Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

vegan parents sentenced over child's death

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

A GP prescribed two kinds of tablets for my mothers rheumatoid

arthritis. Both have since been withdrawn from use because they are

carcinogenic. Strange she died of cancer - or maybe not.

 

 

>Ian wrote:

> remedies to find out which of them work. But remember that tobacco

used

> to be a traditional remedy for lung problems ...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

aspirin was originally derived from the bark of the willow

 

 

peter hurd <swpgh01

Nov 23, 2004 9:28 AM

 

Re: vegan parents sentenced over child's death

 

<html><body>

 

 

<DIV>Sorry to stick in my two penneth, but isnt a lot of mordern pharmacuticals

derived from natural sources ( e.g. asprin from a particular tree?)......</DIV>

<DIV>Sorry , just woke up...</DIV>

<DIV>The Valley Vegan......<BR><BR><B><I>fraggle

<EBbrewpunx</I></B> wrote:</DIV>

<

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Ian

 

> traditional medicine is right, and I'm all for going through traditional

> remedies to find out which of them work. But remember that tobacco used

> to be a traditional remedy for lung problems ...

 

Please could you provide your source for this claim?

 

BB

Peter

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> aspirin was originally derived from the bark of the willow

 

And, was not penicilin... the " staple " of modern medicine... derived from

mouldy bread after someone noticed that people eating it didn't get ill? If

it had been up to modern methods, surely penicilin would never have been

thought of?

 

BB

Peter

Link to comment
Share on other sites

we was all taught in skool that Fleming discovered penicillin one day why

cleaning up some petri dishes in his sink..

 

 

Peter <metalscarab

Nov 23, 2004 11:03 AM

 

Re: vegan parents sentenced over child's death

 

 

<html><body>

 

 

<tt>

> aspirin was originally derived from the bark of the willow<BR>

<BR>

And, was not penicilin... the " staple " of modern medicine... derived from<BR>

mouldy bread after someone noticed that people eating it didn't get ill? If<BR>

it had been up to modern methods, surely penicilin would never have been<BR>

thought of?<BR>

<BR>

BB<BR>

Peter<BR>

<BR>

</tt>

 

<br><br>

<tt>

To send an email to - </tt>

<br><br>

 

<br>

 

<!-- |**|begin egp html banner|**| -->

 

<table border=0 cellspacing=0 cellpadding=2>

<tr bgcolor=#FFFFCC>

<td align=center><font size= " -1 " color=#003399><b>

Sponsor</b></font></td>

</tr>

<tr bgcolor=#FFFFFF>

<td align=center width=470><a

href= " http://us.ard./SIG=129vg1fsb/M=296572.5585671.6651487.3001176/D=g\

roups/S=1705129295:HM/EXP=1101323355/A=2343726/R=0/SIG=12ifc6n5j/*http://clk.atd\

mt.com/VON/go/yhxxxvon01900091von/direct/01/ & time=1101236955560888 "

target= " _blank " > <img

src= " http://us.a1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/a/vo/vonage/logo_25x25.gif " width= " 25 "

height= " 25 " border= " 0 " ></a> <a

href= " http://us.ard./SIG=129vg1fsb/M=296572.5585671.6651487.3001176/D=g\

roups/S=1705129295:HM/EXP=1101323355/A=2343726/R=1/SIG=12ifc6n5j/*http://clk.atd\

mt.com/VON/go/yhxxxvon01900091von/direct/01/ & time=1101236955560888 "

target= " _blank " ><p>Get unlimited calls to</p> <p>U.S./Canada</p> </a> <img

src= " http://view.atdmt.com/VON/view/yhxxxvon01900091von/direct/01/ & time=11012369\

55560888 " width=1 height=1 border=0></td>

</tr>

<tr><td><img alt= " " width=1 height=1

src= " http://us.adserver./l?M=296572.5585671.6651487.3001176/D=groups/S=\

:HM/A=2343726/rand=583814546 " ></td></tr>

</table>

 

<!-- |**|end egp html banner|**| -->

 

 

 

<!-- |**|begin egp html banner|**| -->

 

<br>

<tt><hr width= " 500 " >

<b>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Valley:

> Sorry to stick in my two penneth, but isnt a lot of mordern pharmacuticals

derived from natural

> sources ( e.g. asprin from a

> particular tree?)......

 

Yes. I like natural sources. Natural sources are my friend. I've got

absolutely no prejudice against natural sources. I just haven't got a

prejudice in favour of natural sources either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a source for a general claim of health benefits for tobacco,

rather than specifically for lung problems, but it still shows that

tradition can get it seriously wrong:

 

1535: CANADA: Jacques Cartier encounters natives on the island of

Montreal who use tobacco.

 

" In Hochelaga, at the head of the river in Canada, grows a certain herb

which is stocked in large quantities by the natives during the summer

season, and on which they set great value. Men alone use it, and after

drying it in the sun they carry it around their neck wrapped up in the

skin of a small animal, like a sac, with a hollow piece of stone or

wood. When the spirit moves them, they pulverize this herb and place it

at one end, lighting it with a fire brand, and draw on the other end so

long that they fill their bodies with smoke until it comes out of their

mouth and nostrils as from a chimney. *** They claim it keeps them warm

and in good health. *** They never travel without this herb. " --- Smoke

and Mirrors, p. 30

 

Peter wrote:

>

> Hi Ian

>

> > traditional medicine is right, and I'm all for going through traditional

> > remedies to find out which of them work. But remember that tobacco used

> > to be a traditional remedy for lung problems ...

>

> Please could you provide your source for this claim?

>

> BB

> Peter

Link to comment
Share on other sites

heartwerk wrote:

>

> A GP prescribed two kinds of tablets for my mothers rheumatoid

> arthritis. Both have since been withdrawn from use because they are

> carcinogenic.

>

 

I actually think that epidemiology is better than tradition at finding

carcinogens. Again, tradition never noticed that tobacco was

carcinogenic; if the tablets were traditional remedies, they might never

have been withdrawn.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Ian

 

> 1535: CANADA: Jacques Cartier encounters natives on the island of

> Montreal who use tobacco.

 

Thanks for the quote... however, I see several major problems...

 

1. Many different plants are smoked by the " Native American " tribes, and I

see no reference that singles this particular herb as tobacco.

 

2. There is no reference to a long-standing traditional belief held by a

culture - just a belief by a group of natives, with absolutely no reference

to how long this belief had been held. For all we know from the quote, it

had been thought up 5 years previous. Is there any evidence for a

**traditional medicinal use** as opposed to a casual belief by a small

number of " primitives " encountered by a " civilised " Westerner.

 

3. Who is the author? It is always important to understand the bias of an

author in historical texts - is he trying to " prove " that native Canadians

are stupid? Is he trying to argue that tobacco *is* good for you? What is

his / her bias?

 

4. Is there any corroboration of this quote anywhere else (ideally, the

original source would be useful) - something you find frequently is that

historical " quotes " are placed either completely out of context, or even

changed in substance if an author has a particular argument to present.

Considering the title of your source, I suspect this could easily be the

case here!

 

5. Even if the quote is accurate, what was Jacques Cartier's aim... it is

very rare for a 16th century text to be a genuine attempt to portray a

culture, and normally has some important political or religious aim. A

classic amongst 16th century Western texts reporting the activities of the

natives of the new world is to show just how primitive the natives are!

 

I wouldn't say that this quote is at all conclusive of your argument, and

really needs to be backed up with some far better evidence if you are to

claim a genuine historical tradition.

 

BB

Peter

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've just had a quick ten minute look at Jacques Cartier to try to find out

the viability of his report on smoking... considering that Cartier also

claimed the same tribe told him of a " land of gold and jewels " further north

which does not exist, I can't help wondering just how seriously anything he

reported as being said by them should be taken.

 

In my, admittedly brief, look at the events, I think it is pretty clear that

Cartier's report was heavily influenced by his desire to get funding for a

further expedition, and therefore any claims of medicinal discoveries should

be taken with a fairly hefty pinch of salt!

 

BB

Peter

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...