Hitler was a social darwinist

[Guest guest]

Prof Richard Weikart, again, as horrified by student views on the moral

neutrality of Hitler:

 

A number of years ago two intelligent students surprised me in a class

discussion by defending the proposition that Hitler was neither good nor

evil. Though I kept my composure, I was horrified. One of the worst mass

murderers in history wasn't evil? How could they believe this? How could

they justify such a view?

 

They did it by appealing to Darwinism.

 

More: http://post-darwinist.blogspot.com/2006/09/what-did-hitler-believe-

about.html

[suchandra 1]

 

Prof Richard Weikart, again, as horrified by student views on the moral

neutrality of Hitler:

 

A number of years ago two intelligent students surprised me in a class

discussion by defending the proposition that Hitler was neither good nor

evil. Though I kept my composure, I was horrified. One of the worst mass

murderers in history wasn't evil? How could they believe this? How could

they justify such a view?

 

They did it by appealing to Darwinism.

 

More: http://post-darwinist.blogspot.com/2006/09/what-did-hitler-believe-

about.html

 

This is just another "ISKCON internal" highlight - Hitler was ok because he fits into Charles Darwin's evolution theory...nice ISKCON katha!!