Guest guest Posted July 28, 2007 Report Share Posted July 28, 2007 Dear Lalith: The whole world knows the history of Blessed Meera Bhai....the epitome of Bhakti......She was attached to her " Lala " - the wonderful idol of Krishna gifted to her even from her childhood....Do you mean to say that innocent young girl started chanting " Kliim krishnaaya " mantra automatically? Even Bhakta Prahlaada had to be initiated by Sage Naaradha for his chant of dwaadasaakshari mantra.... Nobody is afraid of you here......You need not proclaim that you are not in the business of a Guru.....actually Guru status is not a business (true to your half-baked knowledge you will claim it is also like software engineering!). The difference my friend between you and other great persons like Rafal or Dakshinamoorthiji is that they are spending their money for the internet, whereas you are pilfering your company's time and the company's resources while browsing the internet. Don't you think you are cheating your company when you spend so much time on empty and egoistic posts defending yourself against every expert after arguing with them unnecessarily? Are you not getting paid for the time you spend in the company....Know the basics of ethics before ever sermonizing.....So, actually you are an exploiter....try to understand that....the other gurujis are probably too decent to comment on that......What happened to your project? Better rush to it nough!....It will spare us the agony of replying to your half-witted postings! By the say, Which member asked you Prashna Tantra dear? We did not see any posts requesting " Honourable Lalith " to explain Prashna Tantra (as if you could explain it!) What arrogance you have to claim that nobody can stand before you.....Guruji's posts exposed your ignorance....you did not even know how to ask queries and get replies from one of the most empathetic astrologers of this group, and yet you claim you are this and that...... For your information....nobody is afraid of you..Rather you should be afraid of yourself......Your foolishness itself will be your doom. Did you not become the laughing stock due to your email-based chasing of Priyaa? Such foolishness in occult matters could be more costly dear.....I think Mohanraaamji and Rafalji are only afraid about your own well-being! They are not afraid of you. Nor am I afraid of you. Your posts never answer the queries or points raised by others; you take off on a new ground only because of your shallow understanding of subjects. Nobody has accepted you as a Guru here, and nobody will....Can a fire-fly eclipse the Sun? There are too many " Suns " here and you are just a fire-fly. It reminds me of a story.....Once an ant challenged the mighty elephant for a fight; the elephant obviously could not hear the ant (the ant being so tiny and it was on the ground, its sound could not reach the elephant). The elephant just walked away out of its own volition in its natural course. Then the ant claimed, " you see I challenged the elephant and it ran away " . Dear, your saying that nobody can stand before you is similar to that....... FIRST LEARN THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN GHOSTS AND YOUR ANCESTOR SUMANGALIS BEFORE WRITING THE FIRST POSTS ON OCCULT! What a pity......what a pity.....That we have to bear your meaningless rantings here! Abhishek. vedic astrology , " litsol " <mishra.lalit wrote: > > > I was waiting for u dear.. > > why u took time ? > > Do u mean Meera Bai discussed with u, what she did.. > > Do u know 'Kleem Krishnay, Govindaya Gopijan Vallabhaya Namh' is a > mantra for lord krishna. > > is there no beej mantras, to whom u wish to misguide ? let thnigs > remain between lord, bhakta , their shraddha and their guru. > > why u people are so afraid of me, i m not in business of guru. > > i m happy with my life, my profession of software engineering and > my hobbies ok. > > there are 7000+ members are here, by writing such type of foolish > things u expose urself only, mind, there are better brains here. > > this is enough ... > > > > > > vedic astrology , > " abhishekpotti " <abhishekpotti@> wrote: > > > > Respected Mohanraaamji: > > > > Well said. Lalith is saying that " maybe in south india devotees > > don't chant Moola mantras but not so in North " ...What > > stupidity.....He does not seem to understand that " mantra shaastra > > experts " are also devotees, but they cannot be called as innocent > > saatwik bhaktaas! A typical example of a pure saadhwik bhakta will > > be Meera Bhai (was she not North Indian). Can Lalith say which > Dasa > > Mahaa Vidya Meera Bhai practised? She was immersed in Krishna > > consciousness and Lover for Him. Her own Bhajans were her prayers > in > > the bhaavana of Bhakti in the form of Love! This is not mantra > > shaastra. Another example will be Saant Tukhaaraam. These > bhaktaas > > did not chant moola mantraas. Panditji Dakshinamoorthi was on dot > in > > saying that " Pure bhaktaas do not chant complicated moola > mantraas " . > > You have clarified this fact wonderfully in your post. I wish more > > knowledgeable persons also put erratic posters in their place just > as > > Mohanraaamji does here. This will benefit more naive readers of > > these forums who might otherwise get confused as to which of the > > paths to follow. Actually, anyone can follow any path as he/ she > > deems it fit; but there should be consistency of procedures. > > > > We should not confuse mantrik rituals and bhakti doctrines. > Bhaktaas > > can chant the names of Gods at anytime.....Mantra shaastra experts > > chanting advanced moola mantras should necessarily adopt ritual > > procedures for the welfare of themselves and others! > Yes...improper > > chanting of mantras can cause danger to the society also just as > > proper chanting can help others. Hence, this cannot be considered > as > > a personal preference of the aspirant. If this was not the case, > why > > did sages codify spiritual practises scrupulously? Rafalji, > > Mohanraaamji, etc. are correct in saying it is best to follow > Pandit > > Dakshinamoorthiji's advices on mantra shastra or japams. He is > > learned and he is living a life compatible to the shaastras though > he > > has faced uncertain circumstances in his own personal life. He > never > > compromised on principles and he willingly paid the price for that > > which most of us will never do. The words of such a person should > > obviously carry more weight. > > > > Abhishek. > > > > vedic astrology , " mohanraaam " <mohanraaam@> > > wrote: > > > > > > Well Lalith: > > > > > > If you have really done dasa Maha Vidyaa, you would have never > > > approached a professional astrologer for consultation...that much > I > > > can say.... > > > > > > And what idiocy when you say Panditji is partly wrong? He > > > said " Bhaktaas do not chant Moola mantras " , whereas you have > edited > > > the words to suit your ends....He never said " devotees don't > chant > > > Beej mantras " .....You are putting words into his mouth and > assuming > > > he is wrong! Why, do you know....the Great Panditji himself > chants > > > Moola mantras.....He is a bhakta and a mantra shastra expert. As > a > > > bhakta he keeps incessant chanting of naama japa throughout the > > day; > > > as a mantra shastra expert, he restricts the moola mantra japams > to > > > stipulated times with ritual purity.....It is this wonderful > > practice > > > that Guruji was alluding to. Guruji cannot be wrong in ritual > and > > > occult matters. Please understand that. > > > > > > There are 4 classes of Devotees.......1) Saatwik vedic devotees > who > > > will follow vedic dharma scrupulously. They will not dare to > > compare > > > astrology and vedanga to Engineering! as you did... > > > 2) Raajasik devotees who will follow vedic disciplines as far as > > > possible, but will still go after upaasanaas of Demi-Gods for > > > accomplishment of siddhis. Mantra shaastra experts usually fall > in > > > this category. > > > 3) Saatwik Bhaktaas - for whom the meditation and glory of their > > > Ishta Devataa is enough for spiritual satisfaction. It is this > > > category that Guruji referred to when he said they will not chant > > > Moola mantras too much. Definitely they will not do Dasa Mahaa > > > Vidyaa. > > > 4) Taamasic Devotees - Those whose main motive is to project > > > themselves at all costs and acting as if they are equal to the > > > experts; they will try ALL practices - whether they are > sanctioned > > by > > > vedas or not.....Their only aim is personal glory and > > satisfaction. > > > They will attack even established dharma if they do not get > results > > > (sounds familiar....You are one!) Ignorance and half-baked > > knowledge > > > and egotism are these persons' motivating fuel. > > > > > > You are really satan's Gift to this list.......My only prayer is > > that > > > innocent members of this list do not get side-tracked with your > > > ramblings. > > > > > > Let me make this clear to the list.....Panditji said that saatwik > > > Bhaktaas who chant Divine names only due to Pure Love on God > > usually > > > never chant mantrik moola mantraas. It is just one class of > > > devotees. A rajasik bhakta who is a mantra-shaastra expert may > > even > > > be a bhakta at heart; and a pure bhakta may sometimes chant some > > > mantrik japams for solving some practical issues......But, when > > they > > > switch their routines temporarily, these enlightened devotees > > usually > > > take good guidance and follow the tenets of shaastras > > > scrupulously....Definitely they will not sit on assumption like > > > Lalith. > > > > > > On the one hand, this fellow claims he has done chants in > forests, > > > rivers, earth, etc. (Probably we have a Maharishi here! What > > heights > > > of pointless pride in this young man list....it is disgusting!). > > On > > > the other hand, he says he chants mantras in buses, trains, > > etc...... > > > He is confused about which no body can have issues. Only his > Guru > > > should be concerned about that.....But, his attempts to stuff his > > > shallow understanding upon this list is reprehensible. And, his > > > habit of quoting experts out of context is really condemnable. > May > > > Jupiter's Light Shine on that fellow and teach him to respect the > > > hallowed traditions and to stay at his level rather than trying > > > to " teach " others (He has the audacity to claim he is " teaching " > > > Rafalji!) > > > > > > If a mere young man of 35 years who has spent his life on a > " Failed > > > computer web desining business " , " pointless email chasing of > > girls " , > > > and other " past times " can gain insight as he claims, how much > will > > > learned Gurus of this group with their life of devotion to > vedanta > > > and vedanga know? His peanut brain and hyper-inflated ego will > > never > > > allow him to see this obvious truth. But, please list exercise > > your > > > discretion while reading his posts (There are doubtless some good > > > elements even in his posts; but mostly there is trash presented > as > > > philosophy). > > > > > > Mohanraaam > > > > > > vedic astrology , " litsol " <mishra.lalit@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Dear Rafal, > > > > > > > > Do u think, a hobby means shallow knowledge of the domain, No > > > rafal, > > > > it's not like that. > > > > > > > > At least not for me. You have learnt and i m learning, i read > > ur's > > > > replies and get benifitted, same way i wanted you to pay heed > to > > > > what i have written about spritiuality, mostrly i did write for > u > > > > > > > > I have done all 10 mahavidyas of tantra and read many tantrik > > > > classics, spent good deal of time with great tantriks trained > in > > > > Kamakhya and other places, keenly observed their doings, their > > > > mistakes etc.., I did tremendous mantra chanting on water, on > > > earth, > > > > at home, in forests etc... > > > > > > > > then reached here, then i did write something, but sorry i dont > > > > remember shlokas. i was not interested in cramming that. > > > > > > > > Panditji is not fully correct in saying that BeejMantras are > not > > > > chanted by devotees, I dont know much about South India but in > > > North > > > > normally its done. > > > > > > > > And a successfull mantra sadhana has to result in one's being a > > > > devotee, the devotion is the outcome, final result of mantra > > > sadhana, > > > > perhaps, Pandit Ji believes mantras are power packet,thinks, i > do > > > it > > > > this way , these many times and get this result, this is where > > most > > > > of the people are confused. without being a good human being if > > we > > > > think, we will achieve something in spirituality, is difficult, > > > very > > > > difficult. > > > > > > > > what happens is, with the mantra chanting, a self > > transformation > > > > process begins, u if dont restrict urself, ur karma begins > > > diluting, > > > > and u begin ur purification process unknowingly, when > substantial > > > > part of ego and greed for respect vanishes and many such thing > > > > togather, mantra awakens u and with the God's grace ur > objective > > > gets > > > > fullfilled, gradually u become a devotee. ur being simple and > > being > > > > devotee is sometimes is indication of ur's going on the right > > track. > > > > > > > > I think we have discussed a lot, it's enough !! > > > > > > > > My Boss has given me lot of projects to complete, so, may be, i > m > > > not > > > > going to available in the group like i was recently. however. i > > > will > > > > complete Garg Hora series. > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > Lalit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology , Rafal Gendarz > > > > <starsuponme@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya* > > > > > > > > > > Dear Litsol, > > > > > > > > > > Then please dont generalize Your preferences as they are too > > > > shallow for > > > > > this Forum aspiration. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > Rafal Gendarz > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru > > > > > email: rafal@ > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > litsol napisa?(a): > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Rafel, > > > > > > > > > > > > I take Astrology as a good hobby, and i w'd be looking at > it > > > with > > > > an > > > > > > engineer's approach. > > > > > > > > > > > > I asked ur age because, it's our thinking to put our > > parameters > > > in > > > > > > god's system, there is nothing like delay or advancement in > > > > > > spirituality. So, " Delay " or " Speed " , " backwardness " > > > > > > and " advancement " doesn't exist in spirituality, I thought > if > > u > > > r > > > > > > thinking that it may take too much time, I wanted to tell > u, > > > it's > > > > not > > > > > > like that. there is no delay. > > > > > > > > > > > > It clicks in fraction of a second, when u r getting clicked > > > > depends > > > > > > on u and on god's will, when he wants u to get clicked. > > > > > > > > > > > > God sometimes graces for no reason ( " Ahetuka " ) just for his > > > > > > compassion towards u and it may happen next minute too. > > > > > > > > > > > > spirituality is not delimited by time , effort and rules. > > > > > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > Lalit. > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology > > > > > > <vedic astrology%40>, Rafal Gendarz > > > > > > <starsuponme@ ...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Litsol, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please be careful about words. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Im happy that You are sharing Your experience - very > > > inspirating > > > > > > ones. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Age hierarchy is for sudras - Manu Samhita. If You treat > > > Jyotish > > > > > > Vedanga > > > > > > > as profession similar to engineering You have a long way > to > > > go. > > > > But > > > > > > dont > > > > > > > be pessimistic here are many who will try to help You in > > > getting > > > > > > proper > > > > > > > understanding. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > After some time You will agree with me about the mala and > > > japa. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru > > > > > > > email: rafal@ > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > litsol napisa?(a): > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Rafal, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Here u r doing two wrong things, instead of developing > ur > > > > > > understanding, > > > > > > > > u r trying to conclude something and going beyond that > u r > > > > > > messaging > > > > > > > > same to many. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I m touching 35, What's ur age ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Astrology is a kind of vidya or profession, like i m a > > > > software > > > > > > > > engineer, software engineering is my profession. > > > spirituality > > > > is > > > > > > beyond > > > > > > > > all sort of vidya or profession. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I wish u to be a good soul and to realize the bliss of > > self > > > > > > awakening or > > > > > > > > in other terms, the bliss that comes once u feel u and > > god > > > is > > > > > > > > connected. dissolved in each other. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > First realize, experience, then speak and then suggest > to > > > > others, > > > > > > by > > > > > > > > mere reading shastras or books u r not going to feel > it. > > > > unless > > > > > > god > > > > > > > > graces u it's very very difficult. and if u dont avoid > > this > > > > sort > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > hurriedness instead of learning and understanding, it > > will > > > > affect > > > > > > u only > > > > > > > > no one else. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > somehere i have read, it was written - By mere > > > repeating " So- > > > > > > Aham " no > > > > > > > > one gets liberated unless he realizes it like one > doesnt > > get > > > > > > cured by > > > > > > > > knowing the name of the medicine, u need to take the > > > medicine > > > > to > > > > > > get > > > > > > > > cured " . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So, pls. be wise, as it was being discussed here, i > > shared > > > the > > > > > > > > experience of my life, pls. mind it, i m not a > preecher, > > > nor a > > > > > > guru, nor > > > > > > > > i have to make my followers, nor it's my profession, > nor > > i > > > > have > > > > > > to get > > > > > > > > fame, sharing things is a kind of friendliness a kind of > > > > > > affection, > > > > > > > > that's it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > > > Lalit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. com>, Rafal > > Gendarz > > > > > > > > <starsuponme@ ...> > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Jyotishas > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Counting of mala has more depth sense than just > > counting, > > > > so for > > > > > > > > natives > > > > > > > > > like Litsol counting is neccessary and any other > > > speculation > > > > > > will be > > > > > > > > > only illusory and just imagination. We should follow > Pt. > > > > > > > > Dakshinamoorti > > > > > > > > > advise strictly, otherwise our process of spiritual > > > > development > > > > > > will > > > > > > > > be > > > > > > > > > slow and unauthoritative. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz > > > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru > > > > > > > > > email: rafal@ > > > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > asmp2k02@ napisa?(a): > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Resp Sri Lalitji, > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for your mail.But please also read > > > > GuruDakshinamurthyi > > > > > > ji's > > > > > > > > > > mail(addressing me) also on this,which brings in > more > > > > clarity > > > > > > to the > > > > > > > > > > applicability principles to my mail. > > > > > > > > > > I meant that both are necessity but to what degree > of > > > time > > > > (it > > > > > > varies > > > > > > > > > > from saadhaka to saadhaka) to get such inbuilt > > maturity > > > > such > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > > > the count will be taken care of by Divine forces > > after > > > > some > > > > > > initial > > > > > > > > > > period of saadhana. > > > > > > > > > > Morover the type of bio matter present in the japa > > maala > > > > > > (which is > > > > > > > > > > symbolic for ritualism as well as from practical > > point > > > of > > > > > > view for > > > > > > > > our > > > > > > > > > > count) will help in keeping away destructive forces > > > > acting on > > > > > > us > > > > > > > > .Thus > > > > > > > > > > the symbolic rituals will indirectly help us in > > keeping > > > > away > > > > > > from > > > > > > > > > > negative thoughts and also trains our memory to be > > > object > > > > > > > > oriented.If > > > > > > > > > > our memory grows and retentive capacity increase > the > > > > Gnaana > > > > > > will > > > > > > > > > > increase ,but at the same time destructive forces > > > > > > (diversions) also > > > > > > > > > > becomes powerful.Thus the symbolic procedures will > > come > > > in > > > > > > handy to > > > > > > > > > > successfully fight the negative forces.The rituals > > may > > > be > > > > > > Rising > > > > > > > > > > early(if possible during Braahmi muhurta),Taking > > > > > > bath,Japaanusthaan, > > > > > > > > > > attending to the livelihood job etc etc in defined > > > times > > > > as > > > > > > > > discipline > > > > > > > > > > helps indirectly tune our memory through keeping > our > > > body > > > > > > healthy. > > > > > > > > > > Thus ultimately we conclude that the so called > > symbolic > > > > > > procedures > > > > > > > > are > > > > > > > > > > not actually symbolic(it got branded as such) but a > > > > necessity > > > > > > for > > > > > > > > our > > > > > > > > > > own good if we practice to the extent we can. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quoting mishra.lalit@ ... <mishra. lalit% > > > 40gmail. > > > > com>: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Resp. Sri Murthy Adavi, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, what you said is perfectly right, we count or > > dont > > > > > > count,target > > > > > > > > > > is realization of god's love within, I got it with > no > > > > > > counting, > > > > > > > > > > someone may get it with counting. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanx, for the writing. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > > > > > Lalit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. com> > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. com>, > > srinivasa > > > > > > murthy adavi > > > > > > > > > > asmp2k02@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Respected Learned Members, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Both views may be correct when the views have/or > > with > > > > the > > > > > > goal as > > > > > > > > > > development of Love/Devotion towards adhistana > > Devatha > > > of > > > > the > > > > > > Mantra > > > > > > > > > > as Base. > > > > > > > > > > > In the initial stage only you need the count;as > one > > > > > > develops the > > > > > > > > > > habit the biological tuning of the intellect/body > will > > > > > > automatically > > > > > > > > > > take care of the practice(without count-help of > malas > > > > etc). > > > > > > > > > > > It's like if with the help of Alarm clock if we > > wake > > > up > > > > for > > > > > > 2 or 3 > > > > > > > > > > days at some appointed hour,then automatically we > > > wakeup > > > > at > > > > > > the same > > > > > > > > > > time every day without help of alarm. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > With due Respects > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > smadavi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quoting starsuponme@ : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Litsol, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Definitely we should count our Mantra Japa on > Mala. > > > Your > > > > > > view is > > > > > > > > > > against > > > > > > > > > > > Vedic Authorities and Sages, so should be > rejected. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz > > > > > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru > > > > > > > > > > > email: rafal@ > > > > > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > litsol napisa?(a): > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Mr. Jayashri, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > A thought came, why i should not share with u, > U > > > pls. > > > > stop > > > > > > > > > > counting > > > > > > > > > > > > mantra chantings, counting mantra gives false > ego > > > and > > > > then > > > > > > > > > > > > frustration if u dont get desired results. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > leave it to the god, god counts the mantra > > chanted > > > by > > > > you > > > > > > may be > > > > > > > > > > > > 108, 1008 or whatsoever, let him count, it's > his > > > part > > > > and > > > > > > ur > > > > > > > > part > > > > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > > > to chant the mantra. when the mantra has to > > awaken, > > > it > > > > > > will be, > > > > > > > > > > god > > > > > > > > > > > > will ensure it for u. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sometimes we try to become more intelligent > with > > out > > > > > > limited > > > > > > > > > > > > intellect and that creates obstacles in our > > > spiritual > > > > > > growth. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So, forget about counts, forget about the time > u > > > put > > > > in > > > > > > for ur's > > > > > > > > > > > > sadhana, invoke the god with pure heart. purity > > > > counts. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > Lalit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. > > > > > > com>, " dakshinastrologer " > > > > > > > > > > > > <dakshinastrologer@ ...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Ms. Jayashree: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think this topic on 108 is getting very > > > > interesting > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > > > > enlightening for all members. Yesterday we > had a > > > > > > wonderful > > > > > > > > > > > > esoteric > > > > > > > > > > > > > explanation from Shri. Sushil Dikshit, and > > today > > > > your > > > > > > > > wonderful > > > > > > > > > > > > > explanation of numerical symmetry of the > cosmos! > > > > > > Wonderful. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There definitely exists a " numerical > symphony " > > in > > > > the > > > > > > > > Universe. > > > > > > > > > > > > But, > > > > > > > > > > > > > not only 108.....as I mentioned in my earlier > > > post, > > > > > > there are > > > > > > > > > > > > various > > > > > > > > > > > > > other numerals that are significant in occult > > > > > > practices. 108 > > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > a > > > > > > > > > > > > > powerful and all-purpose perfect > number...While > > > we > > > > have > > > > > > > > > > understood > > > > > > > > > > > > > the glory of 108, we should not lose sight of > > the > > > > fact > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > > > there > > > > > > > > > > > > are > > > > > > > > > > > > > other powerful numbers also. This is just for > > the > > > > > > information > > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > > list. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > My apprecitation again for this wonderful > > > response. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Blessed be. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pandit R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Blessed be. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pandit R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI. vedic- > > > > > > > > > > > > > astrology@grou ps.com <astrology% > > > > > > > > > > 40. com>, > > > > > > > > > > > > " jayasartn " <jayasartn@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In cosmology, 108 has this significance - > the > > > > moon is > > > > > > away > > > > > > > > > > from > > > > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > earth 108 times its (moon's) diameter and > the > > > sun > > > > is > > > > > > away > > > > > > > > > > from the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > earth, 108 times its diameter. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Perhaps this reality of distances is > > applicable > > > to > > > > > > deities > > > > > > > > > > too. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Perhaps this has been indicated by the 108 > > divya > > > > > > desas of > > > > > > > > Lord > > > > > > > > > > > > > Narayana. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > jayasree > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. > > > > > > com>, " dakshinastrologer " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <dakshinastrologer@ > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Shri. Sushil: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It is a wonderful answer you have given. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Blessed be. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pandit R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. > > > > > > com>, " sushil.dikshit " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <sushil.dikshit@ > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Babu, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It is not a silly question but it is a > > very > > > > good > > > > > > > > question. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Actually > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > there are 27 Nakshatras and every > > Nakshtras > > > > has 4 > > > > > > Charan > > > > > > > > > > so > > > > > > > > > > > > > total > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > charans are 27 x 4 = 108 Charan. Each > > > Charan > > > > has 3 > > > > > > > > degree > > > > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > > > > 20 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > minutes so if you multiply 3 degree and > 20 > > > > > > minutes to > > > > > > > > 108 > > > > > > > > > > it > > > > > > > > > > > > > comes > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > out to be 360 degress i.e. one cycle > > > (Circle). > > > > > > This > > > > > > > > cycle > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > represetns > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > whole brahmand because all the rashis, > > > > planets and > > > > > > > > > > nakshatra > > > > > > > > > > > > > are > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > between these 360 degree in 2 > dimensional > > > > > > horoscope. So > > > > > > > > > > > > > chanting a > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mantra completes one cycle of this > > brahmand. > > > > > > Further One > > > > > > > > > > who > > > > > > > > > > > > > has > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > visited Brahamand at least one time > i.e. > > he > > > is > > > > > > > > > > brahmagyani he > > > > > > > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > entitiled to place 108 Shri before his > > name. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sushil dikshit > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology@ . com > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. com>, > > babu > > > > mon > > > > > > > > > > > > > <muthappan111@ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Namaste, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It may be a silly matter for all of > you. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I want to know what is the reason > that > > > some > > > > > > remedies > > > > > > > > > > > > > recomended > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > for 108 times. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I dont know any thing about astrology. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I hope you may pleased to provide a > > reply > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thanks, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Babu > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------ --------- --------- --- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Be a better Globetrotter. Get better > > > travel > > > > > > answers > > > > > > > > from > > > > > > > > > > > > > someone > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > who knows. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Answers - Check it out. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message > have > > > been > > > > > > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 28, 2007 Report Share Posted July 28, 2007 *hraum namah adityaya* Dear Jyotishas, Please dont use my name in that quarrel. Thank You. Regards, Rafal Gendarz Sri Jagannath Center Guru email: rafal Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa.com abhishekpotti napisa?(a): > > Dear Lalith: > > The whole world knows the history of Blessed Meera Bhai....the > epitome of Bhakti...... She was attached to her " Lala " - the wonderful > idol of Krishna gifted to her even from her childhood... .Do you mean > to say that innocent young girl started chanting " Kliim krishnaaya " > mantra automatically? Even Bhakta Prahlaada had to be initiated by > Sage Naaradha for his chant of dwaadasaakshari mantra.... > > Nobody is afraid of you here......You need not proclaim that you are > not in the business of a Guru.....actually Guru status is not a > business (true to your half-baked knowledge you will claim it is also > like software engineering! ). The difference my friend between you > and other great persons like Rafal or Dakshinamoorthiji is that they > are spending their money for the internet, whereas you are pilfering > your company's time and the company's resources while browsing the > internet. Don't you think you are cheating your company when you > spend so much time on empty and egoistic posts defending yourself > against every expert after arguing with them unnecessarily? Are you > not getting paid for the time you spend in the company....Know the > basics of ethics before ever sermonizing. ....So, actually you are an > exploiter... .try to understand that....the other gurujis are probably > too decent to comment on that......What happened to your project? > Better rush to it nough!....It will spare us the agony of replying to > your half-witted postings! > > By the say, Which member asked you Prashna Tantra dear? We did not > see any posts requesting " Honourable Lalith " to explain Prashna > Tantra (as if you could explain it!) What arrogance you have to > claim that nobody can stand before you.....Guruji' s posts exposed > your ignorance... .you did not even know how to ask queries and get > replies from one of the most empathetic astrologers of this group, > and yet you claim you are this and that...... > > For your information. ...nobody is afraid of you..Rather you should be > afraid of yourself.... ..Your foolishness itself will be your doom. > Did you not become the laughing stock due to your email-based chasing > of Priyaa? Such foolishness in occult matters could be more costly > dear.....I think Mohanraaamji and Rafalji are only afraid about your > own well-being! They are not afraid of you. Nor am I afraid of you. > > Your posts never answer the queries or points raised by others; you > take off on a new ground only because of your shallow understanding > of subjects. Nobody has accepted you as a Guru here, and nobody > will....Can a fire-fly eclipse the Sun? There are too many " Suns " > here and you are just a fire-fly. > > It reminds me of a story.....Once an ant challenged the mighty > elephant for a fight; the elephant obviously could not hear the ant > (the ant being so tiny and it was on the ground, its sound could not > reach the elephant). The elephant just walked away out of its own > volition in its natural course. Then the ant claimed, " you see I > challenged the elephant and it ran away " . Dear, your saying that > nobody can stand before you is similar to that....... > > FIRST LEARN THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN GHOSTS AND YOUR ANCESTOR > SUMANGALIS BEFORE WRITING THE FIRST POSTS ON OCCULT! What a > pity......what a pity.....That we have to bear your meaningless > rantings here! > > Abhishek. > > vedic astrology > <vedic astrology%40>, " litsol " <mishra.lalit@ ...> > wrote: > > > > > > I was waiting for u dear.. > > > > why u took time ? > > > > Do u mean Meera Bai discussed with u, what she did.. > > > > Do u know 'Kleem Krishnay, Govindaya Gopijan Vallabhaya Namh' is a > > mantra for lord krishna. > > > > is there no beej mantras, to whom u wish to misguide ? let thnigs > > remain between lord, bhakta , their shraddha and their guru. > > > > why u people are so afraid of me, i m not in business of guru. > > > > i m happy with my life, my profession of software engineering and > > my hobbies ok. > > > > there are 7000+ members are here, by writing such type of foolish > > things u expose urself only, mind, there are better brains here. > > > > this is enough ... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology > <vedic astrology%40>, > > " abhishekpotti " <abhishekpotti@ > wrote: > > > > > > Respected Mohanraaamji: > > > > > > Well said. Lalith is saying that " maybe in south india devotees > > > don't chant Moola mantras but not so in North " ...What > > > stupidity... ..He does not seem to understand that " mantra > shaastra > > > experts " are also devotees, but they cannot be called as innocent > > > saatwik bhaktaas! A typical example of a pure saadhwik bhakta > will > > > be Meera Bhai (was she not North Indian). Can Lalith say which > > Dasa > > > Mahaa Vidya Meera Bhai practised? She was immersed in Krishna > > > consciousness and Lover for Him. Her own Bhajans were her > prayers > > in > > > the bhaavana of Bhakti in the form of Love! This is not mantra > > > shaastra. Another example will be Saant Tukhaaraam. These > > bhaktaas > > > did not chant moola mantraas. Panditji Dakshinamoorthi was on > dot > > in > > > saying that " Pure bhaktaas do not chant complicated moola > > mantraas " . > > > You have clarified this fact wonderfully in your post. I wish > more > > > knowledgeable persons also put erratic posters in their place > just > > as > > > Mohanraaamji does here. This will benefit more naive readers of > > > these forums who might otherwise get confused as to which of the > > > paths to follow. Actually, anyone can follow any path as he/ she > > > deems it fit; but there should be consistency of procedures. > > > > > > We should not confuse mantrik rituals and bhakti doctrines. > > Bhaktaas > > > can chant the names of Gods at anytime..... Mantra shaastra > experts > > > chanting advanced moola mantras should necessarily adopt ritual > > > procedures for the welfare of themselves and others! > > Yes...improper > > > chanting of mantras can cause danger to the society also just as > > > proper chanting can help others. Hence, this cannot be > considered > > as > > > a personal preference of the aspirant. If this was not the case, > > why > > > did sages codify spiritual practises scrupulously? Rafalji, > > > Mohanraaamji, etc. are correct in saying it is best to follow > > Pandit > > > Dakshinamoorthiji' s advices on mantra shastra or japams. He is > > > learned and he is living a life compatible to the shaastras > though > > he > > > has faced uncertain circumstances in his own personal life. He > > never > > > compromised on principles and he willingly paid the price for > that > > > which most of us will never do. The words of such a person > should > > > obviously carry more weight. > > > > > > Abhishek. > > > > > > vedic astrology > <vedic astrology%40>, " mohanraaam " > <mohanraaam@ > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Well Lalith: > > > > > > > > If you have really done dasa Maha Vidyaa, you would have never > > > > approached a professional astrologer for consultation. ..that > much > > I > > > > can say.... > > > > > > > > And what idiocy when you say Panditji is partly wrong? He > > > > said " Bhaktaas do not chant Moola mantras " , whereas you have > > edited > > > > the words to suit your ends....He never said " devotees don't > > chant > > > > Beej mantras " .... .You are putting words into his mouth and > > assuming > > > > he is wrong! Why, do you know....the Great Panditji himself > > chants > > > > Moola mantras..... He is a bhakta and a mantra shastra expert. > As > > a > > > > bhakta he keeps incessant chanting of naama japa throughout the > > > day; > > > > as a mantra shastra expert, he restricts the moola mantra > japams > > to > > > > stipulated times with ritual purity.....It is this wonderful > > > practice > > > > that Guruji was alluding to. Guruji cannot be wrong in ritual > > and > > > > occult matters. Please understand that. > > > > > > > > There are 4 classes of Devotees.... ...1) Saatwik vedic devotees > > who > > > > will follow vedic dharma scrupulously. They will not dare to > > > compare > > > > astrology and vedanga to Engineering! as you did... > > > > 2) Raajasik devotees who will follow vedic disciplines as far > as > > > > possible, but will still go after upaasanaas of Demi-Gods for > > > > accomplishment of siddhis. Mantra shaastra experts usually > fall > > in > > > > this category. > > > > 3) Saatwik Bhaktaas - for whom the meditation and glory of > their > > > > Ishta Devataa is enough for spiritual satisfaction. It is this > > > > category that Guruji referred to when he said they will not > chant > > > > Moola mantras too much. Definitely they will not do Dasa Mahaa > > > > Vidyaa. > > > > 4) Taamasic Devotees - Those whose main motive is to project > > > > themselves at all costs and acting as if they are equal to the > > > > experts; they will try ALL practices - whether they are > > sanctioned > > > by > > > > vedas or not.....Their only aim is personal glory and > > > satisfaction. > > > > They will attack even established dharma if they do not get > > results > > > > (sounds familiar.... You are one!) Ignorance and half-baked > > > knowledge > > > > and egotism are these persons' motivating fuel. > > > > > > > > You are really satan's Gift to this list.......My only prayer > is > > > that > > > > innocent members of this list do not get side-tracked with your > > > > ramblings. > > > > > > > > Let me make this clear to the list.....Panditji said that > saatwik > > > > Bhaktaas who chant Divine names only due to Pure Love on God > > > usually > > > > never chant mantrik moola mantraas. It is just one class of > > > > devotees. A rajasik bhakta who is a mantra-shaastra expert may > > > even > > > > be a bhakta at heart; and a pure bhakta may sometimes chant > some > > > > mantrik japams for solving some practical issues...... But, when > > > they > > > > switch their routines temporarily, these enlightened devotees > > > usually > > > > take good guidance and follow the tenets of shaastras > > > > scrupulously. ...Definitely they will not sit on assumption like > > > > Lalith. > > > > > > > > On the one hand, this fellow claims he has done chants in > > forests, > > > > rivers, earth, etc. (Probably we have a Maharishi here! What > > > heights > > > > of pointless pride in this young man list....it is > disgusting!) . > > > On > > > > the other hand, he says he chants mantras in buses, trains, > > > etc...... > > > > He is confused about which no body can have issues. Only his > > Guru > > > > should be concerned about that.....But, his attempts to stuff > his > > > > shallow understanding upon this list is reprehensible. And, > his > > > > habit of quoting experts out of context is really condemnable. > > May > > > > Jupiter's Light Shine on that fellow and teach him to respect > the > > > > hallowed traditions and to stay at his level rather than trying > > > > to " teach " others (He has the audacity to claim he > is " teaching " > > > > Rafalji!) > > > > > > > > If a mere young man of 35 years who has spent his life on a > > " Failed > > > > computer web desining business " , " pointless email chasing of > > > girls " , > > > > and other " past times " can gain insight as he claims, how much > > will > > > > learned Gurus of this group with their life of devotion to > > vedanta > > > > and vedanga know? His peanut brain and hyper-inflated ego will > > > never > > > > allow him to see this obvious truth. But, please list exercise > > > your > > > > discretion while reading his posts (There are doubtless some > good > > > > elements even in his posts; but mostly there is trash presented > > as > > > > philosophy). > > > > > > > > Mohanraaam > > > > > > > > vedic astrology > <vedic astrology%40>, " litsol " > <mishra.lalit@ > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Dear Rafal, > > > > > > > > > > Do u think, a hobby means shallow knowledge of the domain, No > > > > rafal, > > > > > it's not like that. > > > > > > > > > > At least not for me. You have learnt and i m learning, i read > > > ur's > > > > > replies and get benifitted, same way i wanted you to pay > heed > > to > > > > > what i have written about spritiuality, mostrly i did write > for > > u > > > > > > > > > > I have done all 10 mahavidyas of tantra and read many tantrik > > > > > classics, spent good deal of time with great tantriks > trained > > in > > > > > Kamakhya and other places, keenly observed their doings, > their > > > > > mistakes etc.., I did tremendous mantra chanting on water, > on > > > > earth, > > > > > at home, in forests etc... > > > > > > > > > > then reached here, then i did write something, but sorry i > dont > > > > > remember shlokas. i was not interested in cramming that. > > > > > > > > > > Panditji is not fully correct in saying that BeejMantras are > > not > > > > > chanted by devotees, I dont know much about South India but > in > > > > North > > > > > normally its done. > > > > > > > > > > And a successfull mantra sadhana has to result in one's being > a > > > > > devotee, the devotion is the outcome, final result of mantra > > > > sadhana, > > > > > perhaps, Pandit Ji believes mantras are power packet,thinks, > i > > do > > > > it > > > > > this way , these many times and get this result, this is > where > > > most > > > > > of the people are confused. without being a good human being > if > > > we > > > > > think, we will achieve something in spirituality, is > difficult, > > > > very > > > > > difficult. > > > > > > > > > > what happens is, with the mantra chanting, a self > > > transformation > > > > > process begins, u if dont restrict urself, ur karma begins > > > > diluting, > > > > > and u begin ur purification process unknowingly, when > > substantial > > > > > part of ego and greed for respect vanishes and many such > thing > > > > > togather, mantra awakens u and with the God's grace ur > > objective > > > > gets > > > > > fullfilled, gradually u become a devotee. ur being simple and > > > being > > > > > devotee is sometimes is indication of ur's going on the right > > > track. > > > > > > > > > > I think we have discussed a lot, it's enough !! > > > > > > > > > > My Boss has given me lot of projects to complete, so, may be, > i > > m > > > > not > > > > > going to available in the group like i was recently. however. > i > > > > will > > > > > complete Garg Hora series. > > > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > Lalit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology > <vedic astrology%40>, Rafal Gendarz > > > > > <starsuponme@ > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya* > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Litsol, > > > > > > > > > > > > Then please dont generalize Your preferences as they are > too > > > > > shallow for > > > > > > this Forum aspiration. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru > > > > > > email: rafal@ > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > litsol napisa?(a): > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Rafel, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I take Astrology as a good hobby, and i w'd be looking at > > it > > > > with > > > > > an > > > > > > > engineer's approach. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I asked ur age because, it's our thinking to put our > > > parameters > > > > in > > > > > > > god's system, there is nothing like delay or advancement > in > > > > > > > spirituality. So, " Delay " or " Speed " , " backwardness " > > > > > > > and " advancement " doesn't exist in spirituality, I > thought > > if > > > u > > > > r > > > > > > > thinking that it may take too much time, I wanted to tell > > u, > > > > it's > > > > > not > > > > > > > like that. there is no delay. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It clicks in fraction of a second, when u r getting > clicked > > > > > depends > > > > > > > on u and on god's will, when he wants u to get clicked. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > God sometimes graces for no reason ( " Ahetuka " ) just for > his > > > > > > > compassion towards u and it may happen next minute too. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > spirituality is not delimited by time , effort and rules. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > > Lalit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. com>, Rafal Gendarz > > > > > > > <starsuponme@ ...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Litsol, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please be careful about words. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Im happy that You are sharing Your experience - very > > > > inspirating > > > > > > > ones. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Age hierarchy is for sudras - Manu Samhita. If You > treat > > > > Jyotish > > > > > > > Vedanga > > > > > > > > as profession similar to engineering You have a long > way > > to > > > > go. > > > > > But > > > > > > > dont > > > > > > > > be pessimistic here are many who will try to help You > in > > > > getting > > > > > > > proper > > > > > > > > understanding. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > After some time You will agree with me about the mala > and > > > > japa. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz > > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru > > > > > > > > email: rafal@ > > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > litsol napisa?(a): > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Rafal, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Here u r doing two wrong things, instead of > developing > > ur > > > > > > > understanding, > > > > > > > > > u r trying to conclude something and going beyond > that > > u r > > > > > > > messaging > > > > > > > > > same to many. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I m touching 35, What's ur age ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Astrology is a kind of vidya or profession, like i m > a > > > > > software > > > > > > > > > engineer, software engineering is my profession. > > > > spirituality > > > > > is > > > > > > > beyond > > > > > > > > > all sort of vidya or profession. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I wish u to be a good soul and to realize the bliss > of > > > self > > > > > > > awakening or > > > > > > > > > in other terms, the bliss that comes once u feel u > and > > > god > > > > is > > > > > > > > > connected. dissolved in each other. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > First realize, experience, then speak and then > suggest > > to > > > > > others, > > > > > > > by > > > > > > > > > mere reading shastras or books u r not going to feel > > it. > > > > > unless > > > > > > > god > > > > > > > > > graces u it's very very difficult. and if u dont > avoid > > > this > > > > > sort > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > hurriedness instead of learning and understanding, it > > > will > > > > > affect > > > > > > > u only > > > > > > > > > no one else. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > somehere i have read, it was written - By mere > > > > repeating " So- > > > > > > > Aham " no > > > > > > > > > one gets liberated unless he realizes it like one > > doesnt > > > get > > > > > > > cured by > > > > > > > > > knowing the name of the medicine, u need to take the > > > > medicine > > > > > to > > > > > > > get > > > > > > > > > cured " . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So, pls. be wise, as it was being discussed here, i > > > shared > > > > the > > > > > > > > > experience of my life, pls. mind it, i m not a > > preecher, > > > > nor a > > > > > > > guru, nor > > > > > > > > > i have to make my followers, nor it's my profession, > > nor > > > i > > > > > have > > > > > > > to get > > > > > > > > > fame, sharing things is a kind of friendliness a kind > of > > > > > > > affection, > > > > > > > > > that's it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > > > > Lalit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. com>, Rafal > > > Gendarz > > > > > > > > > <starsuponme@ ...> > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Jyotishas > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Counting of mala has more depth sense than just > > > counting, > > > > > so for > > > > > > > > > natives > > > > > > > > > > like Litsol counting is neccessary and any other > > > > speculation > > > > > > > will be > > > > > > > > > > only illusory and just imagination. We should > follow > > Pt. > > > > > > > > > Dakshinamoorti > > > > > > > > > > advise strictly, otherwise our process of spiritual > > > > > development > > > > > > > will > > > > > > > > > be > > > > > > > > > > slow and unauthoritative. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz > > > > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru > > > > > > > > > > email: rafal@ > > > > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > asmp2k02@ napisa?(a): > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Resp Sri Lalitji, > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for your mail.But please also read > > > > > GuruDakshinamurthyi > > > > > > > ji's > > > > > > > > > > > mail(addressing me) also on this,which brings in > > more > > > > > clarity > > > > > > > to the > > > > > > > > > > > applicability principles to my mail. > > > > > > > > > > > I meant that both are necessity but to what > degree > > of > > > > time > > > > > (it > > > > > > > varies > > > > > > > > > > > from saadhaka to saadhaka) to get such inbuilt > > > maturity > > > > > such > > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > > > > the count will be taken care of by Divine forces > > > after > > > > > some > > > > > > > initial > > > > > > > > > > > period of saadhana. > > > > > > > > > > > Morover the type of bio matter present in the > japa > > > maala > > > > > > > (which is > > > > > > > > > > > symbolic for ritualism as well as from practical > > > point > > > > of > > > > > > > view for > > > > > > > > > our > > > > > > > > > > > count) will help in keeping away destructive > forces > > > > > acting on > > > > > > > us > > > > > > > > > .Thus > > > > > > > > > > > the symbolic rituals will indirectly help us in > > > keeping > > > > > away > > > > > > > from > > > > > > > > > > > negative thoughts and also trains our memory to > be > > > > object > > > > > > > > > oriented.If > > > > > > > > > > > our memory grows and retentive capacity increase > > the > > > > > Gnaana > > > > > > > will > > > > > > > > > > > increase ,but at the same time destructive forces > > > > > > > (diversions) also > > > > > > > > > > > becomes powerful.Thus the symbolic procedures > will > > > come > > > > in > > > > > > > handy to > > > > > > > > > > > successfully fight the negative forces.The > rituals > > > may > > > > be > > > > > > > Rising > > > > > > > > > > > early(if possible during Braahmi muhurta),Taking > > > > > > > bath,Japaanusthaan, > > > > > > > > > > > attending to the livelihood job etc etc in > defined > > > > times > > > > > as > > > > > > > > > discipline > > > > > > > > > > > helps indirectly tune our memory through keeping > > our > > > > body > > > > > > > healthy. > > > > > > > > > > > Thus ultimately we conclude that the so called > > > symbolic > > > > > > > procedures > > > > > > > > > are > > > > > > > > > > > not actually symbolic(it got branded as such) but > a > > > > > necessity > > > > > > > for > > > > > > > > > our > > > > > > > > > > > own good if we practice to the extent we can. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quoting mishra.lalit@ ... <mishra. lalit% > > > > 40gmail. > > > > > com>: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Resp. Sri Murthy Adavi, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, what you said is perfectly right, we count > or > > > dont > > > > > > > count,target > > > > > > > > > > > is realization of god's love within, I got it > with > > no > > > > > > > counting, > > > > > > > > > > > someone may get it with counting. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanx, for the writing. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > > > > > > Lalit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. com> > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. com>, > > > srinivasa > > > > > > > murthy adavi > > > > > > > > > > > asmp2k02@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Respected Learned Members, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Both views may be correct when the views > have/or > > > with > > > > > the > > > > > > > goal as > > > > > > > > > > > development of Love/Devotion towards adhistana > > > Devatha > > > > of > > > > > the > > > > > > > Mantra > > > > > > > > > > > as Base. > > > > > > > > > > > > In the initial stage only you need the count;as > > one > > > > > > > develops the > > > > > > > > > > > habit the biological tuning of the intellect/body > > will > > > > > > > automatically > > > > > > > > > > > take care of the practice(without count-help of > > malas > > > > > etc). > > > > > > > > > > > > It's like if with the help of Alarm clock if we > > > wake > > > > up > > > > > for > > > > > > > 2 or 3 > > > > > > > > > > > days at some appointed hour,then automatically we > > > > wakeup > > > > > at > > > > > > > the same > > > > > > > > > > > time every day without help of alarm. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > With due Respects > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > smadavi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quoting starsuponme@ : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Litsol, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Definitely we should count our Mantra Japa on > > Mala. > > > > Your > > > > > > > view is > > > > > > > > > > > against > > > > > > > > > > > > Vedic Authorities and Sages, so should be > > rejected. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz > > > > > > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru > > > > > > > > > > > > email: rafal@ > > > > > > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > litsol napisa?(a): > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Mr. Jayashri, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > A thought came, why i should not share with > u, > > U > > > > pls. > > > > > stop > > > > > > > > > > > counting > > > > > > > > > > > > > mantra chantings, counting mantra gives false > > ego > > > > and > > > > > then > > > > > > > > > > > > > frustration if u dont get desired results. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > leave it to the god, god counts the mantra > > > chanted > > > > by > > > > > you > > > > > > > may be > > > > > > > > > > > > > 108, 1008 or whatsoever, let him count, it's > > his > > > > part > > > > > and > > > > > > > ur > > > > > > > > > part > > > > > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > > > > to chant the mantra. when the mantra has to > > > awaken, > > > > it > > > > > > > will be, > > > > > > > > > > > god > > > > > > > > > > > > > will ensure it for u. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sometimes we try to become more intelligent > > with > > > out > > > > > > > limited > > > > > > > > > > > > > intellect and that creates obstacles in our > > > > spiritual > > > > > > > growth. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So, forget about counts, forget about the > time > > u > > > > put > > > > > in > > > > > > > for ur's > > > > > > > > > > > > > sadhana, invoke the god with pure heart. > purity > > > > > counts. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > Lalit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology > > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. > > > > > > > com>, " dakshinastrologer " > > > > > > > > > > > > > <dakshinastrologer@ ...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Ms. Jayashree: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think this topic on 108 is getting very > > > > > interesting > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > enlightening for all members. Yesterday we > > had a > > > > > > > wonderful > > > > > > > > > > > > > esoteric > > > > > > > > > > > > > > explanation from Shri. Sushil Dikshit, and > > > today > > > > > your > > > > > > > > > wonderful > > > > > > > > > > > > > > explanation of numerical symmetry of the > > cosmos! > > > > > > > Wonderful. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There definitely exists a " numerical > > symphony " > > > in > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > Universe. > > > > > > > > > > > > > But, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > not only 108.....as I mentioned in my > earlier > > > > post, > > > > > > > there are > > > > > > > > > > > > > various > > > > > > > > > > > > > > other numerals that are significant in > occult > > > > > > > practices. 108 > > > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > > a > > > > > > > > > > > > > > powerful and all-purpose perfect > > number...While > > > > we > > > > > have > > > > > > > > > > > understood > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the glory of 108, we should not lose sight > of > > > the > > > > > fact > > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > > > > there > > > > > > > > > > > > > are > > > > > > > > > > > > > > other powerful numbers also. This is just > for > > > the > > > > > > > information > > > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > list. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > My apprecitation again for this wonderful > > > > response. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Blessed be. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pandit R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Blessed be. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pandit R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI. vedic- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > astrology@grou ps.com > <astrology% > > > > > > > > > > > 40. com>, > > > > > > > > > > > > > " jayasartn " <jayasartn@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In cosmology, 108 has this significance - > > the > > > > > moon is > > > > > > > away > > > > > > > > > > > from > > > > > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > earth 108 times its (moon's) diameter and > > the > > > > sun > > > > > is > > > > > > > away > > > > > > > > > > > from the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > earth, 108 times its diameter. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Perhaps this reality of distances is > > > applicable > > > > to > > > > > > > deities > > > > > > > > > > > too. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Perhaps this has been indicated by the > 108 > > > divya > > > > > > > desas of > > > > > > > > > Lord > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Narayana. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > jayasree > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology > > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. > > > > > > > com>, " dakshinastrologer " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <dakshinastrologer@ > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Shri. Sushil: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It is a wonderful answer you have given. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Blessed be. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pandit R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology > > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. > > > > > > > com>, " sushil.dikshit " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <sushil.dikshit@ > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Babu, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It is not a silly question but it is > a > > > very > > > > > good > > > > > > > > > question. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Actually > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > there are 27 Nakshatras and every > > > Nakshtras > > > > > has 4 > > > > > > > Charan > > > > > > > > > > > so > > > > > > > > > > > > > > total > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > charans are 27 x 4 = 108 Charan. Each > > > > Charan > > > > > has 3 > > > > > > > > > degree > > > > > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 20 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > minutes so if you multiply 3 degree > and > > 20 > > > > > > > minutes to > > > > > > > > > 108 > > > > > > > > > > > it > > > > > > > > > > > > > > comes > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > out to be 360 degress i.e. one cycle > > > > (Circle). > > > > > > > This > > > > > > > > > cycle > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > represetns > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > whole brahmand because all the > rashis, > > > > > planets and > > > > > > > > > > > nakshatra > > > > > > > > > > > > > > are > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > between these 360 degree in 2 > > dimensional > > > > > > > horoscope. So > > > > > > > > > > > > > > chanting a > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mantra completes one cycle of this > > > brahmand. > > > > > > > Further One > > > > > > > > > > > who > > > > > > > > > > > > > > has > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > visited Brahamand at least one time > > i.e. > > > he > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > > brahmagyani he > > > > > > > > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > entitiled to place 108 Shri before > his > > > name. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sushil dikshit > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology@ . > com > > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. > com>, > > > babu > > > > > mon > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <muthappan111@ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Namaste, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It may be a silly matter for all of > > you. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I want to know what is the reason > > that > > > > some > > > > > > > remedies > > > > > > > > > > > > > > recomended > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > for 108 times. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I dont know any thing about > astrology. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I hope you may pleased to provide a > > > reply > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thanks, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Babu > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------ --------- --------- --- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Be a better Globetrotter. Get > better > > > > travel > > > > > > > answers > > > > > > > > > from > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someone > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > who knows. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Answers - Check it out. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message > > have > > > > been > > > > > > > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > > > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > > > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 28, 2007 Report Share Posted July 28, 2007 Namaste Abhishek/ Mohanraaam Just why are you trying to run Lalith down? From the posts that I have read All he has done is given this point of view - if you don't accept them than simply ignore it - there is No need for any name calling or belittling someone. There is also nothing wrong in Lalith forwarding " Prashna Tantra " text to this group as to whether someone has requested it or not - he certainly doesn't need your or mine permission to do so - after all he thought it would be useful to everyone - again his view. Sorry if I am coming across annoyed and perhaps rude But feel it is Best that everyone should stop " belittling " other group members as in the long run all it does is make oneself appear small and bigoted. Best wishes and hoping this will be the last mail on this subject .. Jai Sita Ram Ram _____ vedic astrology [vedic astrology ] On Behalf Of abhishekpotti 28 July 2007 19:54 vedic astrology [vedic astrology] Oye Lalith! No one here is afraid of you.... Dear Lalith: The whole world knows the history of Blessed Meera Bhai....the epitome of Bhakti......She was attached to her " Lala " - the wonderful idol of Krishna gifted to her even from her childhood....Do you mean to say that innocent young girl started chanting " Kliim krishnaaya " mantra automatically? Even Bhakta Prahlaada had to be initiated by Sage Naaradha for his chant of dwaadasaakshari mantra.... Nobody is afraid of you here......You need not proclaim that you are not in the business of a Guru.....actually Guru status is not a business (true to your half-baked knowledge you will claim it is also like software engineering!). The difference my friend between you and other great persons like Rafal or Dakshinamoorthiji is that they are spending their money for the internet, whereas you are pilfering your company's time and the company's resources while browsing the internet. Don't you think you are cheating your company when you spend so much time on empty and egoistic posts defending yourself against every expert after arguing with them unnecessarily? Are you not getting paid for the time you spend in the company....Know the basics of ethics before ever sermonizing.....So, actually you are an exploiter....try to understand that....the other gurujis are probably too decent to comment on that......What happened to your project? Better rush to it nough!....It will spare us the agony of replying to your half-witted postings! By the say, Which member asked you Prashna Tantra dear? We did not see any posts requesting " Honourable Lalith " to explain Prashna Tantra (as if you could explain it!) What arrogance you have to claim that nobody can stand before you.....Guruji's posts exposed your ignorance....you did not even know how to ask queries and get replies from one of the most empathetic astrologers of this group, and yet you claim you are this and that...... For your information....nobody is afraid of you..Rather you should be afraid of yourself......Your foolishness itself will be your doom. Did you not become the laughing stock due to your email-based chasing of Priyaa? Such foolishness in occult matters could be more costly dear.....I think Mohanraaamji and Rafalji are only afraid about your own well-being! They are not afraid of you. Nor am I afraid of you. Your posts never answer the queries or points raised by others; you take off on a new ground only because of your shallow understanding of subjects. Nobody has accepted you as a Guru here, and nobody will....Can a fire-fly eclipse the Sun? There are too many " Suns " here and you are just a fire-fly. It reminds me of a story.....Once an ant challenged the mighty elephant for a fight; the elephant obviously could not hear the ant (the ant being so tiny and it was on the ground, its sound could not reach the elephant). The elephant just walked away out of its own volition in its natural course. Then the ant claimed, " you see I challenged the elephant and it ran away " . Dear, your saying that nobody can stand before you is similar to that....... FIRST LEARN THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN GHOSTS AND YOUR ANCESTOR SUMANGALIS BEFORE WRITING THE FIRST POSTS ON OCCULT! What a pity......what a pity.....That we have to bear your meaningless rantings here! Abhishek. vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology%40> , " litsol " <mishra.lalit wrote: > > > I was waiting for u dear.. > > why u took time ? > > Do u mean Meera Bai discussed with u, what she did.. > > Do u know 'Kleem Krishnay, Govindaya Gopijan Vallabhaya Namh' is a > mantra for lord krishna. > > is there no beej mantras, to whom u wish to misguide ? let thnigs > remain between lord, bhakta , their shraddha and their guru. > > why u people are so afraid of me, i m not in business of guru. > > i m happy with my life, my profession of software engineering and > my hobbies ok. > > there are 7000+ members are here, by writing such type of foolish > things u expose urself only, mind, there are better brains here. > > this is enough ... > > > > > > vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology%40> , > " abhishekpotti " <abhishekpotti@> wrote: > > > > Respected Mohanraaamji: > > > > Well said. Lalith is saying that " maybe in south india devotees > > don't chant Moola mantras but not so in North " ...What > > stupidity.....He does not seem to understand that " mantra shaastra > > experts " are also devotees, but they cannot be called as innocent > > saatwik bhaktaas! A typical example of a pure saadhwik bhakta will > > be Meera Bhai (was she not North Indian). Can Lalith say which > Dasa > > Mahaa Vidya Meera Bhai practised? She was immersed in Krishna > > consciousness and Lover for Him. Her own Bhajans were her prayers > in > > the bhaavana of Bhakti in the form of Love! This is not mantra > > shaastra. Another example will be Saant Tukhaaraam. These > bhaktaas > > did not chant moola mantraas. Panditji Dakshinamoorthi was on dot > in > > saying that " Pure bhaktaas do not chant complicated moola > mantraas " . > > You have clarified this fact wonderfully in your post. I wish more > > knowledgeable persons also put erratic posters in their place just > as > > Mohanraaamji does here. This will benefit more naive readers of > > these forums who might otherwise get confused as to which of the > > paths to follow. Actually, anyone can follow any path as he/ she > > deems it fit; but there should be consistency of procedures. > > > > We should not confuse mantrik rituals and bhakti doctrines. > Bhaktaas > > can chant the names of Gods at anytime.....Mantra shaastra experts > > chanting advanced moola mantras should necessarily adopt ritual > > procedures for the welfare of themselves and others! > Yes...improper > > chanting of mantras can cause danger to the society also just as > > proper chanting can help others. Hence, this cannot be considered > as > > a personal preference of the aspirant. If this was not the case, > why > > did sages codify spiritual practises scrupulously? Rafalji, > > Mohanraaamji, etc. are correct in saying it is best to follow > Pandit > > Dakshinamoorthiji's advices on mantra shastra or japams. He is > > learned and he is living a life compatible to the shaastras though > he > > has faced uncertain circumstances in his own personal life. He > never > > compromised on principles and he willingly paid the price for that > > which most of us will never do. The words of such a person should > > obviously carry more weight. > > > > Abhishek. > > > > vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology%40> , " mohanraaam " <mohanraaam@> > > wrote: > > > > > > Well Lalith: > > > > > > If you have really done dasa Maha Vidyaa, you would have never > > > approached a professional astrologer for consultation...that much > I > > > can say.... > > > > > > And what idiocy when you say Panditji is partly wrong? He > > > said " Bhaktaas do not chant Moola mantras " , whereas you have > edited > > > the words to suit your ends....He never said " devotees don't > chant > > > Beej mantras " .....You are putting words into his mouth and > assuming > > > he is wrong! Why, do you know....the Great Panditji himself > chants > > > Moola mantras.....He is a bhakta and a mantra shastra expert. As > a > > > bhakta he keeps incessant chanting of naama japa throughout the > > day; > > > as a mantra shastra expert, he restricts the moola mantra japams > to > > > stipulated times with ritual purity.....It is this wonderful > > practice > > > that Guruji was alluding to. Guruji cannot be wrong in ritual > and > > > occult matters. Please understand that. > > > > > > There are 4 classes of Devotees.......1) Saatwik vedic devotees > who > > > will follow vedic dharma scrupulously. They will not dare to > > compare > > > astrology and vedanga to Engineering! as you did... > > > 2) Raajasik devotees who will follow vedic disciplines as far as > > > possible, but will still go after upaasanaas of Demi-Gods for > > > accomplishment of siddhis. Mantra shaastra experts usually fall > in > > > this category. > > > 3) Saatwik Bhaktaas - for whom the meditation and glory of their > > > Ishta Devataa is enough for spiritual satisfaction. It is this > > > category that Guruji referred to when he said they will not chant > > > Moola mantras too much. Definitely they will not do Dasa Mahaa > > > Vidyaa. > > > 4) Taamasic Devotees - Those whose main motive is to project > > > themselves at all costs and acting as if they are equal to the > > > experts; they will try ALL practices - whether they are > sanctioned > > by > > > vedas or not.....Their only aim is personal glory and > > satisfaction. > > > They will attack even established dharma if they do not get > results > > > (sounds familiar....You are one!) Ignorance and half-baked > > knowledge > > > and egotism are these persons' motivating fuel. > > > > > > You are really satan's Gift to this list.......My only prayer is > > that > > > innocent members of this list do not get side-tracked with your > > > ramblings. > > > > > > Let me make this clear to the list.....Panditji said that saatwik > > > Bhaktaas who chant Divine names only due to Pure Love on God > > usually > > > never chant mantrik moola mantraas. It is just one class of > > > devotees. A rajasik bhakta who is a mantra-shaastra expert may > > even > > > be a bhakta at heart; and a pure bhakta may sometimes chant some > > > mantrik japams for solving some practical issues......But, when > > they > > > switch their routines temporarily, these enlightened devotees > > usually > > > take good guidance and follow the tenets of shaastras > > > scrupulously....Definitely they will not sit on assumption like > > > Lalith. > > > > > > On the one hand, this fellow claims he has done chants in > forests, > > > rivers, earth, etc. (Probably we have a Maharishi here! What > > heights > > > of pointless pride in this young man list....it is disgusting!). > > On > > > the other hand, he says he chants mantras in buses, trains, > > etc...... > > > He is confused about which no body can have issues. Only his > Guru > > > should be concerned about that.....But, his attempts to stuff his > > > shallow understanding upon this list is reprehensible. And, his > > > habit of quoting experts out of context is really condemnable. > May > > > Jupiter's Light Shine on that fellow and teach him to respect the > > > hallowed traditions and to stay at his level rather than trying > > > to " teach " others (He has the audacity to claim he is " teaching " > > > Rafalji!) > > > > > > If a mere young man of 35 years who has spent his life on a > " Failed > > > computer web desining business " , " pointless email chasing of > > girls " , > > > and other " past times " can gain insight as he claims, how much > will > > > learned Gurus of this group with their life of devotion to > vedanta > > > and vedanga know? His peanut brain and hyper-inflated ego will > > never > > > allow him to see this obvious truth. But, please list exercise > > your > > > discretion while reading his posts (There are doubtless some good > > > elements even in his posts; but mostly there is trash presented > as > > > philosophy). > > > > > > Mohanraaam > > > > > > vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology%40> , " litsol " <mishra.lalit@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Dear Rafal, > > > > > > > > Do u think, a hobby means shallow knowledge of the domain, No > > > rafal, > > > > it's not like that. > > > > > > > > At least not for me. You have learnt and i m learning, i read > > ur's > > > > replies and get benifitted, same way i wanted you to pay heed > to > > > > what i have written about spritiuality, mostrly i did write for > u > > > > > > > > I have done all 10 mahavidyas of tantra and read many tantrik > > > > classics, spent good deal of time with great tantriks trained > in > > > > Kamakhya and other places, keenly observed their doings, their > > > > mistakes etc.., I did tremendous mantra chanting on water, on > > > earth, > > > > at home, in forests etc... > > > > > > > > then reached here, then i did write something, but sorry i dont > > > > remember shlokas. i was not interested in cramming that. > > > > > > > > Panditji is not fully correct in saying that BeejMantras are > not > > > > chanted by devotees, I dont know much about South India but in > > > North > > > > normally its done. > > > > > > > > And a successfull mantra sadhana has to result in one's being a > > > > devotee, the devotion is the outcome, final result of mantra > > > sadhana, > > > > perhaps, Pandit Ji believes mantras are power packet,thinks, i > do > > > it > > > > this way , these many times and get this result, this is where > > most > > > > of the people are confused. without being a good human being if > > we > > > > think, we will achieve something in spirituality, is difficult, > > > very > > > > difficult. > > > > > > > > what happens is, with the mantra chanting, a self > > transformation > > > > process begins, u if dont restrict urself, ur karma begins > > > diluting, > > > > and u begin ur purification process unknowingly, when > substantial > > > > part of ego and greed for respect vanishes and many such thing > > > > togather, mantra awakens u and with the God's grace ur > objective > > > gets > > > > fullfilled, gradually u become a devotee. ur being simple and > > being > > > > devotee is sometimes is indication of ur's going on the right > > track. > > > > > > > > I think we have discussed a lot, it's enough !! > > > > > > > > My Boss has given me lot of projects to complete, so, may be, i > m > > > not > > > > going to available in the group like i was recently. however. i > > > will > > > > complete Garg Hora series. > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > Lalit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology%40> , Rafal Gendarz > > > > <starsuponme@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya* > > > > > > > > > > Dear Litsol, > > > > > > > > > > Then please dont generalize Your preferences as they are too > > > > shallow for > > > > > this Forum aspiration. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > Rafal Gendarz > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru > > > > > email: rafal@ > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > litsol napisa?(a): > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Rafel, > > > > > > > > > > > > I take Astrology as a good hobby, and i w'd be looking at > it > > > with > > > > an > > > > > > engineer's approach. > > > > > > > > > > > > I asked ur age because, it's our thinking to put our > > parameters > > > in > > > > > > god's system, there is nothing like delay or advancement in > > > > > > spirituality. So, " Delay " or " Speed " , " backwardness " > > > > > > and " advancement " doesn't exist in spirituality, I thought > if > > u > > > r > > > > > > thinking that it may take too much time, I wanted to tell > u, > > > it's > > > > not > > > > > > like that. there is no delay. > > > > > > > > > > > > It clicks in fraction of a second, when u r getting clicked > > > > depends > > > > > > on u and on god's will, when he wants u to get clicked. > > > > > > > > > > > > God sometimes graces for no reason ( " Ahetuka " ) just for his > > > > > > compassion towards u and it may happen next minute too. > > > > > > > > > > > > spirituality is not delimited by time , effort and rules. > > > > > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > Lalit. > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology > > > > > > <vedic astrology%40>, Rafal Gendarz > > > > > > <starsuponme@ ...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Litsol, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please be careful about words. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Im happy that You are sharing Your experience - very > > > inspirating > > > > > > ones. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Age hierarchy is for sudras - Manu Samhita. If You treat > > > Jyotish > > > > > > Vedanga > > > > > > > as profession similar to engineering You have a long way > to > > > go. > > > > But > > > > > > dont > > > > > > > be pessimistic here are many who will try to help You in > > > getting > > > > > > proper > > > > > > > understanding. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > After some time You will agree with me about the mala and > > > japa. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru > > > > > > > email: rafal@ > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > litsol napisa?(a): > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Rafal, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Here u r doing two wrong things, instead of developing > ur > > > > > > understanding, > > > > > > > > u r trying to conclude something and going beyond that > u r > > > > > > messaging > > > > > > > > same to many. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I m touching 35, What's ur age ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Astrology is a kind of vidya or profession, like i m a > > > > software > > > > > > > > engineer, software engineering is my profession. > > > spirituality > > > > is > > > > > > beyond > > > > > > > > all sort of vidya or profession. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I wish u to be a good soul and to realize the bliss of > > self > > > > > > awakening or > > > > > > > > in other terms, the bliss that comes once u feel u and > > god > > > is > > > > > > > > connected. dissolved in each other. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > First realize, experience, then speak and then suggest > to > > > > others, > > > > > > by > > > > > > > > mere reading shastras or books u r not going to feel > it. > > > > unless > > > > > > god > > > > > > > > graces u it's very very difficult. and if u dont avoid > > this > > > > sort > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > hurriedness instead of learning and understanding, it > > will > > > > affect > > > > > > u only > > > > > > > > no one else. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > somehere i have read, it was written - By mere > > > repeating " So- > > > > > > Aham " no > > > > > > > > one gets liberated unless he realizes it like one > doesnt > > get > > > > > > cured by > > > > > > > > knowing the name of the medicine, u need to take the > > > medicine > > > > to > > > > > > get > > > > > > > > cured " . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So, pls. be wise, as it was being discussed here, i > > shared > > > the > > > > > > > > experience of my life, pls. mind it, i m not a > preecher, > > > nor a > > > > > > guru, nor > > > > > > > > i have to make my followers, nor it's my profession, > nor > > i > > > > have > > > > > > to get > > > > > > > > fame, sharing things is a kind of friendliness a kind of > > > > > > affection, > > > > > > > > that's it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > > > Lalit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. com>, Rafal > > Gendarz > > > > > > > > <starsuponme@ ...> > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Jyotishas > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Counting of mala has more depth sense than just > > counting, > > > > so for > > > > > > > > natives > > > > > > > > > like Litsol counting is neccessary and any other > > > speculation > > > > > > will be > > > > > > > > > only illusory and just imagination. We should follow > Pt. > > > > > > > > Dakshinamoorti > > > > > > > > > advise strictly, otherwise our process of spiritual > > > > development > > > > > > will > > > > > > > > be > > > > > > > > > slow and unauthoritative. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz > > > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru > > > > > > > > > email: rafal@ > > > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > asmp2k02@ napisa?(a): > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Resp Sri Lalitji, > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for your mail.But please also read > > > > GuruDakshinamurthyi > > > > > > ji's > > > > > > > > > > mail(addressing me) also on this,which brings in > more > > > > clarity > > > > > > to the > > > > > > > > > > applicability principles to my mail. > > > > > > > > > > I meant that both are necessity but to what degree > of > > > time > > > > (it > > > > > > varies > > > > > > > > > > from saadhaka to saadhaka) to get such inbuilt > > maturity > > > > such > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > > > the count will be taken care of by Divine forces > > after > > > > some > > > > > > initial > > > > > > > > > > period of saadhana. > > > > > > > > > > Morover the type of bio matter present in the japa > > maala > > > > > > (which is > > > > > > > > > > symbolic for ritualism as well as from practical > > point > > > of > > > > > > view for > > > > > > > > our > > > > > > > > > > count) will help in keeping away destructive forces > > > > acting on > > > > > > us > > > > > > > > .Thus > > > > > > > > > > the symbolic rituals will indirectly help us in > > keeping > > > > away > > > > > > from > > > > > > > > > > negative thoughts and also trains our memory to be > > > object > > > > > > > > oriented.If > > > > > > > > > > our memory grows and retentive capacity increase > the > > > > Gnaana > > > > > > will > > > > > > > > > > increase ,but at the same time destructive forces > > > > > > (diversions) also > > > > > > > > > > becomes powerful.Thus the symbolic procedures will > > come > > > in > > > > > > handy to > > > > > > > > > > successfully fight the negative forces.The rituals > > may > > > be > > > > > > Rising > > > > > > > > > > early(if possible during Braahmi muhurta),Taking > > > > > > bath,Japaanusthaan, > > > > > > > > > > attending to the livelihood job etc etc in defined > > > times > > > > as > > > > > > > > discipline > > > > > > > > > > helps indirectly tune our memory through keeping > our > > > body > > > > > > healthy. > > > > > > > > > > Thus ultimately we conclude that the so called > > symbolic > > > > > > procedures > > > > > > > > are > > > > > > > > > > not actually symbolic(it got branded as such) but a > > > > necessity > > > > > > for > > > > > > > > our > > > > > > > > > > own good if we practice to the extent we can. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quoting mishra.lalit@ ... <mishra. lalit% > > > 40gmail. > > > > com>: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Resp. Sri Murthy Adavi, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, what you said is perfectly right, we count or > > dont > > > > > > count,target > > > > > > > > > > is realization of god's love within, I got it with > no > > > > > > counting, > > > > > > > > > > someone may get it with counting. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanx, for the writing. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > > > > > Lalit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. com> > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. com>, > > srinivasa > > > > > > murthy adavi > > > > > > > > > > asmp2k02@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Respected Learned Members, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Both views may be correct when the views have/or > > with > > > > the > > > > > > goal as > > > > > > > > > > development of Love/Devotion towards adhistana > > Devatha > > > of > > > > the > > > > > > Mantra > > > > > > > > > > as Base. > > > > > > > > > > > In the initial stage only you need the count;as > one > > > > > > develops the > > > > > > > > > > habit the biological tuning of the intellect/body > will > > > > > > automatically > > > > > > > > > > take care of the practice(without count-help of > malas > > > > etc). > > > > > > > > > > > It's like if with the help of Alarm clock if we > > wake > > > up > > > > for > > > > > > 2 or 3 > > > > > > > > > > days at some appointed hour,then automatically we > > > wakeup > > > > at > > > > > > the same > > > > > > > > > > time every day without help of alarm. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > With due Respects > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > smadavi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quoting starsuponme@ : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Litsol, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Definitely we should count our Mantra Japa on > Mala. > > > Your > > > > > > view is > > > > > > > > > > against > > > > > > > > > > > Vedic Authorities and Sages, so should be > rejected. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz > > > > > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru > > > > > > > > > > > email: rafal@ > > > > > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > litsol napisa?(a): > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Mr. Jayashri, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > A thought came, why i should not share with u, > U > > > pls. > > > > stop > > > > > > > > > > counting > > > > > > > > > > > > mantra chantings, counting mantra gives false > ego > > > and > > > > then > > > > > > > > > > > > frustration if u dont get desired results. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > leave it to the god, god counts the mantra > > chanted > > > by > > > > you > > > > > > may be > > > > > > > > > > > > 108, 1008 or whatsoever, let him count, it's > his > > > part > > > > and > > > > > > ur > > > > > > > > part > > > > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > > > to chant the mantra. when the mantra has to > > awaken, > > > it > > > > > > will be, > > > > > > > > > > god > > > > > > > > > > > > will ensure it for u. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sometimes we try to become more intelligent > with > > out > > > > > > limited > > > > > > > > > > > > intellect and that creates obstacles in our > > > spiritual > > > > > > growth. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So, forget about counts, forget about the time > u > > > put > > > > in > > > > > > for ur's > > > > > > > > > > > > sadhana, invoke the god with pure heart. purity > > > > counts. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > Lalit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. > > > > > > com>, " dakshinastrologer " > > > > > > > > > > > > <dakshinastrologer@ ...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Ms. Jayashree: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think this topic on 108 is getting very > > > > interesting > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > > > > enlightening for all members. Yesterday we > had a > > > > > > wonderful > > > > > > > > > > > > esoteric > > > > > > > > > > > > > explanation from Shri. Sushil Dikshit, and > > today > > > > your > > > > > > > > wonderful > > > > > > > > > > > > > explanation of numerical symmetry of the > cosmos! > > > > > > Wonderful. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There definitely exists a " numerical > symphony " > > in > > > > the > > > > > > > > Universe. > > > > > > > > > > > > But, > > > > > > > > > > > > > not only 108.....as I mentioned in my earlier > > > post, > > > > > > there are > > > > > > > > > > > > various > > > > > > > > > > > > > other numerals that are significant in occult > > > > > > practices. 108 > > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > a > > > > > > > > > > > > > powerful and all-purpose perfect > number...While > > > we > > > > have > > > > > > > > > > understood > > > > > > > > > > > > > the glory of 108, we should not lose sight of > > the > > > > fact > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > > > there > > > > > > > > > > > > are > > > > > > > > > > > > > other powerful numbers also. This is just for > > the > > > > > > information > > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > > list. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > My apprecitation again for this wonderful > > > response. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Blessed be. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pandit R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Blessed be. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pandit R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI. vedic- > > > > > > > > > > > > > astrology@grou ps.com <astrology% > > > > > > > > > > 40. com>, > > > > > > > > > > > > " jayasartn " <jayasartn@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In cosmology, 108 has this significance - > the > > > > moon is > > > > > > away > > > > > > > > > > from > > > > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > earth 108 times its (moon's) diameter and > the > > > sun > > > > is > > > > > > away > > > > > > > > > > from the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > earth, 108 times its diameter. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Perhaps this reality of distances is > > applicable > > > to > > > > > > deities > > > > > > > > > > too. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Perhaps this has been indicated by the 108 > > divya > > > > > > desas of > > > > > > > > Lord > > > > > > > > > > > > > Narayana. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > jayasree > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. > > > > > > com>, " dakshinastrologer " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <dakshinastrologer@ > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Shri. Sushil: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It is a wonderful answer you have given. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Blessed be. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pandit R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. > > > > > > com>, " sushil.dikshit " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <sushil.dikshit@ > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Babu, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It is not a silly question but it is a > > very > > > > good > > > > > > > > question. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Actually > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > there are 27 Nakshatras and every > > Nakshtras > > > > has 4 > > > > > > Charan > > > > > > > > > > so > > > > > > > > > > > > > total > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > charans are 27 x 4 = 108 Charan. Each > > > Charan > > > > has 3 > > > > > > > > degree > > > > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > > > > 20 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > minutes so if you multiply 3 degree and > 20 > > > > > > minutes to > > > > > > > > 108 > > > > > > > > > > it > > > > > > > > > > > > > comes > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > out to be 360 degress i.e. one cycle > > > (Circle). > > > > > > This > > > > > > > > cycle > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > represetns > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > whole brahmand because all the rashis, > > > > planets and > > > > > > > > > > nakshatra > > > > > > > > > > > > > are > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > between these 360 degree in 2 > dimensional > > > > > > horoscope. So > > > > > > > > > > > > > chanting a > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mantra completes one cycle of this > > brahmand. > > > > > > Further One > > > > > > > > > > who > > > > > > > > > > > > > has > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > visited Brahamand at least one time > i.e. > > he > > > is > > > > > > > > > > brahmagyani he > > > > > > > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > entitiled to place 108 Shri before his > > name. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sushil dikshit > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology@ . com > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. com>, > > babu > > > > mon > > > > > > > > > > > > > <muthappan111@ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Namaste, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It may be a silly matter for all of > you. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I want to know what is the reason > that > > > some > > > > > > remedies > > > > > > > > > > > > > recomended > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > for 108 times. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I dont know any thing about astrology. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I hope you may pleased to provide a > > reply > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thanks, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Babu > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------ --------- --------- --- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Be a better Globetrotter. Get better > > > travel > > > > > > answers > > > > > > > > from > > > > > > > > > > > > > someone > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > who knows. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Answers - Check it out. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message > have > > > been > > > > > > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 28, 2007 Report Share Posted July 28, 2007 Dear Ram Jaswal: If Lalith stops challenging others with his rude posts no one will run him down...please follow the threads carefully......He is speaking as if he is the master of everything and everybody else is a fool. When he passes judgment on senior astrologers of this group or unnecessarily challenges established conventions, we have defended that. Now, why are you defending Lalith? Don't you think if you have the right to defend an offender, we have the right to defend the more decent members and traditions that he is subtly attacking.... just read his posts.....If he has just forwarded the Prashna Tantra, nobody would have objected to it.....See the accompanying comments where he abrasively comments certain things...... Open your eyes before advicing anyone. Why don't you write to Lalith also? When did I call him names?......No sir...you are mistaken.... Did you not notice that even after Mohanraamji stopped writing posts, this fellow was taunting that old gentleman repeatedly last week. Where were you at that time? If Lalith stops writing abrasive posts like " Nobody can stand before me " and all that silly nonsense, we have no issues with him (or at least I have no issues with him). So, advice Lalith also in this regard. If Lalith and you enjoy freedom of speech, we also claim the same previlege. Abhishek. vedic astrology , " Ram Jaswal " <rkjaswal wrote: > > Namaste Abhishek/ Mohanraaam > > Just why are you trying to run Lalith down? From the posts that I have read > All he has done is given this point of view - if you don't accept them than > simply ignore it - there is No need for any name calling or belittling > someone. > > There is also nothing wrong in Lalith forwarding " Prashna Tantra " text to > this group as to whether someone has requested it or not - he certainly > doesn't need your or mine permission to do so - after all he thought it > would be useful to everyone - again his view. > > Sorry if I am coming across annoyed and perhaps rude But feel it is Best > that everyone should stop " belittling " other group members as in the long > run all it does is make oneself appear small and bigoted. > > Best wishes and hoping this will be the last mail on this subject .. > > Jai Sita Ram > > Ram > > _____ > > vedic astrology > [vedic astrology ] On Behalf Of abhishekpotti > 28 July 2007 19:54 > vedic astrology > [vedic astrology] Oye Lalith! No one here is afraid of you.... > > Dear Lalith: > > The whole world knows the history of Blessed Meera Bhai....the > epitome of Bhakti......She was attached to her " Lala " - the wonderful > idol of Krishna gifted to her even from her childhood....Do you mean > to say that innocent young girl started chanting " Kliim krishnaaya " > mantra automatically? Even Bhakta Prahlaada had to be initiated by > Sage Naaradha for his chant of dwaadasaakshari mantra.... > > Nobody is afraid of you here......You need not proclaim that you are > not in the business of a Guru.....actually Guru status is not a > business (true to your half-baked knowledge you will claim it is also > like software engineering!). The difference my friend between you > and other great persons like Rafal or Dakshinamoorthiji is that they > are spending their money for the internet, whereas you are pilfering > your company's time and the company's resources while browsing the > internet. Don't you think you are cheating your company when you > spend so much time on empty and egoistic posts defending yourself > against every expert after arguing with them unnecessarily? Are you > not getting paid for the time you spend in the company....Know the > basics of ethics before ever sermonizing.....So, actually you are an > exploiter....try to understand that....the other gurujis are probably > too decent to comment on that......What happened to your project? > Better rush to it nough!....It will spare us the agony of replying to > your half-witted postings! > > By the say, Which member asked you Prashna Tantra dear? We did not > see any posts requesting " Honourable Lalith " to explain Prashna > Tantra (as if you could explain it!) What arrogance you have to > claim that nobody can stand before you.....Guruji's posts exposed > your ignorance....you did not even know how to ask queries and get > replies from one of the most empathetic astrologers of this group, > and yet you claim you are this and that...... > > For your information....nobody is afraid of you..Rather you should be > afraid of yourself......Your foolishness itself will be your doom. > Did you not become the laughing stock due to your email-based chasing > of Priyaa? Such foolishness in occult matters could be more costly > dear.....I think Mohanraaamji and Rafalji are only afraid about your > own well-being! They are not afraid of you. Nor am I afraid of you. > > Your posts never answer the queries or points raised by others; you > take off on a new ground only because of your shallow understanding > of subjects. Nobody has accepted you as a Guru here, and nobody > will....Can a fire-fly eclipse the Sun? There are too many " Suns " > here and you are just a fire-fly. > > It reminds me of a story.....Once an ant challenged the mighty > elephant for a fight; the elephant obviously could not hear the ant > (the ant being so tiny and it was on the ground, its sound could not > reach the elephant). The elephant just walked away out of its own > volition in its natural course. Then the ant claimed, " you see I > challenged the elephant and it ran away " . Dear, your saying that > nobody can stand before you is similar to that....... > > FIRST LEARN THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN GHOSTS AND YOUR ANCESTOR > SUMANGALIS BEFORE WRITING THE FIRST POSTS ON OCCULT! What a > pity......what a pity.....That we have to bear your meaningless > rantings here! > > Abhishek. > > vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology%40> > , " litsol " <mishra.lalit@> > wrote: > > > > > > I was waiting for u dear.. > > > > why u took time ? > > > > Do u mean Meera Bai discussed with u, what she did.. > > > > Do u know 'Kleem Krishnay, Govindaya Gopijan Vallabhaya Namh' is a > > mantra for lord krishna. > > > > is there no beej mantras, to whom u wish to misguide ? let thnigs > > remain between lord, bhakta , their shraddha and their guru. > > > > why u people are so afraid of me, i m not in business of guru. > > > > i m happy with my life, my profession of software engineering and > > my hobbies ok. > > > > there are 7000+ members are here, by writing such type of foolish > > things u expose urself only, mind, there are better brains here. > > > > this is enough ... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology%40> > , > > " abhishekpotti " <abhishekpotti@> wrote: > > > > > > Respected Mohanraaamji: > > > > > > Well said. Lalith is saying that " maybe in south india devotees > > > don't chant Moola mantras but not so in North " ...What > > > stupidity.....He does not seem to understand that " mantra > shaastra > > > experts " are also devotees, but they cannot be called as innocent > > > saatwik bhaktaas! A typical example of a pure saadhwik bhakta > will > > > be Meera Bhai (was she not North Indian). Can Lalith say which > > Dasa > > > Mahaa Vidya Meera Bhai practised? She was immersed in Krishna > > > consciousness and Lover for Him. Her own Bhajans were her > prayers > > in > > > the bhaavana of Bhakti in the form of Love! This is not mantra > > > shaastra. Another example will be Saant Tukhaaraam. These > > bhaktaas > > > did not chant moola mantraas. Panditji Dakshinamoorthi was on > dot > > in > > > saying that " Pure bhaktaas do not chant complicated moola > > mantraas " . > > > You have clarified this fact wonderfully in your post. I wish > more > > > knowledgeable persons also put erratic posters in their place > just > > as > > > Mohanraaamji does here. This will benefit more naive readers of > > > these forums who might otherwise get confused as to which of the > > > paths to follow. Actually, anyone can follow any path as he/ she > > > deems it fit; but there should be consistency of procedures. > > > > > > We should not confuse mantrik rituals and bhakti doctrines. > > Bhaktaas > > > can chant the names of Gods at anytime.....Mantra shaastra > experts > > > chanting advanced moola mantras should necessarily adopt ritual > > > procedures for the welfare of themselves and others! > > Yes...improper > > > chanting of mantras can cause danger to the society also just as > > > proper chanting can help others. Hence, this cannot be > considered > > as > > > a personal preference of the aspirant. If this was not the case, > > why > > > did sages codify spiritual practises scrupulously? Rafalji, > > > Mohanraaamji, etc. are correct in saying it is best to follow > > Pandit > > > Dakshinamoorthiji's advices on mantra shastra or japams. He is > > > learned and he is living a life compatible to the shaastras > though > > he > > > has faced uncertain circumstances in his own personal life. He > > never > > > compromised on principles and he willingly paid the price for > that > > > which most of us will never do. The words of such a person > should > > > obviously carry more weight. > > > > > > Abhishek. > > > > > > vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology% 40> > , " mohanraaam " > <mohanraaam@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Well Lalith: > > > > > > > > If you have really done dasa Maha Vidyaa, you would have never > > > > approached a professional astrologer for consultation...that > much > > I > > > > can say.... > > > > > > > > And what idiocy when you say Panditji is partly wrong? He > > > > said " Bhaktaas do not chant Moola mantras " , whereas you have > > edited > > > > the words to suit your ends....He never said " devotees don't > > chant > > > > Beej mantras " .....You are putting words into his mouth and > > assuming > > > > he is wrong! Why, do you know....the Great Panditji himself > > chants > > > > Moola mantras.....He is a bhakta and a mantra shastra expert. > As > > a > > > > bhakta he keeps incessant chanting of naama japa throughout the > > > day; > > > > as a mantra shastra expert, he restricts the moola mantra > japams > > to > > > > stipulated times with ritual purity.....It is this wonderful > > > practice > > > > that Guruji was alluding to. Guruji cannot be wrong in ritual > > and > > > > occult matters. Please understand that. > > > > > > > > There are 4 classes of Devotees.......1) Saatwik vedic devotees > > who > > > > will follow vedic dharma scrupulously. They will not dare to > > > compare > > > > astrology and vedanga to Engineering! as you did... > > > > 2) Raajasik devotees who will follow vedic disciplines as far > as > > > > possible, but will still go after upaasanaas of Demi-Gods for > > > > accomplishment of siddhis. Mantra shaastra experts usually > fall > > in > > > > this category. > > > > 3) Saatwik Bhaktaas - for whom the meditation and glory of > their > > > > Ishta Devataa is enough for spiritual satisfaction. It is this > > > > category that Guruji referred to when he said they will not > chant > > > > Moola mantras too much. Definitely they will not do Dasa Mahaa > > > > Vidyaa. > > > > 4) Taamasic Devotees - Those whose main motive is to project > > > > themselves at all costs and acting as if they are equal to the > > > > experts; they will try ALL practices - whether they are > > sanctioned > > > by > > > > vedas or not.....Their only aim is personal glory and > > > satisfaction. > > > > They will attack even established dharma if they do not get > > results > > > > (sounds familiar....You are one!) Ignorance and half-baked > > > knowledge > > > > and egotism are these persons' motivating fuel. > > > > > > > > You are really satan's Gift to this list.......My only prayer > is > > > that > > > > innocent members of this list do not get side-tracked with your > > > > ramblings. > > > > > > > > Let me make this clear to the list.....Panditji said that > saatwik > > > > Bhaktaas who chant Divine names only due to Pure Love on God > > > usually > > > > never chant mantrik moola mantraas. It is just one class of > > > > devotees. A rajasik bhakta who is a mantra-shaastra expert may > > > even > > > > be a bhakta at heart; and a pure bhakta may sometimes chant > some > > > > mantrik japams for solving some practical issues......But, when > > > they > > > > switch their routines temporarily, these enlightened devotees > > > usually > > > > take good guidance and follow the tenets of shaastras > > > > scrupulously....Definitely they will not sit on assumption like > > > > Lalith. > > > > > > > > On the one hand, this fellow claims he has done chants in > > forests, > > > > rivers, earth, etc. (Probably we have a Maharishi here! What > > > heights > > > > of pointless pride in this young man list....it is > disgusting!). > > > On > > > > the other hand, he says he chants mantras in buses, trains, > > > etc...... > > > > He is confused about which no body can have issues. Only his > > Guru > > > > should be concerned about that.....But, his attempts to stuff > his > > > > shallow understanding upon this list is reprehensible. And, > his > > > > habit of quoting experts out of context is really condemnable. > > May > > > > Jupiter's Light Shine on that fellow and teach him to respect > the > > > > hallowed traditions and to stay at his level rather than trying > > > > to " teach " others (He has the audacity to claim he > is " teaching " > > > > Rafalji!) > > > > > > > > If a mere young man of 35 years who has spent his life on a > > " Failed > > > > computer web desining business " , " pointless email chasing of > > > girls " , > > > > and other " past times " can gain insight as he claims, how much > > will > > > > learned Gurus of this group with their life of devotion to > > vedanta > > > > and vedanga know? His peanut brain and hyper-inflated ego will > > > never > > > > allow him to see this obvious truth. But, please list exercise > > > your > > > > discretion while reading his posts (There are doubtless some > good > > > > elements even in his posts; but mostly there is trash presented > > as > > > > philosophy). > > > > > > > > Mohanraaam > > > > > > > > vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology% 40> > , " litsol " > <mishra.lalit@> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Dear Rafal, > > > > > > > > > > Do u think, a hobby means shallow knowledge of the domain, No > > > > rafal, > > > > > it's not like that. > > > > > > > > > > At least not for me. You have learnt and i m learning, i read > > > ur's > > > > > replies and get benifitted, same way i wanted you to pay > heed > > to > > > > > what i have written about spritiuality, mostrly i did write > for > > u > > > > > > > > > > I have done all 10 mahavidyas of tantra and read many tantrik > > > > > classics, spent good deal of time with great tantriks > trained > > in > > > > > Kamakhya and other places, keenly observed their doings, > their > > > > > mistakes etc.., I did tremendous mantra chanting on water, > on > > > > earth, > > > > > at home, in forests etc... > > > > > > > > > > then reached here, then i did write something, but sorry i > dont > > > > > remember shlokas. i was not interested in cramming that. > > > > > > > > > > Panditji is not fully correct in saying that BeejMantras are > > not > > > > > chanted by devotees, I dont know much about South India but > in > > > > North > > > > > normally its done. > > > > > > > > > > And a successfull mantra sadhana has to result in one's being > a > > > > > devotee, the devotion is the outcome, final result of mantra > > > > sadhana, > > > > > perhaps, Pandit Ji believes mantras are power packet,thinks, > i > > do > > > > it > > > > > this way , these many times and get this result, this is > where > > > most > > > > > of the people are confused. without being a good human being > if > > > we > > > > > think, we will achieve something in spirituality, is > difficult, > > > > very > > > > > difficult. > > > > > > > > > > what happens is, with the mantra chanting, a self > > > transformation > > > > > process begins, u if dont restrict urself, ur karma begins > > > > diluting, > > > > > and u begin ur purification process unknowingly, when > > substantial > > > > > part of ego and greed for respect vanishes and many such > thing > > > > > togather, mantra awakens u and with the God's grace ur > > objective > > > > gets > > > > > fullfilled, gradually u become a devotee. ur being simple and > > > being > > > > > devotee is sometimes is indication of ur's going on the right > > > track. > > > > > > > > > > I think we have discussed a lot, it's enough !! > > > > > > > > > > My Boss has given me lot of projects to complete, so, may be, > i > > m > > > > not > > > > > going to available in the group like i was recently. however. > i > > > > will > > > > > complete Garg Hora series. > > > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > Lalit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology% 40> > , Rafal Gendarz > > > > > <starsuponme@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya* > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Litsol, > > > > > > > > > > > > Then please dont generalize Your preferences as they are > too > > > > > shallow for > > > > > > this Forum aspiration. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru > > > > > > email: rafal@ > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > litsol napisa?(a): > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Rafel, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I take Astrology as a good hobby, and i w'd be looking at > > it > > > > with > > > > > an > > > > > > > engineer's approach. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I asked ur age because, it's our thinking to put our > > > parameters > > > > in > > > > > > > god's system, there is nothing like delay or advancement > in > > > > > > > spirituality. So, " Delay " or " Speed " , " backwardness " > > > > > > > and " advancement " doesn't exist in spirituality, I > thought > > if > > > u > > > > r > > > > > > > thinking that it may take too much time, I wanted to tell > > u, > > > > it's > > > > > not > > > > > > > like that. there is no delay. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It clicks in fraction of a second, when u r getting > clicked > > > > > depends > > > > > > > on u and on god's will, when he wants u to get clicked. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > God sometimes graces for no reason ( " Ahetuka " ) just for > his > > > > > > > compassion towards u and it may happen next minute too. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > spirituality is not delimited by time , effort and rules. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > > Lalit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology > > > > > > > <vedic astrology%40>, Rafal Gendarz > > > > > > > <starsuponme@ ...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Litsol, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please be careful about words. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Im happy that You are sharing Your experience - very > > > > inspirating > > > > > > > ones. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Age hierarchy is for sudras - Manu Samhita. If You > treat > > > > Jyotish > > > > > > > Vedanga > > > > > > > > as profession similar to engineering You have a long > way > > to > > > > go. > > > > > But > > > > > > > dont > > > > > > > > be pessimistic here are many who will try to help You > in > > > > getting > > > > > > > proper > > > > > > > > understanding. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > After some time You will agree with me about the mala > and > > > > japa. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz > > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru > > > > > > > > email: rafal@ > > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > litsol napisa?(a): > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Rafal, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Here u r doing two wrong things, instead of > developing > > ur > > > > > > > understanding, > > > > > > > > > u r trying to conclude something and going beyond > that > > u r > > > > > > > messaging > > > > > > > > > same to many. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I m touching 35, What's ur age ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Astrology is a kind of vidya or profession, like i m > a > > > > > software > > > > > > > > > engineer, software engineering is my profession. > > > > spirituality > > > > > is > > > > > > > beyond > > > > > > > > > all sort of vidya or profession. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I wish u to be a good soul and to realize the bliss > of > > > self > > > > > > > awakening or > > > > > > > > > in other terms, the bliss that comes once u feel u > and > > > god > > > > is > > > > > > > > > connected. dissolved in each other. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > First realize, experience, then speak and then > suggest > > to > > > > > others, > > > > > > > by > > > > > > > > > mere reading shastras or books u r not going to feel > > it. > > > > > unless > > > > > > > god > > > > > > > > > graces u it's very very difficult. and if u dont > avoid > > > this > > > > > sort > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > hurriedness instead of learning and understanding, it > > > will > > > > > affect > > > > > > > u only > > > > > > > > > no one else. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > somehere i have read, it was written - By mere > > > > repeating " So- > > > > > > > Aham " no > > > > > > > > > one gets liberated unless he realizes it like one > > doesnt > > > get > > > > > > > cured by > > > > > > > > > knowing the name of the medicine, u need to take the > > > > medicine > > > > > to > > > > > > > get > > > > > > > > > cured " . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So, pls. be wise, as it was being discussed here, i > > > shared > > > > the > > > > > > > > > experience of my life, pls. mind it, i m not a > > preecher, > > > > nor a > > > > > > > guru, nor > > > > > > > > > i have to make my followers, nor it's my profession, > > nor > > > i > > > > > have > > > > > > > to get > > > > > > > > > fame, sharing things is a kind of friendliness a kind > of > > > > > > > affection, > > > > > > > > > that's it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > > > > Lalit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. com>, Rafal > > > Gendarz > > > > > > > > > <starsuponme@ ...> > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Jyotishas > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Counting of mala has more depth sense than just > > > counting, > > > > > so for > > > > > > > > > natives > > > > > > > > > > like Litsol counting is neccessary and any other > > > > speculation > > > > > > > will be > > > > > > > > > > only illusory and just imagination. We should > follow > > Pt. > > > > > > > > > Dakshinamoorti > > > > > > > > > > advise strictly, otherwise our process of spiritual > > > > > development > > > > > > > will > > > > > > > > > be > > > > > > > > > > slow and unauthoritative. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz > > > > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru > > > > > > > > > > email: rafal@ > > > > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > asmp2k02@ napisa?(a): > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Resp Sri Lalitji, > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for your mail.But please also read > > > > > GuruDakshinamurthyi > > > > > > > ji's > > > > > > > > > > > mail(addressing me) also on this,which brings in > > more > > > > > clarity > > > > > > > to the > > > > > > > > > > > applicability principles to my mail. > > > > > > > > > > > I meant that both are necessity but to what > degree > > of > > > > time > > > > > (it > > > > > > > varies > > > > > > > > > > > from saadhaka to saadhaka) to get such inbuilt > > > maturity > > > > > such > > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > > > > the count will be taken care of by Divine forces > > > after > > > > > some > > > > > > > initial > > > > > > > > > > > period of saadhana. > > > > > > > > > > > Morover the type of bio matter present in the > japa > > > maala > > > > > > > (which is > > > > > > > > > > > symbolic for ritualism as well as from practical > > > point > > > > of > > > > > > > view for > > > > > > > > > our > > > > > > > > > > > count) will help in keeping away destructive > forces > > > > > acting on > > > > > > > us > > > > > > > > > .Thus > > > > > > > > > > > the symbolic rituals will indirectly help us in > > > keeping > > > > > away > > > > > > > from > > > > > > > > > > > negative thoughts and also trains our memory to > be > > > > object > > > > > > > > > oriented.If > > > > > > > > > > > our memory grows and retentive capacity increase > > the > > > > > Gnaana > > > > > > > will > > > > > > > > > > > increase ,but at the same time destructive forces > > > > > > > (diversions) also > > > > > > > > > > > becomes powerful.Thus the symbolic procedures > will > > > come > > > > in > > > > > > > handy to > > > > > > > > > > > successfully fight the negative forces.The > rituals > > > may > > > > be > > > > > > > Rising > > > > > > > > > > > early(if possible during Braahmi muhurta),Taking > > > > > > > bath,Japaanusthaan, > > > > > > > > > > > attending to the livelihood job etc etc in > defined > > > > times > > > > > as > > > > > > > > > discipline > > > > > > > > > > > helps indirectly tune our memory through keeping > > our > > > > body > > > > > > > healthy. > > > > > > > > > > > Thus ultimately we conclude that the so called > > > symbolic > > > > > > > procedures > > > > > > > > > are > > > > > > > > > > > not actually symbolic(it got branded as such) but > a > > > > > necessity > > > > > > > for > > > > > > > > > our > > > > > > > > > > > own good if we practice to the extent we can. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quoting mishra.lalit@ ... <mishra. lalit% > > > > 40gmail. > > > > > com>: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Resp. Sri Murthy Adavi, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, what you said is perfectly right, we count > or > > > dont > > > > > > > count,target > > > > > > > > > > > is realization of god's love within, I got it > with > > no > > > > > > > counting, > > > > > > > > > > > someone may get it with counting. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanx, for the writing. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > > > > > > Lalit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. com> > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. com>, > > > srinivasa > > > > > > > murthy adavi > > > > > > > > > > > asmp2k02@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Respected Learned Members, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Both views may be correct when the views > have/or > > > with > > > > > the > > > > > > > goal as > > > > > > > > > > > development of Love/Devotion towards adhistana > > > Devatha > > > > of > > > > > the > > > > > > > Mantra > > > > > > > > > > > as Base. > > > > > > > > > > > > In the initial stage only you need the count;as > > one > > > > > > > develops the > > > > > > > > > > > habit the biological tuning of the intellect/body > > will > > > > > > > automatically > > > > > > > > > > > take care of the practice(without count-help of > > malas > > > > > etc). > > > > > > > > > > > > It's like if with the help of Alarm clock if we > > > wake > > > > up > > > > > for > > > > > > > 2 or 3 > > > > > > > > > > > days at some appointed hour,then automatically we > > > > wakeup > > > > > at > > > > > > > the same > > > > > > > > > > > time every day without help of alarm. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > With due Respects > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > smadavi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quoting starsuponme@ : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Litsol, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Definitely we should count our Mantra Japa on > > Mala. > > > > Your > > > > > > > view is > > > > > > > > > > > against > > > > > > > > > > > > Vedic Authorities and Sages, so should be > > rejected. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz > > > > > > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru > > > > > > > > > > > > email: rafal@ > > > > > > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > litsol napisa?(a): > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Mr. Jayashri, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > A thought came, why i should not share with > u, > > U > > > > pls. > > > > > stop > > > > > > > > > > > counting > > > > > > > > > > > > > mantra chantings, counting mantra gives false > > ego > > > > and > > > > > then > > > > > > > > > > > > > frustration if u dont get desired results. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > leave it to the god, god counts the mantra > > > chanted > > > > by > > > > > you > > > > > > > may be > > > > > > > > > > > > > 108, 1008 or whatsoever, let him count, it's > > his > > > > part > > > > > and > > > > > > > ur > > > > > > > > > part > > > > > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > > > > to chant the mantra. when the mantra has to > > > awaken, > > > > it > > > > > > > will be, > > > > > > > > > > > god > > > > > > > > > > > > > will ensure it for u. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sometimes we try to become more intelligent > > with > > > out > > > > > > > limited > > > > > > > > > > > > > intellect and that creates obstacles in our > > > > spiritual > > > > > > > growth. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So, forget about counts, forget about the > time > > u > > > > put > > > > > in > > > > > > > for ur's > > > > > > > > > > > > > sadhana, invoke the god with pure heart. > purity > > > > > counts. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > Lalit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology > > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. > > > > > > > com>, " dakshinastrologer " > > > > > > > > > > > > > <dakshinastrologer@ ...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Ms. Jayashree: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think this topic on 108 is getting very > > > > > interesting > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > enlightening for all members. Yesterday we > > had a > > > > > > > wonderful > > > > > > > > > > > > > esoteric > > > > > > > > > > > > > > explanation from Shri. Sushil Dikshit, and > > > today > > > > > your > > > > > > > > > wonderful > > > > > > > > > > > > > > explanation of numerical symmetry of the > > cosmos! > > > > > > > Wonderful. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There definitely exists a " numerical > > symphony " > > > in > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > Universe. > > > > > > > > > > > > > But, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > not only 108.....as I mentioned in my > earlier > > > > post, > > > > > > > there are > > > > > > > > > > > > > various > > > > > > > > > > > > > > other numerals that are significant in > occult > > > > > > > practices. 108 > > > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > > a > > > > > > > > > > > > > > powerful and all-purpose perfect > > number...While > > > > we > > > > > have > > > > > > > > > > > understood > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the glory of 108, we should not lose sight > of > > > the > > > > > fact > > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > > > > there > > > > > > > > > > > > > are > > > > > > > > > > > > > > other powerful numbers also. This is just > for > > > the > > > > > > > information > > > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > list. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > My apprecitation again for this wonderful > > > > response. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Blessed be. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pandit R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Blessed be. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pandit R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI. vedic- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > astrology@grou ps.com > <astrology% > > > > > > > > > > > 40. com>, > > > > > > > > > > > > > " jayasartn " <jayasartn@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In cosmology, 108 has this significance - > > the > > > > > moon is > > > > > > > away > > > > > > > > > > > from > > > > > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > earth 108 times its (moon's) diameter and > > the > > > > sun > > > > > is > > > > > > > away > > > > > > > > > > > from the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > earth, 108 times its diameter. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Perhaps this reality of distances is > > > applicable > > > > to > > > > > > > deities > > > > > > > > > > > too. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Perhaps this has been indicated by the > 108 > > > divya > > > > > > > desas of > > > > > > > > > Lord > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Narayana. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > jayasree > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology > > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. > > > > > > > com>, " dakshinastrologer " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <dakshinastrologer@ > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Shri. Sushil: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It is a wonderful answer you have given. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Blessed be. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pandit R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology@ . com > > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. > > > > > > > com>, " sushil.dikshit " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <sushil.dikshit@ > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Babu, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It is not a silly question but it is > a > > > very > > > > > good > > > > > > > > > question. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Actually > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > there are 27 Nakshatras and every > > > Nakshtras > > > > > has 4 > > > > > > > Charan > > > > > > > > > > > so > > > > > > > > > > > > > > total > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > charans are 27 x 4 = 108 Charan. Each > > > > Charan > > > > > has 3 > > > > > > > > > degree > > > > > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 20 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > minutes so if you multiply 3 degree > and > > 20 > > > > > > > minutes to > > > > > > > > > 108 > > > > > > > > > > > it > > > > > > > > > > > > > > comes > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > out to be 360 degress i.e. one cycle > > > > (Circle). > > > > > > > This > > > > > > > > > cycle > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > represetns > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > whole brahmand because all the > rashis, > > > > > planets and > > > > > > > > > > > nakshatra > > > > > > > > > > > > > > are > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > between these 360 degree in 2 > > dimensional > > > > > > > horoscope. So > > > > > > > > > > > > > > chanting a > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mantra completes one cycle of this > > > brahmand. > > > > > > > Further One > > > > > > > > > > > who > > > > > > > > > > > > > > has > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > visited Brahamand at least one time > > i.e. > > > he > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > > brahmagyani he > > > > > > > > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > entitiled to place 108 Shri before > his > > > name. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sushil dikshit > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology@ . > com > > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. > com>, > > > babu > > > > > mon > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <muthappan111@ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Namaste, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It may be a silly matter for all of > > you. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I want to know what is the reason > > that > > > > some > > > > > > > remedies > > > > > > > > > > > > > > recomended > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > for 108 times. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I dont know any thing about > astrology. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I hope you may pleased to provide a > > > reply > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thanks, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Babu > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------ --------- --------- - -- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Be a better Globetrotter. Get > better > > > > travel > > > > > > > answers > > > > > > > > > from > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someone > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > who knows. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Answers - Check it out. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message > > have > > > > been > > > > > > > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > > > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > > > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 28, 2007 Report Share Posted July 28, 2007 Namaste Abhishek My post wasn't so much in defense of Lalith but one to stop the " belittling " of a person within this Group. If you don't agree with someone's views you are perfectly within your rights to say so why in a scholarly fashion so as to discuss and further the merits of the topic under discussion. Thereafter it is a matter for the individual to either continue with the on-going discussion or to stop? The only way you or anyone else is likely to change Lalith's view on chanting of Mantras will be from a scholarly viewpoint and not from goading him? Also why are you taking personal offense? If Guru's can ignore his comments - can't you do the same? With freedom of speech comes the responsibility of keeping a civil and polite language - please re-read your note which prompted my earlier response. Like I said in my earlier post it is all about ones viewpoints - my personal advise to everyone would be to take what you find reasonable and ignore the rest. Best wishes .. Jai Sita Ram Ram _____ vedic astrology [vedic astrology ] On Behalf Of abhishekpotti 28 July 2007 20:42 vedic astrology [vedic astrology] Re: Oye Lalith! No one here is afraid of you.... Dear Ram Jaswal: If Lalith stops challenging others with his rude posts no one will run him down...please follow the threads carefully......He is speaking as if he is the master of everything and everybody else is a fool. When he passes judgment on senior astrologers of this group or unnecessarily challenges established conventions, we have defended that. Now, why are you defending Lalith? Don't you think if you have the right to defend an offender, we have the right to defend the more decent members and traditions that he is subtly attacking.... just read his posts.....If he has just forwarded the Prashna Tantra, nobody would have objected to it.....See the accompanying comments where he abrasively comments certain things...... Open your eyes before advicing anyone. Why don't you write to Lalith also? When did I call him names?......No sir...you are mistaken.... Did you not notice that even after Mohanraamji stopped writing posts, this fellow was taunting that old gentleman repeatedly last week. Where were you at that time? If Lalith stops writing abrasive posts like " Nobody can stand before me " and all that silly nonsense, we have no issues with him (or at least I have no issues with him). So, advice Lalith also in this regard. If Lalith and you enjoy freedom of speech, we also claim the same previlege. Abhishek. vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology%40> , " Ram Jaswal " <rkjaswal wrote: > > Namaste Abhishek/ Mohanraaam > > Just why are you trying to run Lalith down? From the posts that I have read > All he has done is given this point of view - if you don't accept them than > simply ignore it - there is No need for any name calling or belittling > someone. > > There is also nothing wrong in Lalith forwarding " Prashna Tantra " text to > this group as to whether someone has requested it or not - he certainly > doesn't need your or mine permission to do so - after all he thought it > would be useful to everyone - again his view. > > Sorry if I am coming across annoyed and perhaps rude But feel it is Best > that everyone should stop " belittling " other group members as in the long > run all it does is make oneself appear small and bigoted. > > Best wishes and hoping this will be the last mail on this subject .. > > Jai Sita Ram > > Ram > > _____ > > vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology%40> > [vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology%40> ] On Behalf Of abhishekpotti > 28 July 2007 19:54 > vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology%40> > [vedic astrology] Oye Lalith! No one here is afraid of you.... > > Dear Lalith: > > The whole world knows the history of Blessed Meera Bhai....the > epitome of Bhakti......She was attached to her " Lala " - the wonderful > idol of Krishna gifted to her even from her childhood....Do you mean > to say that innocent young girl started chanting " Kliim krishnaaya " > mantra automatically? Even Bhakta Prahlaada had to be initiated by > Sage Naaradha for his chant of dwaadasaakshari mantra.... > > Nobody is afraid of you here......You need not proclaim that you are > not in the business of a Guru.....actually Guru status is not a > business (true to your half-baked knowledge you will claim it is also > like software engineering!). The difference my friend between you > and other great persons like Rafal or Dakshinamoorthiji is that they > are spending their money for the internet, whereas you are pilfering > your company's time and the company's resources while browsing the > internet. Don't you think you are cheating your company when you > spend so much time on empty and egoistic posts defending yourself > against every expert after arguing with them unnecessarily? Are you > not getting paid for the time you spend in the company....Know the > basics of ethics before ever sermonizing.....So, actually you are an > exploiter....try to understand that....the other gurujis are probably > too decent to comment on that......What happened to your project? > Better rush to it nough!....It will spare us the agony of replying to > your half-witted postings! > > By the say, Which member asked you Prashna Tantra dear? We did not > see any posts requesting " Honourable Lalith " to explain Prashna > Tantra (as if you could explain it!) What arrogance you have to > claim that nobody can stand before you.....Guruji's posts exposed > your ignorance....you did not even know how to ask queries and get > replies from one of the most empathetic astrologers of this group, > and yet you claim you are this and that...... > > For your information....nobody is afraid of you..Rather you should be > afraid of yourself......Your foolishness itself will be your doom. > Did you not become the laughing stock due to your email-based chasing > of Priyaa? Such foolishness in occult matters could be more costly > dear.....I think Mohanraaamji and Rafalji are only afraid about your > own well-being! They are not afraid of you. Nor am I afraid of you. > > Your posts never answer the queries or points raised by others; you > take off on a new ground only because of your shallow understanding > of subjects. Nobody has accepted you as a Guru here, and nobody > will....Can a fire-fly eclipse the Sun? There are too many " Suns " > here and you are just a fire-fly. > > It reminds me of a story.....Once an ant challenged the mighty > elephant for a fight; the elephant obviously could not hear the ant > (the ant being so tiny and it was on the ground, its sound could not > reach the elephant). The elephant just walked away out of its own > volition in its natural course. Then the ant claimed, " you see I > challenged the elephant and it ran away " . Dear, your saying that > nobody can stand before you is similar to that....... > > FIRST LEARN THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN GHOSTS AND YOUR ANCESTOR > SUMANGALIS BEFORE WRITING THE FIRST POSTS ON OCCULT! What a > pity......what a pity.....That we have to bear your meaningless > rantings here! > > Abhishek. > > vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology%40> > , " litsol " <mishra.lalit@> > wrote: > > > > > > I was waiting for u dear.. > > > > why u took time ? > > > > Do u mean Meera Bai discussed with u, what she did.. > > > > Do u know 'Kleem Krishnay, Govindaya Gopijan Vallabhaya Namh' is a > > mantra for lord krishna. > > > > is there no beej mantras, to whom u wish to misguide ? let thnigs > > remain between lord, bhakta , their shraddha and their guru. > > > > why u people are so afraid of me, i m not in business of guru. > > > > i m happy with my life, my profession of software engineering and > > my hobbies ok. > > > > there are 7000+ members are here, by writing such type of foolish > > things u expose urself only, mind, there are better brains here. > > > > this is enough ... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology%40> > , > > " abhishekpotti " <abhishekpotti@> wrote: > > > > > > Respected Mohanraaamji: > > > > > > Well said. Lalith is saying that " maybe in south india devotees > > > don't chant Moola mantras but not so in North " ...What > > > stupidity.....He does not seem to understand that " mantra > shaastra > > > experts " are also devotees, but they cannot be called as innocent > > > saatwik bhaktaas! A typical example of a pure saadhwik bhakta > will > > > be Meera Bhai (was she not North Indian). Can Lalith say which > > Dasa > > > Mahaa Vidya Meera Bhai practised? She was immersed in Krishna > > > consciousness and Lover for Him. Her own Bhajans were her > prayers > > in > > > the bhaavana of Bhakti in the form of Love! This is not mantra > > > shaastra. Another example will be Saant Tukhaaraam. These > > bhaktaas > > > did not chant moola mantraas. Panditji Dakshinamoorthi was on > dot > > in > > > saying that " Pure bhaktaas do not chant complicated moola > > mantraas " . > > > You have clarified this fact wonderfully in your post. I wish > more > > > knowledgeable persons also put erratic posters in their place > just > > as > > > Mohanraaamji does here. This will benefit more naive readers of > > > these forums who might otherwise get confused as to which of the > > > paths to follow. Actually, anyone can follow any path as he/ she > > > deems it fit; but there should be consistency of procedures. > > > > > > We should not confuse mantrik rituals and bhakti doctrines. > > Bhaktaas > > > can chant the names of Gods at anytime.....Mantra shaastra > experts > > > chanting advanced moola mantras should necessarily adopt ritual > > > procedures for the welfare of themselves and others! > > Yes...improper > > > chanting of mantras can cause danger to the society also just as > > > proper chanting can help others. Hence, this cannot be > considered > > as > > > a personal preference of the aspirant. If this was not the case, > > why > > > did sages codify spiritual practises scrupulously? Rafalji, > > > Mohanraaamji, etc. are correct in saying it is best to follow > > Pandit > > > Dakshinamoorthiji's advices on mantra shastra or japams. He is > > > learned and he is living a life compatible to the shaastras > though > > he > > > has faced uncertain circumstances in his own personal life. He > > never > > > compromised on principles and he willingly paid the price for > that > > > which most of us will never do. The words of such a person > should > > > obviously carry more weight. > > > > > > Abhishek. > > > > > > vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology% 40> > , " mohanraaam " > <mohanraaam@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Well Lalith: > > > > > > > > If you have really done dasa Maha Vidyaa, you would have never > > > > approached a professional astrologer for consultation...that > much > > I > > > > can say.... > > > > > > > > And what idiocy when you say Panditji is partly wrong? He > > > > said " Bhaktaas do not chant Moola mantras " , whereas you have > > edited > > > > the words to suit your ends....He never said " devotees don't > > chant > > > > Beej mantras " .....You are putting words into his mouth and > > assuming > > > > he is wrong! Why, do you know....the Great Panditji himself > > chants > > > > Moola mantras.....He is a bhakta and a mantra shastra expert. > As > > a > > > > bhakta he keeps incessant chanting of naama japa throughout the > > > day; > > > > as a mantra shastra expert, he restricts the moola mantra > japams > > to > > > > stipulated times with ritual purity.....It is this wonderful > > > practice > > > > that Guruji was alluding to. Guruji cannot be wrong in ritual > > and > > > > occult matters. Please understand that. > > > > > > > > There are 4 classes of Devotees.......1) Saatwik vedic devotees > > who > > > > will follow vedic dharma scrupulously. They will not dare to > > > compare > > > > astrology and vedanga to Engineering! as you did... > > > > 2) Raajasik devotees who will follow vedic disciplines as far > as > > > > possible, but will still go after upaasanaas of Demi-Gods for > > > > accomplishment of siddhis. Mantra shaastra experts usually > fall > > in > > > > this category. > > > > 3) Saatwik Bhaktaas - for whom the meditation and glory of > their > > > > Ishta Devataa is enough for spiritual satisfaction. It is this > > > > category that Guruji referred to when he said they will not > chant > > > > Moola mantras too much. Definitely they will not do Dasa Mahaa > > > > Vidyaa. > > > > 4) Taamasic Devotees - Those whose main motive is to project > > > > themselves at all costs and acting as if they are equal to the > > > > experts; they will try ALL practices - whether they are > > sanctioned > > > by > > > > vedas or not.....Their only aim is personal glory and > > > satisfaction. > > > > They will attack even established dharma if they do not get > > results > > > > (sounds familiar....You are one!) Ignorance and half-baked > > > knowledge > > > > and egotism are these persons' motivating fuel. > > > > > > > > You are really satan's Gift to this list.......My only prayer > is > > > that > > > > innocent members of this list do not get side-tracked with your > > > > ramblings. > > > > > > > > Let me make this clear to the list.....Panditji said that > saatwik > > > > Bhaktaas who chant Divine names only due to Pure Love on God > > > usually > > > > never chant mantrik moola mantraas. It is just one class of > > > > devotees. A rajasik bhakta who is a mantra-shaastra expert may > > > even > > > > be a bhakta at heart; and a pure bhakta may sometimes chant > some > > > > mantrik japams for solving some practical issues......But, when > > > they > > > > switch their routines temporarily, these enlightened devotees > > > usually > > > > take good guidance and follow the tenets of shaastras > > > > scrupulously....Definitely they will not sit on assumption like > > > > Lalith. > > > > > > > > On the one hand, this fellow claims he has done chants in > > forests, > > > > rivers, earth, etc. (Probably we have a Maharishi here! What > > > heights > > > > of pointless pride in this young man list....it is > disgusting!). > > > On > > > > the other hand, he says he chants mantras in buses, trains, > > > etc...... > > > > He is confused about which no body can have issues. Only his > > Guru > > > > should be concerned about that.....But, his attempts to stuff > his > > > > shallow understanding upon this list is reprehensible. And, > his > > > > habit of quoting experts out of context is really condemnable. > > May > > > > Jupiter's Light Shine on that fellow and teach him to respect > the > > > > hallowed traditions and to stay at his level rather than trying > > > > to " teach " others (He has the audacity to claim he > is " teaching " > > > > Rafalji!) > > > > > > > > If a mere young man of 35 years who has spent his life on a > > " Failed > > > > computer web desining business " , " pointless email chasing of > > > girls " , > > > > and other " past times " can gain insight as he claims, how much > > will > > > > learned Gurus of this group with their life of devotion to > > vedanta > > > > and vedanga know? His peanut brain and hyper-inflated ego will > > > never > > > > allow him to see this obvious truth. But, please list exercise > > > your > > > > discretion while reading his posts (There are doubtless some > good > > > > elements even in his posts; but mostly there is trash presented > > as > > > > philosophy). > > > > > > > > Mohanraaam > > > > > > > > vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology% 40> > , " litsol " > <mishra.lalit@> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Dear Rafal, > > > > > > > > > > Do u think, a hobby means shallow knowledge of the domain, No > > > > rafal, > > > > > it's not like that. > > > > > > > > > > At least not for me. You have learnt and i m learning, i read > > > ur's > > > > > replies and get benifitted, same way i wanted you to pay > heed > > to > > > > > what i have written about spritiuality, mostrly i did write > for > > u > > > > > > > > > > I have done all 10 mahavidyas of tantra and read many tantrik > > > > > classics, spent good deal of time with great tantriks > trained > > in > > > > > Kamakhya and other places, keenly observed their doings, > their > > > > > mistakes etc.., I did tremendous mantra chanting on water, > on > > > > earth, > > > > > at home, in forests etc... > > > > > > > > > > then reached here, then i did write something, but sorry i > dont > > > > > remember shlokas. i was not interested in cramming that. > > > > > > > > > > Panditji is not fully correct in saying that BeejMantras are > > not > > > > > chanted by devotees, I dont know much about South India but > in > > > > North > > > > > normally its done. > > > > > > > > > > And a successfull mantra sadhana has to result in one's being > a > > > > > devotee, the devotion is the outcome, final result of mantra > > > > sadhana, > > > > > perhaps, Pandit Ji believes mantras are power packet,thinks, > i > > do > > > > it > > > > > this way , these many times and get this result, this is > where > > > most > > > > > of the people are confused. without being a good human being > if > > > we > > > > > think, we will achieve something in spirituality, is > difficult, > > > > very > > > > > difficult. > > > > > > > > > > what happens is, with the mantra chanting, a self > > > transformation > > > > > process begins, u if dont restrict urself, ur karma begins > > > > diluting, > > > > > and u begin ur purification process unknowingly, when > > substantial > > > > > part of ego and greed for respect vanishes and many such > thing > > > > > togather, mantra awakens u and with the God's grace ur > > objective > > > > gets > > > > > fullfilled, gradually u become a devotee. ur being simple and > > > being > > > > > devotee is sometimes is indication of ur's going on the right > > > track. > > > > > > > > > > I think we have discussed a lot, it's enough !! > > > > > > > > > > My Boss has given me lot of projects to complete, so, may be, > i > > m > > > > not > > > > > going to available in the group like i was recently. however. > i > > > > will > > > > > complete Garg Hora series. > > > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > Lalit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology% 40> > , Rafal Gendarz > > > > > <starsuponme@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya* > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Litsol, > > > > > > > > > > > > Then please dont generalize Your preferences as they are > too > > > > > shallow for > > > > > > this Forum aspiration. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru > > > > > > email: rafal@ > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > litsol napisa?(a): > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Rafel, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I take Astrology as a good hobby, and i w'd be looking at > > it > > > > with > > > > > an > > > > > > > engineer's approach. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I asked ur age because, it's our thinking to put our > > > parameters > > > > in > > > > > > > god's system, there is nothing like delay or advancement > in > > > > > > > spirituality. So, " Delay " or " Speed " , " backwardness " > > > > > > > and " advancement " doesn't exist in spirituality, I > thought > > if > > > u > > > > r > > > > > > > thinking that it may take too much time, I wanted to tell > > u, > > > > it's > > > > > not > > > > > > > like that. there is no delay. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It clicks in fraction of a second, when u r getting > clicked > > > > > depends > > > > > > > on u and on god's will, when he wants u to get clicked. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > God sometimes graces for no reason ( " Ahetuka " ) just for > his > > > > > > > compassion towards u and it may happen next minute too. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > spirituality is not delimited by time , effort and rules. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > > Lalit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology > > > > > > > <vedic astrology%40>, Rafal Gendarz > > > > > > > <starsuponme@ ...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Litsol, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please be careful about words. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Im happy that You are sharing Your experience - very > > > > inspirating > > > > > > > ones. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Age hierarchy is for sudras - Manu Samhita. If You > treat > > > > Jyotish > > > > > > > Vedanga > > > > > > > > as profession similar to engineering You have a long > way > > to > > > > go. > > > > > But > > > > > > > dont > > > > > > > > be pessimistic here are many who will try to help You > in > > > > getting > > > > > > > proper > > > > > > > > understanding. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > After some time You will agree with me about the mala > and > > > > japa. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz > > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru > > > > > > > > email: rafal@ > > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > litsol napisa?(a): > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Rafal, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Here u r doing two wrong things, instead of > developing > > ur > > > > > > > understanding, > > > > > > > > > u r trying to conclude something and going beyond > that > > u r > > > > > > > messaging > > > > > > > > > same to many. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I m touching 35, What's ur age ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Astrology is a kind of vidya or profession, like i m > a > > > > > software > > > > > > > > > engineer, software engineering is my profession. > > > > spirituality > > > > > is > > > > > > > beyond > > > > > > > > > all sort of vidya or profession. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I wish u to be a good soul and to realize the bliss > of > > > self > > > > > > > awakening or > > > > > > > > > in other terms, the bliss that comes once u feel u > and > > > god > > > > is > > > > > > > > > connected. dissolved in each other. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > First realize, experience, then speak and then > suggest > > to > > > > > others, > > > > > > > by > > > > > > > > > mere reading shastras or books u r not going to feel > > it. > > > > > unless > > > > > > > god > > > > > > > > > graces u it's very very difficult. and if u dont > avoid > > > this > > > > > sort > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > hurriedness instead of learning and understanding, it > > > will > > > > > affect > > > > > > > u only > > > > > > > > > no one else. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > somehere i have read, it was written - By mere > > > > repeating " So- > > > > > > > Aham " no > > > > > > > > > one gets liberated unless he realizes it like one > > doesnt > > > get > > > > > > > cured by > > > > > > > > > knowing the name of the medicine, u need to take the > > > > medicine > > > > > to > > > > > > > get > > > > > > > > > cured " . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So, pls. be wise, as it was being discussed here, i > > > shared > > > > the > > > > > > > > > experience of my life, pls. mind it, i m not a > > preecher, > > > > nor a > > > > > > > guru, nor > > > > > > > > > i have to make my followers, nor it's my profession, > > nor > > > i > > > > > have > > > > > > > to get > > > > > > > > > fame, sharing things is a kind of friendliness a kind > of > > > > > > > affection, > > > > > > > > > that's it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > > > > Lalit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. com>, Rafal > > > Gendarz > > > > > > > > > <starsuponme@ ...> > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Jyotishas > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Counting of mala has more depth sense than just > > > counting, > > > > > so for > > > > > > > > > natives > > > > > > > > > > like Litsol counting is neccessary and any other > > > > speculation > > > > > > > will be > > > > > > > > > > only illusory and just imagination. We should > follow > > Pt. > > > > > > > > > Dakshinamoorti > > > > > > > > > > advise strictly, otherwise our process of spiritual > > > > > development > > > > > > > will > > > > > > > > > be > > > > > > > > > > slow and unauthoritative. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz > > > > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru > > > > > > > > > > email: rafal@ > > > > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > asmp2k02@ napisa?(a): > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Resp Sri Lalitji, > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for your mail.But please also read > > > > > GuruDakshinamurthyi > > > > > > > ji's > > > > > > > > > > > mail(addressing me) also on this,which brings in > > more > > > > > clarity > > > > > > > to the > > > > > > > > > > > applicability principles to my mail. > > > > > > > > > > > I meant that both are necessity but to what > degree > > of > > > > time > > > > > (it > > > > > > > varies > > > > > > > > > > > from saadhaka to saadhaka) to get such inbuilt > > > maturity > > > > > such > > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > > > > the count will be taken care of by Divine forces > > > after > > > > > some > > > > > > > initial > > > > > > > > > > > period of saadhana. > > > > > > > > > > > Morover the type of bio matter present in the > japa > > > maala > > > > > > > (which is > > > > > > > > > > > symbolic for ritualism as well as from practical > > > point > > > > of > > > > > > > view for > > > > > > > > > our > > > > > > > > > > > count) will help in keeping away destructive > forces > > > > > acting on > > > > > > > us > > > > > > > > > .Thus > > > > > > > > > > > the symbolic rituals will indirectly help us in > > > keeping > > > > > away > > > > > > > from > > > > > > > > > > > negative thoughts and also trains our memory to > be > > > > object > > > > > > > > > oriented.If > > > > > > > > > > > our memory grows and retentive capacity increase > > the > > > > > Gnaana > > > > > > > will > > > > > > > > > > > increase ,but at the same time destructive forces > > > > > > > (diversions) also > > > > > > > > > > > becomes powerful.Thus the symbolic procedures > will > > > come > > > > in > > > > > > > handy to > > > > > > > > > > > successfully fight the negative forces.The > rituals > > > may > > > > be > > > > > > > Rising > > > > > > > > > > > early(if possible during Braahmi muhurta),Taking > > > > > > > bath,Japaanusthaan, > > > > > > > > > > > attending to the livelihood job etc etc in > defined > > > > times > > > > > as > > > > > > > > > discipline > > > > > > > > > > > helps indirectly tune our memory through keeping > > our > > > > body > > > > > > > healthy. > > > > > > > > > > > Thus ultimately we conclude that the so called > > > symbolic > > > > > > > procedures > > > > > > > > > are > > > > > > > > > > > not actually symbolic(it got branded as such) but > a > > > > > necessity > > > > > > > for > > > > > > > > > our > > > > > > > > > > > own good if we practice to the extent we can. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quoting mishra.lalit@ ... <mishra. lalit% > > > > 40gmail. > > > > > com>: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Resp. Sri Murthy Adavi, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, what you said is perfectly right, we count > or > > > dont > > > > > > > count,target > > > > > > > > > > > is realization of god's love within, I got it > with > > no > > > > > > > counting, > > > > > > > > > > > someone may get it with counting. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanx, for the writing. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > > > > > > Lalit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. com> > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. com>, > > > srinivasa > > > > > > > murthy adavi > > > > > > > > > > > asmp2k02@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Respected Learned Members, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Both views may be correct when the views > have/or > > > with > > > > > the > > > > > > > goal as > > > > > > > > > > > development of Love/Devotion towards adhistana > > > Devatha > > > > of > > > > > the > > > > > > > Mantra > > > > > > > > > > > as Base. > > > > > > > > > > > > In the initial stage only you need the count;as > > one > > > > > > > develops the > > > > > > > > > > > habit the biological tuning of the intellect/body > > will > > > > > > > automatically > > > > > > > > > > > take care of the practice(without count-help of > > malas > > > > > etc). > > > > > > > > > > > > It's like if with the help of Alarm clock if we > > > wake > > > > up > > > > > for > > > > > > > 2 or 3 > > > > > > > > > > > days at some appointed hour,then automatically we > > > > wakeup > > > > > at > > > > > > > the same > > > > > > > > > > > time every day without help of alarm. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > With due Respects > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > smadavi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quoting starsuponme@ : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Litsol, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Definitely we should count our Mantra Japa on > > Mala. > > > > Your > > > > > > > view is > > > > > > > > > > > against > > > > > > > > > > > > Vedic Authorities and Sages, so should be > > rejected. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz > > > > > > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru > > > > > > > > > > > > email: rafal@ > > > > > > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > litsol napisa?(a): > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Mr. Jayashri, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > A thought came, why i should not share with > u, > > U > > > > pls. > > > > > stop > > > > > > > > > > > counting > > > > > > > > > > > > > mantra chantings, counting mantra gives false > > ego > > > > and > > > > > then > > > > > > > > > > > > > frustration if u dont get desired results. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > leave it to the god, god counts the mantra > > > chanted > > > > by > > > > > you > > > > > > > may be > > > > > > > > > > > > > 108, 1008 or whatsoever, let him count, it's > > his > > > > part > > > > > and > > > > > > > ur > > > > > > > > > part > > > > > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > > > > to chant the mantra. when the mantra has to > > > awaken, > > > > it > > > > > > > will be, > > > > > > > > > > > god > > > > > > > > > > > > > will ensure it for u. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sometimes we try to become more intelligent > > with > > > out > > > > > > > limited > > > > > > > > > > > > > intellect and that creates obstacles in our > > > > spiritual > > > > > > > growth. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So, forget about counts, forget about the > time > > u > > > > put > > > > > in > > > > > > > for ur's > > > > > > > > > > > > > sadhana, invoke the god with pure heart. > purity > > > > > counts. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > Lalit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology > > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. > > > > > > > com>, " dakshinastrologer " > > > > > > > > > > > > > <dakshinastrologer@ ...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Ms. Jayashree: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think this topic on 108 is getting very > > > > > interesting > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > enlightening for all members. Yesterday we > > had a > > > > > > > wonderful > > > > > > > > > > > > > esoteric > > > > > > > > > > > > > > explanation from Shri. Sushil Dikshit, and > > > today > > > > > your > > > > > > > > > wonderful > > > > > > > > > > > > > > explanation of numerical symmetry of the > > cosmos! > > > > > > > Wonderful. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There definitely exists a " numerical > > symphony " > > > in > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > Universe. > > > > > > > > > > > > > But, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > not only 108.....as I mentioned in my > earlier > > > > post, > > > > > > > there are > > > > > > > > > > > > > various > > > > > > > > > > > > > > other numerals that are significant in > occult > > > > > > > practices. 108 > > > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > > a > > > > > > > > > > > > > > powerful and all-purpose perfect > > number...While > > > > we > > > > > have > > > > > > > > > > > understood > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the glory of 108, we should not lose sight > of > > > the > > > > > fact > > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > > > > there > > > > > > > > > > > > > are > > > > > > > > > > > > > > other powerful numbers also. This is just > for > > > the > > > > > > > information > > > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > list. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > My apprecitation again for this wonderful > > > > response. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Blessed be. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pandit R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Blessed be. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pandit R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI. vedic- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > astrology@grou ps.com > <astrology% > > > > > > > > > > > 40. com>, > > > > > > > > > > > > > " jayasartn " <jayasartn@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In cosmology, 108 has this significance - > > the > > > > > moon is > > > > > > > away > > > > > > > > > > > from > > > > > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > earth 108 times its (moon's) diameter and > > the > > > > sun > > > > > is > > > > > > > away > > > > > > > > > > > from the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > earth, 108 times its diameter. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Perhaps this reality of distances is > > > applicable > > > > to > > > > > > > deities > > > > > > > > > > > too. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Perhaps this has been indicated by the > 108 > > > divya > > > > > > > desas of > > > > > > > > > Lord > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Narayana. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > jayasree > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology > > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. > > > > > > > com>, " dakshinastrologer " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <dakshinastrologer@ > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Shri. Sushil: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It is a wonderful answer you have given. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Blessed be. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pandit R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology@ . com > > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. > > > > > > > com>, " sushil.dikshit " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <sushil.dikshit@ > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Babu, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It is not a silly question but it is > a > > > very > > > > > good > > > > > > > > > question. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Actually > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > there are 27 Nakshatras and every > > > Nakshtras > > > > > has 4 > > > > > > > Charan > > > > > > > > > > > so > > > > > > > > > > > > > > total > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > charans are 27 x 4 = 108 Charan. Each > > > > Charan > > > > > has 3 > > > > > > > > > degree > > > > > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 20 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > minutes so if you multiply 3 degree > and > > 20 > > > > > > > minutes to > > > > > > > > > 108 > > > > > > > > > > > it > > > > > > > > > > > > > > comes > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > out to be 360 degress i.e. one cycle > > > > (Circle). > > > > > > > This > > > > > > > > > cycle > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > represetns > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > whole brahmand because all the > rashis, > > > > > planets and > > > > > > > > > > > nakshatra > > > > > > > > > > > > > > are > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > between these 360 degree in 2 > > dimensional > > > > > > > horoscope. So > > > > > > > > > > > > > > chanting a > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mantra completes one cycle of this > > > brahmand. > > > > > > > Further One > > > > > > > > > > > who > > > > > > > > > > > > > > has > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > visited Brahamand at least one time > > i.e. > > > he > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > > brahmagyani he > > > > > > > > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > entitiled to place 108 Shri before > his > > > name. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sushil dikshit > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology@ . > com > > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. > com>, > > > babu > > > > > mon > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <muthappan111@ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Namaste, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It may be a silly matter for all of > > you. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I want to know what is the reason > > that > > > > some > > > > > > > remedies > > > > > > > > > > > > > > recomended > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > for 108 times. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I dont know any thing about > astrology. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I hope you may pleased to provide a > > > reply > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thanks, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Babu > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------ --------- --------- - -- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Be a better Globetrotter. Get > better > > > > travel > > > > > > > answers > > > > > > > > > from > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someone > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > who knows. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Answers - Check it out. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message > > have > > > > been > > > > > > > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > > > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > > > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 29, 2007 Report Share Posted July 29, 2007 You praised Meera, Good, when u w'd learn sth from her pure bhakti, see, cunningness and being manipulator doesnt help always!! twisting words always, i shown u a mantra of lord Krishna, in which a beej mantra is used, instead of learning that God's Name and Beej are one and same thing, writing so much. What i said, open ur eyes and mind, read again, a devotion is obvious final outcome of mantra chanting. read what i have been saying, read many times a day, the clouds of ur karma smokes ur understanding. and learn one more thing - Meera got formal deekschha from Saint Raidas. I use company's time or what, that i manage and is a matter of my job, i dont advertise here to get some business in background, and u 2-3 who are lobbying here , are exposed by urself. exposing u was not my objective, but it happened. it will keep happening. ok vedic astrology , " abhishekpotti " <abhishekpotti wrote: > > Dear Lalith: > > The whole world knows the history of Blessed Meera Bhai....the > epitome of Bhakti......She was attached to her " Lala " - the wonderful > idol of Krishna gifted to her even from her childhood....Do you mean > to say that innocent young girl started chanting " Kliim krishnaaya " > mantra automatically? Even Bhakta Prahlaada had to be initiated by > Sage Naaradha for his chant of dwaadasaakshari mantra.... > > Nobody is afraid of you here......You need not proclaim that you are > not in the business of a Guru.....actually Guru status is not a > business (true to your half-baked knowledge you will claim it is also > like software engineering!). The difference my friend between you > and other great persons like Rafal or Dakshinamoorthiji is that they > are spending their money for the internet, whereas you are pilfering > your company's time and the company's resources while browsing the > internet. Don't you think you are cheating your company when you > spend so much time on empty and egoistic posts defending yourself > against every expert after arguing with them unnecessarily? Are you > not getting paid for the time you spend in the company....Know the > basics of ethics before ever sermonizing.....So, actually you are an > exploiter....try to understand that....the other gurujis are probably > too decent to comment on that......What happened to your project? > Better rush to it nough!....It will spare us the agony of replying to > your half-witted postings! > > By the say, Which member asked you Prashna Tantra dear? We did not > see any posts requesting " Honourable Lalith " to explain Prashna > Tantra (as if you could explain it!) What arrogance you have to > claim that nobody can stand before you.....Guruji's posts exposed > your ignorance....you did not even know how to ask queries and get > replies from one of the most empathetic astrologers of this group, > and yet you claim you are this and that...... > > For your information....nobody is afraid of you..Rather you should be > afraid of yourself......Your foolishness itself will be your doom. > Did you not become the laughing stock due to your email-based chasing > of Priyaa? Such foolishness in occult matters could be more costly > dear.....I think Mohanraaamji and Rafalji are only afraid about your > own well-being! They are not afraid of you. Nor am I afraid of you. > > Your posts never answer the queries or points raised by others; you > take off on a new ground only because of your shallow understanding > of subjects. Nobody has accepted you as a Guru here, and nobody > will....Can a fire-fly eclipse the Sun? There are too many " Suns " > here and you are just a fire-fly. > > It reminds me of a story.....Once an ant challenged the mighty > elephant for a fight; the elephant obviously could not hear the ant > (the ant being so tiny and it was on the ground, its sound could not > reach the elephant). The elephant just walked away out of its own > volition in its natural course. Then the ant claimed, " you see I > challenged the elephant and it ran away " . Dear, your saying that > nobody can stand before you is similar to that....... > > FIRST LEARN THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN GHOSTS AND YOUR ANCESTOR > SUMANGALIS BEFORE WRITING THE FIRST POSTS ON OCCULT! What a > pity......what a pity.....That we have to bear your meaningless > rantings here! > > Abhishek. > > vedic astrology , " litsol " <mishra.lalit@> > wrote: > > > > > > I was waiting for u dear.. > > > > why u took time ? > > > > Do u mean Meera Bai discussed with u, what she did.. > > > > Do u know 'Kleem Krishnay, Govindaya Gopijan Vallabhaya Namh' is a > > mantra for lord krishna. > > > > is there no beej mantras, to whom u wish to misguide ? let thnigs > > remain between lord, bhakta , their shraddha and their guru. > > > > why u people are so afraid of me, i m not in business of guru. > > > > i m happy with my life, my profession of software engineering and > > my hobbies ok. > > > > there are 7000+ members are here, by writing such type of foolish > > things u expose urself only, mind, there are better brains here. > > > > this is enough ... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology , > > " abhishekpotti " <abhishekpotti@> wrote: > > > > > > Respected Mohanraaamji: > > > > > > Well said. Lalith is saying that " maybe in south india devotees > > > don't chant Moola mantras but not so in North " ...What > > > stupidity.....He does not seem to understand that " mantra > shaastra > > > experts " are also devotees, but they cannot be called as innocent > > > saatwik bhaktaas! A typical example of a pure saadhwik bhakta > will > > > be Meera Bhai (was she not North Indian). Can Lalith say which > > Dasa > > > Mahaa Vidya Meera Bhai practised? She was immersed in Krishna > > > consciousness and Lover for Him. Her own Bhajans were her > prayers > > in > > > the bhaavana of Bhakti in the form of Love! This is not mantra > > > shaastra. Another example will be Saant Tukhaaraam. These > > bhaktaas > > > did not chant moola mantraas. Panditji Dakshinamoorthi was on > dot > > in > > > saying that " Pure bhaktaas do not chant complicated moola > > mantraas " . > > > You have clarified this fact wonderfully in your post. I wish > more > > > knowledgeable persons also put erratic posters in their place > just > > as > > > Mohanraaamji does here. This will benefit more naive readers of > > > these forums who might otherwise get confused as to which of the > > > paths to follow. Actually, anyone can follow any path as he/ she > > > deems it fit; but there should be consistency of procedures. > > > > > > We should not confuse mantrik rituals and bhakti doctrines. > > Bhaktaas > > > can chant the names of Gods at anytime.....Mantra shaastra > experts > > > chanting advanced moola mantras should necessarily adopt ritual > > > procedures for the welfare of themselves and others! > > Yes...improper > > > chanting of mantras can cause danger to the society also just as > > > proper chanting can help others. Hence, this cannot be > considered > > as > > > a personal preference of the aspirant. If this was not the case, > > why > > > did sages codify spiritual practises scrupulously? Rafalji, > > > Mohanraaamji, etc. are correct in saying it is best to follow > > Pandit > > > Dakshinamoorthiji's advices on mantra shastra or japams. He is > > > learned and he is living a life compatible to the shaastras > though > > he > > > has faced uncertain circumstances in his own personal life. He > > never > > > compromised on principles and he willingly paid the price for > that > > > which most of us will never do. The words of such a person > should > > > obviously carry more weight. > > > > > > Abhishek. > > > > > > vedic astrology , " mohanraaam " > <mohanraaam@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Well Lalith: > > > > > > > > If you have really done dasa Maha Vidyaa, you would have never > > > > approached a professional astrologer for consultation...that > much > > I > > > > can say.... > > > > > > > > And what idiocy when you say Panditji is partly wrong? He > > > > said " Bhaktaas do not chant Moola mantras " , whereas you have > > edited > > > > the words to suit your ends....He never said " devotees don't > > chant > > > > Beej mantras " .....You are putting words into his mouth and > > assuming > > > > he is wrong! Why, do you know....the Great Panditji himself > > chants > > > > Moola mantras.....He is a bhakta and a mantra shastra expert. > As > > a > > > > bhakta he keeps incessant chanting of naama japa throughout the > > > day; > > > > as a mantra shastra expert, he restricts the moola mantra > japams > > to > > > > stipulated times with ritual purity.....It is this wonderful > > > practice > > > > that Guruji was alluding to. Guruji cannot be wrong in ritual > > and > > > > occult matters. Please understand that. > > > > > > > > There are 4 classes of Devotees.......1) Saatwik vedic devotees > > who > > > > will follow vedic dharma scrupulously. They will not dare to > > > compare > > > > astrology and vedanga to Engineering! as you did... > > > > 2) Raajasik devotees who will follow vedic disciplines as far > as > > > > possible, but will still go after upaasanaas of Demi-Gods for > > > > accomplishment of siddhis. Mantra shaastra experts usually > fall > > in > > > > this category. > > > > 3) Saatwik Bhaktaas - for whom the meditation and glory of > their > > > > Ishta Devataa is enough for spiritual satisfaction. It is this > > > > category that Guruji referred to when he said they will not > chant > > > > Moola mantras too much. Definitely they will not do Dasa Mahaa > > > > Vidyaa. > > > > 4) Taamasic Devotees - Those whose main motive is to project > > > > themselves at all costs and acting as if they are equal to the > > > > experts; they will try ALL practices - whether they are > > sanctioned > > > by > > > > vedas or not.....Their only aim is personal glory and > > > satisfaction. > > > > They will attack even established dharma if they do not get > > results > > > > (sounds familiar....You are one!) Ignorance and half-baked > > > knowledge > > > > and egotism are these persons' motivating fuel. > > > > > > > > You are really satan's Gift to this list.......My only prayer > is > > > that > > > > innocent members of this list do not get side-tracked with your > > > > ramblings. > > > > > > > > Let me make this clear to the list.....Panditji said that > saatwik > > > > Bhaktaas who chant Divine names only due to Pure Love on God > > > usually > > > > never chant mantrik moola mantraas. It is just one class of > > > > devotees. A rajasik bhakta who is a mantra-shaastra expert may > > > even > > > > be a bhakta at heart; and a pure bhakta may sometimes chant > some > > > > mantrik japams for solving some practical issues......But, when > > > they > > > > switch their routines temporarily, these enlightened devotees > > > usually > > > > take good guidance and follow the tenets of shaastras > > > > scrupulously....Definitely they will not sit on assumption like > > > > Lalith. > > > > > > > > On the one hand, this fellow claims he has done chants in > > forests, > > > > rivers, earth, etc. (Probably we have a Maharishi here! What > > > heights > > > > of pointless pride in this young man list....it is > disgusting!). > > > On > > > > the other hand, he says he chants mantras in buses, trains, > > > etc...... > > > > He is confused about which no body can have issues. Only his > > Guru > > > > should be concerned about that.....But, his attempts to stuff > his > > > > shallow understanding upon this list is reprehensible. And, > his > > > > habit of quoting experts out of context is really condemnable. > > May > > > > Jupiter's Light Shine on that fellow and teach him to respect > the > > > > hallowed traditions and to stay at his level rather than trying > > > > to " teach " others (He has the audacity to claim he > is " teaching " > > > > Rafalji!) > > > > > > > > If a mere young man of 35 years who has spent his life on a > > " Failed > > > > computer web desining business " , " pointless email chasing of > > > girls " , > > > > and other " past times " can gain insight as he claims, how much > > will > > > > learned Gurus of this group with their life of devotion to > > vedanta > > > > and vedanga know? His peanut brain and hyper-inflated ego will > > > never > > > > allow him to see this obvious truth. But, please list exercise > > > your > > > > discretion while reading his posts (There are doubtless some > good > > > > elements even in his posts; but mostly there is trash presented > > as > > > > philosophy). > > > > > > > > Mohanraaam > > > > > > > > vedic astrology , " litsol " > <mishra.lalit@> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Dear Rafal, > > > > > > > > > > Do u think, a hobby means shallow knowledge of the domain, No > > > > rafal, > > > > > it's not like that. > > > > > > > > > > At least not for me. You have learnt and i m learning, i read > > > ur's > > > > > replies and get benifitted, same way i wanted you to pay > heed > > to > > > > > what i have written about spritiuality, mostrly i did write > for > > u > > > > > > > > > > I have done all 10 mahavidyas of tantra and read many tantrik > > > > > classics, spent good deal of time with great tantriks > trained > > in > > > > > Kamakhya and other places, keenly observed their doings, > their > > > > > mistakes etc.., I did tremendous mantra chanting on water, > on > > > > earth, > > > > > at home, in forests etc... > > > > > > > > > > then reached here, then i did write something, but sorry i > dont > > > > > remember shlokas. i was not interested in cramming that. > > > > > > > > > > Panditji is not fully correct in saying that BeejMantras are > > not > > > > > chanted by devotees, I dont know much about South India but > in > > > > North > > > > > normally its done. > > > > > > > > > > And a successfull mantra sadhana has to result in one's being > a > > > > > devotee, the devotion is the outcome, final result of mantra > > > > sadhana, > > > > > perhaps, Pandit Ji believes mantras are power packet,thinks, > i > > do > > > > it > > > > > this way , these many times and get this result, this is > where > > > most > > > > > of the people are confused. without being a good human being > if > > > we > > > > > think, we will achieve something in spirituality, is > difficult, > > > > very > > > > > difficult. > > > > > > > > > > what happens is, with the mantra chanting, a self > > > transformation > > > > > process begins, u if dont restrict urself, ur karma begins > > > > diluting, > > > > > and u begin ur purification process unknowingly, when > > substantial > > > > > part of ego and greed for respect vanishes and many such > thing > > > > > togather, mantra awakens u and with the God's grace ur > > objective > > > > gets > > > > > fullfilled, gradually u become a devotee. ur being simple and > > > being > > > > > devotee is sometimes is indication of ur's going on the right > > > track. > > > > > > > > > > I think we have discussed a lot, it's enough !! > > > > > > > > > > My Boss has given me lot of projects to complete, so, may be, > i > > m > > > > not > > > > > going to available in the group like i was recently. however. > i > > > > will > > > > > complete Garg Hora series. > > > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > Lalit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology , Rafal Gendarz > > > > > <starsuponme@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya* > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Litsol, > > > > > > > > > > > > Then please dont generalize Your preferences as they are > too > > > > > shallow for > > > > > > this Forum aspiration. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru > > > > > > email: rafal@ > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > litsol napisa?(a): > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Rafel, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I take Astrology as a good hobby, and i w'd be looking at > > it > > > > with > > > > > an > > > > > > > engineer's approach. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I asked ur age because, it's our thinking to put our > > > parameters > > > > in > > > > > > > god's system, there is nothing like delay or advancement > in > > > > > > > spirituality. So, " Delay " or " Speed " , " backwardness " > > > > > > > and " advancement " doesn't exist in spirituality, I > thought > > if > > > u > > > > r > > > > > > > thinking that it may take too much time, I wanted to tell > > u, > > > > it's > > > > > not > > > > > > > like that. there is no delay. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It clicks in fraction of a second, when u r getting > clicked > > > > > depends > > > > > > > on u and on god's will, when he wants u to get clicked. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > God sometimes graces for no reason ( " Ahetuka " ) just for > his > > > > > > > compassion towards u and it may happen next minute too. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > spirituality is not delimited by time , effort and rules. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > > Lalit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology > > > > > > > <vedic astrology%40>, Rafal Gendarz > > > > > > > <starsuponme@ ...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Litsol, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please be careful about words. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Im happy that You are sharing Your experience - very > > > > inspirating > > > > > > > ones. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Age hierarchy is for sudras - Manu Samhita. If You > treat > > > > Jyotish > > > > > > > Vedanga > > > > > > > > as profession similar to engineering You have a long > way > > to > > > > go. > > > > > But > > > > > > > dont > > > > > > > > be pessimistic here are many who will try to help You > in > > > > getting > > > > > > > proper > > > > > > > > understanding. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > After some time You will agree with me about the mala > and > > > > japa. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz > > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru > > > > > > > > email: rafal@ > > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > litsol napisa?(a): > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Rafal, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Here u r doing two wrong things, instead of > developing > > ur > > > > > > > understanding, > > > > > > > > > u r trying to conclude something and going beyond > that > > u r > > > > > > > messaging > > > > > > > > > same to many. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I m touching 35, What's ur age ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Astrology is a kind of vidya or profession, like i m > a > > > > > software > > > > > > > > > engineer, software engineering is my profession. > > > > spirituality > > > > > is > > > > > > > beyond > > > > > > > > > all sort of vidya or profession. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I wish u to be a good soul and to realize the bliss > of > > > self > > > > > > > awakening or > > > > > > > > > in other terms, the bliss that comes once u feel u > and > > > god > > > > is > > > > > > > > > connected. dissolved in each other. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > First realize, experience, then speak and then > suggest > > to > > > > > others, > > > > > > > by > > > > > > > > > mere reading shastras or books u r not going to feel > > it. > > > > > unless > > > > > > > god > > > > > > > > > graces u it's very very difficult. and if u dont > avoid > > > this > > > > > sort > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > hurriedness instead of learning and understanding, it > > > will > > > > > affect > > > > > > > u only > > > > > > > > > no one else. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > somehere i have read, it was written - By mere > > > > repeating " So- > > > > > > > Aham " no > > > > > > > > > one gets liberated unless he realizes it like one > > doesnt > > > get > > > > > > > cured by > > > > > > > > > knowing the name of the medicine, u need to take the > > > > medicine > > > > > to > > > > > > > get > > > > > > > > > cured " . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So, pls. be wise, as it was being discussed here, i > > > shared > > > > the > > > > > > > > > experience of my life, pls. mind it, i m not a > > preecher, > > > > nor a > > > > > > > guru, nor > > > > > > > > > i have to make my followers, nor it's my profession, > > nor > > > i > > > > > have > > > > > > > to get > > > > > > > > > fame, sharing things is a kind of friendliness a kind > of > > > > > > > affection, > > > > > > > > > that's it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > > > > Lalit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. com>, Rafal > > > Gendarz > > > > > > > > > <starsuponme@ ...> > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Jyotishas > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Counting of mala has more depth sense than just > > > counting, > > > > > so for > > > > > > > > > natives > > > > > > > > > > like Litsol counting is neccessary and any other > > > > speculation > > > > > > > will be > > > > > > > > > > only illusory and just imagination. We should > follow > > Pt. > > > > > > > > > Dakshinamoorti > > > > > > > > > > advise strictly, otherwise our process of spiritual > > > > > development > > > > > > > will > > > > > > > > > be > > > > > > > > > > slow and unauthoritative. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz > > > > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru > > > > > > > > > > email: rafal@ > > > > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > asmp2k02@ napisa?(a): > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Resp Sri Lalitji, > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for your mail.But please also read > > > > > GuruDakshinamurthyi > > > > > > > ji's > > > > > > > > > > > mail(addressing me) also on this,which brings in > > more > > > > > clarity > > > > > > > to the > > > > > > > > > > > applicability principles to my mail. > > > > > > > > > > > I meant that both are necessity but to what > degree > > of > > > > time > > > > > (it > > > > > > > varies > > > > > > > > > > > from saadhaka to saadhaka) to get such inbuilt > > > maturity > > > > > such > > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > > > > the count will be taken care of by Divine forces > > > after > > > > > some > > > > > > > initial > > > > > > > > > > > period of saadhana. > > > > > > > > > > > Morover the type of bio matter present in the > japa > > > maala > > > > > > > (which is > > > > > > > > > > > symbolic for ritualism as well as from practical > > > point > > > > of > > > > > > > view for > > > > > > > > > our > > > > > > > > > > > count) will help in keeping away destructive > forces > > > > > acting on > > > > > > > us > > > > > > > > > .Thus > > > > > > > > > > > the symbolic rituals will indirectly help us in > > > keeping > > > > > away > > > > > > > from > > > > > > > > > > > negative thoughts and also trains our memory to > be > > > > object > > > > > > > > > oriented.If > > > > > > > > > > > our memory grows and retentive capacity increase > > the > > > > > Gnaana > > > > > > > will > > > > > > > > > > > increase ,but at the same time destructive forces > > > > > > > (diversions) also > > > > > > > > > > > becomes powerful.Thus the symbolic procedures > will > > > come > > > > in > > > > > > > handy to > > > > > > > > > > > successfully fight the negative forces.The > rituals > > > may > > > > be > > > > > > > Rising > > > > > > > > > > > early(if possible during Braahmi muhurta),Taking > > > > > > > bath,Japaanusthaan, > > > > > > > > > > > attending to the livelihood job etc etc in > defined > > > > times > > > > > as > > > > > > > > > discipline > > > > > > > > > > > helps indirectly tune our memory through keeping > > our > > > > body > > > > > > > healthy. > > > > > > > > > > > Thus ultimately we conclude that the so called > > > symbolic > > > > > > > procedures > > > > > > > > > are > > > > > > > > > > > not actually symbolic(it got branded as such) but > a > > > > > necessity > > > > > > > for > > > > > > > > > our > > > > > > > > > > > own good if we practice to the extent we can. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quoting mishra.lalit@ ... <mishra. lalit% > > > > 40gmail. > > > > > com>: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Resp. Sri Murthy Adavi, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, what you said is perfectly right, we count > or > > > dont > > > > > > > count,target > > > > > > > > > > > is realization of god's love within, I got it > with > > no > > > > > > > counting, > > > > > > > > > > > someone may get it with counting. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanx, for the writing. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > > > > > > Lalit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. com> > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. com>, > > > srinivasa > > > > > > > murthy adavi > > > > > > > > > > > asmp2k02@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Respected Learned Members, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Both views may be correct when the views > have/or > > > with > > > > > the > > > > > > > goal as > > > > > > > > > > > development of Love/Devotion towards adhistana > > > Devatha > > > > of > > > > > the > > > > > > > Mantra > > > > > > > > > > > as Base. > > > > > > > > > > > > In the initial stage only you need the count;as > > one > > > > > > > develops the > > > > > > > > > > > habit the biological tuning of the intellect/body > > will > > > > > > > automatically > > > > > > > > > > > take care of the practice(without count-help of > > malas > > > > > etc). > > > > > > > > > > > > It's like if with the help of Alarm clock if we > > > wake > > > > up > > > > > for > > > > > > > 2 or 3 > > > > > > > > > > > days at some appointed hour,then automatically we > > > > wakeup > > > > > at > > > > > > > the same > > > > > > > > > > > time every day without help of alarm. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > With due Respects > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > smadavi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quoting starsuponme@ : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Litsol, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Definitely we should count our Mantra Japa on > > Mala. > > > > Your > > > > > > > view is > > > > > > > > > > > against > > > > > > > > > > > > Vedic Authorities and Sages, so should be > > rejected. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz > > > > > > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru > > > > > > > > > > > > email: rafal@ > > > > > > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > litsol napisa?(a): > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Mr. Jayashri, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > A thought came, why i should not share with > u, > > U > > > > pls. > > > > > stop > > > > > > > > > > > counting > > > > > > > > > > > > > mantra chantings, counting mantra gives false > > ego > > > > and > > > > > then > > > > > > > > > > > > > frustration if u dont get desired results. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > leave it to the god, god counts the mantra > > > chanted > > > > by > > > > > you > > > > > > > may be > > > > > > > > > > > > > 108, 1008 or whatsoever, let him count, it's > > his > > > > part > > > > > and > > > > > > > ur > > > > > > > > > part > > > > > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > > > > to chant the mantra. when the mantra has to > > > awaken, > > > > it > > > > > > > will be, > > > > > > > > > > > god > > > > > > > > > > > > > will ensure it for u. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sometimes we try to become more intelligent > > with > > > out > > > > > > > limited > > > > > > > > > > > > > intellect and that creates obstacles in our > > > > spiritual > > > > > > > growth. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So, forget about counts, forget about the > time > > u > > > > put > > > > > in > > > > > > > for ur's > > > > > > > > > > > > > sadhana, invoke the god with pure heart. > purity > > > > > counts. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > Lalit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology > > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. > > > > > > > com>, " dakshinastrologer " > > > > > > > > > > > > > <dakshinastrologer@ ...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Ms. Jayashree: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think this topic on 108 is getting very > > > > > interesting > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > enlightening for all members. Yesterday we > > had a > > > > > > > wonderful > > > > > > > > > > > > > esoteric > > > > > > > > > > > > > > explanation from Shri. Sushil Dikshit, and > > > today > > > > > your > > > > > > > > > wonderful > > > > > > > > > > > > > > explanation of numerical symmetry of the > > cosmos! > > > > > > > Wonderful. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There definitely exists a " numerical > > symphony " > > > in > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > Universe. > > > > > > > > > > > > > But, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > not only 108.....as I mentioned in my > earlier > > > > post, > > > > > > > there are > > > > > > > > > > > > > various > > > > > > > > > > > > > > other numerals that are significant in > occult > > > > > > > practices. 108 > > > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > > a > > > > > > > > > > > > > > powerful and all-purpose perfect > > number...While > > > > we > > > > > have > > > > > > > > > > > understood > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the glory of 108, we should not lose sight > of > > > the > > > > > fact > > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > > > > there > > > > > > > > > > > > > are > > > > > > > > > > > > > > other powerful numbers also. This is just > for > > > the > > > > > > > information > > > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > list. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > My apprecitation again for this wonderful > > > > response. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Blessed be. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pandit R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Blessed be. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pandit R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI. vedic- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > astrology@grou ps.com > <astrology% > > > > > > > > > > > 40. com>, > > > > > > > > > > > > > " jayasartn " <jayasartn@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In cosmology, 108 has this significance - > > the > > > > > moon is > > > > > > > away > > > > > > > > > > > from > > > > > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > earth 108 times its (moon's) diameter and > > the > > > > sun > > > > > is > > > > > > > away > > > > > > > > > > > from the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > earth, 108 times its diameter. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Perhaps this reality of distances is > > > applicable > > > > to > > > > > > > deities > > > > > > > > > > > too. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Perhaps this has been indicated by the > 108 > > > divya > > > > > > > desas of > > > > > > > > > Lord > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Narayana. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > jayasree > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology > > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. > > > > > > > com>, " dakshinastrologer " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <dakshinastrologer@ > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Shri. Sushil: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It is a wonderful answer you have given. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Blessed be. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pandit R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology@ . com > > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. > > > > > > > com>, " sushil.dikshit " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <sushil.dikshit@ > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Babu, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It is not a silly question but it is > a > > > very > > > > > good > > > > > > > > > question. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Actually > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > there are 27 Nakshatras and every > > > Nakshtras > > > > > has 4 > > > > > > > Charan > > > > > > > > > > > so > > > > > > > > > > > > > > total > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > charans are 27 x 4 = 108 Charan. Each > > > > Charan > > > > > has 3 > > > > > > > > > degree > > > > > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 20 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > minutes so if you multiply 3 degree > and > > 20 > > > > > > > minutes to > > > > > > > > > 108 > > > > > > > > > > > it > > > > > > > > > > > > > > comes > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > out to be 360 degress i.e. one cycle > > > > (Circle). > > > > > > > This > > > > > > > > > cycle > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > represetns > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > whole brahmand because all the > rashis, > > > > > planets and > > > > > > > > > > > nakshatra > > > > > > > > > > > > > > are > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > between these 360 degree in 2 > > dimensional > > > > > > > horoscope. So > > > > > > > > > > > > > > chanting a > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mantra completes one cycle of this > > > brahmand. > > > > > > > Further One > > > > > > > > > > > who > > > > > > > > > > > > > > has > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > visited Brahamand at least one time > > i.e. > > > he > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > > brahmagyani he > > > > > > > > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > entitiled to place 108 Shri before > his > > > name. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sushil dikshit > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology@ . > com > > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. > com>, > > > babu > > > > > mon > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <muthappan111@ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Namaste, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It may be a silly matter for all of > > you. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I want to know what is the reason > > that > > > > some > > > > > > > remedies > > > > > > > > > > > > > > recomended > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > for 108 times. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I dont know any thing about > astrology. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I hope you may pleased to provide a > > > reply > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thanks, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Babu > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------ --------- --------- - -- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Be a better Globetrotter. Get > better > > > > travel > > > > > > > answers > > > > > > > > > from > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someone > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > who knows. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Answers - Check it out. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message > > have > > > > been > > > > > > > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > > > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > > > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 29, 2007 Report Share Posted July 29, 2007 Res. Ram ji, Pls. dont advice him or mohan raam, they have nothing to debate or discuss on either mantra or bhakti. I don't remember shlokas much as i read classics for my satisfaction, in two phases, firstly from my class 8'th till my 2nd year of graduation. that time i had no faith and no bhakti, just read like i was reading some comics or cartoon books, i had not developed ideas, not taken any message, i knew and i can talk about the content, but i was not involved. after that incident happened at Sharda Temple,Maihar,it was unbelievable and it made me change my thoughts, i again read some classics and this time,i grasped the message given in the classics. They are at the stage of my chlidhood, they may read and discuss. but dont take the message in their heart, somewhere their greed to establish themselves as pandit or authority is also a reason. Perhapse, in lieu of, hitting them hard, i had to take another rout to let them realize they are wrong and deliberately wrong. He didnt say any thing on my how i shown, beej and god's name is one and same thing, in fact it's a simple thnig, and well known but they dont accept. let them dont accept, what difference it makes to us, they have their life with them, any qualitative change within them will do good to them only. So, i prayed maa, mother divine for mohan raam, he is too old, his problem is he learnt astrology, did some breathing excercises, but he lacks spiritual experiences so he doesn't believe, I was like him in my childhood. I prayed, and it's acknowledged by maa, time will change for him a little, what didn't happen to him in last 85 yrs, will happen in next 5-6 monnths, he will get some good spritiual experience, the curtain will be lifted for some time, reality at a glance. after that it's his part to stick to that or not, coz, ego, greed and fear still remains, i m not completely gone out of it, i have to fight with me many times. I thought gruop w'd be a good plateform to get like minded friends, if nothnig, it gives joy. Let's wish good for all, I also express my gratitude to you to speak for what u thought right. regards, Lalit. vedic astrology , " Ram Jaswal " <rkjaswal wrote: > > Namaste Abhishek > > My post wasn't so much in defense of Lalith but one to stop the " belittling " > of a person within this Group. If you don't agree with someone's views you > are perfectly within your rights to say so why in a scholarly fashion so as > to discuss and further the merits of the topic under discussion. Thereafter > it is a matter for the individual to either continue with the on- going > discussion or to stop? The only way you or anyone else is likely to change > Lalith's view on chanting of Mantras will be from a scholarly viewpoint and > not from goading him? > > Also why are you taking personal offense? If Guru's can ignore his comments > - can't you do the same? > > With freedom of speech comes the responsibility of keeping a civil and > polite language - please re-read your note which prompted my earlier > response. > > Like I said in my earlier post it is all about ones viewpoints - my personal > advise to everyone would be to take what you find reasonable and ignore the > rest. > > Best wishes .. > > Jai Sita Ram > > Ram > _____ > > vedic astrology > [vedic astrology ] On Behalf Of abhishekpotti > 28 July 2007 20:42 > vedic astrology > [vedic astrology] Re: Oye Lalith! No one here is afraid of you.... > > Dear Ram Jaswal: > > If Lalith stops challenging others with his rude posts no one will > run him down...please follow the threads carefully......He is > speaking as if he is the master of everything and everybody else is a > fool. When he passes judgment on senior astrologers of this group or > unnecessarily challenges established conventions, we have defended > that. Now, why are you defending Lalith? Don't you think if you > have the right to defend an offender, we have the right to defend the > more decent members and traditions that he is subtly attacking.... > > just read his posts.....If he has just forwarded the Prashna Tantra, > nobody would have objected to it.....See the accompanying comments > where he abrasively comments certain things...... > > Open your eyes before advicing anyone. Why don't you write to Lalith > also? When did I call him names?......No sir...you are mistaken.... > > Did you not notice that even after Mohanraamji stopped writing posts, > this fellow was taunting that old gentleman repeatedly last week. > Where were you at that time? > > If Lalith stops writing abrasive posts like " Nobody can stand before > me " and all that silly nonsense, we have no issues with him (or at > least I have no issues with him). So, advice Lalith also in this > regard. > > If Lalith and you enjoy freedom of speech, we also claim the same > previlege. > > Abhishek. > > vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology%40> > , " Ram Jaswal " <rkjaswal@> > wrote: > > > > Namaste Abhishek/ Mohanraaam > > > > Just why are you trying to run Lalith down? From the posts that I > have read > > All he has done is given this point of view - if you don't accept > them than > > simply ignore it - there is No need for any name calling or > belittling > > someone. > > > > There is also nothing wrong in Lalith forwarding " Prashna Tantra " > text to > > this group as to whether someone has requested it or not - he > certainly > > doesn't need your or mine permission to do so - after all he > thought it > > would be useful to everyone - again his view. > > > > Sorry if I am coming across annoyed and perhaps rude But feel it is > Best > > that everyone should stop " belittling " other group members as in > the long > > run all it does is make oneself appear small and bigoted. > > > > Best wishes and hoping this will be the last mail on this subject .. > > > > Jai Sita Ram > > > > Ram > > > > _____ > > > > vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology%40> > > > [vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology% 40> > ] On Behalf Of abhishekpotti > > 28 July 2007 19:54 > > vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology%40> > > > [vedic astrology] Oye Lalith! No one here is afraid of > you.... > > > > Dear Lalith: > > > > The whole world knows the history of Blessed Meera Bhai....the > > epitome of Bhakti......She was attached to her " Lala " - the > wonderful > > idol of Krishna gifted to her even from her childhood....Do you > mean > > to say that innocent young girl started chanting " Kliim krishnaaya " > > mantra automatically? Even Bhakta Prahlaada had to be initiated by > > Sage Naaradha for his chant of dwaadasaakshari mantra.... > > > > Nobody is afraid of you here......You need not proclaim that you > are > > not in the business of a Guru.....actually Guru status is not a > > business (true to your half-baked knowledge you will claim it is > also > > like software engineering!). The difference my friend between you > > and other great persons like Rafal or Dakshinamoorthiji is that > they > > are spending their money for the internet, whereas you are > pilfering > > your company's time and the company's resources while browsing the > > internet. Don't you think you are cheating your company when you > > spend so much time on empty and egoistic posts defending yourself > > against every expert after arguing with them unnecessarily? Are you > > not getting paid for the time you spend in the company....Know the > > basics of ethics before ever sermonizing.....So, actually you are > an > > exploiter....try to understand that....the other gurujis are > probably > > too decent to comment on that......What happened to your project? > > Better rush to it nough!....It will spare us the agony of replying > to > > your half-witted postings! > > > > By the say, Which member asked you Prashna Tantra dear? We did not > > see any posts requesting " Honourable Lalith " to explain Prashna > > Tantra (as if you could explain it!) What arrogance you have to > > claim that nobody can stand before you.....Guruji's posts exposed > > your ignorance....you did not even know how to ask queries and get > > replies from one of the most empathetic astrologers of this group, > > and yet you claim you are this and that...... > > > > For your information....nobody is afraid of you..Rather you should > be > > afraid of yourself......Your foolishness itself will be your doom. > > Did you not become the laughing stock due to your email-based > chasing > > of Priyaa? Such foolishness in occult matters could be more costly > > dear.....I think Mohanraaamji and Rafalji are only afraid about > your > > own well-being! They are not afraid of you. Nor am I afraid of you. > > > > Your posts never answer the queries or points raised by others; you > > take off on a new ground only because of your shallow understanding > > of subjects. Nobody has accepted you as a Guru here, and nobody > > will....Can a fire-fly eclipse the Sun? There are too many " Suns " > > here and you are just a fire-fly. > > > > It reminds me of a story.....Once an ant challenged the mighty > > elephant for a fight; the elephant obviously could not hear the ant > > (the ant being so tiny and it was on the ground, its sound could > not > > reach the elephant). The elephant just walked away out of its own > > volition in its natural course. Then the ant claimed, " you see I > > challenged the elephant and it ran away " . Dear, your saying that > > nobody can stand before you is similar to that....... > > > > FIRST LEARN THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN GHOSTS AND YOUR ANCESTOR > > SUMANGALIS BEFORE WRITING THE FIRST POSTS ON OCCULT! What a > > pity......what a pity.....That we have to bear your meaningless > > rantings here! > > > > Abhishek. > > > > vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology%40> > > , " litsol " <mishra.lalit@> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > I was waiting for u dear.. > > > > > > why u took time ? > > > > > > Do u mean Meera Bai discussed with u, what she did.. > > > > > > Do u know 'Kleem Krishnay, Govindaya Gopijan Vallabhaya Namh' is > a > > > mantra for lord krishna. > > > > > > is there no beej mantras, to whom u wish to misguide ? let thnigs > > > remain between lord, bhakta , their shraddha and their guru. > > > > > > why u people are so afraid of me, i m not in business of guru. > > > > > > i m happy with my life, my profession of software engineering and > > > my hobbies ok. > > > > > > there are 7000+ members are here, by writing such type of foolish > > > things u expose urself only, mind, there are better brains here. > > > > > > this is enough ... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology% 40> > > , > > > " abhishekpotti " <abhishekpotti@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Respected Mohanraaamji: > > > > > > > > Well said. Lalith is saying that " maybe in south india devotees > > > > don't chant Moola mantras but not so in North " ...What > > > > stupidity.....He does not seem to understand that " mantra > > shaastra > > > > experts " are also devotees, but they cannot be called as > innocent > > > > saatwik bhaktaas! A typical example of a pure saadhwik bhakta > > will > > > > be Meera Bhai (was she not North Indian). Can Lalith say which > > > Dasa > > > > Mahaa Vidya Meera Bhai practised? She was immersed in Krishna > > > > consciousness and Lover for Him. Her own Bhajans were her > > prayers > > > in > > > > the bhaavana of Bhakti in the form of Love! This is not mantra > > > > shaastra. Another example will be Saant Tukhaaraam. These > > > bhaktaas > > > > did not chant moola mantraas. Panditji Dakshinamoorthi was on > > dot > > > in > > > > saying that " Pure bhaktaas do not chant complicated moola > > > mantraas " . > > > > You have clarified this fact wonderfully in your post. I wish > > more > > > > knowledgeable persons also put erratic posters in their place > > just > > > as > > > > Mohanraaamji does here. This will benefit more naive readers of > > > > these forums who might otherwise get confused as to which of > the > > > > paths to follow. Actually, anyone can follow any path as he/ > she > > > > deems it fit; but there should be consistency of procedures. > > > > > > > > We should not confuse mantrik rituals and bhakti doctrines. > > > Bhaktaas > > > > can chant the names of Gods at anytime.....Mantra shaastra > > experts > > > > chanting advanced moola mantras should necessarily adopt ritual > > > > procedures for the welfare of themselves and others! > > > Yes...improper > > > > chanting of mantras can cause danger to the society also just > as > > > > proper chanting can help others. Hence, this cannot be > > considered > > > as > > > > a personal preference of the aspirant. If this was not the > case, > > > why > > > > did sages codify spiritual practises scrupulously? Rafalji, > > > > Mohanraaamji, etc. are correct in saying it is best to follow > > > Pandit > > > > Dakshinamoorthiji's advices on mantra shastra or japams. He is > > > > learned and he is living a life compatible to the shaastras > > though > > > he > > > > has faced uncertain circumstances in his own personal life. He > > > never > > > > compromised on principles and he willingly paid the price for > > that > > > > which most of us will never do. The words of such a person > > should > > > > obviously carry more weight. > > > > > > > > Abhishek. > > > > > > > > vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology% > 40> > > , " mohanraaam " > > <mohanraaam@> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Well Lalith: > > > > > > > > > > If you have really done dasa Maha Vidyaa, you would have > never > > > > > approached a professional astrologer for consultation...that > > much > > > I > > > > > can say.... > > > > > > > > > > And what idiocy when you say Panditji is partly wrong? He > > > > > said " Bhaktaas do not chant Moola mantras " , whereas you have > > > edited > > > > > the words to suit your ends....He never said " devotees don't > > > chant > > > > > Beej mantras " .....You are putting words into his mouth and > > > assuming > > > > > he is wrong! Why, do you know....the Great Panditji himself > > > chants > > > > > Moola mantras.....He is a bhakta and a mantra shastra expert. > > As > > > a > > > > > bhakta he keeps incessant chanting of naama japa throughout > the > > > > day; > > > > > as a mantra shastra expert, he restricts the moola mantra > > japams > > > to > > > > > stipulated times with ritual purity.....It is this wonderful > > > > practice > > > > > that Guruji was alluding to. Guruji cannot be wrong in ritual > > > and > > > > > occult matters. Please understand that. > > > > > > > > > > There are 4 classes of Devotees.......1) Saatwik vedic > devotees > > > who > > > > > will follow vedic dharma scrupulously. They will not dare to > > > > compare > > > > > astrology and vedanga to Engineering! as you did... > > > > > 2) Raajasik devotees who will follow vedic disciplines as far > > as > > > > > possible, but will still go after upaasanaas of Demi-Gods for > > > > > accomplishment of siddhis. Mantra shaastra experts usually > > fall > > > in > > > > > this category. > > > > > 3) Saatwik Bhaktaas - for whom the meditation and glory of > > their > > > > > Ishta Devataa is enough for spiritual satisfaction. It is > this > > > > > category that Guruji referred to when he said they will not > > chant > > > > > Moola mantras too much. Definitely they will not do Dasa > Mahaa > > > > > Vidyaa. > > > > > 4) Taamasic Devotees - Those whose main motive is to project > > > > > themselves at all costs and acting as if they are equal to > the > > > > > experts; they will try ALL practices - whether they are > > > sanctioned > > > > by > > > > > vedas or not.....Their only aim is personal glory and > > > > satisfaction. > > > > > They will attack even established dharma if they do not get > > > results > > > > > (sounds familiar....You are one!) Ignorance and half-baked > > > > knowledge > > > > > and egotism are these persons' motivating fuel. > > > > > > > > > > You are really satan's Gift to this list.......My only prayer > > is > > > > that > > > > > innocent members of this list do not get side-tracked with > your > > > > > ramblings. > > > > > > > > > > Let me make this clear to the list.....Panditji said that > > saatwik > > > > > Bhaktaas who chant Divine names only due to Pure Love on God > > > > usually > > > > > never chant mantrik moola mantraas. It is just one class of > > > > > devotees. A rajasik bhakta who is a mantra-shaastra expert > may > > > > even > > > > > be a bhakta at heart; and a pure bhakta may sometimes chant > > some > > > > > mantrik japams for solving some practical issues......But, > when > > > > they > > > > > switch their routines temporarily, these enlightened devotees > > > > usually > > > > > take good guidance and follow the tenets of shaastras > > > > > scrupulously....Definitely they will not sit on assumption > like > > > > > Lalith. > > > > > > > > > > On the one hand, this fellow claims he has done chants in > > > forests, > > > > > rivers, earth, etc. (Probably we have a Maharishi here! What > > > > heights > > > > > of pointless pride in this young man list....it is > > disgusting!). > > > > On > > > > > the other hand, he says he chants mantras in buses, trains, > > > > etc...... > > > > > He is confused about which no body can have issues. Only his > > > Guru > > > > > should be concerned about that.....But, his attempts to stuff > > his > > > > > shallow understanding upon this list is reprehensible. And, > > his > > > > > habit of quoting experts out of context is really > condemnable. > > > May > > > > > Jupiter's Light Shine on that fellow and teach him to respect > > the > > > > > hallowed traditions and to stay at his level rather than > trying > > > > > to " teach " others (He has the audacity to claim he > > is " teaching " > > > > > Rafalji!) > > > > > > > > > > If a mere young man of 35 years who has spent his life on a > > > " Failed > > > > > computer web desining business " , " pointless email chasing of > > > > girls " , > > > > > and other " past times " can gain insight as he claims, how > much > > > will > > > > > learned Gurus of this group with their life of devotion to > > > vedanta > > > > > and vedanga know? His peanut brain and hyper-inflated ego > will > > > > never > > > > > allow him to see this obvious truth. But, please list > exercise > > > > your > > > > > discretion while reading his posts (There are doubtless some > > good > > > > > elements even in his posts; but mostly there is trash > presented > > > as > > > > > philosophy). > > > > > > > > > > Mohanraaam > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology% > 40> > > , " litsol " > > <mishra.lalit@> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Rafal, > > > > > > > > > > > > Do u think, a hobby means shallow knowledge of the domain, > No > > > > > rafal, > > > > > > it's not like that. > > > > > > > > > > > > At least not for me. You have learnt and i m learning, i > read > > > > ur's > > > > > > replies and get benifitted, same way i wanted you to pay > > heed > > > to > > > > > > what i have written about spritiuality, mostrly i did write > > for > > > u > > > > > > > > > > > > I have done all 10 mahavidyas of tantra and read many > tantrik > > > > > > classics, spent good deal of time with great tantriks > > trained > > > in > > > > > > Kamakhya and other places, keenly observed their doings, > > their > > > > > > mistakes etc.., I did tremendous mantra chanting on water, > > on > > > > > earth, > > > > > > at home, in forests etc... > > > > > > > > > > > > then reached here, then i did write something, but sorry i > > dont > > > > > > remember shlokas. i was not interested in cramming that. > > > > > > > > > > > > Panditji is not fully correct in saying that BeejMantras > are > > > not > > > > > > chanted by devotees, I dont know much about South India but > > in > > > > > North > > > > > > normally its done. > > > > > > > > > > > > And a successfull mantra sadhana has to result in one's > being > > a > > > > > > devotee, the devotion is the outcome, final result of > mantra > > > > > sadhana, > > > > > > perhaps, Pandit Ji believes mantras are power > packet,thinks, > > i > > > do > > > > > it > > > > > > this way , these many times and get this result, this is > > where > > > > most > > > > > > of the people are confused. without being a good human > being > > if > > > > we > > > > > > think, we will achieve something in spirituality, is > > difficult, > > > > > very > > > > > > difficult. > > > > > > > > > > > > what happens is, with the mantra chanting, a self > > > > transformation > > > > > > process begins, u if dont restrict urself, ur karma begins > > > > > diluting, > > > > > > and u begin ur purification process unknowingly, when > > > substantial > > > > > > part of ego and greed for respect vanishes and many such > > thing > > > > > > togather, mantra awakens u and with the God's grace ur > > > objective > > > > > gets > > > > > > fullfilled, gradually u become a devotee. ur being simple > and > > > > being > > > > > > devotee is sometimes is indication of ur's going on the > right > > > > track. > > > > > > > > > > > > I think we have discussed a lot, it's enough !! > > > > > > > > > > > > My Boss has given me lot of projects to complete, so, may > be, > > i > > > m > > > > > not > > > > > > going to available in the group like i was recently. > however. > > i > > > > > will > > > > > > complete Garg Hora series. > > > > > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > Lalit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology% > 40> > > , Rafal Gendarz > > > > > > <starsuponme@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Litsol, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Then please dont generalize Your preferences as they are > > too > > > > > > shallow for > > > > > > > this Forum aspiration. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru > > > > > > > email: rafal@ > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > litsol napisa?(a): > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Rafel, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I take Astrology as a good hobby, and i w'd be looking > at > > > it > > > > > with > > > > > > an > > > > > > > > engineer's approach. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I asked ur age because, it's our thinking to put our > > > > parameters > > > > > in > > > > > > > > god's system, there is nothing like delay or > advancement > > in > > > > > > > > spirituality. So, " Delay " or " Speed " , " backwardness " > > > > > > > > and " advancement " doesn't exist in spirituality, I > > thought > > > if > > > > u > > > > > r > > > > > > > > thinking that it may take too much time, I wanted to > tell > > > u, > > > > > it's > > > > > > not > > > > > > > > like that. there is no delay. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It clicks in fraction of a second, when u r getting > > clicked > > > > > > depends > > > > > > > > on u and on god's will, when he wants u to get clicked. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > God sometimes graces for no reason ( " Ahetuka " ) just for > > his > > > > > > > > compassion towards u and it may happen next minute too. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > spirituality is not delimited by time , effort and > rules. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > > > Lalit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology > > > > > > > > <vedic astrology%40>, Rafal > Gendarz > > > > > > > > <starsuponme@ ...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Litsol, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please be careful about words. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Im happy that You are sharing Your experience - very > > > > > inspirating > > > > > > > > ones. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Age hierarchy is for sudras - Manu Samhita. If You > > treat > > > > > Jyotish > > > > > > > > Vedanga > > > > > > > > > as profession similar to engineering You have a long > > way > > > to > > > > > go. > > > > > > But > > > > > > > > dont > > > > > > > > > be pessimistic here are many who will try to help You > > in > > > > > getting > > > > > > > > proper > > > > > > > > > understanding. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > After some time You will agree with me about the mala > > and > > > > > japa. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz > > > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru > > > > > > > > > email: rafal@ > > > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > litsol napisa?(a): > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Rafal, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Here u r doing two wrong things, instead of > > developing > > > ur > > > > > > > > understanding, > > > > > > > > > > u r trying to conclude something and going beyond > > that > > > u r > > > > > > > > messaging > > > > > > > > > > same to many. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I m touching 35, What's ur age ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Astrology is a kind of vidya or profession, like i > m > > a > > > > > > software > > > > > > > > > > engineer, software engineering is my profession. > > > > > spirituality > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > beyond > > > > > > > > > > all sort of vidya or profession. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I wish u to be a good soul and to realize the bliss > > of > > > > self > > > > > > > > awakening or > > > > > > > > > > in other terms, the bliss that comes once u feel u > > and > > > > god > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > connected. dissolved in each other. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > First realize, experience, then speak and then > > suggest > > > to > > > > > > others, > > > > > > > > by > > > > > > > > > > mere reading shastras or books u r not going to > feel > > > it. > > > > > > unless > > > > > > > > god > > > > > > > > > > graces u it's very very difficult. and if u dont > > avoid > > > > this > > > > > > sort > > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > hurriedness instead of learning and understanding, > it > > > > will > > > > > > affect > > > > > > > > u only > > > > > > > > > > no one else. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > somehere i have read, it was written - By mere > > > > > repeating " So- > > > > > > > > Aham " no > > > > > > > > > > one gets liberated unless he realizes it like one > > > doesnt > > > > get > > > > > > > > cured by > > > > > > > > > > knowing the name of the medicine, u need to take > the > > > > > medicine > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > get > > > > > > > > > > cured " . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So, pls. be wise, as it was being discussed here, i > > > > shared > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > experience of my life, pls. mind it, i m not a > > > preecher, > > > > > nor a > > > > > > > > guru, nor > > > > > > > > > > i have to make my followers, nor it's my > profession, > > > nor > > > > i > > > > > > have > > > > > > > > to get > > > > > > > > > > fame, sharing things is a kind of friendliness a > kind > > of > > > > > > > > affection, > > > > > > > > > > that's it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > > > > > Lalit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. com>, > Rafal > > > > Gendarz > > > > > > > > > > <starsuponme@ ...> > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Jyotishas > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Counting of mala has more depth sense than just > > > > counting, > > > > > > so for > > > > > > > > > > natives > > > > > > > > > > > like Litsol counting is neccessary and any other > > > > > speculation > > > > > > > > will be > > > > > > > > > > > only illusory and just imagination. We should > > follow > > > Pt. > > > > > > > > > > Dakshinamoorti > > > > > > > > > > > advise strictly, otherwise our process of > spiritual > > > > > > development > > > > > > > > will > > > > > > > > > > be > > > > > > > > > > > slow and unauthoritative. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz > > > > > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru > > > > > > > > > > > email: rafal@ > > > > > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > asmp2k02@ napisa?(a): > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Resp Sri Lalitji, > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for your mail.But please also read > > > > > > GuruDakshinamurthyi > > > > > > > > ji's > > > > > > > > > > > > mail(addressing me) also on this,which brings > in > > > more > > > > > > clarity > > > > > > > > to the > > > > > > > > > > > > applicability principles to my mail. > > > > > > > > > > > > I meant that both are necessity but to what > > degree > > > of > > > > > time > > > > > > (it > > > > > > > > varies > > > > > > > > > > > > from saadhaka to saadhaka) to get such inbuilt > > > > maturity > > > > > > such > > > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > > > > > the count will be taken care of by Divine > forces > > > > after > > > > > > some > > > > > > > > initial > > > > > > > > > > > > period of saadhana. > > > > > > > > > > > > Morover the type of bio matter present in the > > japa > > > > maala > > > > > > > > (which is > > > > > > > > > > > > symbolic for ritualism as well as from > practical > > > > point > > > > > of > > > > > > > > view for > > > > > > > > > > our > > > > > > > > > > > > count) will help in keeping away destructive > > forces > > > > > > acting on > > > > > > > > us > > > > > > > > > > .Thus > > > > > > > > > > > > the symbolic rituals will indirectly help us in > > > > keeping > > > > > > away > > > > > > > > from > > > > > > > > > > > > negative thoughts and also trains our memory to > > be > > > > > object > > > > > > > > > > oriented.If > > > > > > > > > > > > our memory grows and retentive capacity > increase > > > the > > > > > > Gnaana > > > > > > > > will > > > > > > > > > > > > increase ,but at the same time destructive > forces > > > > > > > > (diversions) also > > > > > > > > > > > > becomes powerful.Thus the symbolic procedures > > will > > > > come > > > > > in > > > > > > > > handy to > > > > > > > > > > > > successfully fight the negative forces.The > > rituals > > > > may > > > > > be > > > > > > > > Rising > > > > > > > > > > > > early(if possible during Braahmi muhurta),Taking > > > > > > > > bath,Japaanusthaan, > > > > > > > > > > > > attending to the livelihood job etc etc in > > defined > > > > > times > > > > > > as > > > > > > > > > > discipline > > > > > > > > > > > > helps indirectly tune our memory through > keeping > > > our > > > > > body > > > > > > > > healthy. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thus ultimately we conclude that the so called > > > > symbolic > > > > > > > > procedures > > > > > > > > > > are > > > > > > > > > > > > not actually symbolic(it got branded as such) > but > > a > > > > > > necessity > > > > > > > > for > > > > > > > > > > our > > > > > > > > > > > > own good if we practice to the extent we can. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quoting mishra.lalit@ ... <mishra. lalit% > > > > > 40gmail. > > > > > > com>: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Resp. Sri Murthy Adavi, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, what you said is perfectly right, we count > > or > > > > dont > > > > > > > > count,target > > > > > > > > > > > > is realization of god's love within, I got it > > with > > > no > > > > > > > > counting, > > > > > > > > > > > > someone may get it with counting. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanx, for the writing. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > Lalit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. com> > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. com>, > > > > srinivasa > > > > > > > > murthy adavi > > > > > > > > > > > > asmp2k02@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Respected Learned Members, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Both views may be correct when the views > > have/or > > > > with > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > goal as > > > > > > > > > > > > development of Love/Devotion towards adhistana > > > > Devatha > > > > > of > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > Mantra > > > > > > > > > > > > as Base. > > > > > > > > > > > > > In the initial stage only you need the > count;as > > > one > > > > > > > > develops the > > > > > > > > > > > > habit the biological tuning of the > intellect/body > > > will > > > > > > > > automatically > > > > > > > > > > > > take care of the practice(without count-help of > > > malas > > > > > > etc). > > > > > > > > > > > > > It's like if with the help of Alarm clock if > we > > > > wake > > > > > up > > > > > > for > > > > > > > > 2 or 3 > > > > > > > > > > > > days at some appointed hour,then automatically > we > > > > > wakeup > > > > > > at > > > > > > > > the same > > > > > > > > > > > > time every day without help of alarm. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > With due Respects > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > smadavi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quoting starsuponme@ : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Litsol, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Definitely we should count our Mantra Japa on > > > Mala. > > > > > Your > > > > > > > > view is > > > > > > > > > > > > against > > > > > > > > > > > > > Vedic Authorities and Sages, so should be > > > rejected. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru > > > > > > > > > > > > > email: rafal@ > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > litsol napisa?(a): > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Mr. Jayashri, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > A thought came, why i should not share with > > u, > > > U > > > > > pls. > > > > > > stop > > > > > > > > > > > > counting > > > > > > > > > > > > > > mantra chantings, counting mantra gives > false > > > ego > > > > > and > > > > > > then > > > > > > > > > > > > > > frustration if u dont get desired results. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > leave it to the god, god counts the mantra > > > > chanted > > > > > by > > > > > > you > > > > > > > > may be > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 108, 1008 or whatsoever, let him count, > it's > > > his > > > > > part > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > ur > > > > > > > > > > part > > > > > > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to chant the mantra. when the mantra has to > > > > awaken, > > > > > it > > > > > > > > will be, > > > > > > > > > > > > god > > > > > > > > > > > > > > will ensure it for u. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sometimes we try to become more intelligent > > > with > > > > out > > > > > > > > limited > > > > > > > > > > > > > > intellect and that creates obstacles in our > > > > > spiritual > > > > > > > > growth. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So, forget about counts, forget about the > > time > > > u > > > > > put > > > > > > in > > > > > > > > for ur's > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sadhana, invoke the god with pure heart. > > purity > > > > > > counts. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Lalit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. > > > > > > > > com>, " dakshinastrologer " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <dakshinastrologer@ ...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Ms. Jayashree: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think this topic on 108 is getting very > > > > > > interesting > > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > enlightening for all members. Yesterday > we > > > had a > > > > > > > > wonderful > > > > > > > > > > > > > > esoteric > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > explanation from Shri. Sushil Dikshit, > and > > > > today > > > > > > your > > > > > > > > > > wonderful > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > explanation of numerical symmetry of the > > > cosmos! > > > > > > > > Wonderful. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There definitely exists a " numerical > > > symphony " > > > > in > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > Universe. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > not only 108.....as I mentioned in my > > earlier > > > > > post, > > > > > > > > there are > > > > > > > > > > > > > > various > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > other numerals that are significant in > > occult > > > > > > > > practices. 108 > > > > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > > > a > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > powerful and all-purpose perfect > > > number...While > > > > > we > > > > > > have > > > > > > > > > > > > understood > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the glory of 108, we should not lose > sight > > of > > > > the > > > > > > fact > > > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > > > > > there > > > > > > > > > > > > > > are > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > other powerful numbers also. This is just > > for > > > > the > > > > > > > > information > > > > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > list. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > My apprecitation again for this wonderful > > > > > response. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Blessed be. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pandit R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Blessed be. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pandit R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI. vedic- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > astrology@grou ps.com > > <astrology% > > > > > > > > > > > > 40. com>, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " jayasartn " <jayasartn@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In cosmology, 108 has this > significance - > > > the > > > > > > moon is > > > > > > > > away > > > > > > > > > > > > from > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > earth 108 times its (moon's) diameter > and > > > the > > > > > sun > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > away > > > > > > > > > > > > from the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > earth, 108 times its diameter. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Perhaps this reality of distances is > > > > applicable > > > > > to > > > > > > > > deities > > > > > > > > > > > > too. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Perhaps this has been indicated by the > > 108 > > > > divya > > > > > > > > desas of > > > > > > > > > > Lord > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Narayana. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > jayasree > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology@ . com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. > > > > > > > > com>, " dakshinastrologer " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <dakshinastrologer@ > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Shri. Sushil: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It is a wonderful answer you have > given. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Blessed be. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pandit R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology@ . > com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. > > > > > > > > com>, " sushil.dikshit " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <sushil.dikshit@ > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Babu, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It is not a silly question but it > is > > a > > > > very > > > > > > good > > > > > > > > > > question. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Actually > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > there are 27 Nakshatras and every > > > > Nakshtras > > > > > > has 4 > > > > > > > > Charan > > > > > > > > > > > > so > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > total > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > charans are 27 x 4 = 108 Charan. > Each > > > > > Charan > > > > > > has 3 > > > > > > > > > > degree > > > > > > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 20 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > minutes so if you multiply 3 degree > > and > > > 20 > > > > > > > > minutes to > > > > > > > > > > 108 > > > > > > > > > > > > it > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > comes > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > out to be 360 degress i.e. one > cycle > > > > > (Circle). > > > > > > > > This > > > > > > > > > > cycle > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > represetns > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > whole brahmand because all the > > rashis, > > > > > > planets and > > > > > > > > > > > > nakshatra > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > are > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > between these 360 degree in 2 > > > dimensional > > > > > > > > horoscope. So > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > chanting a > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mantra completes one cycle of this > > > > brahmand. > > > > > > > > Further One > > > > > > > > > > > > who > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > has > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > visited Brahamand at least one time > > > i.e. > > > > he > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > > > brahmagyani he > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > entitiled to place 108 Shri before > > his > > > > name. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sushil dikshit > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology@ > . > > com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. > > com>, > > > > babu > > > > > > mon > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <muthappan111@ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Namaste, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It may be a silly matter for all > of > > > you. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I want to know what is the reason > > > that > > > > > some > > > > > > > > remedies > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > recomended > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > for 108 times. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I dont know any thing about > > astrology. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I hope you may pleased to provide > a > > > > reply > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thanks, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Babu > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------ --------- --------- - > -- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Be a better Globetrotter. Get > > better > > > > > travel > > > > > > > > answers > > > > > > > > > > from > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someone > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > who knows. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Answers - Check it out. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this > message > > > have > > > > > been > > > > > > > > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > > > > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > > > > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > > > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 29, 2007 Report Share Posted July 29, 2007 Oye Lalith: How are you sending a message today? Did you go to the office today also just to pilfer the company's internet connections on a holiday also? typical of you! One of these days, your employer will kick you out of the office for having misused company's resources and may be you will write another story on how sani came in front of you and asked you to change job! for your information, Meera Bhai's affection to Lord Krishna was way before her formal initiation into the beeja mantra. She was known to sing heart-rending songs on Lord Krishna rather than chanting the beeja mantra in buses and trains! Beeja mantra and God's name are not one and the same as you are trying to portray. In fact for chanting God's name can be chanted without any beeja mantra and still it will give good results. This is what happens when you " steal " knowledge by observing tantrik practices without formal initiation! we are not getting exposed....rather it is you who are being exposed with every post. As I said to Ram Jaswalji yesterday itself, I will stop this exchange if you stop it. Otherwise, this will go on. I am not afraid of you. But I pity you.....that is why I am writing the below matter...... By the way, see a good psychiatrist.....I will give just one evidence for your psycopathy...In your posts, often you type a word " Sth " often incoherently.....It is almost a pattern for you. This is suggestive of OCB problem for you. Better get yourself treated for psychiatric ailments and get on with your life instead of trying evaluate persons far elder and wiser than you. I am not saying this to abuse you as Ram Jaswalji might think....It is the genuine advice of an elderly person. There is nothing wrong in consulting a good psychiatrist; now a days the stigma is not there. So, help yourself. Abhishek. vedic astrology , " litsol " <mishra.lalit wrote: > > > You praised Meera, Good, when u w'd learn sth from her pure bhakti, > see, cunningness and being manipulator doesnt help always!! > > twisting words always, i shown u a mantra of lord Krishna, in which a > beej mantra is used, instead of learning that God's Name and Beej are > one and same thing, writing so much. > > What i said, open ur eyes and mind, read again, a devotion is obvious > final outcome of mantra chanting. > > read what i have been saying, read many times a day, the clouds of ur > karma smokes ur understanding. > > and learn one more thing - Meera got formal deekschha from Saint > Raidas. > > I use company's time or what, that i manage and is a matter of my > job, i dont advertise here to get some business in background, and u > 2-3 who are lobbying here , are exposed by urself. > > exposing u was not my objective, but it happened. > > it will keep happening. > > > ok > > > > vedic astrology , " abhishekpotti " > <abhishekpotti@> wrote: > > > > Dear Lalith: > > > > The whole world knows the history of Blessed Meera Bhai....the > > epitome of Bhakti......She was attached to her " Lala " - the > wonderful > > idol of Krishna gifted to her even from her childhood....Do you > mean > > to say that innocent young girl started chanting " Kliim krishnaaya " > > mantra automatically? Even Bhakta Prahlaada had to be initiated by > > Sage Naaradha for his chant of dwaadasaakshari mantra.... > > > > Nobody is afraid of you here......You need not proclaim that you > are > > not in the business of a Guru.....actually Guru status is not a > > business (true to your half-baked knowledge you will claim it is > also > > like software engineering!). The difference my friend between you > > and other great persons like Rafal or Dakshinamoorthiji is that > they > > are spending their money for the internet, whereas you are > pilfering > > your company's time and the company's resources while browsing the > > internet. Don't you think you are cheating your company when you > > spend so much time on empty and egoistic posts defending yourself > > against every expert after arguing with them unnecessarily? Are > you > > not getting paid for the time you spend in the company....Know the > > basics of ethics before ever sermonizing.....So, actually you are > an > > exploiter....try to understand that....the other gurujis are > probably > > too decent to comment on that......What happened to your project? > > Better rush to it nough!....It will spare us the agony of replying > to > > your half-witted postings! > > > > By the say, Which member asked you Prashna Tantra dear? We did not > > see any posts requesting " Honourable Lalith " to explain Prashna > > Tantra (as if you could explain it!) What arrogance you have to > > claim that nobody can stand before you.....Guruji's posts exposed > > your ignorance....you did not even know how to ask queries and get > > replies from one of the most empathetic astrologers of this group, > > and yet you claim you are this and that...... > > > > For your information....nobody is afraid of you..Rather you should > be > > afraid of yourself......Your foolishness itself will be your doom. > > Did you not become the laughing stock due to your email-based > chasing > > of Priyaa? Such foolishness in occult matters could be more costly > > dear.....I think Mohanraaamji and Rafalji are only afraid about > your > > own well-being! They are not afraid of you. Nor am I afraid of you. > > > > Your posts never answer the queries or points raised by others; you > > take off on a new ground only because of your shallow understanding > > of subjects. Nobody has accepted you as a Guru here, and nobody > > will....Can a fire-fly eclipse the Sun? There are too many " Suns " > > here and you are just a fire-fly. > > > > It reminds me of a story.....Once an ant challenged the mighty > > elephant for a fight; the elephant obviously could not hear the ant > > (the ant being so tiny and it was on the ground, its sound could > not > > reach the elephant). The elephant just walked away out of its own > > volition in its natural course. Then the ant claimed, " you see I > > challenged the elephant and it ran away " . Dear, your saying that > > nobody can stand before you is similar to that....... > > > > FIRST LEARN THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN GHOSTS AND YOUR ANCESTOR > > SUMANGALIS BEFORE WRITING THE FIRST POSTS ON OCCULT! What a > > pity......what a pity.....That we have to bear your meaningless > > rantings here! > > > > Abhishek. > > > > vedic astrology , " litsol " <mishra.lalit@> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > I was waiting for u dear.. > > > > > > why u took time ? > > > > > > Do u mean Meera Bai discussed with u, what she did.. > > > > > > Do u know 'Kleem Krishnay, Govindaya Gopijan Vallabhaya Namh' is > a > > > mantra for lord krishna. > > > > > > is there no beej mantras, to whom u wish to misguide ? let > thnigs > > > remain between lord, bhakta , their shraddha and their guru. > > > > > > why u people are so afraid of me, i m not in business of guru. > > > > > > i m happy with my life, my profession of software engineering > and > > > my hobbies ok. > > > > > > there are 7000+ members are here, by writing such type of > foolish > > > things u expose urself only, mind, there are better brains here. > > > > > > this is enough ... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology , > > > " abhishekpotti " <abhishekpotti@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Respected Mohanraaamji: > > > > > > > > Well said. Lalith is saying that " maybe in south india > devotees > > > > don't chant Moola mantras but not so in North " ...What > > > > stupidity.....He does not seem to understand that " mantra > > shaastra > > > > experts " are also devotees, but they cannot be called as > innocent > > > > saatwik bhaktaas! A typical example of a pure saadhwik bhakta > > will > > > > be Meera Bhai (was she not North Indian). Can Lalith say which > > > Dasa > > > > Mahaa Vidya Meera Bhai practised? She was immersed in Krishna > > > > consciousness and Lover for Him. Her own Bhajans were her > > prayers > > > in > > > > the bhaavana of Bhakti in the form of Love! This is not mantra > > > > shaastra. Another example will be Saant Tukhaaraam. These > > > bhaktaas > > > > did not chant moola mantraas. Panditji Dakshinamoorthi was on > > dot > > > in > > > > saying that " Pure bhaktaas do not chant complicated moola > > > mantraas " . > > > > You have clarified this fact wonderfully in your post. I wish > > more > > > > knowledgeable persons also put erratic posters in their place > > just > > > as > > > > Mohanraaamji does here. This will benefit more naive readers > of > > > > these forums who might otherwise get confused as to which of > the > > > > paths to follow. Actually, anyone can follow any path as he/ > she > > > > deems it fit; but there should be consistency of procedures. > > > > > > > > We should not confuse mantrik rituals and bhakti doctrines. > > > Bhaktaas > > > > can chant the names of Gods at anytime.....Mantra shaastra > > experts > > > > chanting advanced moola mantras should necessarily adopt ritual > > > > procedures for the welfare of themselves and others! > > > Yes...improper > > > > chanting of mantras can cause danger to the society also just > as > > > > proper chanting can help others. Hence, this cannot be > > considered > > > as > > > > a personal preference of the aspirant. If this was not the > case, > > > why > > > > did sages codify spiritual practises scrupulously? Rafalji, > > > > Mohanraaamji, etc. are correct in saying it is best to follow > > > Pandit > > > > Dakshinamoorthiji's advices on mantra shastra or japams. He is > > > > learned and he is living a life compatible to the shaastras > > though > > > he > > > > has faced uncertain circumstances in his own personal life. He > > > never > > > > compromised on principles and he willingly paid the price for > > that > > > > which most of us will never do. The words of such a person > > should > > > > obviously carry more weight. > > > > > > > > Abhishek. > > > > > > > > vedic astrology , " mohanraaam " > > <mohanraaam@> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Well Lalith: > > > > > > > > > > If you have really done dasa Maha Vidyaa, you would have > never > > > > > approached a professional astrologer for consultation...that > > much > > > I > > > > > can say.... > > > > > > > > > > And what idiocy when you say Panditji is partly wrong? He > > > > > said " Bhaktaas do not chant Moola mantras " , whereas you have > > > edited > > > > > the words to suit your ends....He never said " devotees don't > > > chant > > > > > Beej mantras " .....You are putting words into his mouth and > > > assuming > > > > > he is wrong! Why, do you know....the Great Panditji himself > > > chants > > > > > Moola mantras.....He is a bhakta and a mantra shastra expert. > > As > > > a > > > > > bhakta he keeps incessant chanting of naama japa throughout > the > > > > day; > > > > > as a mantra shastra expert, he restricts the moola mantra > > japams > > > to > > > > > stipulated times with ritual purity.....It is this wonderful > > > > practice > > > > > that Guruji was alluding to. Guruji cannot be wrong in > ritual > > > and > > > > > occult matters. Please understand that. > > > > > > > > > > There are 4 classes of Devotees.......1) Saatwik vedic > devotees > > > who > > > > > will follow vedic dharma scrupulously. They will not dare to > > > > compare > > > > > astrology and vedanga to Engineering! as you did... > > > > > 2) Raajasik devotees who will follow vedic disciplines as far > > as > > > > > possible, but will still go after upaasanaas of Demi-Gods for > > > > > accomplishment of siddhis. Mantra shaastra experts usually > > fall > > > in > > > > > this category. > > > > > 3) Saatwik Bhaktaas - for whom the meditation and glory of > > their > > > > > Ishta Devataa is enough for spiritual satisfaction. It is > this > > > > > category that Guruji referred to when he said they will not > > chant > > > > > Moola mantras too much. Definitely they will not do Dasa > Mahaa > > > > > Vidyaa. > > > > > 4) Taamasic Devotees - Those whose main motive is to project > > > > > themselves at all costs and acting as if they are equal to > the > > > > > experts; they will try ALL practices - whether they are > > > sanctioned > > > > by > > > > > vedas or not.....Their only aim is personal glory and > > > > satisfaction. > > > > > They will attack even established dharma if they do not get > > > results > > > > > (sounds familiar....You are one!) Ignorance and half-baked > > > > knowledge > > > > > and egotism are these persons' motivating fuel. > > > > > > > > > > You are really satan's Gift to this list.......My only prayer > > is > > > > that > > > > > innocent members of this list do not get side-tracked with > your > > > > > ramblings. > > > > > > > > > > Let me make this clear to the list.....Panditji said that > > saatwik > > > > > Bhaktaas who chant Divine names only due to Pure Love on God > > > > usually > > > > > never chant mantrik moola mantraas. It is just one class of > > > > > devotees. A rajasik bhakta who is a mantra-shaastra expert > may > > > > even > > > > > be a bhakta at heart; and a pure bhakta may sometimes chant > > some > > > > > mantrik japams for solving some practical issues......But, > when > > > > they > > > > > switch their routines temporarily, these enlightened devotees > > > > usually > > > > > take good guidance and follow the tenets of shaastras > > > > > scrupulously....Definitely they will not sit on assumption > like > > > > > Lalith. > > > > > > > > > > On the one hand, this fellow claims he has done chants in > > > forests, > > > > > rivers, earth, etc. (Probably we have a Maharishi here! What > > > > heights > > > > > of pointless pride in this young man list....it is > > disgusting!). > > > > On > > > > > the other hand, he says he chants mantras in buses, trains, > > > > etc...... > > > > > He is confused about which no body can have issues. Only his > > > Guru > > > > > should be concerned about that.....But, his attempts to stuff > > his > > > > > shallow understanding upon this list is reprehensible. And, > > his > > > > > habit of quoting experts out of context is really > condemnable. > > > May > > > > > Jupiter's Light Shine on that fellow and teach him to respect > > the > > > > > hallowed traditions and to stay at his level rather than > trying > > > > > to " teach " others (He has the audacity to claim he > > is " teaching " > > > > > Rafalji!) > > > > > > > > > > If a mere young man of 35 years who has spent his life on a > > > " Failed > > > > > computer web desining business " , " pointless email chasing of > > > > girls " , > > > > > and other " past times " can gain insight as he claims, how > much > > > will > > > > > learned Gurus of this group with their life of devotion to > > > vedanta > > > > > and vedanga know? His peanut brain and hyper-inflated ego > will > > > > never > > > > > allow him to see this obvious truth. But, please list > exercise > > > > your > > > > > discretion while reading his posts (There are doubtless some > > good > > > > > elements even in his posts; but mostly there is trash > presented > > > as > > > > > philosophy). > > > > > > > > > > Mohanraaam > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology , " litsol " > > <mishra.lalit@> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Rafal, > > > > > > > > > > > > Do u think, a hobby means shallow knowledge of the domain, > No > > > > > rafal, > > > > > > it's not like that. > > > > > > > > > > > > At least not for me. You have learnt and i m learning, i > read > > > > ur's > > > > > > replies and get benifitted, same way i wanted you to pay > > heed > > > to > > > > > > what i have written about spritiuality, mostrly i did write > > for > > > u > > > > > > > > > > > > I have done all 10 mahavidyas of tantra and read many > tantrik > > > > > > classics, spent good deal of time with great tantriks > > trained > > > in > > > > > > Kamakhya and other places, keenly observed their doings, > > their > > > > > > mistakes etc.., I did tremendous mantra chanting on water, > > on > > > > > earth, > > > > > > at home, in forests etc... > > > > > > > > > > > > then reached here, then i did write something, but sorry i > > dont > > > > > > remember shlokas. i was not interested in cramming that. > > > > > > > > > > > > Panditji is not fully correct in saying that BeejMantras > are > > > not > > > > > > chanted by devotees, I dont know much about South India but > > in > > > > > North > > > > > > normally its done. > > > > > > > > > > > > And a successfull mantra sadhana has to result in one's > being > > a > > > > > > devotee, the devotion is the outcome, final result of > mantra > > > > > sadhana, > > > > > > perhaps, Pandit Ji believes mantras are power > packet,thinks, > > i > > > do > > > > > it > > > > > > this way , these many times and get this result, this is > > where > > > > most > > > > > > of the people are confused. without being a good human > being > > if > > > > we > > > > > > think, we will achieve something in spirituality, is > > difficult, > > > > > very > > > > > > difficult. > > > > > > > > > > > > what happens is, with the mantra chanting, a self > > > > transformation > > > > > > process begins, u if dont restrict urself, ur karma begins > > > > > diluting, > > > > > > and u begin ur purification process unknowingly, when > > > substantial > > > > > > part of ego and greed for respect vanishes and many such > > thing > > > > > > togather, mantra awakens u and with the God's grace ur > > > objective > > > > > gets > > > > > > fullfilled, gradually u become a devotee. ur being simple > and > > > > being > > > > > > devotee is sometimes is indication of ur's going on the > right > > > > track. > > > > > > > > > > > > I think we have discussed a lot, it's enough !! > > > > > > > > > > > > My Boss has given me lot of projects to complete, so, may > be, > > i > > > m > > > > > not > > > > > > going to available in the group like i was recently. > however. > > i > > > > > will > > > > > > complete Garg Hora series. > > > > > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > Lalit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology , Rafal Gendarz > > > > > > <starsuponme@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Litsol, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Then please dont generalize Your preferences as they are > > too > > > > > > shallow for > > > > > > > this Forum aspiration. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru > > > > > > > email: rafal@ > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > litsol napisa?(a): > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Rafel, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I take Astrology as a good hobby, and i w'd be looking > at > > > it > > > > > with > > > > > > an > > > > > > > > engineer's approach. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I asked ur age because, it's our thinking to put our > > > > parameters > > > > > in > > > > > > > > god's system, there is nothing like delay or > advancement > > in > > > > > > > > spirituality. So, " Delay " or " Speed " , " backwardness " > > > > > > > > and " advancement " doesn't exist in spirituality, I > > thought > > > if > > > > u > > > > > r > > > > > > > > thinking that it may take too much time, I wanted to > tell > > > u, > > > > > it's > > > > > > not > > > > > > > > like that. there is no delay. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It clicks in fraction of a second, when u r getting > > clicked > > > > > > depends > > > > > > > > on u and on god's will, when he wants u to get clicked. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > God sometimes graces for no reason ( " Ahetuka " ) just for > > his > > > > > > > > compassion towards u and it may happen next minute too. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > spirituality is not delimited by time , effort and > rules. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > > > Lalit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology > > > > > > > > <vedic astrology%40>, Rafal > Gendarz > > > > > > > > <starsuponme@ ...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Litsol, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please be careful about words. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Im happy that You are sharing Your experience - very > > > > > inspirating > > > > > > > > ones. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Age hierarchy is for sudras - Manu Samhita. If You > > treat > > > > > Jyotish > > > > > > > > Vedanga > > > > > > > > > as profession similar to engineering You have a long > > way > > > to > > > > > go. > > > > > > But > > > > > > > > dont > > > > > > > > > be pessimistic here are many who will try to help You > > in > > > > > getting > > > > > > > > proper > > > > > > > > > understanding. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > After some time You will agree with me about the mala > > and > > > > > japa. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz > > > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru > > > > > > > > > email: rafal@ > > > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > litsol napisa?(a): > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Rafal, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Here u r doing two wrong things, instead of > > developing > > > ur > > > > > > > > understanding, > > > > > > > > > > u r trying to conclude something and going beyond > > that > > > u r > > > > > > > > messaging > > > > > > > > > > same to many. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I m touching 35, What's ur age ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Astrology is a kind of vidya or profession, like i > m > > a > > > > > > software > > > > > > > > > > engineer, software engineering is my profession. > > > > > spirituality > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > beyond > > > > > > > > > > all sort of vidya or profession. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I wish u to be a good soul and to realize the bliss > > of > > > > self > > > > > > > > awakening or > > > > > > > > > > in other terms, the bliss that comes once u feel u > > and > > > > god > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > connected. dissolved in each other. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > First realize, experience, then speak and then > > suggest > > > to > > > > > > others, > > > > > > > > by > > > > > > > > > > mere reading shastras or books u r not going to > feel > > > it. > > > > > > unless > > > > > > > > god > > > > > > > > > > graces u it's very very difficult. and if u dont > > avoid > > > > this > > > > > > sort > > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > hurriedness instead of learning and understanding, > it > > > > will > > > > > > affect > > > > > > > > u only > > > > > > > > > > no one else. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > somehere i have read, it was written - By mere > > > > > repeating " So- > > > > > > > > Aham " no > > > > > > > > > > one gets liberated unless he realizes it like one > > > doesnt > > > > get > > > > > > > > cured by > > > > > > > > > > knowing the name of the medicine, u need to take > the > > > > > medicine > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > get > > > > > > > > > > cured " . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So, pls. be wise, as it was being discussed here, i > > > > shared > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > experience of my life, pls. mind it, i m not a > > > preecher, > > > > > nor a > > > > > > > > guru, nor > > > > > > > > > > i have to make my followers, nor it's my > profession, > > > nor > > > > i > > > > > > have > > > > > > > > to get > > > > > > > > > > fame, sharing things is a kind of friendliness a > kind > > of > > > > > > > > affection, > > > > > > > > > > that's it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > > > > > Lalit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. com>, > Rafal > > > > Gendarz > > > > > > > > > > <starsuponme@ ...> > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Jyotishas > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Counting of mala has more depth sense than just > > > > counting, > > > > > > so for > > > > > > > > > > natives > > > > > > > > > > > like Litsol counting is neccessary and any other > > > > > speculation > > > > > > > > will be > > > > > > > > > > > only illusory and just imagination. We should > > follow > > > Pt. > > > > > > > > > > Dakshinamoorti > > > > > > > > > > > advise strictly, otherwise our process of > spiritual > > > > > > development > > > > > > > > will > > > > > > > > > > be > > > > > > > > > > > slow and unauthoritative. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz > > > > > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru > > > > > > > > > > > email: rafal@ > > > > > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > asmp2k02@ napisa?(a): > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Resp Sri Lalitji, > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for your mail.But please also read > > > > > > GuruDakshinamurthyi > > > > > > > > ji's > > > > > > > > > > > > mail(addressing me) also on this,which brings > in > > > more > > > > > > clarity > > > > > > > > to the > > > > > > > > > > > > applicability principles to my mail. > > > > > > > > > > > > I meant that both are necessity but to what > > degree > > > of > > > > > time > > > > > > (it > > > > > > > > varies > > > > > > > > > > > > from saadhaka to saadhaka) to get such inbuilt > > > > maturity > > > > > > such > > > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > > > > > the count will be taken care of by Divine > forces > > > > after > > > > > > some > > > > > > > > initial > > > > > > > > > > > > period of saadhana. > > > > > > > > > > > > Morover the type of bio matter present in the > > japa > > > > maala > > > > > > > > (which is > > > > > > > > > > > > symbolic for ritualism as well as from > practical > > > > point > > > > > of > > > > > > > > view for > > > > > > > > > > our > > > > > > > > > > > > count) will help in keeping away destructive > > forces > > > > > > acting on > > > > > > > > us > > > > > > > > > > .Thus > > > > > > > > > > > > the symbolic rituals will indirectly help us in > > > > keeping > > > > > > away > > > > > > > > from > > > > > > > > > > > > negative thoughts and also trains our memory to > > be > > > > > object > > > > > > > > > > oriented.If > > > > > > > > > > > > our memory grows and retentive capacity > increase > > > the > > > > > > Gnaana > > > > > > > > will > > > > > > > > > > > > increase ,but at the same time destructive > forces > > > > > > > > (diversions) also > > > > > > > > > > > > becomes powerful.Thus the symbolic procedures > > will > > > > come > > > > > in > > > > > > > > handy to > > > > > > > > > > > > successfully fight the negative forces.The > > rituals > > > > may > > > > > be > > > > > > > > Rising > > > > > > > > > > > > early(if possible during Braahmi muhurta),Taking > > > > > > > > bath,Japaanusthaan, > > > > > > > > > > > > attending to the livelihood job etc etc in > > defined > > > > > times > > > > > > as > > > > > > > > > > discipline > > > > > > > > > > > > helps indirectly tune our memory through > keeping > > > our > > > > > body > > > > > > > > healthy. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thus ultimately we conclude that the so called > > > > symbolic > > > > > > > > procedures > > > > > > > > > > are > > > > > > > > > > > > not actually symbolic(it got branded as such) > but > > a > > > > > > necessity > > > > > > > > for > > > > > > > > > > our > > > > > > > > > > > > own good if we practice to the extent we can. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quoting mishra.lalit@ ... <mishra. lalit% > > > > > 40gmail. > > > > > > com>: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Resp. Sri Murthy Adavi, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, what you said is perfectly right, we count > > or > > > > dont > > > > > > > > count,target > > > > > > > > > > > > is realization of god's love within, I got it > > with > > > no > > > > > > > > counting, > > > > > > > > > > > > someone may get it with counting. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanx, for the writing. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > Lalit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. com> > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. com>, > > > > srinivasa > > > > > > > > murthy adavi > > > > > > > > > > > > asmp2k02@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Respected Learned Members, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Both views may be correct when the views > > have/or > > > > with > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > goal as > > > > > > > > > > > > development of Love/Devotion towards adhistana > > > > Devatha > > > > > of > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > Mantra > > > > > > > > > > > > as Base. > > > > > > > > > > > > > In the initial stage only you need the > count;as > > > one > > > > > > > > develops the > > > > > > > > > > > > habit the biological tuning of the > intellect/body > > > will > > > > > > > > automatically > > > > > > > > > > > > take care of the practice(without count-help of > > > malas > > > > > > etc). > > > > > > > > > > > > > It's like if with the help of Alarm clock if > we > > > > wake > > > > > up > > > > > > for > > > > > > > > 2 or 3 > > > > > > > > > > > > days at some appointed hour,then automatically > we > > > > > wakeup > > > > > > at > > > > > > > > the same > > > > > > > > > > > > time every day without help of alarm. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > With due Respects > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > smadavi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quoting starsuponme@ : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Litsol, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Definitely we should count our Mantra Japa on > > > Mala. > > > > > Your > > > > > > > > view is > > > > > > > > > > > > against > > > > > > > > > > > > > Vedic Authorities and Sages, so should be > > > rejected. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru > > > > > > > > > > > > > email: rafal@ > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > litsol napisa?(a): > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Mr. Jayashri, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > A thought came, why i should not share with > > u, > > > U > > > > > pls. > > > > > > stop > > > > > > > > > > > > counting > > > > > > > > > > > > > > mantra chantings, counting mantra gives > false > > > ego > > > > > and > > > > > > then > > > > > > > > > > > > > > frustration if u dont get desired results. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > leave it to the god, god counts the mantra > > > > chanted > > > > > by > > > > > > you > > > > > > > > may be > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 108, 1008 or whatsoever, let him count, > it's > > > his > > > > > part > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > ur > > > > > > > > > > part > > > > > > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to chant the mantra. when the mantra has to > > > > awaken, > > > > > it > > > > > > > > will be, > > > > > > > > > > > > god > > > > > > > > > > > > > > will ensure it for u. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sometimes we try to become more intelligent > > > with > > > > out > > > > > > > > limited > > > > > > > > > > > > > > intellect and that creates obstacles in our > > > > > spiritual > > > > > > > > growth. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So, forget about counts, forget about the > > time > > > u > > > > > put > > > > > > in > > > > > > > > for ur's > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sadhana, invoke the god with pure heart. > > purity > > > > > > counts. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Lalit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. > > > > > > > > com>, " dakshinastrologer " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <dakshinastrologer@ ...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Ms. Jayashree: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think this topic on 108 is getting very > > > > > > interesting > > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > enlightening for all members. Yesterday > we > > > had a > > > > > > > > wonderful > > > > > > > > > > > > > > esoteric > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > explanation from Shri. Sushil Dikshit, > and > > > > today > > > > > > your > > > > > > > > > > wonderful > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > explanation of numerical symmetry of the > > > cosmos! > > > > > > > > Wonderful. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There definitely exists a " numerical > > > symphony " > > > > in > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > Universe. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > not only 108.....as I mentioned in my > > earlier > > > > > post, > > > > > > > > there are > > > > > > > > > > > > > > various > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > other numerals that are significant in > > occult > > > > > > > > practices. 108 > > > > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > > > a > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > powerful and all-purpose perfect > > > number...While > > > > > we > > > > > > have > > > > > > > > > > > > understood > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the glory of 108, we should not lose > sight > > of > > > > the > > > > > > fact > > > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > > > > > there > > > > > > > > > > > > > > are > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > other powerful numbers also. This is just > > for > > > > the > > > > > > > > information > > > > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > list. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > My apprecitation again for this wonderful > > > > > response. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Blessed be. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pandit R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Blessed be. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pandit R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI. vedic- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > astrology@grou ps.com > > <astrology% > > > > > > > > > > > > 40. com>, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " jayasartn " <jayasartn@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In cosmology, 108 has this > significance - > > > the > > > > > > moon is > > > > > > > > away > > > > > > > > > > > > from > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > earth 108 times its (moon's) diameter > and > > > the > > > > > sun > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > away > > > > > > > > > > > > from the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > earth, 108 times its diameter. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Perhaps this reality of distances is > > > > applicable > > > > > to > > > > > > > > deities > > > > > > > > > > > > too. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Perhaps this has been indicated by the > > 108 > > > > divya > > > > > > > > desas of > > > > > > > > > > Lord > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Narayana. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > jayasree > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology@ . com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. > > > > > > > > com>, " dakshinastrologer " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <dakshinastrologer@ > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Shri. Sushil: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It is a wonderful answer you have > given. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Blessed be. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pandit R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology@ . > com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. > > > > > > > > com>, " sushil.dikshit " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <sushil.dikshit@ > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Babu, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It is not a silly question but it > is > > a > > > > very > > > > > > good > > > > > > > > > > question. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Actually > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > there are 27 Nakshatras and every > > > > Nakshtras > > > > > > has 4 > > > > > > > > Charan > > > > > > > > > > > > so > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > total > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > charans are 27 x 4 = 108 Charan. > Each > > > > > Charan > > > > > > has 3 > > > > > > > > > > degree > > > > > > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 20 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > minutes so if you multiply 3 degree > > and > > > 20 > > > > > > > > minutes to > > > > > > > > > > 108 > > > > > > > > > > > > it > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > comes > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > out to be 360 degress i.e. one > cycle > > > > > (Circle). > > > > > > > > This > > > > > > > > > > cycle > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > represetns > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > whole brahmand because all the > > rashis, > > > > > > planets and > > > > > > > > > > > > nakshatra > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > are > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > between these 360 degree in 2 > > > dimensional > > > > > > > > horoscope. So > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > chanting a > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mantra completes one cycle of this > > > > brahmand. > > > > > > > > Further One > > > > > > > > > > > > who > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > has > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > visited Brahamand at least one time > > > i.e. > > > > he > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > > > brahmagyani he > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > entitiled to place 108 Shri before > > his > > > > name. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sushil dikshit > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology@ > . > > com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. > > com>, > > > > babu > > > > > > mon > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <muthappan111@ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Namaste, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It may be a silly matter for all > of > > > you. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I want to know what is the reason > > > that > > > > > some > > > > > > > > remedies > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > recomended > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > for 108 times. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I dont know any thing about > > astrology. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I hope you may pleased to provide > a > > > > reply > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thanks, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Babu > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------ --------- --------- - > -- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Be a better Globetrotter. Get > > better > > > > > travel > > > > > > > > answers > > > > > > > > > > from > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someone > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > who knows. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Answers - Check it out. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this > message > > > have > > > > > been > > > > > > > > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > > > > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > > > > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > > > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 29, 2007 Report Share Posted July 29, 2007 Idiot, I have my laptop with me at home. vedic astrology , " abhishekpotti " <abhishekpotti wrote: > > Oye Lalith: > > How are you sending a message today? Did you go to the office today > also just to pilfer the company's internet connections on a holiday > also? typical of you! One of these days, your employer will kick you > out of the office for having misused company's resources and may be > you will write another story on how sani came in front of you and > asked you to change job! > > for your information, Meera Bhai's affection to Lord Krishna was way > before her formal initiation into the beeja mantra. She was known to > sing heart-rending songs on Lord Krishna rather than chanting the > beeja mantra in buses and trains! > > Beeja mantra and God's name are not one and the same as you are > trying to portray. In fact for chanting God's name can be chanted > without any beeja mantra and still it will give good results. This > is what happens when you " steal " knowledge by observing tantrik > practices without formal initiation! > > we are not getting exposed....rather it is you who are being exposed > with every post. As I said to Ram Jaswalji yesterday itself, I will > stop this exchange if you stop it. Otherwise, this will go on. I am > not afraid of you. But I pity you.....that is why I am writing the > below matter...... > > By the way, see a good psychiatrist.....I will give just one evidence > for your psycopathy...In your posts, often you type a word " Sth " > often incoherently.....It is almost a pattern for you. This is > suggestive of OCB problem for you. Better get yourself treated for > psychiatric ailments and get on with your life instead of trying > evaluate persons far elder and wiser than you. I am not saying this > to abuse you as Ram Jaswalji might think....It is the genuine advice > of an elderly person. There is nothing wrong in consulting a good > psychiatrist; now a days the stigma is not there. So, help yourself. > > Abhishek. > > vedic astrology , " litsol " <mishra.lalit@> > wrote: > > > > > > You praised Meera, Good, when u w'd learn sth from her pure bhakti, > > see, cunningness and being manipulator doesnt help always!! > > > > twisting words always, i shown u a mantra of lord Krishna, in which > a > > beej mantra is used, instead of learning that God's Name and Beej > are > > one and same thing, writing so much. > > > > What i said, open ur eyes and mind, read again, a devotion is > obvious > > final outcome of mantra chanting. > > > > read what i have been saying, read many times a day, the clouds of > ur > > karma smokes ur understanding. > > > > and learn one more thing - Meera got formal deekschha from Saint > > Raidas. > > > > I use company's time or what, that i manage and is a matter of my > > job, i dont advertise here to get some business in background, and > u > > 2-3 who are lobbying here , are exposed by urself. > > > > exposing u was not my objective, but it happened. > > > > it will keep happening. > > > > > > ok > > > > > > > > vedic astrology , " abhishekpotti " > > <abhishekpotti@> wrote: > > > > > > Dear Lalith: > > > > > > The whole world knows the history of Blessed Meera Bhai....the > > > epitome of Bhakti......She was attached to her " Lala " - the > > wonderful > > > idol of Krishna gifted to her even from her childhood....Do you > > mean > > > to say that innocent young girl started chanting " Kliim > krishnaaya " > > > mantra automatically? Even Bhakta Prahlaada had to be initiated > by > > > Sage Naaradha for his chant of dwaadasaakshari mantra.... > > > > > > Nobody is afraid of you here......You need not proclaim that you > > are > > > not in the business of a Guru.....actually Guru status is not a > > > business (true to your half-baked knowledge you will claim it is > > also > > > like software engineering!). The difference my friend between > you > > > and other great persons like Rafal or Dakshinamoorthiji is that > > they > > > are spending their money for the internet, whereas you are > > pilfering > > > your company's time and the company's resources while browsing > the > > > internet. Don't you think you are cheating your company when you > > > spend so much time on empty and egoistic posts defending yourself > > > against every expert after arguing with them unnecessarily? Are > > you > > > not getting paid for the time you spend in the company....Know > the > > > basics of ethics before ever sermonizing.....So, actually you are > > an > > > exploiter....try to understand that....the other gurujis are > > probably > > > too decent to comment on that......What happened to your > project? > > > Better rush to it nough!....It will spare us the agony of > replying > > to > > > your half-witted postings! > > > > > > By the say, Which member asked you Prashna Tantra dear? We did > not > > > see any posts requesting " Honourable Lalith " to explain Prashna > > > Tantra (as if you could explain it!) What arrogance you have to > > > claim that nobody can stand before you.....Guruji's posts exposed > > > your ignorance....you did not even know how to ask queries and > get > > > replies from one of the most empathetic astrologers of this > group, > > > and yet you claim you are this and that...... > > > > > > For your information....nobody is afraid of you..Rather you > should > > be > > > afraid of yourself......Your foolishness itself will be your > doom. > > > Did you not become the laughing stock due to your email-based > > chasing > > > of Priyaa? Such foolishness in occult matters could be more > costly > > > dear.....I think Mohanraaamji and Rafalji are only afraid about > > your > > > own well-being! They are not afraid of you. Nor am I afraid of > you. > > > > > > Your posts never answer the queries or points raised by others; > you > > > take off on a new ground only because of your shallow > understanding > > > of subjects. Nobody has accepted you as a Guru here, and nobody > > > will....Can a fire-fly eclipse the Sun? There are too > many " Suns " > > > here and you are just a fire-fly. > > > > > > It reminds me of a story.....Once an ant challenged the mighty > > > elephant for a fight; the elephant obviously could not hear the > ant > > > (the ant being so tiny and it was on the ground, its sound could > > not > > > reach the elephant). The elephant just walked away out of its own > > > volition in its natural course. Then the ant claimed, " you see > I > > > challenged the elephant and it ran away " . Dear, your saying that > > > nobody can stand before you is similar to that....... > > > > > > FIRST LEARN THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN GHOSTS AND YOUR ANCESTOR > > > SUMANGALIS BEFORE WRITING THE FIRST POSTS ON OCCULT! What a > > > pity......what a pity.....That we have to bear your meaningless > > > rantings here! > > > > > > Abhishek. > > > > > > vedic astrology , " litsol " <mishra.lalit@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > I was waiting for u dear.. > > > > > > > > why u took time ? > > > > > > > > Do u mean Meera Bai discussed with u, what she did.. > > > > > > > > Do u know 'Kleem Krishnay, Govindaya Gopijan Vallabhaya Namh' > is > > a > > > > mantra for lord krishna. > > > > > > > > is there no beej mantras, to whom u wish to misguide ? let > > thnigs > > > > remain between lord, bhakta , their shraddha and their guru. > > > > > > > > why u people are so afraid of me, i m not in business of guru. > > > > > > > > i m happy with my life, my profession of software engineering > > and > > > > my hobbies ok. > > > > > > > > there are 7000+ members are here, by writing such type of > > foolish > > > > things u expose urself only, mind, there are better brains here. > > > > > > > > this is enough ... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology , > > > > " abhishekpotti " <abhishekpotti@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Respected Mohanraaamji: > > > > > > > > > > Well said. Lalith is saying that " maybe in south india > > devotees > > > > > don't chant Moola mantras but not so in North " ...What > > > > > stupidity.....He does not seem to understand that " mantra > > > shaastra > > > > > experts " are also devotees, but they cannot be called as > > innocent > > > > > saatwik bhaktaas! A typical example of a pure saadhwik > bhakta > > > will > > > > > be Meera Bhai (was she not North Indian). Can Lalith say > which > > > > Dasa > > > > > Mahaa Vidya Meera Bhai practised? She was immersed in > Krishna > > > > > consciousness and Lover for Him. Her own Bhajans were her > > > prayers > > > > in > > > > > the bhaavana of Bhakti in the form of Love! This is not > mantra > > > > > shaastra. Another example will be Saant Tukhaaraam. These > > > > bhaktaas > > > > > did not chant moola mantraas. Panditji Dakshinamoorthi was > on > > > dot > > > > in > > > > > saying that " Pure bhaktaas do not chant complicated moola > > > > mantraas " . > > > > > You have clarified this fact wonderfully in your post. I wish > > > more > > > > > knowledgeable persons also put erratic posters in their place > > > just > > > > as > > > > > Mohanraaamji does here. This will benefit more naive readers > > of > > > > > these forums who might otherwise get confused as to which of > > the > > > > > paths to follow. Actually, anyone can follow any path as he/ > > she > > > > > deems it fit; but there should be consistency of procedures. > > > > > > > > > > We should not confuse mantrik rituals and bhakti doctrines. > > > > Bhaktaas > > > > > can chant the names of Gods at anytime.....Mantra shaastra > > > experts > > > > > chanting advanced moola mantras should necessarily adopt > ritual > > > > > procedures for the welfare of themselves and others! > > > > Yes...improper > > > > > chanting of mantras can cause danger to the society also just > > as > > > > > proper chanting can help others. Hence, this cannot be > > > considered > > > > as > > > > > a personal preference of the aspirant. If this was not the > > case, > > > > why > > > > > did sages codify spiritual practises scrupulously? Rafalji, > > > > > Mohanraaamji, etc. are correct in saying it is best to follow > > > > Pandit > > > > > Dakshinamoorthiji's advices on mantra shastra or japams. He > is > > > > > learned and he is living a life compatible to the shaastras > > > though > > > > he > > > > > has faced uncertain circumstances in his own personal life. > He > > > > never > > > > > compromised on principles and he willingly paid the price for > > > that > > > > > which most of us will never do. The words of such a person > > > should > > > > > obviously carry more weight. > > > > > > > > > > Abhishek. > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology , " mohanraaam " > > > <mohanraaam@> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Well Lalith: > > > > > > > > > > > > If you have really done dasa Maha Vidyaa, you would have > > never > > > > > > approached a professional astrologer for > consultation...that > > > much > > > > I > > > > > > can say.... > > > > > > > > > > > > And what idiocy when you say Panditji is partly wrong? He > > > > > > said " Bhaktaas do not chant Moola mantras " , whereas you > have > > > > edited > > > > > > the words to suit your ends....He never said " devotees > don't > > > > chant > > > > > > Beej mantras " .....You are putting words into his mouth and > > > > assuming > > > > > > he is wrong! Why, do you know....the Great Panditji himself > > > > chants > > > > > > Moola mantras.....He is a bhakta and a mantra shastra > expert. > > > As > > > > a > > > > > > bhakta he keeps incessant chanting of naama japa throughout > > the > > > > > day; > > > > > > as a mantra shastra expert, he restricts the moola mantra > > > japams > > > > to > > > > > > stipulated times with ritual purity.....It is this > wonderful > > > > > practice > > > > > > that Guruji was alluding to. Guruji cannot be wrong in > > ritual > > > > and > > > > > > occult matters. Please understand that. > > > > > > > > > > > > There are 4 classes of Devotees.......1) Saatwik vedic > > devotees > > > > who > > > > > > will follow vedic dharma scrupulously. They will not dare > to > > > > > compare > > > > > > astrology and vedanga to Engineering! as you did... > > > > > > 2) Raajasik devotees who will follow vedic disciplines as > far > > > as > > > > > > possible, but will still go after upaasanaas of Demi-Gods > for > > > > > > accomplishment of siddhis. Mantra shaastra experts usually > > > fall > > > > in > > > > > > this category. > > > > > > 3) Saatwik Bhaktaas - for whom the meditation and glory of > > > their > > > > > > Ishta Devataa is enough for spiritual satisfaction. It is > > this > > > > > > category that Guruji referred to when he said they will not > > > chant > > > > > > Moola mantras too much. Definitely they will not do Dasa > > Mahaa > > > > > > Vidyaa. > > > > > > 4) Taamasic Devotees - Those whose main motive is to > project > > > > > > themselves at all costs and acting as if they are equal to > > the > > > > > > experts; they will try ALL practices - whether they are > > > > sanctioned > > > > > by > > > > > > vedas or not.....Their only aim is personal glory and > > > > > satisfaction. > > > > > > They will attack even established dharma if they do not get > > > > results > > > > > > (sounds familiar....You are one!) Ignorance and half- baked > > > > > knowledge > > > > > > and egotism are these persons' motivating fuel. > > > > > > > > > > > > You are really satan's Gift to this list.......My only > prayer > > > is > > > > > that > > > > > > innocent members of this list do not get side-tracked with > > your > > > > > > ramblings. > > > > > > > > > > > > Let me make this clear to the list.....Panditji said that > > > saatwik > > > > > > Bhaktaas who chant Divine names only due to Pure Love on > God > > > > > usually > > > > > > never chant mantrik moola mantraas. It is just one class > of > > > > > > devotees. A rajasik bhakta who is a mantra-shaastra expert > > may > > > > > even > > > > > > be a bhakta at heart; and a pure bhakta may sometimes chant > > > some > > > > > > mantrik japams for solving some practical issues......But, > > when > > > > > they > > > > > > switch their routines temporarily, these enlightened > devotees > > > > > usually > > > > > > take good guidance and follow the tenets of shaastras > > > > > > scrupulously....Definitely they will not sit on assumption > > like > > > > > > Lalith. > > > > > > > > > > > > On the one hand, this fellow claims he has done chants in > > > > forests, > > > > > > rivers, earth, etc. (Probably we have a Maharishi here! > What > > > > > heights > > > > > > of pointless pride in this young man list....it is > > > disgusting!). > > > > > On > > > > > > the other hand, he says he chants mantras in buses, trains, > > > > > etc...... > > > > > > He is confused about which no body can have issues. Only > his > > > > Guru > > > > > > should be concerned about that.....But, his attempts to > stuff > > > his > > > > > > shallow understanding upon this list is reprehensible. > And, > > > his > > > > > > habit of quoting experts out of context is really > > condemnable. > > > > May > > > > > > Jupiter's Light Shine on that fellow and teach him to > respect > > > the > > > > > > hallowed traditions and to stay at his level rather than > > trying > > > > > > to " teach " others (He has the audacity to claim he > > > is " teaching " > > > > > > Rafalji!) > > > > > > > > > > > > If a mere young man of 35 years who has spent his life on a > > > > " Failed > > > > > > computer web desining business " , " pointless email chasing > of > > > > > girls " , > > > > > > and other " past times " can gain insight as he claims, how > > much > > > > will > > > > > > learned Gurus of this group with their life of devotion to > > > > vedanta > > > > > > and vedanga know? His peanut brain and hyper-inflated ego > > will > > > > > never > > > > > > allow him to see this obvious truth. But, please list > > exercise > > > > > your > > > > > > discretion while reading his posts (There are doubtless > some > > > good > > > > > > elements even in his posts; but mostly there is trash > > presented > > > > as > > > > > > philosophy). > > > > > > > > > > > > Mohanraaam > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology , " litsol " > > > <mishra.lalit@> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Rafal, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Do u think, a hobby means shallow knowledge of the > domain, > > No > > > > > > rafal, > > > > > > > it's not like that. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > At least not for me. You have learnt and i m learning, i > > read > > > > > ur's > > > > > > > replies and get benifitted, same way i wanted you to pay > > > heed > > > > to > > > > > > > what i have written about spritiuality, mostrly i did > write > > > for > > > > u > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have done all 10 mahavidyas of tantra and read many > > tantrik > > > > > > > classics, spent good deal of time with great tantriks > > > trained > > > > in > > > > > > > Kamakhya and other places, keenly observed their doings, > > > their > > > > > > > mistakes etc.., I did tremendous mantra chanting on > water, > > > on > > > > > > earth, > > > > > > > at home, in forests etc... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > then reached here, then i did write something, but sorry > i > > > dont > > > > > > > remember shlokas. i was not interested in cramming that. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Panditji is not fully correct in saying that BeejMantras > > are > > > > not > > > > > > > chanted by devotees, I dont know much about South India > but > > > in > > > > > > North > > > > > > > normally its done. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > And a successfull mantra sadhana has to result in one's > > being > > > a > > > > > > > devotee, the devotion is the outcome, final result of > > mantra > > > > > > sadhana, > > > > > > > perhaps, Pandit Ji believes mantras are power > > packet,thinks, > > > i > > > > do > > > > > > it > > > > > > > this way , these many times and get this result, this is > > > where > > > > > most > > > > > > > of the people are confused. without being a good human > > being > > > if > > > > > we > > > > > > > think, we will achieve something in spirituality, is > > > difficult, > > > > > > very > > > > > > > difficult. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > what happens is, with the mantra chanting, a self > > > > > transformation > > > > > > > process begins, u if dont restrict urself, ur karma > begins > > > > > > diluting, > > > > > > > and u begin ur purification process unknowingly, when > > > > substantial > > > > > > > part of ego and greed for respect vanishes and many such > > > thing > > > > > > > togather, mantra awakens u and with the God's grace ur > > > > objective > > > > > > gets > > > > > > > fullfilled, gradually u become a devotee. ur being simple > > and > > > > > being > > > > > > > devotee is sometimes is indication of ur's going on the > > right > > > > > track. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think we have discussed a lot, it's enough !! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > My Boss has given me lot of projects to complete, so, may > > be, > > > i > > > > m > > > > > > not > > > > > > > going to available in the group like i was recently. > > however. > > > i > > > > > > will > > > > > > > complete Garg Hora series. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > > Lalit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology , Rafal Gendarz > > > > > > > <starsuponme@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Litsol, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Then please dont generalize Your preferences as they > are > > > too > > > > > > > shallow for > > > > > > > > this Forum aspiration. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz > > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru > > > > > > > > email: rafal@ > > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > litsol napisa?(a): > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Rafel, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I take Astrology as a good hobby, and i w'd be > looking > > at > > > > it > > > > > > with > > > > > > > an > > > > > > > > > engineer's approach. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I asked ur age because, it's our thinking to put our > > > > > parameters > > > > > > in > > > > > > > > > god's system, there is nothing like delay or > > advancement > > > in > > > > > > > > > spirituality. So, " Delay " or " Speed " , " backwardness " > > > > > > > > > and " advancement " doesn't exist in spirituality, I > > > thought > > > > if > > > > > u > > > > > > r > > > > > > > > > thinking that it may take too much time, I wanted to > > tell > > > > u, > > > > > > it's > > > > > > > not > > > > > > > > > like that. there is no delay. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It clicks in fraction of a second, when u r getting > > > clicked > > > > > > > depends > > > > > > > > > on u and on god's will, when he wants u to get > clicked. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > God sometimes graces for no reason ( " Ahetuka " ) just > for > > > his > > > > > > > > > compassion towards u and it may happen next minute > too. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > spirituality is not delimited by time , effort and > > rules. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > > > > Lalit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology > > > > > > > > > <vedic astrology%40>, Rafal > > Gendarz > > > > > > > > > <starsuponme@ ...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Litsol, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please be careful about words. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Im happy that You are sharing Your experience - > very > > > > > > inspirating > > > > > > > > > ones. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Age hierarchy is for sudras - Manu Samhita. If You > > > treat > > > > > > Jyotish > > > > > > > > > Vedanga > > > > > > > > > > as profession similar to engineering You have a > long > > > way > > > > to > > > > > > go. > > > > > > > But > > > > > > > > > dont > > > > > > > > > > be pessimistic here are many who will try to help > You > > > in > > > > > > getting > > > > > > > > > proper > > > > > > > > > > understanding. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > After some time You will agree with me about the > mala > > > and > > > > > > japa. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz > > > > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru > > > > > > > > > > email: rafal@ > > > > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > litsol napisa?(a): > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Rafal, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Here u r doing two wrong things, instead of > > > developing > > > > ur > > > > > > > > > understanding, > > > > > > > > > > > u r trying to conclude something and going beyond > > > that > > > > u r > > > > > > > > > messaging > > > > > > > > > > > same to many. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I m touching 35, What's ur age ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Astrology is a kind of vidya or profession, like > i > > m > > > a > > > > > > > software > > > > > > > > > > > engineer, software engineering is my profession. > > > > > > spirituality > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > beyond > > > > > > > > > > > all sort of vidya or profession. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I wish u to be a good soul and to realize the > bliss > > > of > > > > > self > > > > > > > > > awakening or > > > > > > > > > > > in other terms, the bliss that comes once u feel > u > > > and > > > > > god > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > > connected. dissolved in each other. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > First realize, experience, then speak and then > > > suggest > > > > to > > > > > > > others, > > > > > > > > > by > > > > > > > > > > > mere reading shastras or books u r not going to > > feel > > > > it. > > > > > > > unless > > > > > > > > > god > > > > > > > > > > > graces u it's very very difficult. and if u dont > > > avoid > > > > > this > > > > > > > sort > > > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > > hurriedness instead of learning and > understanding, > > it > > > > > will > > > > > > > affect > > > > > > > > > u only > > > > > > > > > > > no one else. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > somehere i have read, it was written - By mere > > > > > > repeating " So- > > > > > > > > > Aham " no > > > > > > > > > > > one gets liberated unless he realizes it like one > > > > doesnt > > > > > get > > > > > > > > > cured by > > > > > > > > > > > knowing the name of the medicine, u need to take > > the > > > > > > medicine > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > get > > > > > > > > > > > cured " . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So, pls. be wise, as it was being discussed here, > i > > > > > shared > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > experience of my life, pls. mind it, i m not a > > > > preecher, > > > > > > nor a > > > > > > > > > guru, nor > > > > > > > > > > > i have to make my followers, nor it's my > > profession, > > > > nor > > > > > i > > > > > > > have > > > > > > > > > to get > > > > > > > > > > > fame, sharing things is a kind of friendliness a > > kind > > > of > > > > > > > > > affection, > > > > > > > > > > > that's it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > > > > > > Lalit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. com>, > > Rafal > > > > > Gendarz > > > > > > > > > > > <starsuponme@ ...> > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Jyotishas > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Counting of mala has more depth sense than just > > > > > counting, > > > > > > > so for > > > > > > > > > > > natives > > > > > > > > > > > > like Litsol counting is neccessary and any > other > > > > > > speculation > > > > > > > > > will be > > > > > > > > > > > > only illusory and just imagination. We should > > > follow > > > > Pt. > > > > > > > > > > > Dakshinamoorti > > > > > > > > > > > > advise strictly, otherwise our process of > > spiritual > > > > > > > development > > > > > > > > > will > > > > > > > > > > > be > > > > > > > > > > > > slow and unauthoritative. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz > > > > > > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru > > > > > > > > > > > > email: rafal@ > > > > > > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > asmp2k02@ napisa?(a): > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Resp Sri Lalitji, > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for your mail.But please also read > > > > > > > GuruDakshinamurthyi > > > > > > > > > ji's > > > > > > > > > > > > > mail(addressing me) also on this,which brings > > in > > > > more > > > > > > > clarity > > > > > > > > > to the > > > > > > > > > > > > > applicability principles to my mail. > > > > > > > > > > > > > I meant that both are necessity but to what > > > degree > > > > of > > > > > > time > > > > > > > (it > > > > > > > > > varies > > > > > > > > > > > > > from saadhaka to saadhaka) to get such > inbuilt > > > > > maturity > > > > > > > such > > > > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > > > > > > the count will be taken care of by Divine > > forces > > > > > after > > > > > > > some > > > > > > > > > initial > > > > > > > > > > > > > period of saadhana. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Morover the type of bio matter present in the > > > japa > > > > > maala > > > > > > > > > (which is > > > > > > > > > > > > > symbolic for ritualism as well as from > > practical > > > > > point > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > view for > > > > > > > > > > > our > > > > > > > > > > > > > count) will help in keeping away destructive > > > forces > > > > > > > acting on > > > > > > > > > us > > > > > > > > > > > .Thus > > > > > > > > > > > > > the symbolic rituals will indirectly help us > in > > > > > keeping > > > > > > > away > > > > > > > > > from > > > > > > > > > > > > > negative thoughts and also trains our memory > to > > > be > > > > > > object > > > > > > > > > > > oriented.If > > > > > > > > > > > > > our memory grows and retentive capacity > > increase > > > > the > > > > > > > Gnaana > > > > > > > > > will > > > > > > > > > > > > > increase ,but at the same time destructive > > forces > > > > > > > > > (diversions) also > > > > > > > > > > > > > becomes powerful.Thus the symbolic procedures > > > will > > > > > come > > > > > > in > > > > > > > > > handy to > > > > > > > > > > > > > successfully fight the negative forces.The > > > rituals > > > > > may > > > > > > be > > > > > > > > > Rising > > > > > > > > > > > > > early(if possible during Braahmi > muhurta),Taking > > > > > > > > > bath,Japaanusthaan, > > > > > > > > > > > > > attending to the livelihood job etc etc in > > > defined > > > > > > times > > > > > > > as > > > > > > > > > > > discipline > > > > > > > > > > > > > helps indirectly tune our memory through > > keeping > > > > our > > > > > > body > > > > > > > > > healthy. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thus ultimately we conclude that the so > called > > > > > symbolic > > > > > > > > > procedures > > > > > > > > > > > are > > > > > > > > > > > > > not actually symbolic(it got branded as such) > > but > > > a > > > > > > > necessity > > > > > > > > > for > > > > > > > > > > > our > > > > > > > > > > > > > own good if we practice to the extent we can. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quoting mishra.lalit@ ... <mishra. > lalit% > > > > > > 40gmail. > > > > > > > com>: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Resp. Sri Murthy Adavi, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, what you said is perfectly right, we > count > > > or > > > > > dont > > > > > > > > > count,target > > > > > > > > > > > > > is realization of god's love within, I got it > > > with > > > > no > > > > > > > > > counting, > > > > > > > > > > > > > someone may get it with counting. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanx, for the writing. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > Lalit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. com> > > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. > com>, > > > > > srinivasa > > > > > > > > > murthy adavi > > > > > > > > > > > > > asmp2k02@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Respected Learned Members, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Both views may be correct when the views > > > have/or > > > > > with > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > goal as > > > > > > > > > > > > > development of Love/Devotion towards > adhistana > > > > > Devatha > > > > > > of > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > Mantra > > > > > > > > > > > > > as Base. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In the initial stage only you need the > > count;as > > > > one > > > > > > > > > develops the > > > > > > > > > > > > > habit the biological tuning of the > > intellect/body > > > > will > > > > > > > > > automatically > > > > > > > > > > > > > take care of the practice(without count- help > of > > > > malas > > > > > > > etc). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It's like if with the help of Alarm clock > if > > we > > > > > wake > > > > > > up > > > > > > > for > > > > > > > > > 2 or 3 > > > > > > > > > > > > > days at some appointed hour,then > automatically > > we > > > > > > wakeup > > > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > the same > > > > > > > > > > > > > time every day without help of alarm. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > With due Respects > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > smadavi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quoting starsuponme@ : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Litsol, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Definitely we should count our Mantra Japa > on > > > > Mala. > > > > > > Your > > > > > > > > > view is > > > > > > > > > > > > > against > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Vedic Authorities and Sages, so should be > > > > rejected. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru > > > > > > > > > > > > > > email: rafal@ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > litsol napisa?(a): > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Mr. Jayashri, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > A thought came, why i should not share > with > > > u, > > > > U > > > > > > pls. > > > > > > > stop > > > > > > > > > > > > > counting > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > mantra chantings, counting mantra gives > > false > > > > ego > > > > > > and > > > > > > > then > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > frustration if u dont get desired results. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > leave it to the god, god counts the > mantra > > > > > chanted > > > > > > by > > > > > > > you > > > > > > > > > may be > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 108, 1008 or whatsoever, let him count, > > it's > > > > his > > > > > > part > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > ur > > > > > > > > > > > part > > > > > > > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to chant the mantra. when the mantra has > to > > > > > awaken, > > > > > > it > > > > > > > > > will be, > > > > > > > > > > > > > god > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > will ensure it for u. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sometimes we try to become more > intelligent > > > > with > > > > > out > > > > > > > > > limited > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > intellect and that creates obstacles in > our > > > > > > spiritual > > > > > > > > > growth. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So, forget about counts, forget about the > > > time > > > > u > > > > > > put > > > > > > > in > > > > > > > > > for ur's > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sadhana, invoke the god with pure heart. > > > purity > > > > > > > counts. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Lalit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. > > > > > > > > > com>, " dakshinastrologer " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <dakshinastrologer@ ...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Ms. Jayashree: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think this topic on 108 is getting > very > > > > > > > interesting > > > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > enlightening for all members. Yesterday > > we > > > > had a > > > > > > > > > wonderful > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > esoteric > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > explanation from Shri. Sushil Dikshit, > > and > > > > > today > > > > > > > your > > > > > > > > > > > wonderful > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > explanation of numerical symmetry of > the > > > > cosmos! > > > > > > > > > Wonderful. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There definitely exists a " numerical > > > > symphony " > > > > > in > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > Universe. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > not only 108.....as I mentioned in my > > > earlier > > > > > > post, > > > > > > > > > there are > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > various > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > other numerals that are significant in > > > occult > > > > > > > > > practices. 108 > > > > > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > > > > a > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > powerful and all-purpose perfect > > > > number...While > > > > > > we > > > > > > > have > > > > > > > > > > > > > understood > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the glory of 108, we should not lose > > sight > > > of > > > > > the > > > > > > > fact > > > > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > > > > > > there > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > are > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > other powerful numbers also. This is > just > > > for > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > information > > > > > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > list. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > My apprecitation again for this > wonderful > > > > > > response. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Blessed be. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pandit R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Blessed be. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pandit R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI. --- In vedic- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > astrology@grou ps.com > > > <astrology% > > > > > > > > > > > > > 40. com>, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " jayasartn " <jayasartn@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In cosmology, 108 has this > > significance - > > > > the > > > > > > > moon is > > > > > > > > > away > > > > > > > > > > > > > from > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > earth 108 times its (moon's) diameter > > and > > > > the > > > > > > sun > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > away > > > > > > > > > > > > > from the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > earth, 108 times its diameter. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Perhaps this reality of distances is > > > > > applicable > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > deities > > > > > > > > > > > > > too. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Perhaps this has been indicated by > the > > > 108 > > > > > divya > > > > > > > > > desas of > > > > > > > > > > > Lord > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Narayana. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > jayasree > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology@ . > com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. > > > > > > > > > com>, " dakshinastrologer " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <dakshinastrologer@ > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Shri. Sushil: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It is a wonderful answer you have > > given. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Blessed be. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pandit R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology@ > . > > com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. > > > > > > > > > com>, " sushil.dikshit " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <sushil.dikshit@ > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Babu, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It is not a silly question but it > > is > > > a > > > > > very > > > > > > > good > > > > > > > > > > > question. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Actually > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > there are 27 Nakshatras and every > > > > > Nakshtras > > > > > > > has 4 > > > > > > > > > Charan > > > > > > > > > > > > > so > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > total > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > charans are 27 x 4 = 108 Charan. > > Each > > > > > > Charan > > > > > > > has 3 > > > > > > > > > > > degree > > > > > > > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 20 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > minutes so if you multiply 3 > degree > > > and > > > > 20 > > > > > > > > > minutes to > > > > > > > > > > > 108 > > > > > > > > > > > > > it > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > comes > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > out to be 360 degress i.e. one > > cycle > > > > > > (Circle). > > > > > > > > > This > > > > > > > > > > > cycle > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > represetns > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > whole brahmand because all the > > > rashis, > > > > > > > planets and > > > > > > > > > > > > > nakshatra > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > are > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > between these 360 degree in 2 > > > > dimensional > > > > > > > > > horoscope. So > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > chanting a > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mantra completes one cycle of > this > > > > > brahmand. > > > > > > > > > Further One > > > > > > > > > > > > > who > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > has > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > visited Brahamand at least one > time > > > > i.e. > > > > > he > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > > > > brahmagyani he > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > entitiled to place 108 Shri > before > > > his > > > > > name. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sushil dikshit > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology@ > > . > > > com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. > > > com>, > > > > > babu > > > > > > > mon > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <muthappan111@ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Namaste, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It may be a silly matter for > all > > of > > > > you. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I want to know what is the > reason > > > > that > > > > > > some > > > > > > > > > remedies > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > recomended > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > for 108 times. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I dont know any thing about > > > astrology. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I hope you may pleased to > provide > > a > > > > > reply > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thanks, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Babu > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------ --------- ------- -- > - > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Be a better Globetrotter. Get > > > better > > > > > > travel > > > > > > > > > answers > > > > > > > > > > > from > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someone > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > who knows. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Answers - Check it out. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this > > message > > > > have > > > > > > been > > > > > > > > > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have > been > > > > > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have > been > > > > > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > > > > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > > > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 29, 2007 Report Share Posted July 29, 2007 sth = something, learn it, now !! i m happy for u on this and many other readers w'd be. good. vedic astrology , " litsol " <mishra.lalit wrote: > > Idiot, I have my laptop with me at home. > > > vedic astrology , " abhishekpotti " > <abhishekpotti@> wrote: > > > > Oye Lalith: > > > > How are you sending a message today? Did you go to the office > today > > also just to pilfer the company's internet connections on a holiday > > also? typical of you! One of these days, your employer will kick > you > > out of the office for having misused company's resources and may be > > you will write another story on how sani came in front of you and > > asked you to change job! > > > > for your information, Meera Bhai's affection to Lord Krishna was > way > > before her formal initiation into the beeja mantra. She was known > to > > sing heart-rending songs on Lord Krishna rather than chanting the > > beeja mantra in buses and trains! > > > > Beeja mantra and God's name are not one and the same as you are > > trying to portray. In fact for chanting God's name can be chanted > > without any beeja mantra and still it will give good results. This > > is what happens when you " steal " knowledge by observing tantrik > > practices without formal initiation! > > > > we are not getting exposed....rather it is you who are being > exposed > > with every post. As I said to Ram Jaswalji yesterday itself, I > will > > stop this exchange if you stop it. Otherwise, this will go on. I > am > > not afraid of you. But I pity you.....that is why I am writing the > > below matter...... > > > > By the way, see a good psychiatrist.....I will give just one > evidence > > for your psycopathy...In your posts, often you type a word " Sth " > > often incoherently.....It is almost a pattern for you. This is > > suggestive of OCB problem for you. Better get yourself treated for > > psychiatric ailments and get on with your life instead of trying > > evaluate persons far elder and wiser than you. I am not saying > this > > to abuse you as Ram Jaswalji might think....It is the genuine > advice > > of an elderly person. There is nothing wrong in consulting a good > > psychiatrist; now a days the stigma is not there. So, help yourself. > > > > Abhishek. > > > > vedic astrology , " litsol " <mishra.lalit@> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > You praised Meera, Good, when u w'd learn sth from her pure > bhakti, > > > see, cunningness and being manipulator doesnt help always!! > > > > > > twisting words always, i shown u a mantra of lord Krishna, in > which > > a > > > beej mantra is used, instead of learning that God's Name and Beej > > are > > > one and same thing, writing so much. > > > > > > What i said, open ur eyes and mind, read again, a devotion is > > obvious > > > final outcome of mantra chanting. > > > > > > read what i have been saying, read many times a day, the clouds > of > > ur > > > karma smokes ur understanding. > > > > > > and learn one more thing - Meera got formal deekschha from Saint > > > Raidas. > > > > > > I use company's time or what, that i manage and is a matter of my > > > job, i dont advertise here to get some business in background, > and > > u > > > 2-3 who are lobbying here , are exposed by urself. > > > > > > exposing u was not my objective, but it happened. > > > > > > it will keep happening. > > > > > > > > > ok > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology , " abhishekpotti " > > > <abhishekpotti@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Dear Lalith: > > > > > > > > The whole world knows the history of Blessed Meera Bhai....the > > > > epitome of Bhakti......She was attached to her " Lala " - the > > > wonderful > > > > idol of Krishna gifted to her even from her childhood....Do you > > > mean > > > > to say that innocent young girl started chanting " Kliim > > krishnaaya " > > > > mantra automatically? Even Bhakta Prahlaada had to be > initiated > > by > > > > Sage Naaradha for his chant of dwaadasaakshari mantra.... > > > > > > > > Nobody is afraid of you here......You need not proclaim that > you > > > are > > > > not in the business of a Guru.....actually Guru status is not a > > > > business (true to your half-baked knowledge you will claim it > is > > > also > > > > like software engineering!). The difference my friend between > > you > > > > and other great persons like Rafal or Dakshinamoorthiji is that > > > they > > > > are spending their money for the internet, whereas you are > > > pilfering > > > > your company's time and the company's resources while browsing > > the > > > > internet. Don't you think you are cheating your company when > you > > > > spend so much time on empty and egoistic posts defending > yourself > > > > against every expert after arguing with them unnecessarily? > Are > > > you > > > > not getting paid for the time you spend in the company....Know > > the > > > > basics of ethics before ever sermonizing.....So, actually you > are > > > an > > > > exploiter....try to understand that....the other gurujis are > > > probably > > > > too decent to comment on that......What happened to your > > project? > > > > Better rush to it nough!....It will spare us the agony of > > replying > > > to > > > > your half-witted postings! > > > > > > > > By the say, Which member asked you Prashna Tantra dear? We did > > not > > > > see any posts requesting " Honourable Lalith " to explain Prashna > > > > Tantra (as if you could explain it!) What arrogance you have > to > > > > claim that nobody can stand before you.....Guruji's posts > exposed > > > > your ignorance....you did not even know how to ask queries and > > get > > > > replies from one of the most empathetic astrologers of this > > group, > > > > and yet you claim you are this and that...... > > > > > > > > For your information....nobody is afraid of you..Rather you > > should > > > be > > > > afraid of yourself......Your foolishness itself will be your > > doom. > > > > Did you not become the laughing stock due to your email-based > > > chasing > > > > of Priyaa? Such foolishness in occult matters could be more > > costly > > > > dear.....I think Mohanraaamji and Rafalji are only afraid about > > > your > > > > own well-being! They are not afraid of you. Nor am I afraid of > > you. > > > > > > > > Your posts never answer the queries or points raised by others; > > you > > > > take off on a new ground only because of your shallow > > understanding > > > > of subjects. Nobody has accepted you as a Guru here, and > nobody > > > > will....Can a fire-fly eclipse the Sun? There are too > > many " Suns " > > > > here and you are just a fire-fly. > > > > > > > > It reminds me of a story.....Once an ant challenged the mighty > > > > elephant for a fight; the elephant obviously could not hear the > > ant > > > > (the ant being so tiny and it was on the ground, its sound > could > > > not > > > > reach the elephant). The elephant just walked away out of its > own > > > > volition in its natural course. Then the ant claimed, " you > see > > I > > > > challenged the elephant and it ran away " . Dear, your saying > that > > > > nobody can stand before you is similar to that....... > > > > > > > > FIRST LEARN THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN GHOSTS AND YOUR ANCESTOR > > > > SUMANGALIS BEFORE WRITING THE FIRST POSTS ON OCCULT! What a > > > > pity......what a pity.....That we have to bear your meaningless > > > > rantings here! > > > > > > > > Abhishek. > > > > > > > > vedic astrology , " litsol " > <mishra.lalit@> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I was waiting for u dear.. > > > > > > > > > > why u took time ? > > > > > > > > > > Do u mean Meera Bai discussed with u, what she did.. > > > > > > > > > > Do u know 'Kleem Krishnay, Govindaya Gopijan Vallabhaya > Namh' > > is > > > a > > > > > mantra for lord krishna. > > > > > > > > > > is there no beej mantras, to whom u wish to misguide ? let > > > thnigs > > > > > remain between lord, bhakta , their shraddha and their guru. > > > > > > > > > > why u people are so afraid of me, i m not in business of > guru. > > > > > > > > > > i m happy with my life, my profession of software > engineering > > > and > > > > > my hobbies ok. > > > > > > > > > > there are 7000+ members are here, by writing such type of > > > foolish > > > > > things u expose urself only, mind, there are better brains > here. > > > > > > > > > > this is enough ... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology , > > > > > " abhishekpotti " <abhishekpotti@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Respected Mohanraaamji: > > > > > > > > > > > > Well said. Lalith is saying that " maybe in south india > > > devotees > > > > > > don't chant Moola mantras but not so in North " ...What > > > > > > stupidity.....He does not seem to understand that " mantra > > > > shaastra > > > > > > experts " are also devotees, but they cannot be called as > > > innocent > > > > > > saatwik bhaktaas! A typical example of a pure saadhwik > > bhakta > > > > will > > > > > > be Meera Bhai (was she not North Indian). Can Lalith say > > which > > > > > Dasa > > > > > > Mahaa Vidya Meera Bhai practised? She was immersed in > > Krishna > > > > > > consciousness and Lover for Him. Her own Bhajans were her > > > > prayers > > > > > in > > > > > > the bhaavana of Bhakti in the form of Love! This is not > > mantra > > > > > > shaastra. Another example will be Saant Tukhaaraam. These > > > > > bhaktaas > > > > > > did not chant moola mantraas. Panditji Dakshinamoorthi was > > on > > > > dot > > > > > in > > > > > > saying that " Pure bhaktaas do not chant complicated moola > > > > > mantraas " . > > > > > > You have clarified this fact wonderfully in your post. I > wish > > > > more > > > > > > knowledgeable persons also put erratic posters in their > place > > > > just > > > > > as > > > > > > Mohanraaamji does here. This will benefit more naive > readers > > > of > > > > > > these forums who might otherwise get confused as to which > of > > > the > > > > > > paths to follow. Actually, anyone can follow any path as > he/ > > > she > > > > > > deems it fit; but there should be consistency of procedures. > > > > > > > > > > > > We should not confuse mantrik rituals and bhakti > doctrines. > > > > > Bhaktaas > > > > > > can chant the names of Gods at anytime.....Mantra shaastra > > > > experts > > > > > > chanting advanced moola mantras should necessarily adopt > > ritual > > > > > > procedures for the welfare of themselves and others! > > > > > Yes...improper > > > > > > chanting of mantras can cause danger to the society also > just > > > as > > > > > > proper chanting can help others. Hence, this cannot be > > > > considered > > > > > as > > > > > > a personal preference of the aspirant. If this was not the > > > case, > > > > > why > > > > > > did sages codify spiritual practises scrupulously? > Rafalji, > > > > > > Mohanraaamji, etc. are correct in saying it is best to > follow > > > > > Pandit > > > > > > Dakshinamoorthiji's advices on mantra shastra or japams. > He > > is > > > > > > learned and he is living a life compatible to the shaastras > > > > though > > > > > he > > > > > > has faced uncertain circumstances in his own personal > life. > > He > > > > > never > > > > > > compromised on principles and he willingly paid the price > for > > > > that > > > > > > which most of us will never do. The words of such a person > > > > should > > > > > > obviously carry more weight. > > > > > > > > > > > > Abhishek. > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology , " mohanraaam " > > > > <mohanraaam@> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Well Lalith: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If you have really done dasa Maha Vidyaa, you would have > > > never > > > > > > > approached a professional astrologer for > > consultation...that > > > > much > > > > > I > > > > > > > can say.... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > And what idiocy when you say Panditji is partly wrong? > He > > > > > > > said " Bhaktaas do not chant Moola mantras " , whereas you > > have > > > > > edited > > > > > > > the words to suit your ends....He never said " devotees > > don't > > > > > chant > > > > > > > Beej mantras " .....You are putting words into his mouth > and > > > > > assuming > > > > > > > he is wrong! Why, do you know....the Great Panditji > himself > > > > > chants > > > > > > > Moola mantras.....He is a bhakta and a mantra shastra > > expert. > > > > As > > > > > a > > > > > > > bhakta he keeps incessant chanting of naama japa > throughout > > > the > > > > > > day; > > > > > > > as a mantra shastra expert, he restricts the moola mantra > > > > japams > > > > > to > > > > > > > stipulated times with ritual purity.....It is this > > wonderful > > > > > > practice > > > > > > > that Guruji was alluding to. Guruji cannot be wrong in > > > ritual > > > > > and > > > > > > > occult matters. Please understand that. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There are 4 classes of Devotees.......1) Saatwik vedic > > > devotees > > > > > who > > > > > > > will follow vedic dharma scrupulously. They will not > dare > > to > > > > > > compare > > > > > > > astrology and vedanga to Engineering! as you did... > > > > > > > 2) Raajasik devotees who will follow vedic disciplines as > > far > > > > as > > > > > > > possible, but will still go after upaasanaas of Demi- Gods > > for > > > > > > > accomplishment of siddhis. Mantra shaastra experts > usually > > > > fall > > > > > in > > > > > > > this category. > > > > > > > 3) Saatwik Bhaktaas - for whom the meditation and glory > of > > > > their > > > > > > > Ishta Devataa is enough for spiritual satisfaction. It > is > > > this > > > > > > > category that Guruji referred to when he said they will > not > > > > chant > > > > > > > Moola mantras too much. Definitely they will not do Dasa > > > Mahaa > > > > > > > Vidyaa. > > > > > > > 4) Taamasic Devotees - Those whose main motive is to > > project > > > > > > > themselves at all costs and acting as if they are equal > to > > > the > > > > > > > experts; they will try ALL practices - whether they are > > > > > sanctioned > > > > > > by > > > > > > > vedas or not.....Their only aim is personal glory and > > > > > > satisfaction. > > > > > > > They will attack even established dharma if they do not > get > > > > > results > > > > > > > (sounds familiar....You are one!) Ignorance and half- > baked > > > > > > knowledge > > > > > > > and egotism are these persons' motivating fuel. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You are really satan's Gift to this list.......My only > > prayer > > > > is > > > > > > that > > > > > > > innocent members of this list do not get side-tracked > with > > > your > > > > > > > ramblings. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Let me make this clear to the list.....Panditji said that > > > > saatwik > > > > > > > Bhaktaas who chant Divine names only due to Pure Love on > > God > > > > > > usually > > > > > > > never chant mantrik moola mantraas. It is just one class > > of > > > > > > > devotees. A rajasik bhakta who is a mantra-shaastra > expert > > > may > > > > > > even > > > > > > > be a bhakta at heart; and a pure bhakta may sometimes > chant > > > > some > > > > > > > mantrik japams for solving some practical > issues......But, > > > when > > > > > > they > > > > > > > switch their routines temporarily, these enlightened > > devotees > > > > > > usually > > > > > > > take good guidance and follow the tenets of shaastras > > > > > > > scrupulously....Definitely they will not sit on > assumption > > > like > > > > > > > Lalith. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On the one hand, this fellow claims he has done chants in > > > > > forests, > > > > > > > rivers, earth, etc. (Probably we have a Maharishi here! > > What > > > > > > heights > > > > > > > of pointless pride in this young man list....it is > > > > disgusting!). > > > > > > On > > > > > > > the other hand, he says he chants mantras in buses, > trains, > > > > > > etc...... > > > > > > > He is confused about which no body can have issues. Only > > his > > > > > Guru > > > > > > > should be concerned about that.....But, his attempts to > > stuff > > > > his > > > > > > > shallow understanding upon this list is reprehensible. > > And, > > > > his > > > > > > > habit of quoting experts out of context is really > > > condemnable. > > > > > May > > > > > > > Jupiter's Light Shine on that fellow and teach him to > > respect > > > > the > > > > > > > hallowed traditions and to stay at his level rather than > > > trying > > > > > > > to " teach " others (He has the audacity to claim he > > > > is " teaching " > > > > > > > Rafalji!) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If a mere young man of 35 years who has spent his life on > a > > > > > " Failed > > > > > > > computer web desining business " , " pointless email chasing > > of > > > > > > girls " , > > > > > > > and other " past times " can gain insight as he claims, how > > > much > > > > > will > > > > > > > learned Gurus of this group with their life of devotion > to > > > > > vedanta > > > > > > > and vedanga know? His peanut brain and hyper-inflated > ego > > > will > > > > > > never > > > > > > > allow him to see this obvious truth. But, please list > > > exercise > > > > > > your > > > > > > > discretion while reading his posts (There are doubtless > > some > > > > good > > > > > > > elements even in his posts; but mostly there is trash > > > presented > > > > > as > > > > > > > philosophy). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mohanraaam > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology , " litsol " > > > > <mishra.lalit@> > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Rafal, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Do u think, a hobby means shallow knowledge of the > > domain, > > > No > > > > > > > rafal, > > > > > > > > it's not like that. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > At least not for me. You have learnt and i m learning, > i > > > read > > > > > > ur's > > > > > > > > replies and get benifitted, same way i wanted you to > pay > > > > heed > > > > > to > > > > > > > > what i have written about spritiuality, mostrly i did > > write > > > > for > > > > > u > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have done all 10 mahavidyas of tantra and read many > > > tantrik > > > > > > > > classics, spent good deal of time with great tantriks > > > > trained > > > > > in > > > > > > > > Kamakhya and other places, keenly observed their > doings, > > > > their > > > > > > > > mistakes etc.., I did tremendous mantra chanting on > > water, > > > > on > > > > > > > earth, > > > > > > > > at home, in forests etc... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > then reached here, then i did write something, but > sorry > > i > > > > dont > > > > > > > > remember shlokas. i was not interested in cramming that. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Panditji is not fully correct in saying that > BeejMantras > > > are > > > > > not > > > > > > > > chanted by devotees, I dont know much about South India > > but > > > > in > > > > > > > North > > > > > > > > normally its done. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > And a successfull mantra sadhana has to result in one's > > > being > > > > a > > > > > > > > devotee, the devotion is the outcome, final result of > > > mantra > > > > > > > sadhana, > > > > > > > > perhaps, Pandit Ji believes mantras are power > > > packet,thinks, > > > > i > > > > > do > > > > > > > it > > > > > > > > this way , these many times and get this result, this > is > > > > where > > > > > > most > > > > > > > > of the people are confused. without being a good human > > > being > > > > if > > > > > > we > > > > > > > > think, we will achieve something in spirituality, is > > > > difficult, > > > > > > > very > > > > > > > > difficult. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > what happens is, with the mantra chanting, a self > > > > > > transformation > > > > > > > > process begins, u if dont restrict urself, ur karma > > begins > > > > > > > diluting, > > > > > > > > and u begin ur purification process unknowingly, when > > > > > substantial > > > > > > > > part of ego and greed for respect vanishes and many > such > > > > thing > > > > > > > > togather, mantra awakens u and with the God's grace ur > > > > > objective > > > > > > > gets > > > > > > > > fullfilled, gradually u become a devotee. ur being > simple > > > and > > > > > > being > > > > > > > > devotee is sometimes is indication of ur's going on the > > > right > > > > > > track. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think we have discussed a lot, it's enough !! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > My Boss has given me lot of projects to complete, so, > may > > > be, > > > > i > > > > > m > > > > > > > not > > > > > > > > going to available in the group like i was recently. > > > however. > > > > i > > > > > > > will > > > > > > > > complete Garg Hora series. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > > > Lalit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology , Rafal Gendarz > > > > > > > > <starsuponme@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Litsol, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Then please dont generalize Your preferences as they > > are > > > > too > > > > > > > > shallow for > > > > > > > > > this Forum aspiration. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz > > > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru > > > > > > > > > email: rafal@ > > > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > litsol napisa?(a): > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Rafel, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I take Astrology as a good hobby, and i w'd be > > looking > > > at > > > > > it > > > > > > > with > > > > > > > > an > > > > > > > > > > engineer's approach. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I asked ur age because, it's our thinking to put > our > > > > > > parameters > > > > > > > in > > > > > > > > > > god's system, there is nothing like delay or > > > advancement > > > > in > > > > > > > > > > spirituality. So, " Delay " > or " Speed " , " backwardness " > > > > > > > > > > and " advancement " doesn't exist in spirituality, I > > > > thought > > > > > if > > > > > > u > > > > > > > r > > > > > > > > > > thinking that it may take too much time, I wanted > to > > > tell > > > > > u, > > > > > > > it's > > > > > > > > not > > > > > > > > > > like that. there is no delay. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It clicks in fraction of a second, when u r getting > > > > clicked > > > > > > > > depends > > > > > > > > > > on u and on god's will, when he wants u to get > > clicked. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > God sometimes graces for no reason ( " Ahetuka " ) just > > for > > > > his > > > > > > > > > > compassion towards u and it may happen next minute > > too. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > spirituality is not delimited by time , effort and > > > rules. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > > > > > Lalit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology > > > > > > > > > > <vedic astrology%40>, Rafal > > > Gendarz > > > > > > > > > > <starsuponme@ ...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Litsol, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please be careful about words. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Im happy that You are sharing Your experience - > > very > > > > > > > inspirating > > > > > > > > > > ones. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Age hierarchy is for sudras - Manu Samhita. If > You > > > > treat > > > > > > > Jyotish > > > > > > > > > > Vedanga > > > > > > > > > > > as profession similar to engineering You have a > > long > > > > way > > > > > to > > > > > > > go. > > > > > > > > But > > > > > > > > > > dont > > > > > > > > > > > be pessimistic here are many who will try to help > > You > > > > in > > > > > > > getting > > > > > > > > > > proper > > > > > > > > > > > understanding. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > After some time You will agree with me about the > > mala > > > > and > > > > > > > japa. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz > > > > > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru > > > > > > > > > > > email: rafal@ > > > > > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > litsol napisa?(a): > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Rafal, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Here u r doing two wrong things, instead of > > > > developing > > > > > ur > > > > > > > > > > understanding, > > > > > > > > > > > > u r trying to conclude something and going > beyond > > > > that > > > > > u r > > > > > > > > > > messaging > > > > > > > > > > > > same to many. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I m touching 35, What's ur age ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Astrology is a kind of vidya or profession, > like > > i > > > m > > > > a > > > > > > > > software > > > > > > > > > > > > engineer, software engineering is my > profession. > > > > > > > spirituality > > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > beyond > > > > > > > > > > > > all sort of vidya or profession. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I wish u to be a good soul and to realize the > > bliss > > > > of > > > > > > self > > > > > > > > > > awakening or > > > > > > > > > > > > in other terms, the bliss that comes once u > feel > > u > > > > and > > > > > > god > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > > > connected. dissolved in each other. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > First realize, experience, then speak and then > > > > suggest > > > > > to > > > > > > > > others, > > > > > > > > > > by > > > > > > > > > > > > mere reading shastras or books u r not going to > > > feel > > > > > it. > > > > > > > > unless > > > > > > > > > > god > > > > > > > > > > > > graces u it's very very difficult. and if u > dont > > > > avoid > > > > > > this > > > > > > > > sort > > > > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > > > hurriedness instead of learning and > > understanding, > > > it > > > > > > will > > > > > > > > affect > > > > > > > > > > u only > > > > > > > > > > > > no one else. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > somehere i have read, it was written - By mere > > > > > > > repeating " So- > > > > > > > > > > Aham " no > > > > > > > > > > > > one gets liberated unless he realizes it like > one > > > > > doesnt > > > > > > get > > > > > > > > > > cured by > > > > > > > > > > > > knowing the name of the medicine, u need to > take > > > the > > > > > > > medicine > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > get > > > > > > > > > > > > cured " . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So, pls. be wise, as it was being discussed > here, > > i > > > > > > shared > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > experience of my life, pls. mind it, i m not a > > > > > preecher, > > > > > > > nor a > > > > > > > > > > guru, nor > > > > > > > > > > > > i have to make my followers, nor it's my > > > profession, > > > > > nor > > > > > > i > > > > > > > > have > > > > > > > > > > to get > > > > > > > > > > > > fame, sharing things is a kind of friendliness > a > > > kind > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > affection, > > > > > > > > > > > > that's it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > Lalit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. com>, > > > Rafal > > > > > > Gendarz > > > > > > > > > > > > <starsuponme@ ...> > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Jyotishas > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Counting of mala has more depth sense than > just > > > > > > counting, > > > > > > > > so for > > > > > > > > > > > > natives > > > > > > > > > > > > > like Litsol counting is neccessary and any > > other > > > > > > > speculation > > > > > > > > > > will be > > > > > > > > > > > > > only illusory and just imagination. We should > > > > follow > > > > > Pt. > > > > > > > > > > > > Dakshinamoorti > > > > > > > > > > > > > advise strictly, otherwise our process of > > > spiritual > > > > > > > > development > > > > > > > > > > will > > > > > > > > > > > > be > > > > > > > > > > > > > slow and unauthoritative. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru > > > > > > > > > > > > > email: rafal@ > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > asmp2k02@ napisa?(a): > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Resp Sri Lalitji, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for your mail.But please also read > > > > > > > > GuruDakshinamurthyi > > > > > > > > > > ji's > > > > > > > > > > > > > > mail(addressing me) also on this,which > brings > > > in > > > > > more > > > > > > > > clarity > > > > > > > > > > to the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > applicability principles to my mail. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I meant that both are necessity but to what > > > > degree > > > > > of > > > > > > > time > > > > > > > > (it > > > > > > > > > > varies > > > > > > > > > > > > > > from saadhaka to saadhaka) to get such > > inbuilt > > > > > > maturity > > > > > > > > such > > > > > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the count will be taken care of by Divine > > > forces > > > > > > after > > > > > > > > some > > > > > > > > > > initial > > > > > > > > > > > > > > period of saadhana. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Morover the type of bio matter present in > the > > > > japa > > > > > > maala > > > > > > > > > > (which is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > symbolic for ritualism as well as from > > > practical > > > > > > point > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > view for > > > > > > > > > > > > our > > > > > > > > > > > > > > count) will help in keeping away > destructive > > > > forces > > > > > > > > acting on > > > > > > > > > > us > > > > > > > > > > > > .Thus > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the symbolic rituals will indirectly help > us > > in > > > > > > keeping > > > > > > > > away > > > > > > > > > > from > > > > > > > > > > > > > > negative thoughts and also trains our > memory > > to > > > > be > > > > > > > object > > > > > > > > > > > > oriented.If > > > > > > > > > > > > > > our memory grows and retentive capacity > > > increase > > > > > the > > > > > > > > Gnaana > > > > > > > > > > will > > > > > > > > > > > > > > increase ,but at the same time destructive > > > forces > > > > > > > > > > (diversions) also > > > > > > > > > > > > > > becomes powerful.Thus the symbolic > procedures > > > > will > > > > > > come > > > > > > > in > > > > > > > > > > handy to > > > > > > > > > > > > > > successfully fight the negative forces.The > > > > rituals > > > > > > may > > > > > > > be > > > > > > > > > > Rising > > > > > > > > > > > > > > early(if possible during Braahmi > > muhurta),Taking > > > > > > > > > > bath,Japaanusthaan, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > attending to the livelihood job etc etc in > > > > defined > > > > > > > times > > > > > > > > as > > > > > > > > > > > > discipline > > > > > > > > > > > > > > helps indirectly tune our memory through > > > keeping > > > > > our > > > > > > > body > > > > > > > > > > healthy. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thus ultimately we conclude that the so > > called > > > > > > symbolic > > > > > > > > > > procedures > > > > > > > > > > > > are > > > > > > > > > > > > > > not actually symbolic(it got branded as > such) > > > but > > > > a > > > > > > > > necessity > > > > > > > > > > for > > > > > > > > > > > > our > > > > > > > > > > > > > > own good if we practice to the extent we > can. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quoting mishra.lalit@ ... <mishra. > > lalit% > > > > > > > 40gmail. > > > > > > > > com>: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Resp. Sri Murthy Adavi, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, what you said is perfectly right, we > > count > > > > or > > > > > > dont > > > > > > > > > > count,target > > > > > > > > > > > > > > is realization of god's love within, I got > it > > > > with > > > > > no > > > > > > > > > > counting, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someone may get it with counting. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanx, for the writing. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Lalit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. com> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. > > com>, > > > > > > srinivasa > > > > > > > > > > murthy adavi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > asmp2k02@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Respected Learned Members, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Both views may be correct when the views > > > > have/or > > > > > > with > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > goal as > > > > > > > > > > > > > > development of Love/Devotion towards > > adhistana > > > > > > Devatha > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > Mantra > > > > > > > > > > > > > > as Base. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In the initial stage only you need the > > > count;as > > > > > one > > > > > > > > > > develops the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > habit the biological tuning of the > > > intellect/body > > > > > will > > > > > > > > > > automatically > > > > > > > > > > > > > > take care of the practice(without count- > help > > of > > > > > malas > > > > > > > > etc). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It's like if with the help of Alarm clock > > if > > > we > > > > > > wake > > > > > > > up > > > > > > > > for > > > > > > > > > > 2 or 3 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > days at some appointed hour,then > > automatically > > > we > > > > > > > wakeup > > > > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > the same > > > > > > > > > > > > > > time every day without help of alarm. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > With due Respects > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > smadavi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quoting starsuponme@ : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Litsol, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Definitely we should count our Mantra > Japa > > on > > > > > Mala. > > > > > > > Your > > > > > > > > > > view is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > against > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Vedic Authorities and Sages, so should be > > > > > rejected. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > email: rafal@ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > litsol napisa?(a): > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Mr. Jayashri, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > A thought came, why i should not share > > with > > > > u, > > > > > U > > > > > > > pls. > > > > > > > > stop > > > > > > > > > > > > > > counting > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > mantra chantings, counting mantra gives > > > false > > > > > ego > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > then > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > frustration if u dont get desired > results. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > leave it to the god, god counts the > > mantra > > > > > > chanted > > > > > > > by > > > > > > > > you > > > > > > > > > > may be > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 108, 1008 or whatsoever, let him count, > > > it's > > > > > his > > > > > > > part > > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > ur > > > > > > > > > > > > part > > > > > > > > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to chant the mantra. when the mantra > has > > to > > > > > > awaken, > > > > > > > it > > > > > > > > > > will be, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > god > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > will ensure it for u. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sometimes we try to become more > > intelligent > > > > > with > > > > > > out > > > > > > > > > > limited > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > intellect and that creates obstacles in > > our > > > > > > > spiritual > > > > > > > > > > growth. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So, forget about counts, forget about > the > > > > time > > > > > u > > > > > > > put > > > > > > > > in > > > > > > > > > > for ur's > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sadhana, invoke the god with pure > heart. > > > > purity > > > > > > > > counts. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Lalit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology@ . com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. > > > > > > > > > > com>, " dakshinastrologer " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <dakshinastrologer@ ...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Ms. Jayashree: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think this topic on 108 is getting > > very > > > > > > > > interesting > > > > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > enlightening for all members. > Yesterday > > > we > > > > > had a > > > > > > > > > > wonderful > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > esoteric > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > explanation from Shri. Sushil > Dikshit, > > > and > > > > > > today > > > > > > > > your > > > > > > > > > > > > wonderful > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > explanation of numerical symmetry of > > the > > > > > cosmos! > > > > > > > > > > Wonderful. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There definitely exists a " numerical > > > > > symphony " > > > > > > in > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > Universe. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > not only 108.....as I mentioned in my > > > > earlier > > > > > > > post, > > > > > > > > > > there are > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > various > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > other numerals that are significant > in > > > > occult > > > > > > > > > > practices. 108 > > > > > > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > a > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > powerful and all-purpose perfect > > > > > number...While > > > > > > > we > > > > > > > > have > > > > > > > > > > > > > > understood > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the glory of 108, we should not lose > > > sight > > > > of > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > fact > > > > > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > > > > > > > there > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > are > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > other powerful numbers also. This is > > just > > > > for > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > information > > > > > > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > list. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > My apprecitation again for this > > wonderful > > > > > > > response. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Blessed be. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pandit R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Blessed be. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pandit R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI. --- In > vedic- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > astrology@grou ps.com > > > > <astrology% > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 40. com>, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " jayasartn " <jayasartn@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In cosmology, 108 has this > > > significance - > > > > > the > > > > > > > > moon is > > > > > > > > > > away > > > > > > > > > > > > > > from > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > earth 108 times its (moon's) > diameter > > > and > > > > > the > > > > > > > sun > > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > away > > > > > > > > > > > > > > from the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > earth, 108 times its diameter. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Perhaps this reality of distances > is > > > > > > applicable > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > deities > > > > > > > > > > > > > > too. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Perhaps this has been indicated by > > the > > > > 108 > > > > > > divya > > > > > > > > > > desas of > > > > > > > > > > > > Lord > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Narayana. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > jayasree > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology@ > . > > com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. > > > > > > > > > > com>, " dakshinastrologer " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <dakshinastrologer@ > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Shri. Sushil: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It is a wonderful answer you have > > > given. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Blessed be. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pandit R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology@ > > . > > > com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. > > > > > > > > > > com>, " sushil.dikshit " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <sushil.dikshit@ > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Babu, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It is not a silly question but > it > > > is > > > > a > > > > > > very > > > > > > > > good > > > > > > > > > > > > question. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Actually > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > there are 27 Nakshatras and > every > > > > > > Nakshtras > > > > > > > > has 4 > > > > > > > > > > Charan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > so > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > total > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > charans are 27 x 4 = 108 > Charan. > > > Each > > > > > > > Charan > > > > > > > > has 3 > > > > > > > > > > > > degree > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 20 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > minutes so if you multiply 3 > > degree > > > > and > > > > > 20 > > > > > > > > > > minutes to > > > > > > > > > > > > 108 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > it > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > comes > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > out to be 360 degress i.e. one > > > cycle > > > > > > > (Circle). > > > > > > > > > > This > > > > > > > > > > > > cycle > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > represetns > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > whole brahmand because all the > > > > rashis, > > > > > > > > planets and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > nakshatra > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > are > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > between these 360 degree in 2 > > > > > dimensional > > > > > > > > > > horoscope. So > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > chanting a > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mantra completes one cycle of > > this > > > > > > brahmand. > > > > > > > > > > Further One > > > > > > > > > > > > > > who > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > has > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > visited Brahamand at least one > > time > > > > > i.e. > > > > > > he > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > brahmagyani he > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > entitiled to place 108 Shri > > before > > > > his > > > > > > name. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sushil dikshit > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology@ > > > . > > > > com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% > 40. > > > > com>, > > > > > > babu > > > > > > > > mon > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <muthappan111@ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Namaste, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It may be a silly matter for > > all > > > of > > > > > you. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I want to know what is the > > reason > > > > > that > > > > > > > some > > > > > > > > > > remedies > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > recomended > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > for 108 times. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I dont know any thing about > > > > astrology. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I hope you may pleased to > > provide > > > a > > > > > > reply > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thanks, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Babu > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------ --------- ----- -- > -- > > - > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Be a better Globetrotter. Get > > > > better > > > > > > > travel > > > > > > > > > > answers > > > > > > > > > > > > from > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someone > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > who knows. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Answers - Check it out. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this > > > message > > > > > have > > > > > > > been > > > > > > > > > > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have > > been > > > > > > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have > > been > > > > > > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have > been > > > > > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > > > > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 29, 2007 Report Share Posted July 29, 2007 Oye Lalith: How do you know Mohanraaamji is not enlightened? Do you know onething....it is not merely that Mohanraaamji respects Panditji....Panditji himself respects Mohanraaamji for his yogic accomplishments. You compare Mohanraaamji with your childhood....You are a peanut brain who thinks the small portions of sanskrit that your school portion gave you are magnum opuses! This is typical of small brains like you. Mohanraaamji is a mantra saamraat......by the way, what happened to your challenge about the court case against Mohanraaamji? You should have put a case and then you would have known who he is! He has effected some rare miracles which you won't manifest even after 100 years of japams. If Shaarada Maa indeed blessed you, where is your insight. Mohanraaamji said something about you without seeing you.....Like Priyaa and preeti....You say about Mohanraaamji's wife if possible. Panditji knows the information and he can be the judge as to whether you are correct in your predictions! You - who claim that you know everything and have the Grace of Maa, get at this simple truth if you can! Siddhis by themselves do not mean anything great. That is why Mohanraaamji respects Guruji who does not manifest any occult powers. Try to understand that. It is the attitude that counts, and it is that which you are lacking. Don't try to act smart. Try to spend time more on your projects lest you fail in this also just as you failed in your business, and in Priya's case! If your money is also not there, nobody will even look at you twice. Only money and that job are allowing to speak haughtily like this. At least save that by being conscientious at work. Did Shaarada Maa ask you to pilfer company's resources and type endless quarrelsome mails to respected mantra shaastra experts? If your Maa said so, probably it is not the Gracious Maa who guides us all, but the ghost that is afflicting your family due to your sins! You are a mere software engineer who gets shouted at by your reporting officers often; everyone at your place of work is laughing behind you, and you know that. That is why you are taking out your frustration on us in this forum. Can you speak one word back at your reporting managers at work? Whereas Mohanraaamji was a respected Military officer in his professional days and even his seniors respected him for his intelligence and sharpness. He is not an imbecile old man, but a great yogi. Ask Panditji whether Mohanraaamji is capable of miracles or not? Panditji has personal experience in that regard. But, only Panditji stopped Mohanraaamji from using miraculous powers as they might be bad for the evolution of soul and mantrik power should not be wasted in empty displays. If Panditji had not stopped Mohanraaamji, you would have paid seriously for your insulting mails last week. Thank Panditji that you are still o.k., because only his words in a private mail to Mohanraaamji saved you (Incidentally, even Panditji has not seen Mohanraaamji in person; only I have seen him. This is just for your information. Search all through the web, you will not find any BUSINESS information on Mohanraaamji. What do we gain by manipulation or anything? At least you are a frustrated person who could not get married and all girls are rejecting you, and so for psychological comfort you are writing posts here. But, we are old men who have lived happy and contented lives, and have no material interests to satisfy here) I DARE YOU UPON ONE COUNT...PANDITJI LEFT WELL-PAYING MNC JOB TO PURSUE ASTROLOGY AND SPIRITUALITY FULL TIME......CAN YOU DO THAT? PANDITJI FELT THIS IS HIS MISSION....CAN YOU DO THAT? It is easy to speak of great philosphies from the comfort of an Airconditioned Office at the cost of others. Obviously that comfort matters to you more, and you feel that is the blessing of shaarada Maa. No young man....Wisdom is the real Gift of Divinities. You will not be so confused if you have really seen Divine Manifestations before you. The incidents you have narrated are no so great as you think. Do more tapasya and you will know what real manifestation will be like! You are under illusions. Please get yourself treated. Please don't keep sleeping with Rahu, and Sani. Try to get the Grace of Guru! Ram Jaswal did not get the context of my utterings clearly and hence wrote to me. If you were decent, you should have stopped referring to me or Mohanraaamji; then we also would have stopped. You started it, you must end this. If you keep making patronising comments like this, you will definitely get answers like this from me. I WILL NOT STOP TILL YOU STOP. Abhishek vedic astrology , " litsol " <mishra.lalit wrote: > > Res. Ram ji, > > Pls. dont advice him or mohan raam, they have nothing to debate or > discuss on either mantra or bhakti. > > I don't remember shlokas much as i read classics for my satisfaction, > in two phases, firstly from my class 8'th till my 2nd year of > graduation. that time i had no faith and no bhakti, just read like i > was reading some comics or cartoon books, i had not developed ideas, > not taken any message, i knew and i can talk about the content, but i > was not involved. > > after that incident happened at Sharda Temple,Maihar,it was > unbelievable and it made me change my thoughts, i again read some > classics and this time,i grasped the message given in the classics. > > They are at the stage of my chlidhood, they may read and discuss. but > dont take the message in their heart, somewhere their greed to > establish themselves as pandit or authority is also a reason. > > Perhapse, in lieu of, hitting them hard, i had to take another rout > to let them realize they are wrong and deliberately wrong. > > He didnt say any thing on my how i shown, beej and god's name is one > and same thing, in fact it's a simple thnig, and well known but they > dont accept. > > let them dont accept, what difference it makes to us, they have their > life with them, any qualitative change within them will do good to > them only. > > So, i prayed maa, mother divine for mohan raam, he is too old, his > problem is he learnt astrology, did some breathing excercises, but he > lacks spiritual experiences so he doesn't believe, I was like him in > my childhood. > > I prayed, and it's acknowledged by maa, time will change for him a > little, what didn't happen to him in last 85 yrs, will happen in next > 5-6 monnths, he will get some good spritiual experience, the curtain > will be lifted for some time, reality at a glance. > > after that it's his part to stick to that or not, coz, ego, greed and > fear still remains, i m not completely gone out of it, i have to > fight with me many times. > > I thought gruop w'd be a good plateform to get like minded friends, > if nothnig, it gives joy. > > Let's wish good for all, I also express my gratitude to you to speak > for what u thought right. > > regards, > Lalit. > vedic astrology , " Ram Jaswal " <rkjaswal@> > wrote: > > > > Namaste Abhishek > > > > My post wasn't so much in defense of Lalith but one to stop > the " belittling " > > of a person within this Group. If you don't agree with someone's > views you > > are perfectly within your rights to say so why in a scholarly > fashion so as > > to discuss and further the merits of the topic under discussion. > Thereafter > > it is a matter for the individual to either continue with the on- > going > > discussion or to stop? The only way you or anyone else is likely to > change > > Lalith's view on chanting of Mantras will be from a scholarly > viewpoint and > > not from goading him? > > > > Also why are you taking personal offense? If Guru's can ignore his > comments > > - can't you do the same? > > > > With freedom of speech comes the responsibility of keeping a civil > and > > polite language - please re-read your note which prompted my earlier > > response. > > > > Like I said in my earlier post it is all about ones viewpoints - my > personal > > advise to everyone would be to take what you find reasonable and > ignore the > > rest. > > > > Best wishes .. > > > > Jai Sita Ram > > > > Ram > > _____ > > > > vedic astrology > > [vedic astrology ] On Behalf Of abhishekpotti > > 28 July 2007 20:42 > > vedic astrology > > [vedic astrology] Re: Oye Lalith! No one here is afraid of > you.... > > > > Dear Ram Jaswal: > > > > If Lalith stops challenging others with his rude posts no one will > > run him down...please follow the threads carefully......He is > > speaking as if he is the master of everything and everybody else is > a > > fool. When he passes judgment on senior astrologers of this group > or > > unnecessarily challenges established conventions, we have defended > > that. Now, why are you defending Lalith? Don't you think if you > > have the right to defend an offender, we have the right to defend > the > > more decent members and traditions that he is subtly attacking.... > > > > just read his posts.....If he has just forwarded the Prashna > Tantra, > > nobody would have objected to it.....See the accompanying comments > > where he abrasively comments certain things...... > > > > Open your eyes before advicing anyone. Why don't you write to > Lalith > > also? When did I call him names?......No sir...you are mistaken.... > > > > Did you not notice that even after Mohanraamji stopped writing > posts, > > this fellow was taunting that old gentleman repeatedly last week. > > Where were you at that time? > > > > If Lalith stops writing abrasive posts like " Nobody can stand > before > > me " and all that silly nonsense, we have no issues with him (or at > > least I have no issues with him). So, advice Lalith also in this > > regard. > > > > If Lalith and you enjoy freedom of speech, we also claim the same > > previlege. > > > > Abhishek. > > > > vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology%40> > > , " Ram Jaswal " <rkjaswal@> > > wrote: > > > > > > Namaste Abhishek/ Mohanraaam > > > > > > Just why are you trying to run Lalith down? From the posts that I > > have read > > > All he has done is given this point of view - if you don't accept > > them than > > > simply ignore it - there is No need for any name calling or > > belittling > > > someone. > > > > > > There is also nothing wrong in Lalith forwarding " Prashna Tantra " > > text to > > > this group as to whether someone has requested it or not - he > > certainly > > > doesn't need your or mine permission to do so - after all he > > thought it > > > would be useful to everyone - again his view. > > > > > > Sorry if I am coming across annoyed and perhaps rude But feel it > is > > Best > > > that everyone should stop " belittling " other group members as in > > the long > > > run all it does is make oneself appear small and bigoted. > > > > > > Best wishes and hoping this will be the last mail on this > subject .. > > > > > > Jai Sita Ram > > > > > > Ram > > > > > > _____ > > > > > > vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology% 40> > > > > > [vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology% > 40> > > ] On Behalf Of abhishekpotti > > > 28 July 2007 19:54 > > > vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology%40> > > > > > [vedic astrology] Oye Lalith! No one here is afraid of > > you.... > > > > > > Dear Lalith: > > > > > > The whole world knows the history of Blessed Meera Bhai....the > > > epitome of Bhakti......She was attached to her " Lala " - the > > wonderful > > > idol of Krishna gifted to her even from her childhood....Do you > > mean > > > to say that innocent young girl started chanting " Kliim > krishnaaya " > > > mantra automatically? Even Bhakta Prahlaada had to be initiated > by > > > Sage Naaradha for his chant of dwaadasaakshari mantra.... > > > > > > Nobody is afraid of you here......You need not proclaim that you > > are > > > not in the business of a Guru.....actually Guru status is not a > > > business (true to your half-baked knowledge you will claim it is > > also > > > like software engineering!). The difference my friend between you > > > and other great persons like Rafal or Dakshinamoorthiji is that > > they > > > are spending their money for the internet, whereas you are > > pilfering > > > your company's time and the company's resources while browsing > the > > > internet. Don't you think you are cheating your company when you > > > spend so much time on empty and egoistic posts defending yourself > > > against every expert after arguing with them unnecessarily? Are > you > > > not getting paid for the time you spend in the company....Know > the > > > basics of ethics before ever sermonizing.....So, actually you are > > an > > > exploiter....try to understand that....the other gurujis are > > probably > > > too decent to comment on that......What happened to your project? > > > Better rush to it nough!....It will spare us the agony of > replying > > to > > > your half-witted postings! > > > > > > By the say, Which member asked you Prashna Tantra dear? We did > not > > > see any posts requesting " Honourable Lalith " to explain Prashna > > > Tantra (as if you could explain it!) What arrogance you have to > > > claim that nobody can stand before you.....Guruji's posts exposed > > > your ignorance....you did not even know how to ask queries and > get > > > replies from one of the most empathetic astrologers of this > group, > > > and yet you claim you are this and that...... > > > > > > For your information....nobody is afraid of you..Rather you > should > > be > > > afraid of yourself......Your foolishness itself will be your > doom. > > > Did you not become the laughing stock due to your email-based > > chasing > > > of Priyaa? Such foolishness in occult matters could be more > costly > > > dear.....I think Mohanraaamji and Rafalji are only afraid about > > your > > > own well-being! They are not afraid of you. Nor am I afraid of > you. > > > > > > Your posts never answer the queries or points raised by others; > you > > > take off on a new ground only because of your shallow > understanding > > > of subjects. Nobody has accepted you as a Guru here, and nobody > > > will....Can a fire-fly eclipse the Sun? There are too many " Suns " > > > here and you are just a fire-fly. > > > > > > It reminds me of a story.....Once an ant challenged the mighty > > > elephant for a fight; the elephant obviously could not hear the > ant > > > (the ant being so tiny and it was on the ground, its sound could > > not > > > reach the elephant). The elephant just walked away out of its own > > > volition in its natural course. Then the ant claimed, " you see I > > > challenged the elephant and it ran away " . Dear, your saying that > > > nobody can stand before you is similar to that....... > > > > > > FIRST LEARN THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN GHOSTS AND YOUR ANCESTOR > > > SUMANGALIS BEFORE WRITING THE FIRST POSTS ON OCCULT! What a > > > pity......what a pity.....That we have to bear your meaningless > > > rantings here! > > > > > > Abhishek. > > > > > > vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology% 40> > > > , " litsol " <mishra.lalit@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > I was waiting for u dear.. > > > > > > > > why u took time ? > > > > > > > > Do u mean Meera Bai discussed with u, what she did.. > > > > > > > > Do u know 'Kleem Krishnay, Govindaya Gopijan Vallabhaya Namh' > is > > a > > > > mantra for lord krishna. > > > > > > > > is there no beej mantras, to whom u wish to misguide ? let > thnigs > > > > remain between lord, bhakta , their shraddha and their guru. > > > > > > > > why u people are so afraid of me, i m not in business of guru. > > > > > > > > i m happy with my life, my profession of software engineering > and > > > > my hobbies ok. > > > > > > > > there are 7000+ members are here, by writing such type of > foolish > > > > things u expose urself only, mind, there are better brains here. > > > > > > > > this is enough ... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology% > 40> > > > , > > > > " abhishekpotti " <abhishekpotti@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Respected Mohanraaamji: > > > > > > > > > > Well said. Lalith is saying that " maybe in south india > devotees > > > > > don't chant Moola mantras but not so in North " ...What > > > > > stupidity.....He does not seem to understand that " mantra > > > shaastra > > > > > experts " are also devotees, but they cannot be called as > > innocent > > > > > saatwik bhaktaas! A typical example of a pure saadhwik bhakta > > > will > > > > > be Meera Bhai (was she not North Indian). Can Lalith say > which > > > > Dasa > > > > > Mahaa Vidya Meera Bhai practised? She was immersed in Krishna > > > > > consciousness and Lover for Him. Her own Bhajans were her > > > prayers > > > > in > > > > > the bhaavana of Bhakti in the form of Love! This is not > mantra > > > > > shaastra. Another example will be Saant Tukhaaraam. These > > > > bhaktaas > > > > > did not chant moola mantraas. Panditji Dakshinamoorthi was on > > > dot > > > > in > > > > > saying that " Pure bhaktaas do not chant complicated moola > > > > mantraas " . > > > > > You have clarified this fact wonderfully in your post. I wish > > > more > > > > > knowledgeable persons also put erratic posters in their place > > > just > > > > as > > > > > Mohanraaamji does here. This will benefit more naive readers > of > > > > > these forums who might otherwise get confused as to which of > > the > > > > > paths to follow. Actually, anyone can follow any path as he/ > > she > > > > > deems it fit; but there should be consistency of procedures. > > > > > > > > > > We should not confuse mantrik rituals and bhakti doctrines. > > > > Bhaktaas > > > > > can chant the names of Gods at anytime.....Mantra shaastra > > > experts > > > > > chanting advanced moola mantras should necessarily adopt > ritual > > > > > procedures for the welfare of themselves and others! > > > > Yes...improper > > > > > chanting of mantras can cause danger to the society also just > > as > > > > > proper chanting can help others. Hence, this cannot be > > > considered > > > > as > > > > > a personal preference of the aspirant. If this was not the > > case, > > > > why > > > > > did sages codify spiritual practises scrupulously? Rafalji, > > > > > Mohanraaamji, etc. are correct in saying it is best to follow > > > > Pandit > > > > > Dakshinamoorthiji's advices on mantra shastra or japams. He > is > > > > > learned and he is living a life compatible to the shaastras > > > though > > > > he > > > > > has faced uncertain circumstances in his own personal life. > He > > > > never > > > > > compromised on principles and he willingly paid the price for > > > that > > > > > which most of us will never do. The words of such a person > > > should > > > > > obviously carry more weight. > > > > > > > > > > Abhishek. > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology% > > 40> > > > , " mohanraaam " > > > <mohanraaam@> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Well Lalith: > > > > > > > > > > > > If you have really done dasa Maha Vidyaa, you would have > > never > > > > > > approached a professional astrologer for > consultation...that > > > much > > > > I > > > > > > can say.... > > > > > > > > > > > > And what idiocy when you say Panditji is partly wrong? He > > > > > > said " Bhaktaas do not chant Moola mantras " , whereas you > have > > > > edited > > > > > > the words to suit your ends....He never said " devotees > don't > > > > chant > > > > > > Beej mantras " .....You are putting words into his mouth and > > > > assuming > > > > > > he is wrong! Why, do you know....the Great Panditji himself > > > > chants > > > > > > Moola mantras.....He is a bhakta and a mantra shastra > expert. > > > As > > > > a > > > > > > bhakta he keeps incessant chanting of naama japa throughout > > the > > > > > day; > > > > > > as a mantra shastra expert, he restricts the moola mantra > > > japams > > > > to > > > > > > stipulated times with ritual purity.....It is this > wonderful > > > > > practice > > > > > > that Guruji was alluding to. Guruji cannot be wrong in > ritual > > > > and > > > > > > occult matters. Please understand that. > > > > > > > > > > > > There are 4 classes of Devotees.......1) Saatwik vedic > > devotees > > > > who > > > > > > will follow vedic dharma scrupulously. They will not dare > to > > > > > compare > > > > > > astrology and vedanga to Engineering! as you did... > > > > > > 2) Raajasik devotees who will follow vedic disciplines as > far > > > as > > > > > > possible, but will still go after upaasanaas of Demi-Gods > for > > > > > > accomplishment of siddhis. Mantra shaastra experts usually > > > fall > > > > in > > > > > > this category. > > > > > > 3) Saatwik Bhaktaas - for whom the meditation and glory of > > > their > > > > > > Ishta Devataa is enough for spiritual satisfaction. It is > > this > > > > > > category that Guruji referred to when he said they will not > > > chant > > > > > > Moola mantras too much. Definitely they will not do Dasa > > Mahaa > > > > > > Vidyaa. > > > > > > 4) Taamasic Devotees - Those whose main motive is to > project > > > > > > themselves at all costs and acting as if they are equal to > > the > > > > > > experts; they will try ALL practices - whether they are > > > > sanctioned > > > > > by > > > > > > vedas or not.....Their only aim is personal glory and > > > > > satisfaction. > > > > > > They will attack even established dharma if they do not get > > > > results > > > > > > (sounds familiar....You are one!) Ignorance and half- baked > > > > > knowledge > > > > > > and egotism are these persons' motivating fuel. > > > > > > > > > > > > You are really satan's Gift to this list.......My only > prayer > > > is > > > > > that > > > > > > innocent members of this list do not get side-tracked with > > your > > > > > > ramblings. > > > > > > > > > > > > Let me make this clear to the list.....Panditji said that > > > saatwik > > > > > > Bhaktaas who chant Divine names only due to Pure Love on > God > > > > > usually > > > > > > never chant mantrik moola mantraas. It is just one class of > > > > > > devotees. A rajasik bhakta who is a mantra-shaastra expert > > may > > > > > even > > > > > > be a bhakta at heart; and a pure bhakta may sometimes chant > > > some > > > > > > mantrik japams for solving some practical issues......But, > > when > > > > > they > > > > > > switch their routines temporarily, these enlightened > devotees > > > > > usually > > > > > > take good guidance and follow the tenets of shaastras > > > > > > scrupulously....Definitely they will not sit on assumption > > like > > > > > > Lalith. > > > > > > > > > > > > On the one hand, this fellow claims he has done chants in > > > > forests, > > > > > > rivers, earth, etc. (Probably we have a Maharishi here! > What > > > > > heights > > > > > > of pointless pride in this young man list....it is > > > disgusting!). > > > > > On > > > > > > the other hand, he says he chants mantras in buses, trains, > > > > > etc...... > > > > > > He is confused about which no body can have issues. Only > his > > > > Guru > > > > > > should be concerned about that.....But, his attempts to > stuff > > > his > > > > > > shallow understanding upon this list is reprehensible. And, > > > his > > > > > > habit of quoting experts out of context is really > > condemnable. > > > > May > > > > > > Jupiter's Light Shine on that fellow and teach him to > respect > > > the > > > > > > hallowed traditions and to stay at his level rather than > > trying > > > > > > to " teach " others (He has the audacity to claim he > > > is " teaching " > > > > > > Rafalji!) > > > > > > > > > > > > If a mere young man of 35 years who has spent his life on a > > > > " Failed > > > > > > computer web desining business " , " pointless email chasing > of > > > > > girls " , > > > > > > and other " past times " can gain insight as he claims, how > > much > > > > will > > > > > > learned Gurus of this group with their life of devotion to > > > > vedanta > > > > > > and vedanga know? His peanut brain and hyper-inflated ego > > will > > > > > never > > > > > > allow him to see this obvious truth. But, please list > > exercise > > > > > your > > > > > > discretion while reading his posts (There are doubtless > some > > > good > > > > > > elements even in his posts; but mostly there is trash > > presented > > > > as > > > > > > philosophy). > > > > > > > > > > > > Mohanraaam > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology% > > 40> > > > , " litsol " > > > <mishra.lalit@> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Rafal, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Do u think, a hobby means shallow knowledge of the > domain, > > No > > > > > > rafal, > > > > > > > it's not like that. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > At least not for me. You have learnt and i m learning, i > > read > > > > > ur's > > > > > > > replies and get benifitted, same way i wanted you to pay > > > heed > > > > to > > > > > > > what i have written about spritiuality, mostrly i did > write > > > for > > > > u > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have done all 10 mahavidyas of tantra and read many > > tantrik > > > > > > > classics, spent good deal of time with great tantriks > > > trained > > > > in > > > > > > > Kamakhya and other places, keenly observed their doings, > > > their > > > > > > > mistakes etc.., I did tremendous mantra chanting on > water, > > > on > > > > > > earth, > > > > > > > at home, in forests etc... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > then reached here, then i did write something, but sorry > i > > > dont > > > > > > > remember shlokas. i was not interested in cramming that. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Panditji is not fully correct in saying that BeejMantras > > are > > > > not > > > > > > > chanted by devotees, I dont know much about South India > but > > > in > > > > > > North > > > > > > > normally its done. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > And a successfull mantra sadhana has to result in one's > > being > > > a > > > > > > > devotee, the devotion is the outcome, final result of > > mantra > > > > > > sadhana, > > > > > > > perhaps, Pandit Ji believes mantras are power > > packet,thinks, > > > i > > > > do > > > > > > it > > > > > > > this way , these many times and get this result, this is > > > where > > > > > most > > > > > > > of the people are confused. without being a good human > > being > > > if > > > > > we > > > > > > > think, we will achieve something in spirituality, is > > > difficult, > > > > > > very > > > > > > > difficult. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > what happens is, with the mantra chanting, a self > > > > > transformation > > > > > > > process begins, u if dont restrict urself, ur karma > begins > > > > > > diluting, > > > > > > > and u begin ur purification process unknowingly, when > > > > substantial > > > > > > > part of ego and greed for respect vanishes and many such > > > thing > > > > > > > togather, mantra awakens u and with the God's grace ur > > > > objective > > > > > > gets > > > > > > > fullfilled, gradually u become a devotee. ur being simple > > and > > > > > being > > > > > > > devotee is sometimes is indication of ur's going on the > > right > > > > > track. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think we have discussed a lot, it's enough !! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > My Boss has given me lot of projects to complete, so, may > > be, > > > i > > > > m > > > > > > not > > > > > > > going to available in the group like i was recently. > > however. > > > i > > > > > > will > > > > > > > complete Garg Hora series. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > > Lalit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology% > > 40> > > > , Rafal Gendarz > > > > > > > <starsuponme@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Litsol, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Then please dont generalize Your preferences as they > are > > > too > > > > > > > shallow for > > > > > > > > this Forum aspiration. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz > > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru > > > > > > > > email: rafal@ > > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > litsol napisa?(a): > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Rafel, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I take Astrology as a good hobby, and i w'd be > looking > > at > > > > it > > > > > > with > > > > > > > an > > > > > > > > > engineer's approach. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I asked ur age because, it's our thinking to put our > > > > > parameters > > > > > > in > > > > > > > > > god's system, there is nothing like delay or > > advancement > > > in > > > > > > > > > spirituality. So, " Delay " or " Speed " , " backwardness " > > > > > > > > > and " advancement " doesn't exist in spirituality, I > > > thought > > > > if > > > > > u > > > > > > r > > > > > > > > > thinking that it may take too much time, I wanted to > > tell > > > > u, > > > > > > it's > > > > > > > not > > > > > > > > > like that. there is no delay. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It clicks in fraction of a second, when u r getting > > > clicked > > > > > > > depends > > > > > > > > > on u and on god's will, when he wants u to get > clicked. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > God sometimes graces for no reason ( " Ahetuka " ) just > for > > > his > > > > > > > > > compassion towards u and it may happen next minute > too. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > spirituality is not delimited by time , effort and > > rules. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > > > > Lalit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology > > > > > > > > > <vedic astrology%40>, Rafal > > Gendarz > > > > > > > > > <starsuponme@ ...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Litsol, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please be careful about words. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Im happy that You are sharing Your experience - > very > > > > > > inspirating > > > > > > > > > ones. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Age hierarchy is for sudras - Manu Samhita. If You > > > treat > > > > > > Jyotish > > > > > > > > > Vedanga > > > > > > > > > > as profession similar to engineering You have a > long > > > way > > > > to > > > > > > go. > > > > > > > But > > > > > > > > > dont > > > > > > > > > > be pessimistic here are many who will try to help > You > > > in > > > > > > getting > > > > > > > > > proper > > > > > > > > > > understanding. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > After some time You will agree with me about the > mala > > > and > > > > > > japa. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz > > > > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru > > > > > > > > > > email: rafal@ > > > > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > litsol napisa?(a): > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Rafal, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Here u r doing two wrong things, instead of > > > developing > > > > ur > > > > > > > > > understanding, > > > > > > > > > > > u r trying to conclude something and going beyond > > > that > > > > u r > > > > > > > > > messaging > > > > > > > > > > > same to many. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I m touching 35, What's ur age ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Astrology is a kind of vidya or profession, like > i > > m > > > a > > > > > > > software > > > > > > > > > > > engineer, software engineering is my profession. > > > > > > spirituality > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > beyond > > > > > > > > > > > all sort of vidya or profession. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I wish u to be a good soul and to realize the > bliss > > > of > > > > > self > > > > > > > > > awakening or > > > > > > > > > > > in other terms, the bliss that comes once u feel > u > > > and > > > > > god > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > > connected. dissolved in each other. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > First realize, experience, then speak and then > > > suggest > > > > to > > > > > > > others, > > > > > > > > > by > > > > > > > > > > > mere reading shastras or books u r not going to > > feel > > > > it. > > > > > > > unless > > > > > > > > > god > > > > > > > > > > > graces u it's very very difficult. and if u dont > > > avoid > > > > > this > > > > > > > sort > > > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > > hurriedness instead of learning and > understanding, > > it > > > > > will > > > > > > > affect > > > > > > > > > u only > > > > > > > > > > > no one else. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > somehere i have read, it was written - By mere > > > > > > repeating " So- > > > > > > > > > Aham " no > > > > > > > > > > > one gets liberated unless he realizes it like one > > > > doesnt > > > > > get > > > > > > > > > cured by > > > > > > > > > > > knowing the name of the medicine, u need to take > > the > > > > > > medicine > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > get > > > > > > > > > > > cured " . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So, pls. be wise, as it was being discussed here, > i > > > > > shared > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > experience of my life, pls. mind it, i m not a > > > > preecher, > > > > > > nor a > > > > > > > > > guru, nor > > > > > > > > > > > i have to make my followers, nor it's my > > profession, > > > > nor > > > > > i > > > > > > > have > > > > > > > > > to get > > > > > > > > > > > fame, sharing things is a kind of friendliness a > > kind > > > of > > > > > > > > > affection, > > > > > > > > > > > that's it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > > > > > > Lalit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. com>, > > Rafal > > > > > Gendarz > > > > > > > > > > > <starsuponme@ ...> > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Jyotishas > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Counting of mala has more depth sense than just > > > > > counting, > > > > > > > so for > > > > > > > > > > > natives > > > > > > > > > > > > like Litsol counting is neccessary and any > other > > > > > > speculation > > > > > > > > > will be > > > > > > > > > > > > only illusory and just imagination. We should > > > follow > > > > Pt. > > > > > > > > > > > Dakshinamoorti > > > > > > > > > > > > advise strictly, otherwise our process of > > spiritual > > > > > > > development > > > > > > > > > will > > > > > > > > > > > be > > > > > > > > > > > > slow and unauthoritative. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz > > > > > > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru > > > > > > > > > > > > email: rafal@ > > > > > > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > asmp2k02@ napisa?(a): > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Resp Sri Lalitji, > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for your mail.But please also read > > > > > > > GuruDakshinamurthyi > > > > > > > > > ji's > > > > > > > > > > > > > mail(addressing me) also on this,which brings > > in > > > > more > > > > > > > clarity > > > > > > > > > to the > > > > > > > > > > > > > applicability principles to my mail. > > > > > > > > > > > > > I meant that both are necessity but to what > > > degree > > > > of > > > > > > time > > > > > > > (it > > > > > > > > > varies > > > > > > > > > > > > > from saadhaka to saadhaka) to get such > inbuilt > > > > > maturity > > > > > > > such > > > > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > > > > > > the count will be taken care of by Divine > > forces > > > > > after > > > > > > > some > > > > > > > > > initial > > > > > > > > > > > > > period of saadhana. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Morover the type of bio matter present in the > > > japa > > > > > maala > > > > > > > > > (which is > > > > > > > > > > > > > symbolic for ritualism as well as from > > practical > > > > > point > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > view for > > > > > > > > > > > our > > > > > > > > > > > > > count) will help in keeping away destructive > > > forces > > > > > > > acting on > > > > > > > > > us > > > > > > > > > > > .Thus > > > > > > > > > > > > > the symbolic rituals will indirectly help us > in > > > > > keeping > > > > > > > away > > > > > > > > > from > > > > > > > > > > > > > negative thoughts and also trains our memory > to > > > be > > > > > > object > > > > > > > > > > > oriented.If > > > > > > > > > > > > > our memory grows and retentive capacity > > increase > > > > the > > > > > > > Gnaana > > > > > > > > > will > > > > > > > > > > > > > increase ,but at the same time destructive > > forces > > > > > > > > > (diversions) also > > > > > > > > > > > > > becomes powerful.Thus the symbolic procedures > > > will > > > > > come > > > > > > in > > > > > > > > > handy to > > > > > > > > > > > > > successfully fight the negative forces.The > > > rituals > > > > > may > > > > > > be > > > > > > > > > Rising > > > > > > > > > > > > > early(if possible during Braahmi > muhurta),Taking > > > > > > > > > bath,Japaanusthaan, > > > > > > > > > > > > > attending to the livelihood job etc etc in > > > defined > > > > > > times > > > > > > > as > > > > > > > > > > > discipline > > > > > > > > > > > > > helps indirectly tune our memory through > > keeping > > > > our > > > > > > body > > > > > > > > > healthy. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thus ultimately we conclude that the so > called > > > > > symbolic > > > > > > > > > procedures > > > > > > > > > > > are > > > > > > > > > > > > > not actually symbolic(it got branded as such) > > but > > > a > > > > > > > necessity > > > > > > > > > for > > > > > > > > > > > our > > > > > > > > > > > > > own good if we practice to the extent we can. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quoting mishra.lalit@ ... <mishra. > lalit% > > > > > > 40gmail. > > > > > > > com>: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Resp. Sri Murthy Adavi, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, what you said is perfectly right, we > count > > > or > > > > > dont > > > > > > > > > count,target > > > > > > > > > > > > > is realization of god's love within, I got it > > > with > > > > no > > > > > > > > > counting, > > > > > > > > > > > > > someone may get it with counting. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanx, for the writing. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > Lalit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. com> > > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. > com>, > > > > > srinivasa > > > > > > > > > murthy adavi > > > > > > > > > > > > > asmp2k02@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Respected Learned Members, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Both views may be correct when the views > > > have/or > > > > > with > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > goal as > > > > > > > > > > > > > development of Love/Devotion towards > adhistana > > > > > Devatha > > > > > > of > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > Mantra > > > > > > > > > > > > > as Base. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In the initial stage only you need the > > count;as > > > > one > > > > > > > > > develops the > > > > > > > > > > > > > habit the biological tuning of the > > intellect/body > > > > will > > > > > > > > > automatically > > > > > > > > > > > > > take care of the practice(without count- help > of > > > > malas > > > > > > > etc). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It's like if with the help of Alarm clock > if > > we > > > > > wake > > > > > > up > > > > > > > for > > > > > > > > > 2 or 3 > > > > > > > > > > > > > days at some appointed hour,then > automatically > > we > > > > > > wakeup > > > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > the same > > > > > > > > > > > > > time every day without help of alarm. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > With due Respects > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > smadavi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quoting starsuponme@ : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Litsol, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Definitely we should count our Mantra Japa > on > > > > Mala. > > > > > > Your > > > > > > > > > view is > > > > > > > > > > > > > against > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Vedic Authorities and Sages, so should be > > > > rejected. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru > > > > > > > > > > > > > > email: rafal@ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > litsol napisa?(a): > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Mr. Jayashri, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > A thought came, why i should not share > with > > > u, > > > > U > > > > > > pls. > > > > > > > stop > > > > > > > > > > > > > counting > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > mantra chantings, counting mantra gives > > false > > > > ego > > > > > > and > > > > > > > then > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > frustration if u dont get desired results. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > leave it to the god, god counts the > mantra > > > > > chanted > > > > > > by > > > > > > > you > > > > > > > > > may be > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 108, 1008 or whatsoever, let him count, > > it's > > > > his > > > > > > part > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > ur > > > > > > > > > > > part > > > > > > > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to chant the mantra. when the mantra has > to > > > > > awaken, > > > > > > it > > > > > > > > > will be, > > > > > > > > > > > > > god > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > will ensure it for u. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sometimes we try to become more > intelligent > > > > with > > > > > out > > > > > > > > > limited > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > intellect and that creates obstacles in > our > > > > > > spiritual > > > > > > > > > growth. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So, forget about counts, forget about the > > > time > > > > u > > > > > > put > > > > > > > in > > > > > > > > > for ur's > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sadhana, invoke the god with pure heart. > > > purity > > > > > > > counts. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Lalit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. > > > > > > > > > com>, " dakshinastrologer " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <dakshinastrologer@ ...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Ms. Jayashree: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think this topic on 108 is getting > very > > > > > > > interesting > > > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > enlightening for all members. Yesterday > > we > > > > had a > > > > > > > > > wonderful > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > esoteric > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > explanation from Shri. Sushil Dikshit, > > and > > > > > today > > > > > > > your > > > > > > > > > > > wonderful > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > explanation of numerical symmetry of > the > > > > cosmos! > > > > > > > > > Wonderful. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There definitely exists a " numerical > > > > symphony " > > > > > in > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > Universe. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > not only 108.....as I mentioned in my > > > earlier > > > > > > post, > > > > > > > > > there are > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > various > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > other numerals that are significant in > > > occult > > > > > > > > > practices. 108 > > > > > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > > > > a > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > powerful and all-purpose perfect > > > > number...While > > > > > > we > > > > > > > have > > > > > > > > > > > > > understood > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the glory of 108, we should not lose > > sight > > > of > > > > > the > > > > > > > fact > > > > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > > > > > > there > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > are > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > other powerful numbers also. This is > just > > > for > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > information > > > > > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > list. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > My apprecitation again for this > wonderful > > > > > > response. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Blessed be. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pandit R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Blessed be. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pandit R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI. --- In vedic- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > astrology@grou ps.com > > > <astrology% > > > > > > > > > > > > > 40. com>, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " jayasartn " <jayasartn@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In cosmology, 108 has this > > significance - > > > > the > > > > > > > moon is > > > > > > > > > away > > > > > > > > > > > > > from > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > earth 108 times its (moon's) diameter > > and > > > > the > > > > > > sun > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > away > > > > > > > > > > > > > from the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > earth, 108 times its diameter. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Perhaps this reality of distances is > > > > > applicable > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > deities > > > > > > > > > > > > > too. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Perhaps this has been indicated by > the > > > 108 > > > > > divya > > > > > > > > > desas of > > > > > > > > > > > Lord > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Narayana. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > jayasree > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology@ . > com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. > > > > > > > > > com>, " dakshinastrologer " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <dakshinastrologer@ > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Shri. Sushil: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It is a wonderful answer you have > > given. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Blessed be. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pandit R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology@ > . > > com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. > > > > > > > > > com>, " sushil.dikshit " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <sushil.dikshit@ > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Babu, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It is not a silly question but it > > is > > > a > > > > > very > > > > > > > good > > > > > > > > > > > question. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Actually > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > there are 27 Nakshatras and every > > > > > Nakshtras > > > > > > > has 4 > > > > > > > > > Charan > > > > > > > > > > > > > so > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > total > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > charans are 27 x 4 = 108 Charan. > > Each > > > > > > Charan > > > > > > > has 3 > > > > > > > > > > > degree > > > > > > > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 20 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > minutes so if you multiply 3 > degree > > > and > > > > 20 > > > > > > > > > minutes to > > > > > > > > > > > 108 > > > > > > > > > > > > > it > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > comes > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > out to be 360 degress i.e. one > > cycle > > > > > > (Circle). > > > > > > > > > This > > > > > > > > > > > cycle > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > represetns > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > whole brahmand because all the > > > rashis, > > > > > > > planets and > > > > > > > > > > > > > nakshatra > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > are > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > between these 360 degree in 2 > > > > dimensional > > > > > > > > > horoscope. So > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > chanting a > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mantra completes one cycle of > this > > > > > brahmand. > > > > > > > > > Further One > > > > > > > > > > > > > who > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > has > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > visited Brahamand at least one > time > > > > i.e. > > > > > he > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > > > > brahmagyani he > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > entitiled to place 108 Shri > before > > > his > > > > > name. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sushil dikshit > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology@ > > . > > > com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. > > > com>, > > > > > babu > > > > > > > mon > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <muthappan111@ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Namaste, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It may be a silly matter for > all > > of > > > > you. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I want to know what is the > reason > > > > that > > > > > > some > > > > > > > > > remedies > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > recomended > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > for 108 times. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I dont know any thing about > > > astrology. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I hope you may pleased to > provide > > a > > > > > reply > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thanks, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Babu > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------ --------- ------- -- > - > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Be a better Globetrotter. Get > > > better > > > > > > travel > > > > > > > > > answers > > > > > > > > > > > from > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someone > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > who knows. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Answers - Check it out. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this > > message > > > > have > > > > > > been > > > > > > > > > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have > been > > > > > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have > been > > > > > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > > > > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > > > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 29, 2007 Report Share Posted July 29, 2007 The laptop given by your company for doing comany's job ! vedic astrology , " litsol " <mishra.lalit wrote: > > Idiot, I have my laptop with me at home. > > > vedic astrology , " abhishekpotti " > <abhishekpotti@> wrote: > > > > Oye Lalith: > > > > How are you sending a message today? Did you go to the office > today > > also just to pilfer the company's internet connections on a holiday > > also? typical of you! One of these days, your employer will kick > you > > out of the office for having misused company's resources and may be > > you will write another story on how sani came in front of you and > > asked you to change job! > > > > for your information, Meera Bhai's affection to Lord Krishna was > way > > before her formal initiation into the beeja mantra. She was known > to > > sing heart-rending songs on Lord Krishna rather than chanting the > > beeja mantra in buses and trains! > > > > Beeja mantra and God's name are not one and the same as you are > > trying to portray. In fact for chanting God's name can be chanted > > without any beeja mantra and still it will give good results. This > > is what happens when you " steal " knowledge by observing tantrik > > practices without formal initiation! > > > > we are not getting exposed....rather it is you who are being > exposed > > with every post. As I said to Ram Jaswalji yesterday itself, I > will > > stop this exchange if you stop it. Otherwise, this will go on. I > am > > not afraid of you. But I pity you.....that is why I am writing the > > below matter...... > > > > By the way, see a good psychiatrist.....I will give just one > evidence > > for your psycopathy...In your posts, often you type a word " Sth " > > often incoherently.....It is almost a pattern for you. This is > > suggestive of OCB problem for you. Better get yourself treated for > > psychiatric ailments and get on with your life instead of trying > > evaluate persons far elder and wiser than you. I am not saying > this > > to abuse you as Ram Jaswalji might think....It is the genuine > advice > > of an elderly person. There is nothing wrong in consulting a good > > psychiatrist; now a days the stigma is not there. So, help yourself. > > > > Abhishek. > > > > vedic astrology , " litsol " <mishra.lalit@> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > You praised Meera, Good, when u w'd learn sth from her pure > bhakti, > > > see, cunningness and being manipulator doesnt help always!! > > > > > > twisting words always, i shown u a mantra of lord Krishna, in > which > > a > > > beej mantra is used, instead of learning that God's Name and Beej > > are > > > one and same thing, writing so much. > > > > > > What i said, open ur eyes and mind, read again, a devotion is > > obvious > > > final outcome of mantra chanting. > > > > > > read what i have been saying, read many times a day, the clouds > of > > ur > > > karma smokes ur understanding. > > > > > > and learn one more thing - Meera got formal deekschha from Saint > > > Raidas. > > > > > > I use company's time or what, that i manage and is a matter of my > > > job, i dont advertise here to get some business in background, > and > > u > > > 2-3 who are lobbying here , are exposed by urself. > > > > > > exposing u was not my objective, but it happened. > > > > > > it will keep happening. > > > > > > > > > ok > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology , " abhishekpotti " > > > <abhishekpotti@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Dear Lalith: > > > > > > > > The whole world knows the history of Blessed Meera Bhai....the > > > > epitome of Bhakti......She was attached to her " Lala " - the > > > wonderful > > > > idol of Krishna gifted to her even from her childhood....Do you > > > mean > > > > to say that innocent young girl started chanting " Kliim > > krishnaaya " > > > > mantra automatically? Even Bhakta Prahlaada had to be > initiated > > by > > > > Sage Naaradha for his chant of dwaadasaakshari mantra.... > > > > > > > > Nobody is afraid of you here......You need not proclaim that > you > > > are > > > > not in the business of a Guru.....actually Guru status is not a > > > > business (true to your half-baked knowledge you will claim it > is > > > also > > > > like software engineering!). The difference my friend between > > you > > > > and other great persons like Rafal or Dakshinamoorthiji is that > > > they > > > > are spending their money for the internet, whereas you are > > > pilfering > > > > your company's time and the company's resources while browsing > > the > > > > internet. Don't you think you are cheating your company when > you > > > > spend so much time on empty and egoistic posts defending > yourself > > > > against every expert after arguing with them unnecessarily? > Are > > > you > > > > not getting paid for the time you spend in the company....Know > > the > > > > basics of ethics before ever sermonizing.....So, actually you > are > > > an > > > > exploiter....try to understand that....the other gurujis are > > > probably > > > > too decent to comment on that......What happened to your > > project? > > > > Better rush to it nough!....It will spare us the agony of > > replying > > > to > > > > your half-witted postings! > > > > > > > > By the say, Which member asked you Prashna Tantra dear? We did > > not > > > > see any posts requesting " Honourable Lalith " to explain Prashna > > > > Tantra (as if you could explain it!) What arrogance you have > to > > > > claim that nobody can stand before you.....Guruji's posts > exposed > > > > your ignorance....you did not even know how to ask queries and > > get > > > > replies from one of the most empathetic astrologers of this > > group, > > > > and yet you claim you are this and that...... > > > > > > > > For your information....nobody is afraid of you..Rather you > > should > > > be > > > > afraid of yourself......Your foolishness itself will be your > > doom. > > > > Did you not become the laughing stock due to your email-based > > > chasing > > > > of Priyaa? Such foolishness in occult matters could be more > > costly > > > > dear.....I think Mohanraaamji and Rafalji are only afraid about > > > your > > > > own well-being! They are not afraid of you. Nor am I afraid of > > you. > > > > > > > > Your posts never answer the queries or points raised by others; > > you > > > > take off on a new ground only because of your shallow > > understanding > > > > of subjects. Nobody has accepted you as a Guru here, and > nobody > > > > will....Can a fire-fly eclipse the Sun? There are too > > many " Suns " > > > > here and you are just a fire-fly. > > > > > > > > It reminds me of a story.....Once an ant challenged the mighty > > > > elephant for a fight; the elephant obviously could not hear the > > ant > > > > (the ant being so tiny and it was on the ground, its sound > could > > > not > > > > reach the elephant). The elephant just walked away out of its > own > > > > volition in its natural course. Then the ant claimed, " you > see > > I > > > > challenged the elephant and it ran away " . Dear, your saying > that > > > > nobody can stand before you is similar to that....... > > > > > > > > FIRST LEARN THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN GHOSTS AND YOUR ANCESTOR > > > > SUMANGALIS BEFORE WRITING THE FIRST POSTS ON OCCULT! What a > > > > pity......what a pity.....That we have to bear your meaningless > > > > rantings here! > > > > > > > > Abhishek. > > > > > > > > vedic astrology , " litsol " > <mishra.lalit@> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I was waiting for u dear.. > > > > > > > > > > why u took time ? > > > > > > > > > > Do u mean Meera Bai discussed with u, what she did.. > > > > > > > > > > Do u know 'Kleem Krishnay, Govindaya Gopijan Vallabhaya > Namh' > > is > > > a > > > > > mantra for lord krishna. > > > > > > > > > > is there no beej mantras, to whom u wish to misguide ? let > > > thnigs > > > > > remain between lord, bhakta , their shraddha and their guru. > > > > > > > > > > why u people are so afraid of me, i m not in business of > guru. > > > > > > > > > > i m happy with my life, my profession of software > engineering > > > and > > > > > my hobbies ok. > > > > > > > > > > there are 7000+ members are here, by writing such type of > > > foolish > > > > > things u expose urself only, mind, there are better brains > here. > > > > > > > > > > this is enough ... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology , > > > > > " abhishekpotti " <abhishekpotti@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Respected Mohanraaamji: > > > > > > > > > > > > Well said. Lalith is saying that " maybe in south india > > > devotees > > > > > > don't chant Moola mantras but not so in North " ...What > > > > > > stupidity.....He does not seem to understand that " mantra > > > > shaastra > > > > > > experts " are also devotees, but they cannot be called as > > > innocent > > > > > > saatwik bhaktaas! A typical example of a pure saadhwik > > bhakta > > > > will > > > > > > be Meera Bhai (was she not North Indian). Can Lalith say > > which > > > > > Dasa > > > > > > Mahaa Vidya Meera Bhai practised? She was immersed in > > Krishna > > > > > > consciousness and Lover for Him. Her own Bhajans were her > > > > prayers > > > > > in > > > > > > the bhaavana of Bhakti in the form of Love! This is not > > mantra > > > > > > shaastra. Another example will be Saant Tukhaaraam. These > > > > > bhaktaas > > > > > > did not chant moola mantraas. Panditji Dakshinamoorthi was > > on > > > > dot > > > > > in > > > > > > saying that " Pure bhaktaas do not chant complicated moola > > > > > mantraas " . > > > > > > You have clarified this fact wonderfully in your post. I > wish > > > > more > > > > > > knowledgeable persons also put erratic posters in their > place > > > > just > > > > > as > > > > > > Mohanraaamji does here. This will benefit more naive > readers > > > of > > > > > > these forums who might otherwise get confused as to which > of > > > the > > > > > > paths to follow. Actually, anyone can follow any path as > he/ > > > she > > > > > > deems it fit; but there should be consistency of procedures. > > > > > > > > > > > > We should not confuse mantrik rituals and bhakti > doctrines. > > > > > Bhaktaas > > > > > > can chant the names of Gods at anytime.....Mantra shaastra > > > > experts > > > > > > chanting advanced moola mantras should necessarily adopt > > ritual > > > > > > procedures for the welfare of themselves and others! > > > > > Yes...improper > > > > > > chanting of mantras can cause danger to the society also > just > > > as > > > > > > proper chanting can help others. Hence, this cannot be > > > > considered > > > > > as > > > > > > a personal preference of the aspirant. If this was not the > > > case, > > > > > why > > > > > > did sages codify spiritual practises scrupulously? > Rafalji, > > > > > > Mohanraaamji, etc. are correct in saying it is best to > follow > > > > > Pandit > > > > > > Dakshinamoorthiji's advices on mantra shastra or japams. > He > > is > > > > > > learned and he is living a life compatible to the shaastras > > > > though > > > > > he > > > > > > has faced uncertain circumstances in his own personal > life. > > He > > > > > never > > > > > > compromised on principles and he willingly paid the price > for > > > > that > > > > > > which most of us will never do. The words of such a person > > > > should > > > > > > obviously carry more weight. > > > > > > > > > > > > Abhishek. > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology , " mohanraaam " > > > > <mohanraaam@> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Well Lalith: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If you have really done dasa Maha Vidyaa, you would have > > > never > > > > > > > approached a professional astrologer for > > consultation...that > > > > much > > > > > I > > > > > > > can say.... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > And what idiocy when you say Panditji is partly wrong? > He > > > > > > > said " Bhaktaas do not chant Moola mantras " , whereas you > > have > > > > > edited > > > > > > > the words to suit your ends....He never said " devotees > > don't > > > > > chant > > > > > > > Beej mantras " .....You are putting words into his mouth > and > > > > > assuming > > > > > > > he is wrong! Why, do you know....the Great Panditji > himself > > > > > chants > > > > > > > Moola mantras.....He is a bhakta and a mantra shastra > > expert. > > > > As > > > > > a > > > > > > > bhakta he keeps incessant chanting of naama japa > throughout > > > the > > > > > > day; > > > > > > > as a mantra shastra expert, he restricts the moola mantra > > > > japams > > > > > to > > > > > > > stipulated times with ritual purity.....It is this > > wonderful > > > > > > practice > > > > > > > that Guruji was alluding to. Guruji cannot be wrong in > > > ritual > > > > > and > > > > > > > occult matters. Please understand that. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There are 4 classes of Devotees.......1) Saatwik vedic > > > devotees > > > > > who > > > > > > > will follow vedic dharma scrupulously. They will not > dare > > to > > > > > > compare > > > > > > > astrology and vedanga to Engineering! as you did... > > > > > > > 2) Raajasik devotees who will follow vedic disciplines as > > far > > > > as > > > > > > > possible, but will still go after upaasanaas of Demi- Gods > > for > > > > > > > accomplishment of siddhis. Mantra shaastra experts > usually > > > > fall > > > > > in > > > > > > > this category. > > > > > > > 3) Saatwik Bhaktaas - for whom the meditation and glory > of > > > > their > > > > > > > Ishta Devataa is enough for spiritual satisfaction. It > is > > > this > > > > > > > category that Guruji referred to when he said they will > not > > > > chant > > > > > > > Moola mantras too much. Definitely they will not do Dasa > > > Mahaa > > > > > > > Vidyaa. > > > > > > > 4) Taamasic Devotees - Those whose main motive is to > > project > > > > > > > themselves at all costs and acting as if they are equal > to > > > the > > > > > > > experts; they will try ALL practices - whether they are > > > > > sanctioned > > > > > > by > > > > > > > vedas or not.....Their only aim is personal glory and > > > > > > satisfaction. > > > > > > > They will attack even established dharma if they do not > get > > > > > results > > > > > > > (sounds familiar....You are one!) Ignorance and half- > baked > > > > > > knowledge > > > > > > > and egotism are these persons' motivating fuel. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You are really satan's Gift to this list.......My only > > prayer > > > > is > > > > > > that > > > > > > > innocent members of this list do not get side-tracked > with > > > your > > > > > > > ramblings. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Let me make this clear to the list.....Panditji said that > > > > saatwik > > > > > > > Bhaktaas who chant Divine names only due to Pure Love on > > God > > > > > > usually > > > > > > > never chant mantrik moola mantraas. It is just one class > > of > > > > > > > devotees. A rajasik bhakta who is a mantra-shaastra > expert > > > may > > > > > > even > > > > > > > be a bhakta at heart; and a pure bhakta may sometimes > chant > > > > some > > > > > > > mantrik japams for solving some practical > issues......But, > > > when > > > > > > they > > > > > > > switch their routines temporarily, these enlightened > > devotees > > > > > > usually > > > > > > > take good guidance and follow the tenets of shaastras > > > > > > > scrupulously....Definitely they will not sit on > assumption > > > like > > > > > > > Lalith. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On the one hand, this fellow claims he has done chants in > > > > > forests, > > > > > > > rivers, earth, etc. (Probably we have a Maharishi here! > > What > > > > > > heights > > > > > > > of pointless pride in this young man list....it is > > > > disgusting!). > > > > > > On > > > > > > > the other hand, he says he chants mantras in buses, > trains, > > > > > > etc...... > > > > > > > He is confused about which no body can have issues. Only > > his > > > > > Guru > > > > > > > should be concerned about that.....But, his attempts to > > stuff > > > > his > > > > > > > shallow understanding upon this list is reprehensible. > > And, > > > > his > > > > > > > habit of quoting experts out of context is really > > > condemnable. > > > > > May > > > > > > > Jupiter's Light Shine on that fellow and teach him to > > respect > > > > the > > > > > > > hallowed traditions and to stay at his level rather than > > > trying > > > > > > > to " teach " others (He has the audacity to claim he > > > > is " teaching " > > > > > > > Rafalji!) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If a mere young man of 35 years who has spent his life on > a > > > > > " Failed > > > > > > > computer web desining business " , " pointless email chasing > > of > > > > > > girls " , > > > > > > > and other " past times " can gain insight as he claims, how > > > much > > > > > will > > > > > > > learned Gurus of this group with their life of devotion > to > > > > > vedanta > > > > > > > and vedanga know? His peanut brain and hyper-inflated > ego > > > will > > > > > > never > > > > > > > allow him to see this obvious truth. But, please list > > > exercise > > > > > > your > > > > > > > discretion while reading his posts (There are doubtless > > some > > > > good > > > > > > > elements even in his posts; but mostly there is trash > > > presented > > > > > as > > > > > > > philosophy). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mohanraaam > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology , " litsol " > > > > <mishra.lalit@> > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Rafal, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Do u think, a hobby means shallow knowledge of the > > domain, > > > No > > > > > > > rafal, > > > > > > > > it's not like that. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > At least not for me. You have learnt and i m learning, > i > > > read > > > > > > ur's > > > > > > > > replies and get benifitted, same way i wanted you to > pay > > > > heed > > > > > to > > > > > > > > what i have written about spritiuality, mostrly i did > > write > > > > for > > > > > u > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have done all 10 mahavidyas of tantra and read many > > > tantrik > > > > > > > > classics, spent good deal of time with great tantriks > > > > trained > > > > > in > > > > > > > > Kamakhya and other places, keenly observed their > doings, > > > > their > > > > > > > > mistakes etc.., I did tremendous mantra chanting on > > water, > > > > on > > > > > > > earth, > > > > > > > > at home, in forests etc... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > then reached here, then i did write something, but > sorry > > i > > > > dont > > > > > > > > remember shlokas. i was not interested in cramming that. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Panditji is not fully correct in saying that > BeejMantras > > > are > > > > > not > > > > > > > > chanted by devotees, I dont know much about South India > > but > > > > in > > > > > > > North > > > > > > > > normally its done. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > And a successfull mantra sadhana has to result in one's > > > being > > > > a > > > > > > > > devotee, the devotion is the outcome, final result of > > > mantra > > > > > > > sadhana, > > > > > > > > perhaps, Pandit Ji believes mantras are power > > > packet,thinks, > > > > i > > > > > do > > > > > > > it > > > > > > > > this way , these many times and get this result, this > is > > > > where > > > > > > most > > > > > > > > of the people are confused. without being a good human > > > being > > > > if > > > > > > we > > > > > > > > think, we will achieve something in spirituality, is > > > > difficult, > > > > > > > very > > > > > > > > difficult. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > what happens is, with the mantra chanting, a self > > > > > > transformation > > > > > > > > process begins, u if dont restrict urself, ur karma > > begins > > > > > > > diluting, > > > > > > > > and u begin ur purification process unknowingly, when > > > > > substantial > > > > > > > > part of ego and greed for respect vanishes and many > such > > > > thing > > > > > > > > togather, mantra awakens u and with the God's grace ur > > > > > objective > > > > > > > gets > > > > > > > > fullfilled, gradually u become a devotee. ur being > simple > > > and > > > > > > being > > > > > > > > devotee is sometimes is indication of ur's going on the > > > right > > > > > > track. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think we have discussed a lot, it's enough !! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > My Boss has given me lot of projects to complete, so, > may > > > be, > > > > i > > > > > m > > > > > > > not > > > > > > > > going to available in the group like i was recently. > > > however. > > > > i > > > > > > > will > > > > > > > > complete Garg Hora series. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > > > Lalit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology , Rafal Gendarz > > > > > > > > <starsuponme@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Litsol, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Then please dont generalize Your preferences as they > > are > > > > too > > > > > > > > shallow for > > > > > > > > > this Forum aspiration. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz > > > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru > > > > > > > > > email: rafal@ > > > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > litsol napisa?(a): > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Rafel, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I take Astrology as a good hobby, and i w'd be > > looking > > > at > > > > > it > > > > > > > with > > > > > > > > an > > > > > > > > > > engineer's approach. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I asked ur age because, it's our thinking to put > our > > > > > > parameters > > > > > > > in > > > > > > > > > > god's system, there is nothing like delay or > > > advancement > > > > in > > > > > > > > > > spirituality. So, " Delay " > or " Speed " , " backwardness " > > > > > > > > > > and " advancement " doesn't exist in spirituality, I > > > > thought > > > > > if > > > > > > u > > > > > > > r > > > > > > > > > > thinking that it may take too much time, I wanted > to > > > tell > > > > > u, > > > > > > > it's > > > > > > > > not > > > > > > > > > > like that. there is no delay. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It clicks in fraction of a second, when u r getting > > > > clicked > > > > > > > > depends > > > > > > > > > > on u and on god's will, when he wants u to get > > clicked. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > God sometimes graces for no reason ( " Ahetuka " ) just > > for > > > > his > > > > > > > > > > compassion towards u and it may happen next minute > > too. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > spirituality is not delimited by time , effort and > > > rules. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > > > > > Lalit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology > > > > > > > > > > <vedic astrology%40>, Rafal > > > Gendarz > > > > > > > > > > <starsuponme@ ...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Litsol, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please be careful about words. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Im happy that You are sharing Your experience - > > very > > > > > > > inspirating > > > > > > > > > > ones. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Age hierarchy is for sudras - Manu Samhita. If > You > > > > treat > > > > > > > Jyotish > > > > > > > > > > Vedanga > > > > > > > > > > > as profession similar to engineering You have a > > long > > > > way > > > > > to > > > > > > > go. > > > > > > > > But > > > > > > > > > > dont > > > > > > > > > > > be pessimistic here are many who will try to help > > You > > > > in > > > > > > > getting > > > > > > > > > > proper > > > > > > > > > > > understanding. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > After some time You will agree with me about the > > mala > > > > and > > > > > > > japa. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz > > > > > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru > > > > > > > > > > > email: rafal@ > > > > > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > litsol napisa?(a): > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Rafal, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Here u r doing two wrong things, instead of > > > > developing > > > > > ur > > > > > > > > > > understanding, > > > > > > > > > > > > u r trying to conclude something and going > beyond > > > > that > > > > > u r > > > > > > > > > > messaging > > > > > > > > > > > > same to many. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I m touching 35, What's ur age ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Astrology is a kind of vidya or profession, > like > > i > > > m > > > > a > > > > > > > > software > > > > > > > > > > > > engineer, software engineering is my > profession. > > > > > > > spirituality > > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > beyond > > > > > > > > > > > > all sort of vidya or profession. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I wish u to be a good soul and to realize the > > bliss > > > > of > > > > > > self > > > > > > > > > > awakening or > > > > > > > > > > > > in other terms, the bliss that comes once u > feel > > u > > > > and > > > > > > god > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > > > connected. dissolved in each other. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > First realize, experience, then speak and then > > > > suggest > > > > > to > > > > > > > > others, > > > > > > > > > > by > > > > > > > > > > > > mere reading shastras or books u r not going to > > > feel > > > > > it. > > > > > > > > unless > > > > > > > > > > god > > > > > > > > > > > > graces u it's very very difficult. and if u > dont > > > > avoid > > > > > > this > > > > > > > > sort > > > > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > > > hurriedness instead of learning and > > understanding, > > > it > > > > > > will > > > > > > > > affect > > > > > > > > > > u only > > > > > > > > > > > > no one else. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > somehere i have read, it was written - By mere > > > > > > > repeating " So- > > > > > > > > > > Aham " no > > > > > > > > > > > > one gets liberated unless he realizes it like > one > > > > > doesnt > > > > > > get > > > > > > > > > > cured by > > > > > > > > > > > > knowing the name of the medicine, u need to > take > > > the > > > > > > > medicine > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > get > > > > > > > > > > > > cured " . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So, pls. be wise, as it was being discussed > here, > > i > > > > > > shared > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > experience of my life, pls. mind it, i m not a > > > > > preecher, > > > > > > > nor a > > > > > > > > > > guru, nor > > > > > > > > > > > > i have to make my followers, nor it's my > > > profession, > > > > > nor > > > > > > i > > > > > > > > have > > > > > > > > > > to get > > > > > > > > > > > > fame, sharing things is a kind of friendliness > a > > > kind > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > affection, > > > > > > > > > > > > that's it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > Lalit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. com>, > > > Rafal > > > > > > Gendarz > > > > > > > > > > > > <starsuponme@ ...> > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Jyotishas > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Counting of mala has more depth sense than > just > > > > > > counting, > > > > > > > > so for > > > > > > > > > > > > natives > > > > > > > > > > > > > like Litsol counting is neccessary and any > > other > > > > > > > speculation > > > > > > > > > > will be > > > > > > > > > > > > > only illusory and just imagination. We should > > > > follow > > > > > Pt. > > > > > > > > > > > > Dakshinamoorti > > > > > > > > > > > > > advise strictly, otherwise our process of > > > spiritual > > > > > > > > development > > > > > > > > > > will > > > > > > > > > > > > be > > > > > > > > > > > > > slow and unauthoritative. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru > > > > > > > > > > > > > email: rafal@ > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > asmp2k02@ napisa?(a): > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Resp Sri Lalitji, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for your mail.But please also read > > > > > > > > GuruDakshinamurthyi > > > > > > > > > > ji's > > > > > > > > > > > > > > mail(addressing me) also on this,which > brings > > > in > > > > > more > > > > > > > > clarity > > > > > > > > > > to the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > applicability principles to my mail. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I meant that both are necessity but to what > > > > degree > > > > > of > > > > > > > time > > > > > > > > (it > > > > > > > > > > varies > > > > > > > > > > > > > > from saadhaka to saadhaka) to get such > > inbuilt > > > > > > maturity > > > > > > > > such > > > > > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the count will be taken care of by Divine > > > forces > > > > > > after > > > > > > > > some > > > > > > > > > > initial > > > > > > > > > > > > > > period of saadhana. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Morover the type of bio matter present in > the > > > > japa > > > > > > maala > > > > > > > > > > (which is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > symbolic for ritualism as well as from > > > practical > > > > > > point > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > view for > > > > > > > > > > > > our > > > > > > > > > > > > > > count) will help in keeping away > destructive > > > > forces > > > > > > > > acting on > > > > > > > > > > us > > > > > > > > > > > > .Thus > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the symbolic rituals will indirectly help > us > > in > > > > > > keeping > > > > > > > > away > > > > > > > > > > from > > > > > > > > > > > > > > negative thoughts and also trains our > memory > > to > > > > be > > > > > > > object > > > > > > > > > > > > oriented.If > > > > > > > > > > > > > > our memory grows and retentive capacity > > > increase > > > > > the > > > > > > > > Gnaana > > > > > > > > > > will > > > > > > > > > > > > > > increase ,but at the same time destructive > > > forces > > > > > > > > > > (diversions) also > > > > > > > > > > > > > > becomes powerful.Thus the symbolic > procedures > > > > will > > > > > > come > > > > > > > in > > > > > > > > > > handy to > > > > > > > > > > > > > > successfully fight the negative forces.The > > > > rituals > > > > > > may > > > > > > > be > > > > > > > > > > Rising > > > > > > > > > > > > > > early(if possible during Braahmi > > muhurta),Taking > > > > > > > > > > bath,Japaanusthaan, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > attending to the livelihood job etc etc in > > > > defined > > > > > > > times > > > > > > > > as > > > > > > > > > > > > discipline > > > > > > > > > > > > > > helps indirectly tune our memory through > > > keeping > > > > > our > > > > > > > body > > > > > > > > > > healthy. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thus ultimately we conclude that the so > > called > > > > > > symbolic > > > > > > > > > > procedures > > > > > > > > > > > > are > > > > > > > > > > > > > > not actually symbolic(it got branded as > such) > > > but > > > > a > > > > > > > > necessity > > > > > > > > > > for > > > > > > > > > > > > our > > > > > > > > > > > > > > own good if we practice to the extent we > can. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quoting mishra.lalit@ ... <mishra. > > lalit% > > > > > > > 40gmail. > > > > > > > > com>: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Resp. Sri Murthy Adavi, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, what you said is perfectly right, we > > count > > > > or > > > > > > dont > > > > > > > > > > count,target > > > > > > > > > > > > > > is realization of god's love within, I got > it > > > > with > > > > > no > > > > > > > > > > counting, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someone may get it with counting. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanx, for the writing. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Lalit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. com> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. > > com>, > > > > > > srinivasa > > > > > > > > > > murthy adavi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > asmp2k02@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Respected Learned Members, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Both views may be correct when the views > > > > have/or > > > > > > with > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > goal as > > > > > > > > > > > > > > development of Love/Devotion towards > > adhistana > > > > > > Devatha > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > Mantra > > > > > > > > > > > > > > as Base. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In the initial stage only you need the > > > count;as > > > > > one > > > > > > > > > > develops the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > habit the biological tuning of the > > > intellect/body > > > > > will > > > > > > > > > > automatically > > > > > > > > > > > > > > take care of the practice(without count- > help > > of > > > > > malas > > > > > > > > etc). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It's like if with the help of Alarm clock > > if > > > we > > > > > > wake > > > > > > > up > > > > > > > > for > > > > > > > > > > 2 or 3 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > days at some appointed hour,then > > automatically > > > we > > > > > > > wakeup > > > > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > the same > > > > > > > > > > > > > > time every day without help of alarm. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > With due Respects > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > smadavi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quoting starsuponme@ : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Litsol, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Definitely we should count our Mantra > Japa > > on > > > > > Mala. > > > > > > > Your > > > > > > > > > > view is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > against > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Vedic Authorities and Sages, so should be > > > > > rejected. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > email: rafal@ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > litsol napisa?(a): > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Mr. Jayashri, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > A thought came, why i should not share > > with > > > > u, > > > > > U > > > > > > > pls. > > > > > > > > stop > > > > > > > > > > > > > > counting > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > mantra chantings, counting mantra gives > > > false > > > > > ego > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > then > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > frustration if u dont get desired > results. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > leave it to the god, god counts the > > mantra > > > > > > chanted > > > > > > > by > > > > > > > > you > > > > > > > > > > may be > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 108, 1008 or whatsoever, let him count, > > > it's > > > > > his > > > > > > > part > > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > ur > > > > > > > > > > > > part > > > > > > > > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to chant the mantra. when the mantra > has > > to > > > > > > awaken, > > > > > > > it > > > > > > > > > > will be, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > god > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > will ensure it for u. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sometimes we try to become more > > intelligent > > > > > with > > > > > > out > > > > > > > > > > limited > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > intellect and that creates obstacles in > > our > > > > > > > spiritual > > > > > > > > > > growth. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So, forget about counts, forget about > the > > > > time > > > > > u > > > > > > > put > > > > > > > > in > > > > > > > > > > for ur's > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sadhana, invoke the god with pure > heart. > > > > purity > > > > > > > > counts. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Lalit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology@ . com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. > > > > > > > > > > com>, " dakshinastrologer " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <dakshinastrologer@ ...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Ms. Jayashree: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think this topic on 108 is getting > > very > > > > > > > > interesting > > > > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > enlightening for all members. > Yesterday > > > we > > > > > had a > > > > > > > > > > wonderful > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > esoteric > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > explanation from Shri. Sushil > Dikshit, > > > and > > > > > > today > > > > > > > > your > > > > > > > > > > > > wonderful > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > explanation of numerical symmetry of > > the > > > > > cosmos! > > > > > > > > > > Wonderful. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There definitely exists a " numerical > > > > > symphony " > > > > > > in > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > Universe. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > not only 108.....as I mentioned in my > > > > earlier > > > > > > > post, > > > > > > > > > > there are > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > various > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > other numerals that are significant > in > > > > occult > > > > > > > > > > practices. 108 > > > > > > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > a > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > powerful and all-purpose perfect > > > > > number...While > > > > > > > we > > > > > > > > have > > > > > > > > > > > > > > understood > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the glory of 108, we should not lose > > > sight > > > > of > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > fact > > > > > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > > > > > > > there > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > are > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > other powerful numbers also. This is > > just > > > > for > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > information > > > > > > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > list. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > My apprecitation again for this > > wonderful > > > > > > > response. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Blessed be. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pandit R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Blessed be. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pandit R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI. --- In > vedic- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > astrology@grou ps.com > > > > <astrology% > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 40. com>, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " jayasartn " <jayasartn@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In cosmology, 108 has this > > > significance - > > > > > the > > > > > > > > moon is > > > > > > > > > > away > > > > > > > > > > > > > > from > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > earth 108 times its (moon's) > diameter > > > and > > > > > the > > > > > > > sun > > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > away > > > > > > > > > > > > > > from the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > earth, 108 times its diameter. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Perhaps this reality of distances > is > > > > > > applicable > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > deities > > > > > > > > > > > > > > too. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Perhaps this has been indicated by > > the > > > > 108 > > > > > > divya > > > > > > > > > > desas of > > > > > > > > > > > > Lord > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Narayana. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > jayasree > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology@ > . > > com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. > > > > > > > > > > com>, " dakshinastrologer " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <dakshinastrologer@ > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Shri. Sushil: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It is a wonderful answer you have > > > given. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Blessed be. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pandit R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology@ > > . > > > com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. > > > > > > > > > > com>, " sushil.dikshit " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <sushil.dikshit@ > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Babu, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It is not a silly question but > it > > > is > > > > a > > > > > > very > > > > > > > > good > > > > > > > > > > > > question. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Actually > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > there are 27 Nakshatras and > every > > > > > > Nakshtras > > > > > > > > has 4 > > > > > > > > > > Charan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > so > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > total > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > charans are 27 x 4 = 108 > Charan. > > > Each > > > > > > > Charan > > > > > > > > has 3 > > > > > > > > > > > > degree > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 20 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > minutes so if you multiply 3 > > degree > > > > and > > > > > 20 > > > > > > > > > > minutes to > > > > > > > > > > > > 108 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > it > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > comes > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > out to be 360 degress i.e. one > > > cycle > > > > > > > (Circle). > > > > > > > > > > This > > > > > > > > > > > > cycle > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > represetns > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > whole brahmand because all the > > > > rashis, > > > > > > > > planets and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > nakshatra > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > are > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > between these 360 degree in 2 > > > > > dimensional > > > > > > > > > > horoscope. So > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > chanting a > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mantra completes one cycle of > > this > > > > > > brahmand. > > > > > > > > > > Further One > > > > > > > > > > > > > > who > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > has > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > visited Brahamand at least one > > time > > > > > i.e. > > > > > > he > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > brahmagyani he > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > entitiled to place 108 Shri > > before > > > > his > > > > > > name. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sushil dikshit > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology@ > > > . > > > > com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% > 40. > > > > com>, > > > > > > babu > > > > > > > > mon > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <muthappan111@ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Namaste, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It may be a silly matter for > > all > > > of > > > > > you. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I want to know what is the > > reason > > > > > that > > > > > > > some > > > > > > > > > > remedies > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > recomended > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > for 108 times. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I dont know any thing about > > > > astrology. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I hope you may pleased to > > provide > > > a > > > > > > reply > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thanks, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Babu > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------ --------- ----- -- > -- > > - > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Be a better Globetrotter. Get > > > > better > > > > > > > travel > > > > > > > > > > answers > > > > > > > > > > > > from > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someone > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > who knows. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Answers - Check it out. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this > > > message > > > > > have > > > > > > > been > > > > > > > > > > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have > > been > > > > > > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have > > been > > > > > > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have > been > > > > > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > > > > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 29, 2007 Report Share Posted July 29, 2007 Oye Lalith: Wherever you have typed sth, it does not fit naturally......probably your mind gets stuck up and you are using fillers like that to get going is it? Quite natural....I can understand your problem. OCB patients or shallow individuals have mind-blocks and they naturally have to use word-fillers like " uh " ... " I mean " , etc. to put on an act as if they are going to say something important. This word fillers will give them time to think.....Thanks. Honestly sth = something is new to me; because I am yet to see anyone lazy enough to use this shortform. Naturally, when you pilfer other's resources and have to type in what little time you have got to do your thing without getting caught, you will use all sort of abbreviations...... sth is also another moola mantra.... " something " " something " In Government office parlance " something " means " something else " .....bribes...No wonder your corrupt intelligence wants the use of " something " often! Abhishek vedic astrology , " litsol " <mishra.lalit wrote: > > > > > sth = something, learn it, now !! > > > > i m happy for u on this and many other readers w'd be. > > good. > > > vedic astrology , " litsol " <mishra.lalit@> > wrote: > > > > Idiot, I have my laptop with me at home. > > > > > > vedic astrology , " abhishekpotti " > > <abhishekpotti@> wrote: > > > > > > Oye Lalith: > > > > > > How are you sending a message today? Did you go to the office > > today > > > also just to pilfer the company's internet connections on a > holiday > > > also? typical of you! One of these days, your employer will kick > > you > > > out of the office for having misused company's resources and may > be > > > you will write another story on how sani came in front of you and > > > asked you to change job! > > > > > > for your information, Meera Bhai's affection to Lord Krishna was > > way > > > before her formal initiation into the beeja mantra. She was > known > > to > > > sing heart-rending songs on Lord Krishna rather than chanting the > > > beeja mantra in buses and trains! > > > > > > Beeja mantra and God's name are not one and the same as you are > > > trying to portray. In fact for chanting God's name can be > chanted > > > without any beeja mantra and still it will give good results. > This > > > is what happens when you " steal " knowledge by observing tantrik > > > practices without formal initiation! > > > > > > we are not getting exposed....rather it is you who are being > > exposed > > > with every post. As I said to Ram Jaswalji yesterday itself, I > > will > > > stop this exchange if you stop it. Otherwise, this will go on. > I > > am > > > not afraid of you. But I pity you.....that is why I am writing > the > > > below matter...... > > > > > > By the way, see a good psychiatrist.....I will give just one > > evidence > > > for your psycopathy...In your posts, often you type a word " Sth " > > > often incoherently.....It is almost a pattern for you. This is > > > suggestive of OCB problem for you. Better get yourself treated > for > > > psychiatric ailments and get on with your life instead of trying > > > evaluate persons far elder and wiser than you. I am not saying > > this > > > to abuse you as Ram Jaswalji might think....It is the genuine > > advice > > > of an elderly person. There is nothing wrong in consulting a > good > > > psychiatrist; now a days the stigma is not there. So, help > yourself. > > > > > > Abhishek. > > > > > > vedic astrology , " litsol " <mishra.lalit@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > You praised Meera, Good, when u w'd learn sth from her pure > > bhakti, > > > > see, cunningness and being manipulator doesnt help always!! > > > > > > > > twisting words always, i shown u a mantra of lord Krishna, in > > which > > > a > > > > beej mantra is used, instead of learning that God's Name and > Beej > > > are > > > > one and same thing, writing so much. > > > > > > > > What i said, open ur eyes and mind, read again, a devotion is > > > obvious > > > > final outcome of mantra chanting. > > > > > > > > read what i have been saying, read many times a day, the clouds > > of > > > ur > > > > karma smokes ur understanding. > > > > > > > > and learn one more thing - Meera got formal deekschha from > Saint > > > > Raidas. > > > > > > > > I use company's time or what, that i manage and is a matter of > my > > > > job, i dont advertise here to get some business in background, > > and > > > u > > > > 2-3 who are lobbying here , are exposed by urself. > > > > > > > > exposing u was not my objective, but it happened. > > > > > > > > it will keep happening. > > > > > > > > > > > > ok > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology , " abhishekpotti " > > > > <abhishekpotti@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Dear Lalith: > > > > > > > > > > The whole world knows the history of Blessed Meera > Bhai....the > > > > > epitome of Bhakti......She was attached to her " Lala " - the > > > > wonderful > > > > > idol of Krishna gifted to her even from her childhood....Do > you > > > > mean > > > > > to say that innocent young girl started chanting " Kliim > > > krishnaaya " > > > > > mantra automatically? Even Bhakta Prahlaada had to be > > initiated > > > by > > > > > Sage Naaradha for his chant of dwaadasaakshari mantra.... > > > > > > > > > > Nobody is afraid of you here......You need not proclaim that > > you > > > > are > > > > > not in the business of a Guru.....actually Guru status is not > a > > > > > business (true to your half-baked knowledge you will claim it > > is > > > > also > > > > > like software engineering!). The difference my friend > between > > > you > > > > > and other great persons like Rafal or Dakshinamoorthiji is > that > > > > they > > > > > are spending their money for the internet, whereas you are > > > > pilfering > > > > > your company's time and the company's resources while > browsing > > > the > > > > > internet. Don't you think you are cheating your company when > > you > > > > > spend so much time on empty and egoistic posts defending > > yourself > > > > > against every expert after arguing with them unnecessarily? > > Are > > > > you > > > > > not getting paid for the time you spend in the > company....Know > > > the > > > > > basics of ethics before ever sermonizing.....So, actually you > > are > > > > an > > > > > exploiter....try to understand that....the other gurujis are > > > > probably > > > > > too decent to comment on that......What happened to your > > > project? > > > > > Better rush to it nough!....It will spare us the agony of > > > replying > > > > to > > > > > your half-witted postings! > > > > > > > > > > By the say, Which member asked you Prashna Tantra dear? We > did > > > not > > > > > see any posts requesting " Honourable Lalith " to explain > Prashna > > > > > Tantra (as if you could explain it!) What arrogance you have > > to > > > > > claim that nobody can stand before you.....Guruji's posts > > exposed > > > > > your ignorance....you did not even know how to ask queries > and > > > get > > > > > replies from one of the most empathetic astrologers of this > > > group, > > > > > and yet you claim you are this and that...... > > > > > > > > > > For your information....nobody is afraid of you..Rather you > > > should > > > > be > > > > > afraid of yourself......Your foolishness itself will be your > > > doom. > > > > > Did you not become the laughing stock due to your email- based > > > > chasing > > > > > of Priyaa? Such foolishness in occult matters could be more > > > costly > > > > > dear.....I think Mohanraaamji and Rafalji are only afraid > about > > > > your > > > > > own well-being! They are not afraid of you. Nor am I afraid > of > > > you. > > > > > > > > > > Your posts never answer the queries or points raised by > others; > > > you > > > > > take off on a new ground only because of your shallow > > > understanding > > > > > of subjects. Nobody has accepted you as a Guru here, and > > nobody > > > > > will....Can a fire-fly eclipse the Sun? There are too > > > many " Suns " > > > > > here and you are just a fire-fly. > > > > > > > > > > It reminds me of a story.....Once an ant challenged the > mighty > > > > > elephant for a fight; the elephant obviously could not hear > the > > > ant > > > > > (the ant being so tiny and it was on the ground, its sound > > could > > > > not > > > > > reach the elephant). The elephant just walked away out of its > > own > > > > > volition in its natural course. Then the ant claimed, " you > > see > > > I > > > > > challenged the elephant and it ran away " . Dear, your saying > > that > > > > > nobody can stand before you is similar to that....... > > > > > > > > > > FIRST LEARN THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN GHOSTS AND YOUR ANCESTOR > > > > > SUMANGALIS BEFORE WRITING THE FIRST POSTS ON OCCULT! What a > > > > > pity......what a pity.....That we have to bear your > meaningless > > > > > rantings here! > > > > > > > > > > Abhishek. > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology , " litsol " > > <mishra.lalit@> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I was waiting for u dear.. > > > > > > > > > > > > why u took time ? > > > > > > > > > > > > Do u mean Meera Bai discussed with u, what she did.. > > > > > > > > > > > > Do u know 'Kleem Krishnay, Govindaya Gopijan Vallabhaya > > Namh' > > > is > > > > a > > > > > > mantra for lord krishna. > > > > > > > > > > > > is there no beej mantras, to whom u wish to misguide ? let > > > > thnigs > > > > > > remain between lord, bhakta , their shraddha and their guru. > > > > > > > > > > > > why u people are so afraid of me, i m not in business of > > guru. > > > > > > > > > > > > i m happy with my life, my profession of software > > engineering > > > > and > > > > > > my hobbies ok. > > > > > > > > > > > > there are 7000+ members are here, by writing such type of > > > > foolish > > > > > > things u expose urself only, mind, there are better brains > > here. > > > > > > > > > > > > this is enough ... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology , > > > > > > " abhishekpotti " <abhishekpotti@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Respected Mohanraaamji: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Well said. Lalith is saying that " maybe in south india > > > > devotees > > > > > > > don't chant Moola mantras but not so in North " ...What > > > > > > > stupidity.....He does not seem to understand that " mantra > > > > > shaastra > > > > > > > experts " are also devotees, but they cannot be called as > > > > innocent > > > > > > > saatwik bhaktaas! A typical example of a pure saadhwik > > > bhakta > > > > > will > > > > > > > be Meera Bhai (was she not North Indian). Can Lalith say > > > which > > > > > > Dasa > > > > > > > Mahaa Vidya Meera Bhai practised? She was immersed in > > > Krishna > > > > > > > consciousness and Lover for Him. Her own Bhajans were > her > > > > > prayers > > > > > > in > > > > > > > the bhaavana of Bhakti in the form of Love! This is not > > > mantra > > > > > > > shaastra. Another example will be Saant Tukhaaraam. > These > > > > > > bhaktaas > > > > > > > did not chant moola mantraas. Panditji Dakshinamoorthi > was > > > on > > > > > dot > > > > > > in > > > > > > > saying that " Pure bhaktaas do not chant complicated moola > > > > > > mantraas " . > > > > > > > You have clarified this fact wonderfully in your post. I > > wish > > > > > more > > > > > > > knowledgeable persons also put erratic posters in their > > place > > > > > just > > > > > > as > > > > > > > Mohanraaamji does here. This will benefit more naive > > readers > > > > of > > > > > > > these forums who might otherwise get confused as to which > > of > > > > the > > > > > > > paths to follow. Actually, anyone can follow any path as > > he/ > > > > she > > > > > > > deems it fit; but there should be consistency of > procedures. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We should not confuse mantrik rituals and bhakti > > doctrines. > > > > > > Bhaktaas > > > > > > > can chant the names of Gods at anytime.....Mantra > shaastra > > > > > experts > > > > > > > chanting advanced moola mantras should necessarily adopt > > > ritual > > > > > > > procedures for the welfare of themselves and others! > > > > > > Yes...improper > > > > > > > chanting of mantras can cause danger to the society also > > just > > > > as > > > > > > > proper chanting can help others. Hence, this cannot be > > > > > considered > > > > > > as > > > > > > > a personal preference of the aspirant. If this was not > the > > > > case, > > > > > > why > > > > > > > did sages codify spiritual practises scrupulously? > > Rafalji, > > > > > > > Mohanraaamji, etc. are correct in saying it is best to > > follow > > > > > > Pandit > > > > > > > Dakshinamoorthiji's advices on mantra shastra or japams. > > He > > > is > > > > > > > learned and he is living a life compatible to the > shaastras > > > > > though > > > > > > he > > > > > > > has faced uncertain circumstances in his own personal > > life. > > > He > > > > > > never > > > > > > > compromised on principles and he willingly paid the price > > for > > > > > that > > > > > > > which most of us will never do. The words of such a > person > > > > > should > > > > > > > obviously carry more weight. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Abhishek. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology , " mohanraaam " > > > > > <mohanraaam@> > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Well Lalith: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If you have really done dasa Maha Vidyaa, you would > have > > > > never > > > > > > > > approached a professional astrologer for > > > consultation...that > > > > > much > > > > > > I > > > > > > > > can say.... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > And what idiocy when you say Panditji is partly wrong? > > He > > > > > > > > said " Bhaktaas do not chant Moola mantras " , whereas you > > > have > > > > > > edited > > > > > > > > the words to suit your ends....He never said " devotees > > > don't > > > > > > chant > > > > > > > > Beej mantras " .....You are putting words into his mouth > > and > > > > > > assuming > > > > > > > > he is wrong! Why, do you know....the Great Panditji > > himself > > > > > > chants > > > > > > > > Moola mantras.....He is a bhakta and a mantra shastra > > > expert. > > > > > As > > > > > > a > > > > > > > > bhakta he keeps incessant chanting of naama japa > > throughout > > > > the > > > > > > > day; > > > > > > > > as a mantra shastra expert, he restricts the moola > mantra > > > > > japams > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > stipulated times with ritual purity.....It is this > > > wonderful > > > > > > > practice > > > > > > > > that Guruji was alluding to. Guruji cannot be wrong in > > > > ritual > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > occult matters. Please understand that. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There are 4 classes of Devotees.......1) Saatwik vedic > > > > devotees > > > > > > who > > > > > > > > will follow vedic dharma scrupulously. They will not > > dare > > > to > > > > > > > compare > > > > > > > > astrology and vedanga to Engineering! as you did... > > > > > > > > 2) Raajasik devotees who will follow vedic disciplines > as > > > far > > > > > as > > > > > > > > possible, but will still go after upaasanaas of Demi- > Gods > > > for > > > > > > > > accomplishment of siddhis. Mantra shaastra experts > > usually > > > > > fall > > > > > > in > > > > > > > > this category. > > > > > > > > 3) Saatwik Bhaktaas - for whom the meditation and glory > > of > > > > > their > > > > > > > > Ishta Devataa is enough for spiritual satisfaction. It > > is > > > > this > > > > > > > > category that Guruji referred to when he said they will > > not > > > > > chant > > > > > > > > Moola mantras too much. Definitely they will not do > Dasa > > > > Mahaa > > > > > > > > Vidyaa. > > > > > > > > 4) Taamasic Devotees - Those whose main motive is to > > > project > > > > > > > > themselves at all costs and acting as if they are equal > > to > > > > the > > > > > > > > experts; they will try ALL practices - whether they are > > > > > > sanctioned > > > > > > > by > > > > > > > > vedas or not.....Their only aim is personal glory and > > > > > > > satisfaction. > > > > > > > > They will attack even established dharma if they do not > > get > > > > > > results > > > > > > > > (sounds familiar....You are one!) Ignorance and half- > > baked > > > > > > > knowledge > > > > > > > > and egotism are these persons' motivating fuel. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You are really satan's Gift to this list.......My only > > > prayer > > > > > is > > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > innocent members of this list do not get side-tracked > > with > > > > your > > > > > > > > ramblings. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Let me make this clear to the list.....Panditji said > that > > > > > saatwik > > > > > > > > Bhaktaas who chant Divine names only due to Pure Love > on > > > God > > > > > > > usually > > > > > > > > never chant mantrik moola mantraas. It is just one > class > > > of > > > > > > > > devotees. A rajasik bhakta who is a mantra-shaastra > > expert > > > > may > > > > > > > even > > > > > > > > be a bhakta at heart; and a pure bhakta may sometimes > > chant > > > > > some > > > > > > > > mantrik japams for solving some practical > > issues......But, > > > > when > > > > > > > they > > > > > > > > switch their routines temporarily, these enlightened > > > devotees > > > > > > > usually > > > > > > > > take good guidance and follow the tenets of shaastras > > > > > > > > scrupulously....Definitely they will not sit on > > assumption > > > > like > > > > > > > > Lalith. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On the one hand, this fellow claims he has done chants > in > > > > > > forests, > > > > > > > > rivers, earth, etc. (Probably we have a Maharishi here! > > > What > > > > > > > heights > > > > > > > > of pointless pride in this young man list....it is > > > > > disgusting!). > > > > > > > On > > > > > > > > the other hand, he says he chants mantras in buses, > > trains, > > > > > > > etc...... > > > > > > > > He is confused about which no body can have issues. > Only > > > his > > > > > > Guru > > > > > > > > should be concerned about that.....But, his attempts to > > > stuff > > > > > his > > > > > > > > shallow understanding upon this list is reprehensible. > > > And, > > > > > his > > > > > > > > habit of quoting experts out of context is really > > > > condemnable. > > > > > > May > > > > > > > > Jupiter's Light Shine on that fellow and teach him to > > > respect > > > > > the > > > > > > > > hallowed traditions and to stay at his level rather > than > > > > trying > > > > > > > > to " teach " others (He has the audacity to claim he > > > > > is " teaching " > > > > > > > > Rafalji!) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If a mere young man of 35 years who has spent his life > on > > a > > > > > > " Failed > > > > > > > > computer web desining business " , " pointless email > chasing > > > of > > > > > > > girls " , > > > > > > > > and other " past times " can gain insight as he claims, > how > > > > much > > > > > > will > > > > > > > > learned Gurus of this group with their life of devotion > > to > > > > > > vedanta > > > > > > > > and vedanga know? His peanut brain and hyper- inflated > > ego > > > > will > > > > > > > never > > > > > > > > allow him to see this obvious truth. But, please list > > > > exercise > > > > > > > your > > > > > > > > discretion while reading his posts (There are doubtless > > > some > > > > > good > > > > > > > > elements even in his posts; but mostly there is trash > > > > presented > > > > > > as > > > > > > > > philosophy). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mohanraaam > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology , " litsol " > > > > > <mishra.lalit@> > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Rafal, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Do u think, a hobby means shallow knowledge of the > > > domain, > > > > No > > > > > > > > rafal, > > > > > > > > > it's not like that. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > At least not for me. You have learnt and i m > learning, > > i > > > > read > > > > > > > ur's > > > > > > > > > replies and get benifitted, same way i wanted you to > > pay > > > > > heed > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > what i have written about spritiuality, mostrly i did > > > write > > > > > for > > > > > > u > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have done all 10 mahavidyas of tantra and read many > > > > tantrik > > > > > > > > > classics, spent good deal of time with great > tantriks > > > > > trained > > > > > > in > > > > > > > > > Kamakhya and other places, keenly observed their > > doings, > > > > > their > > > > > > > > > mistakes etc.., I did tremendous mantra chanting on > > > water, > > > > > on > > > > > > > > earth, > > > > > > > > > at home, in forests etc... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > then reached here, then i did write something, but > > sorry > > > i > > > > > dont > > > > > > > > > remember shlokas. i was not interested in cramming > that. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Panditji is not fully correct in saying that > > BeejMantras > > > > are > > > > > > not > > > > > > > > > chanted by devotees, I dont know much about South > India > > > but > > > > > in > > > > > > > > North > > > > > > > > > normally its done. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > And a successfull mantra sadhana has to result in > one's > > > > being > > > > > a > > > > > > > > > devotee, the devotion is the outcome, final result of > > > > mantra > > > > > > > > sadhana, > > > > > > > > > perhaps, Pandit Ji believes mantras are power > > > > packet,thinks, > > > > > i > > > > > > do > > > > > > > > it > > > > > > > > > this way , these many times and get this result, this > > is > > > > > where > > > > > > > most > > > > > > > > > of the people are confused. without being a good > human > > > > being > > > > > if > > > > > > > we > > > > > > > > > think, we will achieve something in spirituality, is > > > > > difficult, > > > > > > > > very > > > > > > > > > difficult. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > what happens is, with the mantra chanting, a self > > > > > > > transformation > > > > > > > > > process begins, u if dont restrict urself, ur karma > > > begins > > > > > > > > diluting, > > > > > > > > > and u begin ur purification process unknowingly, when > > > > > > substantial > > > > > > > > > part of ego and greed for respect vanishes and many > > such > > > > > thing > > > > > > > > > togather, mantra awakens u and with the God's grace > ur > > > > > > objective > > > > > > > > gets > > > > > > > > > fullfilled, gradually u become a devotee. ur being > > simple > > > > and > > > > > > > being > > > > > > > > > devotee is sometimes is indication of ur's going on > the > > > > right > > > > > > > track. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think we have discussed a lot, it's enough !! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > My Boss has given me lot of projects to complete, so, > > may > > > > be, > > > > > i > > > > > > m > > > > > > > > not > > > > > > > > > going to available in the group like i was recently. > > > > however. > > > > > i > > > > > > > > will > > > > > > > > > complete Garg Hora series. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > > > > Lalit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology , Rafal Gendarz > > > > > > > > > <starsuponme@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Litsol, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Then please dont generalize Your preferences as > they > > > are > > > > > too > > > > > > > > > shallow for > > > > > > > > > > this Forum aspiration. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz > > > > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru > > > > > > > > > > email: rafal@ > > > > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > litsol napisa?(a): > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Rafel, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I take Astrology as a good hobby, and i w'd be > > > looking > > > > at > > > > > > it > > > > > > > > with > > > > > > > > > an > > > > > > > > > > > engineer's approach. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I asked ur age because, it's our thinking to put > > our > > > > > > > parameters > > > > > > > > in > > > > > > > > > > > god's system, there is nothing like delay or > > > > advancement > > > > > in > > > > > > > > > > > spirituality. So, " Delay " > > or " Speed " , " backwardness " > > > > > > > > > > > and " advancement " doesn't exist in spirituality, > I > > > > > thought > > > > > > if > > > > > > > u > > > > > > > > r > > > > > > > > > > > thinking that it may take too much time, I wanted > > to > > > > tell > > > > > > u, > > > > > > > > it's > > > > > > > > > not > > > > > > > > > > > like that. there is no delay. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It clicks in fraction of a second, when u r > getting > > > > > clicked > > > > > > > > > depends > > > > > > > > > > > on u and on god's will, when he wants u to get > > > clicked. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > God sometimes graces for no reason ( " Ahetuka " ) > just > > > for > > > > > his > > > > > > > > > > > compassion towards u and it may happen next > minute > > > too. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > spirituality is not delimited by time , effort > and > > > > rules. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > > > > > > Lalit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic astrology%40>, Rafal > > > > Gendarz > > > > > > > > > > > <starsuponme@ ...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Litsol, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please be careful about words. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Im happy that You are sharing Your experience - > > > very > > > > > > > > inspirating > > > > > > > > > > > ones. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Age hierarchy is for sudras - Manu Samhita. If > > You > > > > > treat > > > > > > > > Jyotish > > > > > > > > > > > Vedanga > > > > > > > > > > > > as profession similar to engineering You have a > > > long > > > > > way > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > go. > > > > > > > > > But > > > > > > > > > > > dont > > > > > > > > > > > > be pessimistic here are many who will try to > help > > > You > > > > > in > > > > > > > > getting > > > > > > > > > > > proper > > > > > > > > > > > > understanding. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > After some time You will agree with me about > the > > > mala > > > > > and > > > > > > > > japa. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz > > > > > > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru > > > > > > > > > > > > email: rafal@ > > > > > > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > litsol napisa?(a): > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Rafal, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Here u r doing two wrong things, instead of > > > > > developing > > > > > > ur > > > > > > > > > > > understanding, > > > > > > > > > > > > > u r trying to conclude something and going > > beyond > > > > > that > > > > > > u r > > > > > > > > > > > messaging > > > > > > > > > > > > > same to many. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I m touching 35, What's ur age ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Astrology is a kind of vidya or profession, > > like > > > i > > > > m > > > > > a > > > > > > > > > software > > > > > > > > > > > > > engineer, software engineering is my > > profession. > > > > > > > > spirituality > > > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > > beyond > > > > > > > > > > > > > all sort of vidya or profession. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I wish u to be a good soul and to realize the > > > bliss > > > > > of > > > > > > > self > > > > > > > > > > > awakening or > > > > > > > > > > > > > in other terms, the bliss that comes once u > > feel > > > u > > > > > and > > > > > > > god > > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > > > > connected. dissolved in each other. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > First realize, experience, then speak and > then > > > > > suggest > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > others, > > > > > > > > > > > by > > > > > > > > > > > > > mere reading shastras or books u r not going > to > > > > feel > > > > > > it. > > > > > > > > > unless > > > > > > > > > > > god > > > > > > > > > > > > > graces u it's very very difficult. and if u > > dont > > > > > avoid > > > > > > > this > > > > > > > > > sort > > > > > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > > > > hurriedness instead of learning and > > > understanding, > > > > it > > > > > > > will > > > > > > > > > affect > > > > > > > > > > > u only > > > > > > > > > > > > > no one else. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > somehere i have read, it was written - By > mere > > > > > > > > repeating " So- > > > > > > > > > > > Aham " no > > > > > > > > > > > > > one gets liberated unless he realizes it like > > one > > > > > > doesnt > > > > > > > get > > > > > > > > > > > cured by > > > > > > > > > > > > > knowing the name of the medicine, u need to > > take > > > > the > > > > > > > > medicine > > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > > get > > > > > > > > > > > > > cured " . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So, pls. be wise, as it was being discussed > > here, > > > i > > > > > > > shared > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > > experience of my life, pls. mind it, i m not > a > > > > > > preecher, > > > > > > > > nor a > > > > > > > > > > > guru, nor > > > > > > > > > > > > > i have to make my followers, nor it's my > > > > profession, > > > > > > nor > > > > > > > i > > > > > > > > > have > > > > > > > > > > > to get > > > > > > > > > > > > > fame, sharing things is a kind of > friendliness > > a > > > > kind > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > > affection, > > > > > > > > > > > > > that's it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > Lalit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology > > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. > com>, > > > > Rafal > > > > > > > Gendarz > > > > > > > > > > > > > <starsuponme@ ...> > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Jyotishas > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Counting of mala has more depth sense than > > just > > > > > > > counting, > > > > > > > > > so for > > > > > > > > > > > > > natives > > > > > > > > > > > > > > like Litsol counting is neccessary and any > > > other > > > > > > > > speculation > > > > > > > > > > > will be > > > > > > > > > > > > > > only illusory and just imagination. We > should > > > > > follow > > > > > > Pt. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dakshinamoorti > > > > > > > > > > > > > > advise strictly, otherwise our process of > > > > spiritual > > > > > > > > > development > > > > > > > > > > > will > > > > > > > > > > > > > be > > > > > > > > > > > > > > slow and unauthoritative. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru > > > > > > > > > > > > > > email: rafal@ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > asmp2k02@ napisa?(a): > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Resp Sri Lalitji, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for your mail.But please also read > > > > > > > > > GuruDakshinamurthyi > > > > > > > > > > > ji's > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > mail(addressing me) also on this,which > > brings > > > > in > > > > > > more > > > > > > > > > clarity > > > > > > > > > > > to the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > applicability principles to my mail. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I meant that both are necessity but to > what > > > > > degree > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > time > > > > > > > > > (it > > > > > > > > > > > varies > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > from saadhaka to saadhaka) to get such > > > inbuilt > > > > > > > maturity > > > > > > > > > such > > > > > > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the count will be taken care of by Divine > > > > forces > > > > > > > after > > > > > > > > > some > > > > > > > > > > > initial > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > period of saadhana. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Morover the type of bio matter present in > > the > > > > > japa > > > > > > > maala > > > > > > > > > > > (which is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > symbolic for ritualism as well as from > > > > practical > > > > > > > point > > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > > view for > > > > > > > > > > > > > our > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > count) will help in keeping away > > destructive > > > > > forces > > > > > > > > > acting on > > > > > > > > > > > us > > > > > > > > > > > > > .Thus > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the symbolic rituals will indirectly help > > us > > > in > > > > > > > keeping > > > > > > > > > away > > > > > > > > > > > from > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > negative thoughts and also trains our > > memory > > > to > > > > > be > > > > > > > > object > > > > > > > > > > > > > oriented.If > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > our memory grows and retentive capacity > > > > increase > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > Gnaana > > > > > > > > > > > will > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > increase ,but at the same time > destructive > > > > forces > > > > > > > > > > > (diversions) also > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > becomes powerful.Thus the symbolic > > procedures > > > > > will > > > > > > > come > > > > > > > > in > > > > > > > > > > > handy to > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > successfully fight the negative > forces.The > > > > > rituals > > > > > > > may > > > > > > > > be > > > > > > > > > > > Rising > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > early(if possible during Braahmi > > > muhurta),Taking > > > > > > > > > > > bath,Japaanusthaan, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > attending to the livelihood job etc etc > in > > > > > defined > > > > > > > > times > > > > > > > > > as > > > > > > > > > > > > > discipline > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > helps indirectly tune our memory through > > > > keeping > > > > > > our > > > > > > > > body > > > > > > > > > > > healthy. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thus ultimately we conclude that the so > > > called > > > > > > > symbolic > > > > > > > > > > > procedures > > > > > > > > > > > > > are > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > not actually symbolic(it got branded as > > such) > > > > but > > > > > a > > > > > > > > > necessity > > > > > > > > > > > for > > > > > > > > > > > > > our > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > own good if we practice to the extent we > > can. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quoting mishra.lalit@ ... <mishra. > > > lalit% > > > > > > > > 40gmail. > > > > > > > > > com>: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Resp. Sri Murthy Adavi, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, what you said is perfectly right, we > > > count > > > > > or > > > > > > > dont > > > > > > > > > > > count,target > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > is realization of god's love within, I > got > > it > > > > > with > > > > > > no > > > > > > > > > > > counting, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someone may get it with counting. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanx, for the writing. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Lalit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology > > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. com> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. > > > com>, > > > > > > > srinivasa > > > > > > > > > > > murthy adavi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > asmp2k02@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Respected Learned Members, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Both views may be correct when the > views > > > > > have/or > > > > > > > with > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > goal as > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > development of Love/Devotion towards > > > adhistana > > > > > > > Devatha > > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > Mantra > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > as Base. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In the initial stage only you need the > > > > count;as > > > > > > one > > > > > > > > > > > develops the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > habit the biological tuning of the > > > > intellect/body > > > > > > will > > > > > > > > > > > automatically > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > take care of the practice(without count- > > help > > > of > > > > > > malas > > > > > > > > > etc). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It's like if with the help of Alarm > clock > > > if > > > > we > > > > > > > wake > > > > > > > > up > > > > > > > > > for > > > > > > > > > > > 2 or 3 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > days at some appointed hour,then > > > automatically > > > > we > > > > > > > > wakeup > > > > > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > > the same > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > time every day without help of alarm. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > With due Respects > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > smadavi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quoting starsuponme@ : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Litsol, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Definitely we should count our Mantra > > Japa > > > on > > > > > > Mala. > > > > > > > > Your > > > > > > > > > > > view is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > against > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Vedic Authorities and Sages, so should > be > > > > > > rejected. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > email: rafal@ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > litsol napisa?(a): > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Mr. Jayashri, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > A thought came, why i should not > share > > > with > > > > > u, > > > > > > U > > > > > > > > pls. > > > > > > > > > stop > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > counting > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > mantra chantings, counting mantra > gives > > > > false > > > > > > ego > > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > then > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > frustration if u dont get desired > > results. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > leave it to the god, god counts the > > > mantra > > > > > > > chanted > > > > > > > > by > > > > > > > > > you > > > > > > > > > > > may be > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 108, 1008 or whatsoever, let him > count, > > > > it's > > > > > > his > > > > > > > > part > > > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > > ur > > > > > > > > > > > > > part > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to chant the mantra. when the mantra > > has > > > to > > > > > > > awaken, > > > > > > > > it > > > > > > > > > > > will be, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > god > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > will ensure it for u. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sometimes we try to become more > > > intelligent > > > > > > with > > > > > > > out > > > > > > > > > > > limited > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > intellect and that creates obstacles > in > > > our > > > > > > > > spiritual > > > > > > > > > > > growth. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So, forget about counts, forget about > > the > > > > > time > > > > > > u > > > > > > > > put > > > > > > > > > in > > > > > > > > > > > for ur's > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sadhana, invoke the god with pure > > heart. > > > > > purity > > > > > > > > > counts. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Lalit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology@ . > com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% > 40. > > > > > > > > > > > com>, " dakshinastrologer " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <dakshinastrologer@ ...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Ms. Jayashree: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think this topic on 108 is > getting > > > very > > > > > > > > > interesting > > > > > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > enlightening for all members. > > Yesterday > > > > we > > > > > > had a > > > > > > > > > > > wonderful > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > esoteric > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > explanation from Shri. Sushil > > Dikshit, > > > > and > > > > > > > today > > > > > > > > > your > > > > > > > > > > > > > wonderful > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > explanation of numerical symmetry > of > > > the > > > > > > cosmos! > > > > > > > > > > > Wonderful. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There definitely exists > a " numerical > > > > > > symphony " > > > > > > > in > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > > Universe. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > not only 108.....as I mentioned in > my > > > > > earlier > > > > > > > > post, > > > > > > > > > > > there are > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > various > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > other numerals that are significant > > in > > > > > occult > > > > > > > > > > > practices. 108 > > > > > > > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > a > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > powerful and all-purpose perfect > > > > > > number...While > > > > > > > > we > > > > > > > > > have > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > understood > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the glory of 108, we should not > lose > > > > sight > > > > > of > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > fact > > > > > > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > there > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > are > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > other powerful numbers also. This > is > > > just > > > > > for > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > information > > > > > > > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > list. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > My apprecitation again for this > > > wonderful > > > > > > > > response. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Blessed be. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pandit R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Blessed be. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pandit R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI. --- In > > vedic- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > astrology@grou ps.com > > > > > <astrology% > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 40. com>, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " jayasartn " <jayasartn@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In cosmology, 108 has this > > > > significance - > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > moon is > > > > > > > > > > > away > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > from > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > earth 108 times its (moon's) > > diameter > > > > and > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > sun > > > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > > away > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > from the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > earth, 108 times its diameter. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Perhaps this reality of distances > > is > > > > > > > applicable > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > > deities > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > too. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Perhaps this has been indicated > by > > > the > > > > > 108 > > > > > > > divya > > > > > > > > > > > desas of > > > > > > > > > > > > > Lord > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Narayana. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > jayasree > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology@ > > . > > > com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% > 40. > > > > > > > > > > > com>, " dakshinastrologer " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <dakshinastrologer@ > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Shri. Sushil: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It is a wonderful answer you > have > > > > given. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Blessed be. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pandit R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology@ > > > . > > > > com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% > 40. > > > > > > > > > > > com>, " sushil.dikshit " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <sushil.dikshit@ > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Babu, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It is not a silly question > but > > it > > > > is > > > > > a > > > > > > > very > > > > > > > > > good > > > > > > > > > > > > > question. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Actually > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > there are 27 Nakshatras and > > every > > > > > > > Nakshtras > > > > > > > > > has 4 > > > > > > > > > > > Charan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > so > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > total > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > charans are 27 x 4 = 108 > > Charan. > > > > Each > > > > > > > > Charan > > > > > > > > > has 3 > > > > > > > > > > > > > degree > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 20 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > minutes so if you multiply 3 > > > degree > > > > > and > > > > > > 20 > > > > > > > > > > > minutes to > > > > > > > > > > > > > 108 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > it > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > comes > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > out to be 360 degress i.e. > one > > > > cycle > > > > > > > > (Circle). > > > > > > > > > > > This > > > > > > > > > > > > > cycle > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > represetns > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > whole brahmand because all > the > > > > > rashis, > > > > > > > > > planets and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > nakshatra > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > are > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > between these 360 degree in 2 > > > > > > dimensional > > > > > > > > > > > horoscope. So > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > chanting a > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mantra completes one cycle of > > > this > > > > > > > brahmand. > > > > > > > > > > > Further One > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > who > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > has > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > visited Brahamand at least > one > > > time > > > > > > i.e. > > > > > > > he > > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > brahmagyani he > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > entitiled to place 108 Shri > > > before > > > > > his > > > > > > > name. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sushil dikshit > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology@ > > > > . > > > > > com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% > > 40. > > > > > com>, > > > > > > > babu > > > > > > > > > mon > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <muthappan111@ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Namaste, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It may be a silly matter > for > > > all > > > > of > > > > > > you. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I want to know what is the > > > reason > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > some > > > > > > > > > > > remedies > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > recomended > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > for 108 times. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I dont know any thing about > > > > > astrology. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I hope you may pleased to > > > provide > > > > a > > > > > > > reply > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thanks, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Babu > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------ --------- --- -- > -- > > -- > > > - > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Be a better Globetrotter. > Get > > > > > better > > > > > > > > travel > > > > > > > > > > > answers > > > > > > > > > > > > > from > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someone > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > who knows. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Answers - Check it > out. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this > > > > message > > > > > > have > > > > > > > > been > > > > > > > > > > > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have > > > been > > > > > > > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have > > > been > > > > > > > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have > > been > > > > > > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have > been > > > > > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > > > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 29, 2007 Report Share Posted July 29, 2007 Oye Lalith: You think they teach " mantra " shashtra basics in 8th standard sanskrit syllabus! Or, they had a separate syllabus for you! Your hallucination and illusion seem to have no limits! You can't even remember simple slokhas and yet feel you are qualified to debate with people who have mastered works like Tantra saara, and other classics, and what is more have practical siddhis! Ram Jaswal is also too junior to both me and Mohanraaamji. He said what he felt; I have written to him explaining myself. You people are all too young and inexperienced to advice me or Mohanraaamji. Only Panditji has the moral right to control us, because of his knowledge and spotless attitude of perfect ethics. We will listen to no one else - not even Rafalji here. But, Guruji is not even reading these posts and I think he will not interfere in this debate because this has become " personal " between Lalith and Me/ Mohanraaamji. I again say one thing.....I assure this group also about this......If Lalith stops his harangues, I will also stop. If he keeps referring to me or Mohanraaamji and uses dangerous words like " manipulator " I will keep posting abrasive mails like these. It is not that one person has the right to abuse and others should keep quite. He abused us and we are sarcastically attacking him. That is all to it. Please members advice him to stop, and I will stop. I HONESTLY WANT TO STOP THIS. But, I have nothing to fear; I have not done any mistake and so there is no risk of getting exposed. But Lalith may lose his very job if his managers happen to see that he spends so much time on the internet in empty harangues because he is using company's time for this. What he does is unethical though it does not concern this group. We have no such things; we are retired persons. PEOPLE WHO SPEAK OF SPIRITUALITY SHOULD FIRST BE ETHICAL. Abhishek. vedic astrology , " litsol " <mishra.lalit wrote: > > Res. Ram ji, > > Pls. dont advice him or mohan raam, they have nothing to debate or > discuss on either mantra or bhakti. > > I don't remember shlokas much as i read classics for my satisfaction, > in two phases, firstly from my class 8'th till my 2nd year of > graduation. that time i had no faith and no bhakti, just read like i > was reading some comics or cartoon books, i had not developed ideas, > not taken any message, i knew and i can talk about the content, but i > was not involved. > > after that incident happened at Sharda Temple,Maihar,it was > unbelievable and it made me change my thoughts, i again read some > classics and this time,i grasped the message given in the classics. > > They are at the stage of my chlidhood, they may read and discuss. but > dont take the message in their heart, somewhere their greed to > establish themselves as pandit or authority is also a reason. > > Perhapse, in lieu of, hitting them hard, i had to take another rout > to let them realize they are wrong and deliberately wrong. > > He didnt say any thing on my how i shown, beej and god's name is one > and same thing, in fact it's a simple thnig, and well known but they > dont accept. > > let them dont accept, what difference it makes to us, they have their > life with them, any qualitative change within them will do good to > them only. > > So, i prayed maa, mother divine for mohan raam, he is too old, his > problem is he learnt astrology, did some breathing excercises, but he > lacks spiritual experiences so he doesn't believe, I was like him in > my childhood. > > I prayed, and it's acknowledged by maa, time will change for him a > little, what didn't happen to him in last 85 yrs, will happen in next > 5-6 monnths, he will get some good spritiual experience, the curtain > will be lifted for some time, reality at a glance. > > after that it's his part to stick to that or not, coz, ego, greed and > fear still remains, i m not completely gone out of it, i have to > fight with me many times. > > I thought gruop w'd be a good plateform to get like minded friends, > if nothnig, it gives joy. > > Let's wish good for all, I also express my gratitude to you to speak > for what u thought right. > > regards, > Lalit. > vedic astrology , " Ram Jaswal " <rkjaswal@> > wrote: > > > > Namaste Abhishek > > > > My post wasn't so much in defense of Lalith but one to stop > the " belittling " > > of a person within this Group. If you don't agree with someone's > views you > > are perfectly within your rights to say so why in a scholarly > fashion so as > > to discuss and further the merits of the topic under discussion. > Thereafter > > it is a matter for the individual to either continue with the on- > going > > discussion or to stop? The only way you or anyone else is likely to > change > > Lalith's view on chanting of Mantras will be from a scholarly > viewpoint and > > not from goading him? > > > > Also why are you taking personal offense? If Guru's can ignore his > comments > > - can't you do the same? > > > > With freedom of speech comes the responsibility of keeping a civil > and > > polite language - please re-read your note which prompted my earlier > > response. > > > > Like I said in my earlier post it is all about ones viewpoints - my > personal > > advise to everyone would be to take what you find reasonable and > ignore the > > rest. > > > > Best wishes .. > > > > Jai Sita Ram > > > > Ram > > _____ > > > > vedic astrology > > [vedic astrology ] On Behalf Of abhishekpotti > > 28 July 2007 20:42 > > vedic astrology > > [vedic astrology] Re: Oye Lalith! No one here is afraid of > you.... > > > > Dear Ram Jaswal: > > > > If Lalith stops challenging others with his rude posts no one will > > run him down...please follow the threads carefully......He is > > speaking as if he is the master of everything and everybody else is > a > > fool. When he passes judgment on senior astrologers of this group > or > > unnecessarily challenges established conventions, we have defended > > that. Now, why are you defending Lalith? Don't you think if you > > have the right to defend an offender, we have the right to defend > the > > more decent members and traditions that he is subtly attacking.... > > > > just read his posts.....If he has just forwarded the Prashna > Tantra, > > nobody would have objected to it.....See the accompanying comments > > where he abrasively comments certain things...... > > > > Open your eyes before advicing anyone. Why don't you write to > Lalith > > also? When did I call him names?......No sir...you are mistaken.... > > > > Did you not notice that even after Mohanraamji stopped writing > posts, > > this fellow was taunting that old gentleman repeatedly last week. > > Where were you at that time? > > > > If Lalith stops writing abrasive posts like " Nobody can stand > before > > me " and all that silly nonsense, we have no issues with him (or at > > least I have no issues with him). So, advice Lalith also in this > > regard. > > > > If Lalith and you enjoy freedom of speech, we also claim the same > > previlege. > > > > Abhishek. > > > > vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology%40> > > , " Ram Jaswal " <rkjaswal@> > > wrote: > > > > > > Namaste Abhishek/ Mohanraaam > > > > > > Just why are you trying to run Lalith down? From the posts that I > > have read > > > All he has done is given this point of view - if you don't accept > > them than > > > simply ignore it - there is No need for any name calling or > > belittling > > > someone. > > > > > > There is also nothing wrong in Lalith forwarding " Prashna Tantra " > > text to > > > this group as to whether someone has requested it or not - he > > certainly > > > doesn't need your or mine permission to do so - after all he > > thought it > > > would be useful to everyone - again his view. > > > > > > Sorry if I am coming across annoyed and perhaps rude But feel it > is > > Best > > > that everyone should stop " belittling " other group members as in > > the long > > > run all it does is make oneself appear small and bigoted. > > > > > > Best wishes and hoping this will be the last mail on this > subject .. > > > > > > Jai Sita Ram > > > > > > Ram > > > > > > _____ > > > > > > vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology% 40> > > > > > [vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology% > 40> > > ] On Behalf Of abhishekpotti > > > 28 July 2007 19:54 > > > vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology%40> > > > > > [vedic astrology] Oye Lalith! No one here is afraid of > > you.... > > > > > > Dear Lalith: > > > > > > The whole world knows the history of Blessed Meera Bhai....the > > > epitome of Bhakti......She was attached to her " Lala " - the > > wonderful > > > idol of Krishna gifted to her even from her childhood....Do you > > mean > > > to say that innocent young girl started chanting " Kliim > krishnaaya " > > > mantra automatically? Even Bhakta Prahlaada had to be initiated > by > > > Sage Naaradha for his chant of dwaadasaakshari mantra.... > > > > > > Nobody is afraid of you here......You need not proclaim that you > > are > > > not in the business of a Guru.....actually Guru status is not a > > > business (true to your half-baked knowledge you will claim it is > > also > > > like software engineering!). The difference my friend between you > > > and other great persons like Rafal or Dakshinamoorthiji is that > > they > > > are spending their money for the internet, whereas you are > > pilfering > > > your company's time and the company's resources while browsing > the > > > internet. Don't you think you are cheating your company when you > > > spend so much time on empty and egoistic posts defending yourself > > > against every expert after arguing with them unnecessarily? Are > you > > > not getting paid for the time you spend in the company....Know > the > > > basics of ethics before ever sermonizing.....So, actually you are > > an > > > exploiter....try to understand that....the other gurujis are > > probably > > > too decent to comment on that......What happened to your project? > > > Better rush to it nough!....It will spare us the agony of > replying > > to > > > your half-witted postings! > > > > > > By the say, Which member asked you Prashna Tantra dear? We did > not > > > see any posts requesting " Honourable Lalith " to explain Prashna > > > Tantra (as if you could explain it!) What arrogance you have to > > > claim that nobody can stand before you.....Guruji's posts exposed > > > your ignorance....you did not even know how to ask queries and > get > > > replies from one of the most empathetic astrologers of this > group, > > > and yet you claim you are this and that...... > > > > > > For your information....nobody is afraid of you..Rather you > should > > be > > > afraid of yourself......Your foolishness itself will be your > doom. > > > Did you not become the laughing stock due to your email-based > > chasing > > > of Priyaa? Such foolishness in occult matters could be more > costly > > > dear.....I think Mohanraaamji and Rafalji are only afraid about > > your > > > own well-being! They are not afraid of you. Nor am I afraid of > you. > > > > > > Your posts never answer the queries or points raised by others; > you > > > take off on a new ground only because of your shallow > understanding > > > of subjects. Nobody has accepted you as a Guru here, and nobody > > > will....Can a fire-fly eclipse the Sun? There are too many " Suns " > > > here and you are just a fire-fly. > > > > > > It reminds me of a story.....Once an ant challenged the mighty > > > elephant for a fight; the elephant obviously could not hear the > ant > > > (the ant being so tiny and it was on the ground, its sound could > > not > > > reach the elephant). The elephant just walked away out of its own > > > volition in its natural course. Then the ant claimed, " you see I > > > challenged the elephant and it ran away " . Dear, your saying that > > > nobody can stand before you is similar to that....... > > > > > > FIRST LEARN THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN GHOSTS AND YOUR ANCESTOR > > > SUMANGALIS BEFORE WRITING THE FIRST POSTS ON OCCULT! What a > > > pity......what a pity.....That we have to bear your meaningless > > > rantings here! > > > > > > Abhishek. > > > > > > vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology% 40> > > > , " litsol " <mishra.lalit@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > I was waiting for u dear.. > > > > > > > > why u took time ? > > > > > > > > Do u mean Meera Bai discussed with u, what she did.. > > > > > > > > Do u know 'Kleem Krishnay, Govindaya Gopijan Vallabhaya Namh' > is > > a > > > > mantra for lord krishna. > > > > > > > > is there no beej mantras, to whom u wish to misguide ? let > thnigs > > > > remain between lord, bhakta , their shraddha and their guru. > > > > > > > > why u people are so afraid of me, i m not in business of guru. > > > > > > > > i m happy with my life, my profession of software engineering > and > > > > my hobbies ok. > > > > > > > > there are 7000+ members are here, by writing such type of > foolish > > > > things u expose urself only, mind, there are better brains here. > > > > > > > > this is enough ... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology% > 40> > > > , > > > > " abhishekpotti " <abhishekpotti@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Respected Mohanraaamji: > > > > > > > > > > Well said. Lalith is saying that " maybe in south india > devotees > > > > > don't chant Moola mantras but not so in North " ...What > > > > > stupidity.....He does not seem to understand that " mantra > > > shaastra > > > > > experts " are also devotees, but they cannot be called as > > innocent > > > > > saatwik bhaktaas! A typical example of a pure saadhwik bhakta > > > will > > > > > be Meera Bhai (was she not North Indian). Can Lalith say > which > > > > Dasa > > > > > Mahaa Vidya Meera Bhai practised? She was immersed in Krishna > > > > > consciousness and Lover for Him. Her own Bhajans were her > > > prayers > > > > in > > > > > the bhaavana of Bhakti in the form of Love! This is not > mantra > > > > > shaastra. Another example will be Saant Tukhaaraam. These > > > > bhaktaas > > > > > did not chant moola mantraas. Panditji Dakshinamoorthi was on > > > dot > > > > in > > > > > saying that " Pure bhaktaas do not chant complicated moola > > > > mantraas " . > > > > > You have clarified this fact wonderfully in your post. I wish > > > more > > > > > knowledgeable persons also put erratic posters in their place > > > just > > > > as > > > > > Mohanraaamji does here. This will benefit more naive readers > of > > > > > these forums who might otherwise get confused as to which of > > the > > > > > paths to follow. Actually, anyone can follow any path as he/ > > she > > > > > deems it fit; but there should be consistency of procedures. > > > > > > > > > > We should not confuse mantrik rituals and bhakti doctrines. > > > > Bhaktaas > > > > > can chant the names of Gods at anytime.....Mantra shaastra > > > experts > > > > > chanting advanced moola mantras should necessarily adopt > ritual > > > > > procedures for the welfare of themselves and others! > > > > Yes...improper > > > > > chanting of mantras can cause danger to the society also just > > as > > > > > proper chanting can help others. Hence, this cannot be > > > considered > > > > as > > > > > a personal preference of the aspirant. If this was not the > > case, > > > > why > > > > > did sages codify spiritual practises scrupulously? Rafalji, > > > > > Mohanraaamji, etc. are correct in saying it is best to follow > > > > Pandit > > > > > Dakshinamoorthiji's advices on mantra shastra or japams. He > is > > > > > learned and he is living a life compatible to the shaastras > > > though > > > > he > > > > > has faced uncertain circumstances in his own personal life. > He > > > > never > > > > > compromised on principles and he willingly paid the price for > > > that > > > > > which most of us will never do. The words of such a person > > > should > > > > > obviously carry more weight. > > > > > > > > > > Abhishek. > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology% > > 40> > > > , " mohanraaam " > > > <mohanraaam@> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Well Lalith: > > > > > > > > > > > > If you have really done dasa Maha Vidyaa, you would have > > never > > > > > > approached a professional astrologer for > consultation...that > > > much > > > > I > > > > > > can say.... > > > > > > > > > > > > And what idiocy when you say Panditji is partly wrong? He > > > > > > said " Bhaktaas do not chant Moola mantras " , whereas you > have > > > > edited > > > > > > the words to suit your ends....He never said " devotees > don't > > > > chant > > > > > > Beej mantras " .....You are putting words into his mouth and > > > > assuming > > > > > > he is wrong! Why, do you know....the Great Panditji himself > > > > chants > > > > > > Moola mantras.....He is a bhakta and a mantra shastra > expert. > > > As > > > > a > > > > > > bhakta he keeps incessant chanting of naama japa throughout > > the > > > > > day; > > > > > > as a mantra shastra expert, he restricts the moola mantra > > > japams > > > > to > > > > > > stipulated times with ritual purity.....It is this > wonderful > > > > > practice > > > > > > that Guruji was alluding to. Guruji cannot be wrong in > ritual > > > > and > > > > > > occult matters. Please understand that. > > > > > > > > > > > > There are 4 classes of Devotees.......1) Saatwik vedic > > devotees > > > > who > > > > > > will follow vedic dharma scrupulously. They will not dare > to > > > > > compare > > > > > > astrology and vedanga to Engineering! as you did... > > > > > > 2) Raajasik devotees who will follow vedic disciplines as > far > > > as > > > > > > possible, but will still go after upaasanaas of Demi-Gods > for > > > > > > accomplishment of siddhis. Mantra shaastra experts usually > > > fall > > > > in > > > > > > this category. > > > > > > 3) Saatwik Bhaktaas - for whom the meditation and glory of > > > their > > > > > > Ishta Devataa is enough for spiritual satisfaction. It is > > this > > > > > > category that Guruji referred to when he said they will not > > > chant > > > > > > Moola mantras too much. Definitely they will not do Dasa > > Mahaa > > > > > > Vidyaa. > > > > > > 4) Taamasic Devotees - Those whose main motive is to > project > > > > > > themselves at all costs and acting as if they are equal to > > the > > > > > > experts; they will try ALL practices - whether they are > > > > sanctioned > > > > > by > > > > > > vedas or not.....Their only aim is personal glory and > > > > > satisfaction. > > > > > > They will attack even established dharma if they do not get > > > > results > > > > > > (sounds familiar....You are one!) Ignorance and half- baked > > > > > knowledge > > > > > > and egotism are these persons' motivating fuel. > > > > > > > > > > > > You are really satan's Gift to this list.......My only > prayer > > > is > > > > > that > > > > > > innocent members of this list do not get side-tracked with > > your > > > > > > ramblings. > > > > > > > > > > > > Let me make this clear to the list.....Panditji said that > > > saatwik > > > > > > Bhaktaas who chant Divine names only due to Pure Love on > God > > > > > usually > > > > > > never chant mantrik moola mantraas. It is just one class of > > > > > > devotees. A rajasik bhakta who is a mantra-shaastra expert > > may > > > > > even > > > > > > be a bhakta at heart; and a pure bhakta may sometimes chant > > > some > > > > > > mantrik japams for solving some practical issues......But, > > when > > > > > they > > > > > > switch their routines temporarily, these enlightened > devotees > > > > > usually > > > > > > take good guidance and follow the tenets of shaastras > > > > > > scrupulously....Definitely they will not sit on assumption > > like > > > > > > Lalith. > > > > > > > > > > > > On the one hand, this fellow claims he has done chants in > > > > forests, > > > > > > rivers, earth, etc. (Probably we have a Maharishi here! > What > > > > > heights > > > > > > of pointless pride in this young man list....it is > > > disgusting!). > > > > > On > > > > > > the other hand, he says he chants mantras in buses, trains, > > > > > etc...... > > > > > > He is confused about which no body can have issues. Only > his > > > > Guru > > > > > > should be concerned about that.....But, his attempts to > stuff > > > his > > > > > > shallow understanding upon this list is reprehensible. And, > > > his > > > > > > habit of quoting experts out of context is really > > condemnable. > > > > May > > > > > > Jupiter's Light Shine on that fellow and teach him to > respect > > > the > > > > > > hallowed traditions and to stay at his level rather than > > trying > > > > > > to " teach " others (He has the audacity to claim he > > > is " teaching " > > > > > > Rafalji!) > > > > > > > > > > > > If a mere young man of 35 years who has spent his life on a > > > > " Failed > > > > > > computer web desining business " , " pointless email chasing > of > > > > > girls " , > > > > > > and other " past times " can gain insight as he claims, how > > much > > > > will > > > > > > learned Gurus of this group with their life of devotion to > > > > vedanta > > > > > > and vedanga know? His peanut brain and hyper-inflated ego > > will > > > > > never > > > > > > allow him to see this obvious truth. But, please list > > exercise > > > > > your > > > > > > discretion while reading his posts (There are doubtless > some > > > good > > > > > > elements even in his posts; but mostly there is trash > > presented > > > > as > > > > > > philosophy). > > > > > > > > > > > > Mohanraaam > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology% > > 40> > > > , " litsol " > > > <mishra.lalit@> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Rafal, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Do u think, a hobby means shallow knowledge of the > domain, > > No > > > > > > rafal, > > > > > > > it's not like that. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > At least not for me. You have learnt and i m learning, i > > read > > > > > ur's > > > > > > > replies and get benifitted, same way i wanted you to pay > > > heed > > > > to > > > > > > > what i have written about spritiuality, mostrly i did > write > > > for > > > > u > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have done all 10 mahavidyas of tantra and read many > > tantrik > > > > > > > classics, spent good deal of time with great tantriks > > > trained > > > > in > > > > > > > Kamakhya and other places, keenly observed their doings, > > > their > > > > > > > mistakes etc.., I did tremendous mantra chanting on > water, > > > on > > > > > > earth, > > > > > > > at home, in forests etc... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > then reached here, then i did write something, but sorry > i > > > dont > > > > > > > remember shlokas. i was not interested in cramming that. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Panditji is not fully correct in saying that BeejMantras > > are > > > > not > > > > > > > chanted by devotees, I dont know much about South India > but > > > in > > > > > > North > > > > > > > normally its done. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > And a successfull mantra sadhana has to result in one's > > being > > > a > > > > > > > devotee, the devotion is the outcome, final result of > > mantra > > > > > > sadhana, > > > > > > > perhaps, Pandit Ji believes mantras are power > > packet,thinks, > > > i > > > > do > > > > > > it > > > > > > > this way , these many times and get this result, this is > > > where > > > > > most > > > > > > > of the people are confused. without being a good human > > being > > > if > > > > > we > > > > > > > think, we will achieve something in spirituality, is > > > difficult, > > > > > > very > > > > > > > difficult. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > what happens is, with the mantra chanting, a self > > > > > transformation > > > > > > > process begins, u if dont restrict urself, ur karma > begins > > > > > > diluting, > > > > > > > and u begin ur purification process unknowingly, when > > > > substantial > > > > > > > part of ego and greed for respect vanishes and many such > > > thing > > > > > > > togather, mantra awakens u and with the God's grace ur > > > > objective > > > > > > gets > > > > > > > fullfilled, gradually u become a devotee. ur being simple > > and > > > > > being > > > > > > > devotee is sometimes is indication of ur's going on the > > right > > > > > track. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think we have discussed a lot, it's enough !! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > My Boss has given me lot of projects to complete, so, may > > be, > > > i > > > > m > > > > > > not > > > > > > > going to available in the group like i was recently. > > however. > > > i > > > > > > will > > > > > > > complete Garg Hora series. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > > Lalit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology% > > 40> > > > , Rafal Gendarz > > > > > > > <starsuponme@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Litsol, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Then please dont generalize Your preferences as they > are > > > too > > > > > > > shallow for > > > > > > > > this Forum aspiration. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz > > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru > > > > > > > > email: rafal@ > > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > litsol napisa?(a): > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Rafel, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I take Astrology as a good hobby, and i w'd be > looking > > at > > > > it > > > > > > with > > > > > > > an > > > > > > > > > engineer's approach. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I asked ur age because, it's our thinking to put our > > > > > parameters > > > > > > in > > > > > > > > > god's system, there is nothing like delay or > > advancement > > > in > > > > > > > > > spirituality. So, " Delay " or " Speed " , " backwardness " > > > > > > > > > and " advancement " doesn't exist in spirituality, I > > > thought > > > > if > > > > > u > > > > > > r > > > > > > > > > thinking that it may take too much time, I wanted to > > tell > > > > u, > > > > > > it's > > > > > > > not > > > > > > > > > like that. there is no delay. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It clicks in fraction of a second, when u r getting > > > clicked > > > > > > > depends > > > > > > > > > on u and on god's will, when he wants u to get > clicked. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > God sometimes graces for no reason ( " Ahetuka " ) just > for > > > his > > > > > > > > > compassion towards u and it may happen next minute > too. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > spirituality is not delimited by time , effort and > > rules. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > > > > Lalit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology > > > > > > > > > <vedic astrology%40>, Rafal > > Gendarz > > > > > > > > > <starsuponme@ ...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Litsol, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please be careful about words. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Im happy that You are sharing Your experience - > very > > > > > > inspirating > > > > > > > > > ones. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Age hierarchy is for sudras - Manu Samhita. If You > > > treat > > > > > > Jyotish > > > > > > > > > Vedanga > > > > > > > > > > as profession similar to engineering You have a > long > > > way > > > > to > > > > > > go. > > > > > > > But > > > > > > > > > dont > > > > > > > > > > be pessimistic here are many who will try to help > You > > > in > > > > > > getting > > > > > > > > > proper > > > > > > > > > > understanding. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > After some time You will agree with me about the > mala > > > and > > > > > > japa. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz > > > > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru > > > > > > > > > > email: rafal@ > > > > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > litsol napisa?(a): > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Rafal, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Here u r doing two wrong things, instead of > > > developing > > > > ur > > > > > > > > > understanding, > > > > > > > > > > > u r trying to conclude something and going beyond > > > that > > > > u r > > > > > > > > > messaging > > > > > > > > > > > same to many. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I m touching 35, What's ur age ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Astrology is a kind of vidya or profession, like > i > > m > > > a > > > > > > > software > > > > > > > > > > > engineer, software engineering is my profession. > > > > > > spirituality > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > beyond > > > > > > > > > > > all sort of vidya or profession. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I wish u to be a good soul and to realize the > bliss > > > of > > > > > self > > > > > > > > > awakening or > > > > > > > > > > > in other terms, the bliss that comes once u feel > u > > > and > > > > > god > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > > connected. dissolved in each other. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > First realize, experience, then speak and then > > > suggest > > > > to > > > > > > > others, > > > > > > > > > by > > > > > > > > > > > mere reading shastras or books u r not going to > > feel > > > > it. > > > > > > > unless > > > > > > > > > god > > > > > > > > > > > graces u it's very very difficult. and if u dont > > > avoid > > > > > this > > > > > > > sort > > > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > > hurriedness instead of learning and > understanding, > > it > > > > > will > > > > > > > affect > > > > > > > > > u only > > > > > > > > > > > no one else. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > somehere i have read, it was written - By mere > > > > > > repeating " So- > > > > > > > > > Aham " no > > > > > > > > > > > one gets liberated unless he realizes it like one > > > > doesnt > > > > > get > > > > > > > > > cured by > > > > > > > > > > > knowing the name of the medicine, u need to take > > the > > > > > > medicine > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > get > > > > > > > > > > > cured " . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So, pls. be wise, as it was being discussed here, > i > > > > > shared > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > experience of my life, pls. mind it, i m not a > > > > preecher, > > > > > > nor a > > > > > > > > > guru, nor > > > > > > > > > > > i have to make my followers, nor it's my > > profession, > > > > nor > > > > > i > > > > > > > have > > > > > > > > > to get > > > > > > > > > > > fame, sharing things is a kind of friendliness a > > kind > > > of > > > > > > > > > affection, > > > > > > > > > > > that's it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > > > > > > Lalit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. com>, > > Rafal > > > > > Gendarz > > > > > > > > > > > <starsuponme@ ...> > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Jyotishas > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Counting of mala has more depth sense than just > > > > > counting, > > > > > > > so for > > > > > > > > > > > natives > > > > > > > > > > > > like Litsol counting is neccessary and any > other > > > > > > speculation > > > > > > > > > will be > > > > > > > > > > > > only illusory and just imagination. We should > > > follow > > > > Pt. > > > > > > > > > > > Dakshinamoorti > > > > > > > > > > > > advise strictly, otherwise our process of > > spiritual > > > > > > > development > > > > > > > > > will > > > > > > > > > > > be > > > > > > > > > > > > slow and unauthoritative. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz > > > > > > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru > > > > > > > > > > > > email: rafal@ > > > > > > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > asmp2k02@ napisa?(a): > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Resp Sri Lalitji, > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for your mail.But please also read > > > > > > > GuruDakshinamurthyi > > > > > > > > > ji's > > > > > > > > > > > > > mail(addressing me) also on this,which brings > > in > > > > more > > > > > > > clarity > > > > > > > > > to the > > > > > > > > > > > > > applicability principles to my mail. > > > > > > > > > > > > > I meant that both are necessity but to what > > > degree > > > > of > > > > > > time > > > > > > > (it > > > > > > > > > varies > > > > > > > > > > > > > from saadhaka to saadhaka) to get such > inbuilt > > > > > maturity > > > > > > > such > > > > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > > > > > > the count will be taken care of by Divine > > forces > > > > > after > > > > > > > some > > > > > > > > > initial > > > > > > > > > > > > > period of saadhana. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Morover the type of bio matter present in the > > > japa > > > > > maala > > > > > > > > > (which is > > > > > > > > > > > > > symbolic for ritualism as well as from > > practical > > > > > point > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > view for > > > > > > > > > > > our > > > > > > > > > > > > > count) will help in keeping away destructive > > > forces > > > > > > > acting on > > > > > > > > > us > > > > > > > > > > > .Thus > > > > > > > > > > > > > the symbolic rituals will indirectly help us > in > > > > > keeping > > > > > > > away > > > > > > > > > from > > > > > > > > > > > > > negative thoughts and also trains our memory > to > > > be > > > > > > object > > > > > > > > > > > oriented.If > > > > > > > > > > > > > our memory grows and retentive capacity > > increase > > > > the > > > > > > > Gnaana > > > > > > > > > will > > > > > > > > > > > > > increase ,but at the same time destructive > > forces > > > > > > > > > (diversions) also > > > > > > > > > > > > > becomes powerful.Thus the symbolic procedures > > > will > > > > > come > > > > > > in > > > > > > > > > handy to > > > > > > > > > > > > > successfully fight the negative forces.The > > > rituals > > > > > may > > > > > > be > > > > > > > > > Rising > > > > > > > > > > > > > early(if possible during Braahmi > muhurta),Taking > > > > > > > > > bath,Japaanusthaan, > > > > > > > > > > > > > attending to the livelihood job etc etc in > > > defined > > > > > > times > > > > > > > as > > > > > > > > > > > discipline > > > > > > > > > > > > > helps indirectly tune our memory through > > keeping > > > > our > > > > > > body > > > > > > > > > healthy. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thus ultimately we conclude that the so > called > > > > > symbolic > > > > > > > > > procedures > > > > > > > > > > > are > > > > > > > > > > > > > not actually symbolic(it got branded as such) > > but > > > a > > > > > > > necessity > > > > > > > > > for > > > > > > > > > > > our > > > > > > > > > > > > > own good if we practice to the extent we can. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quoting mishra.lalit@ ... <mishra. > lalit% > > > > > > 40gmail. > > > > > > > com>: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Resp. Sri Murthy Adavi, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, what you said is perfectly right, we > count > > > or > > > > > dont > > > > > > > > > count,target > > > > > > > > > > > > > is realization of god's love within, I got it > > > with > > > > no > > > > > > > > > counting, > > > > > > > > > > > > > someone may get it with counting. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanx, for the writing. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > Lalit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. com> > > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. > com>, > > > > > srinivasa > > > > > > > > > murthy adavi > > > > > > > > > > > > > asmp2k02@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Respected Learned Members, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Both views may be correct when the views > > > have/or > > > > > with > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > goal as > > > > > > > > > > > > > development of Love/Devotion towards > adhistana > > > > > Devatha > > > > > > of > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > Mantra > > > > > > > > > > > > > as Base. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In the initial stage only you need the > > count;as > > > > one > > > > > > > > > develops the > > > > > > > > > > > > > habit the biological tuning of the > > intellect/body > > > > will > > > > > > > > > automatically > > > > > > > > > > > > > take care of the practice(without count- help > of > > > > malas > > > > > > > etc). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It's like if with the help of Alarm clock > if > > we > > > > > wake > > > > > > up > > > > > > > for > > > > > > > > > 2 or 3 > > > > > > > > > > > > > days at some appointed hour,then > automatically > > we > > > > > > wakeup > > > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > the same > > > > > > > > > > > > > time every day without help of alarm. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > With due Respects > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > smadavi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quoting starsuponme@ : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Litsol, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Definitely we should count our Mantra Japa > on > > > > Mala. > > > > > > Your > > > > > > > > > view is > > > > > > > > > > > > > against > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Vedic Authorities and Sages, so should be > > > > rejected. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru > > > > > > > > > > > > > > email: rafal@ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > litsol napisa?(a): > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Mr. Jayashri, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > A thought came, why i should not share > with > > > u, > > > > U > > > > > > pls. > > > > > > > stop > > > > > > > > > > > > > counting > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > mantra chantings, counting mantra gives > > false > > > > ego > > > > > > and > > > > > > > then > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > frustration if u dont get desired results. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > leave it to the god, god counts the > mantra > > > > > chanted > > > > > > by > > > > > > > you > > > > > > > > > may be > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 108, 1008 or whatsoever, let him count, > > it's > > > > his > > > > > > part > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > ur > > > > > > > > > > > part > > > > > > > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to chant the mantra. when the mantra has > to > > > > > awaken, > > > > > > it > > > > > > > > > will be, > > > > > > > > > > > > > god > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > will ensure it for u. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sometimes we try to become more > intelligent > > > > with > > > > > out > > > > > > > > > limited > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > intellect and that creates obstacles in > our > > > > > > spiritual > > > > > > > > > growth. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So, forget about counts, forget about the > > > time > > > > u > > > > > > put > > > > > > > in > > > > > > > > > for ur's > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sadhana, invoke the god with pure heart. > > > purity > > > > > > > counts. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Lalit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. > > > > > > > > > com>, " dakshinastrologer " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <dakshinastrologer@ ...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Ms. Jayashree: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think this topic on 108 is getting > very > > > > > > > interesting > > > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > enlightening for all members. Yesterday > > we > > > > had a > > > > > > > > > wonderful > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > esoteric > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > explanation from Shri. Sushil Dikshit, > > and > > > > > today > > > > > > > your > > > > > > > > > > > wonderful > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > explanation of numerical symmetry of > the > > > > cosmos! > > > > > > > > > Wonderful. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There definitely exists a " numerical > > > > symphony " > > > > > in > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > Universe. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > not only 108.....as I mentioned in my > > > earlier > > > > > > post, > > > > > > > > > there are > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > various > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > other numerals that are significant in > > > occult > > > > > > > > > practices. 108 > > > > > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > > > > a > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > powerful and all-purpose perfect > > > > number...While > > > > > > we > > > > > > > have > > > > > > > > > > > > > understood > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the glory of 108, we should not lose > > sight > > > of > > > > > the > > > > > > > fact > > > > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > > > > > > there > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > are > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > other powerful numbers also. This is > just > > > for > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > information > > > > > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > list. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > My apprecitation again for this > wonderful > > > > > > response. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Blessed be. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pandit R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Blessed be. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pandit R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI. --- In vedic- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > astrology@grou ps.com > > > <astrology% > > > > > > > > > > > > > 40. com>, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " jayasartn " <jayasartn@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In cosmology, 108 has this > > significance - > > > > the > > > > > > > moon is > > > > > > > > > away > > > > > > > > > > > > > from > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > earth 108 times its (moon's) diameter > > and > > > > the > > > > > > sun > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > away > > > > > > > > > > > > > from the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > earth, 108 times its diameter. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Perhaps this reality of distances is > > > > > applicable > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > deities > > > > > > > > > > > > > too. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Perhaps this has been indicated by > the > > > 108 > > > > > divya > > > > > > > > > desas of > > > > > > > > > > > Lord > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Narayana. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > jayasree > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology@ . > com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. > > > > > > > > > com>, " dakshinastrologer " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <dakshinastrologer@ > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Shri. Sushil: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It is a wonderful answer you have > > given. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Blessed be. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pandit R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology@ > . > > com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. > > > > > > > > > com>, " sushil.dikshit " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <sushil.dikshit@ > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Babu, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It is not a silly question but it > > is > > > a > > > > > very > > > > > > > good > > > > > > > > > > > question. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Actually > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > there are 27 Nakshatras and every > > > > > Nakshtras > > > > > > > has 4 > > > > > > > > > Charan > > > > > > > > > > > > > so > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > total > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > charans are 27 x 4 = 108 Charan. > > Each > > > > > > Charan > > > > > > > has 3 > > > > > > > > > > > degree > > > > > > > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 20 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > minutes so if you multiply 3 > degree > > > and > > > > 20 > > > > > > > > > minutes to > > > > > > > > > > > 108 > > > > > > > > > > > > > it > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > comes > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > out to be 360 degress i.e. one > > cycle > > > > > > (Circle). > > > > > > > > > This > > > > > > > > > > > cycle > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > represetns > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > whole brahmand because all the > > > rashis, > > > > > > > planets and > > > > > > > > > > > > > nakshatra > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > are > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > between these 360 degree in 2 > > > > dimensional > > > > > > > > > horoscope. So > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > chanting a > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mantra completes one cycle of > this > > > > > brahmand. > > > > > > > > > Further One > > > > > > > > > > > > > who > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > has > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > visited Brahamand at least one > time > > > > i.e. > > > > > he > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > > > > brahmagyani he > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > entitiled to place 108 Shri > before > > > his > > > > > name. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sushil dikshit > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology@ > > . > > > com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. > > > com>, > > > > > babu > > > > > > > mon > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <muthappan111@ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Namaste, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It may be a silly matter for > all > > of > > > > you. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I want to know what is the > reason > > > > that > > > > > > some > > > > > > > > > remedies > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > recomended > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > for 108 times. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I dont know any thing about > > > astrology. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I hope you may pleased to > provide > > a > > > > > reply > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thanks, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Babu > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------ --------- ------- -- > - > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Be a better Globetrotter. Get > > > better > > > > > > travel > > > > > > > > > answers > > > > > > > > > > > from > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someone > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > who knows. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Answers - Check it out. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this > > message > > > > have > > > > > > been > > > > > > > > > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have > been > > > > > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have > been > > > > > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > > > > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > > > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 29, 2007 Report Share Posted July 29, 2007 Your problem is u have no patience to read a post seriously, u read a part, then ur brain gets stuck, then u try to come to a point, abundance of thoughts.. , with no focus and then ur state of misunderstanding and then getting angry. I said, i started reading classics when i was studying in class 8'th, for my satisfaction, let me clraify more, wherefrom i studied, from the bookshelf that my grandfather managed, who visited india's all religious dhams (4 dham) two times in his 50's. So, what's strange in it, i could enjoy reading both my school syllabus and classics as well as cartoon books, i m no exception, many students does similar things, ok, not in large nos. also its urs wrong impression that i dont respect elders, i do, but one should not be biased. and one should be open to discuss and share a point. it's ur wrong impression that i know every thing or i m showing that i know everything, no i dont, but i have good fundamental knowledge, and somewhere i have good experience also, i can post and discuss, i dont need ur's approval, if so,the owner of the group should inform to all members, then we w'd decide if we should continue with the group or discontinue. as u appear little better, find a regards, regards, Lalit. vedic astrology , " abhishekpotti " <abhishekpotti wrote: > > Oye Lalith: > > You think they teach " mantra " shashtra basics in 8th standard > sanskrit syllabus! Or, they had a separate syllabus for you! Your > hallucination and illusion seem to have no limits! > > You can't even remember simple slokhas and yet feel you are qualified > to debate with people who have mastered works like Tantra saara, and > other classics, and what is more have practical siddhis! > > Ram Jaswal is also too junior to both me and Mohanraaamji. He said > what he felt; I have written to him explaining myself. You people are > all too young and inexperienced to advice me or Mohanraaamji. Only > Panditji has the moral right to control us, because of his knowledge > and spotless attitude of perfect ethics. We will listen to no one > else - not even Rafalji here. But, Guruji is not even reading these > posts and I think he will not interfere in this debate because this > has become " personal " between Lalith and Me/ Mohanraaamji. > > I again say one thing.....I assure this group also about this......If > Lalith stops his harangues, I will also stop. If he keeps referring > to me or Mohanraaamji and uses dangerous words like " manipulator " I > will keep posting abrasive mails like these. It is not that one > person has the right to abuse and others should keep quite. He > abused us and we are sarcastically attacking him. That is all to it. > > Please members advice him to stop, and I will stop. I HONESTLY WANT > TO STOP THIS. But, I have nothing to fear; I have not done any > mistake and so there is no risk of getting exposed. > > But Lalith may lose his very job if his managers happen to see that > he spends so much time on the internet in empty harangues because he > is using company's time for this. What he does is unethical though > it does not concern this group. We have no such things; we are > retired persons. PEOPLE WHO SPEAK OF SPIRITUALITY SHOULD FIRST BE > ETHICAL. > > Abhishek. > > vedic astrology , " litsol " <mishra.lalit@> > wrote: > > > > Res. Ram ji, > > > > Pls. dont advice him or mohan raam, they have nothing to debate or > > discuss on either mantra or bhakti. > > > > I don't remember shlokas much as i read classics for my > satisfaction, > > in two phases, firstly from my class 8'th till my 2nd year of > > graduation. that time i had no faith and no bhakti, just read like > i > > was reading some comics or cartoon books, i had not developed > ideas, > > not taken any message, i knew and i can talk about the content, but > i > > was not involved. > > > > after that incident happened at Sharda Temple,Maihar,it was > > unbelievable and it made me change my thoughts, i again read some > > classics and this time,i grasped the message given in the classics. > > > > They are at the stage of my chlidhood, they may read and discuss. > but > > dont take the message in their heart, somewhere their greed to > > establish themselves as pandit or authority is also a reason. > > > > Perhapse, in lieu of, hitting them hard, i had to take another rout > > to let them realize they are wrong and deliberately wrong. > > > > He didnt say any thing on my how i shown, beej and god's name is > one > > and same thing, in fact it's a simple thnig, and well known but > they > > dont accept. > > > > let them dont accept, what difference it makes to us, they have > their > > life with them, any qualitative change within them will do good to > > them only. > > > > So, i prayed maa, mother divine for mohan raam, he is too old, his > > problem is he learnt astrology, did some breathing excercises, but > he > > lacks spiritual experiences so he doesn't believe, I was like him > in > > my childhood. > > > > I prayed, and it's acknowledged by maa, time will change for him a > > little, what didn't happen to him in last 85 yrs, will happen in > next > > 5-6 monnths, he will get some good spritiual experience, the > curtain > > will be lifted for some time, reality at a glance. > > > > after that it's his part to stick to that or not, coz, ego, greed > and > > fear still remains, i m not completely gone out of it, i have to > > fight with me many times. > > > > I thought gruop w'd be a good plateform to get like minded friends, > > if nothnig, it gives joy. > > > > Let's wish good for all, I also express my gratitude to you to > speak > > for what u thought right. > > > > regards, > > Lalit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology , " Ram Jaswal " <rkjaswal@> > > wrote: > > > > > > Namaste Abhishek > > > > > > My post wasn't so much in defense of Lalith but one to stop > > the " belittling " > > > of a person within this Group. If you don't agree with someone's > > views you > > > are perfectly within your rights to say so why in a scholarly > > fashion so as > > > to discuss and further the merits of the topic under discussion. > > Thereafter > > > it is a matter for the individual to either continue with the on- > > going > > > discussion or to stop? The only way you or anyone else is likely > to > > change > > > Lalith's view on chanting of Mantras will be from a scholarly > > viewpoint and > > > not from goading him? > > > > > > Also why are you taking personal offense? If Guru's can ignore > his > > comments > > > - can't you do the same? > > > > > > With freedom of speech comes the responsibility of keeping a > civil > > and > > > polite language - please re-read your note which prompted my > earlier > > > response. > > > > > > Like I said in my earlier post it is all about ones viewpoints - > my > > personal > > > advise to everyone would be to take what you find reasonable and > > ignore the > > > rest. > > > > > > Best wishes .. > > > > > > Jai Sita Ram > > > > > > Ram > > > _____ > > > > > > vedic astrology > > > [vedic astrology ] On Behalf Of > abhishekpotti > > > 28 July 2007 20:42 > > > vedic astrology > > > [vedic astrology] Re: Oye Lalith! No one here is afraid > of > > you.... > > > > > > Dear Ram Jaswal: > > > > > > If Lalith stops challenging others with his rude posts no one > will > > > run him down...please follow the threads carefully......He is > > > speaking as if he is the master of everything and everybody else > is > > a > > > fool. When he passes judgment on senior astrologers of this group > > or > > > unnecessarily challenges established conventions, we have > defended > > > that. Now, why are you defending Lalith? Don't you think if you > > > have the right to defend an offender, we have the right to defend > > the > > > more decent members and traditions that he is subtly attacking.... > > > > > > just read his posts.....If he has just forwarded the Prashna > > Tantra, > > > nobody would have objected to it.....See the accompanying > comments > > > where he abrasively comments certain things...... > > > > > > Open your eyes before advicing anyone. Why don't you write to > > Lalith > > > also? When did I call him names?......No sir...you are > mistaken.... > > > > > > Did you not notice that even after Mohanraamji stopped writing > > posts, > > > this fellow was taunting that old gentleman repeatedly last week. > > > Where were you at that time? > > > > > > If Lalith stops writing abrasive posts like " Nobody can stand > > before > > > me " and all that silly nonsense, we have no issues with him (or > at > > > least I have no issues with him). So, advice Lalith also in this > > > regard. > > > > > > If Lalith and you enjoy freedom of speech, we also claim the same > > > previlege. > > > > > > Abhishek. > > > > > > vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology% 40> > > > , " Ram Jaswal " <rkjaswal@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Namaste Abhishek/ Mohanraaam > > > > > > > > Just why are you trying to run Lalith down? From the posts that > I > > > have read > > > > All he has done is given this point of view - if you don't > accept > > > them than > > > > simply ignore it - there is No need for any name calling or > > > belittling > > > > someone. > > > > > > > > There is also nothing wrong in Lalith forwarding " Prashna > Tantra " > > > text to > > > > this group as to whether someone has requested it or not - he > > > certainly > > > > doesn't need your or mine permission to do so - after all he > > > thought it > > > > would be useful to everyone - again his view. > > > > > > > > Sorry if I am coming across annoyed and perhaps rude But feel > it > > is > > > Best > > > > that everyone should stop " belittling " other group members as > in > > > the long > > > > run all it does is make oneself appear small and bigoted. > > > > > > > > Best wishes and hoping this will be the last mail on this > > subject .. > > > > > > > > Jai Sita Ram > > > > > > > > Ram > > > > > > > > _____ > > > > > > > > vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology% > 40> > > > > > > > [vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology% > > 40> > > > ] On Behalf Of abhishekpotti > > > > 28 July 2007 19:54 > > > > vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology% 40> > > > > > > > [vedic astrology] Oye Lalith! No one here is afraid of > > > you.... > > > > > > > > Dear Lalith: > > > > > > > > The whole world knows the history of Blessed Meera Bhai....the > > > > epitome of Bhakti......She was attached to her " Lala " - the > > > wonderful > > > > idol of Krishna gifted to her even from her childhood....Do you > > > mean > > > > to say that innocent young girl started chanting " Kliim > > krishnaaya " > > > > mantra automatically? Even Bhakta Prahlaada had to be initiated > > by > > > > Sage Naaradha for his chant of dwaadasaakshari mantra.... > > > > > > > > Nobody is afraid of you here......You need not proclaim that > you > > > are > > > > not in the business of a Guru.....actually Guru status is not a > > > > business (true to your half-baked knowledge you will claim it > is > > > also > > > > like software engineering!). The difference my friend between > you > > > > and other great persons like Rafal or Dakshinamoorthiji is that > > > they > > > > are spending their money for the internet, whereas you are > > > pilfering > > > > your company's time and the company's resources while browsing > > the > > > > internet. Don't you think you are cheating your company when > you > > > > spend so much time on empty and egoistic posts defending > yourself > > > > against every expert after arguing with them unnecessarily? Are > > you > > > > not getting paid for the time you spend in the company....Know > > the > > > > basics of ethics before ever sermonizing.....So, actually you > are > > > an > > > > exploiter....try to understand that....the other gurujis are > > > probably > > > > too decent to comment on that......What happened to your > project? > > > > Better rush to it nough!....It will spare us the agony of > > replying > > > to > > > > your half-witted postings! > > > > > > > > By the say, Which member asked you Prashna Tantra dear? We did > > not > > > > see any posts requesting " Honourable Lalith " to explain Prashna > > > > Tantra (as if you could explain it!) What arrogance you have to > > > > claim that nobody can stand before you.....Guruji's posts > exposed > > > > your ignorance....you did not even know how to ask queries and > > get > > > > replies from one of the most empathetic astrologers of this > > group, > > > > and yet you claim you are this and that...... > > > > > > > > For your information....nobody is afraid of you..Rather you > > should > > > be > > > > afraid of yourself......Your foolishness itself will be your > > doom. > > > > Did you not become the laughing stock due to your email-based > > > chasing > > > > of Priyaa? Such foolishness in occult matters could be more > > costly > > > > dear.....I think Mohanraaamji and Rafalji are only afraid about > > > your > > > > own well-being! They are not afraid of you. Nor am I afraid of > > you. > > > > > > > > Your posts never answer the queries or points raised by others; > > you > > > > take off on a new ground only because of your shallow > > understanding > > > > of subjects. Nobody has accepted you as a Guru here, and nobody > > > > will....Can a fire-fly eclipse the Sun? There are too > many " Suns " > > > > here and you are just a fire-fly. > > > > > > > > It reminds me of a story.....Once an ant challenged the mighty > > > > elephant for a fight; the elephant obviously could not hear the > > ant > > > > (the ant being so tiny and it was on the ground, its sound > could > > > not > > > > reach the elephant). The elephant just walked away out of its > own > > > > volition in its natural course. Then the ant claimed, " you see > I > > > > challenged the elephant and it ran away " . Dear, your saying > that > > > > nobody can stand before you is similar to that....... > > > > > > > > FIRST LEARN THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN GHOSTS AND YOUR ANCESTOR > > > > SUMANGALIS BEFORE WRITING THE FIRST POSTS ON OCCULT! What a > > > > pity......what a pity.....That we have to bear your meaningless > > > > rantings here! > > > > > > > > Abhishek. > > > > > > > > vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology% > 40> > > > > , " litsol " <mishra.lalit@> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I was waiting for u dear.. > > > > > > > > > > why u took time ? > > > > > > > > > > Do u mean Meera Bai discussed with u, what she did.. > > > > > > > > > > Do u know 'Kleem Krishnay, Govindaya Gopijan Vallabhaya Namh' > > is > > > a > > > > > mantra for lord krishna. > > > > > > > > > > is there no beej mantras, to whom u wish to misguide ? let > > thnigs > > > > > remain between lord, bhakta , their shraddha and their guru. > > > > > > > > > > why u people are so afraid of me, i m not in business of guru. > > > > > > > > > > i m happy with my life, my profession of software engineering > > and > > > > > my hobbies ok. > > > > > > > > > > there are 7000+ members are here, by writing such type of > > foolish > > > > > things u expose urself only, mind, there are better brains > here. > > > > > > > > > > this is enough ... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology% > > 40> > > > > , > > > > > " abhishekpotti " <abhishekpotti@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Respected Mohanraaamji: > > > > > > > > > > > > Well said. Lalith is saying that " maybe in south india > > devotees > > > > > > don't chant Moola mantras but not so in North " ...What > > > > > > stupidity.....He does not seem to understand that " mantra > > > > shaastra > > > > > > experts " are also devotees, but they cannot be called as > > > innocent > > > > > > saatwik bhaktaas! A typical example of a pure saadhwik > bhakta > > > > will > > > > > > be Meera Bhai (was she not North Indian). Can Lalith say > > which > > > > > Dasa > > > > > > Mahaa Vidya Meera Bhai practised? She was immersed in > Krishna > > > > > > consciousness and Lover for Him. Her own Bhajans were her > > > > prayers > > > > > in > > > > > > the bhaavana of Bhakti in the form of Love! This is not > > mantra > > > > > > shaastra. Another example will be Saant Tukhaaraam. These > > > > > bhaktaas > > > > > > did not chant moola mantraas. Panditji Dakshinamoorthi was > on > > > > dot > > > > > in > > > > > > saying that " Pure bhaktaas do not chant complicated moola > > > > > mantraas " . > > > > > > You have clarified this fact wonderfully in your post. I > wish > > > > more > > > > > > knowledgeable persons also put erratic posters in their > place > > > > just > > > > > as > > > > > > Mohanraaamji does here. This will benefit more naive > readers > > of > > > > > > these forums who might otherwise get confused as to which > of > > > the > > > > > > paths to follow. Actually, anyone can follow any path as > he/ > > > she > > > > > > deems it fit; but there should be consistency of procedures. > > > > > > > > > > > > We should not confuse mantrik rituals and bhakti doctrines. > > > > > Bhaktaas > > > > > > can chant the names of Gods at anytime.....Mantra shaastra > > > > experts > > > > > > chanting advanced moola mantras should necessarily adopt > > ritual > > > > > > procedures for the welfare of themselves and others! > > > > > Yes...improper > > > > > > chanting of mantras can cause danger to the society also > just > > > as > > > > > > proper chanting can help others. Hence, this cannot be > > > > considered > > > > > as > > > > > > a personal preference of the aspirant. If this was not the > > > case, > > > > > why > > > > > > did sages codify spiritual practises scrupulously? Rafalji, > > > > > > Mohanraaamji, etc. are correct in saying it is best to > follow > > > > > Pandit > > > > > > Dakshinamoorthiji's advices on mantra shastra or japams. He > > is > > > > > > learned and he is living a life compatible to the shaastras > > > > though > > > > > he > > > > > > has faced uncertain circumstances in his own personal life. > > He > > > > > never > > > > > > compromised on principles and he willingly paid the price > for > > > > that > > > > > > which most of us will never do. The words of such a person > > > > should > > > > > > obviously carry more weight. > > > > > > > > > > > > Abhishek. > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology% > > > 40> > > > > , " mohanraaam " > > > > <mohanraaam@> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Well Lalith: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If you have really done dasa Maha Vidyaa, you would have > > > never > > > > > > > approached a professional astrologer for > > consultation...that > > > > much > > > > > I > > > > > > > can say.... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > And what idiocy when you say Panditji is partly wrong? He > > > > > > > said " Bhaktaas do not chant Moola mantras " , whereas you > > have > > > > > edited > > > > > > > the words to suit your ends....He never said " devotees > > don't > > > > > chant > > > > > > > Beej mantras " .....You are putting words into his mouth > and > > > > > assuming > > > > > > > he is wrong! Why, do you know....the Great Panditji > himself > > > > > chants > > > > > > > Moola mantras.....He is a bhakta and a mantra shastra > > expert. > > > > As > > > > > a > > > > > > > bhakta he keeps incessant chanting of naama japa > throughout > > > the > > > > > > day; > > > > > > > as a mantra shastra expert, he restricts the moola mantra > > > > japams > > > > > to > > > > > > > stipulated times with ritual purity.....It is this > > wonderful > > > > > > practice > > > > > > > that Guruji was alluding to. Guruji cannot be wrong in > > ritual > > > > > and > > > > > > > occult matters. Please understand that. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There are 4 classes of Devotees.......1) Saatwik vedic > > > devotees > > > > > who > > > > > > > will follow vedic dharma scrupulously. They will not dare > > to > > > > > > compare > > > > > > > astrology and vedanga to Engineering! as you did... > > > > > > > 2) Raajasik devotees who will follow vedic disciplines as > > far > > > > as > > > > > > > possible, but will still go after upaasanaas of Demi- Gods > > for > > > > > > > accomplishment of siddhis. Mantra shaastra experts > usually > > > > fall > > > > > in > > > > > > > this category. > > > > > > > 3) Saatwik Bhaktaas - for whom the meditation and glory > of > > > > their > > > > > > > Ishta Devataa is enough for spiritual satisfaction. It is > > > this > > > > > > > category that Guruji referred to when he said they will > not > > > > chant > > > > > > > Moola mantras too much. Definitely they will not do Dasa > > > Mahaa > > > > > > > Vidyaa. > > > > > > > 4) Taamasic Devotees - Those whose main motive is to > > project > > > > > > > themselves at all costs and acting as if they are equal > to > > > the > > > > > > > experts; they will try ALL practices - whether they are > > > > > sanctioned > > > > > > by > > > > > > > vedas or not.....Their only aim is personal glory and > > > > > > satisfaction. > > > > > > > They will attack even established dharma if they do not > get > > > > > results > > > > > > > (sounds familiar....You are one!) Ignorance and half- > baked > > > > > > knowledge > > > > > > > and egotism are these persons' motivating fuel. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You are really satan's Gift to this list.......My only > > prayer > > > > is > > > > > > that > > > > > > > innocent members of this list do not get side-tracked > with > > > your > > > > > > > ramblings. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Let me make this clear to the list.....Panditji said that > > > > saatwik > > > > > > > Bhaktaas who chant Divine names only due to Pure Love on > > God > > > > > > usually > > > > > > > never chant mantrik moola mantraas. It is just one class > of > > > > > > > devotees. A rajasik bhakta who is a mantra-shaastra > expert > > > may > > > > > > even > > > > > > > be a bhakta at heart; and a pure bhakta may sometimes > chant > > > > some > > > > > > > mantrik japams for solving some practical > issues......But, > > > when > > > > > > they > > > > > > > switch their routines temporarily, these enlightened > > devotees > > > > > > usually > > > > > > > take good guidance and follow the tenets of shaastras > > > > > > > scrupulously....Definitely they will not sit on > assumption > > > like > > > > > > > Lalith. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On the one hand, this fellow claims he has done chants in > > > > > forests, > > > > > > > rivers, earth, etc. (Probably we have a Maharishi here! > > What > > > > > > heights > > > > > > > of pointless pride in this young man list....it is > > > > disgusting!). > > > > > > On > > > > > > > the other hand, he says he chants mantras in buses, > trains, > > > > > > etc...... > > > > > > > He is confused about which no body can have issues. Only > > his > > > > > Guru > > > > > > > should be concerned about that.....But, his attempts to > > stuff > > > > his > > > > > > > shallow understanding upon this list is reprehensible. > And, > > > > his > > > > > > > habit of quoting experts out of context is really > > > condemnable. > > > > > May > > > > > > > Jupiter's Light Shine on that fellow and teach him to > > respect > > > > the > > > > > > > hallowed traditions and to stay at his level rather than > > > trying > > > > > > > to " teach " others (He has the audacity to claim he > > > > is " teaching " > > > > > > > Rafalji!) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If a mere young man of 35 years who has spent his life on > a > > > > > " Failed > > > > > > > computer web desining business " , " pointless email chasing > > of > > > > > > girls " , > > > > > > > and other " past times " can gain insight as he claims, how > > > much > > > > > will > > > > > > > learned Gurus of this group with their life of devotion > to > > > > > vedanta > > > > > > > and vedanga know? His peanut brain and hyper-inflated ego > > > will > > > > > > never > > > > > > > allow him to see this obvious truth. But, please list > > > exercise > > > > > > your > > > > > > > discretion while reading his posts (There are doubtless > > some > > > > good > > > > > > > elements even in his posts; but mostly there is trash > > > presented > > > > > as > > > > > > > philosophy). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mohanraaam > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology% > > > 40> > > > > , " litsol " > > > > <mishra.lalit@> > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Rafal, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Do u think, a hobby means shallow knowledge of the > > domain, > > > No > > > > > > > rafal, > > > > > > > > it's not like that. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > At least not for me. You have learnt and i m learning, > i > > > read > > > > > > ur's > > > > > > > > replies and get benifitted, same way i wanted you to > pay > > > > heed > > > > > to > > > > > > > > what i have written about spritiuality, mostrly i did > > write > > > > for > > > > > u > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have done all 10 mahavidyas of tantra and read many > > > tantrik > > > > > > > > classics, spent good deal of time with great tantriks > > > > trained > > > > > in > > > > > > > > Kamakhya and other places, keenly observed their > doings, > > > > their > > > > > > > > mistakes etc.., I did tremendous mantra chanting on > > water, > > > > on > > > > > > > earth, > > > > > > > > at home, in forests etc... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > then reached here, then i did write something, but > sorry > > i > > > > dont > > > > > > > > remember shlokas. i was not interested in cramming that. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Panditji is not fully correct in saying that > BeejMantras > > > are > > > > > not > > > > > > > > chanted by devotees, I dont know much about South India > > but > > > > in > > > > > > > North > > > > > > > > normally its done. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > And a successfull mantra sadhana has to result in one's > > > being > > > > a > > > > > > > > devotee, the devotion is the outcome, final result of > > > mantra > > > > > > > sadhana, > > > > > > > > perhaps, Pandit Ji believes mantras are power > > > packet,thinks, > > > > i > > > > > do > > > > > > > it > > > > > > > > this way , these many times and get this result, this > is > > > > where > > > > > > most > > > > > > > > of the people are confused. without being a good human > > > being > > > > if > > > > > > we > > > > > > > > think, we will achieve something in spirituality, is > > > > difficult, > > > > > > > very > > > > > > > > difficult. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > what happens is, with the mantra chanting, a self > > > > > > transformation > > > > > > > > process begins, u if dont restrict urself, ur karma > > begins > > > > > > > diluting, > > > > > > > > and u begin ur purification process unknowingly, when > > > > > substantial > > > > > > > > part of ego and greed for respect vanishes and many > such > > > > thing > > > > > > > > togather, mantra awakens u and with the God's grace ur > > > > > objective > > > > > > > gets > > > > > > > > fullfilled, gradually u become a devotee. ur being > simple > > > and > > > > > > being > > > > > > > > devotee is sometimes is indication of ur's going on the > > > right > > > > > > track. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think we have discussed a lot, it's enough !! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > My Boss has given me lot of projects to complete, so, > may > > > be, > > > > i > > > > > m > > > > > > > not > > > > > > > > going to available in the group like i was recently. > > > however. > > > > i > > > > > > > will > > > > > > > > complete Garg Hora series. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > > > Lalit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology% > > > 40> > > > > , Rafal Gendarz > > > > > > > > <starsuponme@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Litsol, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Then please dont generalize Your preferences as they > > are > > > > too > > > > > > > > shallow for > > > > > > > > > this Forum aspiration. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz > > > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru > > > > > > > > > email: rafal@ > > > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > litsol napisa?(a): > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Rafel, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I take Astrology as a good hobby, and i w'd be > > looking > > > at > > > > > it > > > > > > > with > > > > > > > > an > > > > > > > > > > engineer's approach. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I asked ur age because, it's our thinking to put > our > > > > > > parameters > > > > > > > in > > > > > > > > > > god's system, there is nothing like delay or > > > advancement > > > > in > > > > > > > > > > spirituality. So, " Delay " > or " Speed " , " backwardness " > > > > > > > > > > and " advancement " doesn't exist in spirituality, I > > > > thought > > > > > if > > > > > > u > > > > > > > r > > > > > > > > > > thinking that it may take too much time, I wanted > to > > > tell > > > > > u, > > > > > > > it's > > > > > > > > not > > > > > > > > > > like that. there is no delay. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It clicks in fraction of a second, when u r getting > > > > clicked > > > > > > > > depends > > > > > > > > > > on u and on god's will, when he wants u to get > > clicked. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > God sometimes graces for no reason ( " Ahetuka " ) just > > for > > > > his > > > > > > > > > > compassion towards u and it may happen next minute > > too. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > spirituality is not delimited by time , effort and > > > rules. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > > > > > Lalit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology > > > > > > > > > > <vedic astrology%40>, Rafal > > > Gendarz > > > > > > > > > > <starsuponme@ ...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Litsol, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please be careful about words. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Im happy that You are sharing Your experience - > > very > > > > > > > inspirating > > > > > > > > > > ones. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Age hierarchy is for sudras - Manu Samhita. If > You > > > > treat > > > > > > > Jyotish > > > > > > > > > > Vedanga > > > > > > > > > > > as profession similar to engineering You have a > > long > > > > way > > > > > to > > > > > > > go. > > > > > > > > But > > > > > > > > > > dont > > > > > > > > > > > be pessimistic here are many who will try to help > > You > > > > in > > > > > > > getting > > > > > > > > > > proper > > > > > > > > > > > understanding. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > After some time You will agree with me about the > > mala > > > > and > > > > > > > japa. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz > > > > > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru > > > > > > > > > > > email: rafal@ > > > > > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > litsol napisa?(a): > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Rafal, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Here u r doing two wrong things, instead of > > > > developing > > > > > ur > > > > > > > > > > understanding, > > > > > > > > > > > > u r trying to conclude something and going > beyond > > > > that > > > > > u r > > > > > > > > > > messaging > > > > > > > > > > > > same to many. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I m touching 35, What's ur age ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Astrology is a kind of vidya or profession, > like > > i > > > m > > > > a > > > > > > > > software > > > > > > > > > > > > engineer, software engineering is my > profession. > > > > > > > spirituality > > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > beyond > > > > > > > > > > > > all sort of vidya or profession. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I wish u to be a good soul and to realize the > > bliss > > > > of > > > > > > self > > > > > > > > > > awakening or > > > > > > > > > > > > in other terms, the bliss that comes once u > feel > > u > > > > and > > > > > > god > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > > > connected. dissolved in each other. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > First realize, experience, then speak and then > > > > suggest > > > > > to > > > > > > > > others, > > > > > > > > > > by > > > > > > > > > > > > mere reading shastras or books u r not going to > > > feel > > > > > it. > > > > > > > > unless > > > > > > > > > > god > > > > > > > > > > > > graces u it's very very difficult. and if u > dont > > > > avoid > > > > > > this > > > > > > > > sort > > > > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > > > hurriedness instead of learning and > > understanding, > > > it > > > > > > will > > > > > > > > affect > > > > > > > > > > u only > > > > > > > > > > > > no one else. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > somehere i have read, it was written - By mere > > > > > > > repeating " So- > > > > > > > > > > Aham " no > > > > > > > > > > > > one gets liberated unless he realizes it like > one > > > > > doesnt > > > > > > get > > > > > > > > > > cured by > > > > > > > > > > > > knowing the name of the medicine, u need to > take > > > the > > > > > > > medicine > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > get > > > > > > > > > > > > cured " . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So, pls. be wise, as it was being discussed > here, > > i > > > > > > shared > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > experience of my life, pls. mind it, i m not a > > > > > preecher, > > > > > > > nor a > > > > > > > > > > guru, nor > > > > > > > > > > > > i have to make my followers, nor it's my > > > profession, > > > > > nor > > > > > > i > > > > > > > > have > > > > > > > > > > to get > > > > > > > > > > > > fame, sharing things is a kind of friendliness > a > > > kind > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > affection, > > > > > > > > > > > > that's it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > Lalit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. com>, > > > Rafal > > > > > > Gendarz > > > > > > > > > > > > <starsuponme@ ...> > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Jyotishas > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Counting of mala has more depth sense than > just > > > > > > counting, > > > > > > > > so for > > > > > > > > > > > > natives > > > > > > > > > > > > > like Litsol counting is neccessary and any > > other > > > > > > > speculation > > > > > > > > > > will be > > > > > > > > > > > > > only illusory and just imagination. We should > > > > follow > > > > > Pt. > > > > > > > > > > > > Dakshinamoorti > > > > > > > > > > > > > advise strictly, otherwise our process of > > > spiritual > > > > > > > > development > > > > > > > > > > will > > > > > > > > > > > > be > > > > > > > > > > > > > slow and unauthoritative. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru > > > > > > > > > > > > > email: rafal@ > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > asmp2k02@ napisa?(a): > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Resp Sri Lalitji, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for your mail.But please also read > > > > > > > > GuruDakshinamurthyi > > > > > > > > > > ji's > > > > > > > > > > > > > > mail(addressing me) also on this,which > brings > > > in > > > > > more > > > > > > > > clarity > > > > > > > > > > to the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > applicability principles to my mail. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I meant that both are necessity but to what > > > > degree > > > > > of > > > > > > > time > > > > > > > > (it > > > > > > > > > > varies > > > > > > > > > > > > > > from saadhaka to saadhaka) to get such > > inbuilt > > > > > > maturity > > > > > > > > such > > > > > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the count will be taken care of by Divine > > > forces > > > > > > after > > > > > > > > some > > > > > > > > > > initial > > > > > > > > > > > > > > period of saadhana. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Morover the type of bio matter present in > the > > > > japa > > > > > > maala > > > > > > > > > > (which is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > symbolic for ritualism as well as from > > > practical > > > > > > point > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > view for > > > > > > > > > > > > our > > > > > > > > > > > > > > count) will help in keeping away > destructive > > > > forces > > > > > > > > acting on > > > > > > > > > > us > > > > > > > > > > > > .Thus > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the symbolic rituals will indirectly help > us > > in > > > > > > keeping > > > > > > > > away > > > > > > > > > > from > > > > > > > > > > > > > > negative thoughts and also trains our > memory > > to > > > > be > > > > > > > object > > > > > > > > > > > > oriented.If > > > > > > > > > > > > > > our memory grows and retentive capacity > > > increase > > > > > the > > > > > > > > Gnaana > > > > > > > > > > will > > > > > > > > > > > > > > increase ,but at the same time destructive > > > forces > > > > > > > > > > (diversions) also > > > > > > > > > > > > > > becomes powerful.Thus the symbolic > procedures > > > > will > > > > > > come > > > > > > > in > > > > > > > > > > handy to > > > > > > > > > > > > > > successfully fight the negative forces.The > > > > rituals > > > > > > may > > > > > > > be > > > > > > > > > > Rising > > > > > > > > > > > > > > early(if possible during Braahmi > > muhurta),Taking > > > > > > > > > > bath,Japaanusthaan, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > attending to the livelihood job etc etc in > > > > defined > > > > > > > times > > > > > > > > as > > > > > > > > > > > > discipline > > > > > > > > > > > > > > helps indirectly tune our memory through > > > keeping > > > > > our > > > > > > > body > > > > > > > > > > healthy. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thus ultimately we conclude that the so > > called > > > > > > symbolic > > > > > > > > > > procedures > > > > > > > > > > > > are > > > > > > > > > > > > > > not actually symbolic(it got branded as > such) > > > but > > > > a > > > > > > > > necessity > > > > > > > > > > for > > > > > > > > > > > > our > > > > > > > > > > > > > > own good if we practice to the extent we > can. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quoting mishra.lalit@ ... <mishra. > > lalit% > > > > > > > 40gmail. > > > > > > > > com>: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Resp. Sri Murthy Adavi, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, what you said is perfectly right, we > > count > > > > or > > > > > > dont > > > > > > > > > > count,target > > > > > > > > > > > > > > is realization of god's love within, I got > it > > > > with > > > > > no > > > > > > > > > > counting, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someone may get it with counting. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanx, for the writing. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Lalit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. com> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. > > com>, > > > > > > srinivasa > > > > > > > > > > murthy adavi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > asmp2k02@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Respected Learned Members, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Both views may be correct when the views > > > > have/or > > > > > > with > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > goal as > > > > > > > > > > > > > > development of Love/Devotion towards > > adhistana > > > > > > Devatha > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > Mantra > > > > > > > > > > > > > > as Base. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In the initial stage only you need the > > > count;as > > > > > one > > > > > > > > > > develops the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > habit the biological tuning of the > > > intellect/body > > > > > will > > > > > > > > > > automatically > > > > > > > > > > > > > > take care of the practice(without count- > help > > of > > > > > malas > > > > > > > > etc). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It's like if with the help of Alarm clock > > if > > > we > > > > > > wake > > > > > > > up > > > > > > > > for > > > > > > > > > > 2 or 3 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > days at some appointed hour,then > > automatically > > > we > > > > > > > wakeup > > > > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > the same > > > > > > > > > > > > > > time every day without help of alarm. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > With due Respects > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > smadavi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quoting starsuponme@ : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Litsol, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Definitely we should count our Mantra > Japa > > on > > > > > Mala. > > > > > > > Your > > > > > > > > > > view is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > against > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Vedic Authorities and Sages, so should be > > > > > rejected. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > email: rafal@ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > litsol napisa?(a): > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Mr. Jayashri, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > A thought came, why i should not share > > with > > > > u, > > > > > U > > > > > > > pls. > > > > > > > > stop > > > > > > > > > > > > > > counting > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > mantra chantings, counting mantra gives > > > false > > > > > ego > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > then > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > frustration if u dont get desired > results. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > leave it to the god, god counts the > > mantra > > > > > > chanted > > > > > > > by > > > > > > > > you > > > > > > > > > > may be > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 108, 1008 or whatsoever, let him count, > > > it's > > > > > his > > > > > > > part > > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > ur > > > > > > > > > > > > part > > > > > > > > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to chant the mantra. when the mantra > has > > to > > > > > > awaken, > > > > > > > it > > > > > > > > > > will be, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > god > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > will ensure it for u. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sometimes we try to become more > > intelligent > > > > > with > > > > > > out > > > > > > > > > > limited > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > intellect and that creates obstacles in > > our > > > > > > > spiritual > > > > > > > > > > growth. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So, forget about counts, forget about > the > > > > time > > > > > u > > > > > > > put > > > > > > > > in > > > > > > > > > > for ur's > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sadhana, invoke the god with pure > heart. > > > > purity > > > > > > > > counts. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Lalit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology@ . com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. > > > > > > > > > > com>, " dakshinastrologer " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <dakshinastrologer@ ...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Ms. Jayashree: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think this topic on 108 is getting > > very > > > > > > > > interesting > > > > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > enlightening for all members. > Yesterday > > > we > > > > > had a > > > > > > > > > > wonderful > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > esoteric > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > explanation from Shri. Sushil > Dikshit, > > > and > > > > > > today > > > > > > > > your > > > > > > > > > > > > wonderful > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > explanation of numerical symmetry of > > the > > > > > cosmos! > > > > > > > > > > Wonderful. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There definitely exists a " numerical > > > > > symphony " > > > > > > in > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > Universe. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > not only 108.....as I mentioned in my > > > > earlier > > > > > > > post, > > > > > > > > > > there are > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > various > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > other numerals that are significant > in > > > > occult > > > > > > > > > > practices. 108 > > > > > > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > a > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > powerful and all-purpose perfect > > > > > number...While > > > > > > > we > > > > > > > > have > > > > > > > > > > > > > > understood > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the glory of 108, we should not lose > > > sight > > > > of > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > fact > > > > > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > > > > > > > there > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > are > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > other powerful numbers also. This is > > just > > > > for > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > information > > > > > > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > list. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > My apprecitation again for this > > wonderful > > > > > > > response. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Blessed be. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pandit R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Blessed be. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pandit R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI. --- In > vedic- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > astrology@grou ps.com > > > > <astrology% > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 40. com>, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " jayasartn " <jayasartn@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In cosmology, 108 has this > > > significance - > > > > > the > > > > > > > > moon is > > > > > > > > > > away > > > > > > > > > > > > > > from > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > earth 108 times its (moon's) > diameter > > > and > > > > > the > > > > > > > sun > > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > away > > > > > > > > > > > > > > from the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > earth, 108 times its diameter. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Perhaps this reality of distances > is > > > > > > applicable > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > deities > > > > > > > > > > > > > > too. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Perhaps this has been indicated by > > the > > > > 108 > > > > > > divya > > > > > > > > > > desas of > > > > > > > > > > > > Lord > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Narayana. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > jayasree > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology@ > . > > com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. > > > > > > > > > > com>, " dakshinastrologer " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <dakshinastrologer@ > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Shri. Sushil: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It is a wonderful answer you have > > > given. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Blessed be. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pandit R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology@ > > . > > > com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. > > > > > > > > > > com>, " sushil.dikshit " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <sushil.dikshit@ > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Babu, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It is not a silly question but > it > > > is > > > > a > > > > > > very > > > > > > > > good > > > > > > > > > > > > question. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Actually > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > there are 27 Nakshatras and > every > > > > > > Nakshtras > > > > > > > > has 4 > > > > > > > > > > Charan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > so > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > total > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > charans are 27 x 4 = 108 > Charan. > > > Each > > > > > > > Charan > > > > > > > > has 3 > > > > > > > > > > > > degree > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 20 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > minutes so if you multiply 3 > > degree > > > > and > > > > > 20 > > > > > > > > > > minutes to > > > > > > > > > > > > 108 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > it > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > comes > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > out to be 360 degress i.e. one > > > cycle > > > > > > > (Circle). > > > > > > > > > > This > > > > > > > > > > > > cycle > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > represetns > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > whole brahmand because all the > > > > rashis, > > > > > > > > planets and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > nakshatra > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > are > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > between these 360 degree in 2 > > > > > dimensional > > > > > > > > > > horoscope. So > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > chanting a > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mantra completes one cycle of > > this > > > > > > brahmand. > > > > > > > > > > Further One > > > > > > > > > > > > > > who > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > has > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > visited Brahamand at least one > > time > > > > > i.e. > > > > > > he > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > brahmagyani he > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > entitiled to place 108 Shri > > before > > > > his > > > > > > name. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sushil dikshit > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology@ > > > . > > > > com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% > 40. > > > > com>, > > > > > > babu > > > > > > > > mon > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <muthappan111@ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Namaste, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It may be a silly matter for > > all > > > of > > > > > you. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I want to know what is the > > reason > > > > > that > > > > > > > some > > > > > > > > > > remedies > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > recomended > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > for 108 times. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I dont know any thing about > > > > astrology. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I hope you may pleased to > > provide > > > a > > > > > > reply > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thanks, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Babu > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------ --------- ----- -- > -- > > - > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Be a better Globetrotter. Get > > > > better > > > > > > > travel > > > > > > > > > > answers > > > > > > > > > > > > from > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someone > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > who knows. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Answers - Check it out. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this > > > message > > > > > have > > > > > > > been > > > > > > > > > > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have > > been > > > > > > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have > > been > > > > > > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have > been > > > > > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > > > > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 29, 2007 Report Share Posted July 29, 2007 Once making an impression and behaving under that impression is quite obvious. so is a case with u. I m trully happy to know that Mohan Raam ji worked with indian army, but he was so biased, no spiritual personality can be biased, he could see some - " Pa varga : Priya, Preeti " etc. but why he could not see, how i happened to post a love mail written to Priya in a group, she might be ashamed of it, she lost her faith on me and my friends aggervated the situation, the difference was widened, and u know i asked maa many times, but never got any acknowledgement. why he couldn't see that ? later, i tried to find out her, im such a confident person, i contacted her company's HR Head, and Director of her company, and got 5 guys on orkut, working in her company, it was surprising to know, there was though a Priya Tiwari, but not in software engineering, she was in BPO, they didnt share this information but somehow i guessed She may be in BPO division of Mphasis, whereas, she told to me that she is going to Germany. So, lie was detected. why he couldn't see that ? And where is she right now, Why he couldn't do that, is there a Priya really, or it was a game of some of my friends ? even this is not clear. why he couldn't see that ? I m still in mystery, dont know any thing for sure, Why he couldn't see that ? So, i think he knows Karna-Pisachini sort of vidya and could tell me what he was told and finally put it in the name of Prashna Chart. regards, Lalit. vedic astrology , " abhishekpotti " <abhishekpotti wrote: > > Oye Lalith: > > How do you know Mohanraaamji is not enlightened? Do you know > onething....it is not merely that Mohanraaamji respects > Panditji....Panditji himself respects Mohanraaamji for his yogic > accomplishments. You compare Mohanraaamji with your childhood....You > are a peanut brain who thinks the small portions of sanskrit that > your school portion gave you are magnum opuses! This is typical of > small brains like you. Mohanraaamji is a mantra saamraat......by the > way, what happened to your challenge about the court case against > Mohanraaamji? You should have put a case and then you would have > known who he is! He has effected some rare miracles which you won't > manifest even after 100 years of japams. > > If Shaarada Maa indeed blessed you, where is your insight. > Mohanraaamji said something about you without seeing you.....Like > Priyaa and preeti....You say about Mohanraaamji's wife if possible. > Panditji knows the information and he can be the judge as to whether > you are correct in your predictions! You - who claim that you know > everything and have the Grace of Maa, get at this simple truth if you > can! > > Siddhis by themselves do not mean anything great. That is why > Mohanraaamji respects Guruji who does not manifest any occult > powers. Try to understand that. It is the attitude that counts, and > it is that which you are lacking. > > Don't try to act smart. Try to spend time more on your projects lest > you fail in this also just as you failed in your business, and in > Priya's case! If your money is also not there, nobody will even look > at you twice. Only money and that job are allowing to speak > haughtily like this. At least save that by being conscientious at > work. Did Shaarada Maa ask you to pilfer company's resources and type > endless quarrelsome mails to respected mantra shaastra experts? If > your Maa said so, probably it is not the Gracious Maa who guides us > all, but the ghost that is afflicting your family due to your sins! > > You are a mere software engineer who gets shouted at by your > reporting officers often; everyone at your place of work is laughing > behind you, and you know that. That is why you are taking out your > frustration on us in this forum. Can you speak one word back at your > reporting managers at work? Whereas Mohanraaamji was a respected > Military officer in his professional days and even his seniors > respected him for his intelligence and sharpness. He is not an > imbecile old man, but a great yogi. Ask Panditji whether Mohanraaamji > is capable of miracles or not? Panditji has personal experience in > that regard. But, only Panditji stopped Mohanraaamji from using > miraculous powers as they might be bad for the evolution of soul and > mantrik power should not be wasted in empty displays. If Panditji > had not stopped Mohanraaamji, you would have paid seriously for your > insulting mails last week. Thank Panditji that you are still o.k., > because only his words in a private mail to Mohanraaamji saved you > (Incidentally, even Panditji has not seen Mohanraaamji in person; > only I have seen him. This is just for your information. Search all > through the web, you will not find any BUSINESS information on > Mohanraaamji. What do we gain by manipulation or anything? At least > you are a frustrated person who could not get married and all girls > are rejecting you, and so for psychological comfort you are writing > posts here. But, we are old men who have lived happy and contented > lives, and have no material interests to satisfy here) > > I DARE YOU UPON ONE COUNT...PANDITJI LEFT WELL-PAYING MNC JOB TO > PURSUE ASTROLOGY AND SPIRITUALITY FULL TIME......CAN YOU DO THAT? > PANDITJI FELT THIS IS HIS MISSION....CAN YOU DO THAT? It is easy to > speak of great philosphies from the comfort of an Airconditioned > Office at the cost of others. Obviously that comfort matters to you > more, and you feel that is the blessing of shaarada Maa. No young > man....Wisdom is the real Gift of Divinities. You will not be so > confused if you have really seen Divine Manifestations before you. > The incidents you have narrated are no so great as you think. Do > more tapasya and you will know what real manifestation will be like! > You are under illusions. Please get yourself treated. Please don't > keep sleeping with Rahu, and Sani. Try to get the Grace of Guru! > > Ram Jaswal did not get the context of my utterings clearly and hence > wrote to me. If you were decent, you should have stopped referring > to me or Mohanraaamji; then we also would have stopped. You started > it, you must end this. > > If you keep making patronising comments like this, you will > definitely get answers like this from me. I WILL NOT STOP TILL YOU > STOP. > > Abhishek > > vedic astrology , " litsol " <mishra.lalit@> > wrote: > > > > Res. Ram ji, > > > > Pls. dont advice him or mohan raam, they have nothing to debate or > > discuss on either mantra or bhakti. > > > > I don't remember shlokas much as i read classics for my > satisfaction, > > in two phases, firstly from my class 8'th till my 2nd year of > > graduation. that time i had no faith and no bhakti, just read like > i > > was reading some comics or cartoon books, i had not developed > ideas, > > not taken any message, i knew and i can talk about the content, but > i > > was not involved. > > > > after that incident happened at Sharda Temple,Maihar,it was > > unbelievable and it made me change my thoughts, i again read some > > classics and this time,i grasped the message given in the classics. > > > > They are at the stage of my chlidhood, they may read and discuss. > but > > dont take the message in their heart, somewhere their greed to > > establish themselves as pandit or authority is also a reason. > > > > Perhapse, in lieu of, hitting them hard, i had to take another rout > > to let them realize they are wrong and deliberately wrong. > > > > He didnt say any thing on my how i shown, beej and god's name is > one > > and same thing, in fact it's a simple thnig, and well known but > they > > dont accept. > > > > let them dont accept, what difference it makes to us, they have > their > > life with them, any qualitative change within them will do good to > > them only. > > > > So, i prayed maa, mother divine for mohan raam, he is too old, his > > problem is he learnt astrology, did some breathing excercises, but > he > > lacks spiritual experiences so he doesn't believe, I was like him > in > > my childhood. > > > > I prayed, and it's acknowledged by maa, time will change for him a > > little, what didn't happen to him in last 85 yrs, will happen in > next > > 5-6 monnths, he will get some good spritiual experience, the > curtain > > will be lifted for some time, reality at a glance. > > > > after that it's his part to stick to that or not, coz, ego, greed > and > > fear still remains, i m not completely gone out of it, i have to > > fight with me many times. > > > > I thought gruop w'd be a good plateform to get like minded friends, > > if nothnig, it gives joy. > > > > Let's wish good for all, I also express my gratitude to you to > speak > > for what u thought right. > > > > regards, > > Lalit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology , " Ram Jaswal " <rkjaswal@> > > wrote: > > > > > > Namaste Abhishek > > > > > > My post wasn't so much in defense of Lalith but one to stop > > the " belittling " > > > of a person within this Group. If you don't agree with someone's > > views you > > > are perfectly within your rights to say so why in a scholarly > > fashion so as > > > to discuss and further the merits of the topic under discussion. > > Thereafter > > > it is a matter for the individual to either continue with the on- > > going > > > discussion or to stop? The only way you or anyone else is likely > to > > change > > > Lalith's view on chanting of Mantras will be from a scholarly > > viewpoint and > > > not from goading him? > > > > > > Also why are you taking personal offense? If Guru's can ignore > his > > comments > > > - can't you do the same? > > > > > > With freedom of speech comes the responsibility of keeping a > civil > > and > > > polite language - please re-read your note which prompted my > earlier > > > response. > > > > > > Like I said in my earlier post it is all about ones viewpoints - > my > > personal > > > advise to everyone would be to take what you find reasonable and > > ignore the > > > rest. > > > > > > Best wishes .. > > > > > > Jai Sita Ram > > > > > > Ram > > > _____ > > > > > > vedic astrology > > > [vedic astrology ] On Behalf Of > abhishekpotti > > > 28 July 2007 20:42 > > > vedic astrology > > > [vedic astrology] Re: Oye Lalith! No one here is afraid > of > > you.... > > > > > > Dear Ram Jaswal: > > > > > > If Lalith stops challenging others with his rude posts no one > will > > > run him down...please follow the threads carefully......He is > > > speaking as if he is the master of everything and everybody else > is > > a > > > fool. When he passes judgment on senior astrologers of this group > > or > > > unnecessarily challenges established conventions, we have > defended > > > that. Now, why are you defending Lalith? Don't you think if you > > > have the right to defend an offender, we have the right to defend > > the > > > more decent members and traditions that he is subtly attacking.... > > > > > > just read his posts.....If he has just forwarded the Prashna > > Tantra, > > > nobody would have objected to it.....See the accompanying > comments > > > where he abrasively comments certain things...... > > > > > > Open your eyes before advicing anyone. Why don't you write to > > Lalith > > > also? When did I call him names?......No sir...you are > mistaken.... > > > > > > Did you not notice that even after Mohanraamji stopped writing > > posts, > > > this fellow was taunting that old gentleman repeatedly last week. > > > Where were you at that time? > > > > > > If Lalith stops writing abrasive posts like " Nobody can stand > > before > > > me " and all that silly nonsense, we have no issues with him (or > at > > > least I have no issues with him). So, advice Lalith also in this > > > regard. > > > > > > If Lalith and you enjoy freedom of speech, we also claim the same > > > previlege. > > > > > > Abhishek. > > > > > > vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology% 40> > > > , " Ram Jaswal " <rkjaswal@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Namaste Abhishek/ Mohanraaam > > > > > > > > Just why are you trying to run Lalith down? From the posts that > I > > > have read > > > > All he has done is given this point of view - if you don't > accept > > > them than > > > > simply ignore it - there is No need for any name calling or > > > belittling > > > > someone. > > > > > > > > There is also nothing wrong in Lalith forwarding " Prashna > Tantra " > > > text to > > > > this group as to whether someone has requested it or not - he > > > certainly > > > > doesn't need your or mine permission to do so - after all he > > > thought it > > > > would be useful to everyone - again his view. > > > > > > > > Sorry if I am coming across annoyed and perhaps rude But feel > it > > is > > > Best > > > > that everyone should stop " belittling " other group members as > in > > > the long > > > > run all it does is make oneself appear small and bigoted. > > > > > > > > Best wishes and hoping this will be the last mail on this > > subject .. > > > > > > > > Jai Sita Ram > > > > > > > > Ram > > > > > > > > _____ > > > > > > > > vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology% > 40> > > > > > > > [vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology% > > 40> > > > ] On Behalf Of abhishekpotti > > > > 28 July 2007 19:54 > > > > vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology% 40> > > > > > > > [vedic astrology] Oye Lalith! No one here is afraid of > > > you.... > > > > > > > > Dear Lalith: > > > > > > > > The whole world knows the history of Blessed Meera Bhai....the > > > > epitome of Bhakti......She was attached to her " Lala " - the > > > wonderful > > > > idol of Krishna gifted to her even from her childhood....Do you > > > mean > > > > to say that innocent young girl started chanting " Kliim > > krishnaaya " > > > > mantra automatically? Even Bhakta Prahlaada had to be initiated > > by > > > > Sage Naaradha for his chant of dwaadasaakshari mantra.... > > > > > > > > Nobody is afraid of you here......You need not proclaim that > you > > > are > > > > not in the business of a Guru.....actually Guru status is not a > > > > business (true to your half-baked knowledge you will claim it > is > > > also > > > > like software engineering!). The difference my friend between > you > > > > and other great persons like Rafal or Dakshinamoorthiji is that > > > they > > > > are spending their money for the internet, whereas you are > > > pilfering > > > > your company's time and the company's resources while browsing > > the > > > > internet. Don't you think you are cheating your company when > you > > > > spend so much time on empty and egoistic posts defending > yourself > > > > against every expert after arguing with them unnecessarily? Are > > you > > > > not getting paid for the time you spend in the company....Know > > the > > > > basics of ethics before ever sermonizing.....So, actually you > are > > > an > > > > exploiter....try to understand that....the other gurujis are > > > probably > > > > too decent to comment on that......What happened to your > project? > > > > Better rush to it nough!....It will spare us the agony of > > replying > > > to > > > > your half-witted postings! > > > > > > > > By the say, Which member asked you Prashna Tantra dear? We did > > not > > > > see any posts requesting " Honourable Lalith " to explain Prashna > > > > Tantra (as if you could explain it!) What arrogance you have to > > > > claim that nobody can stand before you.....Guruji's posts > exposed > > > > your ignorance....you did not even know how to ask queries and > > get > > > > replies from one of the most empathetic astrologers of this > > group, > > > > and yet you claim you are this and that...... > > > > > > > > For your information....nobody is afraid of you..Rather you > > should > > > be > > > > afraid of yourself......Your foolishness itself will be your > > doom. > > > > Did you not become the laughing stock due to your email-based > > > chasing > > > > of Priyaa? Such foolishness in occult matters could be more > > costly > > > > dear.....I think Mohanraaamji and Rafalji are only afraid about > > > your > > > > own well-being! They are not afraid of you. Nor am I afraid of > > you. > > > > > > > > Your posts never answer the queries or points raised by others; > > you > > > > take off on a new ground only because of your shallow > > understanding > > > > of subjects. Nobody has accepted you as a Guru here, and nobody > > > > will....Can a fire-fly eclipse the Sun? There are too > many " Suns " > > > > here and you are just a fire-fly. > > > > > > > > It reminds me of a story.....Once an ant challenged the mighty > > > > elephant for a fight; the elephant obviously could not hear the > > ant > > > > (the ant being so tiny and it was on the ground, its sound > could > > > not > > > > reach the elephant). The elephant just walked away out of its > own > > > > volition in its natural course. Then the ant claimed, " you see > I > > > > challenged the elephant and it ran away " . Dear, your saying > that > > > > nobody can stand before you is similar to that....... > > > > > > > > FIRST LEARN THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN GHOSTS AND YOUR ANCESTOR > > > > SUMANGALIS BEFORE WRITING THE FIRST POSTS ON OCCULT! What a > > > > pity......what a pity.....That we have to bear your meaningless > > > > rantings here! > > > > > > > > Abhishek. > > > > > > > > vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology% > 40> > > > > , " litsol " <mishra.lalit@> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I was waiting for u dear.. > > > > > > > > > > why u took time ? > > > > > > > > > > Do u mean Meera Bai discussed with u, what she did.. > > > > > > > > > > Do u know 'Kleem Krishnay, Govindaya Gopijan Vallabhaya Namh' > > is > > > a > > > > > mantra for lord krishna. > > > > > > > > > > is there no beej mantras, to whom u wish to misguide ? let > > thnigs > > > > > remain between lord, bhakta , their shraddha and their guru. > > > > > > > > > > why u people are so afraid of me, i m not in business of guru. > > > > > > > > > > i m happy with my life, my profession of software engineering > > and > > > > > my hobbies ok. > > > > > > > > > > there are 7000+ members are here, by writing such type of > > foolish > > > > > things u expose urself only, mind, there are better brains > here. > > > > > > > > > > this is enough ... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology% > > 40> > > > > , > > > > > " abhishekpotti " <abhishekpotti@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Respected Mohanraaamji: > > > > > > > > > > > > Well said. Lalith is saying that " maybe in south india > > devotees > > > > > > don't chant Moola mantras but not so in North " ...What > > > > > > stupidity.....He does not seem to understand that " mantra > > > > shaastra > > > > > > experts " are also devotees, but they cannot be called as > > > innocent > > > > > > saatwik bhaktaas! A typical example of a pure saadhwik > bhakta > > > > will > > > > > > be Meera Bhai (was she not North Indian). Can Lalith say > > which > > > > > Dasa > > > > > > Mahaa Vidya Meera Bhai practised? She was immersed in > Krishna > > > > > > consciousness and Lover for Him. Her own Bhajans were her > > > > prayers > > > > > in > > > > > > the bhaavana of Bhakti in the form of Love! This is not > > mantra > > > > > > shaastra. Another example will be Saant Tukhaaraam. These > > > > > bhaktaas > > > > > > did not chant moola mantraas. Panditji Dakshinamoorthi was > on > > > > dot > > > > > in > > > > > > saying that " Pure bhaktaas do not chant complicated moola > > > > > mantraas " . > > > > > > You have clarified this fact wonderfully in your post. I > wish > > > > more > > > > > > knowledgeable persons also put erratic posters in their > place > > > > just > > > > > as > > > > > > Mohanraaamji does here. This will benefit more naive > readers > > of > > > > > > these forums who might otherwise get confused as to which > of > > > the > > > > > > paths to follow. Actually, anyone can follow any path as > he/ > > > she > > > > > > deems it fit; but there should be consistency of procedures. > > > > > > > > > > > > We should not confuse mantrik rituals and bhakti doctrines. > > > > > Bhaktaas > > > > > > can chant the names of Gods at anytime.....Mantra shaastra > > > > experts > > > > > > chanting advanced moola mantras should necessarily adopt > > ritual > > > > > > procedures for the welfare of themselves and others! > > > > > Yes...improper > > > > > > chanting of mantras can cause danger to the society also > just > > > as > > > > > > proper chanting can help others. Hence, this cannot be > > > > considered > > > > > as > > > > > > a personal preference of the aspirant. If this was not the > > > case, > > > > > why > > > > > > did sages codify spiritual practises scrupulously? Rafalji, > > > > > > Mohanraaamji, etc. are correct in saying it is best to > follow > > > > > Pandit > > > > > > Dakshinamoorthiji's advices on mantra shastra or japams. He > > is > > > > > > learned and he is living a life compatible to the shaastras > > > > though > > > > > he > > > > > > has faced uncertain circumstances in his own personal life. > > He > > > > > never > > > > > > compromised on principles and he willingly paid the price > for > > > > that > > > > > > which most of us will never do. The words of such a person > > > > should > > > > > > obviously carry more weight. > > > > > > > > > > > > Abhishek. > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology% > > > 40> > > > > , " mohanraaam " > > > > <mohanraaam@> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Well Lalith: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If you have really done dasa Maha Vidyaa, you would have > > > never > > > > > > > approached a professional astrologer for > > consultation...that > > > > much > > > > > I > > > > > > > can say.... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > And what idiocy when you say Panditji is partly wrong? He > > > > > > > said " Bhaktaas do not chant Moola mantras " , whereas you > > have > > > > > edited > > > > > > > the words to suit your ends....He never said " devotees > > don't > > > > > chant > > > > > > > Beej mantras " .....You are putting words into his mouth > and > > > > > assuming > > > > > > > he is wrong! Why, do you know....the Great Panditji > himself > > > > > chants > > > > > > > Moola mantras.....He is a bhakta and a mantra shastra > > expert. > > > > As > > > > > a > > > > > > > bhakta he keeps incessant chanting of naama japa > throughout > > > the > > > > > > day; > > > > > > > as a mantra shastra expert, he restricts the moola mantra > > > > japams > > > > > to > > > > > > > stipulated times with ritual purity.....It is this > > wonderful > > > > > > practice > > > > > > > that Guruji was alluding to. Guruji cannot be wrong in > > ritual > > > > > and > > > > > > > occult matters. Please understand that. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There are 4 classes of Devotees.......1) Saatwik vedic > > > devotees > > > > > who > > > > > > > will follow vedic dharma scrupulously. They will not dare > > to > > > > > > compare > > > > > > > astrology and vedanga to Engineering! as you did... > > > > > > > 2) Raajasik devotees who will follow vedic disciplines as > > far > > > > as > > > > > > > possible, but will still go after upaasanaas of Demi- Gods > > for > > > > > > > accomplishment of siddhis. Mantra shaastra experts > usually > > > > fall > > > > > in > > > > > > > this category. > > > > > > > 3) Saatwik Bhaktaas - for whom the meditation and glory > of > > > > their > > > > > > > Ishta Devataa is enough for spiritual satisfaction. It is > > > this > > > > > > > category that Guruji referred to when he said they will > not > > > > chant > > > > > > > Moola mantras too much. Definitely they will not do Dasa > > > Mahaa > > > > > > > Vidyaa. > > > > > > > 4) Taamasic Devotees - Those whose main motive is to > > project > > > > > > > themselves at all costs and acting as if they are equal > to > > > the > > > > > > > experts; they will try ALL practices - whether they are > > > > > sanctioned > > > > > > by > > > > > > > vedas or not.....Their only aim is personal glory and > > > > > > satisfaction. > > > > > > > They will attack even established dharma if they do not > get > > > > > results > > > > > > > (sounds familiar....You are one!) Ignorance and half- > baked > > > > > > knowledge > > > > > > > and egotism are these persons' motivating fuel. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You are really satan's Gift to this list.......My only > > prayer > > > > is > > > > > > that > > > > > > > innocent members of this list do not get side-tracked > with > > > your > > > > > > > ramblings. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Let me make this clear to the list.....Panditji said that > > > > saatwik > > > > > > > Bhaktaas who chant Divine names only due to Pure Love on > > God > > > > > > usually > > > > > > > never chant mantrik moola mantraas. It is just one class > of > > > > > > > devotees. A rajasik bhakta who is a mantra-shaastra > expert > > > may > > > > > > even > > > > > > > be a bhakta at heart; and a pure bhakta may sometimes > chant > > > > some > > > > > > > mantrik japams for solving some practical > issues......But, > > > when > > > > > > they > > > > > > > switch their routines temporarily, these enlightened > > devotees > > > > > > usually > > > > > > > take good guidance and follow the tenets of shaastras > > > > > > > scrupulously....Definitely they will not sit on > assumption > > > like > > > > > > > Lalith. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On the one hand, this fellow claims he has done chants in > > > > > forests, > > > > > > > rivers, earth, etc. (Probably we have a Maharishi here! > > What > > > > > > heights > > > > > > > of pointless pride in this young man list....it is > > > > disgusting!). > > > > > > On > > > > > > > the other hand, he says he chants mantras in buses, > trains, > > > > > > etc...... > > > > > > > He is confused about which no body can have issues. Only > > his > > > > > Guru > > > > > > > should be concerned about that.....But, his attempts to > > stuff > > > > his > > > > > > > shallow understanding upon this list is reprehensible. > And, > > > > his > > > > > > > habit of quoting experts out of context is really > > > condemnable. > > > > > May > > > > > > > Jupiter's Light Shine on that fellow and teach him to > > respect > > > > the > > > > > > > hallowed traditions and to stay at his level rather than > > > trying > > > > > > > to " teach " others (He has the audacity to claim he > > > > is " teaching " > > > > > > > Rafalji!) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If a mere young man of 35 years who has spent his life on > a > > > > > " Failed > > > > > > > computer web desining business " , " pointless email chasing > > of > > > > > > girls " , > > > > > > > and other " past times " can gain insight as he claims, how > > > much > > > > > will > > > > > > > learned Gurus of this group with their life of devotion > to > > > > > vedanta > > > > > > > and vedanga know? His peanut brain and hyper-inflated ego > > > will > > > > > > never > > > > > > > allow him to see this obvious truth. But, please list > > > exercise > > > > > > your > > > > > > > discretion while reading his posts (There are doubtless > > some > > > > good > > > > > > > elements even in his posts; but mostly there is trash > > > presented > > > > > as > > > > > > > philosophy). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mohanraaam > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology% > > > 40> > > > > , " litsol " > > > > <mishra.lalit@> > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Rafal, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Do u think, a hobby means shallow knowledge of the > > domain, > > > No > > > > > > > rafal, > > > > > > > > it's not like that. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > At least not for me. You have learnt and i m learning, > i > > > read > > > > > > ur's > > > > > > > > replies and get benifitted, same way i wanted you to > pay > > > > heed > > > > > to > > > > > > > > what i have written about spritiuality, mostrly i did > > write > > > > for > > > > > u > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have done all 10 mahavidyas of tantra and read many > > > tantrik > > > > > > > > classics, spent good deal of time with great tantriks > > > > trained > > > > > in > > > > > > > > Kamakhya and other places, keenly observed their > doings, > > > > their > > > > > > > > mistakes etc.., I did tremendous mantra chanting on > > water, > > > > on > > > > > > > earth, > > > > > > > > at home, in forests etc... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > then reached here, then i did write something, but > sorry > > i > > > > dont > > > > > > > > remember shlokas. i was not interested in cramming that. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Panditji is not fully correct in saying that > BeejMantras > > > are > > > > > not > > > > > > > > chanted by devotees, I dont know much about South India > > but > > > > in > > > > > > > North > > > > > > > > normally its done. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > And a successfull mantra sadhana has to result in one's > > > being > > > > a > > > > > > > > devotee, the devotion is the outcome, final result of > > > mantra > > > > > > > sadhana, > > > > > > > > perhaps, Pandit Ji believes mantras are power > > > packet,thinks, > > > > i > > > > > do > > > > > > > it > > > > > > > > this way , these many times and get this result, this > is > > > > where > > > > > > most > > > > > > > > of the people are confused. without being a good human > > > being > > > > if > > > > > > we > > > > > > > > think, we will achieve something in spirituality, is > > > > difficult, > > > > > > > very > > > > > > > > difficult. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > what happens is, with the mantra chanting, a self > > > > > > transformation > > > > > > > > process begins, u if dont restrict urself, ur karma > > begins > > > > > > > diluting, > > > > > > > > and u begin ur purification process unknowingly, when > > > > > substantial > > > > > > > > part of ego and greed for respect vanishes and many > such > > > > thing > > > > > > > > togather, mantra awakens u and with the God's grace ur > > > > > objective > > > > > > > gets > > > > > > > > fullfilled, gradually u become a devotee. ur being > simple > > > and > > > > > > being > > > > > > > > devotee is sometimes is indication of ur's going on the > > > right > > > > > > track. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think we have discussed a lot, it's enough !! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > My Boss has given me lot of projects to complete, so, > may > > > be, > > > > i > > > > > m > > > > > > > not > > > > > > > > going to available in the group like i was recently. > > > however. > > > > i > > > > > > > will > > > > > > > > complete Garg Hora series. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > > > Lalit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology@ <vedic astrology% > > > 40> > > > > , Rafal Gendarz > > > > > > > > <starsuponme@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Litsol, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Then please dont generalize Your preferences as they > > are > > > > too > > > > > > > > shallow for > > > > > > > > > this Forum aspiration. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz > > > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru > > > > > > > > > email: rafal@ > > > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > litsol napisa?(a): > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Rafel, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I take Astrology as a good hobby, and i w'd be > > looking > > > at > > > > > it > > > > > > > with > > > > > > > > an > > > > > > > > > > engineer's approach. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I asked ur age because, it's our thinking to put > our > > > > > > parameters > > > > > > > in > > > > > > > > > > god's system, there is nothing like delay or > > > advancement > > > > in > > > > > > > > > > spirituality. So, " Delay " > or " Speed " , " backwardness " > > > > > > > > > > and " advancement " doesn't exist in spirituality, I > > > > thought > > > > > if > > > > > > u > > > > > > > r > > > > > > > > > > thinking that it may take too much time, I wanted > to > > > tell > > > > > u, > > > > > > > it's > > > > > > > > not > > > > > > > > > > like that. there is no delay. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It clicks in fraction of a second, when u r getting > > > > clicked > > > > > > > > depends > > > > > > > > > > on u and on god's will, when he wants u to get > > clicked. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > God sometimes graces for no reason ( " Ahetuka " ) just > > for > > > > his > > > > > > > > > > compassion towards u and it may happen next minute > > too. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > spirituality is not delimited by time , effort and > > > rules. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > > > > > Lalit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology > > > > > > > > > > <vedic astrology%40>, Rafal > > > Gendarz > > > > > > > > > > <starsuponme@ ...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Litsol, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please be careful about words. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Im happy that You are sharing Your experience - > > very > > > > > > > inspirating > > > > > > > > > > ones. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Age hierarchy is for sudras - Manu Samhita. If > You > > > > treat > > > > > > > Jyotish > > > > > > > > > > Vedanga > > > > > > > > > > > as profession similar to engineering You have a > > long > > > > way > > > > > to > > > > > > > go. > > > > > > > > But > > > > > > > > > > dont > > > > > > > > > > > be pessimistic here are many who will try to help > > You > > > > in > > > > > > > getting > > > > > > > > > > proper > > > > > > > > > > > understanding. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > After some time You will agree with me about the > > mala > > > > and > > > > > > > japa. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz > > > > > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru > > > > > > > > > > > email: rafal@ > > > > > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > litsol napisa?(a): > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Rafal, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Here u r doing two wrong things, instead of > > > > developing > > > > > ur > > > > > > > > > > understanding, > > > > > > > > > > > > u r trying to conclude something and going > beyond > > > > that > > > > > u r > > > > > > > > > > messaging > > > > > > > > > > > > same to many. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I m touching 35, What's ur age ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Astrology is a kind of vidya or profession, > like > > i > > > m > > > > a > > > > > > > > software > > > > > > > > > > > > engineer, software engineering is my > profession. > > > > > > > spirituality > > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > beyond > > > > > > > > > > > > all sort of vidya or profession. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I wish u to be a good soul and to realize the > > bliss > > > > of > > > > > > self > > > > > > > > > > awakening or > > > > > > > > > > > > in other terms, the bliss that comes once u > feel > > u > > > > and > > > > > > god > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > > > connected. dissolved in each other. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > First realize, experience, then speak and then > > > > suggest > > > > > to > > > > > > > > others, > > > > > > > > > > by > > > > > > > > > > > > mere reading shastras or books u r not going to > > > feel > > > > > it. > > > > > > > > unless > > > > > > > > > > god > > > > > > > > > > > > graces u it's very very difficult. and if u > dont > > > > avoid > > > > > > this > > > > > > > > sort > > > > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > > > hurriedness instead of learning and > > understanding, > > > it > > > > > > will > > > > > > > > affect > > > > > > > > > > u only > > > > > > > > > > > > no one else. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > somehere i have read, it was written - By mere > > > > > > > repeating " So- > > > > > > > > > > Aham " no > > > > > > > > > > > > one gets liberated unless he realizes it like > one > > > > > doesnt > > > > > > get > > > > > > > > > > cured by > > > > > > > > > > > > knowing the name of the medicine, u need to > take > > > the > > > > > > > medicine > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > get > > > > > > > > > > > > cured " . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So, pls. be wise, as it was being discussed > here, > > i > > > > > > shared > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > experience of my life, pls. mind it, i m not a > > > > > preecher, > > > > > > > nor a > > > > > > > > > > guru, nor > > > > > > > > > > > > i have to make my followers, nor it's my > > > profession, > > > > > nor > > > > > > i > > > > > > > > have > > > > > > > > > > to get > > > > > > > > > > > > fame, sharing things is a kind of friendliness > a > > > kind > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > affection, > > > > > > > > > > > > that's it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > Lalit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. com>, > > > Rafal > > > > > > Gendarz > > > > > > > > > > > > <starsuponme@ ...> > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Jyotishas > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Counting of mala has more depth sense than > just > > > > > > counting, > > > > > > > > so for > > > > > > > > > > > > natives > > > > > > > > > > > > > like Litsol counting is neccessary and any > > other > > > > > > > speculation > > > > > > > > > > will be > > > > > > > > > > > > > only illusory and just imagination. We should > > > > follow > > > > > Pt. > > > > > > > > > > > > Dakshinamoorti > > > > > > > > > > > > > advise strictly, otherwise our process of > > > spiritual > > > > > > > > development > > > > > > > > > > will > > > > > > > > > > > > be > > > > > > > > > > > > > slow and unauthoritative. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru > > > > > > > > > > > > > email: rafal@ > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > asmp2k02@ napisa?(a): > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Resp Sri Lalitji, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for your mail.But please also read > > > > > > > > GuruDakshinamurthyi > > > > > > > > > > ji's > > > > > > > > > > > > > > mail(addressing me) also on this,which > brings > > > in > > > > > more > > > > > > > > clarity > > > > > > > > > > to the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > applicability principles to my mail. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I meant that both are necessity but to what > > > > degree > > > > > of > > > > > > > time > > > > > > > > (it > > > > > > > > > > varies > > > > > > > > > > > > > > from saadhaka to saadhaka) to get such > > inbuilt > > > > > > maturity > > > > > > > > such > > > > > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the count will be taken care of by Divine > > > forces > > > > > > after > > > > > > > > some > > > > > > > > > > initial > > > > > > > > > > > > > > period of saadhana. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Morover the type of bio matter present in > the > > > > japa > > > > > > maala > > > > > > > > > > (which is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > symbolic for ritualism as well as from > > > practical > > > > > > point > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > view for > > > > > > > > > > > > our > > > > > > > > > > > > > > count) will help in keeping away > destructive > > > > forces > > > > > > > > acting on > > > > > > > > > > us > > > > > > > > > > > > .Thus > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the symbolic rituals will indirectly help > us > > in > > > > > > keeping > > > > > > > > away > > > > > > > > > > from > > > > > > > > > > > > > > negative thoughts and also trains our > memory > > to > > > > be > > > > > > > object > > > > > > > > > > > > oriented.If > > > > > > > > > > > > > > our memory grows and retentive capacity > > > increase > > > > > the > > > > > > > > Gnaana > > > > > > > > > > will > > > > > > > > > > > > > > increase ,but at the same time destructive > > > forces > > > > > > > > > > (diversions) also > > > > > > > > > > > > > > becomes powerful.Thus the symbolic > procedures > > > > will > > > > > > come > > > > > > > in > > > > > > > > > > handy to > > > > > > > > > > > > > > successfully fight the negative forces.The > > > > rituals > > > > > > may > > > > > > > be > > > > > > > > > > Rising > > > > > > > > > > > > > > early(if possible during Braahmi > > muhurta),Taking > > > > > > > > > > bath,Japaanusthaan, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > attending to the livelihood job etc etc in > > > > defined > > > > > > > times > > > > > > > > as > > > > > > > > > > > > discipline > > > > > > > > > > > > > > helps indirectly tune our memory through > > > keeping > > > > > our > > > > > > > body > > > > > > > > > > healthy. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thus ultimately we conclude that the so > > called > > > > > > symbolic > > > > > > > > > > procedures > > > > > > > > > > > > are > > > > > > > > > > > > > > not actually symbolic(it got branded as > such) > > > but > > > > a > > > > > > > > necessity > > > > > > > > > > for > > > > > > > > > > > > our > > > > > > > > > > > > > > own good if we practice to the extent we > can. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quoting mishra.lalit@ ... <mishra. > > lalit% > > > > > > > 40gmail. > > > > > > > > com>: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Resp. Sri Murthy Adavi, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, what you said is perfectly right, we > > count > > > > or > > > > > > dont > > > > > > > > > > count,target > > > > > > > > > > > > > > is realization of god's love within, I got > it > > > > with > > > > > no > > > > > > > > > > counting, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someone may get it with counting. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanx, for the writing. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Lalit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. com> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. > > com>, > > > > > > srinivasa > > > > > > > > > > murthy adavi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > asmp2k02@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Respected Learned Members, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Both views may be correct when the views > > > > have/or > > > > > > with > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > goal as > > > > > > > > > > > > > > development of Love/Devotion towards > > adhistana > > > > > > Devatha > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > Mantra > > > > > > > > > > > > > > as Base. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In the initial stage only you need the > > > count;as > > > > > one > > > > > > > > > > develops the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > habit the biological tuning of the > > > intellect/body > > > > > will > > > > > > > > > > automatically > > > > > > > > > > > > > > take care of the practice(without count- > help > > of > > > > > malas > > > > > > > > etc). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It's like if with the help of Alarm clock > > if > > > we > > > > > > wake > > > > > > > up > > > > > > > > for > > > > > > > > > > 2 or 3 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > days at some appointed hour,then > > automatically > > > we > > > > > > > wakeup > > > > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > the same > > > > > > > > > > > > > > time every day without help of alarm. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > With due Respects > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > smadavi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quoting starsuponme@ : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Litsol, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Definitely we should count our Mantra > Japa > > on > > > > > Mala. > > > > > > > Your > > > > > > > > > > view is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > against > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Vedic Authorities and Sages, so should be > > > > > rejected. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > email: rafal@ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > litsol napisa?(a): > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Mr. Jayashri, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > A thought came, why i should not share > > with > > > > u, > > > > > U > > > > > > > pls. > > > > > > > > stop > > > > > > > > > > > > > > counting > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > mantra chantings, counting mantra gives > > > false > > > > > ego > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > then > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > frustration if u dont get desired > results. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > leave it to the god, god counts the > > mantra > > > > > > chanted > > > > > > > by > > > > > > > > you > > > > > > > > > > may be > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 108, 1008 or whatsoever, let him count, > > > it's > > > > > his > > > > > > > part > > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > ur > > > > > > > > > > > > part > > > > > > > > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to chant the mantra. when the mantra > has > > to > > > > > > awaken, > > > > > > > it > > > > > > > > > > will be, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > god > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > will ensure it for u. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sometimes we try to become more > > intelligent > > > > > with > > > > > > out > > > > > > > > > > limited > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > intellect and that creates obstacles in > > our > > > > > > > spiritual > > > > > > > > > > growth. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So, forget about counts, forget about > the > > > > time > > > > > u > > > > > > > put > > > > > > > > in > > > > > > > > > > for ur's > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sadhana, invoke the god with pure > heart. > > > > purity > > > > > > > > counts. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Lalit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology@ . com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. > > > > > > > > > > com>, " dakshinastrologer " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <dakshinastrologer@ ...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Ms. Jayashree: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think this topic on 108 is getting > > very > > > > > > > > interesting > > > > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > enlightening for all members. > Yesterday > > > we > > > > > had a > > > > > > > > > > wonderful > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > esoteric > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > explanation from Shri. Sushil > Dikshit, > > > and > > > > > > today > > > > > > > > your > > > > > > > > > > > > wonderful > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > explanation of numerical symmetry of > > the > > > > > cosmos! > > > > > > > > > > Wonderful. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There definitely exists a " numerical > > > > > symphony " > > > > > > in > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > Universe. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > not only 108.....as I mentioned in my > > > > earlier > > > > > > > post, > > > > > > > > > > there are > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > various > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > other numerals that are significant > in > > > > occult > > > > > > > > > > practices. 108 > > > > > > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > a > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > powerful and all-purpose perfect > > > > > number...While > > > > > > > we > > > > > > > > have > > > > > > > > > > > > > > understood > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the glory of 108, we should not lose > > > sight > > > > of > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > fact > > > > > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > > > > > > > there > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > are > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > other powerful numbers also. This is > > just > > > > for > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > information > > > > > > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > list. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > My apprecitation again for this > > wonderful > > > > > > > response. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Blessed be. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pandit R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Blessed be. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pandit R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI. --- In > vedic- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > astrology@grou ps.com > > > > <astrology% > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 40. com>, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " jayasartn " <jayasartn@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In cosmology, 108 has this > > > significance - > > > > > the > > > > > > > > moon is > > > > > > > > > > away > > > > > > > > > > > > > > from > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > earth 108 times its (moon's) > diameter > > > and > > > > > the > > > > > > > sun > > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > away > > > > > > > > > > > > > > from the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > earth, 108 times its diameter. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Perhaps this reality of distances > is > > > > > > applicable > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > deities > > > > > > > > > > > > > > too. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Perhaps this has been indicated by > > the > > > > 108 > > > > > > divya > > > > > > > > > > desas of > > > > > > > > > > > > Lord > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Narayana. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > jayasree > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology@ > . > > com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. > > > > > > > > > > com>, " dakshinastrologer " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <dakshinastrologer@ > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Shri. Sushil: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It is a wonderful answer you have > > > given. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Blessed be. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pandit R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology@ > > . > > > com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% 40. > > > > > > > > > > com>, " sushil.dikshit " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <sushil.dikshit@ > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Babu, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It is not a silly question but > it > > > is > > > > a > > > > > > very > > > > > > > > good > > > > > > > > > > > > question. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Actually > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > there are 27 Nakshatras and > every > > > > > > Nakshtras > > > > > > > > has 4 > > > > > > > > > > Charan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > so > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > total > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > charans are 27 x 4 = 108 > Charan. > > > Each > > > > > > > Charan > > > > > > > > has 3 > > > > > > > > > > > > degree > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 20 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > minutes so if you multiply 3 > > degree > > > > and > > > > > 20 > > > > > > > > > > minutes to > > > > > > > > > > > > 108 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > it > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > comes > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > out to be 360 degress i.e. one > > > cycle > > > > > > > (Circle). > > > > > > > > > > This > > > > > > > > > > > > cycle > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > represetns > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > whole brahmand because all the > > > > rashis, > > > > > > > > planets and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > nakshatra > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > are > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > between these 360 degree in 2 > > > > > dimensional > > > > > > > > > > horoscope. So > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > chanting a > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mantra completes one cycle of > > this > > > > > > brahmand. > > > > > > > > > > Further One > > > > > > > > > > > > > > who > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > has > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > visited Brahamand at least one > > time > > > > > i.e. > > > > > > he > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > brahmagyani he > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > entitiled to place 108 Shri > > before > > > > his > > > > > > name. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sushil dikshit > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology@ > > > . > > > > com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <vedic- astrology% > 40. > > > > com>, > > > > > > babu > > > > > > > > mon > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <muthappan111@ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Namaste, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It may be a silly matter for > > all > > > of > > > > > you. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I want to know what is the > > reason > > > > > that > > > > > > > some > > > > > > > > > > remedies > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > recomended > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > for 108 times. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I dont know any thing about > > > > astrology. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I hope you may pleased to > > provide > > > a > > > > > > reply > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thanks, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Babu > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------ --------- ----- -- > -- > > - > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Be a better Globetrotter. Get > > > > better > > > > > > > travel > > > > > > > > > > answers > > > > > > > > > > > > from > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > someone > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > who knows. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Answers - Check it out. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this > > > message > > > > > have > > > > > > > been > > > > > > > > > > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have > > been > > > > > > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have > > been > > > > > > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have > been > > > > > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > > > > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.