RadhaMukunda

Bolo Brahma, Bolo Brahma

Hare Hare Brahma,

Shiva Shiva Brahma,

Brahma to the rescue.

LOL

He has God, he lives in the highest heaven. He has knowledge of the four Vedas. He is father of us all.

AUM Vedaatmane Purushaaya Brahmane Namah

AUM hiranyagarbhaya Namah

Vidhaata ko Namaskaar

Chaturmukha ki Jay Ho, Jay Ho

Brahma JI ko Namaskaar Hai

AUM Namo Brahma Devaya

Vishnu and Shiva are both Jivas. The only true god is Shakti Durga.

But her name is Lalita, or is it Maha Laxmi or Maha Kali? Actually, it is maha Saraswati and her Lord Brahma Deva. Namo Brahma Devaya, he is the only god. But he has no ego, so he let you worship the other gods. It say he is the creator, and the creator is God, right? Vishnu and Shiva are serving Brahma's Creation. I only bow to that Brahma Deva, with four heads who spoke the vedas. Shiva doesn't want you to worship Brahma and cursed him, Vishnu constantly tells he is better than Brahma. But Brahma Deva has no ego, I only bow down to him.

AUM namo Brahma Devaya

Brahma is the father of Shiva, he took a position above Vishnu. Satya Loka is the highest planet there is and there resides Brahma, with ParaShakti Saraswati. Vaikuntha is the lowest. And kailasha is only a small cold mountain. Satya Loka is the highest attainment of Yogis. Brahma is a brahmana, shiva is a kshatriya, and vishnu is a vaishya. Who is the highest??? Is it the Rigveda(Brahma), Yajurveda(Shiva) or the Samaveda(Vishnu)?

LOL LOL You are really stupid...

Forgive me, atleast you are the servants of servants. Maybe in one of your next lives, after worshipping Shiva or Vishnu for one thousand lifetimes, you may have the pleasure of worshipping Brahma Deva.

I know you have studied Vaishnava and Shaiva Puranas. But I know the Chaturanana Purana, which is only revealed to those who have been a sinless vipra for a hundred lifetimes. Now stop this silly debate and I may send you a copy of the Chaturanana purana.

It has spread to east and to the south in his own form. To the west it hasn't spread as hinduism, but all other religions in the world are in some way a reflection of Hinduism. Rituals like agnihotra were performed by the zoroastrans, in Rome the Mitras cult was present. The bible took some stories of Krishna and asigned them to Jesus etc.

Hare Krishna actually stands for Hari and Krishna, Hare is not the name of Laxmi as Srila Prabhupada wrote somewhere in his books. It's the vocative of Hari.

Namah and Swaha can be used both together. Like in AUM namah shivaya swaha, AUM namo bhagavate vasudevaya swaha etc. If you are talking about a mantra from the vedas or a specific mantra, like the dvadashakshara mantra, you can always place Swaha on the end even if namah has already been used. But if you would do homa with the Vishnu Sahasranamavali for example, you have to replace the namah's with swahah's.

Everytime you make an ahuti with the name of particular deity without a specific mantra, you place the name in the dative and only say swaha. For the Hare Krishna Maha Mantra,it would be like this.

Haraye Swaha

Ramaya Swaha

Krishnaya Swaha

The hare krishna maha mantra can also be used as an integer mantra. Like this:

Hare Rama Hare Rama Rama Rama Hare Hare

Hare Krishna Hare Krishan Krishna Krishna Hare Hare, Swaha

This can also be done with shlokas from the Bhagavad Gita, the Durga Sapta Shati and most mantras from the vedas. Nothing should be changed in the mantra or shloka.

yo mam eva asammudha janati purushotama

sa sarva vid bhajate mam sarva bhavena bharata, swahah

bhagavad gita

sarva mangala mangalye shive sarvartha saadhike

sharanye trayambake gauri narayani namostute, swahah

durga saptashati

namah shambavaya cha mayobhavaya

cha namah shivaya shivataraya cha, swahah

yajurveda

The Vishnu SahasraNama from the Padma Purana is very good, but it's incomplete. These are the introduction verses and nyaasa mantras.

You shan't be anyones' disciple, Right?

I am sorry, but whose disciple are you, it's not an English teacher, right?

???

The Jain way of life is impracticle in modern society and therefore it will soon extinct. Therefore I am not worried about Jains taking over our Sanatan Dharma. I am more worried about Muslims and other sects like ISCKON and Arya Samaj.

There is no confusion, AUM namo bhagavate rudraya vishnave mrityor me pahi.

Srila Prabhupadai's writings are not considered to be authoritive Shastra, like the vedas and puranas. His writings are only interpretations. But even Srila Prabhupada accepts the Puranas as authoritive works, often quoting from the padma purana and the brahmavaivarta purana to support his arguments. If you would study these two puranas, you will find that there are two classes of people mentioned who are not considered vaishnavas. Not even by Vishnu himself. These are first, the person who regards Shiva and Krishna as different and second, the person who regards Radha and Krishna as different.

Not only are they disregarded as vaishnavas, it is also mentioned that their right are the hellish planets after death. Shiva is Vishnnu, and Vishnu is Shiva. Radha is Krishna, Krishna is Radha. If you cannot accept this, you are only pretending to be a vaishnava. Study the Puranas thoroughly and you will see that the ISCKON philosophy has no foundation in the Hindu Shastras. Bhaktajan, Bhakti is like a ripe fruit. You have heard about it, you have talked about it, you have seen it, you have smelled it, but I promise you, Bhaktajan, you have not tasted it, not yet.

Bhaktajan, I hope you are capable to think about this and maybe even curious to do some research and study the puranas independant of Srila Prabhupada Ji's interruptions. Followers of an Acharya might be stubborn and never change in opinion and belief. But their children and grandchildren will not understand these stupid quarrels between devotees and therfore convert from Sanatana Dharma to other religions. "Allah is the supreme and only God, no debate." and "Jesus is our saviour, no fighting about that." They will regard Hinduism as obscure, only because they were deprived from the essence of it.

The Sanatan Dharm has such a beatifull and rich philosophy. But these acharyas in Kali Yuga mislead their disciples and tell them not to read the puranas. They'll tell you it will only confuse you. They want to keep you in the dark. I will only say this. If your intellect is small, you will get confused. Yasya Svayam Nasti Pragya, Tasya Shastra karoti kim? But if you are intelligent enough, you should atleast read the Markandeya Purana, the Bhagavat Purana, the Vishnu Purana, the Shiva Purana and any other Maha Purana by your choice. Read them in their original language if possible, or read an uncoloured translation. Then you can make up your mind about Shiva and Vishnu, not before. Not without knowledge.

AUM namo bhagavate rudraya vishnave mrityor me pahi.