Guest guest Posted May 2, 2006 Report Posted May 2, 2006 BUT we all habour nanobacteria and mycoplasma etc, and not all of us have diseases that can be caused by it. This brings us abruptly back to the Bechamp theory that bacteria only cause disease if the host oganism is ripe for it. The focus of the article in question however is centered on Pasteur's much outdated and inaccurate germ theory of disease in which the germ " causes " something. Duncan > > http://www.adventist4truth.com/refitted/index.php?HealthPages=nanobac > teria > > Nanobacteria Implicated in Most All Degenerative Diseases > Major Breakthrough in Arterial Health Quote
Guest guest Posted May 3, 2006 Report Posted May 3, 2006 Could these be the "somatids" that Naessan(?) saw, when he disputed Pasteur's theory of 'germs', but was railroaded? If so, then this is vindication of the complete wrong-tracking of 'germ leads to illness' stand of our current medical philosophy. Regards Jorge Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.