Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  


Rate this topic

Recommended Posts

India could go to the moon (as per http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow.asp?artid=18898116 as follows)

<blockquote>Moon within our reach: Isro




MUMBAI: The report of the lunar mission task force, which was constituted by the Indian Space Research Organisation (Isro) last year, states that the moon is within India's reach.


The report, which was submitted to Isro chairperson K. Kasturirangan in July, emphasises that this country has the technical capability to launch an unmanned flight to the moon in five years.


The task force was headed by George Joseph, former director of the Ahmedabad-based Space Applications Centre. Its other members included space scientists P C Agarwal of the Tata Institute of Fundamental Research in Mumbai and N Bhandari of the Physical Research Laboratory at Ahmedabad. Its membersecretary was K. Thyagarajan of the Isro satellite centre in Bangalore.


Speaking to TNN from Ahmedabad on Monday, Joseph said, "Ours is the official report on India's mission to the moon. Our studies clearly indicate that this country has the technical capability to launch this mission and place a satellite in the lunar orbit for carrying out scientific studies."


He said it took quite some time to prepare the report because the task force members had to do a lot of research by carrying out computer simulations. Outlining some of the salient points in the recently- submitted report, he said:


The rocket to be used for the mission will be the highly-proven Polar Satellite Launch Vehicle.


After launch, the satellite will be initially placed in a particular orbit (the geo-synchronous transfer orbit).


At this point, it will fire its thruster motors,which will raise the satellite to the lunar orbit. The flight from launch to the lunar orbit is expected to last for five days.


A deep space network for communication purposes has to be set up prior to embarking on the lunar mission. One such unit can be set up at the tracking centre at Bangalore.


The project will cost less than Rs 400 crore, which includes setting up the deep space network.


Joseph said the Indian moon project arose out of Kasturirangan's vision to embark on such an exciting and challenging mission. According to Joseph, it has the backing of prestigious bodies like the Astronautical Society of India.


Once the Indian lunar mission is given the formal go-ahead by Kasturirangan, it will have be to be cleared at different levels in the government.


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

<h2>SMART Technology: Moon Mission to Test Solar Engine With No Limits</h2>


By Heather Sparks Staff Writer


posted: 07:00 am ET 31 July 2002


Electric power and ion propulsion are about to combine for only the second time to propel a spacecraft beyond Earth orbit. Next April the European Space Agency's SMART-1 lunar satellite heads off to explore the Moon from an orbital position.


Electric propulsion has been used in low-Earth telecommunications satellites for years, and a high-tech ion engine powered NASA's Deep Space 1 test craft from 1998 until late last year. But before this technology is ready for prime-time missions to other planets and beyond, more tests are needed.


While SMART-1 is slated to perform science experiments at the Moon, its main mission is to test this technology.


The engine being built for SMART-1 was originally designed by the Soviet space program in the 1970s. It does not burn fuel like chemical rockets; instead solar panels convert sunlight into electricity, which powers the atomic-scale propulsion system.


"There is no limit to where this technology may take us," said Denis Estublier, the propulsion engineer for the mission.


Most spacecraft use rockets for propulsion, but the rocket fuel hydrazine is enormously heavy. Burdensome fuel tanks limit payloads, from how many scientific instruments can be carried to the number of astronauts. It's virtually impossible to embark on any voyage beyond the Moon without the help of gravity assist -- looping around a planet for a slingshot effect -- which limits launch windows and creates long, meandering trajectories.


Electric propulsion avoids these problems.


"To get rid of gravity assist, a...more efficient propulsion system is needed, so that a craft can fly directly to Saturn for example, and not have to spend the time it takes go from Earth and then to Venus and then back again, before it finally travels out to Saturn," as the Cassini mission did, said John Brophy, a propulsion engineer at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory. The limits so far will be less than those imposed by chemical rockets.


Electric-ion propulsion is more efficient because its energy source (the solar panels) and the propulsion chemical (xenon) are separate, Estublier said. This way, the xenon atoms are used at an atomic scale, not on a massive scale like rocket fuel, which is both the fuel and energy source.


Instead of the blazing chemical fire of solid hydrazine rocket fuel creating momentum, on SMART-1 highly efficient lithium solar panels will power what's known as a Hall-effect thruster.


The thruster is a 6-inch (10-cm) ceramic chamber ringed with magnets. On one end of the chamber a cathode emits electrons generated by the solar panels. On the other end of the chamber a positively charged anode attracts the electrons.


As xenon gas is released into the chamber, electrons rush in with a momentum caused by the magnets and knock electrons off the xenon atoms. This creates positively charged xenon ions, and even more electrons. The electrons continue to bombard the xenon, creating even more positive xenon ions. The cathode then pushes the xenon ions out of the chamber in a glowing blue ion beam.


The atomic scale of the mechanism means the thrust on SMART-1 will be very small, equivalent to the pressure a sheet of paper applies to the palm of your hand. But because the xenon will be energized so much more efficiently than in a rocket, the ion engine will run much longer, Estublier said.


Over time the momentum of the craft will increase, eventually gaining speeds faster than a rocket would be able to produce.


"Imagine SMART-1 is a car that uses 10 times less gas," Estublier said. "The car may also go very slow when it starts, but it gains a certain velocity every hour that it runs."


The ability to run continuously, all the while gaining velocity, will aid energetically demanding missions such as the upcoming ESA trip to Mercury. This journey will demand more energy output than a trip to Mars or Venus, Giuseppe Racca, the SMART-1 project manager, said.


Racca reported last year in the science journal Planetary and Space Science that an electric propulsion spacecraft would take two-and-a-half years to reach Mercury, beating a conventional spacecraft by a year and four months. The extra weight of the rocket fuel would require gravity assists from both Earth and Venus, he said.


The low thrust of electric propulsion has another advantage: maneuverability. The tiny push of the thruster, pointed in different directions, will make for more precise orientation of the craft. NASA's Deep Space 1 mission tested the maneuvering capability of its thruster after an onboard star-tracking device broke down last year. The thruster's soft touch was able to control pitch and roll with more stability than the original steering mechanisms. Brophy said the images taken at that time were less shaky because of it.


Ion propulsion was first developed in the 1960s, but it wasn't taken seriously until recent changes at NASA forced planners to look for cheaper alternatives to space travel. Brophy and others say similar propulsion systems could one day make it possible to send dozens or hundreds of soup-can-sized spacecraft into orbit around Saturn or onto the surface of Mars.


Efficient propulsion will create more opportunities for solar system travel.


But getting to interstellar space will require more power. Nuclear-powered ion propulsion will be needed, said Brophy, who has worked almost exclusively on ion propulsion for 18 years.


If the success of DS1 is any indication, SMART-1 stands to be quite a successful test mission. DS1 exceeded expectations, and an identical test engine, still running in a vacuum chamber in a JPL lab, has processed three times the xenon it was design to handle.


The scientists at ESA expect SMART-1 will perform just as well, if not better. "You don't know until you fly it in space, and if something is wrong it will be too late," Estublier said. "But the Moon group has big expectations."


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

  • Create New...