Avinash

Chinese government claims Tibet as an integral part of China. Though Tibetans are demanding freedom.

I am not a fascist. Do you support what VHP does?

VHP has no right to keep instructing the government of India what to do.

If somebody knows everything that is going to happen, then we can not have free will. Of course we feel that we have free will, but that is not the same as really having free will.

If somebody knows everything that is going to happen, then we can not have free will. Of course we feel that we have free will, but that is not the same as really having free will.

Those who know me personally do not at all find me lively, charming. This is because I do not socialize much. This is because I have found that people pretend a lot in the name of being social. Not only that, I have also found that many consider it good. I just hate pretending things. I have noticed that, in order to be called as social, it does not matter how much you really care for a person and how much you really help. It matters how much you pretend that you care.

41-50 POINTS: Others see you as fresh, lively, charming, amusing, fun > and always interesting; someone whose constantly the center of > attention, but sufficiently well- balanced not to let it go to your > head. They also see you as kind, considerate & understanding; someone > who will always cheer them up and help them out. _______ The first line is not at all true.

Where is the original teachings of Saankhya that the original Lord Kapila thought. It is in the chapters twinty five through thirty three of Bhagvatam.

It is true that many Muslim invaders in the past did many wrong things to India. But, why should the present Muslims be punished for that? Some people say that they are setting things right. So, somebody does something wrong and you they somebody else. This is how they are setting things right. I find this completely illogical. I am not saying that if some Muslims do wrong, you should always forgive. I understand that they may take advantage if they are always forgiven. If you want to punish them, then punish. But punish only those who did wrong. In Godhra some Muslims killed some Hindus inside a train. Those Muslims should be caught and hanged. But whom did the Hindus kill in revenge? Did they really kill the same Muslims who were responsible for Godhra carnage? No. They killed many innocent Muslims. I am not saying that only Hindus are killing innocent Muslims. Muslims also kill innocent Hindus. Some Muslims kill innocent Hindus. Then Hindus kill innocent Muslims to take revenge. Then again Muslims kill innocent Hindus to take revenge. This cycle continues. But when is this cycle going to end? Why is it that revenge is not taken on those who did wrong but on those who are innocent? This is either because the culprits are long dead or they cannot be found. Somebody has to be punished. Therefore innocent people are caught and murdered. I remember a story which I had read in my school days. Somebody had to be hanged. But the loop of the rope proved to be too big for him. So, the king ordered that some fat person be found and hanged. I bet that these Hindus and Muslims who are killing each other will laugh at the foolishness of the king. But they are indulging in the same foolish activity. In many schools a teacher punishes all the students of a classroom if he/she is not able to find out which student did the mischief. This is also foolishness. It is really a matter of shame that people are very happy restricting their personalities. When there is some fight between two groups of people in India one of who are Hindus and the other Muslims, then people forget that they are all Indians. They think of themselves as Hindus and Muslims. When there is some fight between forward caste Hindus and backward caste Hindus, then they forget that they are Hindus; they think in terms of forward caste and backward caste. When there is fight between persons of two forward castes, then they even forget that they are forward castes. Now they think of the castes to which they belong. People have made circles around themselves and they are happy restricting themselves within those circles. At every opportunity, they decrease the radii of these circles thus restricting themselves further. The government is also responsible for it to a large extent because they are dividing people by having different laws for people of different religions, and by considering castes in the matters of employment and promotions. How long are we going to restrict ourselves? When will we expand our horizons?

What is IT? Information Technology /images/graemlins/smile.gif

It is true that feathers will have more volume. But I was asking the reading of spring balance. The answer is that the spring balance will show more reading for iron than for feathers. Your answer was just the opposite. Your intuition failed.

It is true that feathers will have more volume. But I was asking the reading of spring balance. The answer is that the spring balance will show more reading for iron than for feathers. Your answer was just the opposite. Your intuition failed.

Pound is a unit of weight. So, they will weigh the same. Now, let us twist the question a little. Using a spring balance, I find the weight of iron of mass 1 kg. Then, I find the weight of feathers of mass 1 kg (again using a spring balance). Which of the two results will be more?

Pound is a unit of weight. So, they will weigh the same. Now, let us twist the question a little. Using a spring balance, I find the weight of iron of mass 1 kg. Then, I find the weight of feathers of mass 1 kg (again using a spring balance). Which of the two results will be more?

If a ram hits an object with his head with x amount of force it will have a predictable result. If a human hits the same onbject in the same way with an equal amount of force the result will be the same. Right Avinash? Yes, you are right. Assuming the other factors are same, the result will be the same. I remember an incident. A few years back, I was helping somebody solve a problem in Mechanics in which there was a pully of a given mass and a given radius and which could rotate. There was a rope hanging across the pulley. There was a stone of mass M1 tied to one end and another stone of mass M2 tied to another end. After solving the problem, I just replaced the stone of mass M1 by a monkey of the same mass. I had pains to explain to that person that the result will be the same. In Newton's law the intention does not matter, which matters a lot in the law of karma.

If a ram hits an object with his head with x amount of force it will have a predictable result. If a human hits the same onbject in the same way with an equal amount of force the result will be the same. Right Avinash? Yes, you are right. Assuming the other factors are same, the result will be the same. I remember an incident. A few years back, I was helping somebody solve a problem in Mechanics in which there was a pully of a given mass and a given radius and which could rotate. There was a rope hanging across the pulley. There was a stone of mass M1 tied to one end and another stone of mass M2 tied to another end. After solving the problem, I just replaced the stone of mass M1 by a monkey of the same mass. I had pains to explain to that person that the result will be the same. In Newton's law the intention does not matter, which matters a lot in the law of karma.

Shashi ji, What is the version of Internet Explorer you are using? Or, are you using Netscape?

Shashi ji, When I saw the first post from the new Sashi, I could understand that it was not you. I think Theist ji also must have understood it.

Who is the author of the Bhagvatam as it is found currently?

According to Merriam-Webster dictionary, gay means: - happy, exuberant, having or inducing high spirits, bright, lively. So, I agree that the test is really accurate. /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif

IP addresses of posters can be easily checked by the moderator. So, you should not worry that somebody may try to be the impostor of you. In any case, it is easy to find out if it is really you making a post (from the writing style).

Shashi ji, I was wondering why I was not seeing posts from you. Nice to know that you are still posting. Love you.

Why is your one eye flickering? Did you see a handsome guy (if you are a female) or a beautiful lady (if you are a male)? /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif Wish you and all other members of these forums a very happy and prosperous new year.

It is proper not to mention the religion of criminals, otherwise it may lead to fight between two religious communities.

The schoolbooks are notable for their elision of many awkward facts, like the assassination of Mahatma Gandhi by a Hindu nationalist in 1948. The assassination of Mahatma Gandhi was added in the revised version. But it was not emphasised that the person who killed him was a Hindu. According to the head of the committee, it will be bad to emphasised that he was a Hindu. He says that if it is said that the murderer of Gandhi was a Hindu, then one must mention that the murderer of Mrs. Indira Gandhi was a Sikh. These will give rise of religious intolerance.