RadheyRadhey108

Srila Narayana Maharaja

ONE POINTED BHAKTI

 

I've never read this before, but I'm really glad I'm a Radharani-Bhakta right about now I have a picture of Her alone in the forest that I always chant in front of, and I always wondered if Sri Krishna was okay with me concentrating on only Her form, and I guess He is Thank you Beggar Prabhu for this beautiful post.

due to sins of my past lives, i once went inside their temple, what i found was that there only big statues of their theory founders made were portrayed, there was not a single diety of LordShreeKrshna or LordSadäShiva!

 

OMG! I've been eating foods with lactic acid in them for years! I assumed it was a milk derivitive (since 'lact' usually implies a milk-substance)! Jeez, I feel so terrible! I'm so sorry Gopala!

Thank you so much bhaktajan and KrishnasGirl!

Lol!

I am a 37 aged man... married...after completion of my 40 years. i would like to take sanyasa .... where to contact... any online guruji sevas available... please let me know .

Is your wife okay with it? I think you should also take her view into consideration (if you haven't already) since if you take sanyasa, you'll become dead to the world, and she'll basically become a spiritual widow. But, of course, in the end the decision is really between you and God.

Hence if I worship Lord Narayan or Lord Krishna, how does it matter????

 

Pranaam

 

 

They're one and the same, so I really don't understand the problem either. Even if one does believe that Lord Krishna is divinity in it's highest form, and one of his forms is Narayana, then I still don't see a problem. There are many people that only meditate on the form of Lord Chaitanya or the form of Lord Rama, and they're just as progressed in love of Krishna (through these forms) as anyone else.

If, by your own admission, there's so much confusion regarding Jesus and his 'teaching,' whatever that may be, wouldn't it be in your best interest to chuck the whole thing, and instead retain your focus on the gita, bhAgavatam, and the rest? Something to think about, eh?

Well, the Gospel of Phillip doesn't include Jesus' words in it (or hardly any of them, it's been a while since I've read it). I don't see why I have to chuck out good teachings. They're good teachings whether he was real or not. I like the character of Jesus. I don't see why people have to insult it. Whether real or ficticious, he has some very wise teachings attributed to him.

Hey guys,

I wanted you all to know that I'm radherade1657. I had to do a system restore on my computer, and I forgot my internet password, so now I can't get on my email address. So, I have to start over with a new Audarya account as well, since I had an email w/ my Audarya passoword in it saved on my computer that I (obviously) am now unable to access.