First to 20 - Page 3

bija · 01-21-2007, 05:57 PM

Quote:

Theorem: 1=2

Proof:

1. let A=1
2. let B=A
3. multiply both sides of (2.) by A, you get AB=A2
4. subtract B2 from both sides, you get AB-B2=A2-B2
5. factor left and right hand sides, you get B(A-B)=(A-B)(A+B)
6. divide both sides by (A-B), you get B=A+B
7. plug A=1 and B=A into (6.), you get 1=2

Quote:

Epimenides (c. 7 century B.C.) once made a long pilgrimage to meet Buddha. When he finally met him, Epimenides said, "I have come to ask a question. What is the best question that can be asked and what is the best answer that can be given?"

Buddha replied, "The best question that can be asked is the question you have just asked, and the best answer that can be given is the answer I am giving."

01-21-2007, 06:11 PM

Im speaking for myself here. I accept their rulings, but their taking me over is a bit much. If they didnt surf, Id protest vigorously, but Ill cut them a bit of slack. Plus, now they are taking over bija, making demands that, in my ol hippie opinion, are rather harsh. The 747 thing is okay, but how about a volkswagen bus painted in day glo?

Now, rules dudes, since you have taken my service, I demand service in return, which is only fair, and you do claim to be fair, dont you? My request is that you allow bija to go to SF if he wants to, even in future lives. He can also go to golden gate park during the day, during the summer, but I stand by your ben and jerries decision. Please make available some Stoneyfield organic ice cream, guaranteed free from all prohibited foods.

I mean, really, rules dudes, yer doin the surf thing up north, and will probable catch some good ones at trinidad beach as you please as well, because all marin dudes like to go up past garberville and do the eureka thing. So easy on the restrictions. We are here competing, its not like we accept your absoluteness anyway.

So, I speak out, I hope they take alternative viewpoints from those they feel free to possess as they will. Ive had trouble with that before, my outspokenness always gets me in trouble.

ouch

stop

&^%

^ (&%$#@****&&

^&*(&

^*&*&^*(*

&%*&^**&%

%(^*%&^(

^^&*%(&*^%&(^%&%(*

&(^(*&*^^&%

^35435&%^%

$&

Ok, no ice cream for bija, and no flute playing.

You are lucky bija, You almost got sent to long beach mahak

Avinash · 01-21-2007, 08:43 PM

Avinash · 01-21-2007, 08:45 PM

Prof. biza has proved 1 = 2. But he has done one step of dividing by zero (though he did not write it explicitly). This is illegal. However, you can prove there are many winning numbers without doing any such thing. You will see that in the next post.

Avinash · 01-21-2007, 08:51 PM

The post that contains the number six is a winning post and that post has already been made by Mr. Avinash, who likes to find loophole in laws.
The rule says that 20 is a winning number. But it does not say what base to be used. The participants are assuming the base to be 10, but it is nowhere specified.
Assuming 20 is written in base 3, the equivalent number in decimal system is 2 * 3 + 0 = 6

Mr. Avinash should be given the first prize for writing the winning number before any other. But others also have chance to win.
Base = 4: 20 = 2 * 4 + 0 = 8
Base = 5: 20 = 2 * 5 + 0 = 10

and so on.
(As claimed earlier, any even number greater than or equal to six is a winning number.)

01-22-2007, 11:26 AM

"Six does not win, we use only sacred geometry. there is only nine numbers. 16108=7. 666=9. 108=9. 2231950=4. 22+31+950=4 2+23+1950=4

the placement of +,-,*, makes no difference on the outcome.

6+6+6=18=9
6*6*6=216=9

16+10+8=34=7
16*10*8=1240=7

this is a demonstration, but it is flawed because of the use of 0, a bogus concoction of the voidist over the years. Only demons and fools even use 0s. But we make concessions, use thei calandars, clocks, etc.

Enough, we go eat ice cream and surf, avinash claim of victory rejected"

RC via the back-in-the-fold mahak

01-22-2007, 11:27 AM

Avinash · 01-22-2007, 12:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Guest (mahak)

avinash claim of victory rejected

Avinash's solicitor wishes to present an argument. Six is a winning number if 3 is a valid base. However commonly 10 is taken to be the base of number system. If so, then six is not a valid number. Before the opposing party jumps with joy in court, the solicitor would like to finish his argument. If only 10 is taken as valid base, then even 2 is not a valid base. But the computer through which both parties are giving their arguments is based on the base 2. If 2 cannot be taken as base, then computers do not exist, Internet does not exist, web sites do not exist, Audarya Fellowship does not exist, Good Clean Jokes forum does not exist, this thread does not exist, and posts in this thread do not exist.
If the rival party accepts that all these things do not exist, then Mr. Avinash's will forego his claim of victory (when the contest does not exist, what does not victory mean?)

bija · 01-22-2007, 01:50 PM

Quote:

Prof. biza has proved 1 = 2. But he has done one step of dividing by zero (though he did not write it explicitly).

Quote:

this is a demonstration, but it is flawed because of the use of 0, a bogus concoction of the voidist over the years.

Proffessor Biza's mathematical formula was a cut and paste, being totally unaware of the inclusion of zero. He has been duped into the zero philosophy by slight of hand of the non-existence of the computer age. Being unaware of the non-existence of the jokes forum his intentions were surely just play.

Quote:

Only demons and fools even use 0s. quote by mahak

By claiming innocence and poor use of guile, he rejects this apparent label.

And since accepting the philosophy of sacred geometry will never go near ben and jerries again. Henceforth seeking organic filth free product.

bija · 01-22-2007, 01:51 PM

01-22-2007, 04:25 PM

Its very hard, though. Ive seen their happy cows, long grass, clean fields, mamas so happy that they have to turn the ice cream into milk.

BTW, in my dream last night, the rules dudes said that professor bija is faultless, that they committee is very favorable to all who have come to this thread.

I dont know what they will say about avinash's statement about forcing base 2 on everyone or else everything disappears. 2 is a strange number anyway.

mahak

Pankaja_Dasa · 01-22-2007, 06:47 PM

your're all banned

Surachandra Prabhu is the winner,
the prize is on it's way..

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.
No.21

Murali_Mohan_das · 01-24-2007, 02:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bija

I am not a number, I am a free man (Iron Maiden)

Actually, 1960's science fiction TV show, The Prisoner, starring Patrick McGoohan, is the source of that quote. I guess Iron Maiden have good taste in TV.

Here's another good quote:
"I've resigned," he fumes. "I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed, or numbered. My life is my own."

From:
http://www.amazon.com/Complete-Priso.../dp/B00005NKCQ

03-25-2007, 06:47 PM

bija · 03-25-2007, 09:29 PM

9 is a lucky number....

(10)

Break the walls, I'm coming out.
I'm not a prisoner, I'm a free man!

(Iron Maiden)

07-29-2007, 03:13 PM

The dudes upstairs reject your commentary. See next post.

07-29-2007, 03:13 PM

mahak · 08-11-2007, 10:30 AM

They are blaming me for only having ten valid entries. I told them to go after pankaja. Maybe bija ate the ice cream or went to golden gate after dark. Maybe avinash is right after all.

We need a gHari consult. I gotta tell em something, they are threatening Long Beach again, what would an avadhuta from the graveyard in the great white north do in belmont shore, other than get bashed again with white lightening and hash oil?

HELP.

mahak · 08-25-2007, 12:21 PM