race theory of india

[Guest guest]

the main thing is how come 1 recognise in india of who comes from suerior race in india and who is not......the answer is simple...the more fair skinnedperson u find in india ...then more the aryan race conyent he has in him....and the more dark a person is ,,,then that shows the more of dravidic or indian race he has in him.......and one more thing aryans were not dark

people who r dark and claim that they belong to aryan stock is totally .,these ppl who r black n claim so r actually talkinbullshit as they change their name castes to show ppl tht they r of superior stock

[Guest guest]

Aryans and dravidians are one and the same."arya" means "great".Dravidian means living in "dravidam" or south India.

 

even bhramins living in south india are dravidians.Many bhramins use the surname "dravid".One classic case is Rahul dravid, indian cricket player.

 

theory of fair people being aryans is ..Bhramins did not go ouyt of temple and homes to earn.So they did not get dark in sunlight.Othe castes were exposed to sunlight, particularly the harijans, who had to work in sunlight.So they went dark.

 

Hindusims is not about racism.

[Guest guest]

Then why are the Dravidians physically culturally, linguistically, religiously different from North Indians ?

 

[Guest guest]

http://www.hindubooks.org/david_frawley/myth_aryan_invasion/the_aryan_dravidian_divide/page1.htm

 

IMHO, it explains things pretty well, and at the very least, provides some insight into the whole controversy. I don't believe in the Aryan invasion theory, and I think it really is BS.

 

There were a lot of things that the West credits the Greeks for such as the development of mathematics, and philosophy that the ancient Indians did even before the Greeks. The Greeks might have actually been influenced a great deal by the ancient Indians, yet no mention is ever made of that.

 

Why? could it be that the west just finds it so hard to believe that the East developed much quicker than the West did? That the East was a more civilized region than the West?

[brinthan 0]

<<..the main thing is how come 1 recognise in india of who comes from suerior race in india and who is not......the answer is simple...the more fair skinnedperson u find in india ...then more the aryan race conyent he has in him....and the more dark a person is ,,,then that shows the more of dravidic or indian race he has in him.......and one more thing aryans were not dark

people who r dark and claim that they belong to aryan stock is totally .,these ppl who r black n claim so r actually talkinbullshit as they change their name castes to show ppl tht they r of superior stock..>>

 

. man. In my opinion, your theory is completely wrong. Krishna was so dark. But people didn't think that he is not from superior race. I know that a lot of tamil (dravidian) politicians believe in Aryan Invasion Theory, and think that Aryan really invaded India and Sanatana Dharma was spread to control the dravidian. But this is not the case.

[maadhav 0]

this theory is your concoction only.

 

<< who comes from suerior race in india and who is not..>>

 

most people of india are sanatana dharmais (new name hindu)

any hindu is an aryan regardless of race.

 

any race has no importance in hinduism.

there is no superior or inferior race per hinduism.

 

there are diffrerent races and mixed races for sure,

but any race or ony person is or can become more or less advanced spiritually than any other at a time.

 

hinduism or god is not a monopoly of a pertucular race or nationality or country.

 

so please do not talk race superiority here.

talk about spiritual advancement.

 

a race does not make one spiritually superior or inferior.

 

again, ARYAN IS NOT A RACE.

a white skin does not make one superior in in any way.

 

Krishna is black skinned,

however he did not appear in black race.

Vyasdev was black and ugly, but was from not a black race.

 

blood/body relation has no importance in hindism.

please rememer it.