Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Chanting of Maha Mantra

Rate this topic


sushanta

Recommended Posts

Where in the Vedas has it been written?

 

Please refer to the following document for some references on the Maha-mantra from the vast body of Vedic literature. The document has two sections, one for references from pre-Caitanya era and another for references from post-Caitanya era.

 

http://www.raganuga.com/literature/authors/madhava/maha-mantra-references.pdf

 

If I've missed out any, please drop me a note or post the references in this thread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hare Krsna

 

This is what I could find on the net I am not sure of the authenticity, maybe some of the learned souls here could help.

 

In article <3g4bq8$ds1@ucunix.san.uc.edu>,

anand hudli <ahudli@silver.ucs.indiana.edu> wrote:

> sa hovaca hiraNyagarbhah |

 

> Tr: Lord Brahma said:

 

> hare rAma hare rAma rAma rAma hare hare |

 

> Tr: O Hari, O Rama, O Hari, O Rama , O Rama O Rama, O Hari, O Hari!

 

> hare kRShNa hare kRShNa kRShNa kRShNa hare hare |

 

> Tr: O Hari, O Krishna, O Hari, O Krishna , O Krishna O Krishna,

> O Hari, O Hari!

 

> Note: Gaudiyas chant this mantra by reversing the order of> the two halves, ie. the Hare Krishna first and then the Hare Rama.

 

Actually, there has been a good reason for this reversal. This is how I have heard the story; I welcome any corrections. Sri Caitanya Mahaprabhu wanted to spread this maha-mantra to all the fallen souls of Kali Yuga, regardless of qualification. Now, technically, there are Vedic injunctions that the Vedic mantras (such as this

mantra of the Kalisantarana Upanishad) are not to be publically chanted, and they are never to be chanted by sudras, women, etc. In order to solve the problem, while keeping within the context of the Vedas and thus not offending the Brahmins, Mahaprbhu reversed the two halves. It is equally potent either way and this way it can

be freely distributed, chanted in sankirtan, etc.

 

Also, they seem to believe that the name Rama

here indicates Balabhadra and not Ramacandra! Now there are

Actually, there are a considerable number of explanations even among Gaudiya Vaisnava acaryas on the name-by-name explanation of this maha-mantra. Some say "rAma" means Ramacandra, others Balarama. Others point to a scriptural verse that indicates that rAma means "rAdhA-ramana", or

Krishna. Similarly, "hare" is seen as both vocative of "hari" and of "harA", the latter a name of Radharani.

 

 

Below is the link from which I have reproduced part here

 

http://www.hindunet.org/alt_hindu/1995_Jan_2/msg00041.html

 

Hare Krsna

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Actually, there has been a good reason for this reversal. This is how I have heard the story; I welcome any corrections. Sri Caitanya Mahaprabhu wanted to spread this maha-mantra to all the fallen souls of Kali Yuga, regardless of qualification. Now, technically, there are Vedic injunctions that the Vedic mantras (such as this

mantra of the Kalisantarana Upanishad) are not to be publically chanted, and they are never to be chanted by sudras, women, etc. In order to solve the problem, while keeping within the context of the Vedas and thus not offending the Brahmins, Mahaprbhu reversed the two halves. It is equally potent either way and this way it can

be freely distributed, chanted in sankirtan, etc.

 

 

I do not recall reading in any historical Gaudiya scripture that Mahaprabhu would have reversed anything. What is the basis of this idea? It sounds like a speculation to me. At any rate, the maha-mantra was not chanted publicly in any form at that time. The brahmins were mainly shaktas in Bengal.

 

 

 

Also, they seem to believe that the name Rama

here indicates Balabhadra and not Ramacandra! Now there are

Actually, there are a considerable number of explanations even among Gaudiya Vaisnava acaryas on the name-by-name explanation of this maha-mantra. Some say "rAma" means Ramacandra, others Balarama. Others point to a scriptural verse that indicates that rAma means "rAdhA-ramana", or

Krishna. Similarly, "hare" is seen as both vocative of "hari" and of "harA", the latter a name of Radharani.

 

 

Where do you find Gaudiya acaryas explaining the name "Rama" as anything other than Radha-Ramana?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Is chanting Vishnu Sahasranaam more powerful then doing 16 rounds on the mahamantra?

 

 

The phala-shruti of the Vishnu Sahasranama states the following:

 

sri rama rama rameti rame rame manorame

sahasra nama tat tulyam rama nama varanane

 

"If one chants the name of Lord Rama three times it is equal to chanting this thousand names of Lord Vishnu."

 

This is usually chanted along with the Sahasranama.

 

One single mahamantra has four Rama's contained within it. If you chant sixteen rounds of the mahamantra it will contain thousands of Lord Rama's names, thus bringing you the result of having chanted the Vishnu Sahasranama 1,000 times over.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Majority means majority of the faction of the people, who chant either of these two mantras.

 

 

Yes, I do understand English. The idea was that you'd name some groups of people who chant the mantra in a certain way, and we could then examine whether it is a majority or not.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

krishna-caitanyeti nama

mukhyan mukhyatamam prabhoh

helaya sakrid uccarya

sarva-nama-phalam labhet.

 

"The name Krishna Caitanya is the topmost and most important among all the names of the Lord. By chanting this name once, a person attains the results of chanting all the holy names of the Lord."

 

 

...do any other samprady chant this also?

 

 

Other sampradayas do not consider Sri Chaitanya to be an incarnation of Lord Krishna, thus they don't chant this mantra. Those belonging to other sampradayas who have come to understand Chaitanya as Krishna Himself generally take to the teachings of Chaitanya Mahaprabhu in the Gaudiya Sampradaya.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

In stead of writing about "Englishpower", etc. would you please try to answer the questions straighforwd as others are answering?

 

 

If you bothered to follow the links I presented, you will find 30+ pages of references on Maha-mantra in a document I've collected.

 

I cannot locate the exact question for which you are waiting for a straightforward reply, kindly repeat that. The post in which you commented is as follows:

 

 

In reply to:

 

<hr>

Majority means majority of the faction of the people, who chant either of these two mantras.

 

<hr>Yes, I do understand English. The idea was that you'd name some groups of people who chant the mantra in a certain way, and we could then examine whether it is a majority or not.

 

 

How about you replying to the question here?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have received your mail in woed, but due to some other preoccupied time factor, is not able to read the same so far, anyway thanks very much for the same.

 

My question is still as early, why the Mantra is sung as Hare Rama by ISCKON only where as in Vedas it starts with Hare Rama.

 

And there is no scriptures, which shows that Chaitanya Mahaprabhu has changed this mantra from Hare Rama to Hare Krishna.

 

FOrgive me if I am wrong.

 

Sushanta

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even I would like to know if in Kalisantarana Upanishad of the Yajur Veda its Hare Rama first then Hare Krishna why do we chant it as Hare krishna first.

 

I am sorry for my ignorance but I am just a bit curious about this. I am not looking for any scriptural verse to support anything, I just want to know of this out of curiosity.

 

Prabhuji please help.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...