jinglebells

If you can't beat them, join them.

This piece is proof that atheists are better than religious people. The racist attack throughout this essay (combined with explicit support for outdated creationist ideas, attack on homosexuals etc.) is evidence.

Hinduism is essentially Indian, it never spread to the west, that's why.

You're paranoid. Jains are a small, harmless minority, unlike Muslims who're large, organized, and extremely efficient.

Your moral relativism is more a leftist concept than a vaishnava one. So please....

I am inclined to agree with you. For a few quacks , we do have rational and broad-minded devotees like Kulapavana. So all is not lost. But I do wish Prabhupada could've been a bit more gentlemanly and politically correct.

Yes, that's what I meant. Islamic terrorism is simply a tool of the Jewish Bourgeois, which they unleash on their opponents (as they did in the Soviet War, when Bin Laden was their best friend!). And in other cases, they unleash it on their 'own' people to distract them from the real economic problem (which always revolves around workers). This helps the Jewish bourgeois regain control of the means of production, and keep the workers down and suppressed, all the while distracting them with the bogey of Islamic terrorism. Job well done! Many people have ignored the real problem, which is the oppression of the working class by the Jewish capitalists, and instead targeted their anger on Islam, which itself happens to be a creation of Jewish capitalists to suppress workers. Result: Rich get richer, and the poor get stupid.

What do you mean?

Considering the actions of US/Israel, I am seriously beginning to think 9/11 was an inside job. Too many contradictions in the govt. version of events, too many loopholes, also motive for US to invade Iraq. Not that I am justifying Islamic terrorism, but it's come in handy for the US/Jews to use Islamic terrorism as a pretext to start wars.

Radhey, relax! It's Vaishnavism to deny the supremacy of gods other than Vishnu. Jan is simply doing what his teacher-SP-has taught him to. His style also reflects that, can't blame him.

Is Souza a liar?

We'll then have a new set of Barbie dolls, based on the divine couple concept.

Just because evolution may not have all the answers, it doesn't cease to be scientific.Incomplete knowledge is not necessarily incorrect knowledge. Nor does it mean the religious folks are right, because at least in the case of evolution, a lot of scientific research has been done, and a tremendous amount of knowledge accumulated. So their position can be respected, if not accepted. But who can take religious people seriously, when they point to their an old book as evidence? This is why when it comes to science vs religion, it's always a no contest. It would be better if religious people can spend more on their religious practices than they do on refuting scientific materialism with their poor fund of (secular) knowledge.

Souza is fake, the whole program is fake. Hitchens is an intellectual, whereas this souza is a moron who babbles like an idiot. But since religious people always control the proceedings, it's no surprise he's 'won' the debate.

This souza is fake. Hitchens is a good man. All these debates are a farce to make the good guy look bad, the results (and even the audience) cannot be trusted.

DNA test?

Shvu's sources are accepted as authentic by all schools of Vaishnavism, and even by others such as advaitins. Whereas, other sources that you/others mention are not. That should explain it.

How would you explain cancer or AIDS in this context?

How then do you explain diseases which need treatment, the bodies aren't self-correcting and adaptable, are they?

Bottom line, Shvu has shown that authentic sources on Krishna's life, like Harivamsa, don't mention Radha. Instead of refuting him, you're just babbling, why?

All said and done, Zionism is fulfilling most people's secret desire-to eliminate terrorists and such undesirables from the society. Oil crisis is just an unfortunate side effect, which will persist with or without Israel/Jews and Zionism, anyway. This cannot be denied, so let's try to see the good things in Zionism, for a change. Honestly, Zionism seems to be the only counterweight against terrorism as well as imperialism, which is why Jews are hated by both sides, the muslims as well as the racist skinhead types. So in a way, Zionists are actually fulfilling the wishes of good people by acting as a hurdle to both forms of imperialism.

Your sig is your answer.

Thanks for the info., but how do we link their interest in Vedic culture to their anti-Semitic policies which formed a major part of their movement? That seems to be one of the most puzzling things in their ideology, it's nearly a contradiction.

Not this matter specifically, but the general tendency throughout the world to blame Jews for every problem. Surely, that's ridiculous, don't you agree? As to Iran/Iraq, both nations have had a violent history, which includes a war between them killing millions. So with or without Jews, they've been hating and killing each other. So does it really matter if Jews are involved, when it's palpably clear that Muslim nations are violent, no matter what? I am not justifying Jews/US, only saying Muslim nations EVEN WITHOUT US/JEW intervention have always been killing each other. On a side note, do you know of any references pointing to National Socialists and their interest in Vedic Civilization?

All said and done, he'll go down in history as the smartest man ever. And this upsets white supremacists terribly, because he's Jewish.