Guest guest Posted March 1, 2004 Report Share Posted March 1, 2004 Hi All, & Hi Aqupoint & Chris, Aqupoint wrote: > Cancer is caused by a parasite, and this mix will kill all 3 > stages. Aqupoint, what is the published evidence that " Cancer is caused by a parasite " ? What parasite? IMO, that is most unlilkely; if it were true, it would be easy to control, even prevent, cancer. Chris replied: > Since most people with cancers have active parasites, one might > assume the cancer was caused by parasites. Another view is that as > the bodies biochemistry degrades, there are critters that find the > body a good host. The cancer is caused by other factors. Agreed. An association per se does NOT prove causality. Chris again: > It is these factors that give invite to the critters. By killing > the parasites and increase yang, as these herbs will do, the > person has an opportunity to heal themselves. I would also include > Alpha Lipoic acid, Acetyl L Carnitine, curcumin and if you think > calcium is a good idea, use a source with boron, silica Vit D and > magnesium. Juicing cucumbers, with a clove of garlic and a little > beet may also be a god idea. The juice is used by some famous > healing centers as a part of a live food program. I have seen > people come in hunched over in a wheel chair and be up with lots > of energy in a week. Hope this helps, Chris Cancer is a highly complex field - many different types, many different markers, and (to date) relatively bad clinical success with any method of therapy. Even the best combinations of allopathic + herbal remedies known today are a long way from CURING cancer. If my last sentence is incorrect, please enlighten me. Best regards, Email: < WORK : Teagasc Research Management, Sandymount Ave., Dublin 4, Ireland Mobile: 353-; [in the Republic: 0] HOME : 1 Esker Lawns, Lucan, Dublin, Ireland Tel : 353-; [in the Republic: 0] WWW : http://homepage.eircom.net/~progers/searchap.htm Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 1, 2004 Report Share Posted March 1, 2004 Hi Phil and All, I agree, Phil, that except for papillomavirus the etiology of cancer has little to do with infection. Cigarette smoking is clearly shown to cause lung cancer. It leads to " transformation " of the tissue which makes the tissue vulnerable to oncogenesis ... firing off of a growth gene promoter. Where's the infection? I've heard people discuss " parasites " before, but when I ask for which parasites as you've just done, Phil, they seem not able to answer. This seems to be an allopathic side of some alternative practitioners. They seem to want to address infection or some aspect of germ theory without actually having knowledge of it .... or only wanting to allude to it in some vague sort of way. If someone can set me straight on this, I'd appreciate it. Thank you. Respectfully, Emmanuel Segmen Hi All, & Hi Aqupoint & Chris, Aqupoint wrote: > Cancer is caused by a parasite, and this mix will kill all 3 > stages. Aqupoint, what is the published evidence that " Cancer is caused by a parasite " ? What parasite? IMO, that is most unlilkely; if it were true, it would be easy to control, even prevent, cancer. Chris replied: > Since most people with cancers have active parasites, one might > assume the cancer was caused by parasites. Another view is that as > the bodies biochemistry degrades, there are critters that find the > body a good host. The cancer is caused by other factors. Agreed. An association per se does NOT prove causality. Chris again: > It is these factors that give invite to the critters. By killing > the parasites and increase yang, as these herbs will do, the > person has an opportunity to heal themselves. I would also include > Alpha Lipoic acid, Acetyl L Carnitine, curcumin and if you think > calcium is a good idea, use a source with boron, silica Vit D and > magnesium. Juicing cucumbers, with a clove of garlic and a little > beet may also be a god idea. The juice is used by some famous > healing centers as a part of a live food program. I have seen > people come in hunched over in a wheel chair and be up with lots > of energy in a week. Hope this helps, Chris Cancer is a highly complex field - many different types, many different markers, and (to date) relatively bad clinical success with any method of therapy. Even the best combinations of allopathic + herbal remedies known today are a long way from CURING cancer. If my last sentence is incorrect, please enlighten me. Best regards, Email: < WORK : Teagasc Research Management, Sandymount Ave., Dublin 4, Ireland Mobile: 353-; [in the Republic: 0] HOME : 1 Esker Lawns, Lucan, Dublin, Ireland Tel : 353-; [in the Republic: 0] WWW : http://homepage.eircom.net/~progers/searchap.htm Membership requires that you do not post any commerical, swear, religious, spam messages,flame another member or swear. To change your email settings, i.e. individually, daily digest or none, visit the groups' homepage: Chinese Medicine/ click 'edit my membership' on the right hand side and adjust accordingly. To send an email to <Chinese Medicine- > from the email account you joined with. You will be removed automatically but will still recieve messages for a few days. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 1, 2004 Report Share Posted March 1, 2004 I agree that cancer is fairly complex, and there are different markers and differing reasons for cells to turn into " cancer " . Therefor, IMHO, there is no one cause nor no one answer to it. I would disagree with the assertion that we are a long way from garnering answers to at least some cancers. In one of my classes, a Dr. brought in a series of slides showing the different stages of epithelial cell stress,,,,, up to and including cancer. He noted that in his experience, if one can induce stress, one can relieve it. I agree. I had the opportunity to work in " The Hypocrites Heath Institute " in Florida. During that time, using live food, I saw people near death, rejuvenate and become cancer free. Would I say that live food is the cure for cancer? Absolutely not. Although, in many cases where a person has cancer, if they bring their Biological Terrain back in line, the cells that were experiencing extreme stress can return to a normal function. There are several compounds found in our diet that have been shown to reactivate the gene responsible for cellular death. This effectively degrades the cell from cancer to not cancer. Obviously there is no one answer, however, I believe from experience that there are answers to some cancers for at least some cancers. Chris In a message dated 2/29/2004 7:39:13 PM Eastern Standard Time, writes: Chris again: > It is these factors that give invite to the critters. By killing > the parasites and increase yang, as these herbs will do, the > person has an opportunity to heal themselves. I would also include > Alpha Lipoic acid, Acetyl L Carnitine, curcumin and if you think > calcium is a good idea, use a source with boron, silica Vit D and > magnesium. Juicing cucumbers, with a clove of garlic and a little > beet may also be a god idea. The juice is used by some famous > healing centers as a part of a live food program. I have seen > people come in hunched over in a wheel chair and be up with lots > of energy in a week. Hope this helps, Chris Cancer is a highly complex field - many different types, many different markers, and (to date) relatively bad clinical success with any method of therapy. Even the best combinations of allopathic + herbal remedies known today are a long way from CURING cancer. If my last sentence is incorrect, please enlighten me. Best regards, Email: < Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 1, 2004 Report Share Posted March 1, 2004 Emmanuel: The parasite that causes cancer is Fasciolopsis buskii. - Emmanuel Segmen Chinese Medicine Sunday, February 29, 2004 8:04 PM Re: Cancer, parasites and clinical success Hi Phil and All, I agree, Phil, that except for papillomavirus the etiology of cancer has little to do with infection. Cigarette smoking is clearly shown to cause lung cancer. It leads to " transformation " of the tissue which makes the tissue vulnerable to oncogenesis ... firing off of a growth gene promoter. Where's the infection? I've heard people discuss " parasites " before, but when I ask for which parasites as you've just done, Phil, they seem not able to answer. This seems to be an allopathic side of some alternative practitioners. They seem to want to address infection or some aspect of germ theory without actually having knowledge of it ... or only wanting to allude to it in some vague sort of way. If someone can set me straight on this, I'd appreciate it. Thank you. Respectfully, Emmanuel Segmen Hi All, & Hi Aqupoint & Chris, Aqupoint wrote: > Cancer is caused by a parasite, and this mix will kill all 3 > stages. Aqupoint, what is the published evidence that " Cancer is caused by a parasite " ? What parasite? IMO, that is most unlilkely; if it were true, it would be easy to control, even prevent, cancer. Chris replied: > Since most people with cancers have active parasites, one might > assume the cancer was caused by parasites. Another view is that as > the bodies biochemistry degrades, there are critters that find the > body a good host. The cancer is caused by other factors. Agreed. An association per se does NOT prove causality. Chris again: > It is these factors that give invite to the critters. By killing > the parasites and increase yang, as these herbs will do, the > person has an opportunity to heal themselves. I would also include > Alpha Lipoic acid, Acetyl L Carnitine, curcumin and if you think > calcium is a good idea, use a source with boron, silica Vit D and > magnesium. Juicing cucumbers, with a clove of garlic and a little > beet may also be a god idea. The juice is used by some famous > healing centers as a part of a live food program. I have seen > people come in hunched over in a wheel chair and be up with lots > of energy in a week. Hope this helps, Chris Cancer is a highly complex field - many different types, many different markers, and (to date) relatively bad clinical success with any method of therapy. Even the best combinations of allopathic + herbal remedies known today are a long way from CURING cancer. If my last sentence is incorrect, please enlighten me. Best regards, Email: < WORK : Teagasc Research Management, Sandymount Ave., Dublin 4, Ireland Mobile: 353-; [in the Republic: 0] HOME : 1 Esker Lawns, Lucan, Dublin, Ireland Tel : 353-; [in the Republic: 0] WWW : http://homepage.eircom.net/~progers/searchap.htm Membership requires that you do not post any commerical, swear, religious, spam messages,flame another member or swear. To change your email settings, i.e. individually, daily digest or none, visit the groups' homepage: Chinese Medicine/ click 'edit my membership' on the right hand side and adjust accordingly. To send an email to <Chinese Medicine- > from the email account you joined with. You will be removed automatically but will still recieve messages for a few days. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 2, 2004 Report Share Posted March 2, 2004 Hello Phil: I have not been at the computer for a few days- I wasn't trying to avoid the question. The parasite that causes cancer is Fasciolopsis buskii.The egg is about/10mm. The microscopic hatchlings are called miracidia and are the second stage. When the eggs reach the liver they will hatch if there is a presence of propyl alcohol. The miracidia start to make little balls inside themselves called redia. It leaves the miracidia and begins to reproduce itself. 40 redia can each make 40 more- this is out of 1 egg.These redia are swept along in your blood landing on whatever tissue lets them in, usually weak tissue- smokers lungs, breasts with benign lumps etc. Multiplying continues and they change shape- growing a tail- allowing them to swim- now called cercaria. The cercaria attaches itself to your tissue, and begins to grow a cocoon. Now it is called metacercaria. The metacercaria develop an extremely thick shell around themselves- which it seems is dissolve in propyl alcohol- completing it's life cycle in your body. When there adults in the liver, a growth factor " ortho-phospho-tyrosine appears. This is the growth factor proven in Toronto to be the cause of the excessive growth of the cancer. This parasite has been studied since 1925 but overlooked. Please go to www.dr.clark.com to find published evidence of this. I have stopped cancer many times- it doesn't seem to matter which kind of cancer. If this is not the answer it is 90% of it. The mix has been tested on many types of parasites and kills about 100 types. Chris brings up the old saying of the chicken and the egg. This time the body gets the parasites first- then irritable bowel syndrome- Crohn's Disease- then cancer of the bowel. Please remember that my response was to a Dr. in England asking for help for his patient- not meant to be a tell all. If you do follow this procedure you will be very surprised and I ask that you let me know about it. And yes- you can prevent cancer by taking the mix- no parasites- no cancer, but we are very easily reinfected so you have to take a dose once a week. This is an area where TCM can shine if you take your blinders off. Western Medicine is looking in the wrong direction and has most convinced it iis a DNA problem. Bill Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 2, 2004 Report Share Posted March 2, 2004 William Brown <aqupoint wrote: the mix- no parasites- no cancer, Can you repeat what the mix is again pls? I have used freq stims and herbs for parasites before, and new info on the chngng stages is interesting. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 2, 2004 Report Share Posted March 2, 2004 Hi William. " The " parasite that causes cancer (in general?) is Fasciolopsis buskii? William, I have to assume you're joking, being facetious or pulling my leg a little. Right? Or perhaps you wish to elaborate. Part of my work is to teach this topic in physiology. I studied it also as a cell and molecular biologist. I do have a subscription to Medline. Perhaps you are about to win the Nobel Prize for your new discovery. Please let me know. Respectfully ... and a little amused, if you don't mind, Emmanuel Segmen - William Brown Chinese Medicine Monday, March 01, 2004 3:52 PM Re: Cancer, parasites and clinical success Emmanuel: The parasite that causes cancer is Fasciolopsis buskii. - Emmanuel Segmen Chinese Medicine Sunday, February 29, 2004 8:04 PM Re: Cancer, parasites and clinical success Hi Phil and All, I agree, Phil, that except for papillomavirus the etiology of cancer has little to do with infection. Cigarette smoking is clearly shown to cause lung cancer. It leads to " transformation " of the tissue which makes the tissue vulnerable to oncogenesis ... firing off of a growth gene promoter. Where's the infection? I've heard people discuss " parasites " before, but when I ask for which parasites as you've just done, Phil, they seem not able to answer. This seems to be an allopathic side of some alternative practitioners. They seem to want to address infection or some aspect of germ theory without actually having knowledge of it ... or only wanting to allude to it in some vague sort of way. If someone can set me straight on this, I'd appreciate it. Thank you. Respectfully, Emmanuel Segmen Hi All, & Hi Aqupoint & Chris, Aqupoint wrote: > Cancer is caused by a parasite, and this mix will kill all 3 > stages. Aqupoint, what is the published evidence that " Cancer is caused by a parasite " ? What parasite? IMO, that is most unlilkely; if it were true, it would be easy to control, even prevent, cancer. Chris replied: > Since most people with cancers have active parasites, one might > assume the cancer was caused by parasites. Another view is that as > the bodies biochemistry degrades, there are critters that find the > body a good host. The cancer is caused by other factors. Agreed. An association per se does NOT prove causality. Chris again: > It is these factors that give invite to the critters. By killing > the parasites and increase yang, as these herbs will do, the > person has an opportunity to heal themselves. I would also include > Alpha Lipoic acid, Acetyl L Carnitine, curcumin and if you think > calcium is a good idea, use a source with boron, silica Vit D and > magnesium. Juicing cucumbers, with a clove of garlic and a little > beet may also be a god idea. The juice is used by some famous > healing centers as a part of a live food program. I have seen > people come in hunched over in a wheel chair and be up with lots > of energy in a week. Hope this helps, Chris Cancer is a highly complex field - many different types, many different markers, and (to date) relatively bad clinical success with any method of therapy. Even the best combinations of allopathic + herbal remedies known today are a long way from CURING cancer. If my last sentence is incorrect, please enlighten me. Best regards, Email: < WORK : Teagasc Research Management, Sandymount Ave., Dublin 4, Ireland Mobile: 353-; [in the Republic: 0] HOME : 1 Esker Lawns, Lucan, Dublin, Ireland Tel : 353-; [in the Republic: 0] WWW : http://homepage.eircom.net/~progers/searchap.htm Membership requires that you do not post any commerical, swear, religious, spam messages,flame another member or swear. To change your email settings, i.e. individually, daily digest or none, visit the groups' homepage: Chinese Medicine/ click 'edit my membership' on the right hand side and adjust accordingly. To send an email to <Chinese Medicine- > from the email account you joined with. You will be removed automatically but will still recieve messages for a few days. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 2, 2004 Report Share Posted March 2, 2004 Bill, I heartily agree that Chinese medicine can shine in the realm of treating various forms of cancer. As to the rest of your allopathic presentation ... I did a broad search back to 1960. Fasciolopsis buskii has not been " overlooked " . It's been studied and 46 papers have been published in peer-review journals in the past 44 years. I took the time to read this literature. Fasciolopsis buskii infects worms, not humans. It has as hard time to infect any mammal, whatsoever. Mice, rats, all primates (including humans) and dogs were found to be completely refractory (no infection.) Guinea pigs were partially susceptible and newborn rabbits were fairly susceptible and the only mammalian animal model for researching Fasciolopsis buskii. The only presence in humans was found in a few individuals in third world countries with liver flukes. That's because Fasciolopsis buskii infects various kinds of worms including flukes .... not humans! If you don't have a fluke or other parasitic worm infection, you can't get Fasciolopsis buskii inside your body. It has such a hard time to infect mammals that finding an animal model to study this organism was very difficult. See: " The susceptibility of mammals to Fasciolopsis buskii. " J Helminthol 1985 Mar;59(1):19-22 (ISSN: 002-149X) Malviya HC. (England) I'm sorry, Bill, I found your presentation to be profoundly bogus. Chinese medicine formulas that address various types of cancer are not based on treating human infections of Fasciolopsis buski. Such infections do not exist except in a fairly active imagination. Respectfully, Emmanuel Segmen - William Brown Chinese Medicine Monday, March 01, 2004 4:27 PM Re: Cancer, parasites and clinical success Hello Phil: I have not been at the computer for a few days- I wasn't trying to avoid the question. The parasite that causes cancer is Fasciolopsis buskii.The egg is about/10mm. The microscopic hatchlings are called miracidia and are the second stage. When the eggs reach the liver they will hatch if there is a presence of propyl alcohol. The miracidia start to make little balls inside themselves called redia. It leaves the miracidia and begins to reproduce itself. 40 redia can each make 40 more- this is out of 1 egg.These redia are swept along in your blood landing on whatever tissue lets them in, usually weak tissue- smokers lungs, breasts with benign lumps etc. Multiplying continues and they change shape- growing a tail- allowing them to swim- now called cercaria. The cercaria attaches itself to your tissue, and begins to grow a cocoon. Now it is called metacercaria. The metacercaria develop an extremely thick shell around themselves- which it seems is dissolve in propyl alcohol- completing it's life cycle in your body. When there adults in the liver, a growth factor " ortho-phospho-tyrosine appears. This is the growth factor proven in Toronto to be the cause of the excessive growth of the cancer. This parasite has been studied since 1925 but overlooked. Please go to www.dr.clark.com to find published evidence of this. I have stopped cancer many times- it doesn't seem to matter which kind of cancer. If this is not the answer it is 90% of it. The mix has been tested on many types of parasites and kills about 100 types. Chris brings up the old saying of the chicken and the egg. This time the body gets the parasites first- then irritable bowel syndrome- Crohn's Disease- then cancer of the bowel. Please remember that my response was to a Dr. in England asking for help for his patient- not meant to be a tell all. If you do follow this procedure you will be very surprised and I ask that you let me know about it. And yes- you can prevent cancer by taking the mix- no parasites- no cancer, but we are very easily reinfected so you have to take a dose once a week. This is an area where TCM can shine if you take your blinders off. Western Medicine is looking in the wrong direction and has most convinced it iis a DNA problem. Bill Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 2, 2004 Report Share Posted March 2, 2004 Bill, I heartily agree that Chinese medicine can shine in the realm of treating various forms of cancer. As to the rest of your allopathic presentation ... I did a broad search back to 1960. Fasciolopsis buskii has not been " overlooked " . It's been studied and 46 papers have been published in peer-review journals in the past 44 years. I took the time to read this literature. Fasciolopsis buskii infects worms, not humans. It has as hard time to infect any mammal, whatsoever. Mice, rats, all primates (including humans) and dogs were found to be completely refractory (no infection.) Guinea pigs were partially susceptible and newborn rabbits were fairly susceptible and the only mammalian animal model for researching Fasciolopsis buskii. The only presence in humans was found in a few individuals in third world countries with liver flukes. That's because Fasciolopsis buskii infects various kinds of worms including flukes .... not humans! If you don't have a fluke or other parasitic worm infection, you can't get Fasciolopsis buskii inside your body. It has such a hard time to infect mammals that finding an animal model to study this organism was very difficult. See: " The susceptibility of mammals to Fasciolopsis buskii. " J Helminthol 1985 Mar;59(1):19-22 (ISSN: 002- 149X) Malviya HC. (England) I'm sorry, Bill, I found your presentation to be profoundly bogus. Chinese medicine formulas that address various types of cancer are not based on treating human infections of Fasciolopsis buski. Such infections do not exist except in a fairly active imagination. Respectfully, Emmanuel Segmen Chinese Medicine , " William Brown " <aqupoint@r...> wrote: > Hello Phil: I have not been at the computer for a few days- I wasn't trying to avoid the question. The parasite that causes cancer is Fasciolopsis buskii.The egg is about/10mm. The microscopic hatchlings are called miracidia and are the second stage. When the eggs reach the liver they will hatch if there is a presence of propyl alcohol. The miracidia start to make little balls inside themselves called redia. It leaves the miracidia and begins to reproduce itself. 40 redia can each make 40 more- this is out of 1 egg.These redia are swept along in your blood landing on whatever tissue lets them in, usually weak tissue- smokers lungs, breasts with benign lumps etc. Multiplying continues and they change shape- growing a tail- allowing them to swim- now called cercaria. The cercaria attaches itself to your tissue, and begins to grow a cocoon. Now it is called metacercaria. The metacercaria develop an extremely thick shell around themselves- which it seems is dissolve in propyl alcohol- completing it's life cycle in your body. When there adults in the liver, a growth factor " ortho-phospho-tyrosine appears. This is the growth factor proven in Toronto to be the cause of the excessive growth of the cancer. This parasite has been studied since 1925 but overlooked. Please go to www.dr.clark.com to find published evidence of this. I have stopped cancer many times- it doesn't seem to matter which kind of cancer. If this is not the answer it is 90% of it. The mix has been tested on many types of parasites and kills about 100 types. Chris brings up the old saying of the chicken and the egg. This time the body gets the parasites first- then irritable bowel syndrome- Crohn's Disease- then cancer of the bowel. Please remember that my response was to a Dr. in England asking for help for his patient- not meant to be a tell all. If you do follow this procedure > you will be very surprised and I ask that you let me know about it. And yes- you can prevent cancer by taking the mix- no parasites- no cancer, but we are very easily reinfected so you have to take a dose once a week. This is an area where TCM can shine if you take your blinders off. Western Medicine is looking in the wrong direction and has most convinced it iis a DNA problem. Bill > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 2, 2004 Report Share Posted March 2, 2004 Pardon me, Bill. It turns out upon further reading that this fluke does infect snails, pigs and human children in China and Thailand. This is the result of eating unwashed and uncooked roots and tubers from local rivers. None of the papers report any correlation to cancer. Nor do they report a correlation to adult human infection. Where have you found this in any peer-reviewed journal? My error below resulted from getting myopically caught up in the fascinating reading of a few of the papers. Respectfully, Emmanuel Segmen -Emmanuel Segmen wrote: Bill, I heartily agree that Chinese medicine can shine in the realm of treating various forms of cancer. As to the rest of your allopathic presentation ... I did a broad search back to 1960. Fasciolopsis buskii has not been " overlooked " . It's been studied and 46 papers have been published in peer-review journals in the past 44 years. I took the time to read this literature. Fasciolopsis buskii infects worms, not humans. It has as hard time to infect any mammal, whatsoever. Mice, rats, all primates (including humans) and dogs were found to be completely refractory (no infection.) Guinea pigs were partially susceptible and newborn rabbits were fairly susceptible and the only mammalian animal model for researching Fasciolopsis buskii. The only presence in humans was found in a few individuals in third world countries with liver flukes. That's because Fasciolopsis buskii infects various kinds of worms including flukes .... not humans! If you don't have a fluke or other parasitic worm infection, you can't get Fasciolopsis buskii inside your body. It has such a hard time to infect mammals that finding an animal model to study this organism was very difficult. See: " The susceptibility of mammals to Fasciolopsis buskii. " J Helminthol 1985 Mar;59(1):19-22 (ISSN: 002-149X) Malviya HC. (England) I'm sorry, Bill, I found your presentation to be profoundly bogus. Chinese medicine formulas that address various types of cancer are not based on treating human infections of Fasciolopsis buski. Such infections do not exist except in a fairly active imagination. Respectfully, Emmanuel Segmen - William Brown Chinese Medicine Monday, March 01, 2004 4:27 PM Re: Cancer, parasites and clinical success Hello Phil: I have not been at the computer for a few days- I wasn't trying to avoid the question. The parasite that causes cancer is Fasciolopsis buskii.The egg is about/10mm. The microscopic hatchlings are called miracidia and are the second stage. When the eggs reach the liver they will hatch if there is a presence of propyl alcohol. The miracidia start to make little balls inside themselves called redia. It leaves the miracidia and begins to reproduce itself. 40 redia can each make 40 more- this is out of 1 egg.These redia are swept along in your blood landing on whatever tissue lets them in, usually weak tissue- smokers lungs, breasts with benign lumps etc. Multiplying continues and they change shape- growing a tail- allowing them to swim- now called cercaria. The cercaria attaches itself to your tissue, and begins to grow a cocoon. Now it is called metacercaria. The metacercaria develop an extremely thick shell around themselves- which it seems is dissolve in propyl alcohol- completing it's life cycle in your body. When there adults in the liver, a growth factor " ortho-phospho-tyrosine appears. This is the growth factor proven in Toronto to be the cause of the excessive growth of the cancer. This parasite has been studied since 1925 but overlooked. Please go to www.dr.clark.com to find published evidence of this. I have stopped cancer many times- it doesn't seem to matter which kind of cancer. If this is not the answer it is 90% of it. The mix has been tested on many types of parasites and kills about 100 types. Chris brings up the old saying of the chicken and the egg. This time the body gets the parasites first- then irritable bowel syndrome- Crohn's Disease- then cancer of the bowel. Please remember that my response was to a Dr. in England asking for help for his patient- not meant to be a tell all. If you do follow this procedure you will be very surprised and I ask that you let me know about it. And yes- you can prevent cancer by taking the mix- no parasites- no cancer, but we are very easily reinfected so you have to take a dose once a week. This is an area where TCM can shine if you take your blinders off. Western Medicine is looking in the wrong direction and has most convinced it iis a DNA problem. Bill Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 3, 2004 Report Share Posted March 3, 2004 on 3/2/04 2:33 AM, Musiclear at Musiclear wrote: Hypocrites Heath Institute Wonderful mispelling! I guess you meant the Hypocrates Health Institute as I doubt if anybody would trust an institute of hypocrites, healthy or not regards, PJ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 3, 2004 Report Share Posted March 3, 2004 on 3/2/04 2:07 AM, Emmanuel Segmen at susegmen wrote: Hi William. " The " parasite that causes cancer (in general?) is Fasciolopsis buskii? William, I have to assume you're joking, being facetious or pulling my leg a little. Right? Or perhaps you wish to elaborate. Part of my work is to teach this topic in physiology. I studied it also as a cell and molecular biologist. I do have a subscription to Medline. Perhaps you are about to win the Nobel Prize for your new discovery. Please let me know. Respectfully ... and a little amused, if you don't mind, Emmanuel Segmen - William Brown Chinese Medicine Monday, March 01, 2004 3:52 PM Re: Cancer, parasites and clinical success Emmanuel: The parasite that causes cancer is Fasciolopsis buskii. - Emmanuel Segmen Chinese Medicine Sunday, February 29, 2004 8:04 PM Re: Cancer, parasites and clinical success Hi Phil and All, I agree, Phil, that except for papillomavirus the etiology of cancer has little to do with infection. Cigarette smoking is clearly shown to cause lung cancer. It leads to " transformation " of the tissue which makes the tissue vulnerable to oncogenesis ... firing off of a growth gene promoter. Where's the infection? I've heard people discuss " parasites " before, but when I ask for which parasites as you've just done, Phil, they seem not able to answer. This seems to be an allopathic side of some alternative practitioners. They seem to want to address infection or some aspect of germ theory without actually having knowledge of it ... or only wanting to allude to it in some vague sort of way. If someone can set me straight on this, I'd appreciate it. Thank you. Respectfully, Emmanuel Segmen Hi All, & Hi Aqupoint & Chris, Aqupoint wrote: > Cancer is caused by a parasite, and this mix will kill all 3 > stages. Aqupoint, what is the published evidence that " Cancer is caused by a parasite " ? What parasite? IMO, that is most unlilkely; if it were true, it would be easy to control, even prevent, cancer. Chris replied: > Since most people with cancers have active parasites, one might > assume the cancer was caused by parasites. Another view is that as > the bodies biochemistry degrades, there are critters that find the > body a good host. The cancer is caused by other factors. Agreed. An association per se does NOT prove causality. Chris again: > It is these factors that give invite to the critters. By killing > the parasites and increase yang, as these herbs will do, the > person has an opportunity to heal themselves. I would also include > Alpha Lipoic acid, Acetyl L Carnitine, curcumin and if you think > calcium is a good idea, use a source with boron, silica Vit D and > magnesium. Juicing cucumbers, with a clove of garlic and a little > beet may also be a god idea. The juice is used by some famous > healing centers as a part of a live food program. I have seen > people come in hunched over in a wheel chair and be up with lots > of energy in a week. Hope this helps, Chris Cancer is a highly complex field - many different types, many different markers, and (to date) relatively bad clinical success with any method of therapy. Even the best combinations of allopathic + herbal remedies known today are a long way from CURING cancer. If my last sentence is incorrect, please enlighten me. Best regards, Email: < Hello, most of the stuff on cancer and parasite come from Hulda Clark, a weirdo claiming to be a doctor of some kind ; Read this from Quack Buster ( I do not often agree with the ranting of Stephen Barrett, but sometimes he is correct.) I wish it would be so simple to cure cancer, i also wish that good therapist, genuinely interested in helping people to get better, would not be so naive Regards, PJ ------ Hulda Regehr Clark, 72, claims to cure cancer, AIDS, and many other serious diseases. She describes herself as an " independent research scientist " with bachelor and master's degrees from the University of Saskatchewan and a Ph.D. degree in physiology from the University of Minnesota (1958). She also lists a naturopathic (N.D.) degree from the Clayton College of Natural Health [1]. Clayton is a nonaccredited correspondence school founded in 1980 and located in Birmingham Alabama. In 1985, when this school was called Dr. Clayton's School of Natural Healing, its " Doctor of Naturopathy " course was described in a magazine article as a " 100-hour course " for which the tuition was $695 [2]. For several years, Clark's treatment has been administered at Century Nutrition, a clinic in Tijuana, Mexico, where the basic fee for two weeks of " treatment " was $4,500 (plus 10% tax). This figure does not include the cost of a motel room (approximately $210/week); meals ($250/week); blood tests ($70 each); standard diagnostic imaging tests ($40 to $400); dental x-rays (at least $206); " individually tailored " supplements ($400 to $1,500 for a month supply); equipment (about $350); tooth extractions ($80 each); and partial or full dentures ($450). Bizarre Claims Clark claims that all cancers and many other diseases are caused by " parasites, toxins, and pollutants " and can be cured by killing the parasites and ridding the body of environmental chemicals. In a videotaped presentation, she said that all diseases are caused by a combination of a parisite and a pollutant [3]. Her book The Cure for All Cancers states: All cancers are alike. They are all caused by a parasite. A single parasite! It is the human intestinal fluke. And if you kill this parasite, the cancer stops immediately. The tissue becomes normal again. In order to get cancer, you must have this parasite. . . . This parasite typically lives in the intestine where it might do little harm, causing only colitis, Crohn's disease or irritable bowel syndrome, or perhaps nothing at all. But if it invades a different organ, like the uterus, kidneys or liver, it does a great deal of harm. If it establishes itself in the liver, it causes cancer! It only establishes itself in the liver of some people. These people have propyl alcohol in their body. All cancer patients (100%) have both propyl alcohol and the intestinal fluke in their livers. The solvent propyl alcohol is responsible for letting the fluke establish itself in the liver. In order to get cancer, you must have both the parasite and propyl alcohol in your body [4:1-2]. Clark further alleges: * The adult liver fluke -- which she misspells as Faciolopsis buskii -- " stays stuck to our intestine, (or liver, causing cancer, or uterus, causing endometriosis, or thymus, causing AIDS, or kidney, causing Hodgkin's disease). " [4:4] Or the pancreas, causing diabetes; the brain, causing Alzheimer's disease; the prostate (causing prostatitis; or the skin if you have Kaposi's sarcoma [4:35]. * As soon as there are adults in the liver. . . . a growth factor, called ortho-phospho-tyrosine appears. Growth factors make cells divide. Now YOUR cells will begin to divide too! Now you have cancer. . . . Having propyl alcohol in your body allows the fluke to develop outside of the intestine [4:8]. * When the fluke and all its stages have been killed, the ortho-phospho-tyrosine is gone! Your cancer is gone [4:9]. * Clearly, you must do 3 things: (1) Kill the parasite and all its stages; (2) stop letting propyl alcohol into your body; and (3) flush out the metals and common toxins from your body so you can get well [4:10]. * It is not unusual for someone to have a dozen (or more) of the parasites I have samples of. You can assume that you, too, have a dozen different parasites [4:10]. * Three herbs, used together, can rid you of over 100 types of parasites: black walnut hulls, wormwood, and common cloves [4:11-12]. But the amino acids ornithine and arginine improve this recipe [4:15]. * Use of these five products will kill the cancer-causing fluke in the first five days and the remaining parasites in another two weeks [4:19]. * It takes 5 days to be cured of cancer regardless of the type you have. Surgery, radiation, or chemotherapy can be canceled because, after Clark's recipe cures the cancer, it cannot come back [4:introductory passage]. * All metal (fillings, crowns, bridges, etc.) should be removed from the mouth, and all teeth with root canals should be extracted, because their presence damages the immune system [4:46-48]. * To prevent recurrence, stay on a maintenance program of killing parasites and give yourself a high-dose program at least twice a year. Also treat all family members and household pets [4:23-26]. * The method is 100% effective in stopping cancer regardless of the type of cancer or how terminal it may be. It follows that this method must work for you, too, if you are able to carry out the instructions. [4:120] * No matter what kind of cancer you have (or HIV or pains or weakness), a complete program of lifting the burdens on your immune system will miraculously clear it up. [4:372] All of the above notions are absurd. In a recent talk that attacked widespread misbeliefs about parasites, the president of the American Society of Parasitologists noted that if Clark's pseudoscientific claims were correct, " the medical establishment and . . . professional pathologists are guilty of a gigantic and cruel fraud on the public. " [5] Patients who " cleanse " their intestines with Clark's recommended herbs may excrete what they think are parasites. However, in one instance I know of, a specimen of " parasites " turned out to be citrus fibers, presumably from grapefruit juice used for the " cleanse. " In another, reported in a medical journal, the " parasites " turned out to be ordinary fecal material [6]. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 3, 2004 Report Share Posted March 3, 2004 There is no name in TCM for what is known as cancer in WM. What justice do we do to a patient with WM labels? There are unlimited doctors and institutions who work with WM concepts when dealing with carcinoma. Are TCM practitioners to jump on the bandwagon? If you work with someone who came in with a WM diagnosis of lymphosacrcoma, he or she does not want you to treat by WM tenets, but help with TCM methodolgies. Can one do that while accepting labels like sarcoma and lipoma and adenoma? Dr. Holmes Keikobad MB BS DPH Ret. DIP AC NCCAOM LIC AC CO & AZ www.acu-free.com - home based recertification for acupuncturists and health professionals Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 3, 2004 Report Share Posted March 3, 2004 Thanks, PJ. I tried looking this up on snopes but didn't get anywhere. Glad you found the item on Quack Busters. I've been dealing with the " parasite " problem from frightened patients of naturopaths for the last fourteen years. It's quite amazing how many people believe that they have parasites without ever having been tested for them. They could have saved much worry and lots of dollars if they had simply had lab tests done. In gratitude, Emmanuel Segmen - Heretix Chinese Medicine Wednesday, March 03, 2004 1:05 AM Re: Cancer, parasites and clinical success on 3/2/04 2:07 AM, Emmanuel Segmen at susegmen wrote: Hi William. " The " parasite that causes cancer (in general?) is Fasciolopsis buskii? William, I have to assume you're joking, being facetious or pulling my leg a little. Right? Or perhaps you wish to elaborate. Part of my work is to teach this topic in physiology. I studied it also as a cell and molecular biologist. I do have a subscription to Medline. Perhaps you are about to win the Nobel Prize for your new discovery. Please let me know. Respectfully ... and a little amused, if you don't mind, Emmanuel Segmen - William Brown Chinese Medicine Monday, March 01, 2004 3:52 PM Re: Cancer, parasites and clinical success Emmanuel: The parasite that causes cancer is Fasciolopsis buskii. - Emmanuel Segmen Chinese Medicine Sunday, February 29, 2004 8:04 PM Re: Cancer, parasites and clinical success Hi Phil and All, I agree, Phil, that except for papillomavirus the etiology of cancer has little to do with infection. Cigarette smoking is clearly shown to cause lung cancer. It leads to " transformation " of the tissue which makes the tissue vulnerable to oncogenesis ... firing off of a growth gene promoter. Where's the infection? I've heard people discuss " parasites " before, but when I ask for which parasites as you've just done, Phil, they seem not able to answer. This seems to be an allopathic side of some alternative practitioners. They seem to want to address infection or some aspect of germ theory without actually having knowledge of it ... or only wanting to allude to it in some vague sort of way. If someone can set me straight on this, I'd appreciate it. Thank you. Respectfully, Emmanuel Segmen Hi All, & Hi Aqupoint & Chris, Aqupoint wrote: > Cancer is caused by a parasite, and this mix will kill all 3 > stages. Aqupoint, what is the published evidence that " Cancer is caused by a parasite " ? What parasite? IMO, that is most unlilkely; if it were true, it would be easy to control, even prevent, cancer. Chris replied: > Since most people with cancers have active parasites, one might > assume the cancer was caused by parasites. Another view is that as > the bodies biochemistry degrades, there are critters that find the > body a good host. The cancer is caused by other factors. Agreed. An association per se does NOT prove causality. Chris again: > It is these factors that give invite to the critters. By killing > the parasites and increase yang, as these herbs will do, the > person has an opportunity to heal themselves. I would also include > Alpha Lipoic acid, Acetyl L Carnitine, curcumin and if you think > calcium is a good idea, use a source with boron, silica Vit D and > magnesium. Juicing cucumbers, with a clove of garlic and a little > beet may also be a god idea. The juice is used by some famous > healing centers as a part of a live food program. I have seen > people come in hunched over in a wheel chair and be up with lots > of energy in a week. Hope this helps, Chris Cancer is a highly complex field - many different types, many different markers, and (to date) relatively bad clinical success with any method of therapy. Even the best combinations of allopathic + herbal remedies known today are a long way from CURING cancer. If my last sentence is incorrect, please enlighten me. Best regards, Email: < Hello, most of the stuff on cancer and parasite come from Hulda Clark, a weirdo claiming to be a doctor of some kind ; Read this from Quack Buster ( I do not often agree with the ranting of Stephen Barrett, but sometimes he is correct.) I wish it would be so simple to cure cancer, i also wish that good therapist, genuinely interested in helping people to get better, would not be so naive Regards, PJ ------ Hulda Regehr Clark, 72, claims to cure cancer, AIDS, and many other serious diseases. She describes herself as an " independent research scientist " with bachelor and master's degrees from the University of Saskatchewan and a Ph.D. degree in physiology from the University of Minnesota (1958). She also lists a naturopathic (N.D.) degree from the Clayton College of Natural Health [1]. Clayton is a nonaccredited correspondence school founded in 1980 and located in Birmingham Alabama. In 1985, when this school was called Dr. Clayton's School of Natural Healing, its " Doctor of Naturopathy " course was described in a magazine article as a " 100-hour course " for which the tuition was $695 [2]. For several years, Clark's treatment has been administered at Century Nutrition, a clinic in Tijuana, Mexico, where the basic fee for two weeks of " treatment " was $4,500 (plus 10% tax). This figure does not include the cost of a motel room (approximately $210/week); meals ($250/week); blood tests ($70 each); standard diagnostic imaging tests ($40 to $400); dental x-rays (at least $206); " individually tailored " supplements ($400 to $1,500 for a month supply); equipment (about $350); tooth extractions ($80 each); and partial or full dentures ($450). Bizarre Claims Clark claims that all cancers and many other diseases are caused by " parasites, toxins, and pollutants " and can be cured by killing the parasites and ridding the body of environmental chemicals. In a videotaped presentation, she said that all diseases are caused by a combination of a parisite and a pollutant [3]. Her book The Cure for All Cancers states: All cancers are alike. They are all caused by a parasite. A single parasite! It is the human intestinal fluke. And if you kill this parasite, the cancer stops immediately. The tissue becomes normal again. In order to get cancer, you must have this parasite. . . . This parasite typically lives in the intestine where it might do little harm, causing only colitis, Crohn's disease or irritable bowel syndrome, or perhaps nothing at all. But if it invades a different organ, like the uterus, kidneys or liver, it does a great deal of harm. If it establishes itself in the liver, it causes cancer! It only establishes itself in the liver of some people. These people have propyl alcohol in their body. All cancer patients (100%) have both propyl alcohol and the intestinal fluke in their livers. The solvent propyl alcohol is responsible for letting the fluke establish itself in the liver. In order to get cancer, you must have both the parasite and propyl alcohol in your body [4:1-2]. Clark further alleges: * The adult liver fluke -- which she misspells as Faciolopsis buskii -- " stays stuck to our intestine, (or liver, causing cancer, or uterus, causing endometriosis, or thymus, causing AIDS, or kidney, causing Hodgkin's disease). " [4:4] Or the pancreas, causing diabetes; the brain, causing Alzheimer's disease; the prostate (causing prostatitis; or the skin if you have Kaposi's sarcoma [4:35]. * As soon as there are adults in the liver. . . . a growth factor, called ortho-phospho-tyrosine appears. Growth factors make cells divide. Now YOUR cells will begin to divide too! Now you have cancer. . . . Having propyl alcohol in your body allows the fluke to develop outside of the intestine [4:8]. * When the fluke and all its stages have been killed, the ortho-phospho-tyrosine is gone! Your cancer is gone [4:9]. * Clearly, you must do 3 things: (1) Kill the parasite and all its stages; (2) stop letting propyl alcohol into your body; and (3) flush out the metals and common toxins from your body so you can get well [4:10]. * It is not unusual for someone to have a dozen (or more) of the parasites I have samples of. You can assume that you, too, have a dozen different parasites [4:10]. * Three herbs, used together, can rid you of over 100 types of parasites: black walnut hulls, wormwood, and common cloves [4:11-12]. But the amino acids ornithine and arginine improve this recipe [4:15]. * Use of these five products will kill the cancer-causing fluke in the first five days and the remaining parasites in another two weeks [4:19]. * It takes 5 days to be cured of cancer regardless of the type you have. Surgery, radiation, or chemotherapy can be canceled because, after Clark's recipe cures the cancer, it cannot come back [4:introductory passage]. * All metal (fillings, crowns, bridges, etc.) should be removed from the mouth, and all teeth with root canals should be extracted, because their presence damages the immune system [4:46-48]. * To prevent recurrence, stay on a maintenance program of killing parasites and give yourself a high-dose program at least twice a year. Also treat all family members and household pets [4:23-26]. * The method is 100% effective in stopping cancer regardless of the type of cancer or how terminal it may be. It follows that this method must work for you, too, if you are able to carry out the instructions. [4:120] * No matter what kind of cancer you have (or HIV or pains or weakness), a complete program of lifting the burdens on your immune system will miraculously clear it up. [4:372] All of the above notions are absurd. In a recent talk that attacked widespread misbeliefs about parasites, the president of the American Society of Parasitologists noted that if Clark's pseudoscientific claims were correct, " the medical establishment and . . . professional pathologists are guilty of a gigantic and cruel fraud on the public. " [5] Patients who " cleanse " their intestines with Clark's recommended herbs may excrete what they think are parasites. However, in one instance I know of, a specimen of " parasites " turned out to be citrus fibers, presumably from grapefruit juice used for the " cleanse. " In another, reported in a medical journal, the " parasites " turned out to be ordinary fecal material [6]. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 4, 2004 Report Share Posted March 4, 2004 Emmanuel: Respectfully, you should look at this again. If it had been written down in the books correctly we would not be talking about this. Again, I was answering an urgent request from a Dr. in England, not trying to change the many closed minds out there. Cancer patients given this mixture have had their cancers disappear. All cancer patients studied by Dr. Clark have had parasites. I don't have a lab to check this out and count on her wisdom and studies for the proof. All I see is the cancers stopping and the patients getting better. I am not out for a nobel prize but will use a method that works , time and time again without causing my patient harm. Go to http://www.drclark.net/ and read for yourself. Maybe you have heard of " Taxol " being used effectively as chemo for cancer patients. Did you know this is an anti-parasitic in TCM! Unfortunately it is not the best mix and seems effective only on breast, testicular and ovarian cancers- but it is an anti-parasitic just the same. The difference is the 3 injections cost $30,000 instead of the raw herb product given for peanuts in comparison. And- the powers that be have it on the restricted list- so you couldn't get it anyway. These products that I mentioned will probably end up on the same list when it is seen as useful. What were you teaching your students about stomach ulcers? Were you right? Bill Dr. Hulda Clark Hulda Regehr Clark began her studies in biology at the University of Saskatchewan, Canada, where she was awarded the Bachelor of Arts, Magna Cum Laude, and the Master of Arts, with High Honors. After two years of study at McGill University, she attended the University of Minnesota, studying biophysics and cell physiology. She received her Doctorate degree in physiology in 1958. In 1979 she left government funded research and began private consulting on a full time basis, after attaining a naturopathy degree at the Clayton College of Natural Health. Six years later she discovered an electronic technique for scanning the human body. With it she noticed clues as to the cause of cancer, HIV and other " mysterious " diseases. Today Dr. Clark puts her methods, her results, and her conclusions before you. Read her books and recover. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 4, 2004 Report Share Posted March 4, 2004 I think the real parasites are the bogus or incompetent natural therapists who exploit shamelessly vulnerable, often desperate patients These people often boast of Ph D ( as sold by Anton Jarasuriya in Sri Lanka for example for a few hundred dollars) So technically, these patient have parasites, but there is no need for lab test, just a determined kick up the ass of their therapist should get rid of the unwanted host. Regards, PJ On Wednesday, March 3, 2004, at 11:02 pm, Emmanuel Segmen wrote: > Thanks, PJ. > > I tried looking this up on snopes but didn't get anywhere. Glad you > found the item on Quack Busters. I've been dealing with the > " parasite " problem from frightened patients of naturopaths for the > last fourteen years. It's quite amazing how many people believe that > they have parasites without ever having been tested for them. They > could have saved much worry and lots of dollars if they had simply had > lab tests done. > > In gratitude, > Emmanuel Segmen > - > Heretix > Chinese Medicine > Wednesday, March 03, 2004 1:05 AM > Re: Cancer, parasites and clinical success > > > on 3/2/04 2:07 AM, Emmanuel Segmen at susegmen wrote: > > Hi William. > > " The " parasite that causes cancer (in general?) is Fasciolopsis > buskii? > William, I have to assume you're joking, being facetious or pulling > my leg a > little. Right? Or perhaps you wish to elaborate. Part of my work > is to > teach this topic in physiology. I studied it also as a cell and > molecular > biologist. I do have a subscription to Medline. Perhaps you are > about to > win the Nobel Prize for your new discovery. Please let me know. > > Respectfully ... and a little amused, if you don't mind, > Emmanuel Segmen > > - > William Brown > Chinese Medicine > Monday, March 01, 2004 3:52 PM > Re: Cancer, parasites and clinical success > > > Emmanuel: The parasite that causes cancer is Fasciolopsis buskii. > - > Emmanuel Segmen > Chinese Medicine > Sunday, February 29, 2004 8:04 PM > Re: Cancer, parasites and clinical success > > > Hi Phil and All, > > I agree, Phil, that except for papillomavirus the etiology of > cancer has > little to do with infection. Cigarette smoking is clearly shown to > cause > lung cancer. It leads to " transformation " of the tissue which makes > the > tissue vulnerable to oncogenesis ... firing off of a growth gene > promoter. > Where's the infection? > > I've heard people discuss " parasites " before, but when I ask for > which > parasites as you've just done, Phil, they seem not able to answer. > This > seems to be an allopathic side of some alternative practitioners. > They seem > to want to address infection or some aspect of germ theory without > actually > having knowledge of it ... or only wanting to allude to it in some > vague > sort of way. If someone can set me straight on this, I'd appreciate > it. > Thank you. > > Respectfully, > Emmanuel Segmen > > > > Hi All, & Hi Aqupoint & Chris, > > Aqupoint wrote: > > Cancer is caused by a parasite, and this mix will kill all 3 > > stages. > > Aqupoint, what is the published evidence that " Cancer is caused > by a parasite " ? What parasite? > > IMO, that is most unlilkely; if it were true, it would be easy > to > control, even prevent, cancer. > > Chris replied: > > Since most people with cancers have active parasites, one > might > > assume the cancer was caused by parasites. Another view is > that as > > the bodies biochemistry degrades, there are critters that > find the > > body a good host. The cancer is caused by other factors. > > Agreed. An association per se does NOT prove causality. > > Chris again: > > It is these factors that give invite to the critters. By > killing > > the parasites and increase yang, as these herbs will do, the > > person has an opportunity to heal themselves. I would also > include > > Alpha Lipoic acid, Acetyl L Carnitine, curcumin and if you > think > > calcium is a good idea, use a source with boron, silica Vit D > and > > magnesium. Juicing cucumbers, with a clove of garlic and a > little > > beet may also be a god idea. The juice is used by some famous > > healing centers as a part of a live food program. I have seen > > people come in hunched over in a wheel chair and be up with > lots > > of energy in a week. Hope this helps, Chris > > Cancer is a highly complex field - many different types, many > different markers, and (to date) relatively bad clinical > success with > any method of therapy. Even the best combinations of allopathic > + > herbal remedies known today are a long way from CURING cancer. > > If my last sentence is incorrect, please enlighten me. > > Best regards, > > Email: < > > > > Hello, most of the stuff on cancer and parasite come from Hulda > Clark, a > weirdo claiming to be a doctor of some kind ; > Read this from Quack Buster ( I do not often agree with the ranting > of > Stephen Barrett, but sometimes he is correct.) > I wish it would be so simple to cure cancer, i also wish that good > therapist, genuinely interested in helping people to get better, > would not > be so naive > > Regards, > > > PJ > > > ----- > - > > > > Hulda Regehr Clark, 72, claims to cure cancer, AIDS, and many other > serious > diseases. She describes herself as an " independent research > scientist " with > bachelor and master's degrees from the University of Saskatchewan > and a > Ph.D. degree in physiology from the University of Minnesota (1958). > She also > lists a naturopathic (N.D.) degree from the Clayton College of > Natural > Health [1]. Clayton is a nonaccredited correspondence school founded > in 1980 > and located in Birmingham Alabama. In 1985, when this school was > called Dr. > Clayton's School of Natural Healing, its " Doctor of Naturopathy " > course was > described in a magazine article as a " 100-hour course " for which the > tuition > was $695 [2]. > > For several years, Clark's treatment has been administered at Century > Nutrition, a clinic in Tijuana, Mexico, where the basic fee for two > weeks of > " treatment " was $4,500 (plus 10% tax). This figure does not include > the cost > of a motel room (approximately $210/week); meals ($250/week); blood > tests > ($70 each); standard diagnostic imaging tests ($40 to $400); dental > x-rays > (at least $206); " individually tailored " supplements ($400 to $1,500 > for a > month supply); equipment (about $350); tooth extractions ($80 each); > and > partial or full dentures ($450). > > Bizarre Claims > > Clark claims that all cancers and many other diseases are caused by > " parasites, toxins, and pollutants " and can be cured by killing the > parasites and ridding the body of environmental chemicals. In a > videotaped > presentation, she said that all diseases are caused by a combination > of a > parisite and a pollutant [3]. Her book The Cure for All Cancers > states: > > > All cancers are alike. They are all caused by a parasite. A single > parasite! > It is the human intestinal fluke. And if you kill this parasite, the > cancer > stops immediately. The tissue becomes normal again. In order to get > cancer, > you must have this parasite. . . . > > This parasite typically lives in the intestine where it might do > little > harm, causing only colitis, Crohn's disease or irritable bowel > syndrome, or > perhaps nothing at all. But if it invades a different organ, like the > uterus, kidneys or liver, it does a great deal of harm. If it > establishes > itself in the liver, it causes cancer! It only establishes itself in > the > liver of some people. These people have propyl alcohol in their > body. All > cancer patients (100%) have both propyl alcohol and the intestinal > fluke in > their livers. The solvent propyl alcohol is responsible for letting > the > fluke establish itself in the liver. In order to get cancer, you > must have > both the parasite and propyl alcohol in your body [4:1-2]. > > Clark further alleges: > > * The adult liver fluke -- which she misspells as Faciolopsis > buskii -- > " stays stuck to our intestine, (or liver, causing cancer, or uterus, > causing > endometriosis, or thymus, causing AIDS, or kidney, causing Hodgkin's > disease). " [4:4] Or the pancreas, causing diabetes; the brain, > causing > Alzheimer's disease; the prostate (causing prostatitis; or the skin > if you > have Kaposi's sarcoma [4:35]. > * As soon as there are adults in the liver. . . . a growth > factor, called > ortho-phospho-tyrosine appears. Growth factors make cells divide. > Now YOUR > cells will begin to divide too! Now you have cancer. . . . Having > propyl > alcohol in your body allows the fluke to develop outside of the > intestine > [4:8]. > * When the fluke and all its stages have been killed, the > ortho-phospho-tyrosine is gone! Your cancer is gone [4:9]. > * Clearly, you must do 3 things: (1) Kill the parasite and all its > stages; (2) stop letting propyl alcohol into your body; and (3) > flush out > the metals and common toxins from your body so you can get well > [4:10]. > * It is not unusual for someone to have a dozen (or more) of the > parasites I have samples of. You can assume that you, too, have a > dozen > different parasites [4:10]. > * Three herbs, used together, can rid you of over 100 types of > parasites: > black walnut hulls, wormwood, and common cloves [4:11-12]. But the > amino > acids ornithine and arginine improve this recipe [4:15]. > * Use of these five products will kill the cancer-causing fluke > in the > first five days and the remaining parasites in another two weeks > [4:19]. > * It takes 5 days to be cured of cancer regardless of the type > you have. > Surgery, radiation, or chemotherapy can be canceled because, after > Clark's > recipe cures the cancer, it cannot come back [4:introductory > passage]. > * All metal (fillings, crowns, bridges, etc.) should be removed > from the > mouth, and all teeth with root canals should be extracted, because > their > presence damages the immune system [4:46-48]. > * To prevent recurrence, stay on a maintenance program of killing > parasites and give yourself a high-dose program at least twice a > year. Also > treat all family members and household pets [4:23-26]. > * The method is 100% effective in stopping cancer regardless of > the type > of cancer or how terminal it may be. It follows that this method > must work > for you, too, if you are able to carry out the instructions. [4:120] > * No matter what kind of cancer you have (or HIV or pains or > weakness), a > complete program of lifting the burdens on your immune system will > miraculously clear it up. [4:372] > > All of the above notions are absurd. In a recent talk that attacked > widespread misbeliefs about parasites, the president of the American > Society > of Parasitologists noted that if Clark's pseudoscientific claims were > correct, " the medical establishment and . . . professional > pathologists are > guilty of a gigantic and cruel fraud on the public. " [5] > > Patients who " cleanse " their intestines with Clark's recommended > herbs may > excrete what they think are parasites. However, in one instance I > know of, a > specimen of " parasites " turned out to be citrus fibers, presumably > from > grapefruit juice used for the " cleanse. " In another, reported in a > medical > journal, the " parasites " turned out to be ordinary fecal material > [6]. > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 4, 2004 Report Share Posted March 4, 2004 Bill, It's interesting to hear of your personal success. However, if your personal success is not repeatable in other settings, if it has not be peer-reviewed, if it breaks with all axes of conventional wisdom and current knowledge, you can't expect to have a respectful conversation about this. Respectful conversation is based not on persuasion or salesmanship, but rather on what's stated above. Your thesis does not meet any criteria that I can personally think of or imagine from Western science, Western medicine nor Chinese medicine. Having visited Dr. Clark's site, read about Dr. Clark in Quackbusters, and seeing that Dr. Clark has never been published in a peer-reviewed journal, I have to respectfully conclude that Dr. Clark has no useful information to offer. Thus, Bill, I must respectfully note with all due consideration that your thesis is not based on any demonstrated and responsible evidence. I am also amused that you've asked people directly for money on this list. At this time I would suggest that there needs to be a point of order regarding this thread. Hopefully you can conduct your personal business off list. Respectfully, Emmanuel Segmen - William Brown Chinese Medicine Wednesday, March 03, 2004 8:42 PM Re: Cancer, parasites and clinical success Emmanuel: Respectfully, you should look at this again. If it had been written down in the books correctly we would not be talking about this. Again, I was answering an urgent request from a Dr. in England, not trying to change the many closed minds out there. Cancer patients given this mixture have had their cancers disappear. All cancer patients studied by Dr. Clark have had parasites. I don't have a lab to check this out and count on her wisdom and studies for the proof. All I see is the cancers stopping and the patients getting better. I am not out for a nobel prize but will use a method that works , time and time again without causing my patient harm. Go to http://www.drclark.net/ and read for yourself. Maybe you have heard of " Taxol " being used effectively as chemo for cancer patients. Did you know this is an anti-parasitic in TCM! Unfortunately it is not the best mix and seems effective only on breast, testicular and ovarian cancers- but it is an anti-parasitic just the same. The difference is the 3 injections cost $30,000 instead of the raw herb product given for peanuts in comparison. And- the powers that be have it on the restricted list- so you couldn't get it anyway. These products that I mentioned will probably end up on the same list when it is seen as useful. What were you teaching your students about stomach ulcers? Were you right? Bill Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 4, 2004 Report Share Posted March 4, 2004 Hi PJ, I would have to agree with your comments. And I again appreciate your time and energy in helping me check on the authenticity of this issue. I've just pointed out that there needs to be a point of order on this thread. Hopefully, Attilio will step in here though he's pretty busy just now. In gratitude, Emmanuel Segmen - " Pierre jean cousin " I think the real parasites are the bogus or incompetent natural therapists who exploit shamelessly vulnerable, often desperate patients These people often boast of Ph D ( as sold by Anton Jarasuriya in Sri Lanka for example for a few hundred dollars) So technically, these patient have parasites, but there is no need for lab test, just a determined kick up the ass of their therapist should get rid of the unwanted host. Regards, PJ On Wednesday, March 3, 2004, at 11:02 pm, Emmanuel Segmen wrote: > Thanks, PJ. > > I tried looking this up on snopes but didn't get anywhere. Glad you > found the item on Quack Busters. I've been dealing with the > " parasite " problem from frightened patients of naturopaths for the > last fourteen years. It's quite amazing how many people believe that > they have parasites without ever having been tested for them. They > could have saved much worry and lots of dollars if they had simply had > lab tests done. > > In gratitude, > Emmanuel Segmen Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 5, 2004 Report Share Posted March 5, 2004 Thanks Emmanuel for pointing this out to me. Yes, i've been busy, 5 days a week at the hospital, starting at 8.30. Marco, my moderator seems to be busy aswell. Anyway, Bill's messages does break the group's rules in that; Promotion of a business otherwise known as spam. The biography of Dr Clark at that bottom of this text points to that. Discussion of this topic is fine as long as the TCM herbal aspect is focused upon. This means the herb that Bill points out as being anti- parasitic in TCM should be focused upon. I hope this goes some way to clarifying the issue. If anyone feels it doesn't, please contact me off-list, at attiliodalberto Attilio " William Brown " <aqupoint@r...> wrote: > Emmanuel: Respectfully, you should look at this again. If it had been written down in the books correctly we would not be talking about this. Again, I was answering an urgent request from a Dr. in England, not trying to change the many closed minds out there. Cancer patients given this mixture have had their cancers disappear. All cancer patients studied by Dr. Clark have had parasites. I don't have a lab to check this out and count on her wisdom and studies for the proof. All I see is the cancers stopping and the patients getting better. > I am not out for a nobel prize but will use a method that works , time and time again without causing my patient harm. Go to http://www.drclark.net/ and read for yourself. > Maybe you have heard of " Taxol " being used effectively as chemo for cancer patients. Did you know this is an anti-parasitic in TCM! Unfortunately it is not the best mix and seems effective only on breast, testicular and ovarian cancers- but it is an anti-parasitic just the same. The difference is the 3 injections cost $30,000 instead of the raw herb product given for peanuts in comparison. And- the powers that be have it on the restricted list- so you couldn't get it anyway. These products that I mentioned will probably end up on the same list when it is seen as useful. What were you teaching your students about stomach ulcers? Were you right? Bill > > Dr. Hulda Clark > > Hulda Regehr Clark began her studies in biology at the University of Saskatchewan, Canada, where she was awarded the Bachelor of Arts, Magna Cum Laude, and the Master of Arts, with High Honors. After two years of study at McGill University, she attended the University of Minnesota, studying biophysics and cell physiology. She received her Doctorate degree in physiology in 1958. In 1979 she left government funded research and began private consulting on a full time basis, after attaining a naturopathy degree at the Clayton College of Natural Health. Six years later she discovered an electronic technique for scanning the human body. With it she noticed clues as to the cause of cancer, HIV and other " mysterious " diseases. Today Dr. Clark puts her methods, her results, and her conclusions before you. Read her books and recover. > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 5, 2004 Report Share Posted March 5, 2004 Attilio: I didn't intend to break any house rules in my answer. I thought that I was asked where information could be found that would support what I had written- as I was asked for more info. I don't have this on my web-site, as I don't need lawyers chasing me around as Dr. Clark has. Not because she is wrong- it's just that she wrote it all in her book. I am not connected financially in any way to her- so I did not see anything improper in copying her credentials - as it seemed mine were being questioned. I have has some positive feedback on this- as well as the other, which I expected. If all would really consider this maybe someone in the group has the power for a proper/ final study on this. The mix can be created as a placebo and added to 10000 cancer patient's treatment programs. 5000 with the mix, 5000 with the placebo. Increase the numbers if you can. We could do this worldwide and keep track of it on your site. I dare you! Bill - Chinese Medicine Friday, March 05, 2004 8:36 AM Re: Cancer, parasites and clinical success Thanks Emmanuel for pointing this out to me. Yes, i've been busy, 5 days a week at the hospital, starting at 8.30. Marco, my moderator seems to be busy aswell. Anyway, Bill's messages does break the group's rules in that; Promotion of a business otherwise known as spam. The biography of Dr Clark at that bottom of this text points to that. Discussion of this topic is fine as long as the TCM herbal aspect is focused upon. This means the herb that Bill points out as being anti- parasitic in TCM should be focused upon. I hope this goes some way to clarifying the issue. If anyone feels it doesn't, please contact me off-list, at attiliodalberto Attilio " William Brown " <aqupoint@r...> wrote: > Emmanuel: Respectfully, you should look at this again. If it had been written down in the books correctly we would not be talking about this. Again, I was answering an urgent request from a Dr. in England, not trying to change the many closed minds out there. Cancer patients given this mixture have had their cancers disappear. All cancer patients studied by Dr. Clark have had parasites. I don't have a lab to check this out and count on her wisdom and studies for the proof. All I see is the cancers stopping and the patients getting better. > I am not out for a nobel prize but will use a method that works , time and time again without causing my patient harm. Go to http://www.drclark.net/ and read for yourself. > Maybe you have heard of " Taxol " being used effectively as chemo for cancer patients. Did you know this is an anti-parasitic in TCM! Unfortunately it is not the best mix and seems effective only on breast, testicular and ovarian cancers- but it is an anti-parasitic just the same. The difference is the 3 injections cost $30,000 instead of the raw herb product given for peanuts in comparison. And- the powers that be have it on the restricted list- so you couldn't get it anyway. These products that I mentioned will probably end up on the same list when it is seen as useful. What were you teaching your students about stomach ulcers? Were you right? Bill > > Dr. Hulda Clark > > Hulda Regehr Clark began her studies in biology at the University of Saskatchewan, Canada, where she was awarded the Bachelor of Arts, Magna Cum Laude, and the Master of Arts, with High Honors. After two years of study at McGill University, she attended the University of Minnesota, studying biophysics and cell physiology. She received her Doctorate degree in physiology in 1958. In 1979 she left government funded research and began private consulting on a full time basis, after attaining a naturopathy degree at the Clayton College of Natural Health. Six years later she discovered an electronic technique for scanning the human body. With it she noticed clues as to the cause of cancer, HIV and other " mysterious " diseases. Today Dr. Clark puts her methods, her results, and her conclusions before you. Read her books and recover. > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 6, 2004 Report Share Posted March 6, 2004 Hi All, & Hi Emmanuel, Pierre Jean & Attilio, Emmanuel wrote: > I've just pointed out that there needs to be a point of order on > this thread. Hopefully, Attilio will step in here though he's > pretty busy just now. In gratitude, Emmanuel Segmen Attilio, I support Emmanuel on this. If members wish to continue this thread, I suggest that it be off-list. One could say (with the same degree of invalidity) that most cancer sufferers host E. coli, or drink water, or eat wheat products, ergo E. coli, water and wheat are causative in their cancers. Pierre Jean wrote: > I think the real parasites are the bogus or incompetent natural > therapists who exploit shamelessly vulnerable, often desperate > patients ... IMO, the parasite theory of cancer (and especially the named and rare parasite) has no scientific basis. IMO, it is a waste of bandwidth on this List. I intend no insult to those who believe this theory. One can believe what one wishes, but I cannot accept such radical ideas without a reasonable basis, backed up by publications in peer-reviewed journals. Best regards, Email: < WORK : Teagasc Research Management, Sandymount Ave., Dublin 4, Ireland Mobile: 353-; [in the Republic: 0] HOME : 1 Esker Lawns, Lucan, Dublin, Ireland Tel : 353-; [in the Republic: 0] WWW : http://homepage.eircom.net/~progers/searchap.htm Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 6, 2004 Report Share Posted March 6, 2004 Hi Bill, Emmanuel, PJ, Phil and Christine, Advertising of yourself and your clinic no matter who it is, is spam. Therefore stating Dr Clark's website goes against the group's rules as it doesn't really provide any (evidence based) information other can business details. Bill has a right to state claims so long as he can back it up with evidence. If he can then ok, continue the thread. If he can't then please take it off-list until you have some evidence. It's no good asking for a research proposal to be set up that will support your claims after you have stated them. Otherwise we'll have a hundred and one ideas being promoted on the list. Discussion on the TCM herb involved from a strict TCM viewpoint would be interesting. Attilio " " <@e...> wrote: > Hi All, & Hi Emmanuel, Pierre Jean & Attilio, > > Emmanuel wrote: > > I've just pointed out that there needs to be a point of order on > > this thread. Hopefully, Attilio will step in here though he's > > pretty busy just now. In gratitude, Emmanuel Segmen > > Attilio, I support Emmanuel on this. If members wish to continue > this thread, I suggest that it be off-list. > > One could say (with the same degree of invalidity) that most > cancer sufferers host E. coli, or drink water, or eat wheat products, > ergo E. coli, water and wheat are causative in their cancers. > > Pierre Jean wrote: > > I think the real parasites are the bogus or incompetent natural > > therapists who exploit shamelessly vulnerable, often desperate > > patients ... > > IMO, the parasite theory of cancer (and especially the named and > rare parasite) has no scientific basis. IMO, it is a waste of > bandwidth on this List. > > I intend no insult to those who believe this theory. One can believe > what one wishes, but I cannot accept such radical ideas without a > reasonable basis, backed up by publications in peer-reviewed > journals. > > > Best regards, > > Email: <@e...> > > WORK : Teagasc Research Management, Sandymount Ave., Dublin 4, Ireland > Mobile: 353-; [in the Republic: 0] > > HOME : 1 Esker Lawns, Lucan, Dublin, Ireland > Tel : 353-; [in the Republic: 0] > WWW : http://homepage.eircom.net/~progers/searchap.htm Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 6, 2004 Report Share Posted March 6, 2004 Attilio: I don't mean to break any rules here. I was asked where further information could be found. This, of course is not on Medline. This is too new to be on it. Unable to fund a study large enough to make a difference, I referred the group to a Practioner that has written 3 books. One can link through the site, if one takes a minute and doesn't discount the whole thing because it is not COMMON thought. It is much easier to just go along with the crowd on these things and not bring up something with controversy. I am not trying to promote myself here either , but thought this may be a site that would be open to ideas that work. I have patients that are cancer free using this- as well as treatment in my clinic. What do I do- just keep my mouth closed and follow the herd? Some of the responses here have been intentionally insulting and that would seem to qualify as flaming a member to me! Have none of your members been successful with cancer patients? I know some that have. This is why I see it as a possibility for TCM to shine here. What I seem to find is the same old attitude I see in Western Medicine. > Pierre Jean wrote: > > I think the real parasites are the bogus or incompetent natural > > therapists who exploit shamelessly vulnerable, often desperate > > patients ... Pierre: I will show this to my patients that used to have cancer. Why someone would jump to this conclusion is beyond me and fits in my definition of a flame. To whoever stated that the parasites come after the fact- would it not be reasonable to rid the body of them anyway- no matter what you think? Would you not think you would see improvement in allowing the body to recover without them? I need not continue on this subject if it is too contraversial for the group and will end the subject here. My email is aqupoint if any of you want to flame me directly so I can respond directly. Bill - Chinese Medicine Friday, March 05, 2004 10:39 PM Re: Cancer, parasites and clinical success Advertising of yourself and your clinic no matter who it is, is spam. Therefore stating Dr Clark's website goes against the group's rules as it doesn't really provide any (evidence based) information other can business details. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 6, 2004 Report Share Posted March 6, 2004 On WM labels in TCM usage: Parasite, saprophytes, commensals Symbiosis on a sacrificial stage One however wonders at TCM when it apes; There were no microscopes in Huang Di's Age. Dr. Holmes Keikobad MB BS DPH Ret. DIP AC NCCAOM LIC AC CO & AZ www.acu-free.com - home based recertification for acupuncturists and health professionals Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 6, 2004 Report Share Posted March 6, 2004 Hello William, Let me clarify a few points for you: First, my comments were not meant to insult you in anyway, I will explain the reason I made them later. I maintain that Hulda Clark's theory does not make sense, and that her credentials are doubtful. put it in a nutshell with his comment: " One could say (with the same degree of invalidity) that most cancer sufferers host E. coli, or drink water, or eat wheat products, ergo E. coli, water and wheat are causative in their cancers. " And Emmanuel also pointed out that parasites can always be put in evidence with a lab test. If there is not any, they will not be found. At the time of my Email, I was particularly angry for one reason: A client of mine, currently undergoing treatment for bone cancer, went to see a kind of naturopath for advice. On that day, she was particularly unwell, she had not eaten or drank because of nausea, and was feeling faint. She ask the naturopath for a glass of water or juice and a biscuit, and the women gave her a glass of orange juice and 2 dry biscuits. She gave her a consultation, put her on a drastic diet and also gave her a number of nutritional supplements, and told her that the bone cancer was due to an imbalance in her colon. Then the bill came, it was more than £200 or about $400. When her husband asked for an itemised bill, he found out that this compassionate practitionner had charged her £12 or about $22 for the glass of juice and the 2 biscuit. I was very much venting my frustration at this kind of parasite that prey on vulnerable, often desperate patients, charging them unjustifiable amount of money for incompetent and useless if not dangerous advice. Iam not questioning your integrity or therapeutic skills, but just commenting on charlatan who give genuine practitionner a bad name. As for Hulda Clark, before she make such claims as she has done, she should give some verifiable evidence to convince me and many others. Regards, PJ On Saturday, March 6, 2004, at 04:37 pm, William Brown wrote: > Attilio: I don't mean to break any rules here. I was asked where > further information could be found. This, of course is not on Medline. > This is too new to be on it. Unable to fund a study large enough to > make a difference, I referred the group to a Practioner that has > written 3 books. One can link through the site, if one takes a minute > and doesn't discount the whole thing because it is not COMMON thought. > It is much easier to just go along with the crowd on these things and > not bring up something with controversy. I am not trying to promote > myself here either , but thought this may be a site that would be open > to ideas that work. I have patients that are cancer free using this- > as well as treatment in my clinic. What do I do- just keep my mouth > closed and follow the herd? Some of the responses here have been > intentionally insulting and that would seem to qualify as flaming a > member to me! Have none of your members been successful with cancer > patients? I know some that have. This is why I see it as a possibility > for TCM to shine here. What I seem to find is the same old attitude I > see in Western Medicine. > > > > Pierre Jean wrote: > > > I think the real parasites are the bogus or incompetent natural > > > therapists who exploit shamelessly vulnerable, often desperate > > > patients ... > Pierre: I will show this to my patients that used to have cancer. Why > someone would jump to this conclusion is beyond me and fits in my > definition of a flame. > To whoever stated that the parasites come after the fact- would it not > be reasonable to rid the body of them anyway- no matter what you > think? Would you not think you would see improvement in allowing the > body to recover without them? > > I need not continue on this subject if it is too contraversial for the > group and will end the subject here. My email is aqupoint > if any of you want to flame me directly so I can respond directly. > Bill > - > > Chinese Medicine > Friday, March 05, 2004 10:39 PM > Re: Cancer, parasites and clinical success > > > > Advertising of yourself and your clinic no matter who it is, is > spam. Therefore stating Dr Clark's website goes against the group's > rules as it doesn't really provide any (evidence based) information > other can business details. > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.