Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org
Sign in to follow this  
Guest guest

How to Eradicate Islamic Fundamentalism

Rate this topic

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

It is a common complaint among some non-Muslims that Islam would not have millions of adherents all over the world, if it had not been spread by the use of force. The following points will make it clear, that far from being spread by the sword, it was the inherent force of truth, reason and logic that was responsible for the rapid spread of Islam.

 

 

1. Islam means peace.

 

Islam comes from the root word 'salaam', which means peace. It also means submitting one's will to Allah (swt). Thus Islam is a religion of peace, which is acquired by submitting one's will to the will of the Supreme Creator, Allah (swt).

 

 

2. Sometimes force has to be used to maintain peace.

 

Each and every human being in this world is not in favour of maintaining peace and harmony. There are many, who would disrupt it for their own vested interests. Sometimes force has to be used to maintain peace. It is precisely for this reason that we have the police who use force against criminals and anti-social elements to maintain peace in the country. Islam promotes peace. At the same time, Islam exhorts it followers to fight where there is oppression. The fight against oppression may, at times, require the use of force. In Islam force can only be used to promote peace and justice.

 

 

3. Opinion of historian De Lacy O'Leary.

 

The best reply to the misconception that Islam was spread by the sword is given by the noted historian De Lacy O'Leary in the book "Islam at the cross road" (Page 8):

 

"History makes it clear however, that the legend of fanatical Muslims sweeping through the world and forcing Islam at the point of the sword upon conquered races is one of the most fantastically absurd myth that historians have ever repeated."

 

 

4. Muslims ruled Spain for 800 years.

 

Muslims ruled Spain for about 800 years. The Muslims in Spain never used the sword to force the people to convert. Later the Christian Crusaders came to Spain and wiped out the Muslims. There was not a single Muslim in Spain who could openly give the adhan, that is the call for prayers.

 

 

5. 14 million Arabs are Coptic Christians.

 

Muslims were the lords of Arabia for 1400 years. For a few years the British ruled, and for a few years the French ruled. Overall, the Muslims ruled Arabia for 1400 years. Yet today, there are 14 million Arabs who are Coptic Christians i.e. Christians since generations. If the Muslims had used the sword there would not have been a single Arab who would have remained a Christian.

 

 

6. More than 80% non-Muslims in India.

 

The Muslims ruled India for about a thousand years. If they wanted, they had the power of converting each and every non-Muslim of India to Islam. Today more than 80% of the population of India are non-Muslims. All these non-Muslim Indians are bearing witness today that Islam was not spread by the sword.

 

 

7. Indonesia and Malaysia.

 

Indonesia is a country that has the maximum number of Muslims in the world. The majority of people in Malaysia are Muslims. May one ask, "Which Muslim army went to Indonesia and Malaysia?"

 

 

8. East Coast of Africa.

 

Similarly, Islam has spread rapidly on the East Coast of Africa. One may again ask, if Islam was spread by the sword, "Which Muslim army went to the East Coast of Africa?"

 

 

9. Thomas Carlyle.

 

The famous historian, Thomas Carlyle, in his book "Heroes and Hero worship", refers to this misconception about the spread of Islam: "The sword indeed, but where will you get your sword? Every new opinion, at its starting is precisely in a minority of one. In one man's head alone. There it dwells as yet. One man alone of the whole world believes it, there is one man against all men. That he takes a sword and try to propagate with that, will do little for him. You must get your sword! On the whole, a thing will propagate itself as it can."

 

 

10. No compulsion in religion.

 

With which sword was Islam spread? Even if Muslims had it they could not use it to spread Islam because the Qur'an says in the following verse:

 

"Let there be no compulsion in religion:

Truth stands out clear from error"

[Al-Qur'an 2:256]

 

 

11. Sword of the Intellect.

 

It is the sword of intellect. The sword that conquers the hearts and minds of people. The Qur'an says in Surah Nahl, chapter 16 verse 125:

 

"Invite (all) to the way of thy Lord

with wisdom and beautiful preaching;

and argue with them in ways that are

best and most gracious."

[Al-Qur'an 16:125]

 

 

12. Increase in the world religions from 1934 to 1984.

 

An article in Reader's Digest 'Almanac', year book 1986, gave the statistics of the increase of percentage of the major religions of the world in half a century from 1934 to 1984. This article also appeared in 'The Plain Truth' magazine. At the top was Islam, which increased by 235%, and Christianity had increased only by 47%. May one ask, which war took place in this century which converted millions of people to Islam?

 

 

13. Islam is the fastest growing religion in America and Europe.

 

Today the fastest growing religion in America is Islam. The fastest growing religion in Europe in Islam. Which sword is forcing people in the West to accept Islam in such large numbers?

 

 

14. Dr. Joseph Adam Pearson.

 

Dr. Joseph Adam Pearson rightly says, "People who worry that nuclear weaponry will one day fall in the hands of the Arabs, fail to realize that the Islamic bomb has been dropped already, it fell the day MUHAMMED (pbuh) was born".

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

some of your answers are easy to object... but i do not care.

It is not even necessary to think that all the religions are like ours, to be ecumenic, the most important thing is to believe that any disagreement has to be solved in the dialogue's plane

 

if you are in this way for me it is enough

 

my opinion is that you have to partecipate to this forum with a different name than "muslim", it is not important to push our identification, the important thing is to make questions and offer answers on the absolute truth

 

if you consider that this identification is unavoidable you will get constantly opposition in a forum called "hindu-religion" because mundane identifications cannot avoid to clash and generate conflicts

 

if you enter with your own name or another not identified you will have easily the opportunity to make questions and give answers that will be judged on the basis of logic and intelligence, not as "muslim" or "hindu" or "christian" answers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Islam is like rotten apples.

You put a rotten apple in a bsaket of apple, it will rotten all others.

 

Have you guys forgotten the Godhra massacare?

 

Each and every point you try to explain contradicts the Godhra massacare.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Islam authorises a man to have multiple wifes, multiple marriages, multiple husbands and all animal un natural sexual relationships.

 

Your Kings had biiig harems where thair job was just to f***.

 

So why would not the population increase?

YOu are claiming falsly that people have converted.

 

And another point is, you guys have used the social status of the blacks and converting them, just like christian missionaries are doing in India.

 

Yours is a religion of Hatred.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Are you using your brain to think or using something else to think?

 

There was no Muslim army in Kashmir. Infact you guys dont require an army at all. Every muslim is a terrorist in heart.

 

The extermination of Kashmiri pandits was not done my nay muslim army, but by the Moollahs and Islamic fundamentalists.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

1. Who bombed Twin towers?

2. Who Bombed Spain trains?

3. Who is killing innocent Pandits and Civilians in Kashmir?

4. Who is heading the Seperatinst movement in Chechnya?

5. Who Hijacked the Indian airlines plane and landed in Afgan?

6. Who blew up the Buddhas of bamiyan?

7. Who were behind the Bombay Blasts?

8. Who were behind the Kovai Blasts?

9. Who were behind the Godhra massacare?

 

If you have the guts and conscience, answer these questions.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

There are good and bad in every religion.

And as you said Islam is built on the fundamental principles of hatred, intolerance, terror.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

1. Who bombed Twin towers?

2. Who Bombed Spain trains?

3. Who is killing innocent Pandits and Civilians in Kashmir?

4. Who is heading the Seperatinst movement in Chechnya?

5. Who Hijacked the Indian airlines plane and landed in Afgan?

6. Who blew up the Buddhas of bamiyan?

7. Who were behind the Bombay Blasts?

8. Who were behind the Kovai Blasts?

9. Who were behind the Godhra massacare?

 

someone of islamic religion... but i know that sometimes also hindus go to jail... have i to assume that if an hindu make a crime you and me are also criminals only because we're hindu?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Hindus have not committed genocide.

So if you cannot understand the mindset of Hindus its better not to show your pseudo secularist ignorance.

 

Hindus have not murdered in the name of religion.

Of course they commit some petty crimes for money, but large scale extermination and revengeful murders and mass killings are not done by the hindus.

 

Its better morons like you stay out of the forum

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

if some muslim has done something you cannot give faults to all muslims as you cannot do it if some hindu, buddhist or christian does a crime

 

i do not ask you to leave the forum, but it is better for you to use the brain, a forum is a place of discussion

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

<< Islam is bad because of its intolerable nature against the "Non Muslims", if we try to change that >>

 

you cannot change the koran and hadith.

you have no authority, no muslim looks up to you as allah or mohammed. you can get rid of it by exposing its barbaric nature, so that no one would accept it.

 

make a law that says no one has any religion at birth.

let all study hinduism and a couple of other religions till high school graduation. then at gratudation they can pick a religion of their choice. but not islam if they choose to live in india. if this is done, i believe most will not pick islam.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

<< You guys are talking like all muslims in the world are bad, which is not.>>

 

yes, only as long as they do not follow koran and hadith seriously.

 

in contrast, a hindu is good to the extent he follows gita.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1. Who bombed Twin towers?

2. Who Bombed Spain trains?

3. Who is killing innocent Pandits and Civilians in Kashmir?

4. Who is heading the Seperatinst movement in Chechnya?

5. Who Hijacked the Indian airlines plane and landed in Afgan?

6. Who blew up the Buddhas of bamiyan?

7. Who were behind the Bombay Blasts?

8. Who were behind the Kovai Blasts?

9. Who were behind the Godhra massacare?

 

I agree with you a 100% , but consider this after 9/11 when the americans bombed afghanistan they killed twice as many "civilians" not terrorists than was killed in the 9/11 attacks. Who condemns them for it?? no one.

Secondly iraq, america bombed the hell out of iraq killing more than 3000 civilians for what? No weapons of mass destruction either.

The isreali army kills palestinian babies on a daily basis, no news organization reports it only when a suicide bomber kills israelis do we hear about it. THe media is biased, I have "christian" palestinian friends who hate the israeli govt for what they are doing. Israeli army bulldozes houses of palestinian farmers on a daily basis, you only hear about that in the arab press no one else reports it. IN israel today they have "jewsih only" streets and resturants where non-jews cannot go. That reminds me of the 40-50's when america had "white only" resturants.

So yes islam has a lot of faults and has the potential to do more harm than any other religion.It is very hard for a hindu to co-exist with a muslim because our philosophies are opposite.TRUE, but lets also be fair and criticize other people too at the same time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

one more thing.

 

the shuddhi karan yatra need armed volunteers to protect the yatris. else those muslims who do not like the yatra will attack and kill many hindus. even police protection is needed.

 

another way to really make teh muslims to give up islam is to bycott them completely economically. never buy or sell any product or service to a muslim until he/she gives up islam formally. choose a day from which all the hindus will do it. even if many just prepare for this, then some muslims wil give up islam becore it is placed in action.

economics is a mighty tool.

it is non violent. DO IT, please.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1. Islam means peace.

 

Islam comes from the root word 'salaam', which means peace. It also means submitting one's will to Allah (swt). Thus Islam is a religion of peace, which is acquired by submitting one's will to the will of the Supreme Creator, Allah (swt).

 

----Doesn't matter what it means, whats important is what is done by the muslims under the name of islam.

 

Genocide committed in the name of Allah: 3,000,000 Bangladeshi Hindus Killed during the Pakistan-Bangladesh war in 1971. From 1894 to 1896 Abdul Hamid, Sultan of the Ottoman Empire, killed 150,000 Armenian Christians. In India, Sikh Guru Tegh Bahadur along with his disciples was burned to death by the Moghul ruler Aurangzeb in 1675. Another Sikh, Bhai Mati Das was sawn into right and left halves while he was still alive. In July 1974, 4,000 Christians living in Cyprus were killed by Fahri Koroturk, president of Turkey and his Islamic army. From 1843 to 1846 10,000 Assyrian Christians including women and children were massacred by the Muslims. From 1915 to 1918 750,000 Assyrians were killed in the name of Islamic Jihad. In 1933 thousands of Assyrian villagers were murdered by the Iraqi soldiers in Northern Iraq. Since 1990 more than 10,000 Kashmiri Hindus have been brutally murdered by Islamic fundamentalists. Over 280,000 Ugandans killed during the reign of Idi Amin from 1971 to 1979. Over 30,000 Mauritanians have been killed by the Islamic dictators since 1960. In 1980, 20,000 Syrians were murdered under the rule of Hafez Al-Assad, President of Syria. Since 1992 120,000 Algerians have been murdered by the Islamic fundamentalist army.

What kind of peace is this????

 

2. Sometimes force has to be used to maintain peace.

 

Each and every human being in this world is not in favour of maintaining peace and harmony. There are many, who would disrupt it for their own vested interests. Sometimes force has to be used to maintain peace. It is precisely for this reason that we have the police who use force against criminals and anti-social elements to maintain peace in the country. Islam promotes peace. At the same time, Islam exhorts it followers to fight where there is oppression. The fight against oppression may, at times, require the use of force. In Islam force can only be used to promote peace and justice.

 

------------oh really???? Is that why force was used by the arab/muslim invaders to conquer other countries???? Not just india all they way from central asia, iran and pakistan. You get parsis in india today who came to india hundreds of years ago to escape the islamic sword. They came here so they could pursue their religion in peace.

The koran says:

"I have been commanded by Allah to fight the unbelievers until they believe in Allah and His prophet and follow the laws of Islam. It is only then that the safety of their lives and property may be guaranteed." (Sahih Tirmzi, Vol. 2: 192)

 

And why should they persecute and annihilate the non-Muslims? The Koran explains the point:

 

"God has bought from the believers their selves and their possessions against the gift of paradise; they fight in the way of God; they kill, and are killed; that is a promise; binding on God.... And who fulfills his covenant truer than God? So rejoice in the bargain you have made with Him that is the mighty triumph..." (Repentance: 192)

 

As you can see here the jihad an agrrement between allah and his followers..allah promises his followers paradise for plundering non-muslims.

 

"It is not for any prophet to have prisoners, until he make wide slaughter in land.....

Eat of what you have taken as booty, it is lawful and good." (The Spoils: 65)

 

So morally degenerate were the Muslim Sultans that, rather than attract Hindu "infidels" to Islam through force of personal example and exhortation, they just built a number of mosques at the sites of torn down temples - and foolishly pretended that they had triumphed over the minds and culture of the Hindus.

 

Infact the name "hindu kush" in persian means place of hindu slaughter. It is a reminder of days when when Hindu slaves from Indian subcontinent died in harsh Afghan mountains while being transported to Moslem courts of Central Asia.

 

3. Opinion of historian De Lacy O'Leary.

 

The best reply to the misconception that Islam was spread by the sword is given by the noted historian De Lacy O'Leary in the book "Islam at the cross road" (Page 8):

 

"History makes it clear however, that the legend of fanatical Muslims sweeping through the world and forcing Islam at the point of the sword upon conquered races is one of the most fantastically absurd myth that historians have ever repeated."

 

-----Encyclopaedia Britannica again mentions that Mughal emperor Akbar 'ordered the massacre of about 30,000 captured Rajput Hindus on February 24, 1568 AD, after the battle for Chitod, a number confirmed by Abul Fazl, Akbar's court historian.' Afghan historian KHONDAMIR records that during one of the many repeated invasions on the city of Herat in western Afghanistan, which used to be part of the Hindu Shahiya kingdoms '1,500,000 residents perished.'

 

Firuz Shah Tughlak (1351-1388), who has an avenue named after him in New Delhi, wrote: 'On the day of a Hindu festival, I went there myself, ordered the executions of all the leaders and practitioners of this abomination; I destroyed their idols and temples to build mosques in their places.

 

"9. Thomas Carlyle.

 

The famous historian, Thomas Carlyle, in his book "Heroes and Hero worship", refers to this misconception about the spread of Islam: "The sword indeed, but where will you get your sword? Every new opinion, at its starting is precisely in a minority of one. In one man's head alone. There it dwells as yet. One man alone of the whole world believes it, there is one man against all men. That he takes a sword and try to propagate with that, will do little for him. You must get your sword! On the whole, a thing will propagate itself as it can.""

 

-----Go to this site

http://www.indiastar.com/wallia7.htm

So what do the original sources tell us about Tipu? The anthology includes excerpts from Tipu's letters as researched by the distinguished Kerala historian K. M. Panicker, which he reviewed in the Bhasha Poshini magazine, August 1923:

 

1. Letter dated March 22, 1788, to Abdul Kadir: "Over 12,000 Hindus were honoured with Islam. There were many Namboodri Brahmins among them. This achievement should be widely publicised among the Hindus. Then the local Hindus should be brought before you and converted to Islam. No Namboodri Brahmin should be spared. "

 

2. Letter dated December 14, 1988, to his army chief in Calicut: " I am sending two of my followers with Mir Hussain Ali. With their assistance, you should capture and kill all Hindus. Those below 20 may be kept in prison and 5000 from the rest should be killed from the tree-tops. These are my orders."

 

3. Letter dated January 18, 1790, to Syed Abdul Dulai: " ...almost all Hindus in Calicut are converted to Islam. I consider this as Jehad."

 

The anthology also quotes from A Voyage to the East Indies by Fra Barthoelomeo, a renowned Portuguese traveller and historian, who was present in Tipu's war zone in early 1790:

 

"First a corps of 30,000 barbarians who butchered everybody on the way ... followed by the field gun unit under the French commander, M. Lally. Tipu was riding on an elephant behind which another army of 30,000 soldiers followed. Most of the men and women were hanged in Calicut, first mothers were hanged with their children tied to necks of mothers. That barbarian Tipu Sultan tied the naked Christian and Hindus to the legs of elephants and made the elephants to move around till the bodies of the helpless victims were torn to pieces. Temples and churches were ordered to be burned down, desecrated, and destroyed. ... Those Christians who refused to be honoured with Islam were ordered to be killed by hanging immediately. These atrocities were told to me by the victims of Tipu Sultan who escaped from the clutches of his army and reached Varapphuza, which is the centre of Carmichael Christian Mission. I myself helped many victims to cross the Varapphuza river by boats."

 

"6. More than 80% non-Muslims in India.

 

The Muslims ruled India for about a thousand years. If they wanted, they had the power of converting each and every non-Muslim of India to Islam. Today more than 80% of the population of India are non-Muslims. All these non-Muslim Indians are bearing witness today that Islam was not spread by the sword."

 

Thats because the hindus resisted the islamic invasion of india. Between the year of 1000 and 1525 AD approximately 80 million hindus were killed by the islamic conquerors.

 

Read this website..the books here are written by islamic scholars, they themselves have admitted to this holocaust..

I have just mentioned one of the many books available

 

http://www.flex.com/~jai/satyamevajayate/temple1.html

 

Name Of The Book: Tarikh-i-Tabari

 

Name Of The Historian: Abu Ja'far Muhammad bin Jarir at-Tabari

 

About The Author: This author is considered to be the foremost historian of Islam. The above mentioned book written by him is regarded as the mother of histories.

 

The Muslim Rulers He Wrote About:

 

 

Qutaibah bin Muslim al-Bahili (AD 705-715)

Beykund (Khurasan)

"The ultimate capture of Beykund (in AD 706) rewarded him with an incalculable booty; even more than had hitherto fallen into the hands of the Mohammedans by the conquest of the entire province of Khorassaun; and the unfortunate merchants of the town, having been absent on a trading excursion while their country was assailed by the enemy, and finding their habitations desolate on their return contributed further to enrich the invaders, by the ransom which they paid for the recovery of their wives and children. The oranments alone, of which these women had been plundered, being melted down, produce, in gold, 150,000 meskals; of a dram and a half each. Among the articles of the booty, is also described an image of gold, of 50,000 meskals, of which the eyes were two pearls, the exquisite beauty and magnitude of which excited the surprise and admiration of Kateibah. They were transmitted by him, with a fifth of the spoil to Hejauje, together with a request that he might be permitted to distribute, to the troops, the arms which had been found in the palace in great profusion."

 

Samarkand (Farghana)

"A breach was, however, at last effected in the walls of the city in AD 712 by the warlike machines of Kateibah; and some of the most daring of its defenders having fallen by the skill of his archers, the besieged demanded a cessation of arms to the following day, when they promised to capitulate. The request was acceded to the Kateibah; and a treaty was the next day accordingly concluded between him and the prince of Samarkand, by which the latter engaged for the annual payment of ten million of dhirems, and a supply of three thousand slaves; of whom it was particularly stipulated, that none should either be in a state of infancy, or ineffective from old age and debility. He further contracted that the ministers of his religion should be expelled from their temples and their idols destroyed and burnt; that Kateibah should be allowed to establish a mosque in the place of the principal temple...."

"...Kateibah accordingly set set fire to the whole collection with his own hands; it was soon consumed to ashes, and 50,000 meskals of gold and silver, collected from the nails which had been used in the workmanship of the images."

 

 

Yaqub bin Laith (AD 870-871)

Balkh and Kabul (Afghanistan)

"He took Bamian, which he probably reached by way of Herat, and then marched on Balkh where he ruined (the temple) Naushad. On his way back from Balkh he attacked Kabul..."

"Starting from Panjhir, the place he is known to have visited, he must have passed through the capital city of the Hindu Sahis to rob the sacred temple -- the reputed place of coronation of the Sahi rulers -- of its sculptural wealth..."

"The exact details of the spoil collected from Kabul valley are lacking. The Tarikh [-i-Sistan] records 50 idols of gold and silver and Mas'udi mentions elephants. The wonder excited in Baghdad by baghdad by elephants and pagan idols forwarded to the Caliph by Ya'qub also speaks for their high value."

 

Name Of The Book: Tarikhu'l-Hind

Name Of The Historian: Abu Rihan Muhammad bin Ahmad al-Biruni al-Khwarizmi.

About The Author: This author spent 40 years in India during the reign of Sultan Mahmud of Ghazni (AD 997 - 1030). His history treats of the literature and learning of the Hindus at the commencement of the 11th century.

The Muslim Rulers He Wrote About:

 

 

Jalam ibn Shaiban (9th century AD)

Multan (Punjab)

"A famous idol of theirs was that of Multan, dedicated to the sun, and therefore called Aditya. It was of wood and covered with red Cordovan leather; in its two eyes were two red rubies. It is said to have been made in the last Kritayuga .....When Muhammad Ibn Alkasim Ibn Almunaibh conquered Multan, he inquired how the town had become so very flourishing and so many treasures had there been accumulated, and then he found out that this idol was the cause, for there came pilgrims from all sides to visit it. Therefore he thought it best to have the idol where it was, but he hung a piece of cow's flesh on its neck by way of mockery. On the same place a mosque was built. When the Karmatians occupied Multan, Jalam Ibn Shaiban, the usurper, broke the idol into pieces and killed its priests..."

 

 

Sultan Mahmud of Gazni (AD 997-1030)

Thanesar (Haryana)

"The city of Taneshar is highly venerated by Hindus. The idol of that place is called Cakrasvamin, i.e. the owner of the cakra, a weapon which we have already described. It is of bronze, and is nearly the size of a man. It is now lying in the hippodrome in Ghazna, together with the Lord of Somnath, which is a representation of the penis of the Mahadeva, called Linga."

 

Somnath (Gujrat)

"The linga he raised was the stone of Somnath, for soma means the moon and natan means master, so that the whole word means master of the moon. The image was destroyed by the Prince Mahmud, may God be merciful to him! --AH 416. He ordered the upper part to be broken and the remainder to be transported to his residence, Ghaznin, with all its coverings and trappings of gold, jewels, and embroided garments. Part of it has been thrown into the hippodrome of the town, together with Cakrasvamin , an idol of bronze, that had been brought from Taneshar. Another part of the idol from Somnath lies before the door of the mosque of Ghaznin, on which people rub their feet to clean them from dirt and wet."

 

10. No compulsion in religion.

 

With which sword was Islam spread? Even if Muslims had it they could not use it to spread Islam because the Qur'an says in the following verse:

 

"Let there be no compulsion in religion:

Truth stands out clear from error"

[Al-Qur'an 2:256]

 

Oh great, well the koran also says:

 

I have been ordered to fight with the people till they say, none has the right to be worshipped but Allah” (Al Bukhari vol. 4:196))

 

 

"Fight the unbelievers in your surroundings, and let them find harshness in you." (Qur'an 9:123)

 

“Slay the idolators [non-Muslims] wherever ye find them, and take them captive, and besiege them, and prepare for them each ambush. Fight against such of those who have been given the Scripture as believe not in Allah nor the last Day…. Go forth, light-armed and heavy-armed, and strive with your wealth and your lives in the way of Allah! (Sura 9:5,29,41

 

Mohammed said, “I have been ordered to fight with the people till they say, none has the right to be worshipped but Allah” (Al Bukhari vol. 4:196))

 

Mohammed said: “No Muslim should be killed for killing a Kafir (infidel).”(Hadith vol. 9:50)

 

 

13. Islam is the fastest growing religion in America and Europe.

 

Today the fastest growing religion in America is Islam. The fastest growing religion in Europe in Islam. Which sword is forcing people in the West to accept Islam in such large numbers?

 

Islam is the fastest growing religion pretty musch all over the world not just europe...the reason is that islamic women have a lot more children than non-islamic women.

A muslim man can have 2-3 wives and as many children possible. The average somalian woman produces 7 babies in her lifetime.

 

 

14. Dr. Joseph Adam Pearson.

 

Dr. Joseph Adam Pearson rightly says, "People who worry that nuclear weaponry will one day fall in the hands of the Arabs, fail to realize that the Islamic bomb has been dropped already, it fell the day MUHAMMED (pbuh) was born".

 

Look up and see what the word MUHAMMED means.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

in contrast, a hindu is good to the extent he follows gita.

 

so you are not good because of your attempts to pervert his meaning

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What is written in the Hadis is what they call heresay. Collection of information is compiled into a book which they call the interpretaion of the Quran. But there is nothing of that sort written in the Quran. The Hadis was witten 100 years after the death of Mohammed. We realy do not know how Mohammed carried on his task of changing the faith of the pre Islamic Arabs. What the Muslim today rely on is the Hadis and there are Muslims who do not follow the Hadis because it is not the Holy book. The Holy Quran is the only source of real Islam. Read it and you wil realize how foolish you are. Hadis Al Bukhari is a fictious story concocted by the caliph in order to be famous and have control over the poor converts. Greedy and thirsty for blood the followers of Islam became barbaric invaders who stole everything they find in their raid. Mohammed could not have done such but made to believe so by his followers. There is no compel in Islam. Mohammed respected the prophets of other religion as far as the Quran is but not the Hadis. The Hadis has potraited Mohammed as a brutal, heartless and fierce human being ever to live in the 6th century.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Yes there are many hadith not authentic, but there are some like bukhari and muslim, which are Authentic Tradition of the PROPHET, why cant it be true? Are youdoubting coz its 100 years after prophet's death?

 

What is the age of VEDAS? Who is The Author? Where did it come from?

NO ANSWER!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Am I being Fforced to Quote from Hindus scriptures again?:P

If I start doing then you will end up Suiciding!

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Yes I cant forget the Gujrat riots too!

But Im not blaming Hinduism For that, coz I know What hinduism teaches.3

 

Same way I want you to learn ISLAM,

 

"Dont Judge the Car by its Bad driver"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

How far is 4 from 16,108? /images/graemlins/wink.gif

 

You know It!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Do you know how much muslim died since 1985? 10,848 against 1500 non muslims in KASHMIR.

 

At an average of 6 muslims die everyday in kashmir. does anyone talks about it?

 

The terrorist are not fighting for religion, but for political reasons!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Muslims are those who follow Islam, and Islam is for peace.

Those who are against Peace is not a MUSLIM WITHOUT DOUBT.

 

Qur'an says :"whoever killeth an innocent, is like he killeth the whole mankind and whoever save one is like he save the whole mankind"

 

"Dont judge car by its bad driver"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Show mee One Verse from QUR'AN that conciliates your claims !

 

 

If people who have name of muslim is doing, WHY IS ISLAM GOING ON TRIAL?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...