sant

Even non Vaisnav texts show that krisna is the source of al read devi bhagwatam.posting and hav u com acros sanat kumar samhit im shore you must its in the shiva purana

Bhavisya purana

Ken111 do u have some vision also

im sorry ididnt mean to hurt you

please

but atleast read my post and answer

you are posting again and again ignoring what im asking you

no no no...Don't try to avoid the the allegation by saying,"Vivekananda has popularized vedanta."

 

he was following ramakrishna who claims to be an avtar of vishnu

truth is swami vivekanada did popularize veda though through mayavad view

read about vivekananda he is a great soul

Siva alone exists in Himself.

He is the Impersonal Absolute Brahman.

 

 

he finally says what i want him to

goutham if you know sanskrit find out the meaning of this verse

i m shore you will cause you talk about gita

brahmaṇo hi pratiṣṭhāham

amṛtasyāvyayasya ca

śāśvatasya ca dharmasya

sukhasyaikāntikasya ca

now please come out of your fanatic trance

prince goutham personality

understanding my questions-nil

intelligence quotient=corrupted

able to answer simple yes or know=nil

talking off topic=100%

are you answering me ?

do you agree on shivohum

<!-- / message -->

srila prabhupada saw krisna all the time

he is a great devotee

his teachings are great and based on vedas

not being

able to use your genitals except for procreation are Vedic.

 

this he said because he wanted to tell you to control sexual desires and have sex to create babies rather than to enjoy sex and lust.

now isnt this in the vedas .

he teaches on the basis of vedas

thanks

do you agree on shivohum

Shiva Is Not Mentioned In The Vedas Ive Heard Give Me A Verse

shive Not Rudra

But Then The Christiians Were Not Following Vedic Laws .

So How Does Thou Shall Not Kill Apply To Them?

I Guess You Were A Non Hindu Earlier [no Ofense]so You Must Know

They Have Turkey In Christmas With Wine

And Beleive In Nonsense Santa Claus Theories

Now Children Are Forgetting True Christmas Spirit

But Srila Prabhupada Himself Says That In Self Defence One Can Kill

So Thou Shall Not Kill Can Be Intepreted In Different Ways

In that part of the world at that time there was scarcity of grains, fruits and vegetables.

So, even it says in Veda that in emergency in absence of sufficient food grains that even meat and fish can be eaten.

 

Srila Prabhupada recommended that if they eat meat that to eat the lower animals first like fish, pigs or dogs but to not eat the cow under any circumstance.

 

So, eating fish is not much different than killing plants which also have life.

Ultimately, even the vegetarian kills plants and insects in the production of food.

So, the Vedic standard is to not eat meat if at all possible.

In emergency you can.

 

Even Prabhupada recommended that animals can die naturally and then the meat can be eaten without any bad karma of killing the animal.

 

It is not the meat-eating that is so bad, but the killing of the animal that is the bad karma.

 

In emergency then fish is the first kind of meat that humans can eat with minimum karma as fish are very low life forms.

 

Fruit-of-the-ganga...........

THANKS SONIC YOGI

If you really want to see the little people that can bee seen on Salvia you must smoke a concentrated extract

WHATS THIS

In short, your meat-eating theory has no scriptural support. It's origin lies in the minds of some Brahmanas from 2000 years ago.

 

NO BHAGWAD GITA TALKS ABOUT SATWIK FOOD,PURANAS SUPPORT BEING SATWIC BRAHMANAS ARE NOT ALLOWED TO EAT ANY MEAT EXCEPT FEW CASES

THE THING IS DIFFERENT FOR DIFFERENT CLASSES

HAVE YOU READ MAHABHARAT REMEMBER YUDHISTHARS JUDGEMENT ON HOW HE HANDLES THE CASE OF THE DIFFERENT CLASSES OF PEOPLE[bRAHMAN,SHUDRA,KHSATRIYA,VAISHYA] WHO HAD TOGETHER KILLED A MAN.EACH WERE GIVEN DIFFERENT PUNISHMENTS

BESIDES KILLING ANIMALS FOR SATISFYING YOUR TAMO GUN TASTE IS NO GOOD THING

Jesus said "though shalt not kill".

I HAVE A DOUBT ON THIS

IF THAT WAS TRUE THEN WHY WOULD JESUS HELP THE FISHER MAN TO CATCH FISH

AND ALSO THE SOLDIERS AND PEOPLE OF LAW KILL CRIMINALS

IS THAT NOT KILLING

BUT THAT IS JUSTIFIED IS IT?

Quote:

<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=6 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR><TD style="BORDER-RIGHT: #666666 1px solid; PADDING-RIGHT: 3ex; BORDER-TOP: #666666 1px solid; PADDING-LEFT: 3ex; BORDER-LEFT: #666666 1px solid; BORDER-BOTTOM: #666666 1px solid" bgColor=#e0e0e0>Originally Posted by kaisersose

Wrong Again. You are still holding on to the Shaivism = Advaita theory, which is wrong.

Shaivas see their final abode as Kailsas where they will reside with Shiva. Most of them never even heard of Brahman nor are are they interested.

There is world beyond the little ikscon world you lvie in, in case you want to explore and learn the truth.

Cheers

</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>

<!-- END TEMPLATE: bbcode_quote -->DO YOU KNOW MOST SHAIV ARE NIRGUN

I THINK ONLY AGHORIS ARE SAGUN

READ ABOUT SHAIVISM AND COME

I totally agreed with you Brother As Hari and Hara are one and the same

 

 

DO YOU BELIEVE NOW OH SHAIV BELEIVER

Im Sorry No Disrespect I Thought It Was In Usa

Yes So How Can Contact You That Is If You Want