Guest guest Report post Posted July 4, 2006 Hi Arun, You are correct, we are in DT - I should have caught Mahendra's error. On the Ra-Me, I'd like to hear the Professor's opinion. I've seen cases where well placed planets in strong degrees, closely afflicted by a malefic causes problems - especially Ra. This is my finding in the limted amount of human cases and a great amount of mundane ones I've studied. Best regards, Vyas Munidas - " Arun Rao " <arunrao9 Monday, July 03, 2006 8:12 PM Re: (unknown) > Dear Vyas, > > When a planet is strong, the negative influence of a FM is minimal, > practically zero. If there are special afflictions, we would use an > orb of 2 degrees. > > In this case, we would refer to the planet (Mercury in this case) as > being strong and capable of protecting and promoting its significations. > > The ascendant is Taurus, not Gemini. > > Best Wishes, > > Arun > > , " Vyas Munidas " <muni> wrote: >> >> Dear Arun, >> >> I agree with you that this child shall do well in life. It certainly > is a >> fortunate chart. >> >> Me is strong and well placed, but still close under Rahu (less than 3 >> degreess). My understanding is that when exact under Rahu, the >> significations are destroyed. When close it's not so bad, but still > there >> are some problems. Perhaps can comment further to > further >> this understanding. >> >> >> Best regards, >> >> Vyas Munidas >> >> >> >> - >> " Arun Rao " <arunrao9 >> >> Monday, July 03, 2006 7:49 PM >> Re: (unknown) >> >> >> > Dear Mr. Mahendra and Vyas, >> > >> > Mercury is a strong planet and is not bothered by the aspect of Rahu. >> > >> > The chart is solid overall. She will do well in life. >> > >> > Best Wishes, >> > >> > Arun Rao >> > >> > , " Vyas Munidas " <munidas@> wrote: >> >> >> >> Dear Professor, >> >> >> >> I am reading Gemini Asc 10:26 for this data. The four planets you >> > mentioned >> >> are strong, but Ve is badly placed in H12, and Me is within the > close 5 >> >> degree aspect of Ra. >> >> >> >> >> >> Best regards, >> >> >> >> Vyas Munidas >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> - >> >> <siha@> >> >> >> >> Monday, July 03, 2006 4:27 PM >> >> Re: (unknown) >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> > Hello Mahendra, >> >> > >> >> > Congratulations. Your daughter has Mercury, Saturn, Sun and > Moon as >> >> > strong >> >> > planets. There is no planet in the malefic houses. Rahu and Ketu >> > do not >> >> > cause close afflictions in the chart. The chart augers well for >> > the child >> >> > and for the family. >> >> > >> >> > Best wishes, >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > www.YourNetAstrologer.com >> >> > www.JyotishRemedies121.com >> >> > A-105, South City II, Gurgaon 122018. (India) >> >> > Phones: 91 124 - 2219240 >> >> > Mobile 98110 16333 >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > - >> >> > " Mahendra " <mahendra_gr@> >> >> > >> >> > Monday, July 03, 2006 9:24 PM >> >> > (unknown) >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >> Learned Members: >> >> >> >> >> >> I have been blessed with a baby daughter born on >> >> >> Jul 3, 2006 >> >> >> 4:37 AM (+5 EST) >> >> >> Longitude: 83W47 Latitude: 42N10 >> >> >> >> >> >> As its easy to get biased in looking at own family members > horoscope, >> >> >> I would sincerely appreciate any insights / strengths and > weaknesses >> >> >> in the horoscope. >> >> >> >> >> >> May the SATVA tribe increase. >> >> >> With humble regards, Mahendra >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted July 4, 2006 Hello Vyas, The orb of affliction for strong planets is one degree or two degree under multiple afflictions or affliction by MMP. On DST info is awaited from Mr. Mahendra. If Arun is right then certainly the ascendant will change. Best wishes, - " Vyas Munidas " <muni> Tuesday, July 04, 2006 7:43 AM Re: Re: (unknown) > Hi Arun, > > You are correct, we are in DT - I should have caught Mahendra's error. > > On the Ra-Me, I'd like to hear the Professor's opinion. I've seen cases > where well placed planets in strong degrees, closely afflicted by a > malefic > causes problems - especially Ra. This is my finding in the limted amount > of > human cases and a great amount of mundane ones I've studied. > > > Best regards, > > Vyas Munidas > > > > - > " Arun Rao " <arunrao9 > > Monday, July 03, 2006 8:12 PM > Re: (unknown) > > >> Dear Vyas, >> >> When a planet is strong, the negative influence of a FM is minimal, >> practically zero. If there are special afflictions, we would use an >> orb of 2 degrees. >> >> In this case, we would refer to the planet (Mercury in this case) as >> being strong and capable of protecting and promoting its significations. >> >> The ascendant is Taurus, not Gemini. >> >> Best Wishes, >> >> Arun >> >> , " Vyas Munidas " <muni> wrote: >>> >>> Dear Arun, >>> >>> I agree with you that this child shall do well in life. It certainly >> is a >>> fortunate chart. >>> >>> Me is strong and well placed, but still close under Rahu (less than 3 >>> degreess). My understanding is that when exact under Rahu, the >>> significations are destroyed. When close it's not so bad, but still >> there >>> are some problems. Perhaps can comment further to >> further >>> this understanding. >>> >>> >>> Best regards, >>> >>> Vyas Munidas >>> >>> >>> >>> - >>> " Arun Rao " <arunrao9 >>> >>> Monday, July 03, 2006 7:49 PM >>> Re: (unknown) >>> >>> >>> > Dear Mr. Mahendra and Vyas, >>> > >>> > Mercury is a strong planet and is not bothered by the aspect of Rahu. >>> > >>> > The chart is solid overall. She will do well in life. >>> > >>> > Best Wishes, >>> > >>> > Arun Rao >>> > >>> > , " Vyas Munidas " <munidas@> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> Dear Professor, >>> >> >>> >> I am reading Gemini Asc 10:26 for this data. The four planets you >>> > mentioned >>> >> are strong, but Ve is badly placed in H12, and Me is within the >> close 5 >>> >> degree aspect of Ra. >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> Best regards, >>> >> >>> >> Vyas Munidas >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> - >>> >> <siha@> >>> >> >>> >> Monday, July 03, 2006 4:27 PM >>> >> Re: (unknown) >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> > >>> >> > Hello Mahendra, >>> >> > >>> >> > Congratulations. Your daughter has Mercury, Saturn, Sun and >> Moon as >>> >> > strong >>> >> > planets. There is no planet in the malefic houses. Rahu and Ketu >>> > do not >>> >> > cause close afflictions in the chart. The chart augers well for >>> > the child >>> >> > and for the family. >>> >> > >>> >> > Best wishes, >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > www.YourNetAstrologer.com >>> >> > www.JyotishRemedies121.com >>> >> > A-105, South City II, Gurgaon 122018. (India) >>> >> > Phones: 91 124 - 2219240 >>> >> > Mobile 98110 16333 >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > - >>> >> > " Mahendra " <mahendra_gr@> >>> >> > >>> >> > Monday, July 03, 2006 9:24 PM >>> >> > (unknown) >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> >> Learned Members: >>> >> >> >>> >> >> I have been blessed with a baby daughter born on >>> >> >> Jul 3, 2006 >>> >> >> 4:37 AM (+5 EST) >>> >> >> Longitude: 83W47 Latitude: 42N10 >>> >> >> >>> >> >> As its easy to get biased in looking at own family members >> horoscope, >>> >> >> I would sincerely appreciate any insights / strengths and >> weaknesses >>> >> >> in the horoscope. >>> >> >> >>> >> >> May the SATVA tribe increase. >>> >> >> With humble regards, Mahendra >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted July 4, 2006 Hi Professor, How are the significations of an otherwise strong planet affected when it's only closely afflicted? Best regards, Vyas Munidas - <siha Monday, July 03, 2006 10:28 PM Re: Re: (unknown) > > Hello Vyas, > > The orb of affliction for strong planets is one degree or two degree under > multiple afflictions or affliction by MMP. On DST info is awaited from > Mr. > Mahendra. If Arun is right then certainly the ascendant will change. > > Best wishes, > > > > > - > " Vyas Munidas " <muni> > > Tuesday, July 04, 2006 7:43 AM > Re: Re: (unknown) > > >> Hi Arun, >> >> You are correct, we are in DT - I should have caught Mahendra's error. >> >> On the Ra-Me, I'd like to hear the Professor's opinion. I've seen cases >> where well placed planets in strong degrees, closely afflicted by a >> malefic >> causes problems - especially Ra. This is my finding in the limted amount >> of >> human cases and a great amount of mundane ones I've studied. >> >> >> Best regards, >> >> Vyas Munidas >> >> >> >> - >> " Arun Rao " <arunrao9 >> >> Monday, July 03, 2006 8:12 PM >> Re: (unknown) >> >> >>> Dear Vyas, >>> >>> When a planet is strong, the negative influence of a FM is minimal, >>> practically zero. If there are special afflictions, we would use an >>> orb of 2 degrees. >>> >>> In this case, we would refer to the planet (Mercury in this case) as >>> being strong and capable of protecting and promoting its significations. >>> >>> The ascendant is Taurus, not Gemini. >>> >>> Best Wishes, >>> >>> Arun >>> >>> , " Vyas Munidas " <muni> wrote: >>>> >>>> Dear Arun, >>>> >>>> I agree with you that this child shall do well in life. It certainly >>> is a >>>> fortunate chart. >>>> >>>> Me is strong and well placed, but still close under Rahu (less than 3 >>>> degreess). My understanding is that when exact under Rahu, the >>>> significations are destroyed. When close it's not so bad, but still >>> there >>>> are some problems. Perhaps can comment further to >>> further >>>> this understanding. >>>> >>>> >>>> Best regards, >>>> >>>> Vyas Munidas >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> - >>>> " Arun Rao " <arunrao9 >>>> >>>> Monday, July 03, 2006 7:49 PM >>>> Re: (unknown) >>>> >>>> >>>> > Dear Mr. Mahendra and Vyas, >>>> > >>>> > Mercury is a strong planet and is not bothered by the aspect of Rahu. >>>> > >>>> > The chart is solid overall. She will do well in life. >>>> > >>>> > Best Wishes, >>>> > >>>> > Arun Rao >>>> > >>>> > , " Vyas Munidas " <munidas@> wrote: >>>> >> >>>> >> Dear Professor, >>>> >> >>>> >> I am reading Gemini Asc 10:26 for this data. The four planets you >>>> > mentioned >>>> >> are strong, but Ve is badly placed in H12, and Me is within the >>> close 5 >>>> >> degree aspect of Ra. >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> Best regards, >>>> >> >>>> >> Vyas Munidas >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> - >>>> >> <siha@> >>>> >> >>>> >> Monday, July 03, 2006 4:27 PM >>>> >> Re: (unknown) >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> > >>>> >> > Hello Mahendra, >>>> >> > >>>> >> > Congratulations. Your daughter has Mercury, Saturn, Sun and >>> Moon as >>>> >> > strong >>>> >> > planets. There is no planet in the malefic houses. Rahu and Ketu >>>> > do not >>>> >> > cause close afflictions in the chart. The chart augers well for >>>> > the child >>>> >> > and for the family. >>>> >> > >>>> >> > Best wishes, >>>> >> > >>>> >> > >>>> >> > www.YourNetAstrologer.com >>>> >> > www.JyotishRemedies121.com >>>> >> > A-105, South City II, Gurgaon 122018. (India) >>>> >> > Phones: 91 124 - 2219240 >>>> >> > Mobile 98110 16333 >>>> >> > >>>> >> > >>>> >> > - >>>> >> > " Mahendra " <mahendra_gr@> >>>> >> > >>>> >> > Monday, July 03, 2006 9:24 PM >>>> >> > (unknown) >>>> >> > >>>> >> > >>>> >> >> Learned Members: >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> I have been blessed with a baby daughter born on >>>> >> >> Jul 3, 2006 >>>> >> >> 4:37 AM (+5 EST) >>>> >> >> Longitude: 83W47 Latitude: 42N10 >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> As its easy to get biased in looking at own family members >>> horoscope, >>>> >> >> I would sincerely appreciate any insights / strengths and >>> weaknesses >>>> >> >> in the horoscope. >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> May the SATVA tribe increase. >>>> >> >> With humble regards, Mahendra >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted July 4, 2006 Hello Vyas, When a strong planet is closely afflicted in the applicable orb then the significations of the planet suffer to some extent and for short lived durations. Best wishes, - " Vyas Munidas " <muni> Tuesday, July 04, 2006 8:04 AM Re: Re: (unknown) > Hi Professor, > > How are the significations of an otherwise strong planet affected when > it's > only closely afflicted? > > > Best regards, > > Vyas Munidas > > > > - > <siha > > Monday, July 03, 2006 10:28 PM > Re: Re: (unknown) > > >> >> Hello Vyas, >> >> The orb of affliction for strong planets is one degree or two degree >> under >> multiple afflictions or affliction by MMP. On DST info is awaited from >> Mr. >> Mahendra. If Arun is right then certainly the ascendant will change. >> >> Best wishes, >> >> >> >> >> - >> " Vyas Munidas " <muni> >> >> Tuesday, July 04, 2006 7:43 AM >> Re: Re: (unknown) >> >> >>> Hi Arun, >>> >>> You are correct, we are in DT - I should have caught Mahendra's error. >>> >>> On the Ra-Me, I'd like to hear the Professor's opinion. I've seen cases >>> where well placed planets in strong degrees, closely afflicted by a >>> malefic >>> causes problems - especially Ra. This is my finding in the limted amount >>> of >>> human cases and a great amount of mundane ones I've studied. >>> >>> >>> Best regards, >>> >>> Vyas Munidas >>> >>> >>> >>> - >>> " Arun Rao " <arunrao9 >>> >>> Monday, July 03, 2006 8:12 PM >>> Re: (unknown) >>> >>> >>>> Dear Vyas, >>>> >>>> When a planet is strong, the negative influence of a FM is minimal, >>>> practically zero. If there are special afflictions, we would use an >>>> orb of 2 degrees. >>>> >>>> In this case, we would refer to the planet (Mercury in this case) as >>>> being strong and capable of protecting and promoting its >>>> significations. >>>> >>>> The ascendant is Taurus, not Gemini. >>>> >>>> Best Wishes, >>>> >>>> Arun >>>> >>>> , " Vyas Munidas " <muni> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Dear Arun, >>>>> >>>>> I agree with you that this child shall do well in life. It certainly >>>> is a >>>>> fortunate chart. >>>>> >>>>> Me is strong and well placed, but still close under Rahu (less than 3 >>>>> degreess). My understanding is that when exact under Rahu, the >>>>> significations are destroyed. When close it's not so bad, but still >>>> there >>>>> are some problems. Perhaps can comment further to >>>> further >>>>> this understanding. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Best regards, >>>>> >>>>> Vyas Munidas >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> - >>>>> " Arun Rao " <arunrao9 >>>>> >>>>> Monday, July 03, 2006 7:49 PM >>>>> Re: (unknown) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> > Dear Mr. Mahendra and Vyas, >>>>> > >>>>> > Mercury is a strong planet and is not bothered by the aspect of >>>>> > Rahu. >>>>> > >>>>> > The chart is solid overall. She will do well in life. >>>>> > >>>>> > Best Wishes, >>>>> > >>>>> > Arun Rao >>>>> > >>>>> > , " Vyas Munidas " <munidas@> wrote: >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Dear Professor, >>>>> >> >>>>> >> I am reading Gemini Asc 10:26 for this data. The four planets you >>>>> > mentioned >>>>> >> are strong, but Ve is badly placed in H12, and Me is within the >>>> close 5 >>>>> >> degree aspect of Ra. >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Best regards, >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Vyas Munidas >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> - >>>>> >> <siha@> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Monday, July 03, 2006 4:27 PM >>>>> >> Re: (unknown) >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > Hello Mahendra, >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > Congratulations. Your daughter has Mercury, Saturn, Sun and >>>> Moon as >>>>> >> > strong >>>>> >> > planets. There is no planet in the malefic houses. Rahu and Ketu >>>>> > do not >>>>> >> > cause close afflictions in the chart. The chart augers well for >>>>> > the child >>>>> >> > and for the family. >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > Best wishes, >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > www.YourNetAstrologer.com >>>>> >> > www.JyotishRemedies121.com >>>>> >> > A-105, South City II, Gurgaon 122018. (India) >>>>> >> > Phones: 91 124 - 2219240 >>>>> >> > Mobile 98110 16333 >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > - >>>>> >> > " Mahendra " <mahendra_gr@> >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > Monday, July 03, 2006 9:24 PM >>>>> >> > (unknown) >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> >> Learned Members: >>>>> >> >> >>>>> >> >> I have been blessed with a baby daughter born on >>>>> >> >> Jul 3, 2006 >>>>> >> >> 4:37 AM (+5 EST) >>>>> >> >> Longitude: 83W47 Latitude: 42N10 >>>>> >> >> >>>>> >> >> As its easy to get biased in looking at own family members >>>> horoscope, >>>>> >> >> I would sincerely appreciate any insights / strengths and >>>> weaknesses >>>>> >> >> in the horoscope. >>>>> >> >> >>>>> >> >> May the SATVA tribe increase. >>>>> >> >> With humble regards, Mahendra >>>>> >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> >> >> Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted July 4, 2006 Dear Vyas, Not to mention that an influence of Rahu on an otherwise strong planet can activate the significations of the said planet to a large extent. This can give profound results over the short-run. Best Wishes, Arun , <siha wrote: > > > Hello Vyas, > > When a strong planet is closely afflicted in the applicable orb then the > significations of the planet suffer to some extent and for short lived > durations. > > Best wishes, > > > > > - > " Vyas Munidas " <muni> > > Tuesday, July 04, 2006 8:04 AM > Re: Re: (unknown) > > > > Hi Professor, > > > > How are the significations of an otherwise strong planet affected when > > it's > > only closely afflicted? > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > Vyas Munidas > > > > > > > > - > > <siha > > > > Monday, July 03, 2006 10:28 PM > > Re: Re: (unknown) > > > > > >> > >> Hello Vyas, > >> > >> The orb of affliction for strong planets is one degree or two degree > >> under > >> multiple afflictions or affliction by MMP. On DST info is awaited from > >> Mr. > >> Mahendra. If Arun is right then certainly the ascendant will change. > >> > >> Best wishes, > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> - > >> " Vyas Munidas " <muni> > >> > >> Tuesday, July 04, 2006 7:43 AM > >> Re: Re: (unknown) > >> > >> > >>> Hi Arun, > >>> > >>> You are correct, we are in DT - I should have caught Mahendra's error. > >>> > >>> On the Ra-Me, I'd like to hear the Professor's opinion. I've seen cases > >>> where well placed planets in strong degrees, closely afflicted by a > >>> malefic > >>> causes problems - especially Ra. This is my finding in the limted amount > >>> of > >>> human cases and a great amount of mundane ones I've studied. > >>> > >>> > >>> Best regards, > >>> > >>> Vyas Munidas > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> - > >>> " Arun Rao " <arunrao9 > >>> > >>> Monday, July 03, 2006 8:12 PM > >>> Re: (unknown) > >>> > >>> > >>>> Dear Vyas, > >>>> > >>>> When a planet is strong, the negative influence of a FM is minimal, > >>>> practically zero. If there are special afflictions, we would use an > >>>> orb of 2 degrees. > >>>> > >>>> In this case, we would refer to the planet (Mercury in this case) as > >>>> being strong and capable of protecting and promoting its > >>>> significations. > >>>> > >>>> The ascendant is Taurus, not Gemini. > >>>> > >>>> Best Wishes, > >>>> > >>>> Arun > >>>> > >>>> , " Vyas Munidas " <munidas@> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> Dear Arun, > >>>>> > >>>>> I agree with you that this child shall do well in life. It certainly > >>>> is a > >>>>> fortunate chart. > >>>>> > >>>>> Me is strong and well placed, but still close under Rahu (less than 3 > >>>>> degreess). My understanding is that when exact under Rahu, the > >>>>> significations are destroyed. When close it's not so bad, but still > >>>> there > >>>>> are some problems. Perhaps can comment further to > >>>> further > >>>>> this understanding. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> Best regards, > >>>>> > >>>>> Vyas Munidas > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> - > >>>>> " Arun Rao " <arunrao9@> > >>>>> > >>>>> Monday, July 03, 2006 7:49 PM > >>>>> Re: (unknown) > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > Dear Mr. Mahendra and Vyas, > >>>>> > > >>>>> > Mercury is a strong planet and is not bothered by the aspect of > >>>>> > Rahu. > >>>>> > > >>>>> > The chart is solid overall. She will do well in life. > >>>>> > > >>>>> > Best Wishes, > >>>>> > > >>>>> > Arun Rao > >>>>> > > >>>>> > , " Vyas Munidas " <munidas@> wrote: > >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> Dear Professor, > >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> I am reading Gemini Asc 10:26 for this data. The four planets you > >>>>> > mentioned > >>>>> >> are strong, but Ve is badly placed in H12, and Me is within the > >>>> close 5 > >>>>> >> degree aspect of Ra. > >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> Best regards, > >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> Vyas Munidas > >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> - > >>>>> >> <siha@> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> Monday, July 03, 2006 4:27 PM > >>>>> >> Re: (unknown) > >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > > >>>>> >> > Hello Mahendra, > >>>>> >> > > >>>>> >> > Congratulations. Your daughter has Mercury, Saturn, Sun and > >>>> Moon as > >>>>> >> > strong > >>>>> >> > planets. There is no planet in the malefic houses. Rahu and Ketu > >>>>> > do not > >>>>> >> > cause close afflictions in the chart. The chart augers well for > >>>>> > the child > >>>>> >> > and for the family. > >>>>> >> > > >>>>> >> > Best wishes, > >>>>> >> > > >>>>> >> > > >>>>> >> > www.YourNetAstrologer.com > >>>>> >> > www.JyotishRemedies121.com > >>>>> >> > A-105, South City II, Gurgaon 122018. (India) > >>>>> >> > Phones: 91 124 - 2219240 > >>>>> >> > Mobile 98110 16333 > >>>>> >> > > >>>>> >> > > >>>>> >> > - > >>>>> >> > " Mahendra " <mahendra_gr@> > >>>>> >> > > >>>>> >> > Monday, July 03, 2006 9:24 PM > >>>>> >> > (unknown) > >>>>> >> > > >>>>> >> > > >>>>> >> >> Learned Members: > >>>>> >> >> > >>>>> >> >> I have been blessed with a baby daughter born on > >>>>> >> >> Jul 3, 2006 > >>>>> >> >> 4:37 AM (+5 EST) > >>>>> >> >> Longitude: 83W47 Latitude: 42N10 > >>>>> >> >> > >>>>> >> >> As its easy to get biased in looking at own family members > >>>> horoscope, > >>>>> >> >> I would sincerely appreciate any insights / strengths and > >>>> weaknesses > >>>>> >> >> in the horoscope. > >>>>> >> >> > >>>>> >> >> May the SATVA tribe increase. > >>>>> >> >> With humble regards, Mahendra > >>>>> >> >> > >>>>> >> >> > >>>>> >> >> > >>>>> >> >> > >>>>> >> >> > >>>>> >> >> > >>>>> >> >> > >>>>> >> >> Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted July 4, 2006 Thanks Professor. Your explanation is the understanding that I have accepted. The intensity of the signification suffering for short durations, for an otherwise strong planet is proportional to how close the malefic influence is. For instance if this Me was 4:59 away from Ra, the evils are much less than 2:38 away. Best regards, Vyas Munidas - <siha Monday, July 03, 2006 11:52 PM Re: Re: (unknown) > > Hello Vyas, > > When a strong planet is closely afflicted in the applicable orb then the > significations of the planet suffer to some extent and for short lived > durations. > > Best wishes, > > > > > - > " Vyas Munidas " <muni> > > Tuesday, July 04, 2006 8:04 AM > Re: Re: (unknown) > > >> Hi Professor, >> >> How are the significations of an otherwise strong planet affected when >> it's >> only closely afflicted? >> >> >> Best regards, >> >> Vyas Munidas >> >> >> >> - >> <siha >> >> Monday, July 03, 2006 10:28 PM >> Re: Re: (unknown) >> >> >>> >>> Hello Vyas, >>> >>> The orb of affliction for strong planets is one degree or two degree >>> under >>> multiple afflictions or affliction by MMP. On DST info is awaited from >>> Mr. >>> Mahendra. If Arun is right then certainly the ascendant will change. >>> >>> Best wishes, >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> - >>> " Vyas Munidas " <muni> >>> >>> Tuesday, July 04, 2006 7:43 AM >>> Re: Re: (unknown) >>> >>> >>>> Hi Arun, >>>> >>>> You are correct, we are in DT - I should have caught Mahendra's error. >>>> >>>> On the Ra-Me, I'd like to hear the Professor's opinion. I've seen cases >>>> where well placed planets in strong degrees, closely afflicted by a >>>> malefic >>>> causes problems - especially Ra. This is my finding in the limted >>>> amount >>>> of >>>> human cases and a great amount of mundane ones I've studied. >>>> >>>> >>>> Best regards, >>>> >>>> Vyas Munidas >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> - >>>> " Arun Rao " <arunrao9 >>>> >>>> Monday, July 03, 2006 8:12 PM >>>> Re: (unknown) >>>> >>>> >>>>> Dear Vyas, >>>>> >>>>> When a planet is strong, the negative influence of a FM is minimal, >>>>> practically zero. If there are special afflictions, we would use an >>>>> orb of 2 degrees. >>>>> >>>>> In this case, we would refer to the planet (Mercury in this case) as >>>>> being strong and capable of protecting and promoting its >>>>> significations. >>>>> >>>>> The ascendant is Taurus, not Gemini. >>>>> >>>>> Best Wishes, >>>>> >>>>> Arun >>>>> >>>>> , " Vyas Munidas " <muni> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Dear Arun, >>>>>> >>>>>> I agree with you that this child shall do well in life. It certainly >>>>> is a >>>>>> fortunate chart. >>>>>> >>>>>> Me is strong and well placed, but still close under Rahu (less than 3 >>>>>> degreess). My understanding is that when exact under Rahu, the >>>>>> significations are destroyed. When close it's not so bad, but still >>>>> there >>>>>> are some problems. Perhaps can comment further to >>>>> further >>>>>> this understanding. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>> >>>>>> Vyas Munidas >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> - >>>>>> " Arun Rao " <arunrao9 >>>>>> >>>>>> Monday, July 03, 2006 7:49 PM >>>>>> Re: (unknown) >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> > Dear Mr. Mahendra and Vyas, >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Mercury is a strong planet and is not bothered by the aspect of >>>>>> > Rahu. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > The chart is solid overall. She will do well in life. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Best Wishes, >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Arun Rao >>>>>> > >>>>>> > , " Vyas Munidas " <munidas@> wrote: >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> Dear Professor, >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> I am reading Gemini Asc 10:26 for this data. The four planets you >>>>>> > mentioned >>>>>> >> are strong, but Ve is badly placed in H12, and Me is within the >>>>> close 5 >>>>>> >> degree aspect of Ra. >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> Best regards, >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> Vyas Munidas >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> - >>>>>> >> <siha@> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> Monday, July 03, 2006 4:27 PM >>>>>> >> Re: (unknown) >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> > Hello Mahendra, >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> > Congratulations. Your daughter has Mercury, Saturn, Sun and >>>>> Moon as >>>>>> >> > strong >>>>>> >> > planets. There is no planet in the malefic houses. Rahu and Ketu >>>>>> > do not >>>>>> >> > cause close afflictions in the chart. The chart augers well for >>>>>> > the child >>>>>> >> > and for the family. >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> > Best wishes, >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> > www.YourNetAstrologer.com >>>>>> >> > www.JyotishRemedies121.com >>>>>> >> > A-105, South City II, Gurgaon 122018. (India) >>>>>> >> > Phones: 91 124 - 2219240 >>>>>> >> > Mobile 98110 16333 >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> > - >>>>>> >> > " Mahendra " <mahendra_gr@> >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> > Monday, July 03, 2006 9:24 PM >>>>>> >> > (unknown) >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> >> Learned Members: >>>>>> >> >> >>>>>> >> >> I have been blessed with a baby daughter born on >>>>>> >> >> Jul 3, 2006 >>>>>> >> >> 4:37 AM (+5 EST) >>>>>> >> >> Longitude: 83W47 Latitude: 42N10 >>>>>> >> >> >>>>>> >> >> As its easy to get biased in looking at own family members >>>>> horoscope, >>>>>> >> >> I would sincerely appreciate any insights / strengths and >>>>> weaknesses >>>>>> >> >> in the horoscope. >>>>>> >> >> >>>>>> >> >> May the SATVA tribe increase. >>>>>> >> >> With humble regards, Mahendra >>>>>> >> >> >>>>>> >> >> >>>>>> >> >> >>>>>> >> >> >>>>>> >> >> >>>>>> >> >> >>>>>> >> >> >>>>>> >> >> Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted July 4, 2006 Dear Arun, Yes you are correct, but only when natal Ra is not in a dushtana. Best regards, Vyas Munidas - " Arun Rao " <arunrao9 Tuesday, July 04, 2006 12:10 AM Re: (unknown) > Dear Vyas, > > Not to mention that an influence of Rahu on an otherwise strong planet > can activate the significations of the said planet to a large extent. > This can give profound results over the short-run. > > Best Wishes, > > Arun > > , <siha wrote: >> >> >> Hello Vyas, >> >> When a strong planet is closely afflicted in the applicable orb then > the >> significations of the planet suffer to some extent and for short lived >> durations. >> >> Best wishes, >> >> >> >> >> - >> " Vyas Munidas " <muni> >> >> Tuesday, July 04, 2006 8:04 AM >> Re: Re: (unknown) >> >> >> > Hi Professor, >> > >> > How are the significations of an otherwise strong planet affected > when >> > it's >> > only closely afflicted? >> > >> > >> > Best regards, >> > >> > Vyas Munidas >> > >> > >> > >> > - >> > <siha >> > >> > Monday, July 03, 2006 10:28 PM >> > Re: Re: (unknown) >> > >> > >> >> >> >> Hello Vyas, >> >> >> >> The orb of affliction for strong planets is one degree or two degree >> >> under >> >> multiple afflictions or affliction by MMP. On DST info is > awaited from >> >> Mr. >> >> Mahendra. If Arun is right then certainly the ascendant will change. >> >> >> >> Best wishes, >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> - >> >> " Vyas Munidas " <muni> >> >> >> >> Tuesday, July 04, 2006 7:43 AM >> >> Re: Re: (unknown) >> >> >> >> >> >>> Hi Arun, >> >>> >> >>> You are correct, we are in DT - I should have caught Mahendra's > error. >> >>> >> >>> On the Ra-Me, I'd like to hear the Professor's opinion. I've > seen cases >> >>> where well placed planets in strong degrees, closely afflicted by a >> >>> malefic >> >>> causes problems - especially Ra. This is my finding in the > limted amount >> >>> of >> >>> human cases and a great amount of mundane ones I've studied. >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> Best regards, >> >>> >> >>> Vyas Munidas >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> - >> >>> " Arun Rao " <arunrao9 >> >>> >> >>> Monday, July 03, 2006 8:12 PM >> >>> Re: (unknown) >> >>> >> >>> >> >>>> Dear Vyas, >> >>>> >> >>>> When a planet is strong, the negative influence of a FM is minimal, >> >>>> practically zero. If there are special afflictions, we would use an >> >>>> orb of 2 degrees. >> >>>> >> >>>> In this case, we would refer to the planet (Mercury in this > case) as >> >>>> being strong and capable of protecting and promoting its >> >>>> significations. >> >>>> >> >>>> The ascendant is Taurus, not Gemini. >> >>>> >> >>>> Best Wishes, >> >>>> >> >>>> Arun >> >>>> >> >>>> , " Vyas Munidas " <munidas@> wrote: >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Dear Arun, >> >>>>> >> >>>>> I agree with you that this child shall do well in life. It > certainly >> >>>> is a >> >>>>> fortunate chart. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Me is strong and well placed, but still close under Rahu (less > than 3 >> >>>>> degreess). My understanding is that when exact under Rahu, the >> >>>>> significations are destroyed. When close it's not so bad, but > still >> >>>> there >> >>>>> are some problems. Perhaps can comment > further to >> >>>> further >> >>>>> this understanding. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Best regards, >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Vyas Munidas >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> - >> >>>>> " Arun Rao " <arunrao9@> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Monday, July 03, 2006 7:49 PM >> >>>>> Re: (unknown) >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> > Dear Mr. Mahendra and Vyas, >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > Mercury is a strong planet and is not bothered by the aspect of >> >>>>> > Rahu. >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > The chart is solid overall. She will do well in life. >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > Best Wishes, >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > Arun Rao >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > , " Vyas Munidas " <munidas@> > wrote: >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> >> Dear Professor, >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> >> I am reading Gemini Asc 10:26 for this data. The four > planets you >> >>>>> > mentioned >> >>>>> >> are strong, but Ve is badly placed in H12, and Me is within the >> >>>> close 5 >> >>>>> >> degree aspect of Ra. >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> >> Best regards, >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> >> Vyas Munidas >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> >> - >> >>>>> >> <siha@> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> >> Monday, July 03, 2006 4:27 PM >> >>>>> >> Re: (unknown) >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> >> > >> >>>>> >> > Hello Mahendra, >> >>>>> >> > >> >>>>> >> > Congratulations. Your daughter has Mercury, Saturn, Sun and >> >>>> Moon as >> >>>>> >> > strong >> >>>>> >> > planets. There is no planet in the malefic houses. Rahu > and Ketu >> >>>>> > do not >> >>>>> >> > cause close afflictions in the chart. The chart augers > well for >> >>>>> > the child >> >>>>> >> > and for the family. >> >>>>> >> > >> >>>>> >> > Best wishes, >> >>>>> >> > >> >>>>> >> > >> >>>>> >> > www.YourNetAstrologer.com >> >>>>> >> > www.JyotishRemedies121.com >> >>>>> >> > A-105, South City II, Gurgaon 122018. (India) >> >>>>> >> > Phones: 91 124 - 2219240 >> >>>>> >> > Mobile 98110 16333 >> >>>>> >> > >> >>>>> >> > >> >>>>> >> > - >> >>>>> >> > " Mahendra " <mahendra_gr@> >> >>>>> >> > >> >>>>> >> > Monday, July 03, 2006 9:24 PM >> >>>>> >> > (unknown) >> >>>>> >> > >> >>>>> >> > >> >>>>> >> >> Learned Members: >> >>>>> >> >> >> >>>>> >> >> I have been blessed with a baby daughter born on >> >>>>> >> >> Jul 3, 2006 >> >>>>> >> >> 4:37 AM (+5 EST) >> >>>>> >> >> Longitude: 83W47 Latitude: 42N10 >> >>>>> >> >> >> >>>>> >> >> As its easy to get biased in looking at own family members >> >>>> horoscope, >> >>>>> >> >> I would sincerely appreciate any insights / strengths and >> >>>> weaknesses >> >>>>> >> >> in the horoscope. >> >>>>> >> >> >> >>>>> >> >> May the SATVA tribe increase. >> >>>>> >> >> With humble regards, Mahendra >> >>>>> >> >> >> >>>>> >> >> >> >>>>> >> >> >> >>>>> >> >> >> >>>>> >> >> >> >>>>> >> >> >> >>>>> >> >> >> >>>>> >> >> Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted July 4, 2006 Hello Vyas, Once out of the orb of affliction, the principle of proportional malefic influence does not work. It is the transit weakness of the planet which becomes vulnerable to transit afflictions. Best wishes, www.YourNetAstrologer.com www.JyotishRemedies121.com A-105, South City II, Gurgaon 122018. (India) Phones: 91 124 - 2219240 Mobile 98110 16333 - " Vyas Munidas " <muni> Tuesday, July 04, 2006 10:12 AM Re: Re: (unknown) > Thanks Professor. > > Your explanation is the understanding that I have accepted. > > The intensity of the signification suffering for short durations, for an > otherwise strong planet is proportional to how close the malefic influence > is. For instance if this Me was 4:59 away from Ra, the evils are much less > than 2:38 away. > > > Best regards, > > Vyas Munidas > > > > - > <siha > > Monday, July 03, 2006 11:52 PM > Re: Re: (unknown) > > >> >> Hello Vyas, >> >> When a strong planet is closely afflicted in the applicable orb then the >> significations of the planet suffer to some extent and for short lived >> durations. >> >> Best wishes, >> >> >> >> >> - >> " Vyas Munidas " <muni> >> >> Tuesday, July 04, 2006 8:04 AM >> Re: Re: (unknown) >> >> >>> Hi Professor, >>> >>> How are the significations of an otherwise strong planet affected when >>> it's >>> only closely afflicted? >>> >>> >>> Best regards, >>> >>> Vyas Munidas >>> >>> >>> >>> - >>> <siha >>> >>> Monday, July 03, 2006 10:28 PM >>> Re: Re: (unknown) >>> >>> >>>> >>>> Hello Vyas, >>>> >>>> The orb of affliction for strong planets is one degree or two degree >>>> under >>>> multiple afflictions or affliction by MMP. On DST info is awaited from >>>> Mr. >>>> Mahendra. If Arun is right then certainly the ascendant will change. >>>> >>>> Best wishes, >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> - >>>> " Vyas Munidas " <muni> >>>> >>>> Tuesday, July 04, 2006 7:43 AM >>>> Re: Re: (unknown) >>>> >>>> >>>>> Hi Arun, >>>>> >>>>> You are correct, we are in DT - I should have caught Mahendra's error. >>>>> >>>>> On the Ra-Me, I'd like to hear the Professor's opinion. I've seen >>>>> cases >>>>> where well placed planets in strong degrees, closely afflicted by a >>>>> malefic >>>>> causes problems - especially Ra. This is my finding in the limted >>>>> amount >>>>> of >>>>> human cases and a great amount of mundane ones I've studied. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Best regards, >>>>> >>>>> Vyas Munidas >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> - >>>>> " Arun Rao " <arunrao9 >>>>> >>>>> Monday, July 03, 2006 8:12 PM >>>>> Re: (unknown) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Dear Vyas, >>>>>> >>>>>> When a planet is strong, the negative influence of a FM is minimal, >>>>>> practically zero. If there are special afflictions, we would use an >>>>>> orb of 2 degrees. >>>>>> >>>>>> In this case, we would refer to the planet (Mercury in this case) as >>>>>> being strong and capable of protecting and promoting its >>>>>> significations. >>>>>> >>>>>> The ascendant is Taurus, not Gemini. >>>>>> >>>>>> Best Wishes, >>>>>> >>>>>> Arun >>>>>> >>>>>> , " Vyas Munidas " <muni> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Dear Arun, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I agree with you that this child shall do well in life. It certainly >>>>>> is a >>>>>>> fortunate chart. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Me is strong and well placed, but still close under Rahu (less than >>>>>>> 3 >>>>>>> degreess). My understanding is that when exact under Rahu, the >>>>>>> significations are destroyed. When close it's not so bad, but still >>>>>> there >>>>>>> are some problems. Perhaps can comment further to >>>>>> further >>>>>>> this understanding. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Vyas Munidas >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> - >>>>>>> " Arun Rao " <arunrao9 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Monday, July 03, 2006 7:49 PM >>>>>>> Re: (unknown) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> > Dear Mr. Mahendra and Vyas, >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > Mercury is a strong planet and is not bothered by the aspect of >>>>>>> > Rahu. >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > The chart is solid overall. She will do well in life. >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > Best Wishes, >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > Arun Rao >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > , " Vyas Munidas " <munidas@> wrote: >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> Dear Professor, >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> I am reading Gemini Asc 10:26 for this data. The four planets you >>>>>>> > mentioned >>>>>>> >> are strong, but Ve is badly placed in H12, and Me is within the >>>>>> close 5 >>>>>>> >> degree aspect of Ra. >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> Best regards, >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> Vyas Munidas >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> - >>>>>>> >> <siha@> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> Monday, July 03, 2006 4:27 PM >>>>>>> >> Re: (unknown) >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> >> > Hello Mahendra, >>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> >> > Congratulations. Your daughter has Mercury, Saturn, Sun and >>>>>> Moon as >>>>>>> >> > strong >>>>>>> >> > planets. There is no planet in the malefic houses. Rahu and >>>>>>> >> > Ketu >>>>>>> > do not >>>>>>> >> > cause close afflictions in the chart. The chart augers well >>>>>>> >> > for >>>>>>> > the child >>>>>>> >> > and for the family. >>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> >> > Best wishes, >>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> >> > www.YourNetAstrologer.com >>>>>>> >> > www.JyotishRemedies121.com >>>>>>> >> > A-105, South City II, Gurgaon 122018. (India) >>>>>>> >> > Phones: 91 124 - 2219240 >>>>>>> >> > Mobile 98110 16333 >>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> >> > - >>>>>>> >> > " Mahendra " <mahendra_gr@> >>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> >> > Monday, July 03, 2006 9:24 PM >>>>>>> >> > (unknown) >>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> >> >> Learned Members: >>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>> >> >> I have been blessed with a baby daughter born on >>>>>>> >> >> Jul 3, 2006 >>>>>>> >> >> 4:37 AM (+5 EST) >>>>>>> >> >> Longitude: 83W47 Latitude: 42N10 >>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>> >> >> As its easy to get biased in looking at own family members >>>>>> horoscope, >>>>>>> >> >> I would sincerely appreciate any insights / strengths and >>>>>> weaknesses >>>>>>> >> >> in the horoscope. >>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>> >> >> May the SATVA tribe increase. >>>>>>> >> >> With humble regards, Mahendra >>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>> >> >> Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted July 4, 2006 Dear Professor, Thank you. Once the affliction isn't exact, we don't bother with the proportional study extending to the 5 degree orb. This 5 degree orb has importance during transit afflictions. This may seem an odd question, but it has relevance to this discussion. Does the strength of the kavach fluctuate during transit? If it doesn't, then what's the need in muhurta selection for their creation to ensure that FMs are outside the 5 degree orb of FMs and MEPs? Best regards, Vyas Munidas - <siha Tuesday, July 04, 2006 12:58 AM Re: Re: (unknown) > > Hello Vyas, > > Once out of the orb of affliction, the principle of proportional malefic > influence does not work. It is the transit weakness of the planet which > becomes vulnerable to transit afflictions. > > Best wishes, > > > www.YourNetAstrologer.com > www.JyotishRemedies121.com > A-105, South City II, Gurgaon 122018. (India) > Phones: 91 124 - 2219240 > Mobile 98110 16333 > > > - > " Vyas Munidas " <muni> > > Tuesday, July 04, 2006 10:12 AM > Re: Re: (unknown) > > >> Thanks Professor. >> >> Your explanation is the understanding that I have accepted. >> >> The intensity of the signification suffering for short durations, for an >> otherwise strong planet is proportional to how close the malefic >> influence >> is. For instance if this Me was 4:59 away from Ra, the evils are much >> less >> than 2:38 away. >> >> >> Best regards, >> >> Vyas Munidas >> >> >> >> - >> <siha >> >> Monday, July 03, 2006 11:52 PM >> Re: Re: (unknown) >> >> >>> >>> Hello Vyas, >>> >>> When a strong planet is closely afflicted in the applicable orb then the >>> significations of the planet suffer to some extent and for short lived >>> durations. >>> >>> Best wishes, >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> - >>> " Vyas Munidas " <muni> >>> >>> Tuesday, July 04, 2006 8:04 AM >>> Re: Re: (unknown) >>> >>> >>>> Hi Professor, >>>> >>>> How are the significations of an otherwise strong planet affected when >>>> it's >>>> only closely afflicted? >>>> >>>> >>>> Best regards, >>>> >>>> Vyas Munidas >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> - >>>> <siha >>>> >>>> Monday, July 03, 2006 10:28 PM >>>> Re: Re: (unknown) >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Hello Vyas, >>>>> >>>>> The orb of affliction for strong planets is one degree or two degree >>>>> under >>>>> multiple afflictions or affliction by MMP. On DST info is awaited >>>>> from >>>>> Mr. >>>>> Mahendra. If Arun is right then certainly the ascendant will change. >>>>> >>>>> Best wishes, >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> - >>>>> " Vyas Munidas " <muni> >>>>> >>>>> Tuesday, July 04, 2006 7:43 AM >>>>> Re: Re: (unknown) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Hi Arun, >>>>>> >>>>>> You are correct, we are in DT - I should have caught Mahendra's >>>>>> error. >>>>>> >>>>>> On the Ra-Me, I'd like to hear the Professor's opinion. I've seen >>>>>> cases >>>>>> where well placed planets in strong degrees, closely afflicted by a >>>>>> malefic >>>>>> causes problems - especially Ra. This is my finding in the limted >>>>>> amount >>>>>> of >>>>>> human cases and a great amount of mundane ones I've studied. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>> >>>>>> Vyas Munidas >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> - >>>>>> " Arun Rao " <arunrao9 >>>>>> >>>>>> Monday, July 03, 2006 8:12 PM >>>>>> Re: (unknown) >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> Dear Vyas, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> When a planet is strong, the negative influence of a FM is minimal, >>>>>>> practically zero. If there are special afflictions, we would use an >>>>>>> orb of 2 degrees. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> In this case, we would refer to the planet (Mercury in this case) as >>>>>>> being strong and capable of protecting and promoting its >>>>>>> significations. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The ascendant is Taurus, not Gemini. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Best Wishes, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Arun >>>>>>> >>>>>>> , " Vyas Munidas " <muni> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Dear Arun, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I agree with you that this child shall do well in life. It >>>>>>>> certainly >>>>>>> is a >>>>>>>> fortunate chart. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Me is strong and well placed, but still close under Rahu (less than >>>>>>>> 3 >>>>>>>> degreess). My understanding is that when exact under Rahu, the >>>>>>>> significations are destroyed. When close it's not so bad, but still >>>>>>> there >>>>>>>> are some problems. Perhaps can comment further >>>>>>>> to >>>>>>> further >>>>>>>> this understanding. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Vyas Munidas >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> - >>>>>>>> " Arun Rao " <arunrao9 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Monday, July 03, 2006 7:49 PM >>>>>>>> Re: (unknown) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> > Dear Mr. Mahendra and Vyas, >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > Mercury is a strong planet and is not bothered by the aspect of >>>>>>>> > Rahu. >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > The chart is solid overall. She will do well in life. >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > Best Wishes, >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > Arun Rao >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > , " Vyas Munidas " <munidas@> wrote: >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> Dear Professor, >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> I am reading Gemini Asc 10:26 for this data. The four planets >>>>>>>> >> you >>>>>>>> > mentioned >>>>>>>> >> are strong, but Ve is badly placed in H12, and Me is within the >>>>>>> close 5 >>>>>>>> >> degree aspect of Ra. >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> Best regards, >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> Vyas Munidas >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> - >>>>>>>> >> <siha@> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> Monday, July 03, 2006 4:27 PM >>>>>>>> >> Re: (unknown) >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>> >> > Hello Mahendra, >>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>> >> > Congratulations. Your daughter has Mercury, Saturn, Sun and >>>>>>> Moon as >>>>>>>> >> > strong >>>>>>>> >> > planets. There is no planet in the malefic houses. Rahu and >>>>>>>> >> > Ketu >>>>>>>> > do not >>>>>>>> >> > cause close afflictions in the chart. The chart augers well >>>>>>>> >> > for >>>>>>>> > the child >>>>>>>> >> > and for the family. >>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>> >> > Best wishes, >>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>> >> > www.YourNetAstrologer.com >>>>>>>> >> > www.JyotishRemedies121.com >>>>>>>> >> > A-105, South City II, Gurgaon 122018. (India) >>>>>>>> >> > Phones: 91 124 - 2219240 >>>>>>>> >> > Mobile 98110 16333 >>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>> >> > - >>>>>>>> >> > " Mahendra " <mahendra_gr@> >>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>> >> > Monday, July 03, 2006 9:24 PM >>>>>>>> >> > (unknown) >>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>> >> >> Learned Members: >>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>> >> >> I have been blessed with a baby daughter born on >>>>>>>> >> >> Jul 3, 2006 >>>>>>>> >> >> 4:37 AM (+5 EST) >>>>>>>> >> >> Longitude: 83W47 Latitude: 42N10 >>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>> >> >> As its easy to get biased in looking at own family members >>>>>>> horoscope, >>>>>>>> >> >> I would sincerely appreciate any insights / strengths and >>>>>>> weaknesses >>>>>>>> >> >> in the horoscope. >>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>> >> >> May the SATVA tribe increase. >>>>>>>> >> >> With humble regards, Mahendra >>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>> >> >> Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted July 4, 2006 Hello Vyas, Nobody is above law including the Kavach. Kavach created during strong planetary influences is comparatively less vulnerable to transit afflictions. Best wishes, - " Vyas Munidas " <muni> Tuesday, July 04, 2006 10:51 AM Re: Re: (unknown) > Dear Professor, > > Thank you. Once the affliction isn't exact, we don't bother with the > proportional study extending to the 5 degree orb. This 5 degree orb has > importance during transit afflictions. > > This may seem an odd question, but it has relevance to this discussion. > Does > the strength of the kavach fluctuate during transit? If it doesn't, then > what's the need in muhurta selection for their creation to ensure that FMs > are outside the 5 degree orb of FMs and MEPs? > > > Best regards, > > Vyas Munidas > > > > - > <siha > > Tuesday, July 04, 2006 12:58 AM > Re: Re: (unknown) > > >> >> Hello Vyas, >> >> Once out of the orb of affliction, the principle of proportional malefic >> influence does not work. It is the transit weakness of the planet which >> becomes vulnerable to transit afflictions. >> >> Best wishes, >> >> >> www.YourNetAstrologer.com >> www.JyotishRemedies121.com >> A-105, South City II, Gurgaon 122018. (India) >> Phones: 91 124 - 2219240 >> Mobile 98110 16333 >> >> >> - >> " Vyas Munidas " <muni> >> >> Tuesday, July 04, 2006 10:12 AM >> Re: Re: (unknown) >> >> >>> Thanks Professor. >>> >>> Your explanation is the understanding that I have accepted. >>> >>> The intensity of the signification suffering for short durations, for an >>> otherwise strong planet is proportional to how close the malefic >>> influence >>> is. For instance if this Me was 4:59 away from Ra, the evils are much >>> less >>> than 2:38 away. >>> >>> >>> Best regards, >>> >>> Vyas Munidas >>> >>> >>> >>> - >>> <siha >>> >>> Monday, July 03, 2006 11:52 PM >>> Re: Re: (unknown) >>> >>> >>>> >>>> Hello Vyas, >>>> >>>> When a strong planet is closely afflicted in the applicable orb then >>>> the >>>> significations of the planet suffer to some extent and for short lived >>>> durations. >>>> >>>> Best wishes, >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> - >>>> " Vyas Munidas " <muni> >>>> >>>> Tuesday, July 04, 2006 8:04 AM >>>> Re: Re: (unknown) >>>> >>>> >>>>> Hi Professor, >>>>> >>>>> How are the significations of an otherwise strong planet affected when >>>>> it's >>>>> only closely afflicted? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Best regards, >>>>> >>>>> Vyas Munidas >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> - >>>>> <siha >>>>> >>>>> Monday, July 03, 2006 10:28 PM >>>>> Re: Re: (unknown) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Hello Vyas, >>>>>> >>>>>> The orb of affliction for strong planets is one degree or two degree >>>>>> under >>>>>> multiple afflictions or affliction by MMP. On DST info is awaited >>>>>> from >>>>>> Mr. >>>>>> Mahendra. If Arun is right then certainly the ascendant will change. >>>>>> >>>>>> Best wishes, >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> - >>>>>> " Vyas Munidas " <muni> >>>>>> >>>>>> Tuesday, July 04, 2006 7:43 AM >>>>>> Re: Re: (unknown) >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi Arun, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You are correct, we are in DT - I should have caught Mahendra's >>>>>>> error. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On the Ra-Me, I'd like to hear the Professor's opinion. I've seen >>>>>>> cases >>>>>>> where well placed planets in strong degrees, closely afflicted by a >>>>>>> malefic >>>>>>> causes problems - especially Ra. This is my finding in the limted >>>>>>> amount >>>>>>> of >>>>>>> human cases and a great amount of mundane ones I've studied. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Vyas Munidas >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> - >>>>>>> " Arun Rao " <arunrao9 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Monday, July 03, 2006 8:12 PM >>>>>>> Re: (unknown) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Dear Vyas, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> When a planet is strong, the negative influence of a FM is minimal, >>>>>>>> practically zero. If there are special afflictions, we would use an >>>>>>>> orb of 2 degrees. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> In this case, we would refer to the planet (Mercury in this case) >>>>>>>> as >>>>>>>> being strong and capable of protecting and promoting its >>>>>>>> significations. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The ascendant is Taurus, not Gemini. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Best Wishes, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Arun >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> , " Vyas Munidas " <muni> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Dear Arun, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I agree with you that this child shall do well in life. It >>>>>>>>> certainly >>>>>>>> is a >>>>>>>>> fortunate chart. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Me is strong and well placed, but still close under Rahu (less >>>>>>>>> than >>>>>>>>> 3 >>>>>>>>> degreess). My understanding is that when exact under Rahu, the >>>>>>>>> significations are destroyed. When close it's not so bad, but >>>>>>>>> still >>>>>>>> there >>>>>>>>> are some problems. Perhaps can comment further >>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>> further >>>>>>>>> this understanding. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Vyas Munidas >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> - >>>>>>>>> " Arun Rao " <arunrao9 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Monday, July 03, 2006 7:49 PM >>>>>>>>> Re: (unknown) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> > Dear Mr. Mahendra and Vyas, >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > Mercury is a strong planet and is not bothered by the aspect of >>>>>>>>> > Rahu. >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > The chart is solid overall. She will do well in life. >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > Best Wishes, >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > Arun Rao >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > , " Vyas Munidas " <munidas@> >>>>>>>>> > wrote: >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> Dear Professor, >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> I am reading Gemini Asc 10:26 for this data. The four planets >>>>>>>>> >> you >>>>>>>>> > mentioned >>>>>>>>> >> are strong, but Ve is badly placed in H12, and Me is within the >>>>>>>> close 5 >>>>>>>>> >> degree aspect of Ra. >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> Best regards, >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> Vyas Munidas >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> - >>>>>>>>> >> <siha@> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> Monday, July 03, 2006 4:27 PM >>>>>>>>> >> Re: (unknown) >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>> >> > Hello Mahendra, >>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>> >> > Congratulations. Your daughter has Mercury, Saturn, Sun and >>>>>>>> Moon as >>>>>>>>> >> > strong >>>>>>>>> >> > planets. There is no planet in the malefic houses. Rahu and >>>>>>>>> >> > Ketu >>>>>>>>> > do not >>>>>>>>> >> > cause close afflictions in the chart. The chart augers well >>>>>>>>> >> > for >>>>>>>>> > the child >>>>>>>>> >> > and for the family. >>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>> >> > Best wishes, >>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>> >> > www.YourNetAstrologer.com >>>>>>>>> >> > www.JyotishRemedies121.com >>>>>>>>> >> > A-105, South City II, Gurgaon 122018. (India) >>>>>>>>> >> > Phones: 91 124 - 2219240 >>>>>>>>> >> > Mobile 98110 16333 >>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>> >> > - >>>>>>>>> >> > " Mahendra " <mahendra_gr@> >>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>> >> > Monday, July 03, 2006 9:24 PM >>>>>>>>> >> > (unknown) >>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>> >> >> Learned Members: >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >> I have been blessed with a baby daughter born on >>>>>>>>> >> >> Jul 3, 2006 >>>>>>>>> >> >> 4:37 AM (+5 EST) >>>>>>>>> >> >> Longitude: 83W47 Latitude: 42N10 >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >> As its easy to get biased in looking at own family members >>>>>>>> horoscope, >>>>>>>>> >> >> I would sincerely appreciate any insights / strengths and >>>>>>>> weaknesses >>>>>>>>> >> >> in the horoscope. >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >> May the SATVA tribe increase. >>>>>>>>> >> >> With humble regards, Mahendra >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >> Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted July 4, 2006 Dear Professor, Thank you! Your insights always deepen my understanding and resolve. Best regards, Vyas Munidas - <siha Tuesday, July 04, 2006 2:22 AM Re: Re: (unknown) > Hello Vyas, > > Nobody is above law including the Kavach. Kavach created during strong > planetary influences is comparatively less vulnerable to transit > afflictions. > > Best wishes, > > > > - > " Vyas Munidas " <muni> > > Tuesday, July 04, 2006 10:51 AM > Re: Re: (unknown) > > >> Dear Professor, >> >> Thank you. Once the affliction isn't exact, we don't bother with the >> proportional study extending to the 5 degree orb. This 5 degree orb has >> importance during transit afflictions. >> >> This may seem an odd question, but it has relevance to this discussion. >> Does >> the strength of the kavach fluctuate during transit? If it doesn't, then >> what's the need in muhurta selection for their creation to ensure that >> FMs >> are outside the 5 degree orb of FMs and MEPs? >> >> >> Best regards, >> >> Vyas Munidas >> >> >> >> - >> <siha >> >> Tuesday, July 04, 2006 12:58 AM >> Re: Re: (unknown) >> >> >>> >>> Hello Vyas, >>> >>> Once out of the orb of affliction, the principle of proportional malefic >>> influence does not work. It is the transit weakness of the planet which >>> becomes vulnerable to transit afflictions. >>> >>> Best wishes, >>> >>> >>> www.YourNetAstrologer.com >>> www.JyotishRemedies121.com >>> A-105, South City II, Gurgaon 122018. (India) >>> Phones: 91 124 - 2219240 >>> Mobile 98110 16333 >>> >>> >>> - >>> " Vyas Munidas " <muni> >>> >>> Tuesday, July 04, 2006 10:12 AM >>> Re: Re: (unknown) >>> >>> >>>> Thanks Professor. >>>> >>>> Your explanation is the understanding that I have accepted. >>>> >>>> The intensity of the signification suffering for short durations, for >>>> an >>>> otherwise strong planet is proportional to how close the malefic >>>> influence >>>> is. For instance if this Me was 4:59 away from Ra, the evils are much >>>> less >>>> than 2:38 away. >>>> >>>> >>>> Best regards, >>>> >>>> Vyas Munidas >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> - >>>> <siha >>>> >>>> Monday, July 03, 2006 11:52 PM >>>> Re: Re: (unknown) >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Hello Vyas, >>>>> >>>>> When a strong planet is closely afflicted in the applicable orb then >>>>> the >>>>> significations of the planet suffer to some extent and for short lived >>>>> durations. >>>>> >>>>> Best wishes, >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> - >>>>> " Vyas Munidas " <muni> >>>>> >>>>> Tuesday, July 04, 2006 8:04 AM >>>>> Re: Re: (unknown) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Hi Professor, >>>>>> >>>>>> How are the significations of an otherwise strong planet affected >>>>>> when >>>>>> it's >>>>>> only closely afflicted? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>> >>>>>> Vyas Munidas >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> - >>>>>> <siha >>>>>> >>>>>> Monday, July 03, 2006 10:28 PM >>>>>> Re: Re: (unknown) >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hello Vyas, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The orb of affliction for strong planets is one degree or two degree >>>>>>> under >>>>>>> multiple afflictions or affliction by MMP. On DST info is awaited >>>>>>> from >>>>>>> Mr. >>>>>>> Mahendra. If Arun is right then certainly the ascendant will change. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Best wishes, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> - >>>>>>> " Vyas Munidas " <muni> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Tuesday, July 04, 2006 7:43 AM >>>>>>> Re: Re: (unknown) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi Arun, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You are correct, we are in DT - I should have caught Mahendra's >>>>>>>> error. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On the Ra-Me, I'd like to hear the Professor's opinion. I've seen >>>>>>>> cases >>>>>>>> where well placed planets in strong degrees, closely afflicted by a >>>>>>>> malefic >>>>>>>> causes problems - especially Ra. This is my finding in the limted >>>>>>>> amount >>>>>>>> of >>>>>>>> human cases and a great amount of mundane ones I've studied. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Vyas Munidas >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> - >>>>>>>> " Arun Rao " <arunrao9 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Monday, July 03, 2006 8:12 PM >>>>>>>> Re: (unknown) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Dear Vyas, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> When a planet is strong, the negative influence of a FM is >>>>>>>>> minimal, >>>>>>>>> practically zero. If there are special afflictions, we would use >>>>>>>>> an >>>>>>>>> orb of 2 degrees. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> In this case, we would refer to the planet (Mercury in this case) >>>>>>>>> as >>>>>>>>> being strong and capable of protecting and promoting its >>>>>>>>> significations. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The ascendant is Taurus, not Gemini. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Best Wishes, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Arun >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> , " Vyas Munidas " <muni> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Dear Arun, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I agree with you that this child shall do well in life. It >>>>>>>>>> certainly >>>>>>>>> is a >>>>>>>>>> fortunate chart. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Me is strong and well placed, but still close under Rahu (less >>>>>>>>>> than >>>>>>>>>> 3 >>>>>>>>>> degreess). My understanding is that when exact under Rahu, the >>>>>>>>>> significations are destroyed. When close it's not so bad, but >>>>>>>>>> still >>>>>>>>> there >>>>>>>>>> are some problems. Perhaps can comment further >>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>> further >>>>>>>>>> this understanding. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Vyas Munidas >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> - >>>>>>>>>> " Arun Rao " <arunrao9 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Monday, July 03, 2006 7:49 PM >>>>>>>>>> Re: (unknown) >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> > Dear Mr. Mahendra and Vyas, >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > Mercury is a strong planet and is not bothered by the aspect of >>>>>>>>>> > Rahu. >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > The chart is solid overall. She will do well in life. >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > Best Wishes, >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > Arun Rao >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > , " Vyas Munidas " <munidas@> >>>>>>>>>> > wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> Dear Professor, >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> I am reading Gemini Asc 10:26 for this data. The four planets >>>>>>>>>> >> you >>>>>>>>>> > mentioned >>>>>>>>>> >> are strong, but Ve is badly placed in H12, and Me is within >>>>>>>>>> >> the >>>>>>>>> close 5 >>>>>>>>>> >> degree aspect of Ra. >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> Best regards, >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> Vyas Munidas >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> - >>>>>>>>>> >> <siha@> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> Monday, July 03, 2006 4:27 PM >>>>>>>>>> >> Re: (unknown) >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>> >> > Hello Mahendra, >>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>> >> > Congratulations. Your daughter has Mercury, Saturn, Sun and >>>>>>>>> Moon as >>>>>>>>>> >> > strong >>>>>>>>>> >> > planets. There is no planet in the malefic houses. Rahu and >>>>>>>>>> >> > Ketu >>>>>>>>>> > do not >>>>>>>>>> >> > cause close afflictions in the chart. The chart augers well >>>>>>>>>> >> > for >>>>>>>>>> > the child >>>>>>>>>> >> > and for the family. >>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>> >> > Best wishes, >>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>> >> > www.YourNetAstrologer.com >>>>>>>>>> >> > www.JyotishRemedies121.com >>>>>>>>>> >> > A-105, South City II, Gurgaon 122018. (India) >>>>>>>>>> >> > Phones: 91 124 - 2219240 >>>>>>>>>> >> > Mobile 98110 16333 >>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>> >> > - >>>>>>>>>> >> > " Mahendra " <mahendra_gr@> >>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>> >> > Monday, July 03, 2006 9:24 PM >>>>>>>>>> >> > (unknown) >>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>> >> >> Learned Members: >>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >> I have been blessed with a baby daughter born on >>>>>>>>>> >> >> Jul 3, 2006 >>>>>>>>>> >> >> 4:37 AM (+5 EST) >>>>>>>>>> >> >> Longitude: 83W47 Latitude: 42N10 >>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >> As its easy to get biased in looking at own family members >>>>>>>>> horoscope, >>>>>>>>>> >> >> I would sincerely appreciate any insights / strengths and >>>>>>>>> weaknesses >>>>>>>>>> >> >> in the horoscope. >>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >> May the SATVA tribe increase. >>>>>>>>>> >> >> With humble regards, Mahendra >>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >> Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted July 4, 2006 Hello Dear Professor, Arun and Vyas, The child was born close to Detroit Michigan which observes EDT=+4. Thanks and Regards Amit , <siha wrote: > > > Hello Vyas, > > The orb of affliction for strong planets is one degree or two degree under > multiple afflictions or affliction by MMP. On DST info is awaited from Mr. > Mahendra. If Arun is right then certainly the ascendant will change. > > Best wishes, > > > > > - > " Vyas Munidas " <muni> > > Tuesday, July 04, 2006 7:43 AM > Re: Re: (unknown) > > > > Hi Arun, > > > > You are correct, we are in DT - I should have caught Mahendra's error. > > > > On the Ra-Me, I'd like to hear the Professor's opinion. I've seen cases > > where well placed planets in strong degrees, closely afflicted by a > > malefic > > causes problems - especially Ra. This is my finding in the limted amount > > of > > human cases and a great amount of mundane ones I've studied. > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > Vyas Munidas > > > > > > > > - > > " Arun Rao " <arunrao9 > > > > Monday, July 03, 2006 8:12 PM > > Re: (unknown) > > > > > >> Dear Vyas, > >> > >> When a planet is strong, the negative influence of a FM is minimal, > >> practically zero. If there are special afflictions, we would use an > >> orb of 2 degrees. > >> > >> In this case, we would refer to the planet (Mercury in this case) as > >> being strong and capable of protecting and promoting its significations. > >> > >> The ascendant is Taurus, not Gemini. > >> > >> Best Wishes, > >> > >> Arun > >> > >> , " Vyas Munidas " <munidas@> wrote: > >>> > >>> Dear Arun, > >>> > >>> I agree with you that this child shall do well in life. It certainly > >> is a > >>> fortunate chart. > >>> > >>> Me is strong and well placed, but still close under Rahu (less than 3 > >>> degreess). My understanding is that when exact under Rahu, the > >>> significations are destroyed. When close it's not so bad, but still > >> there > >>> are some problems. Perhaps can comment further to > >> further > >>> this understanding. > >>> > >>> > >>> Best regards, > >>> > >>> Vyas Munidas > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> - > >>> " Arun Rao " <arunrao9@> > >>> > >>> Monday, July 03, 2006 7:49 PM > >>> Re: (unknown) > >>> > >>> > >>> > Dear Mr. Mahendra and Vyas, > >>> > > >>> > Mercury is a strong planet and is not bothered by the aspect of Rahu. > >>> > > >>> > The chart is solid overall. She will do well in life. > >>> > > >>> > Best Wishes, > >>> > > >>> > Arun Rao > >>> > > >>> > , " Vyas Munidas " <munidas@> wrote: > >>> >> > >>> >> Dear Professor, > >>> >> > >>> >> I am reading Gemini Asc 10:26 for this data. The four planets you > >>> > mentioned > >>> >> are strong, but Ve is badly placed in H12, and Me is within the > >> close 5 > >>> >> degree aspect of Ra. > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> Best regards, > >>> >> > >>> >> Vyas Munidas > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> - > >>> >> <siha@> > >>> >> > >>> >> Monday, July 03, 2006 4:27 PM > >>> >> Re: (unknown) > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > > >>> >> > Hello Mahendra, > >>> >> > > >>> >> > Congratulations. Your daughter has Mercury, Saturn, Sun and > >> Moon as > >>> >> > strong > >>> >> > planets. There is no planet in the malefic houses. Rahu and Ketu > >>> > do not > >>> >> > cause close afflictions in the chart. The chart augers well for > >>> > the child > >>> >> > and for the family. > >>> >> > > >>> >> > Best wishes, > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > www.YourNetAstrologer.com > >>> >> > www.JyotishRemedies121.com > >>> >> > A-105, South City II, Gurgaon 122018. (India) > >>> >> > Phones: 91 124 - 2219240 > >>> >> > Mobile 98110 16333 > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > - > >>> >> > " Mahendra " <mahendra_gr@> > >>> >> > > >>> >> > Monday, July 03, 2006 9:24 PM > >>> >> > (unknown) > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > >>> >> >> Learned Members: > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> I have been blessed with a baby daughter born on > >>> >> >> Jul 3, 2006 > >>> >> >> 4:37 AM (+5 EST) > >>> >> >> Longitude: 83W47 Latitude: 42N10 > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> As its easy to get biased in looking at own family members > >> horoscope, > >>> >> >> I would sincerely appreciate any insights / strengths and > >> weaknesses > >>> >> >> in the horoscope. > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> May the SATVA tribe increase. > >>> >> >> With humble regards, Mahendra > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted July 4, 2006 Right, Mr. Patnaik. That was my inference as well. Best Wishes, Arun , " amit_patnaik6 " <amit_patnaik6 wrote: > > > Hello Dear Professor, Arun and Vyas, > > The child was born close to Detroit Michigan which observes EDT=+4. > > Thanks and Regards > Amit > > , <siha@> wrote: > > > > > > Hello Vyas, > > > > The orb of affliction for strong planets is one degree or two degree > under > > multiple afflictions or affliction by MMP. On DST info is awaited > from Mr. > > Mahendra. If Arun is right then certainly the ascendant will change. > > > > Best wishes, > > > > > > > > > > - > > " Vyas Munidas " <munidas@> > > > > Tuesday, July 04, 2006 7:43 AM > > Re: Re: (unknown) > > > > > > > Hi Arun, > > > > > > You are correct, we are in DT - I should have caught Mahendra's error. > > > > > > On the Ra-Me, I'd like to hear the Professor's opinion. I've seen > cases > > > where well placed planets in strong degrees, closely afflicted by a > > > malefic > > > causes problems - especially Ra. This is my finding in the limted > amount > > > of > > > human cases and a great amount of mundane ones I've studied. > > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > > Vyas Munidas > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > " Arun Rao " <arunrao9@> > > > > > > Monday, July 03, 2006 8:12 PM > > > Re: (unknown) > > > > > > > > >> Dear Vyas, > > >> > > >> When a planet is strong, the negative influence of a FM is minimal, > > >> practically zero. If there are special afflictions, we would use an > > >> orb of 2 degrees. > > >> > > >> In this case, we would refer to the planet (Mercury in this case) as > > >> being strong and capable of protecting and promoting its > significations. > > >> > > >> The ascendant is Taurus, not Gemini. > > >> > > >> Best Wishes, > > >> > > >> Arun > > >> > > >> , " Vyas Munidas " <munidas@> wrote: > > >>> > > >>> Dear Arun, > > >>> > > >>> I agree with you that this child shall do well in life. It certainly > > >> is a > > >>> fortunate chart. > > >>> > > >>> Me is strong and well placed, but still close under Rahu (less > than 3 > > >>> degreess). My understanding is that when exact under Rahu, the > > >>> significations are destroyed. When close it's not so bad, but still > > >> there > > >>> are some problems. Perhaps can comment further to > > >> further > > >>> this understanding. > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> Best regards, > > >>> > > >>> Vyas Munidas > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> - > > >>> " Arun Rao " <arunrao9@> > > >>> > > >>> Monday, July 03, 2006 7:49 PM > > >>> Re: (unknown) > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > Dear Mr. Mahendra and Vyas, > > >>> > > > >>> > Mercury is a strong planet and is not bothered by the aspect > of Rahu. > > >>> > > > >>> > The chart is solid overall. She will do well in life. > > >>> > > > >>> > Best Wishes, > > >>> > > > >>> > Arun Rao > > >>> > > > >>> > , " Vyas Munidas " <munidas@> wrote: > > >>> >> > > >>> >> Dear Professor, > > >>> >> > > >>> >> I am reading Gemini Asc 10:26 for this data. The four planets you > > >>> > mentioned > > >>> >> are strong, but Ve is badly placed in H12, and Me is within the > > >> close 5 > > >>> >> degree aspect of Ra. > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > >>> >> Best regards, > > >>> >> > > >>> >> Vyas Munidas > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > >>> >> - > > >>> >> <siha@> > > >>> >> > > >>> >> Monday, July 03, 2006 4:27 PM > > >>> >> Re: (unknown) > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > > >>> >> > Hello Mahendra, > > >>> >> > > > >>> >> > Congratulations. Your daughter has Mercury, Saturn, Sun and > > >> Moon as > > >>> >> > strong > > >>> >> > planets. There is no planet in the malefic houses. Rahu and > Ketu > > >>> > do not > > >>> >> > cause close afflictions in the chart. The chart augers > well for > > >>> > the child > > >>> >> > and for the family. > > >>> >> > > > >>> >> > Best wishes, > > >>> >> > > > >>> >> > > > >>> >> > www.YourNetAstrologer.com > > >>> >> > www.JyotishRemedies121.com > > >>> >> > A-105, South City II, Gurgaon 122018. (India) > > >>> >> > Phones: 91 124 - 2219240 > > >>> >> > Mobile 98110 16333 > > >>> >> > > > >>> >> > > > >>> >> > - > > >>> >> > " Mahendra " <mahendra_gr@> > > >>> >> > > > >>> >> > Monday, July 03, 2006 9:24 PM > > >>> >> > (unknown) > > >>> >> > > > >>> >> > > > >>> >> >> Learned Members: > > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> I have been blessed with a baby daughter born on > > >>> >> >> Jul 3, 2006 > > >>> >> >> 4:37 AM (+5 EST) > > >>> >> >> Longitude: 83W47 Latitude: 42N10 > > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> As its easy to get biased in looking at own family members > > >> horoscope, > > >>> >> >> I would sincerely appreciate any insights / strengths and > > >> weaknesses > > >>> >> >> in the horoscope. > > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> May the SATVA tribe increase. > > >>> >> >> With humble regards, Mahendra > > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted August 6, 2006 Pranam Vikasji As advised, I have been reciting the mantra as you said for 40 days. what should i do next? I ll start going to hanuman as from next tues. thanks Daminivikas <vikasjeer wrote: ||Om Ramdootaye Om||dear friend,I have made ur chart taking mare tabac as ur location.you seem to be in a very tense relationship.I will suggest some mantras,do it for min 21-days-break-21 days or 40 days at a streach without caring for your natural cycles."hreem shreem kreem chamundaaye viche" for 540 times daily( it would take almost 15 minutes). do this mantra before sleeping and after taking a bath.distribute yellow articles on saturdays.light a lamp in hanuman teple every tuesday.I have suggested these remedies considering you to be hindu,it there is some religious barrier please inform so that I may suggest some secular remedies.with regardsvikas91-9815458584p.s.: I have seen my mailbox flooding with e mails,please note that I offer free astrological guidance in this group ,the quality of analysis is in line with what I have learnt from my Gurus in the last 9 yrs without any discrimination between a paid or a free analysis.please dont send any e mails to me as I charge money for personal consultations.laalkitab , Rohit Sharma <dhanulagna wrote:>> dear i ha already told you that in my software kunli it was showing some error,> then i tried another and i think so, the lagan comes out to be leo or cancer.> i will again chk it. u have to wait dear. or vikas ji can also chk it.> thanx> > Damini Rajiah <drajiah wrote:> Hi Everybody> > Can anyone tell me what is there for me in the future:> > Concerning career, marriage.> > DOB - 11 DEc 1973 20:00 @mauritius (Longitude 57/31 East / latitude 20/31 South)> > Thanks.> > damini> > > > Want to be your own boss? Learn how on Small Business. > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]> > > > > > > Rohit Sharma> (sunny) > 91-9888079834 > 91-9876416285> > > Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger. > > Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted August 6, 2006 Dear Mrs Neelam, Your husband has good horoscope. If he is out of job. He would get very nice job in october. Your husband must have earned good wealth and wealth by wrong means also. Have a nice Day. dear group members, my husband birth details are as under 20-06-1956 Simla time:10:09 pm he is out of job these days. he had a consistent tenure for around 20 yrs in an organisation but for last 4 yrs he had worked in four companys and is forced to quit the job after few months of joining . kindly look into when he is likely to get job and settle down finally in it. upaya may also b advised, if any. he is doing fast on saturdays and is wearing pearl and opal . regards mrs neelam ------------ --------- --------- --- Get on board. You're invited to try the new Mail Beta. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted October 17, 2006 hi As per planetary position you had explained, I roughly gather that his or her date of birth is around 27th to 29th November 1971 or 1970, and his or her birth time 00-35 hours ( at midnight after 12-00). With best wishes, Ajay Pandav 9422202500 --- Radha Viswanathan <denver_radha wrote: > Respected pandits > > Is there any possible to find out the birth time > on the basis of Rasi chart given by the native As > they lost birth time details it is not possible to > find out the dasa period. > The native knows the planetary position as follows > > Lagna..........in simha with ketu > 3 house.......occupied by sukra & guru in Tula > 4th house.....ocupied by surya and Bhuda > 5thhouse......none in Dhanur rasi > 6th house.....occupied by Mars in makara > .7th house ....occupied by chandra with Rahu > 8th house......occupied by none in meena > 9th house......occupied by sani in mesham > > When the native's family want to find out his > future from the astrologers who wants the birth time > or on which maha dasa he was born. Unfortunately > this two important details they lost and they do not > remember. As a well wisher of them, I request you to > tell me is there any possible to know on which maha > dasa he would have born in KP system. Or in which KP > reader it is given. Please let me know > > Thanking you > msr > 9th house......sani in mesha > > > > Get your email and more, right on the new .com ________ India Answers: Share what you know. Learn something new http://in.answers./ Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted October 17, 2006 Dear Ajay How are you so sure of time as 00,35, when you have not pinponted, the date or year. What is your methodology. Ajay Pandav <leojay5 wrote: hi As per planetary position you had explained, I roughlygather that his or her date of birth is around27th to 29th November 1971 or 1970, and his or herbirth time 00-35 hours ( at midnight after 12-00).With best wishes,Ajay Pandav9422202500--- Radha Viswanathan <denver_radha > wrote:> Respected pandits> > Is there any possible to find out the birth time> on the basis of Rasi chart given by the native As> they lost birth time details it is not possible to> find out the dasa period.> The native knows the planetary position as follows> > Lagna..........in simha with ketu> 3 house.......occupied by sukra & guru in Tula> 4th house.....ocupied by surya and Bhuda> 5thhouse......none in Dhanur rasi> 6th house.....occupied by Mars in makara> .7th house ....occupied by chandra with Rahu> 8th house......occupied by none in meena> 9th house......occupied by sani in mesham> > When the native's family want to find out his> future from the astrologers who wants the birth time> or on which maha dasa he was born. Unfortunately> this two important details they lost and they do not> remember. As a well wisher of them, I request you to> tell me is there any possible to know on which maha> dasa he would have born in KP system. Or in which KP> reader it is given. Please let me know> > Thanking you> msr> 9th house......sani in mesha > > > > Get your email and more, right on the new .com________ India Answers: Share what you know. Learn something newhttp://in.answers./Good LuckRaichur A RBombay Tel 2506 2609 Get your email and more, right on the new .com Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted October 17, 2006 Jay Shree Krishna Dear Raichur ji, 1) SUN is in 4th means birth itme is approx. 00.00 to 2.00Am 2)SUN in Vrishchik means birth is during 16/11 to 16/12. in any year. 3) JUP in Tula means, at now JUP is in Tula that means befor 12 year or 24 year or 36 year was birth year.i.e.1994,1982,1970. 4)SAT is in Mesh as per native so if we check in all abve year: 1994 SAT was in Kumbha so no possiblity for 1994, in 1982 SAT was in Kanya and Tula No posiblity. In 1970 SAT Was in Mesha. 5) now we check 16/11/1969 to 15/12/1969 SAT transit in Mesha . and 16/11/1970 to 15/11/1970 also SAT in mesha. 6)As per Native VEN is conj with JUP in Tula.In 1969 VEN was in Dhna during 16/11 to 15/12. and VEN was in Tula during 16/11/to 15/12 in 1970. so native bourn during 16/11/1970 to 15/12/1970 is fix. 7)BUT AT THIS STAGE MAR NOT MATCH WTH DHANA. at that time MAR was in Kanya and Tula.but all planet match with givan chart.and i think native have no proper detals.other wise we can pinpont date like this.and MOOn conj with RAH on 4/5/6 Nov.1970 .only MAR not telly with other planet so in my opinion there is some misundersnading in givan details. hope it help regards Kanak BosmiaRaichur-a-r <raichurar wrote: Dear Ajay How are you so sure of time as 00,35, when you have not pinponted, the date or year. What is your methodology. Ajay Pandav <leojay5 (AT) (DOT) co.in> wrote: hi As per planetary position you had explained, I roughlygather that his or her date of birth is around27th to 29th November 1971 or 1970, and his or herbirth time 00-35 hours ( at midnight after 12-00).With best wishes,Ajay Pandav9422202500--- Radha Viswanathan <denver_radha > wrote:> Respected pandits> > Is there any possible to find out the birth time> on the basis of Rasi chart given by the native As> they lost birth time details it is not possible to> find out the dasa period.> The native knows the planetary position as follows> > Lagna..........in simha with ketu> 3 house.......occupied by sukra & guru in Tula> 4th house.....ocupied by surya and Bhuda> 5thhouse......none in Dhanur rasi> 6th house.....occupied by Mars in makara> .7th house ....occupied by chandra with Rahu> 8th house......occupied by none in meena> 9th house......occupied by sani in mesham> > When the native's family want to find out his> future from the astrologers who wants the birth time> or on which maha dasa he was born. Unfortunately> this two important details they lost and they do not> remember. As a well wisher of them, I request you to> tell me is there any possible to know on which maha> dasa he would have born in KP system. Or in which KP> reader it is given. Please let me know> > Thanking you> msr> 9th house......sani in mesha > > > > Get your email and more, right on the new .com________ India Answers: Share what you know. Learn something newhttp://in.answers./Good LuckRaichur A RBombay Tel 2506 2609 Get your email and more, right on the new .com >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying << Get your own web address for just $1.99/1st yr. We'll help. Small Business. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted October 17, 2006 Dear sir, Thanks for spending your valuable time and effort to give the birth time.In fact, one week before I requested this group for this same question.That time I gave his birth date. Once again I am giving the birth date. His mother was admitted on 17-11-1969.They say he was born after 12 midnight. They recorded as 18-11-1969. It is the official record now.My doubt is we hindus count the day from one sun rising to another sunrising. If so we should take his birth date as 17-11-1969. If you want anymore details I will try my best. Anyway once again I am thanking you for the details given by you.. with regards msrKanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia wrote: Jay Shree Krishna Dear Raichur ji, 1) SUN is in 4th means birth itme is approx. 00.00 to 2.00Am 2)SUN in Vrishchik means birth is during 16/11 to 16/12. in any year. 3) JUP in Tula means, at now JUP is in Tula that means befor 12 year or 24 year or 36 year was birth year.i.e.1994,1982,1970. 4)SAT is in Mesh as per native so if we check in all abve year: 1994 SAT was in Kumbha so no possiblity for 1994, in 1982 SAT was in Kanya and Tula No posiblity. In 1970 SAT Was in Mesha. 5) now we check 16/11/1969 to 15/12/1969 SAT transit in Mesha . and 16/11/1970 to 15/11/1970 also SAT in mesha. 6)As per Native VEN is conj with JUP in Tula.In 1969 VEN was in Dhna during 16/11 to 15/12. and VEN was in Tula during 16/11/to 15/12 in 1970. so native bourn during 16/11/1970 to 15/12/1970 is fix. 7)BUT AT THIS STAGE MAR NOT MATCH WTH DHANA. at that time MAR was in Kanya and Tula.but all planet match with givan chart.and i think native have no proper detals.other wise we can pinpont date like this.and MOOn conj with RAH on 4/5/6 Nov.1970 .only MAR not telly with other planet so in my opinion there is some misundersnading in givan details. hope it help regards Kanak BosmiaRaichur-a-r <raichurar > wrote: Dear Ajay How are you so sure of time as 00,35, when you have not pinponted, the date or year. What is your methodology. Ajay Pandav <leojay5 (AT) (DOT) co.in> wrote: hi As per planetary position you had explained, I roughlygather that his or her date of birth is around27th to 29th November 1971 or 1970, and his or herbirth time 00-35 hours ( at midnight after 12-00).With best wishes,Ajay Pandav9422202500--- Radha Viswanathan <denver_radha > wrote:> Respected pandits> > Is there any possible to find out the birth time> on the basis of Rasi chart given by the native As> they lost birth time details it is not possible to> find out the dasa period.> The native knows the planetary position as follows> > Lagna..........in simha with ketu> 3 house.......occupied by sukra & guru in Tula> 4th house.....ocupied by surya and Bhuda> 5thhouse......none in Dhanur rasi> 6th house.....occupied by Mars in makara> .7th house ....occupied by chandra with Rahu> 8th house......occupied by none in meena> 9th house......occupied by sani in mesham> > When the native's family want to find out his> future from the astrologers who wants the birth time> or on which maha dasa he was born. Unfortunately> this two important details they lost and they do not> remember. As a well wisher of them, I request you to> tell me is there any possible to know on which maha> dasa he would have born in KP system. Or in which KP> reader it is given. Please let me know> > Thanking you> msr> 9th house......sani in mesha > > > > Get your email and more, right on the new .com________ India Answers: Share what you know. Learn something newhttp://in.answers./Good LuckRaichur A RBombay Tel 2506 2609 Get your email and more, right on the new .com >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying << Get your own web address for just $1.99/1st yr. We'll help. Small Business. All-new Mail - Fire up a more powerful email and get things done faster. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted October 17, 2006 Dear msr, Yes I check again 18t/11/1969 is right date as per Graha detials givan. regards kanak Bosmia Radha Viswanathan <denver_radha wrote: Dear sir, Thanks for spending your valuable time and effort to give the birth time.In fact, one week before I requested this group for this same question.That time I gave his birth date. Once again I am giving the birth date. His mother was admitted on 17-11-1969.They say he was born after 12 midnight. They recorded as 18-11-1969. It is the official record now.My doubt is we hindus count the day from one sun rising to another sunrising. If so we should take his birth date as 17-11-1969. If you want anymore details I will try my best. Anyway once again I am thanking you for the details given by you.. with regards msrKanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia > wrote: Jay Shree Krishna Dear Raichur ji, 1) SUN is in 4th means birth itme is approx. 00.00 to 2.00Am 2)SUN in Vrishchik means birth is during 16/11 to 16/12. in any year. 3) JUP in Tula means, at now JUP is in Tula that means befor 12 year or 24 year or 36 year was birth year.i.e.1994,1982,1970. 4)SAT is in Mesh as per native so if we check in all abve year: 1994 SAT was in Kumbha so no possiblity for 1994, in 1982 SAT was in Kanya and Tula No posiblity. In 1970 SAT Was in Mesha. 5) now we check 16/11/1969 to 15/12/1969 SAT transit in Mesha . and 16/11/1970 to 15/11/1970 also SAT in mesha. 6)As per Native VEN is conj with JUP in Tula.In 1969 VEN was in Dhna during 16/11 to 15/12. and VEN was in Tula during 16/11/to 15/12 in 1970. so native bourn during 16/11/1970 to 15/12/1970 is fix. 7)BUT AT THIS STAGE MAR NOT MATCH WTH DHANA. at that time MAR was in Kanya and Tula.but all planet match with givan chart.and i think native have no proper detals.other wise we can pinpont date like this.and MOOn conj with RAH on 4/5/6 Nov.1970 .only MAR not telly with other planet so in my opinion there is some misundersnading in givan details. hope it help regards Kanak BosmiaRaichur-a-r <raichurar > wrote: Dear Ajay How are you so sure of time as 00,35, when you have not pinponted, the date or year. What is your methodology. Ajay Pandav <leojay5 (AT) (DOT) co.in> wrote: hi As per planetary position you had explained, I roughlygather that his or her date of birth is around27th to 29th November 1971 or 1970, and his or herbirth time 00-35 hours ( at midnight after 12-00).With best wishes,Ajay Pandav9422202500--- Radha Viswanathan <denver_radha > wrote:> Respected pandits> > Is there any possible to find out the birth time> on the basis of Rasi chart given by the native As> they lost birth time details it is not possible to> find out the dasa period.> The native knows the planetary position as follows> > Lagna..........in simha with ketu> 3 house.......occupied by sukra & guru in Tula> 4th house.....ocupied by surya and Bhuda> 5thhouse......none in Dhanur rasi> 6th house.....occupied by Mars in makara> .7th house ....occupied by chandra with Rahu> 8th house......occupied by none in meena> 9th house......occupied by sani in mesham> > When the native's family want to find out his> future from the astrologers who wants the birth time> or on which maha dasa he was born. Unfortunately> this two important details they lost and they do not> remember. As a well wisher of them, I request you to> tell me is there any possible to know on which maha> dasa he would have born in KP system. Or in which KP> reader it is given. Please let me know> > Thanking you> msr> 9th house......sani in mesha > > > > Get your email and more, right on the new .com________ India Answers: Share what you know. Learn something newhttp://in.answers./Good LuckRaichur A RBombay Tel 2506 2609 Get your email and more, right on the new .com >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying << Get your own web address for just $1.99/1st yr. We'll help. Small Business. All-new Mail - Fire up a more powerful email and get things done faster. >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying << Get your email and more, right on the new .com Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted October 18, 2006 kanak your thinking on right lines. only Mars, Considering SUN conj Merc both in Vrishick period is 17 to 28 Nov 1970. In this period moon rah conj is not seen. so the original data is not correct. Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia wrote: Jay Shree Krishna Dear Raichur ji, 1) SUN is in 4th means birth itme is approx. 00.00 to 2.00Am 2)SUN in Vrishchik means birth is during 16/11 to 16/12. in any year. 3) JUP in Tula means, at now JUP is in Tula that means befor 12 year or 24 year or 36 year was birth year.i.e.1994,1982,1970. 4)SAT is in Mesh as per native so if we check in all abve year: 1994 SAT was in Kumbha so no possiblity for 1994, in 1982 SAT was in Kanya and Tula No posiblity. In 1970 SAT Was in Mesha. 5) now we check 16/11/1969 to 15/12/1969 SAT transit in Mesha . and 16/11/1970 to 15/11/1970 also SAT in mesha. 6)As per Native VEN is conj with JUP in Tula.In 1969 VEN was in Dhna during 16/11 to 15/12. and VEN was in Tula during 16/11/to 15/12 in 1970. so native bourn during 16/11/1970 to 15/12/1970 is fix. 7)BUT AT THIS STAGE MAR NOT MATCH WTH DHANA. at that time MAR was in Kanya and Tula.but all planet match with givan chart.and i think native have no proper detals.other wise we can pinpont date like this.and MOOn conj with RAH on 4/5/6 Nov.1970 .only MAR not telly with other planet so in my opinion there is some misundersnading in givan details. hope it help regards Kanak BosmiaRaichur-a-r <raichurar > wrote: Dear Ajay How are you so sure of time as 00,35, when you have not pinponted, the date or year. What is your methodology. Ajay Pandav <leojay5 (AT) (DOT) co.in> wrote: hi As per planetary position you had explained, I roughlygather that his or her date of birth is around27th to 29th November 1971 or 1970, and his or herbirth time 00-35 hours ( at midnight after 12-00).With best wishes,Ajay Pandav9422202500--- Radha Viswanathan <denver_radha > wrote:> Respected pandits> > Is there any possible to find out the birth time> on the basis of Rasi chart given by the native As> they lost birth time details it is not possible to> find out the dasa period.> The native knows the planetary position as follows> > Lagna..........in simha with ketu> 3 house.......occupied by sukra & guru in Tula> 4th house.....ocupied by surya and Bhuda> 5thhouse......none in Dhanur rasi> 6th house.....occupied by Mars in makara> .7th house ....occupied by chandra with Rahu> 8th house......occupied by none in meena> 9th house......occupied by sani in mesham> > When the native's family want to find out his> future from the astrologers who wants the birth time> or on which maha dasa he was born. Unfortunately> this two important details they lost and they do not> remember. As a well wisher of them, I request you to> tell me is there any possible to know on which maha> dasa he would have born in KP system. Or in which KP> reader it is given. Please let me know> > Thanking you> msr> 9th house......sani in mesha > > > > Get your email and more, right on the new .com________ India Answers: Share what you know. Learn something newhttp://in.answers./Good LuckRaichur A RBombay Tel 2506 2609 Get your email and more, right on the new .com >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying << Get your own web address for just $1.99/1st yr. We'll help. Small Business. Good LuckRaichur A RBombay Tel 2506 2609 Get on board. You're invited to try the new Mail. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted October 18, 2006 Dear Msr The date is 18 Nov 1969, is correct, so are the Planetary positions, all of them. Now if you give us the Place of birth (lat and long) if possible I will try to fix the time. Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia wrote: Dear msr, Yes I check again 18t/11/1969 is right date as per Graha detials givan. regards kanak Bosmia Radha Viswanathan <denver_radha > wrote: Dear sir, Thanks for spending your valuable time and effort to give the birth time.In fact, one week before I requested this group for this same question.That time I gave his birth date. Once again I am giving the birth date. His mother was admitted on 17-11-1969.They say he was born after 12 midnight. They recorded as 18-11-1969. It is the official record now.My doubt is we hindus count the day from one sun rising to another sunrising. If so we should take his birth date as 17-11-1969. If you want anymore details I will try my best. Anyway once again I am thanking you for the details given by you.. with regards msrKanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia > wrote: Jay Shree Krishna Dear Raichur ji, 1) SUN is in 4th means birth itme is approx. 00.00 to 2.00Am 2)SUN in Vrishchik means birth is during 16/11 to 16/12. in any year. 3) JUP in Tula means, at now JUP is in Tula that means befor 12 year or 24 year or 36 year was birth year.i.e.1994,1982,1970. 4)SAT is in Mesh as per native so if we check in all abve year: 1994 SAT was in Kumbha so no possiblity for 1994, in 1982 SAT was in Kanya and Tula No posiblity. In 1970 SAT Was in Mesha. 5) now we check 16/11/1969 to 15/12/1969 SAT transit in Mesha . and 16/11/1970 to 15/11/1970 also SAT in mesha. 6)As per Native VEN is conj with JUP in Tula.In 1969 VEN was in Dhna during 16/11 to 15/12. and VEN was in Tula during 16/11/to 15/12 in 1970. so native bourn during 16/11/1970 to 15/12/1970 is fix. 7)BUT AT THIS STAGE MAR NOT MATCH WTH DHANA. at that time MAR was in Kanya and Tula.but all planet match with givan chart.and i think native have no proper detals.other wise we can pinpont date like this.and MOOn conj with RAH on 4/5/6 Nov.1970 .only MAR not telly with other planet so in my opinion there is some misundersnading in givan details. hope it help regards Kanak BosmiaRaichur-a-r <raichurar > wrote: Dear Ajay How are you so sure of time as 00,35, when you have not pinponted, the date or year. What is your methodology. Ajay Pandav <leojay5 (AT) (DOT) co.in> wrote: hi As per planetary position you had explained, I roughlygather that his or her date of birth is around27th to 29th November 1971 or 1970, and his or herbirth time 00-35 hours ( at midnight after 12-00).With best wishes,Ajay Pandav9422202500--- Radha Viswanathan <denver_radha > wrote:> Respected pandits> > Is there any possible to find out the birth time> on the basis of Rasi chart given by the native As> they lost birth time details it is not possible to> find out the dasa period.> The native knows the planetary position as follows> > Lagna..........in simha with ketu> 3 house.......occupied by sukra & guru in Tula> 4th house.....ocupied by surya and Bhuda> 5thhouse......none in Dhanur rasi> 6th house.....occupied by Mars in makara> .7th house ....occupied by chandra with Rahu> 8th house......occupied by none in meena> 9th house......occupied by sani in mesham> > When the native's family want to find out his> future from the astrologers who wants the birth time> or on which maha dasa he was born. Unfortunately> this two important details they lost and they do not> remember. As a well wisher of them, I request you to> tell me is there any possible to know on which maha> dasa he would have born in KP system. Or in which KP> reader it is given. Please let me know> > Thanking you> msr> 9th house......sani in mesha > > > > Get your email and more, right on the new .com________ India Answers: Share what you know. Learn something newhttp://in.answers./Good LuckRaichur A RBombay Tel 2506 2609 Get your email and more, right on the new .com >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying << Get your own web address for just $1.99/1st yr. We'll help. Small Business. All-new Mail - Fire up a more powerful email and get things done faster. >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying << Get your email and more, right on the new .com Good LuckRaichur A RBombay Tel 2506 2609 Talk is cheap. Use Messenger to make PC-to-Phone calls. Great rates starting at 1¢/min. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted October 18, 2006 both Kanak and Raichur committed mistake of not noting full facts given in the origional. This is also due to curtailing of past correspondece on the matter in letters. Raichur-a-r <raichurar wrote: kanak your thinking on right lines. only Mars, Considering SUN conj Merc both in Vrishick period is 17 to 28 Nov 1970. In this period moon rah conj is not seen. so the original data is not correct. Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia > wrote: Jay Shree Krishna Dear Raichur ji, 1) SUN is in 4th means birth itme is approx. 00.00 to 2.00Am 2)SUN in Vrishchik means birth is during 16/11 to 16/12. in any year. 3) JUP in Tula means, at now JUP is in Tula that means befor 12 year or 24 year or 36 year was birth year.i.e.1994,1982,1970. 4)SAT is in Mesh as per native so if we check in all abve year: 1994 SAT was in Kumbha so no possiblity for 1994, in 1982 SAT was in Kanya and Tula No posiblity. In 1970 SAT Was in Mesha. 5) now we check 16/11/1969 to 15/12/1969 SAT transit in Mesha . and 16/11/1970 to 15/11/1970 also SAT in mesha. 6)As per Native VEN is conj with JUP in Tula.In 1969 VEN was in Dhna during 16/11 to 15/12. and VEN was in Tula during 16/11/to 15/12 in 1970. so native bourn during 16/11/1970 to 15/12/1970 is fix. 7)BUT AT THIS STAGE MAR NOT MATCH WTH DHANA. at that time MAR was in Kanya and Tula.but all planet match with givan chart.and i think native have no proper detals.other wise we can pinpont date like this.and MOOn conj with RAH on 4/5/6 Nov.1970 .only MAR not telly with other planet so in my opinion there is some misundersnading in givan details. hope it help regards Kanak BosmiaRaichur-a-r <raichurar > wrote: Dear Ajay How are you so sure of time as 00,35, when you have not pinponted, the date or year. What is your methodology. Ajay Pandav <leojay5 (AT) (DOT) co.in> wrote: hi As per planetary position you had explained, I roughlygather that his or her date of birth is around27th to 29th November 1971 or 1970, and his or herbirth time 00-35 hours ( at midnight after 12-00).With best wishes,Ajay Pandav9422202500--- Radha Viswanathan <denver_radha > wrote:> Respected pandits> > Is there any possible to find out the birth time> on the basis of Rasi chart given by the native As> they lost birth time details it is not possible to> find out the dasa period.> The native knows the planetary position as follows> > Lagna..........in simha with ketu> 3 house.......occupied by sukra & guru in Tula> 4th house.....ocupied by surya and Bhuda> 5thhouse......none in Dhanur rasi> 6th house.....occupied by Mars in makara> .7th house ....occupied by chandra with Rahu> 8th house......occupied by none in meena> 9th house......occupied by sani in mesham> > When the native's family want to find out his> future from the astrologers who wants the birth time> or on which maha dasa he was born. Unfortunately> this two important details they lost and they do not> remember. As a well wisher of them, I request you to> tell me is there any possible to know on which maha> dasa he would have born in KP system. Or in which KP> reader it is given. Please let me know> > Thanking you> msr> 9th house......sani in mesha > > > > Get your email and more, right on the new .com________ India Answers: Share what you know. Learn something newhttp://in.answers./Good LuckRaichur A RBombay Tel 2506 2609 Get your email and more, right on the new .com >> I Love Walking In Rain Because Nobody Can See Me Crying << Get your own web address for just $1.99/1st yr. We'll help. Small Business. Good LuckRaichur A RBombay Tel 2506 2609 Get on board. You're invited to try the new Mail. Good LuckRaichur A RBombay Tel 2506 2609 Talk is cheap. Use Messenger to make PC-to-Phone calls. Great rates starting at 1¢/min. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted October 26, 2006 My experience so far with Shri MP Bala in Pune has also been good! You may contact him on 020-2589-7784 or 94220-09334 RegardsDeepak From: baggyb1975Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 11:04:05 +0000 (unknown) can any one give me address of nadi jyotish in pune Be one of the first to try Windows Live Mail. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted October 29, 2006 Respected Radhaji, It is not that difficult that U yourself can not work wout. Ask the age of the native.U can ask elder and older people in the locality who were others who took birth in the that year, Month etc. So U can decide the year of birth. Sun's position tells the month of the birth. Moon will tell that day. Now Mother or Father or any body who was present at the time of birth who can tell afternoon,evening, night etc. Verify this with position of Lugna ( Singh-Leo as U gave here) And now go for the ruling planets at the moment whin all the above details are in hand and U have storng desire to know the time of the birth. and that's all. =insighter= Radha Viswanathan <denver_radha wrote: Respected pandits Is there any possible to find out the birth time on the basis of Rasi chart given by the native As they lost birth time details it is not possible to find out the dasa period. The native knows the planetary position as follows Lagna..........in simha with ketu 3 house.......occupied by sukra & guru in Tula 4th house.....ocupied by surya and Bhuda 5thhouse......none in Dhanur rasi 6th house.....occupied by Mars in makara .7th house ....occupied by chandra with Rahu 8th house......occupied by none in meena 9th house......occupied by sani in mesham When the native's family want to find out his future from the astrologers who wants the birth time or on which maha dasa he was born. Unfortunately this two important details they lost and they do not remember. As a well wisher of them, I request you to tell me is there any possible to know on which maha dasa he would have born in KP system. Or in which KP reader it is given. Please let me know Thanking you msr 9th house......sani in mesha Get your email and more, right on the new .com Find out what India is talking about on - Answers India Send FREE SMS to your friend's mobile from Messenger Version 8. Get it NOW Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
