Gandhi and M L King

[maadhav 0]

gandhi spoke for the majority (hindus).

M L KIng spone for the minority african community in US.

 

gandhi did not care for the interet of the majority he led.

M L King did.

 

democracy was a new thing in gandhi's country - india.

It was not new in M L King's country.

 

gandhi surrendered to the civil war threat by the 10 % polulation muslim minority who were/are anti-vedic.

M L King never had such threat to encounter.

 

gandhi divided the nation for muslims - made pakistan,

and still allowed the muslims to live in india.

M L King did not divide the nation.

 

gandhi created a permanent enemy at the border and also within who are muslims aligned to pakistan even when they are indian citizens.

M L King did not do anything like it.

 

gandhi met a bullet from an intellectual, an editor of a newspaper for the majority.

 

gandhi never read koran and hadith,

and did not know how barbaric islam is.

 

M L King had a dream, and it came true.

gandhi found after independece that he could not lead.

he totally failed to make the muslims non violent and apprecaite of teh vedic culture. instead he made teh nonviolent hindus cowards.

 

gandhans did/do corruption because it is non violent.

M L KIng's followers do not do corruption.

 

what more?