Guest guest Report post Posted April 4, 2005 Dear Roy, You are most welcome in the group.We are looking forward to learn a lot from your vast experience. WELCOME AGAIN ! ! ! Best regards Jaycauzseven89 <rkirkland wrote: I apologize to all: I thought I was sending the last post to the moderator, that's why all the whining about the files:-)Anyway, I wanted to introduce myself to the group and say how happy I am to be here.I have been practicing astrology for well over 30 years, as well as having done some writing and teaching on the subjects of both western astrology and jyotisha. I have only recently become enamoured of the principles and practices of Lal Kitab, and therefore have some catching up to do. My participation may be minimal at first, because I need a little while to 'bone up' on Urdu and Hindi, but I am ready to pursue the study of LK in depth.My full name is Roy Kirkland, andI am currently living in Memphis, Tennessee in the USA and my phone is 1-901-753-3354. I work as a writer and consultant.Being a member of such an illustrious community gladdens me, and I hope I can contribute fully and enjoy the mutual benefit of this internet community.Roy Read only the mail you want - Mail SpamGuard. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted April 4, 2005 Respected Roy Ji There is nothing to apologise.There is nothing personal, here, in the group. The message is deliberately posted by me for other group members to know whether any other members faces the same problem. You are right as the grahdrishti.pdf give error message but it opens after you close the message Any other members please inform me for any difficulty in opening the files. I will try to rectify. Nirmal kumar bhardwaj , " cauzseven89 " <rkirkland@m...> wrote: > > > I apologize to all: I thought I was sending the last post to the > moderator, that's why all the whining about the files:-) > > Anyway, I wanted to introduce myself to the group and say how happy > I am to be here. > > I have been practicing astrology for well over 30 years, as well as > having done some writing and teaching on the subjects of both > western astrology and jyotisha. I have only recently become > enamoured of the principles and practices of Lal Kitab, and > therefore have some catching up to do. My participation may be > minimal at first, because I need a little while to 'bone up' on Urdu > and Hindi, but I am ready to pursue the study of LK in depth. > > My full name is Roy Kirkland, andI am currently living in Memphis, > Tennessee in the USA and my phone is 1-901-753-3354. I work as a > writer and consultant. > > Being a member of such an illustrious community gladdens me, and I > hope I can contribute fully and enjoy the mutual benefit of this > internet community. > > Roy Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted August 2, 2005 At 12:07 PM 7/31/05 -0700, Ken wrote: > But first I'll introduce my self, My name is ken, I'm almost 50 years old and married with six kids and 4 grand children. I used to live in California in the city of Santa Clara, now I live in the high desert of Nevada between Reno and Carson city. with all the kids grown gone now I have time to pursue my many personal interests, one of them being astrology. Hi Ken, Welcome to the sidereal list! It's nice to have the kids gone, isn't it! In perusing this I have come to sort of a " Y " in road, sort of speaking. Of curse that would be Tropical or Sidereal as to the direction I should go with. In the west Topical seems to be the norm, Sidereal seems to make more sense to me in a logical sort of way from what I have learned so far. I always tell astrologers or students at this 'Y' to check the articles on the site below. It's one view, and there are others. http://users.snowcrest.net/sunrise/LostZodiac.htm >As an indication to where I'm at, presently with astrology is that I'm learning to make charts by hand mainly my own :-) and learning where everything fits. Many of us who are older used to do our charts by hand. There was a strong plus to that, as working out the calculations somehow helped us 'get into' the chart. Something is lost through computer calculations, in my opinion. But we all use computers now. >So for now I do the Lurking thing and take a look at the links page and files page and try to get up to speed on what's going on, also try to figure out what the Sidereal Solar Return (SSR) Progression Worksheet is all about. It's been quiet on this list for the most part lately. This generally happens during the summer. You might find past posts interesting--not all of them--there is such a variety. Blessings, Therese List moderator Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted October 2, 2005 welcome umesh ji, we all have been grateful to you for your dedicated contribution to other astro related . The service you are offering to others is really appreciable. Please do share your experiences from time to time with the group. regards On 10/2/05, Umesh Sharma <mudit982001 wrote: Hello, all the members,I am Umesh Sharma, resident of Delhi India. My Phone No. is 011-25086787. I have too much intrest in Lal-Kitab and It is only the real lal-kitabforum where i think i will learn some thing.I thankful to forum moderator for give me the permission to join theaugust group. Thanks Umeash Sharma Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted December 21, 2005 Hey Kirby, Nice to bump into you here. It's fairly quiet here at the moment but some searches of previous messages might yield some nuggets. Older messages may have more western sidereal (Fagan, etc) content while more recent posts have a stronger Vedic flavour. Chris Kirby <odcf5 wrote: Hello, By way of introduction, let me say that I'm the new kid on the block... A 70+ year old kid. I have a pretty good idea of how Magi astrology works now, and would like to gain some insights on how other systems function. I am here to learn. I appreciate the opportunity to do so... many thanks.the Old Buck " How can Pluto be in Sagittarius when it's so close to Antares? " ----- Post message: Subscribe: - Un: - List owner: -owner Shortcut URL to this page: / Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted December 21, 2005 , " Kirby " <odcf5> wrote: > > Hello, By way of introduction, let me say that I'm the new kid on the block... A 70+ year old kid. I have a pretty good idea of how Magi astrology works (snip) > REPLY: Welcome to our list. I'm one of the Fagan School who uses precession corrected Solar and Lunar Returns and progressed S/Rs -- these charts move the angles forward at a 1.25 degree increment (approximately) each day so that the angles of a following S/R chart match up with the progressed-angles chart. What this actually means is that there is a solar-cycle that moves forward throughout your whole life and which is keyed to your natal chart and precession-corrected-or-Sidereal Sun position. For many, this type of chart can be an uncanny and accurate timing and event description methodology. Again, welcome. Dave. PS: I'm only a few months behind you age-wise and have been practicing astrology for some 35 years. Its interesting that you started with the Magi Society's methods -- they certainly speak well of themselves. Have you found their methods accurate and useful? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted December 22, 2005 Thanks to all who welcomed the Old Buck... it is appreciated. I became 'interested' in astrology about 50 years ago, when a couple of Sergeant's wives first introduced me to the concepts... It sounded like they knew what they were talking about - I didn't know if it was so or not; yet it seemed like they were mostly right in their utterances. It was all the hand made charts and the math that kept me from getting serious about astrology earlier. Then after I turned 65, the kids presented me with a computer (and the un-stated invitation to join the 21st Century) that it occurred to me that amazed as what the computer could do, could ALSO do charts, and figure the math for all those angles... And it hasn't let up for a moment! Magi astrology is positively amazing. I attribute this to the narrow Orbs used (3 or 4 degrees) and the fact that we are using all four dimensions - in the Geocntric; the longitudes and the declinations. Ditto in the Heliocentric charts, the longitudes and the latitudes - what the Magi call the declinations in the Helio. Yet I think that other systems will be able to add dimension as well as certain nuances to any system. It should be interesting. Many thanks for your kindness, and it is nice to see some names that I look upon as friends from other lists... the Old Buck Dave <dadsnook wrote: , " Kirby " wrote: > > Hello, By way of introduction, let me say that I'm the new kid on the block... A 70+ year old kid. I have a pretty good idea of how Magi astrology works (snip) > REPLY: Welcome to our list. I'm one of the Fagan School who uses precession corrected Solar and Lunar Returns and progressed S/Rs -- these charts move the angles forward at a 1.25 degree increment (approximately) each day so that the angles of a following S/R chart match up with the progressed-angles chart. What this actually means is that there is a solar-cycle that moves forward throughout your whole life and which is keyed to your natal chart and precession-corrected-or-Sidereal Sun position. For many, this type of chart can be an uncanny and accurate timing and event description methodology. Again, welcome. Dave. PS: I'm only a few months behind you age-wise and have been practicing astrology for some 35 years. Its interesting that you started with the Magi Society's methods -- they certainly speak well of themselves. Have you found their methods accurate and useful? " How can Pluto be in Sagittarius when it's so close to Antares? " ----- Post message: Subscribe: - Un: - List owner: -owner Shortcut URL to this page: / Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted October 11, 2006 Hello, Ben. I never grieved over the loss of my Tropical signs. I was so excited by discovering Fagan and Bradley and methodologies that really worked that I never missed my former practices. At that time (in the late 70's) I was leading a large weekly group (about 20 or so of us) who was meeting with a well known author and practitioner. With Solar and Lunar Returns I could demonstrate highly accurate deliniations to what was brought up in class -- so much so that for an event date in a subject's life I could predict what planet(s) would be angular before I cast the chart. The whole group was so excited about Sidereal astrology that we dropped the weekly lectures and went off on our own. As for where to find appropriate information on the Sidereal Signs, I would suggest you browse the past posts and files on this site. I don't use signs in my work, just aspects and angularity as a rule, so I would be the last to advise you on deep intepretations. Have fun here and do take time to share your experiences with us. Dave Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted October 12, 2006 Hi Therese and Dave, Thank you both for your replies. I'll take some time to browse through the files on this site and on the webpage you provided me. Having a brief read on the information regarding " gemini " was pretty interesting, especially in regards to the mercury/hermes connection as my main interest is actually with the " hermetic sciences " (which is how i came to astrology in the first place..) Thanks again.. and if you have the time to look over my chart, my info is: DOB: 12/07/1980, Time: 17:25, Place: Adelaide, Australia (34.52S 138.30E).. Kindest regards, Ben. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted October 12, 2006 Hi Ben, It's good you included your placements as your notation had us believing in the States that you were born December 7 on some anniversary of Pearl Harbor. With tropical Capricorn rising the Saturn aspecting your three Cancer planets (how else to indicate your sensitivity?) has simply brought you back to Source. No Either / Or ~ don't give up anything you learned so hard; just add the sidereal to it. The 6/7th below needs the 1/7th above to float the iceberg. Welcome... Dark*Star ________________________________ ens_operations wrote: > Hi Therese and Dave, > > Thank you both for your replies. I'll take some time to browse through > > the files on this site and on the webpage you provided me. Having a > brief read on the information regarding " gemini " was pretty > interesting, especially in regards to the mercury/hermes connection as > > my main interest is actually with the " hermetic sciences " (which is > how i came to astrology in the first place..) > > Thanks again.. and if you have the time to look over my chart, my info > > is: DOB: 12/07/1980, Time: 17:25, Place: Adelaide, Australia (34.52S > 138.30E).. > > Kindest regards, > Ben. > > Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted October 12, 2006 At 12:51 AM 10/12/06 -0000, Ben wrote: > Having a brief read on the information regarding " gemini " was pretty >interesting, especially in regards to the mercury/hermes connection as >my main interest is actually with the " hermetic sciences " (which is >how i came to astrology in the first place..) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ That's interesting, Ben, because sidereal Gemini can have a stong mystical or spiritual slant, yet live fully in the physical world. You have sidereal Sagittarius rising which makes Jupiter your ascendant lord. Jupiter isn't strongly placed however (but it picks up a lot of strength in the navamsa chart...), and it may be overshadowed by your Mercury/Sun/Moon so close to the 7th cusp. How do you see that stellium expressing in relation to the 7th house? And then there's Pluto right at the zenith. And Uranus/nodes/Neptune/Moon so close to equal house cusps! How does all this work out for you? Your chart seems to be a particularly interesting one. You're young. A chart of destiny, I'd say. Your Sun, Moon and Mercury all fall in a lunar mansion ruled by Jupiter. According to Defouw and Svoboda (LIGHT ON LIFE) this mansion can relate to philosopy, religion, yoga or any study which enhances self-understanding. If you're interested and don't own LIGHT ON LIFE, I can post more about this mansion. This mansion has three significant bright stars: Castor, Pollux, and the brightest star in the sky, Sirius. What makes your chart significant is that Saturn, Uranus and the nodes are in the exact degree of the ascendant (in their signs), and the Moon and Neptune are only a degree from their cusps, and Pluto is at the zenith. Yes, I see your chart as one of destiny, and responsibility. Now I'll have to go to my Jyotish program to see how the planetary periods fall throghout your life. Therese Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted August 11, 2007 || Jaya Jagannath || Dear Gerlinde, Welcome to this group. Nice to see that you have studied both western as well as vedic astrology. Do you find any key difference when you analyse your own horoscope using western methods and vedic methods? Best Wishes Sarajit varahamihira [varahamihira ] On Behalf Of gefriat Saturday, August 11, 2007 1:07 PM varahamihira |Sri Varaha| Introduction Namaste a hearty Hello to all Members , my name is Gerlinde, female, born 1. Ocotber 1943, 00.50 am, Long 16.13 east, latt 47.58 north - Austria AC 6.26° cancer Moon, 0.56° Libra I have studied Western Astrology since 1996, and Vedic Astrology autoditact since 2000, and I am very happy now to have the permission to participate on this Group, and so to get the possibility to improve and advance my knowledge in Jyotish. with nice greetings from Vienna - Austria Gerlinde Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted July 16, 2008 At 10:24 AM 7/15/08 -0700, liberator_9 wrote: >Greetings, > I am a new member. I have been interested in the " old [fashioned] " types of astrology for a long time. Sidereal astrology definately fits the bill. I am also interested in Fixed Stars, and hope that it is a basic part of this system of astrology. Is it? I also have an appreciation for Jyotish(Hindu Astrology). Hi... We're happy to have you as a new member. This forum covers different kinds of sidereal astrology including western sidereal (mostly solar and lunar return charts with emphasis of planets on angles) and Jyotish, of which there are several varieties. The fixed stars don't figure prominently in either system except the Jyotish system of lunar mansions emphasizes individual stars and asterisms as partly descriptive of the influence of each area of the sky. I personally am working with fixed stars and attempting to isolate how they work in horoscopes. Most people who work with fixed stars realize that we have to begin from the ground up to try to find a valid way of using the stars. Diana Rosenberg (tropical) has used the stars for a long time, and sometimes she finds striking correlations. But in general we have a lot of work to do to before we're sure of how the stars work in mundane astrology and natal charts. For example, I've seen the same star (Algol in Taurus/Perseus) prominent in vastly different kinds of natal charts. It may be that sometimes the stars only operate in conjunction with specific transits and precise times rather than in a blanket way throughout the life. Hope you can contribute to this forum! Best, Therese Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted July 16, 2008 Hi Therese, I think I have found an astrologer who does feature the fixed stars, and he is a sidereal user. He is Kenneth Bowser, whose web site is at http://www.westernsiderealastrology.com/index.asp . He uses the Campanus house system. The only problem is that it is the only house system that I have come across, whether in the sidereal or tropical zodiac, that puts my Moon in the second house. All other house systems puts it in the third house. However, Campanus DOES put it less than one degree from the third house cusp, less than half a degree, in fact (21 minutes). So, do you think, if it were up to you, to also give that consideration, or is this system SO strict that even if it were only one minute or second from the third house; that it would still get just a second house reading? Blessings, Stephen liberator_9 --- On Wed, 7/16/08, Therese Hamilton <eastwest wrote: Therese Hamilton <eastwest Re: Introduction Wednesday, July 16, 2008, 12:46 PM At 10:24 AM 7/15/08 -0700, liberator_9 wrote: >Greetings, > I am a new member. I have been interested in the " old [fashioned] " types of astrology for a long time. Sidereal astrology definately fits the bill. I am also interested in Fixed Stars, and hope that it is a basic part of this system of astrology. Is it? I also have an appreciation for Jyotish(Hindu Astrology). Hi... We're happy to have you as a new member. This forum covers different kinds of sidereal astrology including western sidereal (mostly solar and lunar return charts with emphasis of planets on angles) and Jyotish, of which there are several varieties. The fixed stars don't figure prominently in either system except the Jyotish system of lunar mansions emphasizes individual stars and asterisms as partly descriptive of the influence of each area of the sky. I personally am working with fixed stars and attempting to isolate how they work in horoscopes. Most people who work with fixed stars realize that we have to begin from the ground up to try to find a valid way of using the stars. Diana Rosenberg (tropical) has used the stars for a long time, and sometimes she finds striking correlations. But in general we have a lot of work to do to before we're sure of how the stars work in mundane astrology and natal charts. For example, I've seen the same star (Algol in Taurus/Perseus) prominent in vastly different kinds of natal charts. It may be that sometimes the stars only operate in conjunction with specific transits and precise times rather than in a blanket way throughout the life. Hope you can contribute to this forum! Best, Therese Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted July 17, 2008 - " Therese Hamilton " <eastwest Wednesday, July 16, 2008 8:46 PM Re: Introduction > At 10:24 AM 7/15/08 -0700, liberator_9 wrote: >>Greetings, >> I am a new member. I have been interested in the " old [fashioned] " > types of astrology for a long time. Sidereal astrology definately fits the > bill. I am also interested in Fixed Stars, and hope that it is a basic > part > of this system of astrology. Is it? I also have an appreciation for > Jyotish(Hindu Astrology). > > Hi... > > We're happy to have you as a new member. This forum covers different kinds > of sidereal astrology including western sidereal (mostly solar and lunar > return charts with emphasis of planets on angles) and Jyotish, of which > there are several varieties. > > The fixed stars don't figure prominently in either system except the > Jyotish system of lunar mansions emphasizes individual stars and asterisms > as partly descriptive of the influence of each area of the sky. > > I personally am working with fixed stars and attempting to isolate how > they > work in horoscopes. Most people who work with fixed stars realize that we > have to begin from the ground up to try to find a valid way of using the > stars. Diana Rosenberg (tropical) has used the stars for a long time, and > sometimes she finds striking correlations. But in general we have a lot of > work to do to before we're sure of how the stars work in mundane astrology > and natal charts. > > For example, I've seen the same star (Algol in Taurus/Perseus) prominent > in > vastly different kinds of natal charts. It may be that sometimes the stars > only operate in conjunction with specific transits and precise times > rather > than in a blanket way throughout the life. > > Hope you can contribute to this forum! > > Best, > Therese > > > --- > > " How can Pluto be in Sagittarius when it's so close to Antares? " ----- > > Post message: > Subscribe: - > Un: - > List owner: -owner > > Shortcut URL to this page: > / Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted July 17, 2008 Therese wrote: > I personally am working with fixed stars and attempting to isolate how > they > work in horoscopes. Most people who work with fixed stars realize that we > have to begin from the ground up to try to find a valid way of using the > stars. Diana Rosenberg (tropical) has used the stars for a long time, and > sometimes she finds striking correlations. But in general we have a lot of > work to do to before we're sure of how the stars work in mundane astrology > and natal charts. Hi Therese, Stephen and others, I'm personally interested in fixed stars and I've noted that it's best to study them along with the constellations they belong to. Deborah Houlding has written very good text about the constellations, though the longitudes are tropical http://www.skyscript.co.uk/books.html#sc . I've made a sidereal list of the stars and constellations Houlding discusses and in fact I could send the lists to the files, I have it both by Fagan/Bradley and Lahiri ayanamsas. Best, Sari Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted July 17, 2008 Hello Stephen, Just to keep everything balanced and so you know that the uni-verse is not falling into dis-equilibrium --there are a small number of sidereal-vedics also at this same time actually discovering the beauty of the tropical zodiac of the seasons. I believe the semi-sextile of Uranus-Neptune is proving useful in all of this. Dark*Star __________________________ Stephen Glaser wrote: > Greetings, > I am a new member. I have been interested in the " old fashion " types > of astrology for a long time. Sidereal astrology definately fits the > bill. I am also interested in Fixed Stars, and hope that it is a basic > part of this system of astrology. Is it? I also have an appreciation > for Jyotish(Hindu Astrology). > > liberator_9 > > Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted July 17, 2008 Yes, in the tropical zodiac, Uranus and Neptune was/is having a mutual reception, or an exchange of signs, as the Hindus would put it; not that most of them use Uranus and Neptune in their charts. liberator_9 --- On Thu, 7/17/08, Dark Star <pansophia wrote: Dark Star <pansophia Re: Introduction Thursday, July 17, 2008, 2:19 AM Hello Stephen, Just to keep everything balanced and so you know that the uni-verse is not falling into dis-equilibrium --there are a small number of sidereal-vedics also at this same time actually discovering the beauty of the tropical zodiac of the seasons. I believe the semi-sextile of Uranus-Neptune is proving useful in all of this. Dark*Star ____________ _________ _____ Stephen Glaser wrote: > Greetings, > I am a new member. I have been interested in the " old fashion " types > of astrology for a long time. Sidereal astrology definately fits the > bill. I am also interested in Fixed Stars, and hope that it is a basic > part of this system of astrology. Is it? I also have an appreciation > for Jyotish(Hindu Astrology). > > liberator_9 > > Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted July 17, 2008 At 12:19 AM 7/17/08 -0700, Dark*Star wrote: > >Hello Stephen, > >Just to keep everything balanced and so you know that the uni-verse is >not falling into dis-equilibrium --there are a small number of >sidereal-vedics also at this same time actually discovering the beauty >of the tropical zodiac of the seasons. ----- ....unless you're reading Cyril Fagan, Kenneth Bowser or Yours Truly. Those today who are Vedic/Jyotish astrolgers who still refer to the tropical signs began as tropical astrologers and don't want to let it go. But (as Bowser writes) if you apply the observed tropical meanings to the sidereal (one sign back) you can take the best of tropical with you without mathematically mixing zodiacs. But beware of false sign traits that crop up in the tropical books. Just yesterday I was reading a mostly tropical blog where someone was listing all the people she knew who were nothing like their tropical Aquarius suns (according to the books). Therese Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted July 17, 2008 At 08:56 AM 7/17/08 +0300, Sari wrote: > >I'm personally interested in fixed stars and I've noted that it's best to >study them along with the constellations they belong to. Deborah Houlding >has written very good text about the constellations, though the longitudes >are tropical http://www.skyscript.co.uk/books.html#sc . I've made a sidereal >list of the stars and constellations Houlding discusses and in fact I could >send the lists to the files, I have it both by Fagan/Bradley and Lahiri >ayanamsas ------------------ Thanks, Sari. A long time ago I printed out the very comprehensive star pages from Anne Wright's site and converted the logitudes to the sidereal. The most comprehensive list of stars is on her site (except for Diana Rosenberg's stars--not on the web)--768 Erlewine stars--and I printed the list out and noted the sidereal longitudes. It's much easier to study the stars in a fixed sidereal zodiac since after awhile you get to associate certain meanings with degree numbers. In the tropical zodiac the degrees and minutes keep changing as the years go by. Therese Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted July 17, 2008 Every time I try to go to this Anne Wright's site, I get a page saying that it no longer exists. Could she have changed URLs? The first page of Google shows sites referring to her site, but not the site itself. liberator_9 --- On Thu, 7/17/08, Therese Hamilton <eastwest wrote: Therese Hamilton <eastwest Re: Introduction Thursday, July 17, 2008, 10:44 AM At 08:56 AM 7/17/08 +0300, Sari wrote: > >I'm personally interested in fixed stars and I've noted that it's best to >study them along with the constellations they belong to. Deborah Houlding >has written very good text about the constellations, though the longitudes >are tropical http://www.skyscrip t.co.uk/books. html#sc . I've made a sidereal >list of the stars and constellations Houlding discusses and in fact I could >send the lists to the files, I have it both by Fagan/Bradley and Lahiri >ayanamsas ------------ ------ Thanks, Sari. A long time ago I printed out the very comprehensive star pages from Anne Wright's site and converted the logitudes to the sidereal. The most comprehensive list of stars is on her site (except for Diana Rosenberg's stars--not on the web)--768 Erlewine stars--and I printed the list out and noted the sidereal longitudes. It's much easier to study the stars in a fixed sidereal zodiac since after awhile you get to associate certain meanings with degree numbers. In the tropical zodiac the degrees and minutes keep changing as the years go by. Therese Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted July 18, 2008 Therese, A number of years ago I asked Anne Wright to also show sidereal positions of her stars. She said right away --an excellant idea. Of course she was shining me on D*S _____________________________ Therese Hamilton wrote: > At 08:56 AM 7/17/08 +0300, Sari wrote: > > > >I'm personally interested in fixed stars and I've noted that it's > best to > >study them along with the constellations they belong to. Deborah > Houlding > >has written very good text about the constellations, though the > longitudes > >are tropical http://www.skyscript.co.uk/books.html#sc . I've made a > sidereal > >list of the stars and constellations Houlding discusses and in fact I > could > >send the lists to the files, I have it both by Fagan/Bradley and > Lahiri > >ayanamsas > ------------------ > > Thanks, Sari. A long time ago I printed out the very comprehensive > star > pages from Anne Wright's site and converted the logitudes to the > sidereal. > The most comprehensive list of stars is on her site (except for Diana > Rosenberg's stars--not on the web)--768 Erlewine stars--and I printed > the > list out and noted the sidereal longitudes. It's much easier to study > the > stars in a fixed sidereal zodiac since after awhile you get to > associate > certain meanings with degree numbers. In the tropical zodiac the > degrees > and minutes keep changing as the years go by. > > Therese > > Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted July 18, 2008 At 07:32 PM 7/17/08 -0700, Dark*Star wrote: >A number of years ago I asked Anne Wright to also show sidereal >positions of her stars. She said right away --an excellant idea. Of >course she was shining me on Or maybe she didn't find the time. Ah well, at least with our modern skills it's easy to convert the star positions...You're the first person I've heard who had any personal communication with Anne Wright. Therese Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted February 12, 2009 Dear Nitin Ur present dasha is not dicey but a very slow one. Ur chandra/budh dasha will be very good. U will be more influential in ur approach. In that period u can look forward for change of job. U hv a strong Ruchak mahapurush yog & its period is starting in june 2013. At that moment of time u should look forward to leap in ur career. GOD BLESS YOU WITH WARM REGARDS HARESH(HARRY)NATHANI VEDIC ASTOLOGER VAASTU CONSULTANT CELL +919867214103 (MUMBAI,INDIA) Nitin Jain <jainitin33 Sent: Thursday, 12 February, 2009 12:06:02 PM Introduction Hello Sir,I am Nitin Jain from Delhi. I am a new member of this group. I feel that this group is helping everyone in a big way. Thanks to all the gurujan who are doing wonderful work. I have a question about my career. I am always afraid of my career and always feel uncertain. Due to this, I also lack self confidence and afraid of changing job. Presently, I am working with a pharmaceutical company and looking after International Marketing. My details are follows : Name : Nitin JAin Birth details : 22-05-1971 at 04:21 AM at Khatauli (U.P.) (29N16 77E42)Presently I have Mahadasha of "Chandra" and antardasha of "Shani" which will be upto 30-03-2009, thereafter it will be antardasha of "Budh" in "Chandra" I would request you to please advise remedies to overcome the problems of self confidence and enhance the career.. I am also looking for a change in job, please advise the possible remedies to the same. With best regards,Nitin Jain Connect with friends all over the world. Get India Messenger. Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Invite them now. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted February 12, 2009 Dear Haresh Ji, Thank you very much for your prompt reply. Please also advise, do I need to do some thing may be some "DAN" etc. or wear some stone (presently I am wearing a "MANIK" in silver in my ring finger) or some mantra, so that present dasha could move fast. Thanks in advance! With best regards, Nitin --- On Thu, 12/2/09, Haresh (Harry) Nathani <haresh1405 wrote: Haresh (Harry) Nathani <haresh1405Re: Introduction Date: Thursday, 12 February, 2009, 6:54 AM Dear Nitin Ur present dasha is not dicey but a very slow one. Ur chandra/budh dasha will be very good. U will be more influential in ur approach. In that period u can look forward for change of job. U hv a strong Ruchak mahapurush yog & its period is starting in june 2013. At that moment of time u should look forward to leap in ur career. GOD BLESS YOU WITH WARM REGARDS HARESH(HARRY) NATHANI VEDIC ASTOLOGER VAASTU CONSULTANT CELL +919867214103 (MUMBAI,INDIA) Nitin Jain <jainitin33 >Thursday, 12 February, 2009 12:06:02 PM Introduction Hello Sir,I am Nitin Jain from Delhi. I am a new member of this group. I feel that this group is helping everyone in a big way. Thanks to all the gurujan who are doing wonderful work. I have a question about my career. I am always afraid of my career and always feel uncertain. Due to this, I also lack self confidence and afraid of changing job. Presently, I am working with a pharmaceutical company and looking after International Marketing. My details are follows : Name : Nitin JAin Birth details : 22-05-1971 at 04:21 AM at Khatauli (U.P.) (29N16 77E42)Presently I have Mahadasha of "Chandra" and antardasha of "Shani" which will be upto 30-03-2009, thereafter it will be antardasha of "Budh" in "Chandra" I would request you to please advise remedies to overcome the problems of self confidence and enhance the career.. I am also looking for a change in job, please advise the possible remedies to the same. With best regards,Nitin Jain Connect with friends all over the world. Get India Messenger. Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Invite them now. Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Invite them now. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites