sant

Whats your aim raghu

Galaxy 18 You Too

thanks for the information

I suppose you dont know how to quote. Even i didnt know since i had come on this site. Its the option after insert image option.Look in your toolbar when you reply. It looks like a sheet of paper. When you press it this comes.

Your main problem is you think sambya is a muslim and by talking to him about hinduism will make hinduism bad or show a sad impression of it.Isnt it. Mind your mouth. my request

Thank you g hari ji for your posts. ive not read full.

here then i suggest you speak with mr ranjeetmore. I will tell him.

Ok these are just some of the qualities of the lord. As the lord has to be supreme so he possese everything in supreme. He is almighty .Lord of the universe.Is that christian enough. I dont know about six opulences. i just mentioned his powers. So what i mean to say is lord is all powerful so this applies to maha vishnu . So do you understand. Sambya. Or are you again talk like a stubbborn child. And by the way what happened i had heard ramakrishna also propagated this . I dont follow him that much, but you do so what happened.

of course they wont beleive it so easily. Look at people like sonic yogi,bhaktjan etc.They have accepted it . They Just have to be educated. Iknow chtistianity has rejected idol worship. Thats it i dont know about rejecting krishna. Where fdo you come up with all this.

No the features he talks about relates to sri krisna only .

if you talk about this then faith should be backed by scriptural evidence. Sri krisna says it. But you ask what scriptures to choose to beleive. i say faith ,approval of high souls ,your own experience. So please telll why you find a problem.

u mean sri krisna

How

Great so i suppose you dont beleive the bhavishya puraan. Ok my main purpose of saying it is because prabhupada said so. And so i believe him. You skeptics wouldnt digest that so i quoted bhavishya puraan. Now you wont beleive that also. So i tell you to apply your logic since so called scientists have been applying that only i guess. The lord of chrisrians is all pervading,all knowledgable,omnipresent,supreme,all knowable,all, all beautiful,all mighty, all atrractive,the creator of the world above and supreme to all in all qualities,endless, So you decide who should be possesing all these qualities.

faith great scholars and who have realised themselves Your own experience.

Aright Iv heard about the controversy of bhavishya puraan. I dont think it is wrong to think bhavishya purana as not a puraan because it is mentioned in the list of puraans. According to the Padma Purana,<SUP class=reference id=cite_ref-23>[24]</SUP> the texts may be classified in accordance with the three gunas or qualities; truth, passion, and ignorance: Sattva ("truth; purity"): Vishnu Purana, Bhagavata Purana, Naradeya Purana, Garuda Purana, Padma Purana, Varaha Purana Rajas ("dimness; passion"): Brahmanda Purana, Brahma Vaivarta Purana, Markandeya Purana, Bhavishya Purana, Vamana Purana, Brahma Purana Tamas ("darkness; ignorance"): Matsya Purana, Kurma purana, Linga Purana, Shiva Purana, Skanda Purana, Agni Purana So you cannot deny it as a puraan. By the way what iss your problem , is it the mohammed part you do not accept that or do you not accept the whole puraan. Besides these are predictions and maybe the christ or mohammed parts can be edited or maybe not. Great acharyas dont consider many puraans such as brahmaand etc atleast never heard of them doing it. because they dont need to as srimad bhagwatam is the acurate puraan. Bhavishya puraaan comes as a rajasic puraan so it is not even satwic. Dont deny things just because you dont believe in them.

Why dont you go back and check why i had posted the story. Simply because he wanted to ask what was happening during the time after mahabharat and bhavishya puraan mentions it.As per my knowledge india used to be much bigger at the time of mahabharat. And pradeepji wanted to know about the condition of other religions also, so i had posted the story. So do you understand why i quoted it.

Ok cut it now. You come and pounce on others posts without thinking i guess.

Well maybe you cannot beleive everything written in it. But I suppose then thats the case with other puraan also. There are many instances.You know about it. Why dont you beleive in this is it because your hate against christians or do you undermine the prediction capacity of purana.

Now do i start saying same about your iskcon as ive heard some gurus have been charged of such things there also.But no im not like that i respect iskcon and you respect him or atleast get to know about who you are talking about.Just because he is of different sampradaya then you start finding fault or criticising.A photo you see and you come up with false theories .Besides you even dont know about him.Go to his website.

delete this

i suggest you learn and read about the mentioned 18 puraans and then come.

ok i shouldnt have said youre faithless. Youre not . I am sorry

i have posted this have a read Muni tell that, Vishnu Bhakti, Agni worship, Ahinsaa, Tapasyaa and controlling of Indriyaan are Dharm of Mlechchh. http://www.indiadivine.org/audarya/spiritual-discussions/453282-hindu-beliefs-ritulas.html

i am sorry to interrupt but i must tell you that our thoughts and view pints atleast mine many times can change with time and situation.That is why we beleive the scriptures.You cant just all the time go on just experiences.If that was it then everybody would have become smart and spiritual.We explain through our mind by the amount of knowledge we have. It is very limited unless you are spiritually very educated.