Guest guest Report post Posted July 6, 2006 Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " pliantheart " <pliantheart@> > wrote: > > > I relate > > both abrupt and as if nothing had happened at all > > > > and as in my account, no finding of an It, > > but an *ending* of something false. > > > > what is left is simply What Is. > > > > which in retrospect is seen to have always been, > > but had always been occluded by the false. > > > > Bill > > Bill -- > > Never could be " really " occluded -- > > So, only " as if " occluded - due to belief, > " as if " belief could determine reality (it can't " really " ) > > ;-) > > -- Dan > Maybe you're right Dan... would you settle for " virtually occluded " ? Bill Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted July 6, 2006 Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " pliantheart " <pliantheart@> > > wrote: > > > > > I relate > > > both abrupt and as if nothing had happened at all > > > > > > and as in my account, no finding of an It, > > > but an *ending* of something false. > > > > > > what is left is simply What Is. > > > > > > which in retrospect is seen to have always been, > > > but had always been occluded by the false. > > > > > > Bill > > > > > Occlusion is part of what is. > > Actually, without it, nothing would be. > > > toombaru from the south end of a bull moving northwards, there is emiited the sweet smell of success, and the stuff of the same substance as this conclusion on occlusion..........and from such an illusion this contusion and confusion, is dirt poor ambrosia for fools of the flocks of would be sheep.......but a nice try all the same. ..........bob Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted July 6, 2006 Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " pliantheart " <pliantheart@> > > wrote: > > > > > I relate > > > both abrupt and as if nothing had happened at all > > > > > > and as in my account, no finding of an It, > > > but an *ending* of something false. > > > > > > what is left is simply What Is. > > > > > > which in retrospect is seen to have always been, > > > but had always been occluded by the false. > > > > > > Bill > > > > > > Occlusion is part of what is. > > Actually, without it, nothing would be. > > > toombaru > Occlusion implies separation. In the living Now... no separation no occlusion just vibrant Life. Bill PS: occlusion is " to someone " ... but when the " someone " dissolves into the living Now... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
