Guest guest Report post Posted January 1, 2010 Nisargadatta , " wwoehr " <wwoehr wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " wwoehr " <wwoehr@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " wwoehr " <wwoehr@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Duality, nonduality, the two, the One, the universe, the me etc are just categories of thought. In reality there is neither duality nor nonduality etc. > > > > > > > > > > Werner > > > > > > > > Categories of thought pertain only to thought. > > > > > > > > This is so also for " reality " and " neither " - which also pertain only to thought. > > > > > > > > As for what is not of thought - haven't had any thoughts about that. > > > > > > > > - D - > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dan, your are and idiot. > > > > He seems like an intelligent fellow to me, fwiw. > > > > P.S. " your " are " and " idiot??? > > > > > P.S. > > In spite of trying hard I rarely succeed writing any post without mistypings. > > Reason: Very bad eyesight ... > > Werner > > > Werner > Or just very strong emotional reactions. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted January 1, 2010 Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " wwoehr " <wwoehr@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " wwoehr " <wwoehr@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " wwoehr " <wwoehr@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Duality, nonduality, the two, the One, the universe, the me etc are just categories of thought. In reality there is neither duality nor nonduality etc. > > > > > > > > > > > > Werner > > > > > > > > > > Categories of thought pertain only to thought. > > > > > > > > > > This is so also for " reality " and " neither " - which also pertain only to thought. > > > > > > > > > > As for what is not of thought - haven't had any thoughts about that. > > > > > > > > > > - D - > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dan, your are and idiot. > > > > > > He seems like an intelligent fellow to me, fwiw. > > > > > > P.S. " your " are " and " idiot??? > > > > > > > > > P.S. > > > > In spite of trying hard I rarely succeed writing any post without mistypings. > > > > Reason: Very bad eyesight ... > > > > Werner > > > > > > Werner > > > > Or just very strong emotional reactions. > Haha, Tim's metamorphosis into a psychologist, a nondual phsychologist. Or was your analysis just some wishful thinking, a projection ? Werner Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted January 1, 2010 Nisargadatta , " wwoehr " <wwoehr wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " wwoehr " <wwoehr@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Duality, nonduality, the two, the One, the universe, the me etc are just categories of thought. In reality there is neither duality nor nonduality etc. > > > > > > Werner > > > > Categories of thought pertain only to thought. > > > > This is so also for " reality " and " neither " - which also pertain only to thought. > > > > As for what is not of thought - haven't had any thoughts about that. > > > > - D - > > > > > Dan, your are and idiot. > > I more and more suspect that you and Bob is the same person. > > You both are doing the same here. Bob with 'insults' and you with 'nondaul blabber'. > > > > Werner what are you doing here wernerina? LOL! ..b b.b. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted January 1, 2010 Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " wwoehr " <wwoehr@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " wwoehr " <wwoehr@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Duality, nonduality, the two, the One, the universe, the me etc are just categories of thought. In reality there is neither duality nor nonduality etc. > > > > > > > > Werner > > > > > > Categories of thought pertain only to thought. > > > > > > This is so also for " reality " and " neither " - which also pertain only to thought. > > > > > > As for what is not of thought - haven't had any thoughts about that. > > > > > > - D - > > > > > > > > > Dan, your are and idiot. > > He seems like an intelligent fellow to me, fwiw. > > P.S. " your " are " and " idiot??? wernerina meant herself...and himself. it's a schizo thingo. ..b b.b. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted January 1, 2010 Nisargadatta , " wwoehr " <wwoehr wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " wwoehr " <wwoehr@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " wwoehr " <wwoehr@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Duality, nonduality, the two, the One, the universe, the me etc are just categories of thought. In reality there is neither duality nor nonduality etc. > > > > > > > > > > Werner > > > > > > > > Categories of thought pertain only to thought. > > > > > > > > This is so also for " reality " and " neither " - which also pertain only to thought. > > > > > > > > As for what is not of thought - haven't had any thoughts about that. > > > > > > > > - D - > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dan, your are and idiot. > > > > He seems like an intelligent fellow to me, fwiw. > > > > P.S. " your " are " and " idiot??? > > > > > P.S. > > In spite of trying hard I rarely succeed writing any post without mistypings. > > Reason: Very bad eyesight ... > > Werner > > > Werner always wanting pity. whine whine wernerina. ..b b.b. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted January 2, 2010 Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033 wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " marktimmins60 " <marktimmins60@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > - > > > marktimmins60 > > > Nisargadatta > > > Thursday, December 31, 2009 8:45 PM > > > Re: mind this > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > marktimmins60 > > > > Nisargadatta > > > > Thursday, December 31, 2009 7:53 PM > > > > Re: mind this > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > > marktimmins60 > > > > > Nisargadatta > > > > > Thursday, December 31, 2009 7:36 PM > > > > > Re: mind this > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " marktimmins60 " <marktimmins60@> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " marktimmins60 " > > > > > > > > <marktimmins60@> > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Use your mind to know your mind. It is perfectly legitimate and > > > > > > > > > also > > > > > > > > > the best preparation for going beyond the mind. > > > > > > > > > Sri Nisargadatta Maharaj > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There is nothing else being known, but mind by mind, which is an > > > > > > > > image > > > > > > > > of imaging. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Understanding this, the knowing in which a knower knows something, > > > > > > > > dissolves, as there is no distance apart. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Beyond any mind > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > One > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > No,beyond the mind, none is. > > > > > > > Mark > > > > > > > > > > > > Then who are you to tell me this? > > > > > > > > > > > > - D - > > > > > > > > > > > Nonduality has no problem with duality. > > > > > Why to try to make it one? > > > > > Mark > > > > > > > > > > Let me try to make it two... > > > > > The universe... and me in another one... > > > > > > > > > > Trying.... > > > > > > > > > > trying.... > > > > > > > > > > -geo- > > > > > > > > > what in the hell are you talking about? > > > > Mark > > > > > > > > Duality is the idea of some inner separate entity observing an outer > > > > world. > > > > So I am trying to realize such deed...What is wrong with it? > > > > > > > > ...trying > > > > > > > > ...trying > > > > -geo- > > > > > > > what is wrong is you thinking that there is separation anywhere. > > > Mark > > > > > > You said " nonduality has no problem with duality. " > > > I say either one or the other. Light or dark. > > > -geo- > > > > > when you believe or even when you don't believe your mind duality is realized > > when you don't nonduality is all there is > > so the cool part of this story is nonduality > > includes both because it is all the same. > > > > or something like that. > > Mark > > There's no story about this. > > - D - > Dan,It's all a story. mark Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted January 2, 2010 - wwoehr Nisargadatta Friday, January 01, 2010 6:46 PM Re: mind this Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " wwoehr " <wwoehr@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " wwoehr " <wwoehr@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Duality, nonduality, the two, the One, the universe, the me etc are > > > > just categories of thought. In reality there is neither duality nor > > > > nonduality etc. > > > > > > > > Werner > > > > > > Categories of thought pertain only to thought. > > > > > > This is so also for " reality " and " neither " - which also pertain only > > > to thought. > > > > > > As for what is not of thought - haven't had any thoughts about that. > > > > > > - D - > > > > > > > > > Dan, your are and idiot. > > He seems like an intelligent fellow to me, fwiw. > > P.S. " your " are " and " idiot??? > P.S. In spite of trying hard I rarely succeed writing any post without mistypings. Reason: Very bad eyesight ... Werner Werner Well then use a spell-checker, darling sweety - doesn't require a too much of an IQ to realize such extraordinary deed!!!! -geo- Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted January 2, 2010 Nisargadatta , " marktimmins60 " <marktimmins60 wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " marktimmins60 " <marktimmins60@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > marktimmins60 > > > > Nisargadatta > > > > Thursday, December 31, 2009 8:45 PM > > > > Re: mind this > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > > marktimmins60 > > > > > Nisargadatta > > > > > Thursday, December 31, 2009 7:53 PM > > > > > Re: mind this > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > > > marktimmins60 > > > > > > Nisargadatta > > > > > > Thursday, December 31, 2009 7:36 PM > > > > > > Re: mind this > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " marktimmins60 " <marktimmins60@> > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " marktimmins60 " > > > > > > > > > <marktimmins60@> > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Use your mind to know your mind. It is perfectly legitimate and > > > > > > > > > > also > > > > > > > > > > the best preparation for going beyond the mind. > > > > > > > > > > Sri Nisargadatta Maharaj > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There is nothing else being known, but mind by mind, which is an > > > > > > > > > image > > > > > > > > > of imaging. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Understanding this, the knowing in which a knower knows something, > > > > > > > > > dissolves, as there is no distance apart. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Beyond any mind > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > One > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > No,beyond the mind, none is. > > > > > > > > Mark > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Then who are you to tell me this? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - D - > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nonduality has no problem with duality. > > > > > > Why to try to make it one? > > > > > > Mark > > > > > > > > > > > > Let me try to make it two... > > > > > > The universe... and me in another one... > > > > > > > > > > > > Trying.... > > > > > > > > > > > > trying.... > > > > > > > > > > > > -geo- > > > > > > > > > > > what in the hell are you talking about? > > > > > Mark > > > > > > > > > > Duality is the idea of some inner separate entity observing an outer > > > > > world. > > > > > So I am trying to realize such deed...What is wrong with it? > > > > > > > > > > ...trying > > > > > > > > > > ...trying > > > > > -geo- > > > > > > > > > what is wrong is you thinking that there is separation anywhere. > > > > Mark > > > > > > > > You said " nonduality has no problem with duality. " > > > > I say either one or the other. Light or dark. > > > > -geo- > > > > > > > when you believe or even when you don't believe your mind duality is realized > > > when you don't nonduality is all there is > > > so the cool part of this story is nonduality > > > includes both because it is all the same. > > > > > > or something like that. > > > Mark > > > > There's no story about this. > > > > - D - > > > Dan,It's all a story. > > mark right on the money! ..b b.b. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted January 2, 2010 Nisargadatta , " wwoehr " <wwoehr wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " wwoehr " <wwoehr@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Duality, nonduality, the two, the One, the universe, the me etc are just categories of thought. In reality there is neither duality nor nonduality etc. > > > > > > Werner > > > > Categories of thought pertain only to thought. > > > > This is so also for " reality " and " neither " - which also pertain only to thought. > > > > As for what is not of thought - haven't had any thoughts about that. > > > > - D - > > > > > Dan, your are and idiot. > > I more and more suspect that you and Bob is the same person. > > You both are doing the same here. Bob with 'insults' and you with 'nondaul blabber'. > > > > Werner Whatever you make of the words you read - that is yours, Werner. And you like finding reasons to insult others. Yet, you complain when bob insults Werner. Silly. Yet, there it is. - Dan - Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted January 2, 2010 Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " wwoehr " <wwoehr@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " wwoehr " <wwoehr@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Duality, nonduality, the two, the One, the universe, the me etc are just categories of thought. In reality there is neither duality nor nonduality etc. > > > > > > > > Werner > > > > > > Categories of thought pertain only to thought. > > > > > > This is so also for " reality " and " neither " - which also pertain only to thought. > > > > > > As for what is not of thought - haven't had any thoughts about that. > > > > > > - D - > > > > > > > > > Dan, your are and idiot. > > He seems like an intelligent fellow to me, fwiw. > > P.S. " your " are " and " idiot??? Sure is funny what some folks come up with, ain't it? - D - Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted January 2, 2010 Nisargadatta , " BobN " <Roberibus111 wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " wwoehr " <wwoehr@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " wwoehr " <wwoehr@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Duality, nonduality, the two, the One, the universe, the me etc are just categories of thought. In reality there is neither duality nor nonduality etc. > > > > > > > > Werner > > > > > > Categories of thought pertain only to thought. > > > > > > This is so also for " reality " and " neither " - which also pertain only to thought. > > > > > > As for what is not of thought - haven't had any thoughts about that. > > > > > > - D - > > > > > > > > > Dan, your are and idiot. > > > > I more and more suspect that you and Bob is the same person. > > > > You both are doing the same here. Bob with 'insults' and you with 'nondaul blabber'. > > > > > > > > Werner > > > what are you doing here wernerina? > > LOL! > > .b b.b. a place to share whine and cheese. - D - Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted January 2, 2010 Nisargadatta , " BobN " <Roberibus111 wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " wwoehr " <wwoehr@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " wwoehr " <wwoehr@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " wwoehr " <wwoehr@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Duality, nonduality, the two, the One, the universe, the me etc are just categories of thought. In reality there is neither duality nor nonduality etc. > > > > > > > > > > > > Werner > > > > > > > > > > Categories of thought pertain only to thought. > > > > > > > > > > This is so also for " reality " and " neither " - which also pertain only to thought. > > > > > > > > > > As for what is not of thought - haven't had any thoughts about that. > > > > > > > > > > - D - > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dan, your are and idiot. > > > > > > He seems like an intelligent fellow to me, fwiw. > > > > > > P.S. " your " are " and " idiot??? > > > > > > > > > P.S. > > > > In spite of trying hard I rarely succeed writing any post without mistypings. > > > > Reason: Very bad eyesight ... > > > > Werner > > > > > > Werner > > > always wanting pity. > > whine whine wernerina. > > .b b.b. yes, that's how it goes. here, try some of this " bleu, " it goes well with whine. - D - Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted January 2, 2010 Nisargadatta , " marktimmins60 " <marktimmins60 wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " marktimmins60 " <marktimmins60@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > marktimmins60 > > > > Nisargadatta > > > > Thursday, December 31, 2009 8:45 PM > > > > Re: mind this > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > > marktimmins60 > > > > > Nisargadatta > > > > > Thursday, December 31, 2009 7:53 PM > > > > > Re: mind this > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > > > marktimmins60 > > > > > > Nisargadatta > > > > > > Thursday, December 31, 2009 7:36 PM > > > > > > Re: mind this > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " marktimmins60 " <marktimmins60@> > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " marktimmins60 " > > > > > > > > > <marktimmins60@> > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Use your mind to know your mind. It is perfectly legitimate and > > > > > > > > > > also > > > > > > > > > > the best preparation for going beyond the mind. > > > > > > > > > > Sri Nisargadatta Maharaj > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There is nothing else being known, but mind by mind, which is an > > > > > > > > > image > > > > > > > > > of imaging. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Understanding this, the knowing in which a knower knows something, > > > > > > > > > dissolves, as there is no distance apart. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Beyond any mind > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > One > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > No,beyond the mind, none is. > > > > > > > > Mark > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Then who are you to tell me this? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - D - > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nonduality has no problem with duality. > > > > > > Why to try to make it one? > > > > > > Mark > > > > > > > > > > > > Let me try to make it two... > > > > > > The universe... and me in another one... > > > > > > > > > > > > Trying.... > > > > > > > > > > > > trying.... > > > > > > > > > > > > -geo- > > > > > > > > > > > what in the hell are you talking about? > > > > > Mark > > > > > > > > > > Duality is the idea of some inner separate entity observing an outer > > > > > world. > > > > > So I am trying to realize such deed...What is wrong with it? > > > > > > > > > > ...trying > > > > > > > > > > ...trying > > > > > -geo- > > > > > > > > > what is wrong is you thinking that there is separation anywhere. > > > > Mark > > > > > > > > You said " nonduality has no problem with duality. " > > > > I say either one or the other. Light or dark. > > > > -geo- > > > > > > > when you believe or even when you don't believe your mind duality is realized > > > when you don't nonduality is all there is > > > so the cool part of this story is nonduality > > > includes both because it is all the same. > > > > > > or something like that. > > > Mark > > > > There's no story about this. > > > > - D - > > > Dan,It's all a story. > > mark Nope. None available or needed. Is " none " difficult to grasp? If so, don't grasp. - D - Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted January 2, 2010 Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033 wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " marktimmins60 " <marktimmins60@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " marktimmins60 " <marktimmins60@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > > marktimmins60 > > > > > Nisargadatta > > > > > Thursday, December 31, 2009 8:45 PM > > > > > Re: mind this > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > > > marktimmins60 > > > > > > Nisargadatta > > > > > > Thursday, December 31, 2009 7:53 PM > > > > > > Re: mind this > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > > > > marktimmins60 > > > > > > > Nisargadatta > > > > > > > Thursday, December 31, 2009 7:36 PM > > > > > > > Re: mind this > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " marktimmins60 " <marktimmins60@> > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " marktimmins60 " > > > > > > > > > > <marktimmins60@> > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Use your mind to know your mind. It is perfectly legitimate and > > > > > > > > > > > also > > > > > > > > > > > the best preparation for going beyond the mind. > > > > > > > > > > > Sri Nisargadatta Maharaj > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There is nothing else being known, but mind by mind, which is an > > > > > > > > > > image > > > > > > > > > > of imaging. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Understanding this, the knowing in which a knower knows something, > > > > > > > > > > dissolves, as there is no distance apart. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Beyond any mind > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > One > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > No,beyond the mind, none is. > > > > > > > > > Mark > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Then who are you to tell me this? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - D - > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nonduality has no problem with duality. > > > > > > > Why to try to make it one? > > > > > > > Mark > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Let me try to make it two... > > > > > > > The universe... and me in another one... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Trying.... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > trying.... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -geo- > > > > > > > > > > > > > what in the hell are you talking about? > > > > > > Mark > > > > > > > > > > > > Duality is the idea of some inner separate entity observing an outer > > > > > > world. > > > > > > So I am trying to realize such deed...What is wrong with it? > > > > > > > > > > > > ...trying > > > > > > > > > > > > ...trying > > > > > > -geo- > > > > > > > > > > > what is wrong is you thinking that there is separation anywhere. > > > > > Mark > > > > > > > > > > You said " nonduality has no problem with duality. " > > > > > I say either one or the other. Light or dark. > > > > > -geo- > > > > > > > > > when you believe or even when you don't believe your mind duality is realized > > > > when you don't nonduality is all there is > > > > so the cool part of this story is nonduality > > > > includes both because it is all the same. > > > > > > > > or something like that. > > > > Mark > > > > > > There's no story about this. > > > > > > - D - > > > > > Dan,It's all a story. > > > > mark > > Nope. > > None available or needed. > > Is " none " difficult to grasp? > > If so, don't grasp. > > - D - available nor needed by whom? you give yourself away by empl;oying thise words. cut the bullshit dabbo. for you that's going to be none to easy to not grasp. LOL! ..b b.b. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted January 2, 2010 Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033 wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " BobN " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " marktimmins60 " <marktimmins60@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " marktimmins60 " <marktimmins60@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > > > marktimmins60 > > > > > > Nisargadatta > > > > > > Thursday, December 31, 2009 8:45 PM > > > > > > Re: mind this > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > > > > marktimmins60 > > > > > > > Nisargadatta > > > > > > > Thursday, December 31, 2009 7:53 PM > > > > > > > Re: mind this > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > > > > > marktimmins60 > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta > > > > > > > > Thursday, December 31, 2009 7:36 PM > > > > > > > > Re: mind this > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " marktimmins60 " <marktimmins60@> > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " marktimmins60 " > > > > > > > > > > > <marktimmins60@> > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Use your mind to know your mind. It is perfectly legitimate and > > > > > > > > > > > > also > > > > > > > > > > > > the best preparation for going beyond the mind. > > > > > > > > > > > > Sri Nisargadatta Maharaj > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There is nothing else being known, but mind by mind, which is an > > > > > > > > > > > image > > > > > > > > > > > of imaging. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Understanding this, the knowing in which a knower knows something, > > > > > > > > > > > dissolves, as there is no distance apart. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Beyond any mind > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > One > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > No,beyond the mind, none is. > > > > > > > > > > Mark > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Then who are you to tell me this? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - D - > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nonduality has no problem with duality. > > > > > > > > Why to try to make it one? > > > > > > > > Mark > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Let me try to make it two... > > > > > > > > The universe... and me in another one... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Trying.... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > trying.... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -geo- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > what in the hell are you talking about? > > > > > > > Mark > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Duality is the idea of some inner separate entity observing an outer > > > > > > > world. > > > > > > > So I am trying to realize such deed...What is wrong with it? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ...trying > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ...trying > > > > > > > -geo- > > > > > > > > > > > > > what is wrong is you thinking that there is separation anywhere. > > > > > > Mark > > > > > > > > > > > > You said " nonduality has no problem with duality. " > > > > > > I say either one or the other. Light or dark. > > > > > > -geo- > > > > > > > > > > > when you believe or even when you don't believe your mind duality is realized > > > > > when you don't nonduality is all there is > > > > > so the cool part of this story is nonduality > > > > > includes both because it is all the same. > > > > > > > > > > or something like that. > > > > > Mark > > > > > > > > There's no story about this. > > > > > > > > - D - > > > > > > > Dan,It's all a story. > > > > > > mark > > > > > > right on the money! > > > > .b b.b. > > right off the money! > > - D - booooooooooooooooo! dabbo! that's terrible. at least you admit though that's there's something to be on or off. but you're way off base in your faulty assumption... and way off key with your pitiable attempt at humor. i bet the kids you play with giggle though. LOL! ..b b.b. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted January 2, 2010 Nisargadatta , " BobN " <Roberibus111 wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " marktimmins60 " <marktimmins60@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " marktimmins60 " <marktimmins60@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > > > marktimmins60 > > > > > > Nisargadatta > > > > > > Thursday, December 31, 2009 8:45 PM > > > > > > Re: mind this > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > > > > marktimmins60 > > > > > > > Nisargadatta > > > > > > > Thursday, December 31, 2009 7:53 PM > > > > > > > Re: mind this > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > > > > > marktimmins60 > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta > > > > > > > > Thursday, December 31, 2009 7:36 PM > > > > > > > > Re: mind this > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " marktimmins60 " <marktimmins60@> > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " marktimmins60 " > > > > > > > > > > > <marktimmins60@> > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Use your mind to know your mind. It is perfectly legitimate and > > > > > > > > > > > > also > > > > > > > > > > > > the best preparation for going beyond the mind. > > > > > > > > > > > > Sri Nisargadatta Maharaj > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There is nothing else being known, but mind by mind, which is an > > > > > > > > > > > image > > > > > > > > > > > of imaging. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Understanding this, the knowing in which a knower knows something, > > > > > > > > > > > dissolves, as there is no distance apart. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Beyond any mind > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > One > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > No,beyond the mind, none is. > > > > > > > > > > Mark > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Then who are you to tell me this? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - D - > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nonduality has no problem with duality. > > > > > > > > Why to try to make it one? > > > > > > > > Mark > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Let me try to make it two... > > > > > > > > The universe... and me in another one... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Trying.... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > trying.... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -geo- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > what in the hell are you talking about? > > > > > > > Mark > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Duality is the idea of some inner separate entity observing an outer > > > > > > > world. > > > > > > > So I am trying to realize such deed...What is wrong with it? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ...trying > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ...trying > > > > > > > -geo- > > > > > > > > > > > > > what is wrong is you thinking that there is separation anywhere. > > > > > > Mark > > > > > > > > > > > > You said " nonduality has no problem with duality. " > > > > > > I say either one or the other. Light or dark. > > > > > > -geo- > > > > > > > > > > > when you believe or even when you don't believe your mind duality is realized > > > > > when you don't nonduality is all there is > > > > > so the cool part of this story is nonduality > > > > > includes both because it is all the same. > > > > > > > > > > or something like that. > > > > > Mark > > > > > > > > There's no story about this. > > > > > > > > - D - > > > > > > > Dan,It's all a story. > > > > > > mark > > > > Nope. > > > > None available or needed. > > > > Is " none " difficult to grasp? > > > > If so, don't grasp. > > > > - D - > > > available nor needed by whom? > > you give yourself away by empl;oying thise words. > > cut the bullshit dabbo. > > for you that's going to be none to easy to not grasp. > > LOL! > > .b b.b. that's your story. but in deep sleep - there is none. and now the same it doesn't change. - D - Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted January 2, 2010 Nisargadatta , " BobN " <Roberibus111 wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " BobN " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " marktimmins60 " <marktimmins60@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " marktimmins60 " <marktimmins60@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > > > > marktimmins60 > > > > > > > Nisargadatta > > > > > > > Thursday, December 31, 2009 8:45 PM > > > > > > > Re: mind this > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > > > > > marktimmins60 > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta > > > > > > > > Thursday, December 31, 2009 7:53 PM > > > > > > > > Re: mind this > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > > > > > > marktimmins60 > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta > > > > > > > > > Thursday, December 31, 2009 7:36 PM > > > > > > > > > Re: mind this > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " marktimmins60 " <marktimmins60@> > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " marktimmins60 " > > > > > > > > > > > > <marktimmins60@> > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Use your mind to know your mind. It is perfectly legitimate and > > > > > > > > > > > > > also > > > > > > > > > > > > > the best preparation for going beyond the mind. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sri Nisargadatta Maharaj > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There is nothing else being known, but mind by mind, which is an > > > > > > > > > > > > image > > > > > > > > > > > > of imaging. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Understanding this, the knowing in which a knower knows something, > > > > > > > > > > > > dissolves, as there is no distance apart. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Beyond any mind > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > One > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > No,beyond the mind, none is. > > > > > > > > > > > Mark > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Then who are you to tell me this? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - D - > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nonduality has no problem with duality. > > > > > > > > > Why to try to make it one? > > > > > > > > > Mark > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Let me try to make it two... > > > > > > > > > The universe... and me in another one... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Trying.... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > trying.... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -geo- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > what in the hell are you talking about? > > > > > > > > Mark > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Duality is the idea of some inner separate entity observing an outer > > > > > > > > world. > > > > > > > > So I am trying to realize such deed...What is wrong with it? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ...trying > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ...trying > > > > > > > > -geo- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > what is wrong is you thinking that there is separation anywhere. > > > > > > > Mark > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You said " nonduality has no problem with duality. " > > > > > > > I say either one or the other. Light or dark. > > > > > > > -geo- > > > > > > > > > > > > > when you believe or even when you don't believe your mind duality is realized > > > > > > when you don't nonduality is all there is > > > > > > so the cool part of this story is nonduality > > > > > > includes both because it is all the same. > > > > > > > > > > > > or something like that. > > > > > > Mark > > > > > > > > > > There's no story about this. > > > > > > > > > > - D - > > > > > > > > > Dan,It's all a story. > > > > > > > > mark > > > > > > > > > right on the money! > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > right off the money! > > > > - D - > > > booooooooooooooooo! > > dabbo! > > that's terrible. > > at least you admit though that's there's something to be on or off. > > but you're way off base in your faulty assumption... > > and way off key with your pitiable attempt at humor. > > i bet the kids you play with giggle though. > > LOL! > > .b b.b. you and your endless story-telling. shush. - D - Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted January 2, 2010 Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033 wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " BobN " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " marktimmins60 " <marktimmins60@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " marktimmins60 " <marktimmins60@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > > > > marktimmins60 > > > > > > > Nisargadatta > > > > > > > Thursday, December 31, 2009 8:45 PM > > > > > > > Re: mind this > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > > > > > marktimmins60 > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta > > > > > > > > Thursday, December 31, 2009 7:53 PM > > > > > > > > Re: mind this > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > > > > > > marktimmins60 > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta > > > > > > > > > Thursday, December 31, 2009 7:36 PM > > > > > > > > > Re: mind this > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " marktimmins60 " <marktimmins60@> > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " marktimmins60 " > > > > > > > > > > > > <marktimmins60@> > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Use your mind to know your mind. It is perfectly legitimate and > > > > > > > > > > > > > also > > > > > > > > > > > > > the best preparation for going beyond the mind. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sri Nisargadatta Maharaj > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There is nothing else being known, but mind by mind, which is an > > > > > > > > > > > > image > > > > > > > > > > > > of imaging. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Understanding this, the knowing in which a knower knows something, > > > > > > > > > > > > dissolves, as there is no distance apart. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Beyond any mind > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > One > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > No,beyond the mind, none is. > > > > > > > > > > > Mark > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Then who are you to tell me this? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - D - > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nonduality has no problem with duality. > > > > > > > > > Why to try to make it one? > > > > > > > > > Mark > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Let me try to make it two... > > > > > > > > > The universe... and me in another one... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Trying.... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > trying.... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -geo- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > what in the hell are you talking about? > > > > > > > > Mark > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Duality is the idea of some inner separate entity observing an outer > > > > > > > > world. > > > > > > > > So I am trying to realize such deed...What is wrong with it? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ...trying > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ...trying > > > > > > > > -geo- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > what is wrong is you thinking that there is separation anywhere. > > > > > > > Mark > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You said " nonduality has no problem with duality. " > > > > > > > I say either one or the other. Light or dark. > > > > > > > -geo- > > > > > > > > > > > > > when you believe or even when you don't believe your mind duality is realized > > > > > > when you don't nonduality is all there is > > > > > > so the cool part of this story is nonduality > > > > > > includes both because it is all the same. > > > > > > > > > > > > or something like that. > > > > > > Mark > > > > > > > > > > There's no story about this. > > > > > > > > > > - D - > > > > > > > > > Dan,It's all a story. > > > > > > > > mark > > > > > > Nope. > > > > > > None available or needed. > > > > > > Is " none " difficult to grasp? > > > > > > If so, don't grasp. > > > > > > - D - > > > > > > available nor needed by whom? > > > > you give yourself away by empl;oying thise words. > > > > cut the bullshit dabbo. > > > > for you that's going to be none to easy to not grasp. > > > > LOL! > > > > .b b.b. > > that's your story. > > but in deep sleep - there is none. > > and now the same > > it doesn't change. > > - D - yeah yeah.. you and your " now " are in deep sleep alright. someday you will wake up. for Christ sake dabbo do you think that J.C...Buddha..Niz..or ANYONE.. went around trying to be a mystical dufus.. like you try and be all the time? you talk and act like a bad imitation of a comic book hero. get real kiddo. Shazam! ROFLMAO! OK..you can be " Super Guru " with a real live cape.. after breakfast and before lunch.. but then kid you either quit screwing around.. or poppa's gonna give you a slap on your behind. :-) ..b b.b. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted January 2, 2010 Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033 wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " BobN " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " BobN " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " marktimmins60 " <marktimmins60@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " marktimmins60 " <marktimmins60@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > > > > > marktimmins60 > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta > > > > > > > > Thursday, December 31, 2009 8:45 PM > > > > > > > > Re: mind this > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > > > > > > marktimmins60 > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta > > > > > > > > > Thursday, December 31, 2009 7:53 PM > > > > > > > > > Re: mind this > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > > > > > > > marktimmins60 > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta > > > > > > > > > > Thursday, December 31, 2009 7:36 PM > > > > > > > > > > Re: mind this > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " marktimmins60 " <marktimmins60@> > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " marktimmins60 " > > > > > > > > > > > > > <marktimmins60@> > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Use your mind to know your mind. It is perfectly legitimate and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > also > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the best preparation for going beyond the mind. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sri Nisargadatta Maharaj > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There is nothing else being known, but mind by mind, which is an > > > > > > > > > > > > > image > > > > > > > > > > > > > of imaging. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Understanding this, the knowing in which a knower knows something, > > > > > > > > > > > > > dissolves, as there is no distance apart. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Beyond any mind > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > One > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > No,beyond the mind, none is. > > > > > > > > > > > > Mark > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Then who are you to tell me this? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - D - > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nonduality has no problem with duality. > > > > > > > > > > Why to try to make it one? > > > > > > > > > > Mark > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Let me try to make it two... > > > > > > > > > > The universe... and me in another one... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Trying.... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > trying.... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -geo- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > what in the hell are you talking about? > > > > > > > > > Mark > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Duality is the idea of some inner separate entity observing an outer > > > > > > > > > world. > > > > > > > > > So I am trying to realize such deed...What is wrong with it? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ...trying > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ...trying > > > > > > > > > -geo- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > what is wrong is you thinking that there is separation anywhere. > > > > > > > > Mark > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You said " nonduality has no problem with duality. " > > > > > > > > I say either one or the other. Light or dark. > > > > > > > > -geo- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > when you believe or even when you don't believe your mind duality is realized > > > > > > > when you don't nonduality is all there is > > > > > > > so the cool part of this story is nonduality > > > > > > > includes both because it is all the same. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > or something like that. > > > > > > > Mark > > > > > > > > > > > > There's no story about this. > > > > > > > > > > > > - D - > > > > > > > > > > > Dan,It's all a story. > > > > > > > > > > mark > > > > > > > > > > > > right on the money! > > > > > > > > .b b.b. > > > > > > right off the money! > > > > > > - D - > > > > > > booooooooooooooooo! > > > > dabbo! > > > > that's terrible. > > > > at least you admit though that's there's something to be on or off. > > > > but you're way off base in your faulty assumption... > > > > and way off key with your pitiable attempt at humor. > > > > i bet the kids you play with giggle though. > > > > LOL! > > > > .b b.b. > > you and your endless story-telling. > > shush. > > - D - you and your bullshit. what a story! LOL! ..b b.b. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted January 2, 2010 Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033 wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " wwoehr " <wwoehr@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " wwoehr " <wwoehr@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Duality, nonduality, the two, the One, the universe, the me etc are just categories of thought. In reality there is neither duality nor nonduality etc. > > > > > > > > Werner > > > > > > Categories of thought pertain only to thought. > > > > > > This is so also for " reality " and " neither " - which also pertain only to thought. > > > > > > As for what is not of thought - haven't had any thoughts about that. > > > > > > - D - > > > > > > > > > Dan, your are and idiot. > > > > I more and more suspect that you and Bob is the same person. > > > > You both are doing the same here. Bob with 'insults' and you with 'nondaul blabber'. > > > > > > > > Werner > > Whatever you make of the words you read - that is yours, Werner. > > And you like finding reasons to insult others. > > Yet, you complain when bob insults Werner. > > Silly. > > Yet, there it is. > > - Dan - > Dan, Calling you and idiot was not meant as an insult, I really meant it. But you are such a proud and vain person that you no longer can see what idiot you are. And I stress it again, I am not interested to hurt or to insult you, I really see you that way. You are so heavily stuck in your nondual gibberish and blabber that you no longer can meet other people in a simple fundamental emphatic way which needs intuition and commonsense. You no longer seem to be a human being but rather a nondual machine. Werner Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted January 2, 2010 Nisargadatta , " wwoehr " <wwoehr wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " wwoehr " <wwoehr@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " wwoehr " <wwoehr@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Duality, nonduality, the two, the One, the universe, the me etc are just categories of thought. In reality there is neither duality nor nonduality etc. > > > > > > > > > > Werner > > > > > > > > Categories of thought pertain only to thought. > > > > > > > > This is so also for " reality " and " neither " - which also pertain only to thought. > > > > > > > > As for what is not of thought - haven't had any thoughts about that. > > > > > > > > - D - > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dan, your are and idiot. > > > > > > I more and more suspect that you and Bob is the same person. > > > > > > You both are doing the same here. Bob with 'insults' and you with 'nondaul blabber'. > > > > > > > > > > > > Werner > > > > Whatever you make of the words you read - that is yours, Werner. > > > > And you like finding reasons to insult others. > > > > Yet, you complain when bob insults Werner. > > > > Silly. > > > > Yet, there it is. > > > > - Dan - > > > > > Dan, > > Calling you and idiot was not meant as an insult, I really meant it. > > But you are such a proud and vain person that you no longer can see what idiot you are. And I stress it again, I am not interested to hurt or to insult you, I really see you that way. > > You are so heavily stuck in your nondual gibberish and blabber that you no longer can meet other people in a simple fundamental emphatic way which needs intuition and commonsense. > > You no longer seem to be a human being but rather a nondual machine. > > Werner Silly Wernie. - D - Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted January 2, 2010 Nisargadatta , " wwoehr " <wwoehr wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " wwoehr " <wwoehr@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " wwoehr " <wwoehr@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Duality, nonduality, the two, the One, the universe, the me etc are just categories of thought. In reality there is neither duality nor nonduality etc. > > > > > > > > > > Werner > > > > > > > > Categories of thought pertain only to thought. > > > > > > > > This is so also for " reality " and " neither " - which also pertain only to thought. > > > > > > > > As for what is not of thought - haven't had any thoughts about that. > > > > > > > > - D - > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dan, your are and idiot. > > > > > > I more and more suspect that you and Bob is the same person. > > > > > > You both are doing the same here. Bob with 'insults' and you with 'nondaul blabber'. > > > > > > > > > > > > Werner > > > > Whatever you make of the words you read - that is yours, Werner. > > > > And you like finding reasons to insult others. > > > > Yet, you complain when bob insults Werner. > > > > Silly. > > > > Yet, there it is. > > > > - Dan - > > > > > Dan, > > Calling you and idiot was not meant as an insult, I really meant it. > > But you are such a proud and vain person that you no longer can see what idiot you are. And I stress it again, I am not interested to hurt or to insult you, I really see you that way. > > You are so heavily stuck in your nondual gibberish and blabber that you no longer can meet other people in a simple fundamental emphatic way which needs intuition and commonsense. > > You no longer seem to be a human being but rather a nondual machine. > > Werner baba likes your honesty wernerina. and baba really means everything he has said about you. you never were a human being. don't take that as an insult. you're vain enough to slough it off. besides.. you don't read baba's posts. you're too much of a coward. now don't take that as an insult.. i really mean it.. your vain enough to slough it off. besides.. you don't read baba's posts.. you're to much of... well never mind. you don't read baba's posts anyway. too bad though wernerina.. you're missing all .b b.b.'s compliments on your hairdo. baba just loves that cute pageboy Beatles thing. even though you're a bit old for it. but now that nose thing you've got going.... that's a problem. but anyway you don't read baba's posts. and even if you did you have that bad eyesight you whine about. probably you would misread baba and start whimpering and sniveling. you know wernerina that's disgusting. not so much for your wernerina side but for the wernie poo side. LOL! ..b b.b. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted January 2, 2010 Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033 wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " wwoehr " <wwoehr@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " wwoehr " <wwoehr@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Duality, nonduality, the two, the One, the universe, the me etc are just categories of thought. In reality there is neither duality nor nonduality etc. > > > > > > > > > > Werner > > > > > > > > Categories of thought pertain only to thought. > > > > > > > > This is so also for " reality " and " neither " - which also pertain only to thought. > > > > > > > > As for what is not of thought - haven't had any thoughts about that. > > > > > > > > - D - > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dan, your are and idiot. > > > > He seems like an intelligent fellow to me, fwiw. > > > > P.S. " your " are " and " idiot??? > > Sure is funny what some folks come up with, ain't it? > > - D - > Particularly complaining about 'nondual pointing' on lists where that is on-topic, even expected. Some sort of conflict going on there, I reckon. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted January 2, 2010 < Dan,< Calling you and idiot was not meant as an insult, I really meant it.< But you are such a proud and vain person that you no longer can see what idiot you are. And I stress it again, I am not interested to hurt or to insult you, I really see you that way.< You are so heavily stuck in your nondual gibberish and blabber that you no longer can meet other people in a simple fundamental emphatic way which needs intuition and commonsense.< You no longer seem to be a human being but rather a nondual machine.< Werner Do you feel your above post was a demonstration of "empathy"? m~ Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted January 2, 2010 Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " wwoehr " <wwoehr@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " wwoehr " <wwoehr@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Duality, nonduality, the two, the One, the universe, the me etc are just categories of thought. In reality there is neither duality nor nonduality etc. > > > > > > > > > > > > Werner > > > > > > > > > > Categories of thought pertain only to thought. > > > > > > > > > > This is so also for " reality " and " neither " - which also pertain only to thought. > > > > > > > > > > As for what is not of thought - haven't had any thoughts about that. > > > > > > > > > > - D - > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dan, your are and idiot. > > > > > > He seems like an intelligent fellow to me, fwiw. > > > > > > P.S. " your " are " and " idiot??? > > > > Sure is funny what some folks come up with, ain't it? > > > > - D - > > > > Particularly complaining about 'nondual pointing' on lists where that is on-topic, even expected. > > Some sort of conflict going on there, I reckon. a nondual conflict. wow! that's amazing! or maybe it's incestuous pandering. LOL! ..b b.b. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
