Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Why Shri KN Rao's Double Transit doesn't make sense

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Dear Friends, Let us put the theories into practice with a 'Hot Case'. Birth details: Boy Sept 13,1980 TOB 1559 hrs Place Dadar,Mumbai . What is the wedding date fixed. Regards, Satish--- On Fri, 11/6/09, Punit Pandey <punitp wrote:Punit Pandey

<punitpRe: Re: Why Shri KN Rao's Double Transit doesn't make sense Date: Friday, November 6, 2009, 11:00 AM

 

 

Dear Atul ji,

 

Thanks for sharing this information. Though this is the fourth variation for Double-Transit that we are seeing here. Also this is NOT what Shri KN Rao has taught in his books. As far as I remember, he has not used lagna in Double Transit?

 

Anyways, this is another rule that I'll check and come back.

Thanks & Regards,Punit Pandey

On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 2:39 AM, atul m <atulmaydeo > wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear AllI know this is not Parashari system forum but discussion started on Double transit of K N Rao so thought of sharing precise and complete details on this as per my knowledge and considering researched output from various eminent astrologers like M N Kedar, K N Rao, S N Kapoor, J N Gupta and Others -

Four Tier Scheme of Composite Transit for Marriage Timings as per eminent astrologers like M N Kedar, K N Rao (although K N Rao further ratifies with Jaimini system as well apart from Parashari) and others as per below -

1. Saturn & Jupiter - Should have in transit aspected or transited over: a) Lagna and 7th House; or b) Lagna and 7th Lord; or c) Lagna lord and 7th house or d) Lagna lord and 7th lord

(saturn within 27 months and jupiter within 12 months)2. Jupiter - a) Natal Venus and 5th house/lord or b) 5th house and 9th house or c) 5th lord and 9th house or d) 5th house and 9th lord or

e) 5th lord and 9th lord3. Mars - should have in transit covered within six months: a) what saturn and Jupiter must do, see(1) above; and b) what jupiter must do see (2) above4. The 7th lord -

the 7th lord, in transit within 40 days of any marriage must establish contact with any of the following: a) the 11th lord b) the 9th lord c) the lagna lordAlso, at the time of marriage the lords of 7th, 9th, 5th and lagna will be mutually connected (P-position, A- aspect, C-conjunction) and in most of the cases these will be around 7th, lagna or their lords.

Note - Retrograde planets aspect from previous house as well.The results are very positive (more than 90%) with the above schemes after applying on large number of horoscopes for predicting marriage timings.

if you tie-up with Jaimini dasha system then results are extreamly positive (97-98%).Although, normally it ties-up with Vimshottari Dasha system by all Parashari astrologers.Important - This applies considering horoscope does not have marriage denial features and in case of delayed horoscope, marriage turns up in 2nd round or some time 3rd round saturn and Jupiter transit as per above scheme.

Although, marriage denial and very delayed (computing delay fators) is a seprate topic.Also, you may have noticed that moon or aspect from moon is NOT considered in this rule for predicting marriage timing.

Hope this information is useful to all interested members.RegardsAtul Maydeo.(if you haven't tried, you haven't lived so keep trying...) --- On Fri, 11/6/09, Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

 

Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com>Re: Re: Why Shri KN Rao's Double Transit doesn't make sense@gro ups.com

Friday, November 6, 2009, 12:02 AM

 

 

Dear Satish,

 

So the rule for marriage you are suggesting is -

 

Condition 1. Jupiter should aspect ascendant or 7th house and Saturn should aspect Moon or 7th house from Moon

Condition 2. Saturn should aspect ascendant or 7th house and Jupiter should aspect Moon or 7th house from Moon

 

One of the above condition should be fulfilled. Is it what you are suggesting?

 

By the way, as I mentioned earlier, my observation was based on Shri KN Rao's teaching of Saturn and Jupiter's aspect on 7th and 7th lord. What you are telling seems different. Anyways, I'll try it out sometime and see.

Thanks & Regards,Punit Pandey

 

On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 7:30 PM, R Satish <rsatish1942@ > wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Punit,

What you say about Jup is perfect and easy to understand. When you take the Simultaneous transit of Sat over Lagna/7th or Moon/7th,these percentages get affected.

To clarify if Jup is aspecting Lagn/7th then Sat must aspect Moon/7th to fulfill the requirements.

 

As I mentioned,these happenings are not over 60% consistently. If it were so it would become a simple rule all emcompassing. To improve the % factor Venus/mars have been brought into the picture.

 

Even in KP,for marriages, we started with 2,7,11 houses. Later it became 2, 5,7 11 Astro secrets Pt 1). Then we added 5,8 houses to 2,7,11. Khullar has his rules so does Baskaran.. To add to this confusion, we added sub-sub theories.

 

It is a matter of time when the original formula would undergo such transformation, we would be unable to recognize the original.

 

Whether to use it for prediction or postmortem is a personal choice.Post mortem is easier to handle.However for predictions, we need the skills to try for corroboration one or more of these combinations for best-fit.

 

I for one, attempt to use KP + some others including Double-Transit of Jup/Sat (as I understand).

 

Failed predictions are a part of the game. I humbly accept,I am still a

learner and have many more miles to go.

 

Regards,

 

Satish

 

 

 

 

 

--- On Thu, 11/5/09, Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

 

 

Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com>Re: Re: Why Shri KN Rao's Double Transit doesn't make sense

@gro ups.com

 

 

Thursday, November 5, 2009, 12:22 PM

 

 

Dear Satish,

 

What I am trying to convey that the rule will be true at any piont of time in one's life because it is too vague. Please go through my earlier email on this topic. The rule can not only justify marriage in 10 charts but in any chart.

 

Let us take today's chart as an example taking Leo as ascedant (12:06PM, Agra). Saturn is 7th lord from Leo and 7th sign from Leo is Aquarius.

 

Jupiter is aspecting 7th lord Saturn (1st year). Next year (2nd year), Jupiter will be transiting over 7th house. Next year to that (3rd year), Jupiter will again 7th aspecting 7th lord. 4th year, there will no aspect on 7th and 7th lord. 5th year Jupiter will have 5th aspect on 7th lord. 6th year, Jupiter will be aspecting 7th house. 7th year, Jupiter will be transiting over 7th lord from Moon. 8th year, Jupiter will be aspecting 7th house from 7th aspect. 9th year, Jupiter will be transiting over 7th lord. 10 year, Jupiter will have 5th aspect on 7th house. 11th year, Jupiter will be transiting 7th from Moon. 12th year, again Jupiter will be aspecting 7th lord.

 

Jupiter cycle repeats every 12 year, so it is safe to say that at almost any point of this person's life (born today at 12:06PM at Agra), Jupiter will be either aspecting 7th or 7th lord from Ascendant or Moon. 11/12 = 92% possibility. Even If we check the rule only from Ascendant (and ignore Moon), Jupiter will be aspecting 7th or 7th lord 9/12=75% of time. In other words, whatever year this person marries, double-transit will be able to justify it :-) Does Double Transit make any sense?

 

Thanks & Regards,Punit Pandey

 

On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 11:52 AM, R Satish <rsatish1942@ > wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Punit,

I refer to the book"ADVANCED TECHNIQUES OF ASTROLOGICAL

 

PREDICTIONS" edited Sri KN Rao.In one of the chapters 'Tajika Shastra and Marriage

timing of Event" by Dr R K Wishwakarma, he has given 8 rules for timing marriage date with

 

case studies. He validates 10 samples ,where Sat/Jup aspect 7th house/lord.

 

He adds further Venus/Mars interconnection on marriage date.

 

 

We can only try to minimise the number of rules,but cannot reduce

 

significantly, all introduced thru trial and error,like we are presently doing.

 

Regards,

 

 

 

Satish--- On Wed, 11/4/09, Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

 

 

Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com>Re: Re: Why Shri KN Rao's Double Transit doesn't make sense

@gro ups.com

 

 

Wednesday, November 4, 2009, 11:15 PM

 

 

Dear Mssumich,

 

Please note few points -

 

1. A method needs to be mathematically correct first before we can talk about predictive aspect of the method. As I mentioned this method is fundamentally flawed and doesn't make sense. I have mentioned the reason and would love to hear if somebody can show that I am missing something.

 

2. Double transit, as mentioned by Paul Manley, is different from what Shri KN Rao has used in his books. By Double-Transit, Shri KN Rao doesn't mean that both the planet should aspect one single sign, but one planet aspecting the house and other house lord (generally). As I demonstrated, this condition will match almost 100% of time and hence it makes this tool a good tool for post-mortem and justification. Though not useful for predictions.

 

3. If a method doesn't work, we should leave it and move on. If we will not accept that the method doesn't make sense, we can not discard it. By saying something like "we need to check dasa and yoga etc.", we want to prove it some way or other. Why? If it doens't work, it doesn't work. We should not accpet anything blindly. There are quite a few teachings by Shri KN Rao that works and we should use them. Teachings that do not work, we should discard them.

 

4. I don not understand why you are mixing placidus with double-transit. Let us not mix both the threads. Though i guess that the way you asked your earlier question was not good for generating discussion. In my opinion, correct way for asking question is to present your own analysis and ask your question. If you are learner, you should present your detailed analysis. What is your analysis as per KP? What is your analysis as per Traditional? Saying that I am able to justify events using Traditional but not KP seems too vague a statement. I do not see reference of Sub in your post. I don't see reference of Nakshatra in your post. That doesn't qualify as a KP analysis and hence doesn't provoke any response. This I guess may be the reason you didn't get response.

 

Thanks & Regards,

Punit Pandey

 

On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 9:45 PM, mssumich <mssumich > wrote:

 

 

 

 

Hi PunitLike many of the 100s of tools that Jyotish gives - don't believe in all the techniques that one comes up with. From Paul Manley's website here is what he says"What you'll see in the following illustrations is how the sign(s) that gets the double transit will shift, generally from year to year. In fact, there are only two positions of Jupiter and Saturn that will not have the double transit phenomenon – when Jupiter is in the 8th or 12th house from Saturn. This means that 10 out of the 12 possible positions, or more than 80% of the time, there will be the double transit phenomenon happening in at least one sign, possibly two."

I have see this double transit work sometimes and sometimes not. Obviuosly we have to pay attention to sookshma transits (or finer transits) and just double transit.I urge some expert to answer my question on the Placidus house system for a chart that I put on the other day. One bhava covers 58 deg of zodiac, there are 3 planets in 8th house; This person is very succesful. I can explain every event using vedic astreology and nakshatra analysis. The moment I put 3 planets in 8th in this chart, I am lost.

For latititude that are closer to 66 deg N or S - I believe the Placidus system of houses give wierd house cusps(correct me if I am wrong). This actor was born in Scotland where latitude in 55deg. My question is for people born in such norhtern altitudes -what system works? Is it still Placidus wasy of calculating houses or something else. There should a clear answer from KP experts. I am hoping there is that person in this list.

thanks

 

 

 

 

 

@gro ups.com, Punit Pandey <punitp wrote:>> Dear Friends,>

> KP made timing an event much more easier. Though as a KP astrologer, I> always feel that it will be nice to have another complementary method by> which we can cross-check and confirm. In search of another such method for

> timing events, I looked into many methods and Shri KN Rao's double transit> is among them.> > I personally feel that it is merely a tool for post-mortem and not useful> for future predictions. Let us take an example of Marriage. Double-transit

> suggests that transiting Jupiter and Saturn will always be aspecting Natal> 7th and 7th lord at the time of marriage.> > Now Jupiter has three aspects - 5,7, and 9. So including its own position,

> it will be influencing four houses in any chart. Which means that at any> point of time the possibility of aspecting 7th is 33.33% and 7th lord is> also 33.33%. If we take Jupiter's influence on either 7th OR 7th lord,

> possibility will double from 4/12 to 8/12 or 66.66%. So at any time, we have> 66.66% possibility of Jupiter aspecting either 7th or 7th lord. In other> words, around 66% of time in one's life, we will see that Jupiter is

> influencing either 7th or 7th. Of course, this calculation doesn't consider> some of the possibility e.g. 7th lord is in 7th house itself. Anyways, I> have seen Shri KN Rao is also checking Moon for transit other than

> Ascendant. Which doubles the possibility and if somehow Jupiter is not> aspecting 7th and 7th lord counting from Lagna, it will aspect 7th or 7th> lord from Moon. So in any point of one's life, if take transit from Moon as

> well as Ascendant, it is almost certain that Jupiter will influencing either> 7th from ascendant, or 7th lord from ascendant, or 7th from Moon, or 7th> lord from Moon.> > Similarly, Saturn also has 3 aspects and the above write-up is true for

> Saturn as well. In other words, seeing the above possibility, I feel that> Double-Transit doesn't make sense at all.> > To sound this method sensible and experimental purpose, I checked reducing

> the possibility by checking transit only from Ascendant. If I do that way, I> have many cases where it fails.> > In other words, I do not find Double-transit theory useful at all.> > Thanks & Regards,

> > Punit Pandey> >

> On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 2:06 PM, aashish rai <raiaashish@. ..> wrote:> > >> >> > Dear Sundar,> >> > In classical astrology there are so many dashas, if vimshottari was only

> > required than why did Parashara muni talked about so many dashas. Other> > dashas like Yogini are showing it.> >> >> >> > Let's forget about DBAs for time being as per double transit theory of Shri

> > Kn rao marriage chances are high when transit Saturn and Jupiter aspect> > natal 1/7 axis or their natal lords. In rare cases 9th lord will be> > involved.> >> >> >

> > Natal chart,> >> > Jupier is aspecting natal 7th lord, lagna lord and Lagna> >> > Saturn is sitting in Lagna itself, aspecting 7th house> >> >> >

> >> > Won't be surprised if there is a child birth/pregency before end august> > 2010 !!!> >> > Regards,> > Aashish> >> > ------------ --------- ---------

> > ** Sundar <sundar190561@ ...>> >> > *To:* @gro ups.com

 

 

> > *Sent:* Wed, 4 November, 2009 10:31:33 AM> > *Subject:* Re: Post mortem analysis of marriage> >> >> >> > Dear Aashish> >> > I know you would say, venus is the UL lord, hence the marriage in venus

> > PAD. But did you see venus was debilitated on the day of marriage?> >> > Thanks...... .....Sundar> >> > @gro ups.com <%40. com>, aashish > > rai <raiaashish@ ...> wrote:> > >> > > Dear Sundarji,> > > I have just started learning KP and yet to pick up the basics. but if you> > use traditional astrology it's very clear. As this forum is for KP only I am

> > not elaborating.> > >> > > Regards,> > > Aashish> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > ____________ _________ _________ __

> > > Sundar <sundar190561@ ...>> > > @gro ups.com <%40. com>

 

> >> > > Sun, 1 November, 2009 10:59:22 PM> > > Post mortem analysis of marriage> > >> > >> > >> > > Dear Learned members

> > >> > > My neighbour go married on 21st Oct, 2009 between 9 to 10am. The transit> > of DBAS does not fully signify the event fully.> > >> > > dob: 25th Aug, 1979

> > > tob: 9.37 (rectified)> > > pob: Mumbai> > >> > > Time of birth reported is 9.22am> > > Ayanamsha : 23.28.58> > >> > > dasha/bukti/ antra

> > >> > > planet sgl stl sl> > > (MD)rahu(11) sun(11,12) venus(11,2-9) venus(11,2-9)> > > (AD)ketu(5) sat(12,5-6) rahu(11) venus(11,2-9)> > > (PAD)venus(11, 2-9) sun(11,12) ketu(5) jupiter(11,4- 7)

> > >> > > rahu=sun(11, 12)> > > ketu=saturn( 12,5-6)> > >> > > Marriage on 21st October 2009 between 9 am to 10 am> > >> > > planet sgl stl sl

> > > (MD)rahu(4) sat(12,5-6) sun(1,12) jupiter(5,4- 7)> > > (AD)ketu(10) moon(2,11) jupiter(5,4- 7) rahu-MD(4)> > > (PAD)venus(12, 2-9) mer(1,1-10) moon(2,11) rahu-MD(4)> > >

> > > sun venus(12,2-9) mars(10,3-8) venus(12,2-9)> > > moon mars(10,3-8) sat(12,5-6) venus(12,2-9)> > >> > > Baed on the above it is seen that MD/AD/PAD does not fully signify DBAS

> > (except for ketu, which is rahu's sub.> > >> > > In the light of the above how do we reconcile the timing of marriage.> > >> > > Thanks...... ...Sundar

> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > Keep up with people you care about with India Mail. Learn how. http://in.overview.

> > mail.. com/connectmore<http://in.overview. mail.. com/connectmore>> > >> >

> >> > ------------ --------- ---------> > Connect more, do more and share more with India Mail. Learn more<http://in.rd. / tagline_galaxy_ 3/*http:/ /in.overview. mail.. com/>

> > .> >> > > >>

Link to comment
Share on other sites



Dear Satish

 

Marriage is promised very soon for this chart. It could happen anytime after November 21, 2009

 

Regards

Sudhir

 

 

 

 

-

R Satish

Friday, November 06, 2009 11:54 AM

Re: Re: Why Shri KN Rao's Double Transit doesn't make sense

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Friends,

 

Let us put the theories into practice with a 'Hot Case'.

 

Birth details: Boy Sept 13,1980 TOB 1559 hrs Place Dadar,Mumbai .

 

What is the wedding date fixed.

 

Regards,

 

Satish--- On Fri, 11/6/09, Punit Pandey <punitp > wrote:

Punit Pandey <punitp >Re: Re: Why Shri KN Rao's Double Transit doesn't make sense Date: Friday, November 6, 2009, 11:00 AM

 

Dear Atul ji,

 

Thanks for sharing this information. Though this is the fourth variation for Double-Transit that we are seeing here. Also this is NOT what Shri KN Rao has taught in his books. As far as I remember, he has not used lagna in Double Transit?

 

Anyways, this is another rule that I'll check and come back.

Thanks & Regards,Punit Pandey

On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 2:39 AM, atul m <atulmaydeo > wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear AllI know this is not Parashari system forum but discussion started on Double transit of K N Rao so thought of sharing precise and complete details on this as per my knowledge and considering researched output from various eminent astrologers like M N Kedar, K N Rao, S N Kapoor, J N Gupta and Others - Four Tier Scheme of Composite Transit for Marriage Timings as per eminent astrologers like M N Kedar, K N Rao (although K N Rao further ratifies with Jaimini system as well apart from Parashari) and others as per below - 1. Saturn & Jupiter - Should have in transit aspected or transited over: a) Lagna and 7th House; or b) Lagna and 7th Lord; or c) Lagna lord and 7th house or d) Lagna lord and 7th lord (saturn within 27 months and jupiter within 12 months)2. Jupiter - a) Natal Venus and 5th house/lord or b) 5th house and 9th house or c) 5th lord and 9th house or d) 5th house and 9th lord or e) 5th lord and 9th lord3. Mars - should have in transit covered within six months: a) what saturn and Jupiter must do, see(1) above; and b) what jupiter must do see (2) above4. The 7th lord - the 7th lord, in transit within 40 days of any marriage must establish contact with any of the following: a) the 11th lord b) the 9th lord c) the lagna lordAlso, at the time of marriage the lords of 7th, 9th, 5th and lagna will be mutually connected (P-position, A- aspect, C-conjunction) and in most of the cases these will be around 7th, lagna or their lords.Note - Retrograde planets aspect from previous house as well.The results are very positive (more than 90%) with the above schemes after applying on large number of horoscopes for predicting marriage timings.if you tie-up with Jaimini dasha system then results are extreamly positive (97-98%).Although, normally it ties-up with Vimshottari Dasha system by all Parashari astrologers.Important - This applies considering horoscope does not have marriage denial features and in case of delayed horoscope, marriage turns up in 2nd round or some time 3rd round saturn and Jupiter transit as per above scheme.Although, marriage denial and very delayed (computing delay fators) is a seprate topic.Also, you may have noticed that moon or aspect from moon is NOT considered in this rule for predicting marriage timing.Hope this information is useful to all interested members.RegardsAtul Maydeo.(if you haven't tried, you haven't lived so keep trying...) --- On Fri, 11/6/09, Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

 

Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com>Re: Re: Why Shri KN Rao's Double Transit doesn't make sense@gro ups.comFriday, November 6, 2009, 12:02 AM

 

 

Dear Satish,

 

So the rule for marriage you are suggesting is -

 

Condition 1. Jupiter should aspect ascendant or 7th house and Saturn should aspect Moon or 7th house from Moon

Condition 2. Saturn should aspect ascendant or 7th house and Jupiter should aspect Moon or 7th house from Moon

 

One of the above condition should be fulfilled. Is it what you are suggesting?

 

By the way, as I mentioned earlier, my observation was based on Shri KN Rao's teaching of Saturn and Jupiter's aspect on 7th and 7th lord. What you are telling seems different. Anyways, I'll try it out sometime and see.

Thanks & Regards,Punit Pandey

 

On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 7:30 PM, R Satish <rsatish1942@ > wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Punit,

What you say about Jup is perfect and easy to understand. When you take the Simultaneous transit of Sat over Lagna/7th or Moon/7th,these percentages get affected.

To clarify if Jup is aspecting Lagn/7th then Sat must aspect Moon/7th to fulfill the requirements.

 

As I mentioned,these happenings are not over 60% consistently. If it were so it would become a simple rule all emcompassing. To improve the % factor Venus/mars have been brought into the picture.

 

Even in KP,for marriages, we started with 2,7,11 houses. Later it became 2, 5,7 11 Astro secrets Pt 1). Then we added 5,8 houses to 2,7,11. Khullar has his rules so does Baskaran.. To add to this confusion, we added sub-sub theories.

 

It is a matter of time when the original formula would undergo such transformation, we would be unable to recognize the original.

 

Whether to use it for prediction or postmortem is a personal choice.Post mortem is easier to handle.However for predictions, we need the skills to try for corroboration one or more of these combinations for best-fit.

 

I for one, attempt to use KP + some others including Double-Transit of Jup/Sat (as I understand).

 

Failed predictions are a part of the game. I humbly accept,I am still a

learner and have many more miles to go.

 

Regards,

 

Satish

 

 

 

 

 

--- On Thu, 11/5/09, Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

 

 

Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com>Re: Re: Why Shri KN Rao's Double Transit doesn't make sense@gro ups.com

 

 

Thursday, November 5, 2009, 12:22 PM

 

 

Dear Satish,

 

What I am trying to convey that the rule will be true at any piont of time in one's life because it is too vague. Please go through my earlier email on this topic. The rule can not only justify marriage in 10 charts but in any chart.

 

Let us take today's chart as an example taking Leo as ascedant (12:06PM, Agra). Saturn is 7th lord from Leo and 7th sign from Leo is Aquarius.

 

Jupiter is aspecting 7th lord Saturn (1st year). Next year (2nd year), Jupiter will be transiting over 7th house. Next year to that (3rd year), Jupiter will again 7th aspecting 7th lord. 4th year, there will no aspect on 7th and 7th lord. 5th year Jupiter will have 5th aspect on 7th lord. 6th year, Jupiter will be aspecting 7th house. 7th year, Jupiter will be transiting over 7th lord from Moon. 8th year, Jupiter will be aspecting 7th house from 7th aspect. 9th year, Jupiter will be transiting over 7th lord. 10 year, Jupiter will have 5th aspect on 7th house. 11th year, Jupiter will be transiting 7th from Moon. 12th year, again Jupiter will be aspecting 7th lord.

 

Jupiter cycle repeats every 12 year, so it is safe to say that at almost any point of this person's life (born today at 12:06PM at Agra), Jupiter will be either aspecting 7th or 7th lord from Ascendant or Moon. 11/12 = 92% possibility. Even If we check the rule only from Ascendant (and ignore Moon), Jupiter will be aspecting 7th or 7th lord 9/12=75% of time. In other words, whatever year this person marries, double-transit will be able to justify it :-) Does Double Transit make any sense?

 

Thanks & Regards,Punit Pandey

 

On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 11:52 AM, R Satish <rsatish1942@ > wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Punit,

I refer to the book"ADVANCED TECHNIQUES OF ASTROLOGICAL

 

PREDICTIONS" edited Sri KN Rao.In one of the chapters 'Tajika Shastra and Marriage

timing of Event" by Dr R K Wishwakarma, he has given 8 rules for timing marriage date with

 

case studies. He validates 10 samples ,where Sat/Jup aspect 7th house/lord.

 

He adds further Venus/Mars interconnection on marriage date.

 

 

We can only try to minimise the number of rules,but cannot reduce

 

significantly, all introduced thru trial and error,like we are presently doing.

 

Regards,

 

 

 

Satish--- On Wed, 11/4/09, Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

 

 

Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com>Re: Re: Why Shri KN Rao's Double Transit doesn't make sense

@gro ups.com

 

 

Wednesday, November 4, 2009, 11:15 PM

 

 

Dear Mssumich,

 

Please note few points -

 

1. A method needs to be mathematically correct first before we can talk about predictive aspect of the method. As I mentioned this method is fundamentally flawed and doesn't make sense. I have mentioned the reason and would love to hear if somebody can show that I am missing something.

 

2. Double transit, as mentioned by Paul Manley, is different from what Shri KN Rao has used in his books. By Double-Transit, Shri KN Rao doesn't mean that both the planet should aspect one single sign, but one planet aspecting the house and other house lord (generally). As I demonstrated, this condition will match almost 100% of time and hence it makes this tool a good tool for post-mortem and justification. Though not useful for predictions.

 

3. If a method doesn't work, we should leave it and move on. If we will not accept that the method doesn't make sense, we can not discard it. By saying something like "we need to check dasa and yoga etc.", we want to prove it some way or other. Why? If it doens't work, it doesn't work. We should not accpet anything blindly. There are quite a few teachings by Shri KN Rao that works and we should use them. Teachings that do not work, we should discard them.

 

4. I don not understand why you are mixing placidus with double-transit. Let us not mix both the threads. Though i guess that the way you asked your earlier question was not good for generating discussion. In my opinion, correct way for asking question is to present your own analysis and ask your question. If you are learner, you should present your detailed analysis. What is your analysis as per KP? What is your analysis as per Traditional? Saying that I am able to justify events using Traditional but not KP seems too vague a statement. I do not see reference of Sub in your post. I don't see reference of Nakshatra in your post. That doesn't qualify as a KP analysis and hence doesn't provoke any response. This I guess may be the reason you didn't get response.

 

Thanks & Regards,

Punit Pandey

 

On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 9:45 PM, mssumich <mssumich > wrote:

 

 

 

 

Hi PunitLike many of the 100s of tools that Jyotish gives - don't believe in all the techniques that one comes up with. From Paul Manley's website here is what he says"What you'll see in the following illustrations is how the sign(s) that gets the double transit will shift, generally from year to year. In fact, there are only two positions of Jupiter and Saturn that will not have the double transit phenomenon – when Jupiter is in the 8th or 12th house from Saturn. This means that 10 out of the 12 possible positions, or more than 80% of the time, there will be the double transit phenomenon happening in at least one sign, possibly two."I have see this double transit work sometimes and sometimes not. Obviuosly we have to pay attention to sookshma transits (or finer transits) and just double transit.I urge some expert to answer my question on the Placidus house system for a chart that I put on the other day. One bhava covers 58 deg of zodiac, there are 3 planets in 8th house; This person is very succesful. I can explain every event using vedic astreology and nakshatra analysis. The moment I put 3 planets in 8th in this chart, I am lost.For latititude that are closer to 66 deg N or S - I believe the Placidus system of houses give wierd house cusps(correct me if I am wrong). This actor was born in Scotland where latitude in 55deg. My question is for people born in such norhtern altitudes -what system works? Is it still Placidus wasy of calculating houses or something else. There should a clear answer from KP experts. I am hoping there is that person in this list.thanks

 

 

 

 

 

@gro ups.com, Punit Pandey <punitp wrote:>> Dear Friends,> > KP made timing an event much more easier. Though as a KP astrologer, I> always feel that it will be nice to have another complementary method by> which we can cross-check and confirm. In search of another such method for> timing events, I looked into many methods and Shri KN Rao's double transit> is among them.> > I personally feel that it is merely a tool for post-mortem and not useful> for future predictions. Let us take an example of Marriage. Double-transit> suggests that transiting Jupiter and Saturn will always be aspecting Natal> 7th and 7th lord at the time of marriage.> > Now Jupiter has three aspects - 5,7, and 9. So including its own position,> it will be influencing four houses in any chart. Which means that at any> point of time the possibility of aspecting 7th is 33.33% and 7th lord is> also 33.33%. If we take Jupiter's influence on either 7th OR 7th lord,> possibility will double from 4/12 to 8/12 or 66.66%. So at any time, we have> 66.66% possibility of Jupiter aspecting either 7th or 7th lord. In other> words, around 66% of time in one's life, we will see that Jupiter is> influencing either 7th or 7th. Of course, this calculation doesn't consider> some of the possibility e.g. 7th lord is in 7th house itself. Anyways, I> have seen Shri KN Rao is also checking Moon for transit other than> Ascendant. Which doubles the possibility and if somehow Jupiter is not> aspecting 7th and 7th lord counting from Lagna, it will aspect 7th or 7th> lord from Moon. So in any point of one's life, if take transit from Moon as> well as Ascendant, it is almost certain that Jupiter will influencing either> 7th from ascendant, or 7th lord from ascendant, or 7th from Moon, or 7th> lord from Moon.> > Similarly, Saturn also has 3 aspects and the above write-up is true for> Saturn as well. In other words, seeing the above possibility, I feel that> Double-Transit doesn't make sense at all.> > To sound this method sensible and experimental purpose, I checked reducing> the possibility by checking transit only from Ascendant. If I do that way, I> have many cases where it fails.> > In other words, I do not find Double-transit theory useful at all.> > Thanks & Regards,> > Punit Pandey> >

> On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 2:06 PM, aashish rai <raiaashish@. ..> wrote:> > >> >> > Dear Sundar,> >> > In classical astrology there are so many dashas, if vimshottari was only> > required than why did Parashara muni talked about so many dashas. Other> > dashas like Yogini are showing it.> >> >> >> > Let's forget about DBAs for time being as per double transit theory of Shri> > Kn rao marriage chances are high when transit Saturn and Jupiter aspect> > natal 1/7 axis or their natal lords. In rare cases 9th lord will be> > involved.> >> >> >> > Natal chart,> >> > Jupier is aspecting natal 7th lord, lagna lord and Lagna> >> > Saturn is sitting in Lagna itself, aspecting 7th house> >> >> >> >> > Won't be surprised if there is a child birth/pregency before end august> > 2010 !!!> >> > Regards,> > Aashish> >> > ------------ --------- ---------> > ** Sundar <sundar190561@ ...>> >> > *To:* @gro ups.com

 

 

> > *Sent:* Wed, 4 November, 2009 10:31:33 AM> > *Subject:* Re: Post mortem analysis of marriage> >> >> >> > Dear Aashish> >> > I know you would say, venus is the UL lord, hence the marriage in venus> > PAD. But did you see venus was debilitated on the day of marriage?> >> > Thanks...... .....Sundar> >> > @gro ups.com <%40. com>, aashish > > rai <raiaashish@ ...> wrote:> > >> > > Dear Sundarji,> > > I have just started learning KP and yet to pick up the basics. but if you> > use traditional astrology it's very clear. As this forum is for KP only I am> > not elaborating.> > >> > > Regards,> > > Aashish> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > ____________ _________ _________ __> > > Sundar <sundar190561@ ...>> > > @gro ups.com <%40. com>

 

> >> > > Sun, 1 November, 2009 10:59:22 PM> > > Post mortem analysis of marriage> > >> > >> > >> > > Dear Learned members> > >> > > My neighbour go married on 21st Oct, 2009 between 9 to 10am. The transit> > of DBAS does not fully signify the event fully.> > >> > > dob: 25th Aug, 1979> > > tob: 9.37 (rectified)> > > pob: Mumbai> > >> > > Time of birth reported is 9.22am> > > Ayanamsha : 23.28.58> > >> > > dasha/bukti/ antra> > >> > > planet sgl stl sl> > > (MD)rahu(11) sun(11,12) venus(11,2-9) venus(11,2-9)> > > (AD)ketu(5) sat(12,5-6) rahu(11) venus(11,2-9)> > > (PAD)venus(11, 2-9) sun(11,12) ketu(5) jupiter(11,4- 7)> > >> > > rahu=sun(11, 12)> > > ketu=saturn( 12,5-6)> > >> > > Marriage on 21st October 2009 between 9 am to 10 am> > >> > > planet sgl stl sl> > > (MD)rahu(4) sat(12,5-6) sun(1,12) jupiter(5,4- 7)> > > (AD)ketu(10) moon(2,11) jupiter(5,4- 7) rahu-MD(4)> > > (PAD)venus(12, 2-9) mer(1,1-10) moon(2,11) rahu-MD(4)> > >> > > sun venus(12,2-9) mars(10,3-8) venus(12,2-9)> > > moon mars(10,3-8) sat(12,5-6) venus(12,2-9)> > >> > > Baed on the above it is seen that MD/AD/PAD does not fully signify DBAS> > (except for ketu, which is rahu's sub.> > >> > > In the light of the above how do we reconcile the timing of marriage.> > >> > > Thanks...... ...Sundar> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > Keep up with people you care about with India Mail. Learn how. http://in.overview.> > mail.. com/connectmore<http://in.overview. mail.. com/connectmore>> > >> >> >> > ------------ --------- ---------> > Connect more, do more and share more with India Mail. Learn more<http://in.rd. / tagline_galaxy_ 3/*http:/ /in.overview. mail.. com/>> > .> >> > > >>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Sudhir, Thank you for a quick reply. Your astro analysis and conclusions,for benefit of all,will be appreciated. Regards, Satish--- On Fri, 11/6/09, sudhir <taurus.sudhir wrote:sudhir <taurus.sudhirRe: Re: Why Shri KN Rao's Double Transit doesn't make senseTo:

Date: Friday, November 6, 2009, 2:55 PM

 

 



Dear Satish

 

Marriage is promised very soon for this chart. It could happen anytime after November 21, 2009

 

Regards

Sudhir

 

 

 

 

-

R Satish

@gro ups.com

Friday, November 06, 2009 11:54 AM

Re: Re: Why Shri KN Rao's Double Transit doesn't make sense

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Friends,

 

Let us put the theories into practice with a 'Hot Case'.

 

Birth details: Boy Sept 13,1980 TOB 1559 hrs Place Dadar,Mumbai .

 

What is the wedding date fixed.

 

Regards,

 

Satish--- On Fri, 11/6/09, Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com>Re: Re: Why Shri KN Rao's Double Transit doesn't make sense@gro ups.comFriday, November 6, 2009, 11:00 AM

 

Dear Atul ji,

 

Thanks for sharing this information. Though this is the fourth variation for Double-Transit that we are seeing here. Also this is NOT what Shri KN Rao has taught in his books. As far as I remember, he has not used lagna in Double Transit?

 

Anyways, this is another rule that I'll check and come back.

Thanks & Regards,Punit Pandey

On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 2:39 AM, atul m <atulmaydeo > wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear AllI know this is not Parashari system forum but discussion started on Double transit of K N Rao so thought of sharing precise and complete details on this as per my knowledge and considering researched output from various eminent astrologers like M N Kedar, K N Rao, S N Kapoor, J N Gupta and Others - Four Tier Scheme of Composite Transit for Marriage Timings as per eminent astrologers like M N Kedar, K N Rao (although K N Rao further ratifies with Jaimini system as well apart from Parashari) and others as per below - 1. Saturn & Jupiter - Should have in transit aspected or transited over: a) Lagna and 7th House; or b) Lagna and 7th Lord; or c) Lagna lord and 7th house or d) Lagna lord and 7th lord (saturn within 27 months and jupiter within 12 months)2. Jupiter - a) Natal Venus and 5th house/lord or b) 5th house and 9th house or c) 5th lord and 9th house or d) 5th house and 9th lord or e) 5th lord and 9th lord3. Mars - should have in transit covered within six months: a) what saturn and Jupiter must do, see(1) above; and b) what jupiter must do see (2) above4. The 7th lord - the 7th lord, in transit within 40 days of any marriage must establish contact with any of the following: a) the 11th lord b) the 9th lord c) the lagna lordAlso, at the time of marriage the lords of 7th, 9th, 5th and lagna will be mutually connected (P-position, A- aspect, C-conjunction) and in most of the cases these will be around 7th, lagna or their lords.Note - Retrograde planets aspect from previous house as well.The results are very positive (more than 90%) with the above schemes after applying on large number of horoscopes for predicting marriage timings.if you tie-up with Jaimini dasha system then results are extreamly positive (97-98%).Although, normally it ties-up with Vimshottari Dasha system by all Parashari astrologers.Important - This applies considering horoscope does not have marriage denial features and in case of delayed horoscope, marriage turns up in 2nd round or some time 3rd round saturn and Jupiter transit as per above scheme.Although, marriage denial and very delayed (computing delay fators) is a seprate topic.Also, you may have noticed that moon or aspect from moon is NOT considered in this rule for predicting marriage timing.Hope this information is useful to all interested members.RegardsAtul Maydeo.(if you haven't tried, you haven't lived so keep trying...) --- On Fri, 11/6/09, Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

 

Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com>Re: Re: Why Shri KN Rao's Double Transit doesn't make sense@gro ups.comFriday, November 6, 2009, 12:02 AM

 

 

Dear Satish,

 

So the rule for marriage you are suggesting is -

 

Condition 1. Jupiter should aspect ascendant or 7th house and Saturn should aspect Moon or 7th house from Moon

Condition 2. Saturn should aspect ascendant or 7th house and Jupiter should aspect Moon or 7th house from Moon

 

One of the above condition should be fulfilled. Is it what you are suggesting?

 

By the way, as I mentioned earlier, my observation was based on Shri KN Rao's teaching of Saturn and Jupiter's aspect on 7th and 7th lord. What you are telling seems different. Anyways, I'll try it out sometime and see.

Thanks & Regards,Punit Pandey

 

On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 7:30 PM, R Satish <rsatish1942@ > wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Punit,

What you say about Jup is perfect and easy to understand. When you take the Simultaneous transit of Sat over Lagna/7th or Moon/7th,these percentages get affected.

To clarify if Jup is aspecting Lagn/7th then Sat must aspect Moon/7th to fulfill the requirements.

 

As I mentioned,these happenings are not over 60% consistently. If it were so it would become a simple rule all emcompassing. To improve the % factor Venus/mars have been brought into the picture.

 

Even in KP,for marriages, we started with 2,7,11 houses. Later it became 2, 5,7 11 Astro secrets Pt 1). Then we added 5,8 houses to 2,7,11. Khullar has his rules so does Baskaran.. To add to this confusion, we added sub-sub theories.

 

It is a matter of time when the original formula would undergo such transformation, we would be unable to recognize the original.

 

Whether to use it for prediction or postmortem is a personal choice.Post mortem is easier to handle.However for predictions, we need the skills to try for corroboration one or more of these combinations for best-fit.

 

I for one, attempt to use KP + some others including Double-Transit of Jup/Sat (as I understand).

 

Failed predictions are a part of the game. I humbly accept,I am still a

learner and have many more miles to go.

 

Regards,

 

Satish

 

 

 

 

 

--- On Thu, 11/5/09, Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

 

 

Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com>Re: Re: Why Shri KN Rao's Double Transit doesn't make sense@gro ups.com

 

 

Thursday, November 5, 2009, 12:22 PM

 

 

Dear Satish,

 

What I am trying to convey that the rule will be true at any piont of time in one's life because it is too vague. Please go through my earlier email on this topic. The rule can not only justify marriage in 10 charts but in any chart.

 

Let us take today's chart as an example taking Leo as ascedant (12:06PM, Agra). Saturn is 7th lord from Leo and 7th sign from Leo is Aquarius.

 

Jupiter is aspecting 7th lord Saturn (1st year). Next year (2nd year), Jupiter will be transiting over 7th house. Next year to that (3rd year), Jupiter will again 7th aspecting 7th lord. 4th year, there will no aspect on 7th and 7th lord. 5th year Jupiter will have 5th aspect on 7th lord. 6th year, Jupiter will be aspecting 7th house. 7th year, Jupiter will be transiting over 7th lord from Moon. 8th year, Jupiter will be aspecting 7th house from 7th aspect. 9th year, Jupiter will be transiting over 7th lord. 10 year, Jupiter will have 5th aspect on 7th house. 11th year, Jupiter will be transiting 7th from Moon. 12th year, again Jupiter will be aspecting 7th lord.

 

Jupiter cycle repeats every 12 year, so it is safe to say that at almost any point of this person's life (born today at 12:06PM at Agra), Jupiter will be either aspecting 7th or 7th lord from Ascendant or Moon. 11/12 = 92% possibility. Even If we check the rule only from Ascendant (and ignore Moon), Jupiter will be aspecting 7th or 7th lord 9/12=75% of time. In other words, whatever year this person marries, double-transit will be able to justify it :-) Does Double Transit make any sense?

 

Thanks & Regards,Punit Pandey

 

On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 11:52 AM, R Satish <rsatish1942@ > wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Punit,

I refer to the book"ADVANCED TECHNIQUES OF ASTROLOGICAL

 

PREDICTIONS" edited Sri KN Rao.In one of the chapters 'Tajika Shastra and Marriage

timing of Event" by Dr R K Wishwakarma, he has given 8 rules for timing marriage date with

 

case studies. He validates 10 samples ,where Sat/Jup aspect 7th house/lord.

 

He adds further Venus/Mars interconnection on marriage date.

 

 

We can only try to minimise the number of rules,but cannot reduce

 

significantly, all introduced thru trial and error,like we are presently doing.

 

Regards,

 

 

 

Satish--- On Wed, 11/4/09, Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

 

 

Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com>Re: Re: Why Shri KN Rao's Double Transit doesn't make sense

@gro ups.com

 

 

Wednesday, November 4, 2009, 11:15 PM

 

 

Dear Mssumich,

 

Please note few points -

 

1. A method needs to be mathematically correct first before we can talk about predictive aspect of the method. As I mentioned this method is fundamentally flawed and doesn't make sense. I have mentioned the reason and would love to hear if somebody can show that I am missing something.

 

2. Double transit, as mentioned by Paul Manley, is different from what Shri KN Rao has used in his books. By Double-Transit, Shri KN Rao doesn't mean that both the planet should aspect one single sign, but one planet aspecting the house and other house lord (generally). As I demonstrated, this condition will match almost 100% of time and hence it makes this tool a good tool for post-mortem and justification. Though not useful for predictions.

 

3. If a method doesn't work, we should leave it and move on. If we will not accept that the method doesn't make sense, we can not discard it. By saying something like "we need to check dasa and yoga etc.", we want to prove it some way or other. Why? If it doens't work, it doesn't work. We should not accpet anything blindly. There are quite a few teachings by Shri KN Rao that works and we should use them. Teachings that do not work, we should discard them.

 

4. I don not understand why you are mixing placidus with double-transit. Let us not mix both the threads. Though i guess that the way you asked your earlier question was not good for generating discussion. In my opinion, correct way for asking question is to present your own analysis and ask your question. If you are learner, you should present your detailed analysis. What is your analysis as per KP? What is your analysis as per Traditional? Saying that I am able to justify events using Traditional but not KP seems too vague a statement. I do not see reference of Sub in your post. I don't see reference of Nakshatra in your post. That doesn't qualify as a KP analysis and hence doesn't provoke any response. This I guess may be the reason you didn't get response.

 

Thanks & Regards,

Punit Pandey

 

On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 9:45 PM, mssumich <mssumich > wrote:

 

 

 

 

Hi PunitLike many of the 100s of tools that Jyotish gives - don't believe in all the techniques that one comes up with. From Paul Manley's website here is what he says"What you'll see in the following illustrations is how the sign(s) that gets the double transit will shift, generally from year to year. In fact, there are only two positions of Jupiter and Saturn that will not have the double transit phenomenon – when Jupiter is in the 8th or 12th house from Saturn. This means that 10 out of the 12 possible positions, or more than 80% of the time, there will be the double transit phenomenon happening in at least one sign, possibly two."I have see this double transit work sometimes and sometimes not. Obviuosly we have to pay attention to sookshma transits (or finer transits) and just double transit.I urge some expert to answer my question on the Placidus house system for a chart that I put on the other day. One bhava covers 58 deg of zodiac, there are 3 planets in 8th house; This person is very succesful. I can explain every event using vedic astreology and nakshatra analysis. The moment I put 3 planets in 8th in this chart, I am lost.For latititude that are closer to 66 deg N or S - I believe the Placidus system of houses give wierd house cusps(correct me if I am wrong). This actor was born in Scotland where latitude in 55deg. My question is for people born in such norhtern altitudes -what system works? Is it still Placidus wasy of calculating houses or something else. There should a clear answer from KP experts. I am hoping there is that person in this list.thanks

 

 

 

 

 

@gro ups.com, Punit Pandey <punitp wrote:>> Dear Friends,> > KP made timing an event much more easier. Though as a KP astrologer, I> always feel that it will be nice to have another complementary method by> which we can cross-check and confirm. In search of another such method for> timing events, I looked into many methods and Shri KN Rao's double transit> is among them.> > I personally feel that it is merely a tool for post-mortem and not useful> for future predictions. Let us take an example of Marriage. Double-transit> suggests that transiting Jupiter and Saturn will always be aspecting Natal> 7th and 7th lord at the time of marriage.> > Now Jupiter has three aspects - 5,7, and 9. So including its own position,> it will be influencing four houses in any chart. Which means that at any> point of time the possibility of aspecting 7th is 33.33% and 7th lord is> also 33.33%. If we take Jupiter's influence on either 7th OR 7th lord,> possibility will double from 4/12 to 8/12 or 66.66%. So at any time, we have> 66.66% possibility of Jupiter aspecting either 7th or 7th lord. In other> words, around 66% of time in one's life, we will see that Jupiter is> influencing either 7th or 7th. Of course, this calculation doesn't consider> some of the possibility e.g. 7th lord is in 7th house itself. Anyways, I> have seen Shri KN Rao is also checking Moon for transit other than> Ascendant. Which doubles the possibility and if somehow Jupiter is not> aspecting 7th and 7th lord counting from Lagna, it will aspect 7th or 7th> lord from Moon. So in any point of one's life, if take transit from Moon as> well as Ascendant, it is almost certain that Jupiter will influencing either> 7th from ascendant, or 7th lord from ascendant, or 7th from Moon, or 7th> lord from Moon.> > Similarly, Saturn also has 3 aspects and the above write-up is true for> Saturn as well. In other words, seeing the above possibility, I feel that> Double-Transit doesn't make sense at all.> > To sound this method sensible and experimental purpose, I checked reducing> the possibility by checking transit only from Ascendant. If I do that way, I> have many cases where it fails.> > In other words, I do not find Double-transit theory useful at all.> > Thanks & Regards,> > Punit Pandey> >

> On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 2:06 PM, aashish rai <raiaashish@. ..> wrote:> > >> >> > Dear Sundar,> >> > In classical astrology there are so many dashas, if vimshottari was only> > required than why did Parashara muni talked about so many dashas. Other> > dashas like Yogini are showing it.> >> >> >> > Let's forget about DBAs for time being as per double transit theory of Shri> > Kn rao marriage chances are high when transit Saturn and Jupiter aspect> > natal 1/7 axis or their natal lords. In rare cases 9th lord will be> > involved.> >> >> >> > Natal chart,> >> > Jupier is aspecting natal 7th lord, lagna lord and Lagna> >> > Saturn is sitting in Lagna itself, aspecting 7th house> >> >> >> >> > Won't be surprised if there is a child birth/pregency before end august> > 2010 !!!> >> > Regards,> > Aashish> >> > ------------ --------- ---------> > ** Sundar <sundar190561@ ...>> >> > *To:* @gro ups.com

 

 

> > *Sent:* Wed, 4 November, 2009 10:31:33 AM> > *Subject:* Re: Post mortem analysis of marriage> >> >> >> > Dear Aashish> >> > I know you would say, venus is the UL lord, hence the marriage in venus> > PAD. But did you see venus was debilitated on the day of marriage?> >> > Thanks...... .....Sundar> >> > @gro ups.com <%40. com>, aashish > > rai <raiaashish@ ...> wrote:> > >> > > Dear Sundarji,> > > I have just started learning KP and yet to pick up the basics. but if you> > use traditional astrology it's very clear. As this forum is for KP only I am> > not elaborating.> > >> > > Regards,> > > Aashish> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > ____________ _________ _________ __> > > Sundar <sundar190561@ ...>> > > @gro ups.com <%40. com>

 

> >> > > Sun, 1 November, 2009 10:59:22 PM> > > Post mortem analysis of marriage> > >> > >> > >> > > Dear Learned members> > >> > > My neighbour go married on 21st Oct, 2009 between 9 to 10am. The transit> > of DBAS does not fully signify the event fully.> > >> > > dob: 25th Aug, 1979> > > tob: 9.37 (rectified)> > > pob: Mumbai> > >> > > Time of birth reported is 9.22am> > > Ayanamsha : 23.28.58> > >> > > dasha/bukti/ antra> > >> > > planet sgl stl sl> > > (MD)rahu(11) sun(11,12) venus(11,2-9) venus(11,2-9)> > > (AD)ketu(5) sat(12,5-6) rahu(11) venus(11,2-9)> > > (PAD)venus(11, 2-9) sun(11,12) ketu(5) jupiter(11,4- 7)> > >> > > rahu=sun(11, 12)> > > ketu=saturn( 12,5-6)> > >> > > Marriage on 21st October 2009 between 9 am to 10 am> > >> > > planet sgl stl sl> > > (MD)rahu(4) sat(12,5-6) sun(1,12) jupiter(5,4- 7)> > > (AD)ketu(10) moon(2,11) jupiter(5,4- 7) rahu-MD(4)> > > (PAD)venus(12, 2-9) mer(1,1-10) moon(2,11) rahu-MD(4)> > >> > > sun venus(12,2-9) mars(10,3-8) venus(12,2-9)> > > moon mars(10,3-8) sat(12,5-6) venus(12,2-9)> > >> > > Baed on the above it is seen that MD/AD/PAD does not fully signify DBAS> > (except for ketu, which is rahu's sub.> > >> > > In the light of the above how do we reconcile the timing of marriage.> > >> > > Thanks...... ...Sundar> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > Keep up with people you care about with India Mail. Learn how. http://in.overview.> > mail.. com/connectmore<http://in.overview. mail.. com/connectmore>> > >> >> >> > ------------ --------- ---------> > Connect more, do more and share more with India Mail. Learn more<http://in.rd. / tagline_galaxy_ 3/*http:/ /in.overview. mail.. com/>> > .> >> > > >>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear TW, Appreciate your observations. Please check , 1 when Jup is aspectingLagna/7th,simultaneously Sat should aspect Moon/7th. 2. Vice versa,exchange Jup and Sat. 3. Any relationship between Mars/Ven in above situations. Regards, Satish--- On Fri, 11/6/09, TW <tw853 wrote:TW <tw853 Re: Why Shri KN Rao's Double Transit doesn't make sense Date: Friday, November 6, 2009, 11:45 AM

 

 

Dear Friends,

 

1. What Satish is saying is the up-to-date Double Transit, i.e. the simultaneous joint aspects of transit Jupiter & Saturn on 7th house from Asc. OR earlier way of the simultaneous aspects of transit Ju & Sa on 7th house from Moon.

 

2. I've found the print-out of my study of 50 charts on 21-07-2004 which I sent to my KP brother back home as follows:

 

1) Ju's aspect on 7th house from Asc. 32 out of 50, 64%

2) Sa's aspect on 7th house from Asc. 24 out of 50, 48%

3) Simultaneous aspect of Ju & Sa on 7th from Asc. 14 out of 50, 28%

 

5) Ju's aspect on 7th house from Moon 15 out of 50, 30%

6) Sa's aspect on 7th house from Moon 28 out of 50, 56%

7) Simultaneous aspect of Ju & Sa on 7th from Moon 13 out of 50, 26%

 

8) Ju's aspect on natal Venus 19 out of 50, 38%

9) Sa's aspect on natal Venus 16 out of 50, 32%

10) Simultaneous aspect of Ju & Sa on natal Venus 8 out of 50, 16%

11) Simultaneous aspect of Ju & Sa on both 7th house from Asc. & natal Venus at the same time 3 out of 50, 6%

12) Simultaneous aspect of Ju & Sa on both 7th house from Moon & natal Venus at the same time 3 out of 50, 6%

 

3. According to Sh. KN Rao it is dasha that has a predominant role and not transit. But both must favor elevation to the throne.

-MS Mehta & A Radhika: Time tested Techniques of Mundane Astrology page 258

 

Regards,

TW

 

@gro ups.com, Punit Pandey <punitp wrote:

>

> Dear Satish,

>

> So the rule for marriage you are suggesting is -

>

> Condition 1. Jupiter should aspect ascendant or 7th house and Saturn should

> aspect Moon or 7th house from Moon

> Condition 2. Saturn should aspect ascendant or 7th house and Jupiter should

> aspect Moon or 7th house from Moon

>

> One of the above condition should be fulfilled. Is it what you are

> suggesting?

>

> By the way, as I mentioned earlier, my observation was based on Shri KN

> Rao's teaching of Saturn and Jupiter's aspect on 7th and 7th lord. What you

> are telling seems different. Anyways, I'll try it out sometime and see.

>

> Thanks & Regards,

>

> Punit Pandey

>

>

> On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 7:30 PM, R Satish <rsatish1942@ ...> wrote:

>

> >

> >

> > Dear Punit,

> >

> > What you say about Jup is perfect and easy to

> > understand. When you take the Simultaneous transit of Sat over Lagna/7th or

> > Moon/7th,these percentages get affected.

> > To clarify if Jup is aspecting Lagn/7th then Sat must aspect Moon/7th to

> > fulfill the requirements.

> >

> > As I mentioned,these happenings are not over 60%

> > consistently. If it were so it would become a simple rule all emcompassing.

> > To improve the % factor Venus/mars have been brought into the picture.

> >

> > Even in KP,for marriages, we started with 2,7,11 houses.

> > Later it became 2, 5,7 11 Astro secrets Pt 1). Then we added 5,8 houses to

> > 2,7,11. Khullar has his rules so does Baskaran.. To add to this confusion,

> > we added sub-sub theories.

> >

> > It is a matter of time when the original formula would

> > undergo such transformation, we would be unable to recognize the original.

> >

> > Whether to use it for prediction or postmortem is a

> > personal choice.Post mortem is easier to handle.However for predictions, we

> > need the skills to try for corroboration one or more of these combinations

> > for best-fit.

> >

> > I for one, attempt to use KP + some others including

> > Double-Transit of Jup/Sat (as I understand).

> >

> > Failed predictions are a part of the game. I humbly

> > accept,I am still a

> > learner and have many more miles to go.

> >

> > Regards,

> >

> > Satish

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > --- On Thu, 11/5/09, Punit Pandey *<punitp >* wrote:

> >

> >

> > Punit Pandey <punitp

> > Re: Re: Why Shri KN Rao's Double Transit doesn't make

> > sense

> > @gro ups.com

> > Thursday, November 5, 2009, 12:22 PM

> >

> >

> >

> > Dear Satish,

> >

> > What I am trying to convey that the rule will be true at any piont of time

> > in one's life because it is too vague. Please go through my earlier email on

> > this topic. The rule can not only justify marriage in 10 charts but in any

> > chart.

> >

> > Let us take today's chart as an example taking Leo as ascedant (12:06PM,

> > Agra). Saturn is 7th lord from Leo and 7th sign from Leo is Aquarius.

> >

> > Jupiter is aspecting 7th lord Saturn (1st year). Next year (2nd year),

> > Jupiter will be transiting over 7th house. Next year to that (3rd year),

> > Jupiter will again 7th aspecting 7th lord. 4th year, there will no aspect on

> > 7th and 7th lord. 5th year Jupiter will have 5th aspect on 7th lord. 6th

> > year, Jupiter will be aspecting 7th house. 7th year, Jupiter will be

> > transiting over 7th lord from Moon. 8th year, Jupiter will be aspecting 7th

> > house from 7th aspect. 9th year, Jupiter will be transiting over 7th lord.

> > 10 year, Jupiter will have 5th aspect on 7th house. 11th year, Jupiter will

> > be transiting 7th from Moon. 12th year, again Jupiter will be aspecting 7th

> > lord.

> >

> > *Jupiter cycle repeats every 12 year, so it is safe to say that at

> > almost any point of this person's life (born today at 12:06PM at Agra),

> > Jupiter will be either aspecting 7th or 7th lord from Ascendant or Moon.

> > 11/12 = 92% possibility. * Even If we check the rule only from Ascendant

> > (and ignore Moon), Jupiter will be aspecting 7th or 7th lord 9/12=75% of

> > time. In other words, whatever year this person marries, double-transit

> > will be able to justify it :-) Does Double Transit make any sense?

> >

> > Thanks & Regards,

> >

> > Punit Pandey

> >

> >

> > On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 11:52 AM, R Satish <rsatish1942@ <http://mc/compose? to=rsatish1942@ ...>

> > > wrote:

> >

> >>

> >>

> >> Dear Punit,

> >>

> >> I refer to the book"ADVANCED TECHNIQUES OF ASTROLOGICAL

> >>

> >> PREDICTIONS" edited Sri KN Rao.In one of the chapters 'Tajika Shastra

> >> and Marriage

> >>

> >> timing of Event" by Dr R K Wishwakarma, he has given 8 rules for timing

> >> marriage date with

> >>

> >> case studies. He validates 10 samples ,where Sat/Jup aspect 7th

> >> house/lord.

> >>

> >> He adds further Venus/Mars interconnection on marriage date.

> >>

> >>

> >> We can only try to minimise the number of

> >> rules,but cannot reduce

> >>

> >> significantly, all introduced thru trial and error,like we are presently

> >> doing.

> >>

> >> Regards,

> >>

> >> Satish

> >>

> >> --- On *Wed, 11/4/09, Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com<http://mc/compose? to=punitp@ ...>

> >> >* wrote:

> >>

> >>

> >> Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com<http://mc/compose? to=punitp@ ...>

> >> >

> >> Re: Re: Why Shri KN Rao's Double Transit doesn't

> >> make sense

> >>

> >> @gro ups.com<http://mc/compose? to=>

> >> Wednesday, November 4, 2009, 11:15 PM

> >>

> >>

> >>

> >> Dear Mssumich,

> >>

> >> Please note few points -

> >>

> >> 1. A method needs to be mathematically correct first before we can talk

> >> about predictive aspect of the method. As I mentioned this method is

> >> fundamentally flawed and doesn't make sense. I have mentioned the reason and

> >> would love to hear if somebody can show that I am missing something.

> >>

> >> 2. Double transit, as mentioned by Paul Manley, is different from what

> >> Shri KN Rao has used in his books. By Double-Transit, Shri KN Rao doesn't

> >> mean that both the planet should aspect one single sign, but one planet

> >> aspecting the house and other house lord (generally). As I demonstrated,

> >> this condition will match almost 100% of time and hence it makes this tool a

> >> good tool for post-mortem and justification. Though not useful for

> >> predictions.

> >>

> >> 3. If a method doesn't work, we should leave it and move on. If we will

> >> not accept that the method doesn't make sense, we can not discard it. By

> >> saying something like "we need to check dasa and yoga etc.", we want to

> >> prove it some way or other. Why? If it doens't work, it doesn't work. We

> >> should not accpet anything blindly. There are quite a few teachings by Shri

> >> KN Rao that works and we should use them. Teachings that do not work, we

> >> should discard them.

> >>

> >> 4. I don not understand why you are mixing placidus with double-transit.

> >> Let us not mix both the threads. Though i guess that the way you asked your

> >> earlier question was not good for generating discussion. In my opinion,

> >> correct way for asking question is to present your own analysis and ask your

> >> question. If you are learner, you should present your detailed analysis.

> >> What is your analysis as per KP? What is your analysis as per Traditional?

> >> Saying that I am able to justify events using Traditional but not KP seems

> >> too vague a statement. I do not see reference of Sub in your post. I don't

> >> see reference of Nakshatra in your post. That doesn't qualify as a KP

> >> analysis and hence doesn't provoke any response. This I guess may be the

> >> reason you didn't get response.

> >>

> >> Thanks & Regards,

> >> Punit Pandey

> >>

> >> On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 9:45 PM, mssumich <mssumich <http://mc/compose? to=mssumich@ ...>

> >> > wrote:

> >>

> >>>

> >>>

> >>> Hi Punit

> >>> Like many of the 100s of tools that Jyotish gives - don't believe in all

> >>> the techniques that one comes up with. From Paul Manley's website here is

> >>> what he says

> >>> "What you'll see in the following illustrations is how the sign(s) that

> >>> gets the double transit will shift, generally from year to year. In fact,

> >>> there are only two positions of Jupiter and Saturn that will not have the

> >>> double transit phenomenon – when Jupiter is in the 8th or 12th house from

> >>> Saturn. This means that 10 out of the 12 possible positions, or more than

> >>> 80% of the time, there will be the double transit phenomenon happening in at

> >>> least one sign, possibly two."

> >>>

> >>> I have see this double transit work sometimes and sometimes not.

> >>> Obviuosly we have to pay attention to sookshma transits (or finer transits)

> >>> and just double transit.

> >>>

> >>> I urge some expert to answer my question on the Placidus house system for

> >>> a chart that I put on the other day. One bhava covers 58 deg of zodiac,

> >>> there are 3 planets in 8th house; This person is very succesful. I can

> >>> explain every event using vedic astreology and nakshatra analysis. The

> >>> moment I put 3 planets in 8th in this chart, I am lost.

> >>>

> >>> For latititude that are closer to 66 deg N or S - I believe the Placidus

> >>> system of houses give wierd house cusps(correct me if I am wrong). This

> >>> actor was born in Scotland where latitude in 55deg. My question is for

> >>> people born in such norhtern altitudes -what system works? Is it still

> >>> Placidus wasy of calculating houses or something else. There should a clear

> >>> answer from KP experts. I am hoping there is that person in this list.

> >>> thanks

> >>>

> >>>

> >>> @gro ups.com<http://mc/compose? to=% 40. com>,

> >>> Punit Pandey <punitp@> wrote:

> >>> >

> >>> > Dear Friends,

> >>> >

> >>> > KP made timing an event much more easier. Though as a KP astrologer, I

> >>> > always feel that it will be nice to have another complementary method

> >>> by

> >>> > which we can cross-check and confirm. In search of another such method

> >>> for

> >>> > timing events, I looked into many methods and Shri KN Rao's double

> >>> transit

> >>> > is among them.

> >>> >

> >>> > I personally feel that it is merely a tool for post-mortem and not

> >>> useful

> >>> > for future predictions. Let us take an example of Marriage.

> >>> Double-transit

> >>> > suggests that transiting Jupiter and Saturn will always be aspecting

> >>> Natal

> >>> > 7th and 7th lord at the time of marriage.

> >>> >

> >>> > Now Jupiter has three aspects - 5,7, and 9. So including its own

> >>> position,

> >>> > it will be influencing four houses in any chart. Which means that at

> >>> any

> >>> > point of time the possibility of aspecting 7th is 33.33% and 7th lord

> >>> is

> >>> > also 33.33%. If we take Jupiter's influence on either 7th OR 7th lord,

> >>> > possibility will double from 4/12 to 8/12 or 66.66%. So at any time, we

> >>> have

> >>> > 66.66% possibility of Jupiter aspecting either 7th or 7th lord. In

> >>> other

> >>> > words, around 66% of time in one's life, we will see that Jupiter is

> >>> > influencing either 7th or 7th. Of course, this calculation doesn't

> >>> consider

> >>> > some of the possibility e.g. 7th lord is in 7th house itself. Anyways,

> >>> I

> >>> > have seen Shri KN Rao is also checking Moon for transit other than

> >>> > Ascendant. Which doubles the possibility and if somehow Jupiter is not

> >>> > aspecting 7th and 7th lord counting from Lagna, it will aspect 7th or

> >>> 7th

> >>> > lord from Moon. So in any point of one's life, if take transit from

> >>> Moon as

> >>> > well as Ascendant, it is almost certain that Jupiter will influencing

> >>> either

> >>> > 7th from ascendant, or 7th lord from ascendant, or 7th from Moon, or

> >>> 7th

> >>> > lord from Moon.

> >>> >

> >>> > Similarly, Saturn also has 3 aspects and the above write-up is true for

> >>> > Saturn as well. In other words, seeing the above possibility, I feel

> >>> that

> >>> > Double-Transit doesn't make sense at all.

> >>> >

> >>> > To sound this method sensible and experimental purpose, I checked

> >>> reducing

> >>> > the possibility by checking transit only from Ascendant. If I do that

> >>> way, I

> >>> > have many cases where it fails.

> >>> >

> >>> > In other words, I do not find Double-transit theory useful at all.

> >>> >

> >>> > Thanks & Regards,

> >>> >

> >>> > Punit Pandey

> >>> >

> >>> >

> >>> > On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 2:06 PM, aashish rai <raiaashish@ ..> wrote:

> >>> >

> >>> > >

> >>> > >

> >>> > > Dear Sundar,

> >>> > >

> >>> > > In classical astrology there are so many dashas, if vimshottari was

> >>> only

> >>> > > required than why did Parashara muni talked about so many dashas.

> >>> Other

> >>> > > dashas like Yogini are showing it.

> >>> > >

> >>> > >

> >>> > >

> >>> > > Let's forget about DBAs for time being as per double transit theory

> >>> of Shri

> >>> > > Kn rao marriage chances are high when transit Saturn and Jupiter

> >>> aspect

> >>> > > natal 1/7 axis or their natal lords. In rare cases 9th lord will be

> >>> > > involved.

> >>> > >

> >>> > >

> >>> > >

> >>> > > Natal chart,

> >>> > >

> >>> > > Jupier is aspecting natal 7th lord, lagna lord and Lagna

> >>> > >

> >>> > > Saturn is sitting in Lagna itself, aspecting 7th house

> >>> > >

> >>> > >

> >>> > >

> >>> > >

> >>> > > Won't be surprised if there is a child birth/pregency before end

> >>> august

> >>> > > 2010 !!!

> >>> > >

> >>> > > Regards,

> >>> > > Aashish

> >>> > >

> >>> > > ------------ --------- ---------

> >>> > > ** Sundar <sundar190561@ ...>

> >>> > >

> >>> > > *To:* @gro ups.com<http://mc/compose? to=% 40. com>

> >>>

> >>> > > *Sent:* Wed, 4 November, 2009 10:31:33 AM

> >>> > > *Subject:* Re: Post mortem analysis of marriage

> >>> > >

> >>> > >

> >>> > >

> >>> > > Dear Aashish

> >>> > >

> >>> > > I know you would say, venus is the UL lord, hence the marriage in

> >>> venus

> >>> > > PAD. But did you see venus was debilitated on the day of marriage?

> >>> > >

> >>> > > Thanks...... ....Sundar

> >>> > >

> >>> > > @gro ups.com <% 40. com<http://40 s.com/>>,

> >>> aashish

> >>>

> >>> > > rai <raiaashish@ ...> wrote:

> >>> > > >

> >>> > > > Dear Sundarji,

> >>> > > > I have just started learning KP and yet to pick up the basics. but

> >>> if you

> >>> > > use traditional astrology it's very clear. As this forum is for KP

> >>> only I am

> >>> > > not elaborating.

> >>> > > >

> >>> > > > Regards,

> >>> > > > Aashish

> >>> > > >

> >>> > > >

> >>> > > >

> >>> > > >

> >>> > > >

> >>> > > > ____________ _________ _________ __

> >>> > > > Sundar <sundar190561@ ...>

> >>> > > > @gro ups.com <% 40. com<http://40 s.com/>>

> >>>

> >>>

> >>> > >

> >>> > > > Sun, 1 November, 2009 10:59:22 PM

> >>> > > > Post mortem analysis of marriage

> >>> > > >

> >>> > > >

> >>> > > >

> >>> > > > Dear Learned members

> >>> > > >

> >>> > > > My neighbour go married on 21st Oct, 2009 between 9 to 10am. The

> >>> transit

> >>> > > of DBAS does not fully signify the event fully.

> >>> > > >

> >>> > > > dob: 25th Aug, 1979

> >>> > > > tob: 9.37 (rectified)

> >>> > > > pob: Mumbai

> >>> > > >

> >>> > > > Time of birth reported is 9.22am

> >>> > > > Ayanamsha : 23.28.58

> >>> > > >

> >>> > > > dasha/bukti/ antra

> >>> > > >

> >>> > > > planet sgl stl sl

> >>> > > > (MD)rahu(11) sun(11,12) venus(11,2-9) venus(11,2-9)

> >>> > > > (AD)ketu(5) sat(12,5-6) rahu(11) venus(11,2-9)

> >>> > > > (PAD)venus(11, 2-9) sun(11,12) ketu(5) jupiter(11,4- 7)

> >>> > > >

> >>> > > > rahu=sun(11, 12)

> >>> > > > ketu=saturn( 12,5-6)

> >>> > > >

> >>> > > > Marriage on 21st October 2009 between 9 am to 10 am

> >>> > > >

> >>> > > > planet sgl stl sl

> >>> > > > (MD)rahu(4) sat(12,5-6) sun(1,12) jupiter(5,4- 7)

> >>> > > > (AD)ketu(10) moon(2,11) jupiter(5,4- 7) rahu-MD(4)

> >>> > > > (PAD)venus(12, 2-9) mer(1,1-10) moon(2,11) rahu-MD(4)

> >>> > > >

> >>> > > > sun venus(12,2-9) mars(10,3-8) venus(12,2-9)

> >>> > > > moon mars(10,3-8) sat(12,5-6) venus(12,2-9)

> >>> > > >

> >>> > > > Baed on the above it is seen that MD/AD/PAD does not fully signify

> >>> DBAS

> >>> > > (except for ketu, which is rahu's sub.

> >>> > > >

> >>> > > > In the light of the above how do we reconcile the timing of

> >>> marriage.

> >>> > > >

> >>> > > > Thanks...... ...Sundar

> >>> > > >

> >>> > > >

> >>> > > >

> >>> > > >

> >>> > > >

> >>> > > > Keep up with people you care about with India Mail. Learn

> >>> how. http://in.overview.

> >>> > > mail.. com/connectmore<http://in.overview. mail..

> >>> com/connectmore <http://in.overview. mail.. com/connectmore>>

> >>> > > >

> >>> > >

> >>> > >

> >>> > > ------------ --------- ---------

> >>> > > Connect more, do more and share more with India Mail. Learn

> >>> more<http://in.rd. / tagline_galaxy_ 3/*http:/ /in.overview.

> >>> mail.. com/<http://in.rd. / tagline_galaxy_ 3/*http:/ /in.overview. mail.. com/>

> >>> >

> >>> > > .

> >>> > >

> >>> > >

> >>> > >

> >>> >

> >>>

> >>>

> >>

> >>

> >

> >

> >

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Punit JiBelow mentioned scheme is the extended and ratified version of Double transit ruleto predict marriage timings after carried lot of research out on large number of horoscopes.Most of these rules were used by eminent old Indian astrologers (unfortunately that knowledge is not passed on to the future generation properly) and they are giving very consistent out put on the same.This composite scheme is also mentioned in "Timing of Marriage" book written by various eminent astrlogers like M N Kedar, S N Kapoor etc.. and reviewed and acknowledged by K N Rao as mentioned in the book it-self.I have personally applied these schemes on large number of horoscopes and shared with lot of Parashari based astrologers, where they found it correct from what they have used and gives very good results.Please do not consider this

response negatively as my intention is not to debate about whether it is a variation or in-correct version of K N Rao double transit etc..but would like to give some references about this scheme and shed more light on applicability aspect so members can use the same to ameliorate further.End of the day, what matters is - consistent working RULE and knowledge of it's applicability.Thank you.RegardsAtul Maydeo.(if you haven't tried, you haven't lived so keep trying...)--- On Fri, 11/6/09, Punit Pandey <punitp wrote:Punit Pandey <punitpRe: Re: Why Shri KN Rao's Double Transit doesn't make sense Date: Friday, November 6, 2009, 11:00 AM

 

 

Dear Atul ji,

 

Thanks for sharing this information. Though this is the fourth variation for Double-Transit that we are seeing here. Also this is NOT what Shri KN Rao has taught in his books. As far as I remember, he has not used lagna in Double Transit?

 

Anyways, this is another rule that I'll check and come back.

Thanks & Regards,Punit Pandey

On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 2:39 AM, atul m <atulmaydeo > wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear AllI know this is not Parashari system forum but discussion started on Double transit of K N Rao so thought of sharing precise and complete details on this as per my knowledge and considering researched output from various eminent astrologers like M N Kedar, K N Rao, S N Kapoor, J N Gupta and Others -

Four Tier Scheme of Composite Transit for Marriage Timings as per eminent astrologers like M N Kedar, K N Rao (although K N Rao further ratifies with Jaimini system as well apart from Parashari) and others as per below -

1. Saturn & Jupiter - Should have in transit aspected or transited over: a) Lagna and 7th House; or b) Lagna and 7th Lord; or c) Lagna lord and 7th house or d) Lagna lord and 7th lord

(saturn within 27 months and jupiter within 12 months)2. Jupiter - a) Natal Venus and 5th house/lord or b) 5th house and 9th house or c) 5th lord and 9th house or d) 5th house and 9th lord or

e) 5th lord and 9th lord3. Mars - should have in transit covered within six months: a) what saturn and Jupiter must do, see(1) above; and b) what jupiter must do see (2) above4. The 7th lord -

the 7th lord, in transit within 40 days of any marriage must establish contact with any of the following: a) the 11th lord b) the 9th lord c) the lagna lordAlso, at the time of marriage the lords of 7th, 9th, 5th and lagna will be mutually connected (P-position, A- aspect, C-conjunction) and in most of the cases these will be around 7th, lagna or their lords.

Note - Retrograde planets aspect from previous house as well.The results are very positive (more than 90%) with the above schemes after applying on large number of horoscopes for predicting marriage timings.

if you tie-up with Jaimini dasha system then results are extreamly positive (97-98%).Although, normally it ties-up with Vimshottari Dasha system by all Parashari astrologers.Important - This applies considering horoscope does not have marriage denial features and in case of delayed horoscope, marriage turns up in 2nd round or some time 3rd round saturn and Jupiter transit as per above scheme.

Although, marriage denial and very delayed (computing delay fators) is a seprate topic.Also, you may have noticed that moon or aspect from moon is NOT considered in this rule for predicting marriage timing.

Hope this information is useful to all interested members.RegardsAtul Maydeo.(if you haven't tried, you haven't lived so keep trying...) --- On Fri, 11/6/09, Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

 

Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com>Re: Re: Why Shri KN Rao's Double Transit doesn't make sense@gro ups.com

Friday, November 6, 2009, 12:02 AM

 

 

Dear Satish,

 

So the rule for marriage you are suggesting is -

 

Condition 1. Jupiter should aspect ascendant or 7th house and Saturn should aspect Moon or 7th house from Moon

Condition 2. Saturn should aspect ascendant or 7th house and Jupiter should aspect Moon or 7th house from Moon

 

One of the above condition should be fulfilled. Is it what you are suggesting?

 

By the way, as I mentioned earlier, my observation was based on Shri KN Rao's teaching of Saturn and Jupiter's aspect on 7th and 7th lord. What you are telling seems different. Anyways, I'll try it out sometime and see.

Thanks & Regards,Punit Pandey

 

On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 7:30 PM, R Satish <rsatish1942@ > wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Punit,

What you say about Jup is perfect and easy to understand. When you take the Simultaneous transit of Sat over Lagna/7th or Moon/7th,these percentages get affected.

To clarify if Jup is aspecting Lagn/7th then Sat must aspect Moon/7th to fulfill the requirements.

 

As I mentioned,these happenings are not over 60% consistently. If it were so it would become a simple rule all emcompassing. To improve the % factor Venus/mars have been brought into the picture.

 

Even in KP,for marriages, we started with 2,7,11 houses. Later it became 2, 5,7 11 Astro secrets Pt 1). Then we added 5,8 houses to 2,7,11. Khullar has his rules so does Baskaran.. To add to this confusion, we added sub-sub theories.

 

It is a matter of time when the original formula would undergo such transformation, we would be unable to recognize the original.

 

Whether to use it for prediction or postmortem is a personal choice.Post mortem is easier to handle.However for predictions, we need the skills to try for corroboration one or more of these combinations for best-fit.

 

I for one, attempt to use KP + some others including Double-Transit of Jup/Sat (as I understand).

 

Failed predictions are a part of the game. I humbly accept,I am still a

learner and have many more miles to go.

 

Regards,

 

Satish

 

 

 

 

 

--- On Thu, 11/5/09, Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

 

 

Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com>Re: Re: Why Shri KN Rao's Double Transit doesn't make sense

@gro ups.com

 

 

Thursday, November 5, 2009, 12:22 PM

 

 

Dear Satish,

 

What I am trying to convey that the rule will be true at any piont of time in one's life because it is too vague. Please go through my earlier email on this topic. The rule can not only justify marriage in 10 charts but in any chart.

 

Let us take today's chart as an example taking Leo as ascedant (12:06PM, Agra). Saturn is 7th lord from Leo and 7th sign from Leo is Aquarius.

 

Jupiter is aspecting 7th lord Saturn (1st year).. Next year (2nd year), Jupiter will be transiting over 7th house. Next year to that (3rd year), Jupiter will again 7th aspecting 7th lord. 4th year, there will no aspect on 7th and 7th lord. 5th year Jupiter will have 5th aspect on 7th lord. 6th year, Jupiter will be aspecting 7th house. 7th year, Jupiter will be transiting over 7th lord from Moon. 8th year, Jupiter will be aspecting 7th house from 7th aspect. 9th year, Jupiter will be transiting over 7th lord. 10 year, Jupiter will have 5th aspect on 7th house. 11th year, Jupiter will be transiting 7th from Moon. 12th year, again Jupiter will be aspecting 7th lord.

 

Jupiter cycle repeats every 12 year, so it is safe to say that at almost any point of this person's life (born today at 12:06PM at Agra), Jupiter will be either aspecting 7th or 7th lord from Ascendant or Moon. 11/12 = 92% possibility. Even If we check the rule only from Ascendant (and ignore Moon), Jupiter will be aspecting 7th or 7th lord 9/12=75% of time. In other words, whatever year this person marries, double-transit will be able to justify it :-) Does Double Transit make any sense?

 

Thanks & Regards,Punit Pandey

 

On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 11:52 AM, R Satish <rsatish1942@ > wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Punit,

I refer to the book"ADVANCED TECHNIQUES OF ASTROLOGICAL

 

PREDICTIONS" edited Sri KN Rao.In one of the chapters 'Tajika Shastra and Marriage

timing of Event" by Dr R K Wishwakarma, he has given 8 rules for timing marriage date with

 

case studies. He validates 10 samples ,where Sat/Jup aspect 7th house/lord.

 

He adds further Venus/Mars interconnection on marriage date.

 

 

We can only try to minimise the number of rules,but cannot reduce

 

significantly, all introduced thru trial and error,like we are presently doing.

 

Regards,

 

 

 

Satish--- On Wed, 11/4/09, Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

 

 

Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com>Re: Re: Why Shri KN Rao's Double Transit doesn't make sense

@gro ups.com

 

 

Wednesday, November 4, 2009, 11:15 PM

 

 

Dear Mssumich,

 

Please note few points -

 

1. A method needs to be mathematically correct first before we can talk about predictive aspect of the method. As I mentioned this method is fundamentally flawed and doesn't make sense. I have mentioned the reason and would love to hear if somebody can show that I am missing something.

 

2. Double transit, as mentioned by Paul Manley, is different from what Shri KN Rao has used in his books. By Double-Transit, Shri KN Rao doesn't mean that both the planet should aspect one single sign, but one planet aspecting the house and other house lord (generally). As I demonstrated, this condition will match almost 100% of time and hence it makes this tool a good tool for post-mortem and justification. Though not useful for predictions.

 

3. If a method doesn't work, we should leave it and move on. If we will not accept that the method doesn't make sense, we can not discard it. By saying something like "we need to check dasa and yoga etc.", we want to prove it some way or other.. Why? If it doens't work, it doesn't work. We should not accpet anything blindly. There are quite a few teachings by Shri KN Rao that works and we should use them. Teachings that do not work, we should discard them..

 

4. I don not understand why you are mixing placidus with double-transit. Let us not mix both the threads. Though i guess that the way you asked your earlier question was not good for generating discussion. In my opinion, correct way for asking question is to present your own analysis and ask your question. If you are learner, you should present your detailed analysis. What is your analysis as per KP? What is your analysis as per Traditional? Saying that I am able to justify events using Traditional but not KP seems too vague a statement. I do not see reference of Sub in your post. I don't see reference of Nakshatra in your post. That doesn't qualify as a KP analysis and hence doesn't provoke any response. This I guess may be the reason you didn't get response.

 

Thanks & Regards,

Punit Pandey

 

On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 9:45 PM, mssumich <mssumich > wrote:

 

 

 

 

Hi PunitLike many of the 100s of tools that Jyotish gives - don't believe in all the techniques that one comes up with. From Paul Manley's website here is what he says"What you'll see in the following illustrations is how the sign(s) that gets the double transit will shift, generally from year to year. In fact, there are only two positions of Jupiter and Saturn that will not have the double transit phenomenon – when Jupiter is in the 8th or 12th house from Saturn. This means that 10 out of the 12 possible positions, or more than 80% of the time, there will be the double transit phenomenon happening in at least one sign, possibly two."

I have see this double transit work sometimes and sometimes not. Obviuosly we have to pay attention to sookshma transits (or finer transits) and just double transit.I urge some expert to answer my question on the Placidus house system for a chart that I put on the other day. One bhava covers 58 deg of zodiac, there are 3 planets in 8th house; This person is very succesful. I can explain every event using vedic astreology and nakshatra analysis. The moment I put 3 planets in 8th in this chart, I am lost.

For latititude that are closer to 66 deg N or S - I believe the Placidus system of houses give wierd house cusps(correct me if I am wrong). This actor was born in Scotland where latitude in 55deg. My question is for people born in such norhtern altitudes -what system works? Is it still Placidus wasy of calculating houses or something else. There should a clear answer from KP experts. I am hoping there is that person in this list.

thanks

 

 

 

 

 

@gro ups.com, Punit Pandey <punitp wrote:>> Dear Friends,>

> KP made timing an event much more easier. Though as a KP astrologer, I> always feel that it will be nice to have another complementary method by> which we can cross-check and confirm. In search of another such method for

> timing events, I looked into many methods and Shri KN Rao's double transit> is among them.> > I personally feel that it is merely a tool for post-mortem and not useful> for future predictions. Let us take an example of Marriage. Double-transit

> suggests that transiting Jupiter and Saturn will always be aspecting Natal> 7th and 7th lord at the time of marriage.> > Now Jupiter has three aspects - 5,7, and 9. So including its own position,

> it will be influencing four houses in any chart. Which means that at any> point of time the possibility of aspecting 7th is 33.33% and 7th lord is> also 33..33%. If we take Jupiter's influence on either 7th OR 7th lord,

> possibility will double from 4/12 to 8/12 or 66.66%. So at any time, we have> 66.66% possibility of Jupiter aspecting either 7th or 7th lord. In other> words, around 66% of time in one's life, we will see that Jupiter is

> influencing either 7th or 7th. Of course, this calculation doesn't consider> some of the possibility e.g. 7th lord is in 7th house itself. Anyways, I> have seen Shri KN Rao is also checking Moon for transit other than

> Ascendant. Which doubles the possibility and if somehow Jupiter is not> aspecting 7th and 7th lord counting from Lagna, it will aspect 7th or 7th> lord from Moon. So in any point of one's life, if take transit from Moon as

> well as Ascendant, it is almost certain that Jupiter will influencing either> 7th from ascendant, or 7th lord from ascendant, or 7th from Moon, or 7th> lord from Moon.> > Similarly, Saturn also has 3 aspects and the above write-up is true for

> Saturn as well. In other words, seeing the above possibility, I feel that> Double-Transit doesn't make sense at all.> > To sound this method sensible and experimental purpose, I checked reducing

> the possibility by checking transit only from Ascendant. If I do that way, I> have many cases where it fails.> > In other words, I do not find Double-transit theory useful at all.> > Thanks & Regards,

> > Punit Pandey> >

> On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 2:06 PM, aashish rai <raiaashish@. ..> wrote:> > >> >> > Dear Sundar,> >> > In classical astrology there are so many dashas, if vimshottari was only

> > required than why did Parashara muni talked about so many dashas. Other> > dashas like Yogini are showing it.> >> >> >> > Let's forget about DBAs for time being as per double transit theory of Shri

> > Kn rao marriage chances are high when transit Saturn and Jupiter aspect> > natal 1/7 axis or their natal lords. In rare cases 9th lord will be> > involved.> >> >> >

> > Natal chart,> >> > Jupier is aspecting natal 7th lord, lagna lord and Lagna> >> > Saturn is sitting in Lagna itself, aspecting 7th house> >> >> >

> >> > Won't be surprised if there is a child birth/pregency before end august> > 2010 !!!> >> > Regards,> > Aashish> >> > ------------ --------- ---------

> > ** Sundar <sundar190561@ ...>> >> > *To:* @gro ups.com

 

 

> > *Sent:* Wed, 4 November, 2009 10:31:33 AM> > *Subject:* Re: Post mortem analysis of marriage> >> >> >> > Dear Aashish> >> > I know you would say, venus is the UL lord, hence the marriage in venus

> > PAD. But did you see venus was debilitated on the day of marriage?> >> > Thanks....... .....Sundar> >> > @gro ups.com <%40. com>, aashish > > rai <raiaashish@ ...> wrote:> > >> > > Dear Sundarji,> > > I have just started learning KP and yet to pick up the basics. but if you> > use traditional astrology it's very clear. As this forum is for KP only I am

> > not elaborating.> > >> > > Regards,> > > Aashish> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > ____________ _________ _________ __

> > > Sundar <sundar190561@ ...>> > > @gro ups.com <%40. com>

 

> >> > > Sun, 1 November, 2009 10:59:22 PM> > > Post mortem analysis of marriage> > >> > >> > >> > > Dear Learned members

> > >> > > My neighbour go married on 21st Oct, 2009 between 9 to 10am. The transit> > of DBAS does not fully signify the event fully.> > >> > > dob: 25th Aug, 1979

> > > tob: 9.37 (rectified)> > > pob: Mumbai> > >> > > Time of birth reported is 9.22am> > > Ayanamsha : 23.28.58> > >> > > dasha/bukti/ antra

> > >> > > planet sgl stl sl> > > (MD)rahu(11) sun(11,12) venus(11,2-9) venus(11,2-9)> > > (AD)ketu(5) sat(12,5-6) rahu(11) venus(11,2-9)> > > (PAD)venus(11, 2-9) sun(11,12) ketu(5) jupiter(11,4- 7)

> > >> > > rahu=sun(11, 12)> > > ketu=saturn( 12,5-6)> > >> > > Marriage on 21st October 2009 between 9 am to 10 am> > >> > > planet sgl stl sl

> > > (MD)rahu(4) sat(12,5-6) sun(1,12) jupiter(5,4- 7)> > > (AD)ketu(10) moon(2,11) jupiter(5,4- 7) rahu-MD(4)> > > (PAD)venus(12, 2-9) mer(1,1-10) moon(2,11) rahu-MD(4)> > >

> > > sun venus(12,2-9) mars(10,3-8) venus(12,2-9)> > > moon mars(10,3-8) sat(12,5-6) venus(12,2-9)> > >> > > Baed on the above it is seen that MD/AD/PAD does not fully signify DBAS

> > (except for ketu, which is rahu's sub.> > >> > > In the light of the above how do we reconcile the timing of marriage.> > >> > > Thanks...... ...Sundar

> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > Keep up with people you care about with India Mail. Learn how. http://in.overview.

> > mail.. com/connectmore<http://in.overview. mail.. com/connectmore>> > >> >

> >> > ------------ --------- ---------> > Connect more, do more and share more with India Mail. Learn more<http://in.rd. / tagline_galaxy_ 3/*http:/ /in.overview. mail... com/>

> > .> >> > > >>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Atul,

 

I have provided an oppurtunity for member friends a live case for prediction.The method you may chose only give us your working,so we all learn.

 

Marriage date for a young man

 

Sept 13,1980 TOB 1559hrs Place Dadar Mumbai.

 

You may reply to the group or to me,should you feel restricted.

 

Regards,

 

Satish--- On Fri, 11/6/09, atul m <atulmaydeo wrote:

atul m <atulmaydeoRe: Re: Why Shri KN Rao's Double Transit doesn't make sense Date: Friday, November 6, 2009, 10:44 PM

 

 

 

 

Dear Punit JiBelow mentioned scheme is the extended and ratified version of Double transit ruleto predict marriage timings after carried lot of research out on large number of horoscopes.Most of these rules were used by eminent old Indian astrologers (unfortunately that knowledge is not passed on to the future generation properly) and they are giving very consistent out put on the same.This composite scheme is also mentioned in "Timing of Marriage" book written by various eminent astrlogers like M N Kedar, S N Kapoor etc.. and reviewed and acknowledged by K N Rao as mentioned in the book it-self.I have personally applied these schemes on large number of horoscopes and shared with lot of Parashari based astrologers, where they found it correct from what they have used and gives very good results.Please do not consider this response negatively as my intention is not to debate about whether it is a

variation or in-correct version of K N Rao double transit etc..but would like to give some references about this scheme and shed more light on applicability aspect so members can use the same to ameliorate further.End of the day, what matters is - consistent working RULE and knowledge of it's applicability.Thank you.RegardsAtul Maydeo.(if you haven't tried, you haven't lived so keep trying...)--- On Fri, 11/6/09, Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com>Re: Re: Why Shri KN Rao's Double Transit doesn't make sense@gro ups.comFriday, November 6, 2009, 11:00 AM

 

Dear Atul ji,

 

Thanks for sharing this information. Though this is the fourth variation for Double-Transit that we are seeing here. Also this is NOT what Shri KN Rao has taught in his books. As far as I remember, he has not used lagna in Double Transit?

 

Anyways, this is another rule that I'll check and come back.

Thanks & Regards,Punit Pandey

On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 2:39 AM, atul m <atulmaydeo > wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear AllI know this is not Parashari system forum but discussion started on Double transit of K N Rao so thought of sharing precise and complete details on this as per my knowledge and considering researched output from various eminent astrologers like M N Kedar, K N Rao, S N Kapoor, J N Gupta and Others - Four Tier Scheme of Composite Transit for Marriage Timings as per eminent astrologers like M N Kedar, K N Rao (although K N Rao further ratifies with Jaimini system as well apart from Parashari) and others as per below - 1. Saturn & Jupiter - Should have in transit aspected or transited over: a) Lagna and 7th House; or b) Lagna and 7th Lord; or c) Lagna lord and 7th house or d) Lagna lord and 7th lord (saturn within 27 months and jupiter within 12 months)2.

Jupiter - a) Natal Venus and 5th house/lord or b) 5th house and 9th house or c) 5th lord and 9th house or d) 5th house and 9th lord or e) 5th lord and 9th lord3. Mars - should have in transit covered within six months: a) what saturn and Jupiter must do, see(1) above; and b) what jupiter must do see (2) above4. The 7th lord - the 7th lord, in transit within 40 days of any marriage must establish contact with any of the following: a) the 11th lord b) the 9th lord c) the lagna lordAlso, at the time of marriage the lords of 7th, 9th, 5th and lagna will be mutually connected (P-position, A- aspect, C-conjunction) and in most of

the cases these will be around 7th, lagna or their lords.Note - Retrograde planets aspect from previous house as well.The results are very positive (more than 90%) with the above schemes after applying on large number of horoscopes for predicting marriage timings.if you tie-up with Jaimini dasha system then results are extreamly positive (97-98%).Although, normally it ties-up with Vimshottari Dasha system by all Parashari astrologers.Important - This applies considering horoscope does not have marriage denial features and in case of delayed horoscope, marriage turns up in 2nd round or some time 3rd round saturn and Jupiter transit as per above scheme.Although, marriage denial and very delayed (computing delay fators) is a seprate topic.Also, you may have noticed that moon or aspect from moon is NOT considered in this rule for predicting marriage timing.Hope this information is useful to all

interested members.RegardsAtul Maydeo.(if you haven't tried, you haven't lived so keep trying...) --- On Fri, 11/6/09, Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

 

Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com>Re: Re: Why Shri KN Rao's Double Transit doesn't make sense@gro ups.comFriday, November 6, 2009, 12:02 AM

 

 

Dear Satish,

 

So the rule for marriage you are suggesting is -

 

Condition 1. Jupiter should aspect ascendant or 7th house and Saturn should aspect Moon or 7th house from Moon

Condition 2. Saturn should aspect ascendant or 7th house and Jupiter should aspect Moon or 7th house from Moon

 

One of the above condition should be fulfilled. Is it what you are suggesting?

 

By the way, as I mentioned earlier, my observation was based on Shri KN Rao's teaching of Saturn and Jupiter's aspect on 7th and 7th lord. What you are telling seems different. Anyways, I'll try it out sometime and see.

Thanks & Regards,Punit Pandey

 

On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 7:30 PM, R Satish <rsatish1942@ > wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Punit,

What you say about Jup is perfect and easy to understand. When you take the Simultaneous transit of Sat over Lagna/7th or Moon/7th,these percentages get affected.

To clarify if Jup is aspecting Lagn/7th then Sat must aspect Moon/7th to fulfill the requirements.

 

As I mentioned,these happenings are not over 60% consistently. If it were so it would become a simple rule all emcompassing. To improve the % factor Venus/mars have been brought into the picture.

 

Even in KP,for marriages, we started with 2,7,11 houses. Later it became 2, 5,7 11 Astro secrets Pt 1). Then we added 5,8 houses to 2,7,11. Khullar has his rules so does Baskaran.. To add to this confusion, we added sub-sub theories.

 

It is a matter of time when the original formula would undergo such transformation, we would be unable to recognize the original.

 

Whether to use it for prediction or postmortem is a personal choice.Post mortem is easier to handle.However for predictions, we need the skills to try for corroboration one or more of these combinations for best-fit.

 

I for one, attempt to use KP + some others including Double-Transit of Jup/Sat (as I understand).

 

Failed predictions are a part of the game. I humbly accept,I am still a

learner and have many more miles to go.

 

Regards,

 

Satish

 

 

 

 

 

--- On Thu, 11/5/09, Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

 

 

Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com>Re: Re: Why Shri KN Rao's Double Transit doesn't make sense@gro ups.com

 

 

Thursday, November 5, 2009, 12:22 PM

 

 

Dear Satish,

 

What I am trying to convey that the rule will be true at any piont of time in one's life because it is too vague. Please go through my earlier email on this topic. The rule can not only justify marriage in 10 charts but in any chart.

 

Let us take today's chart as an example taking Leo as ascedant (12:06PM, Agra). Saturn is 7th lord from Leo and 7th sign from Leo is Aquarius.

 

Jupiter is aspecting 7th lord Saturn (1st year).. Next year (2nd year), Jupiter will be transiting over 7th house. Next year to that (3rd year), Jupiter will again 7th aspecting 7th lord. 4th year, there will no aspect on 7th and 7th lord. 5th year Jupiter will have 5th aspect on 7th lord. 6th year, Jupiter will be aspecting 7th house. 7th year, Jupiter will be transiting over 7th lord from Moon. 8th year, Jupiter will be aspecting 7th house from 7th aspect. 9th year, Jupiter will be transiting over 7th lord. 10 year, Jupiter will have 5th aspect on 7th house. 11th year, Jupiter will be transiting 7th from Moon. 12th year, again Jupiter will be aspecting 7th lord.

 

Jupiter cycle repeats every 12 year, so it is safe to say that at almost any point of this person's life (born today at 12:06PM at Agra), Jupiter will be either aspecting 7th or 7th lord from Ascendant or Moon. 11/12 = 92% possibility. Even If we check the rule only from Ascendant (and ignore Moon), Jupiter will be aspecting 7th or 7th lord 9/12=75% of time. In other words, whatever year this person marries, double-transit will be able to justify it :-) Does Double Transit make any sense?

 

Thanks & Regards,Punit Pandey

 

On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 11:52 AM, R Satish <rsatish1942@ > wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Punit,

I refer to the book"ADVANCED TECHNIQUES OF ASTROLOGICAL

 

PREDICTIONS" edited Sri KN Rao.In one of the chapters 'Tajika Shastra and Marriage

timing of Event" by Dr R K Wishwakarma, he has given 8 rules for timing marriage date with

 

case studies. He validates 10 samples ,where Sat/Jup aspect 7th house/lord.

 

He adds further Venus/Mars interconnection on marriage date.

 

 

We can only try to minimise the number of rules,but cannot reduce

 

significantly, all introduced thru trial and error,like we are presently doing.

 

Regards,

 

 

 

Satish--- On Wed, 11/4/09, Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

 

 

Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com>Re: Re: Why Shri KN Rao's Double Transit doesn't make sense

@gro ups.com

 

 

Wednesday, November 4, 2009, 11:15 PM

 

 

Dear Mssumich,

 

Please note few points -

 

1. A method needs to be mathematically correct first before we can talk about predictive aspect of the method. As I mentioned this method is fundamentally flawed and doesn't make sense. I have mentioned the reason and would love to hear if somebody can show that I am missing something.

 

2. Double transit, as mentioned by Paul Manley, is different from what Shri KN Rao has used in his books. By Double-Transit, Shri KN Rao doesn't mean that both the planet should aspect one single sign, but one planet aspecting the house and other house lord (generally). As I demonstrated, this condition will match almost 100% of time and hence it makes this tool a good tool for post-mortem and justification. Though not useful for predictions.

 

3. If a method doesn't work, we should leave it and move on. If we will not accept that the method doesn't make sense, we can not discard it. By saying something like "we need to check dasa and yoga etc.", we want to prove it some way or other.. Why? If it doens't work, it doesn't work. We should not accpet anything blindly. There are quite a few teachings by Shri KN Rao that works and we should use them. Teachings that do not work, we should discard them..

 

4. I don not understand why you are mixing placidus with double-transit. Let us not mix both the threads. Though i guess that the way you asked your earlier question was not good for generating discussion. In my opinion, correct way for asking question is to present your own analysis and ask your question. If you are learner, you should present your detailed analysis. What is your analysis as per KP? What is your analysis as per Traditional? Saying that I am able to justify events using Traditional but not KP seems too vague a statement. I do not see reference of Sub in your post. I don't see reference of Nakshatra in your post. That doesn't qualify as a KP analysis and hence doesn't provoke any response. This I guess may be the reason you didn't get response.

 

Thanks & Regards,

Punit Pandey

 

On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 9:45 PM, mssumich <mssumich > wrote:

 

 

 

 

Hi PunitLike many of the 100s of tools that Jyotish gives - don't believe in all the techniques that one comes up with. From Paul Manley's website here is what he says"What you'll see in the following illustrations is how the sign(s) that gets the double transit will shift, generally from year to year. In fact, there are only two positions of Jupiter and Saturn that will not have the double transit phenomenon – when Jupiter is in the 8th or 12th house from Saturn. This means that 10 out of the 12 possible positions, or more than 80% of the time, there will be the double transit phenomenon happening in at least one sign, possibly two."I have see this double transit work sometimes and sometimes not. Obviuosly we have to pay attention to sookshma transits (or finer transits) and just double transit.I urge some expert to answer my question on the Placidus house system for a chart that I put on the other day. One bhava covers 58

deg of zodiac, there are 3 planets in 8th house; This person is very succesful. I can explain every event using vedic astreology and nakshatra analysis. The moment I put 3 planets in 8th in this chart, I am lost.For latititude that are closer to 66 deg N or S - I believe the Placidus system of houses give wierd house cusps(correct me if I am wrong). This actor was born in Scotland where latitude in 55deg. My question is for people born in such norhtern altitudes -what system works? Is it still Placidus wasy of calculating houses or something else. There should a clear answer from KP experts. I am hoping there is that person in this list.thanks

 

 

 

 

 

@gro ups.com, Punit Pandey <punitp wrote:>> Dear Friends,> > KP made timing an event much more easier. Though as a KP astrologer, I> always feel that it will be nice to have another complementary method by> which we can cross-check and confirm. In search of another such method for> timing events, I looked into many methods and Shri KN Rao's double transit> is among them.> > I personally feel that it is merely a tool for post-mortem and not useful> for future predictions. Let us take an example of Marriage. Double-transit> suggests that transiting Jupiter and Saturn will always be aspecting Natal> 7th and 7th lord at the time of marriage.> > Now Jupiter has three aspects - 5,7, and 9. So including its own

position,> it will be influencing four houses in any chart. Which means that at any> point of time the possibility of aspecting 7th is 33.33% and 7th lord is> also 33..33%. If we take Jupiter's influence on either 7th OR 7th lord,> possibility will double from 4/12 to 8/12 or 66.66%. So at any time, we have> 66.66% possibility of Jupiter aspecting either 7th or 7th lord. In other> words, around 66% of time in one's life, we will see that Jupiter is> influencing either 7th or 7th. Of course, this calculation doesn't consider> some of the possibility e.g. 7th lord is in 7th house itself. Anyways, I> have seen Shri KN Rao is also checking Moon for transit other than> Ascendant. Which doubles the possibility and if somehow Jupiter is not> aspecting 7th and 7th lord counting from Lagna, it will aspect 7th or 7th> lord from Moon. So in any point of one's life, if take transit

from Moon as> well as Ascendant, it is almost certain that Jupiter will influencing either> 7th from ascendant, or 7th lord from ascendant, or 7th from Moon, or 7th> lord from Moon.> > Similarly, Saturn also has 3 aspects and the above write-up is true for> Saturn as well. In other words, seeing the above possibility, I feel that> Double-Transit doesn't make sense at all.> > To sound this method sensible and experimental purpose, I checked reducing> the possibility by checking transit only from Ascendant. If I do that way, I> have many cases where it fails.> > In other words, I do not find Double-transit theory useful at all.> > Thanks & Regards,> > Punit Pandey> >

> On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 2:06 PM, aashish rai <raiaashish@. ..> wrote:> > >> >> > Dear Sundar,> >> > In classical astrology there are so many dashas, if vimshottari was only> > required than why did Parashara muni talked about so many dashas. Other> > dashas like Yogini are showing it.> >> >> >> > Let's forget about DBAs for time being as per double transit theory of Shri> > Kn rao marriage chances are high when transit Saturn and Jupiter aspect> > natal 1/7 axis or their natal lords. In rare cases 9th lord will be> > involved.> >> >> >> > Natal chart,> >> > Jupier is aspecting natal 7th lord, lagna lord and Lagna> >> > Saturn is sitting in Lagna itself, aspecting 7th house> >> >>

>> >> > Won't be surprised if there is a child birth/pregency before end august> > 2010 !!!> >> > Regards,> > Aashish> >> > ------------ --------- ---------> > ** Sundar <sundar190561@ ...>> >> > *To:* @gro ups.com

 

 

> > *Sent:* Wed, 4 November, 2009 10:31:33 AM> > *Subject:* Re: Post mortem analysis of marriage> >> >> >> > Dear Aashish> >> > I know you would say, venus is the UL lord, hence the marriage in venus> > PAD. But did you see venus was debilitated on the day of marriage?> >> > Thanks...... . .....Sundar> >> > @gro ups.com <%40. com>, aashish > > rai <raiaashish@ ...> wrote:> > >> > > Dear Sundarji,> > > I have just started learning KP and yet to pick up the basics. but if you> > use traditional astrology it's very clear. As this forum is for KP only I am> > not elaborating.> > >> > > Regards,> > > Aashish> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > ____________ _________ _________ __> > > Sundar <sundar190561@ ...>> > > @gro ups.com <%40. com>

 

> >> > > Sun, 1 November, 2009 10:59:22 PM> > > Post mortem analysis of marriage> > >> > >> > >> > > Dear Learned members> > >> > > My neighbour go married on 21st Oct, 2009 between 9 to 10am. The transit> > of DBAS does not fully signify the event fully.> > >> > > dob: 25th Aug, 1979> > > tob: 9.37 (rectified)> > > pob: Mumbai> > >> > > Time of birth reported is 9.22am> > > Ayanamsha : 23.28.58> > >> > > dasha/bukti/ antra> > >> > > planet sgl stl sl> > > (MD)rahu(11) sun(11,12) venus(11,2-9) venus(11,2-9)> > > (AD)ketu(5) sat(12,5-6) rahu(11) venus(11,2-9)> > > (PAD)venus(11, 2-9) sun(11,12) ketu(5) jupiter(11,4-

7)> > >> > > rahu=sun(11, 12)> > > ketu=saturn( 12,5-6)> > >> > > Marriage on 21st October 2009 between 9 am to 10 am> > >> > > planet sgl stl sl> > > (MD)rahu(4) sat(12,5-6) sun(1,12) jupiter(5,4- 7)> > > (AD)ketu(10) moon(2,11) jupiter(5,4- 7) rahu-MD(4)> > > (PAD)venus(12, 2-9) mer(1,1-10) moon(2,11) rahu-MD(4)> > >> > > sun venus(12,2-9) mars(10,3-8) venus(12,2-9)> > > moon mars(10,3-8) sat(12,5-6) venus(12,2-9)> > >> > > Baed on the above it is seen that MD/AD/PAD does not fully signify DBAS> > (except for ketu, which is rahu's sub.> > >> > > In the light of the above how do we reconcile the timing of marriage.> > >> > > Thanks...... ...Sundar> > >> > >> >

>> > >> > >> > > Keep up with people you care about with India Mail. Learn how. http://in.overview.> > mail.. com/connectmore<http://in.overview. mail.. com/connectmore>> > >> >> >> > ------------ --------- ---------> > Connect more, do more and share more with India Mail. Learn more<http://in.rd. / tagline_galaxy_ 3/*http:/ /in.overview. mail... com/>> > .> >> > > >>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Friends,

 

Here are four variations of Double Transit that we discussed -

 

I. SATISH JI suggested -

1a. Jupiter aspects either lagna or 7th AND Saturn aspects either Moon or 7th from Moon, OR

1b. Saturn aspects either lagna or 7th AND Jupiter aspects either Moon or 7th from Moon

 

II. TW JI suggested -

1a. Jupiter & Saturn on 7th house from Asc. OR

1b. Ju & Sa on 7th house from Moon.

(Different from method 'I' - TW ji is not suggesting to consider aspect on Lagna or Moon for Marriage)

 

III. SHRI K.N. RAO'S METHOD (From his books, mentioned by Punit) -

1a. Jupiter aspects 7th AND Saturn aspects 7th lord, OR

1b. Saturn aspects 7th AND Jupiter aspects 7th lord

(Above is considered more often, but in general, Jupiter and Saturn aspecting either 7th or 7th lord is OK)

 

IV. ATUL JI suggested (according to Atul ji, iti is refined method of Shri KN Rao's Double Transit)

Saturn & Jupiter -      Should have in transit aspected or transited over:     1a. Lagna and 7th House; OR     1b. Lagna and 7th Lord; OR     1c. Lagna lord and 7th house; OR     1d. Lagna lord and 7th lord

(Moon is not considered. In case, either Jupiter or Saturn are retrograde, their aspect will also be counted from previous house. In other words, the planet will be influencing 8 houses in the chart - 4 from their actual position and another 4 from previous position)

 

My comment was for method III. SHRI K.N. RAO'S METHOD which I feel that doesn't make sense. I have not tested other methods and hence have no opinion.

Thanks & Regards,Punit Pandey

On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 4:55 PM, R Satish <rsatish1942 wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  Dear TW,

               Appreciate your observations.

 

       Please check ,

 

      1  when Jup is aspectingLagna/7th,simultaneously Sat should aspect Moon/7th.

 

      2. Vice versa,exchange Jup and Sat.

 

 

      3. Any relationship between Mars/Ven in above situations.

 

 

          Regards,

 

          Satish--- On Fri, 11/6/09, TW <tw853 wrote:

TW <tw853 Re: Why Shri KN Rao's Double Transit doesn't make sense Date: Friday, November 6, 2009, 11:45 AM

 

 

Dear Friends,1. What Satish is saying is the up-to-date Double Transit, i.e. the simultaneous joint aspects of transit Jupiter & Saturn on 7th house from Asc. OR earlier way of the simultaneous aspects of transit Ju & Sa on 7th house from Moon.

2. I've found the print-out of my study of 50 charts on 21-07-2004 which I sent to my KP brother back home as follows:1) Ju's aspect on 7th house from Asc. 32 out of 50, 64%2) Sa's aspect on 7th house from Asc. 24 out of 50, 48%

3) Simultaneous aspect of Ju & Sa on 7th from Asc. 14 out of 50, 28%5) Ju's aspect on 7th house from Moon 15 out of 50, 30%6) Sa's aspect on 7th house from Moon 28 out of 50, 56% 7) Simultaneous aspect of Ju & Sa on 7th from Moon 13 out of 50, 26%

8) Ju's aspect on natal Venus 19 out of 50, 38%9) Sa's aspect on natal Venus 16 out of 50, 32% 10) Simultaneous aspect of Ju & Sa on natal Venus 8 out of 50, 16%11) Simultaneous aspect of Ju & Sa on both 7th house from Asc. & natal Venus at the same time 3 out of 50, 6%

12) Simultaneous aspect of Ju & Sa on both 7th house from Moon & natal Venus at the same time 3 out of 50, 6%3. According to Sh. KN Rao it is dasha that has a predominant role and not transit. But both must favor elevation to the throne.

-MS Mehta & A Radhika: Time tested Techniques of Mundane Astrology page 258Regards,TW

 

 

@gro ups.com, Punit Pandey <punitp wrote:>> Dear Satish,>

> So the rule for marriage you are suggesting is -> > Condition 1. Jupiter should aspect ascendant or 7th house and Saturn should> aspect Moon or 7th house from Moon> Condition 2. Saturn should aspect ascendant or 7th house and Jupiter should

> aspect Moon or 7th house from Moon> > One of the above condition should be fulfilled. Is it what you are> suggesting?> > By the way, as I mentioned earlier, my observation was based on Shri KN

> Rao's teaching of Saturn and Jupiter's aspect on 7th and 7th lord. What you> are telling seems different. Anyways, I'll try it out sometime and see.> > Thanks & Regards,>

> Punit Pandey> > > On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 7:30 PM, R Satish <rsatish1942@ ...> wrote:> > >> >> > Dear Punit,> >> > What you say about Jup is perfect and easy to

> > understand. When you take the Simultaneous transit of Sat over Lagna/7th or> > Moon/7th,these percentages get affected.> > To clarify if Jup is aspecting Lagn/7th then Sat must aspect Moon/7th to

> > fulfill the requirements.> >> > As I mentioned,these happenings are not over 60%> > consistently. If it were so it would become a simple rule all emcompassing.> > To improve the % factor Venus/mars have been brought into the picture.

> >> > Even in KP,for marriages, we started with 2,7,11 houses.> > Later it became 2, 5,7 11 Astro secrets Pt 1). Then we added 5,8 houses to> > 2,7,11. Khullar has his rules so does Baskaran.. To add to this confusion,

> > we added sub-sub theories.> >> > It is a matter of time when the original formula would> > undergo such transformation, we would be unable to recognize the original.> >

> > Whether to use it for prediction or postmortem is a> > personal choice.Post mortem is easier to handle.However for predictions, we> > need the skills to try for corroboration one or more of these combinations

> > for best-fit.> >> > I for one, attempt to use KP + some others including> > Double-Transit of Jup/Sat (as I understand).> >> > Failed predictions are a part of the game. I humbly

> > accept,I am still a> > learner and have many more miles to go.> >> > Regards,> >> > Satish> >> >> >> >> >> >

> > --- On Thu, 11/5/09, Punit Pandey *<punitp >* wrote:> >> >> > Punit Pandey <punitp> > Re: Re: Why Shri KN Rao's Double Transit doesn't make

> > sense> > @gro ups.com

 

> > Thursday, November 5, 2009, 12:22 PM> >> >> >> > Dear Satish,> >> > What I am trying to convey that the rule will be true at any piont of time

> > in one's life because it is too vague. Please go through my earlier email on> > this topic. The rule can not only justify marriage in 10 charts but in any> > chart.> >> > Let us take today's chart as an example taking Leo as ascedant (12:06PM,

> > Agra). Saturn is 7th lord from Leo and 7th sign from Leo is Aquarius.> >> > Jupiter is aspecting 7th lord Saturn (1st year). Next year (2nd year),> > Jupiter will be transiting over 7th house. Next year to that (3rd year),

> > Jupiter will again 7th aspecting 7th lord. 4th year, there will no aspect on> > 7th and 7th lord. 5th year Jupiter will have 5th aspect on 7th lord. 6th> > year, Jupiter will be aspecting 7th house. 7th year, Jupiter will be

> > transiting over 7th lord from Moon. 8th year, Jupiter will be aspecting 7th> > house from 7th aspect. 9th year, Jupiter will be transiting over 7th lord.> > 10 year, Jupiter will have 5th aspect on 7th house. 11th year, Jupiter will

> > be transiting 7th from Moon. 12th year, again Jupiter will be aspecting 7th> > lord.> >> > *Jupiter cycle repeats every 12 year, so it is safe to say that at> > almost any point of this person's life (born today at 12:06PM at Agra),

> > Jupiter will be either aspecting 7th or 7th lord from Ascendant or Moon.> > 11/12 = 92% possibility. * Even If we check the rule only from Ascendant> > (and ignore Moon), Jupiter will be aspecting 7th or 7th lord 9/12=75% of

> > time. In other words, whatever year this person marries, double-transit> > will be able to justify it :-) Does Double Transit make any sense?> >> > Thanks & Regards,> >

> > Punit Pandey> >> >> > On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 11:52 AM, R Satish <rsatish1942@ <http://mc/compose? to=rsatish1942@ ...>

> > > wrote:> >> >>> >>> >> Dear Punit,> >>> >> I refer to the book " ADVANCED TECHNIQUES OF ASTROLOGICAL> >>> >> PREDICTIONS " edited Sri KN Rao.In one of the chapters 'Tajika Shastra

> >> and Marriage> >>> >> timing of Event " by Dr R K Wishwakarma, he has given 8 rules for timing> >> marriage date with> >>> >> case studies. He validates 10 samples ,where Sat/Jup aspect 7th

> >> house/lord.> >>> >> He adds further Venus/Mars interconnection on marriage date.> >>> >>> >> We can only try to minimise the number of> >> rules,but cannot reduce

> >>> >> significantly, all introduced thru trial and error,like we are presently> >> doing.> >>> >> Regards,> >>> >> Satish> >>

> >> --- On *Wed, 11/4/09, Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com<http://mc/compose? to=punitp@ ...>> >> >* wrote:

> >>> >>> >> Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com<http://mc/compose? to=punitp@ ...>> >> >

> >> Re: Re: Why Shri KN Rao's Double Transit doesn't> >> make sense> >>> >> @gro ups.com<http://mc/compose? to=>

> >> Wednesday, November 4, 2009, 11:15 PM> >>> >>> >>> >> Dear Mssumich,> >>> >> Please note few points -> >>> >> 1. A method needs to be mathematically correct first before we can talk

> >> about predictive aspect of the method. As I mentioned this method is> >> fundamentally flawed and doesn't make sense. I have mentioned the reason and> >> would love to hear if somebody can show that I am missing something.

> >>> >> 2. Double transit, as mentioned by Paul Manley, is different from what> >> Shri KN Rao has used in his books. By Double-Transit, Shri KN Rao doesn't> >> mean that both the planet should aspect one single sign, but one planet

> >> aspecting the house and other house lord (generally). As I demonstrated,> >> this condition will match almost 100% of time and hence it makes this tool a> >> good tool for post-mortem and justification. Though not useful for

> >> predictions.> >>> >> 3. If a method doesn't work, we should leave it and move on. If we will> >> not accept that the method doesn't make sense, we can not discard it. By

> >> saying something like " we need to check dasa and yoga etc. " , we want to> >> prove it some way or other. Why? If it doens't work, it doesn't work. We> >> should not accpet anything blindly. There are quite a few teachings by Shri

> >> KN Rao that works and we should use them. Teachings that do not work, we> >> should discard them.> >>> >> 4. I don not understand why you are mixing placidus with double-transit.

> >> Let us not mix both the threads. Though i guess that the way you asked your> >> earlier question was not good for generating discussion. In my opinion,> >> correct way for asking question is to present your own analysis and ask your

> >> question. If you are learner, you should present your detailed analysis.> >> What is your analysis as per KP? What is your analysis as per Traditional?> >> Saying that I am able to justify events using Traditional but not KP seems

> >> too vague a statement. I do not see reference of Sub in your post. I don't> >> see reference of Nakshatra in your post. That doesn't qualify as a KP> >> analysis and hence doesn't provoke any response. This I guess may be the

> >> reason you didn't get response.> >>> >> Thanks & Regards,> >> Punit Pandey> >>> >> On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 9:45 PM, mssumich <mssumich <http://mc/compose? to=mssumich@ ...>

> >> > wrote:> >>> >>>> >>>> >>> Hi Punit> >>> Like many of the 100s of tools that Jyotish gives - don't believe in all> >>> the techniques that one comes up with. From Paul Manley's website here is

> >>> what he says> >>> " What you'll see in the following illustrations is how the sign(s) that> >>> gets the double transit will shift, generally from year to year. In fact,

> >>> there are only two positions of Jupiter and Saturn that will not have the> >>> double transit phenomenon – when Jupiter is in the 8th or 12th house from> >>> Saturn. This means that 10 out of the 12 possible positions, or more than

> >>> 80% of the time, there will be the double transit phenomenon happening in at> >>> least one sign, possibly two. " > >>>> >>> I have see this double transit work sometimes and sometimes not.

> >>> Obviuosly we have to pay attention to sookshma transits (or finer transits)> >>> and just double transit.> >>>> >>> I urge some expert to answer my question on the Placidus house system for

> >>> a chart that I put on the other day. One bhava covers 58 deg of zodiac,> >>> there are 3 planets in 8th house; This person is very succesful. I can> >>> explain every event using vedic astreology and nakshatra analysis. The

> >>> moment I put 3 planets in 8th in this chart, I am lost.> >>>> >>> For latititude that are closer to 66 deg N or S - I believe the Placidus> >>> system of houses give wierd house cusps(correct me if I am wrong). This

> >>> actor was born in Scotland where latitude in 55deg. My question is for> >>> people born in such norhtern altitudes -what system works? Is it still> >>> Placidus wasy of calculating houses or something else. There should a clear

> >>> answer from KP experts. I am hoping there is that person in this list.> >>> thanks> >>>> >>>> >>> @gro ups.com<http://mc/compose? to=% 40. com>,

> >>> Punit Pandey <punitp@> wrote:> >>> >> >>> > Dear Friends,> >>> >> >>> > KP made timing an event much more easier. Though as a KP astrologer, I

> >>> > always feel that it will be nice to have another complementary method> >>> by> >>> > which we can cross-check and confirm. In search of another such method> >>> for

> >>> > timing events, I looked into many methods and Shri KN Rao's double> >>> transit> >>> > is among them.> >>> >> >>> > I personally feel that it is merely a tool for post-mortem and not

> >>> useful> >>> > for future predictions. Let us take an example of Marriage.> >>> Double-transit> >>> > suggests that transiting Jupiter and Saturn will always be aspecting

> >>> Natal> >>> > 7th and 7th lord at the time of marriage.> >>> >> >>> > Now Jupiter has three aspects - 5,7, and 9. So including its own> >>> position,

> >>> > it will be influencing four houses in any chart. Which means that at> >>> any> >>> > point of time the possibility of aspecting 7th is 33.33% and 7th lord> >>> is

> >>> > also 33.33%. If we take Jupiter's influence on either 7th OR 7th lord,> >>> > possibility will double from 4/12 to 8/12 or 66.66%. So at any time, we> >>> have

> >>> > 66.66% possibility of Jupiter aspecting either 7th or 7th lord. In> >>> other> >>> > words, around 66% of time in one's life, we will see that Jupiter is> >>> > influencing either 7th or 7th. Of course, this calculation doesn't

> >>> consider> >>> > some of the possibility e.g. 7th lord is in 7th house itself. Anyways,> >>> I> >>> > have seen Shri KN Rao is also checking Moon for transit other than

> >>> > Ascendant. Which doubles the possibility and if somehow Jupiter is not> >>> > aspecting 7th and 7th lord counting from Lagna, it will aspect 7th or> >>> 7th> >>> > lord from Moon. So in any point of one's life, if take transit from

> >>> Moon as> >>> > well as Ascendant, it is almost certain that Jupiter will influencing> >>> either> >>> > 7th from ascendant, or 7th lord from ascendant, or 7th from Moon, or

> >>> 7th> >>> > lord from Moon.> >>> >> >>> > Similarly, Saturn also has 3 aspects and the above write-up is true for> >>> > Saturn as well. In other words, seeing the above possibility, I feel

> >>> that> >>> > Double-Transit doesn't make sense at all.> >>> >> >>> > To sound this method sensible and experimental purpose, I checked> >>> reducing

> >>> > the possibility by checking transit only from Ascendant. If I do that> >>> way, I> >>> > have many cases where it fails.> >>> >> >>> > In other words, I do not find Double-transit theory useful at all.

> >>> >> >>> > Thanks & Regards,> >>> >> >>> > Punit Pandey> >>> >> >>> >> >>> > On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 2:06 PM, aashish rai <raiaashish@ ..> wrote:

> >>> >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > > Dear Sundar,> >>> > >> >>> > > In classical astrology there are so many dashas, if vimshottari was

> >>> only> >>> > > required than why did Parashara muni talked about so many dashas.> >>> Other> >>> > > dashas like Yogini are showing it.> >>> > >

> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > > Let's forget about DBAs for time being as per double transit theory> >>> of Shri> >>> > > Kn rao marriage chances are high when transit Saturn and Jupiter

> >>> aspect> >>> > > natal 1/7 axis or their natal lords. In rare cases 9th lord will be> >>> > > involved.> >>> > >> >>> > >

> >>> > >> >>> > > Natal chart,> >>> > >> >>> > > Jupier is aspecting natal 7th lord, lagna lord and Lagna> >>> > >

> >>> > > Saturn is sitting in Lagna itself, aspecting 7th house> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > > Won't be surprised if there is a child birth/pregency before end

> >>> august> >>> > > 2010 !!!> >>> > >> >>> > > Regards,> >>> > > Aashish> >>> > >> >>> > > ------------ --------- ---------

> >>> > > ** Sundar <sundar190561@ ...>> >>> > >> >>> > > *To:* @gro ups.com<http://mc/compose? to=% 40. com>

> >>>> >>> > > *Sent:* Wed, 4 November, 2009 10:31:33 AM> >>> > > *Subject:* Re: Post mortem analysis of marriage> >>> > >> >>> > >

> >>> > >> >>> > > Dear Aashish> >>> > >> >>> > > I know you would say, venus is the UL lord, hence the marriage in> >>> venus

> >>> > > PAD. But did you see venus was debilitated on the day of marriage?> >>> > >> >>> > > Thanks...... ....Sundar> >>> > >

> >>> > > @gro ups.com <% 40. com<http://40 s.com/>>, > >>> aashish> >>>> >>> > > rai <raiaashish@ ...> wrote:> >>> > > >> >>> > > > Dear Sundarji,

> >>> > > > I have just started learning KP and yet to pick up the basics. but> >>> if you> >>> > > use traditional astrology it's very clear. As this forum is for KP

> >>> only I am> >>> > > not elaborating.> >>> > > >> >>> > > > Regards,> >>> > > > Aashish> >>> > > >

> >>> > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > > ____________ _________ _________ __> >>> > > > Sundar <sundar190561@ ...>

> >>> > > > @gro ups.com <% 40. com<http://40 s.com/>>

 

> >>>> >>>> >>> > >> >>> > > > Sun, 1 November, 2009 10:59:22 PM> >>> > > > Post mortem analysis of marriage

> >>> > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > > Dear Learned members> >>> > > >> >>> > > > My neighbour go married on 21st Oct, 2009 between 9 to 10am. The

> >>> transit> >>> > > of DBAS does not fully signify the event fully.> >>> > > >> >>> > > > dob: 25th Aug, 1979> >>> > > > tob: 9.37 (rectified)

> >>> > > > pob: Mumbai> >>> > > >> >>> > > > Time of birth reported is 9.22am> >>> > > > Ayanamsha : 23.28.58> >>> > > >

> >>> > > > dasha/bukti/ antra> >>> > > >> >>> > > > planet sgl stl sl> >>> > > > (MD)rahu(11) sun(11,12) venus(11,2-9) venus(11,2-9)

> >>> > > > (AD)ketu(5) sat(12,5-6) rahu(11) venus(11,2-9)> >>> > > > (PAD)venus(11, 2-9) sun(11,12) ketu(5) jupiter(11,4- 7)> >>> > > >> >>> > > > rahu=sun(11, 12)

> >>> > > > ketu=saturn( 12,5-6)> >>> > > >> >>> > > > Marriage on 21st October 2009 between 9 am to 10 am> >>> > > >> >>> > > > planet sgl stl sl

> >>> > > > (MD)rahu(4) sat(12,5-6) sun(1,12) jupiter(5,4- 7)> >>> > > > (AD)ketu(10) moon(2,11) jupiter(5,4- 7) rahu-MD(4)> >>> > > > (PAD)venus(12, 2-9) mer(1,1-10) moon(2,11) rahu-MD(4)

> >>> > > >> >>> > > > sun venus(12,2-9) mars(10,3-8) venus(12,2-9)> >>> > > > moon mars(10,3-8) sat(12,5-6) venus(12,2-9)> >>> > > >

> >>> > > > Baed on the above it is seen that MD/AD/PAD does not fully signify> >>> DBAS> >>> > > (except for ketu, which is rahu's sub.> >>> > > >

> >>> > > > In the light of the above how do we reconcile the timing of> >>> marriage.> >>> > > >> >>> > > > Thanks...... ...Sundar

> >>> > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > > Keep up with people you care about with India Mail. Learn

> >>> how. http://in.overview.> >>> > > mail.. com/connectmore<http://in.overview. mail..

> >>> com/connectmore <http://in.overview. mail.. com/connectmore>>> >>> > > >

> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > > ------------ --------- ---------> >>> > > Connect more, do more and share more with India Mail. Learn

> >>> more<http://in.rd. / tagline_galaxy_ 3/*http:/ /in.overview.> >>> mail.. com/<http://in.rd. / tagline_galaxy_ 3/*http:/ /in.overview. mail.. com/>

> >>> >> >>> > > .> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> >> >>>> >>>> >>

> >>> >> > > >>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Sudhir ji & Friends,

 

The objective of this forum is learning by discussion. So the participation in quizzes and blind charts are not helpful, if it doesn't accompany astro-analysis.

 

Everyone is requested to send the astrological analysis with the prediction. Also let us ensure the same in future.

 

Thanks & Regards,Punit Pandey

On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 2:55 PM, sudhir <taurus.sudhir wrote:

 

 

 

 

 Dear Satish

 

Marriage is promised very soon for this chart. It could happen anytime after November 21, 2009

 

Regards

Sudhir

 

 

 

 

-

R Satish

 

 

 

Friday, November 06, 2009 11:54 AM

Re: Re: Why Shri KN Rao's Double Transit doesn't make sense

 

 

 

 

 

 

  Dear Friends,

                     Let us put the theories into practice with a 'Hot Case'.

 

       Birth details: Boy   Sept 13,1980  TOB 1559 hrs Place Dadar,Mumbai . 

 

          What is the wedding date fixed.

 

                       Regards,

 

                       Satish--- On Fri, 11/6/09, Punit Pandey <punitp wrote:

Punit Pandey <punitpRe: Re: Why Shri KN Rao's Double Transit doesn't make sense

Date: Friday, November 6, 2009, 11:00 AM

 

 

Dear Atul ji,

 

Thanks for sharing this information. Though this is the fourth variation for Double-Transit that we are seeing here. Also this is NOT what Shri KN Rao has taught in his books. As far as I remember, he has not used lagna in Double Transit?

 

Anyways, this is another rule that I'll check and come back.

Thanks & Regards,Punit Pandey

On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 2:39 AM, atul m <atulmaydeo > wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear AllI know this is not Parashari system forum but discussion started on Double transit of K N Rao so thought of sharing precise and complete details on this as per my knowledge and considering researched output from various eminent astrologers like M N Kedar, K N Rao, S N Kapoor, J N Gupta and Others -

Four Tier Scheme of Composite Transit for Marriage Timings as per eminent astrologers like M N Kedar, K N Rao (although K N Rao further ratifies with Jaimini system as well apart from Parashari) and others as per below -

1. Saturn & Jupiter -      Should have in transit aspected or transited over:     a) Lagna and 7th House; or      b) Lagna and 7th Lord; or     c) Lagna lord and 7th house or     d) Lagna lord and 7th lord

(saturn within 27 months and jupiter within 12 months)2. Jupiter -      a) Natal Venus and 5th house/lord or     b) 5th house and 9th house or     c) 5th lord and 9th house or     d) 5th house and 9th lord or

     e) 5th lord and 9th lord3. Mars - should have in transit covered within six months:     a) what saturn and Jupiter must do, see(1) above; and      b) what jupiter must do see (2) above4. The 7th lord -

     the 7th lord, in transit within 40 days of any marriage must establish contact with any of the following:     a) the 11th lord     b) the 9th lord     c) the lagna lordAlso, at the time of marriage the lords of 7th, 9th, 5th and lagna will be mutually connected (P-position, A- aspect, C-conjunction)  and in most of the cases these will be around 7th, lagna or their lords.

Note - Retrograde planets aspect from previous house as well.The results are very positive (more than 90%) with the above schemes after applying on large number of horoscopes for predicting marriage timings.

if you tie-up with Jaimini dasha system then results are extreamly positive (97-98%).Although, normally it ties-up with Vimshottari Dasha system by all Parashari astrologers.Important - This applies considering horoscope does not have marriage denial features and in case of delayed horoscope, marriage turns up in 2nd round or some time 3rd round saturn and Jupiter transit as per above scheme.

Although, marriage denial and very delayed (computing delay fators) is a seprate topic.Also, you may have noticed that moon or aspect from moon is NOT considered in this rule for predicting marriage timing.

Hope this information is useful to all interested members.RegardsAtul Maydeo.(if you haven't tried, you haven't lived so keep trying...) --- On Fri, 11/6/09, Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

 

Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com>Re: Re: Why Shri KN Rao's Double Transit doesn't make sense

@gro ups.comFriday, November 6, 2009, 12:02 AM

 

 

 

Dear Satish,

 

So the rule for marriage you are suggesting is -

 

Condition 1. Jupiter should aspect ascendant or 7th house and Saturn should aspect Moon or 7th house from Moon

Condition 2. Saturn should aspect ascendant or 7th house and Jupiter should aspect Moon or 7th house from Moon

 

One of the above condition should be fulfilled. Is it what you are suggesting?

 

By the way, as I mentioned earlier, my observation was based on Shri KN Rao's teaching of Saturn and Jupiter's aspect on 7th and 7th lord. What you are telling seems different. Anyways, I'll try it out sometime and see.

Thanks & Regards,Punit Pandey

 

On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 7:30 PM, R Satish <rsatish1942@ > wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Dear Punit,

                  What you say about Jup is perfect  and easy to understand. When you take the Simultaneous transit of Sat over Lagna/7th or Moon/7th,these percentages get affected.

To clarify if Jup is aspecting Lagn/7th then Sat must aspect Moon/7th to fulfill the requirements.

 

                  As I mentioned,these happenings are not over 60% consistently. If it were so it would become a simple rule all emcompassing. To improve the % factor Venus/mars have been brought into the picture.

 

                  Even in KP,for marriages, we started with 2,7,11 houses. Later it became 2, 5,7 11 Astro secrets Pt 1).   Then we added 5,8 houses to 2,7,11. Khullar has his rules so does Baskaran.. To add to this confusion, we added sub-sub theories.

 

                  It is a matter of time when the original formula would undergo such transformation, we  would be unable to recognize the original.

 

                   Whether to use it for prediction or postmortem is a personal  choice.Post mortem is easier to handle.However for predictions, we need the skills to try for corroboration  one or more of these combinations for best-fit.

 

                   I for one, attempt to use KP + some others including Double-Transit  of Jup/Sat (as I understand).

 

                   Failed predictions are a part of the game. I humbly accept,I am still a

 learner and have many more miles to go.

 

                   Regards,

 

                   Satish

 

                  

 

 

 

 

                   --- On Thu, 11/5/09, Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

 

 

Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com>Re: Re: Why Shri KN Rao's Double Transit doesn't make sense

@gro ups.com

 

 

Thursday, November 5, 2009, 12:22 PM

 

 

 

Dear Satish,

 

What I am trying to convey that the rule will be true at any piont of time in one's life because it is too vague. Please go through my earlier email on this topic. The rule can not only justify marriage in 10 charts but in any chart.

 

Let us take today's chart as an example taking Leo as ascedant (12:06PM, Agra). Saturn is 7th lord from Leo and 7th sign from Leo is Aquarius.

 

Jupiter is aspecting 7th lord Saturn (1st year). Next year (2nd year), Jupiter will be transiting over 7th house. Next year to that (3rd year), Jupiter will again 7th aspecting 7th lord. 4th year, there will no aspect on 7th and 7th lord. 5th year Jupiter will have 5th aspect on 7th lord. 6th year, Jupiter will be aspecting 7th house. 7th year, Jupiter will be transiting over 7th lord from Moon. 8th year, Jupiter will be aspecting 7th house from 7th aspect. 9th year, Jupiter will be transiting over 7th lord. 10 year, Jupiter will have 5th aspect on 7th house. 11th year, Jupiter will be transiting 7th from Moon. 12th year, again Jupiter will be aspecting 7th lord.

 

Jupiter cycle repeats every 12 year, so it is safe to say that at almost any point of this person's life (born today at 12:06PM at Agra), Jupiter will be either aspecting 7th or 7th lord from Ascendant or Moon. 11/12 = 92% possibility. Even If we check the rule only from Ascendant (and ignore Moon), Jupiter will be aspecting 7th or 7th lord 9/12=75% of time.  In other words, whatever year this person marries, double-transit will be able to justify it :-) Does Double Transit make any sense?

 

Thanks & Regards,Punit Pandey

 

On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 11:52 AM, R Satish <rsatish1942@ > wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Dear Punit,

                 I refer to the book " ADVANCED TECHNIQUES OF ASTROLOGICAL 

 

 PREDICTIONS " edited Sri KN Rao.In one of the chapters 'Tajika Shastra and Marriage 

  

timing of Event " by Dr R K Wishwakarma, he has given 8 rules for timing marriage date with 

 

case studies. He validates 10 samples ,where Sat/Jup aspect 7th house/lord.

 

 He adds further Venus/Mars interconnection on marriage date.

 

 

                    We can only try to  minimise  the  number of rules,but cannot reduce 

 

significantly, all introduced  thru trial and error,like we are presently doing.

 

                     Regards,

 

 

 

                     Satish--- On Wed, 11/4/09, Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

 

 

Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com>Re: Re: Why Shri KN Rao's Double Transit doesn't make sense

@gro ups.com

 

 

Wednesday, November 4, 2009, 11:15 PM

 

 

 

Dear Mssumich,

 

Please note few points -

 

1. A method needs to be mathematically correct first before we can talk about predictive aspect of the method. As I mentioned this method is fundamentally flawed and doesn't make sense. I have mentioned the reason and would love to hear if somebody can show that I am missing something.

 

2. Double transit, as mentioned by Paul Manley, is different from what Shri KN Rao has used in his books. By Double-Transit, Shri KN Rao doesn't mean that both the planet should aspect one single sign, but one planet aspecting the house and other house lord (generally). As I demonstrated, this condition will match almost 100% of time and hence it makes this tool a good tool for post-mortem and justification. Though not useful for predictions.

 

3. If a method doesn't work, we should leave it and move on. If we will not accept that the method doesn't make sense, we can not discard it. By saying something like  " we need to check dasa and yoga etc. " , we want to prove it some way or other. Why? If it doens't work, it doesn't work. We should not accpet anything blindly. There are quite a few teachings by Shri KN Rao that works and we should use them. Teachings that do not work, we should discard them.

 

4. I don not understand why you are mixing placidus with double-transit. Let us not mix both the threads. Though i guess that the way you asked your earlier question was not good for generating discussion. In my opinion, correct way for asking question is to present your own analysis and ask your question. If you are learner, you should present your detailed analysis. What is your analysis as per KP? What is your analysis as per Traditional? Saying that I am able to justify events using Traditional but not KP seems too vague a statement. I do not see reference of Sub in your post. I don't see reference of Nakshatra in your post. That doesn't qualify as a KP analysis and hence doesn't provoke any response.  This I guess may be the reason you didn't get response.

 

Thanks & Regards,

Punit Pandey

 

On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 9:45 PM, mssumich <mssumich > wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

Hi PunitLike many of the 100s of tools that Jyotish gives - don't believe in all the techniques that one comes up with. From Paul Manley's website here is what he says " What you'll see in the following illustrations is how the sign(s) that gets the double transit will shift, generally from year to year. In fact, there are only two positions of Jupiter and Saturn that will not have the double transit phenomenon – when Jupiter is in the 8th or 12th house from Saturn. This means that 10 out of the 12 possible positions, or more than 80% of the time, there will be the double transit phenomenon happening in at least one sign, possibly two. "

I have see this double transit work sometimes and sometimes not. Obviuosly we have to pay attention to sookshma transits (or finer transits) and just double transit.I urge some expert to answer my question on the Placidus house system for a chart that I put on the other day. One bhava covers 58 deg of zodiac, there are 3 planets in 8th house; This person is very succesful. I can explain every event using vedic astreology and nakshatra analysis. The moment I put 3 planets in 8th in this chart, I am lost.

For latititude that are closer to 66 deg N or S - I believe the Placidus system of houses give wierd house cusps(correct me if I am wrong). This actor was born in Scotland where latitude in 55deg. My question is for people born in such norhtern altitudes -what system works? Is it still Placidus wasy of calculating houses or something else. There should a clear answer from KP experts. I am hoping there is that person in this list.

thanks

 

 

 

 

 

@gro ups.com, Punit Pandey <punitp wrote:>> Dear Friends,>

> KP made timing an event much more easier. Though as a KP astrologer, I> always feel that it will be nice to have another complementary method by> which we can cross-check and confirm. In search of another such method for

> timing events, I looked into many methods and Shri KN Rao's double transit> is among them.> > I personally feel that it is merely a tool for post-mortem and not useful> for future predictions. Let us take an example of Marriage. Double-transit

> suggests that transiting Jupiter and Saturn will always be aspecting Natal> 7th and 7th lord at the time of marriage.> > Now Jupiter has three aspects - 5,7, and 9. So including its own position,

> it will be influencing four houses in any chart. Which means that at any> point of time the possibility of aspecting 7th is 33.33% and 7th lord is> also 33.33%. If we take Jupiter's influence on either 7th OR 7th lord,

> possibility will double from 4/12 to 8/12 or 66.66%. So at any time, we have> 66.66% possibility of Jupiter aspecting either 7th or 7th lord. In other> words, around 66% of time in one's life, we will see that Jupiter is

> influencing either 7th or 7th. Of course, this calculation doesn't consider> some of the possibility e.g. 7th lord is in 7th house itself. Anyways, I> have seen Shri KN Rao is also checking Moon for transit other than

> Ascendant. Which doubles the possibility and if somehow Jupiter is not> aspecting 7th and 7th lord counting from Lagna, it will aspect 7th or 7th> lord from Moon. So in any point of one's life, if take transit from Moon as

> well as Ascendant, it is almost certain that Jupiter will influencing either> 7th from ascendant, or 7th lord from ascendant, or 7th from Moon, or 7th> lord from Moon.> > Similarly, Saturn also has 3 aspects and the above write-up is true for

> Saturn as well. In other words, seeing the above possibility, I feel that> Double-Transit doesn't make sense at all.> > To sound this method sensible and experimental purpose, I checked reducing

> the possibility by checking transit only from Ascendant. If I do that way, I> have many cases where it fails.> > In other words, I do not find Double-transit theory useful at all.> > Thanks & Regards,

> > Punit Pandey> >

> On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 2:06 PM, aashish rai <raiaashish@. ..> wrote:> > >> >> > Dear Sundar,> >> > In classical astrology there are so many dashas, if vimshottari was only

> > required than why did Parashara muni talked about so many dashas. Other> > dashas like Yogini are showing it.> >> >> >> > Let's forget about DBAs for time being as per double transit theory of Shri

> > Kn rao marriage chances are high when transit Saturn and Jupiter aspect> > natal 1/7 axis or their natal lords. In rare cases 9th lord will be> > involved.> >> >> >

> > Natal chart,> >> > Jupier is aspecting natal 7th lord, lagna lord and Lagna> >> > Saturn is sitting in Lagna itself, aspecting 7th house> >> >> >

> >> > Won't be surprised if there is a child birth/pregency before end august> > 2010 !!!> >> > Regards,> > Aashish> >> > ------------ --------- ---------

> > ** Sundar <sundar190561@ ...>> >> > *To:* @gro ups.com

 

 

> > *Sent:* Wed, 4 November, 2009 10:31:33 AM> > *Subject:* Re: Post mortem analysis of marriage> >> >> >> > Dear Aashish> >> > I know you would say, venus is the UL lord, hence the marriage in venus

> > PAD. But did you see venus was debilitated on the day of marriage?> >> > Thanks...... .....Sundar> >> > @gro ups.com <%40. com>, aashish > > rai <raiaashish@ ...> wrote:> > >> > > Dear Sundarji,> > > I have just started learning KP and yet to pick up the basics. but if you> > use traditional astrology it's very clear. As this forum is for KP only I am

> > not elaborating.> > >> > > Regards,> > > Aashish> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > ____________ _________ _________ __

> > > Sundar <sundar190561@ ...>> > > @gro ups.com <%40. com>

 

> >> > > Sun, 1 November, 2009 10:59:22 PM> > > Post mortem analysis of marriage> > >> > >> > >> > > Dear Learned members

> > >> > > My neighbour go married on 21st Oct, 2009 between 9 to 10am. The transit> > of DBAS does not fully signify the event fully.> > >> > > dob: 25th Aug, 1979

> > > tob: 9.37 (rectified)> > > pob: Mumbai> > >> > > Time of birth reported is 9.22am> > > Ayanamsha : 23.28.58> > >> > > dasha/bukti/ antra

> > >> > > planet sgl stl sl> > > (MD)rahu(11) sun(11,12) venus(11,2-9) venus(11,2-9)> > > (AD)ketu(5) sat(12,5-6) rahu(11) venus(11,2-9)> > > (PAD)venus(11, 2-9) sun(11,12) ketu(5) jupiter(11,4- 7)

> > >> > > rahu=sun(11, 12)> > > ketu=saturn( 12,5-6)> > >> > > Marriage on 21st October 2009 between 9 am to 10 am> > >> > > planet sgl stl sl

> > > (MD)rahu(4) sat(12,5-6) sun(1,12) jupiter(5,4- 7)> > > (AD)ketu(10) moon(2,11) jupiter(5,4- 7) rahu-MD(4)> > > (PAD)venus(12, 2-9) mer(1,1-10) moon(2,11) rahu-MD(4)> > >

> > > sun venus(12,2-9) mars(10,3-8) venus(12,2-9)> > > moon mars(10,3-8) sat(12,5-6) venus(12,2-9)> > >> > > Baed on the above it is seen that MD/AD/PAD does not fully signify DBAS

> > (except for ketu, which is rahu's sub.> > >> > > In the light of the above how do we reconcile the timing of marriage.> > >> > > Thanks...... ...Sundar

> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > Keep up with people you care about with India Mail. Learn how. http://in.overview.

> > mail.. com/connectmore<http://in.overview. mail.. com/connectmore>> > >> >

> >> > ------------ --------- ---------> > Connect more, do more and share more with India Mail. Learn more<http://in.rd. / tagline_galaxy_ 3/*http:/ /in.overview. mail.. com/>

> > .> >> > > >>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Tw ji,

 

Please publish the birth details so that it can be utilized for testing for all the other Double-Transit rules mentioned in /message/29185

 

Generally there will be huge value additions to such studies, if accompanied with the birth details.

Thanks & Regards,Punit Pandey

On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 11:45 AM, TW <tw853 wrote:

 

 

 

 

Dear Friends,1. What Satish is saying is the up-to-date Double Transit, i.e. the simultaneous joint aspects of transit Jupiter & Saturn on 7th house from Asc. OR earlier way of the simultaneous aspects of transit Ju & Sa on 7th house from Moon.

2. I've found the print-out of my study of 50 charts on 21-07-2004 which I sent to my KP brother back home as follows:1) Ju's aspect on 7th house from Asc. 32 out of 50, 64%2) Sa's aspect on 7th house from Asc. 24 out of 50, 48%

3) Simultaneous aspect of Ju & Sa on 7th from Asc. 14 out of 50, 28%5) Ju's aspect on 7th house from Moon 15 out of 50, 30%6) Sa's aspect on 7th house from Moon 28 out of 50, 56% 7) Simultaneous aspect of Ju & Sa on 7th from Moon 13 out of 50, 26%

8) Ju's aspect on natal Venus 19 out of 50, 38%9) Sa's aspect on natal Venus 16 out of 50, 32% 10) Simultaneous aspect of Ju & Sa on natal Venus 8 out of 50, 16%11) Simultaneous aspect of Ju & Sa on both 7th house from Asc. & natal Venus at the same time 3 out of 50, 6%

12) Simultaneous aspect of Ju & Sa on both 7th house from Moon & natal Venus at the same time 3 out of 50, 6%3. According to Sh. KN Rao it is dasha that has a predominant role and not transit. But both must favor elevation to the throne.

-MS Mehta & A Radhika: Time tested Techniques of Mundane Astrology page 258Regards,TW , Punit Pandey <punitp wrote:>> Dear Satish,> > So the rule for marriage you are suggesting is -

> > Condition 1. Jupiter should aspect ascendant or 7th house and Saturn should> aspect Moon or 7th house from Moon> Condition 2. Saturn should aspect ascendant or 7th house and Jupiter should> aspect Moon or 7th house from Moon

> > One of the above condition should be fulfilled. Is it what you are> suggesting?> > By the way, as I mentioned earlier, my observation was based on Shri KN> Rao's teaching of Saturn and Jupiter's aspect on 7th and 7th lord. What you

> are telling seems different. Anyways, I'll try it out sometime and see.> > Thanks & Regards,> > Punit Pandey> >

 

 

> On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 7:30 PM, R Satish <rsatish1942 wrote:> > >> >> > Dear Punit,> >> > What you say about Jup is perfect and easy to

> > understand. When you take the Simultaneous transit of Sat over Lagna/7th or> > Moon/7th,these percentages get affected.> > To clarify if Jup is aspecting Lagn/7th then Sat must aspect Moon/7th to

> > fulfill the requirements.> >> > As I mentioned,these happenings are not over 60%> > consistently. If it were so it would become a simple rule all emcompassing.> > To improve the % factor Venus/mars have been brought into the picture.

> >> > Even in KP,for marriages, we started with 2,7,11 houses.> > Later it became 2, 5,7 11 Astro secrets Pt 1). Then we added 5,8 houses to> > 2,7,11. Khullar has his rules so does Baskaran.. To add to this confusion,

> > we added sub-sub theories.> >> > It is a matter of time when the original formula would> > undergo such transformation,we would be unable to recognize the original.> >

> > Whether to use it for prediction or postmortem is a> > personal choice.Post mortem is easier to handle.However for predictions, we> > need the skills to try for corroboration one or more of these combinations

> > for best-fit.> >> > I for one, attempt to use KP + some others including> > Double-Transit of Jup/Sat (as I understand).> >> > Failed predictions are a part of the game. I humbly

> > accept,I am still a> > learner and have many more miles to go.> >> > Regards,> >> > Satish> >> >> >> >> >> >

> > --- On Thu, 11/5/09, Punit Pandey *<punitp* wrote:> >> >> > Punit Pandey <punitp

 

> > Re: Re: Why Shri KN Rao's Double Transit doesn't make> > sense> >

> > Thursday, November 5, 2009, 12:22 PM> >> >> >> > Dear Satish,> >> > What I am trying to convey that the rule will be true at any piont of time

> > in one's life because it is too vague. Please go through my earlier email on> > this topic. The rule can not only justify marriage in 10 charts but in any> > chart.> >> > Let us take today's chart as an example taking Leo as ascedant (12:06PM,

> > Agra). Saturn is 7th lord from Leo and 7th sign from Leo is Aquarius.> >> > Jupiter is aspecting 7th lord Saturn (1st year). Next year (2nd year),> > Jupiter will be transiting over 7th house. Next year to that (3rd year),

> > Jupiter will again 7th aspecting 7th lord. 4th year, there will no aspect on> > 7th and 7th lord. 5th year Jupiter will have 5th aspect on 7th lord. 6th> > year, Jupiter will be aspecting 7th house. 7th year, Jupiter will be

> > transiting over 7th lord from Moon. 8th year, Jupiter will be aspecting 7th> > house from 7th aspect. 9th year, Jupiter will be transiting over 7th lord.> > 10 year, Jupiter will have 5th aspect on 7th house. 11th year, Jupiter will

> > be transiting 7th from Moon. 12th year, again Jupiter will be aspecting 7th> > lord.> >> > *Jupiter cycle repeats every 12 year, so it is safe to say that at> > almost any point of this person's life (born today at 12:06PM at Agra),

> > Jupiter will be either aspecting 7th or 7th lord from Ascendant or Moon.> > 11/12 = 92% possibility.* Even If we check the rule only from Ascendant> > (and ignore Moon), Jupiter will be aspecting 7th or 7th lord 9/12=75% of

> > time. In other words, whatever year this person marries, double-transit> > will be able to justify it :-) Does Double Transit make any sense?> >> > Thanks & Regards,> >

> > Punit Pandey> >> >> > On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 11:52 AM, R Satish <rsatish1942@ <http://mc/compose?to=rsatish1942 > > > wrote:> >> >>> >>> >> Dear Punit,> >>> >> I refer to the book " ADVANCED TECHNIQUES OF ASTROLOGICAL> >>

> >> PREDICTIONS " edited Sri KN Rao.In one of the chapters 'Tajika Shastra> >> and Marriage> >>> >> timing of Event " by Dr R K Wishwakarma, he has given 8 rules for timing

> >> marriage date with> >>> >> case studies. He validates 10 samples ,where Sat/Jup aspect 7th> >> house/lord.> >>> >> He adds further Venus/Mars interconnection on marriage date.

> >>> >>> >> We can only try to minimise the number of> >> rules,but cannot reduce> >>> >> significantly, all introduced thru trial and error,like we are presently

> >> doing.> >>> >> Regards,> >>> >> Satish> >>> >> --- On *Wed, 11/4/09, Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com<http://mc/compose?to=punitp

> >> >* wrote:> >>> >>> >> Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com<http://mc/compose?to=punitp > >> >> >> Re: Re: Why Shri KN Rao's Double Transit doesn't> >> make sense> >>> >> @gro ups.com<http://mc/compose?to= >

 

> >> Wednesday, November 4, 2009, 11:15 PM> >>> >>> >>> >> Dear Mssumich,> >>> >> Please note few points -

> >>> >> 1. A method needs to be mathematically correct first before we can talk> >> about predictive aspect of the method. As I mentioned this method is> >> fundamentally flawed and doesn't make sense. I have mentioned the reason and

> >> would love to hear if somebody can show that I am missing something.> >>> >> 2. Double transit, as mentioned by Paul Manley, is different from what> >> Shri KN Rao has used in his books. By Double-Transit, Shri KN Rao doesn't

> >> mean that both the planet should aspect one single sign, but one planet> >> aspecting the house and other house lord (generally). As I demonstrated,> >> this condition will match almost 100% of time and hence it makes this tool a

> >> good tool for post-mortem and justification. Though not useful for> >> predictions.> >>> >> 3. If a method doesn't work, we should leave it and move on. If we will

> >> not accept that the method doesn't make sense, we can not discard it. By> >> saying something like " we need to check dasa and yoga etc. " , we want to> >> prove it some way or other. Why? If it doens't work, it doesn't work. We

> >> should not accpet anything blindly. There are quite a few teachings by Shri> >> KN Rao that works and we should use them. Teachings that do not work, we> >> should discard them.

> >>> >> 4. I don not understand why you are mixing placidus with double-transit.> >> Let us not mix both the threads. Though i guess that the way you asked your> >> earlier question was not good for generating discussion. In my opinion,

> >> correct way for asking question is to present your own analysis and ask your> >> question. If you are learner, you should present your detailed analysis.> >> What is your analysis as per KP? What is your analysis as per Traditional?

> >> Saying that I am able to justify events using Traditional but not KP seems> >> too vague a statement. I do not see reference of Sub in your post. I don't> >> see reference of Nakshatra in your post. That doesn't qualify as a KP

> >> analysis and hence doesn't provoke any response. This I guess may be the> >> reason you didn't get response.> >>> >> Thanks & Regards,> >> Punit Pandey

> >>> >> On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 9:45 PM, mssumich <mssumich <http://mc/compose?to=mssumich

 

> >> > wrote:> >>> >>>> >>>> >>> Hi Punit> >>> Like many of the 100s of tools that Jyotish gives - don't believe in all

> >>> the techniques that one comes up with. From Paul Manley's website here is> >>> what he says> >>> " What you'll see in the following illustrations is how the sign(s) that

> >>> gets the double transit will shift, generally from year to year. In fact,> >>> there are only two positions of Jupiter and Saturn that will not have the> >>> double transit phenomenon – when Jupiter is in the 8th or 12th house from

> >>> Saturn. This means that 10 out of the 12 possible positions, or more than> >>> 80% of the time, there will be the double transit phenomenon happening in at> >>> least one sign, possibly two. "

> >>>> >>> I have see this double transit work sometimes and sometimes not.> >>> Obviuosly we have to pay attention to sookshma transits (or finer transits)> >>> and just double transit.

> >>>> >>> I urge some expert to answer my question on the Placidus house system for> >>> a chart that I put on the other day. One bhava covers 58 deg of zodiac,> >>> there are 3 planets in 8th house; This person is very succesful. I can

> >>> explain every event using vedic astreology and nakshatra analysis. The> >>> moment I put 3 planets in 8th in this chart, I am lost.> >>>> >>> For latititude that are closer to 66 deg N or S - I believe the Placidus

> >>> system of houses give wierd house cusps(correct me if I am wrong). This> >>> actor was born in Scotland where latitude in 55deg. My question is for> >>> people born in such norhtern altitudes -what system works? Is it still

> >>> Placidus wasy of calculating houses or something else. There should a clear> >>> answer from KP experts. I am hoping there is that person in this list.> >>> thanks> >>>

> >>>> >>> @gro ups.com<http://mc/compose?to=%40>,

 

> >>> Punit Pandey <punitp@> wrote:> >>> >> >>> > Dear Friends,> >>> >> >>> > KP made timing an event much more easier. Though as a KP astrologer, I

> >>> > always feel that it will be nice to have another complementary method> >>> by> >>> > which we can cross-check and confirm. In search of another such method> >>> for

> >>> > timing events, I looked into many methods and Shri KN Rao's double> >>> transit> >>> > is among them.> >>> >> >>> > I personally feel that it is merely a tool for post-mortem and not

> >>> useful> >>> > for future predictions. Let us take an example of Marriage.> >>> Double-transit> >>> > suggests that transiting Jupiter and Saturn will always be aspecting

> >>> Natal> >>> > 7th and 7th lord at the time of marriage.> >>> >> >>> > Now Jupiter has three aspects - 5,7, and 9. So including its own> >>> position,

> >>> > it will be influencing four houses in any chart. Which means that at> >>> any> >>> > point of time the possibility of aspecting 7th is 33.33% and 7th lord> >>> is

> >>> > also 33.33%. If we take Jupiter's influence on either 7th OR 7th lord,> >>> > possibility will double from 4/12 to 8/12 or 66.66%. So at any time, we> >>> have

> >>> > 66.66% possibility of Jupiter aspecting either 7th or 7th lord. In> >>> other> >>> > words, around 66% of time in one's life, we will see that Jupiter is> >>> > influencing either 7th or 7th. Of course, this calculation doesn't

> >>> consider> >>> > some of the possibility e.g. 7th lord is in 7th house itself. Anyways,> >>> I> >>> > have seen Shri KN Rao is also checking Moon for transit other than

> >>> > Ascendant. Which doubles the possibility and if somehow Jupiter is not> >>> > aspecting 7th and 7th lord counting from Lagna, it will aspect 7th or> >>> 7th> >>> > lord from Moon. So in any point of one's life, if take transit from

> >>> Moon as> >>> > well as Ascendant, it is almost certain that Jupiter will influencing> >>> either> >>> > 7th from ascendant, or 7th lord from ascendant, or 7th from Moon, or

> >>> 7th> >>> > lord from Moon.> >>> >> >>> > Similarly, Saturn also has 3 aspects and the above write-up is true for> >>> > Saturn as well. In other words, seeing the above possibility, I feel

> >>> that> >>> > Double-Transit doesn't make sense at all.> >>> >> >>> > To sound this method sensible and experimental purpose, I checked> >>> reducing

> >>> > the possibility by checking transit only from Ascendant. If I do that> >>> way, I> >>> > have many cases where it fails.> >>> >> >>> > In other words, I do not find Double-transit theory useful at all.

> >>> >> >>> > Thanks & Regards,> >>> >> >>> > Punit Pandey> >>> >> >>> >> >>> > On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 2:06 PM, aashish rai <raiaashish@ ..> wrote:

> >>> >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > > Dear Sundar,> >>> > >> >>> > > In classical astrology there are so many dashas, if vimshottari was

> >>> only> >>> > > required than why did Parashara muni talked about so many dashas.> >>> Other> >>> > > dashas like Yogini are showing it.> >>> > >

> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > > Let's forget about DBAs for time being as per double transit theory> >>> of Shri> >>> > > Kn rao marriage chances are high when transit Saturn and Jupiter

> >>> aspect> >>> > > natal 1/7 axis or their natal lords. In rare cases 9th lord will be> >>> > > involved.> >>> > >> >>> > >

> >>> > >> >>> > > Natal chart,> >>> > >> >>> > > Jupier is aspecting natal 7th lord, lagna lord and Lagna> >>> > >

> >>> > > Saturn is sitting in Lagna itself, aspecting 7th house> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > > Won't be surprised if there is a child birth/pregency before end

> >>> august> >>> > > 2010 !!!> >>> > >> >>> > > Regards,> >>> > > Aashish> >>> > >> >>> > > ------------ --------- ---------

> >>> > > ** Sundar <sundar190561@ ...>> >>> > >> >>> > > *To:* @gro ups.com<http://mc/compose?to=%40> > >>>> >>> > > *Sent:* Wed, 4 November, 2009 10:31:33 AM> >>> > > *Subject:* Re: Post mortem analysis of marriage> >>> > >

> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > > Dear Aashish> >>> > >> >>> > > I know you would say, venus is the UL lord, hence the marriage in

> >>> venus> >>> > > PAD. But did you see venus was debilitated on the day of marriage?> >>> > >> >>> > > Thanks...... ....Sundar> >>> > >

> >>> > > @gro ups.com <%40. com<http://40/>>, > >>> aashish> >>>> >>> > > rai <raiaashish@ ...> wrote:> >>> > > >> >>> > > > Dear Sundarji,

> >>> > > > I have just started learning KP and yet to pick up the basics. but> >>> if you> >>> > > use traditional astrology it's very clear. As this forum is for KP

> >>> only I am> >>> > > not elaborating.> >>> > > >> >>> > > > Regards,> >>> > > > Aashish> >>> > > >

> >>> > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > > ____________ _________ _________ __> >>> > > > Sundar <sundar190561@ ...>

> >>> > > > @gro ups.com <%40. com<http://40/>>

 

> >>>> >>>> >>> > >> >>> > > > Sun, 1 November, 2009 10:59:22 PM> >>> > > > Post mortem analysis of marriage

> >>> > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > > Dear Learned members> >>> > > >> >>> > > > My neighbour go married on 21st Oct, 2009 between 9 to 10am. The

> >>> transit> >>> > > of DBAS does not fully signify the event fully.> >>> > > >> >>> > > > dob: 25th Aug, 1979> >>> > > > tob: 9.37 (rectified)

> >>> > > > pob: Mumbai> >>> > > >> >>> > > > Time of birth reported is 9.22am> >>> > > > Ayanamsha : 23.28.58> >>> > > >

> >>> > > > dasha/bukti/ antra> >>> > > >> >>> > > > planet sgl stl sl> >>> > > > (MD)rahu(11) sun(11,12) venus(11,2-9) venus(11,2-9)

> >>> > > > (AD)ketu(5) sat(12,5-6) rahu(11) venus(11,2-9)> >>> > > > (PAD)venus(11, 2-9) sun(11,12) ketu(5) jupiter(11,4- 7)> >>> > > >> >>> > > > rahu=sun(11, 12)

> >>> > > > ketu=saturn( 12,5-6)> >>> > > >> >>> > > > Marriage on 21st October 2009 between 9 am to 10 am> >>> > > >> >>> > > > planet sgl stl sl

> >>> > > > (MD)rahu(4) sat(12,5-6) sun(1,12) jupiter(5,4- 7)> >>> > > > (AD)ketu(10) moon(2,11) jupiter(5,4- 7) rahu-MD(4)> >>> > > > (PAD)venus(12, 2-9) mer(1,1-10) moon(2,11) rahu-MD(4)

> >>> > > >> >>> > > > sun venus(12,2-9) mars(10,3-8) venus(12,2-9)> >>> > > > moon mars(10,3-8) sat(12,5-6) venus(12,2-9)> >>> > > >

> >>> > > > Baed on the above it is seen that MD/AD/PAD does not fully signify> >>> DBAS> >>> > > (except for ketu, which is rahu's sub.> >>> > > >

> >>> > > > In the light of the above how do we reconcile the timing of> >>> marriage.> >>> > > >> >>> > > > Thanks...... ...Sundar

> >>> > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > > Keep up with people you care about with India Mail. Learn

> >>> how. http://in.overview.> >>> > > mail.. com/connectmore<http://in.overview. mail..

> >>> com/connectmore <http://in.overview.mail./connectmore>> > >>> > > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > > ------------ --------- ---------> >>> > > Connect more, do more and share more with India Mail. Learn

> >>> more<http://in.rd. / tagline_galaxy_ 3/*http:/ /in.overview.> >>> mail.. com/<http://in.rd./tagline_galaxy_3/*http://in.overview.mail./>

> >>> >> >>> > > .> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> >> >>>> >>>> >>

> >>> >> > > >>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 Nov 2009

 

Dear all

 

I feel this  is the extract from Nadi System .    Sat and Jup

aspect to Mars and Venus is used extensively in Nadi System

 

Regards

RG

 

 

 

 

On Behalf Of Punit Pandey

Friday, November 06, 2009 6:31 PM

 

Re: Re: Why Shri KN Rao's Double Transit doesn't

make sense

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Atul ji,

 

 

 

 

 

Thanks for sharing this information. Though this is the

fourth variation for Double-Transit that we are seeing here. Also this is NOT

what Shri KN Rao has taught in his books. As far as I remember, he has not used

lagna in Double Transit?

 

 

 

 

 

Anyways, this is another rule that I'll check and come back.

 

 

 

 

Thanks & Regards,

 

Punit Pandey

 

 

 

 

On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 2:39 AM, atul m <atulmaydeo wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear All

 

I know this is not Parashari system forum but discussion started on Double

transit of K N Rao so thought of sharing precise and complete details on this

as per my knowledge and considering researched output from various eminent

astrologers like M N Kedar, K N Rao, S N Kapoor, J N Gupta and Others -

 

Four Tier Scheme of Composite Transit for Marriage Timings as per eminent

astrologers like M N Kedar, K N Rao (although K N Rao further ratifies with

Jaimini system as well apart from Parashari) and others as per below -

 

1. Saturn & Jupiter -

Should have in transit aspected or transited over:

a) Lagna and 7th House; or

b) Lagna and 7th Lord; or

c) Lagna lord and 7th house or

d) Lagna lord and 7th lord

(saturn within 27 months and jupiter within 12 months)

2. Jupiter -

a) Natal Venus and 5th house/lord or

b) 5th house and 9th house or

c) 5th lord and 9th house or

d) 5th house and 9th lord or

e) 5th lord and 9th lord

3. Mars - should have in transit covered within six months:

a) what saturn and Jupiter must do, see(1) above;

and

b) what jupiter must do see (2) above

4. The 7th lord -

the 7th lord, in transit within 40 days of any

marriage must establish contact with any of the following:

a) the 11th lord

b) the 9th lord

c) the lagna lord

 

Also, at the time of marriage the lords of 7th, 9th, 5th and lagna will be

mutually connected (P-position,A- aspect, C-conjunction) and in most of

the cases these will be around 7th, lagna or their lords.

 

Note - Retrograde planets aspect from previous house as well.

 

The results are very positive (more than 90%) with the above schemes after

applying on large number of horoscopes for predicting marriage timings.

if you tie-up with Jaimini dasha system then results are extreamly positive (97-98%).

Although, normally it ties-up with Vimshottari Dasha system by all Parashari

astrologers.

 

Important -

This applies considering horoscope does not have marriage denial features and

in case of delayed horoscope, marriage turns up in 2nd round or some time 3rd

round saturn and Jupiter transit as per above scheme.

Although, marriage denial and very delayed (computing delay fators) is a

seprate topic.

 

Also, you may have noticed that moon or aspect from moon is NOT considered in

this rule for predicting marriage timing.

 

Hope this information is useful to all interested members.

 

Regards

Atul Maydeo.

(if you haven't tried, you haven't lived so keep trying...)

 

 

 

--- On Fri, 11/6/09, Punit Pandey <punitp wrote:

 

 

 

 

Punit Pandey <punitp

Re: Re: Why Shri KN Rao's Double Transit doesn't make

sense

 

 

Friday, November 6,

2009, 12:02 AM

 

 

 

 

Dear Satish,

 

 

 

 

 

So the rule for marriage you are suggesting is -

 

 

 

 

 

Condition 1. Jupiter should aspect ascendant or 7th house

and Saturn should aspect Moon or 7th house from Moon

 

 

Condition 2. Saturn should aspect ascendant or 7th house

and Jupiter should aspect Moon or 7th house from Moon

 

 

 

 

 

One of the above condition should be fulfilled. Is it what

you are suggesting?

 

 

 

 

 

By the way, as I mentioned earlier, my observation was

based on Shri KN Rao's teaching of Saturn and Jupiter's aspect on 7th and 7th

lord. What you are telling seems different. Anyways, I'll try it out sometime

and see.

 

 

 

Thanks & Regards,

 

Punit Pandey

 

 

 

 

 

 

On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 7:30 PM, R Satish <rsatish1942@

> wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Punit,

 

 

 

 

What you say about Jup is perfect and easy to

understand. When you take the Simultaneous transit of Sat over Lagna/7th or

Moon/7th,these percentages get affected.

 

 

To clarify if Jup is aspecting Lagn/7th then Sat must

aspect Moon/7th to fulfill the requirements.

 

 

 

 

 

As I mentioned,these happenings are not over 60% consistently.

If it were so it would become a simple rule all emcompassing. To improve

the % factor Venus/mars have been brought into the picture.

 

 

 

 

 

Even in KP,for marriages, we started with 2,7,11 houses. Later

it became 2, 5,7 11 Astro secrets Pt 1). Then we added 5,8 houses to

2,7,11. Khullar has his rules so does Baskaran.. To add to this confusion,

we added sub-sub theories.

 

 

 

 

 

It is a matter of time when the original formula would undergo

such transformation, we would be unable to recognize the original.

 

 

 

 

 

Whether to use it for prediction or postmortem is a personal

choice.Post mortem is easier to handle.However for predictions, we

need the skills to try for corroboration one or more of these

combinations for best-fit.

 

 

 

 

 

I for one, attempt to use KP + some others including

Double-Transit of Jup/Sat (as I understand).

 

 

 

 

 

Failed predictions are a part of the game. I humbly accept,I

am still a

 

 

learner and have many more miles to go.

 

 

 

 

 

Regards,

 

 

 

 

 

Satish

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

--- On Thu, 11/5/09, Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT)

com> wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com>

Re: Re: Why Shri KN Rao's Double Transit doesn't make

sense

 

@gro

ups.com

 

 

 

Thursday, November 5,

2009, 12:22 PM

 

 

 

 

Dear Satish,

 

 

 

 

 

What I am trying to convey that the rule will be true at

any piont of time in one's life because it is too vague. Please go through

my earlier email on this topic. The rule can not only justify marriage in

10 charts but in any chart.

 

 

 

 

 

Let us take today's chart as an example taking Leo as

ascedant (12:06PM, Agra). Saturn is 7th lord from Leo and 7th sign from Leo

is Aquarius.

 

 

 

 

 

Jupiter is aspecting 7th lord Saturn (1st year). Next

year (2nd year), Jupiter will be transiting over 7th house. Next year to

that (3rd year), Jupiter will again 7th aspecting 7th lord. 4th year, there

will no aspect on 7th and 7th lord. 5th year Jupiter will have 5th aspect

on 7th lord. 6th year, Jupiter will be aspecting 7th house. 7th year,

Jupiter will be transiting over 7th lord from Moon. 8th year, Jupiter will

be aspecting 7th house from 7th aspect. 9th year, Jupiter will be

transiting over 7th lord. 10 year, Jupiter will have 5th aspect on 7th

house. 11th year, Jupiter will be transiting 7th from Moon. 12th year,

again Jupiter will be aspecting 7th lord.

 

 

 

 

 

Jupiter cycle repeats every 12 year, so it is

safe to say that at almost any point of this person's life (born

today at 12:06PM at Agra), Jupiter will be either aspecting 7th or 7th lord

from Ascendant or Moon. 11/12 = 92% possibility. Even If we check

the rule only from Ascendant (and ignore Moon), Jupiter will be aspecting

7th or 7th lord 9/12=75% of time. In other words, whatever year this

person marries, double-transit will be able to justify it :-) Does Double

Transit make any sense?

 

 

 

 

 

Thanks & Regards,

 

Punit Pandey

 

 

 

 

 

 

On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 11:52 AM, R Satish <rsatish1942@

> wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Punit,

 

 

 

 

I refer to the book " ADVANCED TECHNIQUES OF ASTROLOGICAL

 

 

 

 

 

PREDICTIONS " edited Sri KN Rao.In one of

the chapters 'Tajika Shastra and Marriage

 

 

 

 

timing of Event " by Dr R K Wishwakarma, he has

given 8 rules for timing marriage date with

 

 

 

 

 

case studies. He validates 10 samples ,where Sat/Jup

aspect 7th house/lord.

 

 

 

 

 

He adds further Venus/Mars interconnection on

marriage date.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

We can only try to minimise the

number of rules,but cannot reduce

 

 

 

 

 

significantly, all introduced thru trial and

error,like we are presently doing.

 

 

 

 

 

Regards,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Satish

 

--- On Wed, 11/4/09, Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT)

com> wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com>

 

Re: Re: Why Shri KN Rao's Double

Transit doesn't make sense

 

 

 

@gro ups.com

 

 

 

Wednesday, November

4, 2009, 11:15 PM

 

 

 

 

Dear Mssumich,

 

 

 

 

 

Please note few points -

 

 

 

 

 

1. A method needs to be mathematically correct

first before we can talk about predictive aspect of the method. As I

mentioned this method is fundamentally flawed and doesn't make sense. I

have mentioned the reason and would love to hear if somebody can show

that I am missing something.

 

 

 

 

 

2. Double transit, as mentioned by Paul Manley, is

different from what Shri KN Rao has used in his books. By Double-Transit,

Shri KN Rao doesn't mean that both the planet should aspect one single

sign, but one planet aspecting the house and other house lord

(generally). As I demonstrated, this condition will match almost 100% of

time and hence it makes this tool a good tool for post-mortem and

justification. Though not useful for predictions.

 

 

 

 

 

3. If a method doesn't work, we should leave it and

move on. If we will not accept that the method doesn't make sense, we can

not discard it. By saying something like " we need to check

dasa and yoga etc. " , we want to prove it some way or other.

Why? If it doens't work, it doesn't work. We should not accpet anything

blindly. There are quite a few teachings by Shri KN Rao that

works and we should use them. Teachings that do not work, we should

discard them.

 

 

 

 

 

4. I don not understand why you are

mixing placidus with double-transit. Let us not mix both the

threads. Though i guess that the way you asked your earlier question was

not good for generating discussion. In my opinion, correct way for asking

question is to present your own analysis and ask your question. If you

are learner, you should present your detailed analysis. What is your

analysis as per KP? What is your analysis as per Traditional? Saying that

I am able to justify events using Traditional but not KP seems too vague

a statement. I do not see reference of Sub in your post. I

don't see reference of Nakshatra in your post. That doesn't qualify

as a KP analysis and hence doesn't provoke any response. This I

guess may be the reason you didn't get response.

 

 

 

 

 

Thanks & Regards,

 

 

Punit Pandey

 

 

 

 

On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 9:45 PM, mssumich <mssumich (AT) (DOT)

com> wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hi Punit

Like many of the 100s of tools that Jyotish gives - don't believe in all

the techniques that one comes up with. From Paul Manley's website here is

what he says

" What you'll see in the following illustrations is how the sign(s)

that gets the double transit will shift, generally from year to year. In

fact, there are only two positions of Jupiter and Saturn that will not

have the double transit phenomenon – when Jupiter is in the 8th or 12th

house from Saturn. This means that 10 out of the 12 possible positions,

or more than 80% of the time, there will be the double transit phenomenon

happening in at least one sign, possibly two. "

 

I have see this double transit work sometimes and sometimes not.

Obviuosly we have to pay attention to sookshma transits (or finer

transits) and just double transit.

 

I urge some expert to answer my question on the Placidus house system for

a chart that I put on the other day. One bhava covers 58 deg of zodiac,

there are 3 planets in 8th house; This person is very succesful. I can

explain every event using vedic astreology and nakshatra analysis. The

moment I put 3 planets in 8th in this chart, I am lost.

 

For latititude that are closer to 66 deg N or S - I believe the Placidus

system of houses give wierd house cusps(correct me if I am wrong). This

actor was born in Scotland where latitude in 55deg. My question is for

people born in such norhtern altitudes -what system works? Is it still

Placidus wasy of calculating houses or something else. There should a

clear answer from KP experts. I am hoping there is that person in this

list.

thanks

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

@gro ups.com, Punit Pandey

<punitp wrote:

>

> Dear Friends,

>

> KP made timing an event much more easier. Though as a KP astrologer,

I

> always feel that it will be nice to have another complementary

method by

> which we can cross-check and confirm. In search of another such

method for

> timing events, I looked into many methods and Shri KN Rao's double

transit

> is among them.

>

> I personally feel that it is merely a tool for post-mortem and not

useful

> for future predictions. Let us take an example of Marriage.

Double-transit

> suggests that transiting Jupiter and Saturn will always be aspecting

Natal

> 7th and 7th lord at the time of marriage.

>

> Now Jupiter has three aspects - 5,7, and 9. So including its own

position,

> it will be influencing four houses in any chart. Which means that at

any

> point of time the possibility of aspecting 7th is 33.33% and 7th

lord is

> also 33.33%. If we take Jupiter's influence on either 7th OR 7th

lord,

> possibility will double from 4/12 to 8/12 or 66.66%. So at any time,

we have

> 66.66% possibility of Jupiter aspecting either 7th or 7th lord. In

other

> words, around 66% of time in one's life, we will see that Jupiter is

> influencing either 7th or 7th. Of course, this calculation doesn't

consider

> some of the possibility e.g. 7th lord is in 7th house itself.

Anyways, I

> have seen Shri KN Rao is also checking Moon for transit other than

> Ascendant. Which doubles the possibility and if somehow Jupiter is

not

> aspecting 7th and 7th lord counting from Lagna, it will aspect 7th

or 7th

> lord from Moon. So in any point of one's life, if take transit from

Moon as

> well as Ascendant, it is almost certain that Jupiter will

influencing either

> 7th from ascendant, or 7th lord from ascendant, or 7th from Moon, or

7th

> lord from Moon.

>

> Similarly, Saturn also has 3 aspects and the above write-up is true

for

> Saturn as well. In other words, seeing the above possibility, I feel

that

> Double-Transit doesn't make sense at all.

>

> To sound this method sensible and experimental purpose, I checked

reducing

> the possibility by checking transit only from Ascendant. If I do

that way, I

> have many cases where it fails.

>

> In other words, I do not find Double-transit theory useful at all.

>

> Thanks & Regards,

>

> Punit Pandey

>

>

 

 

 

> On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at

2:06 PM, aashish rai <raiaashish@. ..> wrote:

>

> >

> >

> > Dear Sundar,

> >

> > In classical astrology there are so many dashas, if vimshottari

was only

> > required than why did Parashara muni talked about so many

dashas. Other

> > dashas like Yogini are showing it.

> >

> >

> >

> > Let's forget about DBAs for time being as per double transit

theory of Shri

> > Kn rao marriage chances are high when transit Saturn and

Jupiter aspect

> > natal 1/7 axis or their natal lords. In rare cases 9th lord

will be

> > involved.

> >

> >

> >

> > Natal chart,

> >

> > Jupier is aspecting natal 7th lord, lagna lord and Lagna

> >

> > Saturn is sitting in Lagna itself, aspecting 7th house

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Won't be surprised if there is a child birth/pregency before

end august

> > 2010 !!!

> >

> > Regards,

> > Aashish

> >

> > ------------ --------- ---------

 

> > ** Sundar

<sundar190561@ ...>

> >

 

 

> > *To:* @gro

ups.com

 

 

 

 

> > *Sent:* Wed, 4 November, 2009 10:31:33 AM

> > *Subject:* Re: Post mortem analysis of marriage

> >

> >

> >

> > Dear Aashish

> >

> > I know you would say, venus is the UL lord, hence the marriage

in venus

> > PAD. But did you see venus was debilitated on the day of

marriage?

> >

> > Thanks...... .....Sundar

> >

 

> > --- In

@gro ups.com

<%40.

com>, aashish

 

 

> > rai <raiaashish@ ...> wrote:

> > >

> > > Dear Sundarji,

> > > I have just started learning KP and yet to pick up the

basics. but if you

> > use traditional astrology it's very clear. As this forum is for

KP only I am

> > not elaborating.

> > >

> > > Regards,

> > > Aashish

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > ____________ _________ _________ __

> > > Sundar <sundar190561@ ...>

 

> > > To:

@gro ups.com

<%40.

com>

 

 

 

> >

> > > Sun, 1 November, 2009 10:59:22 PM

> > > Post mortem analysis of marriage

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Dear Learned members

> > >

> > > My neighbour go married on 21st Oct, 2009 between 9 to

10am. The transit

> > of DBAS does not fully signify the event fully.

> > >

> > > dob: 25th Aug, 1979

> > > tob: 9.37 (rectified)

> > > pob: Mumbai

> > >

> > > Time of birth reported is 9.22am

> > > Ayanamsha : 23.28.58

> > >

> > > dasha/bukti/ antra

> > >

> > > planet sgl stl sl

> > > (MD)rahu(11) sun(11,12) venus(11,2-9) venus(11,2-9)

> > > (AD)ketu(5) sat(12,5-6) rahu(11) venus(11,2-9)

> > > (PAD)venus(11, 2-9) sun(11,12) ketu(5) jupiter(11,4- 7)

> > >

> > > rahu=sun(11, 12)

> > > ketu=saturn( 12,5-6)

> > >

> > > Marriage on 21st October 2009 between 9 am to 10 am

> > >

> > > planet sgl stl sl

> > > (MD)rahu(4) sat(12,5-6) sun(1,12) jupiter(5,4- 7)

> > > (AD)ketu(10) moon(2,11) jupiter(5,4- 7) rahu-MD(4)

> > > (PAD)venus(12, 2-9) mer(1,1-10) moon(2,11) rahu-MD(4)

> > >

> > > sun venus(12,2-9) mars(10,3-8) venus(12,2-9)

> > > moon mars(10,3-8) sat(12,5-6) venus(12,2-9)

> > >

> > > Baed on the above it is seen that MD/AD/PAD does not fully

signify DBAS

> > (except for ketu, which is rahu's sub.

> > >

> > > In the light of the above how do we reconcile the timing

of marriage.

> > >

> > > Thanks...... ...Sundar

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Keep up with people you care about with India Mail.

Learn how. http://in.overview.

 

 

>

> mail.. com/connectmore<http://in.overview.

mail.. com/connectmore>

> > >

> >

> >

> > ------------ --------- ---------

> > Connect more, do more and share more with India Mail.

Learn more<http://in.rd. / tagline_galaxy_ 3/*http:/

/in.overview. mail.. com/>

> > .

> >

> >

> >

>

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

saturn transit over Leo and jupiter transit over scorpio was good, but jupiter entry to dhanur and aspect saturn at leo melting period.

Sat at virgo and jup at capricorn some improvement started.

now jup-mars aspect each other & venus aspect by mars.

double transit will give some clue in respect of its transit over firy/watery/airy sign etc.

Saturn transit over 10th house/aspect 10th house in transit some improvement will take place in profession.

Regards

Sahhasra Saagara

 

 

 

Ravinder Grover <rgrover Sent: Sat, 7 November, 2009 12:18:39 AMRE: Re: Why Shri KN Rao's Double Transit doesn't make sense

 

 

7 Nov 2009

 

Dear all

 

I feel this is the extract from Nadi System . Sat and Jup aspect to Mars and Venus is used extensively in Nadi System

 

Regards

RG

 

 

 

@gro ups.com [k_p_ system@grou ps.com] On Behalf Of Punit PandeyFriday, November 06, 2009 6:31 PM@gro ups.comRe: Re: Why Shri KN Rao's Double Transit doesn't make sense

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Atul ji,

 

 

 

Thanks for sharing this information. Though this is the fourth variation for Double-Transit that we are seeing here. Also this is NOT what Shri KN Rao has taught in his books. As far as I remember, he has not used lagna in Double Transit?

 

 

 

Anyways, this is another rule that I'll check and come back.

 

Thanks & Regards,Punit Pandey

 

On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 2:39 AM, atul m <atulmaydeo > wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear AllI know this is not Parashari system forum but discussion started on Double transit of K N Rao so thought of sharing precise and complete details on this as per my knowledge and considering researched output from various eminent astrologers like M N Kedar, K N Rao, S N Kapoor, J N Gupta and Others - Four Tier Scheme of Composite Transit for Marriage Timings as per eminent astrologers like M N Kedar, K N Rao (although K N Rao further ratifies with Jaimini system as well apart from Parashari) and others as per below - 1. Saturn & Jupiter - Should have in transit aspected or transited over: a) Lagna and 7th House; or b) Lagna and 7th Lord; or c) Lagna lord and 7th house or d) Lagna lord and 7th lord (saturn within 27 months and jupiter within 12 months)2.

Jupiter - a) Natal Venus and 5th house/lord or b) 5th house and 9th house or c) 5th lord and 9th house or d) 5th house and 9th lord or e) 5th lord and 9th lord3. Mars - should have in transit covered within six months: a) what saturn and Jupiter must do, see(1) above; and b) what jupiter must do see (2) above4. The 7th lord - the 7th lord, in transit within 40 days of any marriage must establish contact with any of the following: a) the 11th lord b) the 9th lord c) the lagna lordAlso, at the time of marriage the lords of 7th, 9th, 5th and lagna will be mutually connected (P-position, A- aspect, C-conjunction) and in most of

the cases these will be around 7th, lagna or their lords.Note - Retrograde planets aspect from previous house as well.The results are very positive (more than 90%) with the above schemes after applying on large number of horoscopes for predicting marriage timings.if you tie-up with Jaimini dasha system then results are extreamly positive (97-98%).Although, normally it ties-up with Vimshottari Dasha system by all Parashari astrologers.Important - This applies considering horoscope does not have marriage denial features and in case of delayed horoscope, marriage turns up in 2nd round or some time 3rd round saturn and Jupiter transit as per above scheme.Although, marriage denial and very delayed (computing delay fators) is a seprate topic.Also, you may have noticed that moon or aspect from moon is NOT considered in this rule for predicting marriage timing.Hope this information is useful to all

interested members.RegardsAtul Maydeo.(if you haven't tried, you haven't lived so keep trying...)

 

--- On Fri, 11/6/09, Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

 

 

Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com>Re: Re: Why Shri KN Rao's Double Transit doesn't make sense@gro ups.com

Friday, November 6, 2009, 12:02 AM

 

 

 

 

Dear Satish,

 

 

 

So the rule for marriage you are suggesting is -

 

 

 

Condition 1. Jupiter should aspect ascendant or 7th house and Saturn should aspect Moon or 7th house from Moon

 

Condition 2. Saturn should aspect ascendant or 7th house and Jupiter should aspect Moon or 7th house from Moon

 

 

 

One of the above condition should be fulfilled. Is it what you are suggesting?

 

 

 

By the way, as I mentioned earlier, my observation was based on Shri KN Rao's teaching of Saturn and Jupiter's aspect on 7th and 7th lord. What you are telling seems different. Anyways, I'll try it out sometime and see.

 

Thanks & Regards,Punit Pandey

 

 

On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 7:30 PM, R Satish <rsatish1942@ > wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Punit,

 

 

 

What you say about Jup is perfect and easy to understand. When you take the Simultaneous transit of Sat over Lagna/7th or Moon/7th,these percentages get affected.

 

To clarify if Jup is aspecting Lagn/7th then Sat must aspect Moon/7th to fulfill the requirements.

 

 

 

As I mentioned,these happenings are not over 60% consistently. If it were so it would become a simple rule all emcompassing. To improve the % factor Venus/mars have been brought into the picture.

 

 

 

Even in KP,for marriages, we started with 2,7,11 houses. Later it became 2, 5,7 11 Astro secrets Pt 1). Then we added 5,8 houses to 2,7,11. Khullar has his rules so does Baskaran.. To add to this confusion, we added sub-sub theories.

 

 

 

It is a matter of time when the original formula would undergo such transformation, we would be unable to recognize the original.

 

 

 

Whether to use it for prediction or postmortem is a personal choice.Post mortem is easier to handle.However for predictions, we need the skills to try for corroboration one or more of these combinations for best-fit.

 

 

 

I for one, attempt to use KP + some others including Double-Transit of Jup/Sat (as I understand).

 

 

 

Failed predictions are a part of the game. I humbly accept,I am still a

 

learner and have many more miles to go.

 

 

 

Regards,

 

 

 

Satish

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

--- On Thu, 11/5/09, Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

 

 

 

Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com>Re: Re: Why Shri KN Rao's Double Transit doesn't make sense

@gro ups.com

 

 

Thursday, November 5, 2009, 12:22 PM

 

 

 

 

Dear Satish,

 

 

 

What I am trying to convey that the rule will be true at any piont of time in one's life because it is too vague. Please go through my earlier email on this topic. The rule can not only justify marriage in 10 charts but in any chart.

 

 

 

Let us take today's chart as an example taking Leo as ascedant (12:06PM, Agra). Saturn is 7th lord from Leo and 7th sign from Leo is Aquarius.

 

 

 

Jupiter is aspecting 7th lord Saturn (1st year). Next year (2nd year), Jupiter will be transiting over 7th house. Next year to that (3rd year), Jupiter will again 7th aspecting 7th lord. 4th year, there will no aspect on 7th and 7th lord. 5th year Jupiter will have 5th aspect on 7th lord. 6th year, Jupiter will be aspecting 7th house. 7th year, Jupiter will be transiting over 7th lord from Moon. 8th year, Jupiter will be aspecting 7th house from 7th aspect. 9th year, Jupiter will be transiting over 7th lord. 10 year, Jupiter will have 5th aspect on 7th house. 11th year, Jupiter will be transiting 7th from Moon. 12th year, again Jupiter will be aspecting 7th lord.

 

 

 

Jupiter cycle repeats every 12 year, so it is safe to say that at almost any point of this person's life (born today at 12:06PM at Agra), Jupiter will be either aspecting 7th or 7th lord from Ascendant or Moon. 11/12 = 92% possibility. Even If we check the rule only from Ascendant (and ignore Moon), Jupiter will be aspecting 7th or 7th lord 9/12=75% of time. In other words, whatever year this person marries, double-transit will be able to justify it :-) Does Double Transit make any sense?

 

 

 

Thanks & Regards,Punit Pandey

 

 

On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 11:52 AM, R Satish <rsatish1942@ > wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Punit,

 

 

 

I refer to the book"ADVANCED TECHNIQUES OF ASTROLOGICAL

 

 

 

PREDICTIONS" edited Sri KN Rao.In one of the chapters 'Tajika Shastra and Marriage

 

 

timing of Event" by Dr R K Wishwakarma, he has given 8 rules for timing marriage date with

 

 

 

case studies. He validates 10 samples ,where Sat/Jup aspect 7th house/lord.

 

 

 

He adds further Venus/Mars interconnection on marriage date.

 

 

 

 

 

We can only try to minimise the number of rules,but cannot reduce

 

 

 

significantly, all introduced thru trial and error,like we are presently doing.

 

 

 

Regards,

 

 

 

 

 

Satish--- On Wed, 11/4/09, Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

 

 

 

Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com>

Re: Re: Why Shri KN Rao's Double Transit doesn't make sense

 

@gro ups.com

 

 

Wednesday, November 4, 2009, 11:15 PM

 

 

 

 

Dear Mssumich,

 

 

 

Please note few points -

 

 

 

1. A method needs to be mathematically correct first before we can talk about predictive aspect of the method. As I mentioned this method is fundamentally flawed and doesn't make sense. I have mentioned the reason and would love to hear if somebody can show that I am missing something.

 

 

 

2. Double transit, as mentioned by Paul Manley, is different from what Shri KN Rao has used in his books. By Double-Transit, Shri KN Rao doesn't mean that both the planet should aspect one single sign, but one planet aspecting the house and other house lord (generally). As I demonstrated, this condition will match almost 100% of time and hence it makes this tool a good tool for post-mortem and justification. Though not useful for predictions.

 

 

 

3. If a method doesn't work, we should leave it and move on. If we will not accept that the method doesn't make sense, we can not discard it. By saying something like "we need to check dasa and yoga etc.", we want to prove it some way or other. Why? If it doens't work, it doesn't work. We should not accpet anything blindly. There are quite a few teachings by Shri KN Rao that works and we should use them. Teachings that do not work, we should discard them.

 

 

 

4. I don not understand why you are mixing placidus with double-transit. Let us not mix both the threads. Though i guess that the way you asked your earlier question was not good for generating discussion. In my opinion, correct way for asking question is to present your own analysis and ask your question. If you are learner, you should present your detailed analysis. What is your analysis as per KP? What is your analysis as per Traditional? Saying that I am able to justify events using Traditional but not KP seems too vague a statement. I do not see reference of Sub in your post. I don't see reference of Nakshatra in your post. That doesn't qualify as a KP analysis and hence doesn't provoke any response. This I guess may be the reason you didn't get response.

 

 

 

Thanks & Regards,

 

Punit Pandey

 

 

On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 9:45 PM, mssumich <mssumich > wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hi PunitLike many of the 100s of tools that Jyotish gives - don't believe in all the techniques that one comes up with. From Paul Manley's website here is what he says"What you'll see in the following illustrations is how the sign(s) that gets the double transit will shift, generally from year to year. In fact, there are only two positions of Jupiter and Saturn that will not have the double transit phenomenon – when Jupiter is in the 8th or 12th house from Saturn. This means that 10 out of the 12 possible positions, or more than 80% of the time, there will be the double transit phenomenon happening in at least one sign, possibly two."I have see this double transit work sometimes and sometimes not. Obviuosly we have to pay attention to sookshma transits (or finer transits) and just double transit.I urge some expert to answer my question on the Placidus house system for a chart that I put on the other

day. One bhava covers 58 deg of zodiac, there are 3 planets in 8th house; This person is very succesful. I can explain every event using vedic astreology and nakshatra analysis. The moment I put 3 planets in 8th in this chart, I am lost.For latititude that are closer to 66 deg N or S - I believe the Placidus system of houses give wierd house cusps(correct me if I am wrong). This actor was born in Scotland where latitude in 55deg. My question is for people born in such norhtern altitudes -what system works? Is it still Placidus wasy of calculating houses or something else. There should a clear answer from KP experts. I am hoping there is that person in this list.thanks

 

 

 

 

@gro ups.com, Punit Pandey <punitp wrote:>> Dear Friends,> > KP made timing an event much more easier. Though as a KP astrologer, I> always feel that it will be nice to have another complementary method by> which we can cross-check and confirm. In search of another such method for> timing events, I looked into many methods and Shri KN Rao's double transit> is among them.> > I personally feel that it is merely a tool for post-mortem and not useful> for future predictions. Let us take an example of Marriage. Double-transit> suggests that transiting Jupiter and Saturn will always be aspecting Natal> 7th and 7th lord at the time of marriage.> > Now Jupiter has three aspects - 5,7,

and 9. So including its own position,> it will be influencing four houses in any chart. Which means that at any> point of time the possibility of aspecting 7th is 33.33% and 7th lord is> also 33.33%. If we take Jupiter's influence on either 7th OR 7th lord,> possibility will double from 4/12 to 8/12 or 66.66%. So at any time, we have> 66.66% possibility of Jupiter aspecting either 7th or 7th lord. In other> words, around 66% of time in one's life, we will see that Jupiter is> influencing either 7th or 7th. Of course, this calculation doesn't consider> some of the possibility e.g. 7th lord is in 7th house itself. Anyways, I> have seen Shri KN Rao is also checking Moon for transit other than> Ascendant. Which doubles the possibility and if somehow Jupiter is not> aspecting 7th and 7th lord counting from Lagna, it will aspect 7th or 7th> lord from Moon. So in any point of

one's life, if take transit from Moon as> well as Ascendant, it is almost certain that Jupiter will influencing either> 7th from ascendant, or 7th lord from ascendant, or 7th from Moon, or 7th> lord from Moon.> > Similarly, Saturn also has 3 aspects and the above write-up is true for> Saturn as well. In other words, seeing the above possibility, I feel that> Double-Transit doesn't make sense at all.> > To sound this method sensible and experimental purpose, I checked reducing> the possibility by checking transit only from Ascendant. If I do that way, I> have many cases where it fails.> > In other words, I do not find Double-transit theory useful at all.> > Thanks & Regards,> > Punit Pandey> >

 

> On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 2:06 PM, aashish rai <raiaashish@. ..> wrote:> > >> >> > Dear Sundar,> >> > In classical astrology there are so many dashas, if vimshottari was only> > required than why did Parashara muni talked about so many dashas. Other> > dashas like Yogini are showing it.> >> >> >> > Let's forget about DBAs for time being as per double transit theory of Shri> > Kn rao marriage chances are high when transit Saturn and Jupiter aspect> > natal 1/7 axis or their natal lords. In rare cases 9th lord will be> > involved.> >> >> >> > Natal chart,> >> > Jupier is aspecting natal 7th lord, lagna lord and Lagna> >> > Saturn is sitting in Lagna itself, aspecting 7th

house> >> >> >> >> > Won't be surprised if there is a child birth/pregency before end august> > 2010 !!!> >> > Regards,> > Aashish> >> > ------------ --------- ---------

> > ** Sundar <sundar190561@ ...>> >

> > *To:* @gro ups.com

 

 

 

> > *Sent:* Wed, 4 November, 2009 10:31:33 AM> > *Subject:* Re: Post mortem analysis of marriage> >> >> >> > Dear Aashish> >> > I know you would say, venus is the UL lord, hence the marriage in venus> > PAD. But did you see venus was debilitated on the day of marriage?> >> > Thanks...... .....Sundar> >

> > @gro ups.com <%40. com>, aashish

 

> > rai <raiaashish@ ...> wrote:> > >> > > Dear Sundarji,> > > I have just started learning KP and yet to pick up the basics. but if you> > use traditional astrology it's very clear. As this forum is for KP only I am> > not elaborating.> > >> > > Regards,> > > Aashish> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > ____________ _________ _________ __> > > Sundar <sundar190561@ ...>

> > > @gro ups.com <%40. com>

 

 

> >> > > Sun, 1 November, 2009 10:59:22 PM> > > Post mortem analysis of marriage> > >> > >> > >> > > Dear Learned members> > >> > > My neighbour go married on 21st Oct, 2009 between 9 to 10am. The transit> > of DBAS does not fully signify the event fully.> > >> > > dob: 25th Aug, 1979> > > tob: 9.37 (rectified)> > > pob: Mumbai> > >> > > Time of birth reported is 9.22am> > > Ayanamsha : 23.28.58> > >> > > dasha/bukti/ antra> > >> > > planet sgl stl sl> > > (MD)rahu(11) sun(11,12) venus(11,2-9) venus(11,2-9)> > > (AD)ketu(5) sat(12,5-6) rahu(11) venus(11,2-9)> > > (PAD)venus(11, 2-9)

sun(11,12) ketu(5) jupiter(11,4- 7)> > >> > > rahu=sun(11, 12)> > > ketu=saturn( 12,5-6)> > >> > > Marriage on 21st October 2009 between 9 am to 10 am> > >> > > planet sgl stl sl> > > (MD)rahu(4) sat(12,5-6) sun(1,12) jupiter(5,4- 7)> > > (AD)ketu(10) moon(2,11) jupiter(5,4- 7) rahu-MD(4)> > > (PAD)venus(12, 2-9) mer(1,1-10) moon(2,11) rahu-MD(4)> > >> > > sun venus(12,2-9) mars(10,3-8) venus(12,2-9)> > > moon mars(10,3-8) sat(12,5-6) venus(12,2-9)> > >> > > Baed on the above it is seen that MD/AD/PAD does not fully signify DBAS> > (except for ketu, which is rahu's sub.> > >> > > In the light of the above how do we reconcile the timing of marriage.> > >> > > Thanks...... ...Sundar> >

>> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > Keep up with people you care about with India Mail. Learn how. http://in.overview.

> > mail.. com/connectmore<http://in.overview. mail.. com/connectmore>> > >> >> >> > ------------ --------- ---------> > Connect more, do more and share more with India Mail. Learn more<http://in.rd. / tagline_galaxy_ 3/*http:/ /in.overview. mail.. com/>> > .> >> > > >>

 

 

 

 

 

 

The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Homepage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Atul ji & Friends,

 

Let us have a look at the rule you have suggested. The broader rule is -

 

// Saturn & Jupiter -      Should have in transit aspected or transited over:     a) Lagna and 7th House; or      b) Lagna and 7th Lord; or     c) Lagna lord and 7th house or     d) Lagna lord and 7th lord

(Saturn within 27 months and Jupiter within 12 months)

Note - Retrograde planets aspect from previous house as well. //

 

Now, as I mentioned in my earlier Jupiter and Saturn at any time influence four houses - three by aspects and one by placement. Which means that the probability for aspecting any house will be 4/12 i.e. 1/3 or 33.33%. So the probability for any condition (a to d) will be  - 1/3 X 1/3 = 1/9 = 11.11%. But there is greater possibility due to the retrogression rule.

 

But we are saying when a planet is retrograde, the aspect will be counted from previous house as well i.e. planet will be aspecting 8 houses in case it is retrograde. Jupiter and Saturn are retrograde when they are 5 to 9 house away from Sun. In other words they are retrograde in 5 houses and direct in 7 houses from Sun. We can say roughly they remain retrograde 5/12 % 100 = 41.66 percent of time in the cycle (of course this is generic assumption and I have not checked average time for retrogression for these two planets).

 

So the revised probability of one planet aspecting one house will be -

 

(4 X  7 / 12 + 8 X 5 / 12) / 12 = 68/144 = 47.22%.

 

Possibility for both the planets aspecting any two houses -

 

68 / 144 X 68 / 144 = 22.29%

 

So the possibility that any of these conditions to be true -

 

     a) Lagna and 7th House; or      b) Lagna and 7th Lord; or     c) Lagna lord and 7th house or     d) Lagna lord and 7th lord

= 0.223 X 4 = .8919 = 89.19%

 

In other words, possibility of one of the above conditions to be true is almost 89% time in once life. If a person has life span of 100 years, we will find one of the above condition fulfilling 89% of time.

 

Do you still think that the rule quoted by you make any sense? A rule which is almost always true in once's life can really be called a rule? or I am missing something?

Thanks & Regards,Punit Pandey

 

On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 2:39 AM, atul m <atulmaydeo wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear AllI know this is not Parashari system forum but discussion started on Double transit of K N Rao so thought of sharing precise and complete details on this as per my knowledge and considering researched output from various eminent astrologers like M N Kedar, K N Rao, S N Kapoor, J N Gupta and Others -

Four Tier Scheme of Composite Transit for Marriage Timings as per eminent astrologers like M N Kedar, K N Rao (although K N Rao further ratifies with Jaimini system as well apart from Parashari) and others as per below -

1. Saturn & Jupiter -      Should have in transit aspected or transited over:     a) Lagna and 7th House; or      b) Lagna and 7th Lord; or     c) Lagna lord and 7th house or     d) Lagna lord and 7th lord

(saturn within 27 months and jupiter within 12 months)2. Jupiter -      a) Natal Venus and 5th house/lord or     b) 5th house and 9th house or     c) 5th lord and 9th house or     d) 5th house and 9th lord or

     e) 5th lord and 9th lord3. Mars - should have in transit covered within six months:     a) what saturn and Jupiter must do, see(1) above; and      b) what jupiter must do see (2) above4. The 7th lord -

     the 7th lord, in transit within 40 days of any marriage must establish contact with any of the following:     a) the 11th lord     b) the 9th lord     c) the lagna lordAlso, at the time of marriage the lords of 7th, 9th, 5th and lagna will be mutually connected (P-position,A- aspect, C-conjunction)  and in most of the cases these will be around 7th, lagna or their lords.

Note - Retrograde planets aspect from previous house as well.The results are very positive (more than 90%) with the above schemes after applying on large number of horoscopes for predicting marriage timings.

if you tie-up with Jaimini dasha system then results are extreamly positive (97-98%).Although, normally it ties-up with Vimshottari Dasha system by all Parashari astrologers.Important - This applies considering horoscope does not have marriage denial features and in case of delayed horoscope, marriage turns up in 2nd round or some time 3rd round saturn and Jupiter transit as per above scheme.

Although, marriage denial and very delayed (computing delay fators) is a seprate topic.Also, you may have noticed that moon or aspect from moon is NOT considered in this rule for predicting marriage timing.

Hope this information is useful to all interested members.RegardsAtul Maydeo.(if you haven't tried, you haven't lived so keep trying...) --- On Fri, 11/6/09, Punit Pandey <punitp wrote:

 

Punit Pandey <punitpRe: Re: Why Shri KN Rao's Double Transit doesn't make sense

Friday, November 6, 2009, 12:02 AM

 

 

 

Dear Satish,

 

So the rule for marriage you are suggesting is -

 

Condition 1. Jupiter should aspect ascendant or 7th house and Saturn should aspect Moon or 7th house from Moon

Condition 2. Saturn should aspect ascendant or 7th house and Jupiter should aspect Moon or 7th house from Moon

 

One of the above condition should be fulfilled. Is it what you are suggesting?

 

By the way, as I mentioned earlier, my observation was based on Shri KN Rao's teaching of Saturn and Jupiter's aspect on 7th and 7th lord. What you are telling seems different. Anyways, I'll try it out sometime and see.

Thanks & Regards,Punit Pandey

 

On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 7:30 PM, R Satish <rsatish1942@ > wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Dear Punit,

                  What you say about Jup is perfect  and easy to understand. When you take the Simultaneous transit of Sat over Lagna/7th or Moon/7th,these percentages get affected.

To clarify if Jup is aspecting Lagn/7th then Sat must aspect Moon/7th to fulfill the requirements.

 

                  As I mentioned,these happenings are not over 60% consistently. If it were so it would become a simple rule all emcompassing. To improve the % factor Venus/mars have been brought into the picture.

 

                  Even in KP,for marriages, we started with 2,7,11 houses. Later it became 2, 5,7 11 Astro secrets Pt 1).   Then we added 5,8 houses to 2,7,11. Khullar has his rules so does Baskaran.. To add to this confusion, we added sub-sub theories.

 

                  It is a matter of time when the original formula would undergo such transformation, we  would be unable to recognize the original.

 

                   Whether to use it for prediction or postmortem is a personal  choice.Post mortem is easier to handle.However for predictions, we need the skills to try for corroboration  one or more of these combinations for best-fit.

 

                   I for one, attempt to use KP + some others including Double-Transit  of Jup/Sat (as I understand).

 

                   Failed predictions are a part of the game. I humbly accept,I am still a

 learner and have many more miles to go.

 

                   Regards,

 

                   Satish

 

                  

 

 

 

 

                   --- On Thu, 11/5/09, Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

 

 

Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com>Re: Re: Why Shri KN Rao's Double Transit doesn't make sense

@gro ups.com

 

 

Thursday, November 5, 2009, 12:22 PM

 

 

 

Dear Satish,

 

What I am trying to convey that the rule will be true at any piont of time in one's life because it is too vague. Please go through my earlier email on this topic. The rule can not only justify marriage in 10 charts but in any chart.

 

Let us take today's chart as an example taking Leo as ascedant (12:06PM, Agra). Saturn is 7th lord from Leo and 7th sign from Leo is Aquarius.

 

Jupiter is aspecting 7th lord Saturn (1st year). Next year (2nd year), Jupiter will be transiting over 7th house. Next year to that (3rd year), Jupiter will again 7th aspecting 7th lord. 4th year, there will no aspect on 7th and 7th lord. 5th year Jupiter will have 5th aspect on 7th lord. 6th year, Jupiter will be aspecting 7th house. 7th year, Jupiter will be transiting over 7th lord from Moon. 8th year, Jupiter will be aspecting 7th house from 7th aspect. 9th year, Jupiter will be transiting over 7th lord. 10 year, Jupiter will have 5th aspect on 7th house. 11th year, Jupiter will be transiting 7th from Moon. 12th year, again Jupiter will be aspecting 7th lord.

 

Jupiter cycle repeats every 12 year, so it is safe to say that at almost any point of this person's life (born today at 12:06PM at Agra), Jupiter will be either aspecting 7th or 7th lord from Ascendant or Moon. 11/12 = 92% possibility. Even If we check the rule only from Ascendant (and ignore Moon), Jupiter will be aspecting 7th or 7th lord 9/12=75% of time.  In other words, whatever year this person marries, double-transit will be able to justify it :-) Does Double Transit make any sense?

 

Thanks & Regards,Punit Pandey

 

On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 11:52 AM, R Satish <rsatish1942@ > wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Dear Punit,

                 I refer to the book " ADVANCED TECHNIQUES OF ASTROLOGICAL 

 

 PREDICTIONS " edited Sri KN Rao.In one of the chapters 'Tajika Shastra and Marriage 

  

timing of Event " by Dr R K Wishwakarma, he has given 8 rules for timing marriage date with 

 

case studies. He validates 10 samples ,where Sat/Jup aspect 7th house/lord.

 

 He adds further Venus/Mars interconnection on marriage date.

 

 

                    We can only try to  minimise  the  number of rules,but cannot reduce 

 

significantly, all introduced  thru trial and error,like we are presently doing.

 

                     Regards,

 

 

 

                     Satish--- On Wed, 11/4/09, Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

 

 

Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com>Re: Re: Why Shri KN Rao's Double Transit doesn't make sense

@gro ups.com

 

 

Wednesday, November 4, 2009, 11:15 PM

 

 

 

Dear Mssumich,

 

Please note few points -

 

1. A method needs to be mathematically correct first before we can talk about predictive aspect of the method. As I mentioned this method is fundamentally flawed and doesn't make sense. I have mentioned the reason and would love to hear if somebody can show that I am missing something.

 

2. Double transit, as mentioned by Paul Manley, is different from what Shri KN Rao has used in his books. By Double-Transit, Shri KN Rao doesn't mean that both the planet should aspect one single sign, but one planet aspecting the house and other house lord (generally). As I demonstrated, this condition will match almost 100% of time and hence it makes this tool a good tool for post-mortem and justification. Though not useful for predictions.

 

3. If a method doesn't work, we should leave it and move on. If we will not accept that the method doesn't make sense, we can not discard it. By saying something like  " we need to check dasa and yoga etc. " , we want to prove it some way or other. Why? If it doens't work, it doesn't work. We should not accpet anything blindly. There are quite a few teachings by Shri KN Rao that works and we should use them. Teachings that do not work, we should discard them.

 

4. I don not understand why you are mixing placidus with double-transit. Let us not mix both the threads. Though i guess that the way you asked your earlier question was not good for generating discussion. In my opinion, correct way for asking question is to present your own analysis and ask your question. If you are learner, you should present your detailed analysis. What is your analysis as per KP? What is your analysis as per Traditional? Saying that I am able to justify events using Traditional but not KP seems too vague a statement. I do not see reference of Sub in your post. I don't see reference of Nakshatra in your post. That doesn't qualify as a KP analysis and hence doesn't provoke any response.  This I guess may be the reason you didn't get response.

 

Thanks & Regards,

Punit Pandey

 

On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 9:45 PM, mssumich <mssumich > wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

Hi PunitLike many of the 100s of tools that Jyotish gives - don't believe in all the techniques that one comes up with. From Paul Manley's website here is what he says " What you'll see in the following illustrations is how the sign(s) that gets the double transit will shift, generally from year to year. In fact, there are only two positions of Jupiter and Saturn that will not have the double transit phenomenon – when Jupiter is in the 8th or 12th house from Saturn. This means that 10 out of the 12 possible positions, or more than 80% of the time, there will be the double transit phenomenon happening in at least one sign, possibly two. "

I have see this double transit work sometimes and sometimes not. Obviuosly we have to pay attention to sookshma transits (or finer transits) and just double transit.I urge some expert to answer my question on the Placidus house system for a chart that I put on the other day. One bhava covers 58 deg of zodiac, there are 3 planets in 8th house; This person is very succesful. I can explain every event using vedic astreology and nakshatra analysis. The moment I put 3 planets in 8th in this chart, I am lost.

For latititude that are closer to 66 deg N or S - I believe the Placidus system of houses give wierd house cusps(correct me if I am wrong). This actor was born in Scotland where latitude in 55deg. My question is for people born in such norhtern altitudes -what system works? Is it still Placidus wasy of calculating houses or something else. There should a clear answer from KP experts. I am hoping there is that person in this list.

thanks

 

 

 

 

 

@gro ups.com, Punit Pandey <punitp wrote:>> Dear Friends,>

> KP made timing an event much more easier. Though as a KP astrologer, I> always feel that it will be nice to have another complementary method by> which we can cross-check and confirm. In search of another such method for

> timing events, I looked into many methods and Shri KN Rao's double transit> is among them.> > I personally feel that it is merely a tool for post-mortem and not useful> for future predictions. Let us take an example of Marriage. Double-transit

> suggests that transiting Jupiter and Saturn will always be aspecting Natal> 7th and 7th lord at the time of marriage.> > Now Jupiter has three aspects - 5,7, and 9. So including its own position,

> it will be influencing four houses in any chart. Which means that at any> point of time the possibility of aspecting 7th is 33.33% and 7th lord is> also 33.33%. If we take Jupiter's influence on either 7th OR 7th lord,

> possibility will double from 4/12 to 8/12 or 66.66%. So at any time, we have> 66.66% possibility of Jupiter aspecting either 7th or 7th lord. In other> words, around 66% of time in one's life, we will see that Jupiter is

> influencing either 7th or 7th. Of course, this calculation doesn't consider> some of the possibility e.g. 7th lord is in 7th house itself. Anyways, I> have seen Shri KN Rao is also checking Moon for transit other than

> Ascendant. Which doubles the possibility and if somehow Jupiter is not> aspecting 7th and 7th lord counting from Lagna, it will aspect 7th or 7th> lord from Moon. So in any point of one's life, if take transit from Moon as

> well as Ascendant, it is almost certain that Jupiter will influencing either> 7th from ascendant, or 7th lord from ascendant, or 7th from Moon, or 7th> lord from Moon.> > Similarly, Saturn also has 3 aspects and the above write-up is true for

> Saturn as well. In other words, seeing the above possibility, I feel that> Double-Transit doesn't make sense at all.> > To sound this method sensible and experimental purpose, I checked reducing

> the possibility by checking transit only from Ascendant. If I do that way, I> have many cases where it fails.> > In other words, I do not find Double-transit theory useful at all.> > Thanks & Regards,

> > Punit Pandey> >

> On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 2:06 PM, aashish rai <raiaashish@. ..> wrote:> > >> >> > Dear Sundar,> >> > In classical astrology there are so many dashas, if vimshottari was only

> > required than why did Parashara muni talked about so many dashas. Other> > dashas like Yogini are showing it.> >> >> >> > Let's forget about DBAs for time being as per double transit theory of Shri

> > Kn rao marriage chances are high when transit Saturn and Jupiter aspect> > natal 1/7 axis or their natal lords. In rare cases 9th lord will be> > involved.> >> >> >

> > Natal chart,> >> > Jupier is aspecting natal 7th lord, lagna lord and Lagna> >> > Saturn is sitting in Lagna itself, aspecting 7th house> >> >> >

> >> > Won't be surprised if there is a child birth/pregency before end august> > 2010 !!!> >> > Regards,> > Aashish> >> > ------------ --------- ---------

> > ** Sundar <sundar190561@ ...>> >> > *To:* @gro ups.com

 

 

> > *Sent:* Wed, 4 November, 2009 10:31:33 AM> > *Subject:* Re: Post mortem analysis of marriage> >> >> >> > Dear Aashish> >> > I know you would say, venus is the UL lord, hence the marriage in venus

> > PAD. But did you see venus was debilitated on the day of marriage?> >> > Thanks...... .....Sundar> >> > @gro ups.com <%40. com>, aashish > > rai <raiaashish@ ...> wrote:> > >> > > Dear Sundarji,> > > I have just started learning KP and yet to pick up the basics. but if you> > use traditional astrology it's very clear. As this forum is for KP only I am

> > not elaborating.> > >> > > Regards,> > > Aashish> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > ____________ _________ _________ __

> > > Sundar <sundar190561@ ...>> > > @gro ups.com <%40. com>

 

> >> > > Sun, 1 November, 2009 10:59:22 PM> > > Post mortem analysis of marriage> > >> > >> > >> > > Dear Learned members

> > >> > > My neighbour go married on 21st Oct, 2009 between 9 to 10am. The transit> > of DBAS does not fully signify the event fully.> > >> > > dob: 25th Aug, 1979

> > > tob: 9.37 (rectified)> > > pob: Mumbai> > >> > > Time of birth reported is 9.22am> > > Ayanamsha : 23.28.58> > >> > > dasha/bukti/ antra

> > >> > > planet sgl stl sl> > > (MD)rahu(11) sun(11,12) venus(11,2-9) venus(11,2-9)> > > (AD)ketu(5) sat(12,5-6) rahu(11) venus(11,2-9)> > > (PAD)venus(11, 2-9) sun(11,12) ketu(5) jupiter(11,4- 7)

> > >> > > rahu=sun(11, 12)> > > ketu=saturn( 12,5-6)> > >> > > Marriage on 21st October 2009 between 9 am to 10 am> > >> > > planet sgl stl sl

> > > (MD)rahu(4) sat(12,5-6) sun(1,12) jupiter(5,4- 7)> > > (AD)ketu(10) moon(2,11) jupiter(5,4- 7) rahu-MD(4)> > > (PAD)venus(12, 2-9) mer(1,1-10) moon(2,11) rahu-MD(4)> > >

> > > sun venus(12,2-9) mars(10,3-8) venus(12,2-9)> > > moon mars(10,3-8) sat(12,5-6) venus(12,2-9)> > >> > > Baed on the above it is seen that MD/AD/PAD does not fully signify DBAS

> > (except for ketu, which is rahu's sub.> > >> > > In the light of the above how do we reconcile the timing of marriage.> > >> > > Thanks...... ...Sundar

> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > Keep up with people you care about with India Mail. Learn how. http://in.overview.

> > mail.. com/connectmore<http://in.overview. mail.. com/connectmore>> > >> >

> >> > ------------ --------- ---------> > Connect more, do more and share more with India Mail. Learn more<http://in.rd. / tagline_galaxy_ 3/*http:/ /in.overview. mail.. com/>

> > .> >> > > >>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Punitji and AllI didn't get time to verify your % calculation but breeze thr' your response and following are my thoughts - 1. Retrogression planet aspect from previous house so do not include previous but consider only aspect so 7 aspects. (Usually, Jupiter retrogression is NOT considered auspicious for marriage and child but it is still under research.)2. may be I have not articulated well but It is assume that Only Transit cannot predict timing of marriage - RegardsAtul Maydeo.--- On Sat, 11/7/09, Punit Pandey <punitp wrote:Punit Pandey <punitpRe: Re: Why Shri KN Rao's Double Transit doesn't make senseTo:

Date: Saturday, November 7, 2009, 12:01 PM

 

 

Dear Atul ji & Friends,

 

Let us have a look at the rule you have suggested. The broader rule is -

 

// Saturn & Jupiter - Should have in transit aspected or transited over: a) Lagna and 7th House; or b) Lagna and 7th Lord; or c) Lagna lord and 7th house or d) Lagna lord and 7th lord

(Saturn within 27 months and Jupiter within 12 months)

Note - Retrograde planets aspect from previous house as well. //

 

Now, as I mentioned in my earlier Jupiter and Saturn at any time influence four houses - three by aspects and one by placement. Which means that the probability for aspecting any house will be 4/12 i.e. 1/3 or 33.33%. So the probability for any condition (a to d) will be - 1/3 X 1/3 = 1/9 = 11.11%. But there is greater possibility due to the retrogression rule.

 

But we are saying when a planet is retrograde, the aspect will be counted from previous house as well i.e. planet will be aspecting 8 houses in case it is retrograde. Jupiter and Saturn are retrograde when they are 5 to 9 house away from Sun. In other words they are retrograde in 5 houses and direct in 7 houses from Sun. We can say roughly they remain retrograde 5/12 % 100 = 41.66 percent of time in the cycle (of course this is generic assumption and I have not checked average time for retrogression for these two planets).

 

So the revised probability of one planet aspecting one house will be -

 

(4 X 7 / 12 + 8 X 5 / 12) / 12 = 68/144 = 47.22%.

 

Possibility for both the planets aspecting any two houses -

 

68 / 144 X 68 / 144 = 22.29%

 

So the possibility that any of these conditions to be true -

 

a) Lagna and 7th House; or b) Lagna and 7th Lord; or c) Lagna lord and 7th house or d) Lagna lord and 7th lord

= 0.223 X 4 = .8919 = 89.19%

 

In other words, possibility of one of the above conditions to be true is almost 89% time in once life. If a person has life span of 100 years, we will find one of the above condition fulfilling 89% of time.

 

Do you still think that the rule quoted by you make any sense? A rule which is almost always true in once's life can really be called a rule? or I am missing something?

Thanks & Regards,Punit Pandey

 

On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 2:39 AM, atul m <atulmaydeo > wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear AllI know this is not Parashari system forum but discussion started on Double transit of K N Rao so thought of sharing precise and complete details on this as per my knowledge and considering researched output from various eminent astrologers like M N Kedar, K N Rao, S N Kapoor, J N Gupta and Others -

Four Tier Scheme of Composite Transit for Marriage Timings as per eminent astrologers like M N Kedar, K N Rao (although K N Rao further ratifies with Jaimini system as well apart from Parashari) and others as per below -

1. Saturn & Jupiter - Should have in transit aspected or transited over: a) Lagna and 7th House; or b) Lagna and 7th Lord; or c) Lagna lord and 7th house or d) Lagna lord and 7th lord

(saturn within 27 months and jupiter within 12 months)2. Jupiter - a) Natal Venus and 5th house/lord or b) 5th house and 9th house or c) 5th lord and 9th house or d) 5th house and 9th lord or

e) 5th lord and 9th lord3. Mars - should have in transit covered within six months: a) what saturn and Jupiter must do, see(1) above; and b) what jupiter must do see (2) above4. The 7th lord -

the 7th lord, in transit within 40 days of any marriage must establish contact with any of the following: a) the 11th lord b) the 9th lord c) the lagna lordAlso, at the time of marriage the lords of 7th, 9th, 5th and lagna will be mutually connected (P-position, A- aspect, C-conjunction) and in most of the cases these will be around 7th, lagna or their lords.

Note - Retrograde planets aspect from previous house as well.The results are very positive (more than 90%) with the above schemes after applying on large number of horoscopes for predicting marriage timings.

if you tie-up with Jaimini dasha system then results are extreamly positive (97-98%).Although, normally it ties-up with Vimshottari Dasha system by all Parashari astrologers.Important - This applies considering horoscope does not have marriage denial features and in case of delayed horoscope, marriage turns up in 2nd round or some time 3rd round saturn and Jupiter transit as per above scheme.

Although, marriage denial and very delayed (computing delay fators) is a seprate topic.Also, you may have noticed that moon or aspect from moon is NOT considered in this rule for predicting marriage timing.

Hope this information is useful to all interested members.RegardsAtul Maydeo.(if you haven't tried, you haven't lived so keep trying...) --- On Fri, 11/6/09, Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

 

Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com>Re: Re: Why Shri KN Rao's Double Transit doesn't make sense@gro ups.com

Friday, November 6, 2009, 12:02 AM

 

 

Dear Satish,

 

So the rule for marriage you are suggesting is -

 

Condition 1. Jupiter should aspect ascendant or 7th house and Saturn should aspect Moon or 7th house from Moon

Condition 2. Saturn should aspect ascendant or 7th house and Jupiter should aspect Moon or 7th house from Moon

 

One of the above condition should be fulfilled. Is it what you are suggesting?

 

By the way, as I mentioned earlier, my observation was based on Shri KN Rao's teaching of Saturn and Jupiter's aspect on 7th and 7th lord. What you are telling seems different. Anyways, I'll try it out sometime and see.

Thanks & Regards,Punit Pandey

 

On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 7:30 PM, R Satish <rsatish1942@ > wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Punit,

What you say about Jup is perfect and easy to understand. When you take the Simultaneous transit of Sat over Lagna/7th or Moon/7th,these percentages get affected.

To clarify if Jup is aspecting Lagn/7th then Sat must aspect Moon/7th to fulfill the requirements.

 

As I mentioned,these happenings are not over 60% consistently. If it were so it would become a simple rule all emcompassing. To improve the % factor Venus/mars have been brought into the picture.

 

Even in KP,for marriages, we started with 2,7,11 houses. Later it became 2, 5,7 11 Astro secrets Pt 1). Then we added 5,8 houses to 2,7,11. Khullar has his rules so does Baskaran.. To add to this confusion, we added sub-sub theories.

 

It is a matter of time when the original formula would undergo such transformation, we would be unable to recognize the original.

 

Whether to use it for prediction or postmortem is a personal choice.Post mortem is easier to handle.However for predictions, we need the skills to try for corroboration one or more of these combinations for best-fit.

 

I for one, attempt to use KP + some others including Double-Transit of Jup/Sat (as I understand).

 

Failed predictions are a part of the game. I humbly accept,I am still a

learner and have many more miles to go.

 

Regards,

 

Satish

 

 

 

 

 

--- On Thu, 11/5/09, Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

 

 

Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com>Re: Re: Why Shri KN Rao's Double Transit doesn't make sense

@gro ups.com

 

 

Thursday, November 5, 2009, 12:22 PM

 

 

Dear Satish,

 

What I am trying to convey that the rule will be true at any piont of time in one's life because it is too vague. Please go through my earlier email on this topic. The rule can not only justify marriage in 10 charts but in any chart.

 

Let us take today's chart as an example taking Leo as ascedant (12:06PM, Agra). Saturn is 7th lord from Leo and 7th sign from Leo is Aquarius.

 

Jupiter is aspecting 7th lord Saturn (1st year).. Next year (2nd year), Jupiter will be transiting over 7th house. Next year to that (3rd year), Jupiter will again 7th aspecting 7th lord. 4th year, there will no aspect on 7th and 7th lord. 5th year Jupiter will have 5th aspect on 7th lord. 6th year, Jupiter will be aspecting 7th house. 7th year, Jupiter will be transiting over 7th lord from Moon. 8th year, Jupiter will be aspecting 7th house from 7th aspect. 9th year, Jupiter will be transiting over 7th lord. 10 year, Jupiter will have 5th aspect on 7th house. 11th year, Jupiter will be transiting 7th from Moon. 12th year, again Jupiter will be aspecting 7th lord.

 

Jupiter cycle repeats every 12 year, so it is safe to say that at almost any point of this person's life (born today at 12:06PM at Agra), Jupiter will be either aspecting 7th or 7th lord from Ascendant or Moon. 11/12 = 92% possibility. Even If we check the rule only from Ascendant (and ignore Moon), Jupiter will be aspecting 7th or 7th lord 9/12=75% of time. In other words, whatever year this person marries, double-transit will be able to justify it :-) Does Double Transit make any sense?

 

Thanks & Regards,Punit Pandey

 

On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 11:52 AM, R Satish <rsatish1942@ > wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Punit,

I refer to the book"ADVANCED TECHNIQUES OF ASTROLOGICAL

 

PREDICTIONS" edited Sri KN Rao.In one of the chapters 'Tajika Shastra and Marriage

timing of Event" by Dr R K Wishwakarma, he has given 8 rules for timing marriage date with

 

case studies. He validates 10 samples ,where Sat/Jup aspect 7th house/lord.

 

He adds further Venus/Mars interconnection on marriage date.

 

 

We can only try to minimise the number of rules,but cannot reduce

 

significantly, all introduced thru trial and error,like we are presently doing.

 

Regards,

 

 

 

Satish--- On Wed, 11/4/09, Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

 

 

Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com>Re: Re: Why Shri KN Rao's Double Transit doesn't make sense

@gro ups.com

 

 

Wednesday, November 4, 2009, 11:15 PM

 

 

Dear Mssumich,

 

Please note few points -

 

1. A method needs to be mathematically correct first before we can talk about predictive aspect of the method. As I mentioned this method is fundamentally flawed and doesn't make sense. I have mentioned the reason and would love to hear if somebody can show that I am missing something.

 

2. Double transit, as mentioned by Paul Manley, is different from what Shri KN Rao has used in his books. By Double-Transit, Shri KN Rao doesn't mean that both the planet should aspect one single sign, but one planet aspecting the house and other house lord (generally). As I demonstrated, this condition will match almost 100% of time and hence it makes this tool a good tool for post-mortem and justification. Though not useful for predictions.

 

3. If a method doesn't work, we should leave it and move on. If we will not accept that the method doesn't make sense, we can not discard it. By saying something like "we need to check dasa and yoga etc.", we want to prove it some way or other.. Why? If it doens't work, it doesn't work. We should not accpet anything blindly. There are quite a few teachings by Shri KN Rao that works and we should use them. Teachings that do not work, we should discard them..

 

4. I don not understand why you are mixing placidus with double-transit. Let us not mix both the threads. Though i guess that the way you asked your earlier question was not good for generating discussion. In my opinion, correct way for asking question is to present your own analysis and ask your question. If you are learner, you should present your detailed analysis. What is your analysis as per KP? What is your analysis as per Traditional? Saying that I am able to justify events using Traditional but not KP seems too vague a statement. I do not see reference of Sub in your post. I don't see reference of Nakshatra in your post. That doesn't qualify as a KP analysis and hence doesn't provoke any response. This I guess may be the reason you didn't get response.

 

Thanks & Regards,

Punit Pandey

 

On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 9:45 PM, mssumich <mssumich > wrote:

 

 

 

 

Hi PunitLike many of the 100s of tools that Jyotish gives - don't believe in all the techniques that one comes up with. From Paul Manley's website here is what he says"What you'll see in the following illustrations is how the sign(s) that gets the double transit will shift, generally from year to year. In fact, there are only two positions of Jupiter and Saturn that will not have the double transit phenomenon – when Jupiter is in the 8th or 12th house from Saturn. This means that 10 out of the 12 possible positions, or more than 80% of the time, there will be the double transit phenomenon happening in at least one sign, possibly two."

I have see this double transit work sometimes and sometimes not. Obviuosly we have to pay attention to sookshma transits (or finer transits) and just double transit.I urge some expert to answer my question on the Placidus house system for a chart that I put on the other day. One bhava covers 58 deg of zodiac, there are 3 planets in 8th house; This person is very succesful. I can explain every event using vedic astreology and nakshatra analysis. The moment I put 3 planets in 8th in this chart, I am lost.

For latititude that are closer to 66 deg N or S - I believe the Placidus system of houses give wierd house cusps(correct me if I am wrong). This actor was born in Scotland where latitude in 55deg. My question is for people born in such norhtern altitudes -what system works? Is it still Placidus wasy of calculating houses or something else. There should a clear answer from KP experts. I am hoping there is that person in this list.

thanks

 

 

 

 

 

@gro ups.com, Punit Pandey <punitp wrote:>> Dear Friends,>

> KP made timing an event much more easier. Though as a KP astrologer, I> always feel that it will be nice to have another complementary method by> which we can cross-check and confirm. In search of another such method for

> timing events, I looked into many methods and Shri KN Rao's double transit> is among them.> > I personally feel that it is merely a tool for post-mortem and not useful> for future predictions. Let us take an example of Marriage. Double-transit

> suggests that transiting Jupiter and Saturn will always be aspecting Natal> 7th and 7th lord at the time of marriage.> > Now Jupiter has three aspects - 5,7, and 9. So including its own position,

> it will be influencing four houses in any chart. Which means that at any> point of time the possibility of aspecting 7th is 33.33% and 7th lord is> also 33..33%. If we take Jupiter's influence on either 7th OR 7th lord,

> possibility will double from 4/12 to 8/12 or 66.66%. So at any time, we have> 66.66% possibility of Jupiter aspecting either 7th or 7th lord. In other> words, around 66% of time in one's life, we will see that Jupiter is

> influencing either 7th or 7th. Of course, this calculation doesn't consider> some of the possibility e.g. 7th lord is in 7th house itself. Anyways, I> have seen Shri KN Rao is also checking Moon for transit other than

> Ascendant. Which doubles the possibility and if somehow Jupiter is not> aspecting 7th and 7th lord counting from Lagna, it will aspect 7th or 7th> lord from Moon. So in any point of one's life, if take transit from Moon as

> well as Ascendant, it is almost certain that Jupiter will influencing either> 7th from ascendant, or 7th lord from ascendant, or 7th from Moon, or 7th> lord from Moon.> > Similarly, Saturn also has 3 aspects and the above write-up is true for

> Saturn as well. In other words, seeing the above possibility, I feel that> Double-Transit doesn't make sense at all.> > To sound this method sensible and experimental purpose, I checked reducing

> the possibility by checking transit only from Ascendant. If I do that way, I> have many cases where it fails.> > In other words, I do not find Double-transit theory useful at all.> > Thanks & Regards,

> > Punit Pandey> >

> On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 2:06 PM, aashish rai <raiaashish@. ..> wrote:> > >> >> > Dear Sundar,> >> > In classical astrology there are so many dashas, if vimshottari was only

> > required than why did Parashara muni talked about so many dashas. Other> > dashas like Yogini are showing it.> >> >> >> > Let's forget about DBAs for time being as per double transit theory of Shri

> > Kn rao marriage chances are high when transit Saturn and Jupiter aspect> > natal 1/7 axis or their natal lords. In rare cases 9th lord will be> > involved.> >> >> >

> > Natal chart,> >> > Jupier is aspecting natal 7th lord, lagna lord and Lagna> >> > Saturn is sitting in Lagna itself, aspecting 7th house> >> >> >

> >> > Won't be surprised if there is a child birth/pregency before end august> > 2010 !!!> >> > Regards,> > Aashish> >> > ------------ --------- ---------

> > ** Sundar <sundar190561@ ...>> >> > *To:* @gro ups.com

 

 

> > *Sent:* Wed, 4 November, 2009 10:31:33 AM> > *Subject:* Re: Post mortem analysis of marriage> >> >> >> > Dear Aashish> >> > I know you would say, venus is the UL lord, hence the marriage in venus

> > PAD. But did you see venus was debilitated on the day of marriage?> >> > Thanks....... .....Sundar> >> > @gro ups.com <%40. com>, aashish > > rai <raiaashish@ ...> wrote:> > >> > > Dear Sundarji,> > > I have just started learning KP and yet to pick up the basics. but if you> > use traditional astrology it's very clear. As this forum is for KP only I am

> > not elaborating.> > >> > > Regards,> > > Aashish> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > ____________ _________ _________ __

> > > Sundar <sundar190561@ ...>> > > @gro ups.com <%40. com>

 

> >> > > Sun, 1 November, 2009 10:59:22 PM> > > Post mortem analysis of marriage> > >> > >> > >> > > Dear Learned members

> > >> > > My neighbour go married on 21st Oct, 2009 between 9 to 10am. The transit> > of DBAS does not fully signify the event fully.> > >> > > dob: 25th Aug, 1979

> > > tob: 9.37 (rectified)> > > pob: Mumbai> > >> > > Time of birth reported is 9.22am> > > Ayanamsha : 23.28.58> > >> > > dasha/bukti/ antra

> > >> > > planet sgl stl sl> > > (MD)rahu(11) sun(11,12) venus(11,2-9) venus(11,2-9)> > > (AD)ketu(5) sat(12,5-6) rahu(11) venus(11,2-9)> > > (PAD)venus(11, 2-9) sun(11,12) ketu(5) jupiter(11,4- 7)

> > >> > > rahu=sun(11, 12)> > > ketu=saturn( 12,5-6)> > >> > > Marriage on 21st October 2009 between 9 am to 10 am> > >> > > planet sgl stl sl

> > > (MD)rahu(4) sat(12,5-6) sun(1,12) jupiter(5,4- 7)> > > (AD)ketu(10) moon(2,11) jupiter(5,4- 7) rahu-MD(4)> > > (PAD)venus(12, 2-9) mer(1,1-10) moon(2,11) rahu-MD(4)> > >

> > > sun venus(12,2-9) mars(10,3-8) venus(12,2-9)> > > moon mars(10,3-8) sat(12,5-6) venus(12,2-9)> > >> > > Baed on the above it is seen that MD/AD/PAD does not fully signify DBAS

> > (except for ketu, which is rahu's sub.> > >> > > In the light of the above how do we reconcile the timing of marriage.> > >> > > Thanks...... ...Sundar

> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > Keep up with people you care about with India Mail. Learn how. http://in.overview.

> > mail.. com/connectmore<http://in.overview. mail.. com/connectmore>> > >> >

> >> > ------------ --------- ---------> > Connect more, do more and share more with India Mail. Learn more<http://in.rd. / tagline_galaxy_ 3/*http:/ /in.overview. mail... com/>

> > .> >> > > >>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Atul ji & Friends,

 

There is non-mathematical way of checking the possibility. Take any chart and check transit for a fixed date for each year. See how many times you find one of the condition matching. If it happens too often, it means there is something wrong with the rule.

 

89% seems way to high, in my opinion. If it can be really called a rule, the percentage should not be higher than few percent (say 10% maximum). I wonder whether I am making big mistake in calculation, or all these astrologers are fooling (knowingly or unknowingly) themselves or others by creating such a relaxed rule. I hope more responses to my email will be able to clarify it.

 

Aspect on 7 houses in place of 8 houses will not make much difference in calculation. The problem with more fundamental reasons that conditions are matching too often.

 

Either my calculations are all incorrect or the rules are all incorrect. If the rules are incorrect, we should not defend them and retire them. If the calculations are incorrect, it should be shown. Whether without dasa or with dasa, a rule doesn't make sense if it matches 89% of one's life time. I hope you are in agreement with me.

 

I request everyone to give some time to check my calculation and also check the rule on practical charts and see how often it matches. I hope we will be able to conclude something soon.

Thanks & Regards,Punit Pandey

On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 4:58 PM, atul m <atulmaydeo wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Punitji and AllI didn't get time to verify your % calculation but breeze thr' your response and following are my thoughts - 1. Retrogression planet aspect from previous house so do not include previous but consider only aspect so 7 aspects. (Usually, Jupiter retrogression is NOT considered auspicious for marriage and child but it is still under research.)

2. may be I have not articulated well but It is assume that Only Transit cannot predict timing of marriage - RegardsAtul Maydeo. --- On Sat, 11/7/09, Punit Pandey <punitp wrote:

 

Punit Pandey <punitpRe: Re: Why Shri KN Rao's Double Transit doesn't make sense

Saturday, November 7, 2009, 12:01 PM

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Atul ji & Friends,

 

Let us have a look at the rule you have suggested. The broader rule is -

 

// Saturn & Jupiter -      Should have in transit aspected or transited over:     a) Lagna and 7th House; or      b) Lagna and 7th Lord; or     c) Lagna lord and 7th house or     d) Lagna lord and 7th lord

(Saturn within 27 months and Jupiter within 12 months)

Note - Retrograde planets aspect from previous house as well. //

 

Now, as I mentioned in my earlier Jupiter and Saturn at any time influence four houses - three by aspects and one by placement. Which means that the probability for aspecting any house will be 4/12 i.e. 1/3 or 33.33%. So the probability for any condition (a to d) will be  - 1/3 X 1/3 = 1/9 = 11.11%. But there is greater possibility due to the retrogression rule.

 

But we are saying when a planet is retrograde, the aspect will be counted from previous house as well i.e. planet will be aspecting 8 houses in case it is retrograde. Jupiter and Saturn are retrograde when they are 5 to 9 house away from Sun. In other words they are retrograde in 5 houses and direct in 7 houses from Sun. We can say roughly they remain retrograde 5/12 % 100 = 41.66 percent of time in the cycle (of course this is generic assumption and I have not checked average time for retrogression for these two planets).

 

So the revised probability of one planet aspecting one house will be -

 

(4 X  7 / 12 + 8 X 5 / 12) / 12 = 68/144 = 47.22%.

 

Possibility for both the planets aspecting any two houses -

 

68 / 144 X 68 / 144 = 22.29%

 

So the possibility that any of these conditions to be true -

 

     a) Lagna and 7th House; or      b) Lagna and 7th Lord; or     c) Lagna lord and 7th house or     d) Lagna lord and 7th lord

= 0.223 X 4 = .8919 = 89.19%

 

In other words, possibility of one of the above conditions to be true is almost 89% time in once life. If a person has life span of 100 years, we will find one of the above condition fulfilling 89% of time.

 

Do you still think that the rule quoted by you make any sense? A rule which is almost always true in once's life can really be called a rule? or I am missing something?

Thanks & Regards,Punit Pandey

 

 

 

 

On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 2:39 AM, atul m <atulmaydeo > wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear AllI know this is not Parashari system forum but discussion started on Double transit of K N Rao so thought of sharing precise and complete details on this as per my knowledge and considering researched output from various eminent astrologers like M N Kedar, K N Rao, S N Kapoor, J N Gupta and Others -

Four Tier Scheme of Composite Transit for Marriage Timings as per eminent astrologers like M N Kedar, K N Rao (although K N Rao further ratifies with Jaimini system as well apart from Parashari) and others as per below -

1. Saturn & Jupiter -      Should have in transit aspected or transited over:     a) Lagna and 7th House; or      b) Lagna and 7th Lord; or     c) Lagna lord and 7th house or     d) Lagna lord and 7th lord

(saturn within 27 months and jupiter within 12 months)2. Jupiter -      a) Natal Venus and 5th house/lord or     b) 5th house and 9th house or     c) 5th lord and 9th house or     d) 5th house and 9th lord or

     e) 5th lord and 9th lord3. Mars - should have in transit covered within six months:     a) what saturn and Jupiter must do, see(1) above; and      b) what jupiter must do see (2) above4. The 7th lord -

     the 7th lord, in transit within 40 days of any marriage must establish contact with any of the following:     a) the 11th lord     b) the 9th lord     c) the lagna lordAlso, at the time of marriage the lords of 7th, 9th, 5th and lagna will be mutually connected (P-position, A- aspect, C-conjunction)  and in most of the cases these will be around 7th, lagna or their lords.

Note - Retrograde planets aspect from previous house as well.The results are very positive (more than 90%) with the above schemes after applying on large number of horoscopes for predicting marriage timings.

if you tie-up with Jaimini dasha system then results are extreamly positive (97-98%).Although, normally it ties-up with Vimshottari Dasha system by all Parashari astrologers.Important - This applies considering horoscope does not have marriage denial features and in case of delayed horoscope, marriage turns up in 2nd round or some time 3rd round saturn and Jupiter transit as per above scheme.

Although, marriage denial and very delayed (computing delay fators) is a seprate topic.Also, you may have noticed that moon or aspect from moon is NOT considered in this rule for predicting marriage timing.

Hope this information is useful to all interested members.RegardsAtul Maydeo.(if you haven't tried, you haven't lived so keep trying...) --- On Fri, 11/6/09, Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

 

 

 

 

Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com>Re: Re: Why Shri KN Rao's Double Transit doesn't make sense

@gro ups.com

 

 

Friday, November 6, 2009, 12:02 AM

 

 

 

Dear Satish,

 

So the rule for marriage you are suggesting is -

 

Condition 1. Jupiter should aspect ascendant or 7th house and Saturn should aspect Moon or 7th house from Moon

Condition 2. Saturn should aspect ascendant or 7th house and Jupiter should aspect Moon or 7th house from Moon

 

One of the above condition should be fulfilled. Is it what you are suggesting?

 

By the way, as I mentioned earlier, my observation was based on Shri KN Rao's teaching of Saturn and Jupiter's aspect on 7th and 7th lord. What you are telling seems different. Anyways, I'll try it out sometime and see.

Thanks & Regards,Punit Pandey

 

On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 7:30 PM, R Satish <rsatish1942@ > wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Dear Punit,

                  What you say about Jup is perfect  and easy to understand. When you take the Simultaneous transit of Sat over Lagna/7th or Moon/7th,these percentages get affected.

To clarify if Jup is aspecting Lagn/7th then Sat must aspect Moon/7th to fulfill the requirements.

 

                  As I mentioned,these happenings are not over 60% consistently. If it were so it would become a simple rule all emcompassing. To improve the % factor Venus/mars have been brought into the picture.

 

                  Even in KP,for marriages, we started with 2,7,11 houses. Later it became 2, 5,7 11 Astro secrets Pt 1).   Then we added 5,8 houses to 2,7,11. Khullar has his rules so does Baskaran.. To add to this confusion, we added sub-sub theories.

 

                  It is a matter of time when the original formula would undergo such transformation, we  would be unable to recognize the original.

 

                   Whether to use it for prediction or postmortem is a personal  choice.Post mortem is easier to handle.However for predictions, we need the skills to try for corroboration  one or more of these combinations for best-fit.

 

                   I for one, attempt to use KP + some others including Double-Transit  of Jup/Sat (as I understand).

 

                   Failed predictions are a part of the game. I humbly accept,I am still a

 learner and have many more miles to go.

 

                   Regards,

 

                   Satish

 

                  

 

 

 

 

                   --- On Thu, 11/5/09, Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

 

 

Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com>Re: Re: Why Shri KN Rao's Double Transit doesn't make sense

@gro ups.com

 

 

Thursday, November 5, 2009, 12:22 PM

 

 

 

Dear Satish,

 

What I am trying to convey that the rule will be true at any piont of time in one's life because it is too vague. Please go through my earlier email on this topic. The rule can not only justify marriage in 10 charts but in any chart.

 

Let us take today's chart as an example taking Leo as ascedant (12:06PM, Agra). Saturn is 7th lord from Leo and 7th sign from Leo is Aquarius.

 

Jupiter is aspecting 7th lord Saturn (1st year).. Next year (2nd year), Jupiter will be transiting over 7th house. Next year to that (3rd year), Jupiter will again 7th aspecting 7th lord. 4th year, there will no aspect on 7th and 7th lord. 5th year Jupiter will have 5th aspect on 7th lord. 6th year, Jupiter will be aspecting 7th house. 7th year, Jupiter will be transiting over 7th lord from Moon. 8th year, Jupiter will be aspecting 7th house from 7th aspect. 9th year, Jupiter will be transiting over 7th lord. 10 year, Jupiter will have 5th aspect on 7th house. 11th year, Jupiter will be transiting 7th from Moon. 12th year, again Jupiter will be aspecting 7th lord.

 

Jupiter cycle repeats every 12 year, so it is safe to say that at almost any point of this person's life (born today at 12:06PM at Agra), Jupiter will be either aspecting 7th or 7th lord from Ascendant or Moon. 11/12 = 92% possibility. Even If we check the rule only from Ascendant (and ignore Moon), Jupiter will be aspecting 7th or 7th lord 9/12=75% of time.  In other words, whatever year this person marries, double-transit will be able to justify it :-) Does Double Transit make any sense?

 

Thanks & Regards,Punit Pandey

 

On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 11:52 AM, R Satish <rsatish1942@ > wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Dear Punit,

                 I refer to the book " ADVANCED TECHNIQUES OF ASTROLOGICAL 

 

 PREDICTIONS " edited Sri KN Rao.In one of the chapters 'Tajika Shastra and Marriage 

  

timing of Event " by Dr R K Wishwakarma, he has given 8 rules for timing marriage date with 

 

case studies. He validates 10 samples ,where Sat/Jup aspect 7th house/lord.

 

 He adds further Venus/Mars interconnection on marriage date.

 

 

                    We can only try to  minimise  the  number of rules,but cannot reduce 

 

significantly, all introduced  thru trial and error,like we are presently doing.

 

                     Regards,

 

 

 

                     Satish--- On Wed, 11/4/09, Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

 

 

Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com>Re: Re: Why Shri KN Rao's Double Transit doesn't make sense

@gro ups.com

 

 

Wednesday, November 4, 2009, 11:15 PM

 

 

 

Dear Mssumich,

 

Please note few points -

 

1. A method needs to be mathematically correct first before we can talk about predictive aspect of the method. As I mentioned this method is fundamentally flawed and doesn't make sense. I have mentioned the reason and would love to hear if somebody can show that I am missing something.

 

2. Double transit, as mentioned by Paul Manley, is different from what Shri KN Rao has used in his books. By Double-Transit, Shri KN Rao doesn't mean that both the planet should aspect one single sign, but one planet aspecting the house and other house lord (generally). As I demonstrated, this condition will match almost 100% of time and hence it makes this tool a good tool for post-mortem and justification. Though not useful for predictions.

 

3. If a method doesn't work, we should leave it and move on. If we will not accept that the method doesn't make sense, we can not discard it. By saying something like  " we need to check dasa and yoga etc. " , we want to prove it some way or other.. Why? If it doens't work, it doesn't work. We should not accpet anything blindly. There are quite a few teachings by Shri KN Rao that works and we should use them. Teachings that do not work, we should discard them..

 

4. I don not understand why you are mixing placidus with double-transit. Let us not mix both the threads. Though i guess that the way you asked your earlier question was not good for generating discussion. In my opinion, correct way for asking question is to present your own analysis and ask your question. If you are learner, you should present your detailed analysis. What is your analysis as per KP? What is your analysis as per Traditional? Saying that I am able to justify events using Traditional but not KP seems too vague a statement. I do not see reference of Sub in your post. I don't see reference of Nakshatra in your post. That doesn't qualify as a KP analysis and hence doesn't provoke any response.  This I guess may be the reason you didn't get response.

 

Thanks & Regards,

Punit Pandey

 

On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 9:45 PM, mssumich <mssumich > wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

Hi PunitLike many of the 100s of tools that Jyotish gives - don't believe in all the techniques that one comes up with. From Paul Manley's website here is what he says " What you'll see in the following illustrations is how the sign(s) that gets the double transit will shift, generally from year to year. In fact, there are only two positions of Jupiter and Saturn that will not have the double transit phenomenon – when Jupiter is in the 8th or 12th house from Saturn. This means that 10 out of the 12 possible positions, or more than 80% of the time, there will be the double transit phenomenon happening in at least one sign, possibly two. "

I have see this double transit work sometimes and sometimes not. Obviuosly we have to pay attention to sookshma transits (or finer transits) and just double transit.I urge some expert to answer my question on the Placidus house system for a chart that I put on the other day. One bhava covers 58 deg of zodiac, there are 3 planets in 8th house; This person is very succesful. I can explain every event using vedic astreology and nakshatra analysis. The moment I put 3 planets in 8th in this chart, I am lost.

For latititude that are closer to 66 deg N or S - I believe the Placidus system of houses give wierd house cusps(correct me if I am wrong). This actor was born in Scotland where latitude in 55deg. My question is for people born in such norhtern altitudes -what system works? Is it still Placidus wasy of calculating houses or something else. There should a clear answer from KP experts. I am hoping there is that person in this list.

thanks

 

 

 

 

 

@gro ups.com, Punit Pandey <punitp wrote:>> Dear Friends,>

> KP made timing an event much more easier. Though as a KP astrologer, I> always feel that it will be nice to have another complementary method by> which we can cross-check and confirm. In search of another such method for

> timing events, I looked into many methods and Shri KN Rao's double transit> is among them.> > I personally feel that it is merely a tool for post-mortem and not useful> for future predictions. Let us take an example of Marriage. Double-transit

> suggests that transiting Jupiter and Saturn will always be aspecting Natal> 7th and 7th lord at the time of marriage.> > Now Jupiter has three aspects - 5,7, and 9. So including its own position,

> it will be influencing four houses in any chart. Which means that at any> point of time the possibility of aspecting 7th is 33.33% and 7th lord is> also 33..33%. If we take Jupiter's influence on either 7th OR 7th lord,

> possibility will double from 4/12 to 8/12 or 66.66%. So at any time, we have> 66.66% possibility of Jupiter aspecting either 7th or 7th lord. In other> words, around 66% of time in one's life, we will see that Jupiter is

> influencing either 7th or 7th. Of course, this calculation doesn't consider> some of the possibility e.g. 7th lord is in 7th house itself. Anyways, I> have seen Shri KN Rao is also checking Moon for transit other than

> Ascendant. Which doubles the possibility and if somehow Jupiter is not> aspecting 7th and 7th lord counting from Lagna, it will aspect 7th or 7th> lord from Moon. So in any point of one's life, if take transit from Moon as

> well as Ascendant, it is almost certain that Jupiter will influencing either> 7th from ascendant, or 7th lord from ascendant, or 7th from Moon, or 7th> lord from Moon.> > Similarly, Saturn also has 3 aspects and the above write-up is true for

> Saturn as well. In other words, seeing the above possibility, I feel that> Double-Transit doesn't make sense at all.> > To sound this method sensible and experimental purpose, I checked reducing

> the possibility by checking transit only from Ascendant. If I do that way, I> have many cases where it fails.> > In other words, I do not find Double-transit theory useful at all.> > Thanks & Regards,

> > Punit Pandey> >

> On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 2:06 PM, aashish rai <raiaashish@. ..> wrote:> > >> >> > Dear Sundar,> >> > In classical astrology there are so many dashas, if vimshottari was only

> > required than why did Parashara muni talked about so many dashas. Other> > dashas like Yogini are showing it.> >> >> >> > Let's forget about DBAs for time being as per double transit theory of Shri

> > Kn rao marriage chances are high when transit Saturn and Jupiter aspect> > natal 1/7 axis or their natal lords. In rare cases 9th lord will be> > involved.> >> >> >

> > Natal chart,> >> > Jupier is aspecting natal 7th lord, lagna lord and Lagna> >> > Saturn is sitting in Lagna itself, aspecting 7th house> >> >> >

> >> > Won't be surprised if there is a child birth/pregency before end august> > 2010 !!!> >> > Regards,> > Aashish> >> > ------------ --------- ---------

> > ** Sundar <sundar190561@ ...>> >> > *To:* @gro ups.com

 

 

> > *Sent:* Wed, 4 November, 2009 10:31:33 AM> > *Subject:* Re: Post mortem analysis of marriage> >> >> >> > Dear Aashish> >> > I know you would say, venus is the UL lord, hence the marriage in venus

> > PAD. But did you see venus was debilitated on the day of marriage?> >> > Thanks....... .....Sundar> >> > @gro ups.com <%40. com>, aashish > > rai <raiaashish@ ...> wrote:> > >> > > Dear Sundarji,> > > I have just started learning KP and yet to pick up the basics. but if you> > use traditional astrology it's very clear. As this forum is for KP only I am

> > not elaborating.> > >> > > Regards,> > > Aashish> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > ____________ _________ _________ __

> > > Sundar <sundar190561@ ...>> > > @gro ups.com <%40. com>

 

> >> > > Sun, 1 November, 2009 10:59:22 PM> > > Post mortem analysis of marriage> > >> > >> > >> > > Dear Learned members

> > >> > > My neighbour go married on 21st Oct, 2009 between 9 to 10am. The transit> > of DBAS does not fully signify the event fully.> > >> > > dob: 25th Aug, 1979

> > > tob: 9.37 (rectified)> > > pob: Mumbai> > >> > > Time of birth reported is 9.22am> > > Ayanamsha : 23.28.58> > >> > > dasha/bukti/ antra

> > >> > > planet sgl stl sl> > > (MD)rahu(11) sun(11,12) venus(11,2-9) venus(11,2-9)> > > (AD)ketu(5) sat(12,5-6) rahu(11) venus(11,2-9)> > > (PAD)venus(11, 2-9) sun(11,12) ketu(5) jupiter(11,4- 7)

> > >> > > rahu=sun(11, 12)> > > ketu=saturn( 12,5-6)> > >> > > Marriage on 21st October 2009 between 9 am to 10 am> > >> > > planet sgl stl sl

> > > (MD)rahu(4) sat(12,5-6) sun(1,12) jupiter(5,4- 7)> > > (AD)ketu(10) moon(2,11) jupiter(5,4- 7) rahu-MD(4)> > > (PAD)venus(12, 2-9) mer(1,1-10) moon(2,11) rahu-MD(4)> > >

> > > sun venus(12,2-9) mars(10,3-8) venus(12,2-9)> > > moon mars(10,3-8) sat(12,5-6) venus(12,2-9)> > >> > > Baed on the above it is seen that MD/AD/PAD does not fully signify DBAS

> > (except for ketu, which is rahu's sub.> > >> > > In the light of the above how do we reconcile the timing of marriage.> > >> > > Thanks...... ...Sundar

> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > Keep up with people you care about with India Mail. Learn how. http://in.overview.

> > mail.. com/connectmore<http://in.overview. mail.. com/connectmore>> > >> >

> >> > ------------ --------- ---------> > Connect more, do more and share more with India Mail. Learn more<http://in.rd. / tagline_galaxy_ 3/*http:/ /in.overview. mail... com/>

> > .> >> > > >>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear SatishSa aspects the 6th house from Virgo. He is running sa dasa so no marriage till sat moves to libraRegardsSujataR Satish <rsatish1942 Sent: Fri, 6 November, 2009 11:16:23 PMRe: Re: Why Shri KN Rao's Double

Transit doesn't make sense

 

 

Dear Atul,

 

I have provided an oppurtunity for member friends a live case for prediction.The method you may chose only give us your working,so we all learn.

 

Marriage date for a young man

 

Sept 13,1980 TOB 1559hrs Place Dadar Mumbai.

 

You may reply to the group or to me,should you feel restricted.

 

Regards,

 

Satish--- On Fri, 11/6/09, atul m <atulmaydeo > wrote:

atul m <atulmaydeo >Re: Re: Why Shri KN Rao's Double Transit doesn't make sense@gro ups.comFriday, November 6, 2009, 10:44 PM

 

 

 

 

Dear Punit JiBelow mentioned scheme is the extended and ratified version of Double transit ruleto predict marriage timings after carried lot of research out on large number of horoscopes.Most of these rules were used by eminent old Indian astrologers (unfortunately that knowledge is not passed on to the future generation properly) and they are giving very consistent out put on the same.This composite scheme is also mentioned in "Timing of Marriage" book written by various eminent astrlogers like M N Kedar, S N Kapoor etc.. and reviewed and acknowledged by K N Rao as mentioned in the book it-self.I have personally applied these schemes on large number of horoscopes and shared with lot of Parashari based astrologers, where they found it correct from what they have used and gives very good results.Please do not consider this response negatively as my intention is not to debate about whether it is a

variation or in-correct version of K N Rao double transit etc..but would like to give some references about this scheme and shed more light on applicability aspect so members can use the same to ameliorate further.End of the day, what matters is - consistent working RULE and knowledge of it's applicability.Thank you.RegardsAtul Maydeo.(if you haven't tried, you haven't lived so keep trying...)--- On Fri, 11/6/09, Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com>Re: Re: Why Shri KN Rao's Double Transit doesn't make sense@gro ups.comFriday, November 6, 2009, 11:00 AM

 

Dear Atul ji,

 

Thanks for sharing this information. Though this is the fourth variation for Double-Transit that we are seeing here. Also this is NOT what Shri KN Rao has taught in his books. As far as I remember, he has not used lagna in Double Transit?

 

Anyways, this is another rule that I'll check and come back.

Thanks & Regards,Punit Pandey

On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 2:39 AM, atul m <atulmaydeo > wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear AllI know this is not Parashari system forum but discussion started on Double transit of K N Rao so thought of sharing precise and complete details on this as per my knowledge and considering researched output from various eminent astrologers like M N Kedar, K N Rao, S N Kapoor, J N Gupta and Others - Four Tier Scheme of Composite Transit for Marriage Timings as per eminent astrologers like M N Kedar, K N Rao (although K N Rao further ratifies with Jaimini system as well apart from Parashari) and others as per below - 1. Saturn & Jupiter - Should have in transit aspected or transited over: a) Lagna and 7th House; or b) Lagna and 7th Lord; or c) Lagna lord and 7th house or d) Lagna lord and 7th lord (saturn within 27 months and jupiter within 12 months)2.

Jupiter - a) Natal Venus and 5th house/lord or b) 5th house and 9th house or c) 5th lord and 9th house or d) 5th house and 9th lord or e) 5th lord and 9th lord3. Mars - should have in transit covered within six months: a) what saturn and Jupiter must do, see(1) above; and b) what jupiter must do see (2) above4. The 7th lord - the 7th lord, in transit within 40 days of any marriage must establish contact with any of the following: a) the 11th lord b) the 9th lord c) the lagna lordAlso, at the time of marriage the lords of 7th, 9th, 5th and lagna will be mutually connected (P-position, A- aspect, C-conjunction) and in most of

the cases these will be around 7th, lagna or their lords.Note - Retrograde planets aspect from previous house as well.The results are very positive (more than 90%) with the above schemes after applying on large number of horoscopes for predicting marriage timings.if you tie-up with Jaimini dasha system then results are extreamly positive (97-98%).Although, normally it ties-up with Vimshottari Dasha system by all Parashari astrologers.Important - This applies considering horoscope does not have marriage denial features and in case of delayed horoscope, marriage turns up in 2nd round or some time 3rd round saturn and Jupiter transit as per above scheme.Although, marriage denial and very delayed (computing delay fators) is a seprate topic.Also, you may have noticed that moon or aspect from moon is NOT considered in this rule for predicting marriage timing.Hope this information is useful to all

interested members.RegardsAtul Maydeo.(if you haven't tried, you haven't lived so keep trying...) --- On Fri, 11/6/09, Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

 

Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com>Re: Re: Why Shri KN Rao's Double Transit doesn't make sense@gro ups.comFriday, November 6, 2009, 12:02 AM

 

 

Dear Satish,

 

So the rule for marriage you are suggesting is -

 

Condition 1. Jupiter should aspect ascendant or 7th house and Saturn should aspect Moon or 7th house from Moon

Condition 2. Saturn should aspect ascendant or 7th house and Jupiter should aspect Moon or 7th house from Moon

 

One of the above condition should be fulfilled. Is it what you are suggesting?

 

By the way, as I mentioned earlier, my observation was based on Shri KN Rao's teaching of Saturn and Jupiter's aspect on 7th and 7th lord. What you are telling seems different. Anyways, I'll try it out sometime and see.

Thanks & Regards,Punit Pandey

 

On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 7:30 PM, R Satish <rsatish1942@ > wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Punit,

What you say about Jup is perfect and easy to understand. When you take the Simultaneous transit of Sat over Lagna/7th or Moon/7th,these percentages get affected.

To clarify if Jup is aspecting Lagn/7th then Sat must aspect Moon/7th to fulfill the requirements.

 

As I mentioned,these happenings are not over 60% consistently. If it were so it would become a simple rule all emcompassing. To improve the % factor Venus/mars have been brought into the picture.

 

Even in KP,for marriages, we started with 2,7,11 houses. Later it became 2, 5,7 11 Astro secrets Pt 1). Then we added 5,8 houses to 2,7,11. Khullar has his rules so does Baskaran.. To add to this confusion, we added sub-sub theories.

 

It is a matter of time when the original formula would undergo such transformation, we would be unable to recognize the original.

 

Whether to use it for prediction or postmortem is a personal choice.Post mortem is easier to handle.However for predictions, we need the skills to try for corroboration one or more of these combinations for best-fit.

 

I for one, attempt to use KP + some others including Double-Transit of Jup/Sat (as I understand).

 

Failed predictions are a part of the game. I humbly accept,I am still a

learner and have many more miles to go.

 

Regards,

 

Satish

 

 

 

 

 

--- On Thu, 11/5/09, Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

 

 

Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com>Re: Re: Why Shri KN Rao's Double Transit doesn't make sense@gro ups.com

 

 

Thursday, November 5, 2009, 12:22 PM

 

 

Dear Satish,

 

What I am trying to convey that the rule will be true at any piont of time in one's life because it is too vague. Please go through my earlier email on this topic. The rule can not only justify marriage in 10 charts but in any chart.

 

Let us take today's chart as an example taking Leo as ascedant (12:06PM, Agra). Saturn is 7th lord from Leo and 7th sign from Leo is Aquarius.

 

Jupiter is aspecting 7th lord Saturn (1st year).. Next year (2nd year), Jupiter will be transiting over 7th house. Next year to that (3rd year), Jupiter will again 7th aspecting 7th lord. 4th year, there will no aspect on 7th and 7th lord. 5th year Jupiter will have 5th aspect on 7th lord. 6th year, Jupiter will be aspecting 7th house. 7th year, Jupiter will be transiting over 7th lord from Moon. 8th year, Jupiter will be aspecting 7th house from 7th aspect. 9th year, Jupiter will be transiting over 7th lord. 10 year, Jupiter will have 5th aspect on 7th house. 11th year, Jupiter will be transiting 7th from Moon. 12th year, again Jupiter will be aspecting 7th lord.

 

Jupiter cycle repeats every 12 year, so it is safe to say that at almost any point of this person's life (born today at 12:06PM at Agra), Jupiter will be either aspecting 7th or 7th lord from Ascendant or Moon. 11/12 = 92% possibility. Even If we check the rule only from Ascendant (and ignore Moon), Jupiter will be aspecting 7th or 7th lord 9/12=75% of time. In other words, whatever year this person marries, double-transit will be able to justify it :-) Does Double Transit make any sense?

 

Thanks & Regards,Punit Pandey

 

On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 11:52 AM, R Satish <rsatish1942@ > wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Punit,

I refer to the book"ADVANCED TECHNIQUES OF ASTROLOGICAL

 

PREDICTIONS" edited Sri KN Rao.In one of the chapters 'Tajika Shastra and Marriage

timing of Event" by Dr R K Wishwakarma, he has given 8 rules for timing marriage date with

 

case studies. He validates 10 samples ,where Sat/Jup aspect 7th house/lord.

 

He adds further Venus/Mars interconnection on marriage date.

 

 

We can only try to minimise the number of rules,but cannot reduce

 

significantly, all introduced thru trial and error,like we are presently doing.

 

Regards,

 

 

 

Satish--- On Wed, 11/4/09, Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

 

 

Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com>Re: Re: Why Shri KN Rao's Double Transit doesn't make sense

@gro ups.com

 

 

Wednesday, November 4, 2009, 11:15 PM

 

 

Dear Mssumich,

 

Please note few points -

 

1. A method needs to be mathematically correct first before we can talk about predictive aspect of the method. As I mentioned this method is fundamentally flawed and doesn't make sense. I have mentioned the reason and would love to hear if somebody can show that I am missing something.

 

2. Double transit, as mentioned by Paul Manley, is different from what Shri KN Rao has used in his books. By Double-Transit, Shri KN Rao doesn't mean that both the planet should aspect one single sign, but one planet aspecting the house and other house lord (generally). As I demonstrated, this condition will match almost 100% of time and hence it makes this tool a good tool for post-mortem and justification. Though not useful for predictions.

 

3. If a method doesn't work, we should leave it and move on. If we will not accept that the method doesn't make sense, we can not discard it. By saying something like "we need to check dasa and yoga etc.", we want to prove it some way or other.. Why? If it doens't work, it doesn't work. We should not accpet anything blindly. There are quite a few teachings by Shri KN Rao that works and we should use them. Teachings that do not work, we should discard them..

 

4. I don not understand why you are mixing placidus with double-transit. Let us not mix both the threads. Though i guess that the way you asked your earlier question was not good for generating discussion. In my opinion, correct way for asking question is to present your own analysis and ask your question. If you are learner, you should present your detailed analysis. What is your analysis as per KP? What is your analysis as per Traditional? Saying that I am able to justify events using Traditional but not KP seems too vague a statement. I do not see reference of Sub in your post. I don't see reference of Nakshatra in your post. That doesn't qualify as a KP analysis and hence doesn't provoke any response. This I guess may be the reason you didn't get response.

 

Thanks & Regards,

Punit Pandey

 

On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 9:45 PM, mssumich <mssumich > wrote:

 

 

 

 

Hi PunitLike many of the 100s of tools that Jyotish gives - don't believe in all the techniques that one comes up with. From Paul Manley's website here is what he says"What you'll see in the following illustrations is how the sign(s) that gets the double transit will shift, generally from year to year. In fact, there are only two positions of Jupiter and Saturn that will not have the double transit phenomenon – when Jupiter is in the 8th or 12th house from Saturn. This means that 10 out of the 12 possible positions, or more than 80% of the time, there will be the double transit phenomenon happening in at least one sign, possibly two."I have see this double transit work sometimes and sometimes not. Obviuosly we have to pay attention to sookshma transits (or finer transits) and just double transit.I urge some expert to answer my question on the Placidus house system for a chart that I put on the other day. One bhava covers 58

deg of zodiac, there are 3 planets in 8th house; This person is very succesful. I can explain every event using vedic astreology and nakshatra analysis. The moment I put 3 planets in 8th in this chart, I am lost.For latititude that are closer to 66 deg N or S - I believe the Placidus system of houses give wierd house cusps(correct me if I am wrong). This actor was born in Scotland where latitude in 55deg. My question is for people born in such norhtern altitudes -what system works? Is it still Placidus wasy of calculating houses or something else. There should a clear answer from KP experts. I am hoping there is that person in this list.thanks

 

 

 

 

 

@gro ups.com, Punit Pandey <punitp wrote:>> Dear Friends,> > KP made timing an event much more easier. Though as a KP astrologer, I> always feel that it will be nice to have another complementary method by> which we can cross-check and confirm. In search of another such method for> timing events, I looked into many methods and Shri KN Rao's double transit> is among them.> > I personally feel that it is merely a tool for post-mortem and not useful> for future predictions. Let us take an example of Marriage. Double-transit> suggests that transiting Jupiter and Saturn will always be aspecting Natal> 7th and 7th lord at the time of marriage.> > Now Jupiter has three aspects - 5,7, and 9. So including its own

position,> it will be influencing four houses in any chart. Which means that at any> point of time the possibility of aspecting 7th is 33.33% and 7th lord is> also 33..33%. If we take Jupiter's influence on either 7th OR 7th lord,> possibility will double from 4/12 to 8/12 or 66.66%. So at any time, we have> 66.66% possibility of Jupiter aspecting either 7th or 7th lord. In other> words, around 66% of time in one's life, we will see that Jupiter is> influencing either 7th or 7th. Of course, this calculation doesn't consider> some of the possibility e.g. 7th lord is in 7th house itself. Anyways, I> have seen Shri KN Rao is also checking Moon for transit other than> Ascendant. Which doubles the possibility and if somehow Jupiter is not> aspecting 7th and 7th lord counting from Lagna, it will aspect 7th or 7th> lord from Moon. So in any point of one's life, if take transit

from Moon as> well as Ascendant, it is almost certain that Jupiter will influencing either> 7th from ascendant, or 7th lord from ascendant, or 7th from Moon, or 7th> lord from Moon.> > Similarly, Saturn also has 3 aspects and the above write-up is true for> Saturn as well. In other words, seeing the above possibility, I feel that> Double-Transit doesn't make sense at all.> > To sound this method sensible and experimental purpose, I checked reducing> the possibility by checking transit only from Ascendant. If I do that way, I> have many cases where it fails.> > In other words, I do not find Double-transit theory useful at all.> > Thanks & Regards,> > Punit Pandey> >

> On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 2:06 PM, aashish rai <raiaashish@. ..> wrote:> > >> >> > Dear Sundar,> >> > In classical astrology there are so many dashas, if vimshottari was only> > required than why did Parashara muni talked about so many dashas. Other> > dashas like Yogini are showing it.> >> >> >> > Let's forget about DBAs for time being as per double transit theory of Shri> > Kn rao marriage chances are high when transit Saturn and Jupiter aspect> > natal 1/7 axis or their natal lords. In rare cases 9th lord will be> > involved.> >> >> >> > Natal chart,> >> > Jupier is aspecting natal 7th lord, lagna lord and Lagna> >> > Saturn is sitting in Lagna itself, aspecting 7th house> >> >>

>> >> > Won't be surprised if there is a child birth/pregency before end august> > 2010 !!!> >> > Regards,> > Aashish> >> > ------------ --------- ---------> > ** Sundar <sundar190561@ ...>> >> > *To:* @gro ups.com

 

 

> > *Sent:* Wed, 4 November, 2009 10:31:33 AM> > *Subject:* Re: Post mortem analysis of marriage> >> >> >> > Dear Aashish> >> > I know you would say, venus is the UL lord, hence the marriage in venus> > PAD. But did you see venus was debilitated on the day of marriage?> >> > Thanks...... . .....Sundar> >> > @gro ups.com <%40. com>, aashish > > rai <raiaashish@ ...> wrote:> > >> > > Dear Sundarji,> > > I have just started learning KP and yet to pick up the basics. but if you> > use traditional astrology it's very clear. As this forum is for KP only I am> > not elaborating.> > >> > > Regards,> > > Aashish> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > ____________ _________ _________ __> > > Sundar <sundar190561@ ...>> > > @gro ups.com <%40. com>

 

> >> > > Sun, 1 November, 2009 10:59:22 PM> > > Post mortem analysis of marriage> > >> > >> > >> > > Dear Learned members> > >> > > My neighbour go married on 21st Oct, 2009 between 9 to 10am. The transit> > of DBAS does not fully signify the event fully.> > >> > > dob: 25th Aug, 1979> > > tob: 9.37 (rectified)> > > pob: Mumbai> > >> > > Time of birth reported is 9.22am> > > Ayanamsha : 23.28.58> > >> > > dasha/bukti/ antra> > >> > > planet sgl stl sl> > > (MD)rahu(11) sun(11,12) venus(11,2-9) venus(11,2-9)> > > (AD)ketu(5) sat(12,5-6) rahu(11) venus(11,2-9)> > > (PAD)venus(11, 2-9) sun(11,12) ketu(5) jupiter(11,4-

7)> > >> > > rahu=sun(11, 12)> > > ketu=saturn( 12,5-6)> > >> > > Marriage on 21st October 2009 between 9 am to 10 am> > >> > > planet sgl stl sl> > > (MD)rahu(4) sat(12,5-6) sun(1,12) jupiter(5,4- 7)> > > (AD)ketu(10) moon(2,11) jupiter(5,4- 7) rahu-MD(4)> > > (PAD)venus(12, 2-9) mer(1,1-10) moon(2,11) rahu-MD(4)> > >> > > sun venus(12,2-9) mars(10,3-8) venus(12,2-9)> > > moon mars(10,3-8) sat(12,5-6) venus(12,2-9)> > >> > > Baed on the above it is seen that MD/AD/PAD does not fully signify DBAS> > (except for ketu, which is rahu's sub.> > >> > > In the light of the above how do we reconcile the timing of marriage.> > >> > > Thanks...... ...Sundar> > >> > >> >

>> > >> > >> > > Keep up with people you care about with India Mail. Learn how. http://in.overview.> > mail.. com/connectmore<http://in.overview. mail.. com/connectmore>> > >> >> >> > ------------ --------- ---------> > Connect more, do more and share more with India Mail. Learn more<http://in.rd. / tagline_galaxy_ 3/*http:/ /in.overview. mail... com/>> > .> >> > > >>

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Homepage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear All,

 

Namaskar ,

 

First of all double transit theory has been tested by hundreds of students, who

learnt and follow shri K n Rao tested methodologies, [even by me several times

as a professional astrologer].

 

In Traditional astrology only transit does not matter completely, we have to see

many other aspects and riders, even at transit Astakvarge plays an important

role.

 

Secondly 7th house does not only limited to first marriage. It has several other

significance. To see which significance is going to fructity we must also look

the 7th house of all other divisional charts.

 

OKAY, i will give you one more sutra to check the possibility of marriage which

also works 60%, just see when saturn has Rasi aspect (jaimini aspect) on the

Dara Karak planet.

 

For any new comer in KP system, one will get confused by seeing many houses

getting activated in any set of DBAS and can come to many possibilities. But by

proper practice and constant learning this type of doubts gets cleared.

 

In short i will say that the most secret of Nadi principles of 'Double transit

of saturn and jupiter' is ONLY exposed by shri K N Rao to the world at large

with many proofs. Before it was practiced very secretly by very very few

astrologer in India.

 

Thankyou,

Regards,

Vijay Goel

Jaipur.

 

, Luther Rath <rathluther wrote:

>

> Dear sir,

> No one denies Astrology to be a devine Science. In fact it is. But when it is

a science, it definitely bases on Mathematics. From beginning of casting of a

horoscope we all use mathematics. For determining the position os Planets in the

heaven we use mathematics. And why diregard mathematics while going for

prediction? Punitji is right in saying that 'Double Transit " could be seen in

most of the charts as per rule of posibilities. So it cannot be a tool for

predictions of marriage. He also says, it helps in post mortem cases. If any one

supports this method let him predict 5 cases of marriage and prove it. Let us

end the theoritical discussion on this issue but face it and prove it in

practice. I do not mean to hurt any one but wish to come to the right track of

learning.

> With due regards to all.

> Dr. Rath 

>

>

>

>

> ________________________________

> R Satish <rsatish1942

>

> Thu, November 5, 2009 11:27:00 AM

> Re: Why Shri KN Rao's Double Transit doesn't make sense

>

>  

>   Dear Punit and friends,

>

>                    I would suggest we also examine Lagna/7th  or

Moon/7th being  aspected by both Jup and Sat simultaneously. Additionally on

the day of marriage,Venus aspects Mars.

>

>                    These will improve the strike rate. In any case %

adove 60 is a myth  on CONSISTENT basis.

>

>

>                     We trying to make a difficult job

easier.Astrology cannot be reduced to mathematics, once we consider it a divine

science.

>

>                     Regards,

>

>                     ; Satish

>

>                     

>                     

> --- On Wed, 11/4/09, Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

>

>

> >Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com>

> > Why Shri KN Rao's Double Transit doesn't make sense

> >@gro ups.com

> >Wednesday, November 4, 2009, 6:52 PM

> >

> >

> > 

> >Dear Friends,

> >

> >KP made timing an event much more easier. Though as a KP astrologer, I always

feel that it will be nice to have another complementary method by which we can

cross-check and confirm. In search of another such method for timing events, I

looked into many methods and Shri KN Rao's double transit is among them.

> >

> >I personally feel that it is merely a tool for post-mortem and not useful for

future predictions. Let us take an example of Marriage. Double-transit suggests

that transiting Jupiter and Saturn will always be aspecting Natal 7th and 7th

lord at the time of marriage.

> >

> >Now Jupiter has three aspects - 5,7, and 9. So including its own position, it

will be influencing four houses in any chart. Which means that at any point of

time the possibility of aspecting 7th is 33.33% and 7th lord is also 33.33%. If

we take Jupiter's influence on either 7th OR 7th lord, possibility will double

from 4/12 to 8/12 or 66.66%. So at any time, we have 66.66% possibility of

Jupiter aspecting either 7th or 7th lord. In other words, around 66% of time in

one's life, we will see that Jupiter is influencing either 7th or 7th. Of

course, this calculation doesn't consider some of the possibility e.g. 7th lord

is in 7th house itself. Anyways, I have seen Shri KN Rao is also checking Moon

for transit other than Ascendant. Which doubles the possibility and if somehow

Jupiter is not aspecting 7th and 7th lord counting from Lagna, it will aspect

7th or 7th lord from Moon. So in any point of one's life, if take transit from

Moon as well as Ascendant,

> it is almost certain that Jupiter will influencing either 7th from ascendant,

or 7th lord from ascendant, or 7th from Moon, or 7th lord from Moon.

> >

> >Similarly, Saturn also has 3 aspects and the above write-up is true for

Saturn as well. In other words, seeing the above possibility, I feel that

Double-Transit doesn't make sense at all.

> >

> >To sound this method sensible and experimental purpose, I checked reducing

the possibility by checking transit only from Ascendant. If I do that way, I

have many cases where it fails.

> >

> >In other words, I do not find Double-transit theory useful at all.

> >

> >Thanks & Regards,

> >

> >Punit Pandey

> >

> >

> >

> >On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 2:06 PM, aashish rai <raiaashish (AT) (DOT) co.in> wrote:

> >

> > 

> >>Dear Sundar,

> >>

> >>In classical astrology there are so many dashas, if vimshottari was only

required than why did Parashara muni talked about so many dashas. Other dashas

like Yogini are showing it.

> >> 

> >>Let’s forget about DBAs for time being as per double transit theory of

Shri Kn rao  marriage chances are high when transit Saturn  and Jupiter aspect

natal 1/7 axis or their natal lords. In rare cases 9th lord will be involved.

> >> 

> >>Natal chart,

> >>Jupier is aspecting natal 7th lord, lagna lord and Lagna

> >>Saturn is sitting in Lagna itself, aspecting 7th house

> >> 

> >>

> >>

> >>

> >>Won’t be surprised if there is a child birth/pregency before end august

2010 !!!

> >>

> >>Regards,

> >>Aashish

> >>

> >>

> >>

> ________________________________

> Sundar <sundar190561@ .co. in>

> >>

> >>@gro ups.com

> >>Wed, 4 November, 2009 10:31:33 AM

> >> Re: Post mortem analysis of marriage

> >>

> >> 

> >>Dear Aashish

> >>

> >>I know you would say, venus is the UL lord, hence the marriage in venus PAD.

But did you see venus was debilitated on the day of marriage?

> >>

> >>Thanks...... ....Sundar

> >>

> >>

> >>@gro ups.com, aashish rai <raiaashish@ ...> wrote:

> >>>

> >>> Dear Sundarji,

> >>> I have just started learning KP and yet to pick up the basics. but if you

use traditional astrology it's very clear. As this forum is for KP only I am not

elaborating.

> >>>

> >>> Regards,

> >>> Aashish

> >>>

> >>>

> >>>

> >>>

> >>>

> >>> ____________ _________ _________ __

> >>> Sundar <sundar190561@ ...>

> >>> @gro ups.com

> >>

> >>> Sun, 1 November, 2009 10:59:22 PM

> >>> Post mortem analysis of marriage

> >>>

> >>>

> >>>

> >>> Dear Learned members

> >>>

> >>> My neighbour go married on 21st Oct, 2009 between 9 to 10am. The transit

of DBAS does not fully signify the event fully.

> >>>

> >>> dob: 25th Aug, 1979

> >>> tob: 9.37 (rectified)

> >>> pob: Mumbai

> >>>

> >>> Time of birth reported is 9.22am

> >>> Ayanamsha : 23.28.58

> >>>

> >>> dasha/bukti/ antra

> >>>

> >>> planet sgl stl sl

> >>> (MD)rahu(11) sun(11,12) venus(11,2-9) venus(11,2-9)

> >>> (AD)ketu(5) sat(12,5-6) rahu(11) venus(11,2-9)

> >>> (PAD)venus(11, 2-9) sun(11,12) ketu(5) jupiter(11,4- 7)

> >>>

> >>> rahu=sun(11, 12)

> >>> ketu=saturn( 12,5-6)

> >>>

> >>> Marriage on 21st October 2009 between 9 am to 10 am

> >>>

> >>> planet sgl stl sl

> >>> (MD)rahu(4) sat(12,5-6) sun(1,12) jupiter(5,4- 7)

> >>> (AD)ketu(10) moon(2,11) jupiter(5,4- 7) rahu-MD(4)

> >>> (PAD)venus(12, 2-9) mer(1,1-10) moon(2,11) rahu-MD(4)

> >>>

> >>> sun venus(12,2-9) mars(10,3-8) venus(12,2-9)

> >>> moon mars(10,3-8) sat(12,5-6) venus(12,2-9)

> >>>

> >>> Baed on the above it is seen that MD/AD/PAD does not fully signify DBAS

(except for ketu, which is rahu's sub.

> >>>

> >>> In the light of the above how do we reconcile the timing of marriage.

> >>>

> >>> Thanks...... ...Sundar

> >>>

> >>>

> >>>

> >>>

> >>>

> >>> Keep up with people you care about with India Mail. Learn how.

http://in.overview. mail.. com/connectmore

> >>>

> >>

> >>

> >>

> >>________________________________

> Connect more, do more and share more with India Mail. Learn more.

> >

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Vijay ji,

 

I myself tested this theory hundreds of time and didn't find it working at all. That is the reason I initiated this thread. I have given mathematical reasons why the theory is not correct. Please see some of recent posts on this topic by me -

/message/29125

/message/29198

 

Please go through them and tell me where my understanding is incorrect.

 

Let us not defend something which is mathematically incorrect. Either the theory or my calculation - one thing is definitely incorrect.

 

Also I tested the Sutra what you are referring about Char dasa aspect on DK. Again we should note that one rasi aspect three other rasis at any time (four signs influenced) so that this sutra is going to be true 33.33% anyways. If we include antardasa as well apart from mahadasa (aspects on two rasis), probability of aspect will increase to 66.66% and it will feel like working the way Double-Transit feels :-) Statistical study reveals that 60% percentage is misnomer (at least to me). Though let us not discuss this sutra, but finish discussion on Double Transit first.

 

Thanks & Regards,Punit Pandey

On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 12:14 AM, vijay.goel <goyalvj wrote:

 

 

 

 

Dear All,Namaskar ,First of all double transit theory has been tested by hundreds of students, who learnt and follow shri K n Rao tested methodologies, [even by me several times as a professional astrologer].

In Traditional astrology only transit does not matter completely, we have to see many other aspects and riders, even at transit Astakvarge plays an important role.Secondly 7th house does not only limited to first marriage. It has several other significance. To see which significance is going to fructity we must also look the 7th house of all other divisional charts.

OKAY, i will give you one more sutra to check the possibility of marriage which also works 60%, just see when saturn has Rasi aspect (jaimini aspect) on the Dara Karak planet.For any new comer in KP system, one will get confused by seeing many houses getting activated in any set of DBAS and can come to many possibilities. But by proper practice and constant learning this type of doubts gets cleared.

In short i will say that the most secret of Nadi principles of 'Double transit of saturn and jupiter' is ONLY exposed by shri K N Rao to the world at large with many proofs. Before it was practiced very secretly by very very few astrologer in India.

Thankyou,Regards,Vijay GoelJaipur. , Luther Rath <rathluther wrote:>> Dear sir, > No one denies Astrology to be a devine Science. In fact it is. But when it is a science, it definitely bases on Mathematics. From beginning of casting of a horoscope we all use mathematics. For determining the position os Planets in the heaven we use mathematics. And why diregard mathematics while going for prediction? Punitji is right in saying that 'Double Transit " could be seen in most of the charts as per rule of posibilities. So it cannot be a tool for predictions of marriage. He also says, it helps in post mortem cases. If any one supports this method let him predict 5 cases of marriage and prove it. Let us end the theoritical discussion on this issue but face it and prove it in practice. I do not mean to hurt any one but wish to come to the right track of learning. > With due regards to all.> Dr. Rath > > > > > ________________________________> R Satish <rsatish1942 > > Thu, November 5, 2009 11:27:00 AM> Re: Why Shri KN Rao's Double Transit doesn't make sense

> >  

>   Dear Punit and friends, > >                    I would suggest we also examine Lagna/7th  or Moon/7th being  aspected by both Jup and Sat simultaneously. Additionally on the day of marriage,Venus aspects Mars.

> >                    These will improve the strike rate. In any case % adove 60 is a myth  on CONSISTENT basis.> > >                     We trying to make a difficult job easier.Astrology cannot be reduced to mathematics, once we consider it a divine science. > >                     Regards,> >                     ; Satish> >                     >                     

 

> --- On Wed, 11/4/09, Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:> > > >Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com>> > Why Shri KN Rao's Double Transit doesn't make sense

> >@gro ups.com> >Wednesday, November 4, 2009, 6:52 PM> >> >> >  > >Dear Friends,> >

> >KP made timing an event much more easier. Though as a KP astrologer, I always feel that it will be nice to have another complementary method by which we can cross-check and confirm. In search of another such method for timing events, I looked into many methods and Shri KN Rao's double transit is among them.

> >> >I personally feel that it is merely a tool for post-mortem and not useful for future predictions. Let us take an example of Marriage. Double-transit suggests that transiting Jupiter and Saturn will always be aspecting Natal 7th and 7th lord at the time of marriage.

> >> >Now Jupiter has three aspects - 5,7, and 9. So including its own position, it will be influencing four houses in any chart. Which means that at any point of time the possibility of aspecting 7th is 33.33% and 7th lord is also 33.33%. If we take Jupiter's influence on either 7th OR 7th lord, possibility will double from 4/12 to 8/12 or 66.66%. So at any time, we have 66.66% possibility of Jupiter aspecting either 7th or 7th lord. In other words, around 66% of time in one's life, we will see that Jupiter is influencing either 7th or 7th. Of course, this calculation doesn't consider some of the possibility e.g. 7th lord is in 7th house itself. Anyways, I have seen Shri KN Rao is also checking Moon for transit other than Ascendant. Which doubles the possibility and if somehow Jupiter is not aspecting 7th and 7th lord counting from Lagna, it will aspect 7th or 7th lord from Moon. So in any point of one's life, if take transit from Moon as well as Ascendant,

> it is almost certain that Jupiter will influencing either 7th from ascendant, or 7th lord from ascendant, or 7th from Moon, or 7th lord from Moon. > >> >Similarly, Saturn also has 3 aspects and the above write-up is true for Saturn as well. In other words, seeing the above possibility, I feel that Double-Transit doesn't make sense at all.

> >> >To sound this method sensible and experimental purpose, I checked reducing the possibility by checking transit only from Ascendant. If I do that way, I have many cases where it fails. > >

> >In other words, I do not find Double-transit theory useful at all. > >> >Thanks & Regards,> >> >Punit Pandey> >> >> >> >On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 2:06 PM, aashish rai <raiaashish (AT) (DOT) co.in> wrote:

> >> > 

> >>Dear Sundar,> >>> >>In classical astrology there are so many dashas, if vimshottari was only required than why did Parashara muni talked about so many dashas. Other dashas like Yogini are showing it.

> >> > >>Let’s forget about DBAs for time being as per double transit theory of Shri Kn rao  marriage chances are high when transit Saturn  and Jupiter aspect natal 1/7 axis or their natal lords. In rare cases 9th lord will be involved.

> >>  > >>Natal chart,> >>Jupier is aspecting natal 7th lord, lagna lord and Lagna> >>Saturn is sitting in Lagna itself, aspecting 7th house> >> > >>

> >>> >>> >>Won’t be surprised if there is a child birth/pregency before end august 2010 !!! > >>> >>Regards,> >>Aashish> >>> >>> >>> ________________________________> Sundar <sundar190561@ .co. in>

> >>> >>@gro ups.com> >>Wed, 4 November, 2009 10:31:33 AM> >> Re: Post mortem analysis of marriage

> >>> >> 

 

 

> >>Dear Aashish> >>> >>I know you would say, venus is the UL lord, hence the marriage in venus PAD. But did you see venus was debilitated on the day of marriage?> >>

> >>Thanks...... ....Sundar> >>> >>> >>@gro ups.com, aashish rai <raiaashish@ ...> wrote:> >>>

> >>> Dear Sundarji,> >>> I have just started learning KP and yet to pick up the basics. but if you use traditional astrology it's very clear. As this forum is for KP only I am not elaborating.

> >>> > >>> Regards,> >>> Aashish> >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> ____________ _________ _________ __

> >>> Sundar <sundar190561@ ...>> >>> @gro ups.com > >>> >>> Sun, 1 November, 2009 10:59:22 PM

> >>> Post mortem analysis of marriage> >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Dear Learned members> >>> > >>> My neighbour go married on 21st Oct, 2009 between 9 to 10am. The transit of DBAS does not fully signify the event fully.

> >>> > >>> dob: 25th Aug, 1979> >>> tob: 9.37 (rectified)> >>> pob: Mumbai> >>> > >>> Time of birth reported is 9.22am> >>> Ayanamsha : 23.28.58

> >>> > >>> dasha/bukti/ antra> >>> > >>> planet sgl stl sl > >>> (MD)rahu(11) sun(11,12) venus(11,2-9) venus(11,2-9) > >>> (AD)ketu(5) sat(12,5-6) rahu(11) venus(11,2-9)

> >>> (PAD)venus(11, 2-9) sun(11,12) ketu(5) jupiter(11,4- 7)> >>> > >>> rahu=sun(11, 12)> >>> ketu=saturn( 12,5-6)> >>> > >>> Marriage on 21st October 2009 between 9 am to 10 am

> >>> > >>> planet sgl stl sl > >>> (MD)rahu(4) sat(12,5-6) sun(1,12) jupiter(5,4- 7)> >>> (AD)ketu(10) moon(2,11) jupiter(5,4- 7) rahu-MD(4)> >>> (PAD)venus(12, 2-9) mer(1,1-10) moon(2,11) rahu-MD(4)

> >>> > >>> sun venus(12,2-9) mars(10,3-8) venus(12,2-9)> >>> moon mars(10,3-8) sat(12,5-6) venus(12,2-9)> >>> > >>> Baed on the above it is seen that MD/AD/PAD does not fully signify DBAS (except for ketu, which is rahu's sub.

> >>> > >>> In the light of the above how do we reconcile the timing of marriage.> >>> > >>> Thanks...... ...Sundar> >>> > >>>

> >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Keep up with people you care about with India Mail. Learn how. http://in.overview. mail.. com/connectmore

> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>________________________________> Connect more, do more and share more with India Mail. Learn more.> >>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Punit ji,

 

Message number :

//In other words, around 66% of time in one's life, we will see that Jupiter is

influencing either 7th or 7th.//

 

Okay if i take is correct as per your mathematical calculation [ which could be

false if 7L is in 7H]

than also what is the problem, 7th house holds many significance, person is

continuously doing some karma and 7th house is 10th from 10 House, so

recognition of one's efforts are coming to one's life frequently.

 

I have already said that you have to look 7th house in other divisional charts

as well, especially D-9. For better tuning of this double transit you must also

look the navamsha position of this double transit, many more secrets will be

revealed.

 

While looking this transit you have to look Astakvarge points also.

There are many factors attached to it.

Few more pointers has been discussed in AIA by Manoj ji who does not belong to

KNRao camp like me :).

/message/27596

 

///Also I tested the Sutra what you are referring about Char dasa aspect on DK.

Again we should note that one rasi aspect three other rasis at any time (four

signs influenced) so that this sutra is going to be true 33.33% anyways. If we

include antardasa as well apart from mahadasa (aspects on two rasis),

probability of aspect will increase to 66.66% and it will feel like working the

way Double-Transit feels :-)///

 

I have not said to use any DASA \ ANTARDASA, again your understanding of this

context is incorrect.

 

Since this theory needs deep understanding over the subject as a whole, it

requires time and study. If many prominent astrologers in India are using double

transit for their prediction, it simply means that they have some more keys to

use it.

I have earlier said that double transit theory is rare Nadi technique which is

much popularised by Sri KnRao [not invented by him and learnt from his mother].

 

As this forum is more focus to discuss KP methods systematically and

scientifically, i am much interested in it only. I donot like to discuss

traditionally astrology here.

 

I really appreciates the esteemed astrologer [including you] here for removing

many mis-conception in KP and clearly defining and not mixing up the various

advance version of KP methods.

 

Thankyou,

Regards,

Vijay Goel

Jaipur

 

 

 

 

 

 

, Punit Pandey <punitp wrote:

>

> Dear Vijay ji,

>

> I myself tested this theory hundreds of time and didn't find it working at

> all. That is the reason I initiated this thread. I have given mathematical

> reasons why the theory is not correct. Please see some of recent posts on

> this topic by me -

> /message/29125

> /message/29198

>

> Please go through them and tell me where my understanding is incorrect.

>

> Let us not defend something which is mathematically incorrect. Either the

> theory or my calculation - one thing is definitely incorrect.

>

> Also I tested the Sutra what you are referring about Char dasa aspect on DK.

> Again we should note that one rasi aspect three other rasis at any time

> (four signs influenced) so that this sutra is going to be true 33.33%

> anyways. If we include antardasa as well apart from mahadasa (aspects on two

> rasis), probability of aspect will increase to 66.66% and it will feel like

> working the way Double-Transit feels :-) Statistical study reveals that 60%

> percentage is misnomer (at least to me). Though let us not discuss this

> sutra, but finish discussion on Double Transit first.

>

> Thanks & Regards,

>

> Punit Pandey

>

>

> On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 12:14 AM, vijay.goel <goyalvj wrote:

>

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Dear All,

> >

> > Namaskar ,

> >

> > First of all double transit theory has been tested by hundreds of students,

> > who learnt and follow shri K n Rao tested methodologies, [even by me several

> > times as a professional astrologer].

> >

> > In Traditional astrology only transit does not matter completely, we have

> > to see many other aspects and riders, even at transit Astakvarge plays an

> > important role.

> >

> > Secondly 7th house does not only limited to first marriage. It has several

> > other significance. To see which significance is going to fructity we must

> > also look the 7th house of all other divisional charts.

> >

> > OKAY, i will give you one more sutra to check the possibility of marriage

> > which also works 60%, just see when saturn has Rasi aspect (jaimini aspect)

> > on the Dara Karak planet.

> >

> > For any new comer in KP system, one will get confused by seeing many houses

> > getting activated in any set of DBAS and can come to many possibilities. But

> > by proper practice and constant learning this type of doubts gets cleared.

> >

> > In short i will say that the most secret of Nadi principles of 'Double

> > transit of saturn and jupiter' is ONLY exposed by shri K N Rao to the world

> > at large with many proofs. Before it was practiced very secretly by very

> > very few astrologer in India.

> >

> > Thankyou,

> > Regards,

> > Vijay Goel

> > Jaipur.

> >

> >

> > <%40>, Luther

> > Rath <rathluther@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Dear sir,

> > > No one denies Astrology to be a devine Science. In fact it is. But when

> > it is a science, it definitely bases on Mathematics. From beginning of

> > casting of a horoscope we all use mathematics. For determining the position

> > os Planets in the heaven we use mathematics. And why diregard mathematics

> > while going for prediction? Punitji is right in saying that 'Double Transit "

> > could be seen in most of the charts as per rule of posibilities. So it

> > cannot be a tool for predictions of marriage. He also says, it helps in

> > post mortem cases. If any one supports this method let him predict 5 cases

> > of marriage and prove it. Let us end the theoritical discussion on this

> > issue but face it and prove it in practice. I do not mean to hurt any one

> > but wish to come to the right track of learning.

> >

> > > With due regards to all.

> > > Dr. RathÂ

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > ________________________________

> > > R Satish <rsatish1942@>

> >

> > > <%40>

> > > Thu, November 5, 2009 11:27:00 AM

> > > Re: Why Shri KN Rao's Double Transit doesn't make

> > sense

> > >

> > > Â

> > > Â Â Dear Punit and friends,

> > >

> > > Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â I would suggest we also examine Lagna/7th

> >  or Moon/7th being  aspected by both Jup and Sat simultaneously.

> > Additionally on the day of marriage,Venus aspects Mars.

> > >

> > > Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â These will improve the strike rate. In any

> > case % adove 60 is a myth  on CONSISTENT basis.

> > >

> > >

> > > Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â We trying to make a difficult job

> > easier.Astrology cannot be reduced to mathematics, once we consider it a

> > divine science.

> >

> > >

> > > Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Regards,

> > >

> > > Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â ; Satish

> > >

> > > Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â

> > > Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â

> > > --- On Wed, 11/4/09, Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

> > >

> > >

> > > >Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com>

> > > > Why Shri KN Rao's Double Transit doesn't make

> > sense

> > > >@gro ups.com

> > > >Wednesday, November 4, 2009, 6:52 PM

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >Â

> > > >Dear Friends,

> > > >

> > > >KP made timing an event much more easier. Though as a KP astrologer, I

> > always feel that it will be nice to have another complementary method by

> > which we can cross-check and confirm. In search of another such method for

> > timing events, I looked into many methods and Shri KN Rao's double transit

> > is among them.

> > > >

> > > >I personally feel that it is merely a tool for post-mortem and not

> > useful for future predictions. Let us take an example of Marriage.

> > Double-transit suggests that transiting Jupiter and Saturn will always be

> > aspecting Natal 7th and 7th lord at the time of marriage.

> > > >

> > > >Now Jupiter has three aspects - 5,7, and 9. So including its own

> > position, it will be influencing four houses in any chart. Which means that

> > at any point of time the possibility of aspecting 7th is 33.33% and 7th lord

> > is also 33.33%. If we take Jupiter's influence on either 7th OR 7th lord,

> > possibility will double from 4/12 to 8/12 or 66.66%. So at any time, we have

> > 66.66% possibility of Jupiter aspecting either 7th or 7th lord. In other

> > words, around 66% of time in one's life, we will see that Jupiter is

> > influencing either 7th or 7th. Of course, this calculation doesn't consider

> > some of the possibility e.g. 7th lord is in 7th house itself. Anyways, I

> > have seen Shri KN Rao is also checking Moon for transit other than

> > Ascendant. Which doubles the possibility and if somehow Jupiter is not

> > aspecting 7th and 7th lord counting from Lagna, it will aspect 7th or 7th

> > lord from Moon. So in any point of one's life, if take transit from Moon as

> > well as Ascendant,

> > > it is almost certain that Jupiter will influencing either 7th from

> > ascendant, or 7th lord from ascendant, or 7th from Moon, or 7th lord from

> > Moon.

> > > >

> > > >Similarly, Saturn also has 3 aspects and the above write-up is true for

> > Saturn as well. In other words, seeing the above possibility, I feel that

> > Double-Transit doesn't make sense at all.

> > > >

> > > >To sound this method sensible and experimental purpose, I checked

> > reducing the possibility by checking transit only from Ascendant. If I do

> > that way, I have many cases where it fails.

> > > >

> > > >In other words, I do not find Double-transit theory useful at all.

> > > >

> > > >Thanks & Regards,

> > > >

> > > >Punit Pandey

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 2:06 PM, aashish rai <raiaashish (AT) (DOT) co.in>

> > wrote:

> > > >

> > > >Â

> > > >>Dear Sundar,

> > > >>

> > > >>In classical astrology there are so many dashas, if vimshottari was

> > only required than why did Parashara muni talked about so many dashas. Other

> > dashas like Yogini are showing it.

> > > >>Â

> > > >>Let’s forget about DBAs for time being as per double transit theory

> > of Shri Kn rao  marriage chances are high when transit Saturn  and Jupiter

> > aspect natal 1/7 axis or their natal lords. In rare cases 9th lord will be

> > involved.

> > > >>Â

> >

> > > >>Natal chart,

> > > >>Jupier is aspecting natal 7th lord, lagna lord and Lagna

> > > >>Saturn is sitting in Lagna itself, aspecting 7th house

> > > >>Â

> > > >>

> > > >>

> > > >>

> > > >>Won’t be surprised if there is a child birth/pregency before end

> > august 2010 !!!

> >

> > > >>

> > > >>Regards,

> > > >>Aashish

> > > >>

> > > >>

> > > >>

> > > ________________________________

> > > Sundar <sundar190561@ .co. in>

> > > >>

> > > >>@gro ups.com

> > > >>Wed, 4 November, 2009 10:31:33 AM

> > > >> Re: Post mortem analysis of marriage

> > > >>

> > > >>Â

> > > >>Dear Aashish

> > > >>

> > > >>I know you would say, venus is the UL lord, hence the marriage in venus

> > PAD. But did you see venus was debilitated on the day of marriage?

> > > >>

> > > >>Thanks...... ....Sundar

> > > >>

> > > >>

> > > >>@gro ups.com, aashish rai <raiaashish@ ...>

> > wrote:

> > > >>>

> > > >>> Dear Sundarji,

> > > >>> I have just started learning KP and yet to pick up the basics. but if

> > you use traditional astrology it's very clear. As this forum is for KP only

> > I am not elaborating.

> > > >>>

> > > >>> Regards,

> > > >>> Aashish

> > > >>>

> > > >>>

> > > >>>

> > > >>>

> > > >>>

> > > >>> ____________ _________ _________ __

> > > >>> Sundar <sundar190561@ ...>

> > > >>> @gro ups.com

> > > >>

> > > >>> Sun, 1 November, 2009 10:59:22 PM

> > > >>> Post mortem analysis of marriage

> > > >>>

> > > >>>

> > > >>>

> > > >>> Dear Learned members

> > > >>>

> > > >>> My neighbour go married on 21st Oct, 2009 between 9 to 10am. The

> > transit of DBAS does not fully signify the event fully.

> > > >>>

> > > >>> dob: 25th Aug, 1979

> > > >>> tob: 9.37 (rectified)

> > > >>> pob: Mumbai

> > > >>>

> > > >>> Time of birth reported is 9.22am

> > > >>> Ayanamsha : 23.28.58

> > > >>>

> > > >>> dasha/bukti/ antra

> > > >>>

> > > >>> planet sgl stl sl

> > > >>> (MD)rahu(11) sun(11,12) venus(11,2-9) venus(11,2-9)

> > > >>> (AD)ketu(5) sat(12,5-6) rahu(11) venus(11,2-9)

> > > >>> (PAD)venus(11, 2-9) sun(11,12) ketu(5) jupiter(11,4- 7)

> > > >>>

> > > >>> rahu=sun(11, 12)

> > > >>> ketu=saturn( 12,5-6)

> > > >>>

> > > >>> Marriage on 21st October 2009 between 9 am to 10 am

> > > >>>

> > > >>> planet sgl stl sl

> > > >>> (MD)rahu(4) sat(12,5-6) sun(1,12) jupiter(5,4- 7)

> > > >>> (AD)ketu(10) moon(2,11) jupiter(5,4- 7) rahu-MD(4)

> > > >>> (PAD)venus(12, 2-9) mer(1,1-10) moon(2,11) rahu-MD(4)

> > > >>>

> > > >>> sun venus(12,2-9) mars(10,3-8) venus(12,2-9)

> > > >>> moon mars(10,3-8) sat(12,5-6) venus(12,2-9)

> > > >>>

> > > >>> Baed on the above it is seen that MD/AD/PAD does not fully signify

> > DBAS (except for ketu, which is rahu's sub.

> > > >>>

> > > >>> In the light of the above how do we reconcile the timing of marriage.

> > > >>>

> > > >>> Thanks...... ...Sundar

> > > >>>

> > > >>>

> > > >>>

> > > >>>

> > > >>>

> > > >>> Keep up with people you care about with India Mail. Learn how.

> > http://in.overview. mail.. com/connectmore

> > > >>>

> > > >>

> > > >>

> > > >>

> > > >>________________________________

> > > Connect more, do more and share more with India Mail. Learn more.

> > > >

> > >

> >

> >

> >

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Vijay,

I am sad to observe that some people hail K.N.Rao's theory as very effective,while there is an equal number of people who do not think much of it...

Therefore,I suggest Vijayji,you should give examples of atleast 5 predictions,

made in advance,divining/predicting the correct date of marriage...using this theory of K.N.Rao...personally,as said earlier,i have been watching KNrao on TV...but he seems to discuss the rationalisation to suit his "theory" using only past events... !

Now you have a great opportunity to prove K.N.Rao and his theory correct...I am sure you will not like to miss it...

With best wishes,

Yogesh Lajmi.

GOOD LUCK !

--- On Sat, 11/7/09, vijay.goel <goyalvj wrote:

vijay.goel <goyalvj Re: Why Shri KN Rao's Double Transit doesn't make sense Date: Saturday, November 7, 2009, 6:44 PM

Dear All,Namaskar ,First of all double transit theory has been tested by hundreds of students, who learnt and follow shri K n Rao tested methodologies, [even by me several times as a professional astrologer].In Traditional astrology only transit does not matter completely, we have to see many other aspects and riders, even at transit Astakvarge plays an important role.Secondly 7th house does not only limited to first marriage. It has several other significance. To see which significance is going to fructity we must also look the 7th house of all other divisional charts.OKAY, i will give you one more sutra to check the possibility of marriage which also works 60%, just see when saturn has Rasi aspect (jaimini aspect) on the Dara Karak planet.For any new comer in KP system, one will get confused by seeing many houses getting activated in any set of DBAS and can come to many possibilities. But by

proper practice and constant learning this type of doubts gets cleared.In short i will say that the most secret of Nadi principles of 'Double transit of saturn and jupiter' is ONLY exposed by shri K N Rao to the world at large with many proofs. Before it was practiced very secretly by very very few astrologer in India.Thankyou,Regards,Vijay GoelJaipur.@gro ups.com, Luther Rath <rathluther@ ...> wrote:>> Dear sir, > No one denies Astrology to be a devine Science. In fact it is. But when it is a science, it definitely bases on Mathematics. From beginning of casting of a horoscope we all use mathematics. For determining the position os Planets in the heaven we use mathematics. And why diregard mathematics

while going for prediction? Punitji is right in saying that 'Double Transit" could be seen in most of the charts as per rule of posibilities. So it cannot be a tool for predictions of marriage. He also says, it helps in post mortem cases. If any one supports this method let him predict 5 cases of marriage and prove it. Let us end the theoritical discussion on this issue but face it and prove it in practice. I do not mean to hurt any one but wish to come to the right track of learning.> With due regards to all.> Dr. Rath > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __> R Satish <rsatish1942@ ...>> @gro ups.com> Thu, November 5, 2009 11:27:00 AM> Re:

Why Shri KN Rao's Double Transit doesn't make sense> >  >   Dear Punit and friends, > >           I would suggest we also examine Lagna/7th  or Moon/7th being  aspected by both Jup and Sat simultaneously. Additionally on the day of marriage,Venus aspects Mars.> >           These will improve the strike rate. In any case % adove 60 is a myth  on CONSISTENT basis.> > >            We trying to make a difficult job easier.Astrology cannot be reduced to mathematics, once we consider it a divine science.> >        Â

   Regards,> >            ; Satish> >            >            > --- On Wed, 11/4/09, Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:> > > >Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com>> > Why Shri KN Rao's Double Transit doesn't make sense> >@gro ups.com> >Wednesday, November 4, 2009, 6:52 PM> >> >> > > >Dear Friends,> >> >KP made timing an event much more easier. Though as a KP astrologer, I always feel that it will be nice to have another complementary method by which we

can cross-check and confirm. In search of another such method for timing events, I looked into many methods and Shri KN Rao's double transit is among them. > >> >I personally feel that it is merely a tool for post-mortem and not useful for future predictions. Let us take an example of Marriage. Double-transit suggests that transiting Jupiter and Saturn will always be aspecting Natal 7th and 7th lord at the time of marriage. > >> >Now Jupiter has three aspects - 5,7, and 9. So including its own position, it will be influencing four houses in any chart. Which means that at any point of time the possibility of aspecting 7th is 33.33% and 7th lord is also 33.33%. If we take Jupiter's influence on either 7th OR 7th lord, possibility will double from 4/12 to 8/12 or 66.66%. So at any time, we have 66.66% possibility of Jupiter aspecting either 7th or 7th lord. In other words, around 66% of time in one's life, we

will see that Jupiter is influencing either 7th or 7th. Of course, this calculation doesn't consider some of the possibility e.g. 7th lord is in 7th house itself. Anyways, I have seen Shri KN Rao is also checking Moon for transit other than Ascendant. Which doubles the possibility and if somehow Jupiter is not aspecting 7th and 7th lord counting from Lagna, it will aspect 7th or 7th lord from Moon. So in any point of one's life, if take transit from Moon as well as Ascendant,> it is almost certain that Jupiter will influencing either 7th from ascendant, or 7th lord from ascendant, or 7th from Moon, or 7th lord from Moon. > >> >Similarly, Saturn also has 3 aspects and the above write-up is true for Saturn as well. In other words, seeing the above possibility, I feel that Double-Transit doesn't make sense at all. > >> >To sound this method sensible and experimental purpose, I checked reducing the possibility

by checking transit only from Ascendant. If I do that way, I have many cases where it fails. > >> >In other words, I do not find Double-transit theory useful at all. > >> >Thanks & Regards,> >> >Punit Pandey> >> >> >> >On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 2:06 PM, aashish rai <raiaashish@ . co.in> wrote:> >> > > >>Dear Sundar,> >>> >>In classical astrology there are so many dashas, if vimshottari was only required than why did Parashara muni talked about so many dashas. Other dashas like Yogini are showing it. > >> > >>Let’s forget about DBAs for time being as per double transit theory of Shri Kn rao  marriage chances are high when transit Saturn  and Jupiter aspect natal 1/7 axis or their natal lords. In rare cases 9th lord will be

involved.> >> > >>Natal chart,> >>Jupier is aspecting natal 7th lord, lagna lord and Lagna> >>Saturn is sitting in Lagna itself, aspecting 7th house> >> > >>> >>> >>> >>Won’t be surprised if there is a child birth/pregency before end august 2010 !!!> >>> >>Regards,> >>Aashish> >>> >>> >>> ____________ _________ _________ __> Sundar <sundar190561@ .co. in> > >>> >>@gro ups.com> >>Wed, 4 November, 2009 10:31:33 AM> >> Re: Post mortem analysis of marriage> >>> >> > >>Dear Aashish> >>> >>I know you would say, venus is the UL lord, hence the

marriage in venus PAD. But did you see venus was debilitated on the day of marriage?> >>> >>Thanks.... .. ....Sundar> >>> >>> >>@gro ups.com, aashish rai <raiaashish@ ...> wrote:> >>>> >>> Dear Sundarji,> >>> I have just started learning KP and yet to pick up the basics. but if you use traditional astrology it's very clear. As this forum is for KP only I am not elaborating.> >>> > >>> Regards,> >>> Aashish> >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> ____________ _________ _________ __> >>> Sundar <sundar190561@ ...>> >>> @gro ups.com > >>> >>> Sun, 1 November, 2009 10:59:22 PM>

>>> Post mortem analysis of marriage> >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Dear Learned members> >>> > >>> My neighbour go married on 21st Oct, 2009 between 9 to 10am. The transit of DBAS does not fully signify the event fully.> >>> > >>> dob: 25th Aug, 1979> >>> tob: 9.37 (rectified)> >>> pob: Mumbai> >>> > >>> Time of birth reported is 9.22am> >>> Ayanamsha : 23.28.58> >>> > >>> dasha/bukti/ antra> >>> > >>> planet sgl stl sl > >>> (MD)rahu(11) sun(11,12) venus(11,2-9) venus(11,2-9) > >>> (AD)ketu(5) sat(12,5-6) rahu(11) venus(11,2-9)> >>> (PAD)venus(11, 2-9) sun(11,12) ketu(5) jupiter(11,4- 7)> >>>

> >>> rahu=sun(11, 12)> >>> ketu=saturn( 12,5-6)> >>> > >>> Marriage on 21st October 2009 between 9 am to 10 am> >>> > >>> planet sgl stl sl > >>> (MD)rahu(4) sat(12,5-6) sun(1,12) jupiter(5,4- 7)> >>> (AD)ketu(10) moon(2,11) jupiter(5,4- 7) rahu-MD(4)> >>> (PAD)venus(12, 2-9) mer(1,1-10) moon(2,11) rahu-MD(4)> >>> > >>> sun venus(12,2-9) mars(10,3-8) venus(12,2-9)> >>> moon mars(10,3-8) sat(12,5-6) venus(12,2-9)> >>> > >>> Baed on the above it is seen that MD/AD/PAD does not fully signify DBAS (except for ketu, which is rahu's sub.> >>> > >>> In the light of the above how do we reconcile the timing of marriage.> >>> > >>> Thanks...... ...Sundar> >>>

> >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Keep up with people you care about with India Mail. Learn how. http://in.overview. mail.. com/connectmore> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>__________ _________ _________ ____> Connect more, do more and share more with India Mail. Learn more.> >>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Sujata,

 

How does it compare to date as per KP. The dates given by others can be correlated. under 3 categories

 

1. Double transit as understood.

 

2. KP

 

3. Any other rule(s).

 

This exercise can seek to estabilish a correlation between sytems. Ulimately,

 

the system which gives correct date, will be validated after the wedding becomes an

 

event.

 

Members are requested to try this exercise.

 

 

Regards,

 

Satish--- On Sat, 11/7/09, sujata das <sujatadash1 wrote:

sujata das <sujatadash1Re: Re: Why Shri KN Rao's Double Transit doesn't make sense Date: Saturday, November 7, 2009, 7:11 PM

 

 

Dear SatishSa aspects the 6th house from Virgo. He is running sa dasa so no marriage till sat moves to libraRegardsSujata

 

 

 

R Satish <rsatish1942@ >@gro ups.comFri, 6 November, 2009 11:16:23 PMRe: Re: Why Shri KN Rao's Double Transit doesn't make sense

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Atul,

 

I have provided an oppurtunity for member friends a live case for prediction.The method you may chose only give us your working,so we all learn.

 

Marriage date for a young man

 

Sept 13,1980 TOB 1559hrs Place Dadar Mumbai.

 

You may reply to the group or to me,should you feel restricted.

 

Regards,

 

Satish--- On Fri, 11/6/09, atul m <atulmaydeo > wrote:

atul m <atulmaydeo >Re: Re: Why Shri KN Rao's Double Transit doesn't make sense@gro ups.comFriday, November 6, 2009, 10:44 PM

 

 

 

 

Dear Punit JiBelow mentioned scheme is the extended and ratified version of Double transit ruleto predict marriage timings after carried lot of research out on large number of horoscopes.Most of these rules were used by eminent old Indian astrologers (unfortunately that knowledge is not passed on to the future generation properly) and they are giving very consistent out put on the same.This composite scheme is also mentioned in "Timing of Marriage" book written by various eminent astrlogers like M N Kedar, S N Kapoor etc.. and reviewed and acknowledged by K N Rao as mentioned in the book it-self.I have personally applied these schemes on large number of horoscopes and shared with lot of Parashari based astrologers, where they found it correct from what they have used and gives very good results.Please do not consider this response negatively as my intention is not to debate about whether it is a

variation or in-correct version of K N Rao double transit etc..but would like to give some references about this scheme and shed more light on applicability aspect so members can use the same to ameliorate further.End of the day, what matters is - consistent working RULE and knowledge of it's applicability.Thank you.RegardsAtul Maydeo.(if you haven't tried, you haven't lived so keep trying...)--- On Fri, 11/6/09, Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com>Re: Re: Why Shri KN Rao's Double Transit doesn't make sense@gro ups.comFriday, November 6, 2009, 11:00 AM

 

Dear Atul ji,

 

Thanks for sharing this information. Though this is the fourth variation for Double-Transit that we are seeing here. Also this is NOT what Shri KN Rao has taught in his books. As far as I remember, he has not used lagna in Double Transit?

 

Anyways, this is another rule that I'll check and come back.

Thanks & Regards,Punit Pandey

On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 2:39 AM, atul m <atulmaydeo > wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear AllI know this is not Parashari system forum but discussion started on Double transit of K N Rao so thought of sharing precise and complete details on this as per my knowledge and considering researched output from various eminent astrologers like M N Kedar, K N Rao, S N Kapoor, J N Gupta and Others - Four Tier Scheme of Composite Transit for Marriage Timings as per eminent astrologers like M N Kedar, K N Rao (although K N Rao further ratifies with Jaimini system as well apart from Parashari) and others as per below - 1. Saturn & Jupiter - Should have in transit aspected or transited over: a) Lagna and 7th House; or b) Lagna and 7th Lord; or c) Lagna lord and 7th house or d) Lagna lord and 7th lord (saturn within 27 months and jupiter within 12 months)2.

Jupiter - a) Natal Venus and 5th house/lord or b) 5th house and 9th house or c) 5th lord and 9th house or d) 5th house and 9th lord or e) 5th lord and 9th lord3. Mars - should have in transit covered within six months: a) what saturn and Jupiter must do, see(1) above; and b) what jupiter must do see (2) above4. The 7th lord - the 7th lord, in transit within 40 days of any marriage must establish contact with any of the following: a) the 11th lord b) the 9th lord c) the lagna lordAlso, at the time of marriage the lords of 7th, 9th, 5th and lagna will be mutually connected (P-position, A- aspect, C-conjunction) and in most of

the cases these will be around 7th, lagna or their lords.Note - Retrograde planets aspect from previous house as well.The results are very positive (more than 90%) with the above schemes after applying on large number of horoscopes for predicting marriage timings.if you tie-up with Jaimini dasha system then results are extreamly positive (97-98%).Although, normally it ties-up with Vimshottari Dasha system by all Parashari astrologers.Important - This applies considering horoscope does not have marriage denial features and in case of delayed horoscope, marriage turns up in 2nd round or some time 3rd round saturn and Jupiter transit as per above scheme.Although, marriage denial and very delayed (computing delay fators) is a seprate topic.Also, you may have noticed that moon or aspect from moon is NOT considered in this rule for predicting marriage timing.Hope this information is useful to all

interested members.RegardsAtul Maydeo.(if you haven't tried, you haven't lived so keep trying...) --- On Fri, 11/6/09, Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

 

Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com>Re: Re: Why Shri KN Rao's Double Transit doesn't make sense@gro ups.comFriday, November 6, 2009, 12:02 AM

 

 

Dear Satish,

 

So the rule for marriage you are suggesting is -

 

Condition 1. Jupiter should aspect ascendant or 7th house and Saturn should aspect Moon or 7th house from Moon

Condition 2. Saturn should aspect ascendant or 7th house and Jupiter should aspect Moon or 7th house from Moon

 

One of the above condition should be fulfilled. Is it what you are suggesting?

 

By the way, as I mentioned earlier, my observation was based on Shri KN Rao's teaching of Saturn and Jupiter's aspect on 7th and 7th lord. What you are telling seems different. Anyways, I'll try it out sometime and see.

Thanks & Regards,Punit Pandey

 

On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 7:30 PM, R Satish <rsatish1942@ > wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Punit,

What you say about Jup is perfect and easy to understand. When you take the Simultaneous transit of Sat over Lagna/7th or Moon/7th,these percentages get affected.

To clarify if Jup is aspecting Lagn/7th then Sat must aspect Moon/7th to fulfill the requirements.

 

As I mentioned,these happenings are not over 60% consistently. If it were so it would become a simple rule all emcompassing. To improve the % factor Venus/mars have been brought into the picture.

 

Even in KP,for marriages, we started with 2,7,11 houses. Later it became 2, 5,7 11 Astro secrets Pt 1). Then we added 5,8 houses to 2,7,11. Khullar has his rules so does Baskaran.. To add to this confusion, we added sub-sub theories.

 

It is a matter of time when the original formula would undergo such transformation, we would be unable to recognize the original.

 

Whether to use it for prediction or postmortem is a personal choice.Post mortem is easier to handle.However for predictions, we need the skills to try for corroboration one or more of these combinations for best-fit.

 

I for one, attempt to use KP + some others including Double-Transit of Jup/Sat (as I understand).

 

Failed predictions are a part of the game. I humbly accept,I am still a

learner and have many more miles to go.

 

Regards,

 

Satish

 

 

 

 

 

--- On Thu, 11/5/09, Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

 

 

Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com>Re: Re: Why Shri KN Rao's Double Transit doesn't make sense@gro ups.com

 

 

Thursday, November 5, 2009, 12:22 PM

 

 

Dear Satish,

 

What I am trying to convey that the rule will be true at any piont of time in one's life because it is too vague. Please go through my earlier email on this topic. The rule can not only justify marriage in 10 charts but in any chart.

 

Let us take today's chart as an example taking Leo as ascedant (12:06PM, Agra). Saturn is 7th lord from Leo and 7th sign from Leo is Aquarius.

 

Jupiter is aspecting 7th lord Saturn (1st year).. Next year (2nd year), Jupiter will be transiting over 7th house. Next year to that (3rd year), Jupiter will again 7th aspecting 7th lord. 4th year, there will no aspect on 7th and 7th lord. 5th year Jupiter will have 5th aspect on 7th lord. 6th year, Jupiter will be aspecting 7th house. 7th year, Jupiter will be transiting over 7th lord from Moon. 8th year, Jupiter will be aspecting 7th house from 7th aspect. 9th year, Jupiter will be transiting over 7th lord. 10 year, Jupiter will have 5th aspect on 7th house. 11th year, Jupiter will be transiting 7th from Moon. 12th year, again Jupiter will be aspecting 7th lord.

 

Jupiter cycle repeats every 12 year, so it is safe to say that at almost any point of this person's life (born today at 12:06PM at Agra), Jupiter will be either aspecting 7th or 7th lord from Ascendant or Moon. 11/12 = 92% possibility. Even If we check the rule only from Ascendant (and ignore Moon), Jupiter will be aspecting 7th or 7th lord 9/12=75% of time. In other words, whatever year this person marries, double-transit will be able to justify it :-) Does Double Transit make any sense?

 

Thanks & Regards,Punit Pandey

 

On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 11:52 AM, R Satish <rsatish1942@ > wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Punit,

I refer to the book"ADVANCED TECHNIQUES OF ASTROLOGICAL

 

PREDICTIONS" edited Sri KN Rao.In one of the chapters 'Tajika Shastra and Marriage

timing of Event" by Dr R K Wishwakarma, he has given 8 rules for timing marriage date with

 

case studies. He validates 10 samples ,where Sat/Jup aspect 7th house/lord.

 

He adds further Venus/Mars interconnection on marriage date.

 

 

We can only try to minimise the number of rules,but cannot reduce

 

significantly, all introduced thru trial and error,like we are presently doing.

 

Regards,

 

 

 

Satish--- On Wed, 11/4/09, Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

 

 

Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com>Re: Re: Why Shri KN Rao's Double Transit doesn't make sense

@gro ups.com

 

 

Wednesday, November 4, 2009, 11:15 PM

 

 

Dear Mssumich,

 

Please note few points -

 

1. A method needs to be mathematically correct first before we can talk about predictive aspect of the method. As I mentioned this method is fundamentally flawed and doesn't make sense. I have mentioned the reason and would love to hear if somebody can show that I am missing something.

 

2. Double transit, as mentioned by Paul Manley, is different from what Shri KN Rao has used in his books. By Double-Transit, Shri KN Rao doesn't mean that both the planet should aspect one single sign, but one planet aspecting the house and other house lord (generally). As I demonstrated, this condition will match almost 100% of time and hence it makes this tool a good tool for post-mortem and justification. Though not useful for predictions.

 

3. If a method doesn't work, we should leave it and move on. If we will not accept that the method doesn't make sense, we can not discard it. By saying something like "we need to check dasa and yoga etc.", we want to prove it some way or other.. Why? If it doens't work, it doesn't work. We should not accpet anything blindly. There are quite a few teachings by Shri KN Rao that works and we should use them. Teachings that do not work, we should discard them..

 

4. I don not understand why you are mixing placidus with double-transit. Let us not mix both the threads. Though i guess that the way you asked your earlier question was not good for generating discussion. In my opinion, correct way for asking question is to present your own analysis and ask your question. If you are learner, you should present your detailed analysis. What is your analysis as per KP? What is your analysis as per Traditional? Saying that I am able to justify events using Traditional but not KP seems too vague a statement. I do not see reference of Sub in your post. I don't see reference of Nakshatra in your post. That doesn't qualify as a KP analysis and hence doesn't provoke any response. This I guess may be the reason you didn't get response.

 

Thanks & Regards,

Punit Pandey

 

On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 9:45 PM, mssumich <mssumich > wrote:

 

 

 

 

Hi PunitLike many of the 100s of tools that Jyotish gives - don't believe in all the techniques that one comes up with. From Paul Manley's website here is what he says"What you'll see in the following illustrations is how the sign(s) that gets the double transit will shift, generally from year to year. In fact, there are only two positions of Jupiter and Saturn that will not have the double transit phenomenon – when Jupiter is in the 8th or 12th house from Saturn. This means that 10 out of the 12 possible positions, or more than 80% of the time, there will be the double transit phenomenon happening in at least one sign, possibly two."I have see this double transit work sometimes and sometimes not. Obviuosly we have to pay attention to sookshma transits (or finer transits) and just double transit.I urge some expert to answer my question on the Placidus house system for a chart that I put on the other day. One bhava covers 58

deg of zodiac, there are 3 planets in 8th house; This person is very succesful. I can explain every event using vedic astreology and nakshatra analysis. The moment I put 3 planets in 8th in this chart, I am lost.For latititude that are closer to 66 deg N or S - I believe the Placidus system of houses give wierd house cusps(correct me if I am wrong). This actor was born in Scotland where latitude in 55deg. My question is for people born in such norhtern altitudes -what system works? Is it still Placidus wasy of calculating houses or something else. There should a clear answer from KP experts. I am hoping there is that person in this list.thanks

 

 

 

 

 

@gro ups.com, Punit Pandey <punitp wrote:>> Dear Friends,> > KP made timing an event much more easier. Though as a KP astrologer, I> always feel that it will be nice to have another complementary method by> which we can cross-check and confirm. In search of another such method for> timing events, I looked into many methods and Shri KN Rao's double transit> is among them.> > I personally feel that it is merely a tool for post-mortem and not useful> for future predictions. Let us take an example of Marriage. Double-transit> suggests that transiting Jupiter and Saturn will always be aspecting Natal> 7th and 7th lord at the time of marriage.> > Now Jupiter has three aspects - 5,7, and 9. So including its own

position,> it will be influencing four houses in any chart. Which means that at any> point of time the possibility of aspecting 7th is 33.33% and 7th lord is> also 33..33%. If we take Jupiter's influence on either 7th OR 7th lord,> possibility will double from 4/12 to 8/12 or 66.66%. So at any time, we have> 66.66% possibility of Jupiter aspecting either 7th or 7th lord. In other> words, around 66% of time in one's life, we will see that Jupiter is> influencing either 7th or 7th. Of course, this calculation doesn't consider> some of the possibility e.g. 7th lord is in 7th house itself. Anyways, I> have seen Shri KN Rao is also checking Moon for transit other than> Ascendant. Which doubles the possibility and if somehow Jupiter is not> aspecting 7th and 7th lord counting from Lagna, it will aspect 7th or 7th> lord from Moon. So in any point of one's life, if take transit

from Moon as> well as Ascendant, it is almost certain that Jupiter will influencing either> 7th from ascendant, or 7th lord from ascendant, or 7th from Moon, or 7th> lord from Moon.> > Similarly, Saturn also has 3 aspects and the above write-up is true for> Saturn as well. In other words, seeing the above possibility, I feel that> Double-Transit doesn't make sense at all.> > To sound this method sensible and experimental purpose, I checked reducing> the possibility by checking transit only from Ascendant. If I do that way, I> have many cases where it fails.> > In other words, I do not find Double-transit theory useful at all.> > Thanks & Regards,> > Punit Pandey> >

> On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 2:06 PM, aashish rai <raiaashish@. ..> wrote:> > >> >> > Dear Sundar,> >> > In classical astrology there are so many dashas, if vimshottari was only> > required than why did Parashara muni talked about so many dashas. Other> > dashas like Yogini are showing it.> >> >> >> > Let's forget about DBAs for time being as per double transit theory of Shri> > Kn rao marriage chances are high when transit Saturn and Jupiter aspect> > natal 1/7 axis or their natal lords. In rare cases 9th lord will be> > involved.> >> >> >> > Natal chart,> >> > Jupier is aspecting natal 7th lord, lagna lord and Lagna> >> > Saturn is sitting in Lagna itself, aspecting 7th house> >> >>

>> >> > Won't be surprised if there is a child birth/pregency before end august> > 2010 !!!> >> > Regards,> > Aashish> >> > ------------ --------- ---------> > ** Sundar <sundar190561@ ...>> >> > *To:* @gro ups.com

 

 

> > *Sent:* Wed, 4 November, 2009 10:31:33 AM> > *Subject:* Re: Post mortem analysis of marriage> >> >> >> > Dear Aashish> >> > I know you would say, venus is the UL lord, hence the marriage in venus> > PAD. But did you see venus was debilitated on the day of marriage?> >> > Thanks...... . .....Sundar> >> > @gro ups.com <%40. com>, aashish > > rai <raiaashish@ ...> wrote:> > >> > > Dear Sundarji,> > > I have just started learning KP and yet to pick up the basics. but if you> > use traditional astrology it's very clear. As this forum is for KP only I am> > not elaborating.> > >> > > Regards,> > > Aashish> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > ____________ _________ _________ __> > > Sundar <sundar190561@ ...>> > > @gro ups.com <%40. com>

 

> >> > > Sun, 1 November, 2009 10:59:22 PM> > > Post mortem analysis of marriage> > >> > >> > >> > > Dear Learned members> > >> > > My neighbour go married on 21st Oct, 2009 between 9 to 10am. The transit> > of DBAS does not fully signify the event fully.> > >> > > dob: 25th Aug, 1979> > > tob: 9.37 (rectified)> > > pob: Mumbai> > >> > > Time of birth reported is 9.22am> > > Ayanamsha : 23.28.58> > >> > > dasha/bukti/ antra> > >> > > planet sgl stl sl> > > (MD)rahu(11) sun(11,12) venus(11,2-9) venus(11,2-9)> > > (AD)ketu(5) sat(12,5-6) rahu(11) venus(11,2-9)> > > (PAD)venus(11, 2-9) sun(11,12) ketu(5) jupiter(11,4-

7)> > >> > > rahu=sun(11, 12)> > > ketu=saturn( 12,5-6)> > >> > > Marriage on 21st October 2009 between 9 am to 10 am> > >> > > planet sgl stl sl> > > (MD)rahu(4) sat(12,5-6) sun(1,12) jupiter(5,4- 7)> > > (AD)ketu(10) moon(2,11) jupiter(5,4- 7) rahu-MD(4)> > > (PAD)venus(12, 2-9) mer(1,1-10) moon(2,11) rahu-MD(4)> > >> > > sun venus(12,2-9) mars(10,3-8) venus(12,2-9)> > > moon mars(10,3-8) sat(12,5-6) venus(12,2-9)> > >> > > Baed on the above it is seen that MD/AD/PAD does not fully signify DBAS> > (except for ketu, which is rahu's sub.> > >> > > In the light of the above how do we reconcile the timing of marriage.> > >> > > Thanks...... ...Sundar> > >> > >> >

>> > >> > >> > > Keep up with people you care about with India Mail. Learn how. http://in.overview.> > mail.. com/connectmore<http://in.overview. mail.. com/connectmore>> > >> >> >> > ------------ --------- ---------> > Connect more, do more and share more with India Mail. Learn more<http://in.rd. / tagline_galaxy_ 3/*http:/ /in.overview. mail... com/>> > .> >> > > >>

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Homepage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Satish,

I am pleased to inform you that one of my real life cases where the prediction

came correct,inspite of many astrolgers predicting that the marriage will never take place... It took place on the very day that was predicted well in advance..and will most probably be published in the forthcoming K.P. & Astrology Annual...

I have used the same theory/method I have been advocating for some years now...a very slight modification of the late M.P.Shanmugham's theory...

With kind regards,

Yogesh Lajmi.

GOOD LUCK !--- On Sun, 11/8/09, R Satish <rsatish1942 wrote:

R Satish <rsatish1942Re: Re: Why Shri KN Rao's Double Transit doesn't make sense Date: Sunday, November 8, 2009, 6:07 AM

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Sujata,

 

How does it compare to date as per KP. The dates given by others can be correlated. under 3 categories

 

1. Double transit as understood.

 

2. KP

 

3. Any other rule(s).

 

This exercise can seek to estabilish a correlation between sytems. Ulimately,

 

the system which gives correct date, will be validated after the wedding becomes an

 

event.

 

Members are requested to try this exercise.

 

 

Regards,

 

Satish--- On Sat, 11/7/09, sujata das <sujatadash1@ .co. in> wrote:

sujata das <sujatadash1@ .co. in>Re: Re: Why Shri KN Rao's Double Transit doesn't make sense@gro ups.comSaturday, November 7, 2009, 7:11 PM

 

 

Dear SatishSa aspects the 6th house from Virgo. He is running sa dasa so no marriage till sat moves to libraRegardsSujata

 

 

 

R Satish <rsatish1942@ >@gro ups.comFri, 6 November, 2009 11:16:23 PMRe: Re: Why Shri KN Rao's Double Transit doesn't make sense

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Atul,

 

I have provided an oppurtunity for member friends a live case for prediction.The method you may chose only give us your working,so we all learn.

 

Marriage date for a young man

 

Sept 13,1980 TOB 1559hrs Place Dadar Mumbai.

 

You may reply to the group or to me,should you feel restricted.

 

Regards,

 

Satish--- On Fri, 11/6/09, atul m <atulmaydeo > wrote:

atul m <atulmaydeo >Re: Re: Why Shri KN Rao's Double Transit doesn't make sense@gro ups.comFriday, November 6, 2009, 10:44 PM

 

 

 

 

Dear Punit JiBelow mentioned scheme is the extended and ratified version of Double transit ruleto predict marriage timings after carried lot of research out on large number of horoscopes.Most of these rules were used by eminent old Indian astrologers (unfortunately that knowledge is not passed on to the future generation properly) and they are giving very consistent out put on the same.This composite scheme is also mentioned in "Timing of Marriage" book written by various eminent astrlogers like M N Kedar, S N Kapoor etc.. and reviewed and acknowledged by K N Rao as mentioned in the book it-self.I have personally applied these schemes on large number of horoscopes and shared with lot of Parashari based astrologers, where they found it correct from what they have used and gives very good results.Please do not consider this response negatively as my intention is not to debate about whether it is a

variation or in-correct version of K N Rao double transit etc..but would like to give some references about this scheme and shed more light on applicability aspect so members can use the same to ameliorate further.End of the day, what matters is - consistent working RULE and knowledge of it's applicability.Thank you.RegardsAtul Maydeo.(if you haven't tried, you haven't lived so keep trying...)--- On Fri, 11/6/09, Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com>Re: Re: Why Shri KN Rao's Double Transit doesn't make sense@gro ups.comFriday, November 6, 2009, 11:00 AM

 

Dear Atul ji,

 

Thanks for sharing this information. Though this is the fourth variation for Double-Transit that we are seeing here. Also this is NOT what Shri KN Rao has taught in his books. As far as I remember, he has not used lagna in Double Transit?

 

Anyways, this is another rule that I'll check and come back.

Thanks & Regards,Punit Pandey

On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 2:39 AM, atul m <atulmaydeo > wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear AllI know this is not Parashari system forum but discussion started on Double transit of K N Rao so thought of sharing precise and complete details on this as per my knowledge and considering researched output from various eminent astrologers like M N Kedar, K N Rao, S N Kapoor, J N Gupta and Others - Four Tier Scheme of Composite Transit for Marriage Timings as per eminent astrologers like M N Kedar, K N Rao (although K N Rao further ratifies with Jaimini system as well apart from Parashari) and others as per below - 1. Saturn & Jupiter - Should have in transit aspected or transited over: a) Lagna and 7th House; or b) Lagna and 7th Lord; or c) Lagna lord and 7th house or d) Lagna lord and 7th lord (saturn within 27 months and jupiter within 12 months)2.

Jupiter - a) Natal Venus and 5th house/lord or b) 5th house and 9th house or c) 5th lord and 9th house or d) 5th house and 9th lord or e) 5th lord and 9th lord3. Mars - should have in transit covered within six months: a) what saturn and Jupiter must do, see(1) above; and b) what jupiter must do see (2) above4. The 7th lord - the 7th lord, in transit within 40 days of any marriage must establish contact with any of the following: a) the 11th lord b) the 9th lord c) the lagna lordAlso, at the time of marriage the lords of 7th, 9th, 5th and lagna will be mutually connected (P-position, A- aspect, C-conjunction) and in most of

the cases these will be around 7th, lagna or their lords.Note - Retrograde planets aspect from previous house as well.The results are very positive (more than 90%) with the above schemes after applying on large number of horoscopes for predicting marriage timings.if you tie-up with Jaimini dasha system then results are extreamly positive (97-98%).Although, normally it ties-up with Vimshottari Dasha system by all Parashari astrologers.Important - This applies considering horoscope does not have marriage denial features and in case of delayed horoscope, marriage turns up in 2nd round or some time 3rd round saturn and Jupiter transit as per above scheme.Although, marriage denial and very delayed (computing delay fators) is a seprate topic.Also, you may have noticed that moon or aspect from moon is NOT considered in this rule for predicting marriage timing.Hope this information is useful to all

interested members.RegardsAtul Maydeo.(if you haven't tried, you haven't lived so keep trying...) --- On Fri, 11/6/09, Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

 

Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com>Re: Re: Why Shri KN Rao's Double Transit doesn't make sense@gro ups.comFriday, November 6, 2009, 12:02 AM

 

 

Dear Satish,

 

So the rule for marriage you are suggesting is -

 

Condition 1. Jupiter should aspect ascendant or 7th house and Saturn should aspect Moon or 7th house from Moon

Condition 2. Saturn should aspect ascendant or 7th house and Jupiter should aspect Moon or 7th house from Moon

 

One of the above condition should be fulfilled. Is it what you are suggesting?

 

By the way, as I mentioned earlier, my observation was based on Shri KN Rao's teaching of Saturn and Jupiter's aspect on 7th and 7th lord. What you are telling seems different. Anyways, I'll try it out sometime and see.

Thanks & Regards,Punit Pandey

 

On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 7:30 PM, R Satish <rsatish1942@ > wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Punit,

What you say about Jup is perfect and easy to understand. When you take the Simultaneous transit of Sat over Lagna/7th or Moon/7th,these percentages get affected.

To clarify if Jup is aspecting Lagn/7th then Sat must aspect Moon/7th to fulfill the requirements.

 

As I mentioned,these happenings are not over 60% consistently. If it were so it would become a simple rule all emcompassing. To improve the % factor Venus/mars have been brought into the picture.

 

Even in KP,for marriages, we started with 2,7,11 houses. Later it became 2, 5,7 11 Astro secrets Pt 1). Then we added 5,8 houses to 2,7,11. Khullar has his rules so does Baskaran.. To add to this confusion, we added sub-sub theories.

 

It is a matter of time when the original formula would undergo such transformation, we would be unable to recognize the original.

 

Whether to use it for prediction or postmortem is a personal choice.Post mortem is easier to handle.However for predictions, we need the skills to try for corroboration one or more of these combinations for best-fit.

 

I for one, attempt to use KP + some others including Double-Transit of Jup/Sat (as I understand).

 

Failed predictions are a part of the game. I humbly accept,I am still a

learner and have many more miles to go.

 

Regards,

 

Satish

 

 

 

 

 

--- On Thu, 11/5/09, Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

 

 

Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com>Re: Re: Why Shri KN Rao's Double Transit doesn't make sense@gro ups.com

 

 

Thursday, November 5, 2009, 12:22 PM

 

 

Dear Satish,

 

What I am trying to convey that the rule will be true at any piont of time in one's life because it is too vague. Please go through my earlier email on this topic. The rule can not only justify marriage in 10 charts but in any chart.

 

Let us take today's chart as an example taking Leo as ascedant (12:06PM, Agra). Saturn is 7th lord from Leo and 7th sign from Leo is Aquarius.

 

Jupiter is aspecting 7th lord Saturn (1st year).. Next year (2nd year), Jupiter will be transiting over 7th house. Next year to that (3rd year), Jupiter will again 7th aspecting 7th lord. 4th year, there will no aspect on 7th and 7th lord. 5th year Jupiter will have 5th aspect on 7th lord. 6th year, Jupiter will be aspecting 7th house. 7th year, Jupiter will be transiting over 7th lord from Moon. 8th year, Jupiter will be aspecting 7th house from 7th aspect. 9th year, Jupiter will be transiting over 7th lord. 10 year, Jupiter will have 5th aspect on 7th house. 11th year, Jupiter will be transiting 7th from Moon. 12th year, again Jupiter will be aspecting 7th lord.

 

Jupiter cycle repeats every 12 year, so it is safe to say that at almost any point of this person's life (born today at 12:06PM at Agra), Jupiter will be either aspecting 7th or 7th lord from Ascendant or Moon. 11/12 = 92% possibility. Even If we check the rule only from Ascendant (and ignore Moon), Jupiter will be aspecting 7th or 7th lord 9/12=75% of time. In other words, whatever year this person marries, double-transit will be able to justify it :-) Does Double Transit make any sense?

 

Thanks & Regards,Punit Pandey

 

On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 11:52 AM, R Satish <rsatish1942@ > wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Punit,

I refer to the book"ADVANCED TECHNIQUES OF ASTROLOGICAL

 

PREDICTIONS" edited Sri KN Rao.In one of the chapters 'Tajika Shastra and Marriage

timing of Event" by Dr R K Wishwakarma, he has given 8 rules for timing marriage date with

 

case studies. He validates 10 samples ,where Sat/Jup aspect 7th house/lord.

 

He adds further Venus/Mars interconnection on marriage date.

 

 

We can only try to minimise the number of rules,but cannot reduce

 

significantly, all introduced thru trial and error,like we are presently doing.

 

Regards,

 

 

 

Satish--- On Wed, 11/4/09, Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

 

 

Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com>Re: Re: Why Shri KN Rao's Double Transit doesn't make sense

@gro ups.com

 

 

Wednesday, November 4, 2009, 11:15 PM

 

 

Dear Mssumich,

 

Please note few points -

 

1. A method needs to be mathematically correct first before we can talk about predictive aspect of the method. As I mentioned this method is fundamentally flawed and doesn't make sense. I have mentioned the reason and would love to hear if somebody can show that I am missing something.

 

2. Double transit, as mentioned by Paul Manley, is different from what Shri KN Rao has used in his books. By Double-Transit, Shri KN Rao doesn't mean that both the planet should aspect one single sign, but one planet aspecting the house and other house lord (generally). As I demonstrated, this condition will match almost 100% of time and hence it makes this tool a good tool for post-mortem and justification. Though not useful for predictions.

 

3. If a method doesn't work, we should leave it and move on. If we will not accept that the method doesn't make sense, we can not discard it. By saying something like "we need to check dasa and yoga etc.", we want to prove it some way or other.. Why? If it doens't work, it doesn't work. We should not accpet anything blindly. There are quite a few teachings by Shri KN Rao that works and we should use them. Teachings that do not work, we should discard them..

 

4. I don not understand why you are mixing placidus with double-transit. Let us not mix both the threads. Though i guess that the way you asked your earlier question was not good for generating discussion. In my opinion, correct way for asking question is to present your own analysis and ask your question. If you are learner, you should present your detailed analysis. What is your analysis as per KP? What is your analysis as per Traditional? Saying that I am able to justify events using Traditional but not KP seems too vague a statement. I do not see reference of Sub in your post. I don't see reference of Nakshatra in your post. That doesn't qualify as a KP analysis and hence doesn't provoke any response. This I guess may be the reason you didn't get response.

 

Thanks & Regards,

Punit Pandey

 

On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 9:45 PM, mssumich <mssumich > wrote:

 

 

 

 

Hi PunitLike many of the 100s of tools that Jyotish gives - don't believe in all the techniques that one comes up with. From Paul Manley's website here is what he says"What you'll see in the following illustrations is how the sign(s) that gets the double transit will shift, generally from year to year. In fact, there are only two positions of Jupiter and Saturn that will not have the double transit phenomenon – when Jupiter is in the 8th or 12th house from Saturn. This means that 10 out of the 12 possible positions, or more than 80% of the time, there will be the double transit phenomenon happening in at least one sign, possibly two."I have see this double transit work sometimes and sometimes not. Obviuosly we have to pay attention to sookshma transits (or finer transits) and just double transit.I urge some expert to answer my question on the Placidus house system for a chart that I put on the other day. One bhava covers 58

deg of zodiac, there are 3 planets in 8th house; This person is very succesful. I can explain every event using vedic astreology and nakshatra analysis. The moment I put 3 planets in 8th in this chart, I am lost.For latititude that are closer to 66 deg N or S - I believe the Placidus system of houses give wierd house cusps(correct me if I am wrong). This actor was born in Scotland where latitude in 55deg. My question is for people born in such norhtern altitudes -what system works? Is it still Placidus wasy of calculating houses or something else. There should a clear answer from KP experts. I am hoping there is that person in this list.thanks

 

 

 

 

 

@gro ups.com, Punit Pandey <punitp wrote:>> Dear Friends,> > KP made timing an event much more easier. Though as a KP astrologer, I> always feel that it will be nice to have another complementary method by> which we can cross-check and confirm. In search of another such method for> timing events, I looked into many methods and Shri KN Rao's double transit> is among them.> > I personally feel that it is merely a tool for post-mortem and not useful> for future predictions. Let us take an example of Marriage. Double-transit> suggests that transiting Jupiter and Saturn will always be aspecting Natal> 7th and 7th lord at the time of marriage.> > Now Jupiter has three aspects - 5,7, and 9. So including its own

position,> it will be influencing four houses in any chart. Which means that at any> point of time the possibility of aspecting 7th is 33.33% and 7th lord is> also 33..33%. If we take Jupiter's influence on either 7th OR 7th lord,> possibility will double from 4/12 to 8/12 or 66.66%. So at any time, we have> 66.66% possibility of Jupiter aspecting either 7th or 7th lord. In other> words, around 66% of time in one's life, we will see that Jupiter is> influencing either 7th or 7th. Of course, this calculation doesn't consider> some of the possibility e.g. 7th lord is in 7th house itself. Anyways, I> have seen Shri KN Rao is also checking Moon for transit other than> Ascendant. Which doubles the possibility and if somehow Jupiter is not> aspecting 7th and 7th lord counting from Lagna, it will aspect 7th or 7th> lord from Moon. So in any point of one's life, if take transit

from Moon as> well as Ascendant, it is almost certain that Jupiter will influencing either> 7th from ascendant, or 7th lord from ascendant, or 7th from Moon, or 7th> lord from Moon.> > Similarly, Saturn also has 3 aspects and the above write-up is true for> Saturn as well. In other words, seeing the above possibility, I feel that> Double-Transit doesn't make sense at all.> > To sound this method sensible and experimental purpose, I checked reducing> the possibility by checking transit only from Ascendant. If I do that way, I> have many cases where it fails.> > In other words, I do not find Double-transit theory useful at all.> > Thanks & Regards,> > Punit Pandey> >

> On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 2:06 PM, aashish rai <raiaashish@. ..> wrote:> > >> >> > Dear Sundar,> >> > In classical astrology there are so many dashas, if vimshottari was only> > required than why did Parashara muni talked about so many dashas. Other> > dashas like Yogini are showing it.> >> >> >> > Let's forget about DBAs for time being as per double transit theory of Shri> > Kn rao marriage chances are high when transit Saturn and Jupiter aspect> > natal 1/7 axis or their natal lords. In rare cases 9th lord will be> > involved.> >> >> >> > Natal chart,> >> > Jupier is aspecting natal 7th lord, lagna lord and Lagna> >> > Saturn is sitting in Lagna itself, aspecting 7th house> >> >>

>> >> > Won't be surprised if there is a child birth/pregency before end august> > 2010 !!!> >> > Regards,> > Aashish> >> > ------------ --------- ---------> > ** Sundar <sundar190561@ ...>> >> > *To:* @gro ups.com

 

 

> > *Sent:* Wed, 4 November, 2009 10:31:33 AM> > *Subject:* Re: Post mortem analysis of marriage> >> >> >> > Dear Aashish> >> > I know you would say, venus is the UL lord, hence the marriage in venus> > PAD. But did you see venus was debilitated on the day of marriage?> >> > Thanks...... . .....Sundar> >> > @gro ups.com <%40. com>, aashish > > rai <raiaashish@ ...> wrote:> > >> > > Dear Sundarji,> > > I have just started learning KP and yet to pick up the basics. but if you> > use traditional astrology it's very clear. As this forum is for KP only I am> > not elaborating.> > >> > > Regards,> > > Aashish> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > ____________ _________ _________ __> > > Sundar <sundar190561@ ...>> > > @gro ups.com <%40. com>

 

> >> > > Sun, 1 November, 2009 10:59:22 PM> > > Post mortem analysis of marriage> > >> > >> > >> > > Dear Learned members> > >> > > My neighbour go married on 21st Oct, 2009 between 9 to 10am. The transit> > of DBAS does not fully signify the event fully.> > >> > > dob: 25th Aug, 1979> > > tob: 9.37 (rectified)> > > pob: Mumbai> > >> > > Time of birth reported is 9.22am> > > Ayanamsha : 23.28.58> > >> > > dasha/bukti/ antra> > >> > > planet sgl stl sl> > > (MD)rahu(11) sun(11,12) venus(11,2-9) venus(11,2-9)> > > (AD)ketu(5) sat(12,5-6) rahu(11) venus(11,2-9)> > > (PAD)venus(11, 2-9) sun(11,12) ketu(5) jupiter(11,4-

7)> > >> > > rahu=sun(11, 12)> > > ketu=saturn( 12,5-6)> > >> > > Marriage on 21st October 2009 between 9 am to 10 am> > >> > > planet sgl stl sl> > > (MD)rahu(4) sat(12,5-6) sun(1,12) jupiter(5,4- 7)> > > (AD)ketu(10) moon(2,11) jupiter(5,4- 7) rahu-MD(4)> > > (PAD)venus(12, 2-9) mer(1,1-10) moon(2,11) rahu-MD(4)> > >> > > sun venus(12,2-9) mars(10,3-8) venus(12,2-9)> > > moon mars(10,3-8) sat(12,5-6) venus(12,2-9)> > >> > > Baed on the above it is seen that MD/AD/PAD does not fully signify DBAS> > (except for ketu, which is rahu's sub.> > >> > > In the light of the above how do we reconcile the timing of marriage.> > >> > > Thanks...... ...Sundar> > >> > >> >

>> > >> > >> > > Keep up with people you care about with India Mail. Learn how. http://in.overview.> > mail.. com/connectmore<http://in.overview. mail.. com/connectmore>> > >> >> >> > ------------ --------- ---------> > Connect more, do more and share more with India Mail. Learn more<http://in.rd. / tagline_galaxy_ 3/*http:/ /in.overview. mail... com/>> > .> >> > > >>

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Homepage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Vijay ji,

 

Let us call spade a spade. If it doesn't work, it doesn't work. Why there is a need to justify? Why we can not throw away the camps in favour of astrology itself? I am surprised by your email which instead of talking about any mathematical (where this theory is not making sense) or predictive aspect, just talks about " theory needs deep understanding ... prominent astrologers are using this theory successfully etc. "

 

See your email and my thoughts/ remarks -

// Okay if i take is correct as per your mathematical calculation [ which could be false if 7L is in 7H]than also what is the problem, 7th house holds many significance, person is continuously doing some karma and 7th house is 10th from 10 House, so recognition of one's efforts are coming to one's life frequently.//

 

Please understand that the possibilty is of 7L in 7H is just 1 out of 12, so it doesn't make much difference in calculation. Whether 66.66% or 63% percent, the problems with the theory remains the same.

 

I also wonder, if Double-Transit condition fulfills 60% or 90% of time, how you use it for selecting a moment. Would appreciate any practical example, if you feel that this theory has some essence.

 

//I have already said that you have to look 7th house in other divisional charts as well, especially D-9. For better tuning of this double transit you must also look the navamsha position of this double transit, many more secrets will be revealed.//

 

With due respect to you, it made me laugh. If D1 can give 66% possiblity, if we include D9, it will become 100%. What is the use? If I am missing something, please explain with practical example.

 

By the way, Shri KN Rao has not advocated use of Double-Transit in Divisonal charts in any of his book, as far as I remeber. You can correct me if I am wrong, by producing a quote from his book. I, fortunatley, have almost all his books. (This can be taken as one fo the proofs that I respect him a lot and like his approach. Though it doesn't stop me critisizing what I find illogical.)

 

// While looking this transit you have to look Astakvarge points also.There are many factors attached to it.Few more pointers has been discussed in AIA by Manoj ji who does not belong to KNRao camp like me :).

/message/27596 //

 

Thanks for adding Ashtakvarga in it. But it keeps the probability 100%, as the probability can not go beyong 100% now as many coditions we add :-) Are you not realizting that adding so many system is not really making any sense? I can not stop you for using it, but unfortunately it is not making any sense to me. More system, easier it is for justification, but it has no predictive value.

 

Manoj ji says that the system works only 70%. Depending upon what you can a double transit, we have probability of it satisfying upto 89% (as shown in previous emails). Though this doesn't mean that it works " 89% " but it simply mean that it can justify any event " 89% " of time. As I mentioned earlier, more relaxed theory you have, more percentage of cases it will be able to justify.

 

As there are four variations of Double-Transit, it is also important that I understand which Double-Transit, you are referring to. I have defined all four variations of Double-Transit at /message/29185. Please let me know if you are referring any of those or want to have any other variation (which has D-charts and Ashtakvarga), it will help in having a more focussed discussion.

 

Some of the importants points like -

1. Do you consider transit just from Ascendant or Moon or both?

2. Do you consider aspect from previous house as well, if the planet is retrograde?

 

// I have not said to use any DASA \ ANTARDASA, again your understanding of this context is incorrect.//

Sorry for not getting it properly. Do you mean that Transitting Saturn will have Rasi aspect on DK at the time of marriage?

 

// Since this theory needs deep understanding over the subject as a whole, it requires time and study. If many prominent astrologers in India are using double transit for their prediction, it simply means that they have some more keys to use it.

I have earlier said that double transit theory is rare Nadi technique which is much popularised by Sri KnRao [not invented by him and learnt from his mother].//

 

On the contrary, it requires basic mathematics to see that it is merely a justification tool and doesn't have any predictive value. The theory is very simple and straight-forward. We complicate it when we are not able to justify something.

 

Arguments that others are using it successfully so the theory must be true doesn't look like a scientific argument. Where is the proof that others are using this theory successfully? Do we have some study that can be shared and verified - may be on 50 charts or 100 charts? You can check file section of the forum for some example studies. There must be some verification to the clamins?

 

Shri KN Rao generally say that only 1 out of 20,000 astrologers are able to predict. So please do not follow those remining 19,999 astrologers :-)

 

Finally, though the email is written in lighter mood, my intentions are very much of a learner's intention. If I am incorrect or missing something, I would love to listen and correct. Eventually what we care about is the tool that can help us in accurate predictions.

Thanks & Regards,Punit Pandey

On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 8:50 AM, vijay.goel <goyalvj wrote:

 

 

 

 

Dear Punit ji,Message number ://In other words, around 66% of time in one's life, we will see that Jupiter is influencing either 7th or 7th.//Okay if i take is correct as per your mathematical calculation [ which could be false if 7L is in 7H]

than also what is the problem, 7th house holds many significance, person is continuously doing some karma and 7th house is 10th from 10 House, so recognition of one's efforts are coming to one's life frequently.

I have already said that you have to look 7th house in other divisional charts as well, especially D-9. For better tuning of this double transit you must also look the navamsha position of this double transit, many more secrets will be revealed.

While looking this transit you have to look Astakvarge points also.There are many factors attached to it.Few more pointers has been discussed in AIA by Manoj ji who does not belong to KNRao camp like me :).

/message/27596///Also I tested the Sutra what you are referring about Char dasa aspect on DK.

Again we should note that one rasi aspect three other rasis at any time (four signs influenced) so that this sutra is going to be true 33.33% anyways. If we include antardasa as well apart from mahadasa (aspects on two rasis), probability of aspect will increase to 66.66% and it will feel like working the way Double-Transit feels :-)///

I have not said to use any DASA \ ANTARDASA, again your understanding of this context is incorrect.Since this theory needs deep understanding over the subject as a whole, it requires time and study. If many prominent astrologers in India are using double transit for their prediction, it simply means that they have some more keys to use it.

I have earlier said that double transit theory is rare Nadi technique which is much popularised by Sri KnRao [not invented by him and learnt from his mother].As this forum is more focus to discuss KP methods systematically and scientifically, i am much interested in it only. I donot like to discuss traditionally astrology here.

I really appreciates the esteemed astrologer [including you] here for removing many mis-conception in KP and clearly defining and not mixing up the various advance version of KP methods.

Thankyou,Regards,Vijay GoelJaipur

, Punit Pandey <punitp wrote:>> Dear Vijay ji,> > I myself tested this theory hundreds of time and didn't find it working at

> all. That is the reason I initiated this thread. I have given mathematical> reasons why the theory is not correct. Please see some of recent posts on> this topic by me -> /message/29125

> /message/29198> > Please go through them and tell me where my understanding is incorrect.

> > Let us not defend something which is mathematically incorrect. Either the> theory or my calculation - one thing is definitely incorrect.> > Also I tested the Sutra what you are referring about Char dasa aspect on DK.

> Again we should note that one rasi aspect three other rasis at any time> (four signs influenced) so that this sutra is going to be true 33.33%> anyways. If we include antardasa as well apart from mahadasa (aspects on two

> rasis), probability of aspect will increase to 66.66% and it will feel like> working the way Double-Transit feels :-) Statistical study reveals that 60%> percentage is misnomer (at least to me). Though let us not discuss this

> sutra, but finish discussion on Double Transit first.> > Thanks & Regards,> > Punit Pandey> >

 

 

> On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 12:14 AM, vijay.goel <goyalvj wrote:> > >> >> >> >> > Dear All,> >> > Namaskar ,> >

> > First of all double transit theory has been tested by hundreds of students,> > who learnt and follow shri K n Rao tested methodologies, [even by me several> > times as a professional astrologer].

> >> > In Traditional astrology only transit does not matter completely, we have> > to see many other aspects and riders, even at transit Astakvarge plays an> > important role.> >

> > Secondly 7th house does not only limited to first marriage. It has several> > other significance. To see which significance is going to fructity we must> > also look the 7th house of all other divisional charts.

> >> > OKAY, i will give you one more sutra to check the possibility of marriage> > which also works 60%, just see when saturn has Rasi aspect (jaimini aspect)> > on the Dara Karak planet.

> >> > For any new comer in KP system, one will get confused by seeing many houses> > getting activated in any set of DBAS and can come to many possibilities. But> > by proper practice and constant learning this type of doubts gets cleared.

> >> > In short i will say that the most secret of Nadi principles of 'Double> > transit of saturn and jupiter' is ONLY exposed by shri K N Rao to the world> > at large with many proofs. Before it was practiced very secretly by very

> > very few astrologer in India.> >> > Thankyou,> > Regards,> > Vijay Goel> > Jaipur.> >> >> > <%40>, Luther > > Rath <rathluther@> wrote:> > >> > > Dear sir,> > > No one denies Astrology to be a devine Science. In fact it is. But when> > it is a science, it definitely bases on Mathematics. From beginning of

> > casting of a horoscope we all use mathematics. For determining the position> > os Planets in the heaven we use mathematics. And why diregard mathematics> > while going for prediction? Punitji is right in saying that 'Double Transit "

> > could be seen in most of the charts as per rule of posibilities. So it> > cannot be a tool for predictions of marriage. He also says, it helps in> > post mortem cases. If any one supports this method let him predict 5 cases

> > of marriage and prove it. Let us end the theoritical discussion on this> > issue but face it and prove it in practice. I do not mean to hurt any one> > but wish to come to the right track of learning.

> >> > > With due regards to all.> > > Dr. RathÂ> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > ________________________________> > > R Satish <rsatish1942@>

> >> > > <%40>

 

> > > Thu, November 5, 2009 11:27:00 AM> > > Re: Why Shri KN Rao's Double Transit doesn't make> > sense> > >> > > Â

> > >   Dear Punit and friends,> > >> > >           I would suggest we also examine Lagna/7th> >  or Moon/7th being  aspected by both Jup and Sat simultaneously.

> > Additionally on the day of marriage,Venus aspects Mars.> > >> > >           These will improve the strike rate. In any> > case % adove 60 is a myth  on CONSISTENT basis.

> > >> > >> > > Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â We trying to make a difficult job> > easier.Astrology cannot be reduced to mathematics, once we consider it a> > divine science.

> >> > >> > > Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Regards,> > >> > > Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â ; Satish> > >> > > Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â> > > Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â

> > > --- On Wed, 11/4/09, Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:> > >> > >> > > >Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com>> > > > Why Shri KN Rao's Double Transit doesn't make

> > sense> > > >@gro ups.com> > > >Wednesday, November 4, 2009, 6:52 PM> > > >> > > >

> > > >Â> > > >Dear Friends,> > > >> > > >KP made timing an event much more easier. Though as a KP astrologer, I> > always feel that it will be nice to have another complementary method by

> > which we can cross-check and confirm. In search of another such method for> > timing events, I looked into many methods and Shri KN Rao's double transit> > is among them.> > > >

> > > >I personally feel that it is merely a tool for post-mortem and not> > useful for future predictions. Let us take an example of Marriage.> > Double-transit suggests that transiting Jupiter and Saturn will always be

> > aspecting Natal 7th and 7th lord at the time of marriage.> > > >> > > >Now Jupiter has three aspects - 5,7, and 9. So including its own> > position, it will be influencing four houses in any chart. Which means that

> > at any point of time the possibility of aspecting 7th is 33.33% and 7th lord> > is also 33.33%. If we take Jupiter's influence on either 7th OR 7th lord,> > possibility will double from 4/12 to 8/12 or 66.66%. So at any time, we have

> > 66.66% possibility of Jupiter aspecting either 7th or 7th lord. In other> > words, around 66% of time in one's life, we will see that Jupiter is> > influencing either 7th or 7th. Of course, this calculation doesn't consider

> > some of the possibility e.g. 7th lord is in 7th house itself. Anyways, I> > have seen Shri KN Rao is also checking Moon for transit other than> > Ascendant. Which doubles the possibility and if somehow Jupiter is not

> > aspecting 7th and 7th lord counting from Lagna, it will aspect 7th or 7th> > lord from Moon. So in any point of one's life, if take transit from Moon as> > well as Ascendant,> > > it is almost certain that Jupiter will influencing either 7th from

> > ascendant, or 7th lord from ascendant, or 7th from Moon, or 7th lord from> > Moon.> > > >> > > >Similarly, Saturn also has 3 aspects and the above write-up is true for

> > Saturn as well. In other words, seeing the above possibility, I feel that> > Double-Transit doesn't make sense at all.> > > >> > > >To sound this method sensible and experimental purpose, I checked

> > reducing the possibility by checking transit only from Ascendant. If I do> > that way, I have many cases where it fails.> > > >> > > >In other words, I do not find Double-transit theory useful at all.

> > > >> > > >Thanks & Regards,> > > >> > > >Punit Pandey> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 2:06 PM, aashish rai <raiaashish (AT) (DOT) co.in>

> > wrote:> > > >> > > >Â> > > >>Dear Sundar,> > > >>> > > >>In classical astrology there are so many dashas, if vimshottari was

> > only required than why did Parashara muni talked about so many dashas. Other> > dashas like Yogini are showing it.> > > >>Â> > > >>Let’s forget about DBAs for time being as per double transit theory

> > of Shri Kn rao  marriage chances are high when transit Saturn  and Jupiter> > aspect natal 1/7 axis or their natal lords. In rare cases 9th lord will be> > involved.> > > >>Â

> >> > > >>Natal chart,> > > >>Jupier is aspecting natal 7th lord, lagna lord and Lagna> > > >>Saturn is sitting in Lagna itself, aspecting 7th house> > > >>Â

> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>Won’t be surprised if there is a child birth/pregency before end> > august 2010 !!!> >> > > >>

> > > >>Regards,> > > >>Aashish> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > ________________________________> > > Sundar <sundar190561@ .co. in>

> > > >>> > > >>@gro ups.com> > > >>Wed, 4 November, 2009 10:31:33 AM> > > >> Re: Post mortem analysis of marriage

> > > >>> > > >>Â> > > >>Dear Aashish> > > >>> > > >>I know you would say, venus is the UL lord, hence the marriage in venus> > PAD. But did you see venus was debilitated on the day of marriage?

> > > >>> > > >>Thanks...... ....Sundar> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>@gro ups.com, aashish rai <raiaashish@ ...>

> > wrote:> > > >>>> > > >>> Dear Sundarji,> > > >>> I have just started learning KP and yet to pick up the basics. but if> > you use traditional astrology it's very clear. As this forum is for KP only

> > I am not elaborating.> > > >>>> > > >>> Regards,> > > >>> Aashish> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>

> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>> ____________ _________ _________ __> > > >>> Sundar <sundar190561@ ...>> > > >>> @gro ups.com

> > > >>> > > >>> Sun, 1 November, 2009 10:59:22 PM> > > >>> Post mortem analysis of marriage> > > >>>> > > >>>

> > > >>>> > > >>> Dear Learned members> > > >>>> > > >>> My neighbour go married on 21st Oct, 2009 between 9 to 10am. The> > transit of DBAS does not fully signify the event fully.

> > > >>>> > > >>> dob: 25th Aug, 1979> > > >>> tob: 9.37 (rectified)> > > >>> pob: Mumbai> > > >>>> > > >>> Time of birth reported is 9.22am

> > > >>> Ayanamsha : 23.28.58> > > >>>> > > >>> dasha/bukti/ antra> > > >>>> > > >>> planet sgl stl sl> > > >>> (MD)rahu(11) sun(11,12) venus(11,2-9) venus(11,2-9)

> > > >>> (AD)ketu(5) sat(12,5-6) rahu(11) venus(11,2-9)> > > >>> (PAD)venus(11, 2-9) sun(11,12) ketu(5) jupiter(11,4- 7)> > > >>>> > > >>> rahu=sun(11, 12)

> > > >>> ketu=saturn( 12,5-6)> > > >>>> > > >>> Marriage on 21st October 2009 between 9 am to 10 am> > > >>>> > > >>> planet sgl stl sl

> > > >>> (MD)rahu(4) sat(12,5-6) sun(1,12) jupiter(5,4- 7)> > > >>> (AD)ketu(10) moon(2,11) jupiter(5,4- 7) rahu-MD(4)> > > >>> (PAD)venus(12, 2-9) mer(1,1-10) moon(2,11) rahu-MD(4)

> > > >>>> > > >>> sun venus(12,2-9) mars(10,3-8) venus(12,2-9)> > > >>> moon mars(10,3-8) sat(12,5-6) venus(12,2-9)> > > >>>> > > >>> Baed on the above it is seen that MD/AD/PAD does not fully signify

> > DBAS (except for ketu, which is rahu's sub.> > > >>>> > > >>> In the light of the above how do we reconcile the timing of marriage.> > > >>>

> > > >>> Thanks...... ...Sundar> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>> Keep up with people you care about with India Mail. Learn how.

> > http://in.overview. mail.. com/connectmore> > > >>>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>

> > > >>________________________________> > > Connect more, do more and share more with India Mail. Learn more.> > > >> > >> >> > > >

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Yogesh Rao, I am sure with your decades of experience with KP systems,most times you would come out a winner. Looking forward to your article on marriage predicted and happened. How about the present case,I would like to improve, so would many others. Double transit by itself is not adequate,additional aspects need to be considered. Regards,

Satish--- On Sun, 11/8/09, Yogesh Lajmi <yogeshlajmi wrote:Yogesh Lajmi <yogeshlajmiRe: Re: Why Shri KN Rao's Double Transit doesn't make sense Cc: "R Satish" <rsatish1942Sunday, November 8, 2009, 12:54 PM

 

 

Dear Satish,

I am pleased to inform you that one of my real life cases where the prediction

came correct,inspite of many astrolgers predicting that the marriage will never take place... It took place on the very day that was predicted well in advance..and will most probably be published in the forthcoming K.P. & Astrology Annual...

I have used the same theory/method I have been advocating for some years now...a very slight modification of the late M.P.Shanmugham' s theory...

With kind regards,

Yogesh Lajmi.

GOOD LUCK !--- On Sun, 11/8/09, R Satish <rsatish1942@ > wrote:

R Satish <rsatish1942@ >Re: Re: Why Shri KN Rao's Double Transit doesn't make sense@gro ups.comSunday, November 8, 2009, 6:07 AM

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Sujata,

 

How does it compare to date as per KP. The dates given by others can be correlated. under 3 categories

 

1. Double transit as understood.

 

2. KP

 

3. Any other rule(s).

 

This exercise can seek to estabilish a correlation between sytems. Ulimately,

 

the system which gives correct date, will be validated after the wedding becomes an

 

event.

 

Members are requested to try this exercise.

 

 

Regards,

 

Satish--- On Sat, 11/7/09, sujata das <sujatadash1@ .co. in> wrote:

sujata das <sujatadash1@ .co. in>Re: Re: Why Shri KN Rao's Double Transit doesn't make sense@gro ups.comSaturday, November 7, 2009, 7:11 PM

 

 

Dear SatishSa aspects the 6th house from Virgo. He is running sa dasa so no marriage till sat moves to libraRegardsSujata

 

 

 

R Satish <rsatish1942@ >@gro ups.comFri, 6 November, 2009 11:16:23 PMRe: Re: Why Shri KN Rao's Double Transit doesn't make sense

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Atul,

 

I have provided an oppurtunity for member friends a live case for prediction.The method you may chose only give us your working,so we all learn.

 

Marriage date for a young man

 

Sept 13,1980 TOB 1559hrs Place Dadar Mumbai.

 

You may reply to the group or to me,should you feel restricted.

 

Regards,

 

Satish--- On Fri, 11/6/09, atul m <atulmaydeo > wrote:

atul m <atulmaydeo >Re: Re: Why Shri KN Rao's Double Transit doesn't make sense@gro ups.comFriday, November 6, 2009, 10:44 PM

 

 

 

 

Dear Punit JiBelow mentioned scheme is the extended and ratified version of Double transit ruleto predict marriage timings after carried lot of research out on large number of horoscopes.Most of these rules were used by eminent old Indian astrologers (unfortunately that knowledge is not passed on to the future generation properly) and they are giving very consistent out put on the same.This composite scheme is also mentioned in "Timing of Marriage" book written by various eminent astrlogers like M N Kedar, S N Kapoor etc.. and reviewed and acknowledged by K N Rao as mentioned in the book it-self.I have personally applied these schemes on large number of horoscopes and shared with lot of Parashari based astrologers, where they found it correct from what they have used and gives very good results.Please do not consider this response negatively as my intention is not to debate about whether it is a

variation or in-correct version of K N Rao double transit etc..but would like to give some references about this scheme and shed more light on applicability aspect so members can use the same to ameliorate further.End of the day, what matters is - consistent working RULE and knowledge of it's applicability.Thank you.RegardsAtul Maydeo.(if you haven't tried, you haven't lived so keep trying...)--- On Fri, 11/6/09, Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com>Re: Re: Why Shri KN Rao's Double Transit doesn't make sense@gro ups.comFriday, November 6, 2009, 11:00 AM

 

Dear Atul ji,

 

Thanks for sharing this information. Though this is the fourth variation for Double-Transit that we are seeing here. Also this is NOT what Shri KN Rao has taught in his books. As far as I remember, he has not used lagna in Double Transit?

 

Anyways, this is another rule that I'll check and come back.

Thanks & Regards,Punit Pandey

On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 2:39 AM, atul m <atulmaydeo > wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear AllI know this is not Parashari system forum but discussion started on Double transit of K N Rao so thought of sharing precise and complete details on this as per my knowledge and considering researched output from various eminent astrologers like M N Kedar, K N Rao, S N Kapoor, J N Gupta and Others - Four Tier Scheme of Composite Transit for Marriage Timings as per eminent astrologers like M N Kedar, K N Rao (although K N Rao further ratifies with Jaimini system as well apart from Parashari) and others as per below - 1. Saturn & Jupiter - Should have in transit aspected or transited over: a) Lagna and 7th House; or b) Lagna and 7th Lord; or c) Lagna lord and 7th house or d) Lagna lord and 7th lord (saturn within 27 months and jupiter within 12 months)2.

Jupiter - a) Natal Venus and 5th house/lord or b) 5th house and 9th house or c) 5th lord and 9th house or d) 5th house and 9th lord or e) 5th lord and 9th lord3. Mars - should have in transit covered within six months: a) what saturn and Jupiter must do, see(1) above; and b) what jupiter must do see (2) above4. The 7th lord - the 7th lord, in transit within 40 days of any marriage must establish contact with any of the following: a) the 11th lord b) the 9th lord c) the lagna lordAlso, at the time of marriage the lords of 7th, 9th, 5th and lagna will be mutually connected (P-position, A- aspect, C-conjunction) and in most of

the cases these will be around 7th, lagna or their lords.Note - Retrograde planets aspect from previous house as well.The results are very positive (more than 90%) with the above schemes after applying on large number of horoscopes for predicting marriage timings.if you tie-up with Jaimini dasha system then results are extreamly positive (97-98%).Although, normally it ties-up with Vimshottari Dasha system by all Parashari astrologers.Important - This applies considering horoscope does not have marriage denial features and in case of delayed horoscope, marriage turns up in 2nd round or some time 3rd round saturn and Jupiter transit as per above scheme.Although, marriage denial and very delayed (computing delay fators) is a seprate topic.Also, you may have noticed that moon or aspect from moon is NOT considered in this rule for predicting marriage timing.Hope this information is useful to all

interested members.RegardsAtul Maydeo.(if you haven't tried, you haven't lived so keep trying...) --- On Fri, 11/6/09, Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

 

Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com>Re: Re: Why Shri KN Rao's Double Transit doesn't make sense@gro ups.comFriday, November 6, 2009, 12:02 AM

 

 

Dear Satish,

 

So the rule for marriage you are suggesting is -

 

Condition 1. Jupiter should aspect ascendant or 7th house and Saturn should aspect Moon or 7th house from Moon

Condition 2. Saturn should aspect ascendant or 7th house and Jupiter should aspect Moon or 7th house from Moon

 

One of the above condition should be fulfilled. Is it what you are suggesting?

 

By the way, as I mentioned earlier, my observation was based on Shri KN Rao's teaching of Saturn and Jupiter's aspect on 7th and 7th lord. What you are telling seems different. Anyways, I'll try it out sometime and see.

Thanks & Regards,Punit Pandey

 

On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 7:30 PM, R Satish <rsatish1942@ > wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Punit,

What you say about Jup is perfect and easy to understand. When you take the Simultaneous transit of Sat over Lagna/7th or Moon/7th,these percentages get affected.

To clarify if Jup is aspecting Lagn/7th then Sat must aspect Moon/7th to fulfill the requirements.

 

As I mentioned,these happenings are not over 60% consistently. If it were so it would become a simple rule all emcompassing. To improve the % factor Venus/mars have been brought into the picture.

 

Even in KP,for marriages, we started with 2,7,11 houses. Later it became 2, 5,7 11 Astro secrets Pt 1). Then we added 5,8 houses to 2,7,11. Khullar has his rules so does Baskaran.. To add to this confusion, we added sub-sub theories.

 

It is a matter of time when the original formula would undergo such transformation, we would be unable to recognize the original.

 

Whether to use it for prediction or postmortem is a personal choice.Post mortem is easier to handle.However for predictions, we need the skills to try for corroboration one or more of these combinations for best-fit.

 

I for one, attempt to use KP + some others including Double-Transit of Jup/Sat (as I understand).

 

Failed predictions are a part of the game. I humbly accept,I am still a

learner and have many more miles to go.

 

Regards,

 

Satish

 

 

 

 

 

--- On Thu, 11/5/09, Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

 

 

Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com>Re: Re: Why Shri KN Rao's Double Transit doesn't make sense@gro ups.com

 

 

Thursday, November 5, 2009, 12:22 PM

 

 

Dear Satish,

 

What I am trying to convey that the rule will be true at any piont of time in one's life because it is too vague. Please go through my earlier email on this topic. The rule can not only justify marriage in 10 charts but in any chart.

 

Let us take today's chart as an example taking Leo as ascedant (12:06PM, Agra). Saturn is 7th lord from Leo and 7th sign from Leo is Aquarius.

 

Jupiter is aspecting 7th lord Saturn (1st year).. Next year (2nd year), Jupiter will be transiting over 7th house. Next year to that (3rd year), Jupiter will again 7th aspecting 7th lord. 4th year, there will no aspect on 7th and 7th lord. 5th year Jupiter will have 5th aspect on 7th lord. 6th year, Jupiter will be aspecting 7th house. 7th year, Jupiter will be transiting over 7th lord from Moon. 8th year, Jupiter will be aspecting 7th house from 7th aspect. 9th year, Jupiter will be transiting over 7th lord. 10 year, Jupiter will have 5th aspect on 7th house. 11th year, Jupiter will be transiting 7th from Moon. 12th year, again Jupiter will be aspecting 7th lord.

 

Jupiter cycle repeats every 12 year, so it is safe to say that at almost any point of this person's life (born today at 12:06PM at Agra), Jupiter will be either aspecting 7th or 7th lord from Ascendant or Moon. 11/12 = 92% possibility. Even If we check the rule only from Ascendant (and ignore Moon), Jupiter will be aspecting 7th or 7th lord 9/12=75% of time. In other words, whatever year this person marries, double-transit will be able to justify it :-) Does Double Transit make any sense?

 

Thanks & Regards,Punit Pandey

 

On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 11:52 AM, R Satish <rsatish1942@ > wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Punit,

I refer to the book"ADVANCED TECHNIQUES OF ASTROLOGICAL

 

PREDICTIONS" edited Sri KN Rao.In one of the chapters 'Tajika Shastra and Marriage

timing of Event" by Dr R K Wishwakarma, he has given 8 rules for timing marriage date with

 

case studies. He validates 10 samples ,where Sat/Jup aspect 7th house/lord.

 

He adds further Venus/Mars interconnection on marriage date.

 

 

We can only try to minimise the number of rules,but cannot reduce

 

significantly, all introduced thru trial and error,like we are presently doing.

 

Regards,

 

 

 

Satish--- On Wed, 11/4/09, Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

 

 

Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com>Re: Re: Why Shri KN Rao's Double Transit doesn't make sense

@gro ups.com

 

 

Wednesday, November 4, 2009, 11:15 PM

 

 

Dear Mssumich,

 

Please note few points -

 

1. A method needs to be mathematically correct first before we can talk about predictive aspect of the method. As I mentioned this method is fundamentally flawed and doesn't make sense. I have mentioned the reason and would love to hear if somebody can show that I am missing something.

 

2. Double transit, as mentioned by Paul Manley, is different from what Shri KN Rao has used in his books. By Double-Transit, Shri KN Rao doesn't mean that both the planet should aspect one single sign, but one planet aspecting the house and other house lord (generally). As I demonstrated, this condition will match almost 100% of time and hence it makes this tool a good tool for post-mortem and justification. Though not useful for predictions.

 

3. If a method doesn't work, we should leave it and move on. If we will not accept that the method doesn't make sense, we can not discard it. By saying something like "we need to check dasa and yoga etc.", we want to prove it some way or other.. Why? If it doens't work, it doesn't work. We should not accpet anything blindly. There are quite a few teachings by Shri KN Rao that works and we should use them. Teachings that do not work, we should discard them..

 

4. I don not understand why you are mixing placidus with double-transit. Let us not mix both the threads. Though i guess that the way you asked your earlier question was not good for generating discussion. In my opinion, correct way for asking question is to present your own analysis and ask your question. If you are learner, you should present your detailed analysis. What is your analysis as per KP? What is your analysis as per Traditional? Saying that I am able to justify events using Traditional but not KP seems too vague a statement. I do not see reference of Sub in your post. I don't see reference of Nakshatra in your post. That doesn't qualify as a KP analysis and hence doesn't provoke any response. This I guess may be the reason you didn't get response.

 

Thanks & Regards,

Punit Pandey

 

On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 9:45 PM, mssumich <mssumich > wrote:

 

 

 

 

Hi PunitLike many of the 100s of tools that Jyotish gives - don't believe in all the techniques that one comes up with. From Paul Manley's website here is what he says"What you'll see in the following illustrations is how the sign(s) that gets the double transit will shift, generally from year to year. In fact, there are only two positions of Jupiter and Saturn that will not have the double transit phenomenon – when Jupiter is in the 8th or 12th house from Saturn. This means that 10 out of the 12 possible positions, or more than 80% of the time, there will be the double transit phenomenon happening in at least one sign, possibly two."I have see this double transit work sometimes and sometimes not. Obviuosly we have to pay attention to sookshma transits (or finer transits) and just double transit.I urge some expert to answer my question on the Placidus house system for a chart that I put on the other day. One bhava covers 58

deg of zodiac, there are 3 planets in 8th house; This person is very succesful. I can explain every event using vedic astreology and nakshatra analysis. The moment I put 3 planets in 8th in this chart, I am lost.For latititude that are closer to 66 deg N or S - I believe the Placidus system of houses give wierd house cusps(correct me if I am wrong). This actor was born in Scotland where latitude in 55deg. My question is for people born in such norhtern altitudes -what system works? Is it still Placidus wasy of calculating houses or something else. There should a clear answer from KP experts. I am hoping there is that person in this list.thanks

 

 

 

 

 

@gro ups.com, Punit Pandey <punitp wrote:>> Dear Friends,> > KP made timing an event much more easier. Though as a KP astrologer, I> always feel that it will be nice to have another complementary method by> which we can cross-check and confirm. In search of another such method for> timing events, I looked into many methods and Shri KN Rao's double transit> is among them.> > I personally feel that it is merely a tool for post-mortem and not useful> for future predictions. Let us take an example of Marriage. Double-transit> suggests that transiting Jupiter and Saturn will always be aspecting Natal> 7th and 7th lord at the time of marriage.> > Now Jupiter has three aspects - 5,7, and 9. So including its own

position,> it will be influencing four houses in any chart. Which means that at any> point of time the possibility of aspecting 7th is 33.33% and 7th lord is> also 33..33%. If we take Jupiter's influence on either 7th OR 7th lord,> possibility will double from 4/12 to 8/12 or 66.66%. So at any time, we have> 66.66% possibility of Jupiter aspecting either 7th or 7th lord. In other> words, around 66% of time in one's life, we will see that Jupiter is> influencing either 7th or 7th. Of course, this calculation doesn't consider> some of the possibility e.g. 7th lord is in 7th house itself. Anyways, I> have seen Shri KN Rao is also checking Moon for transit other than> Ascendant. Which doubles the possibility and if somehow Jupiter is not> aspecting 7th and 7th lord counting from Lagna, it will aspect 7th or 7th> lord from Moon. So in any point of one's life, if take transit

from Moon as> well as Ascendant, it is almost certain that Jupiter will influencing either> 7th from ascendant, or 7th lord from ascendant, or 7th from Moon, or 7th> lord from Moon.> > Similarly, Saturn also has 3 aspects and the above write-up is true for> Saturn as well. In other words, seeing the above possibility, I feel that> Double-Transit doesn't make sense at all.> > To sound this method sensible and experimental purpose, I checked reducing> the possibility by checking transit only from Ascendant. If I do that way, I> have many cases where it fails.> > In other words, I do not find Double-transit theory useful at all.> > Thanks & Regards,> > Punit Pandey> >

> On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 2:06 PM, aashish rai <raiaashish@. ..> wrote:> > >> >> > Dear Sundar,> >> > In classical astrology there are so many dashas, if vimshottari was only> > required than why did Parashara muni talked about so many dashas. Other> > dashas like Yogini are showing it.> >> >> >> > Let's forget about DBAs for time being as per double transit theory of Shri> > Kn rao marriage chances are high when transit Saturn and Jupiter aspect> > natal 1/7 axis or their natal lords. In rare cases 9th lord will be> > involved.> >> >> >> > Natal chart,> >> > Jupier is aspecting natal 7th lord, lagna lord and Lagna> >> > Saturn is sitting in Lagna itself, aspecting 7th house> >> >>

>> >> > Won't be surprised if there is a child birth/pregency before end august> > 2010 !!!> >> > Regards,> > Aashish> >> > ------------ --------- ---------> > ** Sundar <sundar190561@ ...>> >> > *To:* @gro ups.com

 

 

> > *Sent:* Wed, 4 November, 2009 10:31:33 AM> > *Subject:* Re: Post mortem analysis of marriage> >> >> >> > Dear Aashish> >> > I know you would say, venus is the UL lord, hence the marriage in venus> > PAD. But did you see venus was debilitated on the day of marriage?> >> > Thanks...... . .....Sundar> >> > @gro ups.com <%40. com>, aashish > > rai <raiaashish@ ...> wrote:> > >> > > Dear Sundarji,> > > I have just started learning KP and yet to pick up the basics. but if you> > use traditional astrology it's very clear. As this forum is for KP only I am> > not elaborating.> > >> > > Regards,> > > Aashish> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > ____________ _________ _________ __> > > Sundar <sundar190561@ ...>> > > @gro ups.com <%40. com>

 

> >> > > Sun, 1 November, 2009 10:59:22 PM> > > Post mortem analysis of marriage> > >> > >> > >> > > Dear Learned members> > >> > > My neighbour go married on 21st Oct, 2009 between 9 to 10am. The transit> > of DBAS does not fully signify the event fully.> > >> > > dob: 25th Aug, 1979> > > tob: 9.37 (rectified)> > > pob: Mumbai> > >> > > Time of birth reported is 9.22am> > > Ayanamsha : 23.28.58> > >> > > dasha/bukti/ antra> > >> > > planet sgl stl sl> > > (MD)rahu(11) sun(11,12) venus(11,2-9) venus(11,2-9)> > > (AD)ketu(5) sat(12,5-6) rahu(11) venus(11,2-9)> > > (PAD)venus(11, 2-9) sun(11,12) ketu(5) jupiter(11,4-

7)> > >> > > rahu=sun(11, 12)> > > ketu=saturn( 12,5-6)> > >> > > Marriage on 21st October 2009 between 9 am to 10 am> > >> > > planet sgl stl sl> > > (MD)rahu(4) sat(12,5-6) sun(1,12) jupiter(5,4- 7)> > > (AD)ketu(10) moon(2,11) jupiter(5,4- 7) rahu-MD(4)> > > (PAD)venus(12, 2-9) mer(1,1-10) moon(2,11) rahu-MD(4)> > >> > > sun venus(12,2-9) mars(10,3-8) venus(12,2-9)> > > moon mars(10,3-8) sat(12,5-6) venus(12,2-9)> > >> > > Baed on the above it is seen that MD/AD/PAD does not fully signify DBAS> > (except for ketu, which is rahu's sub.> > >> > > In the light of the above how do we reconcile the timing of marriage.> > >> > > Thanks...... ...Sundar> > >> > >> >

>> > >> > >> > > Keep up with people you care about with India Mail. Learn how. http://in.overview.> > mail.. com/connectmore<http://in.overview. mail.. com/connectmore>> > >> >> >> > ------------ --------- ---------> > Connect more, do more and share more with India Mail. Learn more<http://in.rd. / tagline_galaxy_ 3/*http:/ /in.overview. mail... com/>> > .> >> > > >>

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Homepage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Punitji,

 

At marriage i observe few things as under :

 

1)First look in which category the marriage possibility is there in the chart,

like early marriage [20-25],timely marriage [25-28], late marriage [29-36], this

is broadly explained in research work in one of the book of KnRao. [ i am not

remembering the name right now].

 

2) Than at the point of time when the query comes to me, i look at the Udu dasas

and its possibility to give marriage with respect to Lagna, moon, Navamsha and

(d-4 for females). Major problems comes when D-9 chart is wrongly erected, so i

have confirm D-9 chart from its past events which itself is not a easy process.

 

3) I reconfirm it with the 'Chara dasa' as given by K n Rao to increase the

probability ratio.

 

4) Finally i touch up Double transit method III & IV as you have mentioned. I

also look at the astakvarge to see the strength of transits. I never depends on

only transits.

 

So it is a long process for me.

 

**********************************

 

Even i am also looking for the alternative shorter method if any in KP to find

the marriage date :).

 

Thankyou,

Regards,

Vijay Goel

Jaipur.

 

 

 

 

 

, Punit Pandey <punitp wrote:

>

> Dear Vijay ji,

>

> Let us call spade a spade. If it doesn't work, it doesn't work. Why there is

> a need to justify? Why we can not throw away the camps in favour of

> astrology itself? I am surprised by your email which instead of talking

> about any mathematical (where this theory is not making sense) or predictive

> aspect, just talks about " theory needs deep understanding ... prominent

> astrologers are using this theory successfully etc. "

>

> See your email and my thoughts/ remarks -

> // Okay if i take is correct as per your mathematical calculation [ which

> could be false if 7L is in 7H]

> than also what is the problem, 7th house holds many significance, person is

> continuously doing some karma and 7th house is 10th from 10 House, so

> recognition of one's efforts are coming to one's life frequently.//

> Please understand that the possibilty is of 7L in 7H is just 1 out of 12, so

> it doesn't make much difference in calculation. Whether 66.66% or 63%

> percent, the problems with the theory remains the same.

>

> I also wonder, if Double-Transit condition fulfills 60% or 90% of time, how

> you use it for selecting a moment. Would appreciate any practical example,

> if you feel that this theory has some essence.

>

> //I have already said that you have to look 7th house in other divisional

> charts as well, especially D-9. For better tuning of this double transit you

> must also look the navamsha position of this double transit, many more

> secrets will be revealed.//

>

> With due respect to you, it made me laugh. If D1 can give 66% possiblity, if

> we include D9, it will become 100%. What is the use? If I am missing

> something, please explain with practical example.

>

> By the way, Shri KN Rao has not advocated use of Double-Transit in Divisonal

> charts in any of his book, as far as I remeber. You can correct me if I am

> wrong, by producing a quote from his book. I, fortunatley, have almost all

> his books. (This can be taken as one fo the proofs that I respect him a lot

> and like his approach. Though it doesn't stop me critisizing what I find

> illogical.)

>

> // While looking this transit you have to look Astakvarge points also.

> There are many factors attached to it.

> Few more pointers has been discussed in AIA by Manoj ji who does not belong

> to KNRao camp like me :).

> /message/27596 //

>

> Thanks for adding Ashtakvarga in it. But it keeps the probability 100%, as

> the probability can not go beyong 100% now as many coditions we add :-) Are

> you not realizting that adding so many system is not really making any

> sense? I can not stop you for using it, but unfortunately it is not making

> any sense to me. More system, easier it is for justification, but it has no

> predictive value.

>

> Manoj ji says that the system works only 70%. Depending upon what you can a

> double transit, we have probability of it satisfying upto 89% (as shown in

> previous emails). Though this doesn't mean that it works " 89% " but it simply

> mean that it can justify any event " 89% " of time. As I mentioned earlier,

> more relaxed theory you have, more percentage of cases it will be able to

> justify.

>

> As there are four variations of Double-Transit, it is also important that I

> understand which Double-Transit, you are referring to. I have defined all

> four variations of Double-Transit at

> /message/29185. Please let me know

> if you are referring any of those or want to have any other variation (which

> has D-charts and Ashtakvarga), it will help in having a more focussed

> discussion.

>

> Some of the importants points like -

> 1. Do you consider transit just from Ascendant or Moon or both?

> 2. Do you consider aspect from previous house as well, if the planet is

> retrograde?

>

> // I have not said to use any DASA \ ANTARDASA, again your understanding of

> this context is incorrect.//

> Sorry for not getting it properly. Do you mean that Transitting Saturn will

> have Rasi aspect on DK at the time of marriage?

>

> // Since this theory needs deep understanding over the subject as a whole,

> it requires time and study. If many prominent astrologers in India are using

> double transit for their prediction, it simply means that they have some

> more keys to use it.

> I have earlier said that double transit theory is rare Nadi technique which

> is much popularised by Sri KnRao [not invented by him and learnt from his

> mother].//

>

> On the contrary, it requires basic mathematics to see that it is merely a

> justification tool and doesn't have any predictive value. The theory is very

> simple and straight-forward. We complicate it when we are not able to

> justify something.

>

> Arguments that others are using it successfully so the theory must be true

> doesn't look like a scientific argument. Where is the proof that others are

> using this theory successfully? Do we have some study that can be shared and

> verified - may be on 50 charts or 100 charts? You can check file section of

> the forum for some example studies. There must be some verification to the

> clamins?

>

> Shri KN Rao generally say that only 1 out of 20,000 astrologers are able to

> predict. So please do not follow those remining 19,999 astrologers :-)

>

> Finally, though the email is written in lighter mood, my intentions are very

> much of a learner's intention. If I am incorrect or missing something, I

> would love to listen and correct. *Eventually what we care about is the tool

> that can help us in accurate predictions. *

>

> Thanks & Regards,

>

> Punit Pandey

>

>

> On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 8:50 AM, vijay.goel <goyalvj wrote:

>

> >

> >

> > Dear Punit ji,

> >

> > Message number :

> > //In other words, around 66% of time in one's life, we will see that

> > Jupiter is influencing either 7th or 7th.//

> >

> > Okay if i take is correct as per your mathematical calculation [ which

> > could be false if 7L is in 7H]

> > than also what is the problem, 7th house holds many significance, person is

> > continuously doing some karma and 7th house is 10th from 10 House, so

> > recognition of one's efforts are coming to one's life frequently.

> >

> > I have already said that you have to look 7th house in other divisional

> > charts as well, especially D-9. For better tuning of this double transit you

> > must also look the navamsha position of this double transit, many more

> > secrets will be revealed.

> >

> > While looking this transit you have to look Astakvarge points also.

> > There are many factors attached to it.

> > Few more pointers has been discussed in AIA by Manoj ji who does not belong

> > to KNRao camp like me :).

> > /message/27596

> >

> > ///Also I tested the Sutra what you are referring about Char dasa aspect on

> > DK.

> > Again we should note that one rasi aspect three other rasis at any time

> > (four signs influenced) so that this sutra is going to be true 33.33%

> > anyways. If we include antardasa as well apart from mahadasa (aspects on two

> > rasis), probability of aspect will increase to 66.66% and it will feel like

> > working the way Double-Transit feels :-)///

> >

> > I have not said to use any DASA \ ANTARDASA, again your understanding of

> > this context is incorrect.

> >

> > Since this theory needs deep understanding over the subject as a whole, it

> > requires time and study. If many prominent astrologers in India are using

> > double transit for their prediction, it simply means that they have some

> > more keys to use it.

> > I have earlier said that double transit theory is rare Nadi technique which

> > is much popularised by Sri KnRao [not invented by him and learnt from his

> > mother].

> >

> > As this forum is more focus to discuss KP methods systematically and

> > scientifically, i am much interested in it only. I donot like to discuss

> > traditionally astrology here.

> >

> > I really appreciates the esteemed astrologer [including you] here for

> > removing many mis-conception in KP and clearly defining and not mixing up

> > the various advance version of KP methods.

> >

> > Thankyou,

> > Regards,

> > Vijay Goel

> > Jaipur

> >

> > <%40>, Punit

> > Pandey <punitp@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Dear Vijay ji,

> > >

> > > I myself tested this theory hundreds of time and didn't find it working

> > at

> > > all. That is the reason I initiated this thread. I have given

> > mathematical

> > > reasons why the theory is not correct. Please see some of recent posts on

> > > this topic by me -

> > > /message/29125

> > > /message/29198

> > >

> > > Please go through them and tell me where my understanding is incorrect.

> > >

> > > Let us not defend something which is mathematically incorrect. Either the

> > > theory or my calculation - one thing is definitely incorrect.

> > >

> > > Also I tested the Sutra what you are referring about Char dasa aspect on

> > DK.

> > > Again we should note that one rasi aspect three other rasis at any time

> > > (four signs influenced) so that this sutra is going to be true 33.33%

> > > anyways. If we include antardasa as well apart from mahadasa (aspects on

> > two

> > > rasis), probability of aspect will increase to 66.66% and it will feel

> > like

> > > working the way Double-Transit feels :-) Statistical study reveals that

> > 60%

> > > percentage is misnomer (at least to me). Though let us not discuss this

> > > sutra, but finish discussion on Double Transit first.

> > >

> > > Thanks & Regards,

> > >

> > > Punit Pandey

> > >

> > >

> > > On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 12:14 AM, vijay.goel <goyalvj@> wrote:

> > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Dear All,

> > > >

> > > > Namaskar ,

> > > >

> > > > First of all double transit theory has been tested by hundreds of

> > students,

> > > > who learnt and follow shri K n Rao tested methodologies, [even by me

> > several

> > > > times as a professional astrologer].

> > > >

> > > > In Traditional astrology only transit does not matter completely, we

> > have

> > > > to see many other aspects and riders, even at transit Astakvarge plays

> > an

> > > > important role.

> > > >

> > > > Secondly 7th house does not only limited to first marriage. It has

> > several

> > > > other significance. To see which significance is going to fructity we

> > must

> > > > also look the 7th house of all other divisional charts.

> > > >

> > > > OKAY, i will give you one more sutra to check the possibility of

> > marriage

> > > > which also works 60%, just see when saturn has Rasi aspect (jaimini

> > aspect)

> > > > on the Dara Karak planet.

> > > >

> > > > For any new comer in KP system, one will get confused by seeing many

> > houses

> > > > getting activated in any set of DBAS and can come to many

> > possibilities. But

> > > > by proper practice and constant learning this type of doubts gets

> > cleared.

> > > >

> > > > In short i will say that the most secret of Nadi principles of 'Double

> > > > transit of saturn and jupiter' is ONLY exposed by shri K N Rao to the

> > world

> > > > at large with many proofs. Before it was practiced very secretly by

> > very

> > > > very few astrologer in India.

> > > >

> > > > Thankyou,

> > > > Regards,

> > > > Vijay Goel

> > > > Jaipur.

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

<%40><%

> > 40>, Luther

> >

> > > > Rath <rathluther@> wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > Dear sir,

> > > > > No one denies Astrology to be a devine Science. In fact it is. But

> > when

> > > > it is a science, it definitely bases on Mathematics. From beginning of

> > > > casting of a horoscope we all use mathematics. For determining the

> > position

> > > > os Planets in the heaven we use mathematics. And why diregard

> > mathematics

> > > > while going for prediction? Punitji is right in saying that 'Double

> > Transit "

> > > > could be seen in most of the charts as per rule of posibilities. So it

> > > > cannot be a tool for predictions of marriage. He also says, it helps

> > in

> > > > post mortem cases. If any one supports this method let him predict 5

> > cases

> > > > of marriage and prove it. Let us end the theoritical discussion on this

> > > > issue but face it and prove it in practice. I do not mean to hurt any

> > one

> > > > but wish to come to the right track of learning.

> > > >

> > > > > With due regards to all.

> > > > > Dr. RathÂ

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > ________________________________

> > > > > R Satish <rsatish1942@>

> > > >

> > > > >

<%40><%

> > 40>

> >

> > > > > Thu, November 5, 2009 11:27:00 AM

> > > > > Re: Why Shri KN Rao's Double Transit doesn't

> > make

> > > > sense

> > > > >

> > > > > Â

> > > > > Â Â Dear Punit and friends,

> > > > >

> > > > > Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â I would suggest we also examine Lagna/7th

> > > >  or Moon/7th being  aspected by both Jup and Sat simultaneously.

> > > > Additionally on the day of marriage,Venus aspects Mars.

> > > > >

> > > > > Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â These will improve the strike rate. In any

> > > > case % adove 60 is a myth  on CONSISTENT basis.

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â We trying to make a difficult job

> > > > easier.Astrology cannot be reduced to mathematics, once we consider it

> > a

> > > > divine science.

> > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Regards,

> > > > >

> > > > > Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â ; Satish

> > > > >

> > > > > Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â

> > > > > Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â

> > > > > --- On Wed, 11/4/09, Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > >Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com>

> > > > > > Why Shri KN Rao's Double Transit doesn't make

> > > > sense

> > > > > >@gro ups.com

> > > > > >Wednesday, November 4, 2009, 6:52 PM

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >Â

> > > > > >Dear Friends,

> > > > > >

> > > > > >KP made timing an event much more easier. Though as a KP astrologer,

> > I

> > > > always feel that it will be nice to have another complementary method

> > by

> > > > which we can cross-check and confirm. In search of another such method

> > for

> > > > timing events, I looked into many methods and Shri KN Rao's double

> > transit

> > > > is among them.

> > > > > >

> > > > > >I personally feel that it is merely a tool for post-mortem and not

> > > > useful for future predictions. Let us take an example of Marriage.

> > > > Double-transit suggests that transiting Jupiter and Saturn will always

> > be

> > > > aspecting Natal 7th and 7th lord at the time of marriage.

> > > > > >

> > > > > >Now Jupiter has three aspects - 5,7, and 9. So including its own

> > > > position, it will be influencing four houses in any chart. Which means

> > that

> > > > at any point of time the possibility of aspecting 7th is 33.33% and 7th

> > lord

> > > > is also 33.33%. If we take Jupiter's influence on either 7th OR 7th

> > lord,

> > > > possibility will double from 4/12 to 8/12 or 66.66%. So at any time, we

> > have

> > > > 66.66% possibility of Jupiter aspecting either 7th or 7th lord. In

> > other

> > > > words, around 66% of time in one's life, we will see that Jupiter is

> > > > influencing either 7th or 7th. Of course, this calculation doesn't

> > consider

> > > > some of the possibility e.g. 7th lord is in 7th house itself. Anyways,

> > I

> > > > have seen Shri KN Rao is also checking Moon for transit other than

> > > > Ascendant. Which doubles the possibility and if somehow Jupiter is not

> > > > aspecting 7th and 7th lord counting from Lagna, it will aspect 7th or

> > 7th

> > > > lord from Moon. So in any point of one's life, if take transit from

> > Moon as

> > > > well as Ascendant,

> > > > > it is almost certain that Jupiter will influencing either 7th from

> > > > ascendant, or 7th lord from ascendant, or 7th from Moon, or 7th lord

> > from

> > > > Moon.

> > > > > >

> > > > > >Similarly, Saturn also has 3 aspects and the above write-up is true

> > for

> > > > Saturn as well. In other words, seeing the above possibility, I feel

> > that

> > > > Double-Transit doesn't make sense at all.

> > > > > >

> > > > > >To sound this method sensible and experimental purpose, I checked

> > > > reducing the possibility by checking transit only from Ascendant. If I

> > do

> > > > that way, I have many cases where it fails.

> > > > > >

> > > > > >In other words, I do not find Double-transit theory useful at all.

> > > > > >

> > > > > >Thanks & Regards,

> > > > > >

> > > > > >Punit Pandey

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 2:06 PM, aashish rai <raiaashish (AT) (DOT)

> > co.in>

> > > > wrote:

> > > > > >

> > > > > >Â

> > > > > >>Dear Sundar,

> > > > > >>

> > > > > >>In classical astrology there are so many dashas, if vimshottari was

> > > > only required than why did Parashara muni talked about so many dashas.

> > Other

> > > > dashas like Yogini are showing it.

> > > > > >>Â

> > > > > >>Let’s forget about DBAs for time being as per double transit

> > theory

> > > > of Shri Kn rao  marriage chances are high when transit Saturn  and

> > Jupiter

> > > > aspect natal 1/7 axis or their natal lords. In rare cases 9th lord will

> > be

> > > > involved.

> > > > > >>Â

> > > >

> > > > > >>Natal chart,

> > > > > >>Jupier is aspecting natal 7th lord, lagna lord and Lagna

> > > > > >>Saturn is sitting in Lagna itself, aspecting 7th house

> > > > > >>Â

> > > > > >>

> > > > > >>

> > > > > >>

> > > > > >>Won’t be surprised if there is a child birth/pregency before end

> > > > august 2010 !!!

> > > >

> > > > > >>

> > > > > >>Regards,

> > > > > >>Aashish

> > > > > >>

> > > > > >>

> > > > > >>

> > > > > ________________________________

> > > > > Sundar <sundar190561@ .co. in>

> > > > > >>

> > > > > >>@gro ups.com

> > > > > >>Wed, 4 November, 2009 10:31:33 AM

> > > > > >> Re: Post mortem analysis of marriage

> > > > > >>

> > > > > >>Â

> > > > > >>Dear Aashish

> > > > > >>

> > > > > >>I know you would say, venus is the UL lord, hence the marriage in

> > venus

> > > > PAD. But did you see venus was debilitated on the day of marriage?

> > > > > >>

> > > > > >>Thanks...... ....Sundar

> > > > > >>

> > > > > >>

> > > > > >>@gro ups.com, aashish rai <raiaashish@ ...>

> > > > wrote:

> > > > > >>>

> > > > > >>> Dear Sundarji,

> > > > > >>> I have just started learning KP and yet to pick up the basics.

> > but if

> > > > you use traditional astrology it's very clear. As this forum is for KP

> > only

> > > > I am not elaborating.

> > > > > >>>

> > > > > >>> Regards,

> > > > > >>> Aashish

> > > > > >>>

> > > > > >>>

> > > > > >>>

> > > > > >>>

> > > > > >>>

> > > > > >>> ____________ _________ _________ __

> > > > > >>> Sundar <sundar190561@ ...>

> > > > > >>> @gro ups.com

> > > > > >>

> > > > > >>> Sun, 1 November, 2009 10:59:22 PM

> > > > > >>> Post mortem analysis of marriage

> > > > > >>>

> > > > > >>>

> > > > > >>>

> > > > > >>> Dear Learned members

> > > > > >>>

> > > > > >>> My neighbour go married on 21st Oct, 2009 between 9 to 10am. The

> > > > transit of DBAS does not fully signify the event fully.

> > > > > >>>

> > > > > >>> dob: 25th Aug, 1979

> > > > > >>> tob: 9.37 (rectified)

> > > > > >>> pob: Mumbai

> > > > > >>>

> > > > > >>> Time of birth reported is 9.22am

> > > > > >>> Ayanamsha : 23.28.58

> > > > > >>>

> > > > > >>> dasha/bukti/ antra

> > > > > >>>

> > > > > >>> planet sgl stl sl

> > > > > >>> (MD)rahu(11) sun(11,12) venus(11,2-9) venus(11,2-9)

> > > > > >>> (AD)ketu(5) sat(12,5-6) rahu(11) venus(11,2-9)

> > > > > >>> (PAD)venus(11, 2-9) sun(11,12) ketu(5) jupiter(11,4- 7)

> > > > > >>>

> > > > > >>> rahu=sun(11, 12)

> > > > > >>> ketu=saturn( 12,5-6)

> > > > > >>>

> > > > > >>> Marriage on 21st October 2009 between 9 am to 10 am

> > > > > >>>

> > > > > >>> planet sgl stl sl

> > > > > >>> (MD)rahu(4) sat(12,5-6) sun(1,12) jupiter(5,4- 7)

> > > > > >>> (AD)ketu(10) moon(2,11) jupiter(5,4- 7) rahu-MD(4)

> > > > > >>> (PAD)venus(12, 2-9) mer(1,1-10) moon(2,11) rahu-MD(4)

> > > > > >>>

> > > > > >>> sun venus(12,2-9) mars(10,3-8) venus(12,2-9)

> > > > > >>> moon mars(10,3-8) sat(12,5-6) venus(12,2-9)

> > > > > >>>

> > > > > >>> Baed on the above it is seen that MD/AD/PAD does not fully

> > signify

> > > > DBAS (except for ketu, which is rahu's sub.

> > > > > >>>

> > > > > >>> In the light of the above how do we reconcile the timing of

> > marriage.

> > > > > >>>

> > > > > >>> Thanks...... ...Sundar

> > > > > >>>

> > > > > >>>

> > > > > >>>

> > > > > >>>

> > > > > >>>

> > > > > >>> Keep up with people you care about with India Mail. Learn

> > how.

> > > > http://in.overview. mail.. com/connectmore

> > > > > >>>

> > > > > >>

> > > > > >>

> > > > > >>

> > > > > >>________________________________

> > > > > Connect more, do more and share more with India Mail. Learn

> > more.

> > > > > >

> > > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > >

> >

> >

> >

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Lajmiji,

 

//I am sad to observe that some people hail K.N.Rao's theory as very

effective,while there is an equal number of people who do not think much of

it...//

 

It is the problem with people who donot want to understand the 'complete'

teaching of KnRao, sticking with few popularised methods uneducatively.

 

This same problem also you are facing with BTR rules you yourself experimenting,

in this forum with the 'like minded people', what to say about others !.

 

Your two experience on the works of KP :

1) moons star = ascendent sub.....

2) While meeting with any people, at that point of time, Asc. star will be the

persons moon's star.....

Is not easily digestable by like minded KP astrologers but you are successfully

applying it.

 

So this can never be an issue who is right and who is wrong.

 

//Now you have a great opportunity to prove K.N.Rao and his theory correct...I

am sure you will not like to miss it...//

 

I donot require to proof anything to anybody, I am using it effectively and am

convinced. I have given large number of successful prediction in my professional

jyotishi career based on his teachings i am able to grasped.

 

Astrology is a Holistic subject and requires SYSTEMATIC and holistic approach.

 

I am open to all method which can help me to give more better prediction. I

always move with open mind at all methods in astrology while listening.

 

Your experience in 'Pure' KP methods is no doubt is respectable but giving

disrespect to fellow astrologer will never bring any additional respect to you

in this democratic country :)

 

Thankyou,

Regards,

Vijay Goel

Jaipur.

 

, Yogesh Lajmi <yogeshlajmi wrote:

>

> Dear Vijay,

>                I am sad to observe that some people hail

K.N.Rao's theory as very effective,while there is an equal number of people who

do not think much of it...

>               Therefore,I suggest Vijayji,you should give

examples of atleast 5 predictions,

> made in advance,divining/predicting the correct date of marriage...using this

theory of K.N.Rao...personally,as said earlier,i have been watching KNrao on

TV...but he seems to discuss the rationalisation to suit his " theory " using only

past events... !

>               Now you have a great opportunity to prove K.N.Rao

and his theory correct...I am sure you will not like to miss it...

>               With best wishes,

>               Yogesh Lajmi.

>

                                        

GOOD LUCK !

>              

>

> --- On Sat, 11/7/09, vijay.goel <goyalvj wrote:

>

>

> vijay.goel <goyalvj

> Re: Why Shri KN Rao's Double Transit doesn't make sense

>

> Saturday, November 7, 2009, 6:44 PM

>

>

>  

>

>

>

>

>

> Dear All,

>

> Namaskar ,

>

> First of all double transit theory has been tested by hundreds of students,

who learnt and follow shri K n Rao tested methodologies, [even by me several

times as a professional astrologer].

>

> In Traditional astrology only transit does not matter completely, we have to

see many other aspects and riders, even at transit Astakvarge plays an important

role.

>

> Secondly 7th house does not only limited to first marriage. It has several

other significance. To see which significance is going to fructity we must also

look the 7th house of all other divisional charts.

>

> OKAY, i will give you one more sutra to check the possibility of marriage

which also works 60%, just see when saturn has Rasi aspect (jaimini aspect) on

the Dara Karak planet.

>

> For any new comer in KP system, one will get confused by seeing many houses

getting activated in any set of DBAS and can come to many possibilities. But by

proper practice and constant learning this type of doubts gets cleared.

>

> In short i will say that the most secret of Nadi principles of 'Double transit

of saturn and jupiter' is ONLY exposed by shri K N Rao to the world at large

with many proofs. Before it was practiced very secretly by very very few

astrologer in India.

>

> Thankyou,

> Regards,

> Vijay Goel

> Jaipur.

>

> @gro ups.com, Luther Rath <rathluther@ ...> wrote:

> >

> > Dear sir,

> > No one denies Astrology to be a devine Science. In fact it is. But when

it is a science, it definitely bases on Mathematics. From beginning of casting

of a horoscope we all use mathematics. For determining the position os Planets

in the heaven we use mathematics. And why diregard mathematics while going for

prediction? Punitji is right in saying that 'Double Transit " could be seen in

most of the charts as per rule of posibilities. So it cannot be a tool for

predictions of marriage. He also says, it helps in post mortem cases. If any one

supports this method let him predict 5 cases of marriage and prove it. Let us

end the theoritical discussion on this issue but face it and prove it in

practice. I do not mean to hurt any one but wish to come to the right track

of learning.

> > With due regards to all.

> > Dr. Rath 

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > ____________ _________ _________ __

> > R Satish <rsatish1942@ ...>

> > @gro ups.com

> > Thu, November 5, 2009 11:27:00 AM

> > Re: Why Shri KN Rao's Double Transit doesn't make

sense

> >

> >  

> >   Dear Punit and friends,

> >

> >                    I would suggest we also

examine Lagna/7th  or Moon/7th being  aspected by both Jup and Sat

simultaneously. Additionally on the day of marriage,Venus aspects Mars.

> >

> >                    These will improve the

strike rate. In any case % adove 60 is a myth  on CONSISTENT basis.

> >

> >

> >                     We trying to make a

difficult job easier.Astrology cannot be reduced to mathematics, once we

consider it a divine science.

> >

> >                     Regards,

> >

> >                     ; Satish

> >

> >                     

> >                     

> > --- On Wed, 11/4/09, Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

> >

> >

> > >Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com>

> > > Why Shri KN Rao's Double Transit doesn't make sense

> > >@gro ups.com

> > >Wednesday, November 4, 2009, 6:52 PM

> > >

> > >

> > > 

> > >Dear Friends,

> > >

> > >KP made timing an event much more easier. Though as a KP astrologer, I

always feel that it will be nice to have another complementary method by which

we can cross-check and confirm. In search of another such method for timing

events, I looked into many methods and Shri KN Rao's double transit is among

them.

> > >

> > >I personally feel that it is merely a tool for post-mortem and not useful

for future predictions. Let us take an example of Marriage. Double-transit

suggests that transiting Jupiter and Saturn will always be aspecting Natal 7th

and 7th lord at the time of marriage.

> > >

> > >Now Jupiter has three aspects - 5,7, and 9. So including its own position,

it will be influencing four houses in any chart. Which means that at any point

of time the possibility of aspecting 7th is 33.33% and 7th lord is also 33.33%.

If we take Jupiter's influence on either 7th OR 7th lord, possibility will

double from 4/12 to 8/12 or 66.66%. So at any time, we have 66.66% possibility

of Jupiter aspecting either 7th or 7th lord. In other words, around 66% of time

in one's life, we will see that Jupiter is influencing either 7th or 7th. Of

course, this calculation doesn't consider some of the possibility e.g. 7th lord

is in 7th house itself. Anyways, I have seen Shri KN Rao is also checking Moon

for transit other than Ascendant. Which doubles the possibility and if somehow

Jupiter is not aspecting 7th and 7th lord counting from Lagna, it will aspect

7th or 7th lord from Moon. So in any point of one's life, if take transit from

Moon as well as

> Ascendant,

> > it is almost certain that Jupiter will influencing either 7th from

ascendant, or 7th lord from ascendant, or 7th from Moon, or 7th lord from Moon.

> > >

> > >Similarly, Saturn also has 3 aspects and the above write-up is true for

Saturn as well. In other words, seeing the above possibility, I feel that

Double-Transit doesn't make sense at all.

> > >

> > >To sound this method sensible and experimental purpose, I checked reducing

the possibility by checking transit only from Ascendant. If I do that way, I

have many cases where it fails.

> > >

> > >In other words, I do not find Double-transit theory useful at all.

> > >

> > >Thanks & Regards,

> > >

> > >Punit Pandey

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 2:06 PM, aashish rai <raiaashish@ . co.in>

wrote:

> > >

> > > 

> > >>Dear Sundar,

> > >>

> > >>In classical astrology there are so many dashas, if vimshottari was only

required than why did Parashara muni talked about so many dashas. Other dashas

like Yogini are showing it.

> > >> 

> > >>Let’s forget about DBAs for time being as per double transit theory

of Shri Kn rao  marriage chances are high when transit Saturn  and Jupiter

aspect natal 1/7 axis or their natal lords. In rare cases 9th lord will be

involved.

> > >> 

> > >>Natal chart,

> > >>Jupier is aspecting natal 7th lord, lagna lord and Lagna

> > >>Saturn is sitting in Lagna itself, aspecting 7th house

> > >> 

> > >>

> > >>

> > >>

> > >>Won’t be surprised if there is a child birth/pregency before end

august 2010 !!!

> > >>

> > >>Regards,

> > >>Aashish

> > >>

> > >>

> > >>

> > ____________ _________ _________ __

> > Sundar <sundar190561@ .co. in>

> > >>

> > >>@gro ups.com

> > >>Wed, 4 November, 2009 10:31:33 AM

> > >> Re: Post mortem analysis of marriage

> > >>

> > >> 

> > >>Dear Aashish

> > >>

> > >>I know you would say, venus is the UL lord, hence the marriage in venus

PAD. But did you see venus was debilitated on the day of marriage?

> > >>

> > >>Thanks.... .. ....Sundar

> > >>

> > >>

> > >>@gro ups.com, aashish rai <raiaashish@ ...> wrote:

> > >>>

> > >>> Dear Sundarji,

> > >>> I have just started learning KP and yet to pick up the basics. but if

you use traditional astrology it's very clear. As this forum is for KP only I am

not elaborating.

> > >>>

> > >>> Regards,

> > >>> Aashish

> > >>>

> > >>>

> > >>>

> > >>>

> > >>>

> > >>> ____________ _________ _________ __

> > >>> Sundar <sundar190561@ ...>

> > >>> @gro ups.com

> > >>

> > >>> Sun, 1 November, 2009 10:59:22 PM

> > >>> Post mortem analysis of marriage

> > >>>

> > >>>

> > >>>

> > >>> Dear Learned members

> > >>>

> > >>> My neighbour go married on 21st Oct, 2009 between 9 to 10am. The transit

of DBAS does not fully signify the event fully.

> > >>>

> > >>> dob: 25th Aug, 1979

> > >>> tob: 9.37 (rectified)

> > >>> pob: Mumbai

> > >>>

> > >>> Time of birth reported is 9.22am

> > >>> Ayanamsha : 23.28.58

> > >>>

> > >>> dasha/bukti/ antra

> > >>>

> > >>> planet sgl stl sl

> > >>> (MD)rahu(11) sun(11,12) venus(11,2-9) venus(11,2-9)

> > >>> (AD)ketu(5) sat(12,5-6) rahu(11) venus(11,2-9)

> > >>> (PAD)venus(11, 2-9) sun(11,12) ketu(5) jupiter(11,4- 7)

> > >>>

> > >>> rahu=sun(11, 12)

> > >>> ketu=saturn( 12,5-6)

> > >>>

> > >>> Marriage on 21st October 2009 between 9 am to 10 am

> > >>>

> > >>> planet sgl stl sl

> > >>> (MD)rahu(4) sat(12,5-6) sun(1,12) jupiter(5,4- 7)

> > >>> (AD)ketu(10) moon(2,11) jupiter(5,4- 7) rahu-MD(4)

> > >>> (PAD)venus(12, 2-9) mer(1,1-10) moon(2,11) rahu-MD(4)

> > >>>

> > >>> sun venus(12,2-9) mars(10,3-8) venus(12,2-9)

> > >>> moon mars(10,3-8) sat(12,5-6) venus(12,2-9)

> > >>>

> > >>> Baed on the above it is seen that MD/AD/PAD does not fully signify DBAS

(except for ketu, which is rahu's sub.

> > >>>

> > >>> In the light of the above how do we reconcile the timing of marriage.

> > >>>

> > >>> Thanks...... ...Sundar

> > >>>

> > >>>

> > >>>

> > >>>

> > >>>

> > >>> Keep up with people you care about with India Mail. Learn how.

http://in.overview. mail.. com/connectmore

> > >>>

> > >>

> > >>

> > >>

> > >>__________ _________ _________ ____

> > Connect more, do more and share more with India Mail. Learn more.

> > >

> >

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...