The Dalai Lama and its discussion

[Guest guest]

//Please give your views considering His Holiness's lagna as Taurus

as

you are so sure of that.You still avoiding that while discussing Rahu

dasha.//

 

If you go through the posts you will see that the DL's chart HAS been

discussed extensively (both Taurus and Gemini) by several members

(Neena included). However we've had no real contribution from you as

yet. I for one am keen to see your take on the chart(s). Neena

readily admits that she's still very much a learner whereas you are a

proclaimed acharya (significant guru) - please do share your

knowledge with us in a friendly manner...we can all benefit from

seeing the chart through your eyes, I'm sure.

 

Best Wishes,

Mrs. Wendy

http://JyotishVidya.com

______________________________

[Guest guest]

--

Yes they can be.

 

Neena

- In jyotish-vidya, "Vijai Vasudev Acharya"

<acharya.vasudev wrote:

>

> P.S.-Obviously the results will not be same but can there be such

big

> reversal.?

> Please give your views considering His Holiness's lagna as Taurus

as

> you are so sure of that.You still avoiding that while discussing

Rahu

> dasha.

>

> Sincerely

>

> Acharya Vasudev

>

> ---------------------

>

> jyotish-vidya, "neenako" <neenako@> wrote:

> >

> > --

> > P.S.

> >

> > You have asked if I have seen any other horoscopes which show

such a

> > reversal in effects. In any horoscope you study the effects will

not

> > be the same every time the same planets come together as MD/ AD.

> > - In jyotish-vidya, Acharya Vasudev

> > <acharya.vasudev@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Dear Neena,

> > > You have honestly tried and have given a good answer.

> > > If I understand it correctly ,in your views Jupiter made this

> > > difference, and Jupiter was transiting through Gemini at that

> > time.What

> > > do you think

> > > where should Jupiter be,in lagna or in 2nd house, in case we

> > consider

> > > the transits from the ascendants too.?

> > > Another curious transit is the transit of Rahu also and in my

> > knowledge

> > > it must be considered quite a important transit.

> > > When His Holiness was forced to exile Rahu was transiting over

His

> > Mars

> > > and when he was awarded Nobel Prize,Rahu was just changing his

> > sign from

> > > Aquarius to Capricorn.

> > > Still my query remains the same.These logics are possible with

> > both

> > > lagnas as you haven't taken a notice of lagna while seeing

> > transits.

> > > Have you gone through any other horoscope where these kind of

> > reversal

> > > of dasha-antardasas made such a huge difference in results.

> > > I am trying to understand his horoscope slowly but still not

clear

> > about

> > > his lagna.It is not a simple task, you know !

> > >

> > > Sincerely

> > >

> > > Acharya Vasudev

> > >

> > > -----------------------------

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> >

>