Guest guest Report post Posted November 24, 1999 Hare Krishna, This thread has become devoid of any useful Krishna conscious content, no matter what side you take. Please cease and desist or take it private. Your servant, Sri Rama das [srirama (AT) bbt (DOT) se], or [srirama (AT) jps (DOT) net] < PLEASE NOTE THIS NEW EMAIL ADDRESS [http://www.web-construct.net/creditcard.html] Madhava.Gosh.ACBSP (AT) bbt (DOT) se [Madhava.Gosh.ACBSP (AT) bbt (DOT) se] Monday, November 22, 1999 6:42 AM COM: India (Continental Committee) Open (Forum); COM: Varnasrama development Re: Judge for yourself [Text 2799126 from COM] > > > Dear Goloka > > > > Apparently English isn't your first language, > > aha, here comes a white knight charging in to the defence of his > accomplices. Question is, where was he when somebody was insulting his > spiritual master and some others were trying to rationalize it? How wonderful of you to provide an example of trash talking. This is quite a good one - all the elements are there. The "white knight" thing and "insulting the spiritual master" combine both irrelevnce and insult to my intelligence. > > Thanks for the education. So we are agreed on this point - that "trash" is a > term in common usage, not only in hi-tech but also in that sacred topmost > showpiece of American culture - football. Nothing vulgar about the word, > right? So kindly explain why you and some others are kicking up a fuss over > it? The issue was not the vulgarity of expression, rather the vulgarity of the content. > > As for your put down on the language useage of an entire population, > > which quality of a devotee were you manifesting there? > > Poetic? No? Trash talking devotees Always putting down Are so very expert At eliciting a frown How could your post be poetic? It lacked rythym rhyme and soul Yes, I would prefer football To the dogma that is your goal So if you think you were poetic I suggest you reassess Not only what is poetry But all your "Vedic" mess Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted November 24, 1999 > If we are only able to see demons everywhere, maybe there is something wrong > with our eyeglasses. As Vaishnavas we are supposed to wear the trinad-api > sunicena glasses and see everybody and everything in conection to Krishna. > > Ys. Sraddha dd Even demons everywhere! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted November 24, 1999 > He is a wondrous glorious man > Not God nor a messiah either I don't think those who protest SP criticism propose that he was God, nor did Srila Prabhupada say it for himself. So where does this discussion come from? So far whether he was a messiah, well, according to random house wester's dictonary meaning of "messiah" is: "any expected deliverer or savior ". Wasn't Srila Prabhupada an expcted deliverer? Lord Caitanya Mahaprabhu Himself predicted He will send His senapati bhakta to preach sankirtan movement in the western world. Srila Prabhupada also mentioned that he was sent by Lord Krishna. So where is the chance for speculation? > So stop demanding material perfection > And give us all a breather it will certainly help. ys, bb Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted November 25, 1999 > He is a wondrous glorious man > Not God nor a messiah either > So stop demanding material perfection > And give us all a breather Madhava Gosh poet laureate of the millenium :-) In awe Your servant, Gokula das. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest guest Report post Posted November 25, 1999 > He is a wondrous glorious man > Not God nor a messiah either > So stop demanding material perfection > And give us all a breather Madhava Gosh poet laureate of the millenium :-) In awe Your servant, Gokula das. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
