Guest guest]

Dear Deepak ji,Did I ever say the contrary? 2/11L overtaken by the LL, that too Sun himself can be anything but good. Specially in 11H.:-)SUN's lordship is an important factor in reading the results of combust planets.

RegardsNeelam2009/12/6 deepak sharma <deepak_rptech

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Neelam Ji,I'd like to mention here that combust & retro mercury is good for LEO Ascendant Natives, atleast :-)

Best Regards,Deepak Sharma

neelam gupta <neelamgupta07

Sun, December 6, 2009 12:02:50 AMRe:

Is Mercury to be considered as Combust ?

 

 

Dear Bhaskar ji,//What could be the effect of a combust and retro Mercury?////Anybody care to answer?//Padhe likhe ko faarsi kya! I am sure, by now our members have well understood the effects of a combust-retro mercury!

Does anyone need to answer? :-)RegardsNeelam2009/12/5 Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish@ .co. in>

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear friends,

 

On combustion of Mercury there are diversant views. One sect considers

that Mercury is normally so close to the Sun, so one must not consider

it as Combust (Just as Retro rahu and ketu are considered as Direct,

since they are retro always), while the other sect considers it as

combust.

 

1) What do you consider ?

 

2) Does Mercury combust produce " mand buddhis " ?

 

3) What could be the effect of a combust and retro Mercury ?

 

Anybody care to answer ?

 

Please note that we must not get afraid that we may be wrong, for none

is perfect in astrology and every day of Life even at age of 90, in

astrology is a learning day. Unless one participates one cannot enjoy

the pain and pleasure both. We must always participate in discussions so

that others can learn , if not we. We may look stupid at asking

questions or answering them, but this should not change our mission of

developing astrology to great heights and a learning experience to all

who are silent witnesses and members of this Forum. We have to look at

horizons beyond and move out of our individual images. You can consider

me as a example of this. I have never considered or cared for my image

or any sort of image building. I talk nonsense many times, on women,

etc, and enjoy cheap thrills too at cost of looking stupid or

-un-astrologer like. But who cares? As long as I know how to cut hair, I

will be known as a barber. I know I am skilled at my work. Thats what

matters. Is it not ? So one must shed all fears of images, temporary

fleeting reputations, and pretensions of looking good, and not speaking

out of fear of writing something wrong. Do not do this.

 

Bhool sabhi se hoti aayi. kaun hai jisne na thokar khaayi.

 

Bhoolon se seekhe joh, manzil usne paayi.

 

best wishes/bhaskar.

[Guest guest]

Dear Neelam Ji,//SUN's lordship is an important factor in reading the results of combust planets//Hence such a deep combustion for Virgo, Pisces or Capricorn Ascendants mightbring troubles like Skin disease (very common) etc particulary if venus is also weak.I fully agree with whatever you mentioned in the earlier mail :-)Best Regards,Deepak Sharmaneelam gupta <neelamgupta07To:

Sent: Sun, December 6, 2009 12:14:26 AMRe: Is Mercury to be considered as Combust ?

 

 

Dear Deepak ji,Did I ever say the contrary? 2/11L overtaken by the LL, that too Sun himself can be anything but good. Specially in 11H.:-)SUN's lordship is an important factor in reading the results of combust planets.

RegardsNeelam2009/12/6 deepak sharma <deepak_rptech@ >

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Neelam Ji,I'd like to mention here that combust & retro mercury is good for LEO Ascendant Natives, atleast :-)

Best Regards,Deepak Sharma

neelam gupta <neelamgupta07@ gmail.com>ancient_indian_ astrology

Sun, December 6, 2009 12:02:50 AMRe:

[ancient_indian_ astrology] Is Mercury to be considered as Combust ?

 

 

Dear Bhaskar ji,//What could be the effect of a combust and retro Mercury?////Anybody care to answer?//Padhe likhe ko faarsi kya! I am sure, by now our members have well understood the effects of a combust-retro mercury!

Does anyone need to answer? :-)RegardsNeelam2009/12/5 Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish@ .co. in>

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear friends,

 

On combustion of Mercury there are diversant views. One sect considers

that Mercury is normally so close to the Sun, so one must not consider

it as Combust (Just as Retro rahu and ketu are considered as Direct,

since they are retro always), while the other sect considers it as

combust.

 

1) What do you consider ?

 

2) Does Mercury combust produce "mand buddhis" ?

 

3) What could be the effect of a combust and retro Mercury ?

 

Anybody care to answer ?

 

Please note that we must not get afraid that we may be wrong, for none

is perfect in astrology and every day of Life even at age of 90, in

astrology is a learning day. Unless one participates one cannot enjoy

the pain and pleasure both. We must always participate in discussions so

that others can learn , if not we. We may look stupid at asking

questions or answering them, but this should not change our mission of

developing astrology to great heights and a learning experience to all

who are silent witnesses and members of this Forum. We have to look at

horizons beyond and move out of our individual images. You can consider

me as a example of this. I have never considered or cared for my image

or any sort of image building. I talk nonsense many times, on women,

etc, and enjoy cheap thrills too at cost of looking stupid or

-un-astrologer like. But who cares? As long as I know how to cut hair, I

will be known as a barber. I know I am skilled at my work. Thats what

matters. Is it not ? So one must shed all fears of images, temporary

fleeting reputations, and pretensions of looking good, and not speaking

out of fear of writing something wrong. Do not do this.

 

Bhool sabhi se hoti aayi. kaun hai jisne na thokar khaayi.

 

Bhoolon se seekhe joh, manzil usne paayi.

 

best wishes/bhaskar.

[Guest guest]

Dear Govind Rajan ji,

 

Thank you for participating in the discussion. The more members we have

doing so, the more enjoyable and filturing of knowledge occurs. At the

moment I wish to remind you that we are not looking for definition of

Combustion, rather we are looking for diversant views from members, what

has been their experience and what do they feel of combustion for

" Mercury " .

 

Do you think actually combustion occurs in actual, if we consider the

meaning of combustion as " being burnt " then it means that Mercury no

longer works for the native and ceases to give positive results. Mercury

or " Budh " relates to " Buddhi " , so my clear specific query I would now

re-word as " Would a combust Mercury make a person a " Buddhu "

(Unintelligent person) of sorts " ?.

 

regards/Bhaskar.

 

 

, " S Govind Rajan "

<govindh2001 wrote:

>

> Dear Mr.Bhaskar jee,I am new to forum.Your advice in the last

paragraph made me to attempt it.Mercury and Sun placed in one house as

close as 1 degree apart - then it combust.I am not aware that how many

minimum degree that will not make & nbsp;combust.It is not

mercury, & nbsp;any planet with Sun with closer degree, that combust.The

Jagannath Hora software can tell about if the planet is combust or

not.Please correct if am wrong with proper support classics.warm

regardsS.GovindRajanOn Sat, 05 Dec 2009 23:46:40 +0530 wrote & gt;

>

>

>

> & gt;Dear friends, & gt; & gt;On combustion of Mercury there are diversant

views. One sect considers & gt;that Mercury is normally so close to the

Sun, so one must not consider & gt;it as Combust (Just as Retro rahu and

ketu are considered as Direct, & gt;since they are retro always), while

the other sect considers it as & gt;combust. & gt; & gt;1) What do you

consider ? & gt; & gt;2) Does Mercury combust produce " mand buddhis "

? & gt; & gt;3) What could be the effect of a combust and retro Mercury

? & gt; & gt;Anybody care to answer ? & gt; & gt;Please note that we must not

get afraid that we may be wrong, for none & gt;is perfect in astrology and

every day of Life even at age of 90, in & gt;astrology is a learning day.

Unless one participates one cannot enjoy & gt;the pain and pleasure both.

We must always participate in discussions so & gt;that others can learn ,

if not we. We may look stupid at asking & gt;questions or answering them,

but this should not change our mission of & gt;developing astrology to

great heights and a learning experience to all & gt;who are silent

witnesses and members of this Forum. We have to look at & gt;horizons

beyond and move out of our individual images. You can consider & gt;me as

a example of this. I have never considered or cared for my image & gt;or

any sort of image building. I talk nonsense many times, on

women, & gt;etc, and enjoy cheap thrills too at cost of looking stupid

or & gt;-un-astrologer like. But who cares? As long as I know how to cut

hair, I & gt;will be known as a barber. I know I am skilled at my work.

Thats what & gt;matters. Is it not ? So one must shed all fears of images,

temporary & gt;fleeting reputations, and pretensions of looking good, and

not speaking & gt;out of fear of writing something wrong. Do not do

this. & gt; & gt;Bhool sabhi se hoti aayi. kaun hai jisne na thokar

khaayi. & gt; & gt;Bhoolon se seekhe joh, manzil usne paayi. & gt; & gt;best

wishes/bhaskar. & gt; & gt;

>

[Guest guest]

Bhaskar Ji,I know a few people with combust Mercury and they appear to be quite intelligent..They both appeal to the masses and are always a crowd pleaser.. In both these 2 cases Sun and Mercury are together in a dustana house.Vidya , "Bhaskar" <bhaskar_jyotish wrote:>> > Dear friends,> > On combustion of Mercury there are diversant views. One sect considers> that Mercury is normally so close to the Sun, so one must not consider> it as Combust (Just as Retro rahu and ketu are considered as Direct,> since they are retro always), while the other sect considers it as> combust.> > 1) What do you consider ?> > 2) Does Mercury combust produce "mand buddhis" ?> > 3) What could be the effect of a combust and retro Mercury ?> > Anybody care to answer ?> > Please note that we must not get afraid that we may be wrong, for none> is perfect in astrology and every day of Life even at age of 90, in> astrology is a learning day. Unless one participates one cannot enjoy> the pain and pleasure both. We must always participate in discussions so> that others can learn , if not we. We may look stupid at asking> questions or answering them, but this should not change our mission of> developing astrology to great heights and a learning experience to all> who are silent witnesses and members of this Forum. We have to look at> horizons beyond and move out of our individual images. You can consider> me as a example of this. I have never considered or cared for my image> or any sort of image building. I talk nonsense many times, on women,> etc, and enjoy cheap thrills too at cost of looking stupid or> -un-astrologer like. But who cares? As long as I know how to cut hair, I> will be known as a barber. I know I am skilled at my work. Thats what> matters. Is it not ? So one must shed all fears of images, temporary> fleeting reputations, and pretensions of looking good, and not speaking> out of fear of writing something wrong. Do not do this.> > Bhool sabhi se hoti aayi. kaun hai jisne na thokar khaayi.> > Bhoolon se seekhe joh, manzil usne paayi.> > best wishes/bhaskar.>

[Guest guest]

Dear Vidya Ji,May I intervene here and ask you to provide the birth details. Thanks in anticipation.Best Regards,Deepak SharmaVidya <vidyakmr Sent: Sun, December 6, 2009 12:46:46 AM Re: Is Mercury to be considered as

Combust ?

 

 

 

Bhaskar Ji,I know a few people with combust Mercury and they appear to be quite intelligent. .They both appeal to the masses and are always a crowd pleaser.. In both these 2 cases Sun and Mercury are together in a dustana house.Vidyaancient_indian_ astrology, "Bhaskar" <bhaskar_jyotish@ ...> wrote:>> > Dear friends,> > On combustion of Mercury there are diversant views. One sect considers> that Mercury is normally so close to the Sun, so one must not consider> it as Combust (Just as Retro rahu and ketu are considered as Direct,> since they are retro always), while the other sect considers it as> combust.> > 1) What do you consider ?> > 2) Does Mercury combust produce "mand buddhis" ?> > 3) What could be the effect of a combust and retro Mercury ?> >

Anybody care to answer ?> > Please note that we must not get afraid that we may be wrong, for none> is perfect in astrology and every day of Life even at age of 90, in> astrology is a learning day. Unless one participates one cannot enjoy> the pain and pleasure both. We must always participate in discussions so> that others can learn , if not we. We may look stupid at asking> questions or answering them, but this should not change our mission of> developing astrology to great heights and a learning experience to all> who are silent witnesses and members of this Forum. We have to look at> horizons beyond and move out of our individual images. You can consider> me as a example of this. I have never considered or cared for my image> or any sort of image building. I talk nonsense many times, on women,> etc, and enjoy cheap thrills too at cost of looking stupid

or> -un-astrologer like. But who cares? As long as I know how to cut hair, I> will be known as a barber. I know I am skilled at my work. Thats what> matters. Is it not ? So one must shed all fears of images, temporary> fleeting reputations, and pretensions of looking good, and not speaking> out of fear of writing something wrong. Do not do this.> > Bhool sabhi se hoti aayi. kaun hai jisne na thokar khaayi.> > Bhoolon se seekhe joh, manzil usne paayi.> > best wishes/bhaskar.>

[Guest guest]

Dear Deepak Ji,

 

Sure, it's fine by me..May I ask if this is for a case study. I would check with

those individuals first and then will provide it to protect their privacy.

 

Regards,

Vidya

 

, deepak sharma

<deepak_rptech wrote:

>

> Dear Vidya Ji,

>

> May I intervene here and ask you to provide the birth details.

> Thanks in anticipation.

> Best Regards,

> Deepak Sharma

>

>

> ________________________________

> Vidya <vidyakmr

>

> Sun, December 6, 2009 12:46:46 AM

> Re: Is Mercury to be considered as Combust

?

>

>

> Bhaskar Ji,

>

> I know a few people with combust Mercury and they appear to be quite

intelligent. .They both appeal to the masses and are always a crowd pleaser..

In both these 2 cases Sun and Mercury are together in a dustana house.

>

> Vidya

>

> ancient_indian_ astrology, " Bhaskar "

<bhaskar_jyotish@ ...> wrote:

> >

> >

> > Dear friends,

> >

> > On combustion of Mercury there are diversant views. One sect considers

> > that Mercury is normally so close to the Sun, so one must not consider

> > it as Combust (Just as Retro rahu and ketu are considered as Direct,

> > since they are retro always), while the other sect considers it as

> > combust.

> >

> > 1) What do you consider ?

> >

> > 2) Does Mercury combust produce " mand buddhis " ?

> >

> > 3) What could be the effect of a combust and retro Mercury ?

> >

> > Anybody care to answer ?

> >

> > Please note that we must not get afraid that we may be wrong, for none

> > is perfect in astrology and every day of Life even at age of 90, in

> > astrology is a learning day. Unless one participates one cannot enjoy

> > the pain and pleasure both. We must always participate in discussions so

> > that others can learn , if not we. We may look stupid at asking

> > questions or answering them, but this should not change our mission of

> > developing astrology to great heights and a learning experience to all

> > who are silent witnesses and members of this Forum. We have to look at

> > horizons beyond and move out of our individual images. You can consider

> > me as a example of this. I have never considered or cared for my image

> > or any sort of image building. I talk nonsense many times, on women,

> > etc, and enjoy cheap thrills too at cost of looking stupid or

> > -un-astrologer like. But who cares? As long as I know how to cut hair, I

> > will be known as a barber. I know I am skilled at my work. Thats what

> > matters. Is it not ? So one must shed all fears of images, temporary

> > fleeting reputations, and pretensions of looking good, and not speaking

> > out of fear of writing something wrong. Do not do this.

> >

> > Bhool sabhi se hoti aayi. kaun hai jisne na thokar khaayi.

> >

> > Bhoolon se seekhe joh, manzil usne paayi.

> >

> > best wishes/bhaskar.

> >

>

[Guest guest]

Dear All,

 

Let us not forget that Sun is the Naisargika Atma karaka, the Indicator of the Soul. So any planet he is influencing closely (combustion) that planets qualities will be prevalent in that individual. Whether the positive or negative attributes of that planet becomes prevalent is matter of closer scrutiny . It is common to find people strong in creative arts to have combust Venus, this might ofcourse bring challenges to relationships as well.

Regards,

-Manoj

 

 

 

 

 

Vidya <vidyakmr Sent: Sat, December 5, 2009 12:16:46 PM Re: Is Mercury to be considered as Combust ?

Bhaskar Ji,I know a few people with combust Mercury and they appear to be quite intelligent. .They both appeal to the masses and are always a crowd pleaser.. In both these 2 cases Sun and Mercury are together in a dustana house.Vidyaancient_indian_ astrology, "Bhaskar" <bhaskar_jyotish@ ...> wrote:>> > Dear friends,> > On combustion of Mercury there are diversant views. One sect considers> that Mercury is normally so close to the Sun, so one must not consider> it as Combust (Just as Retro rahu and ketu are considered as Direct,> since they are retro always), while the other sect considers it as> combust.> > 1) What do you consider ?> > 2) Does Mercury combust produce "mand buddhis" ?> > 3) What could be the effect of a combust and retro Mercury ?>

> Anybody care to answer ?> > Please note that we must not get afraid that we may be wrong, for none> is perfect in astrology and every day of Life even at age of 90, in> astrology is a learning day. Unless one participates one cannot enjoy> the pain and pleasure both. We must always participate in discussions so> that others can learn , if not we. We may look stupid at asking> questions or answering them, but this should not change our mission of> developing astrology to great heights and a learning experience to all> who are silent witnesses and members of this Forum. We have to look at> horizons beyond and move out of our individual images. You can consider> me as a example of this. I have never considered or cared for my image> or any sort of image building. I talk nonsense many times, on women,> etc, and enjoy cheap thrills too at cost of looking

stupid or> -un-astrologer like. But who cares? As long as I know how to cut hair, I> will be known as a barber. I know I am skilled at my work. Thats what> matters. Is it not ? So one must shed all fears of images, temporary> fleeting reputations, and pretensions of looking good, and not speaking> out of fear of writing something wrong. Do not do this.> > Bhool sabhi se hoti aayi. kaun hai jisne na thokar khaayi.> > Bhoolon se seekhe joh, manzil usne paayi.> > best wishes/bhaskar.>

[Guest guest]

sharmaji namaskar

 

i have a college boy Bd 11 aug 1985 time 23.45 at ahmedabad

ho has cobarst mecury

meen lagana and mercury mars sun are in 5th house

what effect it give on his education ? please whether parent helphim

thanks

Ramesh joshi

 

, " Bhaskar " <bhaskar_jyotish

wrote:

>

>

> Dear friends,

>

> On combustion of Mercury there are diversant views. One sect considers

> that Mercury is normally so close to the Sun, so one must not consider

> it as Combust (Just as Retro rahu and ketu are considered as Direct,

> since they are retro always), while the other sect considers it as

> combust.

>

> 1) What do you consider ?

>

> 2) Does Mercury combust produce " mand buddhis " ?

>

> 3) What could be the effect of a combust and retro Mercury ?

>

> Anybody care to answer ?

>

> Please note that we must not get afraid that we may be wrong, for none

> is perfect in astrology and every day of Life even at age of 90, in

> astrology is a learning day. Unless one participates one cannot enjoy

> the pain and pleasure both. We must always participate in discussions so

> that others can learn , if not we. We may look stupid at asking

> questions or answering them, but this should not change our mission of

> developing astrology to great heights and a learning experience to all

> who are silent witnesses and members of this Forum. We have to look at

> horizons beyond and move out of our individual images. You can consider

> me as a example of this. I have never considered or cared for my image

> or any sort of image building. I talk nonsense many times, on women,

> etc, and enjoy cheap thrills too at cost of looking stupid or

> -un-astrologer like. But who cares? As long as I know how to cut hair, I

> will be known as a barber. I know I am skilled at my work. Thats what

> matters. Is it not ? So one must shed all fears of images, temporary

> fleeting reputations, and pretensions of looking good, and not speaking

> out of fear of writing something wrong. Do not do this.

>

> Bhool sabhi se hoti aayi. kaun hai jisne na thokar khaayi.

>

> Bhoolon se seekhe joh, manzil usne paayi.

>

> best wishes/bhaskar.

>

[Guest guest]

Dear Ramesh Ji,Below birth details give "Mesh" lagna.As you mentioned "Meen" Lagna, Kindly confirmthe birth data again. Thank you.Best Regards,Deepak Sharmaramesh joshi <jora Sent: Sun, December 6, 2009 2:52:37 AM

Re: Is Mercury to be considered as Combust ?

 

 

sharmaji namaskar

 

i have a college boy Bd 11 aug 1985 time 23.45 at ahmedabad

ho has cobarst mecury

meen lagana and mercury mars sun are in 5th house

what effect it give on his education ? please whether parent helphim

thanks

Ramesh joshi

 

ancient_indian_ astrology, "Bhaskar" <bhaskar_jyotish@ ...> wrote:

>

>

> Dear friends,

>

> On combustion of Mercury there are diversant views. One sect considers

> that Mercury is normally so close to the Sun, so one must not consider

> it as Combust (Just as Retro rahu and ketu are considered as Direct,

> since they are retro always), while the other sect considers it as

> combust.

>

> 1) What do you consider ?

>

> 2) Does Mercury combust produce "mand buddhis" ?

>

> 3) What could be the effect of a combust and retro Mercury ?

>

> Anybody care to answer ?

>

> Please note that we must not get afraid that we may be wrong, for none

> is perfect in astrology and every day of Life even at age of 90, in

> astrology is a learning day. Unless one participates one cannot enjoy

> the pain and pleasure both. We must always participate in discussions so

> that others can learn , if not we. We may look stupid at asking

> questions or answering them, but this should not change our mission of

> developing astrology to great heights and a learning experience to all

> who are silent witnesses and members of this Forum. We have to look at

> horizons beyond and move out of our individual images. You can consider

> me as a example of this. I have never considered or cared for my image

> or any sort of image building. I talk nonsense many times, on women,

> etc, and enjoy cheap thrills too at cost of looking stupid or

> -un-astrologer like. But who cares? As long as I know how to cut hair, I

> will be known as a barber. I know I am skilled at my work. Thats what

> matters. Is it not ? So one must shed all fears of images, temporary

> fleeting reputations, and pretensions of looking good, and not speaking

> out of fear of writing something wrong. Do not do this.

>

> Bhool sabhi se hoti aayi. kaun hai jisne na thokar khaayi.

>

> Bhoolon se seekhe joh, manzil usne paayi.

>

> best wishes/bhaskar.

>

[Guest guest]

Dear Vidya Ji,Thanks a ton for your kind reply.Not much required actually. I'll take examples from my database if required.Best Regards,Deepak SharmaVidya <vidyakmr Sent: Sun, December 6, 2009 1:13:33 AM

Re: Is Mercury to be considered as Combust ?

 

 

Dear Deepak Ji,

 

Sure, it's fine by me..May I ask if this is for a case study. I would check with those individuals first and then will provide it to protect their privacy.

 

Regards,

Vidya

 

ancient_indian_ astrology, deepak sharma <deepak_rptech@ ...> wrote:

>

> Dear Vidya Ji,

>

> May I intervene here and ask you to provide the birth details.

> Thanks in anticipation.

> Best Regards,

> Deepak Sharma

>

>

> ____________ _________ _________ __

> Vidya <vidyakmr@.. .>

> ancient_indian_ astrology

> Sun, December 6, 2009 12:46:46 AM

> [ancient_indian_ astrology] Re: Is Mercury to be considered as Combust ?

>

>

> Bhaskar Ji,

>

> I know a few people with combust Mercury and they appear to be quite intelligent. .They both appeal to the masses and are always a crowd pleaser.. In both these 2 cases Sun and Mercury are together in a dustana house.

>

> Vidya

>

> ancient_indian_ astrology, "Bhaskar" <bhaskar_jyotish@ ...> wrote:

> >

> >

> > Dear friends,

> >

> > On combustion of Mercury there are diversant views. One sect considers

> > that Mercury is normally so close to the Sun, so one must not consider

> > it as Combust (Just as Retro rahu and ketu are considered as Direct,

> > since they are retro always), while the other sect considers it as

> > combust.

> >

> > 1) What do you consider ?

> >

> > 2) Does Mercury combust produce "mand buddhis" ?

> >

> > 3) What could be the effect of a combust and retro Mercury ?

> >

> > Anybody care to answer ?

> >

> > Please note that we must not get afraid that we may be wrong, for none

> > is perfect in astrology and every day of Life even at age of 90, in

> > astrology is a learning day. Unless one participates one cannot enjoy

> > the pain and pleasure both. We must always participate in discussions so

> > that others can learn , if not we. We may look stupid at asking

> > questions or answering them, but this should not change our mission of

> > developing astrology to great heights and a learning experience to all

> > who are silent witnesses and members of this Forum. We have to look at

> > horizons beyond and move out of our individual images. You can consider

> > me as a example of this. I have never considered or cared for my image

> > or any sort of image building. I talk nonsense many times, on women,

> > etc, and enjoy cheap thrills too at cost of looking stupid or

> > -un-astrologer like. But who cares? As long as I know how to cut hair, I

> > will be known as a barber. I know I am skilled at my work. Thats what

> > matters. Is it not ? So one must shed all fears of images, temporary

> > fleeting reputations, and pretensions of looking good, and not speaking

> > out of fear of writing something wrong. Do not do this.

> >

> > Bhool sabhi se hoti aayi. kaun hai jisne na thokar khaayi.

> >

> > Bhoolon se seekhe joh, manzil usne paayi.

> >

> > best wishes/bhaskar.

> >

>

[Guest guest]

Dear Neelam Ji,//SUN's lordship is an important factor in reading the results of combust planets//Based on your expert opinion about the captioned subject, I'd like to examplifya few cases for different ascendants -Pisces Ascendant : Such a deeply combust mercury for Pisces Ascendant gives marital discords and even divorce. As Lordship of Sun here goes to Sixth houseof disputes.A few Example Charts -==>>3 Jul 1977, 00:04 AM, Chandigarh (Male)==>>23 Oct 1975, 16:37, Vijayawada (Male)==>>30 Mar 1972, 6:50, Delhi (female)The common thing about above charts is -1.) Close combustion of Mercury (though not very deep in any of the cases) and hence close conjunction of 6th

house of disputes with 7th house of Marriage,2.) Marital Discords, and3.) Finally Divorce Virgo Ascendant : Deep combust mercury gives weak health / skin disease as in this case Sun rules malefic 12th house and afflicts Ascendant Lord.

Example Charts - 1.) 12 May 83, 14:40, DelhiNative is suffering with skin problem since many years2.) 29 apr 51, 16:00, Jullundhar, PunjabSkin problem case however not a serious one.Why - Mercury is not closely combust. Combust by 7 degrees.Best Regards,Deepak Sharmaneelam gupta <neelamgupta07 Sent: Sun, December 6, 2009 12:14:26 AMRe: Is Mercury to be considered as Combust ?

 

 

Dear Deepak ji,Did I ever say the contrary? 2/11L overtaken by the LL, that too Sun himself can be anything but good. Specially in 11H.:-)SUN's lordship is an important factor in reading the results of combust planets.

RegardsNeelam2009/12/6 deepak sharma <deepak_rptech@ >

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Neelam Ji,I'd like to mention here that combust & retro mercury is good for LEO Ascendant Natives, atleast :-)

Best Regards,Deepak Sharma

neelam gupta <neelamgupta07@ gmail.com>ancient_indian_ astrology

Sun, December 6, 2009 12:02:50 AMRe:

[ancient_indian_ astrology] Is Mercury to be considered as Combust ?

 

 

Dear Bhaskar ji,//What could be the effect of a combust and retro Mercury?////Anybody care to answer?//Padhe likhe ko faarsi kya! I am sure, by now our members have well understood the effects of a combust-retro mercury!

Does anyone need to answer? :-)RegardsNeelam2009/12/5 Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish@ .co. in>

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear friends,

 

On combustion of Mercury there are diversant views. One sect considers

that Mercury is normally so close to the Sun, so one must not consider

it as Combust (Just as Retro rahu and ketu are considered as Direct,

since they are retro always), while the other sect considers it as

combust.

 

1) What do you consider ?

 

2) Does Mercury combust produce "mand buddhis" ?

 

3) What could be the effect of a combust and retro Mercury ?

 

Anybody care to answer ?

 

Please note that we must not get afraid that we may be wrong, for none

is perfect in astrology and every day of Life even at age of 90, in

astrology is a learning day. Unless one participates one cannot enjoy

the pain and pleasure both. We must always participate in discussions so

that others can learn , if not we. We may look stupid at asking

questions or answering them, but this should not change our mission of

developing astrology to great heights and a learning experience to all

who are silent witnesses and members of this Forum. We have to look at

horizons beyond and move out of our individual images. You can consider

me as a example of this. I have never considered or cared for my image

or any sort of image building. I talk nonsense many times, on women,

etc, and enjoy cheap thrills too at cost of looking stupid or

-un-astrologer like. But who cares? As long as I know how to cut hair, I

will be known as a barber. I know I am skilled at my work. Thats what

matters. Is it not ? So one must shed all fears of images, temporary

fleeting reputations, and pretensions of looking good, and not speaking

out of fear of writing something wrong. Do not do this.

 

Bhool sabhi se hoti aayi. kaun hai jisne na thokar khaayi.

 

Bhoolon se seekhe joh, manzil usne paayi.

 

best wishes/bhaskar.

[Guest guest]

Namaste,

 

I have 4 cases of Mercury combust and retro, where the native received

electric shocks during sub-periods of Mercury, two of them in mental

asylum (technically balanced people, with NO traces of any medical

history) and other 2 persons, got electric shocks of their life......!!

 

To say they are crowd pullers = overstatement.

 

With regards,

Sreeram_Srinivas

[Guest guest]

Dear Mr. Deepak Sharma ji,

 

It is important to see condition of Mercury in marriage match making,

for the youth of this generation are more promiscuous and more likely

susceptible to AIDS.

 

A weak Mercury can also lead to marital disputes or sadistic behavior,

depending upon other planetary positions.

 

With regards,

Sreeram_Srinivas

[Guest guest]

Dear Sreeram Ji,//A weak Mercury can also lead to marital disputes or SADISTIC BEHAVIOUR,

depending upon other planetary positions//I do agree with you on the above statement. ThanksBest Regards,Deepak SharmaSre_eram <sreeram64 Sent: Sun, December 6, 2009 10:09:01 AM Re: Is Mercury to be considered

as Combust ?

 

 

Dear Mr. Deepak Sharma ji,

 

It is important to see condition of Mercury in marriage match making,

for the youth of this generation are more promiscuous and more likely

susceptible to AIDS.

 

A weak Mercury can also lead to marital disputes or sadistic behavior,

depending upon other planetary positions.

 

With regards,

Sreeram_Srinivas

[Guest guest]

Dear Neelam ji,//SUN's lordship is an important factor in reading the results of combust planets. //this is an important point to note .Thanks....Regards,gopi. , neelam gupta <neelamgupta07 wrote:>> Dear Deepak ji,> > Did I ever say the contrary? 2/11L overtaken by the LL, that too Sun himself> can be anything but good. Specially in 11H.:-)> > SUN's lordship is an important factor in reading the results of combust> planets.> > Regards> Neelam> > > 2009/12/6 deepak sharma deepak_rptech > >> >> > Dear Neelam Ji,> > I'd like to mention here that combust & retro mercury is good for LEO> > Ascendant Natives, atleast :-)> > Best Regards,> > Deepak Sharma> >> > ------------------------------> > ** neelam gupta neelamgupta07 > *To:* > > *Sent:* Sun, December 6, 2009 12:02:50 AM> > *Subject:* Re: Is Mercury to be considered as> > Combust ?> >> >> >> > Dear Bhaskar ji,> >> > //What could be the effect of a combust and retro Mercury?//> > //Anybody care to answer?//> >> > Padhe likhe ko faarsi kya!> >> > I am sure, by now our members have well understood the effects of a> > combust-retro mercury!> >> > Does anyone need to answer? :-)> >> > Regards> > Neelam> >> >> > 2009/12/5 Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish@ .co. inbhaskar_jyotish > >> >> >>> >>> >>> >> Dear friends,> >>> >> On combustion of Mercury there are diversant views. One sect considers> >> that Mercury is normally so close to the Sun, so one must not consider> >> it as Combust (Just as Retro rahu and ketu are considered as Direct,> >> since they are retro always), while the other sect considers it as> >> combust.> >>> >> 1) What do you consider ?> >>> >> 2) Does Mercury combust produce "mand buddhis" ?> >>> >> 3) What could be the effect of a combust and retro Mercury ?> >>> >> Anybody care to answer ?> >>> >> Please note that we must not get afraid that we may be wrong, for none> >> is perfect in astrology and every day of Life even at age of 90, in> >> astrology is a learning day. Unless one participates one cannot enjoy> >> the pain and pleasure both. We must always participate in discussions so> >> that others can learn , if not we. We may look stupid at asking> >> questions or answering them, but this should not change our mission of> >> developing astrology to great heights and a learning experience to all> >> who are silent witnesses and members of this Forum. We have to look at> >> horizons beyond and move out of our individual images. You can consider> >> me as a example of this. I have never considered or cared for my image> >> or any sort of image building. I talk nonsense many times, on women,> >> etc, and enjoy cheap thrills too at cost of looking stupid or> >> -un-astrologer like. But who cares? As long as I know how to cut hair, I> >> will be known as a barber. I know I am skilled at my work. Thats what> >> matters. Is it not ? So one must shed all fears of images, temporary> >> fleeting reputations, and pretensions of looking good, and not speaking> >> out of fear of writing something wrong. Do not do this.> >>> >> Bhool sabhi se hoti aayi. kaun hai jisne na thokar khaayi.> >>> >> Bhoolon se seekhe joh, manzil usne paayi.> >>> >> best wishes/bhaskar.> >>> >>> >> > > >>

[Guest guest]

Dear Deepak ji,That was nice. Nothing like learning through examples. Thanks and I am sure other members would find them useful too.Mercury is an impressionable planet. When conjunct with any planet, it tends to take on the shades of that planet. That is why in classics mercury’s nature is said to be dependent on its association. Mercury being the karak of VIVEK and VAANI, one can imagine what dire consequences would one suffer if this mercury falls in bad company.

Also being Karak of skin, invariably skin problems and itches would be there under the influence of hot and dry sun. If Saturn also comes along, it can lead to severe long-ternm problems. With Mars, the damage is intense leading to wounds and ulcers on the skin.

The sign placement of mercury often shows the area affected. One can even see short term transit infuences of sun over mercury leading to skin problems and eruptions.I also support Sreeeram ji’s observation of getting electric shocks if mercury is under the influence of Sun. One native got frozen shoulders for 2 years when Saturn was influencing his mercury in transit and when Sun was over this mercury, he was given electrical therapy for relief from pain. Another person received a severe electric jolt in a period of combust mercury. Some people also face a lot of nervous tension in such periods.

Hope we can have more such examples from other members.RegardsNeelam

[Guest guest]

Dear Neelam Ji, Sreeram Ji and All,

 

Most of you know Autism is very close to me (physically, mentally and spiritually). Mercury is the karaka for nerves. Affliction of Me is a tell tale sign of Neurological disorders as we all know. One interesting point I have noted is that Autistic children with combust Mercury also get Epilelpsy (Fits), especially when during teenage years. Epilepsy is essentially equivalent of a "Neurological Shock".

Regards,

-Manoj

 

 

 

 

 

neelam gupta <neelamgupta07 Sent: Sat, December 5, 2009 10:28:19 PMRe: Is Mercury to be considered as Combust ?

Dear Deepak ji,That was nice. Nothing like learning through examples. Thanks and I am sure other members would find them useful too.Mercury is an impressionable planet. When conjunct with any planet, it tends to take on the shades of that planet. That is why in classics mercury’s nature is said to be dependent on its association. Mercury being the karak of VIVEK and VAANI, one can imagine what dire consequences would one suffer if this mercury falls in bad company.Also being Karak of skin, invariably skin problems and itches would be there under the influence of hot and dry sun. If Saturn also comes along, it can lead to severe long-ternm problems. With Mars, the damage is intense leading to wounds and ulcers on the skin.The sign placement of mercury often shows the area affected. One can even see short term transit infuences of sun over mercury leading to skin problems and eruptions.I also support Sreeeram

ji’s observation of getting electric shocks if mercury is under the influence of Sun. One native got frozen shoulders for 2 years when Saturn was influencing his mercury in transit and when Sun was over this mercury, he was given electrical therapy for relief from pain. Another person received a severe electric jolt in a period of combust mercury. Some people also face a lot of nervous tension in such periods. Hope we can have more such examples from other members.RegardsNeelam

[Guest guest]

this will happen only if Mercury is afflicted in the 7th, or as Lord of

7th and in conjunction with neptune.

 

regards/.Bhaskar.

 

 

, deepak sharma

<deepak_rptech wrote:

>

> Dear Sreeram Ji,

> //A weak Mercury can also lead to marital disputes or SADISTIC

BEHAVIOUR,

> depending upon other planetary positions//

> I do agree with you on the above statement. Thanks

> Best Regards,

> Deepak Sharma

>

>

> ________________________________

> Sre_eram sreeram64

>

> Sun, December 6, 2009 10:09:01 AM

> Re: Is Mercury to be considered as

Combust ?

>

>

> Dear Mr. Deepak Sharma ji,

>

> It is important to see condition of Mercury in marriage match making,

> for the youth of this generation are more promiscuous and more likely

> susceptible to AIDS.

>

> A weak Mercury can also lead to marital disputes or sadistic behavior,

> depending upon other planetary positions.

>

> With regards,

> Sreeram_Srinivas

>

[Guest guest]

Electric shocks will only come if there is some connection of Mars or

Rahu.

 

Just because Sun and Mercury are conjoint , it does not bring in weight

enough to cause electric shocks. We must not forget the basics of

astrology.

 

regards/Bhaskar.

[Guest guest]

Dear Neelam Ji,Thanks for the further insights.I hope there must be some additional factors in couple ofextreme cases (frozen shoulder etc) you've mentioned.Best Regards,Deepak Sharmaneelam gupta <neelamgupta07 Sent: Sun, December 6, 2009 10:58:19 AMRe: Is Mercury to be considered as Combust ?

 

 

Dear Deepak ji,That was nice. Nothing like learning through examples. Thanks and I am sure other members would find them useful too.Mercury is an impressionable planet. When conjunct with any planet, it tends to take on the shades of that planet. That is why in classics mercury’s nature is said to be dependent on its association. Mercury being the karak of VIVEK and VAANI, one can imagine what dire consequences would one suffer if this mercury falls in bad company.

Also being Karak of skin, invariably skin problems and itches would be there under the influence of hot and dry sun. If Saturn also comes along, it can lead to severe long-ternm problems. With Mars, the damage is intense leading to wounds and ulcers on the skin.

The sign placement of mercury often shows the area affected. One can even see short term transit infuences of sun over mercury leading to skin problems and eruptions.I also support Sreeeram ji’s observation of getting electric shocks if mercury is under the influence of Sun. One native got frozen shoulders for 2 years when Saturn was influencing his mercury in transit and when Sun was over this mercury, he was given electrical therapy for relief from pain. Another person received a severe electric jolt in a period of combust mercury. Some people also face a lot of nervous tension in such periods.

Hope we can have more such examples from other members.RegardsNeelam

[Guest guest]

Dear Bhaskar Ji,I agree with you. Association of Mercury with 7th is required formarital disputes. (in cases being discussed)Sreeram Ji also mentioned // depending upon other planetory positions//Best Regards,Deepak SharmaBhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish Sent: Sun, December 6, 2009 11:09:25 AM Re: Is Mercury to be considered as Combust ?

 

 

 

this will happen only if Mercury is afflicted in the 7th, or as Lord of

7th and in conjunction with neptune.

 

regards/.Bhaskar.

 

ancient_indian_ astrology, deepak sharma

<deepak_rptech@ ...> wrote:

>

> Dear Sreeram Ji,

> //A weak Mercury can also lead to marital disputes or SADISTIC

BEHAVIOUR,

> depending upon other planetary positions//

> I do agree with you on the above statement. Thanks

> Best Regards,

> Deepak Sharma

>

>

> ____________ _________ _________ __

> Sre_eram sreeram64@.. .

> ancient_indian_ astrology

> Sun, December 6, 2009 10:09:01 AM

> [ancient_indian_ astrology] Re: Is Mercury to be considered as

Combust ?

>

>

> Dear Mr. Deepak Sharma ji,

>

> It is important to see condition of Mercury in marriage match making,

> for the youth of this generation are more promiscuous and more likely

> susceptible to AIDS.

>

> A weak Mercury can also lead to marital disputes or sadistic behavior,

> depending upon other planetary positions.

>

> With regards,

> Sreeram_Srinivas

>