Guest guest Report post Posted July 1, 2009 Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > That's Geo's world. That's Geo. > > > > geo> By " all the time " you mean what? > > Continuity. The assumption that " I am " , and " the world is " . This requires > attempted maintenance, a re-visiting and re-visiting and re-visiting of this > mental world. > > geo> LOL...but this " all the time " is from a timebound stand. If you > where > non-fragmented, seeing-being-what-is, you would never ever say that. Gosh, I admit it (toeing ground with shoe)... I'm fragmented awfully... I suck. Nothing is right here. It's all just so awful. Is that what ya wanted? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted July 1, 2009 Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > > The inconceivable, incomprehensible, unknowable isn't interesting to thought. If it can't be conceived of, it doesn't exist. > > > > Yes. > > > > Has never been conceived of, won't be conceived, doesn't need to be. > > > > Hasn't been discussed or even realized. > > > > All those books by realizers ... a hill of beans. > > Indeed so. Not one word of 'truth' ever communicated. > > Mostly 'self-importance' communicated, and if not that, words that confuddle and confound thought, at best. > > Tips to 'turn to oneself, not others', communicated by supposed others. > > Words saying " I do not exist " , spoken by that well-dressed fellow on the cover. > > Laughter echoing... ;-). LOL. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted July 1, 2009 Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > That's Geo's world. That's Geo. > > > > > > geo> By " all the time " you mean what? > > > > Continuity. The assumption that " I am " , and " the world is " . This requires > > attempted maintenance, a re-visiting and re-visiting and re-visiting of this > > mental world. > > > > geo> LOL...but this " all the time " is from a timebound stand. If you > where > > non-fragmented, seeing-being-what-is, you would never ever say that. > > Gosh, I admit it (toeing ground with shoe)... I'm fragmented awfully... I suck. Nothing is right here. It's all just so awful. > > Is that what ya wanted? You never would have said that if you were a jnani. Now, you have to go to purgatory and think about what you said wrong, and try to get it right, so you can be a jnani. By 3:00 PM you will be very fragmented from all the extraneous thought-effort. But they will put you together again at 12:00 AM, so you can think about it some more and try again. - D - Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted July 1, 2009 Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > > > That's Geo's world. That's Geo. > > > > > > > > geo> By " all the time " you mean what? > > > > > > Continuity. The assumption that " I am " , and " the world is " . This requires > > > attempted maintenance, a re-visiting and re-visiting and re-visiting of this > > > mental world. > > > > > > geo> LOL...but this " all the time " is from a timebound stand. If you > where > > > non-fragmented, seeing-being-what-is, you would never ever say that. > > > > Gosh, I admit it (toeing ground with shoe)... I'm fragmented awfully... I suck. Nothing is right here. It's all just so awful. > > > > Is that what ya wanted? > > You never would have said that if you were a jnani. > > Now, you have to go to purgatory and think about what you said wrong, and try to get it right, so you can be a jnani. > > By 3:00 PM you will be very fragmented from all the extraneous thought-effort. > > But they will put you together again at 12:00 AM, so you can think about it some more and try again. > > - D - Hey, ya didn't let Geo " win " ... It looks as though " Dan is with Tim " . Now, he'll have to try again to come out on top. Oh well... when he gets up there, mebbe someone can knock him off, like Humpty Dumpty ;-). Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted July 1, 2009 Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > That's Geo's world. That's Geo. > > > > > > > > > > geo> By " all the time " you mean what? > > > > > > > > Continuity. The assumption that " I am " , and " the world is " . This requires > > > > attempted maintenance, a re-visiting and re-visiting and re-visiting of this > > > > mental world. > > > > > > > > geo> LOL...but this " all the time " is from a timebound stand. If you > where > > > > non-fragmented, seeing-being-what-is, you would never ever say that. > > > > > > Gosh, I admit it (toeing ground with shoe)... I'm fragmented awfully... I suck. Nothing is right here. It's all just so awful. > > > > > > Is that what ya wanted? > > > > You never would have said that if you were a jnani. > > > > Now, you have to go to purgatory and think about what you said wrong, and try to get it right, so you can be a jnani. > > > > By 3:00 PM you will be very fragmented from all the extraneous thought-effort. > > > > But they will put you together again at 12:00 AM, so you can think about it some more and try again. > > > > - D - > > Hey, ya didn't let Geo " win " ... > > It looks as though " Dan is with Tim " . Now, he'll have to try again to come out on top. > > Oh well... when he gets up there, mebbe someone can knock him off, like Humpty Dumpty ;-). Hey, look, I'm willing to go through purgatory, too. If Geo is also willing, then Tim, Geo, and Dan will all be together in purgatory. Bodhisattvas each and all. We'll each make a vow not to leave until every other sentient being has left purgatory. No one will win or lose. And we'll each only be stuck there as long as we believe there is another sentient being there with us, which is the same thing as saying as long as we believe we are a sentient being. - D -- Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted July 1, 2009 Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " Tim G. " <fewtch@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " geo " <inandor@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > That's Geo's world. That's Geo. > > > > > > > > > > > > geo> By " all the time " you mean what? > > > > > > > > > > Continuity. The assumption that " I am " , and " the world is " . This requires > > > > > attempted maintenance, a re-visiting and re-visiting and re-visiting of this > > > > > mental world. > > > > > > > > > > geo> LOL...but this " all the time " is from a timebound stand. If you > where > > > > > non-fragmented, seeing-being-what-is, you would never ever say that. > > > > > > > > Gosh, I admit it (toeing ground with shoe)... I'm fragmented awfully... I suck. Nothing is right here. It's all just so awful. > > > > > > > > Is that what ya wanted? > > > > > > You never would have said that if you were a jnani. > > > > > > Now, you have to go to purgatory and think about what you said wrong, and try to get it right, so you can be a jnani. > > > > > > By 3:00 PM you will be very fragmented from all the extraneous thought-effort. > > > > > > But they will put you together again at 12:00 AM, so you can think about it some more and try again. > > > > > > - D - > > > > Hey, ya didn't let Geo " win " ... > > > > It looks as though " Dan is with Tim " . Now, he'll have to try again to come out on top. > > > > Oh well... when he gets up there, mebbe someone can knock him off, like Humpty Dumpty ;-). > > Hey, look, I'm willing to go through purgatory, too. > > If Geo is also willing, then Tim, Geo, and Dan will all be together in purgatory. > > Bodhisattvas each and all. > > We'll each make a vow not to leave until every other sentient being has left purgatory. > > No one will win or lose. > > And we'll each only be stuck there as long as we believe there is another sentient being there with us, which is the same thing as saying as long as we believe we are a sentient being. > > - D -- Sure, me too... we're probably already there in Geo... The " Tim " and " Dan " versions of Geo... Those aspects of Geo that are wanted, or rejected. So, nothing needing done -- it's already the case ;-). Sitting here in Geo, Tim Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
