Psychological problem of psychology!

[Guest guest]

Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 "

<Roberibus111 wrote:

>

> Nisargadatta , " iietsa " <iietsa@> wrote:

> >

> > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 "

> > <Roberibus111@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Nisargadatta , " iietsa " <iietsa@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Nisargadatta , " Rob Savarie " <silver@>

> > wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > Nisargadatta , " iietsa " <iietsa@>

wrote:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Nisargadatta , " Rob Savarie "

<silver@>

> > > > wrote:

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " iietsa " <iietsa@>

> > wrote:

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " anabebe57 "

> > > > <kailashana@>

> > > > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " iietsa "

<iietsa@>

> > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > there is nothing problematic about anything

> > > > > > > > > > if one is pure in ones watching...

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > if one is not pure in ones watching however

> > > > > > > > > > then many appaerent problems arise...

> > > > > > > > > > ...iietsa

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > Isn't that dependent on WHAT one is watching, not

WHO

> > is

> > > > > > watching?

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > ~Anna

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > no...they go hand in hand...

> > > > > > > > WHAT one is wathing is dependent one a WHO that makes

the

> > > > > > > watching...

> > > > > > > > take away one of them and both will go away...

> > > > > > > > in pure watching there is nobody watching...and

nothing

> > > > > watched...

> > > > > > > > when there is something seen...or somebody doing the

> > > > looking...

> > > > > > > > ...that is the way of duality...not pure watching...

> > > > > > > > ...iietsa

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > iietsa,

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > No 'you', no problems. So long as 'you are', there will

be

> > > > > duality.

> > > > > > > Remove 'yourself', no duality, no suffering, no joy.

Nobody

> > > > > > watching,

> > > > > > > nothing watched.... You'll need a gun to

shoot 'yourself'

> > with.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Rob S.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > you mix me up with something that I am not...

> > > > > > ...iietsa

> > > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > ****************

> > > > > Obviously, we're not on the same page here, iietsa. I have

no

> > idea

> > > > > what you are talking about now. You lost me. Sorry. What is

> > > > > that 'something' you are not? What is that 'something' I am

> > mixing

> > > > > you up with? Please clarify. What or who is writing your

words

> > > > which

> > > > > appear on sreen for me to read and reply to if there is

> > no 'you' to

> > > > > write them? If there was no 'you', you'd have to be dead.

And

> > if

> > > > you

> > > > > were dead, iietsa, you could not reply to this post. In

fact,

> > you

> > > > > could never again reply to any post. No you, no reply, no

> > problem,

> > > > > nothing to read, nothing to write, nobody watching, nothing

> > watched.

> > > > >

> > > > > Rob S.

> > > > > *****************

> > > > >

> > > >

> > > > you imagine yourself to be on a page (a something)...

> > > > with other persons on the same page or different pages...

> > > > I am not imagine myself to be on a page or other persons to

be on

> > a

> > > > page...

> > > > ...iietsa

> > >

> > >

> > > no shit?

> > >

> > > well you have that one right bunky!

> > >

> > > you aren't in the game.

> > >

> > > :-)

> > >

> > > .b b.b.

> > >

> > ...to you it appears as something wrong or stupid not to be in

the

> > game...why ?

> > ...because of you worshiping the game...or at least some part of

it...

> > cant you see its all nothing...

> > ...iietsa

>

>

> can't you see that you can't see anything?

>

> you're dumb little fella.

>

> LOL!

>

> .b b.b.

>

 

you keep on making an entity out of what is not an entity...

....just stop believing in the crap...

....and your self will be released...

....leaving the real beyond words in its purest form...

....without form and name...

 

....trowing words at a wall that has no own existence as if it had...

....is to take oneself to be a crazy-man that is not there...

....iietsa

[Guest guest]

Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 "

<Roberibus111 wrote:

>

> Nisargadatta , " iietsa " <iietsa@> wrote:

> >

> > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 "

> > <Roberibus111@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Nisargadatta , " iietsa " <iietsa@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Nisargadatta , " Rob Savarie " <silver@>

> > wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > Nisargadatta , " iietsa " <iietsa@>

wrote:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Nisargadatta , " anabebe57 "

> > <kailashana@>

> > > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " Rob Savarie "

> > <silver@>

> > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " iietsa "

<iietsa@>

> > wrote:

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " anabebe57 "

> > > > > <kailashana@>

> > > > > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " iietsa "

> > <iietsa@>

> > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > there is nothing problematic about anything

> > > > > > > > > > > if one is pure in ones watching...

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > if one is not pure in ones watching however

> > > > > > > > > > > then many appaerent problems arise...

> > > > > > > > > > > ...iietsa

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > Isn't that dependent on WHAT one is watching, not

WHO

> > is

> > > > > > watching?

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > ~Anna

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > no...they go hand in hand...

> > > > > > > > > WHAT one is wathing is dependent one a WHO that

makes

> > the

> > > > > > > > watching...

> > > > > > > > > take away one of them and both will go away...

> > > > > > > > > in pure watching there is nobody watching...and

nothing

> > > > > > watched...

> > > > > > > > > when there is something seen...or somebody doing

the

> > > > > looking...

> > > > > > > > > ...that is the way of duality...not pure watching...

> > > > > > > > > ...iietsa

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > iietsa,

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > No 'you', no problems. So long as 'you are', there

will

> > be

> > > > > > duality.

> > > > > > > > Remove 'yourself', no duality, no suffering, no joy.

> > Nobody

> > > > > > watching,

> > > > > > > > nothing watched.... You'll need a gun to

shoot 'yourself'

> > > > with.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Rob S.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > My point iietsa, was: what one watches is one's empty

> > mind's

> > > > play

> > > > > > > back.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > A.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > when ones mind is empty...there is no play to be

watched...

> > > > > > and when it is not empty...why give importance to the

play...

> > > > > > why care about the wind and where and how it is coming or

> > going...

> > > > > > ...iietsa

> > > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > iietsa,

> > > > >

> > > > > Empty mind means no mind,

> > > > > no play and nobody cares.

> > > > >

> > > > > Inactive mind waits for action,

> > > > > comes alive when play begins.

> > > > >

> > > > > When play begins, mind begins.

> > > > > But first, mind. Then play.

> > > > >

> > > > > No mind, no play.

> > > > > No mind, no wind.

> > > > >

> > > > > Mind and wind are one.

> > > > > 'M' is an upside down 'W'.

> > > > >

> > > > > Rob S.

> > > > >

> > > >

> > > > let the wind be...and it will cease of its own...

> > > > ...iietsa

> > >

> > >

> > > there is no wind asshole.

> > >

> > > .b b.b.

> > >

> >

> >

> > explore the asshole instead of judging it...

> > and there is a chance that you come to know yourself

> > in a perfect non-dual way...

> > ...iietsa

>

>

> sorry kid..

>

> that's your kinda exploration.

>

> and yet i can see how you got to know yourself that way.

>

> pretty stinky situation for you eh asshole?

>

> i'm not judging this..i'm just watching and laughing.

>

> ROFLMAO,

>

> .b b.b.

>

> (having laughed my ass off there's nothing here to explore..

>

> but you have fun stinky)

>

 

there is no difference between an asshole and a flower to the eye of

wisdom...but the fool rely on part-knowledge...

and therefor is trapped between his own dual mind...

....iietsa

[Guest guest]

Nisargadatta , " iietsa " <iietsa wrote:

>

> Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 "

> <Roberibus111@> wrote:

> >

> > Nisargadatta , " iietsa " <iietsa@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 "

> > > <Roberibus111@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Nisargadatta , " iietsa " <iietsa@> wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > Nisargadatta , " Rob Savarie " <silver@>

> > > wrote:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Nisargadatta , " iietsa " <iietsa@>

> wrote:

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " Rob Savarie "

> <silver@>

> > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " iietsa " <iietsa@>

> > > wrote:

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " anabebe57 "

> > > > > <kailashana@>

> > > > > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " iietsa "

> <iietsa@>

> > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > there is nothing problematic about anything

> > > > > > > > > > > if one is pure in ones watching...

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > if one is not pure in ones watching however

> > > > > > > > > > > then many appaerent problems arise...

> > > > > > > > > > > ...iietsa

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > Isn't that dependent on WHAT one is watching, not

> WHO

> > > is

> > > > > > > watching?

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > ~Anna

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > no...they go hand in hand...

> > > > > > > > > WHAT one is wathing is dependent one a WHO that makes

> the

> > > > > > > > watching...

> > > > > > > > > take away one of them and both will go away...

> > > > > > > > > in pure watching there is nobody watching...and

> nothing

> > > > > > watched...

> > > > > > > > > when there is something seen...or somebody doing the

> > > > > looking...

> > > > > > > > > ...that is the way of duality...not pure watching...

> > > > > > > > > ...iietsa

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > iietsa,

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > No 'you', no problems. So long as 'you are', there will

> be

> > > > > > duality.

> > > > > > > > Remove 'yourself', no duality, no suffering, no joy.

> Nobody

> > > > > > > watching,

> > > > > > > > nothing watched.... You'll need a gun to

> shoot 'yourself'

> > > with.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Rob S.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > you mix me up with something that I am not...

> > > > > > > ...iietsa

> > > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > ****************

> > > > > > Obviously, we're not on the same page here, iietsa. I have

> no

> > > idea

> > > > > > what you are talking about now. You lost me. Sorry. What is

> > > > > > that 'something' you are not? What is that 'something' I am

> > > mixing

> > > > > > you up with? Please clarify. What or who is writing your

> words

> > > > > which

> > > > > > appear on sreen for me to read and reply to if there is

> > > no 'you' to

> > > > > > write them? If there was no 'you', you'd have to be dead.

> And

> > > if

> > > > > you

> > > > > > were dead, iietsa, you could not reply to this post. In

> fact,

> > > you

> > > > > > could never again reply to any post. No you, no reply, no

> > > problem,

> > > > > > nothing to read, nothing to write, nobody watching, nothing

> > > watched.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Rob S.

> > > > > > *****************

> > > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > you imagine yourself to be on a page (a something)...

> > > > > with other persons on the same page or different pages...

> > > > > I am not imagine myself to be on a page or other persons to

> be on

> > > a

> > > > > page...

> > > > > ...iietsa

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > no shit?

> > > >

> > > > well you have that one right bunky!

> > > >

> > > > you aren't in the game.

> > > >

> > > > :-)

> > > >

> > > > .b b.b.

> > > >

> > > ...to you it appears as something wrong or stupid not to be in

> the

> > > game...why ?

> > > ...because of you worshiping the game...or at least some part of

> it...

> > > cant you see its all nothing...

> > > ...iietsa

> >

> >

> > can't you see that you can't see anything?

> >

> > you're dumb little fella.

> >

> > LOL!

> >

> > .b b.b.

> >

>

> you keep on making an entity out of what is not an entity...

> ...just stop believing in the crap...

> ...and your self will be released...

> ...leaving the real beyond words in its purest form...

> ...without form and name...

>

> ...trowing words at a wall that has no own existence as if it had...

> ...is to take oneself to be a crazy-man that is not there...

> ...iietsa

 

 

hahahahahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa ha ha haaaaaaaaahaaa!

 

your an airhead iietsa.

 

god damn you're great for laughs!

 

ROFLMAO!

 

..b b.b.

[Guest guest]

Nisargadatta , " iietsa " <iietsa wrote:

>

> Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 "

> <Roberibus111@> wrote:

> >

> > Nisargadatta , " iietsa " <iietsa@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 "

> > > <Roberibus111@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Nisargadatta , " iietsa " <iietsa@> wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > Nisargadatta , " Rob Savarie " <silver@>

> > > wrote:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Nisargadatta , " iietsa " <iietsa@>

> wrote:

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " anabebe57 "

> > > <kailashana@>

> > > > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " Rob Savarie "

> > > <silver@>

> > > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " iietsa "

> <iietsa@>

> > > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " anabebe57 "

> > > > > > <kailashana@>

> > > > > > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " iietsa "

> > > <iietsa@>

> > > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > there is nothing problematic about anything

> > > > > > > > > > > > if one is pure in ones watching...

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > if one is not pure in ones watching however

> > > > > > > > > > > > then many appaerent problems arise...

> > > > > > > > > > > > ...iietsa

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > Isn't that dependent on WHAT one is watching, not

> WHO

> > > is

> > > > > > > watching?

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > ~Anna

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > no...they go hand in hand...

> > > > > > > > > > WHAT one is wathing is dependent one a WHO that

> makes

> > > the

> > > > > > > > > watching...

> > > > > > > > > > take away one of them and both will go away...

> > > > > > > > > > in pure watching there is nobody watching...and

> nothing

> > > > > > > watched...

> > > > > > > > > > when there is something seen...or somebody doing

> the

> > > > > > looking...

> > > > > > > > > > ...that is the way of duality...not pure watching...

> > > > > > > > > > ...iietsa

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > iietsa,

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > No 'you', no problems. So long as 'you are', there

> will

> > > be

> > > > > > > duality.

> > > > > > > > > Remove 'yourself', no duality, no suffering, no joy.

> > > Nobody

> > > > > > > watching,

> > > > > > > > > nothing watched.... You'll need a gun to

> shoot 'yourself'

> > > > > with.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > Rob S.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > My point iietsa, was: what one watches is one's empty

> > > mind's

> > > > > play

> > > > > > > > back.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > A.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > when ones mind is empty...there is no play to be

> watched...

> > > > > > > and when it is not empty...why give importance to the

> play...

> > > > > > > why care about the wind and where and how it is coming or

> > > going...

> > > > > > > ...iietsa

> > > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > iietsa,

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Empty mind means no mind,

> > > > > > no play and nobody cares.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Inactive mind waits for action,

> > > > > > comes alive when play begins.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > When play begins, mind begins.

> > > > > > But first, mind. Then play.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > No mind, no play.

> > > > > > No mind, no wind.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Mind and wind are one.

> > > > > > 'M' is an upside down 'W'.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Rob S.

> > > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > let the wind be...and it will cease of its own...

> > > > > ...iietsa

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > there is no wind asshole.

> > > >

> > > > .b b.b.

> > > >

> > >

> > >

> > > explore the asshole instead of judging it...

> > > and there is a chance that you come to know yourself

> > > in a perfect non-dual way...

> > > ...iietsa

> >

> >

> > sorry kid..

> >

> > that's your kinda exploration.

> >

> > and yet i can see how you got to know yourself that way.

> >

> > pretty stinky situation for you eh asshole?

> >

> > i'm not judging this..i'm just watching and laughing.

> >

> > ROFLMAO,

> >

> > .b b.b.

> >

> > (having laughed my ass off there's nothing here to explore..

> >

> > but you have fun stinky)

> >

>

> there is no difference between an asshole and a flower to the eye of

> wisdom...but the fool rely on part-knowledge...

> and therefor is trapped between his own dual mind...

> ...iietsa

 

 

" trapped 'between' his own dual mind " ??????????

 

what the fuck is that supposed to even mean?

 

you're a cockamamie small fry kiddo.

 

you say the most stupid things imaginable.

 

have you ever considered comedy?

 

LOL!

 

..b b.b.