Guest guest Posted February 15, 2002 Report Posted February 15, 2002 Dear " Is [sic] phlegm formation due to failure of spleen T & T always involve the accumulation of dampness as an intermediary pathogen or can phlegm form directly as a result of splentic faiulure without dampness being involved? " It seems scholars have different opinions about this. Wiseman and Ellis (in Fundamentals) imply that the answer is yes, but Clavey implies any fluid, even normal jinye, can be inadquately T & Ted and become phlegm. In addition, he suggests that food can transform to phlegm without first becoming damp due to inhibited splenic T & T. Please see his chapters on Damp, Damp-Heat, and Phlegm in Fluid Physiology and Pathology in Traditional . " ...does internal damp lodge in the lungs, per se? " According to my research, most scholars imply that internal damp does not lodge in the lung per se. However, damp-phlegm can accumulate in the lung and according to Clavey, " ...accumulation of damp into phlegm, with some pathogenic damp still remaining in conjunction the the phlegm is usually termed 'phlegm-damp' (tan shi) or 'damp-phlegm " (shi tan). " Thus it would seem a fine distinction to completely rule out damp accumulation in the lung. David David Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.