Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Bhakta Don Muntean

Members
  • Content Count

    1,633
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Bhakta Don Muntean

  1. No my position is quite clear and - so are those of the two noted apostates - of course - i can see that you have no real position here and - you are a coward - why no name? COWARD! Oh and - "...Anybody who recognises Israel will burn in the fire of the Islamic nation's fury, [while] any [islamic leader] who recognises the Zionist regime means he is acknowledging the surrender and defeat of the Islamic world...There is no doubt that the new wave [of attacks] in Palestine will wipe off this stigma [israel] from the face of the Islamic world..." [Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, president of iran] Does that mean there is a jihad on me now? What a loathsome loser this knucklehead president is to make such threats...threats that you defend - i wonder - are you yourself president knucklehead - how long before he is here hiding - as a beguiler - behind the guest feature? I see many visits from Iran are noted in the stats page - one has to ask - who are those visitors?
  2. Good Lord - that is your reasoning? Would you shake hands with a cow eater? Your comment is actually anti-semitic in itself... That "Moische Arye Friedman" is an apostate jew - like president knuckle head is an apostate muslim - just like yer an apostate vaishnava... These noted jews should read my postings on this matter - there are many of them here including: *These noted orthodox followers are interpreting that they cannot return to Jerusalem to renew the State - without the messiah. But they should embrace the renewed State - for the following reasons and - more. The children of Ephraim were as archers handling the bow, that turned back in the day of battle. [Psalms 78.9] So best to be not now - like them then. In that day, saith the LORD, will I assemble her that halteth, and I will gather her that is driven away, and her that I have afflicted; And I will make her that halted a remnant, and her that was cast far off a mighty nation; and the LORD shall reign over them in mount Zion from thenceforth even for ever. [Micah 4.6-7] Of course the messiah that is expected - shall not be seen through any second advent of Jesus - because Jesus isn't the prophetically expected messiah - the 'why not' part of that - is a whole other discussion . So it should be noted that the expected messiah [a complex subject matter] - is a human being - not God - not an incarnation [partial or otherwise] he isn't a demigod - he isn't a 'supernatural' nor divine being at all. - though he is 'different' - in that he has a 'general soul' or - a 'slightly universal' soul. He doesn't have magic powers. Like in the days of old - God shall work the wonders - during the messianic age. So what are a few points about this - in the Prophetic tradition. But they shall sit every man under his vine and under his fig-tree; and none shall make them afraid; for the mouth of the LORD of hosts hath spoken. For let all the peoples walk each one in the name of its god, but we will walk in the name of the LORD our God for ever and ever. [Micah 4.4-5] In that quote we see that the messianic age - shall be multi-faith. But thou, Beth-lehem Ephrathah, which art little to be among the thousands of Judah, out of thee shall one come forth unto Me that is to be ruler in Israel; whose goings forth are from of old, from ancient days. Therefore will He give them up, until the time that she who travaileth hath brought forth; then the residue of his brethren shall return with the children of Israel. [Micah 5.1-2] In that quote we see that the messiah's maternal roots could be traced to this place [Beth-lehem]. To say 'which art little to be among the thousands of Judah' indicates that this was an obscure place - not a place of greatness. It is a misnomer that he is to be born in Beth-lehem - clearly the texts confirm he is born among the exiles. In saying 'out of thee shall one come forth unto Me that is to be ruler in Israel; whose goings forth are from of old, from ancient days' confirms that he has been reincarnating toward this point for a long time - 'whose goings forth are from of old, from ancient days'. We also see that Beth-lehem shall not be a part of a State of Israel 'until the time that she who travaileth hath brought forth' or - he is born - the text says 'Therefore will He give them up' - so is he talking about Beth-lehem - the Hebrew people in exile [and thus Jursalem] or - both? The full point is 'Therefore will He give them up, until the time that she who travaileth hath brought forth; then the residue of his brethren shall return with the children of Israel' - so 'them' indentifies - both those in exile and - Beth-lehem. So they 'shall return' to where - to an already renewed and infant State or - to just a geographical location or - both? We must consider that were it not for Jesus and the Faith surronding him - Beth-lehem would certainly have become a nearly deserted and forgotten place [by the time messiah is born somewhere in the exile] and - for Hebrews it [was] is an 'obscure place' a place of 'no mention'. So we have to then ask - when did Beth-lehem again become part of a State of Israel? It was on June 05, 1967 - so 'He [will] give them up, until the time that she who travaileth hath brought forth and - that then should indicate that - he must have to be born just prior to that event. Consider 'He [will] give them up until the time that she who is to give birth has given birth' - the word 'until' is important - so they are no longer 'given up' right after he is born and - if the messiah is to [alone] accomplish all this - how would he do so - as an infant child? So the use of 'until' means that as soon as he is born - no more position of being 'given up' or seperated from the renewed State. We can also add that the formal reclamation of all of Jerusalem could/would also coincide with this noted event: Now why dost thou cry out aloud? Is there no King in thee, is thy Counsellor perished, that pangs have taken hold of thee as of a woman in travail? [Micah 4.9] After that - there is this description in Zechariah 1.14-17: ...so the angel that spoke with me said unto me: 'Proclaim thou, saying: Thus saith the LORD of hosts: I am jealous for Jerusalem and for Zion with a great jealousy; and I am very sore displeased with the nations that are at ease; for I was but a little displeased, and they helped for evil. Therefore thus saith the LORD: I return to Jerusalem with compassions: My house shall be built in it, saith the LORD of hosts, and a line shall be stretched forth over Jerusalem. Again, proclaim, saying: Thus saith the LORD of hosts: My cities shall again overflow with prosperity; and the LORD shall yet comfort Zion, and shall yet choose Jerusalem. So that part - 'I am jealous for Jerusalem and for Zion with a great jealousy; and I am very sore displeased with the nations that are at ease; for I was but a little displeased, and they helped for evil.' - that means that God is angry at the nations of the world for it's treatment of His exiled because He was 'but a little displeased' and yet the nations after the exile were to have 'helped for evil' [or helped forward the afflications] and they were 'at ease' with doing so - thus God says 'I am jealous for Jerusalem and for Zion with a great jealousy' - so when we see fruition of the Micah 5.1-2 events we see that God permits all of Jerusalem to be again under an Israeli State. The State of Israel was first reclaimed after WWII - after the well known last general pogrom [directly under the Nazis and other's indirectly] came to an end - as noted in that quote God thinks that the world could have done more to prevent so much loss and instead they were 'at ease' with the Nazis - for too long - and God sanctioned this renewal - but - with this renewed State - there was a line as it were through [dividing] Jerusalem - until 1967. It should be mentioned that many propagandists have taken Zechariah 14.2 - 'For I will gather all nations against Jerusalem to battle; and the city shall be taken, and the houses rifled, and the women ravished; and half of the city shall go forth into captivity, but the residue of the people shall not be cut off from the city.' - to mean that there shall be a future war there and 'the residue of the people shall not be cut off from the city' - but this not so - as that was fulfilled in 30 C.E. - with the Exile - it should be noted that Muslim rulers later allowed the reestablishment of a Jewish community in Jerusalem thus 'the residue of the people [that] shall not be cut off from the city' means that even after the exile the people were being enabled by God - for a return to a former status as a State or - the end of the Exile! In text 3-4 we read that sometime after the exile comes "The Day of the Lord" - we note this point in texts three and four: Then shall the LORD go forth, and fight against those nations, as when He fighteth in the day of battle. And His feet shall stand in that day upon the mount of Olives, which is before Jerusalem on the east, and the mount of Olives shall cleft in the midst thereof toward the east and toward the west, so that there shall be a very great valley; and half of the mountain shall remove toward the north, and half of it toward the south. So God indeed left mercy and an open door through this 'residue of the people [that] shall not be cut off from the city' - so that means that at some point [after the 30 C.E. exile] - the residue of the exile again comes to Jerusalem. Additionally - if the world ends up in a sorry state over this point - there may well come this 'vist' - that produces a mountain dividing earthquake - so - in text 7 we read - And there shall be one day which shall be known as the LORD'S, not day, and not night; but it shall come to pass, that at evening time there shall be light. - of course we 'everyone' have choices - that impact everything. So to the point again - there must have been a State of Israel - already in existence and intended by God - before the time of his birth - as noted by 'then the residue of his brethren shall return with the children of Israel' - it means that there is a State for him and his family and 'the children of Israel' to return to. So yes these are my humble interpretations but - it could well be that he is already here - what aspects of the future of the State of Israel [and the world] are to be impacted by his appearance - is another discussion. One thing is sure - whenever it is that he is born - there must have been a State of Israel - already in existence and intended by God [with a securing of Beth-lehem and [all of] Jerusalem with the timing of his birth] - before the time of his birth - as noted by 'then the residue of his brethren shall return with the children of Israel' - it means that there is already a State for him and 'the residue of his family' and 'the children of Israel' to return to. We can see within this last quote [and through the other's so far] that there is a clear allusion to an exisiting Jerusalem and State - to the seeming surprise of God [and the remant of the people who later begin to return] some time before messiah is born - further - we've seen that God is to show-up in anger - which is noted as being - directed toward the nations - for their helping forward the afflictions of His exiled - when He was 'only a little displeased' - so - at the end of the last and worst pogrom [nazi] God indeed 'showed up' to reclaim Jerusalem and - as expected and 'planned' - He was 'surprised' to see some of His exiled - already there and - because He was sore displeased with the nations - for their 'at ease' adventures in the continual pogroms - He was pleased with finding some remant of His exiled there and He thus began the process - for messiah to be born and - coinciding it with the removal of the dividing-line through Jerusalem: And the word of the LORD of hosts came, saying: 'Thus saith the LORD of hosts: I am jealous for Zion with great jealousy, and I am jealous for her with great fury. Thus saith the LORD: I return unto Zion, and will dwell in the midst of Jerusalem; and Jerusalem shall be called The city of truth; and the mountain of the LORD of hosts The holy mountain. Thus saith the LORD of hosts: There shall yet old men and old women sit in the broad places of Jerusalem, every man with his staff in his hand for very age. And the broad places of the city shall be full of boys and girls playing in the broad places thereof. Thus saith the LORD of hosts: If it be marvellous in the eyes of the remnant of this people in those days, should it also be marvellous in Mine eyes? saith the LORD of hosts. [Zechariah 8.1-6] So later - when the House of The Lord is reestablished by the Lord [and ONLY by the direct efforts of messiah not just the State itself can do this - and it musn't be through violence] - we note this point: Take with you words, and return unto the LORD; say unto Him: 'Forgive all iniquity, and accept that which is good; so will we render for bullocks the offering of our lips. [Hosea 14.3] One sad part of this is that messsiah's appearance shall be marked with spurious claims by others - that he is the anti-christ/al-dajjal. * http://www.audarya-fellowship.com/fo...ddle-east.html So I wonder if Rabbi Moishe Aryeh Friedman really understands these things and if he doesn't - why not? About five years back - I used to think that the neturei karta were a bonafide group - a good thing - however - as i learned more about their very limited understandings [and other stuff too] I had to come to understand that the neturei karta are extremists too.
  3. Quote: This is pretty much false racism - there's no such thing as Russians, French, Hungarians, British, Germans. All these people were part of a huge global migration and are a mixture of all kind of different ethnical groups. Folks were always emigrating and all over Europe it is nothing but a mixture of so many different nationalities in every European country, even millions of Asians and Africans live all over Europe. The "British", what are those "British", these are all immigrants from anywhere and everywhere - same like US residents. Five Million so called "Germans" immigrated in the 19th cent. to US and are now called "Americans". So this is all bogus racism. Reply: That whole statement is 'bogus' and - it has no relevance to this point in my posting and - it makes no sense. The "bogus racism" of those around the Jewish communities is what led to those histories - a "racism" that is still very much a part of the global masses - it is delirious - and - those who perpetuate it are greatly bewildered demoniacs. Quote: what was the reason that the immigrated Jews were expelled from countries that consisted of people who were also nothing but immigrants? What was their "crime"? Reply: Yes - what? Seems that the 'birds of a feather' simile just lingers here - sad that you cannot move past the 'incorrigible'... I think that all the evidence says that God shall punish 'the nations' for this - as I noted already -the exile was less of a punishment of His people and more of a test for the nations - a test which they've failed.
  4. WHATEVER! As if he is jewish....got some evidence for that outrageous claim? It is a widely known fact that he is an apostate Muslim and - I'll bet he even thinks he's the 'al-madhi' or something AND - if the jews in iran have any sense - they shall leave iran ASAP. Ahmadinejad has made several controversial statements about the Holocaust - calling it "a myth"...like you do. "...Anybody who recognises Israel will burn in the fire of the Islamic nation's fury, [while] any [islamic leader] who recognises the Zionist regime means he is acknowledging the surrender and defeat of the Islamic world...There is no doubt that the new wave [of attacks] in Palestine will wipe off this stigma [israel] from the face of the Islamic world..." [Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, president of iran] Is that not a threat? Why do you defend this?
  5. Quote: Of course, the above document does not mean that the Holocaust never took place. Arch historical revisionist David Irving himself admits that there were "death camps". What is at issue here is the exact numbers involved, how they died and who actually benefitted from and promoted the "Holocaust". Was it in fact the Zionists who used the "Holocaust" to pave the way for the foundation of Israel? To answer this question, note the opening sentence of the final paragraph: "But Israel is entitled to a place in the sun, and the crucifixion of Jews must stop". This was first published nearly thirty years before the founding of modern Israel yet it anticipates it and opens many more questions that need to be answered Reply: Hello - was wondering if you were just posting this up for the sake of propaganda or if you were doing so to engage discussion because as it appears it's the former. The premise is false. The birth of the state of israel was [these are highlights only] bourne out of this: 1200 B.C.E. - Lower Egypt’s remaining Jews are expelled at the end of the 19th Dynasty. 586 B.C.E.. - First Temple in Jerusalem is destroyed by the Babylonians. 168 B.C.E. - The Romans defile the Holy Temple, erecting a statue of Zeus and sacrificing swine. Observance of the Sabbath and circumcision are banned. 0 - The Second Temple is destroyed by the Romans. 73 - Roman troops storm Masada after a 3 year siege. The Jewish inhabitants kill themselves rather than submit to Roman slavery. <!-- Content here added by ThinkQuest: --> 135 A.D. - A Jewish diaspora begins as Hadrian bars Jews from Jerusalem and has survivors of the massacre dispersed across the empire. Those who escape are sold into slavery. 627 - Enemies of the prophet Mohammed move on Medina from Mecca and slaughter 700 Jews. 1099 - Crusaders break into Jerusalem, and set fire to a synagogue where Jews are taking refuge, burning them to death. Those who survived are sold as slaves or ransomed. 1290 - England’s Edward I exiles the country’s Jews. 1306 - Jews are expelled from France. England whips and expels some 100,000 Jews who have remained since Edward I’s expulsion order of 1290. 1348 - Jews are blamed for spreading the Black Death by deliberately contaminating wells and by "anointing" people and houses with poison. The Jews are herded into wooden buildings and burned alive. At Strasbourg more than 2,000 Jewish scapegoats are hanged on a scaffold erected at the Jewish burying ground. 1349 - Jews are expelled from Hungary. 1391 - Seville has a pogrom in June that spreads throughout Andalusia as Spaniards seek scapegoats for the Black Death. Castilian sailors set fire to the Barcelona ghetto, and for 4 days a mob rages out of control, killing hundreds. Many Spanish Jews will accept conversion in the next few years. 1400 - 1772 - Jews are restricted from Russia. 1414 - Cologne, a town in western Germany, expels its Jews. 1421 - Jews are expelled from Austria. 1478 - Isabella of Castile launches an Inquisition against converted Jews who secretly practice their original faith, persecuting the so-called Marranos (the word originally meant pigs). 1492 - A decree issued March 31 by Ferdinand and Isabella orders Granada’s 150,000 Jews to sell their property and leave the country by July 31 "for the honor and glory of God." Ferdinand decrees November 23 that all property and assets left by the Jews belong to the Crown, even those now in Christian hands. 1497 - Jews are expelled from Portugal. 1555 - Pope Paul IV orders that Rome’s Jewish quarter be surrounded by a wall, creating the ghetto of Rome, claiming "God has imposed servitude until they should have recognized their errors". 1648 - A Ukrainian pogrom by Greek Orthodox peasants destroys hundreds of Jewish communities, killing all who will not accept the cross. The general populace joined this genocide, which degrades and tortures Jews before murdering them. 1657- Oliver Cromwell tacitly permits Jews to return to England. 1744 - Maria Theresa launches a pogrom to drive the Jews out of Bohemia and Moravia. Even where tolerated, Europe’s Jews often live under degrading conditions with regulations designed to limit their expansion and keep their status at a low level. 1772 - Jews are admitted into Russia, but are confined to the Pale of Settlement, a narrow strip of land. 1788 - Josef II orders Austrian Jews to adopt "proper recognizable surnames." They have been known until now largely by biblical patronyms and when some object to changing their names, the emperor’s officials give them such surnames as "Fresser,Pferd," and "Weinglas." 1789 - French Revolution: French National Association denounce equal rights for French Jews. 1807 - Napoleon forces leading rabbis and leaders to disavow Jewish commitments and pledge allegiance to France alone. 1881 - Russia’s new czar Aleksandr III makes Jews the scapegoats for the assassination of his father. He vows to kill one-third of the country’s Jews, drive out another third, and convert the rest, beginning a series of pogroms that will spur the emigration of millions of Jews in the next 30 years. 1893 - Antisemitism mounts in France as Jews are blamed for the collapse in 1889 of the Panama Canal Co., whose bankruptcy has cost many French investors their savings. 1894 - A French court martial convicts Army captain Alfred Dreyfus, 35, of having passed military information to German agents. Dreyfus will later be proved innocent, but the Dreyfus case adds to the growing Antisemitism in France. Viennese journalist Theodore Herzl, 34, covers the trial and hears the Paris mob cry, "Death to the Jews!" This experience would influence Herzl to become the father of the Zionist movement which inspired the creation of the State of Israel. 1898 -"J’Accuse!" headlines the Paris newspaper L’Aurore January 18 over an open letter by novelist Emile Zola. His attack forces a new trial of Capt. Dreyfus. It is revealed that Dreyfus was the victim of an Antisemitic plot. 1913 - The Anti-Defamation League is founded by B’Nai B’rith (Sons of the Covenant) to fight anti-Semitism in America. 1915 - A new Ku Klux Klan is legally chartered in Georgia. It employs terrorist tactics against blacks, Jews, and Roman Catholics. The new leader calls his KKK a "high-class, mystic, social, patriotic, benevolent association" dedicated to "white supremacy," the protection of Southern womanhood, and "Americanism," and claims it will promote his "invisible empire." It will attract a membership of nearly 100,000 throughout the country within 6 years, concentrating political power to elect sympathetic U.S. senators, congressmen, and state officials. <tt>http://library.thinkquest.org/12307/astl_fr.html </tt>Then later came the Nazi pogrom - that was to make these other events pale in comparison! 2005: "...Anybody who recognises Israel will burn in the fire of the Islamic nation's fury, [while] any [islamic leader] who recognises the Zionist regime means he is acknowledging the surrender and defeat of the Islamic world...There is no doubt that the new wave [of attacks] in Palestine will wipe off this stigma [israel] from the face of the Islamic world..." [Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, president of iran, 2005] <tt>"Burn all synagogues. Destroy all Jewish dwellings. Confiscate the Jews' holy books. Forbid rabbis to teach. Forbid Jews to travel. Forbid Jews to charge interest on loans to non-Jews and confiscate Jewish property. Force Jews to do physical labor. Expel the Jews from provinces where Christians live." - Martin Luther in the pamphlet "Concerning the Jews and Their Lies." Early sixteenth century. I think that Martin Luther embodies the nasty nature to which this thinking can sink to - let's not forget that 'he' was suppossed to be some great 'protestant and reformer' - what was he protesting? The so-called injustices of the catholic church - of which he was clergy - then he defected and did that do anything to help him reform his hate for Jews? Not apparently! Here is a particular nasty comment from him as recorded [more than once!] within his noted pamphlet - [which can be found online]: </tt>"Did I not tell you earlier that a Jew is such a noble, precious jewel that God and all the angels dance when he farts?" <tt> Just see that offensive thinking and - to smear God too into it that way! The sad part of this is that people still think his 'other' writings are worth something! </tt> <tt>"In Morocco in 1907, a huge massacre of Jews took place in Casablanca, along with the usual embellishments-rape, women carried away into the mountains, hundreds of homes and shops burned, etc... In 1912 a big massacre in Fez...girls and women raped in front of their families, the stomachs of pregnant women slashed open, the infants ripped out of them, children smashed with crowbars... All this can be found in the newspapers of the time, including the local Arab papers." "Roughly speaking and in the best of cases, the Jew is protected like a dog which is part of man's property, but if he raises his head or acts like a man, then he must be beaten so that he will always remember his status." - Writings of Albert Memmi, a noted French Jewish novelist</tt> <tt>"[The Jews are] our masters and our enemies, whom we detest... the most abominable people in the world. In short they are a totally ignorant nation who, for many years, have combined contemptible miserliness and the most revolting superstition with a violent hatred of all those nations that have tolerated them... your priests have always sacrificed human victims with their sacred hands." - Voltaire's Dictionnaire Philosophique, in which 30 of his 118 articles described the Jews, Eighteenth Century.</tt> <tt>"The euthanasia of Judaism can only be achieved by means of a pure, moral religion, and the abandonment of all old legal regulations." - Immanuel Kant, major German thinker of the late eighteenth century.</tt> <tt>"What is the secular cult of the Jew? Haggling. What is his secular god? Money. Well them! Emancipation from haggling and money, from practical, real Judaism would be the self-emancipation of our time! Money is the jealous God of Israel, besides which no other God may stand." - Karl Marx in one of his first major essays, "On the Jewish Question," mid nineteenth century.</tt> <tt>"First they came for the communists, and I did not speak out - because I was not a communist. Then they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out - because I was not a socialist. Then they came for the labor leaders, and I did not speak out - because I was not a labor leader. Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out - because I was not a Jew. Then they came for me - and there was no one left to speak out for me." - Reverend Martin Niemoellier, a pastor in the German Confessing Church who spent seven years in a concentration camp.</tt> <tt>So let's look at these words - from the scriptures:</tt> ...so the angel that spoke with me said unto me: 'Proclaim thou, saying: Thus saith the LORD of hosts: I am jealous for Jerusalem and for Zion with a great jealousy; and I am very sore displeased with the nations that are at ease; for I was but a little displeased, and they helped for evil. Therefore thus saith the LORD: I return to Jerusalem with compassions: My house shall be built in it, saith the LORD of hosts, and a line shall be stretched forth over Jerusalem. Again, proclaim, saying: Thus saith the LORD of hosts: My cities shall again overflow with prosperity; and the LORD shall yet comfort Zion, and shall yet choose Jerusalem. [Zechariah 1.14-17] So that part - 'I am jealous for Jerusalem and for Zion with a great jealousy; and I am very sore displeased with the nations that are at ease; for I was but a little displeased, and they helped for evil.' - that means that God is angry at the nations of the world for it's treatment of His exiled - because He was 'but a little displeased' and yet - the nations after the 70 C.E. exile - were to have 'helped for evil' [or helped forward the afflications] and they were 'at ease' with doing so. <tt>I think that this should all be understood and - please try to understand what </tt><tt>Reverend Martin Niemoellierb meant in his words:</tt> <tt>"First they came for the communists, and I did not speak out - because I was not a communist. Then they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out - because I was not a socialist. Then they came for the labor leaders, and I did not speak out - because I was not a labor leader. Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out - because I was not a Jew. Then they came for me - and there was no one left to speak out for me." Let's recap the history: </tt>1200 B.C.E. - Lower Egypt’s remaining Jews are expelled at the end of the 19th Dynasty. 586 B.C.E.. - First Temple in Jerusalem is destroyed by the Babylonians. 168 B.C.E. - The Romans defile the Holy Temple, erecting a statue of Zeus and sacrificing swine. Observance of the Sabbath and circumcision are banned. 0 - The Second Temple is destroyed by the Romans. 73 - Roman troops storm Masada after a 3 year siege. The Jewish inhabitants kill themselves rather than submit to Roman slavery. <!-- Content here added by ThinkQuest: --> 135 A.D. - A Jewish diaspora begins as Hadrian bars Jews from Jerusalem and has survivors of the massacre dispersed across the empire. Those who escape are sold into slavery. 627 - Enemies of the prophet Mohammed move on Medina from Mecca and slaughter 700 Jews. 1099 - Crusaders break into Jerusalem, and set fire to a synagogue where Jews are taking refuge, burning them to death. Those who survived are sold as slaves or ransomed. 1290 - England’s Edward I exiles the country’s Jews. 1306 - Jews are expelled from France. England whips and expels some 100,000 Jews who have remained since Edward I’s expulsion order of 1290. 1348 - Jews are blamed for spreading the Black Death by deliberately contaminating wells and by "anointing" people and houses with poison. The Jews are herded into wooden buildings and burned alive. At Strasbourg more than 2,000 Jewish scapegoats are hanged on a scaffold erected at the Jewish burying ground. 1349 - Jews are expelled from Hungary. 1391 - Seville has a pogrom in June that spreads throughout Andalusia as Spaniards seek scapegoats for the Black Death. Castilian sailors set fire to the Barcelona ghetto, and for 4 days a mob rages out of control, killing hundreds. Many Spanish Jews will accept conversion in the next few years. 1400 - 1772 - Jews are restricted from Russia. 1414 - Cologne, a town in western Germany, expels its Jews. 1421 - Jews are expelled from Austria. 1478 - Isabella of Castile launches an Inquisition against converted Jews who secretly practice their original faith, persecuting the so-called Marranos (the word originally meant pigs). 1492 - A decree issued March 31 by Ferdinand and Isabella orders Granada’s 150,000 Jews to sell their property and leave the country by July 31 "for the honor and glory of God." Ferdinand decrees November 23 that all property and assets left by the Jews belong to the Crown, even those now in Christian hands. 1497 - Jews are expelled from Portugal. 1555 - Pope Paul IV orders that Rome’s Jewish quarter be surrounded by a wall, creating the ghetto of Rome, claiming "God has imposed servitude until they should have recognized their errors". 1648 - A Ukrainian pogrom by Greek Orthodox peasants destroys hundreds of Jewish communities, killing all who will not accept the cross. The general populace joined this genocide, which degrades and tortures Jews before murdering them. 1657- Oliver Cromwell tacitly permits Jews to return to England. 1744 - Maria Theresa launches a pogrom to drive the Jews out of Bohemia and Moravia. Even where tolerated, Europe’s Jews often live under degrading conditions with regulations designed to limit their expansion and keep their status at a low level. 1772 - Jews are admitted into Russia, but are confined to the Pale of Settlement, a narrow strip of land. 1788 - Josef II orders Austrian Jews to adopt "proper recognizable surnames." They have been known until now largely by biblical patronyms and when some object to changing their names, the emperor’s officials give them such surnames as "Fresser,Pferd," and "Weinglas." 1789 - French Revolution: French National Association denounce equal rights for French Jews. 1807 - Napoleon forces leading rabbis and leaders to disavow Jewish commitments and pledge allegiance to France alone. 1881 - Russia’s new czar Aleksandr III makes Jews the scapegoats for the assassination of his father. He vows to kill one-third of the country’s Jews, drive out another third, and convert the rest, beginning a series of pogroms that will spur the emigration of millions of Jews in the next 30 years. 1893 - Antisemitism mounts in France as Jews are blamed for the collapse in 1889 of the Panama Canal Co., whose bankruptcy has cost many French investors their savings. 1894 - A French court martial convicts Army captain Alfred Dreyfus, 35, of having passed military information to German agents. Dreyfus will later be proved innocent, but the Dreyfus case adds to the growing Antisemitism in France. Viennese journalist Theodore Herzl, 34, covers the trial and hears the Paris mob cry, "Death to the Jews!" This experience would influence Herzl to become the father of the Zionist movement which inspired the creation of the State of Israel. 1898 -"J’Accuse!" headlines the Paris newspaper L’Aurore January 18 over an open letter by novelist Emile Zola. His attack forces a new trial of Capt. Dreyfus. It is revealed that Dreyfus was the victim of an Antisemitic plot. 1913 - The Anti-Defamation League is founded by B’Nai B’rith (Sons of the Covenant) to fight anti-Semitism in America. 1915 - A new Ku Klux Klan is legally chartered in Georgia. It employs terrorist tactics against blacks, Jews, and Roman Catholics. The new leader calls his KKK a "high-class, mystic, social, patriotic, benevolent association" dedicated to "white supremacy," the protection of Southern womanhood, and "Americanism," and claims it will promote his "invisible empire." It will attract a membership of nearly 100,000 throughout the country within 6 years, concentrating political power to elect sympathetic U.S. senators, congressmen, and state officials. 1930's and 1940's The Nazi pogrom 2000-2006<tt> </tt>"...Anybody who recognises Israel will burn in the fire of the Islamic nation's fury, [while] any [islamic leader] who recognises the Zionist regime means he is acknowledging the surrender and defeat of the Islamic world...There is no doubt that the new wave [of attacks] in Palestine will wipe off this stigma [israel] from the face of the Islamic world..." [Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, president of iran] "...this is not a country of humans. These are animals and a group of gangs, and this country must be wiped off the face of the earth..." [Ghazi Hamad, hamas spokesperson] "...[the Jews are] the enemies of Allah, descendants of apes and pigs...the scum of the human race, the rats of the world, the violators of pacts and agreements, the murderers of the prophets, and the offspring of apes and pigs...the Jews, an ongoing continuum of deceit, obstinacy, licentiousness, evil, and corruption..." [the highest-ranking cleric in the sunni muslim world] So this vile hate - which leads to a desire for another genocide - is not a thing of the past. Those who respect 'the book' should understand - what does 'the book' say in this regard: ...I am very sore displeased with the nations that are at ease; for I was but a little displeased [with His exiled], and they [the nations] helped for evil [forwarded the afflictions]. [Zechariah 1.14-17] It should be seen - the exile was less of a punishment of His people and more of a test for the nations - a test which they've failed. So any questions?
  6. QUOTE: ...it...opens many more questions that need to be answered... REPLY: So what is just one of those questions?
  7. If only Iranian culture could return to the very distant past... Iran: Lord Vishnu with four arms sporting conch, disk, club and lotus found in a Mosque in Iran. <center> http://www.swordoftruth.com/swordoftruth/archives/oldarchives/lviim.html </center> The above photograph shows the detail of the ceiling, decorated in multicolored majolica, of the Mashhad MOSQUE in Iran. Look to the left of the photograph directly underneath the leftmost peacock's feet and you will suddenly notice the unmistakeable statue of Shree Vishnu Bhagvan seated in lotus pose with Shankh and lotus in his hands. This is clear hard evidence of the fact that many of the mosques in Islamic countries such as Iran were originally Vedic Temples. This can be supported by the fact that the peacock is a bird indigenous to India and central to Hindu religious iconology. The peacock is not native to Iran nor is the use of iconography encouraged by Islam. Figurative sculpture especially is forbidden in Islam as this amounts to idolatory. In addition please observe the typically Hindu stylized lotus pattern background upon which the sculpture of Shree Vishnu is superimposed in relief. One must logically conclude that this photograph is visual evidence of the Vedic Origin of the Mosque in Mashhad, Iran. http://www.salagram.net/VWHMid-East.html
  8. ...good - now go live in the shadows and try to forget that we are not the only people on earth - besides - people who read the vedas should show no other interests - in any other faith groups? This forum is called 'World Review' - what does that mean? I think yer just anti-biblical - besides - why did you leave your opinions here? [answer that and you will have yer answers]
  9. Yes the 'Final Cut' [A REQUIEM FOR THE POST WAR DREAM] - the lyrical genius of Roger Waters...i used to listen to this album all the time in the 80's and 90's - here is the track 'final cut': Through the fish eyed lens of tear stained eyes I can barely define the shape of this moment in time And far from flying high in clear blue skies I'm spiralling down to the hole in the ground where I hide If you negotiate the minefield in the drive And beat the dogs and cheat the cold electronic eyes And if you make it past the shotguns in the hall Dial the combination, open the priesthole And if I'm in I'll tell you what's behind the wall There's a kid who had a big hallucination Making love to girls in magazines He wonders if you're sleeping with your new found faith Could anybody love him or is it just a crazy dream And if I show you my dark side Will you still hold me tonight And if I open my heart to you and show you my weak side What would you do Would you sell your story to Rolling Stone Would you take the children away And leave me alone And smile in reassurance as you whisper down the phone Would you send me packing Or would you take me home Thought I oughta bare my naked feelings Thought I oughta tear the curtain down I held the blade in trembling hands Prepared to make it but just then the phone rang I never had the nerve to make the final cut ...and here is the last track from the 1983 album: 'Two Suns in the Sunset' In my rear view mirror the sun is going down Sinking behind bridges in the road And I think of all the good things That we have left undone And I suffer premonitions Confirm suspicions Of the holocaust to come The rusty wire that holds the cork That keeps the anger in Gives away And suddenly it's day again The sun is in the east Even though the day is done Two suns in the sunset hmmmmmmmmmmm Could be the human race is run Like the moment when the brakes lock And you slide towards the big truck You stretch the frozen moments with your fear And you'll never hear their voices And you'll never see their faces You have no recourse to the law anymore And as the windshield melts My tears evaporate Leaving only charcoal to defend Finally I understand The feelings of the few Ashes and diamonds Foe and friend We were all equal in the end ...pink floyd is to rock what beethoven is to music...
  10. Well at last the former president of Iraq has been dispatched to the courts of Yamaraja - about time...i bet he wishes he had made different choices now... This guy was like the ancient cruel king vena and he wasn't fear personfied for upstarts - he was an upstart. Should we pity him? No. God Bless America! God Bless Iraq!
  11. So it's the standard procedure - but use cherries instead of raisens - i'll try this as it sounds like a great combo!
  12. No - they aren't but - they ain't flesh either - sounds like a nice preparation!
  13. Hey i didn't say it was worthy of any awards... - thanks for your nice comment - it made me smile...
  14. This morning walk quote elucidates the point clearly and i hope that people do not think Prabhupada is excusing the activity - he is saying that it is too common place in today's world: Prabhupada: Yes, that is law always. Rape means without consent, sex. Otherwise there is no rape. There was a rape case in Calcutta, and the lawyer was very intelligent. He some way or other made the woman admit, “Yes, I felt happiness [pleasure].” So he was released. “Here is consent.” And that’s a fact. Because after all, sex, rape or no rape, they will feel some pleasure. So the lawyer by hook and crook made the woman agree, “Yes, I felt some pleasure.” “Now, there is consent.” So he was released.... [Morning Walk, May 11. 1975] So that is a general statement. In the most direct sense rape isn't about sex - it's about control and - even the western laws take note of circumstances - like the so-called difference in manslaughter and first degree murder - the courts make a distinction - also - note his comment - "the lawyer by hook and crook made the woman agree" - so - there it is. We have to understand Prabhupada's awareness of a particular point and understand his comments in proper context. Too often people read such things and conclude that Prabhupada condones such an activity and we here all know that nothing could be further from the truth. We do have a situation in our world now where the push for so-called political correctness has jaded people's understandings in so many ways - we know that Prabhupada was saying 'some women' not all women may have this 'propensity' Without a doubt - there are a great deal of sexually aggressive people [everywhere] in the world - male and female and - it isn't dispargement of women to say so. When these people interact who knows the sorted results which become possible...
  15. I told you what to do - forget gurus and forget chanting if you like - pray and study - sincerely - and you'll find your way - just know that God is not limited to the Christian [or any other for that matter] tradition and know the truth an facts about Jesus and you'll be fine - if you don't wish to sort out the messiah issues then your simply embracing blindly - because if you really believe in God - you'll go where that may take you - even if it's in a place where such things are at question. Good luck!
  16. Well where have you been - they have been feeding cows to cows for years - they feed blood to baby cows - at least if milk from cows is offered to God - with sincere love - there may be some hope for these cows - but - without that - there is nothing but some hideous reflection of 'natural' in all of this. Yes it is prudent to quit eating animals - as even the bible asks this of us - there is that one [there are more] verse in Isaiah 'Butter and honey shall he eat, that he may know to refuse the evil, and choose the good' - that means that we take our food as a by-product of an animal [like butter and honey] - not in the form of the animal itself. As you can see in this video - one can have a meat like substance and not have all the hormones and diseases and other nasty things found in meat [not only the karma] - if one is lacto one can use butter oil to impart the gamey taste to the soy chunks - when made correctly - they are very close to 'beef' in fact -we've given them to people who are not vegetarians and they think it's some kind of meat - they are surprised to learn it's soy - so have a look at it - what you see in the wok is only 2.5 cups dry soy chunks [the cost here is $4.40 a kilo dry] - soy has much more in volume when moistened and cooked - it is less than 1/10 the cost of flesh: [Yes these two are the same i messed up and pasted it in twice and cannot delete one now and - please press the play button on the tool bar not in the center of the image] <embed src="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PtiKGxlL8kY" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" height="350" width="425"> <embed src="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PtiKGxlL8kY" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" height="350" width="425">I'll do a more comprehensive video on cooking these soy chunks if others want to see it....
  17. With Prabhupada's vani - we get everything we need - most of which is common sense no matter our faith leanings. Of course we need a teacher - that is never the question here - it is a question of who and what. You're posting this quote from Srila Prabhupada's guru or teacher and it is good for this discussion. However - i feel that despite the point that we need advanced devotees to associate with - most people are going to learn more from Prabhupada's vani - in a shorter time - than shall in the 'traditional' guru arrangement. Of course even these days - people take initiation and have a guru but - hardly ever see this guru - they may get an hour a year out of their guru - so where and from whom do they learn during the guru's away time? Prabhupada is our best connection for answers. We have to accept that he is the most qualified of gurus for the modern age - with extensive writings etc., to deliver us from ignorance.
  18. Prabupada knew all about socialism and communism you have nothing to teach him on this point - his world was sore impacted by the socialists and communists...
  19. Well from all the name calling you threw my way in the past - i'm quite sure i see here that your mood is as 'filthy and contaminating' as ever - my last posting on this thread wasn't even posted to you!
  20. How many letters and conversations are found in the vedabase? I think that one can surmise what an 'advanced Vaisnava feels, thinks and acts in specific situations like the kind you will face in your practical devotional life' in these - if you cannot - then by all means - go live with some guru and hope that you get the 'real' thing. Just think - many who go to live with these gurus are looking more for some esoterica and not - practical realizations...
  21. Denied as bogus because it is bogus - as noted before - it's all a matter of informed perspective. Of course - that quote isn't 'relevant' - you don't even know who it is - where it is - so what we know is that there are many such cheaters - that doesn't negate the facts and that is that you and - many many others - have wrong ideas about what is a guru and what our dealings might be with some guru. Please read my last posting to you for a better view of my opinions.
  22. Is whatever is found on that link from Prabhupada's books? Can you copy-n-paste the part that says one must serve the carnal desires of a so-called guru? In Bhagavad Gita 4.34 God says: Just try to learn the truth by approaching a spiritual master. Inquire from him submissively and render service unto him. The self-realized soul can impart knowledge unto you because he has seen the truth. So what sort of service do we think that God is speaking of? Take it from there - if it becomes jaded into something else - we know that it has taken leave of this verse. The idea here is that when we are with this teacher we are going to help him - by way of menial service - usually devotional service if the guru is qualified - that is how we serve the guru - by asking questions and doing nice service - if it is taken that we are to serve the bodily needs of the guru and that is 'service' - then that is cheap: ...Because demoniac people want to be cheated, so many cheaters are present to cheat them. At the present moment in this age of Kali-yuga, the entire human society has become an assembly of cheaters and cheated. For this reason the Vedic scriptures have given us the proper directions for sense gratification... [sB 4.26.6, purport] So again it is up to us to know the truth and if some bogus guru or pastor or whatever is cheating us and - if it goes on for some time - one may have to ask if it is that way - due to our being a cheater too. An example: ...In some religious sects a sinful man goes to a priest to confess his sinful acts and pay a fine, but then he again commits the same sins and returns to confess them again. This is the practice of a professional sinner... [sB 6.1.9, purport] In another posting i mentioned that in this vedic path there are nine processes for devotional service: 'hearing [reading is hearing too], chanting, remembering, serving, worshiping, praying, obeying, maintaining friendship [with God] and surrendering everything' So chanting is only one item - hearing is only one - praying is only one - pick one and - do it with great faith and - you'll see success. These nine methods are 'the way' for any sincere seeker in any faith - it's all a science if you will. So please don't make everything so narrow and blighted. If i may i would like to share [if it's worth anything] that i too have great stress and pain in my life right now - I have endured a state induced abuse - for nearly five years now [don't want to get into what it is right now] - even i have occasion at times to become frustrated and to 'question' - but - that is where our 'real' faith in God comes in - we are not to limit God in our lives - God is God and - He has given us many scriptures - vedic and biblical - for us to learn from and - at times of great stress and questioning - it is having a good and broad scriptural education - which gets me through.... As for the point of our false ego being broken - God does that to us through life experiences - not that his servants are to forge some 'program' to do it for Him. I used to say to one devotee that i know that i felt that they didn't see a devotee's surrender as genuine - unless it was induced by a nervous breakdown - like in the dark ages during the inquisition - a confession was not seen as full or even 'sincere' - if not effected with torture. Some so-called servants of God - within all faiths - are infected with this nonsense. We can use our minds and know that this is not the way that it's supposed to be and to make adjustments - for our own spiritual well-being. God Bless you and i know that you shall find your faith footing and - you are correct - you have to find your faith in God and - that it must be independant of - or rather - not dependant on any other person must be realized too. It's just us and God - that's all [the rest must follow from there].
×
×
  • Create New...