Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Oye Lalith! No one here is afraid of you....

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Dear Lalith:

 

The whole world knows the history of Blessed Meera Bhai....the

epitome of Bhakti......She was attached to her " Lala " - the wonderful

idol of Krishna gifted to her even from her childhood....Do you mean

to say that innocent young girl started chanting " Kliim krishnaaya "

mantra automatically? Even Bhakta Prahlaada had to be initiated by

Sage Naaradha for his chant of dwaadasaakshari mantra....

 

Nobody is afraid of you here......You need not proclaim that you are

not in the business of a Guru.....actually Guru status is not a

business (true to your half-baked knowledge you will claim it is also

like software engineering!). The difference my friend between you

and other great persons like Rafal or Dakshinamoorthiji is that they

are spending their money for the internet, whereas you are pilfering

your company's time and the company's resources while browsing the

internet. Don't you think you are cheating your company when you

spend so much time on empty and egoistic posts defending yourself

against every expert after arguing with them unnecessarily? Are you

not getting paid for the time you spend in the company....Know the

basics of ethics before ever sermonizing.....So, actually you are an

exploiter....try to understand that....the other gurujis are probably

too decent to comment on that......What happened to your project?

Better rush to it nough!....It will spare us the agony of replying to

your half-witted postings!

 

By the say, Which member asked you Prashna Tantra dear? We did not

see any posts requesting " Honourable Lalith " to explain Prashna

Tantra (as if you could explain it!) What arrogance you have to

claim that nobody can stand before you.....Guruji's posts exposed

your ignorance....you did not even know how to ask queries and get

replies from one of the most empathetic astrologers of this group,

and yet you claim you are this and that......

 

For your information....nobody is afraid of you..Rather you should be

afraid of yourself......Your foolishness itself will be your doom.

Did you not become the laughing stock due to your email-based chasing

of Priyaa? Such foolishness in occult matters could be more costly

dear.....I think Mohanraaamji and Rafalji are only afraid about your

own well-being! They are not afraid of you. Nor am I afraid of you.

 

Your posts never answer the queries or points raised by others; you

take off on a new ground only because of your shallow understanding

of subjects. Nobody has accepted you as a Guru here, and nobody

will....Can a fire-fly eclipse the Sun? There are too many " Suns "

here and you are just a fire-fly.

 

It reminds me of a story.....Once an ant challenged the mighty

elephant for a fight; the elephant obviously could not hear the ant

(the ant being so tiny and it was on the ground, its sound could not

reach the elephant). The elephant just walked away out of its own

volition in its natural course. Then the ant claimed, " you see I

challenged the elephant and it ran away " . Dear, your saying that

nobody can stand before you is similar to that.......

 

FIRST LEARN THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN GHOSTS AND YOUR ANCESTOR

SUMANGALIS BEFORE WRITING THE FIRST POSTS ON OCCULT! What a

pity......what a pity.....That we have to bear your meaningless

rantings here!

 

Abhishek.

 

vedic astrology , " litsol " <mishra.lalit

wrote:

>

>

> I was waiting for u dear..

>

> why u took time ?

>

> Do u mean Meera Bai discussed with u, what she did..

>

> Do u know 'Kleem Krishnay, Govindaya Gopijan Vallabhaya Namh' is a

> mantra for lord krishna.

>

> is there no beej mantras, to whom u wish to misguide ? let thnigs

> remain between lord, bhakta , their shraddha and their guru.

>

> why u people are so afraid of me, i m not in business of guru.

>

> i m happy with my life, my profession of software engineering and

> my hobbies ok.

>

> there are 7000+ members are here, by writing such type of foolish

> things u expose urself only, mind, there are better brains here.

>

> this is enough ...

>

>

>

>

>

>

vedic astrology ,

> " abhishekpotti " <abhishekpotti@> wrote:

> >

> > Respected Mohanraaamji:

> >

> > Well said. Lalith is saying that " maybe in south india devotees

> > don't chant Moola mantras but not so in North " ...What

> > stupidity.....He does not seem to understand that " mantra

shaastra

> > experts " are also devotees, but they cannot be called as innocent

> > saatwik bhaktaas! A typical example of a pure saadhwik bhakta

will

> > be Meera Bhai (was she not North Indian). Can Lalith say which

> Dasa

> > Mahaa Vidya Meera Bhai practised? She was immersed in Krishna

> > consciousness and Lover for Him. Her own Bhajans were her

prayers

> in

> > the bhaavana of Bhakti in the form of Love! This is not mantra

> > shaastra. Another example will be Saant Tukhaaraam. These

> bhaktaas

> > did not chant moola mantraas. Panditji Dakshinamoorthi was on

dot

> in

> > saying that " Pure bhaktaas do not chant complicated moola

> mantraas " .

> > You have clarified this fact wonderfully in your post. I wish

more

> > knowledgeable persons also put erratic posters in their place

just

> as

> > Mohanraaamji does here. This will benefit more naive readers of

> > these forums who might otherwise get confused as to which of the

> > paths to follow. Actually, anyone can follow any path as he/ she

> > deems it fit; but there should be consistency of procedures.

> >

> > We should not confuse mantrik rituals and bhakti doctrines.

> Bhaktaas

> > can chant the names of Gods at anytime.....Mantra shaastra

experts

> > chanting advanced moola mantras should necessarily adopt ritual

> > procedures for the welfare of themselves and others!

> Yes...improper

> > chanting of mantras can cause danger to the society also just as

> > proper chanting can help others. Hence, this cannot be

considered

> as

> > a personal preference of the aspirant. If this was not the case,

> why

> > did sages codify spiritual practises scrupulously? Rafalji,

> > Mohanraaamji, etc. are correct in saying it is best to follow

> Pandit

> > Dakshinamoorthiji's advices on mantra shastra or japams. He is

> > learned and he is living a life compatible to the shaastras

though

> he

> > has faced uncertain circumstances in his own personal life. He

> never

> > compromised on principles and he willingly paid the price for

that

> > which most of us will never do. The words of such a person

should

> > obviously carry more weight.

> >

> > Abhishek.

> >

> > vedic astrology , " mohanraaam "

<mohanraaam@>

> > wrote:

> > >

> > > Well Lalith:

> > >

> > > If you have really done dasa Maha Vidyaa, you would have never

> > > approached a professional astrologer for consultation...that

much

> I

> > > can say....

> > >

> > > And what idiocy when you say Panditji is partly wrong? He

> > > said " Bhaktaas do not chant Moola mantras " , whereas you have

> edited

> > > the words to suit your ends....He never said " devotees don't

> chant

> > > Beej mantras " .....You are putting words into his mouth and

> assuming

> > > he is wrong! Why, do you know....the Great Panditji himself

> chants

> > > Moola mantras.....He is a bhakta and a mantra shastra expert.

As

> a

> > > bhakta he keeps incessant chanting of naama japa throughout the

> > day;

> > > as a mantra shastra expert, he restricts the moola mantra

japams

> to

> > > stipulated times with ritual purity.....It is this wonderful

> > practice

> > > that Guruji was alluding to. Guruji cannot be wrong in ritual

> and

> > > occult matters. Please understand that.

> > >

> > > There are 4 classes of Devotees.......1) Saatwik vedic devotees

> who

> > > will follow vedic dharma scrupulously. They will not dare to

> > compare

> > > astrology and vedanga to Engineering! as you did...

> > > 2) Raajasik devotees who will follow vedic disciplines as far

as

> > > possible, but will still go after upaasanaas of Demi-Gods for

> > > accomplishment of siddhis. Mantra shaastra experts usually

fall

> in

> > > this category.

> > > 3) Saatwik Bhaktaas - for whom the meditation and glory of

their

> > > Ishta Devataa is enough for spiritual satisfaction. It is this

> > > category that Guruji referred to when he said they will not

chant

> > > Moola mantras too much. Definitely they will not do Dasa Mahaa

> > > Vidyaa.

> > > 4) Taamasic Devotees - Those whose main motive is to project

> > > themselves at all costs and acting as if they are equal to the

> > > experts; they will try ALL practices - whether they are

> sanctioned

> > by

> > > vedas or not.....Their only aim is personal glory and

> > satisfaction.

> > > They will attack even established dharma if they do not get

> results

> > > (sounds familiar....You are one!) Ignorance and half-baked

> > knowledge

> > > and egotism are these persons' motivating fuel.

> > >

> > > You are really satan's Gift to this list.......My only prayer

is

> > that

> > > innocent members of this list do not get side-tracked with your

> > > ramblings.

> > >

> > > Let me make this clear to the list.....Panditji said that

saatwik

> > > Bhaktaas who chant Divine names only due to Pure Love on God

> > usually

> > > never chant mantrik moola mantraas. It is just one class of

> > > devotees. A rajasik bhakta who is a mantra-shaastra expert may

> > even

> > > be a bhakta at heart; and a pure bhakta may sometimes chant

some

> > > mantrik japams for solving some practical issues......But, when

> > they

> > > switch their routines temporarily, these enlightened devotees

> > usually

> > > take good guidance and follow the tenets of shaastras

> > > scrupulously....Definitely they will not sit on assumption like

> > > Lalith.

> > >

> > > On the one hand, this fellow claims he has done chants in

> forests,

> > > rivers, earth, etc. (Probably we have a Maharishi here! What

> > heights

> > > of pointless pride in this young man list....it is

disgusting!).

> > On

> > > the other hand, he says he chants mantras in buses, trains,

> > etc......

> > > He is confused about which no body can have issues. Only his

> Guru

> > > should be concerned about that.....But, his attempts to stuff

his

> > > shallow understanding upon this list is reprehensible. And,

his

> > > habit of quoting experts out of context is really condemnable.

> May

> > > Jupiter's Light Shine on that fellow and teach him to respect

the

> > > hallowed traditions and to stay at his level rather than trying

> > > to " teach " others (He has the audacity to claim he

is " teaching "

> > > Rafalji!)

> > >

> > > If a mere young man of 35 years who has spent his life on a

> " Failed

> > > computer web desining business " , " pointless email chasing of

> > girls " ,

> > > and other " past times " can gain insight as he claims, how much

> will

> > > learned Gurus of this group with their life of devotion to

> vedanta

> > > and vedanga know? His peanut brain and hyper-inflated ego will

> > never

> > > allow him to see this obvious truth. But, please list exercise

> > your

> > > discretion while reading his posts (There are doubtless some

good

> > > elements even in his posts; but mostly there is trash presented

> as

> > > philosophy).

> > >

> > > Mohanraaam

> > >

> > > vedic astrology , " litsol "

<mishra.lalit@>

> > > wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Dear Rafal,

> > > >

> > > > Do u think, a hobby means shallow knowledge of the domain, No

> > > rafal,

> > > > it's not like that.

> > > >

> > > > At least not for me. You have learnt and i m learning, i read

> > ur's

> > > > replies and get benifitted, same way i wanted you to pay

heed

> to

> > > > what i have written about spritiuality, mostrly i did write

for

> u

> > > >

> > > > I have done all 10 mahavidyas of tantra and read many tantrik

> > > > classics, spent good deal of time with great tantriks

trained

> in

> > > > Kamakhya and other places, keenly observed their doings,

their

> > > > mistakes etc.., I did tremendous mantra chanting on water,

on

> > > earth,

> > > > at home, in forests etc...

> > > >

> > > > then reached here, then i did write something, but sorry i

dont

> > > > remember shlokas. i was not interested in cramming that.

> > > >

> > > > Panditji is not fully correct in saying that BeejMantras are

> not

> > > > chanted by devotees, I dont know much about South India but

in

> > > North

> > > > normally its done.

> > > >

> > > > And a successfull mantra sadhana has to result in one's being

a

> > > > devotee, the devotion is the outcome, final result of mantra

> > > sadhana,

> > > > perhaps, Pandit Ji believes mantras are power packet,thinks,

i

> do

> > > it

> > > > this way , these many times and get this result, this is

where

> > most

> > > > of the people are confused. without being a good human being

if

> > we

> > > > think, we will achieve something in spirituality, is

difficult,

> > > very

> > > > difficult.

> > > >

> > > > what happens is, with the mantra chanting, a self

> > transformation

> > > > process begins, u if dont restrict urself, ur karma begins

> > > diluting,

> > > > and u begin ur purification process unknowingly, when

> substantial

> > > > part of ego and greed for respect vanishes and many such

thing

> > > > togather, mantra awakens u and with the God's grace ur

> objective

> > > gets

> > > > fullfilled, gradually u become a devotee. ur being simple and

> > being

> > > > devotee is sometimes is indication of ur's going on the right

> > track.

> > > >

> > > > I think we have discussed a lot, it's enough !!

> > > >

> > > > My Boss has given me lot of projects to complete, so, may be,

i

> m

> > > not

> > > > going to available in the group like i was recently. however.

i

> > > will

> > > > complete Garg Hora series.

> > > >

> > > > regards,

> > > > Lalit.

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > vedic astrology , Rafal Gendarz

> > > > <starsuponme@> wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > *hraum namah adityaya*

> > > > >

> > > > > Dear Litsol,

> > > > >

> > > > > Then please dont generalize Your preferences as they are

too

> > > > shallow for

> > > > > this Forum aspiration.

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Regards,

> > > > > Rafal Gendarz

> > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru

> > > > > email: rafal@

> > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa.com

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > litsol napisa?(a):

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Dear Rafel,

> > > > > >

> > > > > > I take Astrology as a good hobby, and i w'd be looking at

> it

> > > with

> > > > an

> > > > > > engineer's approach.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > I asked ur age because, it's our thinking to put our

> > parameters

> > > in

> > > > > > god's system, there is nothing like delay or advancement

in

> > > > > > spirituality. So, " Delay " or " Speed " , " backwardness "

> > > > > > and " advancement " doesn't exist in spirituality, I

thought

> if

> > u

> > > r

> > > > > > thinking that it may take too much time, I wanted to tell

> u,

> > > it's

> > > > not

> > > > > > like that. there is no delay.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > It clicks in fraction of a second, when u r getting

clicked

> > > > depends

> > > > > > on u and on god's will, when he wants u to get clicked.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > God sometimes graces for no reason ( " Ahetuka " ) just for

his

> > > > > > compassion towards u and it may happen next minute too.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > spirituality is not delimited by time , effort and rules.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > regards,

> > > > > > Lalit.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > vedic astrology

> > > > > > <vedic astrology%40>, Rafal Gendarz

> > > > > > <starsuponme@ ...> wrote:

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya*

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Dear Litsol,

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Please be careful about words.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Im happy that You are sharing Your experience - very

> > > inspirating

> > > > > > ones.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Age hierarchy is for sudras - Manu Samhita. If You

treat

> > > Jyotish

> > > > > > Vedanga

> > > > > > > as profession similar to engineering You have a long

way

> to

> > > go.

> > > > But

> > > > > > dont

> > > > > > > be pessimistic here are many who will try to help You

in

> > > getting

> > > > > > proper

> > > > > > > understanding.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > After some time You will agree with me about the mala

and

> > > japa.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Regards,

> > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz

> > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru

> > > > > > > email: rafal@

> > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > litsol napisa?(a):

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Dear Rafal,

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Here u r doing two wrong things, instead of

developing

> ur

> > > > > > understanding,

> > > > > > > > u r trying to conclude something and going beyond

that

> u r

> > > > > > messaging

> > > > > > > > same to many.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > I m touching 35, What's ur age ?

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Astrology is a kind of vidya or profession, like i m

a

> > > > software

> > > > > > > > engineer, software engineering is my profession.

> > > spirituality

> > > > is

> > > > > > beyond

> > > > > > > > all sort of vidya or profession.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > I wish u to be a good soul and to realize the bliss

of

> > self

> > > > > > awakening or

> > > > > > > > in other terms, the bliss that comes once u feel u

and

> > god

> > > is

> > > > > > > > connected. dissolved in each other.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > First realize, experience, then speak and then

suggest

> to

> > > > others,

> > > > > > by

> > > > > > > > mere reading shastras or books u r not going to feel

> it.

> > > > unless

> > > > > > god

> > > > > > > > graces u it's very very difficult. and if u dont

avoid

> > this

> > > > sort

> > > > > > of

> > > > > > > > hurriedness instead of learning and understanding, it

> > will

> > > > affect

> > > > > > u only

> > > > > > > > no one else.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > somehere i have read, it was written - By mere

> > > repeating " So-

> > > > > > Aham " no

> > > > > > > > one gets liberated unless he realizes it like one

> doesnt

> > get

> > > > > > cured by

> > > > > > > > knowing the name of the medicine, u need to take the

> > > medicine

> > > > to

> > > > > > get

> > > > > > > > cured " .

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > So, pls. be wise, as it was being discussed here, i

> > shared

> > > the

> > > > > > > > experience of my life, pls. mind it, i m not a

> preecher,

> > > nor a

> > > > > > guru, nor

> > > > > > > > i have to make my followers, nor it's my profession,

> nor

> > i

> > > > have

> > > > > > to get

> > > > > > > > fame, sharing things is a kind of friendliness a kind

of

> > > > > > affection,

> > > > > > > > that's it.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > regards,

> > > > > > > > Lalit.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > vedic astrology

> > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. com>, Rafal

> > Gendarz

> > > > > > > > <starsuponme@ ...>

> > > > > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya*

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > Dear Jyotishas

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > Counting of mala has more depth sense than just

> > counting,

> > > > so for

> > > > > > > > natives

> > > > > > > > > like Litsol counting is neccessary and any other

> > > speculation

> > > > > > will be

> > > > > > > > > only illusory and just imagination. We should

follow

> Pt.

> > > > > > > > Dakshinamoorti

> > > > > > > > > advise strictly, otherwise our process of spiritual

> > > > development

> > > > > > will

> > > > > > > > be

> > > > > > > > > slow and unauthoritative.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > Regards,

> > > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz

> > > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru

> > > > > > > > > email: rafal@

> > > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > asmp2k02@ napisa?(a):

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > Resp Sri Lalitji,

> > > > > > > > > > Thanks for your mail.But please also read

> > > > GuruDakshinamurthyi

> > > > > > ji's

> > > > > > > > > > mail(addressing me) also on this,which brings in

> more

> > > > clarity

> > > > > > to the

> > > > > > > > > > applicability principles to my mail.

> > > > > > > > > > I meant that both are necessity but to what

degree

> of

> > > time

> > > > (it

> > > > > > varies

> > > > > > > > > > from saadhaka to saadhaka) to get such inbuilt

> > maturity

> > > > such

> > > > > > that

> > > > > > > > that

> > > > > > > > > > the count will be taken care of by Divine forces

> > after

> > > > some

> > > > > > initial

> > > > > > > > > > period of saadhana.

> > > > > > > > > > Morover the type of bio matter present in the

japa

> > maala

> > > > > > (which is

> > > > > > > > > > symbolic for ritualism as well as from practical

> > point

> > > of

> > > > > > view for

> > > > > > > > our

> > > > > > > > > > count) will help in keeping away destructive

forces

> > > > acting on

> > > > > > us

> > > > > > > > .Thus

> > > > > > > > > > the symbolic rituals will indirectly help us in

> > keeping

> > > > away

> > > > > > from

> > > > > > > > > > negative thoughts and also trains our memory to

be

> > > object

> > > > > > > > oriented.If

> > > > > > > > > > our memory grows and retentive capacity increase

> the

> > > > Gnaana

> > > > > > will

> > > > > > > > > > increase ,but at the same time destructive forces

> > > > > > (diversions) also

> > > > > > > > > > becomes powerful.Thus the symbolic procedures

will

> > come

> > > in

> > > > > > handy to

> > > > > > > > > > successfully fight the negative forces.The

rituals

> > may

> > > be

> > > > > > Rising

> > > > > > > > > > early(if possible during Braahmi muhurta),Taking

> > > > > > bath,Japaanusthaan,

> > > > > > > > > > attending to the livelihood job etc etc in

defined

> > > times

> > > > as

> > > > > > > > discipline

> > > > > > > > > > helps indirectly tune our memory through keeping

> our

> > > body

> > > > > > healthy.

> > > > > > > > > > Thus ultimately we conclude that the so called

> > symbolic

> > > > > > procedures

> > > > > > > > are

> > > > > > > > > > not actually symbolic(it got branded as such) but

a

> > > > necessity

> > > > > > for

> > > > > > > > our

> > > > > > > > > > own good if we practice to the extent we can.

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > Quoting mishra.lalit@ ... <mishra. lalit%

> > > 40gmail.

> > > > com>:

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > Resp. Sri Murthy Adavi,

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > Yes, what you said is perfectly right, we count

or

> > dont

> > > > > > count,target

> > > > > > > > > > is realization of god's love within, I got it

with

> no

> > > > > > counting,

> > > > > > > > > > someone may get it with counting.

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > Thanx, for the writing.

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > regards,

> > > > > > > > > > Lalit.

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology

> > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. com>

> > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. com>,

> > srinivasa

> > > > > > murthy adavi

> > > > > > > > > > asmp2k02@ wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > Respected Learned Members,

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > Both views may be correct when the views

have/or

> > with

> > > > the

> > > > > > goal as

> > > > > > > > > > development of Love/Devotion towards adhistana

> > Devatha

> > > of

> > > > the

> > > > > > Mantra

> > > > > > > > > > as Base.

> > > > > > > > > > > In the initial stage only you need the count;as

> one

> > > > > > develops the

> > > > > > > > > > habit the biological tuning of the intellect/body

> will

> > > > > > automatically

> > > > > > > > > > take care of the practice(without count-help of

> malas

> > > > etc).

> > > > > > > > > > > It's like if with the help of Alarm clock if we

> > wake

> > > up

> > > > for

> > > > > > 2 or 3

> > > > > > > > > > days at some appointed hour,then automatically we

> > > wakeup

> > > > at

> > > > > > the same

> > > > > > > > > > time every day without help of alarm.

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > With due Respects

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > smadavi

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > Quoting starsuponme@ :

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya*

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > Dear Litsol,

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > Definitely we should count our Mantra Japa on

> Mala.

> > > Your

> > > > > > view is

> > > > > > > > > > against

> > > > > > > > > > > Vedic Authorities and Sages, so should be

> rejected.

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > Regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz

> > > > > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru

> > > > > > > > > > > email: rafal@

> > > > > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > litsol napisa?(a):

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Mr. Jayashri,

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > A thought came, why i should not share with

u,

> U

> > > pls.

> > > > stop

> > > > > > > > > > counting

> > > > > > > > > > > > mantra chantings, counting mantra gives false

> ego

> > > and

> > > > then

> > > > > > > > > > > > frustration if u dont get desired results.

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > leave it to the god, god counts the mantra

> > chanted

> > > by

> > > > you

> > > > > > may be

> > > > > > > > > > > > 108, 1008 or whatsoever, let him count, it's

> his

> > > part

> > > > and

> > > > > > ur

> > > > > > > > part

> > > > > > > > > > is

> > > > > > > > > > > > to chant the mantra. when the mantra has to

> > awaken,

> > > it

> > > > > > will be,

> > > > > > > > > > god

> > > > > > > > > > > > will ensure it for u.

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > sometimes we try to become more intelligent

> with

> > out

> > > > > > limited

> > > > > > > > > > > > intellect and that creates obstacles in our

> > > spiritual

> > > > > > growth.

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > So, forget about counts, forget about the

time

> u

> > > put

> > > > in

> > > > > > for ur's

> > > > > > > > > > > > sadhana, invoke the god with pure heart.

purity

> > > > counts.

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > > Lalit.

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology

> > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40.

> > > > > > com>, " dakshinastrologer "

> > > > > > > > > > > > <dakshinastrologer@ ...> wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Ms. Jayashree:

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > I think this topic on 108 is getting very

> > > > interesting

> > > > > > and

> > > > > > > > > > > > > enlightening for all members. Yesterday we

> had a

> > > > > > wonderful

> > > > > > > > > > > > esoteric

> > > > > > > > > > > > > explanation from Shri. Sushil Dikshit, and

> > today

> > > > your

> > > > > > > > wonderful

> > > > > > > > > > > > > explanation of numerical symmetry of the

> cosmos!

> > > > > > Wonderful.

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > There definitely exists a " numerical

> symphony "

> > in

> > > > the

> > > > > > > > Universe.

> > > > > > > > > > > > But,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > not only 108.....as I mentioned in my

earlier

> > > post,

> > > > > > there are

> > > > > > > > > > > > various

> > > > > > > > > > > > > other numerals that are significant in

occult

> > > > > > practices. 108

> > > > > > > > is

> > > > > > > > > > a

> > > > > > > > > > > > > powerful and all-purpose perfect

> number...While

> > > we

> > > > have

> > > > > > > > > > understood

> > > > > > > > > > > > > the glory of 108, we should not lose sight

of

> > the

> > > > fact

> > > > > > that

> > > > > > > > > > there

> > > > > > > > > > > > are

> > > > > > > > > > > > > other powerful numbers also. This is just

for

> > the

> > > > > > information

> > > > > > > > of

> > > > > > > > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > > > > > list.

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > My apprecitation again for this wonderful

> > > response.

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Blessed be.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Pandit R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI.

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Blessed be.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Pandit R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI. vedic-

> > > > > > > > > > > > > astrology@grou ps.com

<astrology%

> > > > > > > > > > 40. com>,

> > > > > > > > > > > > " jayasartn " <jayasartn@> wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > In cosmology, 108 has this significance -

> the

> > > > moon is

> > > > > > away

> > > > > > > > > > from

> > > > > > > > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > earth 108 times its (moon's) diameter and

> the

> > > sun

> > > > is

> > > > > > away

> > > > > > > > > > from the

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > earth, 108 times its diameter.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Perhaps this reality of distances is

> > applicable

> > > to

> > > > > > deities

> > > > > > > > > > too.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Perhaps this has been indicated by the

108

> > divya

> > > > > > desas of

> > > > > > > > Lord

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Narayana.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > jayasree

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology

> > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40.

> > > > > > com>, " dakshinastrologer "

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > <dakshinastrologer@ > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Shri. Sushil:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It is a wonderful answer you have given.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Blessed be.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pandit R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology

> > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40.

> > > > > > com>, " sushil.dikshit "

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <sushil.dikshit@ > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Babu,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It is not a silly question but it is

a

> > very

> > > > good

> > > > > > > > question.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Actually

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > there are 27 Nakshatras and every

> > Nakshtras

> > > > has 4

> > > > > > Charan

> > > > > > > > > > so

> > > > > > > > > > > > > total

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > charans are 27 x 4 = 108 Charan. Each

> > > Charan

> > > > has 3

> > > > > > > > degree

> > > > > > > > > > and

> > > > > > > > > > > > > 20

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > minutes so if you multiply 3 degree

and

> 20

> > > > > > minutes to

> > > > > > > > 108

> > > > > > > > > > it

> > > > > > > > > > > > > comes

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > out to be 360 degress i.e. one cycle

> > > (Circle).

> > > > > > This

> > > > > > > > cycle

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > represetns

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > whole brahmand because all the

rashis,

> > > > planets and

> > > > > > > > > > nakshatra

> > > > > > > > > > > > > are

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > between these 360 degree in 2

> dimensional

> > > > > > horoscope. So

> > > > > > > > > > > > > chanting a

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mantra completes one cycle of this

> > brahmand.

> > > > > > Further One

> > > > > > > > > > who

> > > > > > > > > > > > > has

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > visited Brahamand at least one time

> i.e.

> > he

> > > is

> > > > > > > > > > brahmagyani he

> > > > > > > > > > > > > is

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > entitiled to place 108 Shri before

his

> > name.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sushil dikshit

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology@ .

com

> > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40.

com>,

> > babu

> > > > mon

> > > > > > > > > > > > > <muthappan111@ >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Namaste,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It may be a silly matter for all of

> you.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I want to know what is the reason

> that

> > > some

> > > > > > remedies

> > > > > > > > > > > > > recomended

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > for 108 times.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I dont know any thing about

astrology.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I hope you may pleased to provide a

> > reply

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thanks,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Babu

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------ --------- --------- ---

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Be a better Globetrotter. Get

better

> > > travel

> > > > > > answers

> > > > > > > > from

> > > > > > > > > > > > > someone

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > who knows.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Answers - Check it out.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message

> have

> > > been

> > > > > > removed]

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been

> > removed]

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been

> > removed]

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been

> removed]

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been

removed]

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

*hraum namah adityaya*

 

Dear Jyotishas,

 

Please dont use my name in that quarrel. Thank You.

 

 

Regards,

Rafal Gendarz

Sri Jagannath Center Guru

email: rafal

Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa.com

 

 

 

abhishekpotti napisa?(a):

>

> Dear Lalith:

>

> The whole world knows the history of Blessed Meera Bhai....the

> epitome of Bhakti...... She was attached to her " Lala " - the wonderful

> idol of Krishna gifted to her even from her childhood... .Do you mean

> to say that innocent young girl started chanting " Kliim krishnaaya "

> mantra automatically? Even Bhakta Prahlaada had to be initiated by

> Sage Naaradha for his chant of dwaadasaakshari mantra....

>

> Nobody is afraid of you here......You need not proclaim that you are

> not in the business of a Guru.....actually Guru status is not a

> business (true to your half-baked knowledge you will claim it is also

> like software engineering! ). The difference my friend between you

> and other great persons like Rafal or Dakshinamoorthiji is that they

> are spending their money for the internet, whereas you are pilfering

> your company's time and the company's resources while browsing the

> internet. Don't you think you are cheating your company when you

> spend so much time on empty and egoistic posts defending yourself

> against every expert after arguing with them unnecessarily? Are you

> not getting paid for the time you spend in the company....Know the

> basics of ethics before ever sermonizing. ....So, actually you are an

> exploiter... .try to understand that....the other gurujis are probably

> too decent to comment on that......What happened to your project?

> Better rush to it nough!....It will spare us the agony of replying to

> your half-witted postings!

>

> By the say, Which member asked you Prashna Tantra dear? We did not

> see any posts requesting " Honourable Lalith " to explain Prashna

> Tantra (as if you could explain it!) What arrogance you have to

> claim that nobody can stand before you.....Guruji' s posts exposed

> your ignorance... .you did not even know how to ask queries and get

> replies from one of the most empathetic astrologers of this group,

> and yet you claim you are this and that......

>

> For your information. ...nobody is afraid of you..Rather you should be

> afraid of yourself.... ..Your foolishness itself will be your doom.

> Did you not become the laughing stock due to your email-based chasing

> of Priyaa? Such foolishness in occult matters could be more costly

> dear.....I think Mohanraaamji and Rafalji are only afraid about your

> own well-being! They are not afraid of you. Nor am I afraid of you.

>

> Your posts never answer the queries or points raised by others; you

> take off on a new ground only because of your shallow understanding

> of subjects. Nobody has accepted you as a Guru here, and nobody

> will....Can a fire-fly eclipse the Sun? There are too many " Suns "

> here and you are just a fire-fly.

>

> It reminds me of a story.....Once an ant challenged the mighty

> elephant for a fight; the elephant obviously could not hear the ant

> (the ant being so tiny and it was on the ground, its sound could not

> reach the elephant). The elephant just walked away out of its own

> volition in its natural course. Then the ant claimed, " you see I

> challenged the elephant and it ran away " . Dear, your saying that

> nobody can stand before you is similar to that.......

>

> FIRST LEARN THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN GHOSTS AND YOUR ANCESTOR

> SUMANGALIS BEFORE WRITING THE FIRST POSTS ON OCCULT! What a

> pity......what a pity.....That we have to bear your meaningless

> rantings here!

>

> Abhishek.

>

> vedic astrology

> <vedic astrology%40>, " litsol " <mishra.lalit@ ...>

> wrote:

> >

> >

> > I was waiting for u dear..

> >

> > why u took time ?

> >

> > Do u mean Meera Bai discussed with u, what she did..

> >

> > Do u know 'Kleem Krishnay, Govindaya Gopijan Vallabhaya Namh' is a

> > mantra for lord krishna.

> >

> > is there no beej mantras, to whom u wish to misguide ? let thnigs

> > remain between lord, bhakta , their shraddha and their guru.

> >

> > why u people are so afraid of me, i m not in business of guru.

> >

> > i m happy with my life, my profession of software engineering and

> > my hobbies ok.

> >

> > there are 7000+ members are here, by writing such type of foolish

> > things u expose urself only, mind, there are better brains here.

> >

> > this is enough ...

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > vedic astrology

> <vedic astrology%40>,

> > " abhishekpotti " <abhishekpotti@ > wrote:

> > >

> > > Respected Mohanraaamji:

> > >

> > > Well said. Lalith is saying that " maybe in south india devotees

> > > don't chant Moola mantras but not so in North " ...What

> > > stupidity... ..He does not seem to understand that " mantra

> shaastra

> > > experts " are also devotees, but they cannot be called as innocent

> > > saatwik bhaktaas! A typical example of a pure saadhwik bhakta

> will

> > > be Meera Bhai (was she not North Indian). Can Lalith say which

> > Dasa

> > > Mahaa Vidya Meera Bhai practised? She was immersed in Krishna

> > > consciousness and Lover for Him. Her own Bhajans were her

> prayers

> > in

> > > the bhaavana of Bhakti in the form of Love! This is not mantra

> > > shaastra. Another example will be Saant Tukhaaraam. These

> > bhaktaas

> > > did not chant moola mantraas. Panditji Dakshinamoorthi was on

> dot

> > in

> > > saying that " Pure bhaktaas do not chant complicated moola

> > mantraas " .

> > > You have clarified this fact wonderfully in your post. I wish

> more

> > > knowledgeable persons also put erratic posters in their place

> just

> > as

> > > Mohanraaamji does here. This will benefit more naive readers of

> > > these forums who might otherwise get confused as to which of the

> > > paths to follow. Actually, anyone can follow any path as he/ she

> > > deems it fit; but there should be consistency of procedures.

> > >

> > > We should not confuse mantrik rituals and bhakti doctrines.

> > Bhaktaas

> > > can chant the names of Gods at anytime..... Mantra shaastra

> experts

> > > chanting advanced moola mantras should necessarily adopt ritual

> > > procedures for the welfare of themselves and others!

> > Yes...improper

> > > chanting of mantras can cause danger to the society also just as

> > > proper chanting can help others. Hence, this cannot be

> considered

> > as

> > > a personal preference of the aspirant. If this was not the case,

> > why

> > > did sages codify spiritual practises scrupulously? Rafalji,

> > > Mohanraaamji, etc. are correct in saying it is best to follow

> > Pandit

> > > Dakshinamoorthiji' s advices on mantra shastra or japams. He is

> > > learned and he is living a life compatible to the shaastras

> though

> > he

> > > has faced uncertain circumstances in his own personal life. He

> > never

> > > compromised on principles and he willingly paid the price for

> that

> > > which most of us will never do. The words of such a person

> should

> > > obviously carry more weight.

> > >

> > > Abhishek.

> > >

> > > vedic astrology

> <vedic astrology%40>, " mohanraaam "

> <mohanraaam@ >

> > > wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Well Lalith:

> > > >

> > > > If you have really done dasa Maha Vidyaa, you would have never

> > > > approached a professional astrologer for consultation. ..that

> much

> > I

> > > > can say....

> > > >

> > > > And what idiocy when you say Panditji is partly wrong? He

> > > > said " Bhaktaas do not chant Moola mantras " , whereas you have

> > edited

> > > > the words to suit your ends....He never said " devotees don't

> > chant

> > > > Beej mantras " .... .You are putting words into his mouth and

> > assuming

> > > > he is wrong! Why, do you know....the Great Panditji himself

> > chants

> > > > Moola mantras..... He is a bhakta and a mantra shastra expert.

> As

> > a

> > > > bhakta he keeps incessant chanting of naama japa throughout the

> > > day;

> > > > as a mantra shastra expert, he restricts the moola mantra

> japams

> > to

> > > > stipulated times with ritual purity.....It is this wonderful

> > > practice

> > > > that Guruji was alluding to. Guruji cannot be wrong in ritual

> > and

> > > > occult matters. Please understand that.

> > > >

> > > > There are 4 classes of Devotees.... ...1) Saatwik vedic devotees

> > who

> > > > will follow vedic dharma scrupulously. They will not dare to

> > > compare

> > > > astrology and vedanga to Engineering! as you did...

> > > > 2) Raajasik devotees who will follow vedic disciplines as far

> as

> > > > possible, but will still go after upaasanaas of Demi-Gods for

> > > > accomplishment of siddhis. Mantra shaastra experts usually

> fall

> > in

> > > > this category.

> > > > 3) Saatwik Bhaktaas - for whom the meditation and glory of

> their

> > > > Ishta Devataa is enough for spiritual satisfaction. It is this

> > > > category that Guruji referred to when he said they will not

> chant

> > > > Moola mantras too much. Definitely they will not do Dasa Mahaa

> > > > Vidyaa.

> > > > 4) Taamasic Devotees - Those whose main motive is to project

> > > > themselves at all costs and acting as if they are equal to the

> > > > experts; they will try ALL practices - whether they are

> > sanctioned

> > > by

> > > > vedas or not.....Their only aim is personal glory and

> > > satisfaction.

> > > > They will attack even established dharma if they do not get

> > results

> > > > (sounds familiar.... You are one!) Ignorance and half-baked

> > > knowledge

> > > > and egotism are these persons' motivating fuel.

> > > >

> > > > You are really satan's Gift to this list.......My only prayer

> is

> > > that

> > > > innocent members of this list do not get side-tracked with your

> > > > ramblings.

> > > >

> > > > Let me make this clear to the list.....Panditji said that

> saatwik

> > > > Bhaktaas who chant Divine names only due to Pure Love on God

> > > usually

> > > > never chant mantrik moola mantraas. It is just one class of

> > > > devotees. A rajasik bhakta who is a mantra-shaastra expert may

> > > even

> > > > be a bhakta at heart; and a pure bhakta may sometimes chant

> some

> > > > mantrik japams for solving some practical issues...... But, when

> > > they

> > > > switch their routines temporarily, these enlightened devotees

> > > usually

> > > > take good guidance and follow the tenets of shaastras

> > > > scrupulously. ...Definitely they will not sit on assumption like

> > > > Lalith.

> > > >

> > > > On the one hand, this fellow claims he has done chants in

> > forests,

> > > > rivers, earth, etc. (Probably we have a Maharishi here! What

> > > heights

> > > > of pointless pride in this young man list....it is

> disgusting!) .

> > > On

> > > > the other hand, he says he chants mantras in buses, trains,

> > > etc......

> > > > He is confused about which no body can have issues. Only his

> > Guru

> > > > should be concerned about that.....But, his attempts to stuff

> his

> > > > shallow understanding upon this list is reprehensible. And,

> his

> > > > habit of quoting experts out of context is really condemnable.

> > May

> > > > Jupiter's Light Shine on that fellow and teach him to respect

> the

> > > > hallowed traditions and to stay at his level rather than trying

> > > > to " teach " others (He has the audacity to claim he

> is " teaching "

> > > > Rafalji!)

> > > >

> > > > If a mere young man of 35 years who has spent his life on a

> > " Failed

> > > > computer web desining business " , " pointless email chasing of

> > > girls " ,

> > > > and other " past times " can gain insight as he claims, how much

> > will

> > > > learned Gurus of this group with their life of devotion to

> > vedanta

> > > > and vedanga know? His peanut brain and hyper-inflated ego will

> > > never

> > > > allow him to see this obvious truth. But, please list exercise

> > > your

> > > > discretion while reading his posts (There are doubtless some

> good

> > > > elements even in his posts; but mostly there is trash presented

> > as

> > > > philosophy).

> > > >

> > > > Mohanraaam

> > > >

> > > > vedic astrology

> <vedic astrology%40>, " litsol "

> <mishra.lalit@ >

> > > > wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > Dear Rafal,

> > > > >

> > > > > Do u think, a hobby means shallow knowledge of the domain, No

> > > > rafal,

> > > > > it's not like that.

> > > > >

> > > > > At least not for me. You have learnt and i m learning, i read

> > > ur's

> > > > > replies and get benifitted, same way i wanted you to pay

> heed

> > to

> > > > > what i have written about spritiuality, mostrly i did write

> for

> > u

> > > > >

> > > > > I have done all 10 mahavidyas of tantra and read many tantrik

> > > > > classics, spent good deal of time with great tantriks

> trained

> > in

> > > > > Kamakhya and other places, keenly observed their doings,

> their

> > > > > mistakes etc.., I did tremendous mantra chanting on water,

> on

> > > > earth,

> > > > > at home, in forests etc...

> > > > >

> > > > > then reached here, then i did write something, but sorry i

> dont

> > > > > remember shlokas. i was not interested in cramming that.

> > > > >

> > > > > Panditji is not fully correct in saying that BeejMantras are

> > not

> > > > > chanted by devotees, I dont know much about South India but

> in

> > > > North

> > > > > normally its done.

> > > > >

> > > > > And a successfull mantra sadhana has to result in one's being

> a

> > > > > devotee, the devotion is the outcome, final result of mantra

> > > > sadhana,

> > > > > perhaps, Pandit Ji believes mantras are power packet,thinks,

> i

> > do

> > > > it

> > > > > this way , these many times and get this result, this is

> where

> > > most

> > > > > of the people are confused. without being a good human being

> if

> > > we

> > > > > think, we will achieve something in spirituality, is

> difficult,

> > > > very

> > > > > difficult.

> > > > >

> > > > > what happens is, with the mantra chanting, a self

> > > transformation

> > > > > process begins, u if dont restrict urself, ur karma begins

> > > > diluting,

> > > > > and u begin ur purification process unknowingly, when

> > substantial

> > > > > part of ego and greed for respect vanishes and many such

> thing

> > > > > togather, mantra awakens u and with the God's grace ur

> > objective

> > > > gets

> > > > > fullfilled, gradually u become a devotee. ur being simple and

> > > being

> > > > > devotee is sometimes is indication of ur's going on the right

> > > track.

> > > > >

> > > > > I think we have discussed a lot, it's enough !!

> > > > >

> > > > > My Boss has given me lot of projects to complete, so, may be,

> i

> > m

> > > > not

> > > > > going to available in the group like i was recently. however.

> i

> > > > will

> > > > > complete Garg Hora series.

> > > > >

> > > > > regards,

> > > > > Lalit.

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > vedic astrology

> <vedic astrology%40>, Rafal Gendarz

> > > > > <starsuponme@ > wrote:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya*

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Dear Litsol,

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Then please dont generalize Your preferences as they are

> too

> > > > > shallow for

> > > > > > this Forum aspiration.

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Regards,

> > > > > > Rafal Gendarz

> > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru

> > > > > > email: rafal@

> > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > litsol napisa?(a):

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Dear Rafel,

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > I take Astrology as a good hobby, and i w'd be looking at

> > it

> > > > with

> > > > > an

> > > > > > > engineer's approach.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > I asked ur age because, it's our thinking to put our

> > > parameters

> > > > in

> > > > > > > god's system, there is nothing like delay or advancement

> in

> > > > > > > spirituality. So, " Delay " or " Speed " , " backwardness "

> > > > > > > and " advancement " doesn't exist in spirituality, I

> thought

> > if

> > > u

> > > > r

> > > > > > > thinking that it may take too much time, I wanted to tell

> > u,

> > > > it's

> > > > > not

> > > > > > > like that. there is no delay.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > It clicks in fraction of a second, when u r getting

> clicked

> > > > > depends

> > > > > > > on u and on god's will, when he wants u to get clicked.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > God sometimes graces for no reason ( " Ahetuka " ) just for

> his

> > > > > > > compassion towards u and it may happen next minute too.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > spirituality is not delimited by time , effort and rules.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > regards,

> > > > > > > Lalit.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > vedic astrology

> > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. com>, Rafal Gendarz

> > > > > > > <starsuponme@ ...> wrote:

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya*

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Dear Litsol,

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Please be careful about words.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Im happy that You are sharing Your experience - very

> > > > inspirating

> > > > > > > ones.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Age hierarchy is for sudras - Manu Samhita. If You

> treat

> > > > Jyotish

> > > > > > > Vedanga

> > > > > > > > as profession similar to engineering You have a long

> way

> > to

> > > > go.

> > > > > But

> > > > > > > dont

> > > > > > > > be pessimistic here are many who will try to help You

> in

> > > > getting

> > > > > > > proper

> > > > > > > > understanding.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > After some time You will agree with me about the mala

> and

> > > > japa.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Regards,

> > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz

> > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru

> > > > > > > > email: rafal@

> > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > litsol napisa?(a):

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > Dear Rafal,

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > Here u r doing two wrong things, instead of

> developing

> > ur

> > > > > > > understanding,

> > > > > > > > > u r trying to conclude something and going beyond

> that

> > u r

> > > > > > > messaging

> > > > > > > > > same to many.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > I m touching 35, What's ur age ?

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > Astrology is a kind of vidya or profession, like i m

> a

> > > > > software

> > > > > > > > > engineer, software engineering is my profession.

> > > > spirituality

> > > > > is

> > > > > > > beyond

> > > > > > > > > all sort of vidya or profession.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > I wish u to be a good soul and to realize the bliss

> of

> > > self

> > > > > > > awakening or

> > > > > > > > > in other terms, the bliss that comes once u feel u

> and

> > > god

> > > > is

> > > > > > > > > connected. dissolved in each other.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > First realize, experience, then speak and then

> suggest

> > to

> > > > > others,

> > > > > > > by

> > > > > > > > > mere reading shastras or books u r not going to feel

> > it.

> > > > > unless

> > > > > > > god

> > > > > > > > > graces u it's very very difficult. and if u dont

> avoid

> > > this

> > > > > sort

> > > > > > > of

> > > > > > > > > hurriedness instead of learning and understanding, it

> > > will

> > > > > affect

> > > > > > > u only

> > > > > > > > > no one else.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > somehere i have read, it was written - By mere

> > > > repeating " So-

> > > > > > > Aham " no

> > > > > > > > > one gets liberated unless he realizes it like one

> > doesnt

> > > get

> > > > > > > cured by

> > > > > > > > > knowing the name of the medicine, u need to take the

> > > > medicine

> > > > > to

> > > > > > > get

> > > > > > > > > cured " .

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > So, pls. be wise, as it was being discussed here, i

> > > shared

> > > > the

> > > > > > > > > experience of my life, pls. mind it, i m not a

> > preecher,

> > > > nor a

> > > > > > > guru, nor

> > > > > > > > > i have to make my followers, nor it's my profession,

> > nor

> > > i

> > > > > have

> > > > > > > to get

> > > > > > > > > fame, sharing things is a kind of friendliness a kind

> of

> > > > > > > affection,

> > > > > > > > > that's it.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > regards,

> > > > > > > > > Lalit.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > vedic astrology

> > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. com>, Rafal

> > > Gendarz

> > > > > > > > > <starsuponme@ ...>

> > > > > > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya*

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > Dear Jyotishas

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > Counting of mala has more depth sense than just

> > > counting,

> > > > > so for

> > > > > > > > > natives

> > > > > > > > > > like Litsol counting is neccessary and any other

> > > > speculation

> > > > > > > will be

> > > > > > > > > > only illusory and just imagination. We should

> follow

> > Pt.

> > > > > > > > > Dakshinamoorti

> > > > > > > > > > advise strictly, otherwise our process of spiritual

> > > > > development

> > > > > > > will

> > > > > > > > > be

> > > > > > > > > > slow and unauthoritative.

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > Regards,

> > > > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz

> > > > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru

> > > > > > > > > > email: rafal@

> > > > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > asmp2k02@ napisa?(a):

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > Resp Sri Lalitji,

> > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for your mail.But please also read

> > > > > GuruDakshinamurthyi

> > > > > > > ji's

> > > > > > > > > > > mail(addressing me) also on this,which brings in

> > more

> > > > > clarity

> > > > > > > to the

> > > > > > > > > > > applicability principles to my mail.

> > > > > > > > > > > I meant that both are necessity but to what

> degree

> > of

> > > > time

> > > > > (it

> > > > > > > varies

> > > > > > > > > > > from saadhaka to saadhaka) to get such inbuilt

> > > maturity

> > > > > such

> > > > > > > that

> > > > > > > > > that

> > > > > > > > > > > the count will be taken care of by Divine forces

> > > after

> > > > > some

> > > > > > > initial

> > > > > > > > > > > period of saadhana.

> > > > > > > > > > > Morover the type of bio matter present in the

> japa

> > > maala

> > > > > > > (which is

> > > > > > > > > > > symbolic for ritualism as well as from practical

> > > point

> > > > of

> > > > > > > view for

> > > > > > > > > our

> > > > > > > > > > > count) will help in keeping away destructive

> forces

> > > > > acting on

> > > > > > > us

> > > > > > > > > .Thus

> > > > > > > > > > > the symbolic rituals will indirectly help us in

> > > keeping

> > > > > away

> > > > > > > from

> > > > > > > > > > > negative thoughts and also trains our memory to

> be

> > > > object

> > > > > > > > > oriented.If

> > > > > > > > > > > our memory grows and retentive capacity increase

> > the

> > > > > Gnaana

> > > > > > > will

> > > > > > > > > > > increase ,but at the same time destructive forces

> > > > > > > (diversions) also

> > > > > > > > > > > becomes powerful.Thus the symbolic procedures

> will

> > > come

> > > > in

> > > > > > > handy to

> > > > > > > > > > > successfully fight the negative forces.The

> rituals

> > > may

> > > > be

> > > > > > > Rising

> > > > > > > > > > > early(if possible during Braahmi muhurta),Taking

> > > > > > > bath,Japaanusthaan,

> > > > > > > > > > > attending to the livelihood job etc etc in

> defined

> > > > times

> > > > > as

> > > > > > > > > discipline

> > > > > > > > > > > helps indirectly tune our memory through keeping

> > our

> > > > body

> > > > > > > healthy.

> > > > > > > > > > > Thus ultimately we conclude that the so called

> > > symbolic

> > > > > > > procedures

> > > > > > > > > are

> > > > > > > > > > > not actually symbolic(it got branded as such) but

> a

> > > > > necessity

> > > > > > > for

> > > > > > > > > our

> > > > > > > > > > > own good if we practice to the extent we can.

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > Quoting mishra.lalit@ ... <mishra. lalit%

> > > > 40gmail.

> > > > > com>:

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > Resp. Sri Murthy Adavi,

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > Yes, what you said is perfectly right, we count

> or

> > > dont

> > > > > > > count,target

> > > > > > > > > > > is realization of god's love within, I got it

> with

> > no

> > > > > > > counting,

> > > > > > > > > > > someone may get it with counting.

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > Thanx, for the writing.

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > Lalit.

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology

> > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. com>

> > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. com>,

> > > srinivasa

> > > > > > > murthy adavi

> > > > > > > > > > > asmp2k02@ wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > Respected Learned Members,

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > Both views may be correct when the views

> have/or

> > > with

> > > > > the

> > > > > > > goal as

> > > > > > > > > > > development of Love/Devotion towards adhistana

> > > Devatha

> > > > of

> > > > > the

> > > > > > > Mantra

> > > > > > > > > > > as Base.

> > > > > > > > > > > > In the initial stage only you need the count;as

> > one

> > > > > > > develops the

> > > > > > > > > > > habit the biological tuning of the intellect/body

> > will

> > > > > > > automatically

> > > > > > > > > > > take care of the practice(without count-help of

> > malas

> > > > > etc).

> > > > > > > > > > > > It's like if with the help of Alarm clock if we

> > > wake

> > > > up

> > > > > for

> > > > > > > 2 or 3

> > > > > > > > > > > days at some appointed hour,then automatically we

> > > > wakeup

> > > > > at

> > > > > > > the same

> > > > > > > > > > > time every day without help of alarm.

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > With due Respects

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > smadavi

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > Quoting starsuponme@ :

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya*

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Litsol,

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > Definitely we should count our Mantra Japa on

> > Mala.

> > > > Your

> > > > > > > view is

> > > > > > > > > > > against

> > > > > > > > > > > > Vedic Authorities and Sages, so should be

> > rejected.

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > Regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz

> > > > > > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru

> > > > > > > > > > > > email: rafal@

> > > > > > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > litsol napisa?(a):

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Mr. Jayashri,

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > A thought came, why i should not share with

> u,

> > U

> > > > pls.

> > > > > stop

> > > > > > > > > > > counting

> > > > > > > > > > > > > mantra chantings, counting mantra gives false

> > ego

> > > > and

> > > > > then

> > > > > > > > > > > > > frustration if u dont get desired results.

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > leave it to the god, god counts the mantra

> > > chanted

> > > > by

> > > > > you

> > > > > > > may be

> > > > > > > > > > > > > 108, 1008 or whatsoever, let him count, it's

> > his

> > > > part

> > > > > and

> > > > > > > ur

> > > > > > > > > part

> > > > > > > > > > > is

> > > > > > > > > > > > > to chant the mantra. when the mantra has to

> > > awaken,

> > > > it

> > > > > > > will be,

> > > > > > > > > > > god

> > > > > > > > > > > > > will ensure it for u.

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > sometimes we try to become more intelligent

> > with

> > > out

> > > > > > > limited

> > > > > > > > > > > > > intellect and that creates obstacles in our

> > > > spiritual

> > > > > > > growth.

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > So, forget about counts, forget about the

> time

> > u

> > > > put

> > > > > in

> > > > > > > for ur's

> > > > > > > > > > > > > sadhana, invoke the god with pure heart.

> purity

> > > > > counts.

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Lalit.

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology

> > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40.

> > > > > > > com>, " dakshinastrologer "

> > > > > > > > > > > > > <dakshinastrologer@ ...> wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Ms. Jayashree:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think this topic on 108 is getting very

> > > > > interesting

> > > > > > > and

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > enlightening for all members. Yesterday we

> > had a

> > > > > > > wonderful

> > > > > > > > > > > > > esoteric

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > explanation from Shri. Sushil Dikshit, and

> > > today

> > > > > your

> > > > > > > > > wonderful

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > explanation of numerical symmetry of the

> > cosmos!

> > > > > > > Wonderful.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > There definitely exists a " numerical

> > symphony "

> > > in

> > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > Universe.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > But,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > not only 108.....as I mentioned in my

> earlier

> > > > post,

> > > > > > > there are

> > > > > > > > > > > > > various

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > other numerals that are significant in

> occult

> > > > > > > practices. 108

> > > > > > > > > is

> > > > > > > > > > > a

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > powerful and all-purpose perfect

> > number...While

> > > > we

> > > > > have

> > > > > > > > > > > understood

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > the glory of 108, we should not lose sight

> of

> > > the

> > > > > fact

> > > > > > > that

> > > > > > > > > > > there

> > > > > > > > > > > > > are

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > other powerful numbers also. This is just

> for

> > > the

> > > > > > > information

> > > > > > > > > of

> > > > > > > > > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > list.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > My apprecitation again for this wonderful

> > > > response.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Blessed be.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pandit R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Blessed be.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pandit R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI. vedic-

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > astrology@grou ps.com

> <astrology%

> > > > > > > > > > > 40. com>,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > " jayasartn " <jayasartn@> wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In cosmology, 108 has this significance -

> > the

> > > > > moon is

> > > > > > > away

> > > > > > > > > > > from

> > > > > > > > > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > earth 108 times its (moon's) diameter and

> > the

> > > > sun

> > > > > is

> > > > > > > away

> > > > > > > > > > > from the

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > earth, 108 times its diameter.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Perhaps this reality of distances is

> > > applicable

> > > > to

> > > > > > > deities

> > > > > > > > > > > too.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Perhaps this has been indicated by the

> 108

> > > divya

> > > > > > > desas of

> > > > > > > > > Lord

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Narayana.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > jayasree

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology

> > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40.

> > > > > > > com>, " dakshinastrologer "

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <dakshinastrologer@ > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Shri. Sushil:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It is a wonderful answer you have given.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Blessed be.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pandit R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology

> > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40.

> > > > > > > com>, " sushil.dikshit "

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <sushil.dikshit@ > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Babu,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It is not a silly question but it is

> a

> > > very

> > > > > good

> > > > > > > > > question.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Actually

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > there are 27 Nakshatras and every

> > > Nakshtras

> > > > > has 4

> > > > > > > Charan

> > > > > > > > > > > so

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > total

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > charans are 27 x 4 = 108 Charan. Each

> > > > Charan

> > > > > has 3

> > > > > > > > > degree

> > > > > > > > > > > and

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > 20

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > minutes so if you multiply 3 degree

> and

> > 20

> > > > > > > minutes to

> > > > > > > > > 108

> > > > > > > > > > > it

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > comes

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > out to be 360 degress i.e. one cycle

> > > > (Circle).

> > > > > > > This

> > > > > > > > > cycle

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > represetns

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > whole brahmand because all the

> rashis,

> > > > > planets and

> > > > > > > > > > > nakshatra

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > are

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > between these 360 degree in 2

> > dimensional

> > > > > > > horoscope. So

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > chanting a

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mantra completes one cycle of this

> > > brahmand.

> > > > > > > Further One

> > > > > > > > > > > who

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > has

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > visited Brahamand at least one time

> > i.e.

> > > he

> > > > is

> > > > > > > > > > > brahmagyani he

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > is

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > entitiled to place 108 Shri before

> his

> > > name.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sushil dikshit

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology@ .

> com

> > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40.

> com>,

> > > babu

> > > > > mon

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > <muthappan111@ >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Namaste,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It may be a silly matter for all of

> > you.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I want to know what is the reason

> > that

> > > > some

> > > > > > > remedies

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > recomended

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > for 108 times.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I dont know any thing about

> astrology.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I hope you may pleased to provide a

> > > reply

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thanks,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Babu

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------ --------- --------- ---

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Be a better Globetrotter. Get

> better

> > > > travel

> > > > > > > answers

> > > > > > > > > from

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > someone

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > who knows.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Answers - Check it out.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message

> > have

> > > > been

> > > > > > > removed]

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been

> > > removed]

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been

> > > removed]

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been

> > removed]

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been

> removed]

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Namaste Abhishek/ Mohanraaam

 

Just why are you trying to run Lalith down? From the posts that I have read

All he has done is given this point of view - if you don't accept them than

simply ignore it - there is No need for any name calling or belittling

someone.

 

There is also nothing wrong in Lalith forwarding " Prashna Tantra " text to

this group as to whether someone has requested it or not - he certainly

doesn't need your or mine permission to do so - after all he thought it

would be useful to everyone - again his view.

 

Sorry if I am coming across annoyed and perhaps rude But feel it is Best

that everyone should stop " belittling " other group members as in the long

run all it does is make oneself appear small and bigoted.

 

Best wishes and hoping this will be the last mail on this subject ..

 

Jai Sita Ram

 

Ram

 

_____

 

vedic astrology

[vedic astrology ] On Behalf Of abhishekpotti

28 July 2007 19:54

vedic astrology

[vedic astrology] Oye Lalith! No one here is afraid of you....

 

Dear Lalith:

 

The whole world knows the history of Blessed Meera Bhai....the

epitome of Bhakti......She was attached to her " Lala " - the wonderful

idol of Krishna gifted to her even from her childhood....Do you mean

to say that innocent young girl started chanting " Kliim krishnaaya "

mantra automatically? Even Bhakta Prahlaada had to be initiated by

Sage Naaradha for his chant of dwaadasaakshari mantra....

 

Nobody is afraid of you here......You need not proclaim that you are

not in the business of a Guru.....actually Guru status is not a

business (true to your half-baked knowledge you will claim it is also

like software engineering!). The difference my friend between you

and other great persons like Rafal or Dakshinamoorthiji is that they

are spending their money for the internet, whereas you are pilfering

your company's time and the company's resources while browsing the

internet. Don't you think you are cheating your company when you

spend so much time on empty and egoistic posts defending yourself

against every expert after arguing with them unnecessarily? Are you

not getting paid for the time you spend in the company....Know the

basics of ethics before ever sermonizing.....So, actually you are an

exploiter....try to understand that....the other gurujis are probably

too decent to comment on that......What happened to your project?

Better rush to it nough!....It will spare us the agony of replying to

your half-witted postings!

 

By the say, Which member asked you Prashna Tantra dear? We did not

see any posts requesting " Honourable Lalith " to explain Prashna

Tantra (as if you could explain it!) What arrogance you have to

claim that nobody can stand before you.....Guruji's posts exposed

your ignorance....you did not even know how to ask queries and get

replies from one of the most empathetic astrologers of this group,

and yet you claim you are this and that......

 

For your information....nobody is afraid of you..Rather you should be

afraid of yourself......Your foolishness itself will be your doom.

Did you not become the laughing stock due to your email-based chasing

of Priyaa? Such foolishness in occult matters could be more costly

dear.....I think Mohanraaamji and Rafalji are only afraid about your

own well-being! They are not afraid of you. Nor am I afraid of you.

 

Your posts never answer the queries or points raised by others; you

take off on a new ground only because of your shallow understanding

of subjects. Nobody has accepted you as a Guru here, and nobody

will....Can a fire-fly eclipse the Sun? There are too many " Suns "

here and you are just a fire-fly.

 

It reminds me of a story.....Once an ant challenged the mighty

elephant for a fight; the elephant obviously could not hear the ant

(the ant being so tiny and it was on the ground, its sound could not

reach the elephant). The elephant just walked away out of its own

volition in its natural course. Then the ant claimed, " you see I

challenged the elephant and it ran away " . Dear, your saying that

nobody can stand before you is similar to that.......

 

FIRST LEARN THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN GHOSTS AND YOUR ANCESTOR

SUMANGALIS BEFORE WRITING THE FIRST POSTS ON OCCULT! What a

pity......what a pity.....That we have to bear your meaningless

rantings here!

 

Abhishek.

 

vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology%40>

, " litsol " <mishra.lalit

wrote:

>

>

> I was waiting for u dear..

>

> why u took time ?

>

> Do u mean Meera Bai discussed with u, what she did..

>

> Do u know 'Kleem Krishnay, Govindaya Gopijan Vallabhaya Namh' is a

> mantra for lord krishna.

>

> is there no beej mantras, to whom u wish to misguide ? let thnigs

> remain between lord, bhakta , their shraddha and their guru.

>

> why u people are so afraid of me, i m not in business of guru.

>

> i m happy with my life, my profession of software engineering and

> my hobbies ok.

>

> there are 7000+ members are here, by writing such type of foolish

> things u expose urself only, mind, there are better brains here.

>

> this is enough ...

>

>

>

>

>

>

vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology%40>

,

> " abhishekpotti " <abhishekpotti@> wrote:

> >

> > Respected Mohanraaamji:

> >

> > Well said. Lalith is saying that " maybe in south india devotees

> > don't chant Moola mantras but not so in North " ...What

> > stupidity.....He does not seem to understand that " mantra

shaastra

> > experts " are also devotees, but they cannot be called as innocent

> > saatwik bhaktaas! A typical example of a pure saadhwik bhakta

will

> > be Meera Bhai (was she not North Indian). Can Lalith say which

> Dasa

> > Mahaa Vidya Meera Bhai practised? She was immersed in Krishna

> > consciousness and Lover for Him. Her own Bhajans were her

prayers

> in

> > the bhaavana of Bhakti in the form of Love! This is not mantra

> > shaastra. Another example will be Saant Tukhaaraam. These

> bhaktaas

> > did not chant moola mantraas. Panditji Dakshinamoorthi was on

dot

> in

> > saying that " Pure bhaktaas do not chant complicated moola

> mantraas " .

> > You have clarified this fact wonderfully in your post. I wish

more

> > knowledgeable persons also put erratic posters in their place

just

> as

> > Mohanraaamji does here. This will benefit more naive readers of

> > these forums who might otherwise get confused as to which of the

> > paths to follow. Actually, anyone can follow any path as he/ she

> > deems it fit; but there should be consistency of procedures.

> >

> > We should not confuse mantrik rituals and bhakti doctrines.

> Bhaktaas

> > can chant the names of Gods at anytime.....Mantra shaastra

experts

> > chanting advanced moola mantras should necessarily adopt ritual

> > procedures for the welfare of themselves and others!

> Yes...improper

> > chanting of mantras can cause danger to the society also just as

> > proper chanting can help others. Hence, this cannot be

considered

> as

> > a personal preference of the aspirant. If this was not the case,

> why

> > did sages codify spiritual practises scrupulously? Rafalji,

> > Mohanraaamji, etc. are correct in saying it is best to follow

> Pandit

> > Dakshinamoorthiji's advices on mantra shastra or japams. He is

> > learned and he is living a life compatible to the shaastras

though

> he

> > has faced uncertain circumstances in his own personal life. He

> never

> > compromised on principles and he willingly paid the price for

that

> > which most of us will never do. The words of such a person

should

> > obviously carry more weight.

> >

> > Abhishek.

> >

> > vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology%40>

, " mohanraaam "

<mohanraaam@>

> > wrote:

> > >

> > > Well Lalith:

> > >

> > > If you have really done dasa Maha Vidyaa, you would have never

> > > approached a professional astrologer for consultation...that

much

> I

> > > can say....

> > >

> > > And what idiocy when you say Panditji is partly wrong? He

> > > said " Bhaktaas do not chant Moola mantras " , whereas you have

> edited

> > > the words to suit your ends....He never said " devotees don't

> chant

> > > Beej mantras " .....You are putting words into his mouth and

> assuming

> > > he is wrong! Why, do you know....the Great Panditji himself

> chants

> > > Moola mantras.....He is a bhakta and a mantra shastra expert.

As

> a

> > > bhakta he keeps incessant chanting of naama japa throughout the

> > day;

> > > as a mantra shastra expert, he restricts the moola mantra

japams

> to

> > > stipulated times with ritual purity.....It is this wonderful

> > practice

> > > that Guruji was alluding to. Guruji cannot be wrong in ritual

> and

> > > occult matters. Please understand that.

> > >

> > > There are 4 classes of Devotees.......1) Saatwik vedic devotees

> who

> > > will follow vedic dharma scrupulously. They will not dare to

> > compare

> > > astrology and vedanga to Engineering! as you did...

> > > 2) Raajasik devotees who will follow vedic disciplines as far

as

> > > possible, but will still go after upaasanaas of Demi-Gods for

> > > accomplishment of siddhis. Mantra shaastra experts usually

fall

> in

> > > this category.

> > > 3) Saatwik Bhaktaas - for whom the meditation and glory of

their

> > > Ishta Devataa is enough for spiritual satisfaction. It is this

> > > category that Guruji referred to when he said they will not

chant

> > > Moola mantras too much. Definitely they will not do Dasa Mahaa

> > > Vidyaa.

> > > 4) Taamasic Devotees - Those whose main motive is to project

> > > themselves at all costs and acting as if they are equal to the

> > > experts; they will try ALL practices - whether they are

> sanctioned

> > by

> > > vedas or not.....Their only aim is personal glory and

> > satisfaction.

> > > They will attack even established dharma if they do not get

> results

> > > (sounds familiar....You are one!) Ignorance and half-baked

> > knowledge

> > > and egotism are these persons' motivating fuel.

> > >

> > > You are really satan's Gift to this list.......My only prayer

is

> > that

> > > innocent members of this list do not get side-tracked with your

> > > ramblings.

> > >

> > > Let me make this clear to the list.....Panditji said that

saatwik

> > > Bhaktaas who chant Divine names only due to Pure Love on God

> > usually

> > > never chant mantrik moola mantraas. It is just one class of

> > > devotees. A rajasik bhakta who is a mantra-shaastra expert may

> > even

> > > be a bhakta at heart; and a pure bhakta may sometimes chant

some

> > > mantrik japams for solving some practical issues......But, when

> > they

> > > switch their routines temporarily, these enlightened devotees

> > usually

> > > take good guidance and follow the tenets of shaastras

> > > scrupulously....Definitely they will not sit on assumption like

> > > Lalith.

> > >

> > > On the one hand, this fellow claims he has done chants in

> forests,

> > > rivers, earth, etc. (Probably we have a Maharishi here! What

> > heights

> > > of pointless pride in this young man list....it is

disgusting!).

> > On

> > > the other hand, he says he chants mantras in buses, trains,

> > etc......

> > > He is confused about which no body can have issues. Only his

> Guru

> > > should be concerned about that.....But, his attempts to stuff

his

> > > shallow understanding upon this list is reprehensible. And,

his

> > > habit of quoting experts out of context is really condemnable.

> May

> > > Jupiter's Light Shine on that fellow and teach him to respect

the

> > > hallowed traditions and to stay at his level rather than trying

> > > to " teach " others (He has the audacity to claim he

is " teaching "

> > > Rafalji!)

> > >

> > > If a mere young man of 35 years who has spent his life on a

> " Failed

> > > computer web desining business " , " pointless email chasing of

> > girls " ,

> > > and other " past times " can gain insight as he claims, how much

> will

> > > learned Gurus of this group with their life of devotion to

> vedanta

> > > and vedanga know? His peanut brain and hyper-inflated ego will

> > never

> > > allow him to see this obvious truth. But, please list exercise

> > your

> > > discretion while reading his posts (There are doubtless some

good

> > > elements even in his posts; but mostly there is trash presented

> as

> > > philosophy).

> > >

> > > Mohanraaam

> > >

> > > vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology%40>

, " litsol "

<mishra.lalit@>

> > > wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Dear Rafal,

> > > >

> > > > Do u think, a hobby means shallow knowledge of the domain, No

> > > rafal,

> > > > it's not like that.

> > > >

> > > > At least not for me. You have learnt and i m learning, i read

> > ur's

> > > > replies and get benifitted, same way i wanted you to pay

heed

> to

> > > > what i have written about spritiuality, mostrly i did write

for

> u

> > > >

> > > > I have done all 10 mahavidyas of tantra and read many tantrik

> > > > classics, spent good deal of time with great tantriks

trained

> in

> > > > Kamakhya and other places, keenly observed their doings,

their

> > > > mistakes etc.., I did tremendous mantra chanting on water,

on

> > > earth,

> > > > at home, in forests etc...

> > > >

> > > > then reached here, then i did write something, but sorry i

dont

> > > > remember shlokas. i was not interested in cramming that.

> > > >

> > > > Panditji is not fully correct in saying that BeejMantras are

> not

> > > > chanted by devotees, I dont know much about South India but

in

> > > North

> > > > normally its done.

> > > >

> > > > And a successfull mantra sadhana has to result in one's being

a

> > > > devotee, the devotion is the outcome, final result of mantra

> > > sadhana,

> > > > perhaps, Pandit Ji believes mantras are power packet,thinks,

i

> do

> > > it

> > > > this way , these many times and get this result, this is

where

> > most

> > > > of the people are confused. without being a good human being

if

> > we

> > > > think, we will achieve something in spirituality, is

difficult,

> > > very

> > > > difficult.

> > > >

> > > > what happens is, with the mantra chanting, a self

> > transformation

> > > > process begins, u if dont restrict urself, ur karma begins

> > > diluting,

> > > > and u begin ur purification process unknowingly, when

> substantial

> > > > part of ego and greed for respect vanishes and many such

thing

> > > > togather, mantra awakens u and with the God's grace ur

> objective

> > > gets

> > > > fullfilled, gradually u become a devotee. ur being simple and

> > being

> > > > devotee is sometimes is indication of ur's going on the right

> > track.

> > > >

> > > > I think we have discussed a lot, it's enough !!

> > > >

> > > > My Boss has given me lot of projects to complete, so, may be,

i

> m

> > > not

> > > > going to available in the group like i was recently. however.

i

> > > will

> > > > complete Garg Hora series.

> > > >

> > > > regards,

> > > > Lalit.

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology%40>

, Rafal Gendarz

> > > > <starsuponme@> wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > *hraum namah adityaya*

> > > > >

> > > > > Dear Litsol,

> > > > >

> > > > > Then please dont generalize Your preferences as they are

too

> > > > shallow for

> > > > > this Forum aspiration.

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Regards,

> > > > > Rafal Gendarz

> > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru

> > > > > email: rafal@

> > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa.com

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > litsol napisa?(a):

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Dear Rafel,

> > > > > >

> > > > > > I take Astrology as a good hobby, and i w'd be looking at

> it

> > > with

> > > > an

> > > > > > engineer's approach.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > I asked ur age because, it's our thinking to put our

> > parameters

> > > in

> > > > > > god's system, there is nothing like delay or advancement

in

> > > > > > spirituality. So, " Delay " or " Speed " , " backwardness "

> > > > > > and " advancement " doesn't exist in spirituality, I

thought

> if

> > u

> > > r

> > > > > > thinking that it may take too much time, I wanted to tell

> u,

> > > it's

> > > > not

> > > > > > like that. there is no delay.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > It clicks in fraction of a second, when u r getting

clicked

> > > > depends

> > > > > > on u and on god's will, when he wants u to get clicked.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > God sometimes graces for no reason ( " Ahetuka " ) just for

his

> > > > > > compassion towards u and it may happen next minute too.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > spirituality is not delimited by time , effort and rules.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > regards,

> > > > > > Lalit.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > vedic astrology

> > > > > > <vedic astrology%40>, Rafal Gendarz

> > > > > > <starsuponme@ ...> wrote:

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya*

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Dear Litsol,

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Please be careful about words.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Im happy that You are sharing Your experience - very

> > > inspirating

> > > > > > ones.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Age hierarchy is for sudras - Manu Samhita. If You

treat

> > > Jyotish

> > > > > > Vedanga

> > > > > > > as profession similar to engineering You have a long

way

> to

> > > go.

> > > > But

> > > > > > dont

> > > > > > > be pessimistic here are many who will try to help You

in

> > > getting

> > > > > > proper

> > > > > > > understanding.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > After some time You will agree with me about the mala

and

> > > japa.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Regards,

> > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz

> > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru

> > > > > > > email: rafal@

> > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > litsol napisa?(a):

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Dear Rafal,

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Here u r doing two wrong things, instead of

developing

> ur

> > > > > > understanding,

> > > > > > > > u r trying to conclude something and going beyond

that

> u r

> > > > > > messaging

> > > > > > > > same to many.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > I m touching 35, What's ur age ?

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Astrology is a kind of vidya or profession, like i m

a

> > > > software

> > > > > > > > engineer, software engineering is my profession.

> > > spirituality

> > > > is

> > > > > > beyond

> > > > > > > > all sort of vidya or profession.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > I wish u to be a good soul and to realize the bliss

of

> > self

> > > > > > awakening or

> > > > > > > > in other terms, the bliss that comes once u feel u

and

> > god

> > > is

> > > > > > > > connected. dissolved in each other.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > First realize, experience, then speak and then

suggest

> to

> > > > others,

> > > > > > by

> > > > > > > > mere reading shastras or books u r not going to feel

> it.

> > > > unless

> > > > > > god

> > > > > > > > graces u it's very very difficult. and if u dont

avoid

> > this

> > > > sort

> > > > > > of

> > > > > > > > hurriedness instead of learning and understanding, it

> > will

> > > > affect

> > > > > > u only

> > > > > > > > no one else.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > somehere i have read, it was written - By mere

> > > repeating " So-

> > > > > > Aham " no

> > > > > > > > one gets liberated unless he realizes it like one

> doesnt

> > get

> > > > > > cured by

> > > > > > > > knowing the name of the medicine, u need to take the

> > > medicine

> > > > to

> > > > > > get

> > > > > > > > cured " .

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > So, pls. be wise, as it was being discussed here, i

> > shared

> > > the

> > > > > > > > experience of my life, pls. mind it, i m not a

> preecher,

> > > nor a

> > > > > > guru, nor

> > > > > > > > i have to make my followers, nor it's my profession,

> nor

> > i

> > > > have

> > > > > > to get

> > > > > > > > fame, sharing things is a kind of friendliness a kind

of

> > > > > > affection,

> > > > > > > > that's it.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > regards,

> > > > > > > > Lalit.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > vedic astrology

> > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. com>, Rafal

> > Gendarz

> > > > > > > > <starsuponme@ ...>

> > > > > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya*

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > Dear Jyotishas

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > Counting of mala has more depth sense than just

> > counting,

> > > > so for

> > > > > > > > natives

> > > > > > > > > like Litsol counting is neccessary and any other

> > > speculation

> > > > > > will be

> > > > > > > > > only illusory and just imagination. We should

follow

> Pt.

> > > > > > > > Dakshinamoorti

> > > > > > > > > advise strictly, otherwise our process of spiritual

> > > > development

> > > > > > will

> > > > > > > > be

> > > > > > > > > slow and unauthoritative.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > Regards,

> > > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz

> > > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru

> > > > > > > > > email: rafal@

> > > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > asmp2k02@ napisa?(a):

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > Resp Sri Lalitji,

> > > > > > > > > > Thanks for your mail.But please also read

> > > > GuruDakshinamurthyi

> > > > > > ji's

> > > > > > > > > > mail(addressing me) also on this,which brings in

> more

> > > > clarity

> > > > > > to the

> > > > > > > > > > applicability principles to my mail.

> > > > > > > > > > I meant that both are necessity but to what

degree

> of

> > > time

> > > > (it

> > > > > > varies

> > > > > > > > > > from saadhaka to saadhaka) to get such inbuilt

> > maturity

> > > > such

> > > > > > that

> > > > > > > > that

> > > > > > > > > > the count will be taken care of by Divine forces

> > after

> > > > some

> > > > > > initial

> > > > > > > > > > period of saadhana.

> > > > > > > > > > Morover the type of bio matter present in the

japa

> > maala

> > > > > > (which is

> > > > > > > > > > symbolic for ritualism as well as from practical

> > point

> > > of

> > > > > > view for

> > > > > > > > our

> > > > > > > > > > count) will help in keeping away destructive

forces

> > > > acting on

> > > > > > us

> > > > > > > > .Thus

> > > > > > > > > > the symbolic rituals will indirectly help us in

> > keeping

> > > > away

> > > > > > from

> > > > > > > > > > negative thoughts and also trains our memory to

be

> > > object

> > > > > > > > oriented.If

> > > > > > > > > > our memory grows and retentive capacity increase

> the

> > > > Gnaana

> > > > > > will

> > > > > > > > > > increase ,but at the same time destructive forces

> > > > > > (diversions) also

> > > > > > > > > > becomes powerful.Thus the symbolic procedures

will

> > come

> > > in

> > > > > > handy to

> > > > > > > > > > successfully fight the negative forces.The

rituals

> > may

> > > be

> > > > > > Rising

> > > > > > > > > > early(if possible during Braahmi muhurta),Taking

> > > > > > bath,Japaanusthaan,

> > > > > > > > > > attending to the livelihood job etc etc in

defined

> > > times

> > > > as

> > > > > > > > discipline

> > > > > > > > > > helps indirectly tune our memory through keeping

> our

> > > body

> > > > > > healthy.

> > > > > > > > > > Thus ultimately we conclude that the so called

> > symbolic

> > > > > > procedures

> > > > > > > > are

> > > > > > > > > > not actually symbolic(it got branded as such) but

a

> > > > necessity

> > > > > > for

> > > > > > > > our

> > > > > > > > > > own good if we practice to the extent we can.

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > Quoting mishra.lalit@ ... <mishra. lalit%

> > > 40gmail.

> > > > com>:

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > Resp. Sri Murthy Adavi,

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > Yes, what you said is perfectly right, we count

or

> > dont

> > > > > > count,target

> > > > > > > > > > is realization of god's love within, I got it

with

> no

> > > > > > counting,

> > > > > > > > > > someone may get it with counting.

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > Thanx, for the writing.

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > regards,

> > > > > > > > > > Lalit.

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology

> > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. com>

> > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. com>,

> > srinivasa

> > > > > > murthy adavi

> > > > > > > > > > asmp2k02@ wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > Respected Learned Members,

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > Both views may be correct when the views

have/or

> > with

> > > > the

> > > > > > goal as

> > > > > > > > > > development of Love/Devotion towards adhistana

> > Devatha

> > > of

> > > > the

> > > > > > Mantra

> > > > > > > > > > as Base.

> > > > > > > > > > > In the initial stage only you need the count;as

> one

> > > > > > develops the

> > > > > > > > > > habit the biological tuning of the intellect/body

> will

> > > > > > automatically

> > > > > > > > > > take care of the practice(without count-help of

> malas

> > > > etc).

> > > > > > > > > > > It's like if with the help of Alarm clock if we

> > wake

> > > up

> > > > for

> > > > > > 2 or 3

> > > > > > > > > > days at some appointed hour,then automatically we

> > > wakeup

> > > > at

> > > > > > the same

> > > > > > > > > > time every day without help of alarm.

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > With due Respects

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > smadavi

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > Quoting starsuponme@ :

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya*

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > Dear Litsol,

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > Definitely we should count our Mantra Japa on

> Mala.

> > > Your

> > > > > > view is

> > > > > > > > > > against

> > > > > > > > > > > Vedic Authorities and Sages, so should be

> rejected.

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > Regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz

> > > > > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru

> > > > > > > > > > > email: rafal@

> > > > > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > litsol napisa?(a):

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Mr. Jayashri,

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > A thought came, why i should not share with

u,

> U

> > > pls.

> > > > stop

> > > > > > > > > > counting

> > > > > > > > > > > > mantra chantings, counting mantra gives false

> ego

> > > and

> > > > then

> > > > > > > > > > > > frustration if u dont get desired results.

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > leave it to the god, god counts the mantra

> > chanted

> > > by

> > > > you

> > > > > > may be

> > > > > > > > > > > > 108, 1008 or whatsoever, let him count, it's

> his

> > > part

> > > > and

> > > > > > ur

> > > > > > > > part

> > > > > > > > > > is

> > > > > > > > > > > > to chant the mantra. when the mantra has to

> > awaken,

> > > it

> > > > > > will be,

> > > > > > > > > > god

> > > > > > > > > > > > will ensure it for u.

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > sometimes we try to become more intelligent

> with

> > out

> > > > > > limited

> > > > > > > > > > > > intellect and that creates obstacles in our

> > > spiritual

> > > > > > growth.

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > So, forget about counts, forget about the

time

> u

> > > put

> > > > in

> > > > > > for ur's

> > > > > > > > > > > > sadhana, invoke the god with pure heart.

purity

> > > > counts.

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > > Lalit.

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology

> > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40.

> > > > > > com>, " dakshinastrologer "

> > > > > > > > > > > > <dakshinastrologer@ ...> wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Ms. Jayashree:

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > I think this topic on 108 is getting very

> > > > interesting

> > > > > > and

> > > > > > > > > > > > > enlightening for all members. Yesterday we

> had a

> > > > > > wonderful

> > > > > > > > > > > > esoteric

> > > > > > > > > > > > > explanation from Shri. Sushil Dikshit, and

> > today

> > > > your

> > > > > > > > wonderful

> > > > > > > > > > > > > explanation of numerical symmetry of the

> cosmos!

> > > > > > Wonderful.

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > There definitely exists a " numerical

> symphony "

> > in

> > > > the

> > > > > > > > Universe.

> > > > > > > > > > > > But,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > not only 108.....as I mentioned in my

earlier

> > > post,

> > > > > > there are

> > > > > > > > > > > > various

> > > > > > > > > > > > > other numerals that are significant in

occult

> > > > > > practices. 108

> > > > > > > > is

> > > > > > > > > > a

> > > > > > > > > > > > > powerful and all-purpose perfect

> number...While

> > > we

> > > > have

> > > > > > > > > > understood

> > > > > > > > > > > > > the glory of 108, we should not lose sight

of

> > the

> > > > fact

> > > > > > that

> > > > > > > > > > there

> > > > > > > > > > > > are

> > > > > > > > > > > > > other powerful numbers also. This is just

for

> > the

> > > > > > information

> > > > > > > > of

> > > > > > > > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > > > > > list.

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > My apprecitation again for this wonderful

> > > response.

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Blessed be.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Pandit R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI.

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Blessed be.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Pandit R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI. vedic-

> > > > > > > > > > > > > astrology@grou ps.com

<astrology%

> > > > > > > > > > 40. com>,

> > > > > > > > > > > > " jayasartn " <jayasartn@> wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > In cosmology, 108 has this significance -

> the

> > > > moon is

> > > > > > away

> > > > > > > > > > from

> > > > > > > > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > earth 108 times its (moon's) diameter and

> the

> > > sun

> > > > is

> > > > > > away

> > > > > > > > > > from the

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > earth, 108 times its diameter.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Perhaps this reality of distances is

> > applicable

> > > to

> > > > > > deities

> > > > > > > > > > too.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Perhaps this has been indicated by the

108

> > divya

> > > > > > desas of

> > > > > > > > Lord

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Narayana.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > jayasree

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology

> > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40.

> > > > > > com>, " dakshinastrologer "

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > <dakshinastrologer@ > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Shri. Sushil:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It is a wonderful answer you have given.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Blessed be.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pandit R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology

> > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40.

> > > > > > com>, " sushil.dikshit "

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <sushil.dikshit@ > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Babu,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It is not a silly question but it is

a

> > very

> > > > good

> > > > > > > > question.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Actually

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > there are 27 Nakshatras and every

> > Nakshtras

> > > > has 4

> > > > > > Charan

> > > > > > > > > > so

> > > > > > > > > > > > > total

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > charans are 27 x 4 = 108 Charan. Each

> > > Charan

> > > > has 3

> > > > > > > > degree

> > > > > > > > > > and

> > > > > > > > > > > > > 20

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > minutes so if you multiply 3 degree

and

> 20

> > > > > > minutes to

> > > > > > > > 108

> > > > > > > > > > it

> > > > > > > > > > > > > comes

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > out to be 360 degress i.e. one cycle

> > > (Circle).

> > > > > > This

> > > > > > > > cycle

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > represetns

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > whole brahmand because all the

rashis,

> > > > planets and

> > > > > > > > > > nakshatra

> > > > > > > > > > > > > are

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > between these 360 degree in 2

> dimensional

> > > > > > horoscope. So

> > > > > > > > > > > > > chanting a

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mantra completes one cycle of this

> > brahmand.

> > > > > > Further One

> > > > > > > > > > who

> > > > > > > > > > > > > has

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > visited Brahamand at least one time

> i.e.

> > he

> > > is

> > > > > > > > > > brahmagyani he

> > > > > > > > > > > > > is

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > entitiled to place 108 Shri before

his

> > name.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sushil dikshit

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology@ .

com

> > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40.

com>,

> > babu

> > > > mon

> > > > > > > > > > > > > <muthappan111@ >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Namaste,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It may be a silly matter for all of

> you.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I want to know what is the reason

> that

> > > some

> > > > > > remedies

> > > > > > > > > > > > > recomended

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > for 108 times.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I dont know any thing about

astrology.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I hope you may pleased to provide a

> > reply

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thanks,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Babu

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------ --------- --------- ---

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Be a better Globetrotter. Get

better

> > > travel

> > > > > > answers

> > > > > > > > from

> > > > > > > > > > > > > someone

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > who knows.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Answers - Check it out.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message

> have

> > > been

> > > > > > removed]

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been

> > removed]

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been

> > removed]

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been

> removed]

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been

removed]

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Dear Ram Jaswal:

 

If Lalith stops challenging others with his rude posts no one will

run him down...please follow the threads carefully......He is

speaking as if he is the master of everything and everybody else is a

fool. When he passes judgment on senior astrologers of this group or

unnecessarily challenges established conventions, we have defended

that. Now, why are you defending Lalith? Don't you think if you

have the right to defend an offender, we have the right to defend the

more decent members and traditions that he is subtly attacking....

 

just read his posts.....If he has just forwarded the Prashna Tantra,

nobody would have objected to it.....See the accompanying comments

where he abrasively comments certain things......

 

Open your eyes before advicing anyone. Why don't you write to Lalith

also? When did I call him names?......No sir...you are mistaken....

 

Did you not notice that even after Mohanraamji stopped writing posts,

this fellow was taunting that old gentleman repeatedly last week.

Where were you at that time?

 

If Lalith stops writing abrasive posts like " Nobody can stand before

me " and all that silly nonsense, we have no issues with him (or at

least I have no issues with him). So, advice Lalith also in this

regard.

 

If Lalith and you enjoy freedom of speech, we also claim the same

previlege.

 

Abhishek.

 

vedic astrology , " Ram Jaswal " <rkjaswal

wrote:

>

> Namaste Abhishek/ Mohanraaam

>

> Just why are you trying to run Lalith down? From the posts that I

have read

> All he has done is given this point of view - if you don't accept

them than

> simply ignore it - there is No need for any name calling or

belittling

> someone.

>

> There is also nothing wrong in Lalith forwarding " Prashna Tantra "

text to

> this group as to whether someone has requested it or not - he

certainly

> doesn't need your or mine permission to do so - after all he

thought it

> would be useful to everyone - again his view.

>

> Sorry if I am coming across annoyed and perhaps rude But feel it is

Best

> that everyone should stop " belittling " other group members as in

the long

> run all it does is make oneself appear small and bigoted.

>

> Best wishes and hoping this will be the last mail on this subject ..

>

> Jai Sita Ram

>

> Ram

>

> _____

>

> vedic astrology

> [vedic astrology ] On Behalf Of abhishekpotti

> 28 July 2007 19:54

> vedic astrology

> [vedic astrology] Oye Lalith! No one here is afraid of

you....

>

> Dear Lalith:

>

> The whole world knows the history of Blessed Meera Bhai....the

> epitome of Bhakti......She was attached to her " Lala " - the

wonderful

> idol of Krishna gifted to her even from her childhood....Do you

mean

> to say that innocent young girl started chanting " Kliim krishnaaya "

> mantra automatically? Even Bhakta Prahlaada had to be initiated by

> Sage Naaradha for his chant of dwaadasaakshari mantra....

>

> Nobody is afraid of you here......You need not proclaim that you

are

> not in the business of a Guru.....actually Guru status is not a

> business (true to your half-baked knowledge you will claim it is

also

> like software engineering!). The difference my friend between you

> and other great persons like Rafal or Dakshinamoorthiji is that

they

> are spending their money for the internet, whereas you are

pilfering

> your company's time and the company's resources while browsing the

> internet. Don't you think you are cheating your company when you

> spend so much time on empty and egoistic posts defending yourself

> against every expert after arguing with them unnecessarily? Are you

> not getting paid for the time you spend in the company....Know the

> basics of ethics before ever sermonizing.....So, actually you are

an

> exploiter....try to understand that....the other gurujis are

probably

> too decent to comment on that......What happened to your project?

> Better rush to it nough!....It will spare us the agony of replying

to

> your half-witted postings!

>

> By the say, Which member asked you Prashna Tantra dear? We did not

> see any posts requesting " Honourable Lalith " to explain Prashna

> Tantra (as if you could explain it!) What arrogance you have to

> claim that nobody can stand before you.....Guruji's posts exposed

> your ignorance....you did not even know how to ask queries and get

> replies from one of the most empathetic astrologers of this group,

> and yet you claim you are this and that......

>

> For your information....nobody is afraid of you..Rather you should

be

> afraid of yourself......Your foolishness itself will be your doom.

> Did you not become the laughing stock due to your email-based

chasing

> of Priyaa? Such foolishness in occult matters could be more costly

> dear.....I think Mohanraaamji and Rafalji are only afraid about

your

> own well-being! They are not afraid of you. Nor am I afraid of you.

>

> Your posts never answer the queries or points raised by others; you

> take off on a new ground only because of your shallow understanding

> of subjects. Nobody has accepted you as a Guru here, and nobody

> will....Can a fire-fly eclipse the Sun? There are too many " Suns "

> here and you are just a fire-fly.

>

> It reminds me of a story.....Once an ant challenged the mighty

> elephant for a fight; the elephant obviously could not hear the ant

> (the ant being so tiny and it was on the ground, its sound could

not

> reach the elephant). The elephant just walked away out of its own

> volition in its natural course. Then the ant claimed, " you see I

> challenged the elephant and it ran away " . Dear, your saying that

> nobody can stand before you is similar to that.......

>

> FIRST LEARN THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN GHOSTS AND YOUR ANCESTOR

> SUMANGALIS BEFORE WRITING THE FIRST POSTS ON OCCULT! What a

> pity......what a pity.....That we have to bear your meaningless

> rantings here!

>

> Abhishek.

>

> vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology%40>

> , " litsol " <mishra.lalit@>

> wrote:

> >

> >

> > I was waiting for u dear..

> >

> > why u took time ?

> >

> > Do u mean Meera Bai discussed with u, what she did..

> >

> > Do u know 'Kleem Krishnay, Govindaya Gopijan Vallabhaya Namh' is

a

> > mantra for lord krishna.

> >

> > is there no beej mantras, to whom u wish to misguide ? let thnigs

> > remain between lord, bhakta , their shraddha and their guru.

> >

> > why u people are so afraid of me, i m not in business of guru.

> >

> > i m happy with my life, my profession of software engineering and

> > my hobbies ok.

> >

> > there are 7000+ members are here, by writing such type of foolish

> > things u expose urself only, mind, there are better brains here.

> >

> > this is enough ...

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology%40>

> ,

> > " abhishekpotti " <abhishekpotti@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Respected Mohanraaamji:

> > >

> > > Well said. Lalith is saying that " maybe in south india devotees

> > > don't chant Moola mantras but not so in North " ...What

> > > stupidity.....He does not seem to understand that " mantra

> shaastra

> > > experts " are also devotees, but they cannot be called as

innocent

> > > saatwik bhaktaas! A typical example of a pure saadhwik bhakta

> will

> > > be Meera Bhai (was she not North Indian). Can Lalith say which

> > Dasa

> > > Mahaa Vidya Meera Bhai practised? She was immersed in Krishna

> > > consciousness and Lover for Him. Her own Bhajans were her

> prayers

> > in

> > > the bhaavana of Bhakti in the form of Love! This is not mantra

> > > shaastra. Another example will be Saant Tukhaaraam. These

> > bhaktaas

> > > did not chant moola mantraas. Panditji Dakshinamoorthi was on

> dot

> > in

> > > saying that " Pure bhaktaas do not chant complicated moola

> > mantraas " .

> > > You have clarified this fact wonderfully in your post. I wish

> more

> > > knowledgeable persons also put erratic posters in their place

> just

> > as

> > > Mohanraaamji does here. This will benefit more naive readers of

> > > these forums who might otherwise get confused as to which of

the

> > > paths to follow. Actually, anyone can follow any path as he/

she

> > > deems it fit; but there should be consistency of procedures.

> > >

> > > We should not confuse mantrik rituals and bhakti doctrines.

> > Bhaktaas

> > > can chant the names of Gods at anytime.....Mantra shaastra

> experts

> > > chanting advanced moola mantras should necessarily adopt ritual

> > > procedures for the welfare of themselves and others!

> > Yes...improper

> > > chanting of mantras can cause danger to the society also just

as

> > > proper chanting can help others. Hence, this cannot be

> considered

> > as

> > > a personal preference of the aspirant. If this was not the

case,

> > why

> > > did sages codify spiritual practises scrupulously? Rafalji,

> > > Mohanraaamji, etc. are correct in saying it is best to follow

> > Pandit

> > > Dakshinamoorthiji's advices on mantra shastra or japams. He is

> > > learned and he is living a life compatible to the shaastras

> though

> > he

> > > has faced uncertain circumstances in his own personal life. He

> > never

> > > compromised on principles and he willingly paid the price for

> that

> > > which most of us will never do. The words of such a person

> should

> > > obviously carry more weight.

> > >

> > > Abhishek.

> > >

> > > vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology%

40>

> , " mohanraaam "

> <mohanraaam@>

> > > wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Well Lalith:

> > > >

> > > > If you have really done dasa Maha Vidyaa, you would have

never

> > > > approached a professional astrologer for consultation...that

> much

> > I

> > > > can say....

> > > >

> > > > And what idiocy when you say Panditji is partly wrong? He

> > > > said " Bhaktaas do not chant Moola mantras " , whereas you have

> > edited

> > > > the words to suit your ends....He never said " devotees don't

> > chant

> > > > Beej mantras " .....You are putting words into his mouth and

> > assuming

> > > > he is wrong! Why, do you know....the Great Panditji himself

> > chants

> > > > Moola mantras.....He is a bhakta and a mantra shastra expert.

> As

> > a

> > > > bhakta he keeps incessant chanting of naama japa throughout

the

> > > day;

> > > > as a mantra shastra expert, he restricts the moola mantra

> japams

> > to

> > > > stipulated times with ritual purity.....It is this wonderful

> > > practice

> > > > that Guruji was alluding to. Guruji cannot be wrong in ritual

> > and

> > > > occult matters. Please understand that.

> > > >

> > > > There are 4 classes of Devotees.......1) Saatwik vedic

devotees

> > who

> > > > will follow vedic dharma scrupulously. They will not dare to

> > > compare

> > > > astrology and vedanga to Engineering! as you did...

> > > > 2) Raajasik devotees who will follow vedic disciplines as far

> as

> > > > possible, but will still go after upaasanaas of Demi-Gods for

> > > > accomplishment of siddhis. Mantra shaastra experts usually

> fall

> > in

> > > > this category.

> > > > 3) Saatwik Bhaktaas - for whom the meditation and glory of

> their

> > > > Ishta Devataa is enough for spiritual satisfaction. It is

this

> > > > category that Guruji referred to when he said they will not

> chant

> > > > Moola mantras too much. Definitely they will not do Dasa

Mahaa

> > > > Vidyaa.

> > > > 4) Taamasic Devotees - Those whose main motive is to project

> > > > themselves at all costs and acting as if they are equal to

the

> > > > experts; they will try ALL practices - whether they are

> > sanctioned

> > > by

> > > > vedas or not.....Their only aim is personal glory and

> > > satisfaction.

> > > > They will attack even established dharma if they do not get

> > results

> > > > (sounds familiar....You are one!) Ignorance and half-baked

> > > knowledge

> > > > and egotism are these persons' motivating fuel.

> > > >

> > > > You are really satan's Gift to this list.......My only prayer

> is

> > > that

> > > > innocent members of this list do not get side-tracked with

your

> > > > ramblings.

> > > >

> > > > Let me make this clear to the list.....Panditji said that

> saatwik

> > > > Bhaktaas who chant Divine names only due to Pure Love on God

> > > usually

> > > > never chant mantrik moola mantraas. It is just one class of

> > > > devotees. A rajasik bhakta who is a mantra-shaastra expert

may

> > > even

> > > > be a bhakta at heart; and a pure bhakta may sometimes chant

> some

> > > > mantrik japams for solving some practical issues......But,

when

> > > they

> > > > switch their routines temporarily, these enlightened devotees

> > > usually

> > > > take good guidance and follow the tenets of shaastras

> > > > scrupulously....Definitely they will not sit on assumption

like

> > > > Lalith.

> > > >

> > > > On the one hand, this fellow claims he has done chants in

> > forests,

> > > > rivers, earth, etc. (Probably we have a Maharishi here! What

> > > heights

> > > > of pointless pride in this young man list....it is

> disgusting!).

> > > On

> > > > the other hand, he says he chants mantras in buses, trains,

> > > etc......

> > > > He is confused about which no body can have issues. Only his

> > Guru

> > > > should be concerned about that.....But, his attempts to stuff

> his

> > > > shallow understanding upon this list is reprehensible. And,

> his

> > > > habit of quoting experts out of context is really

condemnable.

> > May

> > > > Jupiter's Light Shine on that fellow and teach him to respect

> the

> > > > hallowed traditions and to stay at his level rather than

trying

> > > > to " teach " others (He has the audacity to claim he

> is " teaching "

> > > > Rafalji!)

> > > >

> > > > If a mere young man of 35 years who has spent his life on a

> > " Failed

> > > > computer web desining business " , " pointless email chasing of

> > > girls " ,

> > > > and other " past times " can gain insight as he claims, how

much

> > will

> > > > learned Gurus of this group with their life of devotion to

> > vedanta

> > > > and vedanga know? His peanut brain and hyper-inflated ego

will

> > > never

> > > > allow him to see this obvious truth. But, please list

exercise

> > > your

> > > > discretion while reading his posts (There are doubtless some

> good

> > > > elements even in his posts; but mostly there is trash

presented

> > as

> > > > philosophy).

> > > >

> > > > Mohanraaam

> > > >

> > > > vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology%

40>

> , " litsol "

> <mishra.lalit@>

> > > > wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > Dear Rafal,

> > > > >

> > > > > Do u think, a hobby means shallow knowledge of the domain,

No

> > > > rafal,

> > > > > it's not like that.

> > > > >

> > > > > At least not for me. You have learnt and i m learning, i

read

> > > ur's

> > > > > replies and get benifitted, same way i wanted you to pay

> heed

> > to

> > > > > what i have written about spritiuality, mostrly i did write

> for

> > u

> > > > >

> > > > > I have done all 10 mahavidyas of tantra and read many

tantrik

> > > > > classics, spent good deal of time with great tantriks

> trained

> > in

> > > > > Kamakhya and other places, keenly observed their doings,

> their

> > > > > mistakes etc.., I did tremendous mantra chanting on water,

> on

> > > > earth,

> > > > > at home, in forests etc...

> > > > >

> > > > > then reached here, then i did write something, but sorry i

> dont

> > > > > remember shlokas. i was not interested in cramming that.

> > > > >

> > > > > Panditji is not fully correct in saying that BeejMantras

are

> > not

> > > > > chanted by devotees, I dont know much about South India but

> in

> > > > North

> > > > > normally its done.

> > > > >

> > > > > And a successfull mantra sadhana has to result in one's

being

> a

> > > > > devotee, the devotion is the outcome, final result of

mantra

> > > > sadhana,

> > > > > perhaps, Pandit Ji believes mantras are power

packet,thinks,

> i

> > do

> > > > it

> > > > > this way , these many times and get this result, this is

> where

> > > most

> > > > > of the people are confused. without being a good human

being

> if

> > > we

> > > > > think, we will achieve something in spirituality, is

> difficult,

> > > > very

> > > > > difficult.

> > > > >

> > > > > what happens is, with the mantra chanting, a self

> > > transformation

> > > > > process begins, u if dont restrict urself, ur karma begins

> > > > diluting,

> > > > > and u begin ur purification process unknowingly, when

> > substantial

> > > > > part of ego and greed for respect vanishes and many such

> thing

> > > > > togather, mantra awakens u and with the God's grace ur

> > objective

> > > > gets

> > > > > fullfilled, gradually u become a devotee. ur being simple

and

> > > being

> > > > > devotee is sometimes is indication of ur's going on the

right

> > > track.

> > > > >

> > > > > I think we have discussed a lot, it's enough !!

> > > > >

> > > > > My Boss has given me lot of projects to complete, so, may

be,

> i

> > m

> > > > not

> > > > > going to available in the group like i was recently.

however.

> i

> > > > will

> > > > > complete Garg Hora series.

> > > > >

> > > > > regards,

> > > > > Lalit.

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology%

40>

> , Rafal Gendarz

> > > > > <starsuponme@> wrote:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya*

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Dear Litsol,

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Then please dont generalize Your preferences as they are

> too

> > > > > shallow for

> > > > > > this Forum aspiration.

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Regards,

> > > > > > Rafal Gendarz

> > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru

> > > > > > email: rafal@

> > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa.com

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > litsol napisa?(a):

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Dear Rafel,

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > I take Astrology as a good hobby, and i w'd be looking

at

> > it

> > > > with

> > > > > an

> > > > > > > engineer's approach.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > I asked ur age because, it's our thinking to put our

> > > parameters

> > > > in

> > > > > > > god's system, there is nothing like delay or

advancement

> in

> > > > > > > spirituality. So, " Delay " or " Speed " , " backwardness "

> > > > > > > and " advancement " doesn't exist in spirituality, I

> thought

> > if

> > > u

> > > > r

> > > > > > > thinking that it may take too much time, I wanted to

tell

> > u,

> > > > it's

> > > > > not

> > > > > > > like that. there is no delay.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > It clicks in fraction of a second, when u r getting

> clicked

> > > > > depends

> > > > > > > on u and on god's will, when he wants u to get clicked.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > God sometimes graces for no reason ( " Ahetuka " ) just for

> his

> > > > > > > compassion towards u and it may happen next minute too.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > spirituality is not delimited by time , effort and

rules.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > regards,

> > > > > > > Lalit.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > vedic astrology

> > > > > > > <vedic astrology%40>, Rafal

Gendarz

> > > > > > > <starsuponme@ ...> wrote:

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya*

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Dear Litsol,

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Please be careful about words.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Im happy that You are sharing Your experience - very

> > > > inspirating

> > > > > > > ones.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Age hierarchy is for sudras - Manu Samhita. If You

> treat

> > > > Jyotish

> > > > > > > Vedanga

> > > > > > > > as profession similar to engineering You have a long

> way

> > to

> > > > go.

> > > > > But

> > > > > > > dont

> > > > > > > > be pessimistic here are many who will try to help You

> in

> > > > getting

> > > > > > > proper

> > > > > > > > understanding.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > After some time You will agree with me about the mala

> and

> > > > japa.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Regards,

> > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz

> > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru

> > > > > > > > email: rafal@

> > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > litsol napisa?(a):

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > Dear Rafal,

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > Here u r doing two wrong things, instead of

> developing

> > ur

> > > > > > > understanding,

> > > > > > > > > u r trying to conclude something and going beyond

> that

> > u r

> > > > > > > messaging

> > > > > > > > > same to many.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > I m touching 35, What's ur age ?

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > Astrology is a kind of vidya or profession, like i

m

> a

> > > > > software

> > > > > > > > > engineer, software engineering is my profession.

> > > > spirituality

> > > > > is

> > > > > > > beyond

> > > > > > > > > all sort of vidya or profession.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > I wish u to be a good soul and to realize the bliss

> of

> > > self

> > > > > > > awakening or

> > > > > > > > > in other terms, the bliss that comes once u feel u

> and

> > > god

> > > > is

> > > > > > > > > connected. dissolved in each other.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > First realize, experience, then speak and then

> suggest

> > to

> > > > > others,

> > > > > > > by

> > > > > > > > > mere reading shastras or books u r not going to

feel

> > it.

> > > > > unless

> > > > > > > god

> > > > > > > > > graces u it's very very difficult. and if u dont

> avoid

> > > this

> > > > > sort

> > > > > > > of

> > > > > > > > > hurriedness instead of learning and understanding,

it

> > > will

> > > > > affect

> > > > > > > u only

> > > > > > > > > no one else.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > somehere i have read, it was written - By mere

> > > > repeating " So-

> > > > > > > Aham " no

> > > > > > > > > one gets liberated unless he realizes it like one

> > doesnt

> > > get

> > > > > > > cured by

> > > > > > > > > knowing the name of the medicine, u need to take

the

> > > > medicine

> > > > > to

> > > > > > > get

> > > > > > > > > cured " .

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > So, pls. be wise, as it was being discussed here, i

> > > shared

> > > > the

> > > > > > > > > experience of my life, pls. mind it, i m not a

> > preecher,

> > > > nor a

> > > > > > > guru, nor

> > > > > > > > > i have to make my followers, nor it's my

profession,

> > nor

> > > i

> > > > > have

> > > > > > > to get

> > > > > > > > > fame, sharing things is a kind of friendliness a

kind

> of

> > > > > > > affection,

> > > > > > > > > that's it.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > regards,

> > > > > > > > > Lalit.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > vedic astrology

> > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. com>,

Rafal

> > > Gendarz

> > > > > > > > > <starsuponme@ ...>

> > > > > > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya*

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > Dear Jyotishas

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > Counting of mala has more depth sense than just

> > > counting,

> > > > > so for

> > > > > > > > > natives

> > > > > > > > > > like Litsol counting is neccessary and any other

> > > > speculation

> > > > > > > will be

> > > > > > > > > > only illusory and just imagination. We should

> follow

> > Pt.

> > > > > > > > > Dakshinamoorti

> > > > > > > > > > advise strictly, otherwise our process of

spiritual

> > > > > development

> > > > > > > will

> > > > > > > > > be

> > > > > > > > > > slow and unauthoritative.

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > Regards,

> > > > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz

> > > > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru

> > > > > > > > > > email: rafal@

> > > > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > asmp2k02@ napisa?(a):

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > Resp Sri Lalitji,

> > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for your mail.But please also read

> > > > > GuruDakshinamurthyi

> > > > > > > ji's

> > > > > > > > > > > mail(addressing me) also on this,which brings

in

> > more

> > > > > clarity

> > > > > > > to the

> > > > > > > > > > > applicability principles to my mail.

> > > > > > > > > > > I meant that both are necessity but to what

> degree

> > of

> > > > time

> > > > > (it

> > > > > > > varies

> > > > > > > > > > > from saadhaka to saadhaka) to get such inbuilt

> > > maturity

> > > > > such

> > > > > > > that

> > > > > > > > > that

> > > > > > > > > > > the count will be taken care of by Divine

forces

> > > after

> > > > > some

> > > > > > > initial

> > > > > > > > > > > period of saadhana.

> > > > > > > > > > > Morover the type of bio matter present in the

> japa

> > > maala

> > > > > > > (which is

> > > > > > > > > > > symbolic for ritualism as well as from

practical

> > > point

> > > > of

> > > > > > > view for

> > > > > > > > > our

> > > > > > > > > > > count) will help in keeping away destructive

> forces

> > > > > acting on

> > > > > > > us

> > > > > > > > > .Thus

> > > > > > > > > > > the symbolic rituals will indirectly help us in

> > > keeping

> > > > > away

> > > > > > > from

> > > > > > > > > > > negative thoughts and also trains our memory to

> be

> > > > object

> > > > > > > > > oriented.If

> > > > > > > > > > > our memory grows and retentive capacity

increase

> > the

> > > > > Gnaana

> > > > > > > will

> > > > > > > > > > > increase ,but at the same time destructive

forces

> > > > > > > (diversions) also

> > > > > > > > > > > becomes powerful.Thus the symbolic procedures

> will

> > > come

> > > > in

> > > > > > > handy to

> > > > > > > > > > > successfully fight the negative forces.The

> rituals

> > > may

> > > > be

> > > > > > > Rising

> > > > > > > > > > > early(if possible during Braahmi muhurta),Taking

> > > > > > > bath,Japaanusthaan,

> > > > > > > > > > > attending to the livelihood job etc etc in

> defined

> > > > times

> > > > > as

> > > > > > > > > discipline

> > > > > > > > > > > helps indirectly tune our memory through

keeping

> > our

> > > > body

> > > > > > > healthy.

> > > > > > > > > > > Thus ultimately we conclude that the so called

> > > symbolic

> > > > > > > procedures

> > > > > > > > > are

> > > > > > > > > > > not actually symbolic(it got branded as such)

but

> a

> > > > > necessity

> > > > > > > for

> > > > > > > > > our

> > > > > > > > > > > own good if we practice to the extent we can.

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > Quoting mishra.lalit@ ... <mishra. lalit%

> > > > 40gmail.

> > > > > com>:

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > Resp. Sri Murthy Adavi,

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > Yes, what you said is perfectly right, we count

> or

> > > dont

> > > > > > > count,target

> > > > > > > > > > > is realization of god's love within, I got it

> with

> > no

> > > > > > > counting,

> > > > > > > > > > > someone may get it with counting.

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > Thanx, for the writing.

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > Lalit.

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology

> > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. com>

> > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. com>,

> > > srinivasa

> > > > > > > murthy adavi

> > > > > > > > > > > asmp2k02@ wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > Respected Learned Members,

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > Both views may be correct when the views

> have/or

> > > with

> > > > > the

> > > > > > > goal as

> > > > > > > > > > > development of Love/Devotion towards adhistana

> > > Devatha

> > > > of

> > > > > the

> > > > > > > Mantra

> > > > > > > > > > > as Base.

> > > > > > > > > > > > In the initial stage only you need the

count;as

> > one

> > > > > > > develops the

> > > > > > > > > > > habit the biological tuning of the

intellect/body

> > will

> > > > > > > automatically

> > > > > > > > > > > take care of the practice(without count-help of

> > malas

> > > > > etc).

> > > > > > > > > > > > It's like if with the help of Alarm clock if

we

> > > wake

> > > > up

> > > > > for

> > > > > > > 2 or 3

> > > > > > > > > > > days at some appointed hour,then automatically

we

> > > > wakeup

> > > > > at

> > > > > > > the same

> > > > > > > > > > > time every day without help of alarm.

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > With due Respects

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > smadavi

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > Quoting starsuponme@ :

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya*

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Litsol,

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > Definitely we should count our Mantra Japa on

> > Mala.

> > > > Your

> > > > > > > view is

> > > > > > > > > > > against

> > > > > > > > > > > > Vedic Authorities and Sages, so should be

> > rejected.

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > Regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz

> > > > > > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru

> > > > > > > > > > > > email: rafal@

> > > > > > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > litsol napisa?(a):

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Mr. Jayashri,

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > A thought came, why i should not share with

> u,

> > U

> > > > pls.

> > > > > stop

> > > > > > > > > > > counting

> > > > > > > > > > > > > mantra chantings, counting mantra gives

false

> > ego

> > > > and

> > > > > then

> > > > > > > > > > > > > frustration if u dont get desired results.

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > leave it to the god, god counts the mantra

> > > chanted

> > > > by

> > > > > you

> > > > > > > may be

> > > > > > > > > > > > > 108, 1008 or whatsoever, let him count,

it's

> > his

> > > > part

> > > > > and

> > > > > > > ur

> > > > > > > > > part

> > > > > > > > > > > is

> > > > > > > > > > > > > to chant the mantra. when the mantra has to

> > > awaken,

> > > > it

> > > > > > > will be,

> > > > > > > > > > > god

> > > > > > > > > > > > > will ensure it for u.

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > sometimes we try to become more intelligent

> > with

> > > out

> > > > > > > limited

> > > > > > > > > > > > > intellect and that creates obstacles in our

> > > > spiritual

> > > > > > > growth.

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > So, forget about counts, forget about the

> time

> > u

> > > > put

> > > > > in

> > > > > > > for ur's

> > > > > > > > > > > > > sadhana, invoke the god with pure heart.

> purity

> > > > > counts.

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Lalit.

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology

> > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40.

> > > > > > > com>, " dakshinastrologer "

> > > > > > > > > > > > > <dakshinastrologer@ ...> wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Ms. Jayashree:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think this topic on 108 is getting very

> > > > > interesting

> > > > > > > and

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > enlightening for all members. Yesterday

we

> > had a

> > > > > > > wonderful

> > > > > > > > > > > > > esoteric

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > explanation from Shri. Sushil Dikshit,

and

> > > today

> > > > > your

> > > > > > > > > wonderful

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > explanation of numerical symmetry of the

> > cosmos!

> > > > > > > Wonderful.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > There definitely exists a " numerical

> > symphony "

> > > in

> > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > Universe.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > But,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > not only 108.....as I mentioned in my

> earlier

> > > > post,

> > > > > > > there are

> > > > > > > > > > > > > various

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > other numerals that are significant in

> occult

> > > > > > > practices. 108

> > > > > > > > > is

> > > > > > > > > > > a

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > powerful and all-purpose perfect

> > number...While

> > > > we

> > > > > have

> > > > > > > > > > > understood

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > the glory of 108, we should not lose

sight

> of

> > > the

> > > > > fact

> > > > > > > that

> > > > > > > > > > > there

> > > > > > > > > > > > > are

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > other powerful numbers also. This is just

> for

> > > the

> > > > > > > information

> > > > > > > > > of

> > > > > > > > > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > list.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > My apprecitation again for this wonderful

> > > > response.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Blessed be.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pandit R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Blessed be.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pandit R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI. vedic-

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > astrology@grou ps.com

> <astrology%

> > > > > > > > > > > 40. com>,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > " jayasartn " <jayasartn@> wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In cosmology, 108 has this

significance -

> > the

> > > > > moon is

> > > > > > > away

> > > > > > > > > > > from

> > > > > > > > > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > earth 108 times its (moon's) diameter

and

> > the

> > > > sun

> > > > > is

> > > > > > > away

> > > > > > > > > > > from the

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > earth, 108 times its diameter.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Perhaps this reality of distances is

> > > applicable

> > > > to

> > > > > > > deities

> > > > > > > > > > > too.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Perhaps this has been indicated by the

> 108

> > > divya

> > > > > > > desas of

> > > > > > > > > Lord

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Narayana.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > jayasree

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology

> > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40.

> > > > > > > com>, " dakshinastrologer "

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <dakshinastrologer@ > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Shri. Sushil:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It is a wonderful answer you have

given.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Blessed be.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pandit R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology@ .

com

> > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40.

> > > > > > > com>, " sushil.dikshit "

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <sushil.dikshit@ > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Babu,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It is not a silly question but it

is

> a

> > > very

> > > > > good

> > > > > > > > > question.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Actually

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > there are 27 Nakshatras and every

> > > Nakshtras

> > > > > has 4

> > > > > > > Charan

> > > > > > > > > > > so

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > total

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > charans are 27 x 4 = 108 Charan.

Each

> > > > Charan

> > > > > has 3

> > > > > > > > > degree

> > > > > > > > > > > and

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > 20

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > minutes so if you multiply 3 degree

> and

> > 20

> > > > > > > minutes to

> > > > > > > > > 108

> > > > > > > > > > > it

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > comes

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > out to be 360 degress i.e. one

cycle

> > > > (Circle).

> > > > > > > This

> > > > > > > > > cycle

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > represetns

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > whole brahmand because all the

> rashis,

> > > > > planets and

> > > > > > > > > > > nakshatra

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > are

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > between these 360 degree in 2

> > dimensional

> > > > > > > horoscope. So

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > chanting a

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mantra completes one cycle of this

> > > brahmand.

> > > > > > > Further One

> > > > > > > > > > > who

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > has

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > visited Brahamand at least one time

> > i.e.

> > > he

> > > > is

> > > > > > > > > > > brahmagyani he

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > is

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > entitiled to place 108 Shri before

> his

> > > name.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sushil dikshit

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology@

.

> com

> > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40.

> com>,

> > > babu

> > > > > mon

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > <muthappan111@ >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Namaste,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It may be a silly matter for all

of

> > you.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I want to know what is the reason

> > that

> > > > some

> > > > > > > remedies

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > recomended

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > for 108 times.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I dont know any thing about

> astrology.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I hope you may pleased to provide

a

> > > reply

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thanks,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Babu

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------ --------- --------- -

--

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Be a better Globetrotter. Get

> better

> > > > travel

> > > > > > > answers

> > > > > > > > > from

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > someone

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > who knows.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Answers - Check it out.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this

message

> > have

> > > > been

> > > > > > > removed]

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been

> > > removed]

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been

> > > removed]

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been

> > removed]

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been

> removed]

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Namaste Abhishek

 

My post wasn't so much in defense of Lalith but one to stop the " belittling "

of a person within this Group. If you don't agree with someone's views you

are perfectly within your rights to say so why in a scholarly fashion so as

to discuss and further the merits of the topic under discussion. Thereafter

it is a matter for the individual to either continue with the on-going

discussion or to stop? The only way you or anyone else is likely to change

Lalith's view on chanting of Mantras will be from a scholarly viewpoint and

not from goading him?

 

Also why are you taking personal offense? If Guru's can ignore his comments

- can't you do the same?

 

With freedom of speech comes the responsibility of keeping a civil and

polite language - please re-read your note which prompted my earlier

response.

 

Like I said in my earlier post it is all about ones viewpoints - my personal

advise to everyone would be to take what you find reasonable and ignore the

rest.

 

Best wishes ..

 

Jai Sita Ram

 

Ram

_____

 

vedic astrology

[vedic astrology ] On Behalf Of abhishekpotti

28 July 2007 20:42

vedic astrology

[vedic astrology] Re: Oye Lalith! No one here is afraid of you....

 

Dear Ram Jaswal:

 

If Lalith stops challenging others with his rude posts no one will

run him down...please follow the threads carefully......He is

speaking as if he is the master of everything and everybody else is a

fool. When he passes judgment on senior astrologers of this group or

unnecessarily challenges established conventions, we have defended

that. Now, why are you defending Lalith? Don't you think if you

have the right to defend an offender, we have the right to defend the

more decent members and traditions that he is subtly attacking....

 

just read his posts.....If he has just forwarded the Prashna Tantra,

nobody would have objected to it.....See the accompanying comments

where he abrasively comments certain things......

 

Open your eyes before advicing anyone. Why don't you write to Lalith

also? When did I call him names?......No sir...you are mistaken....

 

Did you not notice that even after Mohanraamji stopped writing posts,

this fellow was taunting that old gentleman repeatedly last week.

Where were you at that time?

 

If Lalith stops writing abrasive posts like " Nobody can stand before

me " and all that silly nonsense, we have no issues with him (or at

least I have no issues with him). So, advice Lalith also in this

regard.

 

If Lalith and you enjoy freedom of speech, we also claim the same

previlege.

 

Abhishek.

 

vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology%40>

, " Ram Jaswal " <rkjaswal

wrote:

>

> Namaste Abhishek/ Mohanraaam

>

> Just why are you trying to run Lalith down? From the posts that I

have read

> All he has done is given this point of view - if you don't accept

them than

> simply ignore it - there is No need for any name calling or

belittling

> someone.

>

> There is also nothing wrong in Lalith forwarding " Prashna Tantra "

text to

> this group as to whether someone has requested it or not - he

certainly

> doesn't need your or mine permission to do so - after all he

thought it

> would be useful to everyone - again his view.

>

> Sorry if I am coming across annoyed and perhaps rude But feel it is

Best

> that everyone should stop " belittling " other group members as in

the long

> run all it does is make oneself appear small and bigoted.

>

> Best wishes and hoping this will be the last mail on this subject ..

>

> Jai Sita Ram

>

> Ram

>

> _____

>

> vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology%40>

 

> [vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology%40>

] On Behalf Of abhishekpotti

> 28 July 2007 19:54

> vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology%40>

 

> [vedic astrology] Oye Lalith! No one here is afraid of

you....

>

> Dear Lalith:

>

> The whole world knows the history of Blessed Meera Bhai....the

> epitome of Bhakti......She was attached to her " Lala " - the

wonderful

> idol of Krishna gifted to her even from her childhood....Do you

mean

> to say that innocent young girl started chanting " Kliim krishnaaya "

> mantra automatically? Even Bhakta Prahlaada had to be initiated by

> Sage Naaradha for his chant of dwaadasaakshari mantra....

>

> Nobody is afraid of you here......You need not proclaim that you

are

> not in the business of a Guru.....actually Guru status is not a

> business (true to your half-baked knowledge you will claim it is

also

> like software engineering!). The difference my friend between you

> and other great persons like Rafal or Dakshinamoorthiji is that

they

> are spending their money for the internet, whereas you are

pilfering

> your company's time and the company's resources while browsing the

> internet. Don't you think you are cheating your company when you

> spend so much time on empty and egoistic posts defending yourself

> against every expert after arguing with them unnecessarily? Are you

> not getting paid for the time you spend in the company....Know the

> basics of ethics before ever sermonizing.....So, actually you are

an

> exploiter....try to understand that....the other gurujis are

probably

> too decent to comment on that......What happened to your project?

> Better rush to it nough!....It will spare us the agony of replying

to

> your half-witted postings!

>

> By the say, Which member asked you Prashna Tantra dear? We did not

> see any posts requesting " Honourable Lalith " to explain Prashna

> Tantra (as if you could explain it!) What arrogance you have to

> claim that nobody can stand before you.....Guruji's posts exposed

> your ignorance....you did not even know how to ask queries and get

> replies from one of the most empathetic astrologers of this group,

> and yet you claim you are this and that......

>

> For your information....nobody is afraid of you..Rather you should

be

> afraid of yourself......Your foolishness itself will be your doom.

> Did you not become the laughing stock due to your email-based

chasing

> of Priyaa? Such foolishness in occult matters could be more costly

> dear.....I think Mohanraaamji and Rafalji are only afraid about

your

> own well-being! They are not afraid of you. Nor am I afraid of you.

>

> Your posts never answer the queries or points raised by others; you

> take off on a new ground only because of your shallow understanding

> of subjects. Nobody has accepted you as a Guru here, and nobody

> will....Can a fire-fly eclipse the Sun? There are too many " Suns "

> here and you are just a fire-fly.

>

> It reminds me of a story.....Once an ant challenged the mighty

> elephant for a fight; the elephant obviously could not hear the ant

> (the ant being so tiny and it was on the ground, its sound could

not

> reach the elephant). The elephant just walked away out of its own

> volition in its natural course. Then the ant claimed, " you see I

> challenged the elephant and it ran away " . Dear, your saying that

> nobody can stand before you is similar to that.......

>

> FIRST LEARN THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN GHOSTS AND YOUR ANCESTOR

> SUMANGALIS BEFORE WRITING THE FIRST POSTS ON OCCULT! What a

> pity......what a pity.....That we have to bear your meaningless

> rantings here!

>

> Abhishek.

>

> vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology%40>

> , " litsol " <mishra.lalit@>

> wrote:

> >

> >

> > I was waiting for u dear..

> >

> > why u took time ?

> >

> > Do u mean Meera Bai discussed with u, what she did..

> >

> > Do u know 'Kleem Krishnay, Govindaya Gopijan Vallabhaya Namh' is

a

> > mantra for lord krishna.

> >

> > is there no beej mantras, to whom u wish to misguide ? let thnigs

> > remain between lord, bhakta , their shraddha and their guru.

> >

> > why u people are so afraid of me, i m not in business of guru.

> >

> > i m happy with my life, my profession of software engineering and

> > my hobbies ok.

> >

> > there are 7000+ members are here, by writing such type of foolish

> > things u expose urself only, mind, there are better brains here.

> >

> > this is enough ...

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology%40>

> ,

> > " abhishekpotti " <abhishekpotti@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Respected Mohanraaamji:

> > >

> > > Well said. Lalith is saying that " maybe in south india devotees

> > > don't chant Moola mantras but not so in North " ...What

> > > stupidity.....He does not seem to understand that " mantra

> shaastra

> > > experts " are also devotees, but they cannot be called as

innocent

> > > saatwik bhaktaas! A typical example of a pure saadhwik bhakta

> will

> > > be Meera Bhai (was she not North Indian). Can Lalith say which

> > Dasa

> > > Mahaa Vidya Meera Bhai practised? She was immersed in Krishna

> > > consciousness and Lover for Him. Her own Bhajans were her

> prayers

> > in

> > > the bhaavana of Bhakti in the form of Love! This is not mantra

> > > shaastra. Another example will be Saant Tukhaaraam. These

> > bhaktaas

> > > did not chant moola mantraas. Panditji Dakshinamoorthi was on

> dot

> > in

> > > saying that " Pure bhaktaas do not chant complicated moola

> > mantraas " .

> > > You have clarified this fact wonderfully in your post. I wish

> more

> > > knowledgeable persons also put erratic posters in their place

> just

> > as

> > > Mohanraaamji does here. This will benefit more naive readers of

> > > these forums who might otherwise get confused as to which of

the

> > > paths to follow. Actually, anyone can follow any path as he/

she

> > > deems it fit; but there should be consistency of procedures.

> > >

> > > We should not confuse mantrik rituals and bhakti doctrines.

> > Bhaktaas

> > > can chant the names of Gods at anytime.....Mantra shaastra

> experts

> > > chanting advanced moola mantras should necessarily adopt ritual

> > > procedures for the welfare of themselves and others!

> > Yes...improper

> > > chanting of mantras can cause danger to the society also just

as

> > > proper chanting can help others. Hence, this cannot be

> considered

> > as

> > > a personal preference of the aspirant. If this was not the

case,

> > why

> > > did sages codify spiritual practises scrupulously? Rafalji,

> > > Mohanraaamji, etc. are correct in saying it is best to follow

> > Pandit

> > > Dakshinamoorthiji's advices on mantra shastra or japams. He is

> > > learned and he is living a life compatible to the shaastras

> though

> > he

> > > has faced uncertain circumstances in his own personal life. He

> > never

> > > compromised on principles and he willingly paid the price for

> that

> > > which most of us will never do. The words of such a person

> should

> > > obviously carry more weight.

> > >

> > > Abhishek.

> > >

> > > vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology%

40>

> , " mohanraaam "

> <mohanraaam@>

> > > wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Well Lalith:

> > > >

> > > > If you have really done dasa Maha Vidyaa, you would have

never

> > > > approached a professional astrologer for consultation...that

> much

> > I

> > > > can say....

> > > >

> > > > And what idiocy when you say Panditji is partly wrong? He

> > > > said " Bhaktaas do not chant Moola mantras " , whereas you have

> > edited

> > > > the words to suit your ends....He never said " devotees don't

> > chant

> > > > Beej mantras " .....You are putting words into his mouth and

> > assuming

> > > > he is wrong! Why, do you know....the Great Panditji himself

> > chants

> > > > Moola mantras.....He is a bhakta and a mantra shastra expert.

> As

> > a

> > > > bhakta he keeps incessant chanting of naama japa throughout

the

> > > day;

> > > > as a mantra shastra expert, he restricts the moola mantra

> japams

> > to

> > > > stipulated times with ritual purity.....It is this wonderful

> > > practice

> > > > that Guruji was alluding to. Guruji cannot be wrong in ritual

> > and

> > > > occult matters. Please understand that.

> > > >

> > > > There are 4 classes of Devotees.......1) Saatwik vedic

devotees

> > who

> > > > will follow vedic dharma scrupulously. They will not dare to

> > > compare

> > > > astrology and vedanga to Engineering! as you did...

> > > > 2) Raajasik devotees who will follow vedic disciplines as far

> as

> > > > possible, but will still go after upaasanaas of Demi-Gods for

> > > > accomplishment of siddhis. Mantra shaastra experts usually

> fall

> > in

> > > > this category.

> > > > 3) Saatwik Bhaktaas - for whom the meditation and glory of

> their

> > > > Ishta Devataa is enough for spiritual satisfaction. It is

this

> > > > category that Guruji referred to when he said they will not

> chant

> > > > Moola mantras too much. Definitely they will not do Dasa

Mahaa

> > > > Vidyaa.

> > > > 4) Taamasic Devotees - Those whose main motive is to project

> > > > themselves at all costs and acting as if they are equal to

the

> > > > experts; they will try ALL practices - whether they are

> > sanctioned

> > > by

> > > > vedas or not.....Their only aim is personal glory and

> > > satisfaction.

> > > > They will attack even established dharma if they do not get

> > results

> > > > (sounds familiar....You are one!) Ignorance and half-baked

> > > knowledge

> > > > and egotism are these persons' motivating fuel.

> > > >

> > > > You are really satan's Gift to this list.......My only prayer

> is

> > > that

> > > > innocent members of this list do not get side-tracked with

your

> > > > ramblings.

> > > >

> > > > Let me make this clear to the list.....Panditji said that

> saatwik

> > > > Bhaktaas who chant Divine names only due to Pure Love on God

> > > usually

> > > > never chant mantrik moola mantraas. It is just one class of

> > > > devotees. A rajasik bhakta who is a mantra-shaastra expert

may

> > > even

> > > > be a bhakta at heart; and a pure bhakta may sometimes chant

> some

> > > > mantrik japams for solving some practical issues......But,

when

> > > they

> > > > switch their routines temporarily, these enlightened devotees

> > > usually

> > > > take good guidance and follow the tenets of shaastras

> > > > scrupulously....Definitely they will not sit on assumption

like

> > > > Lalith.

> > > >

> > > > On the one hand, this fellow claims he has done chants in

> > forests,

> > > > rivers, earth, etc. (Probably we have a Maharishi here! What

> > > heights

> > > > of pointless pride in this young man list....it is

> disgusting!).

> > > On

> > > > the other hand, he says he chants mantras in buses, trains,

> > > etc......

> > > > He is confused about which no body can have issues. Only his

> > Guru

> > > > should be concerned about that.....But, his attempts to stuff

> his

> > > > shallow understanding upon this list is reprehensible. And,

> his

> > > > habit of quoting experts out of context is really

condemnable.

> > May

> > > > Jupiter's Light Shine on that fellow and teach him to respect

> the

> > > > hallowed traditions and to stay at his level rather than

trying

> > > > to " teach " others (He has the audacity to claim he

> is " teaching "

> > > > Rafalji!)

> > > >

> > > > If a mere young man of 35 years who has spent his life on a

> > " Failed

> > > > computer web desining business " , " pointless email chasing of

> > > girls " ,

> > > > and other " past times " can gain insight as he claims, how

much

> > will

> > > > learned Gurus of this group with their life of devotion to

> > vedanta

> > > > and vedanga know? His peanut brain and hyper-inflated ego

will

> > > never

> > > > allow him to see this obvious truth. But, please list

exercise

> > > your

> > > > discretion while reading his posts (There are doubtless some

> good

> > > > elements even in his posts; but mostly there is trash

presented

> > as

> > > > philosophy).

> > > >

> > > > Mohanraaam

> > > >

> > > > vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology%

40>

> , " litsol "

> <mishra.lalit@>

> > > > wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > Dear Rafal,

> > > > >

> > > > > Do u think, a hobby means shallow knowledge of the domain,

No

> > > > rafal,

> > > > > it's not like that.

> > > > >

> > > > > At least not for me. You have learnt and i m learning, i

read

> > > ur's

> > > > > replies and get benifitted, same way i wanted you to pay

> heed

> > to

> > > > > what i have written about spritiuality, mostrly i did write

> for

> > u

> > > > >

> > > > > I have done all 10 mahavidyas of tantra and read many

tantrik

> > > > > classics, spent good deal of time with great tantriks

> trained

> > in

> > > > > Kamakhya and other places, keenly observed their doings,

> their

> > > > > mistakes etc.., I did tremendous mantra chanting on water,

> on

> > > > earth,

> > > > > at home, in forests etc...

> > > > >

> > > > > then reached here, then i did write something, but sorry i

> dont

> > > > > remember shlokas. i was not interested in cramming that.

> > > > >

> > > > > Panditji is not fully correct in saying that BeejMantras

are

> > not

> > > > > chanted by devotees, I dont know much about South India but

> in

> > > > North

> > > > > normally its done.

> > > > >

> > > > > And a successfull mantra sadhana has to result in one's

being

> a

> > > > > devotee, the devotion is the outcome, final result of

mantra

> > > > sadhana,

> > > > > perhaps, Pandit Ji believes mantras are power

packet,thinks,

> i

> > do

> > > > it

> > > > > this way , these many times and get this result, this is

> where

> > > most

> > > > > of the people are confused. without being a good human

being

> if

> > > we

> > > > > think, we will achieve something in spirituality, is

> difficult,

> > > > very

> > > > > difficult.

> > > > >

> > > > > what happens is, with the mantra chanting, a self

> > > transformation

> > > > > process begins, u if dont restrict urself, ur karma begins

> > > > diluting,

> > > > > and u begin ur purification process unknowingly, when

> > substantial

> > > > > part of ego and greed for respect vanishes and many such

> thing

> > > > > togather, mantra awakens u and with the God's grace ur

> > objective

> > > > gets

> > > > > fullfilled, gradually u become a devotee. ur being simple

and

> > > being

> > > > > devotee is sometimes is indication of ur's going on the

right

> > > track.

> > > > >

> > > > > I think we have discussed a lot, it's enough !!

> > > > >

> > > > > My Boss has given me lot of projects to complete, so, may

be,

> i

> > m

> > > > not

> > > > > going to available in the group like i was recently.

however.

> i

> > > > will

> > > > > complete Garg Hora series.

> > > > >

> > > > > regards,

> > > > > Lalit.

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology%

40>

> , Rafal Gendarz

> > > > > <starsuponme@> wrote:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya*

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Dear Litsol,

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Then please dont generalize Your preferences as they are

> too

> > > > > shallow for

> > > > > > this Forum aspiration.

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Regards,

> > > > > > Rafal Gendarz

> > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru

> > > > > > email: rafal@

> > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa.com

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > litsol napisa?(a):

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Dear Rafel,

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > I take Astrology as a good hobby, and i w'd be looking

at

> > it

> > > > with

> > > > > an

> > > > > > > engineer's approach.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > I asked ur age because, it's our thinking to put our

> > > parameters

> > > > in

> > > > > > > god's system, there is nothing like delay or

advancement

> in

> > > > > > > spirituality. So, " Delay " or " Speed " , " backwardness "

> > > > > > > and " advancement " doesn't exist in spirituality, I

> thought

> > if

> > > u

> > > > r

> > > > > > > thinking that it may take too much time, I wanted to

tell

> > u,

> > > > it's

> > > > > not

> > > > > > > like that. there is no delay.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > It clicks in fraction of a second, when u r getting

> clicked

> > > > > depends

> > > > > > > on u and on god's will, when he wants u to get clicked.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > God sometimes graces for no reason ( " Ahetuka " ) just for

> his

> > > > > > > compassion towards u and it may happen next minute too.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > spirituality is not delimited by time , effort and

rules.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > regards,

> > > > > > > Lalit.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > vedic astrology

> > > > > > > <vedic astrology%40>, Rafal

Gendarz

> > > > > > > <starsuponme@ ...> wrote:

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya*

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Dear Litsol,

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Please be careful about words.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Im happy that You are sharing Your experience - very

> > > > inspirating

> > > > > > > ones.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Age hierarchy is for sudras - Manu Samhita. If You

> treat

> > > > Jyotish

> > > > > > > Vedanga

> > > > > > > > as profession similar to engineering You have a long

> way

> > to

> > > > go.

> > > > > But

> > > > > > > dont

> > > > > > > > be pessimistic here are many who will try to help You

> in

> > > > getting

> > > > > > > proper

> > > > > > > > understanding.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > After some time You will agree with me about the mala

> and

> > > > japa.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Regards,

> > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz

> > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru

> > > > > > > > email: rafal@

> > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > litsol napisa?(a):

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > Dear Rafal,

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > Here u r doing two wrong things, instead of

> developing

> > ur

> > > > > > > understanding,

> > > > > > > > > u r trying to conclude something and going beyond

> that

> > u r

> > > > > > > messaging

> > > > > > > > > same to many.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > I m touching 35, What's ur age ?

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > Astrology is a kind of vidya or profession, like i

m

> a

> > > > > software

> > > > > > > > > engineer, software engineering is my profession.

> > > > spirituality

> > > > > is

> > > > > > > beyond

> > > > > > > > > all sort of vidya or profession.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > I wish u to be a good soul and to realize the bliss

> of

> > > self

> > > > > > > awakening or

> > > > > > > > > in other terms, the bliss that comes once u feel u

> and

> > > god

> > > > is

> > > > > > > > > connected. dissolved in each other.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > First realize, experience, then speak and then

> suggest

> > to

> > > > > others,

> > > > > > > by

> > > > > > > > > mere reading shastras or books u r not going to

feel

> > it.

> > > > > unless

> > > > > > > god

> > > > > > > > > graces u it's very very difficult. and if u dont

> avoid

> > > this

> > > > > sort

> > > > > > > of

> > > > > > > > > hurriedness instead of learning and understanding,

it

> > > will

> > > > > affect

> > > > > > > u only

> > > > > > > > > no one else.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > somehere i have read, it was written - By mere

> > > > repeating " So-

> > > > > > > Aham " no

> > > > > > > > > one gets liberated unless he realizes it like one

> > doesnt

> > > get

> > > > > > > cured by

> > > > > > > > > knowing the name of the medicine, u need to take

the

> > > > medicine

> > > > > to

> > > > > > > get

> > > > > > > > > cured " .

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > So, pls. be wise, as it was being discussed here, i

> > > shared

> > > > the

> > > > > > > > > experience of my life, pls. mind it, i m not a

> > preecher,

> > > > nor a

> > > > > > > guru, nor

> > > > > > > > > i have to make my followers, nor it's my

profession,

> > nor

> > > i

> > > > > have

> > > > > > > to get

> > > > > > > > > fame, sharing things is a kind of friendliness a

kind

> of

> > > > > > > affection,

> > > > > > > > > that's it.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > regards,

> > > > > > > > > Lalit.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > vedic astrology

> > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. com>,

Rafal

> > > Gendarz

> > > > > > > > > <starsuponme@ ...>

> > > > > > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya*

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > Dear Jyotishas

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > Counting of mala has more depth sense than just

> > > counting,

> > > > > so for

> > > > > > > > > natives

> > > > > > > > > > like Litsol counting is neccessary and any other

> > > > speculation

> > > > > > > will be

> > > > > > > > > > only illusory and just imagination. We should

> follow

> > Pt.

> > > > > > > > > Dakshinamoorti

> > > > > > > > > > advise strictly, otherwise our process of

spiritual

> > > > > development

> > > > > > > will

> > > > > > > > > be

> > > > > > > > > > slow and unauthoritative.

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > Regards,

> > > > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz

> > > > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru

> > > > > > > > > > email: rafal@

> > > > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > asmp2k02@ napisa?(a):

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > Resp Sri Lalitji,

> > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for your mail.But please also read

> > > > > GuruDakshinamurthyi

> > > > > > > ji's

> > > > > > > > > > > mail(addressing me) also on this,which brings

in

> > more

> > > > > clarity

> > > > > > > to the

> > > > > > > > > > > applicability principles to my mail.

> > > > > > > > > > > I meant that both are necessity but to what

> degree

> > of

> > > > time

> > > > > (it

> > > > > > > varies

> > > > > > > > > > > from saadhaka to saadhaka) to get such inbuilt

> > > maturity

> > > > > such

> > > > > > > that

> > > > > > > > > that

> > > > > > > > > > > the count will be taken care of by Divine

forces

> > > after

> > > > > some

> > > > > > > initial

> > > > > > > > > > > period of saadhana.

> > > > > > > > > > > Morover the type of bio matter present in the

> japa

> > > maala

> > > > > > > (which is

> > > > > > > > > > > symbolic for ritualism as well as from

practical

> > > point

> > > > of

> > > > > > > view for

> > > > > > > > > our

> > > > > > > > > > > count) will help in keeping away destructive

> forces

> > > > > acting on

> > > > > > > us

> > > > > > > > > .Thus

> > > > > > > > > > > the symbolic rituals will indirectly help us in

> > > keeping

> > > > > away

> > > > > > > from

> > > > > > > > > > > negative thoughts and also trains our memory to

> be

> > > > object

> > > > > > > > > oriented.If

> > > > > > > > > > > our memory grows and retentive capacity

increase

> > the

> > > > > Gnaana

> > > > > > > will

> > > > > > > > > > > increase ,but at the same time destructive

forces

> > > > > > > (diversions) also

> > > > > > > > > > > becomes powerful.Thus the symbolic procedures

> will

> > > come

> > > > in

> > > > > > > handy to

> > > > > > > > > > > successfully fight the negative forces.The

> rituals

> > > may

> > > > be

> > > > > > > Rising

> > > > > > > > > > > early(if possible during Braahmi muhurta),Taking

> > > > > > > bath,Japaanusthaan,

> > > > > > > > > > > attending to the livelihood job etc etc in

> defined

> > > > times

> > > > > as

> > > > > > > > > discipline

> > > > > > > > > > > helps indirectly tune our memory through

keeping

> > our

> > > > body

> > > > > > > healthy.

> > > > > > > > > > > Thus ultimately we conclude that the so called

> > > symbolic

> > > > > > > procedures

> > > > > > > > > are

> > > > > > > > > > > not actually symbolic(it got branded as such)

but

> a

> > > > > necessity

> > > > > > > for

> > > > > > > > > our

> > > > > > > > > > > own good if we practice to the extent we can.

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > Quoting mishra.lalit@ ... <mishra. lalit%

> > > > 40gmail.

> > > > > com>:

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > Resp. Sri Murthy Adavi,

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > Yes, what you said is perfectly right, we count

> or

> > > dont

> > > > > > > count,target

> > > > > > > > > > > is realization of god's love within, I got it

> with

> > no

> > > > > > > counting,

> > > > > > > > > > > someone may get it with counting.

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > Thanx, for the writing.

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > Lalit.

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology

> > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. com>

> > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. com>,

> > > srinivasa

> > > > > > > murthy adavi

> > > > > > > > > > > asmp2k02@ wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > Respected Learned Members,

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > Both views may be correct when the views

> have/or

> > > with

> > > > > the

> > > > > > > goal as

> > > > > > > > > > > development of Love/Devotion towards adhistana

> > > Devatha

> > > > of

> > > > > the

> > > > > > > Mantra

> > > > > > > > > > > as Base.

> > > > > > > > > > > > In the initial stage only you need the

count;as

> > one

> > > > > > > develops the

> > > > > > > > > > > habit the biological tuning of the

intellect/body

> > will

> > > > > > > automatically

> > > > > > > > > > > take care of the practice(without count-help of

> > malas

> > > > > etc).

> > > > > > > > > > > > It's like if with the help of Alarm clock if

we

> > > wake

> > > > up

> > > > > for

> > > > > > > 2 or 3

> > > > > > > > > > > days at some appointed hour,then automatically

we

> > > > wakeup

> > > > > at

> > > > > > > the same

> > > > > > > > > > > time every day without help of alarm.

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > With due Respects

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > smadavi

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > Quoting starsuponme@ :

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya*

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Litsol,

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > Definitely we should count our Mantra Japa on

> > Mala.

> > > > Your

> > > > > > > view is

> > > > > > > > > > > against

> > > > > > > > > > > > Vedic Authorities and Sages, so should be

> > rejected.

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > Regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz

> > > > > > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru

> > > > > > > > > > > > email: rafal@

> > > > > > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > litsol napisa?(a):

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Mr. Jayashri,

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > A thought came, why i should not share with

> u,

> > U

> > > > pls.

> > > > > stop

> > > > > > > > > > > counting

> > > > > > > > > > > > > mantra chantings, counting mantra gives

false

> > ego

> > > > and

> > > > > then

> > > > > > > > > > > > > frustration if u dont get desired results.

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > leave it to the god, god counts the mantra

> > > chanted

> > > > by

> > > > > you

> > > > > > > may be

> > > > > > > > > > > > > 108, 1008 or whatsoever, let him count,

it's

> > his

> > > > part

> > > > > and

> > > > > > > ur

> > > > > > > > > part

> > > > > > > > > > > is

> > > > > > > > > > > > > to chant the mantra. when the mantra has to

> > > awaken,

> > > > it

> > > > > > > will be,

> > > > > > > > > > > god

> > > > > > > > > > > > > will ensure it for u.

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > sometimes we try to become more intelligent

> > with

> > > out

> > > > > > > limited

> > > > > > > > > > > > > intellect and that creates obstacles in our

> > > > spiritual

> > > > > > > growth.

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > So, forget about counts, forget about the

> time

> > u

> > > > put

> > > > > in

> > > > > > > for ur's

> > > > > > > > > > > > > sadhana, invoke the god with pure heart.

> purity

> > > > > counts.

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Lalit.

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology

> > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40.

> > > > > > > com>, " dakshinastrologer "

> > > > > > > > > > > > > <dakshinastrologer@ ...> wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Ms. Jayashree:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think this topic on 108 is getting very

> > > > > interesting

> > > > > > > and

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > enlightening for all members. Yesterday

we

> > had a

> > > > > > > wonderful

> > > > > > > > > > > > > esoteric

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > explanation from Shri. Sushil Dikshit,

and

> > > today

> > > > > your

> > > > > > > > > wonderful

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > explanation of numerical symmetry of the

> > cosmos!

> > > > > > > Wonderful.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > There definitely exists a " numerical

> > symphony "

> > > in

> > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > Universe.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > But,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > not only 108.....as I mentioned in my

> earlier

> > > > post,

> > > > > > > there are

> > > > > > > > > > > > > various

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > other numerals that are significant in

> occult

> > > > > > > practices. 108

> > > > > > > > > is

> > > > > > > > > > > a

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > powerful and all-purpose perfect

> > number...While

> > > > we

> > > > > have

> > > > > > > > > > > understood

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > the glory of 108, we should not lose

sight

> of

> > > the

> > > > > fact

> > > > > > > that

> > > > > > > > > > > there

> > > > > > > > > > > > > are

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > other powerful numbers also. This is just

> for

> > > the

> > > > > > > information

> > > > > > > > > of

> > > > > > > > > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > list.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > My apprecitation again for this wonderful

> > > > response.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Blessed be.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pandit R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Blessed be.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pandit R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI. vedic-

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > astrology@grou ps.com

> <astrology%

> > > > > > > > > > > 40. com>,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > " jayasartn " <jayasartn@> wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In cosmology, 108 has this

significance -

> > the

> > > > > moon is

> > > > > > > away

> > > > > > > > > > > from

> > > > > > > > > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > earth 108 times its (moon's) diameter

and

> > the

> > > > sun

> > > > > is

> > > > > > > away

> > > > > > > > > > > from the

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > earth, 108 times its diameter.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Perhaps this reality of distances is

> > > applicable

> > > > to

> > > > > > > deities

> > > > > > > > > > > too.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Perhaps this has been indicated by the

> 108

> > > divya

> > > > > > > desas of

> > > > > > > > > Lord

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Narayana.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > jayasree

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology

> > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40.

> > > > > > > com>, " dakshinastrologer "

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <dakshinastrologer@ > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Shri. Sushil:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It is a wonderful answer you have

given.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Blessed be.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pandit R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology@ .

com

> > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40.

> > > > > > > com>, " sushil.dikshit "

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <sushil.dikshit@ > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Babu,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It is not a silly question but it

is

> a

> > > very

> > > > > good

> > > > > > > > > question.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Actually

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > there are 27 Nakshatras and every

> > > Nakshtras

> > > > > has 4

> > > > > > > Charan

> > > > > > > > > > > so

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > total

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > charans are 27 x 4 = 108 Charan.

Each

> > > > Charan

> > > > > has 3

> > > > > > > > > degree

> > > > > > > > > > > and

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > 20

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > minutes so if you multiply 3 degree

> and

> > 20

> > > > > > > minutes to

> > > > > > > > > 108

> > > > > > > > > > > it

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > comes

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > out to be 360 degress i.e. one

cycle

> > > > (Circle).

> > > > > > > This

> > > > > > > > > cycle

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > represetns

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > whole brahmand because all the

> rashis,

> > > > > planets and

> > > > > > > > > > > nakshatra

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > are

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > between these 360 degree in 2

> > dimensional

> > > > > > > horoscope. So

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > chanting a

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mantra completes one cycle of this

> > > brahmand.

> > > > > > > Further One

> > > > > > > > > > > who

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > has

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > visited Brahamand at least one time

> > i.e.

> > > he

> > > > is

> > > > > > > > > > > brahmagyani he

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > is

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > entitiled to place 108 Shri before

> his

> > > name.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sushil dikshit

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology@

.

> com

> > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40.

> com>,

> > > babu

> > > > > mon

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > <muthappan111@ >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Namaste,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It may be a silly matter for all

of

> > you.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I want to know what is the reason

> > that

> > > > some

> > > > > > > remedies

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > recomended

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > for 108 times.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I dont know any thing about

> astrology.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I hope you may pleased to provide

a

> > > reply

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thanks,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Babu

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------ --------- --------- -

--

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Be a better Globetrotter. Get

> better

> > > > travel

> > > > > > > answers

> > > > > > > > > from

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > someone

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > who knows.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Answers - Check it out.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this

message

> > have

> > > > been

> > > > > > > removed]

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been

> > > removed]

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been

> > > removed]

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been

> > removed]

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been

> removed]

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

You praised Meera, Good, when u w'd learn sth from her pure bhakti,

see, cunningness and being manipulator doesnt help always!!

 

twisting words always, i shown u a mantra of lord Krishna, in which a

beej mantra is used, instead of learning that God's Name and Beej are

one and same thing, writing so much.

 

What i said, open ur eyes and mind, read again, a devotion is obvious

final outcome of mantra chanting.

 

read what i have been saying, read many times a day, the clouds of ur

karma smokes ur understanding.

 

and learn one more thing - Meera got formal deekschha from Saint

Raidas.

 

I use company's time or what, that i manage and is a matter of my

job, i dont advertise here to get some business in background, and u

2-3 who are lobbying here , are exposed by urself.

 

exposing u was not my objective, but it happened.

 

it will keep happening.

 

 

ok

 

 

 

vedic astrology , " abhishekpotti "

<abhishekpotti wrote:

>

> Dear Lalith:

>

> The whole world knows the history of Blessed Meera Bhai....the

> epitome of Bhakti......She was attached to her " Lala " - the

wonderful

> idol of Krishna gifted to her even from her childhood....Do you

mean

> to say that innocent young girl started chanting " Kliim krishnaaya "

> mantra automatically? Even Bhakta Prahlaada had to be initiated by

> Sage Naaradha for his chant of dwaadasaakshari mantra....

>

> Nobody is afraid of you here......You need not proclaim that you

are

> not in the business of a Guru.....actually Guru status is not a

> business (true to your half-baked knowledge you will claim it is

also

> like software engineering!). The difference my friend between you

> and other great persons like Rafal or Dakshinamoorthiji is that

they

> are spending their money for the internet, whereas you are

pilfering

> your company's time and the company's resources while browsing the

> internet. Don't you think you are cheating your company when you

> spend so much time on empty and egoistic posts defending yourself

> against every expert after arguing with them unnecessarily? Are

you

> not getting paid for the time you spend in the company....Know the

> basics of ethics before ever sermonizing.....So, actually you are

an

> exploiter....try to understand that....the other gurujis are

probably

> too decent to comment on that......What happened to your project?

> Better rush to it nough!....It will spare us the agony of replying

to

> your half-witted postings!

>

> By the say, Which member asked you Prashna Tantra dear? We did not

> see any posts requesting " Honourable Lalith " to explain Prashna

> Tantra (as if you could explain it!) What arrogance you have to

> claim that nobody can stand before you.....Guruji's posts exposed

> your ignorance....you did not even know how to ask queries and get

> replies from one of the most empathetic astrologers of this group,

> and yet you claim you are this and that......

>

> For your information....nobody is afraid of you..Rather you should

be

> afraid of yourself......Your foolishness itself will be your doom.

> Did you not become the laughing stock due to your email-based

chasing

> of Priyaa? Such foolishness in occult matters could be more costly

> dear.....I think Mohanraaamji and Rafalji are only afraid about

your

> own well-being! They are not afraid of you. Nor am I afraid of you.

>

> Your posts never answer the queries or points raised by others; you

> take off on a new ground only because of your shallow understanding

> of subjects. Nobody has accepted you as a Guru here, and nobody

> will....Can a fire-fly eclipse the Sun? There are too many " Suns "

> here and you are just a fire-fly.

>

> It reminds me of a story.....Once an ant challenged the mighty

> elephant for a fight; the elephant obviously could not hear the ant

> (the ant being so tiny and it was on the ground, its sound could

not

> reach the elephant). The elephant just walked away out of its own

> volition in its natural course. Then the ant claimed, " you see I

> challenged the elephant and it ran away " . Dear, your saying that

> nobody can stand before you is similar to that.......

>

> FIRST LEARN THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN GHOSTS AND YOUR ANCESTOR

> SUMANGALIS BEFORE WRITING THE FIRST POSTS ON OCCULT! What a

> pity......what a pity.....That we have to bear your meaningless

> rantings here!

>

> Abhishek.

>

> vedic astrology , " litsol " <mishra.lalit@>

> wrote:

> >

> >

> > I was waiting for u dear..

> >

> > why u took time ?

> >

> > Do u mean Meera Bai discussed with u, what she did..

> >

> > Do u know 'Kleem Krishnay, Govindaya Gopijan Vallabhaya Namh' is

a

> > mantra for lord krishna.

> >

> > is there no beej mantras, to whom u wish to misguide ? let

thnigs

> > remain between lord, bhakta , their shraddha and their guru.

> >

> > why u people are so afraid of me, i m not in business of guru.

> >

> > i m happy with my life, my profession of software engineering

and

> > my hobbies ok.

> >

> > there are 7000+ members are here, by writing such type of

foolish

> > things u expose urself only, mind, there are better brains here.

> >

> > this is enough ...

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > vedic astrology ,

> > " abhishekpotti " <abhishekpotti@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Respected Mohanraaamji:

> > >

> > > Well said. Lalith is saying that " maybe in south india

devotees

> > > don't chant Moola mantras but not so in North " ...What

> > > stupidity.....He does not seem to understand that " mantra

> shaastra

> > > experts " are also devotees, but they cannot be called as

innocent

> > > saatwik bhaktaas! A typical example of a pure saadhwik bhakta

> will

> > > be Meera Bhai (was she not North Indian). Can Lalith say which

> > Dasa

> > > Mahaa Vidya Meera Bhai practised? She was immersed in Krishna

> > > consciousness and Lover for Him. Her own Bhajans were her

> prayers

> > in

> > > the bhaavana of Bhakti in the form of Love! This is not mantra

> > > shaastra. Another example will be Saant Tukhaaraam. These

> > bhaktaas

> > > did not chant moola mantraas. Panditji Dakshinamoorthi was on

> dot

> > in

> > > saying that " Pure bhaktaas do not chant complicated moola

> > mantraas " .

> > > You have clarified this fact wonderfully in your post. I wish

> more

> > > knowledgeable persons also put erratic posters in their place

> just

> > as

> > > Mohanraaamji does here. This will benefit more naive readers

of

> > > these forums who might otherwise get confused as to which of

the

> > > paths to follow. Actually, anyone can follow any path as he/

she

> > > deems it fit; but there should be consistency of procedures.

> > >

> > > We should not confuse mantrik rituals and bhakti doctrines.

> > Bhaktaas

> > > can chant the names of Gods at anytime.....Mantra shaastra

> experts

> > > chanting advanced moola mantras should necessarily adopt ritual

> > > procedures for the welfare of themselves and others!

> > Yes...improper

> > > chanting of mantras can cause danger to the society also just

as

> > > proper chanting can help others. Hence, this cannot be

> considered

> > as

> > > a personal preference of the aspirant. If this was not the

case,

> > why

> > > did sages codify spiritual practises scrupulously? Rafalji,

> > > Mohanraaamji, etc. are correct in saying it is best to follow

> > Pandit

> > > Dakshinamoorthiji's advices on mantra shastra or japams. He is

> > > learned and he is living a life compatible to the shaastras

> though

> > he

> > > has faced uncertain circumstances in his own personal life. He

> > never

> > > compromised on principles and he willingly paid the price for

> that

> > > which most of us will never do. The words of such a person

> should

> > > obviously carry more weight.

> > >

> > > Abhishek.

> > >

> > > vedic astrology , " mohanraaam "

> <mohanraaam@>

> > > wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Well Lalith:

> > > >

> > > > If you have really done dasa Maha Vidyaa, you would have

never

> > > > approached a professional astrologer for consultation...that

> much

> > I

> > > > can say....

> > > >

> > > > And what idiocy when you say Panditji is partly wrong? He

> > > > said " Bhaktaas do not chant Moola mantras " , whereas you have

> > edited

> > > > the words to suit your ends....He never said " devotees don't

> > chant

> > > > Beej mantras " .....You are putting words into his mouth and

> > assuming

> > > > he is wrong! Why, do you know....the Great Panditji himself

> > chants

> > > > Moola mantras.....He is a bhakta and a mantra shastra expert.

> As

> > a

> > > > bhakta he keeps incessant chanting of naama japa throughout

the

> > > day;

> > > > as a mantra shastra expert, he restricts the moola mantra

> japams

> > to

> > > > stipulated times with ritual purity.....It is this wonderful

> > > practice

> > > > that Guruji was alluding to. Guruji cannot be wrong in

ritual

> > and

> > > > occult matters. Please understand that.

> > > >

> > > > There are 4 classes of Devotees.......1) Saatwik vedic

devotees

> > who

> > > > will follow vedic dharma scrupulously. They will not dare to

> > > compare

> > > > astrology and vedanga to Engineering! as you did...

> > > > 2) Raajasik devotees who will follow vedic disciplines as far

> as

> > > > possible, but will still go after upaasanaas of Demi-Gods for

> > > > accomplishment of siddhis. Mantra shaastra experts usually

> fall

> > in

> > > > this category.

> > > > 3) Saatwik Bhaktaas - for whom the meditation and glory of

> their

> > > > Ishta Devataa is enough for spiritual satisfaction. It is

this

> > > > category that Guruji referred to when he said they will not

> chant

> > > > Moola mantras too much. Definitely they will not do Dasa

Mahaa

> > > > Vidyaa.

> > > > 4) Taamasic Devotees - Those whose main motive is to project

> > > > themselves at all costs and acting as if they are equal to

the

> > > > experts; they will try ALL practices - whether they are

> > sanctioned

> > > by

> > > > vedas or not.....Their only aim is personal glory and

> > > satisfaction.

> > > > They will attack even established dharma if they do not get

> > results

> > > > (sounds familiar....You are one!) Ignorance and half-baked

> > > knowledge

> > > > and egotism are these persons' motivating fuel.

> > > >

> > > > You are really satan's Gift to this list.......My only prayer

> is

> > > that

> > > > innocent members of this list do not get side-tracked with

your

> > > > ramblings.

> > > >

> > > > Let me make this clear to the list.....Panditji said that

> saatwik

> > > > Bhaktaas who chant Divine names only due to Pure Love on God

> > > usually

> > > > never chant mantrik moola mantraas. It is just one class of

> > > > devotees. A rajasik bhakta who is a mantra-shaastra expert

may

> > > even

> > > > be a bhakta at heart; and a pure bhakta may sometimes chant

> some

> > > > mantrik japams for solving some practical issues......But,

when

> > > they

> > > > switch their routines temporarily, these enlightened devotees

> > > usually

> > > > take good guidance and follow the tenets of shaastras

> > > > scrupulously....Definitely they will not sit on assumption

like

> > > > Lalith.

> > > >

> > > > On the one hand, this fellow claims he has done chants in

> > forests,

> > > > rivers, earth, etc. (Probably we have a Maharishi here! What

> > > heights

> > > > of pointless pride in this young man list....it is

> disgusting!).

> > > On

> > > > the other hand, he says he chants mantras in buses, trains,

> > > etc......

> > > > He is confused about which no body can have issues. Only his

> > Guru

> > > > should be concerned about that.....But, his attempts to stuff

> his

> > > > shallow understanding upon this list is reprehensible. And,

> his

> > > > habit of quoting experts out of context is really

condemnable.

> > May

> > > > Jupiter's Light Shine on that fellow and teach him to respect

> the

> > > > hallowed traditions and to stay at his level rather than

trying

> > > > to " teach " others (He has the audacity to claim he

> is " teaching "

> > > > Rafalji!)

> > > >

> > > > If a mere young man of 35 years who has spent his life on a

> > " Failed

> > > > computer web desining business " , " pointless email chasing of

> > > girls " ,

> > > > and other " past times " can gain insight as he claims, how

much

> > will

> > > > learned Gurus of this group with their life of devotion to

> > vedanta

> > > > and vedanga know? His peanut brain and hyper-inflated ego

will

> > > never

> > > > allow him to see this obvious truth. But, please list

exercise

> > > your

> > > > discretion while reading his posts (There are doubtless some

> good

> > > > elements even in his posts; but mostly there is trash

presented

> > as

> > > > philosophy).

> > > >

> > > > Mohanraaam

> > > >

> > > > vedic astrology , " litsol "

> <mishra.lalit@>

> > > > wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > Dear Rafal,

> > > > >

> > > > > Do u think, a hobby means shallow knowledge of the domain,

No

> > > > rafal,

> > > > > it's not like that.

> > > > >

> > > > > At least not for me. You have learnt and i m learning, i

read

> > > ur's

> > > > > replies and get benifitted, same way i wanted you to pay

> heed

> > to

> > > > > what i have written about spritiuality, mostrly i did write

> for

> > u

> > > > >

> > > > > I have done all 10 mahavidyas of tantra and read many

tantrik

> > > > > classics, spent good deal of time with great tantriks

> trained

> > in

> > > > > Kamakhya and other places, keenly observed their doings,

> their

> > > > > mistakes etc.., I did tremendous mantra chanting on water,

> on

> > > > earth,

> > > > > at home, in forests etc...

> > > > >

> > > > > then reached here, then i did write something, but sorry i

> dont

> > > > > remember shlokas. i was not interested in cramming that.

> > > > >

> > > > > Panditji is not fully correct in saying that BeejMantras

are

> > not

> > > > > chanted by devotees, I dont know much about South India but

> in

> > > > North

> > > > > normally its done.

> > > > >

> > > > > And a successfull mantra sadhana has to result in one's

being

> a

> > > > > devotee, the devotion is the outcome, final result of

mantra

> > > > sadhana,

> > > > > perhaps, Pandit Ji believes mantras are power

packet,thinks,

> i

> > do

> > > > it

> > > > > this way , these many times and get this result, this is

> where

> > > most

> > > > > of the people are confused. without being a good human

being

> if

> > > we

> > > > > think, we will achieve something in spirituality, is

> difficult,

> > > > very

> > > > > difficult.

> > > > >

> > > > > what happens is, with the mantra chanting, a self

> > > transformation

> > > > > process begins, u if dont restrict urself, ur karma begins

> > > > diluting,

> > > > > and u begin ur purification process unknowingly, when

> > substantial

> > > > > part of ego and greed for respect vanishes and many such

> thing

> > > > > togather, mantra awakens u and with the God's grace ur

> > objective

> > > > gets

> > > > > fullfilled, gradually u become a devotee. ur being simple

and

> > > being

> > > > > devotee is sometimes is indication of ur's going on the

right

> > > track.

> > > > >

> > > > > I think we have discussed a lot, it's enough !!

> > > > >

> > > > > My Boss has given me lot of projects to complete, so, may

be,

> i

> > m

> > > > not

> > > > > going to available in the group like i was recently.

however.

> i

> > > > will

> > > > > complete Garg Hora series.

> > > > >

> > > > > regards,

> > > > > Lalit.

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > vedic astrology , Rafal Gendarz

> > > > > <starsuponme@> wrote:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya*

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Dear Litsol,

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Then please dont generalize Your preferences as they are

> too

> > > > > shallow for

> > > > > > this Forum aspiration.

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Regards,

> > > > > > Rafal Gendarz

> > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru

> > > > > > email: rafal@

> > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa.com

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > litsol napisa?(a):

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Dear Rafel,

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > I take Astrology as a good hobby, and i w'd be looking

at

> > it

> > > > with

> > > > > an

> > > > > > > engineer's approach.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > I asked ur age because, it's our thinking to put our

> > > parameters

> > > > in

> > > > > > > god's system, there is nothing like delay or

advancement

> in

> > > > > > > spirituality. So, " Delay " or " Speed " , " backwardness "

> > > > > > > and " advancement " doesn't exist in spirituality, I

> thought

> > if

> > > u

> > > > r

> > > > > > > thinking that it may take too much time, I wanted to

tell

> > u,

> > > > it's

> > > > > not

> > > > > > > like that. there is no delay.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > It clicks in fraction of a second, when u r getting

> clicked

> > > > > depends

> > > > > > > on u and on god's will, when he wants u to get clicked.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > God sometimes graces for no reason ( " Ahetuka " ) just for

> his

> > > > > > > compassion towards u and it may happen next minute too.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > spirituality is not delimited by time , effort and

rules.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > regards,

> > > > > > > Lalit.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > vedic astrology

> > > > > > > <vedic astrology%40>, Rafal

Gendarz

> > > > > > > <starsuponme@ ...> wrote:

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya*

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Dear Litsol,

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Please be careful about words.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Im happy that You are sharing Your experience - very

> > > > inspirating

> > > > > > > ones.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Age hierarchy is for sudras - Manu Samhita. If You

> treat

> > > > Jyotish

> > > > > > > Vedanga

> > > > > > > > as profession similar to engineering You have a long

> way

> > to

> > > > go.

> > > > > But

> > > > > > > dont

> > > > > > > > be pessimistic here are many who will try to help You

> in

> > > > getting

> > > > > > > proper

> > > > > > > > understanding.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > After some time You will agree with me about the mala

> and

> > > > japa.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Regards,

> > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz

> > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru

> > > > > > > > email: rafal@

> > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > litsol napisa?(a):

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > Dear Rafal,

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > Here u r doing two wrong things, instead of

> developing

> > ur

> > > > > > > understanding,

> > > > > > > > > u r trying to conclude something and going beyond

> that

> > u r

> > > > > > > messaging

> > > > > > > > > same to many.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > I m touching 35, What's ur age ?

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > Astrology is a kind of vidya or profession, like i

m

> a

> > > > > software

> > > > > > > > > engineer, software engineering is my profession.

> > > > spirituality

> > > > > is

> > > > > > > beyond

> > > > > > > > > all sort of vidya or profession.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > I wish u to be a good soul and to realize the bliss

> of

> > > self

> > > > > > > awakening or

> > > > > > > > > in other terms, the bliss that comes once u feel u

> and

> > > god

> > > > is

> > > > > > > > > connected. dissolved in each other.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > First realize, experience, then speak and then

> suggest

> > to

> > > > > others,

> > > > > > > by

> > > > > > > > > mere reading shastras or books u r not going to

feel

> > it.

> > > > > unless

> > > > > > > god

> > > > > > > > > graces u it's very very difficult. and if u dont

> avoid

> > > this

> > > > > sort

> > > > > > > of

> > > > > > > > > hurriedness instead of learning and understanding,

it

> > > will

> > > > > affect

> > > > > > > u only

> > > > > > > > > no one else.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > somehere i have read, it was written - By mere

> > > > repeating " So-

> > > > > > > Aham " no

> > > > > > > > > one gets liberated unless he realizes it like one

> > doesnt

> > > get

> > > > > > > cured by

> > > > > > > > > knowing the name of the medicine, u need to take

the

> > > > medicine

> > > > > to

> > > > > > > get

> > > > > > > > > cured " .

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > So, pls. be wise, as it was being discussed here, i

> > > shared

> > > > the

> > > > > > > > > experience of my life, pls. mind it, i m not a

> > preecher,

> > > > nor a

> > > > > > > guru, nor

> > > > > > > > > i have to make my followers, nor it's my

profession,

> > nor

> > > i

> > > > > have

> > > > > > > to get

> > > > > > > > > fame, sharing things is a kind of friendliness a

kind

> of

> > > > > > > affection,

> > > > > > > > > that's it.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > regards,

> > > > > > > > > Lalit.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > vedic astrology

> > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. com>,

Rafal

> > > Gendarz

> > > > > > > > > <starsuponme@ ...>

> > > > > > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya*

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > Dear Jyotishas

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > Counting of mala has more depth sense than just

> > > counting,

> > > > > so for

> > > > > > > > > natives

> > > > > > > > > > like Litsol counting is neccessary and any other

> > > > speculation

> > > > > > > will be

> > > > > > > > > > only illusory and just imagination. We should

> follow

> > Pt.

> > > > > > > > > Dakshinamoorti

> > > > > > > > > > advise strictly, otherwise our process of

spiritual

> > > > > development

> > > > > > > will

> > > > > > > > > be

> > > > > > > > > > slow and unauthoritative.

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > Regards,

> > > > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz

> > > > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru

> > > > > > > > > > email: rafal@

> > > > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > asmp2k02@ napisa?(a):

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > Resp Sri Lalitji,

> > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for your mail.But please also read

> > > > > GuruDakshinamurthyi

> > > > > > > ji's

> > > > > > > > > > > mail(addressing me) also on this,which brings

in

> > more

> > > > > clarity

> > > > > > > to the

> > > > > > > > > > > applicability principles to my mail.

> > > > > > > > > > > I meant that both are necessity but to what

> degree

> > of

> > > > time

> > > > > (it

> > > > > > > varies

> > > > > > > > > > > from saadhaka to saadhaka) to get such inbuilt

> > > maturity

> > > > > such

> > > > > > > that

> > > > > > > > > that

> > > > > > > > > > > the count will be taken care of by Divine

forces

> > > after

> > > > > some

> > > > > > > initial

> > > > > > > > > > > period of saadhana.

> > > > > > > > > > > Morover the type of bio matter present in the

> japa

> > > maala

> > > > > > > (which is

> > > > > > > > > > > symbolic for ritualism as well as from

practical

> > > point

> > > > of

> > > > > > > view for

> > > > > > > > > our

> > > > > > > > > > > count) will help in keeping away destructive

> forces

> > > > > acting on

> > > > > > > us

> > > > > > > > > .Thus

> > > > > > > > > > > the symbolic rituals will indirectly help us in

> > > keeping

> > > > > away

> > > > > > > from

> > > > > > > > > > > negative thoughts and also trains our memory to

> be

> > > > object

> > > > > > > > > oriented.If

> > > > > > > > > > > our memory grows and retentive capacity

increase

> > the

> > > > > Gnaana

> > > > > > > will

> > > > > > > > > > > increase ,but at the same time destructive

forces

> > > > > > > (diversions) also

> > > > > > > > > > > becomes powerful.Thus the symbolic procedures

> will

> > > come

> > > > in

> > > > > > > handy to

> > > > > > > > > > > successfully fight the negative forces.The

> rituals

> > > may

> > > > be

> > > > > > > Rising

> > > > > > > > > > > early(if possible during Braahmi muhurta),Taking

> > > > > > > bath,Japaanusthaan,

> > > > > > > > > > > attending to the livelihood job etc etc in

> defined

> > > > times

> > > > > as

> > > > > > > > > discipline

> > > > > > > > > > > helps indirectly tune our memory through

keeping

> > our

> > > > body

> > > > > > > healthy.

> > > > > > > > > > > Thus ultimately we conclude that the so called

> > > symbolic

> > > > > > > procedures

> > > > > > > > > are

> > > > > > > > > > > not actually symbolic(it got branded as such)

but

> a

> > > > > necessity

> > > > > > > for

> > > > > > > > > our

> > > > > > > > > > > own good if we practice to the extent we can.

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > Quoting mishra.lalit@ ... <mishra. lalit%

> > > > 40gmail.

> > > > > com>:

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > Resp. Sri Murthy Adavi,

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > Yes, what you said is perfectly right, we count

> or

> > > dont

> > > > > > > count,target

> > > > > > > > > > > is realization of god's love within, I got it

> with

> > no

> > > > > > > counting,

> > > > > > > > > > > someone may get it with counting.

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > Thanx, for the writing.

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > Lalit.

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology

> > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. com>

> > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. com>,

> > > srinivasa

> > > > > > > murthy adavi

> > > > > > > > > > > asmp2k02@ wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > Respected Learned Members,

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > Both views may be correct when the views

> have/or

> > > with

> > > > > the

> > > > > > > goal as

> > > > > > > > > > > development of Love/Devotion towards adhistana

> > > Devatha

> > > > of

> > > > > the

> > > > > > > Mantra

> > > > > > > > > > > as Base.

> > > > > > > > > > > > In the initial stage only you need the

count;as

> > one

> > > > > > > develops the

> > > > > > > > > > > habit the biological tuning of the

intellect/body

> > will

> > > > > > > automatically

> > > > > > > > > > > take care of the practice(without count-help of

> > malas

> > > > > etc).

> > > > > > > > > > > > It's like if with the help of Alarm clock if

we

> > > wake

> > > > up

> > > > > for

> > > > > > > 2 or 3

> > > > > > > > > > > days at some appointed hour,then automatically

we

> > > > wakeup

> > > > > at

> > > > > > > the same

> > > > > > > > > > > time every day without help of alarm.

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > With due Respects

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > smadavi

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > Quoting starsuponme@ :

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya*

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Litsol,

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > Definitely we should count our Mantra Japa on

> > Mala.

> > > > Your

> > > > > > > view is

> > > > > > > > > > > against

> > > > > > > > > > > > Vedic Authorities and Sages, so should be

> > rejected.

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > Regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz

> > > > > > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru

> > > > > > > > > > > > email: rafal@

> > > > > > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > litsol napisa?(a):

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Mr. Jayashri,

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > A thought came, why i should not share with

> u,

> > U

> > > > pls.

> > > > > stop

> > > > > > > > > > > counting

> > > > > > > > > > > > > mantra chantings, counting mantra gives

false

> > ego

> > > > and

> > > > > then

> > > > > > > > > > > > > frustration if u dont get desired results.

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > leave it to the god, god counts the mantra

> > > chanted

> > > > by

> > > > > you

> > > > > > > may be

> > > > > > > > > > > > > 108, 1008 or whatsoever, let him count,

it's

> > his

> > > > part

> > > > > and

> > > > > > > ur

> > > > > > > > > part

> > > > > > > > > > > is

> > > > > > > > > > > > > to chant the mantra. when the mantra has to

> > > awaken,

> > > > it

> > > > > > > will be,

> > > > > > > > > > > god

> > > > > > > > > > > > > will ensure it for u.

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > sometimes we try to become more intelligent

> > with

> > > out

> > > > > > > limited

> > > > > > > > > > > > > intellect and that creates obstacles in our

> > > > spiritual

> > > > > > > growth.

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > So, forget about counts, forget about the

> time

> > u

> > > > put

> > > > > in

> > > > > > > for ur's

> > > > > > > > > > > > > sadhana, invoke the god with pure heart.

> purity

> > > > > counts.

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Lalit.

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology

> > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40.

> > > > > > > com>, " dakshinastrologer "

> > > > > > > > > > > > > <dakshinastrologer@ ...> wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Ms. Jayashree:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think this topic on 108 is getting very

> > > > > interesting

> > > > > > > and

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > enlightening for all members. Yesterday

we

> > had a

> > > > > > > wonderful

> > > > > > > > > > > > > esoteric

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > explanation from Shri. Sushil Dikshit,

and

> > > today

> > > > > your

> > > > > > > > > wonderful

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > explanation of numerical symmetry of the

> > cosmos!

> > > > > > > Wonderful.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > There definitely exists a " numerical

> > symphony "

> > > in

> > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > Universe.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > But,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > not only 108.....as I mentioned in my

> earlier

> > > > post,

> > > > > > > there are

> > > > > > > > > > > > > various

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > other numerals that are significant in

> occult

> > > > > > > practices. 108

> > > > > > > > > is

> > > > > > > > > > > a

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > powerful and all-purpose perfect

> > number...While

> > > > we

> > > > > have

> > > > > > > > > > > understood

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > the glory of 108, we should not lose

sight

> of

> > > the

> > > > > fact

> > > > > > > that

> > > > > > > > > > > there

> > > > > > > > > > > > > are

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > other powerful numbers also. This is just

> for

> > > the

> > > > > > > information

> > > > > > > > > of

> > > > > > > > > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > list.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > My apprecitation again for this wonderful

> > > > response.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Blessed be.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pandit R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Blessed be.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pandit R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI. vedic-

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > astrology@grou ps.com

> <astrology%

> > > > > > > > > > > 40. com>,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > " jayasartn " <jayasartn@> wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In cosmology, 108 has this

significance -

> > the

> > > > > moon is

> > > > > > > away

> > > > > > > > > > > from

> > > > > > > > > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > earth 108 times its (moon's) diameter

and

> > the

> > > > sun

> > > > > is

> > > > > > > away

> > > > > > > > > > > from the

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > earth, 108 times its diameter.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Perhaps this reality of distances is

> > > applicable

> > > > to

> > > > > > > deities

> > > > > > > > > > > too.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Perhaps this has been indicated by the

> 108

> > > divya

> > > > > > > desas of

> > > > > > > > > Lord

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Narayana.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > jayasree

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology

> > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40.

> > > > > > > com>, " dakshinastrologer "

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <dakshinastrologer@ > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Shri. Sushil:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It is a wonderful answer you have

given.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Blessed be.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pandit R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology@ .

com

> > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40.

> > > > > > > com>, " sushil.dikshit "

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <sushil.dikshit@ > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Babu,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It is not a silly question but it

is

> a

> > > very

> > > > > good

> > > > > > > > > question.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Actually

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > there are 27 Nakshatras and every

> > > Nakshtras

> > > > > has 4

> > > > > > > Charan

> > > > > > > > > > > so

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > total

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > charans are 27 x 4 = 108 Charan.

Each

> > > > Charan

> > > > > has 3

> > > > > > > > > degree

> > > > > > > > > > > and

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > 20

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > minutes so if you multiply 3 degree

> and

> > 20

> > > > > > > minutes to

> > > > > > > > > 108

> > > > > > > > > > > it

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > comes

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > out to be 360 degress i.e. one

cycle

> > > > (Circle).

> > > > > > > This

> > > > > > > > > cycle

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > represetns

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > whole brahmand because all the

> rashis,

> > > > > planets and

> > > > > > > > > > > nakshatra

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > are

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > between these 360 degree in 2

> > dimensional

> > > > > > > horoscope. So

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > chanting a

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mantra completes one cycle of this

> > > brahmand.

> > > > > > > Further One

> > > > > > > > > > > who

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > has

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > visited Brahamand at least one time

> > i.e.

> > > he

> > > > is

> > > > > > > > > > > brahmagyani he

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > is

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > entitiled to place 108 Shri before

> his

> > > name.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sushil dikshit

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology@

.

> com

> > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40.

> com>,

> > > babu

> > > > > mon

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > <muthappan111@ >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Namaste,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It may be a silly matter for all

of

> > you.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I want to know what is the reason

> > that

> > > > some

> > > > > > > remedies

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > recomended

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > for 108 times.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I dont know any thing about

> astrology.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I hope you may pleased to provide

a

> > > reply

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thanks,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Babu

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------ --------- --------- -

--

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Be a better Globetrotter. Get

> better

> > > > travel

> > > > > > > answers

> > > > > > > > > from

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > someone

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > who knows.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Answers - Check it out.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this

message

> > have

> > > > been

> > > > > > > removed]

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been

> > > removed]

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been

> > > removed]

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been

> > removed]

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been

> removed]

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Res. Ram ji,

 

Pls. dont advice him or mohan raam, they have nothing to debate or

discuss on either mantra or bhakti.

 

I don't remember shlokas much as i read classics for my satisfaction,

in two phases, firstly from my class 8'th till my 2nd year of

graduation. that time i had no faith and no bhakti, just read like i

was reading some comics or cartoon books, i had not developed ideas,

not taken any message, i knew and i can talk about the content, but i

was not involved.

 

after that incident happened at Sharda Temple,Maihar,it was

unbelievable and it made me change my thoughts, i again read some

classics and this time,i grasped the message given in the classics.

 

They are at the stage of my chlidhood, they may read and discuss. but

dont take the message in their heart, somewhere their greed to

establish themselves as pandit or authority is also a reason.

 

Perhapse, in lieu of, hitting them hard, i had to take another rout

to let them realize they are wrong and deliberately wrong.

 

He didnt say any thing on my how i shown, beej and god's name is one

and same thing, in fact it's a simple thnig, and well known but they

dont accept.

 

let them dont accept, what difference it makes to us, they have their

life with them, any qualitative change within them will do good to

them only.

 

So, i prayed maa, mother divine for mohan raam, he is too old, his

problem is he learnt astrology, did some breathing excercises, but he

lacks spiritual experiences so he doesn't believe, I was like him in

my childhood.

 

I prayed, and it's acknowledged by maa, time will change for him a

little, what didn't happen to him in last 85 yrs, will happen in next

5-6 monnths, he will get some good spritiual experience, the curtain

will be lifted for some time, reality at a glance.

 

after that it's his part to stick to that or not, coz, ego, greed and

fear still remains, i m not completely gone out of it, i have to

fight with me many times.

 

I thought gruop w'd be a good plateform to get like minded friends,

if nothnig, it gives joy.

 

Let's wish good for all, I also express my gratitude to you to speak

for what u thought right.

 

regards,

Lalit.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

vedic astrology , " Ram Jaswal " <rkjaswal

wrote:

>

> Namaste Abhishek

>

> My post wasn't so much in defense of Lalith but one to stop

the " belittling "

> of a person within this Group. If you don't agree with someone's

views you

> are perfectly within your rights to say so why in a scholarly

fashion so as

> to discuss and further the merits of the topic under discussion.

Thereafter

> it is a matter for the individual to either continue with the on-

going

> discussion or to stop? The only way you or anyone else is likely to

change

> Lalith's view on chanting of Mantras will be from a scholarly

viewpoint and

> not from goading him?

>

> Also why are you taking personal offense? If Guru's can ignore his

comments

> - can't you do the same?

>

> With freedom of speech comes the responsibility of keeping a civil

and

> polite language - please re-read your note which prompted my earlier

> response.

>

> Like I said in my earlier post it is all about ones viewpoints - my

personal

> advise to everyone would be to take what you find reasonable and

ignore the

> rest.

>

> Best wishes ..

>

> Jai Sita Ram

>

> Ram

> _____

>

> vedic astrology

> [vedic astrology ] On Behalf Of abhishekpotti

> 28 July 2007 20:42

> vedic astrology

> [vedic astrology] Re: Oye Lalith! No one here is afraid of

you....

>

> Dear Ram Jaswal:

>

> If Lalith stops challenging others with his rude posts no one will

> run him down...please follow the threads carefully......He is

> speaking as if he is the master of everything and everybody else is

a

> fool. When he passes judgment on senior astrologers of this group

or

> unnecessarily challenges established conventions, we have defended

> that. Now, why are you defending Lalith? Don't you think if you

> have the right to defend an offender, we have the right to defend

the

> more decent members and traditions that he is subtly attacking....

>

> just read his posts.....If he has just forwarded the Prashna

Tantra,

> nobody would have objected to it.....See the accompanying comments

> where he abrasively comments certain things......

>

> Open your eyes before advicing anyone. Why don't you write to

Lalith

> also? When did I call him names?......No sir...you are mistaken....

>

> Did you not notice that even after Mohanraamji stopped writing

posts,

> this fellow was taunting that old gentleman repeatedly last week.

> Where were you at that time?

>

> If Lalith stops writing abrasive posts like " Nobody can stand

before

> me " and all that silly nonsense, we have no issues with him (or at

> least I have no issues with him). So, advice Lalith also in this

> regard.

>

> If Lalith and you enjoy freedom of speech, we also claim the same

> previlege.

>

> Abhishek.

>

> vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology%40>

> , " Ram Jaswal " <rkjaswal@>

> wrote:

> >

> > Namaste Abhishek/ Mohanraaam

> >

> > Just why are you trying to run Lalith down? From the posts that I

> have read

> > All he has done is given this point of view - if you don't accept

> them than

> > simply ignore it - there is No need for any name calling or

> belittling

> > someone.

> >

> > There is also nothing wrong in Lalith forwarding " Prashna Tantra "

> text to

> > this group as to whether someone has requested it or not - he

> certainly

> > doesn't need your or mine permission to do so - after all he

> thought it

> > would be useful to everyone - again his view.

> >

> > Sorry if I am coming across annoyed and perhaps rude But feel it

is

> Best

> > that everyone should stop " belittling " other group members as in

> the long

> > run all it does is make oneself appear small and bigoted.

> >

> > Best wishes and hoping this will be the last mail on this

subject ..

> >

> > Jai Sita Ram

> >

> > Ram

> >

> > _____

> >

> > vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology%40>

>

> > [vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology%

40>

> ] On Behalf Of abhishekpotti

> > 28 July 2007 19:54

> > vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology%40>

>

> > [vedic astrology] Oye Lalith! No one here is afraid of

> you....

> >

> > Dear Lalith:

> >

> > The whole world knows the history of Blessed Meera Bhai....the

> > epitome of Bhakti......She was attached to her " Lala " - the

> wonderful

> > idol of Krishna gifted to her even from her childhood....Do you

> mean

> > to say that innocent young girl started chanting " Kliim

krishnaaya "

> > mantra automatically? Even Bhakta Prahlaada had to be initiated

by

> > Sage Naaradha for his chant of dwaadasaakshari mantra....

> >

> > Nobody is afraid of you here......You need not proclaim that you

> are

> > not in the business of a Guru.....actually Guru status is not a

> > business (true to your half-baked knowledge you will claim it is

> also

> > like software engineering!). The difference my friend between you

> > and other great persons like Rafal or Dakshinamoorthiji is that

> they

> > are spending their money for the internet, whereas you are

> pilfering

> > your company's time and the company's resources while browsing

the

> > internet. Don't you think you are cheating your company when you

> > spend so much time on empty and egoistic posts defending yourself

> > against every expert after arguing with them unnecessarily? Are

you

> > not getting paid for the time you spend in the company....Know

the

> > basics of ethics before ever sermonizing.....So, actually you are

> an

> > exploiter....try to understand that....the other gurujis are

> probably

> > too decent to comment on that......What happened to your project?

> > Better rush to it nough!....It will spare us the agony of

replying

> to

> > your half-witted postings!

> >

> > By the say, Which member asked you Prashna Tantra dear? We did

not

> > see any posts requesting " Honourable Lalith " to explain Prashna

> > Tantra (as if you could explain it!) What arrogance you have to

> > claim that nobody can stand before you.....Guruji's posts exposed

> > your ignorance....you did not even know how to ask queries and

get

> > replies from one of the most empathetic astrologers of this

group,

> > and yet you claim you are this and that......

> >

> > For your information....nobody is afraid of you..Rather you

should

> be

> > afraid of yourself......Your foolishness itself will be your

doom.

> > Did you not become the laughing stock due to your email-based

> chasing

> > of Priyaa? Such foolishness in occult matters could be more

costly

> > dear.....I think Mohanraaamji and Rafalji are only afraid about

> your

> > own well-being! They are not afraid of you. Nor am I afraid of

you.

> >

> > Your posts never answer the queries or points raised by others;

you

> > take off on a new ground only because of your shallow

understanding

> > of subjects. Nobody has accepted you as a Guru here, and nobody

> > will....Can a fire-fly eclipse the Sun? There are too many " Suns "

> > here and you are just a fire-fly.

> >

> > It reminds me of a story.....Once an ant challenged the mighty

> > elephant for a fight; the elephant obviously could not hear the

ant

> > (the ant being so tiny and it was on the ground, its sound could

> not

> > reach the elephant). The elephant just walked away out of its own

> > volition in its natural course. Then the ant claimed, " you see I

> > challenged the elephant and it ran away " . Dear, your saying that

> > nobody can stand before you is similar to that.......

> >

> > FIRST LEARN THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN GHOSTS AND YOUR ANCESTOR

> > SUMANGALIS BEFORE WRITING THE FIRST POSTS ON OCCULT! What a

> > pity......what a pity.....That we have to bear your meaningless

> > rantings here!

> >

> > Abhishek.

> >

> > vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology%40>

> > , " litsol " <mishra.lalit@>

> > wrote:

> > >

> > >

> > > I was waiting for u dear..

> > >

> > > why u took time ?

> > >

> > > Do u mean Meera Bai discussed with u, what she did..

> > >

> > > Do u know 'Kleem Krishnay, Govindaya Gopijan Vallabhaya Namh'

is

> a

> > > mantra for lord krishna.

> > >

> > > is there no beej mantras, to whom u wish to misguide ? let

thnigs

> > > remain between lord, bhakta , their shraddha and their guru.

> > >

> > > why u people are so afraid of me, i m not in business of guru.

> > >

> > > i m happy with my life, my profession of software engineering

and

> > > my hobbies ok.

> > >

> > > there are 7000+ members are here, by writing such type of

foolish

> > > things u expose urself only, mind, there are better brains here.

> > >

> > > this is enough ...

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology%

40>

> > ,

> > > " abhishekpotti " <abhishekpotti@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Respected Mohanraaamji:

> > > >

> > > > Well said. Lalith is saying that " maybe in south india

devotees

> > > > don't chant Moola mantras but not so in North " ...What

> > > > stupidity.....He does not seem to understand that " mantra

> > shaastra

> > > > experts " are also devotees, but they cannot be called as

> innocent

> > > > saatwik bhaktaas! A typical example of a pure saadhwik bhakta

> > will

> > > > be Meera Bhai (was she not North Indian). Can Lalith say

which

> > > Dasa

> > > > Mahaa Vidya Meera Bhai practised? She was immersed in Krishna

> > > > consciousness and Lover for Him. Her own Bhajans were her

> > prayers

> > > in

> > > > the bhaavana of Bhakti in the form of Love! This is not

mantra

> > > > shaastra. Another example will be Saant Tukhaaraam. These

> > > bhaktaas

> > > > did not chant moola mantraas. Panditji Dakshinamoorthi was on

> > dot

> > > in

> > > > saying that " Pure bhaktaas do not chant complicated moola

> > > mantraas " .

> > > > You have clarified this fact wonderfully in your post. I wish

> > more

> > > > knowledgeable persons also put erratic posters in their place

> > just

> > > as

> > > > Mohanraaamji does here. This will benefit more naive readers

of

> > > > these forums who might otherwise get confused as to which of

> the

> > > > paths to follow. Actually, anyone can follow any path as he/

> she

> > > > deems it fit; but there should be consistency of procedures.

> > > >

> > > > We should not confuse mantrik rituals and bhakti doctrines.

> > > Bhaktaas

> > > > can chant the names of Gods at anytime.....Mantra shaastra

> > experts

> > > > chanting advanced moola mantras should necessarily adopt

ritual

> > > > procedures for the welfare of themselves and others!

> > > Yes...improper

> > > > chanting of mantras can cause danger to the society also just

> as

> > > > proper chanting can help others. Hence, this cannot be

> > considered

> > > as

> > > > a personal preference of the aspirant. If this was not the

> case,

> > > why

> > > > did sages codify spiritual practises scrupulously? Rafalji,

> > > > Mohanraaamji, etc. are correct in saying it is best to follow

> > > Pandit

> > > > Dakshinamoorthiji's advices on mantra shastra or japams. He

is

> > > > learned and he is living a life compatible to the shaastras

> > though

> > > he

> > > > has faced uncertain circumstances in his own personal life.

He

> > > never

> > > > compromised on principles and he willingly paid the price for

> > that

> > > > which most of us will never do. The words of such a person

> > should

> > > > obviously carry more weight.

> > > >

> > > > Abhishek.

> > > >

> > > > vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology%

> 40>

> > , " mohanraaam "

> > <mohanraaam@>

> > > > wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > Well Lalith:

> > > > >

> > > > > If you have really done dasa Maha Vidyaa, you would have

> never

> > > > > approached a professional astrologer for

consultation...that

> > much

> > > I

> > > > > can say....

> > > > >

> > > > > And what idiocy when you say Panditji is partly wrong? He

> > > > > said " Bhaktaas do not chant Moola mantras " , whereas you

have

> > > edited

> > > > > the words to suit your ends....He never said " devotees

don't

> > > chant

> > > > > Beej mantras " .....You are putting words into his mouth and

> > > assuming

> > > > > he is wrong! Why, do you know....the Great Panditji himself

> > > chants

> > > > > Moola mantras.....He is a bhakta and a mantra shastra

expert.

> > As

> > > a

> > > > > bhakta he keeps incessant chanting of naama japa throughout

> the

> > > > day;

> > > > > as a mantra shastra expert, he restricts the moola mantra

> > japams

> > > to

> > > > > stipulated times with ritual purity.....It is this

wonderful

> > > > practice

> > > > > that Guruji was alluding to. Guruji cannot be wrong in

ritual

> > > and

> > > > > occult matters. Please understand that.

> > > > >

> > > > > There are 4 classes of Devotees.......1) Saatwik vedic

> devotees

> > > who

> > > > > will follow vedic dharma scrupulously. They will not dare

to

> > > > compare

> > > > > astrology and vedanga to Engineering! as you did...

> > > > > 2) Raajasik devotees who will follow vedic disciplines as

far

> > as

> > > > > possible, but will still go after upaasanaas of Demi-Gods

for

> > > > > accomplishment of siddhis. Mantra shaastra experts usually

> > fall

> > > in

> > > > > this category.

> > > > > 3) Saatwik Bhaktaas - for whom the meditation and glory of

> > their

> > > > > Ishta Devataa is enough for spiritual satisfaction. It is

> this

> > > > > category that Guruji referred to when he said they will not

> > chant

> > > > > Moola mantras too much. Definitely they will not do Dasa

> Mahaa

> > > > > Vidyaa.

> > > > > 4) Taamasic Devotees - Those whose main motive is to

project

> > > > > themselves at all costs and acting as if they are equal to

> the

> > > > > experts; they will try ALL practices - whether they are

> > > sanctioned

> > > > by

> > > > > vedas or not.....Their only aim is personal glory and

> > > > satisfaction.

> > > > > They will attack even established dharma if they do not get

> > > results

> > > > > (sounds familiar....You are one!) Ignorance and half-baked

> > > > knowledge

> > > > > and egotism are these persons' motivating fuel.

> > > > >

> > > > > You are really satan's Gift to this list.......My only

prayer

> > is

> > > > that

> > > > > innocent members of this list do not get side-tracked with

> your

> > > > > ramblings.

> > > > >

> > > > > Let me make this clear to the list.....Panditji said that

> > saatwik

> > > > > Bhaktaas who chant Divine names only due to Pure Love on

God

> > > > usually

> > > > > never chant mantrik moola mantraas. It is just one class of

> > > > > devotees. A rajasik bhakta who is a mantra-shaastra expert

> may

> > > > even

> > > > > be a bhakta at heart; and a pure bhakta may sometimes chant

> > some

> > > > > mantrik japams for solving some practical issues......But,

> when

> > > > they

> > > > > switch their routines temporarily, these enlightened

devotees

> > > > usually

> > > > > take good guidance and follow the tenets of shaastras

> > > > > scrupulously....Definitely they will not sit on assumption

> like

> > > > > Lalith.

> > > > >

> > > > > On the one hand, this fellow claims he has done chants in

> > > forests,

> > > > > rivers, earth, etc. (Probably we have a Maharishi here!

What

> > > > heights

> > > > > of pointless pride in this young man list....it is

> > disgusting!).

> > > > On

> > > > > the other hand, he says he chants mantras in buses, trains,

> > > > etc......

> > > > > He is confused about which no body can have issues. Only

his

> > > Guru

> > > > > should be concerned about that.....But, his attempts to

stuff

> > his

> > > > > shallow understanding upon this list is reprehensible. And,

> > his

> > > > > habit of quoting experts out of context is really

> condemnable.

> > > May

> > > > > Jupiter's Light Shine on that fellow and teach him to

respect

> > the

> > > > > hallowed traditions and to stay at his level rather than

> trying

> > > > > to " teach " others (He has the audacity to claim he

> > is " teaching "

> > > > > Rafalji!)

> > > > >

> > > > > If a mere young man of 35 years who has spent his life on a

> > > " Failed

> > > > > computer web desining business " , " pointless email chasing

of

> > > > girls " ,

> > > > > and other " past times " can gain insight as he claims, how

> much

> > > will

> > > > > learned Gurus of this group with their life of devotion to

> > > vedanta

> > > > > and vedanga know? His peanut brain and hyper-inflated ego

> will

> > > > never

> > > > > allow him to see this obvious truth. But, please list

> exercise

> > > > your

> > > > > discretion while reading his posts (There are doubtless

some

> > good

> > > > > elements even in his posts; but mostly there is trash

> presented

> > > as

> > > > > philosophy).

> > > > >

> > > > > Mohanraaam

> > > > >

> > > > > vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology%

> 40>

> > , " litsol "

> > <mishra.lalit@>

> > > > > wrote:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Dear Rafal,

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Do u think, a hobby means shallow knowledge of the

domain,

> No

> > > > > rafal,

> > > > > > it's not like that.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > At least not for me. You have learnt and i m learning, i

> read

> > > > ur's

> > > > > > replies and get benifitted, same way i wanted you to pay

> > heed

> > > to

> > > > > > what i have written about spritiuality, mostrly i did

write

> > for

> > > u

> > > > > >

> > > > > > I have done all 10 mahavidyas of tantra and read many

> tantrik

> > > > > > classics, spent good deal of time with great tantriks

> > trained

> > > in

> > > > > > Kamakhya and other places, keenly observed their doings,

> > their

> > > > > > mistakes etc.., I did tremendous mantra chanting on

water,

> > on

> > > > > earth,

> > > > > > at home, in forests etc...

> > > > > >

> > > > > > then reached here, then i did write something, but sorry

i

> > dont

> > > > > > remember shlokas. i was not interested in cramming that.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Panditji is not fully correct in saying that BeejMantras

> are

> > > not

> > > > > > chanted by devotees, I dont know much about South India

but

> > in

> > > > > North

> > > > > > normally its done.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > And a successfull mantra sadhana has to result in one's

> being

> > a

> > > > > > devotee, the devotion is the outcome, final result of

> mantra

> > > > > sadhana,

> > > > > > perhaps, Pandit Ji believes mantras are power

> packet,thinks,

> > i

> > > do

> > > > > it

> > > > > > this way , these many times and get this result, this is

> > where

> > > > most

> > > > > > of the people are confused. without being a good human

> being

> > if

> > > > we

> > > > > > think, we will achieve something in spirituality, is

> > difficult,

> > > > > very

> > > > > > difficult.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > what happens is, with the mantra chanting, a self

> > > > transformation

> > > > > > process begins, u if dont restrict urself, ur karma

begins

> > > > > diluting,

> > > > > > and u begin ur purification process unknowingly, when

> > > substantial

> > > > > > part of ego and greed for respect vanishes and many such

> > thing

> > > > > > togather, mantra awakens u and with the God's grace ur

> > > objective

> > > > > gets

> > > > > > fullfilled, gradually u become a devotee. ur being simple

> and

> > > > being

> > > > > > devotee is sometimes is indication of ur's going on the

> right

> > > > track.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > I think we have discussed a lot, it's enough !!

> > > > > >

> > > > > > My Boss has given me lot of projects to complete, so, may

> be,

> > i

> > > m

> > > > > not

> > > > > > going to available in the group like i was recently.

> however.

> > i

> > > > > will

> > > > > > complete Garg Hora series.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > regards,

> > > > > > Lalit.

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology%

> 40>

> > , Rafal Gendarz

> > > > > > <starsuponme@> wrote:

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya*

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Dear Litsol,

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Then please dont generalize Your preferences as they

are

> > too

> > > > > > shallow for

> > > > > > > this Forum aspiration.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Regards,

> > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz

> > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru

> > > > > > > email: rafal@

> > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa.com

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > litsol napisa?(a):

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Dear Rafel,

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > I take Astrology as a good hobby, and i w'd be

looking

> at

> > > it

> > > > > with

> > > > > > an

> > > > > > > > engineer's approach.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > I asked ur age because, it's our thinking to put our

> > > > parameters

> > > > > in

> > > > > > > > god's system, there is nothing like delay or

> advancement

> > in

> > > > > > > > spirituality. So, " Delay " or " Speed " , " backwardness "

> > > > > > > > and " advancement " doesn't exist in spirituality, I

> > thought

> > > if

> > > > u

> > > > > r

> > > > > > > > thinking that it may take too much time, I wanted to

> tell

> > > u,

> > > > > it's

> > > > > > not

> > > > > > > > like that. there is no delay.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > It clicks in fraction of a second, when u r getting

> > clicked

> > > > > > depends

> > > > > > > > on u and on god's will, when he wants u to get

clicked.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > God sometimes graces for no reason ( " Ahetuka " ) just

for

> > his

> > > > > > > > compassion towards u and it may happen next minute

too.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > spirituality is not delimited by time , effort and

> rules.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > regards,

> > > > > > > > Lalit.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > vedic astrology

> > > > > > > > <vedic astrology%40>, Rafal

> Gendarz

> > > > > > > > <starsuponme@ ...> wrote:

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya*

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > Dear Litsol,

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > Please be careful about words.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > Im happy that You are sharing Your experience -

very

> > > > > inspirating

> > > > > > > > ones.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > Age hierarchy is for sudras - Manu Samhita. If You

> > treat

> > > > > Jyotish

> > > > > > > > Vedanga

> > > > > > > > > as profession similar to engineering You have a

long

> > way

> > > to

> > > > > go.

> > > > > > But

> > > > > > > > dont

> > > > > > > > > be pessimistic here are many who will try to help

You

> > in

> > > > > getting

> > > > > > > > proper

> > > > > > > > > understanding.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > After some time You will agree with me about the

mala

> > and

> > > > > japa.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > Regards,

> > > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz

> > > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru

> > > > > > > > > email: rafal@

> > > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > litsol napisa?(a):

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > Dear Rafal,

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > Here u r doing two wrong things, instead of

> > developing

> > > ur

> > > > > > > > understanding,

> > > > > > > > > > u r trying to conclude something and going beyond

> > that

> > > u r

> > > > > > > > messaging

> > > > > > > > > > same to many.

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > I m touching 35, What's ur age ?

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > Astrology is a kind of vidya or profession, like

i

> m

> > a

> > > > > > software

> > > > > > > > > > engineer, software engineering is my profession.

> > > > > spirituality

> > > > > > is

> > > > > > > > beyond

> > > > > > > > > > all sort of vidya or profession.

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > I wish u to be a good soul and to realize the

bliss

> > of

> > > > self

> > > > > > > > awakening or

> > > > > > > > > > in other terms, the bliss that comes once u feel

u

> > and

> > > > god

> > > > > is

> > > > > > > > > > connected. dissolved in each other.

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > First realize, experience, then speak and then

> > suggest

> > > to

> > > > > > others,

> > > > > > > > by

> > > > > > > > > > mere reading shastras or books u r not going to

> feel

> > > it.

> > > > > > unless

> > > > > > > > god

> > > > > > > > > > graces u it's very very difficult. and if u dont

> > avoid

> > > > this

> > > > > > sort

> > > > > > > > of

> > > > > > > > > > hurriedness instead of learning and

understanding,

> it

> > > > will

> > > > > > affect

> > > > > > > > u only

> > > > > > > > > > no one else.

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > somehere i have read, it was written - By mere

> > > > > repeating " So-

> > > > > > > > Aham " no

> > > > > > > > > > one gets liberated unless he realizes it like one

> > > doesnt

> > > > get

> > > > > > > > cured by

> > > > > > > > > > knowing the name of the medicine, u need to take

> the

> > > > > medicine

> > > > > > to

> > > > > > > > get

> > > > > > > > > > cured " .

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > So, pls. be wise, as it was being discussed here,

i

> > > > shared

> > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > > experience of my life, pls. mind it, i m not a

> > > preecher,

> > > > > nor a

> > > > > > > > guru, nor

> > > > > > > > > > i have to make my followers, nor it's my

> profession,

> > > nor

> > > > i

> > > > > > have

> > > > > > > > to get

> > > > > > > > > > fame, sharing things is a kind of friendliness a

> kind

> > of

> > > > > > > > affection,

> > > > > > > > > > that's it.

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > regards,

> > > > > > > > > > Lalit.

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology

> > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. com>,

> Rafal

> > > > Gendarz

> > > > > > > > > > <starsuponme@ ...>

> > > > > > > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya*

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > Dear Jyotishas

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > Counting of mala has more depth sense than just

> > > > counting,

> > > > > > so for

> > > > > > > > > > natives

> > > > > > > > > > > like Litsol counting is neccessary and any

other

> > > > > speculation

> > > > > > > > will be

> > > > > > > > > > > only illusory and just imagination. We should

> > follow

> > > Pt.

> > > > > > > > > > Dakshinamoorti

> > > > > > > > > > > advise strictly, otherwise our process of

> spiritual

> > > > > > development

> > > > > > > > will

> > > > > > > > > > be

> > > > > > > > > > > slow and unauthoritative.

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > Regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz

> > > > > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru

> > > > > > > > > > > email: rafal@

> > > > > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > asmp2k02@ napisa?(a):

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > Resp Sri Lalitji,

> > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for your mail.But please also read

> > > > > > GuruDakshinamurthyi

> > > > > > > > ji's

> > > > > > > > > > > > mail(addressing me) also on this,which brings

> in

> > > more

> > > > > > clarity

> > > > > > > > to the

> > > > > > > > > > > > applicability principles to my mail.

> > > > > > > > > > > > I meant that both are necessity but to what

> > degree

> > > of

> > > > > time

> > > > > > (it

> > > > > > > > varies

> > > > > > > > > > > > from saadhaka to saadhaka) to get such

inbuilt

> > > > maturity

> > > > > > such

> > > > > > > > that

> > > > > > > > > > that

> > > > > > > > > > > > the count will be taken care of by Divine

> forces

> > > > after

> > > > > > some

> > > > > > > > initial

> > > > > > > > > > > > period of saadhana.

> > > > > > > > > > > > Morover the type of bio matter present in the

> > japa

> > > > maala

> > > > > > > > (which is

> > > > > > > > > > > > symbolic for ritualism as well as from

> practical

> > > > point

> > > > > of

> > > > > > > > view for

> > > > > > > > > > our

> > > > > > > > > > > > count) will help in keeping away destructive

> > forces

> > > > > > acting on

> > > > > > > > us

> > > > > > > > > > .Thus

> > > > > > > > > > > > the symbolic rituals will indirectly help us

in

> > > > keeping

> > > > > > away

> > > > > > > > from

> > > > > > > > > > > > negative thoughts and also trains our memory

to

> > be

> > > > > object

> > > > > > > > > > oriented.If

> > > > > > > > > > > > our memory grows and retentive capacity

> increase

> > > the

> > > > > > Gnaana

> > > > > > > > will

> > > > > > > > > > > > increase ,but at the same time destructive

> forces

> > > > > > > > (diversions) also

> > > > > > > > > > > > becomes powerful.Thus the symbolic procedures

> > will

> > > > come

> > > > > in

> > > > > > > > handy to

> > > > > > > > > > > > successfully fight the negative forces.The

> > rituals

> > > > may

> > > > > be

> > > > > > > > Rising

> > > > > > > > > > > > early(if possible during Braahmi

muhurta),Taking

> > > > > > > > bath,Japaanusthaan,

> > > > > > > > > > > > attending to the livelihood job etc etc in

> > defined

> > > > > times

> > > > > > as

> > > > > > > > > > discipline

> > > > > > > > > > > > helps indirectly tune our memory through

> keeping

> > > our

> > > > > body

> > > > > > > > healthy.

> > > > > > > > > > > > Thus ultimately we conclude that the so

called

> > > > symbolic

> > > > > > > > procedures

> > > > > > > > > > are

> > > > > > > > > > > > not actually symbolic(it got branded as such)

> but

> > a

> > > > > > necessity

> > > > > > > > for

> > > > > > > > > > our

> > > > > > > > > > > > own good if we practice to the extent we can.

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > Quoting mishra.lalit@ ... <mishra.

lalit%

> > > > > 40gmail.

> > > > > > com>:

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Resp. Sri Murthy Adavi,

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, what you said is perfectly right, we

count

> > or

> > > > dont

> > > > > > > > count,target

> > > > > > > > > > > > is realization of god's love within, I got it

> > with

> > > no

> > > > > > > > counting,

> > > > > > > > > > > > someone may get it with counting.

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > Thanx, for the writing.

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > > Lalit.

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology

> > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. com>

> > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40.

com>,

> > > > srinivasa

> > > > > > > > murthy adavi

> > > > > > > > > > > > asmp2k02@ wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Respected Learned Members,

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Both views may be correct when the views

> > have/or

> > > > with

> > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > goal as

> > > > > > > > > > > > development of Love/Devotion towards

adhistana

> > > > Devatha

> > > > > of

> > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > Mantra

> > > > > > > > > > > > as Base.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > In the initial stage only you need the

> count;as

> > > one

> > > > > > > > develops the

> > > > > > > > > > > > habit the biological tuning of the

> intellect/body

> > > will

> > > > > > > > automatically

> > > > > > > > > > > > take care of the practice(without count-help

of

> > > malas

> > > > > > etc).

> > > > > > > > > > > > > It's like if with the help of Alarm clock

if

> we

> > > > wake

> > > > > up

> > > > > > for

> > > > > > > > 2 or 3

> > > > > > > > > > > > days at some appointed hour,then

automatically

> we

> > > > > wakeup

> > > > > > at

> > > > > > > > the same

> > > > > > > > > > > > time every day without help of alarm.

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > With due Respects

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > smadavi

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Quoting starsuponme@ :

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya*

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Litsol,

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Definitely we should count our Mantra Japa

on

> > > Mala.

> > > > > Your

> > > > > > > > view is

> > > > > > > > > > > > against

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Vedic Authorities and Sages, so should be

> > > rejected.

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru

> > > > > > > > > > > > > email: rafal@

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > litsol napisa?(a):

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Mr. Jayashri,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > A thought came, why i should not share

with

> > u,

> > > U

> > > > > pls.

> > > > > > stop

> > > > > > > > > > > > counting

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > mantra chantings, counting mantra gives

> false

> > > ego

> > > > > and

> > > > > > then

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > frustration if u dont get desired results.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > leave it to the god, god counts the

mantra

> > > > chanted

> > > > > by

> > > > > > you

> > > > > > > > may be

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > 108, 1008 or whatsoever, let him count,

> it's

> > > his

> > > > > part

> > > > > > and

> > > > > > > > ur

> > > > > > > > > > part

> > > > > > > > > > > > is

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > to chant the mantra. when the mantra has

to

> > > > awaken,

> > > > > it

> > > > > > > > will be,

> > > > > > > > > > > > god

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > will ensure it for u.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > sometimes we try to become more

intelligent

> > > with

> > > > out

> > > > > > > > limited

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > intellect and that creates obstacles in

our

> > > > > spiritual

> > > > > > > > growth.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > So, forget about counts, forget about the

> > time

> > > u

> > > > > put

> > > > > > in

> > > > > > > > for ur's

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > sadhana, invoke the god with pure heart.

> > purity

> > > > > > counts.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Lalit.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40.

> > > > > > > > com>, " dakshinastrologer "

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > <dakshinastrologer@ ...> wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Ms. Jayashree:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think this topic on 108 is getting

very

> > > > > > interesting

> > > > > > > > and

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > enlightening for all members. Yesterday

> we

> > > had a

> > > > > > > > wonderful

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > esoteric

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > explanation from Shri. Sushil Dikshit,

> and

> > > > today

> > > > > > your

> > > > > > > > > > wonderful

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > explanation of numerical symmetry of

the

> > > cosmos!

> > > > > > > > Wonderful.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There definitely exists a " numerical

> > > symphony "

> > > > in

> > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > > Universe.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > But,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > not only 108.....as I mentioned in my

> > earlier

> > > > > post,

> > > > > > > > there are

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > various

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > other numerals that are significant in

> > occult

> > > > > > > > practices. 108

> > > > > > > > > > is

> > > > > > > > > > > > a

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > powerful and all-purpose perfect

> > > number...While

> > > > > we

> > > > > > have

> > > > > > > > > > > > understood

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the glory of 108, we should not lose

> sight

> > of

> > > > the

> > > > > > fact

> > > > > > > > that

> > > > > > > > > > > > there

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > are

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > other powerful numbers also. This is

just

> > for

> > > > the

> > > > > > > > information

> > > > > > > > > > of

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > list.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > My apprecitation again for this

wonderful

> > > > > response.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Blessed be.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pandit R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Blessed be.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pandit R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI. vedic-

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > astrology@grou ps.com

> > <astrology%

> > > > > > > > > > > > 40. com>,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > " jayasartn " <jayasartn@> wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In cosmology, 108 has this

> significance -

> > > the

> > > > > > moon is

> > > > > > > > away

> > > > > > > > > > > > from

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > earth 108 times its (moon's) diameter

> and

> > > the

> > > > > sun

> > > > > > is

> > > > > > > > away

> > > > > > > > > > > > from the

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > earth, 108 times its diameter.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Perhaps this reality of distances is

> > > > applicable

> > > > > to

> > > > > > > > deities

> > > > > > > > > > > > too.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Perhaps this has been indicated by

the

> > 108

> > > > divya

> > > > > > > > desas of

> > > > > > > > > > Lord

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Narayana.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > jayasree

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology@ .

com

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40.

> > > > > > > > com>, " dakshinastrologer "

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <dakshinastrologer@ > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Shri. Sushil:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It is a wonderful answer you have

> given.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Blessed be.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pandit R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology@

.

> com

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40.

> > > > > > > > com>, " sushil.dikshit "

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <sushil.dikshit@ > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Babu,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It is not a silly question but it

> is

> > a

> > > > very

> > > > > > good

> > > > > > > > > > question.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Actually

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > there are 27 Nakshatras and every

> > > > Nakshtras

> > > > > > has 4

> > > > > > > > Charan

> > > > > > > > > > > > so

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > total

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > charans are 27 x 4 = 108 Charan.

> Each

> > > > > Charan

> > > > > > has 3

> > > > > > > > > > degree

> > > > > > > > > > > > and

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 20

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > minutes so if you multiply 3

degree

> > and

> > > 20

> > > > > > > > minutes to

> > > > > > > > > > 108

> > > > > > > > > > > > it

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > comes

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > out to be 360 degress i.e. one

> cycle

> > > > > (Circle).

> > > > > > > > This

> > > > > > > > > > cycle

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > represetns

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > whole brahmand because all the

> > rashis,

> > > > > > planets and

> > > > > > > > > > > > nakshatra

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > are

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > between these 360 degree in 2

> > > dimensional

> > > > > > > > horoscope. So

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > chanting a

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mantra completes one cycle of

this

> > > > brahmand.

> > > > > > > > Further One

> > > > > > > > > > > > who

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > has

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > visited Brahamand at least one

time

> > > i.e.

> > > > he

> > > > > is

> > > > > > > > > > > > brahmagyani he

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > is

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > entitiled to place 108 Shri

before

> > his

> > > > name.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sushil dikshit

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology@

> .

> > com

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40.

> > com>,

> > > > babu

> > > > > > mon

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <muthappan111@ >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Namaste,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It may be a silly matter for

all

> of

> > > you.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I want to know what is the

reason

> > > that

> > > > > some

> > > > > > > > remedies

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > recomended

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > for 108 times.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I dont know any thing about

> > astrology.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I hope you may pleased to

provide

> a

> > > > reply

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thanks,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Babu

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------ --------- ---------

-

> --

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Be a better Globetrotter. Get

> > better

> > > > > travel

> > > > > > > > answers

> > > > > > > > > > from

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someone

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > who knows.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Answers - Check it out.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this

> message

> > > have

> > > > > been

> > > > > > > > removed]

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have

been

> > > > removed]

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have

been

> > > > removed]

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been

> > > removed]

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been

> > removed]

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been

removed]

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Oye Lalith:

 

How are you sending a message today? Did you go to the office today

also just to pilfer the company's internet connections on a holiday

also? typical of you! One of these days, your employer will kick you

out of the office for having misused company's resources and may be

you will write another story on how sani came in front of you and

asked you to change job!

 

for your information, Meera Bhai's affection to Lord Krishna was way

before her formal initiation into the beeja mantra. She was known to

sing heart-rending songs on Lord Krishna rather than chanting the

beeja mantra in buses and trains!

 

Beeja mantra and God's name are not one and the same as you are

trying to portray. In fact for chanting God's name can be chanted

without any beeja mantra and still it will give good results. This

is what happens when you " steal " knowledge by observing tantrik

practices without formal initiation!

 

we are not getting exposed....rather it is you who are being exposed

with every post. As I said to Ram Jaswalji yesterday itself, I will

stop this exchange if you stop it. Otherwise, this will go on. I am

not afraid of you. But I pity you.....that is why I am writing the

below matter......

 

By the way, see a good psychiatrist.....I will give just one evidence

for your psycopathy...In your posts, often you type a word " Sth "

often incoherently.....It is almost a pattern for you. This is

suggestive of OCB problem for you. Better get yourself treated for

psychiatric ailments and get on with your life instead of trying

evaluate persons far elder and wiser than you. I am not saying this

to abuse you as Ram Jaswalji might think....It is the genuine advice

of an elderly person. There is nothing wrong in consulting a good

psychiatrist; now a days the stigma is not there. So, help yourself.

 

Abhishek.

 

vedic astrology , " litsol " <mishra.lalit

wrote:

>

>

> You praised Meera, Good, when u w'd learn sth from her pure bhakti,

> see, cunningness and being manipulator doesnt help always!!

>

> twisting words always, i shown u a mantra of lord Krishna, in which

a

> beej mantra is used, instead of learning that God's Name and Beej

are

> one and same thing, writing so much.

>

> What i said, open ur eyes and mind, read again, a devotion is

obvious

> final outcome of mantra chanting.

>

> read what i have been saying, read many times a day, the clouds of

ur

> karma smokes ur understanding.

>

> and learn one more thing - Meera got formal deekschha from Saint

> Raidas.

>

> I use company's time or what, that i manage and is a matter of my

> job, i dont advertise here to get some business in background, and

u

> 2-3 who are lobbying here , are exposed by urself.

>

> exposing u was not my objective, but it happened.

>

> it will keep happening.

>

>

> ok

>

>

>

> vedic astrology , " abhishekpotti "

> <abhishekpotti@> wrote:

> >

> > Dear Lalith:

> >

> > The whole world knows the history of Blessed Meera Bhai....the

> > epitome of Bhakti......She was attached to her " Lala " - the

> wonderful

> > idol of Krishna gifted to her even from her childhood....Do you

> mean

> > to say that innocent young girl started chanting " Kliim

krishnaaya "

> > mantra automatically? Even Bhakta Prahlaada had to be initiated

by

> > Sage Naaradha for his chant of dwaadasaakshari mantra....

> >

> > Nobody is afraid of you here......You need not proclaim that you

> are

> > not in the business of a Guru.....actually Guru status is not a

> > business (true to your half-baked knowledge you will claim it is

> also

> > like software engineering!). The difference my friend between

you

> > and other great persons like Rafal or Dakshinamoorthiji is that

> they

> > are spending their money for the internet, whereas you are

> pilfering

> > your company's time and the company's resources while browsing

the

> > internet. Don't you think you are cheating your company when you

> > spend so much time on empty and egoistic posts defending yourself

> > against every expert after arguing with them unnecessarily? Are

> you

> > not getting paid for the time you spend in the company....Know

the

> > basics of ethics before ever sermonizing.....So, actually you are

> an

> > exploiter....try to understand that....the other gurujis are

> probably

> > too decent to comment on that......What happened to your

project?

> > Better rush to it nough!....It will spare us the agony of

replying

> to

> > your half-witted postings!

> >

> > By the say, Which member asked you Prashna Tantra dear? We did

not

> > see any posts requesting " Honourable Lalith " to explain Prashna

> > Tantra (as if you could explain it!) What arrogance you have to

> > claim that nobody can stand before you.....Guruji's posts exposed

> > your ignorance....you did not even know how to ask queries and

get

> > replies from one of the most empathetic astrologers of this

group,

> > and yet you claim you are this and that......

> >

> > For your information....nobody is afraid of you..Rather you

should

> be

> > afraid of yourself......Your foolishness itself will be your

doom.

> > Did you not become the laughing stock due to your email-based

> chasing

> > of Priyaa? Such foolishness in occult matters could be more

costly

> > dear.....I think Mohanraaamji and Rafalji are only afraid about

> your

> > own well-being! They are not afraid of you. Nor am I afraid of

you.

> >

> > Your posts never answer the queries or points raised by others;

you

> > take off on a new ground only because of your shallow

understanding

> > of subjects. Nobody has accepted you as a Guru here, and nobody

> > will....Can a fire-fly eclipse the Sun? There are too

many " Suns "

> > here and you are just a fire-fly.

> >

> > It reminds me of a story.....Once an ant challenged the mighty

> > elephant for a fight; the elephant obviously could not hear the

ant

> > (the ant being so tiny and it was on the ground, its sound could

> not

> > reach the elephant). The elephant just walked away out of its own

> > volition in its natural course. Then the ant claimed, " you see

I

> > challenged the elephant and it ran away " . Dear, your saying that

> > nobody can stand before you is similar to that.......

> >

> > FIRST LEARN THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN GHOSTS AND YOUR ANCESTOR

> > SUMANGALIS BEFORE WRITING THE FIRST POSTS ON OCCULT! What a

> > pity......what a pity.....That we have to bear your meaningless

> > rantings here!

> >

> > Abhishek.

> >

> > vedic astrology , " litsol " <mishra.lalit@>

> > wrote:

> > >

> > >

> > > I was waiting for u dear..

> > >

> > > why u took time ?

> > >

> > > Do u mean Meera Bai discussed with u, what she did..

> > >

> > > Do u know 'Kleem Krishnay, Govindaya Gopijan Vallabhaya Namh'

is

> a

> > > mantra for lord krishna.

> > >

> > > is there no beej mantras, to whom u wish to misguide ? let

> thnigs

> > > remain between lord, bhakta , their shraddha and their guru.

> > >

> > > why u people are so afraid of me, i m not in business of guru.

> > >

> > > i m happy with my life, my profession of software engineering

> and

> > > my hobbies ok.

> > >

> > > there are 7000+ members are here, by writing such type of

> foolish

> > > things u expose urself only, mind, there are better brains here.

> > >

> > > this is enough ...

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > vedic astrology ,

> > > " abhishekpotti " <abhishekpotti@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Respected Mohanraaamji:

> > > >

> > > > Well said. Lalith is saying that " maybe in south india

> devotees

> > > > don't chant Moola mantras but not so in North " ...What

> > > > stupidity.....He does not seem to understand that " mantra

> > shaastra

> > > > experts " are also devotees, but they cannot be called as

> innocent

> > > > saatwik bhaktaas! A typical example of a pure saadhwik

bhakta

> > will

> > > > be Meera Bhai (was she not North Indian). Can Lalith say

which

> > > Dasa

> > > > Mahaa Vidya Meera Bhai practised? She was immersed in

Krishna

> > > > consciousness and Lover for Him. Her own Bhajans were her

> > prayers

> > > in

> > > > the bhaavana of Bhakti in the form of Love! This is not

mantra

> > > > shaastra. Another example will be Saant Tukhaaraam. These

> > > bhaktaas

> > > > did not chant moola mantraas. Panditji Dakshinamoorthi was

on

> > dot

> > > in

> > > > saying that " Pure bhaktaas do not chant complicated moola

> > > mantraas " .

> > > > You have clarified this fact wonderfully in your post. I wish

> > more

> > > > knowledgeable persons also put erratic posters in their place

> > just

> > > as

> > > > Mohanraaamji does here. This will benefit more naive readers

> of

> > > > these forums who might otherwise get confused as to which of

> the

> > > > paths to follow. Actually, anyone can follow any path as he/

> she

> > > > deems it fit; but there should be consistency of procedures.

> > > >

> > > > We should not confuse mantrik rituals and bhakti doctrines.

> > > Bhaktaas

> > > > can chant the names of Gods at anytime.....Mantra shaastra

> > experts

> > > > chanting advanced moola mantras should necessarily adopt

ritual

> > > > procedures for the welfare of themselves and others!

> > > Yes...improper

> > > > chanting of mantras can cause danger to the society also just

> as

> > > > proper chanting can help others. Hence, this cannot be

> > considered

> > > as

> > > > a personal preference of the aspirant. If this was not the

> case,

> > > why

> > > > did sages codify spiritual practises scrupulously? Rafalji,

> > > > Mohanraaamji, etc. are correct in saying it is best to follow

> > > Pandit

> > > > Dakshinamoorthiji's advices on mantra shastra or japams. He

is

> > > > learned and he is living a life compatible to the shaastras

> > though

> > > he

> > > > has faced uncertain circumstances in his own personal life.

He

> > > never

> > > > compromised on principles and he willingly paid the price for

> > that

> > > > which most of us will never do. The words of such a person

> > should

> > > > obviously carry more weight.

> > > >

> > > > Abhishek.

> > > >

> > > > vedic astrology , " mohanraaam "

> > <mohanraaam@>

> > > > wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > Well Lalith:

> > > > >

> > > > > If you have really done dasa Maha Vidyaa, you would have

> never

> > > > > approached a professional astrologer for

consultation...that

> > much

> > > I

> > > > > can say....

> > > > >

> > > > > And what idiocy when you say Panditji is partly wrong? He

> > > > > said " Bhaktaas do not chant Moola mantras " , whereas you

have

> > > edited

> > > > > the words to suit your ends....He never said " devotees

don't

> > > chant

> > > > > Beej mantras " .....You are putting words into his mouth and

> > > assuming

> > > > > he is wrong! Why, do you know....the Great Panditji himself

> > > chants

> > > > > Moola mantras.....He is a bhakta and a mantra shastra

expert.

> > As

> > > a

> > > > > bhakta he keeps incessant chanting of naama japa throughout

> the

> > > > day;

> > > > > as a mantra shastra expert, he restricts the moola mantra

> > japams

> > > to

> > > > > stipulated times with ritual purity.....It is this

wonderful

> > > > practice

> > > > > that Guruji was alluding to. Guruji cannot be wrong in

> ritual

> > > and

> > > > > occult matters. Please understand that.

> > > > >

> > > > > There are 4 classes of Devotees.......1) Saatwik vedic

> devotees

> > > who

> > > > > will follow vedic dharma scrupulously. They will not dare

to

> > > > compare

> > > > > astrology and vedanga to Engineering! as you did...

> > > > > 2) Raajasik devotees who will follow vedic disciplines as

far

> > as

> > > > > possible, but will still go after upaasanaas of Demi-Gods

for

> > > > > accomplishment of siddhis. Mantra shaastra experts usually

> > fall

> > > in

> > > > > this category.

> > > > > 3) Saatwik Bhaktaas - for whom the meditation and glory of

> > their

> > > > > Ishta Devataa is enough for spiritual satisfaction. It is

> this

> > > > > category that Guruji referred to when he said they will not

> > chant

> > > > > Moola mantras too much. Definitely they will not do Dasa

> Mahaa

> > > > > Vidyaa.

> > > > > 4) Taamasic Devotees - Those whose main motive is to

project

> > > > > themselves at all costs and acting as if they are equal to

> the

> > > > > experts; they will try ALL practices - whether they are

> > > sanctioned

> > > > by

> > > > > vedas or not.....Their only aim is personal glory and

> > > > satisfaction.

> > > > > They will attack even established dharma if they do not get

> > > results

> > > > > (sounds familiar....You are one!) Ignorance and half-baked

> > > > knowledge

> > > > > and egotism are these persons' motivating fuel.

> > > > >

> > > > > You are really satan's Gift to this list.......My only

prayer

> > is

> > > > that

> > > > > innocent members of this list do not get side-tracked with

> your

> > > > > ramblings.

> > > > >

> > > > > Let me make this clear to the list.....Panditji said that

> > saatwik

> > > > > Bhaktaas who chant Divine names only due to Pure Love on

God

> > > > usually

> > > > > never chant mantrik moola mantraas. It is just one class

of

> > > > > devotees. A rajasik bhakta who is a mantra-shaastra expert

> may

> > > > even

> > > > > be a bhakta at heart; and a pure bhakta may sometimes chant

> > some

> > > > > mantrik japams for solving some practical issues......But,

> when

> > > > they

> > > > > switch their routines temporarily, these enlightened

devotees

> > > > usually

> > > > > take good guidance and follow the tenets of shaastras

> > > > > scrupulously....Definitely they will not sit on assumption

> like

> > > > > Lalith.

> > > > >

> > > > > On the one hand, this fellow claims he has done chants in

> > > forests,

> > > > > rivers, earth, etc. (Probably we have a Maharishi here!

What

> > > > heights

> > > > > of pointless pride in this young man list....it is

> > disgusting!).

> > > > On

> > > > > the other hand, he says he chants mantras in buses, trains,

> > > > etc......

> > > > > He is confused about which no body can have issues. Only

his

> > > Guru

> > > > > should be concerned about that.....But, his attempts to

stuff

> > his

> > > > > shallow understanding upon this list is reprehensible.

And,

> > his

> > > > > habit of quoting experts out of context is really

> condemnable.

> > > May

> > > > > Jupiter's Light Shine on that fellow and teach him to

respect

> > the

> > > > > hallowed traditions and to stay at his level rather than

> trying

> > > > > to " teach " others (He has the audacity to claim he

> > is " teaching "

> > > > > Rafalji!)

> > > > >

> > > > > If a mere young man of 35 years who has spent his life on a

> > > " Failed

> > > > > computer web desining business " , " pointless email chasing

of

> > > > girls " ,

> > > > > and other " past times " can gain insight as he claims, how

> much

> > > will

> > > > > learned Gurus of this group with their life of devotion to

> > > vedanta

> > > > > and vedanga know? His peanut brain and hyper-inflated ego

> will

> > > > never

> > > > > allow him to see this obvious truth. But, please list

> exercise

> > > > your

> > > > > discretion while reading his posts (There are doubtless

some

> > good

> > > > > elements even in his posts; but mostly there is trash

> presented

> > > as

> > > > > philosophy).

> > > > >

> > > > > Mohanraaam

> > > > >

> > > > > vedic astrology , " litsol "

> > <mishra.lalit@>

> > > > > wrote:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Dear Rafal,

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Do u think, a hobby means shallow knowledge of the

domain,

> No

> > > > > rafal,

> > > > > > it's not like that.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > At least not for me. You have learnt and i m learning, i

> read

> > > > ur's

> > > > > > replies and get benifitted, same way i wanted you to pay

> > heed

> > > to

> > > > > > what i have written about spritiuality, mostrly i did

write

> > for

> > > u

> > > > > >

> > > > > > I have done all 10 mahavidyas of tantra and read many

> tantrik

> > > > > > classics, spent good deal of time with great tantriks

> > trained

> > > in

> > > > > > Kamakhya and other places, keenly observed their doings,

> > their

> > > > > > mistakes etc.., I did tremendous mantra chanting on

water,

> > on

> > > > > earth,

> > > > > > at home, in forests etc...

> > > > > >

> > > > > > then reached here, then i did write something, but sorry

i

> > dont

> > > > > > remember shlokas. i was not interested in cramming that.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Panditji is not fully correct in saying that BeejMantras

> are

> > > not

> > > > > > chanted by devotees, I dont know much about South India

but

> > in

> > > > > North

> > > > > > normally its done.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > And a successfull mantra sadhana has to result in one's

> being

> > a

> > > > > > devotee, the devotion is the outcome, final result of

> mantra

> > > > > sadhana,

> > > > > > perhaps, Pandit Ji believes mantras are power

> packet,thinks,

> > i

> > > do

> > > > > it

> > > > > > this way , these many times and get this result, this is

> > where

> > > > most

> > > > > > of the people are confused. without being a good human

> being

> > if

> > > > we

> > > > > > think, we will achieve something in spirituality, is

> > difficult,

> > > > > very

> > > > > > difficult.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > what happens is, with the mantra chanting, a self

> > > > transformation

> > > > > > process begins, u if dont restrict urself, ur karma

begins

> > > > > diluting,

> > > > > > and u begin ur purification process unknowingly, when

> > > substantial

> > > > > > part of ego and greed for respect vanishes and many such

> > thing

> > > > > > togather, mantra awakens u and with the God's grace ur

> > > objective

> > > > > gets

> > > > > > fullfilled, gradually u become a devotee. ur being simple

> and

> > > > being

> > > > > > devotee is sometimes is indication of ur's going on the

> right

> > > > track.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > I think we have discussed a lot, it's enough !!

> > > > > >

> > > > > > My Boss has given me lot of projects to complete, so, may

> be,

> > i

> > > m

> > > > > not

> > > > > > going to available in the group like i was recently.

> however.

> > i

> > > > > will

> > > > > > complete Garg Hora series.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > regards,

> > > > > > Lalit.

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > vedic astrology , Rafal Gendarz

> > > > > > <starsuponme@> wrote:

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya*

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Dear Litsol,

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Then please dont generalize Your preferences as they

are

> > too

> > > > > > shallow for

> > > > > > > this Forum aspiration.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Regards,

> > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz

> > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru

> > > > > > > email: rafal@

> > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa.com

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > litsol napisa?(a):

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Dear Rafel,

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > I take Astrology as a good hobby, and i w'd be

looking

> at

> > > it

> > > > > with

> > > > > > an

> > > > > > > > engineer's approach.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > I asked ur age because, it's our thinking to put our

> > > > parameters

> > > > > in

> > > > > > > > god's system, there is nothing like delay or

> advancement

> > in

> > > > > > > > spirituality. So, " Delay " or " Speed " , " backwardness "

> > > > > > > > and " advancement " doesn't exist in spirituality, I

> > thought

> > > if

> > > > u

> > > > > r

> > > > > > > > thinking that it may take too much time, I wanted to

> tell

> > > u,

> > > > > it's

> > > > > > not

> > > > > > > > like that. there is no delay.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > It clicks in fraction of a second, when u r getting

> > clicked

> > > > > > depends

> > > > > > > > on u and on god's will, when he wants u to get

clicked.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > God sometimes graces for no reason ( " Ahetuka " ) just

for

> > his

> > > > > > > > compassion towards u and it may happen next minute

too.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > spirituality is not delimited by time , effort and

> rules.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > regards,

> > > > > > > > Lalit.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > vedic astrology

> > > > > > > > <vedic astrology%40>, Rafal

> Gendarz

> > > > > > > > <starsuponme@ ...> wrote:

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya*

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > Dear Litsol,

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > Please be careful about words.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > Im happy that You are sharing Your experience -

very

> > > > > inspirating

> > > > > > > > ones.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > Age hierarchy is for sudras - Manu Samhita. If You

> > treat

> > > > > Jyotish

> > > > > > > > Vedanga

> > > > > > > > > as profession similar to engineering You have a

long

> > way

> > > to

> > > > > go.

> > > > > > But

> > > > > > > > dont

> > > > > > > > > be pessimistic here are many who will try to help

You

> > in

> > > > > getting

> > > > > > > > proper

> > > > > > > > > understanding.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > After some time You will agree with me about the

mala

> > and

> > > > > japa.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > Regards,

> > > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz

> > > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru

> > > > > > > > > email: rafal@

> > > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > litsol napisa?(a):

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > Dear Rafal,

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > Here u r doing two wrong things, instead of

> > developing

> > > ur

> > > > > > > > understanding,

> > > > > > > > > > u r trying to conclude something and going beyond

> > that

> > > u r

> > > > > > > > messaging

> > > > > > > > > > same to many.

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > I m touching 35, What's ur age ?

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > Astrology is a kind of vidya or profession, like

i

> m

> > a

> > > > > > software

> > > > > > > > > > engineer, software engineering is my profession.

> > > > > spirituality

> > > > > > is

> > > > > > > > beyond

> > > > > > > > > > all sort of vidya or profession.

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > I wish u to be a good soul and to realize the

bliss

> > of

> > > > self

> > > > > > > > awakening or

> > > > > > > > > > in other terms, the bliss that comes once u feel

u

> > and

> > > > god

> > > > > is

> > > > > > > > > > connected. dissolved in each other.

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > First realize, experience, then speak and then

> > suggest

> > > to

> > > > > > others,

> > > > > > > > by

> > > > > > > > > > mere reading shastras or books u r not going to

> feel

> > > it.

> > > > > > unless

> > > > > > > > god

> > > > > > > > > > graces u it's very very difficult. and if u dont

> > avoid

> > > > this

> > > > > > sort

> > > > > > > > of

> > > > > > > > > > hurriedness instead of learning and

understanding,

> it

> > > > will

> > > > > > affect

> > > > > > > > u only

> > > > > > > > > > no one else.

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > somehere i have read, it was written - By mere

> > > > > repeating " So-

> > > > > > > > Aham " no

> > > > > > > > > > one gets liberated unless he realizes it like one

> > > doesnt

> > > > get

> > > > > > > > cured by

> > > > > > > > > > knowing the name of the medicine, u need to take

> the

> > > > > medicine

> > > > > > to

> > > > > > > > get

> > > > > > > > > > cured " .

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > So, pls. be wise, as it was being discussed here,

i

> > > > shared

> > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > > experience of my life, pls. mind it, i m not a

> > > preecher,

> > > > > nor a

> > > > > > > > guru, nor

> > > > > > > > > > i have to make my followers, nor it's my

> profession,

> > > nor

> > > > i

> > > > > > have

> > > > > > > > to get

> > > > > > > > > > fame, sharing things is a kind of friendliness a

> kind

> > of

> > > > > > > > affection,

> > > > > > > > > > that's it.

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > regards,

> > > > > > > > > > Lalit.

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology

> > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. com>,

> Rafal

> > > > Gendarz

> > > > > > > > > > <starsuponme@ ...>

> > > > > > > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya*

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > Dear Jyotishas

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > Counting of mala has more depth sense than just

> > > > counting,

> > > > > > so for

> > > > > > > > > > natives

> > > > > > > > > > > like Litsol counting is neccessary and any

other

> > > > > speculation

> > > > > > > > will be

> > > > > > > > > > > only illusory and just imagination. We should

> > follow

> > > Pt.

> > > > > > > > > > Dakshinamoorti

> > > > > > > > > > > advise strictly, otherwise our process of

> spiritual

> > > > > > development

> > > > > > > > will

> > > > > > > > > > be

> > > > > > > > > > > slow and unauthoritative.

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > Regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz

> > > > > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru

> > > > > > > > > > > email: rafal@

> > > > > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > asmp2k02@ napisa?(a):

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > Resp Sri Lalitji,

> > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for your mail.But please also read

> > > > > > GuruDakshinamurthyi

> > > > > > > > ji's

> > > > > > > > > > > > mail(addressing me) also on this,which brings

> in

> > > more

> > > > > > clarity

> > > > > > > > to the

> > > > > > > > > > > > applicability principles to my mail.

> > > > > > > > > > > > I meant that both are necessity but to what

> > degree

> > > of

> > > > > time

> > > > > > (it

> > > > > > > > varies

> > > > > > > > > > > > from saadhaka to saadhaka) to get such

inbuilt

> > > > maturity

> > > > > > such

> > > > > > > > that

> > > > > > > > > > that

> > > > > > > > > > > > the count will be taken care of by Divine

> forces

> > > > after

> > > > > > some

> > > > > > > > initial

> > > > > > > > > > > > period of saadhana.

> > > > > > > > > > > > Morover the type of bio matter present in the

> > japa

> > > > maala

> > > > > > > > (which is

> > > > > > > > > > > > symbolic for ritualism as well as from

> practical

> > > > point

> > > > > of

> > > > > > > > view for

> > > > > > > > > > our

> > > > > > > > > > > > count) will help in keeping away destructive

> > forces

> > > > > > acting on

> > > > > > > > us

> > > > > > > > > > .Thus

> > > > > > > > > > > > the symbolic rituals will indirectly help us

in

> > > > keeping

> > > > > > away

> > > > > > > > from

> > > > > > > > > > > > negative thoughts and also trains our memory

to

> > be

> > > > > object

> > > > > > > > > > oriented.If

> > > > > > > > > > > > our memory grows and retentive capacity

> increase

> > > the

> > > > > > Gnaana

> > > > > > > > will

> > > > > > > > > > > > increase ,but at the same time destructive

> forces

> > > > > > > > (diversions) also

> > > > > > > > > > > > becomes powerful.Thus the symbolic procedures

> > will

> > > > come

> > > > > in

> > > > > > > > handy to

> > > > > > > > > > > > successfully fight the negative forces.The

> > rituals

> > > > may

> > > > > be

> > > > > > > > Rising

> > > > > > > > > > > > early(if possible during Braahmi

muhurta),Taking

> > > > > > > > bath,Japaanusthaan,

> > > > > > > > > > > > attending to the livelihood job etc etc in

> > defined

> > > > > times

> > > > > > as

> > > > > > > > > > discipline

> > > > > > > > > > > > helps indirectly tune our memory through

> keeping

> > > our

> > > > > body

> > > > > > > > healthy.

> > > > > > > > > > > > Thus ultimately we conclude that the so

called

> > > > symbolic

> > > > > > > > procedures

> > > > > > > > > > are

> > > > > > > > > > > > not actually symbolic(it got branded as such)

> but

> > a

> > > > > > necessity

> > > > > > > > for

> > > > > > > > > > our

> > > > > > > > > > > > own good if we practice to the extent we can.

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > Quoting mishra.lalit@ ... <mishra.

lalit%

> > > > > 40gmail.

> > > > > > com>:

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Resp. Sri Murthy Adavi,

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, what you said is perfectly right, we

count

> > or

> > > > dont

> > > > > > > > count,target

> > > > > > > > > > > > is realization of god's love within, I got it

> > with

> > > no

> > > > > > > > counting,

> > > > > > > > > > > > someone may get it with counting.

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > Thanx, for the writing.

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > > Lalit.

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology

> > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. com>

> > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40.

com>,

> > > > srinivasa

> > > > > > > > murthy adavi

> > > > > > > > > > > > asmp2k02@ wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Respected Learned Members,

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Both views may be correct when the views

> > have/or

> > > > with

> > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > goal as

> > > > > > > > > > > > development of Love/Devotion towards

adhistana

> > > > Devatha

> > > > > of

> > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > Mantra

> > > > > > > > > > > > as Base.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > In the initial stage only you need the

> count;as

> > > one

> > > > > > > > develops the

> > > > > > > > > > > > habit the biological tuning of the

> intellect/body

> > > will

> > > > > > > > automatically

> > > > > > > > > > > > take care of the practice(without count-help

of

> > > malas

> > > > > > etc).

> > > > > > > > > > > > > It's like if with the help of Alarm clock

if

> we

> > > > wake

> > > > > up

> > > > > > for

> > > > > > > > 2 or 3

> > > > > > > > > > > > days at some appointed hour,then

automatically

> we

> > > > > wakeup

> > > > > > at

> > > > > > > > the same

> > > > > > > > > > > > time every day without help of alarm.

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > With due Respects

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > smadavi

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Quoting starsuponme@ :

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya*

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Litsol,

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Definitely we should count our Mantra Japa

on

> > > Mala.

> > > > > Your

> > > > > > > > view is

> > > > > > > > > > > > against

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Vedic Authorities and Sages, so should be

> > > rejected.

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru

> > > > > > > > > > > > > email: rafal@

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > litsol napisa?(a):

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Mr. Jayashri,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > A thought came, why i should not share

with

> > u,

> > > U

> > > > > pls.

> > > > > > stop

> > > > > > > > > > > > counting

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > mantra chantings, counting mantra gives

> false

> > > ego

> > > > > and

> > > > > > then

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > frustration if u dont get desired results.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > leave it to the god, god counts the

mantra

> > > > chanted

> > > > > by

> > > > > > you

> > > > > > > > may be

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > 108, 1008 or whatsoever, let him count,

> it's

> > > his

> > > > > part

> > > > > > and

> > > > > > > > ur

> > > > > > > > > > part

> > > > > > > > > > > > is

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > to chant the mantra. when the mantra has

to

> > > > awaken,

> > > > > it

> > > > > > > > will be,

> > > > > > > > > > > > god

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > will ensure it for u.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > sometimes we try to become more

intelligent

> > > with

> > > > out

> > > > > > > > limited

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > intellect and that creates obstacles in

our

> > > > > spiritual

> > > > > > > > growth.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > So, forget about counts, forget about the

> > time

> > > u

> > > > > put

> > > > > > in

> > > > > > > > for ur's

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > sadhana, invoke the god with pure heart.

> > purity

> > > > > > counts.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Lalit.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40.

> > > > > > > > com>, " dakshinastrologer "

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > <dakshinastrologer@ ...> wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Ms. Jayashree:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think this topic on 108 is getting

very

> > > > > > interesting

> > > > > > > > and

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > enlightening for all members. Yesterday

> we

> > > had a

> > > > > > > > wonderful

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > esoteric

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > explanation from Shri. Sushil Dikshit,

> and

> > > > today

> > > > > > your

> > > > > > > > > > wonderful

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > explanation of numerical symmetry of

the

> > > cosmos!

> > > > > > > > Wonderful.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There definitely exists a " numerical

> > > symphony "

> > > > in

> > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > > Universe.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > But,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > not only 108.....as I mentioned in my

> > earlier

> > > > > post,

> > > > > > > > there are

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > various

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > other numerals that are significant in

> > occult

> > > > > > > > practices. 108

> > > > > > > > > > is

> > > > > > > > > > > > a

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > powerful and all-purpose perfect

> > > number...While

> > > > > we

> > > > > > have

> > > > > > > > > > > > understood

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the glory of 108, we should not lose

> sight

> > of

> > > > the

> > > > > > fact

> > > > > > > > that

> > > > > > > > > > > > there

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > are

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > other powerful numbers also. This is

just

> > for

> > > > the

> > > > > > > > information

> > > > > > > > > > of

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > list.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > My apprecitation again for this

wonderful

> > > > > response.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Blessed be.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pandit R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Blessed be.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pandit R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI. vedic-

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > astrology@grou ps.com

> > <astrology%

> > > > > > > > > > > > 40. com>,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > " jayasartn " <jayasartn@> wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In cosmology, 108 has this

> significance -

> > > the

> > > > > > moon is

> > > > > > > > away

> > > > > > > > > > > > from

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > earth 108 times its (moon's) diameter

> and

> > > the

> > > > > sun

> > > > > > is

> > > > > > > > away

> > > > > > > > > > > > from the

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > earth, 108 times its diameter.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Perhaps this reality of distances is

> > > > applicable

> > > > > to

> > > > > > > > deities

> > > > > > > > > > > > too.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Perhaps this has been indicated by

the

> > 108

> > > > divya

> > > > > > > > desas of

> > > > > > > > > > Lord

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Narayana.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > jayasree

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology@ .

com

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40.

> > > > > > > > com>, " dakshinastrologer "

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <dakshinastrologer@ > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Shri. Sushil:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It is a wonderful answer you have

> given.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Blessed be.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pandit R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology@

.

> com

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40.

> > > > > > > > com>, " sushil.dikshit "

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <sushil.dikshit@ > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Babu,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It is not a silly question but it

> is

> > a

> > > > very

> > > > > > good

> > > > > > > > > > question.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Actually

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > there are 27 Nakshatras and every

> > > > Nakshtras

> > > > > > has 4

> > > > > > > > Charan

> > > > > > > > > > > > so

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > total

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > charans are 27 x 4 = 108 Charan.

> Each

> > > > > Charan

> > > > > > has 3

> > > > > > > > > > degree

> > > > > > > > > > > > and

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 20

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > minutes so if you multiply 3

degree

> > and

> > > 20

> > > > > > > > minutes to

> > > > > > > > > > 108

> > > > > > > > > > > > it

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > comes

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > out to be 360 degress i.e. one

> cycle

> > > > > (Circle).

> > > > > > > > This

> > > > > > > > > > cycle

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > represetns

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > whole brahmand because all the

> > rashis,

> > > > > > planets and

> > > > > > > > > > > > nakshatra

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > are

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > between these 360 degree in 2

> > > dimensional

> > > > > > > > horoscope. So

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > chanting a

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mantra completes one cycle of

this

> > > > brahmand.

> > > > > > > > Further One

> > > > > > > > > > > > who

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > has

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > visited Brahamand at least one

time

> > > i.e.

> > > > he

> > > > > is

> > > > > > > > > > > > brahmagyani he

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > is

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > entitiled to place 108 Shri

before

> > his

> > > > name.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sushil dikshit

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology@

> .

> > com

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40.

> > com>,

> > > > babu

> > > > > > mon

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <muthappan111@ >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Namaste,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It may be a silly matter for

all

> of

> > > you.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I want to know what is the

reason

> > > that

> > > > > some

> > > > > > > > remedies

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > recomended

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > for 108 times.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I dont know any thing about

> > astrology.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I hope you may pleased to

provide

> a

> > > > reply

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thanks,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Babu

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------ --------- ---------

-

> --

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Be a better Globetrotter. Get

> > better

> > > > > travel

> > > > > > > > answers

> > > > > > > > > > from

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someone

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > who knows.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Answers - Check it out.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this

> message

> > > have

> > > > > been

> > > > > > > > removed]

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have

been

> > > > removed]

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have

been

> > > > removed]

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been

> > > removed]

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been

> > removed]

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been

removed]

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Idiot, I have my laptop with me at home.

 

 

vedic astrology , " abhishekpotti "

<abhishekpotti wrote:

>

> Oye Lalith:

>

> How are you sending a message today? Did you go to the office

today

> also just to pilfer the company's internet connections on a holiday

> also? typical of you! One of these days, your employer will kick

you

> out of the office for having misused company's resources and may be

> you will write another story on how sani came in front of you and

> asked you to change job!

>

> for your information, Meera Bhai's affection to Lord Krishna was

way

> before her formal initiation into the beeja mantra. She was known

to

> sing heart-rending songs on Lord Krishna rather than chanting the

> beeja mantra in buses and trains!

>

> Beeja mantra and God's name are not one and the same as you are

> trying to portray. In fact for chanting God's name can be chanted

> without any beeja mantra and still it will give good results. This

> is what happens when you " steal " knowledge by observing tantrik

> practices without formal initiation!

>

> we are not getting exposed....rather it is you who are being

exposed

> with every post. As I said to Ram Jaswalji yesterday itself, I

will

> stop this exchange if you stop it. Otherwise, this will go on. I

am

> not afraid of you. But I pity you.....that is why I am writing the

> below matter......

>

> By the way, see a good psychiatrist.....I will give just one

evidence

> for your psycopathy...In your posts, often you type a word " Sth "

> often incoherently.....It is almost a pattern for you. This is

> suggestive of OCB problem for you. Better get yourself treated for

> psychiatric ailments and get on with your life instead of trying

> evaluate persons far elder and wiser than you. I am not saying

this

> to abuse you as Ram Jaswalji might think....It is the genuine

advice

> of an elderly person. There is nothing wrong in consulting a good

> psychiatrist; now a days the stigma is not there. So, help yourself.

>

> Abhishek.

>

> vedic astrology , " litsol " <mishra.lalit@>

> wrote:

> >

> >

> > You praised Meera, Good, when u w'd learn sth from her pure

bhakti,

> > see, cunningness and being manipulator doesnt help always!!

> >

> > twisting words always, i shown u a mantra of lord Krishna, in

which

> a

> > beej mantra is used, instead of learning that God's Name and Beej

> are

> > one and same thing, writing so much.

> >

> > What i said, open ur eyes and mind, read again, a devotion is

> obvious

> > final outcome of mantra chanting.

> >

> > read what i have been saying, read many times a day, the clouds

of

> ur

> > karma smokes ur understanding.

> >

> > and learn one more thing - Meera got formal deekschha from Saint

> > Raidas.

> >

> > I use company's time or what, that i manage and is a matter of my

> > job, i dont advertise here to get some business in background,

and

> u

> > 2-3 who are lobbying here , are exposed by urself.

> >

> > exposing u was not my objective, but it happened.

> >

> > it will keep happening.

> >

> >

> > ok

> >

> >

> >

> > vedic astrology , " abhishekpotti "

> > <abhishekpotti@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Dear Lalith:

> > >

> > > The whole world knows the history of Blessed Meera Bhai....the

> > > epitome of Bhakti......She was attached to her " Lala " - the

> > wonderful

> > > idol of Krishna gifted to her even from her childhood....Do you

> > mean

> > > to say that innocent young girl started chanting " Kliim

> krishnaaya "

> > > mantra automatically? Even Bhakta Prahlaada had to be

initiated

> by

> > > Sage Naaradha for his chant of dwaadasaakshari mantra....

> > >

> > > Nobody is afraid of you here......You need not proclaim that

you

> > are

> > > not in the business of a Guru.....actually Guru status is not a

> > > business (true to your half-baked knowledge you will claim it

is

> > also

> > > like software engineering!). The difference my friend between

> you

> > > and other great persons like Rafal or Dakshinamoorthiji is that

> > they

> > > are spending their money for the internet, whereas you are

> > pilfering

> > > your company's time and the company's resources while browsing

> the

> > > internet. Don't you think you are cheating your company when

you

> > > spend so much time on empty and egoistic posts defending

yourself

> > > against every expert after arguing with them unnecessarily?

Are

> > you

> > > not getting paid for the time you spend in the company....Know

> the

> > > basics of ethics before ever sermonizing.....So, actually you

are

> > an

> > > exploiter....try to understand that....the other gurujis are

> > probably

> > > too decent to comment on that......What happened to your

> project?

> > > Better rush to it nough!....It will spare us the agony of

> replying

> > to

> > > your half-witted postings!

> > >

> > > By the say, Which member asked you Prashna Tantra dear? We did

> not

> > > see any posts requesting " Honourable Lalith " to explain Prashna

> > > Tantra (as if you could explain it!) What arrogance you have

to

> > > claim that nobody can stand before you.....Guruji's posts

exposed

> > > your ignorance....you did not even know how to ask queries and

> get

> > > replies from one of the most empathetic astrologers of this

> group,

> > > and yet you claim you are this and that......

> > >

> > > For your information....nobody is afraid of you..Rather you

> should

> > be

> > > afraid of yourself......Your foolishness itself will be your

> doom.

> > > Did you not become the laughing stock due to your email-based

> > chasing

> > > of Priyaa? Such foolishness in occult matters could be more

> costly

> > > dear.....I think Mohanraaamji and Rafalji are only afraid about

> > your

> > > own well-being! They are not afraid of you. Nor am I afraid of

> you.

> > >

> > > Your posts never answer the queries or points raised by others;

> you

> > > take off on a new ground only because of your shallow

> understanding

> > > of subjects. Nobody has accepted you as a Guru here, and

nobody

> > > will....Can a fire-fly eclipse the Sun? There are too

> many " Suns "

> > > here and you are just a fire-fly.

> > >

> > > It reminds me of a story.....Once an ant challenged the mighty

> > > elephant for a fight; the elephant obviously could not hear the

> ant

> > > (the ant being so tiny and it was on the ground, its sound

could

> > not

> > > reach the elephant). The elephant just walked away out of its

own

> > > volition in its natural course. Then the ant claimed, " you

see

> I

> > > challenged the elephant and it ran away " . Dear, your saying

that

> > > nobody can stand before you is similar to that.......

> > >

> > > FIRST LEARN THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN GHOSTS AND YOUR ANCESTOR

> > > SUMANGALIS BEFORE WRITING THE FIRST POSTS ON OCCULT! What a

> > > pity......what a pity.....That we have to bear your meaningless

> > > rantings here!

> > >

> > > Abhishek.

> > >

> > > vedic astrology , " litsol "

<mishra.lalit@>

> > > wrote:

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > I was waiting for u dear..

> > > >

> > > > why u took time ?

> > > >

> > > > Do u mean Meera Bai discussed with u, what she did..

> > > >

> > > > Do u know 'Kleem Krishnay, Govindaya Gopijan Vallabhaya

Namh'

> is

> > a

> > > > mantra for lord krishna.

> > > >

> > > > is there no beej mantras, to whom u wish to misguide ? let

> > thnigs

> > > > remain between lord, bhakta , their shraddha and their guru.

> > > >

> > > > why u people are so afraid of me, i m not in business of

guru.

> > > >

> > > > i m happy with my life, my profession of software

engineering

> > and

> > > > my hobbies ok.

> > > >

> > > > there are 7000+ members are here, by writing such type of

> > foolish

> > > > things u expose urself only, mind, there are better brains

here.

> > > >

> > > > this is enough ...

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > vedic astrology ,

> > > > " abhishekpotti " <abhishekpotti@> wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > Respected Mohanraaamji:

> > > > >

> > > > > Well said. Lalith is saying that " maybe in south india

> > devotees

> > > > > don't chant Moola mantras but not so in North " ...What

> > > > > stupidity.....He does not seem to understand that " mantra

> > > shaastra

> > > > > experts " are also devotees, but they cannot be called as

> > innocent

> > > > > saatwik bhaktaas! A typical example of a pure saadhwik

> bhakta

> > > will

> > > > > be Meera Bhai (was she not North Indian). Can Lalith say

> which

> > > > Dasa

> > > > > Mahaa Vidya Meera Bhai practised? She was immersed in

> Krishna

> > > > > consciousness and Lover for Him. Her own Bhajans were her

> > > prayers

> > > > in

> > > > > the bhaavana of Bhakti in the form of Love! This is not

> mantra

> > > > > shaastra. Another example will be Saant Tukhaaraam. These

> > > > bhaktaas

> > > > > did not chant moola mantraas. Panditji Dakshinamoorthi was

> on

> > > dot

> > > > in

> > > > > saying that " Pure bhaktaas do not chant complicated moola

> > > > mantraas " .

> > > > > You have clarified this fact wonderfully in your post. I

wish

> > > more

> > > > > knowledgeable persons also put erratic posters in their

place

> > > just

> > > > as

> > > > > Mohanraaamji does here. This will benefit more naive

readers

> > of

> > > > > these forums who might otherwise get confused as to which

of

> > the

> > > > > paths to follow. Actually, anyone can follow any path as

he/

> > she

> > > > > deems it fit; but there should be consistency of procedures.

> > > > >

> > > > > We should not confuse mantrik rituals and bhakti

doctrines.

> > > > Bhaktaas

> > > > > can chant the names of Gods at anytime.....Mantra shaastra

> > > experts

> > > > > chanting advanced moola mantras should necessarily adopt

> ritual

> > > > > procedures for the welfare of themselves and others!

> > > > Yes...improper

> > > > > chanting of mantras can cause danger to the society also

just

> > as

> > > > > proper chanting can help others. Hence, this cannot be

> > > considered

> > > > as

> > > > > a personal preference of the aspirant. If this was not the

> > case,

> > > > why

> > > > > did sages codify spiritual practises scrupulously?

Rafalji,

> > > > > Mohanraaamji, etc. are correct in saying it is best to

follow

> > > > Pandit

> > > > > Dakshinamoorthiji's advices on mantra shastra or japams.

He

> is

> > > > > learned and he is living a life compatible to the shaastras

> > > though

> > > > he

> > > > > has faced uncertain circumstances in his own personal

life.

> He

> > > > never

> > > > > compromised on principles and he willingly paid the price

for

> > > that

> > > > > which most of us will never do. The words of such a person

> > > should

> > > > > obviously carry more weight.

> > > > >

> > > > > Abhishek.

> > > > >

> > > > > vedic astrology , " mohanraaam "

> > > <mohanraaam@>

> > > > > wrote:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Well Lalith:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > If you have really done dasa Maha Vidyaa, you would have

> > never

> > > > > > approached a professional astrologer for

> consultation...that

> > > much

> > > > I

> > > > > > can say....

> > > > > >

> > > > > > And what idiocy when you say Panditji is partly wrong?

He

> > > > > > said " Bhaktaas do not chant Moola mantras " , whereas you

> have

> > > > edited

> > > > > > the words to suit your ends....He never said " devotees

> don't

> > > > chant

> > > > > > Beej mantras " .....You are putting words into his mouth

and

> > > > assuming

> > > > > > he is wrong! Why, do you know....the Great Panditji

himself

> > > > chants

> > > > > > Moola mantras.....He is a bhakta and a mantra shastra

> expert.

> > > As

> > > > a

> > > > > > bhakta he keeps incessant chanting of naama japa

throughout

> > the

> > > > > day;

> > > > > > as a mantra shastra expert, he restricts the moola mantra

> > > japams

> > > > to

> > > > > > stipulated times with ritual purity.....It is this

> wonderful

> > > > > practice

> > > > > > that Guruji was alluding to. Guruji cannot be wrong in

> > ritual

> > > > and

> > > > > > occult matters. Please understand that.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > There are 4 classes of Devotees.......1) Saatwik vedic

> > devotees

> > > > who

> > > > > > will follow vedic dharma scrupulously. They will not

dare

> to

> > > > > compare

> > > > > > astrology and vedanga to Engineering! as you did...

> > > > > > 2) Raajasik devotees who will follow vedic disciplines as

> far

> > > as

> > > > > > possible, but will still go after upaasanaas of Demi-Gods

> for

> > > > > > accomplishment of siddhis. Mantra shaastra experts

usually

> > > fall

> > > > in

> > > > > > this category.

> > > > > > 3) Saatwik Bhaktaas - for whom the meditation and glory

of

> > > their

> > > > > > Ishta Devataa is enough for spiritual satisfaction. It

is

> > this

> > > > > > category that Guruji referred to when he said they will

not

> > > chant

> > > > > > Moola mantras too much. Definitely they will not do Dasa

> > Mahaa

> > > > > > Vidyaa.

> > > > > > 4) Taamasic Devotees - Those whose main motive is to

> project

> > > > > > themselves at all costs and acting as if they are equal

to

> > the

> > > > > > experts; they will try ALL practices - whether they are

> > > > sanctioned

> > > > > by

> > > > > > vedas or not.....Their only aim is personal glory and

> > > > > satisfaction.

> > > > > > They will attack even established dharma if they do not

get

> > > > results

> > > > > > (sounds familiar....You are one!) Ignorance and half-

baked

> > > > > knowledge

> > > > > > and egotism are these persons' motivating fuel.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > You are really satan's Gift to this list.......My only

> prayer

> > > is

> > > > > that

> > > > > > innocent members of this list do not get side-tracked

with

> > your

> > > > > > ramblings.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Let me make this clear to the list.....Panditji said that

> > > saatwik

> > > > > > Bhaktaas who chant Divine names only due to Pure Love on

> God

> > > > > usually

> > > > > > never chant mantrik moola mantraas. It is just one class

> of

> > > > > > devotees. A rajasik bhakta who is a mantra-shaastra

expert

> > may

> > > > > even

> > > > > > be a bhakta at heart; and a pure bhakta may sometimes

chant

> > > some

> > > > > > mantrik japams for solving some practical

issues......But,

> > when

> > > > > they

> > > > > > switch their routines temporarily, these enlightened

> devotees

> > > > > usually

> > > > > > take good guidance and follow the tenets of shaastras

> > > > > > scrupulously....Definitely they will not sit on

assumption

> > like

> > > > > > Lalith.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > On the one hand, this fellow claims he has done chants in

> > > > forests,

> > > > > > rivers, earth, etc. (Probably we have a Maharishi here!

> What

> > > > > heights

> > > > > > of pointless pride in this young man list....it is

> > > disgusting!).

> > > > > On

> > > > > > the other hand, he says he chants mantras in buses,

trains,

> > > > > etc......

> > > > > > He is confused about which no body can have issues. Only

> his

> > > > Guru

> > > > > > should be concerned about that.....But, his attempts to

> stuff

> > > his

> > > > > > shallow understanding upon this list is reprehensible.

> And,

> > > his

> > > > > > habit of quoting experts out of context is really

> > condemnable.

> > > > May

> > > > > > Jupiter's Light Shine on that fellow and teach him to

> respect

> > > the

> > > > > > hallowed traditions and to stay at his level rather than

> > trying

> > > > > > to " teach " others (He has the audacity to claim he

> > > is " teaching "

> > > > > > Rafalji!)

> > > > > >

> > > > > > If a mere young man of 35 years who has spent his life on

a

> > > > " Failed

> > > > > > computer web desining business " , " pointless email chasing

> of

> > > > > girls " ,

> > > > > > and other " past times " can gain insight as he claims, how

> > much

> > > > will

> > > > > > learned Gurus of this group with their life of devotion

to

> > > > vedanta

> > > > > > and vedanga know? His peanut brain and hyper-inflated

ego

> > will

> > > > > never

> > > > > > allow him to see this obvious truth. But, please list

> > exercise

> > > > > your

> > > > > > discretion while reading his posts (There are doubtless

> some

> > > good

> > > > > > elements even in his posts; but mostly there is trash

> > presented

> > > > as

> > > > > > philosophy).

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Mohanraaam

> > > > > >

> > > > > > vedic astrology , " litsol "

> > > <mishra.lalit@>

> > > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Dear Rafal,

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Do u think, a hobby means shallow knowledge of the

> domain,

> > No

> > > > > > rafal,

> > > > > > > it's not like that.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > At least not for me. You have learnt and i m learning,

i

> > read

> > > > > ur's

> > > > > > > replies and get benifitted, same way i wanted you to

pay

> > > heed

> > > > to

> > > > > > > what i have written about spritiuality, mostrly i did

> write

> > > for

> > > > u

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > I have done all 10 mahavidyas of tantra and read many

> > tantrik

> > > > > > > classics, spent good deal of time with great tantriks

> > > trained

> > > > in

> > > > > > > Kamakhya and other places, keenly observed their

doings,

> > > their

> > > > > > > mistakes etc.., I did tremendous mantra chanting on

> water,

> > > on

> > > > > > earth,

> > > > > > > at home, in forests etc...

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > then reached here, then i did write something, but

sorry

> i

> > > dont

> > > > > > > remember shlokas. i was not interested in cramming that.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Panditji is not fully correct in saying that

BeejMantras

> > are

> > > > not

> > > > > > > chanted by devotees, I dont know much about South India

> but

> > > in

> > > > > > North

> > > > > > > normally its done.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > And a successfull mantra sadhana has to result in one's

> > being

> > > a

> > > > > > > devotee, the devotion is the outcome, final result of

> > mantra

> > > > > > sadhana,

> > > > > > > perhaps, Pandit Ji believes mantras are power

> > packet,thinks,

> > > i

> > > > do

> > > > > > it

> > > > > > > this way , these many times and get this result, this

is

> > > where

> > > > > most

> > > > > > > of the people are confused. without being a good human

> > being

> > > if

> > > > > we

> > > > > > > think, we will achieve something in spirituality, is

> > > difficult,

> > > > > > very

> > > > > > > difficult.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > what happens is, with the mantra chanting, a self

> > > > > transformation

> > > > > > > process begins, u if dont restrict urself, ur karma

> begins

> > > > > > diluting,

> > > > > > > and u begin ur purification process unknowingly, when

> > > > substantial

> > > > > > > part of ego and greed for respect vanishes and many

such

> > > thing

> > > > > > > togather, mantra awakens u and with the God's grace ur

> > > > objective

> > > > > > gets

> > > > > > > fullfilled, gradually u become a devotee. ur being

simple

> > and

> > > > > being

> > > > > > > devotee is sometimes is indication of ur's going on the

> > right

> > > > > track.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > I think we have discussed a lot, it's enough !!

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > My Boss has given me lot of projects to complete, so,

may

> > be,

> > > i

> > > > m

> > > > > > not

> > > > > > > going to available in the group like i was recently.

> > however.

> > > i

> > > > > > will

> > > > > > > complete Garg Hora series.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > regards,

> > > > > > > Lalit.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > vedic astrology , Rafal Gendarz

> > > > > > > <starsuponme@> wrote:

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya*

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Dear Litsol,

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Then please dont generalize Your preferences as they

> are

> > > too

> > > > > > > shallow for

> > > > > > > > this Forum aspiration.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Regards,

> > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz

> > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru

> > > > > > > > email: rafal@

> > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa.com

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > litsol napisa?(a):

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > Dear Rafel,

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > I take Astrology as a good hobby, and i w'd be

> looking

> > at

> > > > it

> > > > > > with

> > > > > > > an

> > > > > > > > > engineer's approach.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > I asked ur age because, it's our thinking to put

our

> > > > > parameters

> > > > > > in

> > > > > > > > > god's system, there is nothing like delay or

> > advancement

> > > in

> > > > > > > > > spirituality. So, " Delay "

or " Speed " , " backwardness "

> > > > > > > > > and " advancement " doesn't exist in spirituality, I

> > > thought

> > > > if

> > > > > u

> > > > > > r

> > > > > > > > > thinking that it may take too much time, I wanted

to

> > tell

> > > > u,

> > > > > > it's

> > > > > > > not

> > > > > > > > > like that. there is no delay.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > It clicks in fraction of a second, when u r getting

> > > clicked

> > > > > > > depends

> > > > > > > > > on u and on god's will, when he wants u to get

> clicked.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > God sometimes graces for no reason ( " Ahetuka " ) just

> for

> > > his

> > > > > > > > > compassion towards u and it may happen next minute

> too.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > spirituality is not delimited by time , effort and

> > rules.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > regards,

> > > > > > > > > Lalit.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > vedic astrology

> > > > > > > > > <vedic astrology%40>, Rafal

> > Gendarz

> > > > > > > > > <starsuponme@ ...> wrote:

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya*

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > Dear Litsol,

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > Please be careful about words.

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > Im happy that You are sharing Your experience -

> very

> > > > > > inspirating

> > > > > > > > > ones.

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > Age hierarchy is for sudras - Manu Samhita. If

You

> > > treat

> > > > > > Jyotish

> > > > > > > > > Vedanga

> > > > > > > > > > as profession similar to engineering You have a

> long

> > > way

> > > > to

> > > > > > go.

> > > > > > > But

> > > > > > > > > dont

> > > > > > > > > > be pessimistic here are many who will try to help

> You

> > > in

> > > > > > getting

> > > > > > > > > proper

> > > > > > > > > > understanding.

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > After some time You will agree with me about the

> mala

> > > and

> > > > > > japa.

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > Regards,

> > > > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz

> > > > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru

> > > > > > > > > > email: rafal@

> > > > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > litsol napisa?(a):

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > Dear Rafal,

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > Here u r doing two wrong things, instead of

> > > developing

> > > > ur

> > > > > > > > > understanding,

> > > > > > > > > > > u r trying to conclude something and going

beyond

> > > that

> > > > u r

> > > > > > > > > messaging

> > > > > > > > > > > same to many.

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > I m touching 35, What's ur age ?

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > Astrology is a kind of vidya or profession,

like

> i

> > m

> > > a

> > > > > > > software

> > > > > > > > > > > engineer, software engineering is my

profession.

> > > > > > spirituality

> > > > > > > is

> > > > > > > > > beyond

> > > > > > > > > > > all sort of vidya or profession.

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > I wish u to be a good soul and to realize the

> bliss

> > > of

> > > > > self

> > > > > > > > > awakening or

> > > > > > > > > > > in other terms, the bliss that comes once u

feel

> u

> > > and

> > > > > god

> > > > > > is

> > > > > > > > > > > connected. dissolved in each other.

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > First realize, experience, then speak and then

> > > suggest

> > > > to

> > > > > > > others,

> > > > > > > > > by

> > > > > > > > > > > mere reading shastras or books u r not going to

> > feel

> > > > it.

> > > > > > > unless

> > > > > > > > > god

> > > > > > > > > > > graces u it's very very difficult. and if u

dont

> > > avoid

> > > > > this

> > > > > > > sort

> > > > > > > > > of

> > > > > > > > > > > hurriedness instead of learning and

> understanding,

> > it

> > > > > will

> > > > > > > affect

> > > > > > > > > u only

> > > > > > > > > > > no one else.

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > somehere i have read, it was written - By mere

> > > > > > repeating " So-

> > > > > > > > > Aham " no

> > > > > > > > > > > one gets liberated unless he realizes it like

one

> > > > doesnt

> > > > > get

> > > > > > > > > cured by

> > > > > > > > > > > knowing the name of the medicine, u need to

take

> > the

> > > > > > medicine

> > > > > > > to

> > > > > > > > > get

> > > > > > > > > > > cured " .

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > So, pls. be wise, as it was being discussed

here,

> i

> > > > > shared

> > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > > > experience of my life, pls. mind it, i m not a

> > > > preecher,

> > > > > > nor a

> > > > > > > > > guru, nor

> > > > > > > > > > > i have to make my followers, nor it's my

> > profession,

> > > > nor

> > > > > i

> > > > > > > have

> > > > > > > > > to get

> > > > > > > > > > > fame, sharing things is a kind of friendliness

a

> > kind

> > > of

> > > > > > > > > affection,

> > > > > > > > > > > that's it.

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > Lalit.

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology

> > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. com>,

> > Rafal

> > > > > Gendarz

> > > > > > > > > > > <starsuponme@ ...>

> > > > > > > > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya*

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Jyotishas

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > Counting of mala has more depth sense than

just

> > > > > counting,

> > > > > > > so for

> > > > > > > > > > > natives

> > > > > > > > > > > > like Litsol counting is neccessary and any

> other

> > > > > > speculation

> > > > > > > > > will be

> > > > > > > > > > > > only illusory and just imagination. We should

> > > follow

> > > > Pt.

> > > > > > > > > > > Dakshinamoorti

> > > > > > > > > > > > advise strictly, otherwise our process of

> > spiritual

> > > > > > > development

> > > > > > > > > will

> > > > > > > > > > > be

> > > > > > > > > > > > slow and unauthoritative.

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > Regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz

> > > > > > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru

> > > > > > > > > > > > email: rafal@

> > > > > > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > asmp2k02@ napisa?(a):

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Resp Sri Lalitji,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for your mail.But please also read

> > > > > > > GuruDakshinamurthyi

> > > > > > > > > ji's

> > > > > > > > > > > > > mail(addressing me) also on this,which

brings

> > in

> > > > more

> > > > > > > clarity

> > > > > > > > > to the

> > > > > > > > > > > > > applicability principles to my mail.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > I meant that both are necessity but to what

> > > degree

> > > > of

> > > > > > time

> > > > > > > (it

> > > > > > > > > varies

> > > > > > > > > > > > > from saadhaka to saadhaka) to get such

> inbuilt

> > > > > maturity

> > > > > > > such

> > > > > > > > > that

> > > > > > > > > > > that

> > > > > > > > > > > > > the count will be taken care of by Divine

> > forces

> > > > > after

> > > > > > > some

> > > > > > > > > initial

> > > > > > > > > > > > > period of saadhana.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Morover the type of bio matter present in

the

> > > japa

> > > > > maala

> > > > > > > > > (which is

> > > > > > > > > > > > > symbolic for ritualism as well as from

> > practical

> > > > > point

> > > > > > of

> > > > > > > > > view for

> > > > > > > > > > > our

> > > > > > > > > > > > > count) will help in keeping away

destructive

> > > forces

> > > > > > > acting on

> > > > > > > > > us

> > > > > > > > > > > .Thus

> > > > > > > > > > > > > the symbolic rituals will indirectly help

us

> in

> > > > > keeping

> > > > > > > away

> > > > > > > > > from

> > > > > > > > > > > > > negative thoughts and also trains our

memory

> to

> > > be

> > > > > > object

> > > > > > > > > > > oriented.If

> > > > > > > > > > > > > our memory grows and retentive capacity

> > increase

> > > > the

> > > > > > > Gnaana

> > > > > > > > > will

> > > > > > > > > > > > > increase ,but at the same time destructive

> > forces

> > > > > > > > > (diversions) also

> > > > > > > > > > > > > becomes powerful.Thus the symbolic

procedures

> > > will

> > > > > come

> > > > > > in

> > > > > > > > > handy to

> > > > > > > > > > > > > successfully fight the negative forces.The

> > > rituals

> > > > > may

> > > > > > be

> > > > > > > > > Rising

> > > > > > > > > > > > > early(if possible during Braahmi

> muhurta),Taking

> > > > > > > > > bath,Japaanusthaan,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > attending to the livelihood job etc etc in

> > > defined

> > > > > > times

> > > > > > > as

> > > > > > > > > > > discipline

> > > > > > > > > > > > > helps indirectly tune our memory through

> > keeping

> > > > our

> > > > > > body

> > > > > > > > > healthy.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Thus ultimately we conclude that the so

> called

> > > > > symbolic

> > > > > > > > > procedures

> > > > > > > > > > > are

> > > > > > > > > > > > > not actually symbolic(it got branded as

such)

> > but

> > > a

> > > > > > > necessity

> > > > > > > > > for

> > > > > > > > > > > our

> > > > > > > > > > > > > own good if we practice to the extent we

can.

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Quoting mishra.lalit@ ... <mishra.

> lalit%

> > > > > > 40gmail.

> > > > > > > com>:

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Resp. Sri Murthy Adavi,

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, what you said is perfectly right, we

> count

> > > or

> > > > > dont

> > > > > > > > > count,target

> > > > > > > > > > > > > is realization of god's love within, I got

it

> > > with

> > > > no

> > > > > > > > > counting,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > someone may get it with counting.

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanx, for the writing.

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Lalit.

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology

> > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. com>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40.

> com>,

> > > > > srinivasa

> > > > > > > > > murthy adavi

> > > > > > > > > > > > > asmp2k02@ wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Respected Learned Members,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Both views may be correct when the views

> > > have/or

> > > > > with

> > > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > goal as

> > > > > > > > > > > > > development of Love/Devotion towards

> adhistana

> > > > > Devatha

> > > > > > of

> > > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > Mantra

> > > > > > > > > > > > > as Base.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > In the initial stage only you need the

> > count;as

> > > > one

> > > > > > > > > develops the

> > > > > > > > > > > > > habit the biological tuning of the

> > intellect/body

> > > > will

> > > > > > > > > automatically

> > > > > > > > > > > > > take care of the practice(without count-

help

> of

> > > > malas

> > > > > > > etc).

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > It's like if with the help of Alarm clock

> if

> > we

> > > > > wake

> > > > > > up

> > > > > > > for

> > > > > > > > > 2 or 3

> > > > > > > > > > > > > days at some appointed hour,then

> automatically

> > we

> > > > > > wakeup

> > > > > > > at

> > > > > > > > > the same

> > > > > > > > > > > > > time every day without help of alarm.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > With due Respects

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > smadavi

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quoting starsuponme@ :

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya*

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Litsol,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Definitely we should count our Mantra

Japa

> on

> > > > Mala.

> > > > > > Your

> > > > > > > > > view is

> > > > > > > > > > > > > against

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Vedic Authorities and Sages, so should be

> > > > rejected.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > email: rafal@

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > litsol napisa?(a):

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Mr. Jayashri,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > A thought came, why i should not share

> with

> > > u,

> > > > U

> > > > > > pls.

> > > > > > > stop

> > > > > > > > > > > > > counting

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > mantra chantings, counting mantra gives

> > false

> > > > ego

> > > > > > and

> > > > > > > then

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > frustration if u dont get desired

results.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > leave it to the god, god counts the

> mantra

> > > > > chanted

> > > > > > by

> > > > > > > you

> > > > > > > > > may be

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 108, 1008 or whatsoever, let him count,

> > it's

> > > > his

> > > > > > part

> > > > > > > and

> > > > > > > > > ur

> > > > > > > > > > > part

> > > > > > > > > > > > > is

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to chant the mantra. when the mantra

has

> to

> > > > > awaken,

> > > > > > it

> > > > > > > > > will be,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > god

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > will ensure it for u.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sometimes we try to become more

> intelligent

> > > > with

> > > > > out

> > > > > > > > > limited

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > intellect and that creates obstacles in

> our

> > > > > > spiritual

> > > > > > > > > growth.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So, forget about counts, forget about

the

> > > time

> > > > u

> > > > > > put

> > > > > > > in

> > > > > > > > > for ur's

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sadhana, invoke the god with pure

heart.

> > > purity

> > > > > > > counts.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Lalit.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40.

> > > > > > > > > com>, " dakshinastrologer "

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <dakshinastrologer@ ...> wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Ms. Jayashree:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think this topic on 108 is getting

> very

> > > > > > > interesting

> > > > > > > > > and

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > enlightening for all members.

Yesterday

> > we

> > > > had a

> > > > > > > > > wonderful

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > esoteric

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > explanation from Shri. Sushil

Dikshit,

> > and

> > > > > today

> > > > > > > your

> > > > > > > > > > > wonderful

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > explanation of numerical symmetry of

> the

> > > > cosmos!

> > > > > > > > > Wonderful.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There definitely exists a " numerical

> > > > symphony "

> > > > > in

> > > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > > > Universe.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > not only 108.....as I mentioned in my

> > > earlier

> > > > > > post,

> > > > > > > > > there are

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > various

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > other numerals that are significant

in

> > > occult

> > > > > > > > > practices. 108

> > > > > > > > > > > is

> > > > > > > > > > > > > a

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > powerful and all-purpose perfect

> > > > number...While

> > > > > > we

> > > > > > > have

> > > > > > > > > > > > > understood

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the glory of 108, we should not lose

> > sight

> > > of

> > > > > the

> > > > > > > fact

> > > > > > > > > that

> > > > > > > > > > > > > there

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > are

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > other powerful numbers also. This is

> just

> > > for

> > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > information

> > > > > > > > > > > of

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > list.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > My apprecitation again for this

> wonderful

> > > > > > response.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Blessed be.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pandit R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Blessed be.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pandit R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI. --- In

vedic-

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > astrology@grou ps.com

> > > <astrology%

> > > > > > > > > > > > > 40. com>,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " jayasartn " <jayasartn@> wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In cosmology, 108 has this

> > significance -

> > > > the

> > > > > > > moon is

> > > > > > > > > away

> > > > > > > > > > > > > from

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > earth 108 times its (moon's)

diameter

> > and

> > > > the

> > > > > > sun

> > > > > > > is

> > > > > > > > > away

> > > > > > > > > > > > > from the

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > earth, 108 times its diameter.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Perhaps this reality of distances

is

> > > > > applicable

> > > > > > to

> > > > > > > > > deities

> > > > > > > > > > > > > too.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Perhaps this has been indicated by

> the

> > > 108

> > > > > divya

> > > > > > > > > desas of

> > > > > > > > > > > Lord

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Narayana.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > jayasree

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology@

.

> com

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40.

> > > > > > > > > com>, " dakshinastrologer "

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <dakshinastrologer@ > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Shri. Sushil:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It is a wonderful answer you have

> > given.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Blessed be.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pandit R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology@

> .

> > com

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40.

> > > > > > > > > com>, " sushil.dikshit "

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <sushil.dikshit@ > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Babu,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It is not a silly question but

it

> > is

> > > a

> > > > > very

> > > > > > > good

> > > > > > > > > > > question.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Actually

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > there are 27 Nakshatras and

every

> > > > > Nakshtras

> > > > > > > has 4

> > > > > > > > > Charan

> > > > > > > > > > > > > so

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > total

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > charans are 27 x 4 = 108

Charan.

> > Each

> > > > > > Charan

> > > > > > > has 3

> > > > > > > > > > > degree

> > > > > > > > > > > > > and

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 20

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > minutes so if you multiply 3

> degree

> > > and

> > > > 20

> > > > > > > > > minutes to

> > > > > > > > > > > 108

> > > > > > > > > > > > > it

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > comes

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > out to be 360 degress i.e. one

> > cycle

> > > > > > (Circle).

> > > > > > > > > This

> > > > > > > > > > > cycle

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > represetns

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > whole brahmand because all the

> > > rashis,

> > > > > > > planets and

> > > > > > > > > > > > > nakshatra

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > are

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > between these 360 degree in 2

> > > > dimensional

> > > > > > > > > horoscope. So

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > chanting a

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mantra completes one cycle of

> this

> > > > > brahmand.

> > > > > > > > > Further One

> > > > > > > > > > > > > who

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > has

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > visited Brahamand at least one

> time

> > > > i.e.

> > > > > he

> > > > > > is

> > > > > > > > > > > > > brahmagyani he

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > is

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > entitiled to place 108 Shri

> before

> > > his

> > > > > name.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sushil dikshit

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology@

> > .

> > > com

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology%

40.

> > > com>,

> > > > > babu

> > > > > > > mon

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <muthappan111@ >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Namaste,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It may be a silly matter for

> all

> > of

> > > > you.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I want to know what is the

> reason

> > > > that

> > > > > > some

> > > > > > > > > remedies

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > recomended

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > for 108 times.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I dont know any thing about

> > > astrology.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I hope you may pleased to

> provide

> > a

> > > > > reply

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thanks,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Babu

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------ --------- -------

--

> -

> > --

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Be a better Globetrotter. Get

> > > better

> > > > > > travel

> > > > > > > > > answers

> > > > > > > > > > > from

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someone

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > who knows.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Answers - Check it out.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this

> > message

> > > > have

> > > > > > been

> > > > > > > > > removed]

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have

> been

> > > > > removed]

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have

> been

> > > > > removed]

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have

been

> > > > removed]

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been

> > > removed]

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been

> removed]

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

:)

 

sth = something, learn it, now !!

 

:)

 

i m happy for u on this and many other readers w'd be.

 

good.

 

 

vedic astrology , " litsol " <mishra.lalit

wrote:

>

> Idiot, I have my laptop with me at home.

>

>

> vedic astrology , " abhishekpotti "

> <abhishekpotti@> wrote:

> >

> > Oye Lalith:

> >

> > How are you sending a message today? Did you go to the office

> today

> > also just to pilfer the company's internet connections on a

holiday

> > also? typical of you! One of these days, your employer will kick

> you

> > out of the office for having misused company's resources and may

be

> > you will write another story on how sani came in front of you and

> > asked you to change job!

> >

> > for your information, Meera Bhai's affection to Lord Krishna was

> way

> > before her formal initiation into the beeja mantra. She was

known

> to

> > sing heart-rending songs on Lord Krishna rather than chanting the

> > beeja mantra in buses and trains!

> >

> > Beeja mantra and God's name are not one and the same as you are

> > trying to portray. In fact for chanting God's name can be

chanted

> > without any beeja mantra and still it will give good results.

This

> > is what happens when you " steal " knowledge by observing tantrik

> > practices without formal initiation!

> >

> > we are not getting exposed....rather it is you who are being

> exposed

> > with every post. As I said to Ram Jaswalji yesterday itself, I

> will

> > stop this exchange if you stop it. Otherwise, this will go on.

I

> am

> > not afraid of you. But I pity you.....that is why I am writing

the

> > below matter......

> >

> > By the way, see a good psychiatrist.....I will give just one

> evidence

> > for your psycopathy...In your posts, often you type a word " Sth "

> > often incoherently.....It is almost a pattern for you. This is

> > suggestive of OCB problem for you. Better get yourself treated

for

> > psychiatric ailments and get on with your life instead of trying

> > evaluate persons far elder and wiser than you. I am not saying

> this

> > to abuse you as Ram Jaswalji might think....It is the genuine

> advice

> > of an elderly person. There is nothing wrong in consulting a

good

> > psychiatrist; now a days the stigma is not there. So, help

yourself.

> >

> > Abhishek.

> >

> > vedic astrology , " litsol " <mishra.lalit@>

> > wrote:

> > >

> > >

> > > You praised Meera, Good, when u w'd learn sth from her pure

> bhakti,

> > > see, cunningness and being manipulator doesnt help always!!

> > >

> > > twisting words always, i shown u a mantra of lord Krishna, in

> which

> > a

> > > beej mantra is used, instead of learning that God's Name and

Beej

> > are

> > > one and same thing, writing so much.

> > >

> > > What i said, open ur eyes and mind, read again, a devotion is

> > obvious

> > > final outcome of mantra chanting.

> > >

> > > read what i have been saying, read many times a day, the clouds

> of

> > ur

> > > karma smokes ur understanding.

> > >

> > > and learn one more thing - Meera got formal deekschha from

Saint

> > > Raidas.

> > >

> > > I use company's time or what, that i manage and is a matter of

my

> > > job, i dont advertise here to get some business in background,

> and

> > u

> > > 2-3 who are lobbying here , are exposed by urself.

> > >

> > > exposing u was not my objective, but it happened.

> > >

> > > it will keep happening.

> > >

> > >

> > > ok

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > vedic astrology , " abhishekpotti "

> > > <abhishekpotti@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Dear Lalith:

> > > >

> > > > The whole world knows the history of Blessed Meera

Bhai....the

> > > > epitome of Bhakti......She was attached to her " Lala " - the

> > > wonderful

> > > > idol of Krishna gifted to her even from her childhood....Do

you

> > > mean

> > > > to say that innocent young girl started chanting " Kliim

> > krishnaaya "

> > > > mantra automatically? Even Bhakta Prahlaada had to be

> initiated

> > by

> > > > Sage Naaradha for his chant of dwaadasaakshari mantra....

> > > >

> > > > Nobody is afraid of you here......You need not proclaim that

> you

> > > are

> > > > not in the business of a Guru.....actually Guru status is not

a

> > > > business (true to your half-baked knowledge you will claim it

> is

> > > also

> > > > like software engineering!). The difference my friend

between

> > you

> > > > and other great persons like Rafal or Dakshinamoorthiji is

that

> > > they

> > > > are spending their money for the internet, whereas you are

> > > pilfering

> > > > your company's time and the company's resources while

browsing

> > the

> > > > internet. Don't you think you are cheating your company when

> you

> > > > spend so much time on empty and egoistic posts defending

> yourself

> > > > against every expert after arguing with them unnecessarily?

> Are

> > > you

> > > > not getting paid for the time you spend in the

company....Know

> > the

> > > > basics of ethics before ever sermonizing.....So, actually you

> are

> > > an

> > > > exploiter....try to understand that....the other gurujis are

> > > probably

> > > > too decent to comment on that......What happened to your

> > project?

> > > > Better rush to it nough!....It will spare us the agony of

> > replying

> > > to

> > > > your half-witted postings!

> > > >

> > > > By the say, Which member asked you Prashna Tantra dear? We

did

> > not

> > > > see any posts requesting " Honourable Lalith " to explain

Prashna

> > > > Tantra (as if you could explain it!) What arrogance you have

> to

> > > > claim that nobody can stand before you.....Guruji's posts

> exposed

> > > > your ignorance....you did not even know how to ask queries

and

> > get

> > > > replies from one of the most empathetic astrologers of this

> > group,

> > > > and yet you claim you are this and that......

> > > >

> > > > For your information....nobody is afraid of you..Rather you

> > should

> > > be

> > > > afraid of yourself......Your foolishness itself will be your

> > doom.

> > > > Did you not become the laughing stock due to your email-based

> > > chasing

> > > > of Priyaa? Such foolishness in occult matters could be more

> > costly

> > > > dear.....I think Mohanraaamji and Rafalji are only afraid

about

> > > your

> > > > own well-being! They are not afraid of you. Nor am I afraid

of

> > you.

> > > >

> > > > Your posts never answer the queries or points raised by

others;

> > you

> > > > take off on a new ground only because of your shallow

> > understanding

> > > > of subjects. Nobody has accepted you as a Guru here, and

> nobody

> > > > will....Can a fire-fly eclipse the Sun? There are too

> > many " Suns "

> > > > here and you are just a fire-fly.

> > > >

> > > > It reminds me of a story.....Once an ant challenged the

mighty

> > > > elephant for a fight; the elephant obviously could not hear

the

> > ant

> > > > (the ant being so tiny and it was on the ground, its sound

> could

> > > not

> > > > reach the elephant). The elephant just walked away out of its

> own

> > > > volition in its natural course. Then the ant claimed, " you

> see

> > I

> > > > challenged the elephant and it ran away " . Dear, your saying

> that

> > > > nobody can stand before you is similar to that.......

> > > >

> > > > FIRST LEARN THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN GHOSTS AND YOUR ANCESTOR

> > > > SUMANGALIS BEFORE WRITING THE FIRST POSTS ON OCCULT! What a

> > > > pity......what a pity.....That we have to bear your

meaningless

> > > > rantings here!

> > > >

> > > > Abhishek.

> > > >

> > > > vedic astrology , " litsol "

> <mishra.lalit@>

> > > > wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > I was waiting for u dear..

> > > > >

> > > > > why u took time ?

> > > > >

> > > > > Do u mean Meera Bai discussed with u, what she did..

> > > > >

> > > > > Do u know 'Kleem Krishnay, Govindaya Gopijan Vallabhaya

> Namh'

> > is

> > > a

> > > > > mantra for lord krishna.

> > > > >

> > > > > is there no beej mantras, to whom u wish to misguide ? let

> > > thnigs

> > > > > remain between lord, bhakta , their shraddha and their guru.

> > > > >

> > > > > why u people are so afraid of me, i m not in business of

> guru.

> > > > >

> > > > > i m happy with my life, my profession of software

> engineering

> > > and

> > > > > my hobbies ok.

> > > > >

> > > > > there are 7000+ members are here, by writing such type of

> > > foolish

> > > > > things u expose urself only, mind, there are better brains

> here.

> > > > >

> > > > > this is enough ...

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > vedic astrology ,

> > > > > " abhishekpotti " <abhishekpotti@> wrote:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Respected Mohanraaamji:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Well said. Lalith is saying that " maybe in south india

> > > devotees

> > > > > > don't chant Moola mantras but not so in North " ...What

> > > > > > stupidity.....He does not seem to understand that " mantra

> > > > shaastra

> > > > > > experts " are also devotees, but they cannot be called as

> > > innocent

> > > > > > saatwik bhaktaas! A typical example of a pure saadhwik

> > bhakta

> > > > will

> > > > > > be Meera Bhai (was she not North Indian). Can Lalith say

> > which

> > > > > Dasa

> > > > > > Mahaa Vidya Meera Bhai practised? She was immersed in

> > Krishna

> > > > > > consciousness and Lover for Him. Her own Bhajans were

her

> > > > prayers

> > > > > in

> > > > > > the bhaavana of Bhakti in the form of Love! This is not

> > mantra

> > > > > > shaastra. Another example will be Saant Tukhaaraam.

These

> > > > > bhaktaas

> > > > > > did not chant moola mantraas. Panditji Dakshinamoorthi

was

> > on

> > > > dot

> > > > > in

> > > > > > saying that " Pure bhaktaas do not chant complicated moola

> > > > > mantraas " .

> > > > > > You have clarified this fact wonderfully in your post. I

> wish

> > > > more

> > > > > > knowledgeable persons also put erratic posters in their

> place

> > > > just

> > > > > as

> > > > > > Mohanraaamji does here. This will benefit more naive

> readers

> > > of

> > > > > > these forums who might otherwise get confused as to which

> of

> > > the

> > > > > > paths to follow. Actually, anyone can follow any path as

> he/

> > > she

> > > > > > deems it fit; but there should be consistency of

procedures.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > We should not confuse mantrik rituals and bhakti

> doctrines.

> > > > > Bhaktaas

> > > > > > can chant the names of Gods at anytime.....Mantra

shaastra

> > > > experts

> > > > > > chanting advanced moola mantras should necessarily adopt

> > ritual

> > > > > > procedures for the welfare of themselves and others!

> > > > > Yes...improper

> > > > > > chanting of mantras can cause danger to the society also

> just

> > > as

> > > > > > proper chanting can help others. Hence, this cannot be

> > > > considered

> > > > > as

> > > > > > a personal preference of the aspirant. If this was not

the

> > > case,

> > > > > why

> > > > > > did sages codify spiritual practises scrupulously?

> Rafalji,

> > > > > > Mohanraaamji, etc. are correct in saying it is best to

> follow

> > > > > Pandit

> > > > > > Dakshinamoorthiji's advices on mantra shastra or japams.

> He

> > is

> > > > > > learned and he is living a life compatible to the

shaastras

> > > > though

> > > > > he

> > > > > > has faced uncertain circumstances in his own personal

> life.

> > He

> > > > > never

> > > > > > compromised on principles and he willingly paid the price

> for

> > > > that

> > > > > > which most of us will never do. The words of such a

person

> > > > should

> > > > > > obviously carry more weight.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Abhishek.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > vedic astrology , " mohanraaam "

> > > > <mohanraaam@>

> > > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Well Lalith:

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > If you have really done dasa Maha Vidyaa, you would

have

> > > never

> > > > > > > approached a professional astrologer for

> > consultation...that

> > > > much

> > > > > I

> > > > > > > can say....

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > And what idiocy when you say Panditji is partly wrong?

> He

> > > > > > > said " Bhaktaas do not chant Moola mantras " , whereas you

> > have

> > > > > edited

> > > > > > > the words to suit your ends....He never said " devotees

> > don't

> > > > > chant

> > > > > > > Beej mantras " .....You are putting words into his mouth

> and

> > > > > assuming

> > > > > > > he is wrong! Why, do you know....the Great Panditji

> himself

> > > > > chants

> > > > > > > Moola mantras.....He is a bhakta and a mantra shastra

> > expert.

> > > > As

> > > > > a

> > > > > > > bhakta he keeps incessant chanting of naama japa

> throughout

> > > the

> > > > > > day;

> > > > > > > as a mantra shastra expert, he restricts the moola

mantra

> > > > japams

> > > > > to

> > > > > > > stipulated times with ritual purity.....It is this

> > wonderful

> > > > > > practice

> > > > > > > that Guruji was alluding to. Guruji cannot be wrong in

> > > ritual

> > > > > and

> > > > > > > occult matters. Please understand that.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > There are 4 classes of Devotees.......1) Saatwik vedic

> > > devotees

> > > > > who

> > > > > > > will follow vedic dharma scrupulously. They will not

> dare

> > to

> > > > > > compare

> > > > > > > astrology and vedanga to Engineering! as you did...

> > > > > > > 2) Raajasik devotees who will follow vedic disciplines

as

> > far

> > > > as

> > > > > > > possible, but will still go after upaasanaas of Demi-

Gods

> > for

> > > > > > > accomplishment of siddhis. Mantra shaastra experts

> usually

> > > > fall

> > > > > in

> > > > > > > this category.

> > > > > > > 3) Saatwik Bhaktaas - for whom the meditation and glory

> of

> > > > their

> > > > > > > Ishta Devataa is enough for spiritual satisfaction. It

> is

> > > this

> > > > > > > category that Guruji referred to when he said they will

> not

> > > > chant

> > > > > > > Moola mantras too much. Definitely they will not do

Dasa

> > > Mahaa

> > > > > > > Vidyaa.

> > > > > > > 4) Taamasic Devotees - Those whose main motive is to

> > project

> > > > > > > themselves at all costs and acting as if they are equal

> to

> > > the

> > > > > > > experts; they will try ALL practices - whether they are

> > > > > sanctioned

> > > > > > by

> > > > > > > vedas or not.....Their only aim is personal glory and

> > > > > > satisfaction.

> > > > > > > They will attack even established dharma if they do not

> get

> > > > > results

> > > > > > > (sounds familiar....You are one!) Ignorance and half-

> baked

> > > > > > knowledge

> > > > > > > and egotism are these persons' motivating fuel.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > You are really satan's Gift to this list.......My only

> > prayer

> > > > is

> > > > > > that

> > > > > > > innocent members of this list do not get side-tracked

> with

> > > your

> > > > > > > ramblings.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Let me make this clear to the list.....Panditji said

that

> > > > saatwik

> > > > > > > Bhaktaas who chant Divine names only due to Pure Love

on

> > God

> > > > > > usually

> > > > > > > never chant mantrik moola mantraas. It is just one

class

> > of

> > > > > > > devotees. A rajasik bhakta who is a mantra-shaastra

> expert

> > > may

> > > > > > even

> > > > > > > be a bhakta at heart; and a pure bhakta may sometimes

> chant

> > > > some

> > > > > > > mantrik japams for solving some practical

> issues......But,

> > > when

> > > > > > they

> > > > > > > switch their routines temporarily, these enlightened

> > devotees

> > > > > > usually

> > > > > > > take good guidance and follow the tenets of shaastras

> > > > > > > scrupulously....Definitely they will not sit on

> assumption

> > > like

> > > > > > > Lalith.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > On the one hand, this fellow claims he has done chants

in

> > > > > forests,

> > > > > > > rivers, earth, etc. (Probably we have a Maharishi here!

> > What

> > > > > > heights

> > > > > > > of pointless pride in this young man list....it is

> > > > disgusting!).

> > > > > > On

> > > > > > > the other hand, he says he chants mantras in buses,

> trains,

> > > > > > etc......

> > > > > > > He is confused about which no body can have issues.

Only

> > his

> > > > > Guru

> > > > > > > should be concerned about that.....But, his attempts to

> > stuff

> > > > his

> > > > > > > shallow understanding upon this list is reprehensible.

> > And,

> > > > his

> > > > > > > habit of quoting experts out of context is really

> > > condemnable.

> > > > > May

> > > > > > > Jupiter's Light Shine on that fellow and teach him to

> > respect

> > > > the

> > > > > > > hallowed traditions and to stay at his level rather

than

> > > trying

> > > > > > > to " teach " others (He has the audacity to claim he

> > > > is " teaching "

> > > > > > > Rafalji!)

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > If a mere young man of 35 years who has spent his life

on

> a

> > > > > " Failed

> > > > > > > computer web desining business " , " pointless email

chasing

> > of

> > > > > > girls " ,

> > > > > > > and other " past times " can gain insight as he claims,

how

> > > much

> > > > > will

> > > > > > > learned Gurus of this group with their life of devotion

> to

> > > > > vedanta

> > > > > > > and vedanga know? His peanut brain and hyper-inflated

> ego

> > > will

> > > > > > never

> > > > > > > allow him to see this obvious truth. But, please list

> > > exercise

> > > > > > your

> > > > > > > discretion while reading his posts (There are doubtless

> > some

> > > > good

> > > > > > > elements even in his posts; but mostly there is trash

> > > presented

> > > > > as

> > > > > > > philosophy).

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Mohanraaam

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > vedic astrology , " litsol "

> > > > <mishra.lalit@>

> > > > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Dear Rafal,

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Do u think, a hobby means shallow knowledge of the

> > domain,

> > > No

> > > > > > > rafal,

> > > > > > > > it's not like that.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > At least not for me. You have learnt and i m

learning,

> i

> > > read

> > > > > > ur's

> > > > > > > > replies and get benifitted, same way i wanted you to

> pay

> > > > heed

> > > > > to

> > > > > > > > what i have written about spritiuality, mostrly i did

> > write

> > > > for

> > > > > u

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > I have done all 10 mahavidyas of tantra and read many

> > > tantrik

> > > > > > > > classics, spent good deal of time with great

tantriks

> > > > trained

> > > > > in

> > > > > > > > Kamakhya and other places, keenly observed their

> doings,

> > > > their

> > > > > > > > mistakes etc.., I did tremendous mantra chanting on

> > water,

> > > > on

> > > > > > > earth,

> > > > > > > > at home, in forests etc...

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > then reached here, then i did write something, but

> sorry

> > i

> > > > dont

> > > > > > > > remember shlokas. i was not interested in cramming

that.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Panditji is not fully correct in saying that

> BeejMantras

> > > are

> > > > > not

> > > > > > > > chanted by devotees, I dont know much about South

India

> > but

> > > > in

> > > > > > > North

> > > > > > > > normally its done.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > And a successfull mantra sadhana has to result in

one's

> > > being

> > > > a

> > > > > > > > devotee, the devotion is the outcome, final result of

> > > mantra

> > > > > > > sadhana,

> > > > > > > > perhaps, Pandit Ji believes mantras are power

> > > packet,thinks,

> > > > i

> > > > > do

> > > > > > > it

> > > > > > > > this way , these many times and get this result, this

> is

> > > > where

> > > > > > most

> > > > > > > > of the people are confused. without being a good

human

> > > being

> > > > if

> > > > > > we

> > > > > > > > think, we will achieve something in spirituality, is

> > > > difficult,

> > > > > > > very

> > > > > > > > difficult.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > what happens is, with the mantra chanting, a self

> > > > > > transformation

> > > > > > > > process begins, u if dont restrict urself, ur karma

> > begins

> > > > > > > diluting,

> > > > > > > > and u begin ur purification process unknowingly, when

> > > > > substantial

> > > > > > > > part of ego and greed for respect vanishes and many

> such

> > > > thing

> > > > > > > > togather, mantra awakens u and with the God's grace

ur

> > > > > objective

> > > > > > > gets

> > > > > > > > fullfilled, gradually u become a devotee. ur being

> simple

> > > and

> > > > > > being

> > > > > > > > devotee is sometimes is indication of ur's going on

the

> > > right

> > > > > > track.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > I think we have discussed a lot, it's enough !!

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > My Boss has given me lot of projects to complete, so,

> may

> > > be,

> > > > i

> > > > > m

> > > > > > > not

> > > > > > > > going to available in the group like i was recently.

> > > however.

> > > > i

> > > > > > > will

> > > > > > > > complete Garg Hora series.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > regards,

> > > > > > > > Lalit.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > vedic astrology , Rafal Gendarz

> > > > > > > > <starsuponme@> wrote:

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya*

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > Dear Litsol,

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > Then please dont generalize Your preferences as

they

> > are

> > > > too

> > > > > > > > shallow for

> > > > > > > > > this Forum aspiration.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > Regards,

> > > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz

> > > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru

> > > > > > > > > email: rafal@

> > > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa.com

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > litsol napisa?(a):

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > Dear Rafel,

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > I take Astrology as a good hobby, and i w'd be

> > looking

> > > at

> > > > > it

> > > > > > > with

> > > > > > > > an

> > > > > > > > > > engineer's approach.

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > I asked ur age because, it's our thinking to put

> our

> > > > > > parameters

> > > > > > > in

> > > > > > > > > > god's system, there is nothing like delay or

> > > advancement

> > > > in

> > > > > > > > > > spirituality. So, " Delay "

> or " Speed " , " backwardness "

> > > > > > > > > > and " advancement " doesn't exist in spirituality,

I

> > > > thought

> > > > > if

> > > > > > u

> > > > > > > r

> > > > > > > > > > thinking that it may take too much time, I wanted

> to

> > > tell

> > > > > u,

> > > > > > > it's

> > > > > > > > not

> > > > > > > > > > like that. there is no delay.

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > It clicks in fraction of a second, when u r

getting

> > > > clicked

> > > > > > > > depends

> > > > > > > > > > on u and on god's will, when he wants u to get

> > clicked.

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > God sometimes graces for no reason ( " Ahetuka " )

just

> > for

> > > > his

> > > > > > > > > > compassion towards u and it may happen next

minute

> > too.

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > spirituality is not delimited by time , effort

and

> > > rules.

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > regards,

> > > > > > > > > > Lalit.

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology

> > > > > > > > > > <vedic astrology%40>, Rafal

> > > Gendarz

> > > > > > > > > > <starsuponme@ ...> wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya*

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > Dear Litsol,

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > Please be careful about words.

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > Im happy that You are sharing Your experience -

> > very

> > > > > > > inspirating

> > > > > > > > > > ones.

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > Age hierarchy is for sudras - Manu Samhita. If

> You

> > > > treat

> > > > > > > Jyotish

> > > > > > > > > > Vedanga

> > > > > > > > > > > as profession similar to engineering You have a

> > long

> > > > way

> > > > > to

> > > > > > > go.

> > > > > > > > But

> > > > > > > > > > dont

> > > > > > > > > > > be pessimistic here are many who will try to

help

> > You

> > > > in

> > > > > > > getting

> > > > > > > > > > proper

> > > > > > > > > > > understanding.

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > After some time You will agree with me about

the

> > mala

> > > > and

> > > > > > > japa.

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > Regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz

> > > > > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru

> > > > > > > > > > > email: rafal@

> > > > > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > litsol napisa?(a):

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Rafal,

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > Here u r doing two wrong things, instead of

> > > > developing

> > > > > ur

> > > > > > > > > > understanding,

> > > > > > > > > > > > u r trying to conclude something and going

> beyond

> > > > that

> > > > > u r

> > > > > > > > > > messaging

> > > > > > > > > > > > same to many.

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > I m touching 35, What's ur age ?

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > Astrology is a kind of vidya or profession,

> like

> > i

> > > m

> > > > a

> > > > > > > > software

> > > > > > > > > > > > engineer, software engineering is my

> profession.

> > > > > > > spirituality

> > > > > > > > is

> > > > > > > > > > beyond

> > > > > > > > > > > > all sort of vidya or profession.

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > I wish u to be a good soul and to realize the

> > bliss

> > > > of

> > > > > > self

> > > > > > > > > > awakening or

> > > > > > > > > > > > in other terms, the bliss that comes once u

> feel

> > u

> > > > and

> > > > > > god

> > > > > > > is

> > > > > > > > > > > > connected. dissolved in each other.

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > First realize, experience, then speak and

then

> > > > suggest

> > > > > to

> > > > > > > > others,

> > > > > > > > > > by

> > > > > > > > > > > > mere reading shastras or books u r not going

to

> > > feel

> > > > > it.

> > > > > > > > unless

> > > > > > > > > > god

> > > > > > > > > > > > graces u it's very very difficult. and if u

> dont

> > > > avoid

> > > > > > this

> > > > > > > > sort

> > > > > > > > > > of

> > > > > > > > > > > > hurriedness instead of learning and

> > understanding,

> > > it

> > > > > > will

> > > > > > > > affect

> > > > > > > > > > u only

> > > > > > > > > > > > no one else.

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > somehere i have read, it was written - By

mere

> > > > > > > repeating " So-

> > > > > > > > > > Aham " no

> > > > > > > > > > > > one gets liberated unless he realizes it like

> one

> > > > > doesnt

> > > > > > get

> > > > > > > > > > cured by

> > > > > > > > > > > > knowing the name of the medicine, u need to

> take

> > > the

> > > > > > > medicine

> > > > > > > > to

> > > > > > > > > > get

> > > > > > > > > > > > cured " .

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > So, pls. be wise, as it was being discussed

> here,

> > i

> > > > > > shared

> > > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > > > > experience of my life, pls. mind it, i m not

a

> > > > > preecher,

> > > > > > > nor a

> > > > > > > > > > guru, nor

> > > > > > > > > > > > i have to make my followers, nor it's my

> > > profession,

> > > > > nor

> > > > > > i

> > > > > > > > have

> > > > > > > > > > to get

> > > > > > > > > > > > fame, sharing things is a kind of

friendliness

> a

> > > kind

> > > > of

> > > > > > > > > > affection,

> > > > > > > > > > > > that's it.

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > > Lalit.

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology

> > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40.

com>,

> > > Rafal

> > > > > > Gendarz

> > > > > > > > > > > > <starsuponme@ ...>

> > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya*

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Jyotishas

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Counting of mala has more depth sense than

> just

> > > > > > counting,

> > > > > > > > so for

> > > > > > > > > > > > natives

> > > > > > > > > > > > > like Litsol counting is neccessary and any

> > other

> > > > > > > speculation

> > > > > > > > > > will be

> > > > > > > > > > > > > only illusory and just imagination. We

should

> > > > follow

> > > > > Pt.

> > > > > > > > > > > > Dakshinamoorti

> > > > > > > > > > > > > advise strictly, otherwise our process of

> > > spiritual

> > > > > > > > development

> > > > > > > > > > will

> > > > > > > > > > > > be

> > > > > > > > > > > > > slow and unauthoritative.

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru

> > > > > > > > > > > > > email: rafal@

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > asmp2k02@ napisa?(a):

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Resp Sri Lalitji,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for your mail.But please also read

> > > > > > > > GuruDakshinamurthyi

> > > > > > > > > > ji's

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > mail(addressing me) also on this,which

> brings

> > > in

> > > > > more

> > > > > > > > clarity

> > > > > > > > > > to the

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > applicability principles to my mail.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > I meant that both are necessity but to

what

> > > > degree

> > > > > of

> > > > > > > time

> > > > > > > > (it

> > > > > > > > > > varies

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > from saadhaka to saadhaka) to get such

> > inbuilt

> > > > > > maturity

> > > > > > > > such

> > > > > > > > > > that

> > > > > > > > > > > > that

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > the count will be taken care of by Divine

> > > forces

> > > > > > after

> > > > > > > > some

> > > > > > > > > > initial

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > period of saadhana.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Morover the type of bio matter present in

> the

> > > > japa

> > > > > > maala

> > > > > > > > > > (which is

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > symbolic for ritualism as well as from

> > > practical

> > > > > > point

> > > > > > > of

> > > > > > > > > > view for

> > > > > > > > > > > > our

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > count) will help in keeping away

> destructive

> > > > forces

> > > > > > > > acting on

> > > > > > > > > > us

> > > > > > > > > > > > .Thus

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > the symbolic rituals will indirectly help

> us

> > in

> > > > > > keeping

> > > > > > > > away

> > > > > > > > > > from

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > negative thoughts and also trains our

> memory

> > to

> > > > be

> > > > > > > object

> > > > > > > > > > > > oriented.If

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > our memory grows and retentive capacity

> > > increase

> > > > > the

> > > > > > > > Gnaana

> > > > > > > > > > will

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > increase ,but at the same time

destructive

> > > forces

> > > > > > > > > > (diversions) also

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > becomes powerful.Thus the symbolic

> procedures

> > > > will

> > > > > > come

> > > > > > > in

> > > > > > > > > > handy to

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > successfully fight the negative

forces.The

> > > > rituals

> > > > > > may

> > > > > > > be

> > > > > > > > > > Rising

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > early(if possible during Braahmi

> > muhurta),Taking

> > > > > > > > > > bath,Japaanusthaan,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > attending to the livelihood job etc etc

in

> > > > defined

> > > > > > > times

> > > > > > > > as

> > > > > > > > > > > > discipline

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > helps indirectly tune our memory through

> > > keeping

> > > > > our

> > > > > > > body

> > > > > > > > > > healthy.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thus ultimately we conclude that the so

> > called

> > > > > > symbolic

> > > > > > > > > > procedures

> > > > > > > > > > > > are

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > not actually symbolic(it got branded as

> such)

> > > but

> > > > a

> > > > > > > > necessity

> > > > > > > > > > for

> > > > > > > > > > > > our

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > own good if we practice to the extent we

> can.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quoting mishra.lalit@ ... <mishra.

> > lalit%

> > > > > > > 40gmail.

> > > > > > > > com>:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Resp. Sri Murthy Adavi,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, what you said is perfectly right, we

> > count

> > > > or

> > > > > > dont

> > > > > > > > > > count,target

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > is realization of god's love within, I

got

> it

> > > > with

> > > > > no

> > > > > > > > > > counting,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > someone may get it with counting.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanx, for the writing.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Lalit.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology

> > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. com>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40.

> > com>,

> > > > > > srinivasa

> > > > > > > > > > murthy adavi

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > asmp2k02@ wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Respected Learned Members,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Both views may be correct when the

views

> > > > have/or

> > > > > > with

> > > > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > > goal as

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > development of Love/Devotion towards

> > adhistana

> > > > > > Devatha

> > > > > > > of

> > > > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > > Mantra

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > as Base.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In the initial stage only you need the

> > > count;as

> > > > > one

> > > > > > > > > > develops the

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > habit the biological tuning of the

> > > intellect/body

> > > > > will

> > > > > > > > > > automatically

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > take care of the practice(without count-

> help

> > of

> > > > > malas

> > > > > > > > etc).

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It's like if with the help of Alarm

clock

> > if

> > > we

> > > > > > wake

> > > > > > > up

> > > > > > > > for

> > > > > > > > > > 2 or 3

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > days at some appointed hour,then

> > automatically

> > > we

> > > > > > > wakeup

> > > > > > > > at

> > > > > > > > > > the same

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > time every day without help of alarm.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > With due Respects

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > smadavi

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quoting starsuponme@ :

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya*

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Litsol,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Definitely we should count our Mantra

> Japa

> > on

> > > > > Mala.

> > > > > > > Your

> > > > > > > > > > view is

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > against

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Vedic Authorities and Sages, so should

be

> > > > > rejected.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > email: rafal@

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > litsol napisa?(a):

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Mr. Jayashri,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > A thought came, why i should not

share

> > with

> > > > u,

> > > > > U

> > > > > > > pls.

> > > > > > > > stop

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > counting

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > mantra chantings, counting mantra

gives

> > > false

> > > > > ego

> > > > > > > and

> > > > > > > > then

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > frustration if u dont get desired

> results.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > leave it to the god, god counts the

> > mantra

> > > > > > chanted

> > > > > > > by

> > > > > > > > you

> > > > > > > > > > may be

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 108, 1008 or whatsoever, let him

count,

> > > it's

> > > > > his

> > > > > > > part

> > > > > > > > and

> > > > > > > > > > ur

> > > > > > > > > > > > part

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > is

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to chant the mantra. when the mantra

> has

> > to

> > > > > > awaken,

> > > > > > > it

> > > > > > > > > > will be,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > god

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > will ensure it for u.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sometimes we try to become more

> > intelligent

> > > > > with

> > > > > > out

> > > > > > > > > > limited

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > intellect and that creates obstacles

in

> > our

> > > > > > > spiritual

> > > > > > > > > > growth.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So, forget about counts, forget about

> the

> > > > time

> > > > > u

> > > > > > > put

> > > > > > > > in

> > > > > > > > > > for ur's

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sadhana, invoke the god with pure

> heart.

> > > > purity

> > > > > > > > counts.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Lalit.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology@ .

com

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology%

40.

> > > > > > > > > > com>, " dakshinastrologer "

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <dakshinastrologer@ ...> wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Ms. Jayashree:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think this topic on 108 is

getting

> > very

> > > > > > > > interesting

> > > > > > > > > > and

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > enlightening for all members.

> Yesterday

> > > we

> > > > > had a

> > > > > > > > > > wonderful

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > esoteric

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > explanation from Shri. Sushil

> Dikshit,

> > > and

> > > > > > today

> > > > > > > > your

> > > > > > > > > > > > wonderful

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > explanation of numerical symmetry

of

> > the

> > > > > cosmos!

> > > > > > > > > > Wonderful.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There definitely exists

a " numerical

> > > > > symphony "

> > > > > > in

> > > > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > > > > Universe.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > not only 108.....as I mentioned in

my

> > > > earlier

> > > > > > > post,

> > > > > > > > > > there are

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > various

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > other numerals that are significant

> in

> > > > occult

> > > > > > > > > > practices. 108

> > > > > > > > > > > > is

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > a

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > powerful and all-purpose perfect

> > > > > number...While

> > > > > > > we

> > > > > > > > have

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > understood

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the glory of 108, we should not

lose

> > > sight

> > > > of

> > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > fact

> > > > > > > > > > that

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > there

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > are

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > other powerful numbers also. This

is

> > just

> > > > for

> > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > > information

> > > > > > > > > > > > of

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > list.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > My apprecitation again for this

> > wonderful

> > > > > > > response.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Blessed be.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pandit R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Blessed be.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pandit R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI. --- In

> vedic-

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > astrology@grou ps.com

> > > > <astrology%

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > 40. com>,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " jayasartn " <jayasartn@> wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In cosmology, 108 has this

> > > significance -

> > > > > the

> > > > > > > > moon is

> > > > > > > > > > away

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > from

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > earth 108 times its (moon's)

> diameter

> > > and

> > > > > the

> > > > > > > sun

> > > > > > > > is

> > > > > > > > > > away

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > from the

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > earth, 108 times its diameter.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Perhaps this reality of distances

> is

> > > > > > applicable

> > > > > > > to

> > > > > > > > > > deities

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > too.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Perhaps this has been indicated

by

> > the

> > > > 108

> > > > > > divya

> > > > > > > > > > desas of

> > > > > > > > > > > > Lord

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Narayana.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > jayasree

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology@

> .

> > com

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology%

40.

> > > > > > > > > > com>, " dakshinastrologer "

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <dakshinastrologer@ > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Shri. Sushil:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It is a wonderful answer you

have

> > > given.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Blessed be.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pandit R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology@

> > .

> > > com

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology%

40.

> > > > > > > > > > com>, " sushil.dikshit "

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <sushil.dikshit@ > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Babu,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It is not a silly question

but

> it

> > > is

> > > > a

> > > > > > very

> > > > > > > > good

> > > > > > > > > > > > question.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Actually

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > there are 27 Nakshatras and

> every

> > > > > > Nakshtras

> > > > > > > > has 4

> > > > > > > > > > Charan

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > so

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > total

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > charans are 27 x 4 = 108

> Charan.

> > > Each

> > > > > > > Charan

> > > > > > > > has 3

> > > > > > > > > > > > degree

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > and

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 20

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > minutes so if you multiply 3

> > degree

> > > > and

> > > > > 20

> > > > > > > > > > minutes to

> > > > > > > > > > > > 108

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > it

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > comes

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > out to be 360 degress i.e.

one

> > > cycle

> > > > > > > (Circle).

> > > > > > > > > > This

> > > > > > > > > > > > cycle

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > represetns

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > whole brahmand because all

the

> > > > rashis,

> > > > > > > > planets and

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > nakshatra

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > are

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > between these 360 degree in 2

> > > > > dimensional

> > > > > > > > > > horoscope. So

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > chanting a

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mantra completes one cycle of

> > this

> > > > > > brahmand.

> > > > > > > > > > Further One

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > who

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > has

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > visited Brahamand at least

one

> > time

> > > > > i.e.

> > > > > > he

> > > > > > > is

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > brahmagyani he

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > is

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > entitiled to place 108 Shri

> > before

> > > > his

> > > > > > name.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sushil dikshit

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology@

> > > .

> > > > com

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology%

> 40.

> > > > com>,

> > > > > > babu

> > > > > > > > mon

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <muthappan111@ >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Namaste,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It may be a silly matter

for

> > all

> > > of

> > > > > you.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I want to know what is the

> > reason

> > > > > that

> > > > > > > some

> > > > > > > > > > remedies

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > recomended

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > for 108 times.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I dont know any thing about

> > > > astrology.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I hope you may pleased to

> > provide

> > > a

> > > > > > reply

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thanks,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Babu

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------ --------- -----

--

> --

> > -

> > > --

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Be a better Globetrotter.

Get

> > > > better

> > > > > > > travel

> > > > > > > > > > answers

> > > > > > > > > > > > from

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someone

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > who knows.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Answers - Check it

out.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this

> > > message

> > > > > have

> > > > > > > been

> > > > > > > > > > removed]

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have

> > been

> > > > > > removed]

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have

> > been

> > > > > > removed]

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have

> been

> > > > > removed]

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have

been

> > > > removed]

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been

> > removed]

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been

removed]

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > >

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Oye Lalith:

 

How do you know Mohanraaamji is not enlightened? Do you know

onething....it is not merely that Mohanraaamji respects

Panditji....Panditji himself respects Mohanraaamji for his yogic

accomplishments. You compare Mohanraaamji with your childhood....You

are a peanut brain who thinks the small portions of sanskrit that

your school portion gave you are magnum opuses! This is typical of

small brains like you. Mohanraaamji is a mantra saamraat......by the

way, what happened to your challenge about the court case against

Mohanraaamji? You should have put a case and then you would have

known who he is! He has effected some rare miracles which you won't

manifest even after 100 years of japams.

 

If Shaarada Maa indeed blessed you, where is your insight.

Mohanraaamji said something about you without seeing you.....Like

Priyaa and preeti....You say about Mohanraaamji's wife if possible.

Panditji knows the information and he can be the judge as to whether

you are correct in your predictions! You - who claim that you know

everything and have the Grace of Maa, get at this simple truth if you

can!

 

Siddhis by themselves do not mean anything great. That is why

Mohanraaamji respects Guruji who does not manifest any occult

powers. Try to understand that. It is the attitude that counts, and

it is that which you are lacking.

 

Don't try to act smart. Try to spend time more on your projects lest

you fail in this also just as you failed in your business, and in

Priya's case! If your money is also not there, nobody will even look

at you twice. Only money and that job are allowing to speak

haughtily like this. At least save that by being conscientious at

work. Did Shaarada Maa ask you to pilfer company's resources and type

endless quarrelsome mails to respected mantra shaastra experts? If

your Maa said so, probably it is not the Gracious Maa who guides us

all, but the ghost that is afflicting your family due to your sins!

 

You are a mere software engineer who gets shouted at by your

reporting officers often; everyone at your place of work is laughing

behind you, and you know that. That is why you are taking out your

frustration on us in this forum. Can you speak one word back at your

reporting managers at work? Whereas Mohanraaamji was a respected

Military officer in his professional days and even his seniors

respected him for his intelligence and sharpness. He is not an

imbecile old man, but a great yogi. Ask Panditji whether Mohanraaamji

is capable of miracles or not? Panditji has personal experience in

that regard. But, only Panditji stopped Mohanraaamji from using

miraculous powers as they might be bad for the evolution of soul and

mantrik power should not be wasted in empty displays. If Panditji

had not stopped Mohanraaamji, you would have paid seriously for your

insulting mails last week. Thank Panditji that you are still o.k.,

because only his words in a private mail to Mohanraaamji saved you

(Incidentally, even Panditji has not seen Mohanraaamji in person;

only I have seen him. This is just for your information. Search all

through the web, you will not find any BUSINESS information on

Mohanraaamji. What do we gain by manipulation or anything? At least

you are a frustrated person who could not get married and all girls

are rejecting you, and so for psychological comfort you are writing

posts here. But, we are old men who have lived happy and contented

lives, and have no material interests to satisfy here)

 

I DARE YOU UPON ONE COUNT...PANDITJI LEFT WELL-PAYING MNC JOB TO

PURSUE ASTROLOGY AND SPIRITUALITY FULL TIME......CAN YOU DO THAT?

PANDITJI FELT THIS IS HIS MISSION....CAN YOU DO THAT? It is easy to

speak of great philosphies from the comfort of an Airconditioned

Office at the cost of others. Obviously that comfort matters to you

more, and you feel that is the blessing of shaarada Maa. No young

man....Wisdom is the real Gift of Divinities. You will not be so

confused if you have really seen Divine Manifestations before you.

The incidents you have narrated are no so great as you think. Do

more tapasya and you will know what real manifestation will be like!

You are under illusions. Please get yourself treated. Please don't

keep sleeping with Rahu, and Sani. Try to get the Grace of Guru!

 

Ram Jaswal did not get the context of my utterings clearly and hence

wrote to me. If you were decent, you should have stopped referring

to me or Mohanraaamji; then we also would have stopped. You started

it, you must end this.

 

If you keep making patronising comments like this, you will

definitely get answers like this from me. I WILL NOT STOP TILL YOU

STOP.

 

Abhishek

 

vedic astrology , " litsol " <mishra.lalit

wrote:

>

> Res. Ram ji,

>

> Pls. dont advice him or mohan raam, they have nothing to debate or

> discuss on either mantra or bhakti.

>

> I don't remember shlokas much as i read classics for my

satisfaction,

> in two phases, firstly from my class 8'th till my 2nd year of

> graduation. that time i had no faith and no bhakti, just read like

i

> was reading some comics or cartoon books, i had not developed

ideas,

> not taken any message, i knew and i can talk about the content, but

i

> was not involved.

>

> after that incident happened at Sharda Temple,Maihar,it was

> unbelievable and it made me change my thoughts, i again read some

> classics and this time,i grasped the message given in the classics.

>

> They are at the stage of my chlidhood, they may read and discuss.

but

> dont take the message in their heart, somewhere their greed to

> establish themselves as pandit or authority is also a reason.

>

> Perhapse, in lieu of, hitting them hard, i had to take another rout

> to let them realize they are wrong and deliberately wrong.

>

> He didnt say any thing on my how i shown, beej and god's name is

one

> and same thing, in fact it's a simple thnig, and well known but

they

> dont accept.

>

> let them dont accept, what difference it makes to us, they have

their

> life with them, any qualitative change within them will do good to

> them only.

>

> So, i prayed maa, mother divine for mohan raam, he is too old, his

> problem is he learnt astrology, did some breathing excercises, but

he

> lacks spiritual experiences so he doesn't believe, I was like him

in

> my childhood.

>

> I prayed, and it's acknowledged by maa, time will change for him a

> little, what didn't happen to him in last 85 yrs, will happen in

next

> 5-6 monnths, he will get some good spritiual experience, the

curtain

> will be lifted for some time, reality at a glance.

>

> after that it's his part to stick to that or not, coz, ego, greed

and

> fear still remains, i m not completely gone out of it, i have to

> fight with me many times.

>

> I thought gruop w'd be a good plateform to get like minded friends,

> if nothnig, it gives joy.

>

> Let's wish good for all, I also express my gratitude to you to

speak

> for what u thought right.

>

> regards,

> Lalit.

>

vedic astrology , " Ram Jaswal " <rkjaswal@>

> wrote:

> >

> > Namaste Abhishek

> >

> > My post wasn't so much in defense of Lalith but one to stop

> the " belittling "

> > of a person within this Group. If you don't agree with someone's

> views you

> > are perfectly within your rights to say so why in a scholarly

> fashion so as

> > to discuss and further the merits of the topic under discussion.

> Thereafter

> > it is a matter for the individual to either continue with the on-

> going

> > discussion or to stop? The only way you or anyone else is likely

to

> change

> > Lalith's view on chanting of Mantras will be from a scholarly

> viewpoint and

> > not from goading him?

> >

> > Also why are you taking personal offense? If Guru's can ignore

his

> comments

> > - can't you do the same?

> >

> > With freedom of speech comes the responsibility of keeping a

civil

> and

> > polite language - please re-read your note which prompted my

earlier

> > response.

> >

> > Like I said in my earlier post it is all about ones viewpoints -

my

> personal

> > advise to everyone would be to take what you find reasonable and

> ignore the

> > rest.

> >

> > Best wishes ..

> >

> > Jai Sita Ram

> >

> > Ram

> > _____

> >

> > vedic astrology

> > [vedic astrology ] On Behalf Of

abhishekpotti

> > 28 July 2007 20:42

> > vedic astrology

> > [vedic astrology] Re: Oye Lalith! No one here is afraid

of

> you....

> >

> > Dear Ram Jaswal:

> >

> > If Lalith stops challenging others with his rude posts no one

will

> > run him down...please follow the threads carefully......He is

> > speaking as if he is the master of everything and everybody else

is

> a

> > fool. When he passes judgment on senior astrologers of this group

> or

> > unnecessarily challenges established conventions, we have

defended

> > that. Now, why are you defending Lalith? Don't you think if you

> > have the right to defend an offender, we have the right to defend

> the

> > more decent members and traditions that he is subtly attacking....

> >

> > just read his posts.....If he has just forwarded the Prashna

> Tantra,

> > nobody would have objected to it.....See the accompanying

comments

> > where he abrasively comments certain things......

> >

> > Open your eyes before advicing anyone. Why don't you write to

> Lalith

> > also? When did I call him names?......No sir...you are

mistaken....

> >

> > Did you not notice that even after Mohanraamji stopped writing

> posts,

> > this fellow was taunting that old gentleman repeatedly last week.

> > Where were you at that time?

> >

> > If Lalith stops writing abrasive posts like " Nobody can stand

> before

> > me " and all that silly nonsense, we have no issues with him (or

at

> > least I have no issues with him). So, advice Lalith also in this

> > regard.

> >

> > If Lalith and you enjoy freedom of speech, we also claim the same

> > previlege.

> >

> > Abhishek.

> >

> > vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology%40>

> > , " Ram Jaswal " <rkjaswal@>

> > wrote:

> > >

> > > Namaste Abhishek/ Mohanraaam

> > >

> > > Just why are you trying to run Lalith down? From the posts that

I

> > have read

> > > All he has done is given this point of view - if you don't

accept

> > them than

> > > simply ignore it - there is No need for any name calling or

> > belittling

> > > someone.

> > >

> > > There is also nothing wrong in Lalith forwarding " Prashna

Tantra "

> > text to

> > > this group as to whether someone has requested it or not - he

> > certainly

> > > doesn't need your or mine permission to do so - after all he

> > thought it

> > > would be useful to everyone - again his view.

> > >

> > > Sorry if I am coming across annoyed and perhaps rude But feel

it

> is

> > Best

> > > that everyone should stop " belittling " other group members as

in

> > the long

> > > run all it does is make oneself appear small and bigoted.

> > >

> > > Best wishes and hoping this will be the last mail on this

> subject ..

> > >

> > > Jai Sita Ram

> > >

> > > Ram

> > >

> > > _____

> > >

> > > vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology%

40>

> >

> > > [vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology%

> 40>

> > ] On Behalf Of abhishekpotti

> > > 28 July 2007 19:54

> > > vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology%40>

> >

> > > [vedic astrology] Oye Lalith! No one here is afraid of

> > you....

> > >

> > > Dear Lalith:

> > >

> > > The whole world knows the history of Blessed Meera Bhai....the

> > > epitome of Bhakti......She was attached to her " Lala " - the

> > wonderful

> > > idol of Krishna gifted to her even from her childhood....Do you

> > mean

> > > to say that innocent young girl started chanting " Kliim

> krishnaaya "

> > > mantra automatically? Even Bhakta Prahlaada had to be initiated

> by

> > > Sage Naaradha for his chant of dwaadasaakshari mantra....

> > >

> > > Nobody is afraid of you here......You need not proclaim that

you

> > are

> > > not in the business of a Guru.....actually Guru status is not a

> > > business (true to your half-baked knowledge you will claim it

is

> > also

> > > like software engineering!). The difference my friend between

you

> > > and other great persons like Rafal or Dakshinamoorthiji is that

> > they

> > > are spending their money for the internet, whereas you are

> > pilfering

> > > your company's time and the company's resources while browsing

> the

> > > internet. Don't you think you are cheating your company when

you

> > > spend so much time on empty and egoistic posts defending

yourself

> > > against every expert after arguing with them unnecessarily? Are

> you

> > > not getting paid for the time you spend in the company....Know

> the

> > > basics of ethics before ever sermonizing.....So, actually you

are

> > an

> > > exploiter....try to understand that....the other gurujis are

> > probably

> > > too decent to comment on that......What happened to your

project?

> > > Better rush to it nough!....It will spare us the agony of

> replying

> > to

> > > your half-witted postings!

> > >

> > > By the say, Which member asked you Prashna Tantra dear? We did

> not

> > > see any posts requesting " Honourable Lalith " to explain Prashna

> > > Tantra (as if you could explain it!) What arrogance you have to

> > > claim that nobody can stand before you.....Guruji's posts

exposed

> > > your ignorance....you did not even know how to ask queries and

> get

> > > replies from one of the most empathetic astrologers of this

> group,

> > > and yet you claim you are this and that......

> > >

> > > For your information....nobody is afraid of you..Rather you

> should

> > be

> > > afraid of yourself......Your foolishness itself will be your

> doom.

> > > Did you not become the laughing stock due to your email-based

> > chasing

> > > of Priyaa? Such foolishness in occult matters could be more

> costly

> > > dear.....I think Mohanraaamji and Rafalji are only afraid about

> > your

> > > own well-being! They are not afraid of you. Nor am I afraid of

> you.

> > >

> > > Your posts never answer the queries or points raised by others;

> you

> > > take off on a new ground only because of your shallow

> understanding

> > > of subjects. Nobody has accepted you as a Guru here, and nobody

> > > will....Can a fire-fly eclipse the Sun? There are too

many " Suns "

> > > here and you are just a fire-fly.

> > >

> > > It reminds me of a story.....Once an ant challenged the mighty

> > > elephant for a fight; the elephant obviously could not hear the

> ant

> > > (the ant being so tiny and it was on the ground, its sound

could

> > not

> > > reach the elephant). The elephant just walked away out of its

own

> > > volition in its natural course. Then the ant claimed, " you see

I

> > > challenged the elephant and it ran away " . Dear, your saying

that

> > > nobody can stand before you is similar to that.......

> > >

> > > FIRST LEARN THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN GHOSTS AND YOUR ANCESTOR

> > > SUMANGALIS BEFORE WRITING THE FIRST POSTS ON OCCULT! What a

> > > pity......what a pity.....That we have to bear your meaningless

> > > rantings here!

> > >

> > > Abhishek.

> > >

> > > vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology%

40>

> > > , " litsol " <mishra.lalit@>

> > > wrote:

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > I was waiting for u dear..

> > > >

> > > > why u took time ?

> > > >

> > > > Do u mean Meera Bai discussed with u, what she did..

> > > >

> > > > Do u know 'Kleem Krishnay, Govindaya Gopijan Vallabhaya Namh'

> is

> > a

> > > > mantra for lord krishna.

> > > >

> > > > is there no beej mantras, to whom u wish to misguide ? let

> thnigs

> > > > remain between lord, bhakta , their shraddha and their guru.

> > > >

> > > > why u people are so afraid of me, i m not in business of guru.

> > > >

> > > > i m happy with my life, my profession of software engineering

> and

> > > > my hobbies ok.

> > > >

> > > > there are 7000+ members are here, by writing such type of

> foolish

> > > > things u expose urself only, mind, there are better brains

here.

> > > >

> > > > this is enough ...

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology%

> 40>

> > > ,

> > > > " abhishekpotti " <abhishekpotti@> wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > Respected Mohanraaamji:

> > > > >

> > > > > Well said. Lalith is saying that " maybe in south india

> devotees

> > > > > don't chant Moola mantras but not so in North " ...What

> > > > > stupidity.....He does not seem to understand that " mantra

> > > shaastra

> > > > > experts " are also devotees, but they cannot be called as

> > innocent

> > > > > saatwik bhaktaas! A typical example of a pure saadhwik

bhakta

> > > will

> > > > > be Meera Bhai (was she not North Indian). Can Lalith say

> which

> > > > Dasa

> > > > > Mahaa Vidya Meera Bhai practised? She was immersed in

Krishna

> > > > > consciousness and Lover for Him. Her own Bhajans were her

> > > prayers

> > > > in

> > > > > the bhaavana of Bhakti in the form of Love! This is not

> mantra

> > > > > shaastra. Another example will be Saant Tukhaaraam. These

> > > > bhaktaas

> > > > > did not chant moola mantraas. Panditji Dakshinamoorthi was

on

> > > dot

> > > > in

> > > > > saying that " Pure bhaktaas do not chant complicated moola

> > > > mantraas " .

> > > > > You have clarified this fact wonderfully in your post. I

wish

> > > more

> > > > > knowledgeable persons also put erratic posters in their

place

> > > just

> > > > as

> > > > > Mohanraaamji does here. This will benefit more naive

readers

> of

> > > > > these forums who might otherwise get confused as to which

of

> > the

> > > > > paths to follow. Actually, anyone can follow any path as

he/

> > she

> > > > > deems it fit; but there should be consistency of procedures.

> > > > >

> > > > > We should not confuse mantrik rituals and bhakti doctrines.

> > > > Bhaktaas

> > > > > can chant the names of Gods at anytime.....Mantra shaastra

> > > experts

> > > > > chanting advanced moola mantras should necessarily adopt

> ritual

> > > > > procedures for the welfare of themselves and others!

> > > > Yes...improper

> > > > > chanting of mantras can cause danger to the society also

just

> > as

> > > > > proper chanting can help others. Hence, this cannot be

> > > considered

> > > > as

> > > > > a personal preference of the aspirant. If this was not the

> > case,

> > > > why

> > > > > did sages codify spiritual practises scrupulously? Rafalji,

> > > > > Mohanraaamji, etc. are correct in saying it is best to

follow

> > > > Pandit

> > > > > Dakshinamoorthiji's advices on mantra shastra or japams. He

> is

> > > > > learned and he is living a life compatible to the shaastras

> > > though

> > > > he

> > > > > has faced uncertain circumstances in his own personal life.

> He

> > > > never

> > > > > compromised on principles and he willingly paid the price

for

> > > that

> > > > > which most of us will never do. The words of such a person

> > > should

> > > > > obviously carry more weight.

> > > > >

> > > > > Abhishek.

> > > > >

> > > > > vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology%

> > 40>

> > > , " mohanraaam "

> > > <mohanraaam@>

> > > > > wrote:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Well Lalith:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > If you have really done dasa Maha Vidyaa, you would have

> > never

> > > > > > approached a professional astrologer for

> consultation...that

> > > much

> > > > I

> > > > > > can say....

> > > > > >

> > > > > > And what idiocy when you say Panditji is partly wrong? He

> > > > > > said " Bhaktaas do not chant Moola mantras " , whereas you

> have

> > > > edited

> > > > > > the words to suit your ends....He never said " devotees

> don't

> > > > chant

> > > > > > Beej mantras " .....You are putting words into his mouth

and

> > > > assuming

> > > > > > he is wrong! Why, do you know....the Great Panditji

himself

> > > > chants

> > > > > > Moola mantras.....He is a bhakta and a mantra shastra

> expert.

> > > As

> > > > a

> > > > > > bhakta he keeps incessant chanting of naama japa

throughout

> > the

> > > > > day;

> > > > > > as a mantra shastra expert, he restricts the moola mantra

> > > japams

> > > > to

> > > > > > stipulated times with ritual purity.....It is this

> wonderful

> > > > > practice

> > > > > > that Guruji was alluding to. Guruji cannot be wrong in

> ritual

> > > > and

> > > > > > occult matters. Please understand that.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > There are 4 classes of Devotees.......1) Saatwik vedic

> > devotees

> > > > who

> > > > > > will follow vedic dharma scrupulously. They will not dare

> to

> > > > > compare

> > > > > > astrology and vedanga to Engineering! as you did...

> > > > > > 2) Raajasik devotees who will follow vedic disciplines as

> far

> > > as

> > > > > > possible, but will still go after upaasanaas of Demi-Gods

> for

> > > > > > accomplishment of siddhis. Mantra shaastra experts

usually

> > > fall

> > > > in

> > > > > > this category.

> > > > > > 3) Saatwik Bhaktaas - for whom the meditation and glory

of

> > > their

> > > > > > Ishta Devataa is enough for spiritual satisfaction. It is

> > this

> > > > > > category that Guruji referred to when he said they will

not

> > > chant

> > > > > > Moola mantras too much. Definitely they will not do Dasa

> > Mahaa

> > > > > > Vidyaa.

> > > > > > 4) Taamasic Devotees - Those whose main motive is to

> project

> > > > > > themselves at all costs and acting as if they are equal

to

> > the

> > > > > > experts; they will try ALL practices - whether they are

> > > > sanctioned

> > > > > by

> > > > > > vedas or not.....Their only aim is personal glory and

> > > > > satisfaction.

> > > > > > They will attack even established dharma if they do not

get

> > > > results

> > > > > > (sounds familiar....You are one!) Ignorance and half-

baked

> > > > > knowledge

> > > > > > and egotism are these persons' motivating fuel.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > You are really satan's Gift to this list.......My only

> prayer

> > > is

> > > > > that

> > > > > > innocent members of this list do not get side-tracked

with

> > your

> > > > > > ramblings.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Let me make this clear to the list.....Panditji said that

> > > saatwik

> > > > > > Bhaktaas who chant Divine names only due to Pure Love on

> God

> > > > > usually

> > > > > > never chant mantrik moola mantraas. It is just one class

of

> > > > > > devotees. A rajasik bhakta who is a mantra-shaastra

expert

> > may

> > > > > even

> > > > > > be a bhakta at heart; and a pure bhakta may sometimes

chant

> > > some

> > > > > > mantrik japams for solving some practical

issues......But,

> > when

> > > > > they

> > > > > > switch their routines temporarily, these enlightened

> devotees

> > > > > usually

> > > > > > take good guidance and follow the tenets of shaastras

> > > > > > scrupulously....Definitely they will not sit on

assumption

> > like

> > > > > > Lalith.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > On the one hand, this fellow claims he has done chants in

> > > > forests,

> > > > > > rivers, earth, etc. (Probably we have a Maharishi here!

> What

> > > > > heights

> > > > > > of pointless pride in this young man list....it is

> > > disgusting!).

> > > > > On

> > > > > > the other hand, he says he chants mantras in buses,

trains,

> > > > > etc......

> > > > > > He is confused about which no body can have issues. Only

> his

> > > > Guru

> > > > > > should be concerned about that.....But, his attempts to

> stuff

> > > his

> > > > > > shallow understanding upon this list is reprehensible.

And,

> > > his

> > > > > > habit of quoting experts out of context is really

> > condemnable.

> > > > May

> > > > > > Jupiter's Light Shine on that fellow and teach him to

> respect

> > > the

> > > > > > hallowed traditions and to stay at his level rather than

> > trying

> > > > > > to " teach " others (He has the audacity to claim he

> > > is " teaching "

> > > > > > Rafalji!)

> > > > > >

> > > > > > If a mere young man of 35 years who has spent his life on

a

> > > > " Failed

> > > > > > computer web desining business " , " pointless email chasing

> of

> > > > > girls " ,

> > > > > > and other " past times " can gain insight as he claims, how

> > much

> > > > will

> > > > > > learned Gurus of this group with their life of devotion

to

> > > > vedanta

> > > > > > and vedanga know? His peanut brain and hyper-inflated ego

> > will

> > > > > never

> > > > > > allow him to see this obvious truth. But, please list

> > exercise

> > > > > your

> > > > > > discretion while reading his posts (There are doubtless

> some

> > > good

> > > > > > elements even in his posts; but mostly there is trash

> > presented

> > > > as

> > > > > > philosophy).

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Mohanraaam

> > > > > >

> > > > > > vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology%

> > 40>

> > > , " litsol "

> > > <mishra.lalit@>

> > > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Dear Rafal,

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Do u think, a hobby means shallow knowledge of the

> domain,

> > No

> > > > > > rafal,

> > > > > > > it's not like that.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > At least not for me. You have learnt and i m learning,

i

> > read

> > > > > ur's

> > > > > > > replies and get benifitted, same way i wanted you to

pay

> > > heed

> > > > to

> > > > > > > what i have written about spritiuality, mostrly i did

> write

> > > for

> > > > u

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > I have done all 10 mahavidyas of tantra and read many

> > tantrik

> > > > > > > classics, spent good deal of time with great tantriks

> > > trained

> > > > in

> > > > > > > Kamakhya and other places, keenly observed their

doings,

> > > their

> > > > > > > mistakes etc.., I did tremendous mantra chanting on

> water,

> > > on

> > > > > > earth,

> > > > > > > at home, in forests etc...

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > then reached here, then i did write something, but

sorry

> i

> > > dont

> > > > > > > remember shlokas. i was not interested in cramming that.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Panditji is not fully correct in saying that

BeejMantras

> > are

> > > > not

> > > > > > > chanted by devotees, I dont know much about South India

> but

> > > in

> > > > > > North

> > > > > > > normally its done.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > And a successfull mantra sadhana has to result in one's

> > being

> > > a

> > > > > > > devotee, the devotion is the outcome, final result of

> > mantra

> > > > > > sadhana,

> > > > > > > perhaps, Pandit Ji believes mantras are power

> > packet,thinks,

> > > i

> > > > do

> > > > > > it

> > > > > > > this way , these many times and get this result, this

is

> > > where

> > > > > most

> > > > > > > of the people are confused. without being a good human

> > being

> > > if

> > > > > we

> > > > > > > think, we will achieve something in spirituality, is

> > > difficult,

> > > > > > very

> > > > > > > difficult.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > what happens is, with the mantra chanting, a self

> > > > > transformation

> > > > > > > process begins, u if dont restrict urself, ur karma

> begins

> > > > > > diluting,

> > > > > > > and u begin ur purification process unknowingly, when

> > > > substantial

> > > > > > > part of ego and greed for respect vanishes and many

such

> > > thing

> > > > > > > togather, mantra awakens u and with the God's grace ur

> > > > objective

> > > > > > gets

> > > > > > > fullfilled, gradually u become a devotee. ur being

simple

> > and

> > > > > being

> > > > > > > devotee is sometimes is indication of ur's going on the

> > right

> > > > > track.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > I think we have discussed a lot, it's enough !!

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > My Boss has given me lot of projects to complete, so,

may

> > be,

> > > i

> > > > m

> > > > > > not

> > > > > > > going to available in the group like i was recently.

> > however.

> > > i

> > > > > > will

> > > > > > > complete Garg Hora series.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > regards,

> > > > > > > Lalit.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology%

> > 40>

> > > , Rafal Gendarz

> > > > > > > <starsuponme@> wrote:

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya*

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Dear Litsol,

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Then please dont generalize Your preferences as they

> are

> > > too

> > > > > > > shallow for

> > > > > > > > this Forum aspiration.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Regards,

> > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz

> > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru

> > > > > > > > email: rafal@

> > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa.com

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > litsol napisa?(a):

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > Dear Rafel,

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > I take Astrology as a good hobby, and i w'd be

> looking

> > at

> > > > it

> > > > > > with

> > > > > > > an

> > > > > > > > > engineer's approach.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > I asked ur age because, it's our thinking to put

our

> > > > > parameters

> > > > > > in

> > > > > > > > > god's system, there is nothing like delay or

> > advancement

> > > in

> > > > > > > > > spirituality. So, " Delay "

or " Speed " , " backwardness "

> > > > > > > > > and " advancement " doesn't exist in spirituality, I

> > > thought

> > > > if

> > > > > u

> > > > > > r

> > > > > > > > > thinking that it may take too much time, I wanted

to

> > tell

> > > > u,

> > > > > > it's

> > > > > > > not

> > > > > > > > > like that. there is no delay.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > It clicks in fraction of a second, when u r getting

> > > clicked

> > > > > > > depends

> > > > > > > > > on u and on god's will, when he wants u to get

> clicked.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > God sometimes graces for no reason ( " Ahetuka " ) just

> for

> > > his

> > > > > > > > > compassion towards u and it may happen next minute

> too.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > spirituality is not delimited by time , effort and

> > rules.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > regards,

> > > > > > > > > Lalit.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > vedic astrology

> > > > > > > > > <vedic astrology%40>, Rafal

> > Gendarz

> > > > > > > > > <starsuponme@ ...> wrote:

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya*

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > Dear Litsol,

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > Please be careful about words.

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > Im happy that You are sharing Your experience -

> very

> > > > > > inspirating

> > > > > > > > > ones.

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > Age hierarchy is for sudras - Manu Samhita. If

You

> > > treat

> > > > > > Jyotish

> > > > > > > > > Vedanga

> > > > > > > > > > as profession similar to engineering You have a

> long

> > > way

> > > > to

> > > > > > go.

> > > > > > > But

> > > > > > > > > dont

> > > > > > > > > > be pessimistic here are many who will try to help

> You

> > > in

> > > > > > getting

> > > > > > > > > proper

> > > > > > > > > > understanding.

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > After some time You will agree with me about the

> mala

> > > and

> > > > > > japa.

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > Regards,

> > > > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz

> > > > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru

> > > > > > > > > > email: rafal@

> > > > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > litsol napisa?(a):

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > Dear Rafal,

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > Here u r doing two wrong things, instead of

> > > developing

> > > > ur

> > > > > > > > > understanding,

> > > > > > > > > > > u r trying to conclude something and going

beyond

> > > that

> > > > u r

> > > > > > > > > messaging

> > > > > > > > > > > same to many.

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > I m touching 35, What's ur age ?

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > Astrology is a kind of vidya or profession,

like

> i

> > m

> > > a

> > > > > > > software

> > > > > > > > > > > engineer, software engineering is my

profession.

> > > > > > spirituality

> > > > > > > is

> > > > > > > > > beyond

> > > > > > > > > > > all sort of vidya or profession.

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > I wish u to be a good soul and to realize the

> bliss

> > > of

> > > > > self

> > > > > > > > > awakening or

> > > > > > > > > > > in other terms, the bliss that comes once u

feel

> u

> > > and

> > > > > god

> > > > > > is

> > > > > > > > > > > connected. dissolved in each other.

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > First realize, experience, then speak and then

> > > suggest

> > > > to

> > > > > > > others,

> > > > > > > > > by

> > > > > > > > > > > mere reading shastras or books u r not going to

> > feel

> > > > it.

> > > > > > > unless

> > > > > > > > > god

> > > > > > > > > > > graces u it's very very difficult. and if u

dont

> > > avoid

> > > > > this

> > > > > > > sort

> > > > > > > > > of

> > > > > > > > > > > hurriedness instead of learning and

> understanding,

> > it

> > > > > will

> > > > > > > affect

> > > > > > > > > u only

> > > > > > > > > > > no one else.

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > somehere i have read, it was written - By mere

> > > > > > repeating " So-

> > > > > > > > > Aham " no

> > > > > > > > > > > one gets liberated unless he realizes it like

one

> > > > doesnt

> > > > > get

> > > > > > > > > cured by

> > > > > > > > > > > knowing the name of the medicine, u need to

take

> > the

> > > > > > medicine

> > > > > > > to

> > > > > > > > > get

> > > > > > > > > > > cured " .

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > So, pls. be wise, as it was being discussed

here,

> i

> > > > > shared

> > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > > > experience of my life, pls. mind it, i m not a

> > > > preecher,

> > > > > > nor a

> > > > > > > > > guru, nor

> > > > > > > > > > > i have to make my followers, nor it's my

> > profession,

> > > > nor

> > > > > i

> > > > > > > have

> > > > > > > > > to get

> > > > > > > > > > > fame, sharing things is a kind of friendliness

a

> > kind

> > > of

> > > > > > > > > affection,

> > > > > > > > > > > that's it.

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > Lalit.

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology

> > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. com>,

> > Rafal

> > > > > Gendarz

> > > > > > > > > > > <starsuponme@ ...>

> > > > > > > > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya*

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Jyotishas

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > Counting of mala has more depth sense than

just

> > > > > counting,

> > > > > > > so for

> > > > > > > > > > > natives

> > > > > > > > > > > > like Litsol counting is neccessary and any

> other

> > > > > > speculation

> > > > > > > > > will be

> > > > > > > > > > > > only illusory and just imagination. We should

> > > follow

> > > > Pt.

> > > > > > > > > > > Dakshinamoorti

> > > > > > > > > > > > advise strictly, otherwise our process of

> > spiritual

> > > > > > > development

> > > > > > > > > will

> > > > > > > > > > > be

> > > > > > > > > > > > slow and unauthoritative.

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > Regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz

> > > > > > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru

> > > > > > > > > > > > email: rafal@

> > > > > > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > asmp2k02@ napisa?(a):

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Resp Sri Lalitji,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for your mail.But please also read

> > > > > > > GuruDakshinamurthyi

> > > > > > > > > ji's

> > > > > > > > > > > > > mail(addressing me) also on this,which

brings

> > in

> > > > more

> > > > > > > clarity

> > > > > > > > > to the

> > > > > > > > > > > > > applicability principles to my mail.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > I meant that both are necessity but to what

> > > degree

> > > > of

> > > > > > time

> > > > > > > (it

> > > > > > > > > varies

> > > > > > > > > > > > > from saadhaka to saadhaka) to get such

> inbuilt

> > > > > maturity

> > > > > > > such

> > > > > > > > > that

> > > > > > > > > > > that

> > > > > > > > > > > > > the count will be taken care of by Divine

> > forces

> > > > > after

> > > > > > > some

> > > > > > > > > initial

> > > > > > > > > > > > > period of saadhana.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Morover the type of bio matter present in

the

> > > japa

> > > > > maala

> > > > > > > > > (which is

> > > > > > > > > > > > > symbolic for ritualism as well as from

> > practical

> > > > > point

> > > > > > of

> > > > > > > > > view for

> > > > > > > > > > > our

> > > > > > > > > > > > > count) will help in keeping away

destructive

> > > forces

> > > > > > > acting on

> > > > > > > > > us

> > > > > > > > > > > .Thus

> > > > > > > > > > > > > the symbolic rituals will indirectly help

us

> in

> > > > > keeping

> > > > > > > away

> > > > > > > > > from

> > > > > > > > > > > > > negative thoughts and also trains our

memory

> to

> > > be

> > > > > > object

> > > > > > > > > > > oriented.If

> > > > > > > > > > > > > our memory grows and retentive capacity

> > increase

> > > > the

> > > > > > > Gnaana

> > > > > > > > > will

> > > > > > > > > > > > > increase ,but at the same time destructive

> > forces

> > > > > > > > > (diversions) also

> > > > > > > > > > > > > becomes powerful.Thus the symbolic

procedures

> > > will

> > > > > come

> > > > > > in

> > > > > > > > > handy to

> > > > > > > > > > > > > successfully fight the negative forces.The

> > > rituals

> > > > > may

> > > > > > be

> > > > > > > > > Rising

> > > > > > > > > > > > > early(if possible during Braahmi

> muhurta),Taking

> > > > > > > > > bath,Japaanusthaan,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > attending to the livelihood job etc etc in

> > > defined

> > > > > > times

> > > > > > > as

> > > > > > > > > > > discipline

> > > > > > > > > > > > > helps indirectly tune our memory through

> > keeping

> > > > our

> > > > > > body

> > > > > > > > > healthy.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Thus ultimately we conclude that the so

> called

> > > > > symbolic

> > > > > > > > > procedures

> > > > > > > > > > > are

> > > > > > > > > > > > > not actually symbolic(it got branded as

such)

> > but

> > > a

> > > > > > > necessity

> > > > > > > > > for

> > > > > > > > > > > our

> > > > > > > > > > > > > own good if we practice to the extent we

can.

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Quoting mishra.lalit@ ... <mishra.

> lalit%

> > > > > > 40gmail.

> > > > > > > com>:

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Resp. Sri Murthy Adavi,

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, what you said is perfectly right, we

> count

> > > or

> > > > > dont

> > > > > > > > > count,target

> > > > > > > > > > > > > is realization of god's love within, I got

it

> > > with

> > > > no

> > > > > > > > > counting,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > someone may get it with counting.

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanx, for the writing.

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Lalit.

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology

> > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. com>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40.

> com>,

> > > > > srinivasa

> > > > > > > > > murthy adavi

> > > > > > > > > > > > > asmp2k02@ wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Respected Learned Members,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Both views may be correct when the views

> > > have/or

> > > > > with

> > > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > goal as

> > > > > > > > > > > > > development of Love/Devotion towards

> adhistana

> > > > > Devatha

> > > > > > of

> > > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > Mantra

> > > > > > > > > > > > > as Base.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > In the initial stage only you need the

> > count;as

> > > > one

> > > > > > > > > develops the

> > > > > > > > > > > > > habit the biological tuning of the

> > intellect/body

> > > > will

> > > > > > > > > automatically

> > > > > > > > > > > > > take care of the practice(without count-

help

> of

> > > > malas

> > > > > > > etc).

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > It's like if with the help of Alarm clock

> if

> > we

> > > > > wake

> > > > > > up

> > > > > > > for

> > > > > > > > > 2 or 3

> > > > > > > > > > > > > days at some appointed hour,then

> automatically

> > we

> > > > > > wakeup

> > > > > > > at

> > > > > > > > > the same

> > > > > > > > > > > > > time every day without help of alarm.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > With due Respects

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > smadavi

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quoting starsuponme@ :

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya*

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Litsol,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Definitely we should count our Mantra

Japa

> on

> > > > Mala.

> > > > > > Your

> > > > > > > > > view is

> > > > > > > > > > > > > against

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Vedic Authorities and Sages, so should be

> > > > rejected.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > email: rafal@

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > litsol napisa?(a):

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Mr. Jayashri,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > A thought came, why i should not share

> with

> > > u,

> > > > U

> > > > > > pls.

> > > > > > > stop

> > > > > > > > > > > > > counting

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > mantra chantings, counting mantra gives

> > false

> > > > ego

> > > > > > and

> > > > > > > then

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > frustration if u dont get desired

results.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > leave it to the god, god counts the

> mantra

> > > > > chanted

> > > > > > by

> > > > > > > you

> > > > > > > > > may be

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 108, 1008 or whatsoever, let him count,

> > it's

> > > > his

> > > > > > part

> > > > > > > and

> > > > > > > > > ur

> > > > > > > > > > > part

> > > > > > > > > > > > > is

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to chant the mantra. when the mantra

has

> to

> > > > > awaken,

> > > > > > it

> > > > > > > > > will be,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > god

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > will ensure it for u.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sometimes we try to become more

> intelligent

> > > > with

> > > > > out

> > > > > > > > > limited

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > intellect and that creates obstacles in

> our

> > > > > > spiritual

> > > > > > > > > growth.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So, forget about counts, forget about

the

> > > time

> > > > u

> > > > > > put

> > > > > > > in

> > > > > > > > > for ur's

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sadhana, invoke the god with pure

heart.

> > > purity

> > > > > > > counts.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Lalit.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40.

> > > > > > > > > com>, " dakshinastrologer "

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <dakshinastrologer@ ...> wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Ms. Jayashree:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think this topic on 108 is getting

> very

> > > > > > > interesting

> > > > > > > > > and

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > enlightening for all members.

Yesterday

> > we

> > > > had a

> > > > > > > > > wonderful

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > esoteric

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > explanation from Shri. Sushil

Dikshit,

> > and

> > > > > today

> > > > > > > your

> > > > > > > > > > > wonderful

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > explanation of numerical symmetry of

> the

> > > > cosmos!

> > > > > > > > > Wonderful.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There definitely exists a " numerical

> > > > symphony "

> > > > > in

> > > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > > > Universe.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > not only 108.....as I mentioned in my

> > > earlier

> > > > > > post,

> > > > > > > > > there are

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > various

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > other numerals that are significant

in

> > > occult

> > > > > > > > > practices. 108

> > > > > > > > > > > is

> > > > > > > > > > > > > a

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > powerful and all-purpose perfect

> > > > number...While

> > > > > > we

> > > > > > > have

> > > > > > > > > > > > > understood

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the glory of 108, we should not lose

> > sight

> > > of

> > > > > the

> > > > > > > fact

> > > > > > > > > that

> > > > > > > > > > > > > there

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > are

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > other powerful numbers also. This is

> just

> > > for

> > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > information

> > > > > > > > > > > of

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > list.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > My apprecitation again for this

> wonderful

> > > > > > response.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Blessed be.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pandit R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Blessed be.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pandit R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI. --- In

vedic-

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > astrology@grou ps.com

> > > <astrology%

> > > > > > > > > > > > > 40. com>,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " jayasartn " <jayasartn@> wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In cosmology, 108 has this

> > significance -

> > > > the

> > > > > > > moon is

> > > > > > > > > away

> > > > > > > > > > > > > from

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > earth 108 times its (moon's)

diameter

> > and

> > > > the

> > > > > > sun

> > > > > > > is

> > > > > > > > > away

> > > > > > > > > > > > > from the

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > earth, 108 times its diameter.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Perhaps this reality of distances

is

> > > > > applicable

> > > > > > to

> > > > > > > > > deities

> > > > > > > > > > > > > too.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Perhaps this has been indicated by

> the

> > > 108

> > > > > divya

> > > > > > > > > desas of

> > > > > > > > > > > Lord

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Narayana.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > jayasree

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology@

.

> com

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40.

> > > > > > > > > com>, " dakshinastrologer "

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <dakshinastrologer@ > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Shri. Sushil:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It is a wonderful answer you have

> > given.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Blessed be.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pandit R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology@

> .

> > com

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40.

> > > > > > > > > com>, " sushil.dikshit "

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <sushil.dikshit@ > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Babu,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It is not a silly question but

it

> > is

> > > a

> > > > > very

> > > > > > > good

> > > > > > > > > > > question.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Actually

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > there are 27 Nakshatras and

every

> > > > > Nakshtras

> > > > > > > has 4

> > > > > > > > > Charan

> > > > > > > > > > > > > so

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > total

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > charans are 27 x 4 = 108

Charan.

> > Each

> > > > > > Charan

> > > > > > > has 3

> > > > > > > > > > > degree

> > > > > > > > > > > > > and

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 20

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > minutes so if you multiply 3

> degree

> > > and

> > > > 20

> > > > > > > > > minutes to

> > > > > > > > > > > 108

> > > > > > > > > > > > > it

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > comes

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > out to be 360 degress i.e. one

> > cycle

> > > > > > (Circle).

> > > > > > > > > This

> > > > > > > > > > > cycle

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > represetns

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > whole brahmand because all the

> > > rashis,

> > > > > > > planets and

> > > > > > > > > > > > > nakshatra

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > are

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > between these 360 degree in 2

> > > > dimensional

> > > > > > > > > horoscope. So

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > chanting a

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mantra completes one cycle of

> this

> > > > > brahmand.

> > > > > > > > > Further One

> > > > > > > > > > > > > who

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > has

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > visited Brahamand at least one

> time

> > > > i.e.

> > > > > he

> > > > > > is

> > > > > > > > > > > > > brahmagyani he

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > is

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > entitiled to place 108 Shri

> before

> > > his

> > > > > name.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sushil dikshit

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology@

> > .

> > > com

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology%

40.

> > > com>,

> > > > > babu

> > > > > > > mon

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <muthappan111@ >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Namaste,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It may be a silly matter for

> all

> > of

> > > > you.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I want to know what is the

> reason

> > > > that

> > > > > > some

> > > > > > > > > remedies

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > recomended

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > for 108 times.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I dont know any thing about

> > > astrology.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I hope you may pleased to

> provide

> > a

> > > > > reply

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thanks,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Babu

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------ --------- -------

--

> -

> > --

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Be a better Globetrotter. Get

> > > better

> > > > > > travel

> > > > > > > > > answers

> > > > > > > > > > > from

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someone

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > who knows.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Answers - Check it out.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this

> > message

> > > > have

> > > > > > been

> > > > > > > > > removed]

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have

> been

> > > > > removed]

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have

> been

> > > > > removed]

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have

been

> > > > removed]

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been

> > > removed]

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been

> removed]

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

The laptop given by your company for doing comany's job !

 

vedic astrology , " litsol " <mishra.lalit

wrote:

>

> Idiot, I have my laptop with me at home.

>

>

> vedic astrology , " abhishekpotti "

> <abhishekpotti@> wrote:

> >

> > Oye Lalith:

> >

> > How are you sending a message today? Did you go to the office

> today

> > also just to pilfer the company's internet connections on a

holiday

> > also? typical of you! One of these days, your employer will kick

> you

> > out of the office for having misused company's resources and may

be

> > you will write another story on how sani came in front of you and

> > asked you to change job!

> >

> > for your information, Meera Bhai's affection to Lord Krishna was

> way

> > before her formal initiation into the beeja mantra. She was

known

> to

> > sing heart-rending songs on Lord Krishna rather than chanting the

> > beeja mantra in buses and trains!

> >

> > Beeja mantra and God's name are not one and the same as you are

> > trying to portray. In fact for chanting God's name can be

chanted

> > without any beeja mantra and still it will give good results.

This

> > is what happens when you " steal " knowledge by observing tantrik

> > practices without formal initiation!

> >

> > we are not getting exposed....rather it is you who are being

> exposed

> > with every post. As I said to Ram Jaswalji yesterday itself, I

> will

> > stop this exchange if you stop it. Otherwise, this will go on.

I

> am

> > not afraid of you. But I pity you.....that is why I am writing

the

> > below matter......

> >

> > By the way, see a good psychiatrist.....I will give just one

> evidence

> > for your psycopathy...In your posts, often you type a word " Sth "

> > often incoherently.....It is almost a pattern for you. This is

> > suggestive of OCB problem for you. Better get yourself treated

for

> > psychiatric ailments and get on with your life instead of trying

> > evaluate persons far elder and wiser than you. I am not saying

> this

> > to abuse you as Ram Jaswalji might think....It is the genuine

> advice

> > of an elderly person. There is nothing wrong in consulting a

good

> > psychiatrist; now a days the stigma is not there. So, help

yourself.

> >

> > Abhishek.

> >

> > vedic astrology , " litsol " <mishra.lalit@>

> > wrote:

> > >

> > >

> > > You praised Meera, Good, when u w'd learn sth from her pure

> bhakti,

> > > see, cunningness and being manipulator doesnt help always!!

> > >

> > > twisting words always, i shown u a mantra of lord Krishna, in

> which

> > a

> > > beej mantra is used, instead of learning that God's Name and

Beej

> > are

> > > one and same thing, writing so much.

> > >

> > > What i said, open ur eyes and mind, read again, a devotion is

> > obvious

> > > final outcome of mantra chanting.

> > >

> > > read what i have been saying, read many times a day, the clouds

> of

> > ur

> > > karma smokes ur understanding.

> > >

> > > and learn one more thing - Meera got formal deekschha from

Saint

> > > Raidas.

> > >

> > > I use company's time or what, that i manage and is a matter of

my

> > > job, i dont advertise here to get some business in background,

> and

> > u

> > > 2-3 who are lobbying here , are exposed by urself.

> > >

> > > exposing u was not my objective, but it happened.

> > >

> > > it will keep happening.

> > >

> > >

> > > ok

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > vedic astrology , " abhishekpotti "

> > > <abhishekpotti@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Dear Lalith:

> > > >

> > > > The whole world knows the history of Blessed Meera

Bhai....the

> > > > epitome of Bhakti......She was attached to her " Lala " - the

> > > wonderful

> > > > idol of Krishna gifted to her even from her childhood....Do

you

> > > mean

> > > > to say that innocent young girl started chanting " Kliim

> > krishnaaya "

> > > > mantra automatically? Even Bhakta Prahlaada had to be

> initiated

> > by

> > > > Sage Naaradha for his chant of dwaadasaakshari mantra....

> > > >

> > > > Nobody is afraid of you here......You need not proclaim that

> you

> > > are

> > > > not in the business of a Guru.....actually Guru status is not

a

> > > > business (true to your half-baked knowledge you will claim it

> is

> > > also

> > > > like software engineering!). The difference my friend

between

> > you

> > > > and other great persons like Rafal or Dakshinamoorthiji is

that

> > > they

> > > > are spending their money for the internet, whereas you are

> > > pilfering

> > > > your company's time and the company's resources while

browsing

> > the

> > > > internet. Don't you think you are cheating your company when

> you

> > > > spend so much time on empty and egoistic posts defending

> yourself

> > > > against every expert after arguing with them unnecessarily?

> Are

> > > you

> > > > not getting paid for the time you spend in the

company....Know

> > the

> > > > basics of ethics before ever sermonizing.....So, actually you

> are

> > > an

> > > > exploiter....try to understand that....the other gurujis are

> > > probably

> > > > too decent to comment on that......What happened to your

> > project?

> > > > Better rush to it nough!....It will spare us the agony of

> > replying

> > > to

> > > > your half-witted postings!

> > > >

> > > > By the say, Which member asked you Prashna Tantra dear? We

did

> > not

> > > > see any posts requesting " Honourable Lalith " to explain

Prashna

> > > > Tantra (as if you could explain it!) What arrogance you have

> to

> > > > claim that nobody can stand before you.....Guruji's posts

> exposed

> > > > your ignorance....you did not even know how to ask queries

and

> > get

> > > > replies from one of the most empathetic astrologers of this

> > group,

> > > > and yet you claim you are this and that......

> > > >

> > > > For your information....nobody is afraid of you..Rather you

> > should

> > > be

> > > > afraid of yourself......Your foolishness itself will be your

> > doom.

> > > > Did you not become the laughing stock due to your email-based

> > > chasing

> > > > of Priyaa? Such foolishness in occult matters could be more

> > costly

> > > > dear.....I think Mohanraaamji and Rafalji are only afraid

about

> > > your

> > > > own well-being! They are not afraid of you. Nor am I afraid

of

> > you.

> > > >

> > > > Your posts never answer the queries or points raised by

others;

> > you

> > > > take off on a new ground only because of your shallow

> > understanding

> > > > of subjects. Nobody has accepted you as a Guru here, and

> nobody

> > > > will....Can a fire-fly eclipse the Sun? There are too

> > many " Suns "

> > > > here and you are just a fire-fly.

> > > >

> > > > It reminds me of a story.....Once an ant challenged the

mighty

> > > > elephant for a fight; the elephant obviously could not hear

the

> > ant

> > > > (the ant being so tiny and it was on the ground, its sound

> could

> > > not

> > > > reach the elephant). The elephant just walked away out of its

> own

> > > > volition in its natural course. Then the ant claimed, " you

> see

> > I

> > > > challenged the elephant and it ran away " . Dear, your saying

> that

> > > > nobody can stand before you is similar to that.......

> > > >

> > > > FIRST LEARN THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN GHOSTS AND YOUR ANCESTOR

> > > > SUMANGALIS BEFORE WRITING THE FIRST POSTS ON OCCULT! What a

> > > > pity......what a pity.....That we have to bear your

meaningless

> > > > rantings here!

> > > >

> > > > Abhishek.

> > > >

> > > > vedic astrology , " litsol "

> <mishra.lalit@>

> > > > wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > I was waiting for u dear..

> > > > >

> > > > > why u took time ?

> > > > >

> > > > > Do u mean Meera Bai discussed with u, what she did..

> > > > >

> > > > > Do u know 'Kleem Krishnay, Govindaya Gopijan Vallabhaya

> Namh'

> > is

> > > a

> > > > > mantra for lord krishna.

> > > > >

> > > > > is there no beej mantras, to whom u wish to misguide ? let

> > > thnigs

> > > > > remain between lord, bhakta , their shraddha and their guru.

> > > > >

> > > > > why u people are so afraid of me, i m not in business of

> guru.

> > > > >

> > > > > i m happy with my life, my profession of software

> engineering

> > > and

> > > > > my hobbies ok.

> > > > >

> > > > > there are 7000+ members are here, by writing such type of

> > > foolish

> > > > > things u expose urself only, mind, there are better brains

> here.

> > > > >

> > > > > this is enough ...

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > vedic astrology ,

> > > > > " abhishekpotti " <abhishekpotti@> wrote:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Respected Mohanraaamji:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Well said. Lalith is saying that " maybe in south india

> > > devotees

> > > > > > don't chant Moola mantras but not so in North " ...What

> > > > > > stupidity.....He does not seem to understand that " mantra

> > > > shaastra

> > > > > > experts " are also devotees, but they cannot be called as

> > > innocent

> > > > > > saatwik bhaktaas! A typical example of a pure saadhwik

> > bhakta

> > > > will

> > > > > > be Meera Bhai (was she not North Indian). Can Lalith say

> > which

> > > > > Dasa

> > > > > > Mahaa Vidya Meera Bhai practised? She was immersed in

> > Krishna

> > > > > > consciousness and Lover for Him. Her own Bhajans were

her

> > > > prayers

> > > > > in

> > > > > > the bhaavana of Bhakti in the form of Love! This is not

> > mantra

> > > > > > shaastra. Another example will be Saant Tukhaaraam.

These

> > > > > bhaktaas

> > > > > > did not chant moola mantraas. Panditji Dakshinamoorthi

was

> > on

> > > > dot

> > > > > in

> > > > > > saying that " Pure bhaktaas do not chant complicated moola

> > > > > mantraas " .

> > > > > > You have clarified this fact wonderfully in your post. I

> wish

> > > > more

> > > > > > knowledgeable persons also put erratic posters in their

> place

> > > > just

> > > > > as

> > > > > > Mohanraaamji does here. This will benefit more naive

> readers

> > > of

> > > > > > these forums who might otherwise get confused as to which

> of

> > > the

> > > > > > paths to follow. Actually, anyone can follow any path as

> he/

> > > she

> > > > > > deems it fit; but there should be consistency of

procedures.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > We should not confuse mantrik rituals and bhakti

> doctrines.

> > > > > Bhaktaas

> > > > > > can chant the names of Gods at anytime.....Mantra

shaastra

> > > > experts

> > > > > > chanting advanced moola mantras should necessarily adopt

> > ritual

> > > > > > procedures for the welfare of themselves and others!

> > > > > Yes...improper

> > > > > > chanting of mantras can cause danger to the society also

> just

> > > as

> > > > > > proper chanting can help others. Hence, this cannot be

> > > > considered

> > > > > as

> > > > > > a personal preference of the aspirant. If this was not

the

> > > case,

> > > > > why

> > > > > > did sages codify spiritual practises scrupulously?

> Rafalji,

> > > > > > Mohanraaamji, etc. are correct in saying it is best to

> follow

> > > > > Pandit

> > > > > > Dakshinamoorthiji's advices on mantra shastra or japams.

> He

> > is

> > > > > > learned and he is living a life compatible to the

shaastras

> > > > though

> > > > > he

> > > > > > has faced uncertain circumstances in his own personal

> life.

> > He

> > > > > never

> > > > > > compromised on principles and he willingly paid the price

> for

> > > > that

> > > > > > which most of us will never do. The words of such a

person

> > > > should

> > > > > > obviously carry more weight.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Abhishek.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > vedic astrology , " mohanraaam "

> > > > <mohanraaam@>

> > > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Well Lalith:

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > If you have really done dasa Maha Vidyaa, you would

have

> > > never

> > > > > > > approached a professional astrologer for

> > consultation...that

> > > > much

> > > > > I

> > > > > > > can say....

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > And what idiocy when you say Panditji is partly wrong?

> He

> > > > > > > said " Bhaktaas do not chant Moola mantras " , whereas you

> > have

> > > > > edited

> > > > > > > the words to suit your ends....He never said " devotees

> > don't

> > > > > chant

> > > > > > > Beej mantras " .....You are putting words into his mouth

> and

> > > > > assuming

> > > > > > > he is wrong! Why, do you know....the Great Panditji

> himself

> > > > > chants

> > > > > > > Moola mantras.....He is a bhakta and a mantra shastra

> > expert.

> > > > As

> > > > > a

> > > > > > > bhakta he keeps incessant chanting of naama japa

> throughout

> > > the

> > > > > > day;

> > > > > > > as a mantra shastra expert, he restricts the moola

mantra

> > > > japams

> > > > > to

> > > > > > > stipulated times with ritual purity.....It is this

> > wonderful

> > > > > > practice

> > > > > > > that Guruji was alluding to. Guruji cannot be wrong in

> > > ritual

> > > > > and

> > > > > > > occult matters. Please understand that.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > There are 4 classes of Devotees.......1) Saatwik vedic

> > > devotees

> > > > > who

> > > > > > > will follow vedic dharma scrupulously. They will not

> dare

> > to

> > > > > > compare

> > > > > > > astrology and vedanga to Engineering! as you did...

> > > > > > > 2) Raajasik devotees who will follow vedic disciplines

as

> > far

> > > > as

> > > > > > > possible, but will still go after upaasanaas of Demi-

Gods

> > for

> > > > > > > accomplishment of siddhis. Mantra shaastra experts

> usually

> > > > fall

> > > > > in

> > > > > > > this category.

> > > > > > > 3) Saatwik Bhaktaas - for whom the meditation and glory

> of

> > > > their

> > > > > > > Ishta Devataa is enough for spiritual satisfaction. It

> is

> > > this

> > > > > > > category that Guruji referred to when he said they will

> not

> > > > chant

> > > > > > > Moola mantras too much. Definitely they will not do

Dasa

> > > Mahaa

> > > > > > > Vidyaa.

> > > > > > > 4) Taamasic Devotees - Those whose main motive is to

> > project

> > > > > > > themselves at all costs and acting as if they are equal

> to

> > > the

> > > > > > > experts; they will try ALL practices - whether they are

> > > > > sanctioned

> > > > > > by

> > > > > > > vedas or not.....Their only aim is personal glory and

> > > > > > satisfaction.

> > > > > > > They will attack even established dharma if they do not

> get

> > > > > results

> > > > > > > (sounds familiar....You are one!) Ignorance and half-

> baked

> > > > > > knowledge

> > > > > > > and egotism are these persons' motivating fuel.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > You are really satan's Gift to this list.......My only

> > prayer

> > > > is

> > > > > > that

> > > > > > > innocent members of this list do not get side-tracked

> with

> > > your

> > > > > > > ramblings.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Let me make this clear to the list.....Panditji said

that

> > > > saatwik

> > > > > > > Bhaktaas who chant Divine names only due to Pure Love

on

> > God

> > > > > > usually

> > > > > > > never chant mantrik moola mantraas. It is just one

class

> > of

> > > > > > > devotees. A rajasik bhakta who is a mantra-shaastra

> expert

> > > may

> > > > > > even

> > > > > > > be a bhakta at heart; and a pure bhakta may sometimes

> chant

> > > > some

> > > > > > > mantrik japams for solving some practical

> issues......But,

> > > when

> > > > > > they

> > > > > > > switch their routines temporarily, these enlightened

> > devotees

> > > > > > usually

> > > > > > > take good guidance and follow the tenets of shaastras

> > > > > > > scrupulously....Definitely they will not sit on

> assumption

> > > like

> > > > > > > Lalith.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > On the one hand, this fellow claims he has done chants

in

> > > > > forests,

> > > > > > > rivers, earth, etc. (Probably we have a Maharishi here!

> > What

> > > > > > heights

> > > > > > > of pointless pride in this young man list....it is

> > > > disgusting!).

> > > > > > On

> > > > > > > the other hand, he says he chants mantras in buses,

> trains,

> > > > > > etc......

> > > > > > > He is confused about which no body can have issues.

Only

> > his

> > > > > Guru

> > > > > > > should be concerned about that.....But, his attempts to

> > stuff

> > > > his

> > > > > > > shallow understanding upon this list is reprehensible.

> > And,

> > > > his

> > > > > > > habit of quoting experts out of context is really

> > > condemnable.

> > > > > May

> > > > > > > Jupiter's Light Shine on that fellow and teach him to

> > respect

> > > > the

> > > > > > > hallowed traditions and to stay at his level rather

than

> > > trying

> > > > > > > to " teach " others (He has the audacity to claim he

> > > > is " teaching "

> > > > > > > Rafalji!)

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > If a mere young man of 35 years who has spent his life

on

> a

> > > > > " Failed

> > > > > > > computer web desining business " , " pointless email

chasing

> > of

> > > > > > girls " ,

> > > > > > > and other " past times " can gain insight as he claims,

how

> > > much

> > > > > will

> > > > > > > learned Gurus of this group with their life of devotion

> to

> > > > > vedanta

> > > > > > > and vedanga know? His peanut brain and hyper-inflated

> ego

> > > will

> > > > > > never

> > > > > > > allow him to see this obvious truth. But, please list

> > > exercise

> > > > > > your

> > > > > > > discretion while reading his posts (There are doubtless

> > some

> > > > good

> > > > > > > elements even in his posts; but mostly there is trash

> > > presented

> > > > > as

> > > > > > > philosophy).

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Mohanraaam

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > vedic astrology , " litsol "

> > > > <mishra.lalit@>

> > > > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Dear Rafal,

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Do u think, a hobby means shallow knowledge of the

> > domain,

> > > No

> > > > > > > rafal,

> > > > > > > > it's not like that.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > At least not for me. You have learnt and i m

learning,

> i

> > > read

> > > > > > ur's

> > > > > > > > replies and get benifitted, same way i wanted you to

> pay

> > > > heed

> > > > > to

> > > > > > > > what i have written about spritiuality, mostrly i did

> > write

> > > > for

> > > > > u

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > I have done all 10 mahavidyas of tantra and read many

> > > tantrik

> > > > > > > > classics, spent good deal of time with great

tantriks

> > > > trained

> > > > > in

> > > > > > > > Kamakhya and other places, keenly observed their

> doings,

> > > > their

> > > > > > > > mistakes etc.., I did tremendous mantra chanting on

> > water,

> > > > on

> > > > > > > earth,

> > > > > > > > at home, in forests etc...

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > then reached here, then i did write something, but

> sorry

> > i

> > > > dont

> > > > > > > > remember shlokas. i was not interested in cramming

that.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Panditji is not fully correct in saying that

> BeejMantras

> > > are

> > > > > not

> > > > > > > > chanted by devotees, I dont know much about South

India

> > but

> > > > in

> > > > > > > North

> > > > > > > > normally its done.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > And a successfull mantra sadhana has to result in

one's

> > > being

> > > > a

> > > > > > > > devotee, the devotion is the outcome, final result of

> > > mantra

> > > > > > > sadhana,

> > > > > > > > perhaps, Pandit Ji believes mantras are power

> > > packet,thinks,

> > > > i

> > > > > do

> > > > > > > it

> > > > > > > > this way , these many times and get this result, this

> is

> > > > where

> > > > > > most

> > > > > > > > of the people are confused. without being a good

human

> > > being

> > > > if

> > > > > > we

> > > > > > > > think, we will achieve something in spirituality, is

> > > > difficult,

> > > > > > > very

> > > > > > > > difficult.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > what happens is, with the mantra chanting, a self

> > > > > > transformation

> > > > > > > > process begins, u if dont restrict urself, ur karma

> > begins

> > > > > > > diluting,

> > > > > > > > and u begin ur purification process unknowingly, when

> > > > > substantial

> > > > > > > > part of ego and greed for respect vanishes and many

> such

> > > > thing

> > > > > > > > togather, mantra awakens u and with the God's grace

ur

> > > > > objective

> > > > > > > gets

> > > > > > > > fullfilled, gradually u become a devotee. ur being

> simple

> > > and

> > > > > > being

> > > > > > > > devotee is sometimes is indication of ur's going on

the

> > > right

> > > > > > track.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > I think we have discussed a lot, it's enough !!

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > My Boss has given me lot of projects to complete, so,

> may

> > > be,

> > > > i

> > > > > m

> > > > > > > not

> > > > > > > > going to available in the group like i was recently.

> > > however.

> > > > i

> > > > > > > will

> > > > > > > > complete Garg Hora series.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > regards,

> > > > > > > > Lalit.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > vedic astrology , Rafal Gendarz

> > > > > > > > <starsuponme@> wrote:

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya*

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > Dear Litsol,

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > Then please dont generalize Your preferences as

they

> > are

> > > > too

> > > > > > > > shallow for

> > > > > > > > > this Forum aspiration.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > Regards,

> > > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz

> > > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru

> > > > > > > > > email: rafal@

> > > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa.com

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > litsol napisa?(a):

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > Dear Rafel,

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > I take Astrology as a good hobby, and i w'd be

> > looking

> > > at

> > > > > it

> > > > > > > with

> > > > > > > > an

> > > > > > > > > > engineer's approach.

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > I asked ur age because, it's our thinking to put

> our

> > > > > > parameters

> > > > > > > in

> > > > > > > > > > god's system, there is nothing like delay or

> > > advancement

> > > > in

> > > > > > > > > > spirituality. So, " Delay "

> or " Speed " , " backwardness "

> > > > > > > > > > and " advancement " doesn't exist in spirituality,

I

> > > > thought

> > > > > if

> > > > > > u

> > > > > > > r

> > > > > > > > > > thinking that it may take too much time, I wanted

> to

> > > tell

> > > > > u,

> > > > > > > it's

> > > > > > > > not

> > > > > > > > > > like that. there is no delay.

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > It clicks in fraction of a second, when u r

getting

> > > > clicked

> > > > > > > > depends

> > > > > > > > > > on u and on god's will, when he wants u to get

> > clicked.

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > God sometimes graces for no reason ( " Ahetuka " )

just

> > for

> > > > his

> > > > > > > > > > compassion towards u and it may happen next

minute

> > too.

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > spirituality is not delimited by time , effort

and

> > > rules.

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > regards,

> > > > > > > > > > Lalit.

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology

> > > > > > > > > > <vedic astrology%40>, Rafal

> > > Gendarz

> > > > > > > > > > <starsuponme@ ...> wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya*

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > Dear Litsol,

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > Please be careful about words.

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > Im happy that You are sharing Your experience -

> > very

> > > > > > > inspirating

> > > > > > > > > > ones.

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > Age hierarchy is for sudras - Manu Samhita. If

> You

> > > > treat

> > > > > > > Jyotish

> > > > > > > > > > Vedanga

> > > > > > > > > > > as profession similar to engineering You have a

> > long

> > > > way

> > > > > to

> > > > > > > go.

> > > > > > > > But

> > > > > > > > > > dont

> > > > > > > > > > > be pessimistic here are many who will try to

help

> > You

> > > > in

> > > > > > > getting

> > > > > > > > > > proper

> > > > > > > > > > > understanding.

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > After some time You will agree with me about

the

> > mala

> > > > and

> > > > > > > japa.

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > Regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz

> > > > > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru

> > > > > > > > > > > email: rafal@

> > > > > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > litsol napisa?(a):

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Rafal,

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > Here u r doing two wrong things, instead of

> > > > developing

> > > > > ur

> > > > > > > > > > understanding,

> > > > > > > > > > > > u r trying to conclude something and going

> beyond

> > > > that

> > > > > u r

> > > > > > > > > > messaging

> > > > > > > > > > > > same to many.

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > I m touching 35, What's ur age ?

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > Astrology is a kind of vidya or profession,

> like

> > i

> > > m

> > > > a

> > > > > > > > software

> > > > > > > > > > > > engineer, software engineering is my

> profession.

> > > > > > > spirituality

> > > > > > > > is

> > > > > > > > > > beyond

> > > > > > > > > > > > all sort of vidya or profession.

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > I wish u to be a good soul and to realize the

> > bliss

> > > > of

> > > > > > self

> > > > > > > > > > awakening or

> > > > > > > > > > > > in other terms, the bliss that comes once u

> feel

> > u

> > > > and

> > > > > > god

> > > > > > > is

> > > > > > > > > > > > connected. dissolved in each other.

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > First realize, experience, then speak and

then

> > > > suggest

> > > > > to

> > > > > > > > others,

> > > > > > > > > > by

> > > > > > > > > > > > mere reading shastras or books u r not going

to

> > > feel

> > > > > it.

> > > > > > > > unless

> > > > > > > > > > god

> > > > > > > > > > > > graces u it's very very difficult. and if u

> dont

> > > > avoid

> > > > > > this

> > > > > > > > sort

> > > > > > > > > > of

> > > > > > > > > > > > hurriedness instead of learning and

> > understanding,

> > > it

> > > > > > will

> > > > > > > > affect

> > > > > > > > > > u only

> > > > > > > > > > > > no one else.

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > somehere i have read, it was written - By

mere

> > > > > > > repeating " So-

> > > > > > > > > > Aham " no

> > > > > > > > > > > > one gets liberated unless he realizes it like

> one

> > > > > doesnt

> > > > > > get

> > > > > > > > > > cured by

> > > > > > > > > > > > knowing the name of the medicine, u need to

> take

> > > the

> > > > > > > medicine

> > > > > > > > to

> > > > > > > > > > get

> > > > > > > > > > > > cured " .

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > So, pls. be wise, as it was being discussed

> here,

> > i

> > > > > > shared

> > > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > > > > experience of my life, pls. mind it, i m not

a

> > > > > preecher,

> > > > > > > nor a

> > > > > > > > > > guru, nor

> > > > > > > > > > > > i have to make my followers, nor it's my

> > > profession,

> > > > > nor

> > > > > > i

> > > > > > > > have

> > > > > > > > > > to get

> > > > > > > > > > > > fame, sharing things is a kind of

friendliness

> a

> > > kind

> > > > of

> > > > > > > > > > affection,

> > > > > > > > > > > > that's it.

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > > Lalit.

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology

> > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40.

com>,

> > > Rafal

> > > > > > Gendarz

> > > > > > > > > > > > <starsuponme@ ...>

> > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya*

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Jyotishas

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Counting of mala has more depth sense than

> just

> > > > > > counting,

> > > > > > > > so for

> > > > > > > > > > > > natives

> > > > > > > > > > > > > like Litsol counting is neccessary and any

> > other

> > > > > > > speculation

> > > > > > > > > > will be

> > > > > > > > > > > > > only illusory and just imagination. We

should

> > > > follow

> > > > > Pt.

> > > > > > > > > > > > Dakshinamoorti

> > > > > > > > > > > > > advise strictly, otherwise our process of

> > > spiritual

> > > > > > > > development

> > > > > > > > > > will

> > > > > > > > > > > > be

> > > > > > > > > > > > > slow and unauthoritative.

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru

> > > > > > > > > > > > > email: rafal@

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > asmp2k02@ napisa?(a):

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Resp Sri Lalitji,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for your mail.But please also read

> > > > > > > > GuruDakshinamurthyi

> > > > > > > > > > ji's

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > mail(addressing me) also on this,which

> brings

> > > in

> > > > > more

> > > > > > > > clarity

> > > > > > > > > > to the

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > applicability principles to my mail.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > I meant that both are necessity but to

what

> > > > degree

> > > > > of

> > > > > > > time

> > > > > > > > (it

> > > > > > > > > > varies

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > from saadhaka to saadhaka) to get such

> > inbuilt

> > > > > > maturity

> > > > > > > > such

> > > > > > > > > > that

> > > > > > > > > > > > that

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > the count will be taken care of by Divine

> > > forces

> > > > > > after

> > > > > > > > some

> > > > > > > > > > initial

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > period of saadhana.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Morover the type of bio matter present in

> the

> > > > japa

> > > > > > maala

> > > > > > > > > > (which is

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > symbolic for ritualism as well as from

> > > practical

> > > > > > point

> > > > > > > of

> > > > > > > > > > view for

> > > > > > > > > > > > our

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > count) will help in keeping away

> destructive

> > > > forces

> > > > > > > > acting on

> > > > > > > > > > us

> > > > > > > > > > > > .Thus

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > the symbolic rituals will indirectly help

> us

> > in

> > > > > > keeping

> > > > > > > > away

> > > > > > > > > > from

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > negative thoughts and also trains our

> memory

> > to

> > > > be

> > > > > > > object

> > > > > > > > > > > > oriented.If

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > our memory grows and retentive capacity

> > > increase

> > > > > the

> > > > > > > > Gnaana

> > > > > > > > > > will

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > increase ,but at the same time

destructive

> > > forces

> > > > > > > > > > (diversions) also

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > becomes powerful.Thus the symbolic

> procedures

> > > > will

> > > > > > come

> > > > > > > in

> > > > > > > > > > handy to

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > successfully fight the negative

forces.The

> > > > rituals

> > > > > > may

> > > > > > > be

> > > > > > > > > > Rising

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > early(if possible during Braahmi

> > muhurta),Taking

> > > > > > > > > > bath,Japaanusthaan,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > attending to the livelihood job etc etc

in

> > > > defined

> > > > > > > times

> > > > > > > > as

> > > > > > > > > > > > discipline

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > helps indirectly tune our memory through

> > > keeping

> > > > > our

> > > > > > > body

> > > > > > > > > > healthy.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thus ultimately we conclude that the so

> > called

> > > > > > symbolic

> > > > > > > > > > procedures

> > > > > > > > > > > > are

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > not actually symbolic(it got branded as

> such)

> > > but

> > > > a

> > > > > > > > necessity

> > > > > > > > > > for

> > > > > > > > > > > > our

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > own good if we practice to the extent we

> can.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quoting mishra.lalit@ ... <mishra.

> > lalit%

> > > > > > > 40gmail.

> > > > > > > > com>:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Resp. Sri Murthy Adavi,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, what you said is perfectly right, we

> > count

> > > > or

> > > > > > dont

> > > > > > > > > > count,target

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > is realization of god's love within, I

got

> it

> > > > with

> > > > > no

> > > > > > > > > > counting,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > someone may get it with counting.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanx, for the writing.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Lalit.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology

> > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. com>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40.

> > com>,

> > > > > > srinivasa

> > > > > > > > > > murthy adavi

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > asmp2k02@ wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Respected Learned Members,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Both views may be correct when the

views

> > > > have/or

> > > > > > with

> > > > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > > goal as

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > development of Love/Devotion towards

> > adhistana

> > > > > > Devatha

> > > > > > > of

> > > > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > > Mantra

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > as Base.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In the initial stage only you need the

> > > count;as

> > > > > one

> > > > > > > > > > develops the

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > habit the biological tuning of the

> > > intellect/body

> > > > > will

> > > > > > > > > > automatically

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > take care of the practice(without count-

> help

> > of

> > > > > malas

> > > > > > > > etc).

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It's like if with the help of Alarm

clock

> > if

> > > we

> > > > > > wake

> > > > > > > up

> > > > > > > > for

> > > > > > > > > > 2 or 3

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > days at some appointed hour,then

> > automatically

> > > we

> > > > > > > wakeup

> > > > > > > > at

> > > > > > > > > > the same

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > time every day without help of alarm.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > With due Respects

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > smadavi

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quoting starsuponme@ :

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya*

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Litsol,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Definitely we should count our Mantra

> Japa

> > on

> > > > > Mala.

> > > > > > > Your

> > > > > > > > > > view is

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > against

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Vedic Authorities and Sages, so should

be

> > > > > rejected.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > email: rafal@

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > litsol napisa?(a):

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Mr. Jayashri,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > A thought came, why i should not

share

> > with

> > > > u,

> > > > > U

> > > > > > > pls.

> > > > > > > > stop

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > counting

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > mantra chantings, counting mantra

gives

> > > false

> > > > > ego

> > > > > > > and

> > > > > > > > then

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > frustration if u dont get desired

> results.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > leave it to the god, god counts the

> > mantra

> > > > > > chanted

> > > > > > > by

> > > > > > > > you

> > > > > > > > > > may be

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 108, 1008 or whatsoever, let him

count,

> > > it's

> > > > > his

> > > > > > > part

> > > > > > > > and

> > > > > > > > > > ur

> > > > > > > > > > > > part

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > is

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to chant the mantra. when the mantra

> has

> > to

> > > > > > awaken,

> > > > > > > it

> > > > > > > > > > will be,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > god

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > will ensure it for u.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sometimes we try to become more

> > intelligent

> > > > > with

> > > > > > out

> > > > > > > > > > limited

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > intellect and that creates obstacles

in

> > our

> > > > > > > spiritual

> > > > > > > > > > growth.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So, forget about counts, forget about

> the

> > > > time

> > > > > u

> > > > > > > put

> > > > > > > > in

> > > > > > > > > > for ur's

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sadhana, invoke the god with pure

> heart.

> > > > purity

> > > > > > > > counts.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Lalit.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology@ .

com

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology%

40.

> > > > > > > > > > com>, " dakshinastrologer "

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <dakshinastrologer@ ...> wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Ms. Jayashree:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think this topic on 108 is

getting

> > very

> > > > > > > > interesting

> > > > > > > > > > and

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > enlightening for all members.

> Yesterday

> > > we

> > > > > had a

> > > > > > > > > > wonderful

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > esoteric

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > explanation from Shri. Sushil

> Dikshit,

> > > and

> > > > > > today

> > > > > > > > your

> > > > > > > > > > > > wonderful

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > explanation of numerical symmetry

of

> > the

> > > > > cosmos!

> > > > > > > > > > Wonderful.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There definitely exists

a " numerical

> > > > > symphony "

> > > > > > in

> > > > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > > > > Universe.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > not only 108.....as I mentioned in

my

> > > > earlier

> > > > > > > post,

> > > > > > > > > > there are

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > various

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > other numerals that are significant

> in

> > > > occult

> > > > > > > > > > practices. 108

> > > > > > > > > > > > is

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > a

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > powerful and all-purpose perfect

> > > > > number...While

> > > > > > > we

> > > > > > > > have

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > understood

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the glory of 108, we should not

lose

> > > sight

> > > > of

> > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > fact

> > > > > > > > > > that

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > there

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > are

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > other powerful numbers also. This

is

> > just

> > > > for

> > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > > information

> > > > > > > > > > > > of

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > list.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > My apprecitation again for this

> > wonderful

> > > > > > > response.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Blessed be.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pandit R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Blessed be.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pandit R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI. --- In

> vedic-

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > astrology@grou ps.com

> > > > <astrology%

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > 40. com>,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " jayasartn " <jayasartn@> wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In cosmology, 108 has this

> > > significance -

> > > > > the

> > > > > > > > moon is

> > > > > > > > > > away

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > from

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > earth 108 times its (moon's)

> diameter

> > > and

> > > > > the

> > > > > > > sun

> > > > > > > > is

> > > > > > > > > > away

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > from the

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > earth, 108 times its diameter.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Perhaps this reality of distances

> is

> > > > > > applicable

> > > > > > > to

> > > > > > > > > > deities

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > too.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Perhaps this has been indicated

by

> > the

> > > > 108

> > > > > > divya

> > > > > > > > > > desas of

> > > > > > > > > > > > Lord

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Narayana.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > jayasree

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology@

> .

> > com

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology%

40.

> > > > > > > > > > com>, " dakshinastrologer "

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <dakshinastrologer@ > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Shri. Sushil:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It is a wonderful answer you

have

> > > given.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Blessed be.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pandit R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology@

> > .

> > > com

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology%

40.

> > > > > > > > > > com>, " sushil.dikshit "

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <sushil.dikshit@ > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Babu,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It is not a silly question

but

> it

> > > is

> > > > a

> > > > > > very

> > > > > > > > good

> > > > > > > > > > > > question.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Actually

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > there are 27 Nakshatras and

> every

> > > > > > Nakshtras

> > > > > > > > has 4

> > > > > > > > > > Charan

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > so

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > total

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > charans are 27 x 4 = 108

> Charan.

> > > Each

> > > > > > > Charan

> > > > > > > > has 3

> > > > > > > > > > > > degree

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > and

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 20

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > minutes so if you multiply 3

> > degree

> > > > and

> > > > > 20

> > > > > > > > > > minutes to

> > > > > > > > > > > > 108

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > it

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > comes

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > out to be 360 degress i.e.

one

> > > cycle

> > > > > > > (Circle).

> > > > > > > > > > This

> > > > > > > > > > > > cycle

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > represetns

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > whole brahmand because all

the

> > > > rashis,

> > > > > > > > planets and

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > nakshatra

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > are

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > between these 360 degree in 2

> > > > > dimensional

> > > > > > > > > > horoscope. So

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > chanting a

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mantra completes one cycle of

> > this

> > > > > > brahmand.

> > > > > > > > > > Further One

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > who

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > has

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > visited Brahamand at least

one

> > time

> > > > > i.e.

> > > > > > he

> > > > > > > is

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > brahmagyani he

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > is

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > entitiled to place 108 Shri

> > before

> > > > his

> > > > > > name.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sushil dikshit

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology@

> > > .

> > > > com

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology%

> 40.

> > > > com>,

> > > > > > babu

> > > > > > > > mon

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <muthappan111@ >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Namaste,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It may be a silly matter

for

> > all

> > > of

> > > > > you.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I want to know what is the

> > reason

> > > > > that

> > > > > > > some

> > > > > > > > > > remedies

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > recomended

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > for 108 times.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I dont know any thing about

> > > > astrology.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I hope you may pleased to

> > provide

> > > a

> > > > > > reply

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thanks,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Babu

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------ --------- -----

--

> --

> > -

> > > --

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Be a better Globetrotter.

Get

> > > > better

> > > > > > > travel

> > > > > > > > > > answers

> > > > > > > > > > > > from

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someone

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > who knows.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Answers - Check it

out.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this

> > > message

> > > > > have

> > > > > > > been

> > > > > > > > > > removed]

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have

> > been

> > > > > > removed]

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have

> > been

> > > > > > removed]

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have

> been

> > > > > removed]

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have

been

> > > > removed]

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been

> > removed]

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been

removed]

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > >

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Oye Lalith:

 

Wherever you have typed sth, it does not fit naturally......probably

your mind gets stuck up and you are using fillers like that to get

going is it?

 

Quite natural....I can understand your problem. OCB patients or

shallow individuals have mind-blocks and they naturally have to use

word-fillers like " uh " ... " I mean " , etc. to put on an act as if they

are going to say something important. This word fillers will give

them time to think.....Thanks. Honestly sth = something is new to

me; because I am yet to see anyone lazy enough to use this shortform.

Naturally, when you pilfer other's resources and have to type in what

little time you have got to do your thing without getting caught, you

will use all sort of abbreviations......

 

sth is also another moola mantra.... " something " " something " In

Government office parlance " something " means " something

else " .....bribes...No wonder your corrupt intelligence wants the use

of " something " often!

 

Abhishek

vedic astrology , " litsol " <mishra.lalit

wrote:

>

>

> :)

>

> sth = something, learn it, now !!

>

> :)

>

> i m happy for u on this and many other readers w'd be.

>

> good.

>

>

> vedic astrology , " litsol " <mishra.lalit@>

> wrote:

> >

> > Idiot, I have my laptop with me at home.

> >

> >

> > vedic astrology , " abhishekpotti "

> > <abhishekpotti@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Oye Lalith:

> > >

> > > How are you sending a message today? Did you go to the office

> > today

> > > also just to pilfer the company's internet connections on a

> holiday

> > > also? typical of you! One of these days, your employer will

kick

> > you

> > > out of the office for having misused company's resources and

may

> be

> > > you will write another story on how sani came in front of you

and

> > > asked you to change job!

> > >

> > > for your information, Meera Bhai's affection to Lord Krishna

was

> > way

> > > before her formal initiation into the beeja mantra. She was

> known

> > to

> > > sing heart-rending songs on Lord Krishna rather than chanting

the

> > > beeja mantra in buses and trains!

> > >

> > > Beeja mantra and God's name are not one and the same as you are

> > > trying to portray. In fact for chanting God's name can be

> chanted

> > > without any beeja mantra and still it will give good results.

> This

> > > is what happens when you " steal " knowledge by observing tantrik

> > > practices without formal initiation!

> > >

> > > we are not getting exposed....rather it is you who are being

> > exposed

> > > with every post. As I said to Ram Jaswalji yesterday itself, I

> > will

> > > stop this exchange if you stop it. Otherwise, this will go

on.

> I

> > am

> > > not afraid of you. But I pity you.....that is why I am writing

> the

> > > below matter......

> > >

> > > By the way, see a good psychiatrist.....I will give just one

> > evidence

> > > for your psycopathy...In your posts, often you type a

word " Sth "

> > > often incoherently.....It is almost a pattern for you. This is

> > > suggestive of OCB problem for you. Better get yourself treated

> for

> > > psychiatric ailments and get on with your life instead of

trying

> > > evaluate persons far elder and wiser than you. I am not saying

> > this

> > > to abuse you as Ram Jaswalji might think....It is the genuine

> > advice

> > > of an elderly person. There is nothing wrong in consulting a

> good

> > > psychiatrist; now a days the stigma is not there. So, help

> yourself.

> > >

> > > Abhishek.

> > >

> > > vedic astrology , " litsol "

<mishra.lalit@>

> > > wrote:

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > You praised Meera, Good, when u w'd learn sth from her pure

> > bhakti,

> > > > see, cunningness and being manipulator doesnt help always!!

> > > >

> > > > twisting words always, i shown u a mantra of lord Krishna, in

> > which

> > > a

> > > > beej mantra is used, instead of learning that God's Name and

> Beej

> > > are

> > > > one and same thing, writing so much.

> > > >

> > > > What i said, open ur eyes and mind, read again, a devotion is

> > > obvious

> > > > final outcome of mantra chanting.

> > > >

> > > > read what i have been saying, read many times a day, the

clouds

> > of

> > > ur

> > > > karma smokes ur understanding.

> > > >

> > > > and learn one more thing - Meera got formal deekschha from

> Saint

> > > > Raidas.

> > > >

> > > > I use company's time or what, that i manage and is a matter

of

> my

> > > > job, i dont advertise here to get some business in

background,

> > and

> > > u

> > > > 2-3 who are lobbying here , are exposed by urself.

> > > >

> > > > exposing u was not my objective, but it happened.

> > > >

> > > > it will keep happening.

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > ok

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > vedic astrology , " abhishekpotti "

> > > > <abhishekpotti@> wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > Dear Lalith:

> > > > >

> > > > > The whole world knows the history of Blessed Meera

> Bhai....the

> > > > > epitome of Bhakti......She was attached to her " Lala " - the

> > > > wonderful

> > > > > idol of Krishna gifted to her even from her childhood....Do

> you

> > > > mean

> > > > > to say that innocent young girl started chanting " Kliim

> > > krishnaaya "

> > > > > mantra automatically? Even Bhakta Prahlaada had to be

> > initiated

> > > by

> > > > > Sage Naaradha for his chant of dwaadasaakshari mantra....

> > > > >

> > > > > Nobody is afraid of you here......You need not proclaim

that

> > you

> > > > are

> > > > > not in the business of a Guru.....actually Guru status is

not

> a

> > > > > business (true to your half-baked knowledge you will claim

it

> > is

> > > > also

> > > > > like software engineering!). The difference my friend

> between

> > > you

> > > > > and other great persons like Rafal or Dakshinamoorthiji is

> that

> > > > they

> > > > > are spending their money for the internet, whereas you are

> > > > pilfering

> > > > > your company's time and the company's resources while

> browsing

> > > the

> > > > > internet. Don't you think you are cheating your company

when

> > you

> > > > > spend so much time on empty and egoistic posts defending

> > yourself

> > > > > against every expert after arguing with them

unnecessarily?

> > Are

> > > > you

> > > > > not getting paid for the time you spend in the

> company....Know

> > > the

> > > > > basics of ethics before ever sermonizing.....So, actually

you

> > are

> > > > an

> > > > > exploiter....try to understand that....the other gurujis

are

> > > > probably

> > > > > too decent to comment on that......What happened to your

> > > project?

> > > > > Better rush to it nough!....It will spare us the agony of

> > > replying

> > > > to

> > > > > your half-witted postings!

> > > > >

> > > > > By the say, Which member asked you Prashna Tantra dear? We

> did

> > > not

> > > > > see any posts requesting " Honourable Lalith " to explain

> Prashna

> > > > > Tantra (as if you could explain it!) What arrogance you

have

> > to

> > > > > claim that nobody can stand before you.....Guruji's posts

> > exposed

> > > > > your ignorance....you did not even know how to ask queries

> and

> > > get

> > > > > replies from one of the most empathetic astrologers of this

> > > group,

> > > > > and yet you claim you are this and that......

> > > > >

> > > > > For your information....nobody is afraid of you..Rather you

> > > should

> > > > be

> > > > > afraid of yourself......Your foolishness itself will be

your

> > > doom.

> > > > > Did you not become the laughing stock due to your email-

based

> > > > chasing

> > > > > of Priyaa? Such foolishness in occult matters could be

more

> > > costly

> > > > > dear.....I think Mohanraaamji and Rafalji are only afraid

> about

> > > > your

> > > > > own well-being! They are not afraid of you. Nor am I

afraid

> of

> > > you.

> > > > >

> > > > > Your posts never answer the queries or points raised by

> others;

> > > you

> > > > > take off on a new ground only because of your shallow

> > > understanding

> > > > > of subjects. Nobody has accepted you as a Guru here, and

> > nobody

> > > > > will....Can a fire-fly eclipse the Sun? There are too

> > > many " Suns "

> > > > > here and you are just a fire-fly.

> > > > >

> > > > > It reminds me of a story.....Once an ant challenged the

> mighty

> > > > > elephant for a fight; the elephant obviously could not hear

> the

> > > ant

> > > > > (the ant being so tiny and it was on the ground, its sound

> > could

> > > > not

> > > > > reach the elephant). The elephant just walked away out of

its

> > own

> > > > > volition in its natural course. Then the ant

claimed, " you

> > see

> > > I

> > > > > challenged the elephant and it ran away " . Dear, your

saying

> > that

> > > > > nobody can stand before you is similar to that.......

> > > > >

> > > > > FIRST LEARN THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN GHOSTS AND YOUR ANCESTOR

> > > > > SUMANGALIS BEFORE WRITING THE FIRST POSTS ON OCCULT! What

a

> > > > > pity......what a pity.....That we have to bear your

> meaningless

> > > > > rantings here!

> > > > >

> > > > > Abhishek.

> > > > >

> > > > > vedic astrology , " litsol "

> > <mishra.lalit@>

> > > > > wrote:

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > I was waiting for u dear..

> > > > > >

> > > > > > why u took time ?

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Do u mean Meera Bai discussed with u, what she did..

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Do u know 'Kleem Krishnay, Govindaya Gopijan Vallabhaya

> > Namh'

> > > is

> > > > a

> > > > > > mantra for lord krishna.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > is there no beej mantras, to whom u wish to misguide ?

let

> > > > thnigs

> > > > > > remain between lord, bhakta , their shraddha and their

guru.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > why u people are so afraid of me, i m not in business of

> > guru.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > i m happy with my life, my profession of software

> > engineering

> > > > and

> > > > > > my hobbies ok.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > there are 7000+ members are here, by writing such type

of

> > > > foolish

> > > > > > things u expose urself only, mind, there are better

brains

> > here.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > this is enough ...

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > vedic astrology ,

> > > > > > " abhishekpotti " <abhishekpotti@> wrote:

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Respected Mohanraaamji:

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Well said. Lalith is saying that " maybe in south india

> > > > devotees

> > > > > > > don't chant Moola mantras but not so in North " ...What

> > > > > > > stupidity.....He does not seem to understand

that " mantra

> > > > > shaastra

> > > > > > > experts " are also devotees, but they cannot be called

as

> > > > innocent

> > > > > > > saatwik bhaktaas! A typical example of a pure saadhwik

> > > bhakta

> > > > > will

> > > > > > > be Meera Bhai (was she not North Indian). Can Lalith

say

> > > which

> > > > > > Dasa

> > > > > > > Mahaa Vidya Meera Bhai practised? She was immersed in

> > > Krishna

> > > > > > > consciousness and Lover for Him. Her own Bhajans were

> her

> > > > > prayers

> > > > > > in

> > > > > > > the bhaavana of Bhakti in the form of Love! This is

not

> > > mantra

> > > > > > > shaastra. Another example will be Saant Tukhaaraam.

> These

> > > > > > bhaktaas

> > > > > > > did not chant moola mantraas. Panditji Dakshinamoorthi

> was

> > > on

> > > > > dot

> > > > > > in

> > > > > > > saying that " Pure bhaktaas do not chant complicated

moola

> > > > > > mantraas " .

> > > > > > > You have clarified this fact wonderfully in your post.

I

> > wish

> > > > > more

> > > > > > > knowledgeable persons also put erratic posters in their

> > place

> > > > > just

> > > > > > as

> > > > > > > Mohanraaamji does here. This will benefit more naive

> > readers

> > > > of

> > > > > > > these forums who might otherwise get confused as to

which

> > of

> > > > the

> > > > > > > paths to follow. Actually, anyone can follow any path

as

> > he/

> > > > she

> > > > > > > deems it fit; but there should be consistency of

> procedures.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > We should not confuse mantrik rituals and bhakti

> > doctrines.

> > > > > > Bhaktaas

> > > > > > > can chant the names of Gods at anytime.....Mantra

> shaastra

> > > > > experts

> > > > > > > chanting advanced moola mantras should necessarily

adopt

> > > ritual

> > > > > > > procedures for the welfare of themselves and others!

> > > > > > Yes...improper

> > > > > > > chanting of mantras can cause danger to the society

also

> > just

> > > > as

> > > > > > > proper chanting can help others. Hence, this cannot be

> > > > > considered

> > > > > > as

> > > > > > > a personal preference of the aspirant. If this was not

> the

> > > > case,

> > > > > > why

> > > > > > > did sages codify spiritual practises scrupulously?

> > Rafalji,

> > > > > > > Mohanraaamji, etc. are correct in saying it is best to

> > follow

> > > > > > Pandit

> > > > > > > Dakshinamoorthiji's advices on mantra shastra or

japams.

> > He

> > > is

> > > > > > > learned and he is living a life compatible to the

> shaastras

> > > > > though

> > > > > > he

> > > > > > > has faced uncertain circumstances in his own personal

> > life.

> > > He

> > > > > > never

> > > > > > > compromised on principles and he willingly paid the

price

> > for

> > > > > that

> > > > > > > which most of us will never do. The words of such a

> person

> > > > > should

> > > > > > > obviously carry more weight.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Abhishek.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > vedic astrology , " mohanraaam "

> > > > > <mohanraaam@>

> > > > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Well Lalith:

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > If you have really done dasa Maha Vidyaa, you would

> have

> > > > never

> > > > > > > > approached a professional astrologer for

> > > consultation...that

> > > > > much

> > > > > > I

> > > > > > > > can say....

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > And what idiocy when you say Panditji is partly

wrong?

> > He

> > > > > > > > said " Bhaktaas do not chant Moola mantras " , whereas

you

> > > have

> > > > > > edited

> > > > > > > > the words to suit your ends....He never

said " devotees

> > > don't

> > > > > > chant

> > > > > > > > Beej mantras " .....You are putting words into his

mouth

> > and

> > > > > > assuming

> > > > > > > > he is wrong! Why, do you know....the Great Panditji

> > himself

> > > > > > chants

> > > > > > > > Moola mantras.....He is a bhakta and a mantra shastra

> > > expert.

> > > > > As

> > > > > > a

> > > > > > > > bhakta he keeps incessant chanting of naama japa

> > throughout

> > > > the

> > > > > > > day;

> > > > > > > > as a mantra shastra expert, he restricts the moola

> mantra

> > > > > japams

> > > > > > to

> > > > > > > > stipulated times with ritual purity.....It is this

> > > wonderful

> > > > > > > practice

> > > > > > > > that Guruji was alluding to. Guruji cannot be wrong

in

> > > > ritual

> > > > > > and

> > > > > > > > occult matters. Please understand that.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > There are 4 classes of Devotees.......1) Saatwik

vedic

> > > > devotees

> > > > > > who

> > > > > > > > will follow vedic dharma scrupulously. They will not

> > dare

> > > to

> > > > > > > compare

> > > > > > > > astrology and vedanga to Engineering! as you did...

> > > > > > > > 2) Raajasik devotees who will follow vedic

disciplines

> as

> > > far

> > > > > as

> > > > > > > > possible, but will still go after upaasanaas of Demi-

> Gods

> > > for

> > > > > > > > accomplishment of siddhis. Mantra shaastra experts

> > usually

> > > > > fall

> > > > > > in

> > > > > > > > this category.

> > > > > > > > 3) Saatwik Bhaktaas - for whom the meditation and

glory

> > of

> > > > > their

> > > > > > > > Ishta Devataa is enough for spiritual satisfaction.

It

> > is

> > > > this

> > > > > > > > category that Guruji referred to when he said they

will

> > not

> > > > > chant

> > > > > > > > Moola mantras too much. Definitely they will not do

> Dasa

> > > > Mahaa

> > > > > > > > Vidyaa.

> > > > > > > > 4) Taamasic Devotees - Those whose main motive is to

> > > project

> > > > > > > > themselves at all costs and acting as if they are

equal

> > to

> > > > the

> > > > > > > > experts; they will try ALL practices - whether they

are

> > > > > > sanctioned

> > > > > > > by

> > > > > > > > vedas or not.....Their only aim is personal glory and

> > > > > > > satisfaction.

> > > > > > > > They will attack even established dharma if they do

not

> > get

> > > > > > results

> > > > > > > > (sounds familiar....You are one!) Ignorance and half-

> > baked

> > > > > > > knowledge

> > > > > > > > and egotism are these persons' motivating fuel.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > You are really satan's Gift to this list.......My

only

> > > prayer

> > > > > is

> > > > > > > that

> > > > > > > > innocent members of this list do not get side-tracked

> > with

> > > > your

> > > > > > > > ramblings.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Let me make this clear to the list.....Panditji said

> that

> > > > > saatwik

> > > > > > > > Bhaktaas who chant Divine names only due to Pure Love

> on

> > > God

> > > > > > > usually

> > > > > > > > never chant mantrik moola mantraas. It is just one

> class

> > > of

> > > > > > > > devotees. A rajasik bhakta who is a mantra-shaastra

> > expert

> > > > may

> > > > > > > even

> > > > > > > > be a bhakta at heart; and a pure bhakta may sometimes

> > chant

> > > > > some

> > > > > > > > mantrik japams for solving some practical

> > issues......But,

> > > > when

> > > > > > > they

> > > > > > > > switch their routines temporarily, these enlightened

> > > devotees

> > > > > > > usually

> > > > > > > > take good guidance and follow the tenets of shaastras

> > > > > > > > scrupulously....Definitely they will not sit on

> > assumption

> > > > like

> > > > > > > > Lalith.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > On the one hand, this fellow claims he has done

chants

> in

> > > > > > forests,

> > > > > > > > rivers, earth, etc. (Probably we have a Maharishi

here!

> > > What

> > > > > > > heights

> > > > > > > > of pointless pride in this young man list....it is

> > > > > disgusting!).

> > > > > > > On

> > > > > > > > the other hand, he says he chants mantras in buses,

> > trains,

> > > > > > > etc......

> > > > > > > > He is confused about which no body can have issues.

> Only

> > > his

> > > > > > Guru

> > > > > > > > should be concerned about that.....But, his attempts

to

> > > stuff

> > > > > his

> > > > > > > > shallow understanding upon this list is

reprehensible.

> > > And,

> > > > > his

> > > > > > > > habit of quoting experts out of context is really

> > > > condemnable.

> > > > > > May

> > > > > > > > Jupiter's Light Shine on that fellow and teach him to

> > > respect

> > > > > the

> > > > > > > > hallowed traditions and to stay at his level rather

> than

> > > > trying

> > > > > > > > to " teach " others (He has the audacity to claim he

> > > > > is " teaching "

> > > > > > > > Rafalji!)

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > If a mere young man of 35 years who has spent his

life

> on

> > a

> > > > > > " Failed

> > > > > > > > computer web desining business " , " pointless email

> chasing

> > > of

> > > > > > > girls " ,

> > > > > > > > and other " past times " can gain insight as he claims,

> how

> > > > much

> > > > > > will

> > > > > > > > learned Gurus of this group with their life of

devotion

> > to

> > > > > > vedanta

> > > > > > > > and vedanga know? His peanut brain and hyper-

inflated

> > ego

> > > > will

> > > > > > > never

> > > > > > > > allow him to see this obvious truth. But, please

list

> > > > exercise

> > > > > > > your

> > > > > > > > discretion while reading his posts (There are

doubtless

> > > some

> > > > > good

> > > > > > > > elements even in his posts; but mostly there is trash

> > > > presented

> > > > > > as

> > > > > > > > philosophy).

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Mohanraaam

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > vedic astrology , " litsol "

> > > > > <mishra.lalit@>

> > > > > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > Dear Rafal,

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > Do u think, a hobby means shallow knowledge of the

> > > domain,

> > > > No

> > > > > > > > rafal,

> > > > > > > > > it's not like that.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > At least not for me. You have learnt and i m

> learning,

> > i

> > > > read

> > > > > > > ur's

> > > > > > > > > replies and get benifitted, same way i wanted you

to

> > pay

> > > > > heed

> > > > > > to

> > > > > > > > > what i have written about spritiuality, mostrly i

did

> > > write

> > > > > for

> > > > > > u

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > I have done all 10 mahavidyas of tantra and read

many

> > > > tantrik

> > > > > > > > > classics, spent good deal of time with great

> tantriks

> > > > > trained

> > > > > > in

> > > > > > > > > Kamakhya and other places, keenly observed their

> > doings,

> > > > > their

> > > > > > > > > mistakes etc.., I did tremendous mantra chanting

on

> > > water,

> > > > > on

> > > > > > > > earth,

> > > > > > > > > at home, in forests etc...

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > then reached here, then i did write something, but

> > sorry

> > > i

> > > > > dont

> > > > > > > > > remember shlokas. i was not interested in cramming

> that.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > Panditji is not fully correct in saying that

> > BeejMantras

> > > > are

> > > > > > not

> > > > > > > > > chanted by devotees, I dont know much about South

> India

> > > but

> > > > > in

> > > > > > > > North

> > > > > > > > > normally its done.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > And a successfull mantra sadhana has to result in

> one's

> > > > being

> > > > > a

> > > > > > > > > devotee, the devotion is the outcome, final result

of

> > > > mantra

> > > > > > > > sadhana,

> > > > > > > > > perhaps, Pandit Ji believes mantras are power

> > > > packet,thinks,

> > > > > i

> > > > > > do

> > > > > > > > it

> > > > > > > > > this way , these many times and get this result,

this

> > is

> > > > > where

> > > > > > > most

> > > > > > > > > of the people are confused. without being a good

> human

> > > > being

> > > > > if

> > > > > > > we

> > > > > > > > > think, we will achieve something in spirituality,

is

> > > > > difficult,

> > > > > > > > very

> > > > > > > > > difficult.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > what happens is, with the mantra chanting, a self

> > > > > > > transformation

> > > > > > > > > process begins, u if dont restrict urself, ur karma

> > > begins

> > > > > > > > diluting,

> > > > > > > > > and u begin ur purification process unknowingly,

when

> > > > > > substantial

> > > > > > > > > part of ego and greed for respect vanishes and many

> > such

> > > > > thing

> > > > > > > > > togather, mantra awakens u and with the God's grace

> ur

> > > > > > objective

> > > > > > > > gets

> > > > > > > > > fullfilled, gradually u become a devotee. ur being

> > simple

> > > > and

> > > > > > > being

> > > > > > > > > devotee is sometimes is indication of ur's going on

> the

> > > > right

> > > > > > > track.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > I think we have discussed a lot, it's enough !!

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > My Boss has given me lot of projects to complete,

so,

> > may

> > > > be,

> > > > > i

> > > > > > m

> > > > > > > > not

> > > > > > > > > going to available in the group like i was

recently.

> > > > however.

> > > > > i

> > > > > > > > will

> > > > > > > > > complete Garg Hora series.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > regards,

> > > > > > > > > Lalit.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > vedic astrology , Rafal

Gendarz

> > > > > > > > > <starsuponme@> wrote:

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya*

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > Dear Litsol,

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > Then please dont generalize Your preferences as

> they

> > > are

> > > > > too

> > > > > > > > > shallow for

> > > > > > > > > > this Forum aspiration.

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > Regards,

> > > > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz

> > > > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru

> > > > > > > > > > email: rafal@

> > > > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa.com

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > litsol napisa?(a):

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > Dear Rafel,

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > I take Astrology as a good hobby, and i w'd be

> > > looking

> > > > at

> > > > > > it

> > > > > > > > with

> > > > > > > > > an

> > > > > > > > > > > engineer's approach.

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > I asked ur age because, it's our thinking to

put

> > our

> > > > > > > parameters

> > > > > > > > in

> > > > > > > > > > > god's system, there is nothing like delay or

> > > > advancement

> > > > > in

> > > > > > > > > > > spirituality. So, " Delay "

> > or " Speed " , " backwardness "

> > > > > > > > > > > and " advancement " doesn't exist in

spirituality,

> I

> > > > > thought

> > > > > > if

> > > > > > > u

> > > > > > > > r

> > > > > > > > > > > thinking that it may take too much time, I

wanted

> > to

> > > > tell

> > > > > > u,

> > > > > > > > it's

> > > > > > > > > not

> > > > > > > > > > > like that. there is no delay.

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > It clicks in fraction of a second, when u r

> getting

> > > > > clicked

> > > > > > > > > depends

> > > > > > > > > > > on u and on god's will, when he wants u to get

> > > clicked.

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > God sometimes graces for no reason ( " Ahetuka " )

> just

> > > for

> > > > > his

> > > > > > > > > > > compassion towards u and it may happen next

> minute

> > > too.

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > spirituality is not delimited by time , effort

> and

> > > > rules.

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > Lalit.

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology

> > > > > > > > > > > <vedic astrology%40>,

Rafal

> > > > Gendarz

> > > > > > > > > > > <starsuponme@ ...> wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya*

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Litsol,

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > Please be careful about words.

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > Im happy that You are sharing Your

experience -

> > > very

> > > > > > > > inspirating

> > > > > > > > > > > ones.

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > Age hierarchy is for sudras - Manu Samhita.

If

> > You

> > > > > treat

> > > > > > > > Jyotish

> > > > > > > > > > > Vedanga

> > > > > > > > > > > > as profession similar to engineering You have

a

> > > long

> > > > > way

> > > > > > to

> > > > > > > > go.

> > > > > > > > > But

> > > > > > > > > > > dont

> > > > > > > > > > > > be pessimistic here are many who will try to

> help

> > > You

> > > > > in

> > > > > > > > getting

> > > > > > > > > > > proper

> > > > > > > > > > > > understanding.

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > After some time You will agree with me about

> the

> > > mala

> > > > > and

> > > > > > > > japa.

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > Regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz

> > > > > > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru

> > > > > > > > > > > > email: rafal@

> > > > > > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > litsol napisa?(a):

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Rafal,

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Here u r doing two wrong things, instead of

> > > > > developing

> > > > > > ur

> > > > > > > > > > > understanding,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > u r trying to conclude something and going

> > beyond

> > > > > that

> > > > > > u r

> > > > > > > > > > > messaging

> > > > > > > > > > > > > same to many.

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > I m touching 35, What's ur age ?

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Astrology is a kind of vidya or profession,

> > like

> > > i

> > > > m

> > > > > a

> > > > > > > > > software

> > > > > > > > > > > > > engineer, software engineering is my

> > profession.

> > > > > > > > spirituality

> > > > > > > > > is

> > > > > > > > > > > beyond

> > > > > > > > > > > > > all sort of vidya or profession.

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > I wish u to be a good soul and to realize

the

> > > bliss

> > > > > of

> > > > > > > self

> > > > > > > > > > > awakening or

> > > > > > > > > > > > > in other terms, the bliss that comes once u

> > feel

> > > u

> > > > > and

> > > > > > > god

> > > > > > > > is

> > > > > > > > > > > > > connected. dissolved in each other.

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > First realize, experience, then speak and

> then

> > > > > suggest

> > > > > > to

> > > > > > > > > others,

> > > > > > > > > > > by

> > > > > > > > > > > > > mere reading shastras or books u r not

going

> to

> > > > feel

> > > > > > it.

> > > > > > > > > unless

> > > > > > > > > > > god

> > > > > > > > > > > > > graces u it's very very difficult. and if u

> > dont

> > > > > avoid

> > > > > > > this

> > > > > > > > > sort

> > > > > > > > > > > of

> > > > > > > > > > > > > hurriedness instead of learning and

> > > understanding,

> > > > it

> > > > > > > will

> > > > > > > > > affect

> > > > > > > > > > > u only

> > > > > > > > > > > > > no one else.

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > somehere i have read, it was written - By

> mere

> > > > > > > > repeating " So-

> > > > > > > > > > > Aham " no

> > > > > > > > > > > > > one gets liberated unless he realizes it

like

> > one

> > > > > > doesnt

> > > > > > > get

> > > > > > > > > > > cured by

> > > > > > > > > > > > > knowing the name of the medicine, u need to

> > take

> > > > the

> > > > > > > > medicine

> > > > > > > > > to

> > > > > > > > > > > get

> > > > > > > > > > > > > cured " .

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > So, pls. be wise, as it was being discussed

> > here,

> > > i

> > > > > > > shared

> > > > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > > > > > experience of my life, pls. mind it, i m

not

> a

> > > > > > preecher,

> > > > > > > > nor a

> > > > > > > > > > > guru, nor

> > > > > > > > > > > > > i have to make my followers, nor it's my

> > > > profession,

> > > > > > nor

> > > > > > > i

> > > > > > > > > have

> > > > > > > > > > > to get

> > > > > > > > > > > > > fame, sharing things is a kind of

> friendliness

> > a

> > > > kind

> > > > > of

> > > > > > > > > > > affection,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > that's it.

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Lalit.

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology

> > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40.

> com>,

> > > > Rafal

> > > > > > > Gendarz

> > > > > > > > > > > > > <starsuponme@ ...>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya*

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Jyotishas

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Counting of mala has more depth sense

than

> > just

> > > > > > > counting,

> > > > > > > > > so for

> > > > > > > > > > > > > natives

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > like Litsol counting is neccessary and

any

> > > other

> > > > > > > > speculation

> > > > > > > > > > > will be

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > only illusory and just imagination. We

> should

> > > > > follow

> > > > > > Pt.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Dakshinamoorti

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > advise strictly, otherwise our process of

> > > > spiritual

> > > > > > > > > development

> > > > > > > > > > > will

> > > > > > > > > > > > > be

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > slow and unauthoritative.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > email: rafal@

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > asmp2k02@ napisa?(a):

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Resp Sri Lalitji,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for your mail.But please also

read

> > > > > > > > > GuruDakshinamurthyi

> > > > > > > > > > > ji's

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > mail(addressing me) also on this,which

> > brings

> > > > in

> > > > > > more

> > > > > > > > > clarity

> > > > > > > > > > > to the

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > applicability principles to my mail.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I meant that both are necessity but to

> what

> > > > > degree

> > > > > > of

> > > > > > > > time

> > > > > > > > > (it

> > > > > > > > > > > varies

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > from saadhaka to saadhaka) to get such

> > > inbuilt

> > > > > > > maturity

> > > > > > > > > such

> > > > > > > > > > > that

> > > > > > > > > > > > > that

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the count will be taken care of by

Divine

> > > > forces

> > > > > > > after

> > > > > > > > > some

> > > > > > > > > > > initial

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > period of saadhana.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Morover the type of bio matter present

in

> > the

> > > > > japa

> > > > > > > maala

> > > > > > > > > > > (which is

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > symbolic for ritualism as well as from

> > > > practical

> > > > > > > point

> > > > > > > > of

> > > > > > > > > > > view for

> > > > > > > > > > > > > our

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > count) will help in keeping away

> > destructive

> > > > > forces

> > > > > > > > > acting on

> > > > > > > > > > > us

> > > > > > > > > > > > > .Thus

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the symbolic rituals will indirectly

help

> > us

> > > in

> > > > > > > keeping

> > > > > > > > > away

> > > > > > > > > > > from

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > negative thoughts and also trains our

> > memory

> > > to

> > > > > be

> > > > > > > > object

> > > > > > > > > > > > > oriented.If

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > our memory grows and retentive capacity

> > > > increase

> > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > Gnaana

> > > > > > > > > > > will

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > increase ,but at the same time

> destructive

> > > > forces

> > > > > > > > > > > (diversions) also

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > becomes powerful.Thus the symbolic

> > procedures

> > > > > will

> > > > > > > come

> > > > > > > > in

> > > > > > > > > > > handy to

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > successfully fight the negative

> forces.The

> > > > > rituals

> > > > > > > may

> > > > > > > > be

> > > > > > > > > > > Rising

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > early(if possible during Braahmi

> > > muhurta),Taking

> > > > > > > > > > > bath,Japaanusthaan,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > attending to the livelihood job etc etc

> in

> > > > > defined

> > > > > > > > times

> > > > > > > > > as

> > > > > > > > > > > > > discipline

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > helps indirectly tune our memory

through

> > > > keeping

> > > > > > our

> > > > > > > > body

> > > > > > > > > > > healthy.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thus ultimately we conclude that the so

> > > called

> > > > > > > symbolic

> > > > > > > > > > > procedures

> > > > > > > > > > > > > are

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > not actually symbolic(it got branded as

> > such)

> > > > but

> > > > > a

> > > > > > > > > necessity

> > > > > > > > > > > for

> > > > > > > > > > > > > our

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > own good if we practice to the extent

we

> > can.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quoting mishra.lalit@ ...

<mishra.

> > > lalit%

> > > > > > > > 40gmail.

> > > > > > > > > com>:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Resp. Sri Murthy Adavi,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, what you said is perfectly right,

we

> > > count

> > > > > or

> > > > > > > dont

> > > > > > > > > > > count,target

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > is realization of god's love within, I

> got

> > it

> > > > > with

> > > > > > no

> > > > > > > > > > > counting,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someone may get it with counting.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanx, for the writing.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Lalit.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology

> > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40.

com>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology%

40.

> > > com>,

> > > > > > > srinivasa

> > > > > > > > > > > murthy adavi

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > asmp2k02@ wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Respected Learned Members,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Both views may be correct when the

> views

> > > > > have/or

> > > > > > > with

> > > > > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > > > goal as

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > development of Love/Devotion towards

> > > adhistana

> > > > > > > Devatha

> > > > > > > > of

> > > > > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > > > Mantra

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > as Base.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In the initial stage only you need

the

> > > > count;as

> > > > > > one

> > > > > > > > > > > develops the

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > habit the biological tuning of the

> > > > intellect/body

> > > > > > will

> > > > > > > > > > > automatically

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > take care of the practice(without count-

> > help

> > > of

> > > > > > malas

> > > > > > > > > etc).

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It's like if with the help of Alarm

> clock

> > > if

> > > > we

> > > > > > > wake

> > > > > > > > up

> > > > > > > > > for

> > > > > > > > > > > 2 or 3

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > days at some appointed hour,then

> > > automatically

> > > > we

> > > > > > > > wakeup

> > > > > > > > > at

> > > > > > > > > > > the same

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > time every day without help of alarm.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > With due Respects

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > smadavi

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quoting starsuponme@ :

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya*

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Litsol,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Definitely we should count our Mantra

> > Japa

> > > on

> > > > > > Mala.

> > > > > > > > Your

> > > > > > > > > > > view is

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > against

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Vedic Authorities and Sages, so

should

> be

> > > > > > rejected.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > email: rafal@

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > litsol napisa?(a):

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Mr. Jayashri,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > A thought came, why i should not

> share

> > > with

> > > > > u,

> > > > > > U

> > > > > > > > pls.

> > > > > > > > > stop

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > counting

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > mantra chantings, counting mantra

> gives

> > > > false

> > > > > > ego

> > > > > > > > and

> > > > > > > > > then

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > frustration if u dont get desired

> > results.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > leave it to the god, god counts the

> > > mantra

> > > > > > > chanted

> > > > > > > > by

> > > > > > > > > you

> > > > > > > > > > > may be

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 108, 1008 or whatsoever, let him

> count,

> > > > it's

> > > > > > his

> > > > > > > > part

> > > > > > > > > and

> > > > > > > > > > > ur

> > > > > > > > > > > > > part

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > is

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to chant the mantra. when the

mantra

> > has

> > > to

> > > > > > > awaken,

> > > > > > > > it

> > > > > > > > > > > will be,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > god

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > will ensure it for u.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sometimes we try to become more

> > > intelligent

> > > > > > with

> > > > > > > out

> > > > > > > > > > > limited

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > intellect and that creates

obstacles

> in

> > > our

> > > > > > > > spiritual

> > > > > > > > > > > growth.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So, forget about counts, forget

about

> > the

> > > > > time

> > > > > > u

> > > > > > > > put

> > > > > > > > > in

> > > > > > > > > > > for ur's

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sadhana, invoke the god with pure

> > heart.

> > > > > purity

> > > > > > > > > counts.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Lalit.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology@

.

> com

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology%

> 40.

> > > > > > > > > > > com>, " dakshinastrologer "

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <dakshinastrologer@ ...> wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Ms. Jayashree:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think this topic on 108 is

> getting

> > > very

> > > > > > > > > interesting

> > > > > > > > > > > and

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > enlightening for all members.

> > Yesterday

> > > > we

> > > > > > had a

> > > > > > > > > > > wonderful

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > esoteric

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > explanation from Shri. Sushil

> > Dikshit,

> > > > and

> > > > > > > today

> > > > > > > > > your

> > > > > > > > > > > > > wonderful

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > explanation of numerical symmetry

> of

> > > the

> > > > > > cosmos!

> > > > > > > > > > > Wonderful.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There definitely exists

> a " numerical

> > > > > > symphony "

> > > > > > > in

> > > > > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Universe.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > not only 108.....as I mentioned

in

> my

> > > > > earlier

> > > > > > > > post,

> > > > > > > > > > > there are

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > various

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > other numerals that are

significant

> > in

> > > > > occult

> > > > > > > > > > > practices. 108

> > > > > > > > > > > > > is

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > a

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > powerful and all-purpose perfect

> > > > > > number...While

> > > > > > > > we

> > > > > > > > > have

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > understood

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the glory of 108, we should not

> lose

> > > > sight

> > > > > of

> > > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > fact

> > > > > > > > > > > that

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > there

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > are

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > other powerful numbers also. This

> is

> > > just

> > > > > for

> > > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > > > information

> > > > > > > > > > > > > of

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > list.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > My apprecitation again for this

> > > wonderful

> > > > > > > > response.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Blessed be.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pandit R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Blessed be.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pandit R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI. --- In

> > vedic-

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > astrology@grou ps.com

> > > > > <astrology%

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 40. com>,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " jayasartn " <jayasartn@> wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In cosmology, 108 has this

> > > > significance -

> > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > moon is

> > > > > > > > > > > away

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > from

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > earth 108 times its (moon's)

> > diameter

> > > > and

> > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > sun

> > > > > > > > > is

> > > > > > > > > > > away

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > from the

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > earth, 108 times its diameter.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Perhaps this reality of

distances

> > is

> > > > > > > applicable

> > > > > > > > to

> > > > > > > > > > > deities

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > too.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Perhaps this has been indicated

> by

> > > the

> > > > > 108

> > > > > > > divya

> > > > > > > > > > > desas of

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Lord

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Narayana.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > jayasree

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology@

> > .

> > > com

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology%

> 40.

> > > > > > > > > > > com>, " dakshinastrologer "

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <dakshinastrologer@ > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Shri. Sushil:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It is a wonderful answer you

> have

> > > > given.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Blessed be.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pandit R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology@

> > > .

> > > > com

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology%

> 40.

> > > > > > > > > > > com>, " sushil.dikshit "

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <sushil.dikshit@ > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Babu,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It is not a silly question

> but

> > it

> > > > is

> > > > > a

> > > > > > > very

> > > > > > > > > good

> > > > > > > > > > > > > question.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Actually

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > there are 27 Nakshatras and

> > every

> > > > > > > Nakshtras

> > > > > > > > > has 4

> > > > > > > > > > > Charan

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > so

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > total

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > charans are 27 x 4 = 108

> > Charan.

> > > > Each

> > > > > > > > Charan

> > > > > > > > > has 3

> > > > > > > > > > > > > degree

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 20

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > minutes so if you multiply

3

> > > degree

> > > > > and

> > > > > > 20

> > > > > > > > > > > minutes to

> > > > > > > > > > > > > 108

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > it

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > comes

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > out to be 360 degress i.e.

> one

> > > > cycle

> > > > > > > > (Circle).

> > > > > > > > > > > This

> > > > > > > > > > > > > cycle

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > represetns

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > whole brahmand because all

> the

> > > > > rashis,

> > > > > > > > > planets and

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > nakshatra

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > are

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > between these 360 degree in

2

> > > > > > dimensional

> > > > > > > > > > > horoscope. So

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > chanting a

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mantra completes one cycle

of

> > > this

> > > > > > > brahmand.

> > > > > > > > > > > Further One

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > who

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > has

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > visited Brahamand at least

> one

> > > time

> > > > > > i.e.

> > > > > > > he

> > > > > > > > is

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > brahmagyani he

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > is

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > entitiled to place 108 Shri

> > > before

> > > > > his

> > > > > > > name.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sushil dikshit

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology@

> > > > .

> > > > > com

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology%

> > 40.

> > > > > com>,

> > > > > > > babu

> > > > > > > > > mon

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <muthappan111@ >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Namaste,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It may be a silly matter

> for

> > > all

> > > > of

> > > > > > you.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I want to know what is

the

> > > reason

> > > > > > that

> > > > > > > > some

> > > > > > > > > > > remedies

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > recomended

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > for 108 times.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I dont know any thing

about

> > > > > astrology.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I hope you may pleased to

> > > provide

> > > > a

> > > > > > > reply

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thanks,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Babu

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------ --------- ---

--

> --

> > --

> > > -

> > > > --

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Be a better Globetrotter.

> Get

> > > > > better

> > > > > > > > travel

> > > > > > > > > > > answers

> > > > > > > > > > > > > from

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someone

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > who knows.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Answers - Check it

> out.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of

this

> > > > message

> > > > > > have

> > > > > > > > been

> > > > > > > > > > > removed]

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message

have

> > > been

> > > > > > > removed]

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message

have

> > > been

> > > > > > > removed]

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have

> > been

> > > > > > removed]

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have

> been

> > > > > removed]

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been

> > > removed]

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been

> removed]

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > >

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Oye Lalith:

 

You think they teach " mantra " shashtra basics in 8th standard

sanskrit syllabus! Or, they had a separate syllabus for you! Your

hallucination and illusion seem to have no limits!

 

You can't even remember simple slokhas and yet feel you are qualified

to debate with people who have mastered works like Tantra saara, and

other classics, and what is more have practical siddhis!

 

Ram Jaswal is also too junior to both me and Mohanraaamji. He said

what he felt; I have written to him explaining myself. You people are

all too young and inexperienced to advice me or Mohanraaamji. Only

Panditji has the moral right to control us, because of his knowledge

and spotless attitude of perfect ethics. We will listen to no one

else - not even Rafalji here. But, Guruji is not even reading these

posts and I think he will not interfere in this debate because this

has become " personal " between Lalith and Me/ Mohanraaamji.

 

I again say one thing.....I assure this group also about this......If

Lalith stops his harangues, I will also stop. If he keeps referring

to me or Mohanraaamji and uses dangerous words like " manipulator " I

will keep posting abrasive mails like these. It is not that one

person has the right to abuse and others should keep quite. He

abused us and we are sarcastically attacking him. That is all to it.

 

Please members advice him to stop, and I will stop. I HONESTLY WANT

TO STOP THIS. But, I have nothing to fear; I have not done any

mistake and so there is no risk of getting exposed.

 

But Lalith may lose his very job if his managers happen to see that

he spends so much time on the internet in empty harangues because he

is using company's time for this. What he does is unethical though

it does not concern this group. We have no such things; we are

retired persons. PEOPLE WHO SPEAK OF SPIRITUALITY SHOULD FIRST BE

ETHICAL.

 

Abhishek.

 

vedic astrology , " litsol " <mishra.lalit

wrote:

>

> Res. Ram ji,

>

> Pls. dont advice him or mohan raam, they have nothing to debate or

> discuss on either mantra or bhakti.

>

> I don't remember shlokas much as i read classics for my

satisfaction,

> in two phases, firstly from my class 8'th till my 2nd year of

> graduation. that time i had no faith and no bhakti, just read like

i

> was reading some comics or cartoon books, i had not developed

ideas,

> not taken any message, i knew and i can talk about the content, but

i

> was not involved.

>

> after that incident happened at Sharda Temple,Maihar,it was

> unbelievable and it made me change my thoughts, i again read some

> classics and this time,i grasped the message given in the classics.

>

> They are at the stage of my chlidhood, they may read and discuss.

but

> dont take the message in their heart, somewhere their greed to

> establish themselves as pandit or authority is also a reason.

>

> Perhapse, in lieu of, hitting them hard, i had to take another rout

> to let them realize they are wrong and deliberately wrong.

>

> He didnt say any thing on my how i shown, beej and god's name is

one

> and same thing, in fact it's a simple thnig, and well known but

they

> dont accept.

>

> let them dont accept, what difference it makes to us, they have

their

> life with them, any qualitative change within them will do good to

> them only.

>

> So, i prayed maa, mother divine for mohan raam, he is too old, his

> problem is he learnt astrology, did some breathing excercises, but

he

> lacks spiritual experiences so he doesn't believe, I was like him

in

> my childhood.

>

> I prayed, and it's acknowledged by maa, time will change for him a

> little, what didn't happen to him in last 85 yrs, will happen in

next

> 5-6 monnths, he will get some good spritiual experience, the

curtain

> will be lifted for some time, reality at a glance.

>

> after that it's his part to stick to that or not, coz, ego, greed

and

> fear still remains, i m not completely gone out of it, i have to

> fight with me many times.

>

> I thought gruop w'd be a good plateform to get like minded friends,

> if nothnig, it gives joy.

>

> Let's wish good for all, I also express my gratitude to you to

speak

> for what u thought right.

>

> regards,

> Lalit.

>

vedic astrology , " Ram Jaswal " <rkjaswal@>

> wrote:

> >

> > Namaste Abhishek

> >

> > My post wasn't so much in defense of Lalith but one to stop

> the " belittling "

> > of a person within this Group. If you don't agree with someone's

> views you

> > are perfectly within your rights to say so why in a scholarly

> fashion so as

> > to discuss and further the merits of the topic under discussion.

> Thereafter

> > it is a matter for the individual to either continue with the on-

> going

> > discussion or to stop? The only way you or anyone else is likely

to

> change

> > Lalith's view on chanting of Mantras will be from a scholarly

> viewpoint and

> > not from goading him?

> >

> > Also why are you taking personal offense? If Guru's can ignore

his

> comments

> > - can't you do the same?

> >

> > With freedom of speech comes the responsibility of keeping a

civil

> and

> > polite language - please re-read your note which prompted my

earlier

> > response.

> >

> > Like I said in my earlier post it is all about ones viewpoints -

my

> personal

> > advise to everyone would be to take what you find reasonable and

> ignore the

> > rest.

> >

> > Best wishes ..

> >

> > Jai Sita Ram

> >

> > Ram

> > _____

> >

> > vedic astrology

> > [vedic astrology ] On Behalf Of

abhishekpotti

> > 28 July 2007 20:42

> > vedic astrology

> > [vedic astrology] Re: Oye Lalith! No one here is afraid

of

> you....

> >

> > Dear Ram Jaswal:

> >

> > If Lalith stops challenging others with his rude posts no one

will

> > run him down...please follow the threads carefully......He is

> > speaking as if he is the master of everything and everybody else

is

> a

> > fool. When he passes judgment on senior astrologers of this group

> or

> > unnecessarily challenges established conventions, we have

defended

> > that. Now, why are you defending Lalith? Don't you think if you

> > have the right to defend an offender, we have the right to defend

> the

> > more decent members and traditions that he is subtly attacking....

> >

> > just read his posts.....If he has just forwarded the Prashna

> Tantra,

> > nobody would have objected to it.....See the accompanying

comments

> > where he abrasively comments certain things......

> >

> > Open your eyes before advicing anyone. Why don't you write to

> Lalith

> > also? When did I call him names?......No sir...you are

mistaken....

> >

> > Did you not notice that even after Mohanraamji stopped writing

> posts,

> > this fellow was taunting that old gentleman repeatedly last week.

> > Where were you at that time?

> >

> > If Lalith stops writing abrasive posts like " Nobody can stand

> before

> > me " and all that silly nonsense, we have no issues with him (or

at

> > least I have no issues with him). So, advice Lalith also in this

> > regard.

> >

> > If Lalith and you enjoy freedom of speech, we also claim the same

> > previlege.

> >

> > Abhishek.

> >

> > vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology%40>

> > , " Ram Jaswal " <rkjaswal@>

> > wrote:

> > >

> > > Namaste Abhishek/ Mohanraaam

> > >

> > > Just why are you trying to run Lalith down? From the posts that

I

> > have read

> > > All he has done is given this point of view - if you don't

accept

> > them than

> > > simply ignore it - there is No need for any name calling or

> > belittling

> > > someone.

> > >

> > > There is also nothing wrong in Lalith forwarding " Prashna

Tantra "

> > text to

> > > this group as to whether someone has requested it or not - he

> > certainly

> > > doesn't need your or mine permission to do so - after all he

> > thought it

> > > would be useful to everyone - again his view.

> > >

> > > Sorry if I am coming across annoyed and perhaps rude But feel

it

> is

> > Best

> > > that everyone should stop " belittling " other group members as

in

> > the long

> > > run all it does is make oneself appear small and bigoted.

> > >

> > > Best wishes and hoping this will be the last mail on this

> subject ..

> > >

> > > Jai Sita Ram

> > >

> > > Ram

> > >

> > > _____

> > >

> > > vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology%

40>

> >

> > > [vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology%

> 40>

> > ] On Behalf Of abhishekpotti

> > > 28 July 2007 19:54

> > > vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology%40>

> >

> > > [vedic astrology] Oye Lalith! No one here is afraid of

> > you....

> > >

> > > Dear Lalith:

> > >

> > > The whole world knows the history of Blessed Meera Bhai....the

> > > epitome of Bhakti......She was attached to her " Lala " - the

> > wonderful

> > > idol of Krishna gifted to her even from her childhood....Do you

> > mean

> > > to say that innocent young girl started chanting " Kliim

> krishnaaya "

> > > mantra automatically? Even Bhakta Prahlaada had to be initiated

> by

> > > Sage Naaradha for his chant of dwaadasaakshari mantra....

> > >

> > > Nobody is afraid of you here......You need not proclaim that

you

> > are

> > > not in the business of a Guru.....actually Guru status is not a

> > > business (true to your half-baked knowledge you will claim it

is

> > also

> > > like software engineering!). The difference my friend between

you

> > > and other great persons like Rafal or Dakshinamoorthiji is that

> > they

> > > are spending their money for the internet, whereas you are

> > pilfering

> > > your company's time and the company's resources while browsing

> the

> > > internet. Don't you think you are cheating your company when

you

> > > spend so much time on empty and egoistic posts defending

yourself

> > > against every expert after arguing with them unnecessarily? Are

> you

> > > not getting paid for the time you spend in the company....Know

> the

> > > basics of ethics before ever sermonizing.....So, actually you

are

> > an

> > > exploiter....try to understand that....the other gurujis are

> > probably

> > > too decent to comment on that......What happened to your

project?

> > > Better rush to it nough!....It will spare us the agony of

> replying

> > to

> > > your half-witted postings!

> > >

> > > By the say, Which member asked you Prashna Tantra dear? We did

> not

> > > see any posts requesting " Honourable Lalith " to explain Prashna

> > > Tantra (as if you could explain it!) What arrogance you have to

> > > claim that nobody can stand before you.....Guruji's posts

exposed

> > > your ignorance....you did not even know how to ask queries and

> get

> > > replies from one of the most empathetic astrologers of this

> group,

> > > and yet you claim you are this and that......

> > >

> > > For your information....nobody is afraid of you..Rather you

> should

> > be

> > > afraid of yourself......Your foolishness itself will be your

> doom.

> > > Did you not become the laughing stock due to your email-based

> > chasing

> > > of Priyaa? Such foolishness in occult matters could be more

> costly

> > > dear.....I think Mohanraaamji and Rafalji are only afraid about

> > your

> > > own well-being! They are not afraid of you. Nor am I afraid of

> you.

> > >

> > > Your posts never answer the queries or points raised by others;

> you

> > > take off on a new ground only because of your shallow

> understanding

> > > of subjects. Nobody has accepted you as a Guru here, and nobody

> > > will....Can a fire-fly eclipse the Sun? There are too

many " Suns "

> > > here and you are just a fire-fly.

> > >

> > > It reminds me of a story.....Once an ant challenged the mighty

> > > elephant for a fight; the elephant obviously could not hear the

> ant

> > > (the ant being so tiny and it was on the ground, its sound

could

> > not

> > > reach the elephant). The elephant just walked away out of its

own

> > > volition in its natural course. Then the ant claimed, " you see

I

> > > challenged the elephant and it ran away " . Dear, your saying

that

> > > nobody can stand before you is similar to that.......

> > >

> > > FIRST LEARN THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN GHOSTS AND YOUR ANCESTOR

> > > SUMANGALIS BEFORE WRITING THE FIRST POSTS ON OCCULT! What a

> > > pity......what a pity.....That we have to bear your meaningless

> > > rantings here!

> > >

> > > Abhishek.

> > >

> > > vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology%

40>

> > > , " litsol " <mishra.lalit@>

> > > wrote:

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > I was waiting for u dear..

> > > >

> > > > why u took time ?

> > > >

> > > > Do u mean Meera Bai discussed with u, what she did..

> > > >

> > > > Do u know 'Kleem Krishnay, Govindaya Gopijan Vallabhaya Namh'

> is

> > a

> > > > mantra for lord krishna.

> > > >

> > > > is there no beej mantras, to whom u wish to misguide ? let

> thnigs

> > > > remain between lord, bhakta , their shraddha and their guru.

> > > >

> > > > why u people are so afraid of me, i m not in business of guru.

> > > >

> > > > i m happy with my life, my profession of software engineering

> and

> > > > my hobbies ok.

> > > >

> > > > there are 7000+ members are here, by writing such type of

> foolish

> > > > things u expose urself only, mind, there are better brains

here.

> > > >

> > > > this is enough ...

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology%

> 40>

> > > ,

> > > > " abhishekpotti " <abhishekpotti@> wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > Respected Mohanraaamji:

> > > > >

> > > > > Well said. Lalith is saying that " maybe in south india

> devotees

> > > > > don't chant Moola mantras but not so in North " ...What

> > > > > stupidity.....He does not seem to understand that " mantra

> > > shaastra

> > > > > experts " are also devotees, but they cannot be called as

> > innocent

> > > > > saatwik bhaktaas! A typical example of a pure saadhwik

bhakta

> > > will

> > > > > be Meera Bhai (was she not North Indian). Can Lalith say

> which

> > > > Dasa

> > > > > Mahaa Vidya Meera Bhai practised? She was immersed in

Krishna

> > > > > consciousness and Lover for Him. Her own Bhajans were her

> > > prayers

> > > > in

> > > > > the bhaavana of Bhakti in the form of Love! This is not

> mantra

> > > > > shaastra. Another example will be Saant Tukhaaraam. These

> > > > bhaktaas

> > > > > did not chant moola mantraas. Panditji Dakshinamoorthi was

on

> > > dot

> > > > in

> > > > > saying that " Pure bhaktaas do not chant complicated moola

> > > > mantraas " .

> > > > > You have clarified this fact wonderfully in your post. I

wish

> > > more

> > > > > knowledgeable persons also put erratic posters in their

place

> > > just

> > > > as

> > > > > Mohanraaamji does here. This will benefit more naive

readers

> of

> > > > > these forums who might otherwise get confused as to which

of

> > the

> > > > > paths to follow. Actually, anyone can follow any path as

he/

> > she

> > > > > deems it fit; but there should be consistency of procedures.

> > > > >

> > > > > We should not confuse mantrik rituals and bhakti doctrines.

> > > > Bhaktaas

> > > > > can chant the names of Gods at anytime.....Mantra shaastra

> > > experts

> > > > > chanting advanced moola mantras should necessarily adopt

> ritual

> > > > > procedures for the welfare of themselves and others!

> > > > Yes...improper

> > > > > chanting of mantras can cause danger to the society also

just

> > as

> > > > > proper chanting can help others. Hence, this cannot be

> > > considered

> > > > as

> > > > > a personal preference of the aspirant. If this was not the

> > case,

> > > > why

> > > > > did sages codify spiritual practises scrupulously? Rafalji,

> > > > > Mohanraaamji, etc. are correct in saying it is best to

follow

> > > > Pandit

> > > > > Dakshinamoorthiji's advices on mantra shastra or japams. He

> is

> > > > > learned and he is living a life compatible to the shaastras

> > > though

> > > > he

> > > > > has faced uncertain circumstances in his own personal life.

> He

> > > > never

> > > > > compromised on principles and he willingly paid the price

for

> > > that

> > > > > which most of us will never do. The words of such a person

> > > should

> > > > > obviously carry more weight.

> > > > >

> > > > > Abhishek.

> > > > >

> > > > > vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology%

> > 40>

> > > , " mohanraaam "

> > > <mohanraaam@>

> > > > > wrote:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Well Lalith:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > If you have really done dasa Maha Vidyaa, you would have

> > never

> > > > > > approached a professional astrologer for

> consultation...that

> > > much

> > > > I

> > > > > > can say....

> > > > > >

> > > > > > And what idiocy when you say Panditji is partly wrong? He

> > > > > > said " Bhaktaas do not chant Moola mantras " , whereas you

> have

> > > > edited

> > > > > > the words to suit your ends....He never said " devotees

> don't

> > > > chant

> > > > > > Beej mantras " .....You are putting words into his mouth

and

> > > > assuming

> > > > > > he is wrong! Why, do you know....the Great Panditji

himself

> > > > chants

> > > > > > Moola mantras.....He is a bhakta and a mantra shastra

> expert.

> > > As

> > > > a

> > > > > > bhakta he keeps incessant chanting of naama japa

throughout

> > the

> > > > > day;

> > > > > > as a mantra shastra expert, he restricts the moola mantra

> > > japams

> > > > to

> > > > > > stipulated times with ritual purity.....It is this

> wonderful

> > > > > practice

> > > > > > that Guruji was alluding to. Guruji cannot be wrong in

> ritual

> > > > and

> > > > > > occult matters. Please understand that.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > There are 4 classes of Devotees.......1) Saatwik vedic

> > devotees

> > > > who

> > > > > > will follow vedic dharma scrupulously. They will not dare

> to

> > > > > compare

> > > > > > astrology and vedanga to Engineering! as you did...

> > > > > > 2) Raajasik devotees who will follow vedic disciplines as

> far

> > > as

> > > > > > possible, but will still go after upaasanaas of Demi-Gods

> for

> > > > > > accomplishment of siddhis. Mantra shaastra experts

usually

> > > fall

> > > > in

> > > > > > this category.

> > > > > > 3) Saatwik Bhaktaas - for whom the meditation and glory

of

> > > their

> > > > > > Ishta Devataa is enough for spiritual satisfaction. It is

> > this

> > > > > > category that Guruji referred to when he said they will

not

> > > chant

> > > > > > Moola mantras too much. Definitely they will not do Dasa

> > Mahaa

> > > > > > Vidyaa.

> > > > > > 4) Taamasic Devotees - Those whose main motive is to

> project

> > > > > > themselves at all costs and acting as if they are equal

to

> > the

> > > > > > experts; they will try ALL practices - whether they are

> > > > sanctioned

> > > > > by

> > > > > > vedas or not.....Their only aim is personal glory and

> > > > > satisfaction.

> > > > > > They will attack even established dharma if they do not

get

> > > > results

> > > > > > (sounds familiar....You are one!) Ignorance and half-

baked

> > > > > knowledge

> > > > > > and egotism are these persons' motivating fuel.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > You are really satan's Gift to this list.......My only

> prayer

> > > is

> > > > > that

> > > > > > innocent members of this list do not get side-tracked

with

> > your

> > > > > > ramblings.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Let me make this clear to the list.....Panditji said that

> > > saatwik

> > > > > > Bhaktaas who chant Divine names only due to Pure Love on

> God

> > > > > usually

> > > > > > never chant mantrik moola mantraas. It is just one class

of

> > > > > > devotees. A rajasik bhakta who is a mantra-shaastra

expert

> > may

> > > > > even

> > > > > > be a bhakta at heart; and a pure bhakta may sometimes

chant

> > > some

> > > > > > mantrik japams for solving some practical

issues......But,

> > when

> > > > > they

> > > > > > switch their routines temporarily, these enlightened

> devotees

> > > > > usually

> > > > > > take good guidance and follow the tenets of shaastras

> > > > > > scrupulously....Definitely they will not sit on

assumption

> > like

> > > > > > Lalith.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > On the one hand, this fellow claims he has done chants in

> > > > forests,

> > > > > > rivers, earth, etc. (Probably we have a Maharishi here!

> What

> > > > > heights

> > > > > > of pointless pride in this young man list....it is

> > > disgusting!).

> > > > > On

> > > > > > the other hand, he says he chants mantras in buses,

trains,

> > > > > etc......

> > > > > > He is confused about which no body can have issues. Only

> his

> > > > Guru

> > > > > > should be concerned about that.....But, his attempts to

> stuff

> > > his

> > > > > > shallow understanding upon this list is reprehensible.

And,

> > > his

> > > > > > habit of quoting experts out of context is really

> > condemnable.

> > > > May

> > > > > > Jupiter's Light Shine on that fellow and teach him to

> respect

> > > the

> > > > > > hallowed traditions and to stay at his level rather than

> > trying

> > > > > > to " teach " others (He has the audacity to claim he

> > > is " teaching "

> > > > > > Rafalji!)

> > > > > >

> > > > > > If a mere young man of 35 years who has spent his life on

a

> > > > " Failed

> > > > > > computer web desining business " , " pointless email chasing

> of

> > > > > girls " ,

> > > > > > and other " past times " can gain insight as he claims, how

> > much

> > > > will

> > > > > > learned Gurus of this group with their life of devotion

to

> > > > vedanta

> > > > > > and vedanga know? His peanut brain and hyper-inflated ego

> > will

> > > > > never

> > > > > > allow him to see this obvious truth. But, please list

> > exercise

> > > > > your

> > > > > > discretion while reading his posts (There are doubtless

> some

> > > good

> > > > > > elements even in his posts; but mostly there is trash

> > presented

> > > > as

> > > > > > philosophy).

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Mohanraaam

> > > > > >

> > > > > > vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology%

> > 40>

> > > , " litsol "

> > > <mishra.lalit@>

> > > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Dear Rafal,

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Do u think, a hobby means shallow knowledge of the

> domain,

> > No

> > > > > > rafal,

> > > > > > > it's not like that.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > At least not for me. You have learnt and i m learning,

i

> > read

> > > > > ur's

> > > > > > > replies and get benifitted, same way i wanted you to

pay

> > > heed

> > > > to

> > > > > > > what i have written about spritiuality, mostrly i did

> write

> > > for

> > > > u

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > I have done all 10 mahavidyas of tantra and read many

> > tantrik

> > > > > > > classics, spent good deal of time with great tantriks

> > > trained

> > > > in

> > > > > > > Kamakhya and other places, keenly observed their

doings,

> > > their

> > > > > > > mistakes etc.., I did tremendous mantra chanting on

> water,

> > > on

> > > > > > earth,

> > > > > > > at home, in forests etc...

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > then reached here, then i did write something, but

sorry

> i

> > > dont

> > > > > > > remember shlokas. i was not interested in cramming that.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Panditji is not fully correct in saying that

BeejMantras

> > are

> > > > not

> > > > > > > chanted by devotees, I dont know much about South India

> but

> > > in

> > > > > > North

> > > > > > > normally its done.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > And a successfull mantra sadhana has to result in one's

> > being

> > > a

> > > > > > > devotee, the devotion is the outcome, final result of

> > mantra

> > > > > > sadhana,

> > > > > > > perhaps, Pandit Ji believes mantras are power

> > packet,thinks,

> > > i

> > > > do

> > > > > > it

> > > > > > > this way , these many times and get this result, this

is

> > > where

> > > > > most

> > > > > > > of the people are confused. without being a good human

> > being

> > > if

> > > > > we

> > > > > > > think, we will achieve something in spirituality, is

> > > difficult,

> > > > > > very

> > > > > > > difficult.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > what happens is, with the mantra chanting, a self

> > > > > transformation

> > > > > > > process begins, u if dont restrict urself, ur karma

> begins

> > > > > > diluting,

> > > > > > > and u begin ur purification process unknowingly, when

> > > > substantial

> > > > > > > part of ego and greed for respect vanishes and many

such

> > > thing

> > > > > > > togather, mantra awakens u and with the God's grace ur

> > > > objective

> > > > > > gets

> > > > > > > fullfilled, gradually u become a devotee. ur being

simple

> > and

> > > > > being

> > > > > > > devotee is sometimes is indication of ur's going on the

> > right

> > > > > track.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > I think we have discussed a lot, it's enough !!

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > My Boss has given me lot of projects to complete, so,

may

> > be,

> > > i

> > > > m

> > > > > > not

> > > > > > > going to available in the group like i was recently.

> > however.

> > > i

> > > > > > will

> > > > > > > complete Garg Hora series.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > regards,

> > > > > > > Lalit.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology%

> > 40>

> > > , Rafal Gendarz

> > > > > > > <starsuponme@> wrote:

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya*

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Dear Litsol,

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Then please dont generalize Your preferences as they

> are

> > > too

> > > > > > > shallow for

> > > > > > > > this Forum aspiration.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Regards,

> > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz

> > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru

> > > > > > > > email: rafal@

> > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa.com

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > litsol napisa?(a):

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > Dear Rafel,

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > I take Astrology as a good hobby, and i w'd be

> looking

> > at

> > > > it

> > > > > > with

> > > > > > > an

> > > > > > > > > engineer's approach.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > I asked ur age because, it's our thinking to put

our

> > > > > parameters

> > > > > > in

> > > > > > > > > god's system, there is nothing like delay or

> > advancement

> > > in

> > > > > > > > > spirituality. So, " Delay "

or " Speed " , " backwardness "

> > > > > > > > > and " advancement " doesn't exist in spirituality, I

> > > thought

> > > > if

> > > > > u

> > > > > > r

> > > > > > > > > thinking that it may take too much time, I wanted

to

> > tell

> > > > u,

> > > > > > it's

> > > > > > > not

> > > > > > > > > like that. there is no delay.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > It clicks in fraction of a second, when u r getting

> > > clicked

> > > > > > > depends

> > > > > > > > > on u and on god's will, when he wants u to get

> clicked.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > God sometimes graces for no reason ( " Ahetuka " ) just

> for

> > > his

> > > > > > > > > compassion towards u and it may happen next minute

> too.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > spirituality is not delimited by time , effort and

> > rules.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > regards,

> > > > > > > > > Lalit.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > vedic astrology

> > > > > > > > > <vedic astrology%40>, Rafal

> > Gendarz

> > > > > > > > > <starsuponme@ ...> wrote:

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya*

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > Dear Litsol,

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > Please be careful about words.

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > Im happy that You are sharing Your experience -

> very

> > > > > > inspirating

> > > > > > > > > ones.

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > Age hierarchy is for sudras - Manu Samhita. If

You

> > > treat

> > > > > > Jyotish

> > > > > > > > > Vedanga

> > > > > > > > > > as profession similar to engineering You have a

> long

> > > way

> > > > to

> > > > > > go.

> > > > > > > But

> > > > > > > > > dont

> > > > > > > > > > be pessimistic here are many who will try to help

> You

> > > in

> > > > > > getting

> > > > > > > > > proper

> > > > > > > > > > understanding.

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > After some time You will agree with me about the

> mala

> > > and

> > > > > > japa.

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > Regards,

> > > > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz

> > > > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru

> > > > > > > > > > email: rafal@

> > > > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > litsol napisa?(a):

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > Dear Rafal,

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > Here u r doing two wrong things, instead of

> > > developing

> > > > ur

> > > > > > > > > understanding,

> > > > > > > > > > > u r trying to conclude something and going

beyond

> > > that

> > > > u r

> > > > > > > > > messaging

> > > > > > > > > > > same to many.

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > I m touching 35, What's ur age ?

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > Astrology is a kind of vidya or profession,

like

> i

> > m

> > > a

> > > > > > > software

> > > > > > > > > > > engineer, software engineering is my

profession.

> > > > > > spirituality

> > > > > > > is

> > > > > > > > > beyond

> > > > > > > > > > > all sort of vidya or profession.

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > I wish u to be a good soul and to realize the

> bliss

> > > of

> > > > > self

> > > > > > > > > awakening or

> > > > > > > > > > > in other terms, the bliss that comes once u

feel

> u

> > > and

> > > > > god

> > > > > > is

> > > > > > > > > > > connected. dissolved in each other.

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > First realize, experience, then speak and then

> > > suggest

> > > > to

> > > > > > > others,

> > > > > > > > > by

> > > > > > > > > > > mere reading shastras or books u r not going to

> > feel

> > > > it.

> > > > > > > unless

> > > > > > > > > god

> > > > > > > > > > > graces u it's very very difficult. and if u

dont

> > > avoid

> > > > > this

> > > > > > > sort

> > > > > > > > > of

> > > > > > > > > > > hurriedness instead of learning and

> understanding,

> > it

> > > > > will

> > > > > > > affect

> > > > > > > > > u only

> > > > > > > > > > > no one else.

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > somehere i have read, it was written - By mere

> > > > > > repeating " So-

> > > > > > > > > Aham " no

> > > > > > > > > > > one gets liberated unless he realizes it like

one

> > > > doesnt

> > > > > get

> > > > > > > > > cured by

> > > > > > > > > > > knowing the name of the medicine, u need to

take

> > the

> > > > > > medicine

> > > > > > > to

> > > > > > > > > get

> > > > > > > > > > > cured " .

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > So, pls. be wise, as it was being discussed

here,

> i

> > > > > shared

> > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > > > experience of my life, pls. mind it, i m not a

> > > > preecher,

> > > > > > nor a

> > > > > > > > > guru, nor

> > > > > > > > > > > i have to make my followers, nor it's my

> > profession,

> > > > nor

> > > > > i

> > > > > > > have

> > > > > > > > > to get

> > > > > > > > > > > fame, sharing things is a kind of friendliness

a

> > kind

> > > of

> > > > > > > > > affection,

> > > > > > > > > > > that's it.

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > Lalit.

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology

> > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. com>,

> > Rafal

> > > > > Gendarz

> > > > > > > > > > > <starsuponme@ ...>

> > > > > > > > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya*

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Jyotishas

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > Counting of mala has more depth sense than

just

> > > > > counting,

> > > > > > > so for

> > > > > > > > > > > natives

> > > > > > > > > > > > like Litsol counting is neccessary and any

> other

> > > > > > speculation

> > > > > > > > > will be

> > > > > > > > > > > > only illusory and just imagination. We should

> > > follow

> > > > Pt.

> > > > > > > > > > > Dakshinamoorti

> > > > > > > > > > > > advise strictly, otherwise our process of

> > spiritual

> > > > > > > development

> > > > > > > > > will

> > > > > > > > > > > be

> > > > > > > > > > > > slow and unauthoritative.

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > Regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz

> > > > > > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru

> > > > > > > > > > > > email: rafal@

> > > > > > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > asmp2k02@ napisa?(a):

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Resp Sri Lalitji,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for your mail.But please also read

> > > > > > > GuruDakshinamurthyi

> > > > > > > > > ji's

> > > > > > > > > > > > > mail(addressing me) also on this,which

brings

> > in

> > > > more

> > > > > > > clarity

> > > > > > > > > to the

> > > > > > > > > > > > > applicability principles to my mail.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > I meant that both are necessity but to what

> > > degree

> > > > of

> > > > > > time

> > > > > > > (it

> > > > > > > > > varies

> > > > > > > > > > > > > from saadhaka to saadhaka) to get such

> inbuilt

> > > > > maturity

> > > > > > > such

> > > > > > > > > that

> > > > > > > > > > > that

> > > > > > > > > > > > > the count will be taken care of by Divine

> > forces

> > > > > after

> > > > > > > some

> > > > > > > > > initial

> > > > > > > > > > > > > period of saadhana.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Morover the type of bio matter present in

the

> > > japa

> > > > > maala

> > > > > > > > > (which is

> > > > > > > > > > > > > symbolic for ritualism as well as from

> > practical

> > > > > point

> > > > > > of

> > > > > > > > > view for

> > > > > > > > > > > our

> > > > > > > > > > > > > count) will help in keeping away

destructive

> > > forces

> > > > > > > acting on

> > > > > > > > > us

> > > > > > > > > > > .Thus

> > > > > > > > > > > > > the symbolic rituals will indirectly help

us

> in

> > > > > keeping

> > > > > > > away

> > > > > > > > > from

> > > > > > > > > > > > > negative thoughts and also trains our

memory

> to

> > > be

> > > > > > object

> > > > > > > > > > > oriented.If

> > > > > > > > > > > > > our memory grows and retentive capacity

> > increase

> > > > the

> > > > > > > Gnaana

> > > > > > > > > will

> > > > > > > > > > > > > increase ,but at the same time destructive

> > forces

> > > > > > > > > (diversions) also

> > > > > > > > > > > > > becomes powerful.Thus the symbolic

procedures

> > > will

> > > > > come

> > > > > > in

> > > > > > > > > handy to

> > > > > > > > > > > > > successfully fight the negative forces.The

> > > rituals

> > > > > may

> > > > > > be

> > > > > > > > > Rising

> > > > > > > > > > > > > early(if possible during Braahmi

> muhurta),Taking

> > > > > > > > > bath,Japaanusthaan,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > attending to the livelihood job etc etc in

> > > defined

> > > > > > times

> > > > > > > as

> > > > > > > > > > > discipline

> > > > > > > > > > > > > helps indirectly tune our memory through

> > keeping

> > > > our

> > > > > > body

> > > > > > > > > healthy.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Thus ultimately we conclude that the so

> called

> > > > > symbolic

> > > > > > > > > procedures

> > > > > > > > > > > are

> > > > > > > > > > > > > not actually symbolic(it got branded as

such)

> > but

> > > a

> > > > > > > necessity

> > > > > > > > > for

> > > > > > > > > > > our

> > > > > > > > > > > > > own good if we practice to the extent we

can.

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Quoting mishra.lalit@ ... <mishra.

> lalit%

> > > > > > 40gmail.

> > > > > > > com>:

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Resp. Sri Murthy Adavi,

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, what you said is perfectly right, we

> count

> > > or

> > > > > dont

> > > > > > > > > count,target

> > > > > > > > > > > > > is realization of god's love within, I got

it

> > > with

> > > > no

> > > > > > > > > counting,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > someone may get it with counting.

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanx, for the writing.

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Lalit.

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology

> > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. com>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40.

> com>,

> > > > > srinivasa

> > > > > > > > > murthy adavi

> > > > > > > > > > > > > asmp2k02@ wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Respected Learned Members,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Both views may be correct when the views

> > > have/or

> > > > > with

> > > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > goal as

> > > > > > > > > > > > > development of Love/Devotion towards

> adhistana

> > > > > Devatha

> > > > > > of

> > > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > Mantra

> > > > > > > > > > > > > as Base.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > In the initial stage only you need the

> > count;as

> > > > one

> > > > > > > > > develops the

> > > > > > > > > > > > > habit the biological tuning of the

> > intellect/body

> > > > will

> > > > > > > > > automatically

> > > > > > > > > > > > > take care of the practice(without count-

help

> of

> > > > malas

> > > > > > > etc).

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > It's like if with the help of Alarm clock

> if

> > we

> > > > > wake

> > > > > > up

> > > > > > > for

> > > > > > > > > 2 or 3

> > > > > > > > > > > > > days at some appointed hour,then

> automatically

> > we

> > > > > > wakeup

> > > > > > > at

> > > > > > > > > the same

> > > > > > > > > > > > > time every day without help of alarm.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > With due Respects

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > smadavi

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quoting starsuponme@ :

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya*

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Litsol,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Definitely we should count our Mantra

Japa

> on

> > > > Mala.

> > > > > > Your

> > > > > > > > > view is

> > > > > > > > > > > > > against

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Vedic Authorities and Sages, so should be

> > > > rejected.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > email: rafal@

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > litsol napisa?(a):

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Mr. Jayashri,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > A thought came, why i should not share

> with

> > > u,

> > > > U

> > > > > > pls.

> > > > > > > stop

> > > > > > > > > > > > > counting

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > mantra chantings, counting mantra gives

> > false

> > > > ego

> > > > > > and

> > > > > > > then

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > frustration if u dont get desired

results.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > leave it to the god, god counts the

> mantra

> > > > > chanted

> > > > > > by

> > > > > > > you

> > > > > > > > > may be

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 108, 1008 or whatsoever, let him count,

> > it's

> > > > his

> > > > > > part

> > > > > > > and

> > > > > > > > > ur

> > > > > > > > > > > part

> > > > > > > > > > > > > is

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to chant the mantra. when the mantra

has

> to

> > > > > awaken,

> > > > > > it

> > > > > > > > > will be,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > god

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > will ensure it for u.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sometimes we try to become more

> intelligent

> > > > with

> > > > > out

> > > > > > > > > limited

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > intellect and that creates obstacles in

> our

> > > > > > spiritual

> > > > > > > > > growth.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So, forget about counts, forget about

the

> > > time

> > > > u

> > > > > > put

> > > > > > > in

> > > > > > > > > for ur's

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sadhana, invoke the god with pure

heart.

> > > purity

> > > > > > > counts.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Lalit.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40.

> > > > > > > > > com>, " dakshinastrologer "

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <dakshinastrologer@ ...> wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Ms. Jayashree:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think this topic on 108 is getting

> very

> > > > > > > interesting

> > > > > > > > > and

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > enlightening for all members.

Yesterday

> > we

> > > > had a

> > > > > > > > > wonderful

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > esoteric

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > explanation from Shri. Sushil

Dikshit,

> > and

> > > > > today

> > > > > > > your

> > > > > > > > > > > wonderful

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > explanation of numerical symmetry of

> the

> > > > cosmos!

> > > > > > > > > Wonderful.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There definitely exists a " numerical

> > > > symphony "

> > > > > in

> > > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > > > Universe.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > not only 108.....as I mentioned in my

> > > earlier

> > > > > > post,

> > > > > > > > > there are

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > various

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > other numerals that are significant

in

> > > occult

> > > > > > > > > practices. 108

> > > > > > > > > > > is

> > > > > > > > > > > > > a

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > powerful and all-purpose perfect

> > > > number...While

> > > > > > we

> > > > > > > have

> > > > > > > > > > > > > understood

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the glory of 108, we should not lose

> > sight

> > > of

> > > > > the

> > > > > > > fact

> > > > > > > > > that

> > > > > > > > > > > > > there

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > are

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > other powerful numbers also. This is

> just

> > > for

> > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > information

> > > > > > > > > > > of

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > list.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > My apprecitation again for this

> wonderful

> > > > > > response.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Blessed be.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pandit R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Blessed be.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pandit R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI. --- In

vedic-

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > astrology@grou ps.com

> > > <astrology%

> > > > > > > > > > > > > 40. com>,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " jayasartn " <jayasartn@> wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In cosmology, 108 has this

> > significance -

> > > > the

> > > > > > > moon is

> > > > > > > > > away

> > > > > > > > > > > > > from

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > earth 108 times its (moon's)

diameter

> > and

> > > > the

> > > > > > sun

> > > > > > > is

> > > > > > > > > away

> > > > > > > > > > > > > from the

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > earth, 108 times its diameter.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Perhaps this reality of distances

is

> > > > > applicable

> > > > > > to

> > > > > > > > > deities

> > > > > > > > > > > > > too.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Perhaps this has been indicated by

> the

> > > 108

> > > > > divya

> > > > > > > > > desas of

> > > > > > > > > > > Lord

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Narayana.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > jayasree

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology@

.

> com

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40.

> > > > > > > > > com>, " dakshinastrologer "

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <dakshinastrologer@ > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Shri. Sushil:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It is a wonderful answer you have

> > given.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Blessed be.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pandit R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology@

> .

> > com

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40.

> > > > > > > > > com>, " sushil.dikshit "

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <sushil.dikshit@ > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Babu,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It is not a silly question but

it

> > is

> > > a

> > > > > very

> > > > > > > good

> > > > > > > > > > > question.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Actually

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > there are 27 Nakshatras and

every

> > > > > Nakshtras

> > > > > > > has 4

> > > > > > > > > Charan

> > > > > > > > > > > > > so

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > total

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > charans are 27 x 4 = 108

Charan.

> > Each

> > > > > > Charan

> > > > > > > has 3

> > > > > > > > > > > degree

> > > > > > > > > > > > > and

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 20

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > minutes so if you multiply 3

> degree

> > > and

> > > > 20

> > > > > > > > > minutes to

> > > > > > > > > > > 108

> > > > > > > > > > > > > it

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > comes

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > out to be 360 degress i.e. one

> > cycle

> > > > > > (Circle).

> > > > > > > > > This

> > > > > > > > > > > cycle

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > represetns

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > whole brahmand because all the

> > > rashis,

> > > > > > > planets and

> > > > > > > > > > > > > nakshatra

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > are

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > between these 360 degree in 2

> > > > dimensional

> > > > > > > > > horoscope. So

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > chanting a

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mantra completes one cycle of

> this

> > > > > brahmand.

> > > > > > > > > Further One

> > > > > > > > > > > > > who

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > has

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > visited Brahamand at least one

> time

> > > > i.e.

> > > > > he

> > > > > > is

> > > > > > > > > > > > > brahmagyani he

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > is

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > entitiled to place 108 Shri

> before

> > > his

> > > > > name.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sushil dikshit

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology@

> > .

> > > com

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology%

40.

> > > com>,

> > > > > babu

> > > > > > > mon

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <muthappan111@ >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Namaste,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It may be a silly matter for

> all

> > of

> > > > you.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I want to know what is the

> reason

> > > > that

> > > > > > some

> > > > > > > > > remedies

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > recomended

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > for 108 times.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I dont know any thing about

> > > astrology.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I hope you may pleased to

> provide

> > a

> > > > > reply

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thanks,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Babu

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------ --------- -------

--

> -

> > --

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Be a better Globetrotter. Get

> > > better

> > > > > > travel

> > > > > > > > > answers

> > > > > > > > > > > from

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someone

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > who knows.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Answers - Check it out.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this

> > message

> > > > have

> > > > > > been

> > > > > > > > > removed]

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have

> been

> > > > > removed]

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have

> been

> > > > > removed]

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have

been

> > > > removed]

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been

> > > removed]

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been

> removed]

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Your problem is u have no patience to read a post seriously, u read a

part, then ur brain gets stuck, then u try to come to a point,

abundance of thoughts.. , with no focus and then ur state of

misunderstanding and then getting angry.

 

I said, i started reading classics when i was studying in class 8'th,

for my satisfaction, let me clraify more, wherefrom i studied, from

the bookshelf that my grandfather managed, who visited india's all

religious dhams (4 dham) two times in his 50's.

 

So, what's strange in it, i could enjoy reading both my school

syllabus and classics as well as cartoon books, i m no exception,

many students does similar things, ok, not in large nos.

 

also its urs wrong impression that i dont respect elders, i do, but

one should not be biased. and one should be open to discuss and share

a point.

 

it's ur wrong impression that i know every thing or i m showing that

i know everything, no i dont, but i have good fundamental knowledge,

and somewhere i have good experience also, i can post and discuss, i

dont need ur's approval, if so,the owner of the group should inform

to all members, then we w'd decide if we should continue with the

group or discontinue.

 

as u appear little better,

 

find a regards,

 

regards,

Lalit.

 

 

 

vedic astrology , " abhishekpotti "

<abhishekpotti wrote:

>

> Oye Lalith:

>

> You think they teach " mantra " shashtra basics in 8th standard

> sanskrit syllabus! Or, they had a separate syllabus for you! Your

> hallucination and illusion seem to have no limits!

>

> You can't even remember simple slokhas and yet feel you are

qualified

> to debate with people who have mastered works like Tantra saara,

and

> other classics, and what is more have practical siddhis!

>

> Ram Jaswal is also too junior to both me and Mohanraaamji. He said

> what he felt; I have written to him explaining myself. You people

are

> all too young and inexperienced to advice me or Mohanraaamji. Only

> Panditji has the moral right to control us, because of his

knowledge

> and spotless attitude of perfect ethics. We will listen to no one

> else - not even Rafalji here. But, Guruji is not even reading

these

> posts and I think he will not interfere in this debate because this

> has become " personal " between Lalith and Me/ Mohanraaamji.

>

> I again say one thing.....I assure this group also about

this......If

> Lalith stops his harangues, I will also stop. If he keeps

referring

> to me or Mohanraaamji and uses dangerous words like " manipulator " I

> will keep posting abrasive mails like these. It is not that one

> person has the right to abuse and others should keep quite. He

> abused us and we are sarcastically attacking him. That is all to it.

>

> Please members advice him to stop, and I will stop. I HONESTLY

WANT

> TO STOP THIS. But, I have nothing to fear; I have not done any

> mistake and so there is no risk of getting exposed.

>

> But Lalith may lose his very job if his managers happen to see that

> he spends so much time on the internet in empty harangues because

he

> is using company's time for this. What he does is unethical though

> it does not concern this group. We have no such things; we are

> retired persons. PEOPLE WHO SPEAK OF SPIRITUALITY SHOULD FIRST BE

> ETHICAL.

>

> Abhishek.

>

> vedic astrology , " litsol " <mishra.lalit@>

> wrote:

> >

> > Res. Ram ji,

> >

> > Pls. dont advice him or mohan raam, they have nothing to debate

or

> > discuss on either mantra or bhakti.

> >

> > I don't remember shlokas much as i read classics for my

> satisfaction,

> > in two phases, firstly from my class 8'th till my 2nd year of

> > graduation. that time i had no faith and no bhakti, just read

like

> i

> > was reading some comics or cartoon books, i had not developed

> ideas,

> > not taken any message, i knew and i can talk about the content,

but

> i

> > was not involved.

> >

> > after that incident happened at Sharda Temple,Maihar,it was

> > unbelievable and it made me change my thoughts, i again read some

> > classics and this time,i grasped the message given in the

classics.

> >

> > They are at the stage of my chlidhood, they may read and discuss.

> but

> > dont take the message in their heart, somewhere their greed to

> > establish themselves as pandit or authority is also a reason.

> >

> > Perhapse, in lieu of, hitting them hard, i had to take another

rout

> > to let them realize they are wrong and deliberately wrong.

> >

> > He didnt say any thing on my how i shown, beej and god's name is

> one

> > and same thing, in fact it's a simple thnig, and well known but

> they

> > dont accept.

> >

> > let them dont accept, what difference it makes to us, they have

> their

> > life with them, any qualitative change within them will do good

to

> > them only.

> >

> > So, i prayed maa, mother divine for mohan raam, he is too old,

his

> > problem is he learnt astrology, did some breathing excercises,

but

> he

> > lacks spiritual experiences so he doesn't believe, I was like him

> in

> > my childhood.

> >

> > I prayed, and it's acknowledged by maa, time will change for him

a

> > little, what didn't happen to him in last 85 yrs, will happen in

> next

> > 5-6 monnths, he will get some good spritiual experience, the

> curtain

> > will be lifted for some time, reality at a glance.

> >

> > after that it's his part to stick to that or not, coz, ego, greed

> and

> > fear still remains, i m not completely gone out of it, i have to

> > fight with me many times.

> >

> > I thought gruop w'd be a good plateform to get like minded

friends,

> > if nothnig, it gives joy.

> >

> > Let's wish good for all, I also express my gratitude to you to

> speak

> > for what u thought right.

> >

> > regards,

> > Lalit.

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > vedic astrology , " Ram Jaswal " <rkjaswal@>

> > wrote:

> > >

> > > Namaste Abhishek

> > >

> > > My post wasn't so much in defense of Lalith but one to stop

> > the " belittling "

> > > of a person within this Group. If you don't agree with

someone's

> > views you

> > > are perfectly within your rights to say so why in a scholarly

> > fashion so as

> > > to discuss and further the merits of the topic under

discussion.

> > Thereafter

> > > it is a matter for the individual to either continue with the

on-

> > going

> > > discussion or to stop? The only way you or anyone else is

likely

> to

> > change

> > > Lalith's view on chanting of Mantras will be from a scholarly

> > viewpoint and

> > > not from goading him?

> > >

> > > Also why are you taking personal offense? If Guru's can ignore

> his

> > comments

> > > - can't you do the same?

> > >

> > > With freedom of speech comes the responsibility of keeping a

> civil

> > and

> > > polite language - please re-read your note which prompted my

> earlier

> > > response.

> > >

> > > Like I said in my earlier post it is all about ones viewpoints -

 

> my

> > personal

> > > advise to everyone would be to take what you find reasonable

and

> > ignore the

> > > rest.

> > >

> > > Best wishes ..

> > >

> > > Jai Sita Ram

> > >

> > > Ram

> > > _____

> > >

> > > vedic astrology

> > > [vedic astrology ] On Behalf Of

> abhishekpotti

> > > 28 July 2007 20:42

> > > vedic astrology

> > > [vedic astrology] Re: Oye Lalith! No one here is

afraid

> of

> > you....

> > >

> > > Dear Ram Jaswal:

> > >

> > > If Lalith stops challenging others with his rude posts no one

> will

> > > run him down...please follow the threads carefully......He is

> > > speaking as if he is the master of everything and everybody

else

> is

> > a

> > > fool. When he passes judgment on senior astrologers of this

group

> > or

> > > unnecessarily challenges established conventions, we have

> defended

> > > that. Now, why are you defending Lalith? Don't you think if you

> > > have the right to defend an offender, we have the right to

defend

> > the

> > > more decent members and traditions that he is subtly

attacking....

> > >

> > > just read his posts.....If he has just forwarded the Prashna

> > Tantra,

> > > nobody would have objected to it.....See the accompanying

> comments

> > > where he abrasively comments certain things......

> > >

> > > Open your eyes before advicing anyone. Why don't you write to

> > Lalith

> > > also? When did I call him names?......No sir...you are

> mistaken....

> > >

> > > Did you not notice that even after Mohanraamji stopped writing

> > posts,

> > > this fellow was taunting that old gentleman repeatedly last

week.

> > > Where were you at that time?

> > >

> > > If Lalith stops writing abrasive posts like " Nobody can stand

> > before

> > > me " and all that silly nonsense, we have no issues with him (or

> at

> > > least I have no issues with him). So, advice Lalith also in

this

> > > regard.

> > >

> > > If Lalith and you enjoy freedom of speech, we also claim the

same

> > > previlege.

> > >

> > > Abhishek.

> > >

> > > vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology%

40>

> > > , " Ram Jaswal " <rkjaswal@>

> > > wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Namaste Abhishek/ Mohanraaam

> > > >

> > > > Just why are you trying to run Lalith down? From the posts

that

> I

> > > have read

> > > > All he has done is given this point of view - if you don't

> accept

> > > them than

> > > > simply ignore it - there is No need for any name calling or

> > > belittling

> > > > someone.

> > > >

> > > > There is also nothing wrong in Lalith forwarding " Prashna

> Tantra "

> > > text to

> > > > this group as to whether someone has requested it or not - he

> > > certainly

> > > > doesn't need your or mine permission to do so - after all he

> > > thought it

> > > > would be useful to everyone - again his view.

> > > >

> > > > Sorry if I am coming across annoyed and perhaps rude But feel

> it

> > is

> > > Best

> > > > that everyone should stop " belittling " other group members as

> in

> > > the long

> > > > run all it does is make oneself appear small and bigoted.

> > > >

> > > > Best wishes and hoping this will be the last mail on this

> > subject ..

> > > >

> > > > Jai Sita Ram

> > > >

> > > > Ram

> > > >

> > > > _____

> > > >

> > > > vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology%

> 40>

> > >

> > > > [vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology%

> > 40>

> > > ] On Behalf Of abhishekpotti

> > > > 28 July 2007 19:54

> > > > vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology%

40>

> > >

> > > > [vedic astrology] Oye Lalith! No one here is afraid

of

> > > you....

> > > >

> > > > Dear Lalith:

> > > >

> > > > The whole world knows the history of Blessed Meera

Bhai....the

> > > > epitome of Bhakti......She was attached to her " Lala " - the

> > > wonderful

> > > > idol of Krishna gifted to her even from her childhood....Do

you

> > > mean

> > > > to say that innocent young girl started chanting " Kliim

> > krishnaaya "

> > > > mantra automatically? Even Bhakta Prahlaada had to be

initiated

> > by

> > > > Sage Naaradha for his chant of dwaadasaakshari mantra....

> > > >

> > > > Nobody is afraid of you here......You need not proclaim that

> you

> > > are

> > > > not in the business of a Guru.....actually Guru status is not

a

> > > > business (true to your half-baked knowledge you will claim it

> is

> > > also

> > > > like software engineering!). The difference my friend between

> you

> > > > and other great persons like Rafal or Dakshinamoorthiji is

that

> > > they

> > > > are spending their money for the internet, whereas you are

> > > pilfering

> > > > your company's time and the company's resources while

browsing

> > the

> > > > internet. Don't you think you are cheating your company when

> you

> > > > spend so much time on empty and egoistic posts defending

> yourself

> > > > against every expert after arguing with them unnecessarily?

Are

> > you

> > > > not getting paid for the time you spend in the

company....Know

> > the

> > > > basics of ethics before ever sermonizing.....So, actually you

> are

> > > an

> > > > exploiter....try to understand that....the other gurujis are

> > > probably

> > > > too decent to comment on that......What happened to your

> project?

> > > > Better rush to it nough!....It will spare us the agony of

> > replying

> > > to

> > > > your half-witted postings!

> > > >

> > > > By the say, Which member asked you Prashna Tantra dear? We

did

> > not

> > > > see any posts requesting " Honourable Lalith " to explain

Prashna

> > > > Tantra (as if you could explain it!) What arrogance you have

to

> > > > claim that nobody can stand before you.....Guruji's posts

> exposed

> > > > your ignorance....you did not even know how to ask queries

and

> > get

> > > > replies from one of the most empathetic astrologers of this

> > group,

> > > > and yet you claim you are this and that......

> > > >

> > > > For your information....nobody is afraid of you..Rather you

> > should

> > > be

> > > > afraid of yourself......Your foolishness itself will be your

> > doom.

> > > > Did you not become the laughing stock due to your email-based

> > > chasing

> > > > of Priyaa? Such foolishness in occult matters could be more

> > costly

> > > > dear.....I think Mohanraaamji and Rafalji are only afraid

about

> > > your

> > > > own well-being! They are not afraid of you. Nor am I afraid

of

> > you.

> > > >

> > > > Your posts never answer the queries or points raised by

others;

> > you

> > > > take off on a new ground only because of your shallow

> > understanding

> > > > of subjects. Nobody has accepted you as a Guru here, and

nobody

> > > > will....Can a fire-fly eclipse the Sun? There are too

> many " Suns "

> > > > here and you are just a fire-fly.

> > > >

> > > > It reminds me of a story.....Once an ant challenged the

mighty

> > > > elephant for a fight; the elephant obviously could not hear

the

> > ant

> > > > (the ant being so tiny and it was on the ground, its sound

> could

> > > not

> > > > reach the elephant). The elephant just walked away out of its

> own

> > > > volition in its natural course. Then the ant claimed, " you

see

> I

> > > > challenged the elephant and it ran away " . Dear, your saying

> that

> > > > nobody can stand before you is similar to that.......

> > > >

> > > > FIRST LEARN THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN GHOSTS AND YOUR ANCESTOR

> > > > SUMANGALIS BEFORE WRITING THE FIRST POSTS ON OCCULT! What a

> > > > pity......what a pity.....That we have to bear your

meaningless

> > > > rantings here!

> > > >

> > > > Abhishek.

> > > >

> > > > vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology%

> 40>

> > > > , " litsol " <mishra.lalit@>

> > > > wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > I was waiting for u dear..

> > > > >

> > > > > why u took time ?

> > > > >

> > > > > Do u mean Meera Bai discussed with u, what she did..

> > > > >

> > > > > Do u know 'Kleem Krishnay, Govindaya Gopijan Vallabhaya

Namh'

> > is

> > > a

> > > > > mantra for lord krishna.

> > > > >

> > > > > is there no beej mantras, to whom u wish to misguide ? let

> > thnigs

> > > > > remain between lord, bhakta , their shraddha and their guru.

> > > > >

> > > > > why u people are so afraid of me, i m not in business of

guru.

> > > > >

> > > > > i m happy with my life, my profession of software

engineering

> > and

> > > > > my hobbies ok.

> > > > >

> > > > > there are 7000+ members are here, by writing such type of

> > foolish

> > > > > things u expose urself only, mind, there are better brains

> here.

> > > > >

> > > > > this is enough ...

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology%

> > 40>

> > > > ,

> > > > > " abhishekpotti " <abhishekpotti@> wrote:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Respected Mohanraaamji:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Well said. Lalith is saying that " maybe in south india

> > devotees

> > > > > > don't chant Moola mantras but not so in North " ...What

> > > > > > stupidity.....He does not seem to understand that " mantra

> > > > shaastra

> > > > > > experts " are also devotees, but they cannot be called as

> > > innocent

> > > > > > saatwik bhaktaas! A typical example of a pure saadhwik

> bhakta

> > > > will

> > > > > > be Meera Bhai (was she not North Indian). Can Lalith say

> > which

> > > > > Dasa

> > > > > > Mahaa Vidya Meera Bhai practised? She was immersed in

> Krishna

> > > > > > consciousness and Lover for Him. Her own Bhajans were her

> > > > prayers

> > > > > in

> > > > > > the bhaavana of Bhakti in the form of Love! This is not

> > mantra

> > > > > > shaastra. Another example will be Saant Tukhaaraam. These

> > > > > bhaktaas

> > > > > > did not chant moola mantraas. Panditji Dakshinamoorthi

was

> on

> > > > dot

> > > > > in

> > > > > > saying that " Pure bhaktaas do not chant complicated moola

> > > > > mantraas " .

> > > > > > You have clarified this fact wonderfully in your post. I

> wish

> > > > more

> > > > > > knowledgeable persons also put erratic posters in their

> place

> > > > just

> > > > > as

> > > > > > Mohanraaamji does here. This will benefit more naive

> readers

> > of

> > > > > > these forums who might otherwise get confused as to which

> of

> > > the

> > > > > > paths to follow. Actually, anyone can follow any path as

> he/

> > > she

> > > > > > deems it fit; but there should be consistency of

procedures.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > We should not confuse mantrik rituals and bhakti

doctrines.

> > > > > Bhaktaas

> > > > > > can chant the names of Gods at anytime.....Mantra

shaastra

> > > > experts

> > > > > > chanting advanced moola mantras should necessarily adopt

> > ritual

> > > > > > procedures for the welfare of themselves and others!

> > > > > Yes...improper

> > > > > > chanting of mantras can cause danger to the society also

> just

> > > as

> > > > > > proper chanting can help others. Hence, this cannot be

> > > > considered

> > > > > as

> > > > > > a personal preference of the aspirant. If this was not

the

> > > case,

> > > > > why

> > > > > > did sages codify spiritual practises scrupulously?

Rafalji,

> > > > > > Mohanraaamji, etc. are correct in saying it is best to

> follow

> > > > > Pandit

> > > > > > Dakshinamoorthiji's advices on mantra shastra or japams.

He

> > is

> > > > > > learned and he is living a life compatible to the

shaastras

> > > > though

> > > > > he

> > > > > > has faced uncertain circumstances in his own personal

life.

> > He

> > > > > never

> > > > > > compromised on principles and he willingly paid the price

> for

> > > > that

> > > > > > which most of us will never do. The words of such a

person

> > > > should

> > > > > > obviously carry more weight.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Abhishek.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology%

> > > 40>

> > > > , " mohanraaam "

> > > > <mohanraaam@>

> > > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Well Lalith:

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > If you have really done dasa Maha Vidyaa, you would

have

> > > never

> > > > > > > approached a professional astrologer for

> > consultation...that

> > > > much

> > > > > I

> > > > > > > can say....

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > And what idiocy when you say Panditji is partly wrong?

He

> > > > > > > said " Bhaktaas do not chant Moola mantras " , whereas you

> > have

> > > > > edited

> > > > > > > the words to suit your ends....He never said " devotees

> > don't

> > > > > chant

> > > > > > > Beej mantras " .....You are putting words into his mouth

> and

> > > > > assuming

> > > > > > > he is wrong! Why, do you know....the Great Panditji

> himself

> > > > > chants

> > > > > > > Moola mantras.....He is a bhakta and a mantra shastra

> > expert.

> > > > As

> > > > > a

> > > > > > > bhakta he keeps incessant chanting of naama japa

> throughout

> > > the

> > > > > > day;

> > > > > > > as a mantra shastra expert, he restricts the moola

mantra

> > > > japams

> > > > > to

> > > > > > > stipulated times with ritual purity.....It is this

> > wonderful

> > > > > > practice

> > > > > > > that Guruji was alluding to. Guruji cannot be wrong in

> > ritual

> > > > > and

> > > > > > > occult matters. Please understand that.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > There are 4 classes of Devotees.......1) Saatwik vedic

> > > devotees

> > > > > who

> > > > > > > will follow vedic dharma scrupulously. They will not

dare

> > to

> > > > > > compare

> > > > > > > astrology and vedanga to Engineering! as you did...

> > > > > > > 2) Raajasik devotees who will follow vedic disciplines

as

> > far

> > > > as

> > > > > > > possible, but will still go after upaasanaas of Demi-

Gods

> > for

> > > > > > > accomplishment of siddhis. Mantra shaastra experts

> usually

> > > > fall

> > > > > in

> > > > > > > this category.

> > > > > > > 3) Saatwik Bhaktaas - for whom the meditation and glory

> of

> > > > their

> > > > > > > Ishta Devataa is enough for spiritual satisfaction. It

is

> > > this

> > > > > > > category that Guruji referred to when he said they will

> not

> > > > chant

> > > > > > > Moola mantras too much. Definitely they will not do

Dasa

> > > Mahaa

> > > > > > > Vidyaa.

> > > > > > > 4) Taamasic Devotees - Those whose main motive is to

> > project

> > > > > > > themselves at all costs and acting as if they are equal

> to

> > > the

> > > > > > > experts; they will try ALL practices - whether they are

> > > > > sanctioned

> > > > > > by

> > > > > > > vedas or not.....Their only aim is personal glory and

> > > > > > satisfaction.

> > > > > > > They will attack even established dharma if they do not

> get

> > > > > results

> > > > > > > (sounds familiar....You are one!) Ignorance and half-

> baked

> > > > > > knowledge

> > > > > > > and egotism are these persons' motivating fuel.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > You are really satan's Gift to this list.......My only

> > prayer

> > > > is

> > > > > > that

> > > > > > > innocent members of this list do not get side-tracked

> with

> > > your

> > > > > > > ramblings.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Let me make this clear to the list.....Panditji said

that

> > > > saatwik

> > > > > > > Bhaktaas who chant Divine names only due to Pure Love

on

> > God

> > > > > > usually

> > > > > > > never chant mantrik moola mantraas. It is just one

class

> of

> > > > > > > devotees. A rajasik bhakta who is a mantra-shaastra

> expert

> > > may

> > > > > > even

> > > > > > > be a bhakta at heart; and a pure bhakta may sometimes

> chant

> > > > some

> > > > > > > mantrik japams for solving some practical

> issues......But,

> > > when

> > > > > > they

> > > > > > > switch their routines temporarily, these enlightened

> > devotees

> > > > > > usually

> > > > > > > take good guidance and follow the tenets of shaastras

> > > > > > > scrupulously....Definitely they will not sit on

> assumption

> > > like

> > > > > > > Lalith.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > On the one hand, this fellow claims he has done chants

in

> > > > > forests,

> > > > > > > rivers, earth, etc. (Probably we have a Maharishi here!

> > What

> > > > > > heights

> > > > > > > of pointless pride in this young man list....it is

> > > > disgusting!).

> > > > > > On

> > > > > > > the other hand, he says he chants mantras in buses,

> trains,

> > > > > > etc......

> > > > > > > He is confused about which no body can have issues.

Only

> > his

> > > > > Guru

> > > > > > > should be concerned about that.....But, his attempts to

> > stuff

> > > > his

> > > > > > > shallow understanding upon this list is reprehensible.

> And,

> > > > his

> > > > > > > habit of quoting experts out of context is really

> > > condemnable.

> > > > > May

> > > > > > > Jupiter's Light Shine on that fellow and teach him to

> > respect

> > > > the

> > > > > > > hallowed traditions and to stay at his level rather

than

> > > trying

> > > > > > > to " teach " others (He has the audacity to claim he

> > > > is " teaching "

> > > > > > > Rafalji!)

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > If a mere young man of 35 years who has spent his life

on

> a

> > > > > " Failed

> > > > > > > computer web desining business " , " pointless email

chasing

> > of

> > > > > > girls " ,

> > > > > > > and other " past times " can gain insight as he claims,

how

> > > much

> > > > > will

> > > > > > > learned Gurus of this group with their life of devotion

> to

> > > > > vedanta

> > > > > > > and vedanga know? His peanut brain and hyper-inflated

ego

> > > will

> > > > > > never

> > > > > > > allow him to see this obvious truth. But, please list

> > > exercise

> > > > > > your

> > > > > > > discretion while reading his posts (There are doubtless

> > some

> > > > good

> > > > > > > elements even in his posts; but mostly there is trash

> > > presented

> > > > > as

> > > > > > > philosophy).

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Mohanraaam

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology%

> > > 40>

> > > > , " litsol "

> > > > <mishra.lalit@>

> > > > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Dear Rafal,

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Do u think, a hobby means shallow knowledge of the

> > domain,

> > > No

> > > > > > > rafal,

> > > > > > > > it's not like that.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > At least not for me. You have learnt and i m

learning,

> i

> > > read

> > > > > > ur's

> > > > > > > > replies and get benifitted, same way i wanted you to

> pay

> > > > heed

> > > > > to

> > > > > > > > what i have written about spritiuality, mostrly i did

> > write

> > > > for

> > > > > u

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > I have done all 10 mahavidyas of tantra and read many

> > > tantrik

> > > > > > > > classics, spent good deal of time with great tantriks

> > > > trained

> > > > > in

> > > > > > > > Kamakhya and other places, keenly observed their

> doings,

> > > > their

> > > > > > > > mistakes etc.., I did tremendous mantra chanting on

> > water,

> > > > on

> > > > > > > earth,

> > > > > > > > at home, in forests etc...

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > then reached here, then i did write something, but

> sorry

> > i

> > > > dont

> > > > > > > > remember shlokas. i was not interested in cramming

that.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Panditji is not fully correct in saying that

> BeejMantras

> > > are

> > > > > not

> > > > > > > > chanted by devotees, I dont know much about South

India

> > but

> > > > in

> > > > > > > North

> > > > > > > > normally its done.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > And a successfull mantra sadhana has to result in

one's

> > > being

> > > > a

> > > > > > > > devotee, the devotion is the outcome, final result of

> > > mantra

> > > > > > > sadhana,

> > > > > > > > perhaps, Pandit Ji believes mantras are power

> > > packet,thinks,

> > > > i

> > > > > do

> > > > > > > it

> > > > > > > > this way , these many times and get this result, this

> is

> > > > where

> > > > > > most

> > > > > > > > of the people are confused. without being a good

human

> > > being

> > > > if

> > > > > > we

> > > > > > > > think, we will achieve something in spirituality, is

> > > > difficult,

> > > > > > > very

> > > > > > > > difficult.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > what happens is, with the mantra chanting, a self

> > > > > > transformation

> > > > > > > > process begins, u if dont restrict urself, ur karma

> > begins

> > > > > > > diluting,

> > > > > > > > and u begin ur purification process unknowingly, when

> > > > > substantial

> > > > > > > > part of ego and greed for respect vanishes and many

> such

> > > > thing

> > > > > > > > togather, mantra awakens u and with the God's grace

ur

> > > > > objective

> > > > > > > gets

> > > > > > > > fullfilled, gradually u become a devotee. ur being

> simple

> > > and

> > > > > > being

> > > > > > > > devotee is sometimes is indication of ur's going on

the

> > > right

> > > > > > track.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > I think we have discussed a lot, it's enough !!

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > My Boss has given me lot of projects to complete, so,

> may

> > > be,

> > > > i

> > > > > m

> > > > > > > not

> > > > > > > > going to available in the group like i was recently.

> > > however.

> > > > i

> > > > > > > will

> > > > > > > > complete Garg Hora series.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > regards,

> > > > > > > > Lalit.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology%

> > > 40>

> > > > , Rafal Gendarz

> > > > > > > > <starsuponme@> wrote:

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya*

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > Dear Litsol,

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > Then please dont generalize Your preferences as

they

> > are

> > > > too

> > > > > > > > shallow for

> > > > > > > > > this Forum aspiration.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > Regards,

> > > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz

> > > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru

> > > > > > > > > email: rafal@

> > > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa.com

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > litsol napisa?(a):

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > Dear Rafel,

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > I take Astrology as a good hobby, and i w'd be

> > looking

> > > at

> > > > > it

> > > > > > > with

> > > > > > > > an

> > > > > > > > > > engineer's approach.

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > I asked ur age because, it's our thinking to put

> our

> > > > > > parameters

> > > > > > > in

> > > > > > > > > > god's system, there is nothing like delay or

> > > advancement

> > > > in

> > > > > > > > > > spirituality. So, " Delay "

> or " Speed " , " backwardness "

> > > > > > > > > > and " advancement " doesn't exist in spirituality,

I

> > > > thought

> > > > > if

> > > > > > u

> > > > > > > r

> > > > > > > > > > thinking that it may take too much time, I wanted

> to

> > > tell

> > > > > u,

> > > > > > > it's

> > > > > > > > not

> > > > > > > > > > like that. there is no delay.

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > It clicks in fraction of a second, when u r

getting

> > > > clicked

> > > > > > > > depends

> > > > > > > > > > on u and on god's will, when he wants u to get

> > clicked.

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > God sometimes graces for no reason ( " Ahetuka " )

just

> > for

> > > > his

> > > > > > > > > > compassion towards u and it may happen next

minute

> > too.

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > spirituality is not delimited by time , effort

and

> > > rules.

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > regards,

> > > > > > > > > > Lalit.

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology

> > > > > > > > > > <vedic astrology%40>, Rafal

> > > Gendarz

> > > > > > > > > > <starsuponme@ ...> wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya*

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > Dear Litsol,

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > Please be careful about words.

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > Im happy that You are sharing Your experience -

> > very

> > > > > > > inspirating

> > > > > > > > > > ones.

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > Age hierarchy is for sudras - Manu Samhita. If

> You

> > > > treat

> > > > > > > Jyotish

> > > > > > > > > > Vedanga

> > > > > > > > > > > as profession similar to engineering You have a

> > long

> > > > way

> > > > > to

> > > > > > > go.

> > > > > > > > But

> > > > > > > > > > dont

> > > > > > > > > > > be pessimistic here are many who will try to

help

> > You

> > > > in

> > > > > > > getting

> > > > > > > > > > proper

> > > > > > > > > > > understanding.

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > After some time You will agree with me about

the

> > mala

> > > > and

> > > > > > > japa.

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > Regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz

> > > > > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru

> > > > > > > > > > > email: rafal@

> > > > > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > litsol napisa?(a):

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Rafal,

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > Here u r doing two wrong things, instead of

> > > > developing

> > > > > ur

> > > > > > > > > > understanding,

> > > > > > > > > > > > u r trying to conclude something and going

> beyond

> > > > that

> > > > > u r

> > > > > > > > > > messaging

> > > > > > > > > > > > same to many.

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > I m touching 35, What's ur age ?

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > Astrology is a kind of vidya or profession,

> like

> > i

> > > m

> > > > a

> > > > > > > > software

> > > > > > > > > > > > engineer, software engineering is my

> profession.

> > > > > > > spirituality

> > > > > > > > is

> > > > > > > > > > beyond

> > > > > > > > > > > > all sort of vidya or profession.

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > I wish u to be a good soul and to realize the

> > bliss

> > > > of

> > > > > > self

> > > > > > > > > > awakening or

> > > > > > > > > > > > in other terms, the bliss that comes once u

> feel

> > u

> > > > and

> > > > > > god

> > > > > > > is

> > > > > > > > > > > > connected. dissolved in each other.

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > First realize, experience, then speak and

then

> > > > suggest

> > > > > to

> > > > > > > > others,

> > > > > > > > > > by

> > > > > > > > > > > > mere reading shastras or books u r not going

to

> > > feel

> > > > > it.

> > > > > > > > unless

> > > > > > > > > > god

> > > > > > > > > > > > graces u it's very very difficult. and if u

> dont

> > > > avoid

> > > > > > this

> > > > > > > > sort

> > > > > > > > > > of

> > > > > > > > > > > > hurriedness instead of learning and

> > understanding,

> > > it

> > > > > > will

> > > > > > > > affect

> > > > > > > > > > u only

> > > > > > > > > > > > no one else.

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > somehere i have read, it was written - By

mere

> > > > > > > repeating " So-

> > > > > > > > > > Aham " no

> > > > > > > > > > > > one gets liberated unless he realizes it like

> one

> > > > > doesnt

> > > > > > get

> > > > > > > > > > cured by

> > > > > > > > > > > > knowing the name of the medicine, u need to

> take

> > > the

> > > > > > > medicine

> > > > > > > > to

> > > > > > > > > > get

> > > > > > > > > > > > cured " .

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > So, pls. be wise, as it was being discussed

> here,

> > i

> > > > > > shared

> > > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > > > > experience of my life, pls. mind it, i m not

a

> > > > > preecher,

> > > > > > > nor a

> > > > > > > > > > guru, nor

> > > > > > > > > > > > i have to make my followers, nor it's my

> > > profession,

> > > > > nor

> > > > > > i

> > > > > > > > have

> > > > > > > > > > to get

> > > > > > > > > > > > fame, sharing things is a kind of

friendliness

> a

> > > kind

> > > > of

> > > > > > > > > > affection,

> > > > > > > > > > > > that's it.

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > > Lalit.

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology

> > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40.

com>,

> > > Rafal

> > > > > > Gendarz

> > > > > > > > > > > > <starsuponme@ ...>

> > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya*

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Jyotishas

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Counting of mala has more depth sense than

> just

> > > > > > counting,

> > > > > > > > so for

> > > > > > > > > > > > natives

> > > > > > > > > > > > > like Litsol counting is neccessary and any

> > other

> > > > > > > speculation

> > > > > > > > > > will be

> > > > > > > > > > > > > only illusory and just imagination. We

should

> > > > follow

> > > > > Pt.

> > > > > > > > > > > > Dakshinamoorti

> > > > > > > > > > > > > advise strictly, otherwise our process of

> > > spiritual

> > > > > > > > development

> > > > > > > > > > will

> > > > > > > > > > > > be

> > > > > > > > > > > > > slow and unauthoritative.

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru

> > > > > > > > > > > > > email: rafal@

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > asmp2k02@ napisa?(a):

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Resp Sri Lalitji,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for your mail.But please also read

> > > > > > > > GuruDakshinamurthyi

> > > > > > > > > > ji's

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > mail(addressing me) also on this,which

> brings

> > > in

> > > > > more

> > > > > > > > clarity

> > > > > > > > > > to the

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > applicability principles to my mail.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > I meant that both are necessity but to

what

> > > > degree

> > > > > of

> > > > > > > time

> > > > > > > > (it

> > > > > > > > > > varies

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > from saadhaka to saadhaka) to get such

> > inbuilt

> > > > > > maturity

> > > > > > > > such

> > > > > > > > > > that

> > > > > > > > > > > > that

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > the count will be taken care of by Divine

> > > forces

> > > > > > after

> > > > > > > > some

> > > > > > > > > > initial

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > period of saadhana.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Morover the type of bio matter present in

> the

> > > > japa

> > > > > > maala

> > > > > > > > > > (which is

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > symbolic for ritualism as well as from

> > > practical

> > > > > > point

> > > > > > > of

> > > > > > > > > > view for

> > > > > > > > > > > > our

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > count) will help in keeping away

> destructive

> > > > forces

> > > > > > > > acting on

> > > > > > > > > > us

> > > > > > > > > > > > .Thus

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > the symbolic rituals will indirectly help

> us

> > in

> > > > > > keeping

> > > > > > > > away

> > > > > > > > > > from

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > negative thoughts and also trains our

> memory

> > to

> > > > be

> > > > > > > object

> > > > > > > > > > > > oriented.If

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > our memory grows and retentive capacity

> > > increase

> > > > > the

> > > > > > > > Gnaana

> > > > > > > > > > will

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > increase ,but at the same time

destructive

> > > forces

> > > > > > > > > > (diversions) also

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > becomes powerful.Thus the symbolic

> procedures

> > > > will

> > > > > > come

> > > > > > > in

> > > > > > > > > > handy to

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > successfully fight the negative

forces.The

> > > > rituals

> > > > > > may

> > > > > > > be

> > > > > > > > > > Rising

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > early(if possible during Braahmi

> > muhurta),Taking

> > > > > > > > > > bath,Japaanusthaan,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > attending to the livelihood job etc etc

in

> > > > defined

> > > > > > > times

> > > > > > > > as

> > > > > > > > > > > > discipline

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > helps indirectly tune our memory through

> > > keeping

> > > > > our

> > > > > > > body

> > > > > > > > > > healthy.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thus ultimately we conclude that the so

> > called

> > > > > > symbolic

> > > > > > > > > > procedures

> > > > > > > > > > > > are

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > not actually symbolic(it got branded as

> such)

> > > but

> > > > a

> > > > > > > > necessity

> > > > > > > > > > for

> > > > > > > > > > > > our

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > own good if we practice to the extent we

> can.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quoting mishra.lalit@ ... <mishra.

> > lalit%

> > > > > > > 40gmail.

> > > > > > > > com>:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Resp. Sri Murthy Adavi,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, what you said is perfectly right, we

> > count

> > > > or

> > > > > > dont

> > > > > > > > > > count,target

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > is realization of god's love within, I

got

> it

> > > > with

> > > > > no

> > > > > > > > > > counting,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > someone may get it with counting.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanx, for the writing.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Lalit.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology

> > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. com>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40.

> > com>,

> > > > > > srinivasa

> > > > > > > > > > murthy adavi

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > asmp2k02@ wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Respected Learned Members,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Both views may be correct when the

views

> > > > have/or

> > > > > > with

> > > > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > > goal as

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > development of Love/Devotion towards

> > adhistana

> > > > > > Devatha

> > > > > > > of

> > > > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > > Mantra

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > as Base.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In the initial stage only you need the

> > > count;as

> > > > > one

> > > > > > > > > > develops the

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > habit the biological tuning of the

> > > intellect/body

> > > > > will

> > > > > > > > > > automatically

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > take care of the practice(without count-

> help

> > of

> > > > > malas

> > > > > > > > etc).

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It's like if with the help of Alarm

clock

> > if

> > > we

> > > > > > wake

> > > > > > > up

> > > > > > > > for

> > > > > > > > > > 2 or 3

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > days at some appointed hour,then

> > automatically

> > > we

> > > > > > > wakeup

> > > > > > > > at

> > > > > > > > > > the same

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > time every day without help of alarm.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > With due Respects

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > smadavi

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quoting starsuponme@ :

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya*

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Litsol,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Definitely we should count our Mantra

> Japa

> > on

> > > > > Mala.

> > > > > > > Your

> > > > > > > > > > view is

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > against

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Vedic Authorities and Sages, so should

be

> > > > > rejected.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > email: rafal@

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > litsol napisa?(a):

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Mr. Jayashri,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > A thought came, why i should not

share

> > with

> > > > u,

> > > > > U

> > > > > > > pls.

> > > > > > > > stop

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > counting

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > mantra chantings, counting mantra

gives

> > > false

> > > > > ego

> > > > > > > and

> > > > > > > > then

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > frustration if u dont get desired

> results.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > leave it to the god, god counts the

> > mantra

> > > > > > chanted

> > > > > > > by

> > > > > > > > you

> > > > > > > > > > may be

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 108, 1008 or whatsoever, let him

count,

> > > it's

> > > > > his

> > > > > > > part

> > > > > > > > and

> > > > > > > > > > ur

> > > > > > > > > > > > part

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > is

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to chant the mantra. when the mantra

> has

> > to

> > > > > > awaken,

> > > > > > > it

> > > > > > > > > > will be,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > god

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > will ensure it for u.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sometimes we try to become more

> > intelligent

> > > > > with

> > > > > > out

> > > > > > > > > > limited

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > intellect and that creates obstacles

in

> > our

> > > > > > > spiritual

> > > > > > > > > > growth.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So, forget about counts, forget about

> the

> > > > time

> > > > > u

> > > > > > > put

> > > > > > > > in

> > > > > > > > > > for ur's

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sadhana, invoke the god with pure

> heart.

> > > > purity

> > > > > > > > counts.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Lalit.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology@ .

com

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology%

40.

> > > > > > > > > > com>, " dakshinastrologer "

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <dakshinastrologer@ ...> wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Ms. Jayashree:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think this topic on 108 is

getting

> > very

> > > > > > > > interesting

> > > > > > > > > > and

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > enlightening for all members.

> Yesterday

> > > we

> > > > > had a

> > > > > > > > > > wonderful

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > esoteric

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > explanation from Shri. Sushil

> Dikshit,

> > > and

> > > > > > today

> > > > > > > > your

> > > > > > > > > > > > wonderful

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > explanation of numerical symmetry

of

> > the

> > > > > cosmos!

> > > > > > > > > > Wonderful.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There definitely exists

a " numerical

> > > > > symphony "

> > > > > > in

> > > > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > > > > Universe.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > not only 108.....as I mentioned in

my

> > > > earlier

> > > > > > > post,

> > > > > > > > > > there are

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > various

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > other numerals that are significant

> in

> > > > occult

> > > > > > > > > > practices. 108

> > > > > > > > > > > > is

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > a

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > powerful and all-purpose perfect

> > > > > number...While

> > > > > > > we

> > > > > > > > have

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > understood

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the glory of 108, we should not

lose

> > > sight

> > > > of

> > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > fact

> > > > > > > > > > that

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > there

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > are

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > other powerful numbers also. This

is

> > just

> > > > for

> > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > > information

> > > > > > > > > > > > of

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > list.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > My apprecitation again for this

> > wonderful

> > > > > > > response.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Blessed be.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pandit R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Blessed be.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pandit R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI. --- In

> vedic-

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > astrology@grou ps.com

> > > > <astrology%

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > 40. com>,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " jayasartn " <jayasartn@> wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In cosmology, 108 has this

> > > significance -

> > > > > the

> > > > > > > > moon is

> > > > > > > > > > away

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > from

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > earth 108 times its (moon's)

> diameter

> > > and

> > > > > the

> > > > > > > sun

> > > > > > > > is

> > > > > > > > > > away

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > from the

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > earth, 108 times its diameter.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Perhaps this reality of distances

> is

> > > > > > applicable

> > > > > > > to

> > > > > > > > > > deities

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > too.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Perhaps this has been indicated

by

> > the

> > > > 108

> > > > > > divya

> > > > > > > > > > desas of

> > > > > > > > > > > > Lord

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Narayana.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > jayasree

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology@

> .

> > com

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology%

40.

> > > > > > > > > > com>, " dakshinastrologer "

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <dakshinastrologer@ > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Shri. Sushil:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It is a wonderful answer you

have

> > > given.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Blessed be.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pandit R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology@

> > .

> > > com

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology%

40.

> > > > > > > > > > com>, " sushil.dikshit "

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <sushil.dikshit@ > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Babu,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It is not a silly question

but

> it

> > > is

> > > > a

> > > > > > very

> > > > > > > > good

> > > > > > > > > > > > question.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Actually

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > there are 27 Nakshatras and

> every

> > > > > > Nakshtras

> > > > > > > > has 4

> > > > > > > > > > Charan

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > so

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > total

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > charans are 27 x 4 = 108

> Charan.

> > > Each

> > > > > > > Charan

> > > > > > > > has 3

> > > > > > > > > > > > degree

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > and

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 20

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > minutes so if you multiply 3

> > degree

> > > > and

> > > > > 20

> > > > > > > > > > minutes to

> > > > > > > > > > > > 108

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > it

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > comes

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > out to be 360 degress i.e.

one

> > > cycle

> > > > > > > (Circle).

> > > > > > > > > > This

> > > > > > > > > > > > cycle

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > represetns

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > whole brahmand because all

the

> > > > rashis,

> > > > > > > > planets and

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > nakshatra

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > are

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > between these 360 degree in 2

> > > > > dimensional

> > > > > > > > > > horoscope. So

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > chanting a

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mantra completes one cycle of

> > this

> > > > > > brahmand.

> > > > > > > > > > Further One

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > who

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > has

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > visited Brahamand at least

one

> > time

> > > > > i.e.

> > > > > > he

> > > > > > > is

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > brahmagyani he

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > is

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > entitiled to place 108 Shri

> > before

> > > > his

> > > > > > name.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sushil dikshit

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology@

> > > .

> > > > com

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology%

> 40.

> > > > com>,

> > > > > > babu

> > > > > > > > mon

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <muthappan111@ >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Namaste,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It may be a silly matter

for

> > all

> > > of

> > > > > you.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I want to know what is the

> > reason

> > > > > that

> > > > > > > some

> > > > > > > > > > remedies

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > recomended

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > for 108 times.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I dont know any thing about

> > > > astrology.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I hope you may pleased to

> > provide

> > > a

> > > > > > reply

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thanks,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Babu

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------ --------- -----

--

> --

> > -

> > > --

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Be a better Globetrotter.

Get

> > > > better

> > > > > > > travel

> > > > > > > > > > answers

> > > > > > > > > > > > from

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someone

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > who knows.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Answers - Check it

out.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this

> > > message

> > > > > have

> > > > > > > been

> > > > > > > > > > removed]

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have

> > been

> > > > > > removed]

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have

> > been

> > > > > > removed]

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have

> been

> > > > > removed]

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have

been

> > > > removed]

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been

> > removed]

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been

removed]

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Once making an impression and behaving under that impression is quite

obvious. so is a case with u.

 

I m trully happy to know that Mohan Raam ji worked with indian army,

but he was so biased, no spiritual personality can be biased,

 

he could see some - " Pa varga : Priya, Preeti " etc.

 

but why he could not see, how i happened to post a love mail written

to Priya in a group, she might be ashamed of it, she lost her faith

on me and my friends aggervated the situation, the difference was

widened, and u know i asked maa many times, but never got any

acknowledgement.

 

why he couldn't see that ?

 

later, i tried to find out her, im such a confident person, i

contacted her company's HR Head, and Director of her company, and got

5 guys on orkut, working in her company, it was surprising to know,

there was though a Priya Tiwari, but not in software engineering, she

was in BPO, they didnt share this information but somehow i guessed

She may be in BPO division of Mphasis, whereas, she told to me that

she is going to Germany. So, lie was detected.

 

why he couldn't see that ?

 

And where is she right now, Why he couldn't do that, is there a Priya

really, or it was a game of some of my friends ? even this is not

clear.

 

why he couldn't see that ?

 

I m still in mystery, dont know any thing for sure, Why he couldn't

see that ?

 

So, i think he knows Karna-Pisachini sort of vidya and could tell me

what he was told and finally put it in the name of Prashna Chart.

 

regards,

Lalit.

 

 

 

vedic astrology , " abhishekpotti "

<abhishekpotti wrote:

>

> Oye Lalith:

>

> How do you know Mohanraaamji is not enlightened? Do you know

> onething....it is not merely that Mohanraaamji respects

> Panditji....Panditji himself respects Mohanraaamji for his yogic

> accomplishments. You compare Mohanraaamji with your

childhood....You

> are a peanut brain who thinks the small portions of sanskrit that

> your school portion gave you are magnum opuses! This is typical of

> small brains like you. Mohanraaamji is a mantra saamraat......by

the

> way, what happened to your challenge about the court case against

> Mohanraaamji? You should have put a case and then you would have

> known who he is! He has effected some rare miracles which you

won't

> manifest even after 100 years of japams.

>

> If Shaarada Maa indeed blessed you, where is your insight.

> Mohanraaamji said something about you without seeing you.....Like

> Priyaa and preeti....You say about Mohanraaamji's wife if

possible.

> Panditji knows the information and he can be the judge as to

whether

> you are correct in your predictions! You - who claim that you know

> everything and have the Grace of Maa, get at this simple truth if

you

> can!

>

> Siddhis by themselves do not mean anything great. That is why

> Mohanraaamji respects Guruji who does not manifest any occult

> powers. Try to understand that. It is the attitude that counts,

and

> it is that which you are lacking.

>

> Don't try to act smart. Try to spend time more on your projects

lest

> you fail in this also just as you failed in your business, and in

> Priya's case! If your money is also not there, nobody will even

look

> at you twice. Only money and that job are allowing to speak

> haughtily like this. At least save that by being conscientious at

> work. Did Shaarada Maa ask you to pilfer company's resources and

type

> endless quarrelsome mails to respected mantra shaastra experts? If

> your Maa said so, probably it is not the Gracious Maa who guides us

> all, but the ghost that is afflicting your family due to your sins!

>

> You are a mere software engineer who gets shouted at by your

> reporting officers often; everyone at your place of work is

laughing

> behind you, and you know that. That is why you are taking out your

> frustration on us in this forum. Can you speak one word back at

your

> reporting managers at work? Whereas Mohanraaamji was a respected

> Military officer in his professional days and even his seniors

> respected him for his intelligence and sharpness. He is not an

> imbecile old man, but a great yogi. Ask Panditji whether

Mohanraaamji

> is capable of miracles or not? Panditji has personal experience in

> that regard. But, only Panditji stopped Mohanraaamji from using

> miraculous powers as they might be bad for the evolution of soul

and

> mantrik power should not be wasted in empty displays. If Panditji

> had not stopped Mohanraaamji, you would have paid seriously for

your

> insulting mails last week. Thank Panditji that you are still o.k.,

> because only his words in a private mail to Mohanraaamji saved you

> (Incidentally, even Panditji has not seen Mohanraaamji in person;

> only I have seen him. This is just for your information. Search

all

> through the web, you will not find any BUSINESS information on

> Mohanraaamji. What do we gain by manipulation or anything? At

least

> you are a frustrated person who could not get married and all girls

> are rejecting you, and so for psychological comfort you are writing

> posts here. But, we are old men who have lived happy and contented

> lives, and have no material interests to satisfy here)

>

> I DARE YOU UPON ONE COUNT...PANDITJI LEFT WELL-PAYING MNC JOB TO

> PURSUE ASTROLOGY AND SPIRITUALITY FULL TIME......CAN YOU DO THAT?

> PANDITJI FELT THIS IS HIS MISSION....CAN YOU DO THAT? It is easy

to

> speak of great philosphies from the comfort of an Airconditioned

> Office at the cost of others. Obviously that comfort matters to

you

> more, and you feel that is the blessing of shaarada Maa. No young

> man....Wisdom is the real Gift of Divinities. You will not be so

> confused if you have really seen Divine Manifestations before you.

> The incidents you have narrated are no so great as you think. Do

> more tapasya and you will know what real manifestation will be like!

> You are under illusions. Please get yourself treated. Please

don't

> keep sleeping with Rahu, and Sani. Try to get the Grace of Guru!

>

> Ram Jaswal did not get the context of my utterings clearly and

hence

> wrote to me. If you were decent, you should have stopped referring

> to me or Mohanraaamji; then we also would have stopped. You

started

> it, you must end this.

>

> If you keep making patronising comments like this, you will

> definitely get answers like this from me. I WILL NOT STOP TILL YOU

> STOP.

>

> Abhishek

>

> vedic astrology , " litsol " <mishra.lalit@>

> wrote:

> >

> > Res. Ram ji,

> >

> > Pls. dont advice him or mohan raam, they have nothing to debate

or

> > discuss on either mantra or bhakti.

> >

> > I don't remember shlokas much as i read classics for my

> satisfaction,

> > in two phases, firstly from my class 8'th till my 2nd year of

> > graduation. that time i had no faith and no bhakti, just read

like

> i

> > was reading some comics or cartoon books, i had not developed

> ideas,

> > not taken any message, i knew and i can talk about the content,

but

> i

> > was not involved.

> >

> > after that incident happened at Sharda Temple,Maihar,it was

> > unbelievable and it made me change my thoughts, i again read some

> > classics and this time,i grasped the message given in the

classics.

> >

> > They are at the stage of my chlidhood, they may read and discuss.

> but

> > dont take the message in their heart, somewhere their greed to

> > establish themselves as pandit or authority is also a reason.

> >

> > Perhapse, in lieu of, hitting them hard, i had to take another

rout

> > to let them realize they are wrong and deliberately wrong.

> >

> > He didnt say any thing on my how i shown, beej and god's name is

> one

> > and same thing, in fact it's a simple thnig, and well known but

> they

> > dont accept.

> >

> > let them dont accept, what difference it makes to us, they have

> their

> > life with them, any qualitative change within them will do good

to

> > them only.

> >

> > So, i prayed maa, mother divine for mohan raam, he is too old,

his

> > problem is he learnt astrology, did some breathing excercises,

but

> he

> > lacks spiritual experiences so he doesn't believe, I was like him

> in

> > my childhood.

> >

> > I prayed, and it's acknowledged by maa, time will change for him

a

> > little, what didn't happen to him in last 85 yrs, will happen in

> next

> > 5-6 monnths, he will get some good spritiual experience, the

> curtain

> > will be lifted for some time, reality at a glance.

> >

> > after that it's his part to stick to that or not, coz, ego, greed

> and

> > fear still remains, i m not completely gone out of it, i have to

> > fight with me many times.

> >

> > I thought gruop w'd be a good plateform to get like minded

friends,

> > if nothnig, it gives joy.

> >

> > Let's wish good for all, I also express my gratitude to you to

> speak

> > for what u thought right.

> >

> > regards,

> > Lalit.

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > vedic astrology , " Ram Jaswal " <rkjaswal@>

> > wrote:

> > >

> > > Namaste Abhishek

> > >

> > > My post wasn't so much in defense of Lalith but one to stop

> > the " belittling "

> > > of a person within this Group. If you don't agree with

someone's

> > views you

> > > are perfectly within your rights to say so why in a scholarly

> > fashion so as

> > > to discuss and further the merits of the topic under

discussion.

> > Thereafter

> > > it is a matter for the individual to either continue with the

on-

> > going

> > > discussion or to stop? The only way you or anyone else is

likely

> to

> > change

> > > Lalith's view on chanting of Mantras will be from a scholarly

> > viewpoint and

> > > not from goading him?

> > >

> > > Also why are you taking personal offense? If Guru's can ignore

> his

> > comments

> > > - can't you do the same?

> > >

> > > With freedom of speech comes the responsibility of keeping a

> civil

> > and

> > > polite language - please re-read your note which prompted my

> earlier

> > > response.

> > >

> > > Like I said in my earlier post it is all about ones viewpoints -

 

> my

> > personal

> > > advise to everyone would be to take what you find reasonable

and

> > ignore the

> > > rest.

> > >

> > > Best wishes ..

> > >

> > > Jai Sita Ram

> > >

> > > Ram

> > > _____

> > >

> > > vedic astrology

> > > [vedic astrology ] On Behalf Of

> abhishekpotti

> > > 28 July 2007 20:42

> > > vedic astrology

> > > [vedic astrology] Re: Oye Lalith! No one here is

afraid

> of

> > you....

> > >

> > > Dear Ram Jaswal:

> > >

> > > If Lalith stops challenging others with his rude posts no one

> will

> > > run him down...please follow the threads carefully......He is

> > > speaking as if he is the master of everything and everybody

else

> is

> > a

> > > fool. When he passes judgment on senior astrologers of this

group

> > or

> > > unnecessarily challenges established conventions, we have

> defended

> > > that. Now, why are you defending Lalith? Don't you think if you

> > > have the right to defend an offender, we have the right to

defend

> > the

> > > more decent members and traditions that he is subtly

attacking....

> > >

> > > just read his posts.....If he has just forwarded the Prashna

> > Tantra,

> > > nobody would have objected to it.....See the accompanying

> comments

> > > where he abrasively comments certain things......

> > >

> > > Open your eyes before advicing anyone. Why don't you write to

> > Lalith

> > > also? When did I call him names?......No sir...you are

> mistaken....

> > >

> > > Did you not notice that even after Mohanraamji stopped writing

> > posts,

> > > this fellow was taunting that old gentleman repeatedly last

week.

> > > Where were you at that time?

> > >

> > > If Lalith stops writing abrasive posts like " Nobody can stand

> > before

> > > me " and all that silly nonsense, we have no issues with him (or

> at

> > > least I have no issues with him). So, advice Lalith also in

this

> > > regard.

> > >

> > > If Lalith and you enjoy freedom of speech, we also claim the

same

> > > previlege.

> > >

> > > Abhishek.

> > >

> > > vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology%

40>

> > > , " Ram Jaswal " <rkjaswal@>

> > > wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Namaste Abhishek/ Mohanraaam

> > > >

> > > > Just why are you trying to run Lalith down? From the posts

that

> I

> > > have read

> > > > All he has done is given this point of view - if you don't

> accept

> > > them than

> > > > simply ignore it - there is No need for any name calling or

> > > belittling

> > > > someone.

> > > >

> > > > There is also nothing wrong in Lalith forwarding " Prashna

> Tantra "

> > > text to

> > > > this group as to whether someone has requested it or not - he

> > > certainly

> > > > doesn't need your or mine permission to do so - after all he

> > > thought it

> > > > would be useful to everyone - again his view.

> > > >

> > > > Sorry if I am coming across annoyed and perhaps rude But feel

> it

> > is

> > > Best

> > > > that everyone should stop " belittling " other group members as

> in

> > > the long

> > > > run all it does is make oneself appear small and bigoted.

> > > >

> > > > Best wishes and hoping this will be the last mail on this

> > subject ..

> > > >

> > > > Jai Sita Ram

> > > >

> > > > Ram

> > > >

> > > > _____

> > > >

> > > > vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology%

> 40>

> > >

> > > > [vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology%

> > 40>

> > > ] On Behalf Of abhishekpotti

> > > > 28 July 2007 19:54

> > > > vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology%

40>

> > >

> > > > [vedic astrology] Oye Lalith! No one here is afraid

of

> > > you....

> > > >

> > > > Dear Lalith:

> > > >

> > > > The whole world knows the history of Blessed Meera

Bhai....the

> > > > epitome of Bhakti......She was attached to her " Lala " - the

> > > wonderful

> > > > idol of Krishna gifted to her even from her childhood....Do

you

> > > mean

> > > > to say that innocent young girl started chanting " Kliim

> > krishnaaya "

> > > > mantra automatically? Even Bhakta Prahlaada had to be

initiated

> > by

> > > > Sage Naaradha for his chant of dwaadasaakshari mantra....

> > > >

> > > > Nobody is afraid of you here......You need not proclaim that

> you

> > > are

> > > > not in the business of a Guru.....actually Guru status is not

a

> > > > business (true to your half-baked knowledge you will claim it

> is

> > > also

> > > > like software engineering!). The difference my friend between

> you

> > > > and other great persons like Rafal or Dakshinamoorthiji is

that

> > > they

> > > > are spending their money for the internet, whereas you are

> > > pilfering

> > > > your company's time and the company's resources while

browsing

> > the

> > > > internet. Don't you think you are cheating your company when

> you

> > > > spend so much time on empty and egoistic posts defending

> yourself

> > > > against every expert after arguing with them unnecessarily?

Are

> > you

> > > > not getting paid for the time you spend in the

company....Know

> > the

> > > > basics of ethics before ever sermonizing.....So, actually you

> are

> > > an

> > > > exploiter....try to understand that....the other gurujis are

> > > probably

> > > > too decent to comment on that......What happened to your

> project?

> > > > Better rush to it nough!....It will spare us the agony of

> > replying

> > > to

> > > > your half-witted postings!

> > > >

> > > > By the say, Which member asked you Prashna Tantra dear? We

did

> > not

> > > > see any posts requesting " Honourable Lalith " to explain

Prashna

> > > > Tantra (as if you could explain it!) What arrogance you have

to

> > > > claim that nobody can stand before you.....Guruji's posts

> exposed

> > > > your ignorance....you did not even know how to ask queries

and

> > get

> > > > replies from one of the most empathetic astrologers of this

> > group,

> > > > and yet you claim you are this and that......

> > > >

> > > > For your information....nobody is afraid of you..Rather you

> > should

> > > be

> > > > afraid of yourself......Your foolishness itself will be your

> > doom.

> > > > Did you not become the laughing stock due to your email-based

> > > chasing

> > > > of Priyaa? Such foolishness in occult matters could be more

> > costly

> > > > dear.....I think Mohanraaamji and Rafalji are only afraid

about

> > > your

> > > > own well-being! They are not afraid of you. Nor am I afraid

of

> > you.

> > > >

> > > > Your posts never answer the queries or points raised by

others;

> > you

> > > > take off on a new ground only because of your shallow

> > understanding

> > > > of subjects. Nobody has accepted you as a Guru here, and

nobody

> > > > will....Can a fire-fly eclipse the Sun? There are too

> many " Suns "

> > > > here and you are just a fire-fly.

> > > >

> > > > It reminds me of a story.....Once an ant challenged the

mighty

> > > > elephant for a fight; the elephant obviously could not hear

the

> > ant

> > > > (the ant being so tiny and it was on the ground, its sound

> could

> > > not

> > > > reach the elephant). The elephant just walked away out of its

> own

> > > > volition in its natural course. Then the ant claimed, " you

see

> I

> > > > challenged the elephant and it ran away " . Dear, your saying

> that

> > > > nobody can stand before you is similar to that.......

> > > >

> > > > FIRST LEARN THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN GHOSTS AND YOUR ANCESTOR

> > > > SUMANGALIS BEFORE WRITING THE FIRST POSTS ON OCCULT! What a

> > > > pity......what a pity.....That we have to bear your

meaningless

> > > > rantings here!

> > > >

> > > > Abhishek.

> > > >

> > > > vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology%

> 40>

> > > > , " litsol " <mishra.lalit@>

> > > > wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > I was waiting for u dear..

> > > > >

> > > > > why u took time ?

> > > > >

> > > > > Do u mean Meera Bai discussed with u, what she did..

> > > > >

> > > > > Do u know 'Kleem Krishnay, Govindaya Gopijan Vallabhaya

Namh'

> > is

> > > a

> > > > > mantra for lord krishna.

> > > > >

> > > > > is there no beej mantras, to whom u wish to misguide ? let

> > thnigs

> > > > > remain between lord, bhakta , their shraddha and their guru.

> > > > >

> > > > > why u people are so afraid of me, i m not in business of

guru.

> > > > >

> > > > > i m happy with my life, my profession of software

engineering

> > and

> > > > > my hobbies ok.

> > > > >

> > > > > there are 7000+ members are here, by writing such type of

> > foolish

> > > > > things u expose urself only, mind, there are better brains

> here.

> > > > >

> > > > > this is enough ...

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology%

> > 40>

> > > > ,

> > > > > " abhishekpotti " <abhishekpotti@> wrote:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Respected Mohanraaamji:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Well said. Lalith is saying that " maybe in south india

> > devotees

> > > > > > don't chant Moola mantras but not so in North " ...What

> > > > > > stupidity.....He does not seem to understand that " mantra

> > > > shaastra

> > > > > > experts " are also devotees, but they cannot be called as

> > > innocent

> > > > > > saatwik bhaktaas! A typical example of a pure saadhwik

> bhakta

> > > > will

> > > > > > be Meera Bhai (was she not North Indian). Can Lalith say

> > which

> > > > > Dasa

> > > > > > Mahaa Vidya Meera Bhai practised? She was immersed in

> Krishna

> > > > > > consciousness and Lover for Him. Her own Bhajans were her

> > > > prayers

> > > > > in

> > > > > > the bhaavana of Bhakti in the form of Love! This is not

> > mantra

> > > > > > shaastra. Another example will be Saant Tukhaaraam. These

> > > > > bhaktaas

> > > > > > did not chant moola mantraas. Panditji Dakshinamoorthi

was

> on

> > > > dot

> > > > > in

> > > > > > saying that " Pure bhaktaas do not chant complicated moola

> > > > > mantraas " .

> > > > > > You have clarified this fact wonderfully in your post. I

> wish

> > > > more

> > > > > > knowledgeable persons also put erratic posters in their

> place

> > > > just

> > > > > as

> > > > > > Mohanraaamji does here. This will benefit more naive

> readers

> > of

> > > > > > these forums who might otherwise get confused as to which

> of

> > > the

> > > > > > paths to follow. Actually, anyone can follow any path as

> he/

> > > she

> > > > > > deems it fit; but there should be consistency of

procedures.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > We should not confuse mantrik rituals and bhakti

doctrines.

> > > > > Bhaktaas

> > > > > > can chant the names of Gods at anytime.....Mantra

shaastra

> > > > experts

> > > > > > chanting advanced moola mantras should necessarily adopt

> > ritual

> > > > > > procedures for the welfare of themselves and others!

> > > > > Yes...improper

> > > > > > chanting of mantras can cause danger to the society also

> just

> > > as

> > > > > > proper chanting can help others. Hence, this cannot be

> > > > considered

> > > > > as

> > > > > > a personal preference of the aspirant. If this was not

the

> > > case,

> > > > > why

> > > > > > did sages codify spiritual practises scrupulously?

Rafalji,

> > > > > > Mohanraaamji, etc. are correct in saying it is best to

> follow

> > > > > Pandit

> > > > > > Dakshinamoorthiji's advices on mantra shastra or japams.

He

> > is

> > > > > > learned and he is living a life compatible to the

shaastras

> > > > though

> > > > > he

> > > > > > has faced uncertain circumstances in his own personal

life.

> > He

> > > > > never

> > > > > > compromised on principles and he willingly paid the price

> for

> > > > that

> > > > > > which most of us will never do. The words of such a

person

> > > > should

> > > > > > obviously carry more weight.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Abhishek.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology%

> > > 40>

> > > > , " mohanraaam "

> > > > <mohanraaam@>

> > > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Well Lalith:

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > If you have really done dasa Maha Vidyaa, you would

have

> > > never

> > > > > > > approached a professional astrologer for

> > consultation...that

> > > > much

> > > > > I

> > > > > > > can say....

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > And what idiocy when you say Panditji is partly wrong?

He

> > > > > > > said " Bhaktaas do not chant Moola mantras " , whereas you

> > have

> > > > > edited

> > > > > > > the words to suit your ends....He never said " devotees

> > don't

> > > > > chant

> > > > > > > Beej mantras " .....You are putting words into his mouth

> and

> > > > > assuming

> > > > > > > he is wrong! Why, do you know....the Great Panditji

> himself

> > > > > chants

> > > > > > > Moola mantras.....He is a bhakta and a mantra shastra

> > expert.

> > > > As

> > > > > a

> > > > > > > bhakta he keeps incessant chanting of naama japa

> throughout

> > > the

> > > > > > day;

> > > > > > > as a mantra shastra expert, he restricts the moola

mantra

> > > > japams

> > > > > to

> > > > > > > stipulated times with ritual purity.....It is this

> > wonderful

> > > > > > practice

> > > > > > > that Guruji was alluding to. Guruji cannot be wrong in

> > ritual

> > > > > and

> > > > > > > occult matters. Please understand that.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > There are 4 classes of Devotees.......1) Saatwik vedic

> > > devotees

> > > > > who

> > > > > > > will follow vedic dharma scrupulously. They will not

dare

> > to

> > > > > > compare

> > > > > > > astrology and vedanga to Engineering! as you did...

> > > > > > > 2) Raajasik devotees who will follow vedic disciplines

as

> > far

> > > > as

> > > > > > > possible, but will still go after upaasanaas of Demi-

Gods

> > for

> > > > > > > accomplishment of siddhis. Mantra shaastra experts

> usually

> > > > fall

> > > > > in

> > > > > > > this category.

> > > > > > > 3) Saatwik Bhaktaas - for whom the meditation and glory

> of

> > > > their

> > > > > > > Ishta Devataa is enough for spiritual satisfaction. It

is

> > > this

> > > > > > > category that Guruji referred to when he said they will

> not

> > > > chant

> > > > > > > Moola mantras too much. Definitely they will not do

Dasa

> > > Mahaa

> > > > > > > Vidyaa.

> > > > > > > 4) Taamasic Devotees - Those whose main motive is to

> > project

> > > > > > > themselves at all costs and acting as if they are equal

> to

> > > the

> > > > > > > experts; they will try ALL practices - whether they are

> > > > > sanctioned

> > > > > > by

> > > > > > > vedas or not.....Their only aim is personal glory and

> > > > > > satisfaction.

> > > > > > > They will attack even established dharma if they do not

> get

> > > > > results

> > > > > > > (sounds familiar....You are one!) Ignorance and half-

> baked

> > > > > > knowledge

> > > > > > > and egotism are these persons' motivating fuel.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > You are really satan's Gift to this list.......My only

> > prayer

> > > > is

> > > > > > that

> > > > > > > innocent members of this list do not get side-tracked

> with

> > > your

> > > > > > > ramblings.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Let me make this clear to the list.....Panditji said

that

> > > > saatwik

> > > > > > > Bhaktaas who chant Divine names only due to Pure Love

on

> > God

> > > > > > usually

> > > > > > > never chant mantrik moola mantraas. It is just one

class

> of

> > > > > > > devotees. A rajasik bhakta who is a mantra-shaastra

> expert

> > > may

> > > > > > even

> > > > > > > be a bhakta at heart; and a pure bhakta may sometimes

> chant

> > > > some

> > > > > > > mantrik japams for solving some practical

> issues......But,

> > > when

> > > > > > they

> > > > > > > switch their routines temporarily, these enlightened

> > devotees

> > > > > > usually

> > > > > > > take good guidance and follow the tenets of shaastras

> > > > > > > scrupulously....Definitely they will not sit on

> assumption

> > > like

> > > > > > > Lalith.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > On the one hand, this fellow claims he has done chants

in

> > > > > forests,

> > > > > > > rivers, earth, etc. (Probably we have a Maharishi here!

> > What

> > > > > > heights

> > > > > > > of pointless pride in this young man list....it is

> > > > disgusting!).

> > > > > > On

> > > > > > > the other hand, he says he chants mantras in buses,

> trains,

> > > > > > etc......

> > > > > > > He is confused about which no body can have issues.

Only

> > his

> > > > > Guru

> > > > > > > should be concerned about that.....But, his attempts to

> > stuff

> > > > his

> > > > > > > shallow understanding upon this list is reprehensible.

> And,

> > > > his

> > > > > > > habit of quoting experts out of context is really

> > > condemnable.

> > > > > May

> > > > > > > Jupiter's Light Shine on that fellow and teach him to

> > respect

> > > > the

> > > > > > > hallowed traditions and to stay at his level rather

than

> > > trying

> > > > > > > to " teach " others (He has the audacity to claim he

> > > > is " teaching "

> > > > > > > Rafalji!)

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > If a mere young man of 35 years who has spent his life

on

> a

> > > > > " Failed

> > > > > > > computer web desining business " , " pointless email

chasing

> > of

> > > > > > girls " ,

> > > > > > > and other " past times " can gain insight as he claims,

how

> > > much

> > > > > will

> > > > > > > learned Gurus of this group with their life of devotion

> to

> > > > > vedanta

> > > > > > > and vedanga know? His peanut brain and hyper-inflated

ego

> > > will

> > > > > > never

> > > > > > > allow him to see this obvious truth. But, please list

> > > exercise

> > > > > > your

> > > > > > > discretion while reading his posts (There are doubtless

> > some

> > > > good

> > > > > > > elements even in his posts; but mostly there is trash

> > > presented

> > > > > as

> > > > > > > philosophy).

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Mohanraaam

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology%

> > > 40>

> > > > , " litsol "

> > > > <mishra.lalit@>

> > > > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Dear Rafal,

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Do u think, a hobby means shallow knowledge of the

> > domain,

> > > No

> > > > > > > rafal,

> > > > > > > > it's not like that.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > At least not for me. You have learnt and i m

learning,

> i

> > > read

> > > > > > ur's

> > > > > > > > replies and get benifitted, same way i wanted you to

> pay

> > > > heed

> > > > > to

> > > > > > > > what i have written about spritiuality, mostrly i did

> > write

> > > > for

> > > > > u

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > I have done all 10 mahavidyas of tantra and read many

> > > tantrik

> > > > > > > > classics, spent good deal of time with great tantriks

> > > > trained

> > > > > in

> > > > > > > > Kamakhya and other places, keenly observed their

> doings,

> > > > their

> > > > > > > > mistakes etc.., I did tremendous mantra chanting on

> > water,

> > > > on

> > > > > > > earth,

> > > > > > > > at home, in forests etc...

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > then reached here, then i did write something, but

> sorry

> > i

> > > > dont

> > > > > > > > remember shlokas. i was not interested in cramming

that.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Panditji is not fully correct in saying that

> BeejMantras

> > > are

> > > > > not

> > > > > > > > chanted by devotees, I dont know much about South

India

> > but

> > > > in

> > > > > > > North

> > > > > > > > normally its done.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > And a successfull mantra sadhana has to result in

one's

> > > being

> > > > a

> > > > > > > > devotee, the devotion is the outcome, final result of

> > > mantra

> > > > > > > sadhana,

> > > > > > > > perhaps, Pandit Ji believes mantras are power

> > > packet,thinks,

> > > > i

> > > > > do

> > > > > > > it

> > > > > > > > this way , these many times and get this result, this

> is

> > > > where

> > > > > > most

> > > > > > > > of the people are confused. without being a good

human

> > > being

> > > > if

> > > > > > we

> > > > > > > > think, we will achieve something in spirituality, is

> > > > difficult,

> > > > > > > very

> > > > > > > > difficult.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > what happens is, with the mantra chanting, a self

> > > > > > transformation

> > > > > > > > process begins, u if dont restrict urself, ur karma

> > begins

> > > > > > > diluting,

> > > > > > > > and u begin ur purification process unknowingly, when

> > > > > substantial

> > > > > > > > part of ego and greed for respect vanishes and many

> such

> > > > thing

> > > > > > > > togather, mantra awakens u and with the God's grace

ur

> > > > > objective

> > > > > > > gets

> > > > > > > > fullfilled, gradually u become a devotee. ur being

> simple

> > > and

> > > > > > being

> > > > > > > > devotee is sometimes is indication of ur's going on

the

> > > right

> > > > > > track.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > I think we have discussed a lot, it's enough !!

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > My Boss has given me lot of projects to complete, so,

> may

> > > be,

> > > > i

> > > > > m

> > > > > > > not

> > > > > > > > going to available in the group like i was recently.

> > > however.

> > > > i

> > > > > > > will

> > > > > > > > complete Garg Hora series.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > regards,

> > > > > > > > Lalit.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology%

> > > 40>

> > > > , Rafal Gendarz

> > > > > > > > <starsuponme@> wrote:

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya*

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > Dear Litsol,

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > Then please dont generalize Your preferences as

they

> > are

> > > > too

> > > > > > > > shallow for

> > > > > > > > > this Forum aspiration.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > Regards,

> > > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz

> > > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru

> > > > > > > > > email: rafal@

> > > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa.com

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > litsol napisa?(a):

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > Dear Rafel,

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > I take Astrology as a good hobby, and i w'd be

> > looking

> > > at

> > > > > it

> > > > > > > with

> > > > > > > > an

> > > > > > > > > > engineer's approach.

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > I asked ur age because, it's our thinking to put

> our

> > > > > > parameters

> > > > > > > in

> > > > > > > > > > god's system, there is nothing like delay or

> > > advancement

> > > > in

> > > > > > > > > > spirituality. So, " Delay "

> or " Speed " , " backwardness "

> > > > > > > > > > and " advancement " doesn't exist in spirituality,

I

> > > > thought

> > > > > if

> > > > > > u

> > > > > > > r

> > > > > > > > > > thinking that it may take too much time, I wanted

> to

> > > tell

> > > > > u,

> > > > > > > it's

> > > > > > > > not

> > > > > > > > > > like that. there is no delay.

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > It clicks in fraction of a second, when u r

getting

> > > > clicked

> > > > > > > > depends

> > > > > > > > > > on u and on god's will, when he wants u to get

> > clicked.

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > God sometimes graces for no reason ( " Ahetuka " )

just

> > for

> > > > his

> > > > > > > > > > compassion towards u and it may happen next

minute

> > too.

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > spirituality is not delimited by time , effort

and

> > > rules.

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > regards,

> > > > > > > > > > Lalit.

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology

> > > > > > > > > > <vedic astrology%40>, Rafal

> > > Gendarz

> > > > > > > > > > <starsuponme@ ...> wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya*

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > Dear Litsol,

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > Please be careful about words.

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > Im happy that You are sharing Your experience -

> > very

> > > > > > > inspirating

> > > > > > > > > > ones.

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > Age hierarchy is for sudras - Manu Samhita. If

> You

> > > > treat

> > > > > > > Jyotish

> > > > > > > > > > Vedanga

> > > > > > > > > > > as profession similar to engineering You have a

> > long

> > > > way

> > > > > to

> > > > > > > go.

> > > > > > > > But

> > > > > > > > > > dont

> > > > > > > > > > > be pessimistic here are many who will try to

help

> > You

> > > > in

> > > > > > > getting

> > > > > > > > > > proper

> > > > > > > > > > > understanding.

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > After some time You will agree with me about

the

> > mala

> > > > and

> > > > > > > japa.

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > Regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz

> > > > > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru

> > > > > > > > > > > email: rafal@

> > > > > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > litsol napisa?(a):

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Rafal,

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > Here u r doing two wrong things, instead of

> > > > developing

> > > > > ur

> > > > > > > > > > understanding,

> > > > > > > > > > > > u r trying to conclude something and going

> beyond

> > > > that

> > > > > u r

> > > > > > > > > > messaging

> > > > > > > > > > > > same to many.

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > I m touching 35, What's ur age ?

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > Astrology is a kind of vidya or profession,

> like

> > i

> > > m

> > > > a

> > > > > > > > software

> > > > > > > > > > > > engineer, software engineering is my

> profession.

> > > > > > > spirituality

> > > > > > > > is

> > > > > > > > > > beyond

> > > > > > > > > > > > all sort of vidya or profession.

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > I wish u to be a good soul and to realize the

> > bliss

> > > > of

> > > > > > self

> > > > > > > > > > awakening or

> > > > > > > > > > > > in other terms, the bliss that comes once u

> feel

> > u

> > > > and

> > > > > > god

> > > > > > > is

> > > > > > > > > > > > connected. dissolved in each other.

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > First realize, experience, then speak and

then

> > > > suggest

> > > > > to

> > > > > > > > others,

> > > > > > > > > > by

> > > > > > > > > > > > mere reading shastras or books u r not going

to

> > > feel

> > > > > it.

> > > > > > > > unless

> > > > > > > > > > god

> > > > > > > > > > > > graces u it's very very difficult. and if u

> dont

> > > > avoid

> > > > > > this

> > > > > > > > sort

> > > > > > > > > > of

> > > > > > > > > > > > hurriedness instead of learning and

> > understanding,

> > > it

> > > > > > will

> > > > > > > > affect

> > > > > > > > > > u only

> > > > > > > > > > > > no one else.

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > somehere i have read, it was written - By

mere

> > > > > > > repeating " So-

> > > > > > > > > > Aham " no

> > > > > > > > > > > > one gets liberated unless he realizes it like

> one

> > > > > doesnt

> > > > > > get

> > > > > > > > > > cured by

> > > > > > > > > > > > knowing the name of the medicine, u need to

> take

> > > the

> > > > > > > medicine

> > > > > > > > to

> > > > > > > > > > get

> > > > > > > > > > > > cured " .

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > So, pls. be wise, as it was being discussed

> here,

> > i

> > > > > > shared

> > > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > > > > experience of my life, pls. mind it, i m not

a

> > > > > preecher,

> > > > > > > nor a

> > > > > > > > > > guru, nor

> > > > > > > > > > > > i have to make my followers, nor it's my

> > > profession,

> > > > > nor

> > > > > > i

> > > > > > > > have

> > > > > > > > > > to get

> > > > > > > > > > > > fame, sharing things is a kind of

friendliness

> a

> > > kind

> > > > of

> > > > > > > > > > affection,

> > > > > > > > > > > > that's it.

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > > Lalit.

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology

> > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40.

com>,

> > > Rafal

> > > > > > Gendarz

> > > > > > > > > > > > <starsuponme@ ...>

> > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya*

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Jyotishas

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Counting of mala has more depth sense than

> just

> > > > > > counting,

> > > > > > > > so for

> > > > > > > > > > > > natives

> > > > > > > > > > > > > like Litsol counting is neccessary and any

> > other

> > > > > > > speculation

> > > > > > > > > > will be

> > > > > > > > > > > > > only illusory and just imagination. We

should

> > > > follow

> > > > > Pt.

> > > > > > > > > > > > Dakshinamoorti

> > > > > > > > > > > > > advise strictly, otherwise our process of

> > > spiritual

> > > > > > > > development

> > > > > > > > > > will

> > > > > > > > > > > > be

> > > > > > > > > > > > > slow and unauthoritative.

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru

> > > > > > > > > > > > > email: rafal@

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > asmp2k02@ napisa?(a):

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Resp Sri Lalitji,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for your mail.But please also read

> > > > > > > > GuruDakshinamurthyi

> > > > > > > > > > ji's

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > mail(addressing me) also on this,which

> brings

> > > in

> > > > > more

> > > > > > > > clarity

> > > > > > > > > > to the

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > applicability principles to my mail.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > I meant that both are necessity but to

what

> > > > degree

> > > > > of

> > > > > > > time

> > > > > > > > (it

> > > > > > > > > > varies

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > from saadhaka to saadhaka) to get such

> > inbuilt

> > > > > > maturity

> > > > > > > > such

> > > > > > > > > > that

> > > > > > > > > > > > that

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > the count will be taken care of by Divine

> > > forces

> > > > > > after

> > > > > > > > some

> > > > > > > > > > initial

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > period of saadhana.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Morover the type of bio matter present in

> the

> > > > japa

> > > > > > maala

> > > > > > > > > > (which is

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > symbolic for ritualism as well as from

> > > practical

> > > > > > point

> > > > > > > of

> > > > > > > > > > view for

> > > > > > > > > > > > our

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > count) will help in keeping away

> destructive

> > > > forces

> > > > > > > > acting on

> > > > > > > > > > us

> > > > > > > > > > > > .Thus

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > the symbolic rituals will indirectly help

> us

> > in

> > > > > > keeping

> > > > > > > > away

> > > > > > > > > > from

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > negative thoughts and also trains our

> memory

> > to

> > > > be

> > > > > > > object

> > > > > > > > > > > > oriented.If

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > our memory grows and retentive capacity

> > > increase

> > > > > the

> > > > > > > > Gnaana

> > > > > > > > > > will

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > increase ,but at the same time

destructive

> > > forces

> > > > > > > > > > (diversions) also

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > becomes powerful.Thus the symbolic

> procedures

> > > > will

> > > > > > come

> > > > > > > in

> > > > > > > > > > handy to

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > successfully fight the negative

forces.The

> > > > rituals

> > > > > > may

> > > > > > > be

> > > > > > > > > > Rising

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > early(if possible during Braahmi

> > muhurta),Taking

> > > > > > > > > > bath,Japaanusthaan,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > attending to the livelihood job etc etc

in

> > > > defined

> > > > > > > times

> > > > > > > > as

> > > > > > > > > > > > discipline

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > helps indirectly tune our memory through

> > > keeping

> > > > > our

> > > > > > > body

> > > > > > > > > > healthy.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thus ultimately we conclude that the so

> > called

> > > > > > symbolic

> > > > > > > > > > procedures

> > > > > > > > > > > > are

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > not actually symbolic(it got branded as

> such)

> > > but

> > > > a

> > > > > > > > necessity

> > > > > > > > > > for

> > > > > > > > > > > > our

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > own good if we practice to the extent we

> can.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quoting mishra.lalit@ ... <mishra.

> > lalit%

> > > > > > > 40gmail.

> > > > > > > > com>:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Resp. Sri Murthy Adavi,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, what you said is perfectly right, we

> > count

> > > > or

> > > > > > dont

> > > > > > > > > > count,target

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > is realization of god's love within, I

got

> it

> > > > with

> > > > > no

> > > > > > > > > > counting,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > someone may get it with counting.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanx, for the writing.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Lalit.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology

> > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. com>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40.

> > com>,

> > > > > > srinivasa

> > > > > > > > > > murthy adavi

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > asmp2k02@ wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Respected Learned Members,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Both views may be correct when the

views

> > > > have/or

> > > > > > with

> > > > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > > goal as

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > development of Love/Devotion towards

> > adhistana

> > > > > > Devatha

> > > > > > > of

> > > > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > > Mantra

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > as Base.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In the initial stage only you need the

> > > count;as

> > > > > one

> > > > > > > > > > develops the

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > habit the biological tuning of the

> > > intellect/body

> > > > > will

> > > > > > > > > > automatically

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > take care of the practice(without count-

> help

> > of

> > > > > malas

> > > > > > > > etc).

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It's like if with the help of Alarm

clock

> > if

> > > we

> > > > > > wake

> > > > > > > up

> > > > > > > > for

> > > > > > > > > > 2 or 3

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > days at some appointed hour,then

> > automatically

> > > we

> > > > > > > wakeup

> > > > > > > > at

> > > > > > > > > > the same

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > time every day without help of alarm.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > With due Respects

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > smadavi

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quoting starsuponme@ :

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya*

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Litsol,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Definitely we should count our Mantra

> Japa

> > on

> > > > > Mala.

> > > > > > > Your

> > > > > > > > > > view is

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > against

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Vedic Authorities and Sages, so should

be

> > > > > rejected.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > email: rafal@

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > litsol napisa?(a):

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Mr. Jayashri,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > A thought came, why i should not

share

> > with

> > > > u,

> > > > > U

> > > > > > > pls.

> > > > > > > > stop

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > counting

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > mantra chantings, counting mantra

gives

> > > false

> > > > > ego

> > > > > > > and

> > > > > > > > then

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > frustration if u dont get desired

> results.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > leave it to the god, god counts the

> > mantra

> > > > > > chanted

> > > > > > > by

> > > > > > > > you

> > > > > > > > > > may be

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 108, 1008 or whatsoever, let him

count,

> > > it's

> > > > > his

> > > > > > > part

> > > > > > > > and

> > > > > > > > > > ur

> > > > > > > > > > > > part

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > is

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to chant the mantra. when the mantra

> has

> > to

> > > > > > awaken,

> > > > > > > it

> > > > > > > > > > will be,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > god

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > will ensure it for u.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sometimes we try to become more

> > intelligent

> > > > > with

> > > > > > out

> > > > > > > > > > limited

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > intellect and that creates obstacles

in

> > our

> > > > > > > spiritual

> > > > > > > > > > growth.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So, forget about counts, forget about

> the

> > > > time

> > > > > u

> > > > > > > put

> > > > > > > > in

> > > > > > > > > > for ur's

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sadhana, invoke the god with pure

> heart.

> > > > purity

> > > > > > > > counts.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Lalit.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology@ .

com

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology%

40.

> > > > > > > > > > com>, " dakshinastrologer "

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <dakshinastrologer@ ...> wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Ms. Jayashree:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think this topic on 108 is

getting

> > very

> > > > > > > > interesting

> > > > > > > > > > and

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > enlightening for all members.

> Yesterday

> > > we

> > > > > had a

> > > > > > > > > > wonderful

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > esoteric

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > explanation from Shri. Sushil

> Dikshit,

> > > and

> > > > > > today

> > > > > > > > your

> > > > > > > > > > > > wonderful

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > explanation of numerical symmetry

of

> > the

> > > > > cosmos!

> > > > > > > > > > Wonderful.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There definitely exists

a " numerical

> > > > > symphony "

> > > > > > in

> > > > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > > > > Universe.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > not only 108.....as I mentioned in

my

> > > > earlier

> > > > > > > post,

> > > > > > > > > > there are

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > various

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > other numerals that are significant

> in

> > > > occult

> > > > > > > > > > practices. 108

> > > > > > > > > > > > is

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > a

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > powerful and all-purpose perfect

> > > > > number...While

> > > > > > > we

> > > > > > > > have

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > understood

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the glory of 108, we should not

lose

> > > sight

> > > > of

> > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > fact

> > > > > > > > > > that

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > there

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > are

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > other powerful numbers also. This

is

> > just

> > > > for

> > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > > information

> > > > > > > > > > > > of

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > list.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > My apprecitation again for this

> > wonderful

> > > > > > > response.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Blessed be.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pandit R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Blessed be.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pandit R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI. --- In

> vedic-

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > astrology@grou ps.com

> > > > <astrology%

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > 40. com>,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " jayasartn " <jayasartn@> wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In cosmology, 108 has this

> > > significance -

> > > > > the

> > > > > > > > moon is

> > > > > > > > > > away

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > from

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > earth 108 times its (moon's)

> diameter

> > > and

> > > > > the

> > > > > > > sun

> > > > > > > > is

> > > > > > > > > > away

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > from the

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > earth, 108 times its diameter.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Perhaps this reality of distances

> is

> > > > > > applicable

> > > > > > > to

> > > > > > > > > > deities

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > too.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Perhaps this has been indicated

by

> > the

> > > > 108

> > > > > > divya

> > > > > > > > > > desas of

> > > > > > > > > > > > Lord

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Narayana.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > jayasree

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology@

> .

> > com

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology%

40.

> > > > > > > > > > com>, " dakshinastrologer "

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <dakshinastrologer@ > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Shri. Sushil:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It is a wonderful answer you

have

> > > given.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Blessed be.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pandit R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology@

> > .

> > > com

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology%

40.

> > > > > > > > > > com>, " sushil.dikshit "

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <sushil.dikshit@ > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Babu,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It is not a silly question

but

> it

> > > is

> > > > a

> > > > > > very

> > > > > > > > good

> > > > > > > > > > > > question.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Actually

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > there are 27 Nakshatras and

> every

> > > > > > Nakshtras

> > > > > > > > has 4

> > > > > > > > > > Charan

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > so

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > total

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > charans are 27 x 4 = 108

> Charan.

> > > Each

> > > > > > > Charan

> > > > > > > > has 3

> > > > > > > > > > > > degree

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > and

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 20

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > minutes so if you multiply 3

> > degree

> > > > and

> > > > > 20

> > > > > > > > > > minutes to

> > > > > > > > > > > > 108

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > it

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > comes

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > out to be 360 degress i.e.

one

> > > cycle

> > > > > > > (Circle).

> > > > > > > > > > This

> > > > > > > > > > > > cycle

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > represetns

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > whole brahmand because all

the

> > > > rashis,

> > > > > > > > planets and

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > nakshatra

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > are

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > between these 360 degree in 2

> > > > > dimensional

> > > > > > > > > > horoscope. So

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > chanting a

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mantra completes one cycle of

> > this

> > > > > > brahmand.

> > > > > > > > > > Further One

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > who

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > has

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > visited Brahamand at least

one

> > time

> > > > > i.e.

> > > > > > he

> > > > > > > is

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > brahmagyani he

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > is

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > entitiled to place 108 Shri

> > before

> > > > his

> > > > > > name.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sushil dikshit

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology@

> > > .

> > > > com

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology%

> 40.

> > > > com>,

> > > > > > babu

> > > > > > > > mon

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <muthappan111@ >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Namaste,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It may be a silly matter

for

> > all

> > > of

> > > > > you.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I want to know what is the

> > reason

> > > > > that

> > > > > > > some

> > > > > > > > > > remedies

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > recomended

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > for 108 times.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I dont know any thing about

> > > > astrology.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I hope you may pleased to

> > provide

> > > a

> > > > > > reply

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thanks,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Babu

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------ --------- -----

--

> --

> > -

> > > --

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Be a better Globetrotter.

Get

> > > > better

> > > > > > > travel

> > > > > > > > > > answers

> > > > > > > > > > > > from

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someone

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > who knows.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Answers - Check it

out.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this

> > > message

> > > > > have

> > > > > > > been

> > > > > > > > > > removed]

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have

> > been

> > > > > > removed]

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have

> > been

> > > > > > removed]

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have

> been

> > > > > removed]

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have

been

> > > > removed]

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been

> > removed]

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been

removed]

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...