Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org
Sign in to follow this  
suchandra

Nuclear Waste: Solutions that Create Problems

Rate this topic

Recommended Posts

In order to take care of 77,000 tons of nuclear waste for the next 100 years some $ 70 billion dollars have to be spent. At least the whole country isnt turned into a waste dump - although we learn again every action has a reaction we have to pay for, so on the one side we get atomic energy, while on the other side we get atomic waste, which is highly toxic and cannot be disposed of in any way for hundreds and thousands of years.

 

Nuclear waste dump faces new roadblocks

<!-- END HEADLINE -->

<!-- BEGIN STORY BODY -->By ERICA WERNER, Associated Press Writer Fri Nov 24, 2:26 PM ET

 

 

WASHINGTON - When Congress targeted Nevada as the nation's nuclear waste dumping ground, the state didn't have the political power to say no. Twenty years later, the most ardent foe of the <FORM class=yqin action=http://yq.search./search method=post></FORM>Yucca Mountain nuclear waste dump is about to become Senate majority leader. Nevada Democratic Sen. Harry Reid (news, bio, voting record)'s new job, which gives him control over what legislation reaches the Senate floor, could deal a crippling blow to the already stumbling project. </NOSCRIPT>

Among Reid's first acts after this month's election was to convene a conference call with home-state reporters to declare Yucca Mountain "dead right now."

"It sure is different now than when I came (to the Senate) in 1986," the senator observed.

The dump 90 miles northwest of Las Vegas is planned as the first national repository for radioactive waste. It's supposed to hold 77,000 tons of the material — from commercial power plants reactors and defense sites across the nation — for thousands of years. About 50,000 tons of the waste is now stored in temporary sites at 65 power plants in 31 states. Reid would leave all of it in place.

Originally targeted to open in 1998, Yucca Mountain has been repeatedly set back by lawsuits, money shortfalls and scientific controversies. The Energy Department's best-case opening date is now 2017.

The effort to create a national storage site has already cost about $9 billion, $6.5 billion of which has been spent on Yucca. Four years ago, the Energy Department estimated the project would cost $58 billion to build and operate for the first 100 years. New cost projections are being worked up, and they are expected to total more than $70 billion.

The department proposed legislation earlier this year meant to fix problems with the dump, which is a mounting liability to taxpayers because the government was contractually obligated to take nuclear waste off utilities' hands starting in 1998. Energy Department officials say at least one legislative change — formally withdrawing land around the dump site — is needed before construction can begin.

Reid, however, pledged after the Nov. 7 election that not only will no bill to help Yucca Mountain reach the Senate floor under his leadership, funding for the project also will dry up quickly. Annual spending on the dump that has ranged between $450 million and $550 million in recent years "will be cut back significantly, that will be for sure," he vowed.

Reid said he couldn't single-handedly kill the dump outright, something that would require a vote of Congress and approval by<FORM class=yqin action=http://yq.search./search method=post></FORM>President Bush. But he added: "There's not much to kill."

The project also is losing some of its most persistent supporters as Republicans relinquish control of Congress. Senate Energy Committee Chairman Pete Domenici, R-N.M., has been a vocal advocate for years; he'll be replaced by Sen. Jeff Bingaman (news, bio, voting record), D-N.M., who supports Yucca Mountain but is viewed by Nevada officials as more open to their viewpoints.

Sen. Barbara Boxer (news, bio, voting record), D-Calif., who will chair the Environment and Public Works Committee with authority over some aspects of the project, is a vocal Yucca Mountain opponent. Incoming House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., worked unsuccessfully to corral opposition to the project in a crucial House vote four years ago, when she was minority whip.

Administration and industry officials insist the changing of the guard on Capitol Hill won't be the death knell for the project. About 1,500 people in Nevada are now employed there.

Yucca Mountain also has lured research grants to the University of Nevada, and even Reid aides say some spending should be maintained.

"I don't think the program's gone off the edge by any means," said David Blee, executive director the U.S. Transport Council, an industry group that works on nuclear waste transportation. "It'll be more complicated and take a more creative approach, and more of an approach outside the (Washington) beltway."

Supporters say they will now focus on submitting a required license application to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. The Energy Department wants to do that in 2008 and it's not dependent on congressional action, though severe budget cuts would be an impediment.

Reid says putting the highly radioactive wastes in dry storage casks at power plants will keep it safe for 100 years or more. To industry officials and the Energy Department, that's no answer.

"Leaving everything where it is, is not a solution to the problem," said Edward F. "Ward" Sproat, director of the department's Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management.

 

Failure to pursue the Yucca project, Sproat said, "is pushing the solution off to future generations, which is pretty much what's been happening with this program up until now."

___

On the Net:

State of Nevada Agency for Nuclear Projects: http://www.state.nv.us/nucwaste/

Energy Department Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management: http://www.ocrwm.doe.gov/ Sen. Harry Reid: http://reid.senate.gov/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just caught a bit of a tape last night on local TV. It was about how the waste from uranium, called depleted uranium, is being reform as tips for ammunition. Depleted uranimum apparently is very moldable and has the extra benefit of becoming sharper as it hits the target instead of blunter. So it's piercing power is unsurpassed. It also causes fire to ignite when it hits the target. They are using it primarlily as an anti-tank weapon. The shells pierce the tank armour and upon explosion the depleted uranium causes everything to burn within the tank that will burn. That includes humans. No one gets out alive. This makes the US tank force virtually unbeatable on the battlefield.

 

The problem for the US is that the soldiers that handle the depleted uranium tipped munitions are coming down seriously ill from radioactive poisoning. The Army disputes the connection with depleted uranium leaving these people to rot without medical treatment.

 

The whole nuclear power industry is a major curse unto the earth. They bury what they can. Consider what kind of time capsule that is for the future inhabitants of this globe. If this planet even lasts that long in terms of human habitation just think how they will curse us.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Yes all these blind politicians want to use the stuff because there's luka in that yella cake, but no one wants the dirty stool dumped in their own back yard, so now they are offering incentives of cash to take it, so in the future all the poor simple nations or islands will probably end up garbage dumps, just to keep their economy alive. America is now suggesting Australia take it all because it has such vast empty space that is supposedly dead anyway. And we have ignoramous politicians and scientists, blind following lackis of the U.S. who suggest we can become amongst the worlds wealthiest nations if we take up the offer, reviving the Golden Fleece days of the past when we rode to wealth on the sheeps back, meaning animal slaughter.

Their mentality is Screw the future, these deluded souls think they won't be here anyway.

But surprise surprise!

No wonder some don't like to consider the law of karma and reincarnation.

They don't want to face the responsibility of the mess they have created.

 

Whatever happened to the simple world of waking up to greet the sun for energy, going to the pristine river or ocean to bathe, and gathering some delicious fruit from abundant trees for breakfast?

 

Someone should write a whole book on the Nature of Demons. Revealing all their subtle, sly, sneaky and sleazy sidestepping manipulations, they seem to be born into it, life after life they have it down to a fine art.

Surely these souls don't get a human birth on top of the damage they wrought, then again maybe they are all sheep and cattle suffering in feedlots from their previous lives.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...