R_Srisan

With regards to "Hinduism", the term is primarily racist, meaning that which is done by one delineated through the INDU river valley, and those Dravidians later who were also considered "indu" as being aboriginal to India. Hinduism is not a "religion" it has absolutely no standardized precepts nor practices. It is true that no one can be converted to be "born German", or "Born Indian"; though in terms of anything Vedic, also there are no authorized "converts" amongst the modern schools of Indian "religion", though originally there was provision of anyone being accepted and consecrated into the Vedic Fold who were accepted by the priesthood as being devout and qualified by devotional and capability, not birth. It baffles me as to how any Indians even think they "have a religion" when they don't do the first thing they puport to be imposing upon. Anyone who is caring to be a better person, had best not associate with Dravidians anyway. Ever asked for simple directions in Calcutta? Ever done any business with Indians? Ever trusted an Indian to perform honorably, and be reliable? The works of the Soul, being of prime concern.

Many self-destructive syndromes are seen as "Religion"; and in that regard if one cares, one may be obligated to save someone from "themself" so to speak... Take the Gaudiya Math line of dead babajis' photos ??? as a solution to this question ???

Twisted Tricksters in India there may be. Though None were ever authorized to the Vedic Tree. All termed Vaishnava are in contempt of the Personal Holy Name as VISHNU is HE who is inconceivably EVERYWHERE.. not ever profane, to remain for anyone's senses nor half-breed brains. There are absolutely no Dravidians authorized to Vedic Devotional Service, they are patently offensive, and eventhough they may call HARI, it is only crow calling: "theif, away, nothing remain, theif, jackal drewl, away, away"... The Holy Name is only Holy if chanted unoffensively, thus the totally offensive absurdities compounded by Gaudiya, and the false brahminizm of Sri Ramanuja nowadays disqualifies anyone from Hari Nama; and the founts of mercy simply do not apply to those who fraudulently imposed damnation by the Holy Name... So take your Heaps of Hindu Hookers, and herbs and piss in your face fools and seekers of dravidian dog barking.

RiG VEDA, Mandala One, 164, 46; [Rig Verse 1761] - dram mitram varunamagnimahu-----ratho divyahñ sa suparno garutamana ; eka sadvipra bahudha vada-----nyagnim yamam matarisva-namahuh. "The One Absolute Lord is beyond infinite scope of superlatives; He is called The Supreme Experiencer Doer, Kind Lord of all, vast Lord sustaining and fulfilling infinity's infinitely infinite infinitudes, The Transformer as Fire and Death, Divine Spiritual Wonder, Guardian of Eternal Energy, Supreme One Absolute Person of Infinite descriptive names, referred limitlessly being so infinitely beyond Infinity." ========================== Visnu and Siva are One and The Same, being different mellows, rasas, and lila pastimes. The modern "Siva" is a distortion of Vedic "Rudhra"... and totally distorted by Dravidian deluge. The Puranas are garbage, can't anyone on the path realize that yet !!! But it makes good speculation cinema for tribal totemists.

Heah... metaphysical stuff... that's what I like... metaphysical stuff..!!

Heah... metaphysical stuff... that's what I like... metaphysical stuff..!!

NO ONE MAKES REAL LOVE WHILE LOOKING AT ONESELF IN A MIRROR.

Agama anyone?

AUM I like this thread... actually I love J Krishnamurti, and agree that if there are plenary avatars, or descended ones, for specific sectors, then it is very possible that JK could be seen an a sort of Buddha Impersonalist Upanishadic "Neti Neti" sort.. and the UG is also very interesting... at many times such indifference is how actual understanding interfaces with the fools of the world, so to speak. It's centered in real worlds we can relate to, and is worth looking into consideration of. It's better than Amnesty International's report on India; though may not contain the same extent of MahaTattva. AUM TAT SAT Srisan

AUM I like this thread... actually I love J Krishnamurti, and agree that if there are plenary avatars, or descended ones, for specific sectors, then it is very possible that JK could be seen an a sort of Buddha Impersonalist Upanishadic "Neti Neti" sort.. and the UG is also very interesting... at many times such indifference is how actual understanding interfaces with the fools of the world, so to speak. It's centered in real worlds we can relate to, and is worth looking into consideration of. It's better than Amnesty International's report on India; though may not contain the same extent of MahaTattva. AUM TAT SAT Srisan

"If God is One and The Same, Then it's only "being" differences, that makes us all "Inane" !!!" [original on the spot] SRISAN

AUM... ooooopppps Picked up on the thread.. but not the UG site... My previous entry was regarding J. Krishnamurti not UGK.. Least anyone say I don't know what I'm talking about !! Flashing through these pages.... heeheehee.. AUM HARI AUM

AUM... ooooopppps Picked up on the thread.. but not the UG site... My previous entry was regarding J. Krishnamurti not UGK.. Least anyone say I don't know what I'm talking about !! Flashing through these pages.... heeheehee.. AUM HARI AUM

What page ? The seer and the seen are the absolute at the time of real seeing; is that not purported by the impersonal Buddhist anti-brahman double-bind Upanishad oneness trickster? What we seen here is not real, when the page is there, and we are here there is nothing seen, there is no reader, there is nothing read... only when the KNOWLEDGE is clearly the page in and of itself, both the reader and the content read.. then and only then... and in the meantime piss on your mentor, defame all the devotional service of the Upanishads where one would steal such tricks.. and live in absolute luxury with the sentimental publishing house that floated by in his garbage... and retire in Ojai with a bunch of rich retired hippies looking for something to smooth out the edge of their absolute confusion... and he was expert in presenting that which "fused the opposites"... I love Krishnamurthi... I like is "Commentaries on Living Series"... Go for it... but don't jump... cause ain't nothing like Bhagavat Seva of The Holy Name !@!! AUM TAT SAT R. SRISAN

What page ? The seer and the seen are the absolute at the time of real seeing; is that not purported by the impersonal Buddhist anti-brahman double-bind Upanishad oneness trickster? What we seen here is not real, when the page is there, and we are here there is nothing seen, there is no reader, there is nothing read... only when the KNOWLEDGE is clearly the page in and of itself, both the reader and the content read.. then and only then... and in the meantime piss on your mentor, defame all the devotional service of the Upanishads where one would steal such tricks.. and live in absolute luxury with the sentimental publishing house that floated by in his garbage... and retire in Ojai with a bunch of rich retired hippies looking for something to smooth out the edge of their absolute confusion... and he was expert in presenting that which "fused the opposites"... I love Krishnamurthi... I like is "Commentaries on Living Series"... Go for it... but don't jump... cause ain't nothing like Bhagavat Seva of The Holy Name !@!! AUM TAT SAT R. SRISAN