In reality, it's Bob's Group... at least, currently!

[Guest guest]

Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033 wrote:

>

>

>

> Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote:

> >

> > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote:

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Nisargadatta , " BobN " <Roberibus111@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > let's have a vote on sarlo!

> > > >

> > > > he's like a rapist....or a murderer...or a terrorist twerp.

> > > >

> > > > let's kill him!

> > > >

> > > > :-)

> > > >

> > > > .b b.b.

> > >

> > > no thanks.

> > >

> > > i killed enough people in my last night's dream.

> > >

> > > - d -

> > >

> >

> > We're all coming back in your dream of tomorrow night to get revenge ;-p.

>

> Uh oh.

>

> - D -

>

 

We'll be under the bed... don't hang your toes over the edge (chuckling ;-).

[Guest guest]

Who is Sarlo? I looked up the name and found a few lists where

the name Sarlo appeared but which one is Anna not a member of?

 

-Lene

 

 

 

 

Nisargadatta , " cerosoul " <pedsie6 wrote:

>

>

>

> Nisargadatta , " Hur Guler " <hurg@> wrote:

> >

> > larry was removed once and i don't remember exactly how many times bob was

removed but he came back. bob likes it here for some reason...maybe he's taken

seriously here?

> >

> > as for sarlo's group, why were you banned from there?

>

> P: Like operates a lot like a . People get

> moderated, and banned without warnings nor explanations.

> Unlike life, Sarlo gives plenty warnings and explanations,

> Anna and him had one of those stormy relationships.

> >

> > Nisargadatta , " anna " <kailashana@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Thank you Hur.

> > >

> > > Perhaps, you might want to contact Sarlo, give him some random notes on

how to moderate without banning or to be moderate with his need to moderate.

> > >

> > > I keep being moderated and then banned. This time not even a heads up. I

sometimes wonder why the great need to out me all the time. As if I were a

plague or something.

> > >

> > > But then again, only the shadow knows for sure.

> > >

> > > All things run their due course, we are soon forever silenced for all

time.

> > >

> > > Anyone remember Larry? It will be 3 years that he passed into the great

no return.

> > >

> > > Love to All and happy hunting.

> > >

> > > ~A

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Nisargadatta , " Hur Guler " <hurg@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > dan, you are so clever in a scholarly way and i don't really have a good

response. i suppose we can speak in degrees of not being concerned as much. i

didn't mean to say i didn't care at all. i must have put bob on moderation at

least a few times in the past but i really can't justify banning him because

he's like the crazy old man in the temple pushing people's limits. it may be

true that he would not have survived in maharaj's satsang loft but then again

this is different...online forms are supposed to give people more " virtual room "

to be more free. bob will only engage as much as you allow him. if anyone is

looking for entertainment he's engaging them at no cost...i think. i also don't

want this group where people are afraid to post their crazy non-dual or " non

non-dual " views...only to a certain extent of course.

> > > >

> > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Nisargadatta , " Hur Guler " <hurg@> wrote:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > it's not at all risky to remove bob at all. i did it before. i am at

a point in my life where i am not concerned whether anyone posts or not. it

makes no difference to me. the reason i don't remove bob is that i don't see a

holy idol that bob is attacking. if there's a holy idol, it has left me. where

have all the cowboys and holy idols are gone?

> > > > >

> > > > > Hi Hur -

> > > > >

> > > > > You are not concerned whether anyone posts or not.

> > > > >

> > > > > It makes no difference to you.

> > > > >

> > > > > You are concerned with how the posters and nonposters vote in a poll,

though.

> > > > >

> > > > > It makes a difference regarding whether or not you will remove

someone, depending on how they vote.

> > > > >

> > > > > - Dan -

> > > > >

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

[Guest guest]

I once was banned from a Krishnamurti group

 

For NOT posting

 

LOL

 

-Lene

 

 

 

 

Nisargadatta , " anna " <kailashana wrote:

>

> Baloney! This time no warning. Just moderation (again--a couple of weeks

after he removed me from moderation) and then banning.

>

> As far as a stormy relationship. We never had a relationship. We

> were never close enough to *relate*. I, obviously, am not his type of

*poster*.

>

> He likes/loves the others, but not me.

>

> And he doesn't even know me enough to not like me.

>

> Thank you for allowing me my voice, Hur, Pete, Jerry, Ivan.

>

> ~A

>

>

>

>

> Nisargadatta , " cerosoul " <pedsie6@> wrote:

> >

> >

> >

> > Nisargadatta , " Hur Guler " <hurg@> wrote:

> > >

> > > larry was removed once and i don't remember exactly how many times bob was

removed but he came back. bob likes it here for some reason...maybe he's taken

seriously here?

> > >

> > > as for sarlo's group, why were you banned from there?

> >

> > P: Like operates a lot like a . People get

> > moderated, and banned without warnings nor explanations.

> > Unlike life, Sarlo gives plenty warnings and explanations,

> > Anna and him had one of those stormy relationships.

> > >

> > > Nisargadatta , " anna " <kailashana@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Thank you Hur.

> > > >

> > > > Perhaps, you might want to contact Sarlo, give him some random notes on

how to moderate without banning or to be moderate with his need to moderate.

> > > >

> > > > I keep being moderated and then banned. This time not even a heads up.

I sometimes wonder why the great need to out me all the time. As if I were a

plague or something.

> > > >

> > > > But then again, only the shadow knows for sure.

> > > >

> > > > All things run their due course, we are soon forever silenced for all

time.

> > > >

> > > > Anyone remember Larry? It will be 3 years that he passed into the great

no return.

> > > >

> > > > Love to All and happy hunting.

> > > >

> > > > ~A

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Nisargadatta , " Hur Guler " <hurg@> wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > dan, you are so clever in a scholarly way and i don't really have a

good response. i suppose we can speak in degrees of not being concerned as much.

i didn't mean to say i didn't care at all. i must have put bob on moderation at

least a few times in the past but i really can't justify banning him because

he's like the crazy old man in the temple pushing people's limits. it may be

true that he would not have survived in maharaj's satsang loft but then again

this is different...online forms are supposed to give people more " virtual room "

to be more free. bob will only engage as much as you allow him. if anyone is

looking for entertainment he's engaging them at no cost...i think. i also don't

want this group where people are afraid to post their crazy non-dual or " non

non-dual " views...only to a certain extent of course.

> > > > >

> > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote:

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Nisargadatta , " Hur Guler " <hurg@> wrote:

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > it's not at all risky to remove bob at all. i did it before. i am

at a point in my life where i am not concerned whether anyone posts or not. it

makes no difference to me. the reason i don't remove bob is that i don't see a

holy idol that bob is attacking. if there's a holy idol, it has left me. where

have all the cowboys and holy idols are gone?

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Hi Hur -

> > > > > >

> > > > > > You are not concerned whether anyone posts or not.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > It makes no difference to you.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > You are concerned with how the posters and nonposters vote in a

poll, though.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > It makes a difference regarding whether or not you will remove

someone, depending on how they vote.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > - Dan -

> > > > > >

> > > > >

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

[Guest guest]

And - to stick to the point - without previous warning )

 

Since this is a forum where one can speak ones nonexisting

mind without being banned let me add that people do things

like that disgusts the me which does not exist deeeply and

fills it with majestic contempt.

 

-L-

 

 

 

 

Nisargadatta , " Lene " <lschwabe wrote:

>

> I once was banned from a Krishnamurti group

>

> For NOT posting

>

> LOL

>

> -Lene

>

>

>

>

> Nisargadatta , " anna " <kailashana@> wrote:

> >

> > Baloney! This time no warning. Just moderation (again--a couple of weeks

after he removed me from moderation) and then banning.

> >

> > As far as a stormy relationship. We never had a relationship. We

> > were never close enough to *relate*. I, obviously, am not his type of

*poster*.

> >

> > He likes/loves the others, but not me.

> >

> > And he doesn't even know me enough to not like me.

> >

> > Thank you for allowing me my voice, Hur, Pete, Jerry, Ivan.

> >

> > ~A

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Nisargadatta , " cerosoul " <pedsie6@> wrote:

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Nisargadatta , " Hur Guler " <hurg@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > larry was removed once and i don't remember exactly how many times bob

was removed but he came back. bob likes it here for some reason...maybe he's

taken seriously here?

> > > >

> > > > as for sarlo's group, why were you banned from there?

> > >

> > > P: Like operates a lot like a . People get

> > > moderated, and banned without warnings nor explanations.

> > > Unlike life, Sarlo gives plenty warnings and explanations,

> > > Anna and him had one of those stormy relationships.

> > > >

> > > > Nisargadatta , " anna " <kailashana@> wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > Thank you Hur.

> > > > >

> > > > > Perhaps, you might want to contact Sarlo, give him some random notes

on how to moderate without banning or to be moderate with his need to moderate.

> > > > >

> > > > > I keep being moderated and then banned. This time not even a heads

up. I sometimes wonder why the great need to out me all the time. As if I were

a plague or something.

> > > > >

> > > > > But then again, only the shadow knows for sure.

> > > > >

> > > > > All things run their due course, we are soon forever silenced for all

time.

> > > > >

> > > > > Anyone remember Larry? It will be 3 years that he passed into the

great no return.

> > > > >

> > > > > Love to All and happy hunting.

> > > > >

> > > > > ~A

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Nisargadatta , " Hur Guler " <hurg@> wrote:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > dan, you are so clever in a scholarly way and i don't really have a

good response. i suppose we can speak in degrees of not being concerned as much.

i didn't mean to say i didn't care at all. i must have put bob on moderation at

least a few times in the past but i really can't justify banning him because

he's like the crazy old man in the temple pushing people's limits. it may be

true that he would not have survived in maharaj's satsang loft but then again

this is different...online forms are supposed to give people more " virtual room "

to be more free. bob will only engage as much as you allow him. if anyone is

looking for entertainment he's engaging them at no cost...i think. i also don't

want this group where people are afraid to post their crazy non-dual or " non

non-dual " views...only to a certain extent of course.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote:

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " Hur Guler " <hurg@> wrote:

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > it's not at all risky to remove bob at all. i did it before. i

am at a point in my life where i am not concerned whether anyone posts or not.

it makes no difference to me. the reason i don't remove bob is that i don't see

a holy idol that bob is attacking. if there's a holy idol, it has left me. where

have all the cowboys and holy idols are gone?

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Hi Hur -

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > You are not concerned whether anyone posts or not.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > It makes no difference to you.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > You are concerned with how the posters and nonposters vote in a

poll, though.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > It makes a difference regarding whether or not you will remove

someone, depending on how they vote.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > - Dan -

> > > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > >

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

[Guest guest]

Nisargadatta , " Lene " <lschwabe wrote:

>

> Who is Sarlo? I looked up the name and found a few lists where

> the name Sarlo appeared but which one is Anna not a member of?

>

> -Lene

 

Krishnamurti once banned Sarlo from an anorexia group for not looking enough

like a post.

 

- Dan -

[Guest guest]

Nisargadatta , " Lene " <lschwabe wrote:

>

> And - to stick to the point - without previous warning )

>

> Since this is a forum where one can speak ones nonexisting

> mind without being banned let me add that people do things

> like that disgusts the me which does not exist deeeply and

> fills it with majestic contempt.

>

> -L-

 

not to mention fear and self-loathing.

 

- D -

[Guest guest]

Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033 wrote:

>

>

>

> Nisargadatta , " Lene " <lschwabe@> wrote:

> >

> > And - to stick to the point - without previous warning )

> >

> > Since this is a forum where one can speak ones nonexisting

> > mind without being banned let me add that people do things

> > like that disgusts the me which does not exist deeeply and

> > fills it with majestic contempt.

> >

> > -L-

>

> not to mention fear and self-loathing.

>

> - D -

>

 

In Las Vegas, no less :-p.

[Guest guest]

Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033 wrote:

>

>

>

> Nisargadatta , " Lene " <lschwabe@> wrote:

> >

> > Who is Sarlo? I looked up the name and found a few lists where

> > the name Sarlo appeared but which one is Anna not a member of?

> >

> > -Lene

>

> Krishnamurti once banned Sarlo from an anorexia group for not looking enough

like a post.

>

> - Dan -

 

 

Ha ha.

 

-L-

[Guest guest]

Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033 wrote:

>

>

>

> Nisargadatta , " Lene " <lschwabe@> wrote:

> >

> > And - to stick to the point - without previous warning )

> >

> > Since this is a forum where one can speak ones nonexisting

> > mind without being banned let me add that people do things

> > like that disgusts the me which does not exist deeeply and

> > fills it with majestic contempt.

> >

> > -L-

>

> not to mention fear and self-loathing.

 

 

 

Fear? Ah -- a sort of Kafkasian fear? J'accuse vous of not

participating in the holy meal instead stealing bread from

it and forwarding it to the breadless poor on other Klists

Ha.

 

Self-loathing? No, it strengthened " me " - because you see,

idiots are idiots and the best thing can happen to members

of idiotic societies is actually to be expelled from them,

it saves one the hard work heh heh and " my " contempt grew

to immense heights.

 

-Your Proud and Humble Maryam-

 

 

 

 

 

>

> - D -

>

[Guest guest]

Nisargadatta , " Lene " <lschwabe wrote:

>

>

>

> Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote:

> >

> >

> >

> > Nisargadatta , " Lene " <lschwabe@> wrote:

> > >

> > > And - to stick to the point - without previous warning )

> > >

> > > Since this is a forum where one can speak ones nonexisting

> > > mind without being banned let me add that people do things

> > > like that disgusts the me which does not exist deeeply and

> > > fills it with majestic contempt.

> > >

> > > -L-

> >

> > not to mention fear and self-loathing.

>

>

>

> Fear? Ah -- a sort of Kafkasian fear? J'accuse vous of not

> participating in the holy meal instead stealing bread from

> it and forwarding it to the breadless poor on other Klists

> Ha.

>

> Self-loathing? No, it strengthened " me " - because you see,

> idiots are idiots and the best thing can happen to members

> of idiotic societies is actually to be expelled from them,

> it saves one the hard work heh heh and " my " contempt grew

> to immense heights.

>

> -Your Proud and Humble Maryam-

 

Humble and immensely contemptous?

 

Okay, if you say so, Proud Maryam.

 

Big wheel keep on turning,

 

Proud Maryam keep on burning,

 

Rolling,

 

Rolling,

 

Rolling on the river ...

 

(apologies to Ike and Tina Turner)

 

- D -

[Guest guest]

[...]

 

> Nisargadatta , " Hur Guler " <hurg@> wrote:

> >

> > dan, you are so clever in a scholarly way and i don't really have a good

response. i suppose we can speak in degrees of not being concerned as much. i

didn't mean to say i didn't care at all. i must have put bob on moderation at

least a few times in the past but i really can't justify banning him because

he's like the crazy old man in the temple pushing people's limits.

 

Yes... by peeing and shitting all over the temple and by making it stink so bad

that it difficult for others to sing bhajans, meditate, talk spirituality or to

offer pujas.

 

 

Sorry, Hur... I see no excuse in " tolerating " Bob except maybe, the moderator's

laziness and lack of time.

 

It is both your duty and responsibility to set and declare a code of conduct for

the forums and declare it so that people aren't shocked when they hear

" Asshole " , " I like licking your ass " in response to their messages. I don't

think it is fair to ask other people to do it for yourself by asking them to

vote.

 

I don't think it is fair for a teacher to ask his students to vote on whether a

kid who repeatedly spits on others should be removed from class or not.

 

 

I don't think it is fair for a manager to ask his team-members to vote on

whether a man who repeatedly harasses female and male employees should be

removed or not.

 

 

 

If you don't have time, maybe, you should temporarily make someone else

moderator and your problem will be likely solved.

 

 

With much respect,

ac

 

 

 

 

 

 

> it may be true that he would not have survived in maharaj's satsang loft but

then again this is different...online forms are supposed to give people more

" virtual room " to be more free. bob will only engage as much as you allow him.

if anyone is looking for entertainment he's engaging them at no cost...i think.

i also don't want this group where people are afraid to post their crazy

non-dual or " non non-dual " views...only to a certain extent of course.

>

[Guest guest]

Nisargadatta , " Hur Guler " <hurg wrote:

>

> larry was removed once and i don't remember exactly how many times bob was

removed but he came back. bob likes it here for some reason...

 

 

 

This one might be quite simple, Hur Jee!

 

Bob was removed from NDS.

 

(NondualitySalon/?yguid=181049836

Members: 1198)

 

 

Bon was removed from GuruRatings.

 

( GuruRatings/

Members: 1691 )

 

 

And, as you say Bob was also removed from this list.

 

 

These three are among very few (maybe, " only " other than Advaitin) forums in

nonduality area with so many (1000+) members.

 

Out of these three, because of his 'past record', Bob is very unlikely to be

allowed to post freely on GuruRating or NDS. That leaves only this forum where

there are many members and where he is relatively free to pee and shit all over

as long he doesn't offend the moderator directly .

 

 

With much respect,

ac

[Guest guest]

Nisargadatta , " ac " <adithya_comming wrote:

>

> [...]

>

> > Nisargadatta , " Hur Guler " <hurg@> wrote:

> > >

> > > dan, you are so clever in a scholarly way and i don't really have a good

response. i suppose we can speak in degrees of not being concerned as much. i

didn't mean to say i didn't care at all. i must have put bob on moderation at

least a few times in the past but i really can't justify banning him because

he's like the crazy old man in the temple pushing people's limits.

>

> Yes... by peeing and shitting all over the temple and by making it stink so

bad that it difficult for others to sing bhajans, meditate, talk spirituality or

to offer pujas.

>

>

> Sorry, Hur... I see no excuse in " tolerating " Bob except maybe, the

moderator's laziness and lack of time.

>

> It is both your duty and responsibility to set and declare a code of conduct

for the forums and declare it so that people aren't shocked when they hear

" Asshole " , " I like licking your ass " in response to their messages. I don't

think it is fair to ask other people to do it for yourself by asking them to

vote.

>

> I don't think it is fair for a teacher to ask his students to vote on whether

a kid who repeatedly spits on others should be removed from class or not.

>

>

> I don't think it is fair for a manager to ask his team-members to vote on

whether a man who repeatedly harasses female and male employees should be

removed or not.

>

>

>

> If you don't have time, maybe, you should temporarily make someone else

moderator and your problem will be likely solved.

>

>

> With much respect,

> ac

 

 

lets have a vote and get rid of this ding-a-ling ac.

 

he's harassing me!

 

and by golly i really mean it.

 

hahahahahahahaaaa!

 

..b b.b.

[Guest guest]

Nisargadatta , " ac " <adithya_comming wrote:

>

>

>

>

> Nisargadatta , " Hur Guler " <hurg@> wrote:

> >

> > larry was removed once and i don't remember exactly how many times bob was

removed but he came back. bob likes it here for some reason...

>

>

>

> This one might be quite simple, Hur Jee!

>

> Bob was removed from NDS.

>

> (NondualitySalon/?yguid=181049836

> Members: 1198)

>

>

> Bon was removed from GuruRatings.

>

> ( GuruRatings/

> Members: 1691 )

>

>

> And, as you say Bob was also removed from this list.

>

>

> These three are among very few (maybe, " only " other than Advaitin) forums in

nonduality area with so many (1000+) members.

>

> Out of these three, because of his 'past record', Bob is very unlikely to be

allowed to post freely on GuruRating or NDS. That leaves only this forum where

there are many members and where he is relatively free to pee and shit all over

as long he doesn't offend the moderator directly .

>

>

> With much respect,

> ac

 

 

has anyone seen a more obsessed little twerp?

 

maybe at NDS and GR..

 

but i mean in the real world?

 

LOL!

 

..b b.b.

[Guest guest]

Nisargadatta , " ac " <adithya_comming wrote:

>

>

>

>

> Nisargadatta , " Hur Guler " <hurg@> wrote:

> >

> > larry was removed once and i don't remember exactly how many times bob was

removed but he came back. bob likes it here for some reason...

>

>

>

> This one might be quite simple, Hur Jee!

>

> Bob was removed from NDS.

>

> (NondualitySalon/?yguid=181049836

> Members: 1198)

>

>

> Bon was removed from GuruRatings.

>

> ( GuruRatings/

> Members: 1691 )

>

>

> And, as you say Bob was also removed from this list.

>

>

> These three are among very few (maybe, " only " other than Advaitin) forums in

nonduality area with so many (1000+) members.

>

> Out of these three, because of his 'past record', Bob is very unlikely to be

allowed to post freely on GuruRating or NDS. That leaves only this forum where

there are many members and where he is relatively free to pee and shit all over

as long he doesn't offend the moderator directly .

>

>

> With much respect,

> ac

 

P: ac, give it up! Hur has spoken, He thinks

Bob is the most useful member in this list. It

is his list, not yours. Accept what you can't

change, no? No one should be insulted by words.

You are only showing that you haven't see that

yet.

>

[Guest guest]

ac, i agree with you. i know bob is offending but think about it...what's most

shocking than non-duality for the dualist mind? it's scandalous. among the most

shocking people of all, nondualists fans, bob is elementary. it's all tolerated

here to a certain extent.

 

Nisargadatta , " ac " <adithya_comming wrote:

>

> [...]

>

> > Nisargadatta , " Hur Guler " <hurg@> wrote:

> > >

> > > dan, you are so clever in a scholarly way and i don't really have a good

response. i suppose we can speak in degrees of not being concerned as much. i

didn't mean to say i didn't care at all. i must have put bob on moderation at

least a few times in the past but i really can't justify banning him because

he's like the crazy old man in the temple pushing people's limits.

>

> Yes... by peeing and shitting all over the temple and by making it stink so

bad that it difficult for others to sing bhajans, meditate, talk spirituality or

to offer pujas.

>

>

> Sorry, Hur... I see no excuse in " tolerating " Bob except maybe, the

moderator's laziness and lack of time.

>

> It is both your duty and responsibility to set and declare a code of conduct

for the forums and declare it so that people aren't shocked when they hear

" Asshole " , " I like licking your ass " in response to their messages. I don't

think it is fair to ask other people to do it for yourself by asking them to

vote.

>

> I don't think it is fair for a teacher to ask his students to vote on whether

a kid who repeatedly spits on others should be removed from class or not.

>

>

> I don't think it is fair for a manager to ask his team-members to vote on

whether a man who repeatedly harasses female and male employees should be

removed or not.

>

>

>

> If you don't have time, maybe, you should temporarily make someone else

moderator and your problem will be likely solved.

>

>

> With much respect,

> ac

> it may be true that he would not have survived in maharaj's satsang loft but

then again this is different...online forms are supposed to give people more

" virtual room " to be more free. bob will only engage as much as you allow him.

if anyone is looking for entertainment he's engaging them at no cost...i think.

i also don't want this group where people are afraid to post their crazy

non-dual or " non non-dual " views...only to a certain extent of course.

> >

>

[Guest guest]

Nisargadatta , "BobN" <Roberibus111 wrote:>>>> Nisargadatta , "ac" <adithya_comming@> wrote:> >> >> >> >> > Nisargadatta , "Hur Guler" <hurg@> wrote:> > >> > > larry was removed once and i don't remember exactly how many times bob wasremoved but he came back. bob likes it here for some reason...> >> >> >> > This one might be quite simple, Hur Jee!> >> > Bob was removed from NDS.> >> > (NondualitySalon/?yguid=181049836> > Members: 1198)> >> >> > Bon was removed from GuruRatings.> >> > ( GuruRatings/> > Members: 1691 )> >> >> > And, as you say Bob was also removed from this list.> >> >> > These three are among very few (maybe, "only" other than Advaitin) forums innonduality area with so many (1000+) members.> >> > Out of these three, because of his 'past record', Bob is very unlikely to beallowed to post freely on GuruRating or NDS. That leaves only this forum wherethere are many members and where he is relatively free to pee and shit all overas long he doesn't offend the moderator directly .> >> >> > With much respect,> > ac>>> has anyone seen a more obsessed little twerp?Dear Bob Jee:I have met few other foul-mouthed people like you online and in real-life. Theyhave invariably turned out to be depressed, lonely individuals with deepemotional problems. It is true that they often insult, ridicule, abuse other andsometimes manage to hurt other people too by doing so. But, it is their owninternal psychological pain which is often the deepest. Deep within they arevery troubled souls. By acting out, they simply try to spread the pain andunhappiness that they feel within.Even your over the top 'pretending' to have fun and "laughing out loud" hasstarted ringing hollow now... simply because you try so HARD to prove it.Long time back I had met a "joker" on this and other forums (, someone who stilllove, admire and respect deeply), later, we discovered that behind that "jokermask", lived a man with long history of deep depression. As soon as hisdepression went way, his behavior too changed on its own. Perhaps, you are notas honest, truthful or courageous (yes, calling someone Asshole or twerp is signof emotional immaturity and not of "courage)as that man to admit it, but, your signs arequite telling!What emotionally stable, sane and mature man needs to behave the way you do onthe online forum?I am yet to meet such a man, Bob Jee! All the men and women I have seen behavethis way have turned out to be deeply depressed, lonely men and women with deeppsychological pain within.---*twerphttp://thesaurus.reference.com/browse/twerpass, birdbrain, blockhead, bonehead, boob*, bore, buffoon, clod, clown, cretin*,dimwit, dolt*, dope*, dumb ox, dunce, dunderhead, easy mark, fair game, fathead,goose, halfwit, idiot, ignoramus, illiterate, imbecile, innocent, jerk*,lamebrain, lightweight, loon, moron, nerd*, nincompoop, ninny, nitwit, numskull,oaf, sap*, schlemiel, silly, simpleton, stooge, sucker, turkey, twerp, twit,victim>> maybe at NDS and GR..>> but i mean in the real world?>> LOL!>> .b b.b.>

[Guest guest]

Nisargadatta , " ac " <adithya_comming wrote:

>

>

> Nisargadatta

> <Nisargadatta/post?postID=JrJAaEEMJUJA7ayD\

> _YC07BSGGGQruBCR_KI02eD0SrIQk-HRv7LBohWmodNjQR0rcc9RZKPZsX0sIV6E2549VorG\

> 2Eo> , " BobN " <Roberibus111@> wrote:

> >

> >

> >

> > Nisargadatta

> <Nisargadatta/post?postID=JrJAaEEMJUJA7ayD\

> _YC07BSGGGQruBCR_KI02eD0SrIQk-HRv7LBohWmodNjQR0rcc9RZKPZsX0sIV6E2549VorG\

> 2Eo> , " ac " <adithya_comming@> wrote:

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Nisargadatta

> <Nisargadatta/post?postID=JrJAaEEMJUJA7ayD\

> _YC07BSGGGQruBCR_KI02eD0SrIQk-HRv7LBohWmodNjQR0rcc9RZKPZsX0sIV6E2549VorG\

> 2Eo> , " Hur Guler " <hurg@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > larry was removed once and i don't remember exactly how many times

> bob was

> removed but he came back. bob likes it here for some reason...

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > This one might be quite simple, Hur Jee!

> > >

> > > Bob was removed from NDS.

> > >

> > > (NondualitySalon/?yguid=181049836

> <NondualitySalon/?yguid=181049836>

> > > Members: 1198)

> > >

> > >

> > > Bon was removed from GuruRatings.

> > >

> > > ( GuruRatings/

> <GuruRatings/>

> > > Members: 1691 )

> > >

> > >

> > > And, as you say Bob was also removed from this list.

> > >

> > >

> > > These three are among very few (maybe, " only " other than Advaitin)

> forums in

> nonduality area with so many (1000+) members.

> > >

> > > Out of these three, because of his 'past record', Bob is very

> unlikely to be

> allowed to post freely on GuruRating or NDS. That leaves only this forum

> where

> there are many members and where he is relatively free to pee and shit

> all over

> as long he doesn't offend the moderator directly .

> > >

> > >

> > > With much respect,

> > > ac

> >

> >

> > has anyone seen a more obsessed little twerp?

>

> Dear Bob Jee:

>

> I have met few other foul-mouthed people like you online and in

> real-life. They

> have invariably turned out to be depressed, lonely individuals with deep

> emotional problems. It is true that they often insult, ridicule, abuse

> other and

> sometimes manage to hurt other people too by doing so. But, it is their

> own

> internal psychological pain which is often the deepest. Deep within they

> are

> very troubled souls. By acting out, they simply try to spread the pain

> and

> unhappiness that they feel within.

>

>

> Even your over the top 'pretending' to have fun and " laughing out loud "

> has

> started ringing hollow now... simply because you try so HARD to prove

> it.

>

> Long time back I had met a " joker " on this and other forums (, someone

> who still

> love, admire and respect deeply), later, we discovered that behind that

> " joker

> mask " , lived a man with long history of deep depression. As soon as his

> depression went way, his behavior too changed on its own. Perhaps, you

> are not

> as honest, truthful or courageous (yes, calling someone Asshole or twerp

> is sign

> of emotional immaturity and not of " courage)as that man to admit it,

> but, your signs are

> quite telling!

>

>

> What emotionally stable, sane and mature man needs to behave the way you

> do on

> the online forum?

>

> I am yet to meet such a man, Bob Jee! All the men and women I have seen

> behave

> this way have turned out to be deeply depressed, lonely men and women

> with deep

> psychological pain within.

 

 

 

 

oh golly ac..

 

i guess i didn't make myself clear.

 

i really don't care what you think.

 

and you've gone to all this work.

 

i really don't care about that either.

 

LOL!

 

..b b.b.

 

p.s.

 

now lets see below the little ac analysis of the word twerp.

 

let's see how he can make it a " foulmouthed' word.

 

isn't it interesting ac that it's been you..

 

that has been most foulmouthed lately?

 

look back you little twerp and you'll see.

 

but frankly i don't care about that either

 

LOL!

 

so here's ac going to town on the lowdown of " twerp " .

 

isn't it astonishing that he had to look it up for God's sake?

 

:-)

 

[.bx3]

 

 

> *twerp

>

> http://thesaurus.reference.com/browse/twerp

> <http://thesaurus.reference.com/browse/twerp>

>

> ass, birdbrain, blockhead, bonehead, boob*, bore, buffoon, clod, clown,

> cretin*,

> dimwit, dolt*, dope*, dumb ox, dunce, dunderhead, easy mark, fair game,

> fathead,

> goose, halfwit, idiot, ignoramus, illiterate, imbecile, innocent, jerk*,

> lamebrain, lightweight, loon, moron, nerd*, nincompoop, ninny, nitwit,

> numskull,

> oaf, sap*, schlemiel, silly, simpleton, stooge, sucker, turkey, twerp,

> twit,

> victim

>

>

> >

> > maybe at NDS and GR..

> >

> > but i mean in the real world?

> >

> > LOL!

> >

> > .b b.b.

> >

>

[Guest guest]

Nisargadatta , " Hur Guler " <hurg wrote:

>

> ac, i agree with you. i know bob is offending but think about it...what's most

shocking than non-duality for the dualist mind? it's scandalous. among the most

shocking people of all, nondualists fans, bob is elementary. it's all tolerated

here to a certain extent.

>

 

 

Dear Hur Jee:

 

I think repeated, unwarranted " verbal insults " , " verbal abuses " are indicative

of certain 'personality types' and are only few steps removed from real physical

violence. I think these are 'warning signs' that something is deeply wrong with

the person using it.

 

What can happen when others start returning... 'fire for fire'?

 

 

My views on what is " virtual " and what is " real " and what is " online " versus

what is real-life, changed dramatically, when...

 

....I read one man threaten to visit another and break his head open.

 

and, when the other threatened to print that " threat letter " and take it to

police!

 

 

Virtual and real could intersect quite easily.

 

On these forums, I saw other instances of...

 

.... people visiting each other.

 

.... men and women deciding to live together.

 

.... somebody maligning someone else online and in response, that person

publishing offender's real name, address and personal history on many forums and

websites.

 

....another instance of someone threatening to talk to lawyer and to file a

complain.

 

 

After all this, I realized that " real " and " virtual " aren't totally separate and

that all 'warning signs' should be heed in time. Excessive, repeated,

unwarranted verbal abuse can be a sign of an angry, emotionally disturbed,

unstable personality and due to this reason, I think such behavior should be

considered " off limit " on " spiritual " forums.

 

With much respect,

ac

[Guest guest]

Nisargadatta , " ac " <adithya_comming wrote:

>

>

>

>

> Nisargadatta , " Hur Guler " <hurg@> wrote:

> >

> > ac, i agree with you. i know bob is offending but think about it...what's

most shocking than non-duality for the dualist mind? it's scandalous. among the

most shocking people of all, nondualists fans, bob is elementary. it's all

tolerated here to a certain extent.

> >

>

>

> Dear Hur Jee:

>

> I think repeated, unwarranted " verbal insults " , " verbal abuses " are indicative

of certain 'personality types' and are only few steps removed from real physical

violence. I think these are 'warning signs' that something is deeply wrong with

the person using it.

>

> What can happen when others start returning... 'fire for fire'?

>

>

> My views on what is " virtual " and what is " real " and what is " online " versus

what is real-life, changed dramatically, when...

>

> ...I read one man threaten to visit another and break his head open.

>

> and, when the other threatened to print that " threat letter " and take it to

police!

>

>

> Virtual and real could intersect quite easily.

>

> On these forums, I saw other instances of...

>

> ... people visiting each other.

>

> ... men and women deciding to live together.

>

> ... somebody maligning someone else online and in response, that person

publishing offender's real name, address and personal history on many forums and

websites.

>

> ...another instance of someone threatening to talk to lawyer and to file a

complain.

>

>

> After all this, I realized that " real " and " virtual " aren't totally separate

and that all 'warning signs' should be heed in time. Excessive, repeated,

unwarranted verbal abuse can be a sign of an angry, emotionally disturbed,

unstable personality and due to this reason, I think such behavior should be

considered " off limit " on " spiritual " forums.

>

> With much respect,

> ac

 

 

Hur..

 

the above..

 

taken in conjunction with the barrage of other obsessive posts today..

 

are indicative of Hysteria.

 

it may be that such a dangerous psychological condition..

 

as is here being exhibited and seemingly getting out of control..

 

will continue and will result in the one suffering said obsession..

 

(our beloved ac)..

 

continuing at ever increasing pace and fervor.

 

to post these howlings again and again.

 

the ones we've witnessed so far then are likely..

 

merely precursors to further off the wall postings.

 

let's encourage ac to continue.

 

i've had few times that i've laughed so much so often..

 

in so little space of time.

 

thank for understanding.

 

:-)

 

..b b.b.

[Guest guest]

[...]

 

>

> so here's ac going to town on the lowdown of " twerp " .

>

> isn't it astonishing that he had to look it up for God's sake?

>

 

Dear Bob ji:

 

English in not my first language and I think there are many others on this forum

whose first language is not English. I think even Nisargadatta did not have

English as his first language.

 

ac

[Guest guest]

Nisargadatta , " ac " <adithya_comming wrote:

>

> [...]

>

> >

> > so here's ac going to town on the lowdown of " twerp " .

> >

> > isn't it astonishing that he had to look it up for God's sake?

> >

>

> Dear Bob ji:

>

> English in not my first language and I think there are many others on this

forum whose first language is not English. I think even Nisargadatta did not

have English as his first language.

>

> ac

 

 

so what?

 

..b b.b.

[Guest guest]

Nisargadatta , " ac " <adithya_comming wrote:

 

> Dear Bob Jee:

>

> I have met few other foul-mouthed people like you online and in

> real-life. They

> have invariably turned out to be depressed, lonely individuals with deep

> emotional problems. It is true that they often insult, ridicule, abuse

> other and

> sometimes manage to hurt other people too by doing so. But, it is their

> own

> internal psychological pain which is often the deepest. Deep within they

> are

> very troubled souls. By acting out, they simply try to spread the pain

> and

> unhappiness that they feel within.

>

>

> Even your over the top 'pretending' to have fun and " laughing out loud "

> has

> started ringing hollow now... simply because you try so HARD to prove

> it.

>

> Long time back I had met a " joker " on this and other forums (, someone

> who still

> love, admire and respect deeply), later, we discovered that behind that

> " joker

> mask " , lived a man with long history of deep depression. As soon as his

> depression went way, his behavior too changed on its own. Perhaps, you

> are not

> as honest, truthful or courageous (yes, calling someone Asshole or twerp

> is sign

> of emotional immaturity and not of " courage)as that man to admit it,

> but, your signs are

> quite telling!

>

>

> What emotionally stable, sane and mature man needs to behave the way you

> do on

> the online forum?

>

> I am yet to meet such a man, Bob Jee! All the men and women I have seen

> behave

> this way have turned out to be deeply depressed, lonely men and women

> with deep

> psychological pain within.

 

Hi AC -

 

Well, the way Hur runs this list has the advantage that you are free to express

yourself about another poster - just as you did above.

 

You can speak your truth freely and openly.

 

You can choose to respond to Bob or not respond to Bob.

 

You can focus on what someone else says, and ignore Bob, if you choose.

 

So, isn't that one of the positives about this list, the way Hur is running it?

 

Also, hasn't it added to the list that recently Hur has let his voice be heard

more consistently?

 

- Dan -

[Guest guest]

Nisargadatta , " ac " <adithya_comming wrote:

>

>

>

>

> Nisargadatta , " Hur Guler " <hurg@> wrote:

> >

> > ac, i agree with you. i know bob is offending but think about it...what's

most shocking than non-duality for the dualist mind? it's scandalous. among the

most shocking people of all, nondualists fans, bob is elementary. it's all

tolerated here to a certain extent.

> >

>

>

> Dear Hur Jee:

>

> I think repeated, unwarranted " verbal insults " , " verbal abuses " are indicative

of certain 'personality types' and are only few steps removed from real physical

violence. I think these are 'warning signs' that something is deeply wrong with

the person using it.

>

> What can happen when others start returning... 'fire for fire'?

>

>

> My views on what is " virtual " and what is " real " and what is " online " versus

what is real-life, changed dramatically, when...

>

> ...I read one man threaten to visit another and break his head open.

>

> and, when the other threatened to print that " threat letter " and take it to

police!

>

>

> Virtual and real could intersect quite easily.

>

> On these forums, I saw other instances of...

>

> ... people visiting each other.

>

> ... men and women deciding to live together.

>

> ... somebody maligning someone else online and in response, that person

publishing offender's real name, address and personal history on many forums and

websites.

>

> ...another instance of someone threatening to talk to lawyer and to file a

complain.

>

>

> After all this, I realized that " real " and " virtual " aren't totally separate

and that all 'warning signs' should be heed in time. Excessive, repeated,

unwarranted verbal abuse can be a sign of an angry, emotionally disturbed,

unstable personality and due to this reason, I think such behavior should be

considered " off limit " on " spiritual " forums.

>

> With much respect,

> ac

 

Hi AC -

 

I agree that the line can get blurry between " in person/real life " and

" fictional/virtual " communications.

 

I agree with your examples, and could add more - but won't.

 

It makes sense to be aware of such things as one posts and responds on line - or

as one decides not to post or not respond.

 

Or as one decides not to moderate a list anymore, which is a decision I made a

few years ago - lol.

 

- Dan -

[Guest guest]

Nisargadatta , " BobN " <Roberibus111 wrote:

>

>

>

> Nisargadatta , " ac " <adithya_comming@> wrote:

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Nisargadatta , " Hur Guler " <hurg@> wrote:

> > >

> > > ac, i agree with you. i know bob is offending but think about it...what's

most shocking than non-duality for the dualist mind? it's scandalous. among the

most shocking people of all, nondualists fans, bob is elementary. it's all

tolerated here to a certain extent.

> > >

> >

> >

> > Dear Hur Jee:

> >

> > I think repeated, unwarranted " verbal insults " , " verbal abuses " are

indicative of certain 'personality types' and are only few steps removed from

real physical violence. I think these are 'warning signs' that something is

deeply wrong with the person using it.

> >

> > What can happen when others start returning... 'fire for fire'?

> >

> >

> > My views on what is " virtual " and what is " real " and what is " online " versus

what is real-life, changed dramatically, when...

> >

> > ...I read one man threaten to visit another and break his head open.

> >

> > and, when the other threatened to print that " threat letter " and take it to

police!

> >

> >

> > Virtual and real could intersect quite easily.

> >

> > On these forums, I saw other instances of...

> >

> > ... people visiting each other.

> >

> > ... men and women deciding to live together.

> >

> > ... somebody maligning someone else online and in response, that person

publishing offender's real name, address and personal history on many forums and

websites.

> >

> > ...another instance of someone threatening to talk to lawyer and to file a

complain.

> >

> >

> > After all this, I realized that " real " and " virtual " aren't totally separate

and that all 'warning signs' should be heed in time. Excessive, repeated,

unwarranted verbal abuse can be a sign of an angry, emotionally disturbed,

unstable personality and due to this reason, I think such behavior should be

considered " off limit " on " spiritual " forums.

> >

> > With much respect,

> > ac

>

>

> Hur..

>

> the above..

>

> taken in conjunction with the barrage of other obsessive posts today..

>

> are indicative of Hysteria.

>

> it may be that such a dangerous psychological condition..

>

> as is here being exhibited and seemingly getting out of control..

>

> will continue and will result in the one suffering said obsession..

>

> (our beloved ac)..

>

> continuing at ever increasing pace and fervor.

>

> to post these howlings again and again.

>

> the ones we've witnessed so far then are likely..

>

> merely precursors to further off the wall postings.

>

> let's encourage ac to continue.

>

> i've had few times that i've laughed so much so often..

>

> in so little space of time.

>

> thank for understanding.

>

> :-)

>

> .b b.b.

 

Well, one thing about this list - it certainly shows the " attraction to

personalized responding " ...

 

And that tendency to go for personalizing, shows where human emotion goes, and

what drives the " personal reality. "

 

One can say over and over that " reality is impersonal " - but that just becomes a

belief system. Meanwhile the emotions that drive human understanding gravitate

to formation of a person reality with a " personal understander of it " - based on

emotions, the past ...

 

Bob eggs this on - he enjoys stirring it up.

 

So, why not step back, and observe what happens?

 

Be clear on it ...

 

 

Love to All -

 

- Dan -